Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 66 views

    In The Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan

    Uploaded by

    api-3745637
    This document lists the authorities relied upon by the counsel for the petitioners in a case in the Lahore High Court Multan Bench. It cites four precedents establishing that: mutations cannot be examined by revenue authorities if fraud is involved, but must be determined by civil courts; mutations made on the basis of clearance certificates cannot be cancelled without notice; mutations unchallenged for over 12 years cannot be reviewed on the basis of a later civil court decree; and reopening mutations after 13 years of attestation on allegations of fraud involves intricate legal questions that cannot be resolved by revenue courts in a summary inquiry.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    In The Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan

    Uploaded by

    api-3745637
    66 views2 pages
    This document lists the authorities relied upon by the counsel for the petitioners in a case in the Lahore High Court Multan Bench. It cites four precedents establishing that: mutations cannot be examined by revenue authorities if fraud is involved, but must be determined by civil courts; mutations made on the basis of clearance certificates cannot be cancelled without notice; mutations unchallenged for over 12 years cannot be reviewed on the basis of a later civil court decree; and reopening mutations after 13 years of attestation on allegations of fraud involves intricate legal questions that cannot be resolved by revenue courts in a summary inquiry.

    Original Title

    M

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document lists the authorities relied upon by the counsel for the petitioners in a case in the Lahore High Court Multan Bench. It cites four precedents establishing that: mutations cannot be examined by revenue authorities if fraud is involved, but must be determined by civil courts; mutations made on the basis of clearance certificates cannot be cancelled without notice; mutations unchallenged for over 12 years cannot be reviewed on the basis of a later civil court decree; and reopening mutations after 13 years of attestation on allegations of fraud involves intricate legal questions that cannot be resolved by revenue courts in a summary inquiry.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    66 views2 pages

    In The Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan

    Uploaded by

    api-3745637
    This document lists the authorities relied upon by the counsel for the petitioners in a case in the Lahore High Court Multan Bench. It cites four precedents establishing that: mutations cannot be examined by revenue authorities if fraud is involved, but must be determined by civil courts; mutations made on the basis of clearance certificates cannot be cancelled without notice; mutations unchallenged for over 12 years cannot be reviewed on the basis of a later civil court decree; and reopening mutations after 13 years of attestation on allegations of fraud involves intricate legal questions that cannot be resolved by revenue courts in a summary inquiry.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, MULTAN BENCH,

    MULTAN.

    W.P. No. ____________/2001

    Muhammad Ali, etc. Vs. D.C. & others.

    AUTHORITIES RELIED UPON BY THE


    COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS.

    1) NLR 1993 Rev. S.C. 36. Question of fraud involved in


    getting mutations cannot be
    examined by Revenue
    authorities. Recourse can be
    had to Civil Courts possessed
    of plenary jurisdiction to
    determine this question.
    2) 1984 CLC 1729 (D.B.) Entries in record of rights
    made in favour of petitioners
    on basis of clearance
    certificate issued by
    Rehabilitation authorities---
    Entries subsequently
    cancelled by Revenue officer
    without giving notice to
    petitioners alleging that said
    certificate was bogus---Held
    even if said certificate was
    bogus, mutation on the basis
    of same could not have been
    cancelled without giving
    notice to persons effected by
    cancellation order, thus,
    passed in violation of
    principles of natural justice---
    same is void.
    3) 1983 CLC 1124 Mutation of sale remaining
    unchallenged for more than
    12 years---property changing
    hands---Mutation of such
    property cannot be allowed to
    be reviewed on basis of
    decree of civil court---vested
    rights of purchasers---held---
    cannot be defeated by altering
    entries of revenue record.
    4) Mutation---Re-opening, on
    allegations of fraud after 13
    years of attestation---not
    permissible----Question
    whether there were sufficient
    grounds for condoning delay
    of 13 years---intricate
    question of law, which cannot
    be resolved by Revenue Court
    in Summary inquiry----civil
    court is proper forum for
    determination of intricate
    question of law---Land
    Record Manual---para 7.30.

    Through: -
    Zaffar Iqbal Khan,
    Advocate
    124-District Courts, Multan.

    You might also like