I.

Testing Normality for scores at class A

Example:

A lecturer was recapitalize test scores of learners. The total number of learners is 100
people. He make a frequency table to see how much value obtained by learners. But before, he
wanted to test normality of the data obtained

Solution:

Testing Hypotheses
Ho : Data is from normal distribution

H1 : Data is not from normal distribution

Score Students
s
28-35 2
36-43 5
44-51 9
52-59 14
60-67 12
68-75 13
76-83 15
84-91 19

92-99 11

Total 100
Using Chi-Square
N
Kelas- Interval xi xi2 fi fixi fixi2
o
31,
1 28-35 992.25 2 63 1984.5
5
39,
2 36-43 1560.25 5 197.5 7801.25
5
47,
3 44-51 2256.25 9 427.5 20306.25
5
55,
4 52-59 3080.25 14 777 43123.5
5
63,
5 60-67 4032.25 12 762 48387
5
6 68-75 71, 5112.25 13 929.5 66459.25
 5
79,
7 76-83 6320.25 15 1192.5 94803.75
5
87,
8 84-91 7656.25 19 1662.5 145468.8
5
95,
9 92-99 9120.25 11 1050.5 100322.8
5
10
Total 7062 528657
0
Calculate the mean
x́=
∑ f i. x i x́= 7062 =70.62
∑ fi 100
Calculate the standard deviation
2
N ∑ f X i 2− ( ∑ f X i )
S=
√ N ( N−1)
2
100(528657)−( 7062 )
S=
√ 100 x 99
52865700−49871844
S=
√
2993856
9900
S=
√
9900
=17.3

Make a frequency distribution table

Z for
Limit of limit of Luas O- Large of Frekuensi yang Observation
X2
Class (x) class Z Interval Class diharapkan (Ei) Frequency (Oi)

27.5 -2.49 0.4936

35.5 -2.03 0.4778 0.0158 1.58 2 0.112
43.5 -1.57 0.4418 0.036 3.6 5 0.544
51.5 -1.11 0.3665 0.0453 4.53 9 4.411
59.5 -0.64 0.2389 0.1276 12.76 14 0.121
67.5 -0.18 0.0714 0.1675 16.75 12 1.347
75.5 0.28 0.1103 0.1817 18.17 13 1.471
83.5 0.74 0.2704 0.1601 16.01 15 0.064
91.5 1.21 0.3869 0.1165 11.65 19 4.637
99.5 1.67 0.4525 0.0656 6.56 11 3.005
TOTAL 100 15.711
Where:
 lim ofclass −x
z=
s

Ei = Large Each of Class Interval ¿ n.

2 (Oi −Ei )2
k
χ =∑
i=1 Ei
χ 2 =15 .711
2 2 2
With significant value so χ table = χ (1-α)(k-3) = χ (0,95)(97) = 124,3. From this
2 2
calculation, we know that χ calculation < χ table so H0 accepted. The conclusion is sample is
from normal distribution.
Analysis using SPSS

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

Name N Percent N Percent N Percent

Value Students 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

Descriptivesa

Name Statistic Std. Error

Value Students Mean 70.6100 1.71987

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 67.1974

Mean
Upper Bound 74.0226

5% Trimmed Mean 70.9222

Median 73.0000

Variance 295.796

Std. Deviation 1.71987E1

Minimum 34.00

Maximum 99.00

Range 65.00

Interquartile Range 29.75

 Skewness -.204 .241

Kurtosis -.875 .478

Tests of Normalityb

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Name Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Value Students .089 100 .051 .968 100 .016

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

b. There are no valid cases for Value when Name = .000. Statistics cannot be computed for this
level.

We can see the results of SPSS analysis by Kolmogorov-Smirnov significance level> 0.05
ie 0.051 but for the Shapiro-Wilk stated significance level< 0.05 is 0.016. We ca use analysis by
Kolmogorov-Smirnov. The criteria receipt of H0 if the level of significance> 0.05. So in this
case H0 received stated that the sample data derived from a normal distribution population.

