Origin of Freemasonry
Origin of Freemasonry
Origin of Freemasonry
By Thomas Paine
[NOTE: This essay appeared in New York, 1818, with an anonymous preface of which I
quote the opening paragraph: "This tract is a chapter belonging to the Third Part of the
"Age of Reason," as will be seen by the references made in it to preceding articles, as
forming part of the same work. It was culled from the writings of Mr. Paine after his
death, and published in a mutilated state by Mrs. Bonneville, his executrix. Passages
having a reference to the Christian religion she erased, with a view no doubt of
accommodating the work to the prejudices of bigotry. These, however, have been
restored from the original manuscript, except a few lines which were rendered illegible."
Madame Bonneville published this fragment in New York, 1810 (with the omissions I
point out) as a pamphlet. -- Dr. Robinet (Danton- Emigre, p. 7) says erroneously that
Paine was a Freemason; but an eminent member of that Fraternity in London, Mr. George
Briggs, after reading this essay, which I submitted to him, tells me that "his general
outline, remarks, and comments, are fairly true." Paine's intimacy in Paris with Nicolas de
Bonneville and Charles Frangois Dupuis, whose writings are replete with masonic
speculations, sufficiently explain his interest in the subject. -- Editor.]
IT is always understood that Free-Masons have a secret which they carefully conceal; but
from every thing that can be collected from their own accounts of Masonry, their real
secret is no other than their origin, which but few of them understand; and those who do,
envelope it in mystery
The Society of Masons are distinguished into three classes or degrees. 1st. The Entered
Apprentice. 2d. The Fellow Craft. 3d. The Master Mason.
The Entered Apprentice knows but little more of Masonry than the use of signs and
tokens, and certain steps and words by which Masons can recognize each other without
being discovered by a person who is not a Mason. The Fellow Craft is not much better
instructed in Masonry, than the Entered Apprentice. It is only in the Master Mason's
Lodge, that whatever knowledge remains of the origin of Masonry is preserved and
concealed.
In his introduction he says, the original institution of Masonry consisted in the foundation
of the liberal arts and sciences, but more especially in Geometry, for at the building of the
tower of Babel, the art and mystery of Masonry was first introduced, and from thence
handed down by Euclid, a worthy and excellent mathematician of the Egyptians; and he
communicated it to Hiram, the Master Mason concerned in building Solomon's Temple in
Jerusalem."
Besides the absurdity of deriving Masonry from the building of Babel, where, according
to the story, the confusion of languages prevented the builders understanding each other,
and consequently of communicating any knowledge they had, there is a glaring
contradiction in point of chronology in the account he gives.
Solomon's Temple was built and dedicated 1004 years before the christian era; and
Euclid, as may be seen in the tables of chronology, lived 277 before the same era. It was
therefore impossible that Euclid could communicate any thing to Hiram, since Euclid did
not live till 700 years after the time of Hiram.
In 1783, Captain George Smith, inspector of the Royal Artillery Academy at Woolwich,
in England, and Provincial Grand Master of Masonry for the county of Kent, published a
treatise entitled, The Use and Abuse of Free-Masonry.
"But," continues he, "I am not at liberty publicly to undraw the curtain, and openly to
descant on this head; it is sacred, and ever will remain so; those who are honored with the
trust will not reveal it, and those who are ignorant of it cannot betray it." By this last part
of the phrase, Smith means the two inferior classes, the Fellow Craft and the Entered
Apprentice, for he says in the next page of his work, "It is not every one that is barely
initiated into Free-Masonry that is entrusted with all the mysteries thereto belonging; they
are not attainable as things of course, nor by every capacity."
The learned, but unfortunate Doctor Dodd, Grand Chaplain of Masonry, in his oration at
the dedication of Free-Mason's Hall, London, traces Masonry through a variety of stages.
Masons, says he, are well informed from their own private and interior records that the
building of Solomon's Temple is an important era, from whence they derive many
mysteries of their art. "Now (says he,) be it remembered that this great event took place
above 1000 years before the Christian era, and consequently more than a century before
Homer, the first of the Grecian Poets, wrote; and above five centuries before Pythagoras
brought from the east his sublime system of truly masonic instruction to illuminate. our
western world. But, remote as this period is, we date not from thence the commencement
of our art. For though it might owe to the wise and glorious King of Israel some of its
many mystic forms and hieroglyphic ceremonies, yet certainly the art itself is coeval with
man, the great subject of it. "We trace," continues he, "its footsteps in the most distant,
the most remote ages and nations of the world. We find it among the first and most
celebrated civilizers of the East. We deduce it regularly from the first astronomers on the
plains of Chaldea, to the wise and mystic kings and priests of Egypt, the sages of Greece,
and the philosophers of Rome."
