Week 2 Unassigned Solutions
Week 2 Unassigned Solutions
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
PROBLEM 3-42
NOTE: The 12/31/x1 balances for cash and accounts receivable, although given in the
problem, are irrelevant to the solution.
1.
$10,100
39,000
$49,100
11,000
$38,100
79,000
$ 4,900
29,000
3,800
2,100
6,000
2,400
3,600
3,100
$54,900
3,100
58,000
$175,100
8,100
$183,200
8,300
$174,900
*The Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured lists the manufacturing costs applied to work
in process. Therefore, the overapplied overhead, $3,100, must be added to total actual
overhead to arrive at the amount of overhead applied to work in process. If there had been
underapplied overhead, the balance would have been deducted from total actual
manufacturing overhead. The amount of overapplied overhead is found by subtracting
actual overhead, $54,900 (as computed above), from applied overhead, $58,000 (given).
2.
$ 14,000
174,900
$188,900
15,400
$173,500
3,100
$170,400
*The cost of goods manufactured is obtained from the Schedule of Cost of Goods
Manufactured.
The
company closes underapplied or overapplied overhead into cost of goods sold. Hence,
the balance in overapplied overhead is deducted from cost of goods sold for the month.
3.
$205,800
170,400
$ 35,400
$13,800
2,500
1,200
1,700
4,000
23,200
$12,200
5,100
$ 7,100
PROBLEM 3-44
The completed T-accounts are shown below. (Missing amounts in problem are italicized.)
Raw-Material Inventory
21,000
135,000 120,000
Bal. 12/31
36,000
Bal. 1/1
Work-in-Process Inventory
Bal. 1/1
17,000
Direct
material
120,000
Direct
labor
150,000 718,000
Mfg.
overhead 450,000
Bal. 12/31
19,000
Manufacturing Overhead
452,500 450,000
Wages Payable
2,000 Bal. 1/1
147,000
150,000
5,000 Bal. 12/31
Accounts Payable
2,500 Bal. 1/1
136,500
135,000
1,000 Bal. 12/31
Finished-Goods Inventory
Bal. 1/1
12,000
718,000 710,000
Bal. 12/31
20,000
PROBLEM 3-45
1.
2.
(a)
80,000
130,800
(c)
34,000
60,000
5,000
139,500
231,000
315,250
146,950
112,250
5.
PROBLEM 3-47
1.
Percent
Traceable
Traceable
Cost
80%
60
90
90
50
$2,000,000
180,000
225,000
45,000
50,000
$2,500,000
JLRs overhead (i.e., the nontraceable costs) total $700,000 ($3,200,000 - $2,500,000).
2.
3.
4.
The total cost of the Martin Manufacturing project is $64,000, and the billing is
$76,800, as follows:
Professional staff salaries
Administrative support staff
Travel..
Photocopying
Other operating costs.
Subtotal
Overhead ($50,000 x 28%).
Total cost.
Markup ($64,000 x 20%).
Billing to Martin
$41,000
2,600
4,500
500
1,400
$50,000
14,000
$64,000
12,800
$76,800
5.
6.
Professional staff members are compensated for attending training sessions and
firm-wide planning meetings, paid vacations, and completion of general, non-clientrelated paperwork and reports. These activities benefit multiple clients, the
consultant, and/or the overall firm, making traceability to specific clients difficult if
not impossible.
PROBLEM 3-49
1.
2.
Journal entries:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
7,850
180
30
800
75,000
1,800
3,000
7,850
180
30
800
75,000
1,800
3,000
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
1,700
21,000
7,000
1,100
Work-in-Process Inventory................................
Manufacturing Overhead.........................
140,000*
1,700
21,000
7,000
1,100
140,000
176,000
139,000
176,000
139,000
PROBLEM 3-52
1.
$ 17,000
113,000
$130,000
26,000
$104,000
160,000 *
80,000
$344,000
40,000
$384,000
36,000
$348,000
*Work upward from the bottom of the statement, using the information available. Direct
labor + manufacturing overhead = total manufacturing costs direct material cost =
$344,000 $104,000 = $240,000. Since manufacturing overhead = 50% of direct labor, then
manufacturing overhead = $80,000 and direct labor = $160,000.
Cost
2.
3.
PROBLEM 3-53
1.
$ 17,000
113,000
$130,000
26,000
$104,000
160,000
$264,000
$160,000
80,000
$240,000
2.
3.
4.
5.