II. Testing Normality and Homogenity of two samples(Class A and Class B)

Example:
A lecturer was to compare the value of class A and class B. Lecturers gave equal treatment
to each class, and then recapitalize the value. Now the lecturer will conduct normality test of the
value of both classes.
Solution:
Testing Hypotheses of class A
Ho : Data is from normal distribution Data of statistics score in Class A
H1 : Data is not from normal distribution
Score Students
30 - 39 2
40 - 49 5
50 - 59 8
60 - 69 8
70 - 79 11
80 - 89 11
90 - 99 5
Total 50
Testing Hypotheses of class B
Ho : Data is from normal distribution
H1 :Data is not from normal distribution

Data of statistics score in Class B

 Score Student
30 - 39 2
40 - 49 7
50 - 59 6
60 - 69 8
70 - 79 11
80 - 89 9
90 - 99 7
Total 50
Calculation Data for Class A ( using Chi-Square)

No Kelas- Interval xi xi2 fi fixi fixi2

1 34.5 1190.25 69 2380.5
30 - 39 2
2 44.5 1980.25 222.5 9901.25
40 - 49 5
3 54.5 2970.25 436 23762
50 - 59 8
4 64.5 4160.25 516 33282
60 - 69 8
5 74.5 5550.25 819.5 61052.75
70 - 79 11
6 84.5 7140.25 929.5 78542.75
80 - 89 11
7 94.5 8930.25 472.5 44651.25
90 - 99 5
Total 50 3465 253572.5
Calculation for mean
x´A=
∑ f i . x i x́ = 3465 =69.3
∑ f i A 50
Calculation for standard deviation
2 2

sA =
√
N ∑ f X i −( ∑ f X i )
N (N −1)
2
50( 253572.5)−( 3465 )
sA =
√ 50 x 49
12678600−12006225
sA =
√ 2450
672375
sA =
√ 2450
=16.56

Make a frequency distribution table

Limit of Z for Luas O- Large of Frekuensi Obsevation X2
Class (x) limit of Z Interval yang Frequency
 class diharapkan
Class (Oi)
(Ei)
29.5 -2.40 0.4918
39.5 -1.80 0.4641 0.0277 1.39 2 0.268
49.5 -1.20 0.3849 0.0792 3.96 5 0.273
59.5 -0.59 0.2224 0.1625 8.13 8 0.002
69.5 0.01 0.0040 0.2264 11.32 8 0.974
79.5 0.62 0.2324 0.2284 11.42 11 0.015
89.5 1.22 0.3888 0.1564 7.82 11 1.293
99.5 1.82 0.4656 0.0768 3.84 5 0.350
TOTAL 50 3.176
Where:
lim of class −x
z=
s
Ei = Large Each of Class Interval ¿ n.

2 (Oi −Ei )2
k
χ =∑
i=1 Ei
χ 2 =3 .176
2 2 2
With significant value so χ table = χ (1-α)(k-3) = χ (0,95)(47) = 67.5. From this calculation, we
2 2
know that χ calculation < χ table so H0 accepted. The conclusion is sample of score statistics at
class A is from normal distribution.

Calculation Data for Class B ( using Chi-Square)

No Kelas- Interval xi xi2 fi fixi fixi2

1 30 - 39 34.5 1190.25 2 69 2380.5
2 40 - 49 44.5 1980.25 7 311.5 13861.75
3 50 - 59 54.5 2970.25 6 327 17821.5
4 60 - 69 64.5 4160.25 8 516 33282
5 70 - 79 74.5 5550.25 11 819.5 61052.75
6 80 - 89 84.5 7140.25 9 760.5 64262.25
7 90 - 99 94.5 8930.25 7 661.5 62511.75
Total 50 3465 255172.5
Calculation for mean
x́ B =
∑ f i . x i x́ = 3465 =69.3
∑ f i B 50
 Calculation for standard deviation
2 2

s B=
√
N ∑ f X i −( ∑ f X i )
N (N −1)
2
50 (255172.5)−( 3465 )
s B=
√ 50 x 49
12758625−12006225
s B=
√ 2450
752400
s B=
√ 2450
=17.52

