Your Doctor Is A Liar! CHOLESTEROL DOES NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE!

Your Doctor
Is A Liar!
Learn the truth about “cholesterol”
BEFORE YOUR DOCTOR KILLS YOU!
(or someone you love!)

The TRUTH is...
Everything that your doctor has told you
about “cholesterol” is absolutely wrong!
Absolutely all of the concern about
“cholesterol” is a monumental lie!
Despite what your doctor says, eating MORE

CHOLESTEROL will actually improve your health!
The so-called bad “cholesterol” (LDL)

is NOT the cause of heart disease!
The medical/pharmaceutical establishment has secretly changed

the meaning of the word “cholesterol” without informing you!
The CHOLESTEROL listed on food packages
has a completely different meaning than the “cholesterol”
that your doctor claims to measure in your blood!
Your test results for HDL and LDL

do not add up to your total “cholesterol”!
They never do! Look at your test results and see!
Statin drugs such as Lipitor, Crestor, etc.,

do NOT prevent heart disease or heart attacks!
They say so right in their own advertisements!
High “cholesterol” levels reflect fundamental

nutritional imbalances that can be improved
by simple dietary changes, but your doctor is
giving you exactly the wrong dietary advice!
Your Doctor Is A Liar!

They are putting your life at risk
and they are ripping you off at the same time!
Are you brave enough to learn the truth?
READ THIS BOOK!
$23.95
www.your doctorisaliar.com
Hi, my name is James Paul Roguski. I am the author of the book
Your Doctor Is A Liar! I do not have a personal story of illness
and/or suffering. I am simply a “regular guy” who has (thankfully)
awakened from the illusions presented by the media. I have seen
through the lies that are told every day by the members of the
medical and pharmaceutical establishment and I can no longer hold
in the disgust that I feel for the despicable and barbaric practices
that are performed with impunity every day by medical doctors,
physicians, surgeons and pharmacists. I have been forced by my
inner spirit to share the insights with which I have been blessed,
with all who care to listen. Thank you for venturing this far.
If you downloaded the E-Book version from the website

www.yourdoctorisaliar.com, please feel free to print it out and share
it with everyone you know. You have my permission to make as
many copies and/or to send it digitally to everyone you know.
Heck, you have my permission to email it to everyone on earth!
After you have read (and re-read) this book, please do not let it just
collect dust on your bookshelf. The information contained within
this book is so vital to your health, and to the health of your loved
ones, that I humbly request that you please make it a point to share
this book with as many people as possible. Please give this book
to someone that you care about. You may very well save their life!
May your life be long and healthy.

.
In a Nutshell
For those of you with very short attention spans, here is the
“Cliffs Notes” version of the contents of this book...
• Your Doctor Is A Liar!

Don’t believe a single word that they say.
• CHOLESTEROL does NOT cause heart disease.

Stop worrying about your “cholesterol” levels.
• All prescription drugs and all over the counter drugs

are poisons that cause serious side effects.
Just say NO to all drugs.
• Drugs that lower your “cholesterol” do NOT prevent

heart disease or heart attacks! Even the drug
companies publicly admit this.
• Find a qualified “natural” health expert. Find a good

naturopathic, homeopathic, chiropractic or Oriental
herbal/acupuncture practitioner to guide you towards
better health. (Throughout this book, when I use the
word “doctor”, I am referring to a Western-style
medical doctor or M.D.)
• If you want to avoid heart disease, alter your diet to

eat the way people ate hundreds of years ago when
there was NO heart disease. Eat more protein.
Eat more foods that contain CHOLESTEROL such
as eggs, butter, cream, red meat and organ meats.
Eat more foods that contain Vitamin C and Copper.
Stop eating sugar. Stop eating processed foods.
In a Nutshell
(continued)
• Avoid processed oils (soybean, canola, corn, etc.)

hydrogenated oils, partially hydrogenated oils and
any food that is prepared in a heated oil that may
contain these toxic “foods” as if they were the plague!
(They are!)
• As a bare minimum, take the following nutritional

supplements on a regular basis...
Multiple Vitamin
Multiple Mineral (including magnesium and copper)
Multiple Essential Fatty Acid (EFA)
Vitamin C
Gelatin/Collagen/Protein supplement
• Get your natural doctor to check your insulin level

(not blood sugar, not glucose, INSULIN). It should
be 10mU/ml or less. If it is higher than that, then you
need to eat less of everything and you definitely need
to eat less sugar and fewer carbohydrates.
• Tell your medical doctor(s) to take their “cholesterol”

tests, their “cholesterol” lowering drugs and their
reduced CHOLESTEROL diets and tell them to go
straight to hell! Their beliefs are based on faulty
statistical analysis, their drugs are poisonous and their
advice does not work!
The following pages provide a thought-provoking array of
statements that have been made by various people who, like me,
have recognized that the so-called “cholesterol” problem is not a
health problem at all. It is a scam of extra-ordinary proportions
that has already cost the American public TRILLIONS of dollars
and has already caused MILLIONS of innocent people to lose their
lives well before their time.
CHOLESTEROL DOES NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE!
and
LOWERING YOUR “CHOLESTEROL”

DOES NOT HELP YOU TO LIVE LONGER
Anyone who attempts to tell you that it does is either lying to you
or has been brainwashed by someone who lied to them.
The only problem is that YOU haven’t seen any of the factual
information contained in this book. The medical/pharmaceutical
industry is designed to receive a huge financial reward when you
get sick, so they are working very, very hard to keep this
information hidden. Instead of telling you the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, they are endeavouring to make you
believe that you are ill so that they can prescribe deadly, poisonous
drugs and recommend surgical procedures that are known to be
ineffective. There is ample evidence that clearly contradicts the
“prevailing wisdom” about “cholesterol” and its relationship to the
heart disease plague. After you finish reading this book, you will
understand your health a little bit better and hopefully, you will
also awaken to the TRUTH that...
YOUR DOCTOR IS A LIAR!

.
“The level of one’s blood ‘cholesterol’ is, at best, nothing more
than an extremely rough indication of a great many different
disease conditions. To alter one’s life-style as a consequence of
this particular laboratory test may well cause more trouble than
it could relieve... if you have come to believe that you can ward
off death from heart disease by altering the amount of
‘cholesterol’ in your blood, whether by diet or by drugs, you are
following a regimen that still has no basis in fact. Rather, you
have been taken in by certain commercial interests and health
groups who are more interested in your money than your life.”
Edward R. Pinckney
Former co-editor of
The Journal of the American Medical Association
“The public is so brainwashed, that many people believe that the

lower your ‘cholesterol’, the healthier you will be or the longer
you will live. Nothing could be further from the truth...
The ‘cholesterol’ cartel of drug companies, manufacturers of
low-fat foods, blood testing devices and others with huge vested
financial interests have waged a highly successful promotional
campaign. Their power is so great that they have infiltrated
medical and governmental regulatory agencies that would
normally protect us from such unsubstantiated dogma. Statin
drugs have been aggressively promoted by the pharmaceutical
industry and medical opinion leaders. The new guidelines were
not written by disinterested scientists, but by members of the
medical community who have received major grants from the
pharmaceutical industry. The recommendations are based on
distorted statistical analysis of relative risk reduction that mislead
doctors and the public.
They are designed to turn healthy people into patients!”
Paul Rosch
Clinical Professor of Medicine and Psychiatry
New York Medical College
“What you believe about heart disease is about to change.
Many Americans, including medical scientists, have a one-track
mind when it comes to the condition. In the past, fats and
CHOLESTEROL in the diet were blamed for causing heart
disease. But years of medical research have produced NO
convincing evidence that these components of foods actually
cause hardening of the arteries. The millions of research dollars
spent trying to prove the ‘cholesterol’ theory have all come
up empty handed. The idea that CHOLESTEROL causes
arteriosclerosis has been touted, researched and publicized for so
many years that, until recently, only a few people questioned it.
The truth is that the ‘cholesterol’ theory has never been proven.
All the attempts to prove a connection between the
CHOLESTEROL we eat and the risk of heart disease have failed.
Eating a CHOLESTEROL-rich diet doesn’t cause heart disease,
and measuring blood levels of ‘cholesterol’ fails to predict heart
disease in most of those who have it. In fact, scientists
have proven that pure CHOLESTEROL does NOT cause
arteriosclerosis and that elevation of blood ‘cholesterol’ is a
symptom - not a cause - of heart disease. Most people who get
heart disease have normal ‘cholesterol’ levels in their blood.
Unfortunately you never read about that in the paper because too
much is invested in the ‘cholesterol’ theory. Scientists don’t want
to admit they’re wrong after all the time and money spent trying
to prove that ‘cholesterol’ was killing us. But this approach isn’t
working. Heart disease is still the number one cause of death in
the United States. The eighty-five year reign of the ‘cholesterol’
theory of heart disease is coming to an end. Our thinking has to
change. There is a way to prevent heart disease and to achieve a
longer, healthier life. Heart disease is caused by modern
processed food and the way to prevent the disease is to improve
the quality of your diet. What the average American eats in one
day - cereal for breakfast, a doughnut and coffee midmorning,
cold cuts on white bread for lunch, potato chips and soda as a
continued...
snack, and a burger and fries for dinner, followed by a double
swirl soft serve ice cream cone - is a stomach turning proposition.
Even health-conscious eaters who use skim milk on their cereal,
replace the doughnut with a plain bagel, eat nonfat pretzels
instead of chips, have pasta for dinner and eat fat-free frozen
yogurt with cookies for dessert, all in the name of good nutrition,
are fooling themselves. If we ate what our bodies needed, heart
disease would be as rare as it is in unindustrialized parts of the
world. The official dietary recommendations made by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute; and the American Heart Association lead us to believe
that eating a ‘balanced diet’ in line with the Food Pyramid will
provide all the nutrients we need. This simply is not true.
The demonization of fats has also led to the low-fat diet craze that
has swept the United States and enticed us to eat more refined
carbohydrates instead of complex carbohydrates from fruit and
vegetables. By eating low-fat foods filled with sugar and white
flour and snacking on highly processed, high calorie foods
depleted of all nutrients, Americans are depriving themselves of
vitamins, minerals, fiber, essential oils and phytochemicals that
are needed to prevent disease. These are more than just bad
habits - the way we eat is causing a disease epidemic.
We’re killing ourselves with our food. Recognizing that our
unhealthy diet can lead to disease, and realizing that we can use
our food choices to prevent disease, are the first steps in making
change. All you have to do is improve your diet. The simplest part
is figuring out what to eat. The only hard part is ignoring what
the health establishment has drilled into our heads about the
supposed culprits. The real villains are processed foods,
especially refined carbohydrates, that are depleted of the vitamins
our bodies need to prevent disease. With a more balanced and
nutritious diet, the mid-twentieth century epidemic of heart
disease can become a distant memory.
Kilmer S. McCully, M.D.

