Appendix A
Appendix A
True/False Questions 1. The price elasticity of demand is used to determine the markup over cost when computing the profit-maximizing price. Ans: True AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy 2. Assume that the price elasticity of demand is less than -1. If the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand increases, the profit-maximizing price increases. Ans: False AACSB: Analytic AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1 AICPA BB: Critical Thinking Level: Hard
3. If the unit sales for one product are more sensitive to price increases than another product, then its markup over variable cost should be more than for the other product if the company wants to maximize profit. Ans: False AACSB: Analytic AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1 AICPA BB: Critical Thinking Level: Medium
4. Demand for a product is said to be elastic if a change in price has little effect on the number of units sold. Ans: False AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1 Level: Medium 5. The demand for products that are sold in discount stores is generally less elastic than the demand for products sold in upscale boutiques. Ans: False AACSB: Analytic AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1 AICPA BB: Critical Thinking Level: Medium
6. The price elasticity of demand can be estimated using the formula ln(1 + percentage change in quantity sold)/ln(1 + percentage change in selling price). Ans: True AACSB: Reflective Thinking AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1 Level: Easy
A-3
8. The absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing will result in attaining the company's required rate of return only if forecasted unit sales are realized. Ans: True AACSB: Analytic AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 AICPA BB: Critical Thinking Level: Medium
9. The markup over cost under the absorption costing approach would decrease if the required rate of return increases, holding everything else constant. Ans: False AACSB: Analytic AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 AICPA BB: Critical Thinking Level: Medium
10. The markup over cost under the absorption costing approach would decrease if the unit product cost increases, holding everything else constant. Ans: True AACSB: Analytic AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 AICPA BB: Critical Thinking Level: Hard
11. Holding all other things constant, an increase in variable production costs will affect: A) the markup under the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing. B) the markup used to compute the profit-maximizing price. C) both the markup under the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing and the markup used to compute profit-maximizing price. D) neither the markup under the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing nor the markup used to compute profit-maximizing price. Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1; 2 Level: Hard
A-4
Ans: D
A-5
A-6
A-7
The product's variable cost is $21.00 per unit. According to the formula in the text, the product's profit-maximizing price is closest to: A) $39.91 B) $22.84 C) $38.81 D) $37.71 Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1 Level: Medium Solution: Percent change in price = ($37.00 $36.00)/$36.00 = 2.78% Percent change in total unit sales = (2,350 2,500)/2,500 = -6% Price elasticity of demand = ln(1 + % change in quantity sold)/ln(1 + % change in price) = ln(1 + 6%)/ln(1 + 2.78%) = 2.2565 Profit maximizing markup on variable cost = 1/(1 + ed) = -1/(1 + (2.2565)) = 0.7959 Profit-maximizing price = (1 + Profit-maximizing markup on variable cost)*Variable cost per unit = (1 + 0.7959)*$21.00 = (1.7959)*$21.00 = $37.71
A-8
The product's price elasticity of demand as defined in the text is closest to: A) 1.04 B) 1.13 C) 1.09 D) 1.10 Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 1 Level: Medium Solution: Percent change in price = ($24 $25)/$25 = 4% Percent change in total unit sales = (6,900 6,600)/6,600 = 4.545% Price elasticity of demand = ln(1 + % change in quantity sold)/ln(1 + % change in price) = ln(1 + 4.545%)/ln(1 + -4%) = 1.09
A-9
A-10
$696,60 0
The company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing described in the text. The pricing calculations are based on budgeted production and sales of 54,000 units per year. The company has invested $420,000 in this product and expects a return on investment of 12%. The selling price based on the absorption costing approach would be closest to: A) $67.43 B) $49.86 C) $90.59 D) $66.50 Ans: A AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 Level: Medium Solution: Direct materials.......................................... Direct labor................................................ Variable manufacturing overhead.............. Fixed manufacturing overhead.................. Unit product cost........................................ $17.4 0 15.10 4.10 12.90 $49.5 0
Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] Markup on absorption cost = [(12% $420,000) + ($2.90 54,000 + $761,400)] ($49.50 54,000)
A-11
A-12
A-13
The company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing described in the text and a 60% markup. Based on these data, the company's total selling and administrative expenses associated with Product B each year are: A) $625,000 B) $600,000 C) $510,000 D) $430,000 Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 Level: Hard Solution: Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] = [(20% $850,000) + Selling and administrative expenses] [$25 40,000] = 60% = [$170,000 + Selling and administrative expenses] $1,000,000 = 60% $170,000 + Selling and administrative expenses = $600,000 Selling and administrative expenses = $430,000