Make a frequency distribution table

Z for limit Large of Obsevation
Limit of Luas O- Frekuensi yang
of class Interval Frequency X2
Class (x) Z diharapkan (Ei)
Class (Oi)
29.5 -2.27 0.4884
39.5 -1.70 0.4554 0.033 1.65 2 0.074
49.5 -1.13 0.3708 0.0846 4.23 7 1.814
59.5 -0.56 0.2123 0.1585 7.925 6 0.468
69.5 0.01 0.0040 0.2163 10.815 8 0.733
79.5 0.58 0.2190 0.215 10.75 11 0.006
89.5 1.15 0.3749 0.1559 7.795 9 0.186
99.5 1.72 0.4573 0.0824 4.12 7 2.013
TOTAL 50 5.294
Where:
lim of class −x
z=
s
Ei = Large Each of Class Interval ¿ n.

2 (Oi −Ei )2
k
χ =∑
i=1 Ei
χ 2 =5 .294
2 2 2
With significant value so χ table = χ (1-α)(k-3) = χ (0,95)(47) = 67.5. From this calculation, we
2 2
know that χ calculation < χ table so H0 accepted. The conclusion is sample of score statistics at
class B is from normal distribution.

III. Testing Homogeneity Class A and Class B

Example:
Now a professor of tests done before, lecturers will compare the value of kedual class and
will conduct a second test of homogeneity of data
Solution:
H0 : Population have the same variance
H1 : Population haven’t the same variance
NO Class A Class B
2 2
Nilai x i−x ( xi −x) Nilai (xi) x i−x ( xi −x)
(xi)
1 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
2 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
3 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
4 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
5 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
6 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
7 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
8 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
9 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
10 34 -30 900 34 -29.8 888.04
11 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
12 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
13 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
14 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
15 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
16 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
17 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
18 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
19 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
20 55 -9 81 54 -9.8 96.04
21 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
22 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
23 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
24 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
25 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
26 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
27 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
28 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
29 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
30 67 3 9 68 4.2 17.64
 31 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
32 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
33 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
34 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
35 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
36 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
37 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
38 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
39 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
40 76 12 144 76 12.2 148.84
41 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
42 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
43 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
44 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
45 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
46 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
47 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
48 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
49 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
50 88 24 576 87 23.2 538.24
Total 3200 0 17100 3190 -4.3x10-13 16888
Average 64     63.8    
Variance for Class A

2 ∑ ( x i−x )2 17100
s= = =384 . 9
n−1 49
Variance for Class B
2
2
s =
∑ ( x i−x ) 16888
= =344 . 6
n−1 49
Smallest Variance 384 . 9
F= = =1. 116
Bigget Variance 344 . 6
With significant value 0,05 dan v1 = v2 = 49 so Ftable is F(0,05)(49,49) = 1,61. The testing criteria
is H0 rejected jika F ¿ F(0,05)(49,49) , for others H0 daccepted. From calculation F = 1.116, while at
table = 1,60. It means that F < F (0,05)(49,49). So H0 is accepted. The conclusion is Population have
the same variance,
Analysis using SPSS
 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

Class N Percent N Percent N Percent

Value Class A 50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Class B 50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Descriptivesa

Class Statistic Std. Error

Value Class A Mean 70.7800 2.41159

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 65.9337

Mean
Upper Bound 75.6263

5% Trimmed Mean 71.1111

Median 73.5000

Variance 290.787

Std. Deviation 1.70525E1

Minimum 34.00

Maximum 99.00

Range 65.00

Interquartile Range 29.25

Skewness -.269 .337

Kurtosis -.828 .662

Class B Mean 70.4400 2.47702

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 65.4622

Mean
Upper Bound 75.4178

5% Trimmed Mean 70.7111

Median 71.5000

Variance 306.782

Std. Deviation 1.75152E1

Minimum 34.00

Maximum 99.00
 Range 65.00

Interquartile Range 29.50

Skewness -.149 .337

Kurtosis -.882 .662

a. There are no valid cases for Value when Class = .000. Statistics cannot be computed for this level.

