C C!" # $ C"%&C'C!C C' ( (&%% (!" + # + # #, # + - # # - # /#0 .%% - (# C (%% # C" 1 C'&' (!' (C) (% & ( +'% 2 # - # 3 C'&' (!' (&' ( (%C' ' ' # ##
C C!" # $ C"%&C'C!C C' ( (&%% (!" + # + # #, # + - # # - # /#0 .%% - (# C (%% # C" 1 C'&' (!' (C) (% & ( +'% 2 # - # 3 C'&' (!' (&' ( (%C' ' ' # ##
rate, investing the yen at 1.75% (7%/4), and then selling the proceeds forward for dollars. This yields a dollar return equal to 142 x 1.0175/139 = 1.0395 or 3.95%. This return significantly exceeds the 2.25% (9%/4) return available from investing in the United States. b) The flip side of a lower return in the United States is a lower borrowing cost. Borrow in the United States. c) Absent transaction costs that would wipe out the yield differential, it makes sense to borrow dollars in New York at 2.25% and invest them in Tokyo at 3.95%. d) The profit would be a 1.7% (3.95% - 2.25%) return per dollar borrowed. 14> a)The annual dollar return on dollars invested in Germany is (1.07 x 0.97)/0.95 - 1 = 9.25%. This return exceeds the 9% return on dollars invested in the United States by 0.25% per annum. Hence arbitrage profits can be earned by borrowing dollars or selling dollar assets, buying euros in the spot market, investing the euros at 7%, and simultaneously selling the euro interest and principal forward for one year for dollars b) In this case, the return on arbitraging dollars falls to 1.07 x 0.97/0.95 x 0.99752 - 1.09 = -0.30% Thus, arbitraging from dollars to euros has now become unprofitable and no capital flow will occur.