Author of “The Heart Revolution”
“There is no nutritional substance as controversial as
CHOLESTEROL, and no substance about which there is more
confusion. There is no other substance as widely publicized by
the medical profession - and no bigger health scandal.
‘Cholesterol’ can strike terror into the minds of misinformed
people. The ‘cholesterol’ scare is big business for doctors,
laboratories, and drug companies. It is also a powerful
marketing gimmick for vegetable oil and margarine
manufacturers who can advertise their products to be
‘cholesterol-free.’”
Udo Erasmus, PhD.
Author of “Fats that Heal, Fats That Kill”
“The idea that saturated fats cause heart disease is completely

wrong, but the statement has been published so many times over
the last three or more decades that it is very difficult to convince
people otherwise unless they are willing to take the time to read
and learn what all the economic and political factors were that
produced the anti-saturated-fat agenda. Blood ‘cholesterol’
levels between 200 and 240 mg/dl are normal. These levels have
always been normal. Many hundreds of thousands of people are
treated with expensive medications to prevent the development of
a non-existent illness. If the medications were only expensive and
not life threatening, their use could no doubt be shrugged off as
a harmless snake oil pharmaceutical scam; but, in fact, these are
thoroughly dangerous medications for both physical and
emotional reasons—for physical reasons because their use can
lead to serious untreatable diseases such as liver cancer, and for
emotional reasons because their use perpetuates the myth that
‘cholesterol’ is dangerous and evil. There is no need to worry
about your ‘cholesterol’ levels. This is a phony issue.”
Mary G. Enig, Ph.D.
President of the Maryland Nutritionists Association
“It is virtually impossible not to recognize that many researchers
routinely manipulate and/or interpret their data to fit
preconceived hypotheses, rather than manipulate hypotheses to
fit their data. Much of the literature, therefore, is nothing less
than an affront to the discipline of science... The current
campaign to convince every American to change his or her diet
and, in many cases, to initiate drug ‘therapy’ for life is based
on fabrications, erroneous interpretations and/or gross
exaggerations of findings and, very importantly, the ignoring of
massive amounts of unsupportive data.”
Russell L. Smith, Ph.D.
Author of “The Cholesterol Conspiracy”
“Clear your mind of the belief that ‘cholesterol’ causes heart

disease. Stop taking ‘cholesterol’ lowering medication.
‘Cholesterol’ lowering, without correcting underlying vitamin
deficiency, should be considered medical malpractice!”
Dr. Matthias Rath, M.D.
Author of “Why Animals Don’t Get Heart Attacks... But People Do!”
“The constant denigration of beef, animal fats, eggs, and

locally produced dairy foods like raw milk, cream, cheeses and
butter - all of which were once the products of small farms - has
no basis in science but powerful support from monopolistic grain
cartels, food processors, vegetable oil producers and pasteurized
dairy manufacturers. Health professionals generally ignore the
growing body of evidence that the ingredients of processed foods
- liquid and hydrogenated vegetable oils, refined sweeteners,
processed milk products, preservatives and artificial flavorings -
are the largest contributors to modern disease, especially heart
disease.”
Ron Schmid, N.D.
Author of “The Untold Story of Milk”
“Back in the early ‘80s, I was the leader of a group of top-level
nutritionists with the USDA who developed the eating guide that
became known as the Food Guide Pyramid. Carefully reviewing
the research on nutrient recommendations, disease prevention,
documented dietary shortfalls and major health problems of the
population, we submitted the final version of our new Food
Guide to the Secretary of Agriculture.
When our version of the Food Guide came back to us revised, we

were shocked to find that it was vastly different from the one we
had developed. As I later discovered, the wholesale changes
made to the Guide by the Office of the Secretary of Agriculture
were calculated to win the acceptance of the food industry. For
instance, the Secretary’s office altered wording to emphasize
processed foods over fresh and whole foods; it also hugely
increased the servings of wheat and other grains to make wheat
growers happy.
Where we, the USDA nutritionists, called for a base of 5-9

servings of fresh fruits and vegetables a day, it was replaced with
a paltry 2-3 servings (changed to 5-7 servings a couple of years
later because of an anti-cancer campaign by another government
agency, the National Cancer Institute, forced the USDA to adopt
the higher standard). Our recommendation of 3-4 daily servings
of whole grain breads and cereals was changed to a whopping
6-11 servings, forming the base of the Food Pyramid as a
concession to the processed wheat and corn industries.
Moreover, my nutritionist group had placed baked goods made
with white flour - including crackers, sweets and other low
nutrient foods laden with sugars and fats - at the peak of the
pyramid, recommending that they be eaten sparingly. To our
alarm, in the ‘revised’ Food Guide, they were now made part of
the Pyramid’s base. And, in yet one more assault on dietary
logic, changes were made to the wording of the dietary guidelines
from ‘eat less’ to ‘avoid too much’, giving a nod to the
continued...
processed food industry interests by not limiting highly profitable
‘fun foods’ (junk foods by any other name) that might affect the
bottom line of food companies.
I vehemently protested that the changes, if followed, could lead

to an epidemic of obesity and diabetes - and couldn’t be justified
on either health or nutritional grounds. To my amazement, I was
a lone voice on this issue, as my colleagues appeared to accept
the ‘policy level’ decision. Over my objections, the Food Guide
Pyramid was finalized. In the 25 years since the initial Food
Guide was developed, we face an unprecedented nutrition crisis.
A majority of Americans have poor quality diets and the rates of
diet related chronic diseases, from cancer, diabetes and heart
disease to digestive diseases and arthritis, are soaring. The latest
research blames commercial food ingredients, imbalanced diets,
excessive calories and too few nutrient and antioxidant rich
vegetables, fruits and whole grains.
Ultimately, the food industry dictates the government’s food

advice, shaping the nutrition agenda delivered to the public.
In fact, to the food industry, the purpose of food guides is to
persuade consumers that all foods (especially those that they’re
selling) fit into a healthful diet. The government readily
complies. How and why does the government allow this to
happen? As I learned from my days as a USDA nutritionist,
nutrition for the government is primarily a marketing tool to fuel
growth in consumer food expenditures and demand for major
food commodities. It’s an economics lesson that has very little to
do with our health and nutrition and everything to do with
making sure that food expenditures continue to rise for all
interests involved in the food industry.
It’s evident that the government can’t be relied upon to provide

objective, health promoting food and nutrition advice.”
Luise Light
Author of “Ketchup is Not a Vegetable”
“Many people consider the consumption of CHOLESTEROL,
in and of itself, to be a health hazard. This is not the case.
The risks associated with CHOLESTEROL intake have been
vastly overstated by the media and even by some health officials.
The CHOLESTEROL in our bodies is essential for good health.
It is a naturally present substance that our bodies need in order
to function properly, not a poison you ingest from the ‘wrong’
foods. The widespread perception, then, that the presence of
CHOLESTEROL in the human body is somehow intrinsically
harmful is a distortion of the truth. The way the foods we eat
affect our risk of heart disease is a subject that has been
wrenched out of context and profoundly exaggerated in recent
years. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute has
developed a National Cholesterol Education Program to increase
awareness of the importance of serum ‘cholesterol’ levels.
Unfortunately, this group has been the source of as much
exaggeration and misdirection as it has useful advice for
physicians and their patients. It is also worth noting that the
National Cholesterol Education Program’s ‘recommended’
maximum level of intake of dietary CHOLESTEROL
(300mg/day) is arbitrary and more or less meaningless from a
physiological standpoint. The figure does not represent any
demonstrated change in risk in any clinical study. For most of us,
the fact that a certain health recommendation receives
substantial news coverage and is the subject of an expensive
public awareness campaign is enough to convince us of the
validity of that position. Such trust is perhaps too easily placed.”
Frederick J. Stare, M.D.
Founder, Department of Nutrition
Harvard School of Public Health
Robert E. Olson, M.D.
Professor of Medicine, SUNY/Stony Brook
Elizabeth M. Whelan, Sc.D.
President, American Council on Science and Health
Authors of “Balanced Nutrition, Beyond the Cholesterol Scare”
“Saturated fats and CHOLESTEROL are not the cause of
coronary heart disease. That myth is the greatest scientific
deception of this century [the 1900s], perhaps of any century.”
Dr. George V. Mann, M.D.
Author of “Coronary Heart Disease, the Dietary Sense and Nonsense”
“There’s no connection whatsoever between CHOLESTEROL in

food and ‘cholesterol’ in blood. And we’ve known that all along.
CHOLESTEROL in the diet doesn’t matter at all unless you
happen to be a chicken or a rabbit.”
Ancel Keys, Ph.D.,
Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota (1997)
“The public has been told for many years that fats are bad.
In fact, we’ve known for thirty or forty years that that’s not
really true.”
Walter Willett
Chairman of the Department of Nutrition
“When I was in medical school in the mid 1980’s, we were taught

that atherosclerosis was an end stage condition, a disease that
everyone would get as they grew older. But that’s just not true.
The body is capable of healing itself. Damaged and blocked
vessels can open up and function normally again. We now know
that we have a choice regarding this disease. Atherosclerosis can
be prevented, brought to a halt and even reversed.”
Dr. John P. Cooke, M.D., Ph.D.
Author of “The Cardiovascular Cure”
“As one investment reporter put it, statin drugs ‘turn
cholesterol into money.’ Industry estimates put total annual
spending on statins at more than $22 billion. It is no wonder the
pharmaceutical companies are hyping these drugs.
Supporters are so enamored of statin drugs that some have even

proposed putting them in the water supply. Critics object that the
statins are another thalidomide story for the drug industry, with
ill effects not yet fully understood. The drug companies will tell
you that the likelihood of side effects from statins is low.
Nevertheless, many physicians who prescribe these drugs - and
their patients who use them - may tell you otherwise. In many
physicians’ practices (including my own), muscle aches and
weakness occur in approximately 30% of patients who take
statins. Like many of my colleagues, I have hundreds of patients
who, when they take a statin agent, develop annoying,
sometimes incapacitating, muscle aches and weakness that
abruptly stop when they discontinue use of the drug, and return
when drug use is resumed.
The fundamental flaws in focusing on ‘cholesterol’ and statin

agents are the perceptions that ‘cholesterol’ identifies hidden
heart disease and that lowering ‘cholesterol’ is the way to a future
free of heart attacks. Both perceptions are untrue. ‘Cholesterol’
can be high, low, or in between, but all too frequently fails to
shed light on this murky situation. ‘Cholesterol’ does not reliably
identify all people with hidden heart disease, nor does lowering
it cure you of heart disease. Many heart attacks still occur in
people with low ‘cholesterol’ levels, whether or not they take
‘cholesterol’ lowering drugs.
Really lowering your risk for heart disease

requires a dramatic shift in focus.”
William Davis, M.D.

Author of “Track Your Plaque”
“The analysis of the shortcomings of the ‘cholesterol’/fat
hypothesis concerning the genesis of arteriosclerosis clearly
indicates that this theory has outlived its usefulness. Indeed,
careful analysis of the data upon which this hypothesis is based
has revealed bias, selective use of data, conflict of interest, and
other irregularities of science, placing the whole concept
of plasma ‘cholesterol’ control in the realm of myth and
pseudoscience. Unfortunately, while the drug industry sends out
80,000 sales representatives to doctors’ offices, fills medical
journals with glossy advertising, and underwrites thousands of
seminars where doctors are paid to listen to lectures that are
really sales pitches for drugs, information about the true risks is
hard to find. Almost all of the information that doctors receive
about drugs comes straight from the pharmaceutical industry.
Even if a natural food or supplement is equally effective, a drug
company can’t make a big profit from it, so it will push a drug
instead.
CHOLESTEROL is perhaps the most important substance in our

lives, for we could not live without an abundant supply of it in
our bodies. The vital role of CHOLESTEROL in the human body
is indisputable. New evidence has surfaced that points to
nutritional factors other than CHOLESTEROL that may really
be our major public health enemy and that suggests our fifty year
war against ‘cholesterol’ has been misdirected. Elevated
‘cholesterol’ is not the problem we have been led to believe.
The annual toll of lives and serious side effects currently

sustained by hundreds of thousands of patients is a heavy and
unnecessary price to pay for faith misplaced.”
Dr. Duane Graveline, M.D.

Former NASA Flight Surgeon
Author of “Lipitor, Thief of Memory”
“CHOLESTEROL is a component of all human cell membranes;
the long term consequences of interfering with its synthesis and
the synthesis of related compounds are unknown.”
Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics
“It is characteristic of human nature that resentment rather than

curiosity is roused when we are advised that evidence dictates
long held beliefs or concepts are false. Debate on the role of
dietary CHOLESTEROL and animal fat in coronary heart
disease is intensifying. This viewpoint, promulgated widely in
both the lay and scientific press with almost religious fervour,
has been sufficiently forceful to develop CHOLESTEROL phobia
in the general public. However, it is implausible that
CHOLESTEROL, an essential metabolite and a constituent of
every cell in the body, could possibly be noxious at all blood
levels when it is also a precursor of vitamin D, steroid hormones
and bile acids and constitutes up to 17% of the dry weight of the
brain. On these grounds alone review of the evidence is
warranted for it is not possible that CHOLESTEROL or LDL
could be the principal CAUSAL factor of atherosclerosis. Risk
factors are only statistical associations and are not causal in any
sense. It is essential to realize that the causality is assumed and
not proven. Such imprecise use of English results in
misrepresentation and bad science. Scientific evidence for the
role of dietary fat and hypercholesterolemia in the causation of
atherosclerosis is seriously lacking... readers should be aware of
the unscientific nature of claims used to support it and see it as
little more than a pernicious bum steer.”
William E. Stehbens
Director of the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research
Professor at the Department of Pathology,
Wellington School of Medicine
“It may surprise you to know that practicing physicians have
been hearing about ‘cholesterol’ and Coronary Heart Disease
(CHD) the same way that you have, through the media. They
also don’t know the real facts. Both the public and the clinical
physicians have simultaneously been swamped by an ever-
growing tidal wave of exaggerations, distortions, and even
fabrications of the facts. The media blitz has been so successful
that nearly everyone is now thoroughly brainwashed.
The perpetrators of this state-of-affairs are principally the
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI),
the American Heart Association (AHA) and many of the medical
‘researchers’ who are financially supported by these agencies.
This alliance controls nearly all CHD research and disseminates
nearly all CHD information to the public. It literally steamrolls
over all who disagree and there are many medical researchers
who have been trampled in its path. If you control the money and
the media, negative findings are little more than irritants because
the public will never hear about them. It is NHLBI/AHA’s
version of George Orwell’s Newspeak. Biases are so
commonplace, they appear to be the rule, rather than the
exception. Such biases have enabled the NHLBI and AHA to
generate ‘positive’ results from masses of negative evidence
merely by stating that the literature is supportive. Conclusions
drawn by authors of such studies seem to be based on the need to
justify the money and many years devoted to these investigations,
rather than on the objective analyses of data. It is painfully
obvious in some instances that preconceived beliefs were to be
supported no matter how much the data had to be manipulated
and erroneously interpreted to achieve this end. Billions of
dollars are spent worthlessly and millions of lives are lost
prematurely because research funding agencies have disregarded
masses of scientific findings and fraudulently used public monies
to disseminate dogma and propaganda.”