From these reports and declarations of Masons of the highest order in the institution, we
see that Masonry, without publicly declaring so, lays claim to some divine
communication from the creator, in a manner different from, and unconnected with, the
book which the christians call the bible; and the natural result from this is, that Masonry
is derived from some very ancient religion, wholly independent of and unconnected with
that book.
To come then at once to the point, Masonry (as I shall show from the customs,
ceremonies, hieroglyphics, and chronology of Masonry) is derived and is the remains of
the religion of the ancient Druids; who, like the Magi of Persia and the Priests of
Heliopolis in Egypt, were Priests of the Sun. They paid worship to this great luminary, as
the great visible agent of a great invisible first cause whom they styled " Time without
limits." [NOTE: Zarvan-Akarana. This personification of Boundless Time, though a part
of Parsee Theology, seems to be a later monotheistic dogma, based on perversions of the
Zendavesta. See Haug's "Religion of the Parsees." -- Editor.]
The christian religion and Masonry have one and the same common origin: both are
derived from the worship of the Sun. The difference between their origin is, that the
christian religion is a parody on the worship of the Sun, in which they put a man whom
they call Christ, in the place of the Sun, and pay him the same adoration which was
originally paid to the Sun, as I have shown in the chapter on the origin of the Christian
religion. [NOTE: Referring to an unpublished portion of the work of which this chapter
forms a part. -- American Editor, 1819 [This paragraph is omitted from the pamphlet
copyrighted by Madame Bonneville in 1810, as also is the last sentence of the next
paragraph. -- Editor.]
In Masonry many of the ceremonies of the Druids are preserved in their original state, at
least without any parody. With them the Sun is still the Sun; and his image, in the form of
the sun is the great emblematical ornament of Masonic Lodges and Masonic dresses. It is
the central figure on their aprons, and they wear it also pendant on the breast in their
lodges, and in their processions. It has the figure of a man, as at the head of the sun, as
Christ is always represented.
At what period of antiquity, or in what nation, this religion was first established, is lost in
the labyrinth of unrecorded time. It is generally ascribed to the ancient Egyptians, the
Babylonians and Chaldeans, and reduced afterwards to a system regulated by the
apparent progress of the sun through the twelve signs of Zodiac by Zoroaster the law
giver of Persia, from whence Pythagoras brought it into Greece. It is to these matters Dr.
Dodd refers in the passage already quoted from his oration.
The worship of the Sun as the great visible agent of a great invisible first cause, "Time
without limits," spread itself over a considerable part of Asia and Africa, from thence to
Greece and Rome, through all ancient Gaul, and into Britain and Ireland.
Smith, in his chapter on the antiquity of Masonry in Britain, says, that "notwithstanding
the obscurity which envelopes Masonic history in that country, various circumstances
contribute to prove that Free-Masonry was introduced into Britain about 1030 Years
before Christ." It cannot be Masonry in its present state that Smith here alludes to. The
Druids flourished in Britain at the period he speaks of, and it is from them that Masonry
is descended. Smith has put the child in the place of the parent.
As the study and contemplation of the Creator [is] in the works of the creation, the Sun,
as the great visible agent of that Being, was the visible object of the adoration of Druids;
all their religious rites and ceremonies had reference to the apparent progress of the Sun
through the twelve signs of the Zodiac, and his influence upon the earth. The Masons
adopt the same practices. The roof of their Temples or Lodges is ornamented with a Sun,
and the floor is a representation of the variegated face of the earth either by carpeting or
Mosaic work.
Free Masons Hall, in Great Queen-street, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, is a magnificent
building, and cost upwards of 12,000 pounds sterling. Smith, in speaking of this building,
says (page 152,) "The roof of this magnificent Hall is in all probability the highest piece
of finished architecture in Europe. In the center of this roof, a most resplendent Sun is
represented in burnished gold, surrounded with the twelve signs of the Zodiac, with their
respective characters;
Aries Libra
Taurus Scorpio
Gemini Sagittarius
Cancer Capricorns
Leo Aquarius
Virgo Pisces
After giving this description, he says, "The emblematical meaning of the Sun is well
known to the enlightened and inquisitive Free-Mason; and as the real Sun is situated in
the center of the universe, so the emblematical Sun is the center of real Masonry. We all
know (continues he) that the Sun is the fountain of light, the source of the seasons, the
cause of the vicissitudes of day and night, the parent of vegetation, the friend of man;
hence the scientific Free-Mason only knows the reason why the Sun is placed in the
center of this beautiful hall."