A-14
$1,314,50 0
The company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing described in the text. The pricing calculations are based on budgeted production and sales of 55,000 units per year. The company has invested $200,000 in this product and expects a return on investment of 8%. The markup on absorption cost would be closest to: A) 144.5% B) 8.0% C) 34.3% D) 34.9% Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 Level: Medium Solution: The unit product cost is: Direct materials........................................................................ Direct labor.............................................................................. Variable manufacturing overhead............................................ Fixed manufacturing overhead ($1,314,500 55,000 units)... Unit product cost...................................................................... $12.5 0 13.10 3.80 23.90 $53.3 0
Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] = [(8% $200,000) + ($2.50 55,000 + $869,000)] [$53.30 55,000] = 34.9%
A-15
A-16
A-17
A-18
30. Aldose Candy Company is implementing a target costing approach for its latest new product, the Big Glob candy bar. The following information relates to the Big Glob project: Target cost per candy bar....................................... Expected annual sales (in units) of candy bars...... Required investment in additional assets............... Desired return on investment................................. $0.30 400,000 $800,00 0 20%
Based on this information, what is Aldose's target selling price per bar for the Big Glob? A) $0.46 B) $0.50 C) $0.55 D) $0.70 Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 3 Level: Medium
A-19
32. Hanisch Corporation would like to use target costing for a new product it is considering introducing. At a selling price of $22 per unit, management projects sales of 50,000 units. The new product would require an investment of $400,000. The desired return on investment is 14%. The target cost per unit is closest to: A) $22.00 B) $23.80 C) $20.88 D) $25.08 Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 3 Level: Easy
A-20
33. A new product, an automated crepe maker, is being introduced at Knutt Corporation. At a selling price of $59 per unit, management projects sales of 70,000 units. Launching the crepe maker as a new product would require an investment of $500,000. The desired return on investment is 12%. The target cost per crepe maker is closest to: A) $59.00 B) $66.08 C) $58.14 D) $65.12 Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 3 Level: Easy Solution: Projected sales (70,000 units $59 per unit)............... Less desired profit (12% $500,000)......................... Target cost for 70,000 units......................................... Target cost per unit ($4,070,000 70,000 units)......... $4,130,00 0 60,000 $4,070,00 0 $58.14
A-21
$1,360,80 0
The company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing described in the text. The pricing calculations are based on budgeted production and sales of 56,000 units per year. The company has invested $400,000 in this product and expects a return on investment of 12%. Direct labor is a variable cost in this company. 34. The markup on absorption cost is closest to: A) 25.0% B) 114.2% C) 26.4% D) 12.0% Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 Level: Medium Solution: The unit product cost is: Direct materials........................................................................ Direct labor.............................................................................. Variable manufacturing overhead............................................ Fixed manufacturing overhead ($1,360,800 56,000 units)... Unit product cost...................................................................... Markup percentage on absorption cost $22.3 0 11.00 1.70 24.30 $59.3 0
A-22
A-23
Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] = [(12% $400,000) + ($1.70 56,000 + $733,600)] [$59.30 56,000] = [$48,000 + $828,800] $3,320,800 = 26.4% The target selling price is determined as follows: $59.3 Unit product cost............... 0 Markup--26.4%.................. Target selling price............ 15.66 $74.9 6
36. If every 10% increase in price leads to an 11% decrease in quantity sold, the profitmaximizing price is closest to: A) $74.10 B) $203.00 C) $201.51 D) $192.18 Ans: C AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking
A-24
A-25
A-26
A-27
A-28
A-29
Nance Company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing as described in the text. 43. Assume that the company uses a markup of 75% in order to determine selling prices. The selling price for one unit of product would be: A) $21.00 B) $26.25 C) $31.50 D) $35.00 Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 Level: Medium Solution: The unit product cost is: Variable production cost..................................................... Fixed manufacturing overhead ($200,000 40,000 units). Unit product cost................................................................. The target selling price is determined as follows: $15.0 Unit product cost............... 0 Markup--75%..................... 11.25 $26.2 Target selling price............ 5 $1 0 5 $1 5
A-30
Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] = [(25% $1,200,000) + ($2.00 40,000 + $120,000)] [$15 40,000] = [$300,000 + $200,000] $600,000 = 83.3%
A-31
Diewold Company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing as described in the text.