“‘Cholesterol’ testing does not see or measure heart disease. In
fact, the total ‘cholesterol’ values of people who do and don’t
have a heart attack are about the same!”
Dr. John A. Rumberger, Ph.D, M.D.
Clinical Professor of Medicine, Ohio State University
“The great mass of people...

will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.”
Adolf Hitler
“Hitler did it. He was not the first, but he did it quite
successfully. ‘It’ being the big lie. He and his cohorts told it often
enough, and with official state backing, so that just about
everyone involved believed it. Government agencies and the
American Heart Association have literally forced a drastic
change in dietary habits with mostly manufactured evidence.
Those dietary changes, along with dangerous medicines, can
cause far more disease, disability and death than the illness they
are supposed to prevent.”
Cathey Pinckney and Edward R. Pinckney, M.D.
Authors of “The Cholesterol Controversy”
“The doctor is to be feared more than the disease.”

Latin proverb
“No illness which can be treated by the diet

should be treated by any other means.”
Moses Malmonides of Caldova
“I have come to recognize that the people who perpetuate the
‘cholesterol’ theory have done it by playing on our fears and our
weaknesses - much the same way terrorists behave. They take
our natural fear of dying and our reluctance to make major
changes in our lives and use them against us: They hype the
rising statistics about heart disease, then promise us that we can
make ourselves safe from it by taking a simple pill. These people
all stand to make a profit out of pushing the simplistic,
scientifically dubious idea that to avoid heart disease all you have
to do is avoid CHOLESTEROL in your diet and lower your blood
‘cholesterol’. Americans have been terrorized for almost half a
century by the activities of a group that has caused far more
damage than Osama bin Ladin’s Al Queda. I call these people
the Cholesterol Terrorists. They don’t deal in bombs or guns, but
in a much more dangerous subversive commodity: misleading,
oversimplified, and even downright untrue claims about your
most precious possession: your health. Their goal is to keep every
hospital bed filled, keep every surgery theater operating all the
time, to push every pill the drug companies can produce.
They are not out to make political points. They’re just out to
make money. Who are these terrorists? Your physician may be
one of them. As a doctor, he or she doesn’t make any money
if you’re so healthy that you never need medical services.
The family doctor is just the smiling front man for a much
larger group, a group that includes hospitals, insurance
companies, sue-happy malpractice lawyers, pharmaceutical
companies and even the big food producers. As long as the
public is kept uninformed about the facts of heart disease and the
fallacy of the ‘cholesterol’ theory, people will keep paying
through the nose for high priced prescription drugs rather than
taking their health into their own hands and taking effective steps
to reduce their risk of heart disease.”
Paul A. Stitt
Author of “The Real Cause of Heart Disease is NOT Cholesterol!”
“Half of all cardiac deaths occur in people with normal
‘cholesterol’ levels. Clearly, other factors are involved. Our
market-driven, advertising-shaped culture pushes sugar, fat and
salt laden foods that cause cardiovascular disease, then pushes
expensive prescription drugs to slow (but not reverse) the
damage. Drug companies control all of the major venues of
information for doctors. This control is accomplished: by a sales
force of 90,000 drug representatives who monitor doctors’
prescribing patterns from pharmacy printouts and carry slanted
information and freebies to doctors’ offices on a weekly basis;
by underwriting and influencing doctors’ conferences and the
majority of doctors’ continuing education; by making the PDR,
which is written by the drug industry, the book doctors use the
most to guide their medication decisions; by possessing the vast
majority of research money and filling medical journals with
studies designed as much for marketing purposes as for medical
progress; and by paying the salaries of more and more
academicians at our medical schools, thereby focusing research
and teaching on marketable drugs rather than on other issues of
scientific importance. The result is that for most disorders,
treatment means drugs. The pharmaceutical industry’s
dominance over information also means that you are not
likely to get a balanced viewpoint from most doctors today.
Our economic system is all about sales, not health. It is about
profits, not prevention, and you are the cash cow.”
Jay S. Cohen, M.D.
Author of “The Magnesium Solution for High Blood Pressure”
“Most people who suffer heart attacks have average ‘cholesterol’

levels. The fact is that one person can have a low ‘cholesterol’
number and be at grave risk for a heart attack, while someone
else with a higher figure will be fine.”
Dr. Arthur Agatston, Cardiologist
Author of “The Miami Beach Diet”
“High ‘cholesterol’ levels are NOT the cause of disease.
High levels of circulating ‘cholesterol’ are an attempt by the body
to fight free radicals. High blood ‘cholesterol’ levels are an
indicator of the presence of high levels of free radicals (such as
fungal mycotoxins, peroxides, petrochemicals and residue from
tobacco smoke for example); oxidant damage; and infestation of
the body with fungi or other pathogenic micro-organisms such as
bacteria or parasites. It is these high levels of toxins that result
in arterial damage and degenerative heart disease. Researchers
at the World Health Organization and elsewhere have found that
a diet of mostly refined carbohydrates increases the presence of
fungal mycotoxin blood levels, which in turn triggers the liver to
increase its production of circulating ‘cholesterol’. Most of the
body’s ‘cholesterol’ is produced by the body itself. In fact,
a deficiency in ‘cholesterol’ is associated with a higher risk for
cancer and immune disorders, including AIDS. This is because
the role of ‘cholesterol’ is a protective one, binding (chelating)
toxic mycotoxins in the blood. A natural foods diet will rid the
body of mycotoxins and free radicals and consequently lower
elevated ‘cholesterol’.”
The Encyclopedia of Natural Healing
“The theory that saturated fats and CHOLESTEROL clog

arteries has been effectively disproved by a number of highly
respected scientists from many nations. Butter consumption
dropped by more than two-thirds over the last century, but the
incidence of heart disease has skyrocketed. What has kept pace
with the rise of heart disease is our consumption of trans-fatty
acids, packaged foods, processed vegetable oils, carbohydrates
and refined sugar. I think you know where the blame should
land.”
Jordan S. Rubin
Author of “The Maker’s Diet”
“There is absolutely no evidence anywhere that normal
CHOLESTEROL floating around in the blood does any harm.
Drug company advertising for ‘cholesterol-lowering’ drugs gives
the impression that excessive ‘cholesterol’ in the blood simply
deposits itself on the artery walls, and that lowering ‘cholesterol’
levels stops that process. It would be nice if it was that simple,
but once again, the magic pill theory falls short. Another
‘cholesterol’ myth perpetuated by the drug companies is that
everyone with a total ‘cholesterol’ over 200mg/dL should be
concerned. This is blatantly false. While a ‘cholesterol-
lowering’ drug will usually do a very good job of lowering your
‘cholesterol’, there’s scant, if any, evidence that it will help you
live longer or reduce your risk of a heart attack. There are no
studies that show that women benefit from these drugs - all the
studies showing even marginal benefits have been done on men.
If the American public had even a clue of how destructive these
drugs are, they wouldn’t touch them. And don’t think this
is a revolutionary statement. There is a complete consensus
(or should we say lip service) among drug companies, physicians
and organizations such as the American Heart Association that
the first step in lowering ‘cholesterol’ should be a ‘vigorous’
attempt to improve diet and increase exercise. Sadly, few
physicians are following this advice, and drug company
advertising and marketing certainly doesn’t reflect it.
Here’s a question for the FDA: Where are the long-term studies
on these drugs? They didn’t exist when the drugs were approved.
These drugs have ominous side effects, especially when used on
a long-term basis. It’s well known that these drugs can cause
severe side effects and that long-term follow-up studies are sadly
lacking. The studies that do exist juggle numbers and play
with statistics to the point where the information becomes
meaningless.”
Earl L. Mindell, R. Ph., Ph.D.

Author of “Prescription Alternatives”
“The fact is that although heart disease is commonly portrayed as
largely caused by high ‘cholesterol’, 80% of the people who get
this disease have the same total and LDL ‘cholesterol’ levels as
those who don’t! A lot of people with ‘normal cholesterol’ are
getting heart disease. How is this compatible with the working
paradigm of heart disease and the treatment guidelines based
upon it?”
Thomas Yannios, M.D.
Author of “The Heart Disease Breakthrough”
“The public have been somewhat ‘brain-washed’ with the idea

that the road to lowering blood ‘cholesterol’ is the ideal, and
perhaps only, pathway to cardiovascular health. There is
an enthusiastic willingness of a physician to adopt a
pharmacological (drug) approach to the therapy of high blood
‘cholesterol’ and an equal willingness for the person with a high
blood ‘cholesterol’ to take this ‘apparent’ easy way out. Studies
have emerged which show that physicians may be apt to prescribe
synthetic ‘cholesterol-lowering’ drugs without exhausting the
possibility of more natural means. I believe that the focus on
‘cholesterol’ and cardiovascular risk has led to an unhealthy
preoccupation of reducing only one risk factor for premature
cardiovascular mortality... lowering ‘cholesterol’ alone without
consideration of other lifestyle or health concerns is not a worthy
objective. In recent years, drugs to lower ‘cholesterol’ have been
viewed erroneously as a panacea for reducing the risk of high
blood ‘cholesterol’ and plaque buildup in the arteries. Lowering
‘cholesterol’ by using synthetic lipid-lowering drugs without
including a nutritional program to improve general health is
neither safe nor cost-effective. Therapy that is targeted to just
lower ‘cholesterol’ is shortsighted or even foolish medicine.”
Stephen Holt, M.D.
“As a medicinal chemist, I discovered startling evidence
surrounding ‘cholesterol’ lowering drugs. Commercially they are
known as atorvastatin (Lipitor), fluvastatin (Lescol), lovastatin
(Mevacor), pravastatin (Pravachol), simvastatin (Zocor) and
rosuvastatin (Crestor). The belief that these drugs prevent heart
disease is undeniably false - but more importantly - dangerous.
Because of the gender and age bias among the statin drug trials,
one cannot conceivably use the statin drug trials to rationalize
prescribing them to women, the elderly, children or ethnic
groups. Prescribing statin drugs to any one of these groups is a
giant leap of faith - safety and effectiveness has not been shown
for any of these populations. If you are among any one of these
populations and taking a statin drug, you are a guinea pig!
It is neither logical nor scientifically sound to use the statin drug
trials in defense of lowering ‘cholesterol’ to prevent heart disease.
All statin drug trials from 1990 to 1999 suffered from age and
gender bias. There is no evidence from primary prevention trials
showing that ‘cholesterol’ lowering effects among women from
the use of statin drugs decreases mortality from heart disease.
The elderly have also been bamboozled. The ‘cholesterol’
lowering myth being spread by pharmaceutical companies
worldwide could rightfully be considered the deadliest health
myth in the history of mankind. With dollar signs in their eyes,
drug companies have launched a massive fear campaign about
‘cholesterol’. Medical doctors, drug manufacturers and
nutritional supplement companies make billions of dollars
browbeating us into believing that CHOLESTEROL is an enemy
to our bodies. This statement has been made with such
redundancy that it has handicapped health logic among some of
the most respected health experts in the world. Rather than
fear CHOLESTEROL, we need to fear the media campaign
against it. This campaign is very prevalent and here to stay.
CHOLESTEROL has been wrongfully convicted as the culprit in
heart disease. It deserves redemption.”
Shane Ellison, M. Sc.
Author of “Health Myths Exposed”
“Diagnosis of overt heart disease on the basis of lipid
(‘cholesterol’) levels alone is simply not feasable.”
Dr. William Kannel
Former Director of the Framingham Study
“I think that it is a mistake to get hung up on one particular value

of ‘cholesterol’ that would divide those at risk from those not at
risk.”
Dr. Antonio Gotto
Former President of the American Heart Association
“Most diseases are the result of medication which has been

prescribed to relieve and take away a beneficient and warning
symptom on the part of Nature.”
Elbert Hubbard
“Unfortunately, it is easier to believe a falsehood that has been

repeated a million times, than it is to believe the truth that you
have just encountered for the first time.”
Anonymous
“Doctors are just the same as lawyers.

