0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views

Fresnel Relations: Phys 531 13 September 2005

This lecture discusses Fresnel relations, which describe how light propagates across boundaries between different optical media. The boundary conditions for the electric and magnetic fields are derived from Maxwell's equations. This leads to Fresnel equations that relate the amplitude of reflected and transmitted light for both s-polarized and p-polarized light. Key results include Brewster's angle, where p-polarized light experiences no reflection, and the reflectance and transmittance coefficients that describe the fraction of power reflected and transmitted.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views

Fresnel Relations: Phys 531 13 September 2005

This lecture discusses Fresnel relations, which describe how light propagates across boundaries between different optical media. The boundary conditions for the electric and magnetic fields are derived from Maxwell's equations. This leads to Fresnel equations that relate the amplitude of reflected and transmitted light for both s-polarized and p-polarized light. Key results include Brewster's angle, where p-polarized light experiences no reflection, and the reflectance and transmittance coefficients that describe the fraction of power reflected and transmitted.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Phys 531 Lecture 6 13 September 2005

Fresnel Relations
Last time, starting looking at how light propagates
across boundaries.
Scattering idea law of reection, Snells law
Generalized to Fermats principle
Important question:
How much light will be reected vs transmitted?
Answer today using Maxwell equations
1
Outline:
Boundary conditions for E and B
Fresnel equations
Brewsters angle
Reectance and transmittance
Everything today from Hecht 4.6
Next time: when the Fresnel equations become
complex
2
Boundary Conditions
Maxwell equations in medium:

0
E = P B = 0
B =
0
P
t
+
0

0
E
t
E =
B
t
P = macroscopic polarization =
0
E
Now consider = (r)
Rewrite:

0
[(1 +)E] = 0 B = 0
B =
0

t
_
(1 +)E
_
E =
B
t
3
Recall
0
(1 +) , electric permittivity
Convenient to dene D = E
Electric displacement (units C/m
2
)
Then have
D = 0 B = 0
B =
0
D
t
E =
B
t
Hides charges of medium, even when crossing
boundaries
Works for conductors too, if complex
4
Know how wave propagates in uniform medium
Dont know how to relate D, E and B on opposite
sides of boundary
Easiest to go back to integral form:
If D = 0, then
_

_
D dS = 0
See what this says about boundary
5
Make little pillbox surface on boundary:
area A small but nonzero
height h 0
A
h
n
2
1
n
Then
_

_
D dS A(D
1
D
2
) = 0
where D

= compenent of D normal to boundary


So D

is continuous across boundary


6
Also have
_
E dl =
__
B
t
dS
Make little loop normal to boundary
length L small
height h 0
h
n
2
1
n
L
7
Then
_
E dl L(E
1
E
2
)
E

= component of E parallel to boundary


And
__
B
t
dS
Lh
2
_
B
1
t
+
B
2
t
_
= 0 for h 0
So E

is continuous across boundary


8
Similarly, from
_

_
B dS = 0 and
_
B dl =
0
__
D
t
dS
show that B

and B

are continous
So B is same on either side of boundary
Note: only true for nonmagnetic materials
(normal in optics)
Hecht gives general formulas
9
Apply continuity conditions to boundary n
i
n
t
Three elds:
Incident E
i
= E
i0
e
i(k
i
rt)
Reected E
r
= E
r0
e
i(k
r
rt)
Transmitted E
t
= E
t0
e
i(k
t
rt)
Here k
i
= n
i

k
i
etc. Also have B =
n
c

kE for each
Want to determine E
r
and E
t
if given E
i
10
Set up coordinates
n
t
n
i
k
x
y
z
i
k
t
k
r

t
so k
y
= 0 always
At z = 0, have:
B
i
+B
r
= B
t
E
ix
+E
rx
= E
tx
E
iy
+E
ry
= E
ty
n
2
i
E
iz
+n
2
i
E
rz
= n
2
t
E
tz
Question: Wait, where did those n
2
s come from?
11
E
x
equation says
E
i0x
e
i(k
ix
xt)
+E
r0x
e
i(k
rx
xt)
= E
t0x
e
i(k
tx
xt)
for all x
Only possible if k
ix
= k
rx
= k
tx
Implies sin
i
= sin
r
and n
i
sin
i
= n
t
sin
t
Gives law of reection, Snells law
So x dependence drops out, leaves equations for
amplitudes E
0
, B
0
example: E
i0x
+E
r0x
= E
t0x
12
Easiest to separate two cases:
Case I: E
i0x
= 0
Then all E
x
components = 0
So E
0
s are to plane of incidence
Called s-polarized or TE-polarized
Case II: E
i0y
= 0
Then all E
y
components = 0
So E
0
s are in plane of incidence
Called p-polarized or TM-polarized
Can write general wave as superposition of these
13
Case I: E y
n
t
n
i
x
y
z
E
i
E
t
E
r
B
i
B
t
B
r

t
So B in xz-plane
Continuity:
E
i0y
= E
i0
etc,
so E
i0
+E
r0
= E
t0
For B:
B
i0x
= B
i0
cos
i
B
r0x
= B
r0
cos
i
B
t0x
= B
t0
cos
t
14
Have B
i0x
+B
r0x
= B
t0x
, and
B
i0x
=
n
i
c
E
i0
etc.
so
n
i
E
i0
cos
i
+n
i
E
r0
cos
i
= n
t
E
t0
cos
t
Two equations, two unknowns E
r0
and E
t0
(B
z
equation is redundant)
15
Solve:
(E
i0
E
r0
)n
i
cos
i
= E
t0
n
t
cos
t
= (E
i0
+E
r0
)n
t
cos
t
E
i0
(n
i
cos
i
n
t
cos
t
) = E
r0
(n
i
cos
i
+n
t
cos
t
)
Write E
r0
= r