Tests of Normalityb

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Class Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Value Class A .109 50 .188 .964 50 .127

Class B .081 50 .200* .969 50 .206

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

We can see the results for Class A of SPSS analysis by Kolmogorov-Smirnov significance
level> 0.05 ie 0.188 as well as the Shapiro-Wilk stated significance level> 0.05 is 0.127.
The criteria receipt of H0 if the level of significance> 0.05. So in this case H0 received
stated that the sample data of Class A derived from a normal distribution population.
Than see the results for Class B of SPSS analysis by Kolmogorov-Smirnov significance
level> 0.05 ie 0.200 as well as the Shapiro-Wilk stated significance level> 0.05 is 0.206.
The criteria receipt of H0 if the level of significance> 0.05. So in this case H0 received
stated that the sample data of Class B derived from a normal distribution population.

Test of Homogeneity of Variancea

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

Value Based on Mean .013 1 98 .910

Based on Median .024 1 98 .876

Based on Median and with

.024 1 97.998 .876
adjusted df

Based on trimmed mean .014 1 98 .905

a. There are no valid cases for Value when Class = .000. Statistics cannot be computed for
this level.
Test Criteria:
 Value Sig. Or significance or probability value <0.05, data derived from populations that have a
variance that is not the same.
 Value Sig. Or significance or probability value> 0.05, data derived from populations that have
the same variance.
In the output above shows that the level of significance or probability value of the mean
(average) which is above 0.05 (0.910 bigger than 0.05). So soundly if the basic measurement is
the median data, numbers Sig. Is 0.876, which is still above 0.05. So in this case H0 is accepted
and stated that these populations have the same variance.
IV. Testing Normality and Homogeneity of three samples
(Subject A, Subject B and Subject C)
Example:
A student recapitalize the value he can from the three eyes of different subjects. He made a
table for subject A, subject B and subject C Therefore, students will conduct the third test against
normality test data from three different subjects.

Solution:

Data for subject A Data for subject B Data for subject C

Testing Hypotheses of Testing Hypotheses of Testing Hypotheses of
class A class B class C
Ho : Data is from normal Ho : Data is from normal Ho : Data is from normal
distribution distribution distribution
H1 : Data is not from H1 : Data is not from H1 : Data is not from
normal distribution normal distribution normal distribution
Score Student Score Student
34-44 4 39-48 3
45-55 3 49-58 7
56-66 5 59-68 4
67-77 6 69-78 6
78-88 8 79-88 5
89-99 4 89-98 5
Total 30 Total 30
Score Student
34-44 2
45-55 6
56-66 7
 67-77 13
78-88 6
89-99 6
Total 40
Testing Normality for Subject A
No Kelas- Interval xi xi2 fi fixi fixi2
1 34-44 39 1521 4 156 6084
2 45-55 50 2500 3 150 7500
3 56-66 61 3721 5 305 18605
4 67-77 72 5184 6 432 31104
5 78-88 83 6889 8 664 55112
6 89-99 94 8836 4 376 35344
Total 30 2083 153749
Calculation for mean
x´A=
∑ f i . x i x́ = 2083 =69.4
∑ f i A 30
Calculation for standard deviation
2 2

sA =
√
N ∑ f X i −( ∑ f X i )
N (N −1)
2
30(153749)− ( 2083 )
sA =
√ 30 x 29
4612470−4338889
sA =
√ 870
273581
sA =
√ 870
=17.73

Make a frequency distribution table

Frekuensi
Z for limit Large of Obsevation
Limit of yang
of class Luas O-Z Interval Frequency X2
Class (x) diharapkan
Class (Oi)
(Ei)
33.5 -2.02 0.4783
44.5 -1.40 0.4192 0.0591 1.773 4 2.797
55.5 -0.78 0.2823 0.1369 4.107 3 0.298
66.5 -0.16 0.0636 0.2187 6.561 5 0.371
77.5 0.46 0.1772 0.2408 7.224 6 0.207
88.5 1.08 0.3599 0.1827 5.481 8 1.158
99.5 1.70 0.4554 0.0955 2.865 4 0.450
TOTAL 30 5.28176
Where:
lim of class −x
z=
s
Ei = Large Each of Class Interval ¿ n.