The only difference is that lawyers merely rob you,
whereas doctors rob you and kill you too.”
Anton Chekhov
“Doctors will get off their pedestals

when patients get off their knees.”
Anonymous
.
Your Doctor
Is A Liar!
Learn the truth about “cholesterol”
BEFORE YOUR DOCTOR KILLS YOU!
(or someone you love!)
Written by:
James Paul Roguski
Published by:
(((((((((((((((((((((((((( o )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Under the Radar Publishing

((((((((((((((( o )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Under the Radar Publishing
Published by:
Under The Radar Publishing

2403 1/2 Gates Avenue
Redondo Beach, California 90278
International Standard Book Number 0-9764445-1-8

Visit the companion website to this book at:
www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
Contact the author (James Paul Roguski) directly at:

(310) 493-2332
Publishing History
Edition Date
First Edition October 25, 2005

No Copyright 2005 James Paul Roguski
No rights reserved.
This book may be reproduced in whole or in part and may be

transmitted in any form without permission of any kind. Any part
of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical,
photocopy, recording or other, without permission of any kind.
The whole point of this book is to expose the lies of the medical and
the pharmaceutical industries by sharing this information with as
many people as possible. Please feel free to copy and share this
book with everyone that you know and love. Their lives depend
upon it!
The material in this book is intended for education. It is also meant

to be construed as advice that is designed to help you keep yourself
healthy and balanced. It is not medical advice. It is health advice.
It is not designed to treat any dis-ease. By definition, all
pharmaceutical drugs are poisons that are designed to “treat” your
symptoms. On the contrary, the information in this book will show
you how to address the most fundamental needs shared by every
human being. It is far better to strive to maintain health rather than
to merely attempt to doctor up the symptoms of one’s disease. It is
suggested that you rely upon your body’s own inner wisdom as
your primary reference for the care and maintenance of your own
health.
You are encouraged to take full responsibility

for your own health and for your own actions.
.
The “Wallet-ectomy”
Original cover artwork provided by Don Faxon.
Don Faxon can be reached at

[email protected]
Prints are available at:

www.yourdoctoris aliar. com
.
Dedication
This book is dedicated to all of you brave souls who have already
had the guts to tell your medical doctors, your pharmacists, your
surgeons and your official government “authorities” that you no
longer need their diagnoses, their drugs, their procedures nor their
advice or assistance in maintaining your own health.
This book is dedicated to all of you brave souls who no longer need
an HMO, a doctor, a surgeon, a pharmacist, a cardiologist, an
internist, a dermatologist, etc., etc., to “manage your disease”
because you have figured out for yourself how to maintain the
health of your own body, heart, mind and spirit.
This book is dedicated to all you brave souls who have taken back
the innate responsibilities that ultimately reside within each
individual human being: The responsibility to take care of yourself;
The responsibility to listen to your own inner spirit; The
responsibility to live in accordance with the laws of Mother Nature;
The responsibility to take the time and put in the effort that is
necessary to understand how and why your own body functions;
The responsibility to pay attention to what you put in your mouth,
to what you breathe into your lungs and to what you rub onto your
skin.
This book is also dedicated to all of you who want to be brave

souls, but have been trapped by the lies that you have been told
every day of your life, in every country, in every state, in every
city in every medical center and in every medical doctor’s
examination room in the world. I dedicate this book to each and
every one of you who is striving to awaken from the nightmare of
“medical science” because you have finally realized that...

.
A very special thank you...
to my life partner,
for believing in me,

for encouraging me,
for helping me,
but most of all,
for simply being

the wonderful person
that you are.
Thanks Marissa.
I love you!
.
Table of Contents
The “C” Word i
Fraud iii
Introduction v
Your Doctor Is A Liar! 1
1 Mechanics, Firefighters &
Yellow Finger Syndrome 3
2 CHOLESTEROL Is NOT Guilty! 35
3 Why Does It Only Clog There? 79
4 The BIG Blood Clot Lie 115
5 The Biggest Lie Of All 125
6 What’s In A Name 131
7 Something Doesn’t Add Up! 141
8 What Is CHOLESTEROL, Really? 167
9 CHOLESTEROL Becomes... 181
10 Pick Your Poison (Actually, Don’t!) 239
11 Horror Stories 273
12 A New Theory For The Causation
Of Heart Disease in Human Beings 339
13 Deep Fried Death 349
14 Evil, Evil, Evil, Evil White Food 381
15 Vitamin C, Scurvy and Heart Disease 407
16 Collagen & Elastin 435
17 Copper 459
18 So, What Should I Do? 471
19 Recommended Reading 491
IT’S A JOKE...
Three doctors were on their way to a convention

when their car got a flat tire. They all got out of
the car to examine the tire.
The first doctor said, “I think that it’s flat.”
The second doctor examined it more closely and
said, “It sure looks like it’s flat.”
The third doctor squeezed the tire and said,
“It sure feels like it’s flat.”
All three doctors nodded their heads in
agreement. “We’d better run some tests!”
• • •
The phone at the nurses’ station rang. When the

nurse picked up the phone, the caller asked,
“Can you tell me how your patient, Mr. Smith is
doing?”
The nurse replied, “He’s getting better. In fact,
he’ll be ready to leave the hospital in a couple of
days. May I ask who is calling?”
The caller replied, “This is Mr. Smith.
The doctor won’t tell me anything!”
Your Doctor is a Liar! i
The “C” Word
In order for you, the reader, to be able to clearly identify

your doctor’s LIES, you must realize that the simple and
true scientific meaning of the word CHOLESTEROL has
secretly been changed.
Throughout this book, I have chosen to use two different

font styles to distinguish the different meanings that the word
CHOLESTEROL has been given. When I am referring to the
original, true meaning of the word CHOLESTEROL, I will
present it in capital letters
“A wise man hears one word with no quotation marks:
and understands two.” CHOLESTEROL. When I
Yiddish Proverb am referring to the
adulterated, deceptive form
of the word that your doctor uses when they are lying to you,
it will appear in lower case letters surrounded by quotation
marks: “cholesterol”.
I implore you. EVERY time you hear the “C” word come out
of your doctor’s mouth, STOP THEM IMMEDIATELY!!
A lie is about to be told. You can identify that lie (and
possibly prevent it) by demanding that your doctor specify
which version of the “C” word they are using. Personally,
I absolutely refuse to allow such deceptive phrases as “good
cholesterol”, “bad cholesterol”, “LDL cholesterol”, “HDL
cholesterol” or “total cholesterol” to even be uttered in my
presence without being challenged. Doing this is tiring, it is
frustrating and it should not be necessary, but it is, and it is
worth it because...

ii www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
CHOLESTEROL
(The true meaning)
CHOLESTEROL is a waxy substance that is found in

every membrane of every cell of the human
body, especially nerve and brain cells. CHOLESTEROL
is used by the body to make a large number of
very important hormones, including Vitamin D,
pregnenolone, progesterone, cortisol, aldosterone,
testosterone, and the estrogens. CHOLESTEROL is
absolutely vital for health. The numerical amount of
CHOLESTEROL listed on food packages refers to true
CHOLESTEROL.
“cholesterol”
(The made up version)
“cholesterol” = HDL + LDL + Triglycerides/5
This term is only used by the medical and

pharmaceutical industries. LDL and HDL are not found
in food. Triglycerides are absolutely, positively not
the same as CHOLESTEROL. Food that does not
contain any CHOLESTEROL can be (and is) converted
into triglycerides, which your doctor then deceitfully
refers to as “cholesterol”.
DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY YOUR DOCTOR’S

ABUSE OF THE LANGUAGE!
CHOLESTEROL ≠ “cholesterol”
Your Doctor is a Liar! iii
fraud: noun. 1. deceit or trickery perpetrated

for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest
advantage. 2. a particular instance of such deceit
or trickery. 3. something that is not what it
pretends to be. 4. a deceitful person. 5. imposter.
doctor: verb. 10. to tamper with, falsify.

13. to practice medicine.
Random House Webster’s College Dictionary

iv www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
IT’S A JOKE...
Before they admitted me to the hospital,

the doctor put me through a pretty lengthy
interview to find out what type of diseases
I could afford to have.
• • •
John: “Only last week they took my poor

brother off to the hospital for an operation.
Since the operation, he no longer has what he
had before he went into the hospital.”
Mary: “What did he have?”
John: “Ten thousand dollars!”
• • •
How many doctors does it take to screw in a

light bulb?
That depends. How good is the light bulb’s
medical coverage?
• • •
I’m not sure exactly what the doctor’s

Hippocratic oath is, but I think that it must be
a vow against poverty!
Your Doctor is a Liar! v
Introduction
vi www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
IT’S A JOKE...
A diabetic patient was in the hospital to have his

gangrenous left leg amputated. After the
surgery, the doctor came in to speak to the
patient.
DOCTOR: I’ve got some good news and some
bad news. The bad news is that I’m afraid we
amputated the wrong leg.
PATIENT: What? With bad news like that,
how could there be any good news?
DOCTOR: Well, it seems that we may be able
to save your left leg after all!
• • •
Why are doctors lousy kidnappers?

No one can read the ransom notes!
• • •
Why do nurses give Viagra to elderly male

patients in old folks’ homes?
To stop them from rolling out of bed!
• • •
What’s the difference between an oral

thermometer and a rectal thermometer?
The taste!
Your Doctor is a Liar! vii
The premise of this book may be shocking to some. Contrary to

“Authority”, contrary to “accepted public knowledge”, contrary to
everything that every medical official and every medical
practitioner has ever told you, and contrary to what “they say” and
what “everybody knows”, I am here to point out a very simple fact
that has been, at the very best, overlooked, and at the very worst,
has deliberately been hidden from the public. I am here to point out
that, in order for you to be healthier...
YOU NEED TO EAT MORE CHOLESTEROL !
I will try to state this as clearly as possible: CHOLESTEROL is

necessary for life. There is only one type of CHOLESTEROL.
There is absolutely nothing “bad” about CHOLESTEROL, in fact,
all CHOLESTEROL is good.
Without adequate levels of “All great truths begin
CHOLESTEROL, your health as blasphemies.”
will drastically deteriorate. In and George Bernard Shaw
of itself, an elevated level of
“cholesterol” does NOT CAUSE heart disease. Absolutely no
scientific study has ever been able to prove such a ridiculous
assertion. None. Never. Nada! In fact, there is ample evidence
to the contrary. If your doctor has frightened you by telling you
that you have elevated levels of “cholesterol” in your bloodstream,
then I suggest that you should tell your doctor to take their test
results and shove them up their ass, because...
Far from being a deadly killer, CHOLESTEROL is a life saver!