E
i0
for
r

=
n
i
cos
i
n
t
cos
t
n
i
cos
i
+n
t
cos
t
r

= amplitude reection coecient


(for TE polarization)
16
Then get E
t0
:
(E
i0
E
r0
)n
i
cos
i
= E
t0
n
t
cos
t
E
t0
=
n
i
cos
i
n
t
cos
t
(1 r

)E
i0
Dene E
t0
= t

E
i0
t

=
n
i
cos
i
n
t
cos
t
(1 r

)
=
n
i
cos
i
n
t
cos
t
2n
t
cos
t
n
i
cos
i
+n
t
cos
t
17
So t

=
2n
i
cos
i
n
i
cos
i
+n
t
cos
t
amplitude transmission coecient
(s-polarization)
This solves case I
Question: What happens to r

and t

if n
i
= n
t
?
18
Case II:
n
t
n
i
x
y
z
E
i
E
t
E
r
B
i
B
t
B
r

t
Now have B plane
B
i0
+B
r0
= B
t0
or n
i
E
i0
+n
i
E
r0
= n
t
E
t0
For E: E
i0x
= E
i0
cos
i
E
r0x
= E
r0
cos
i
E
t0x
= E
t0
cos
t
E
i0
cos
i
E
r0
cos
i
= E
t0
cos
t
19
Solve, get E
r0
= r

E
i0
, E
t0
= t

E
i0
r

=
n
t
cos
i
n
i
cos
t
n
i
cos
t
+n
t
cos
i
t

=
2n
i
cos
i
n
i
cos
t
+n
t
cos
i
Call rs, ts Fresnel coecients, equations are
Fresnel relations
20
Note: signs depend on picture set up
vs.
Gives opposite sign for rs
Hechts set up most common
Question: At normal incidence r

= r

. How are the


actual directions of E
inc
and E
ref
related?
21
For now consider n
i
< n
t
: external incidence
Plot for air (n
i
= 1) glass (n
t
= 1.5)
Need to use Snells Law to get
t
cos
t
=
_
1 sin
2

t
=

_
1
n
2
i
n
2
t
sin
2

i
Question: Do we need to worry about with square root?
22
23
Features:
r

= r

at
i
= 0
No physical dierence between TE and TM
Picture dierence gives minus sign
r 1 as
i
90

Everything reects at glancing incidence


r

0 at
i
=
p
Usually called Brewsters angle
Hecht calls polarization angle
Demo!
24
Brewsters angle important for lasers
best way to minimize reections
Solve r

= 0: n
t
cos
p
= n
i
cos
t
Get sin
p
=
n
t
_
n
2
i
+n
2
t
n
n
(
n


+
n


)
t
i
t
2
i
2
1
/
2
P

Get some insight:


See tan
p
= n
t
/n
i
So n
i
sin
p
= n
t
cos
p
But n
t
cos
p
= n
i
cos
t
so sin
p
= cos
t

p
+
t
= 90

25
Picture:
E
i
E
t
E
r

p
Atoms in transmitted
medium oscillate along E
t
Dipole radiation 0
in direction of oscillation
Brewsters angle:
when direction of oscillation =

k
reect
For air glass,
p
= 56.3

26
Note, r and t are amplitude coecients:
give E-elds
Usually more interested in transmitted and reected
power P
Dene reectance R = P
ref
/P
inc
transmittance T = P
trans
/P
inc
Get P from Poynting vector S:
Plane waves: S =
n
2
0
|E
0
|
2

k
27
Power through area dA = S udA
u = normal to surface
here

k u = cos
So P
inc
=
n
i
2
0
|E
i0
|
2
cos
i
dA
P
re
=
n
i
2
0
|E
j0
|
2
cos
i
dA
P
trans
=
n
t
2
0
|E
t0
|
2
cos
t
dA
28
Then
R =
P
ref
P
inc
=
|E
r0
|
2
|E
i0
|
2
= |r|
2
and
T =
P
trans
P
inc
=
n
t
cos
t
|E
t0
|
2
n
i
cos
i
|E
i0
|
2
=
n
t
cos
t
n
i
cos
i
|t|
2
Extra factors in T make sense:
n accounts for dierence in speed
cos accounts for dierence in area
29
w
i
w
r
w
t
Here w
t
> w
i
Irradiance decreases even
if all power transmitted
Can show R +T = 1 for both and cases
Energy conserved (if n is real)
30
31
Summary:
Maxwell equations give continuity relations
Fresnel coecients r, t relate E
inc
, E
ref
, E
trans
Two cases (= TE = s) and (= TM = p)
are dierent
TM case exhibits Brewsters angle, r(
p
) = 0
Fresnel coes related to power reectance R,
transmittance T
Air-glass boundary reects 4% at
i
= 0
32

You might also like