The Masons, in order to protect themselves from the persecution of the christian church,
have always spoken in a mystical manner of the figure of the Sun in their Lodges, or, like
the astronomer Lalande, who is a Mason, been silent upon the subject. It is their secret,
especially in Catholic countries, because the figure of the Sun is the expressive criterion
that denotes they are descended from the Druids, and that wise, elegant, philosophical
religion, was the faith opposite to the faith of the gloomy Christian church. [NOTE: This
sentence is omitted in Madame Bonneville's publication. -- Editor.]
The Lodges of the Masons, if built for the purpose, are constructed in a manner to
correspond with the apparent motion of the Sun. They are situated East and West.
[NOTE: The Freemason's Hall in London, which Paine has correctly described, is
situated North and South, the exigencies of the space having been too strong for Masonic
orthodoxy. Though nominally eastward the Master stands at the South. -- Editor.] The
master's place is always in the East. In the examination of an Entered Apprentice, the
Master, among many other questions, asks him,
Here the name of the Sun is mentioned, but it is proper to observe that in this place it has
reference only to labor or to the time of labor, and not to any religious druidical rite or
ceremony, as it would have with respect to the situation of Lodges East and West. I have
already observed in the chapter on the origin of the christian religion, that the situation of
churches East and West is taken from the worship of the Sun, which rises in the east, and
has not the least reference to the person called Jesus Christ. The christians never bury
their dead on the North side of a church; [NOTE: In many parts of Northern Europe the
North was supposed to be the region of demons. Executed criminals were buried on the
north side of churches. -- Editor.] and a Mason's Lodge always has, or is supposed to
have, three windows which are called fixed lights, to distinguish them from the moveable
lights of the Sun and the Moon. The Master asks the Entered Apprentice,
Q: How are they (the fixed lights) situated?
A: East, West, and South.
Q: What are their uses?
A: To light the men to and from their work.
Q: Why are there no lights in the North?
A: Because the Sun darts no rays from thence."
This, among numerous other instances, shows that the christian religion and Masonry
have one and the same common origin, the ancient worship of the Sun.
The high festival of the Masons is on the day they call St. John's day; but every
enlightened Mason must know that holding their festival on this day has no reference to
the person called St. John, and that it is only to disguise the true cause of holding it on
this day, that they call the day by that name. As there were Masons, or at least Druids,
many centuries before the time of St. John, if such person ever existed, the holding their
festival on this day must refer to some cause totally unconnected with John.
The case is, that the day called St. John's day, is the 24th of June, and is what is called
Midsummer-day. The sun is then arrived at the summer solstice; and, with respect to his
meridional altitude, or height at high noon, appears for some days to be of the same
height. The astronomical longest day, like the shortest day, is not every year, on account
of leap year, on the same numerical day, and therefore the 24th of June is always taken
for Midsummer-day; and it is in honor of the sun, which has then arrived at his greatest
height in our hemisphere, and not any thing with respect to St. John, that this annual
festival of the Masons, taken from the Druids, is celebrated on Midsummer-day.
Customs will often outlive the remembrance of their origin, and this is the case with
respect to a custom still practiced in Ireland, where the Druids flourished at the time they
flourished in Britain. On the eve of Saint John's day, that is, on the eve of Midsummer-
day, the Irish light fires on the tops of the hills. This can have no reference to St. John;
but it has emblematical reference to the sun, which on that day is at his highest summer
elevation, and might in common language be said to have arrived at the top of the hill.
science in general, and if a religion founded upon astronomy fell into their hands, it is
almost certain it would be corrupted. We do not read in the history of the Jews, whether
in the Bible or elsewhere, that they were the inventors or the improvers of any one art or
science. Even in the building of this temple, the Jews did not know how to square and
frame the timber for beginning and carrying on the work, and Solomon was obliged to
send to Hiram, King of Tyre (Zidon) to procure workmen; "for thou knowest, (says
Solomon to Hiram, i Kings v. 6.) that there is not among us any that can skill to hew
timber like unto the Zidonians." This temple was more properly Hiram's Temple than
Solomon's, and if the Masons derive any thing from the building of it, they owe it to the
Zidonians and not to the Jews. -- But to return to the worship of the Sun in this Temple.