2 (Oi −Ei )2
k
χ =∑
i=1 Ei
χ 2 =5 .28176
2 2 2
With significant value so χ table = χ (1-α)(k-3) = χ (0,95)(27) = 40.1. From this calculation, we
2 2
know that χ calculation < χ table so H0 accepted. The conclusion is sample of score statistics at
subject A is from normal distribution.

Testing Normality for Subject B

No Kelas- Interval xi xi2 fi fixi fixi2
1 39-48 43.5 1892.25 3 130.5 5676.75
2 49-58 53.5 2862.25 7 374.5 20035.75
3 59-68 63.5 4032.25 4 254 16129
4 69-78 73.5 5402.25 6 441 32413.5
5 79-88 83.5 6972.25 5 417.5 34861.25
6 89-98 93.5 8742.25 5 467.5 43711.25
Total 30 2085 152827.5
Calculation for mean
x́ B =
∑ f i . x i x́ = 2085 =69.5
∑ f i B 30
Calculation for standard deviation
2 2

s B=
√
N ∑ f X i −( ∑ f X i )
N (N −1)
2
30 (152827.5)−( 2085 )
s B=
√ 30 x 29
4584825−4347225
s B=
√ 870
237600
s B=
√ 870
=16.52

Make a frequency distribution table

Limit of Z for limit Luas O- Large of Frekuensi Obsevation X2
 yang
of class Interval Frequency
Class (x) Z diharapkan
Class (Oi)
(Ei)
38.5 -1.88 0.4699
48.5 -1.27 0.3980 0.0719 0.993 3 0.329
58.5 -0.67 0.2486 0.1494 1.656 7 1.415
68.5 -0.06 0.0239 0.2247 2.589 4 1.115
78.5 0.54 0.2054 0.2293 3.369 6 0.112
88.5 1.15 0.3749 0.1695 4.098 5 0.001
98.5 1.76 0.4608 0.0859 4.278 5 2.278
TOTAL 30 5.251
Where:
lim of class −x
z=
s
Ei = Large Each of Class Interval ¿ n.

2 (Oi −Ei )2
k
χ =∑
i=1 Ei
χ 2 =5 .251
2 2 2
With significant value so χ table = χ (1-α)(k-3) = χ (0,95)(27) = 40.1. From this calculation, we
2 2
know that χ calculation < χ table so H0 rejected. The conclusion is sample of score statistics at
subject B is from normal distribution.

Testing Normality for Subject C

No Kelas- Interval xi xi2 fi fixi fixi2
1 34-44 39 1521 2 78 3042
2 45-55 50 2500 6 300 15000
3 56-66 61 3721 7 427 26047
4 67-77 72 5184 13 936 67392
5 78-88 83 6889 6 498 41334
6 89-99 94 8836 6 564 53016
Total 40 2803 205831
Calculation for mean
x´C =
∑ f i. x i x´ = 2803 =70.07
∑ f i C 40
Calculation for standard deviation
 2 2

sC =
√
N ∑ f X i −( ∑ f X i )
N (N−1)
2
40 (205831)− (2803 )
sC =
√ 40 x 39
8233240−7856809
sC =
√ 1560
376431
sC =
√ 1560
=15.53

Make a frequency distribution table

Frekuensi
Z for limit Large of Obsevation
Limit of yang
of class Luas O-Z Interval Frequency X2
Class (x) diharapkan
Class (Oi)
(Ei)
33.5 -2.35 0.4906
44.5 -1.65 0.4505 0.0401 1.203 2 0.528
55.5 -0.94 0.3264 0.1241 3.723 6 1.393
66.5 -0.23 0.0910 0.2354 7.062 7 0.001
77.5 0.48 0.1844 0.2754 8.262 13 2.717
88.5 1.19 0.3830 0.1986 5.958 6 0.000
99.5 1.90 0.4713 0.0883 2.649 6 4.239
TOTAL 40 8.878
Where:
lim of class −x
z=
s
Ei = Large Each of Class Interval ¿ n.