A-32
Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] = [(18% $1,500,000) + ($4.00 50,000 + $250,000)] [$24 50,000] = [$270,000 + $450,000] $1,200,000 = 60% 47. After introducing the new product, the company finds that it has excess capacity. A foreign dealer has offered to purchase 3,000 units at a special price of $26 per unit. This sale would not disturb regular business. If the special price is accepted on the 3,000 units, the company's overall net income for the year should: A) increase by $6,000 B) decrease by $48,000 C) decrease by $21,000 D) increase by $18,000 Ans: D AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 Level: Hard
A-33
A-34
Use the following to answer questions 50-52: The management of Musselman Corporation would like to set the selling price on a new product using the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing. The company's accounting department has supplied the following estimates for the new product: Direct materials............................................................... Direct labor..................................................................... Variable manufacturing overhead................................... Fixed annual manufacturing overhead............................ Variable selling and administrative expenses................. Fixed annual selling and administrative expenses.......... Per Unit $27 $16 $8 $3 $72,000 Total
$216,00 0
A-35
A-36
51. To the nearest whole percent, the markup percentage on absorption cost is: A) 25% B) 34% C) 15% D) 10% Ans: B AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking AICPA FN: Reporting LO: 2 Level: Easy Solution: The unit product cost is: Direct materials................................................................... Direct labor.......................................................................... Variable manufacturing overhead....................................... Fixed manufacturing overhead ($216,000 9,000 units)... Unit product cost................................................................. Markup percentage on absorption cost $2 7 16 8 2 4 $7 5
A-37
A-38
Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] = [(10% $1,305,000) + ($3.00 9,000 + $72,000)] [$75 9,000] = [$130,500 + $99,000] $675,000 = 34% The target selling price is determined as follows: Unit product cost............... $ 75 Markup--34%..................... 26 Target selling price............ $101 Use the following to answer questions 53-54: Wenner Corporation would like to use target costing for a new product it is considering introducing. At a selling price of $44 per unit, management projects sales of 10,000 units. The new product would require an investment of $900,000. The desired return on investment is 10%.
A-39
A-40
A-41
$429,00 0
The company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing as described in the text. The pricing calculations are based on budgeted production and sales of 33,000 units per year. The company has invested $100,000 in this product and expects a return on investment of 12%. Required: a. Compute the markup on absorption cost. b. Compute the selling price of the product using the absorption costing approach. c. Assume that every 10% increase in price leads to a 16% decrease in quantity sold. Assuming no change in cost structure and that direct labor is a variable cost, compute the profit-maximizing price.