Underapplied overhead
$6,000
$26,000
$20,000
6,000
6,000
Account
Work in Process
Finished Goods
Cost of Goods
Sold
Total
Explanation
Job P82 only
Job N08 only
Amount*
$ 2,500
12,500
Percentage
12.5%
62.5%
5,000
$20,000
25.0%
100.0%
Account
Work in Process
Finished Goods
Cost of Goods Sold
Total
(b)
Calculation
of Percentage
2,500 20,000
12,500 20,000
5,000
20,000
Underapplied
Overhead
$6,000
6,000
6,000
Percentage
12.5%
62.5%
25.0%
Amount Added
to Account
$ 750
3,750
1,500
$6,000
Journal entry:
Work-in-Process Inventory ..................................................
Finished-Goods Inventory ...................................................
Cost of Goods Sold ..............................................................
Manufacturing Overhead ...........................................
750
3,750
1,500
6,000
PROBLEM 5-45
1.
a.
2.
The increase in the overhead rate should not have a negative impact on the
company, because the increase in indirect costs was offset by a decrease in
direct labor.
3.
4.
PROBLEM 5-46
1.
Direct material.
Direct labor:
3 hours x $12
4 hours x $12
Standard
Enhanced
$ 25
$ 40
36
48
Manufacturing overhead:
3 hours x $32
4 hours x $32
Total cost.
2.
96
$157
128
$216
Cost
Activity Cost
Driver
Application
Rate
Order
processing
$150,000
500 orders
processed (OP)
= $300 per OP
Machine
processing
560,000
40,000 machine
hrs. (MH)
= $14 per MH
Product
inspection
90,000
10,000 inspection
hrs. (IH)
= $9 per IH
Standard
Order processing:
300 OP x $300... $ 90,000
200 OP x $300...
Machine processing:
18,000 MH x $14... 252,000
22,000 MH x $14...
Product inspection:
2,000 IH x $9..
18,000
8,000 IH x $9.
Total
$360,000
Production volume (units)
3,000
Cost per unit
$120*
* $360,000 3,000 units = $120
** $440,000 4,000 units = $110
Enhanced
$ 60,000
308,000
72,000
$440,000
4,000
$110**
The manufactured cost of a Standard unit is $181, and the manufactured cost of an
Enhanced unit is $198:
Direct material.
Direct labor:
3 hours x $12
4 hours x $12
Order processing, machine processing,
and product inspection..
Total cost.
3.
Standard
Enhanced
$ 25
$ 40
36
48
120
$181
110
$198
a.
b.
Yes, especially since the companys selling prices are based heavily on cost.
An overcosted product will result in an inflated selling price, which could
prove detrimental in a highly competitive marketplace. Customers will be
turned off and will go elsewhere, which hurts profitability. With undercosted
products, selling prices may be too low to adequately cover a products more
accurate (higher) cost. This situation is also troublesome and will result in a
lower income being reported for the company.
PROBLEM 5-48
The information supplied by the ABC project team is in columns A, B, C, D, F, G, and I.
Activity
Activity
Cost
Pool
Cost
Driver
Product
Line
Cost
Driver
Quantity
for
Product
Line
40
40
20
100
Cost
Driver
Quantity
Pool
Rate
Activity
Cost for
Product
Line
$21,000
21,000
10,500
$52,500
Product
Line
Production
Volume
Activity
Cost
per Unit
of
Product
5,000
4,000
1,000
$ 4.20
5.25
10.50
The results of the ABC calculations are in columns E, H and J. The ABC calculations are as
follows:
(1) Compute pool rate for material-handling activity:
Activity cost pool cost driver quantity = pool rate
$52,500
100
= $525.00
Pool Rate
Cost Driver
Quantity for
x Product Line
$525.00 x
525.00 x
525.00 x
=
=
=
=
40
40
20
$21,000
21,000
10,500
(3) Compute product cost per unit for each product line:
Activity Cost
for Each
Product
Product
Line
Line
REG
ADV
GMT
$21,000
21,000
10,500
Product Line
Production Volume
5,000
4,000
1,000
=
=
=
PROBLEM 5-49
1.
Direct material.
Direct labor..
Type A
Type B
$ 35
20
$ 60
20
Activity Cost
per Unit
of Product
$ 4.20
5.25
10.50
Manufacturing overhead.
Unit cost
2.