Please realize that the quick measurement of “cholesterol” that is
done in your doctor’s lab or at your pharmacy’s free “cholesterol”
screening does NOT accurately reflect the levels of
CHOLESTEROL in the tissues of your body. Both of these events
viii www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
are nothing more than marvelously designed marketing and

promotional events. A high level of “cholesterol” in the blood
actually means that the individual cells of your body are having
difficulty manufacturing enough CHOLESTEROL on their own,
so your body’s chemical plant (your liver) is helping them out by
making some additional CHOLESTEROL, which is then delivered
to the cells via the bloodstream in nice, neat packages called LDL.
Your liver does this on purpose and with good reason because
the individual cells of your body desperately need MORE
CHOLESTEROL in order to survive!
Please realize that the measurement of blood levels (of anything)

only tells you what the body is moving around from place to place.
The bloodstream is roughly analogous to our interstate freeway

system. If you counted the number of cars on the freeway in the
middle of the night, you might wrongly conclude that the traffic is
not all that bad. However, if you observed cars that were backed
up behind an accident, you might wrongly conclude that the stretch
of freeway that you were observing was overcrowded. Obviously,
a snap-shot observation of freeway traffic is inadequate to
determine future freeway construction needs, so why does the
medical profession believe that the quick measurement of
something so complex as the flow of lipids through the watery
fluids of the human body can possibly be an accurate way to
determine the overall current health of an individual human being?
And how could it possibly predict the FUTURE health condition of
that individual?
“Elevated blood levels of ‘cholesterol’ and other blood risk

factors are not the CAUSE of cardiovascular disease.”
Your Doctor is a Liar! ix
There is so much obvious evidence exposing the stupidity of the

current system that it boggles the mind. Think about it. Your
doctor takes one blood test and professes to be able to accurately
predict the status of your future health for the rest of your life.
Even the worst 1-(900) psychic reader will tell you that the future
that they can see is only one of many possibilities. But your
all-knowing, all-seeing and omnipotent psychic/doctor is somehow
able to clearly predict the only future that awaits you, and if you
have high “cholesterol” readings, then your immediate future is
most definitely going to include a prescription for pharmaceutical
drugs. (You may want to check the diplomas on the wall behind
your doctor’s desk. Maybe they actually did double-major in
Nostradamus Studies and Prognostication when they were in
psychic/medical school.) If you happen to visit a psychic/heart
surgeon, then your future will most likely include some serious
reconstruction on the roadways of your cardiovascular system.
It must undoubtedly be their uncanny psychic ability to predict
your only possible future that enables medical doctors, surgeons
and pharmacists to drive much nicer cars and live in much nicer
homes than you and I.
The linear thinking that dominates the thought processes of the

medical establishment ignores the intricate feedback mechanisms
that are employed by the body in order to keep itself in balance.
Elevated blood levels may very well mean that the body has too
much of something, but it is just as likely that elevated blood
levels mean that the body’s tissues are deficient, so the
bloodstream is merely delivering more resources to wherever they
are needed. Any medical textbook will tell you that LDL is made
in the liver in order to deliver additional CHOLESTEROL to the
cells.
The purposeful activity of producing and delivering nutrients

which are necessary for life is not a mistake on the part of the
human body. It is your liver’s job to manufacture numerous
x www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
complex chemical compounds for use throughout the body. It does

NOT do so in a haphazard manner. Your liver is NOT stupid. If
your liver is making additional “cholesterol” then there must be a
very important reason. An elevated level of LDL means that your
cells need more CHOLESTEROL and your liver is sending some
to the rescue! A low level of HDL means that the cells do NOT
have enough CHOLESTEROL to send back to the liver for
removal. An elevated level of triglycerides means that your liver is
distributing excess calories to the body to be used for energy or
stored for later use. None of this is random. None of this is a
mistake. The mistake is in your doctor’s mis-representation of
these normal, natural, healthful events!
“ ‘Good cholesterol’ is not a type of CHOLESTEROL... ‘good

cholesterol’ refers to the way the body transports
CHOLESTEROL in the blood.”
Understanding Normal and Clinical Nutrition
(Textbook)
I know that this flies in the face of convention. It flies in the face
of common knowledge. “Everybody knows” that “cholesterol”
causes heart disease, don’t they? Well, I know that “everybody”
is wrong! If you want to live a long and healthy life and avoid a
multitude of health problems as the years go by, please consider
this simple fact: Despite trillion$ of dollars in medical research,
despite drugs, surgery, dietary programs, advertising and awareness
programs and everything else that you can think of, more than half
of all of the people in America currently die from heart disease in
spite of all these “efforts”. One hundred years ago heart disease
was absolutely unheard of. You can’t even find a chapter on it in
the medical textbooks of that era. Now heart disease kills more
than half of everyone! Correct me if I am wrong, but it sure seems
to me like the “prevailing wisdom” is not making us any healthier.
Your Doctor is a Liar! xi
In fact, the “prevailing wisdom” is only making the medical and

pharmaceutical industries more and more wealthy while it is killing
all the rest of us faster than any plague in the history of humanity.
Look at the evidence. In 1900 there was no “medical
establishment” to speak of. Most people cared for themselves with
food, herbs, homeopathic remedies, spa treatments, faith and an
occasional visit from their “family doctor” and absolutely no one
was dying from heart disease. And now? Now, 45% of Americans
take prescription drugs, the medical establishment sucks up over
20% of the entire American economy and over 50% of us die from
heart disease! Coincidence? I think not!
According to the statistics of the World Health Organization

(WHO), each year more than 12 million people die from the
consequences of heart attacks and strokes.
I do hereby make the claim that the entire medical/pharmaceutical

industry has been lying to, deceiving, tricking, defrauding and
cheating the American public in a very big way for the last 100+
years. They have bilked and swindled us (their trusting patients)
out of hundreds of trillions of dollars, yes, hundreds of trillions of
dollars in regards to cardiovascular disease alone. The people who
work in the medical and pharmaceutical industries are continuing
to lead us to a slow, painful expensive slaughter with information
that they know to be false and misleading. They must be stopped
and they must be stopped right now!
YOUR DOCTOR IS KILLING YOU!
The official medical establishment openly admits that the fourth

leading cause of death in America is due to adverse reactions to
properly prescribed pharmaceutical drugs!
xii www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions

in Hospitalized Patients
A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies
by
Jason Lazarou, M.Sc.
Bruce H. Pomeranz, M.D., Ph.D.
Paul N. Corey, Ph.D.
Summarized from an article that appeared in
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

April 15, 1998 Volume 279, Number 15
The Objective: To estimate the incidence of serious and

FATAL adverse drug reactions in hospital patients.
The Conclusions: The authors estimated that in 1994, in the

United States alone, 106,000 hospital patients DIED from
adverse drug reactions. They deduced that DEATHS from
adverse drug reactions rank as at least the sixth leading cause
of DEATH in America, and possibly as high as the fourth
leading cause! At best, only heart disease (743,460), cancer
(529,904), stroke (150,108), pulmonary disease (101,077)
and accidents (90,523) KILLED more Americans than
“business as usual” in the medical profession. Doctors
“practicing medicine” KILL more Americans than AIDS,
more than Diabetes, more than Thyroid Disorders, more than
Multiple Sclerosis, more than Muscular Dystrophy, more
than Parkinson’s Disease, more than all the other diseases!
Your Doctor is a Liar! xiii
Important note: This study carefully and explicitly did

NOT count DEATHS that were due to errors in
administering the drugs. This study did NOT count
DEATHS that were due to noncompliance on the part of the
patient. This study did NOT count DEATHS that were due
to overdose. This study did NOT count DEATHS that were
due to drug abuse. This study did NOT count DEATHS that
were merely therapeutic failures. This study did NOT count
DEATHS that were considered as only possible adverse drug
reactions. The determination had to be clear. Also, this
study only counted DEATHS due to adverse drug reactions
if the people actually made it to the hospital before they
DIED. It did NOT account for anyone who may have DIED
at home, or before they made it to the hospital.
106,000 people are KILLED by properly

administered drugs each year in America!
Additionally, the authors of this study reported on the

incidence of serious, but non-fatal incidences of adverse
drug reactions. They estimated that in 1994 approximately
2,216,000 people suffered from serious adverse reactions to
drugs that were properly prescribed and administered by
their doctors. Serious adverse drug reactions were defined as
those that required hospitalization or were permanently
disabling or FATAL. (Subtract the 106,000 FATAL reactions
to get 2,110,000 serious, but not quite FATAL adverse drug
reactions.)
The people who conducted the studies were actually in

contact with the patients who suffered the adverse reactions.
The people who conducted the studies were able to interview
physicians, nurses or patients at least once per week.
xiv www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
All adverse drug reactions were confirmed prior to the

patients’ discharge from the hospital. No adverse drug
reactions were counted unless the people who conducted the
study were actually present at the time.
The studies included in this meta-analysis spanned a period

of 32 years (1964-1996). The analysis found that the
incidence of adverse drug reactions has not changed over the
past 32 years.
To quote directly from JAMA...
“We have found that serious adverse drug reactions are

frequent and more so than generally recognized. FATAL
adverse drug reactions appear to be between the fourth and
sixth leading cause of DEATH. Their incidence has
remained stable over the last 30 years... There are a large
number of serious adverse drug reactions even when the
drugs are properly prescribed and administered... We found
that a high proportion of adverse drug reactions were type A
reactions. This may suggest that many adverse drug
reactions are due to the use of drugs with unavoidably high
toxicity... It is important to note that we have taken a
conservative approach... hence we are probably not
overestimating the incidence of adverse drug reactions.”
Recent studies have shown that the income generated for

hospitals from adverse drug reactions is very high, adding an
additional $1.56 to $4 BILLION dollars per year to
American’s hospital bills.
No numbers were provided for the costs of the funerals.

xiv www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
All adverse drug reactions were confirmed prior to the

patients’ discharge from the hospital. No adverse drug
reactions were counted unless the people who conducted the
study were actually present at the time.
The studies included in this meta-analysis spanned a period

of 32 years (1964-1996). The analysis found that the
incidence of adverse drug reactions has not changed over the
past 32 years.
To quote directly from JAMA...
“We have found that serious adverse drug reactions are

frequent and more so than generally recognized. FATAL
adverse drug reactions appear to be between the fourth and
sixth leading cause of DEATH. Their incidence has
remained stable over the last 30 years... There are a large
number of serious adverse drug reactions even when the
drugs are properly prescribed and administered... We found
that a high proportion of adverse drug reactions were type A
reactions. This may suggest that many adverse drug
reactions are due to the use of drugs with unavoidably high
toxicity... It is important to note that we have taken a
conservative approach... hence we are probably not
overestimating the incidence of adverse drug reactions.”
Recent studies have shown that the income generated for

hospitals from adverse drug reactions is very high, adding an
additional $1.56 to $4 BILLION dollars per year to
American’s hospital bills.
No numbers were provided for the costs of the funerals.

xvi www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
I base these far-reaching accusations on verifiable, documented,

facts. These accusations are not based on new discoveries. They
are not based upon alternative healing practices or exotic medicine.
These accusations are based upon cold, hard facts that are
published in medical textbooks and taught to every medical student
in every medical school in this country.
Every statement in this book is based upon information provided by

the medical/pharmaceutical industry itself. Their own textbooks
incriminate them. Their own documents incriminate them.
Their own journals incriminate them. Their own product
inserts incriminate them. The facts are crystal clear, but
somehow they convince most people to simply look the other way!
And most obvious of all, their pathetic lack of progress and lack of
success incriminates them beyond even a shadow of a doubt.
Half of all people in this country still die from heart disease.
Clearly the advice that you are receiving from your doctor is
NOT WORKING!
I respect your right to your religious beliefs, whatever they may be,
and I am not normally a Bible-toting, Bible-quoting person, but
please allow me to pass along a bit of very wise advice from the
mouth of Jesus Himself:
“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s

clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know
them by their fruits... every good tree bringeth forth good fruit;
but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.”
Matthew 7:15-17
Based solely upon the fruits of their works, it is abundantly clear

that the medical/drug industry is lying to you. Their advice simply
does not bear good fruit. The work of the medical/pharmaceutical
establishment brings forth a wealth of evil fruit. They arrogantly
Your Doctor is a Liar! xvii
hide their dirty laundry behind lab coats and surgical scrubs
because they believe that we are too busy to pay attention, too
ignorant to question their opinions and too afraid to challenge their
authority. They may not be wearing sheep’s clothing exactly, but
they are wrapped in a cloak of deceit, protected by custom, status,
regulation, power, money and linguistic manipulation.
Much like the children’s story where the adults ignore the truth,
and it takes the innocent eyes of a child to see the obvious, I have
opened my eyes and I have discovered that...
The Emperor’s Doctors Don’t Have On Any Clothes Either!
I hope that you are able to see that which is so blatantly obvious.
The foundation of the entire medical/pharmaceutical industry rests
upon a monumental lie. The news media is also lying to you. Your
government is lying to you too. All of the “Walk and Run and Bike
for a Cure” organizations and all of the “Wear a Ribbon on Your
Lapel or a Band Around Your Wrist For a Cure” organizations are
lying to you as well. Are you really so naive as to believe that the
American Heart Association is ever going to do anything so radical
as to be the first “charitable” organization to ever put themselves
out of business by actually “finding a cure” for the disease upon
which their very jobs depend? You must realize that the cure that
they supposedly seek will forever be “right around the corner”,
if only you will donate just a little more, and just a little more, and
just a little more... .
Sadly, your family and friends have also been lied to, so you
should be wary of their poorly informed opinions as well. Also,
you should definitely not believe me either. I am human and I am
probably wrong on a few points in this book. Please contact me
immediately if you discover an error in my work. Also, I have
probably left out some very important information as well. If you
personally have access to any information that you wish to share,
xviii www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
please contact me and share it with me so that I may share it with

others. This book is continuously being updated. Please visit the
companion website in the future to find additional updates.
(www.YourDoctorIsaLiar.com) Your support, your suggestions
and even your criticism are all very much welcome. I will
certainly endeavour to correct any and all flaws. I’m trying very
hard to sift through all these lies so that I too may live in the truth.
Why have you overlooked the reality that is so plain to see? Why
have you allowed yourself to be brainwashed and indoctrinated by
the incessant repetition of statements such as...
“Ask your doctor.”