A-42
Markup on absorption cost = [(12% $100,000) + ($1.80 33,000 + $495,000)] ($35.30 33,000) = [($12,000) + ($554,400)] $1,164,900 = 48.62% b. Target selling price = $35.30 + 48.62% $35.30 = $52.46 c. Price elasticity of demand = ln(1 + % change in quantity sold)/ln(1 + % change in price) = ln(1 + 16%)/ln(1 + 10%) = 1.83 Profit maximizing markup on variable cost = 1/(1 + ed) = 1/(1 + (1.83)) = 1.2058 Profit-maximizing price = (1 + Profit-maximizing markup on variable cost)*Variable cost per unit = (1 + 1.2058)*$24.10 = (2.2058)*$24.10 = $53.16 AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking LO: 1; 2 Level: Hard AICPA FN: Reporting
A-43
59. Pasley Corporation recently changed the selling price of one of its products. Data concerning sales for comparable periods before and after the price change are presented below. Selling Price $78.00 $82.00 Unit Sales 6,500 6,060
The product's variable cost is $22.10 per unit. Required: b. a Compute the product's price elasticity of demand as defined in the text. d. Compute the product's profit-maximizing price according to the formula in the text.
A-44
60. Robak Corporation manufactures a product that has the following costs: Direct materials...................................................... Direct labor............................................................ Variable manufacturing overhead.......................... Fixed manufacturing overhead.............................. Variable selling and administrative expenses........ Fixed selling and administrative expenses............. Per unit $15.40 $17.90 $1.20 $2.00 $919,60 0 Per year
$580,80 0
The company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing as described in the text. The pricing calculations are based on budgeted production and sales of 44,000 units per year. The company has invested $160,000 in this product and expects a return on investment of 13%. Required: a. Compute the markup on absorption cost. b. Compute the selling price of the product using the absorption costing approach.
A-45
Markup on absorption cost = [(13% $160,000) + ($2.00 44,000 + $919,600)] ($47.70 44,000) = [($20,800) + ($1,007,600)] $2,098,800 = 49.00% b. Target selling price = $47.70 + 49.00% $47.70 = $71.07 AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking LO: 2 Level: Medium AICPA FN: Reporting
61. The management of Landstrom Corporation would like to set the selling price on a new product using the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing. The company's accounting department has supplied the following estimates for the new product: Direct materials............................................................... Direct labor..................................................................... Variable manufacturing overhead................................... Fixed annual manufacturing overhead............................ Variable selling and administrative expenses................. Fixed annual selling and administrative expenses.......... Per Unit $28 $12 $9 $4 $30,000 Total
$132,00 0
Management plans to produce and sell 6,000 units of the new product annually. The new product would require an investment of $1,036,200 and has a required return on investment of 10%. Required: a. Determine the unit product cost for the new product. b. Determine the markup percentage on absorption cost for the new product. c. Determine the target selling price for the new product using the absorption costing
A-46
A-47
b. Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] = [(10% $1,036,200) + ($4.00 6,000 + $30,000)] [$71 6,000] = 37% c. The target selling price is determined as follows: $71.0 Unit product cost............... 0 Markup--37%..................... 26.27 $97.2 Target selling price............ 7 AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking LO: 2 Level: Easy AICPA FN: Reporting
A-48
b. Markup percentage on absorption cost = [(Required ROI Investment) + Selling and administrative expenses] [Unit product cost Units sales] = [(10% $110,500) + ($4.00 1,000 + $9,000)] [$65 1,000] = 37% c. The target selling price is determined as follows: $65.0 Unit product cost............... 0 Markup--37%..................... 24.05 $89.0 Target selling price............ 5 AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking LO: 2 Level: Easy AICPA FN: Reporting
A-49
64. The management of Thebeau, Inc., is considering a new product that would have a selling price of $72 per unit and projected sales of 40,000 units. The new product would require an investment of $600,000. The desired return on investment is 19%. Required: Determine the target cost per unit for the new product. Ans: Projected sales (40,000 units $72 per unit).............. Less desired profit (19% $600,000)......................... Target cost for 40,000 units......................................... Target cost per unit ($2,766,000 40,000 units)........ AACSB: Analytic AICPA BB: Critical Thinking LO: 3 Level: Easy $2,880,00 0 114,00 0 $2,766,00 0 $69.15
A-50
A-51