It is said, 2 Kings xxiii. 5, "And [king Josiah] put down all the idolatrous priests ... that
burned incense unto ... the sun, the moon, the planets, and all the host of heaven." And it
is said at the 11th verse: "And he took away the horses that the kings of Judah had given
to the Sun, at the entering in of the house of the Lord, ... and burned the chariots of the
Sun with fire"; verse 13, "And the high places that were before Jerusalem, which were on
the right hand of the mount of corruption, which Solomon the king of Israel had builded
for Ashtoreth, the abomination of the Zidonians" (the very people that built the temple)
"did the king defile."
Besides these things, the description that Josephus gives of the decorations of this
Temple, resembles on a large scale those of a Mason's Lodge. He says that the
distribution of the several parts of the Temple of the Jews represented all nature,
particularly the parts most apparent of it, as the sun, the moon, the planets, the zodiac, the
earth, the elements; and that the system of the world was retraced there by numerous
ingenious emblems. These, in all probability, are, what Josiah, in his ignorance, calls the
abominations of the Zidonians. [NOTE by PAINE: Smith, in speaking of a Lodge, says,
when the Lodge is revealed to an entering Mason, it discovers to him a representation of
the World; in which, from the wonders of nature, we are led to contemplate her great
original, and worship him from his mighty works; and we are thereby also moved to
exercise those moral and social virtues which become mankind as the servants of the
great Architect of the world. -- Author.] Every thing, however, drawn from this Temple
[NOTE by PAINE: It may not be improper here to observe, that the law called the law of
Moses could not have been in existence at the time of building this Temple. Here is the
likeness of things in heaven above and in earth beneath. And we read in I Kings vi., vii.,
that Solomon made cherubs and cherubims, that he carved all the walls of the house
round about with cherubims, and palm-trees, and open flowers, and that he made a
molten sea, placed on twelve oxen, and the ledges of it were ornamented with lions, oxen,
and cherubims: all this is contrary to the law called the law of Moses. -- Author.] and
applied to Masonry, still refers to the worship of the Sun, however corrupted or
misunderstood by the Jews, and consequently to the religion of the Druids.
Another circumstance, which shows that Masonry is derived from some ancient system,
prior to and unconnected with the christian religion, is the chronology, or method of
counting time, used by the Masons in the records of their Lodges. They make no use of
what is called the christian era; and they reckon their months numerically, as the ancient
Egyptians did, and as the Quakers do now. I have by me, a record of a French Lodge, at
the time the late Duke of Orleans, then Duke de Chartres, was Grand Master of Masonry
in France. It begins as follows: "Le trentieme jour du sixieme mois de l'an de la V.L. cinq
mille sept cent soixante treize;" that is, the thirteenth day of the sixth month of the year of
the Venerable Lodge, five thousand seven hundred and seventy-three. By what I observe
in English books of Masonry, the English Masons use the initials A.L. and not V.L. By
A.L. they mean in the year of Light, as the Christians by A.D. mean in the year of our
Lord. But A.L. like V.L. refers to the same chronological era, that is, to the supposed
time of the creation. [NOTE: V.L. are the initials of Vraie Lumiere, true light; and A.L.
of Anne Lucis, in the year of light. This and the three preceding sentences (of the text)
are suppressed in Madame Bonneville's pamphlet, 1810. -- Editor.] In the chapter on the
origin of the Christian religion, I have shown that the Cosmogony, that is, the account of
the creation with which the book of Genesis opens, has been taken and mutilated from the
Zend-Avesta of Zoroaster, and was fixed as a preface to the Bible after the Jews returned
from captivity in Babylon, and that the Robbins of the Jews do not hold their account in
Genesis to be a fact, but mere allegory. The six thousand years in the Zend-Avesta, is
changed or interpolated into six days in the account of Genesis. The Masons appear to
have chosen the same period, and perhaps to avoid the suspicion and persecution of the
Church, have adopted the era of the world, as the era of Masonry. The V.L. of the French,
and A.L. of the English Mason, answer to the A.M. Anno Mundi, or year of the world.
Though the Masons have taken many of their ceremonies and hieroglyphics from the
ancient Egyptians, it is certain they have not taken their chronology from thence. If they
had, the church would soon have sent them to the stake; as the chronology of the
Egyptians, like that of the Chinese, goes many thousand years beyond the Bible
chronology.