“Consult your doctor.”
“Only your doctor can decide what is best for you.”
“Don’t do this and don’t do that until you ask your doctor.”
“There’s nothing that can be done for your condition.”
“You will have to do this for the rest of your life.”
“It’s an infection.”
“It’s a virus.”
“It’s genetic” or “It’s hereditary.”
Whether in the medical or any other field, my personal experience

has shown that whenever someone says that there is nothing that
can be done, you have to realize that it really means one of two
things: Either they are incompetent and don’t know enough to do
what needs to be done, so you should go find a better practitioner,
or they actually do know of something that can be done, but they
also know that you are going to balk at doing what you really need
to do, so they don’t bother to mention what they do know. Doctors
usually mean both. Medical doctors’ field of vision is so narrow
that they don’t know one millionth of the possibilities of all that
can be done, and they are so blinded by their own arrogance that
they are unable to even admit that they are ignorant of such
possibilities. Additionally, most doctors receive the vast majority
Your Doctor is a Liar! xix
of their income from insurance company payments, so if the

insurance company doesn’t cover it, then as far as they are
concerned, the treatment does not exist, because they know that
you are not going to reach into your pocket to pay for it.
In regards to having to follow a given course of treatment for the

rest of your life, of course you will, but only if you refuse to
examine more appropriate therapies. If you refuse to delve into the
true CAUSE of any problem and if you refuse to make any changes
in your habit, lifestyle, living conditions, etc., then of course
nothing is going to change. But what if you identified the CAUSE?
What if you ate more wholesome food, got more rest and had a lot
less stress in your life? What if you made some drastic, but
straightforward changes? What if you did what you truly loved for
a living, lived in a peaceful community, and got along with your
spouse, family and neighbors? These things are the fundamental
starting point of good health. These most basic things must be done
first, in order to be healthy. Couldn’t you do some of them?
Of course you can, but have you?
“Lunacy can be defined as attempting the same thing over and

over while expecting to have different results.”
Anonymous
The reason why doctors have such unusual power in today’s world
is because they profit by committing fraud every day. The primary
reason that doctors lie to their patients is money, but the secondary
reason is because so many patients really do not want to hear the
truth. If you are a typical American, then you have not taken the
time to learn enough about your own body in order to keep your-
self healthy. You don’t know enough to realize that your doctor is
lying to you with every word that they speak. You do not want to
take responsibility for the decisions that you have made and for the
xx www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
actions that you have taken in your life. You just don’t want to be
bothered! By definition, the only people who go to medical
doctors are the people who do not want to take responsibility for
their own health. You want to do whatever you want, you want to
eat whatever you feel like eating, you want to get a paycheck rather
than pursue your innermost dreams, you want to continue to bury
your true emotions and you want to blame someone else for all of
your problems rather than face your inner emotional world with
honesty and dignity. You want to have your cake and be healthy
too. You want your insurance company to pay for everything. You
want to be able to break every health rule in the book and then
either have your doctor fix it with a pill or have a surgeon cut out
the part of you that you broke.
“The truth which makes men free is, for the most part,
the truth which men prefer not to hear.”
Herbert Agar
I’m NOT sorry if this upsets you. You need to be awakened from
the dreamworld that the medical establishment has anesthetized
you into because the nightmares that await you in the “Land of
Doctors” are truly horrifying. Health cannot be administered via a
pill, via an injection or via a surgical procedure. If you want to
truly be healthy, at some point you are going to have to take full
responsiblilty for learning exactly what YOUR body, mind, heart
and spirit really need in order to be healthy and then you are going
to have to make the various changes that are necessary.
All of them.
“You want the truth? You can’t handle the truth!!”

Jack Nicholson
in the movie “A Few Good Men”
Your Doctor is a Liar! xxi
I am tired of seeing and hearing doctors placed on a pedestal and

admired as (M.D.) medical deities. I find this to be completely and
totally offensive to my spiritual beliefs. I believe that it is every
human being’s right to worship the Divinity of their choice and my
personal “God” is most definitely not the American Medical
Association. I hold the medical establishment of this country in
such low regard that I have been forced by my spirit to write the
book that you now hold in your hands. I believe that the only force
that can ever lead you to your own personal truth is the combined
efforts of your own body, heart, mind and spirit.
“For the masses, truth originated in authority

rather than in the evidence of their own senses
or the conclusions arrived at by independent thought.”
J. A. C. Brown
The next time that your doctor tells you that “you have an
infection”, ask them a few questions. Did they take a sample of
fluid from your body, culture it in the lab, wait a few days and then
look at the growth under a microscope? Did they actually use a
microscope and see any bacteria? Or are they simply guessing?
And are you simply believing? If you truly do have a bacterial
infection, it can and should be clearly proven to you. Bacteria can
be seen under a microscope. If you truly do have a bacterial
infection, make your doctor prove it to you BEFORE you start
swallowing poisons to kill some mysterious bacteria that may or
may not be the cause of your health problems.
The next time that your doctor tells you that “you have a virus”,
ask them if you can see their multi-million dollar electron
microscope. Virus particles are so amazingly small that they can
only be seen under the highest magnification possible. Does
your doctor own an electron microscope? Do they know of a
xxii www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
laboratory that owns an electron microscope? Did they bother to

send a sample of your blood or other bodily fluid to be tested for
any possible virus? Are they recommending something that is
effective against viruses? Please realize that antibiotics do not
offer any health benefits if you are dealing with viruses. What did
your doctor recommend for your “virus”?
The next time that your doctor tells you that your health issue is
genetic or hereditary, why don’t you ask them why the issue was
not apparent when you were born? Ask to see the results of the
DNA test that located the damaged or mutated gene that is
supposedly the cause of this alleged “genetic” problem?
If I recall, the Human Genome Project has completely mapped
human DNA. Courts of law accept DNA tests as evidence to both
convict or exonerate people who are accused of crimes. Did your
doctor submit a sample of your DNA to a testing laboratory? Did
the results show which gene was responsible for your health issue?
Or is your doctor simply making up a story to hide the fact that they
simply have no idea how to help you?
Medical doctors lie to every patient that walks into their office
every day. They get away with it because patients are afraid to
challenge their doctor’s lies with the most basic questions. Maybe
this happens less often in the “show me” state of Missouri. Maybe
you should pretend that you are from Missouri. Maybe you should
memorize a few Missouri-like phrases...
Show me the bacteria!

Show me the virus!
Show me the damaged gene!
Show me positive benefits or I won’t show you my money!
Show me that you are not lying, because I know that you are!
I am tired of hearing people say “I can’t do anything unless I ask

my doctor first”! Please learn to listen to your own inner self.
Your Doctor is a Liar! xxiii
Please trust your own personal Divinity to guide you to your truth.
Please keep your mind open and listen to the still, small voice
inside of your very self that guides you to all that is good in your
life. Use your common sense. Trust your gut. Please don’t be
afraid to ask questions when you do not fully understand
something. When something just doesn’t “feel” right, then it
probably isn’t right, at least not for you. Stop putting so much faith
in your doctors and rekindle your faith in the SPIRIT that rests
within you. Listen to the feelings that you feel inside, because life
itself starts within, and your health follows naturally from your
inner life. Please take the time to learn about your personal,
individual health and wisely apply that knowledge to your own life.
“We have not lost faith, but we have transferred it from God
to the medical profession.”
George Bernard Shaw
One way to seek the truth is to ask questions. This book contains a
number of questions that every person should use as a basis to
examine their doctor’s so-called knowledge, and to challenge their
doctor’s undeserved authority. This book also contains the
answers to these questions, so obviously, the main purpose of
asking your doctor is not to increase your understanding of this
subject matter. After you have read this book a few times and
digested the material within it, I very much doubt that your doctor
will be able to add anything other than more lies about
“cholesterol” to your accurate knowledge.
The real purpose of asking your doctor these questions

will be to examine their personal integrity.
xxiv www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
I believe that it is okay if someone does not know all of the details
about a subject, even if it is a subject within their chosen
profession and even if they are charging your insurance company a
lot of money in return for their professional services. It is also okay
if someone makes an honest mistake. We are all human. However,
it is NOT okay to lie. It is NOT okay for doctors to pontificate and
act as if their decisions may not be questioned. It is NOT okay for
doctors to misrepresent all of their personal opinions and outright
guesses as if every single word that comes out of their mouth is a
“proven scientific fact”.
This book contains many valid questions that any and every person
should demand that their doctor answer. I suggest that you do
exactly that. ASK. Confront them head on. See how much they
really know, and see how much they only pretend to know.
Demand references. Ask for proof. But after you ask, what will
you receive? After your doctor has been confronted with the
information in this book, I suggest that you sit back and observe
their responses very carefully. If they grab this book out of your
hand and say something like: “Hey, that is interesting and thought
provoking! Let me see that! Where did you get that book? I’d like
to get a copy for myself!”, then you should probably count your
blessings. You’ve got a rare, open-minded good one.
“Truth is what stands the test of experience.”

Albert Einstein
However, your doctor is far more likely to respond by becoming

defensive, argumentative and (don’t say that I didn’t warn you)
possibly even angry with you. I have witnessed this personally.
When their omnipotence is questioned, most doctors tend to take a
psychological trip on a cruise boat up a well known river in Egypt
called the Nile (they go into denial)!
Your Doctor is a Liar! xxv
“The one condition coupled with the gift of truth is its use.”
Ralph Waldo Emerson
I honestly don’t care if you agree or disagree with what I have

written in this book. All I ask is, since you already have this book
in your hand, please make it a point to read it. When you are done
reading it, please read it again. Then, please pass it along to a
family member or friend who needs to know this information.
If you downloaded this book via the internet, please feel free to
attach it to an email and send a copy of it to everyone you know.
Heck, you have my permission to send it to everyone in the world!
I have chosen to NOT enforce my copyright privileges in regards

to this book. My ultimate reward will be far, far greater when I
look around one day in the near future and see that my fellow
human beings have awakened to the truth that...
The Emperor’s Doctors Don’t Have On Any Clothes Either!
Until that day arrives, I ask so very little. Please keep an open
mind. Ask questions. Demand answers. My guess is that you will
soon discover that...
Soon, everyone will realize that the medical and

pharmaceutical industries, from top to bottom
and as far as the eye can see,
are a complete and total FRAUD!
xxvi www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
Number of physicians in the United States: 700,000.

Accidental deaths caused by physicians per year: 100,000.
Accidental deaths per physician: 0.14285
Number of gun owners in the United States: 80,000,000.

Number of accidental gun deaths per year: 1,500.
Accidental deaths per gun owner: 0.0000188.
Statistically, doctors are 7,600 times more likely

to kill you than gun owners!
Your Doctor Is a Liar!
2 www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
IT’S A JOKE...
How does a woman from Hollywood pick her

nose?
From her doctor’s catalogue!
• • •
PATIENT: Doctor, every time I sneeze I have an

amazing orgasm. What should I take for it?
DOCTOR: Pepper!
• • •
The doctor approached his patient brandishing a

loaded syringe and said, “Nothing to worry
about, just a little prick with a needle.”
“Yes,” the patient replied. “I can see that.”
• • •
What wears thick eyeglasses and has a wet nose?
A nearsighted gynecologist!
Your Doctor is a Liar! 3
Chapter 1
Mechanics,
Firefighters
&
Yellow Finger Syndrome
IT’S A JOKE...
A doctor prescribed suppositories for a man who

was suffering from constipation but a week later,
the man returned and complained that they were
not working.
“Have you been taking them regularly?” asked

the doctor.
“What do you think I’ve been doing? Shoving

them up my ass?”
• • •
A surgeon was about to perform a

hemorrhoidectomy. He instructed the nurse to
get the necessary implements ready for the
surgery. She returned a few minutes later with a
pair of surgical gloves, a jar of Vaseline, a
scalpel and a bottle of beer.
The surgeon soon came in to begin the surgery.