2 (Oi −Ei )2
k
χ =∑
i=1 Ei
χ 2 =8 . 878

2 2 2
With significant value so χ table = χ (1-α)(k-3) = χ (0,95)(37) = 55.8. From this calculation, we
2 2
know that χ calculation < χ table so H0 accepted. The conclusion is sample of score statistics at
subject C is from normal distribution.
V. Test Homogeneity of subject A, subject B, and Subject C
Example:
After testing normality tests, these students are now testing the homogeneity test of the
three data values obtained from three Subject
Solution:
To test the homogeneity by manual we use Barthlett testing
The step as follow
1) Formulating hypothesis
H0 : σ 12 = σ 22 = σ 32
H1 : σ 12 ≠ σ 22 = σ 32

σ 12 = σ 22 ≠ σ 32
2) Determine α and x2 of table, with df = n of sample population -1.
α = 5 %, df = 3-1= 2
X 2( 1−α ) (2)= X 2(0.95 )( 2)=5.99
3) Criteria of testing
X2 is accepted if X2 < 5.99
X2 is rejected if X2 ≥ 5.99
4) Statistics testing

 Find the mean ( x́ ) of each population, with the formula x́=

∑x
n
We now that nA = 30, nB = 30, nC = 40
From the calculation, we get:
x́ A=69.4
x́ B =69.5
x́ C =70.07
 Find the variants of each sample population, with with the formula:

s2=
∑ ¿ x− x́ ¿2
n−1
From the calculation :
 s2A = 314.35
s2B = 272.91
s2C = 241.18
 Make the table :
Sampl
(n-1) 1/(n-1) si 2 log si2 (n-1)*log si2 (n-1)*si2
e
1 29 0.034 314.35 2.497 72.425 9116.15
2 29 0.034 272.91 2.436 70.645 7914.39
3 39 0.025 241.18 2.382 92.911 9406.02
∑ 97 235.981 26436.560
So, the total variants for 3 sample population :

S2=
∑ (ni−1)S 2i = 26436.560 =272.54
∑ (n−1) 97
B = (log s2 ) ∑(n – 1)
= log (272.54). 97
= 236.23
X2 = ( ln 10 ) { B- ∑ (n - 1) log S2}
= 2.3026. (236.32 – 235.981)
= 0.78
5) Make conclusion
2 2
X < X (0.95 )( 2)
0.78 < 5.99, so H0 is accepted
So the data is homogeny

VI. Liliefors test

Example:
Another way to test the normality test is by using the method liliefors. In this case students
want to do a test for normality with liliefors method. He took one of its data, ie data values
subject B
Solution:
Ho : Data is from normal distribution
H1 : Data is not from normal distribution

Data f fkb xi −x F(x) S(x) T=F(x)- S(x) T=|F(x)-S(x)|

(Xi) 39 1 z= 0.030 S(x)S(x)
1 -1.87
s 0.0333 -0.0027 0.0027
46 2 3 -1.46 0.0726 0.1000 -0.0273 0.0273
49 2 5 -1.28 0.1007 0.1667 -0.0660 0.0660
54 2 7 -0.98 0.1637 0.2333 -0.0699 0.0699
55 1 8 -0.92 0.1784 0.2667 -0.0881 0.0881
57 1 9 -0.80 0.2115 0.3000 -0.0888 0.0888
58 1 10 -0.74 0.2282 0.3333 -0.1045 0.1045
64 2 12 -0.39 0.3498 0.4000 -0.0503 0.0503
67 2 14 -0.21 0.4177 0.4667 -0.0490 0.0490
70 1 15 -0.03 0.4886 0.5000 -0.0119 0.0119
73 1 16 0.15 0.5591 0.5333 0.0257 0.0257
74 1 17 0.21 0.5820 0.5667 0.0157 0.0157
76 3 20 0.33 0.6284 0.6667 -0.0386 0.0386
80 1 21 0.56 0.7131 0.7000 0.0138 0.0138
85 1 22 0.86 0.8058 0.7333 0.0722 0.0722
87 2 24 0.98 0.8365 0.8000 0.0366 0.0366
88 1 25 1.04 0.8506 0.8333 0.0175 0.0175
89 2 27 1.10 0.8648 0.9000 -0.0358 0.0358
97 2 29 1.57 0.9422 0.9667 -0.0243 0.0243
98 1 30 1.63 0.9483 1.0000 -0.0511 0.0511
Total 30 9
Average 70.5
Std. Dev 16.83
With compare the Lacoount with Ltable if Lacoount < Ltable, so Ho accepted. In our data the value of
Lacoount is 0.1045 and the value of Ltable (with df = n = 30 and significant level is 0.05 is 0.161).
because 0.1045 < 0.161, so Ho rejected and data is from normal distribution population.