The religion of the Druids, as before said, was the same as the religion of the ancient
Egyptians. The priests of Egypt were the professors and teachers of science, and were
styled priests of Heliopolis, that is, of the City of the Sun. The Druids in Europe, who
were the same order of men, have their name from the Teutonic or ancient German
language; the German being anciently called Teutones. The word Druid signifies a wise
man. [NOTE: German drud, wizard. Cf. Milton's line: "The star-led wizards haste with
odours sweet." The word Druid has also been derived from Greek ####;, an oak; Celtic
'deru,' an oak and 'ndd,' lord; British 'deruidhon,' very wise men; Heb. 'derussim,'
contemplators; etc. -- Editor.] In Persia they were called Magi, which signifies the same
thing.
Egypt," says Smith, "from whence we derive many of our mysteries, has always borne a
distinguished rank in history, and was once celebrated above all others for its antiquities,
learning, opulence, and fertility. In their system, their principal hero- gods, Osiris and
Isis, theologically represented the Supreme Being and universal Nature; and physically
the two great celestial luminaries, the Sun and the Moon, by whose influence all nature
was actuated." "The experienced brethren of the society, [says Smith in a note to this
passage] are well informed what affinity these symbols bear to Masonry, and why they
are used in all Masonic Lodges." In speaking of the apparel of the Masons in their
Lodges, part of which, as we see in their public processions, is a white leather apron, he
says, "the Druids were apparelled in white at the time of their sacrifices and solemn
offices. The Egyptian priests of Osiris wore snow-white cotton. The Grecian and most
other priests wore white garments. As Masons, we regard the principles of those 'who
were the first worshipers of the true God,' imitate their apparel, and assume the badge of
innocence."
"The Egyptians," continues Smith, "in the earliest ages constituted a great number of
Lodges, but with assiduous care kept their secrets of Masonry from all strangers. These
secrets have been imperfectly handed down to us by oral tradition only, and ought to be
kept undiscovered to the laborers, craftsmen, and apprentices, till by good behavior and
long study they become better acquainted in geometry and the liberal arts, and thereby
qualified for Masters and Wardens, which is seldom or never the case with English
Masons."
Under the head of Free-Masonry, written by the astronomer Lalande, in the French
Encyclopedia, I expected from his great knowledge in astronomy, to have found much
information on the origin of Masonry; for what connection can there be between any
institution and the Sun and twelve signs of the Zodiac, if there be not something in that
institution, or in its origin, that has reference to astronomy? Every thing used as an
hieroglyphic has reference to the subject and purpose for which it is used; and we are not
to suppose the Free-Masons, among whom are many very learned and scientific men, to
be such idiots as to make use of astronomical signs without some astronomical purpose.
But I was much disappointed in my expectation from Lalande. In speaking of the origin
of Masonry, he says, "L'orgine de la maconnerie se Perd, comme tant d'autres, dans
l'obscurite des termps;" That is, the origin of Masonry, like many others, loses itself in
the obscurity of time. When I came to this expression, I supposed Lalande a Mason, and
on enquiry found he was. This passing over saved him from the embarrassment which
Masons are under respecting the disclosure of their origin, and which they are sworn to
conceal. There is a society of Masons in Dublin who take the name of Druids; these
Masons must be supposed to have a reason for taking that name.
The natural source of secrecy is fear. When any new religion over-runs a former religion,
the professors of the new become the persecutors of the old. We see this in all instances
that history brings before us. When Hilkiah the priest and Shaphan the scribe, in the reign
of King Josiah, found, or pretended to find, the law, called the law of Moses, a thousand
years after the time of Moses, (and it does not appear from 2 Kings, xxii., xxiii., that such
a law was ever practiced or known before the time of Josiah), he established that law as a
national religion, and put all the priests of the Sun to death. When the christian religion
over-ran the Jewish religion, the Jews were the continual subject of persecution in all
christian countries. When the Protestant religion in England over-ran the Roman Catholic
religion, it was made death for a Catholic priest to be found in England. As this has been
the case in all the instances we have any knowledge of, we are obliged to admit it with
respect to the case in question, and that when the christian religion over-ran the religion
of the Druids in Italy, ancient Gaul, Britain, and Ireland, the Druids became the subject of
persecution. This would naturally and necessarily oblige such of them as remained
attached to their original religion to meet in secret, and under the strongest injunctions of
secrecy. Their safety depended upon it. A false brother might expose the lives of many of
them to destruction; and from the remains of the religion of the Druids, thus preserved,
arose the institution which, to avoid the name of Druid, took that of Mason, and practiced
under this new name the rites and ceremonies of Druids.