Algorithmic Trading TCG
Algorithmic Trading TCG
January, 2005
______________________________________________________
Presented by:
AGENDA
Background Algorithmic Trading Components Trends Factors Impacting Algorithmic Trading Design Flaws of Central Limit Order Books System Design Limitations Conclusions
CG
BACKGROUND
Liquidity pool hubs and spokes: Equity/Options and Futures Exchanges Equity ECNs Fixed Income Intra-Dealer Brokers Market Makers, Specialists, Proprietary Trading Firms, Trading Arcades, Scalpers/Day Traders Buy Side/Quant Trading Shops Boutiques The evolution of trading technology solutions:
ECN aggregators, smart routers, algorithmic slicers, etc.
CG
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
BACKGROUND (Contd)
Program trading, automatic order generators and automated order routing systems are used mainly by sell-side firms to conduct business as: Principal/proprietary trading Agency/customer facilitation In: Equities, Fixed Income, Futures and Options Strategies include index substitutions, risk modifications, liquidation of exchange for physicals (EFPs), etc. Buy programs occur when the futures market is overvalued, relative to the cash market. Sell programs occur when the cash market is overvalued, relative to futures.
CG
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
BACKGROUND (Contd)
Largest players today include: Citadel Investment Group Citigroup Credit Suisse First Boston Deutsche Bank Goldman Sachs Lehman Bros. Morgan Stanley Susquehanna Investment Group UBS
CG
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
BACKGROUND (Contd)
A large percentage of order flow arrives via computer to computer APIs. Proprietary trading systems can bombard an electronic trading system with high burst rates of orders/second. Volume created by program trading engines has become the dominant mode of trading (*now >50% average daily NYSE volume).
* - Source New York Stock Exchange.
CG
CG
TRENDS
Intense pressures on trading costs: Impact of decimalization on spreads, market maker and specialists profitability. Impact of penny jumping on institutional order flow, block trades Implicit and explicit costs - slippage/market impact, floor brokerage and commissions Reduction in soft dollar relationships. Buy-side firms focusing on trading strategies that involve a combination of equities, fixed income and/or derivative instruments that lower overall trading costs and risks when traded together.
CG
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
TRENDS (CONTD)
More sell-side firms offering program trading functions to compete/attract more order flow. Sell side firms moving deeper into the aggregation business: Provide buy side clients with the ability to diversify risk, get comprehensive pricing, acquire research, increase anonymity, maintain relationships, etc. Integrate algo trading strategies into OMS and front end trading systems: Buy side users want to use algorithmic strategies to split up large orders into smaller ones, to reduce market impact. Algos for VWAP, TWAP, small-cap illiquid, mid-cap liquid, passive, aggressive, etc.
CG
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
TRENDS (CONTD)
Buy side firms getting access to algorithms from multiple brokers, OMS vendors. Internalization/crossing of order flow. Cost of market entry continues to get lower: Technology costs less HW/SW/NW Buy versus build, time to market issues Application solutions availability You dont need to be Goldman or Salomon any more! Market structure evolution SEC Reg. NMS reforms: NYSE Hybrid Market initiative NASDAQ/the remaining ECNs Regional equity exchanges
CG
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
10
11
12
There has been a growth in the ratio of orders to fills. Additionally, order book transactions per second already exceed their original design parameters and continue to grow at a geometric rate.
CG
13
The first sign of system stress is the degradation in system response: Usually sub-second, the latency can begin to increase to seconds During extreme market conditions, this can degrade to minutes, as transaction volumes increase Exchanges, ECNs and ATS have met the growth in TPS by using faster processors and adding additional CPU/memory: Some exchanges and ETS have denied service to high volume API users during peak periods Some have large server farms to facilitate segmenting processing resources into increasingly fine pieces
CG
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
14
CG
15
Algo trading strategies often have order cancellation rates of ~90%, consuming ~50% of ETS system resources. A recent study at a major U.S. Futures exchange found that 60% of all trading for that exchange was done in the nearmonth of a single financial futures contract. A similar measurement of the market opening at a U.S. regional Equities exchange pointed out that 70% of all trades (priced and executed off the primary market opening) were in the three most active stocks: The most active issue accounted for 35% of the volume Therefore, system processing power and software efficiencies need to focus on the busiest instrument: Scaling is probably only achieved with 3-5 separate processes for the actual matching engine
CG
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
16
Further issues arise by attempting to separate shared memory regions: If options strategies, spreads or complex orders are being processed, it is a technical challenge to have instruments that interact resident in separate memory pools
CG
17
CONCLUSIONS
The next generation of matching engines needs a rethinking: Design of the central limit order book Support for higher volumes of trades and quotes Exchange rule impact/changes thereto Market structure changes must go hand in hand with technology changes: Quote structure changes in the face of raising autoquote volumes because of narrow spreads Filtered quote streams for pro traders Mechanisms for price improvements without penny jumping
Tellefsen Consulting Group, Inc.
CG
18