Analysis SPSS
 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

Class N Percent N Percent N Percent

Value Subject A 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

Subject B 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

Subject C 40 100.0% 0 .0% 40 100.0%

Descriptivesa

Class Statistic Std. Error

Value Subject A Mean 70.9333 3.33078

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 64.1211

Mean
Upper Bound 77.7455

5% Trimmed Mean 71.4074

Median 76.0000

Variance 332.823

Std. Deviation 1.82434E1

Minimum 34.00

Maximum 99.00

Range 65.00

Interquartile Range 29.75

Skewness -.454 .427

Kurtosis -.835 .833

Subject B Mean 70.3667 3.11743

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 63.9908

Mean
Upper Bound 76.7425

5% Trimmed Mean 70.4630

Median 71.5000

Variance 291.551
 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

Class N Percent N Percent N Percent

Value Subject A 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

Subject B 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

Std. Deviation 1.70749E1

Minimum 39.00

Maximum 98.00

Range 59.00

Interquartile Range 32.25

Skewness -.040 .427

Kurtosis -1.099 .833

Subject C Mean 70.5500 2.67609

95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 65.1371

Mean
Upper Bound 75.9629

5% Trimmed Mean 70.8333

Median 71.5000

Variance 286.459

Std. Deviation 1.69251E1

Minimum 34.00

Maximum 99.00

Range 65.00

Interquartile Range 28.00

Skewness -.122 .374

Kurtosis -.643 .733

a. There are no valid cases for Value when Class = .000. Statistics cannot be computed for this level.
 Tests of Normalityb

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Class Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Value Subject A .143 30 .122 .945 30 .126

Subject B .104 30 .200* .958 30 .270

Subject C .062 40 .200* .977 40 .578

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

b. There are no valid cases for Value when Class = .000. Statistics cannot be computed for this
level.
We can see the results for Subject A of SPSS analysis by Kolmogorov-Smirnov
significance level> 0.05 ie 0.122 as well as the Shapiro-Wilk stated significance level> 0.05 is
0.126. The criteria receipt of H0 if the level of significance> 0.05. So in this case H0 received
stated that the sample data of Subject A derived from a normal distribution population.
Than see the results for Subject B of SPSS analysis by Kolmogorov-Smirnov significance
level> 0.05 ie 0.200 as well as the Shapiro-Wilk stated significance level> 0.05 is 0.270. The
criteria receipt of H0 if the level of significance> 0.05. So in this case H0 received stated that the
sample data of Class B derived from a normal distribution population.
We can see the results for Subject C of SPSS analysis by Kolmogorov-Smirnov
significance level> 0.05 ie 0.200 as well as the Shapiro-Wilk stated significance level> 0.05 is
0.578. The criteria receipt of H0 if the level of significance> 0.05. So in this case H0 received
stated that the sample data of Subject C derived from a normal distribution population.

Test of Homogeneity of Variancea

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

Value Based on Mean .264 2 97 .769

Based on Median .149 2 97 .861

Based on Median and with

.149 2 93.438 .861
adjusted df

Based on trimmed mean .252 2 97 .777

Test Criteria:
 Value Sig. Or significance or probability value <0.05, data derived from populations that have
a variance that is not the same.
 Value Sig. Or significance or probability value> 0.05, data derived from populations that have
the same variance.
In the output above shows that the level of significance or probability value of the mean
(average) which is above 0.05 (0.769 bigger than 0.05). So soundly if the basic measurement is
the median data, numbers Sig. Is 0.861, which is still above 0.05. So in this case H0 is accepted
and stated that these populations have the same variance.