He put on the gloves, lubed them up with the
Vaseline, picked up the scalpel and said,
“No nurse. I said that I needed a butt-light!”
At the beginning of most of the chapters throughout this book,

there will be questions that you should use in order to test your
doctor’s knowledge, to challenge your doctor’s authority and to
examine your doctor’s integrity. At the end of each chapter,
we will go through a sample question and answer session with a
fictitious doctor who actually knows the answers to the questions,
a wonderful doctor who does not lie and who does not try to
deceive you. I had to fabricate a make-believe doctor, because no
such medical doctor exists. Please make it a point to ask your
doctor these questions...
Q. Doctor, can you reference even one study where the

subjects were fed or injected with CHOLESTEROL or
LDL to the point that they developed heart disease and
had a heart attack?
Q. Wouldn’t this type of study be necessary to

“scientifically prove” that “cholesterol” or LDL
actually CAUSE heart attacks?
Q. If “cholesterol” does not actually CAUSE heart disease,

but is only a “risk factor” then why are we so concerned
about it? Shouldn’t we be more concerned about the
CAUSES of heart disease?
A. The short answer is that studies such as this have been

conducted, and they have shown conclusively that
CHOLESTEROL does NOT cause heart disease!
Your doctor simply chooses to ignore this information.
Please realize that nearly 100+ years of “cholesterol” indoctrination

have blinded you to the difference between the meanings of the
words CAUSE and “risk factor”. Doctors talk about “cholesterol”
as a “risk factor” for heart disease, but patients mistakenly
believe that they hear their doctor say that CHOLESTEROL is
the CAUSE of heart disease! Your doctor has absolutely no

motivation to correct you. The word CAUSE needs no
explanation. The term “risk factor”, though, is mis-understood and
mis-used by most people, because it has been conveniently
mis-used and mis-represented by too many doctors for far too long.
“Most of the evidence that seems to link risk factors to

cardiovascular disease is, to date, circumstantial.”
Dr. Manning Feinleib
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
MECHANICS
The way that doctors talk about “cholesterol” as a “risk factor” is

analagous to the way that Joe, my mechanic, would talk to you
about the light that goes off on the dashboard of your car to warn
you that the engine temperature is getting too hot. The temperature
of your engine does not rise because the light is on. The heat
generated by the light on your dashboard is not CAUSING your
engine to overheat. The sensor in the engine that monitors the
temperature of the engine CAUSES the light on your dashboard to
light up in order to warn you that you are risking damage to your
engine. Please note the difference between CAUSE and EFFECT.
The purpose of the light is to point out a potential risk. Many
possible CAUSES need to be examined before your qualified
mechanic can say with any certainty why the warning light is on.
Maybe you don’t have enough coolant. Maybe you blew a hose.
Maybe your water pump is not working. Maybe there is not
enough oil in your crankcase and the engine is generating too much
friction. Maybe your fanbelt is broken. Maybe an old plastic bag
blew onto your radiator and the air cannot pass through the
radiator in order to cool it. Maybe the temperature sensor is
malfunctioning. Maybe it’s just really hot outside and your old car
simply cannot handle it.
“CHOLESTEROL has been presented by many experts as the

arch-villain. In their eagerness to ‘do something’, these experts
have assumed that a risk factor means a causal factor, rather
than a marker of the risk.”
Petr Skrabanek
University of Dublin, Ireland
What if your mechanic behaved like your surgeon? What if you

asked your mechanic to “fix” the light on the dashboard, the way
people ask their surgeon to “fix” their heart trouble, and your
mechanic said, “Sure, I can ‘fix’ the light!” What if they then
proceeded to cut the wire that goes from the temperature sensor to
the light? The light most certainly would be “fixed” (as in: locked
in the off position), so your mechanic could honestly proclaim:
“I ‘fixed’ the light. I’m quite sure it won’t go on any more. I cut
out the thing that you thought was giving you trouble.” So you
drive away, thinking that the CAUSE of the problem was
eliminated, when the mechanic merely disconnected the warning
mechanism that was put in place by the manufacturer in order to
give you advance notice that your engine may be “at risk”. When
a surgeon does a bypass operation or inserts a stent to hold open a
blocked cardiac artery, are they really addressing the root CAUSE
of the heart problem, or are they merely lulling you into a false
sense of security that will most certainly come back to haunt you?
“You may have your suspicions, your fears. You may even believe
there is something, somewhere, terribly, drastically wrong,
but because someone else is in charge, because there is a part of
the system above you which you don’t know, you don’t question
it. You even distrust your own doubts.”
Graham Swift
What if your mechanic behaved like your medical doctor? What if

your mechanic told you that you could solve your problem with
that troublesome light by purchasing a big block of ice each
morning from your local ice pusher, and then told you to place it
on your cooling system’s temperature sensor in order to keep the
temperature reading down? What if your mechanic prescribed
a “sustained release” temperature lowering ice block for the
management of your engine’s high temperature problem?
How different would that be from when your doctor prescribes a
“sustained release” “cholesterol” lowering medication for the
“management” of your high “cholesterol” problem?
The mark of a really, really, really good con man is that the people
that they con never even realize that they have been ripped off.
Apparently your doctor is able to convince you to do something
ridiculous that your mechanic would never even consider.
Wouldn’t you prefer that your doctor actually locate, identify and
correct the root source of the problem? You demand that of your
mechanic, so why not the same requirement of your doctor?
Blood test results reflect a number of functions in the body but,

more than that, they reflect what the body is doing in its infinite
wisdom to communicate within itself in order to maintain balance
and health. Doctors routinely ignore the simple fact that everything
that the body does, it does for a reason. Instead of taking the time
to interpret the messages and the true meanings, they merely reach
for the prescription pad in order to “treat” those pesky symptoms.
“Truth, even if it does not prevail in public,

possesses an ineradicable primacy over all falsehoods.”
Hannah Arendt
“Blood ‘cholesterol’ level is influenced by many other factors.

It changes with body position. It increases with nicotine use,
stress, pain, fear, pregnancy, lack of exercise, a number of drugs
and medicines such as male and female hormones, tranquilizers,
cortisone products, vitamins A and D, diuretics, and even
alcohol. The longer a tourniquet is bound to the arm during the
process of drawing blood, the higher the ‘cholesterol’ value.
And various diseases raise ‘cholesterol’, for example,
hypothyroidism, hepatitis, kidney disease, and gall bladder
obstructions. Blood ‘cholesterol’ is constantly changing and it is
entirely different during the four seasons of the year. For all
of these reasons and more, a single measurement of blood
‘cholesterol’ cannot represent a person’s average level.”
Maybe everything in your blood is there for a reason! Maybe your

arteries are falling apart and the repair work being done by your
body requires the circulation of more leak-prevention materials
(such as fat) to stuff the cracks. Maybe you eat like a pig and your
body has gotten very skilled at turning all those extra calories into
fat. Maybe you are an endurance athlete or you are genetically
pre-disposed to be able to use large amounts of fat for energy.
Maybe you did something as simple as taking a very deep, deep
breath prior to having a blood sample drawn. The simple act of
deep breathing actually causes a dramatic increase in the flow of
fat-rich lymph fluids through your thoracic duct. This directs more
fat into your blood stream from your lymphatic system and can
change the makeup of your blood, much like adding heavy cream
enriches a soup recipe. Maybe you were a bit dehydrated or your
electrolytes were a bit imbalanced, causing your blood to be a bit
“thicker” so it appeared to be a bit more concentrated in fat.
Maybe the laboratory that processed your blood test was
inaccurate. Maybe the last meal that you ate before your test
temporarily caused your “cholesterol” levels to rise. Maybe you

forgot to not eat prior to the blood test. Maybe your situation is a
combination of several or all of the above. More likely than not,
your doctor or surgeon never bothered to take the time to explain
any of the above details to you. The point is this: There are a lot
of very simple factors that can have a dramatic effect upon the
results of any ONE blood test. Basing any health advice upon the
results of any oversimplified test should be viewed as medical
incompetence but, unfortunately, in this day and age, it is
accepted medical practice.
The main difference between a mechanic and a surgeon or a doctor,

is that a mechanic WILL take the time to explain the inner
workings of your automobile to you, for as long as it takes for you
to understand. If you mistakenly thought that the light on your
dashboard actually CAUSED your car to overheat, your mechanic
would take the time to explain to you how the light really works
and why it was on. But, if your doctor sees that you mistakenly
believe that “cholesterol” CAUSES heart disease, the odds are
very good that they will NOT take the time to explain the inner
workings of your body to you. They will not explain to you WHY
your “cholesterol” is high. They will not explain what high levels
really mean in terms of bodily function. Why should they? They
have you right where they want you: Scared, confused and about
to be medicated! You are not really ill so much as you are
ill-informed.
“Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.”

The Ninth Commandment
If your mechanic looked at the light on your dashboard and simply

disconnected the wire that connected the warning light to the
internal temperature sensor, or if your mechanic wrote you a
prescription for you to get a daily block of ice at your local ice
pusher’s store, and you drove off, only to have your engine blow a
few miles down the road anyway, you would call your lawyer and
sue your mechanic for malpractice in a heartbeat.
So, when your surgeon reaches for their scalpel and starts
removing and rearranging body parts or when your doctor refuses
to even discuss possible CAUSES and immediately reaches for the
prescription pad to medicate your “cholesterol” warning light into
the “acceptable range”, why do you not question their
competence? And, more importantly, why do you not also
question their integrity?
It is true that there have been thousands of “statistical” studies over

the last 100+ years that show that high “cholesterol” levels are a
statistically significant “risk factor” relating to a number of
diseases. Well, any mechanic could tell you that there is a much
greater “statistical” risk of having your car overheat when the
warning light is in the red zone. But that doesn’t tell you WHY
your car is overheating. High “cholesterol” levels simply mean that
something is wrong, and that something is altering the balance of
fats in the blood, but what is that something? What is the CAUSE?
There has NEVER been even one study where scientists took a
group of people, made them eat a measured amount of pure
CHOLESTEROL or LDL and then discovered that they had more
heart attacks! Never! This would seem to be a reasonable initial
experiment to begin to determine whether eating too much
CHOLESTEROL or LDL actually led to heart disease or other
health problems. Has this type of experiment ever been done?
YES! Will your doctor show you the results of these studies? NO!
Why not? Because every study that has observed people who eat
large amounts of CHOLESTEROL in their diets has found exactly
the opposite of what your doctor wants you to believe. Dozens of
studies have shown that the more CHOLESTEROL that you eat,
the healthier you will be!
IT IS ALL A LIE!
Please apply your innate, “common” sense to this issue. Trillions

of dollars have been spent on tests, drugs, and surgeries yet more
than 50% of all people still DIE from cardiovascular disease.
The Journal of the American Medical Association admits that
properly prescribed drugs are the fourth leading cause of death.
The use of drugs to “manage cholesterol” has NOT resulted in the
eradication of heart disease or heart attacks. People with “normal
cholesterol” levels die from heart attacks just as often as do people
with “high cholesterol” levels. The entire “cholesterol” testing,
pharmaceutical drugging and surgical butchering industries are
simply businesses that are based upon a monumental lie! It’s all
about the money. YOUR MONEY!
“What is truth? For the multitude, that which it continually

reads and hears... what the Press wills, is true. Three weeks of
press-work, and the ‘truth’ is acknowledged by everybody.”
Oswald Spengler
The above statement may take a while to sink into most readers’
minds. High “cholesterol” levels may warn of some bio-chemical
imbalance of some sort, but the point to remember is that the
elevated levels are a result of those imbalances, not a CAUSE of
them. Doctors have confused CAUSE and EFFECT (symptom)
and they have done so on purpose. They ignore the root CAUSE
and focus upon endless varieties of symptoms and the “treatment”
of those symptoms, rather than the elimination of CAUSES.
If they actually treated the CAUSES and successfully cured you,
they believe that they would soon be out of work. So they believe
that it is financially better for them to hide the cure and give you a
chemical “treat” in order to generate a different set of symptoms,

so that they can “treat” you again, and again and again. This way,
they can keep you coming back forever because, as they put it,
“You are going to have to do this for the rest of your life!” (If they
are ever going to own a yacht!)
Have you ever wondered why doctors say that they practice the
art of (giving) medicine?
Wouldn’t it be better if they practiced the art of healing?
The practice of medicine, by definition, is designed to merely

distract your body from its current concerns by literally poisoning
the body with a chemical toxin so that the body’s attention is drawn
away from the original problem. The “art” of practicing medicine
is NOT the same as the art of healing. The art of practicing
medicine is based upon finding the “right” type of poison and
prescribing the “right” amount of that poison in order to distract the
body, without killing the patient. While the body is focused on
the new and different poison that has been added to the body by the
modern medicine man, it is the medical doctor’s hope that the body
will be able to heal itself in the background, behind the side effects
that are caused, on purpose, by the pharmaceutical drug. If the
doctor is lucky and the patient is strong enough to withstand the
onslaught of the poisonous drug AND the original problem at the
same time, the body may be able to heal itself from both the old
and the new problems. When this happens, most doctors are given
the credit for this healing, and they wrongfully accept it, knowing
full well that all healing is done by the body itself.
“God heals, and the doctor takes the fees!”

