Eco Literacy Challenge
Eco Literacy Challenge
Eco Literacy Challenge
BY FRITJOF CAPRA
Ecoliteracy:
The Challenge for Education
in the Next Century
“It was twenty years ago today” that I gave my first Schumacher Lecture in
Bristol, and I am very grateful to the Schumacher Society and the Institute
for Health for inviting me back. What unites this community—the
Schumacher Society, the Institute for Health, the participants in the
Schumacher Lectures and in the courses at Schumacher College, and the
readers of Resurgence—is the recognition that our great challenge today is
to build and nurture sustainable communities—social, cultural, and physical
environments in which we can satisfy our needs and aspirations without
diminishing the chances of future generations.
Since its introduction in the early 1980s, the concept of sustainability
A sustainable community is
has often been distorted, co-opted, and even trivialized by being used
designed in such a way that its without the ecological context that gives it its proper meaning. So, I think it
is worthwhile to reflect for a moment about what sustainability really
ways of life, businesses,
means.
economy, physical structures, What is sustained in a sustainable community is not economic growth,
development, market share, or competitive advantage, but the entire web
and technologies do not
of life on which our long-term survival depends. In other words, a sustain-
interfere with nature’s inherent able community is designed in such a way that its ways of life, businesses,
economy, physical structures, and technologies do not interfere with
ability to sustain life.
nature’s inherent ability to sustain life.
The first step in this endeavor, naturally, is to understand the principles
of organization that ecosystems have developed to sustain the web of life.
This understanding is what I call ecological literacy.
The ecosystems of the natural world are sustainable communities of
plants, animals, and microorganisms. There is no waste in these ecological
communities, one species’ waste being another species’ food. Thus matter
cycles continually through the web of life. The energy driving these ecologi-
cal cycles flows from the sun, and the diversity and cooperation among its
embers is the source of the community’s resilience.
The Center for Ecoliteracy in Berkeley is dedicated to fostering the
experience and understanding of the natural world in primary education.
LIVING SYSTEMS
The most appropriate theoretical framework for ecology is the theory of
living systems. This theory is only now fully emerging but has its roots in
several scientific fields that were developed during the first half of the
century—organismic biology, gestalt psychology, ecology, general systems
theory, and cybernetics.
In all these fields scientists explored living systems, which means
integrated wholes whose properties cannot be reduced to those of
smaller parts. Although we can distinguish parts in any living system, the
nature of the whole is always different from the mere sum of its parts.
Systems theory entails a new way of seeing the world and a new way
of thinking, known as systems thinking, or systemic thinking. It means thinking
in terms of relationships, connectedness, and context.
Systems thinking was raised to a new level during the past twenty
years with the development of a new science of complexity, including a
whole new mathematical language and a new set of concepts to describe
the complexity of living systems.
principles of organization. tells us that all living systems share a set of common properties and
principles of organization. This means that systems thinking can be applied
to integrate academic disciplines and to discover similarities between
phenomena at different levels of scale—the individual child, the classroom,
the school,the district,and the surrounding human communities and ecosystems.
The principles of ecology are the principles of organization that are
common to all these living systems. If you wish, they are the basic patterns
of life. Indeed, in human communities, they could also be called the prin-
ciples of community.
Now, of course, there are a lot of differences between ecosystems
and human communities. There is no culture in ecosystems, no conscious-
ness, no justice, no equity. So we can’t learn anything about these human
values from ecosystems. But what we can learn and must learn is how to
live sustainably. Over more than three billion years of evolution, ecosys-
tems have organized themselves so as to maximize sustainability. This
wisdom of nature is the essence of ecoliteracy.
weigh things. But relationships cannot be measured and weighed; relation- measured and weighed;
ships need to be mapped. You can draw a map of relationships, intercon-
necting different elements or different members of a community. When relationships need to be
ability to recognize and more effective than the arts—whether it’s the visual arts, music, or the
performing arts—for developing and refining the child’s natural ability to
express patterns. recognize and express patterns. Thus, the arts can be a powerful tool for
teaching systems thinking, in addition to enhancing the emotional dimen-
sion that is increasingly being recognized as an essential component of the
learning process.
• that the energy driving these ecological cycles flows from the
sun;
• that life, from its beginning more than three billion years ago, did Teaching this ecological
not take over the planet by combat but by cooperation, part-
nership, and networking. knowledge, which is also
Teaching this ecological knowledge, which is also ancient wisdom, will be ancient wisdom, will be the
the most important role of education in the next century.
most important role of
and for integrating garden as a whole is embedded in larger systems that are again living
networks with their own cycles. The food cycles intersect with these larger
the curriculum. cycles—the water cycle, the cycle of the seasons, and so on—all of which
are links in the planetary web of life.
A SENSE OF PLACE
Through gardening, we also become aware how we ourselves are part of
the web of life, and over time the experience of ecology in nature gives us
a sense of place. We become aware of how we are embedded in an
ecosystem; in a landscape with a particular flora and fauna; in a particular
social system and culture. “Places,” writes David W. Orr, “are laboratories of
diversity and complexity, mixing social functions and natural processes...
The study of place enables us to widen our focus to examine the interre-
lationships between disciplines and to lengthen our perception of time.”
In a learning community, other ecologically-oriented project, is possible only if the school becomes
a true learning community. The conceptual relationships among the various
teachers, students, adminis- disciplines can be made explicit only if there are corresponding human
relationships among the teachers and administrators.
trators, and parents are all
In such a learning community, teachers, students, administrators, and
interlinked in a network of parents are all interlinked in a network of relationships, working together
to facilitate learning. The teaching does not flow from the top down, but
relationships, working
there is a cyclical exchange of information. The focus is on learning and
together to everyone in the system is both a teacher and a learner. Feedback loops
are intrinsic to the learning process, and feedback becomes the key
facilitate learning.
purpose of assessment. Systems thinking is crucial to understand the
functioning of learning communities. Indeed, as I have mentioned, the
principles of ecology can also be interpreted as principles of community.
Finally, the systemic understanding of learning, instruction, curriculum
design, and assessment can only be implemented with a corresponding
practice of leadership. This new kind of leadership is inspired by the
understanding of a very important property of living systems, which has
been identified and explored only recently. Every living system occasionally
encounters points of instability, at which some of its structures break down
and new structures emerge. The spontaneous emergence of order—of
new structures and new forms of behavior—is one of the hallmarks of life.
In other words, creativity—the generation of forms that are constantly
new—is a key property of all living systems.
Leadership, therefore, consists to a large extent in continually facilitat-
ing the emergence of new structures and incorporating the best of them
into the organization’s design. This type of systemic leadership is not limited
to a single individual but can be shared, and responsibility then becomes a
capacity of the whole.