160
$215
120
$200
Application
Rate
Activity
Cost
Manufacturing
setups
$ 672,000
80 setups (SU)
= $8,400 per SU
1,848,000
38,500 machine
hours (MH)
= $48 per MH
Machine
processing
Product
560,000 175
outgoing = $3,200 per OS
shipping
shipments (OS)
Manufacturing setup, machine processing, and product shipping costs of a Type A unit and
a Type B unit:
Activity
Type A
Manufacturing setups:
50 SU x $8,400.. $ 420,000
30 SU x $8,400..
Machine processing:
16,000 MH x $48...
768,000
22,500 MH x $48...
Product shipping:
100 OS x $3,200
320,000
75 OS x $3,200..
Total . $1,508,000
Type B
$ 252,000
1,080,000
240,000
$1,572,000
8,000
15,000
$188.50*
$104.80**
Type B
Direct material
Direct labor.
Manufacturing setup, machine
processing, and outgoing shipments..
Total cost.
3.
$ 35.00
20.00
$ 60.00
20.00
188.50
$243.50
104.80
$184.80
Yes, the Type A storage cabinet is undercosted. The use of machine hours
produced a unit cost of $215; in contrast, the more accurate activity-based-costing
approach shows a unit cost of $243.50. The difference between these two amounts is $28.50.
4.
No, the discount is not advisable. The regular selling price of $260, when compared
against the more accurate ABC cost figure, shows that each sale provides a profit to
the firm of $16.50 ($260.00 - $243.50). However, a $30 discount will actually produce
a loss of $13.50 ($243.50 - $230.00), and the more units that are sold, the larger the
loss. Notice that with the less-accurate, machine-hour-based figure ($215), the
marketing manager will be misled, believing that each discounted unit sold would
boost income by $15 ($230 - $215).
PROBLEM 5-56
1.
a.
WGCC's predetermined overhead rate, using direct-labor cost as the single cost
driver, is $5 per direct labor dollar, calculated as follows:
Overhead rate
= $3,000,000/$600,000
= $5 per direct-labor dollar
b.
The full product costs and selling prices of one pound of Kona and one pound of
Malaysian coffee are calculated as follows:
Kona
Direct material ........................................
Direct labor.............................................
Overhead (.30 $5) ...............................
Full product cost ...................................
Markup (30%) .........................................
$3.20
.30
1.50
$5.00
1.50
Malaysian
$4.20
.30
1.50
$6.00
1.80
$6.50
$7.80
A new product cost, under an activity-based costing approach, is $7.46 per pound of
Kona and $4.82 per pound of Malaysian coffee, calculated as follows:
Activity
Purchasing
Cost Driver
Purchase orders
Budgeted
Activity
1,158
Material handling
Quality control
Roasting
Blending
Packaging
Setups
Batches
Roasting hours
Blending hours
Packaging hours
1,800
720
96,100
33,600
26,000
Budgeted
Cost
$579,000
Unit Cost
$500
720,000
144,000
961,000
336,000
260,000
400
200
10
10
10
Kona Coffee
Standard cost per pound:
Direct material .......................................................................................
Direct labor ............................................................................................
Purchasing (4 orders $500/2,000 lb.) ................................................
Material handling (12 setups $400/2,000 lb.) ...................................
Quality control (4 batches $200/2,000 lb.) ........................................
Roasting (20 hours $10/2,000 lb.) .....................................................
Blending (10 hours $10/2,000 lb.) .....................................................
Packaging (2 hours $10/2,000 lb.) ....................................................
Total cost ...............................................................................................
$3.20
.30
1.00
2.40
.40
.10
.05
.01
$7.46
Malaysian Coffee
Standard cost per pound:
Direct material .......................................................................................
Direct labor ............................................................................................
Purchasing (4* orders $500/100,000 lb.) ..........................................
Material handling (30 setups $400/100,000 lb.)................................
Quality control (10 batches $200/100,000 lb.) ..................................
Roasting (1,000 hours $10/100,000 lb.) ............................................
$4.20
.30
.02
.12
.02
.10
.05
.01
$4.82
3.
a.
The ABC analysis indicates that several activities other than direct labor drive
overhead. The cost computations show that the current system significantly
undercosted Kona coffee, the low-volume product, and overcosted the highvolume product, Malaysian coffee.
b.
The implication of the ABC analysis is that the low-volume products are using
resources but are not covering their share of the cost of those resources. The
Kona blend is currently priced at $6.50 [see requirement 1(b)], which is
significantly below its activity-based cost of $7.46. The company should set longrun prices above cost. If there is excess capacity and many of the costs are fixed,
it may be acceptable to price some products below full activity-based cost
temporarily in order to build demand for the product. Otherwise, the high-volume,
high-margin products are subsidizing the low-volume, low-margin products.