Benjamin Franklin
As you saw in the introduction, doctors are missing the mark quite
frequently, because their own medicine is the fourth leading cause
of death in America. By definition, when you walk out of your
doctor’s office with your prescription in hand, and go to the drug
store to purchase your drugs and then take those drugs, YOU ARE
NOT BEING HEALED! YOU ARE BEING POISONED! And
even worse, you are doing so voluntarily! All drugs are toxic, that
is why they are so closely regulated. When you take any
pharmaceutical drug, please realize that its real purpose is to
poison you “just enough” that it distracts your body’s attention
“just enough” so that you no longer notice your body’s original
efforts to heal itself from the root CAUSE of your initial problem.
No matter what, you still have to deal with whatever it was that
was causing your problem in the first place.
“A doctor is a person who writes prescriptions

till the patient either dies or is cured by Nature.”
John Taylor
Simply stated, heart disease is NOT caused by a dietary

deficiency of Lipitor. Strokes are NOT caused by a deficiency of
Coumadin. Arthritis is NOT caused by a deficiency of Celebrex.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is not caused by a
deficiency of Ritalin. Allergies are NOT caused by a deficiency of
Claritin. Osteoporosis is NOT caused by a deficiency of Fosamax.
Upset stomachs are NOT caused by a deficiency of Tagamet or
Zantac. Acne is NOT caused by a deficiency of birth control pills.
Hot flashes are NOT caused by a deficiency of an extract of urine
obtained from a pregnant female horse (Premarin). And the list
goes on and on.
One hundred fifty years ago, doctors routinely prescribed arsenic

and mercury based “medicines” for a wide variety of ills. We
now know that arsenic and mercury are devastatingly toxic

poisons, but they are undeniably very effective at diverting your
body’s attention from any existing problem. It is kind of like how
you forget about your headache after someone drops a bowling ball
on your toe. Even when your “medical” doctor does their job
perfectly well, it is still your own natural healing abilities that
ultimately heal you. It is your body, heart, mind and spirit that
originally created your body. Only you know how to heal you!
DOCTORS DO NOT HEAL, THE BODY HEALS ITSELF!
Iatric:
Referring to medicine, the medical profession or physicians.
Iatrogenic disorder:
Any adverse mental or physical condition induced
in a patient by effects of treatment by a physician,
surgeon or dentist. The term implies that
such effects could have been avoided.
Iatrogeny:
An adverse state or condition induced by a physician.
Iatrology:
Medical science.
Taber’s Medical Dictionary
Please take a good look at the dictionary definitions in the box

above. If the words above seem foreign or unusual, compare them
to the words psychiatric, pediatric and geriatric. If the simple
words iatric, iatrogeny and iatrology do not manage to send a
shiver of fear, anger, disgust and vengeance through your body,
then you had better read them again, because you obviously do not
yet fully comprehend their meaning. Medical science is, by

definition, the study of how medical doctors strive to induce new
mental or physical conditions in patients. The purpose of medical
science is NOT to cure! The clear purpose of the medical industry
as defined in the medical dictionary, is to induce adverse effects
that could have been avoided. How can you avoid them? Simple.
Don’t let a practitioner of medical science (M.D.) do anything to
you, ever! Don’t ever go into their office and don’t ever let them
stick anything into any of your orifices!
“The art of medicine consists of amusing the patient

while nature cures the disease.”
Voltaire
Is your doctor actually healthy themself? Do they take the time to

teach you about health? Do you hire an unhealthy medical doctor
to help you to improve your health? Would you hire a plumber to
redecorate your living room? Would you hire an interior decorator
to do bodywork on your car? Would you hire an auto mechanic to
hem the pants and take in the jacket of your silk suit? Would you
hire a seamstress to file legal papers for you in a court of law?
Would you hire a lawyer to teach your children about moral and
ethical behaviour? So why do you hire a drug pusher or a butcher
to help you improve your health? Is it any wonder that you often
find yourself in conflict with your medical doctor or surgeon?
“Conventional medicine, based on pharmaceutical drugs, is

limited to treating the symptoms of cardiovascular disease while
ignoring the root cause - blood vessel weakness. Marketing
campaigns for ‘cholesterol’ lowering drugs simply proclaim
‘cholesterol’ as the scapegoat.”
Is it any wonder that you have a gnawing feeling inside that there
must be something that they are missing or not telling you?
The fault does NOT rest with your doctor. It rests with YOU!
Whose fault would it be if your living room was decorated in Early
American Porcelain? Whose fault would it be if your car came
back from the shop painted mauve or ecru? Whose fault would it
be if your brand new silk suit had oil stains on it? So whose fault
is it when your health starts to suffer from the side effects of the
medication that you have voluntarily been swallowing every day
on the advice of your drug pusher? And whose fault is it when you
follow their recommendation and take yet another poisonous drug
to “treat” the side effects of the first drug? Come on, confess!
IT IS YOUR FAULT FOR GOING TO

A MEDICAL DOCTOR IN THE FIRST PLACE!
The true blame for the state of your health rests solely upon the
person that looks back at you whenever you look into a mirror.
Your doctor puts the letters M.D. after their name. Do you not
know that those letters stand for MEDICAL doctor? Do you not
realize that your M.D.’s job is to doctor up your symptoms with
medicine? When you hire a surgeon, you are going to get cut.
When you hire a psychologist, you are going to get therapy.
When you go to a medical drug pusher, do you really think that you
are going to get anything other than a prescription for a poisonous
pharmaceutical drug with a long list of deadly side effects?
WHAT THE HELL DO YOU EXPECT?

Allopathy:
[Greek: allos, other, + pathos, disease, suffering]
System of treating disease by inducing a pathologic reaction
that is antagonistic to the disease being treated.
Tabor’s Medical Dictionary
Listen carefully to the language that your allopathic doctor uses.

They never actually say that they are offering a “cure” that is
designed to eliminate the CAUSE of your problem. They are only
going to give you a “treatment”, which will only give you a
different set of symptoms (side effects) that (they hope) will mask
your current symptoms. The concept of “allopathic” medicine is
clearly defined by the word itself. “Allo” comes from the root that
means opposite and “pathic” means disease. Before you ever
consider taking another pharmaceutical drug, please realize that its
main purpose is not to “cure” your condition. The main purpose of
all drugs is to give you another disease that produces symptoms
that are the opposite of your original symptoms. The symptoms of
your original disease only seem to go away. In reality, they are
merely being masked by the symptoms of your brand new,
iatrogenic, allopathic, doctor-caused second disease. If your
system is really strong, you may be able to heal yourself from both
diseases. When this self-healing takes place, you can be sure that
your medical doctor will be there to take the credit. However,
when something goes wrong, and your body is not strong enough
to handle the original disease and the new allopathic, iatrogenic
disorder that was CAUSED, on purpose, by your well paid drug
pusher, then you will DIE just like 105,999 other people each and
every year... KILLED by your “properly prescribed” medicine!
“I often say that a great doctor

kills more people than a great general.”
Gottfried Leibnitz
Think about it. If you have “acid reflux”, your doctor prescribes
an antacid. But what CAUSED the problem in the first place?
Did you know that 15,000 people DIE due to intestinal bleeding
caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications each and
every year? Medical doctors don’t care about CAUSES. They are
only skilled in CAUSING new, iatrogenic diseases with symptoms
that mask over your original symptoms. If you have a runny nose,
they prescribe a drug designed to dry up your nose. Never mind
that a runny nose is the body’s way of washing out something that
doesn’t belong there. When you have a cough, you reach for a
cough suppressant, never once thinking that maybe the cough was
your body’s way of trying to clear harmful substances out of your
lungs. If a balanced person took antacids or sinus drugs, their
stomach would become too alkaline and their nose would become
too dry. If you have “cholesterol” levels that are too “high”, then
they give you a drug that would, in a healthy person, cause
“cholesterol” levels to drop too low. But why were those levels too
high? High levels of “cholesterol” in the blood are NOT the
CAUSE of heart disease.
It is impossible to get rid of the CAUSE by applying effort in a vain

attempt to alter the EFFECT while the CAUSE is still active.
It is impossible to stop your car’s engine from overheating by
disconnecting the wire that lights up the light on your dashboard
when your engine is getting too hot. That would clearly be absurd.
In fact, disconnecting the warning light has been shown to be
a “statistically significant risk factor” for a blown engine!
It is equally impossible to correct the nutritional deficiencies that
CAUSE heart disease by taking poisonous pharmaceutical drugs
that merely prevent you from recognizing that the high
“cholesterol” light is flashing a warning on your body’s dashboard.
TAKING DRUGS TO LOWER YOUR

“CHOLESTEROL” LEVELS IS STUPID!
As you will see in later chapters, the CAUSE of heart disease is

known, and treating the CAUSE does result in normalization of
blood “cholesterol” readings. But does your doctor want to talk
about that?
FIREFIGHTERS
If the analogy about mechanics and overheating engines left you

wanting more, then how about an analogy about fires and
firefighters?
What if you were a space alien and you came to earth during the hot
dry season in any of our world’s many forests? What would you
see? You would see fires raging out of control, destroying the life
of the forest. What else would you see? You would see
seemingly endless hordes of firefighters starting fires!! As a space
alien, you might not immediately recognize the concept that
firefighters employ when they are starting controlled backfires in
order to limit the damage caused by the raging, uncontrolled fires.
Firefighters position themselves in advance of the dangerous fire
and start fires that burn back toward the main fire in order to use up
the fuel that would have been available to the fire and thus
extinguish it in a controlled and ingenious way. But, until you
realize what they are doing, it sure looks like they are causing the
problem!
“Epidemiologic observations can never be utilized to prove

causation.”
David A. McCarron, M.D. and Cynthia D. Morris, Ph.D.
Authors of “Calcium and Hypertension”
from a NIH workshop on nutrition and hypertension
When surgeons cut into a clogged coronary artery and find tough,
arteriosclerotic plaque that has been built up over time and is now
clogging the arteries, they act as judge, jury and executioner when
they blame “cholesterol” just like the space aliens might blame the
firefighters. “Cholesterol” is not guilty of causing the initial
damage, but it is wrongly convicted by virtue of being caught at
the “scene of the crime”. Please realize that absolutely every
doctor knows this, but fails to share this with their patients. When
any type of irritation, damage or weakness occurs in the
cardiovascular system of arteries, capillaries and veins, one means
of repair used by the human body is to coat the damaged area with
fatty substances and fibrous connective tissue (fibrinogen) in order
to stop the leak. If the damage continues year after year after year,
then obviously the repair work will have to continue year after year
as well. Eventually the patchwork gets calcified, hardens and may
become too big and start to clog the flow of blood through the
damaged artery. The “cholesterol” was not the initial CAUSE of
the damage. The “cholesterol” is much like the innocent
firefighters, it is at the scene attempting to stop further destruction.
YELLOW FINGER SYNDROME
The simplest analogy follows. It is a known fact that people who

smoke tend to suffer from heart disease at a higher rate than people
who do not smoke. It is also a known fact that people who smoke
tend to suffer from yellow discoloration of the fingers from the
simple act of holding the cigarettes that they smoke. Thus, in the
idiotic “Land of Doctors”, yellow fingers could be seen as an
accurate “risk factor” for heart disease. Your doctor could refer to
this as Yellow Finger Syndrome. Obviously Yellow Finger
Syndrome does not CAUSE heart disease, but it is connected in a
remote way to heart disease, so it could be referred to as a heart
disease “risk factor”. Any observant physician in the “Land of
Doctors” would be able to immediately recognize that a patient
with yellow fingers may be at an elevated risk for heart disease.

The physician would then be able to make the dreaded
official diagnosis of “Yellow Finger Syndrome”. The logic would
be so seemingly simple. Yellow fingers = smoker = higher heart
disease risk = Yellow Finger Syndrome Sufferer. In this case, the
doctor would most certainly prescribe a powerful anti-yellowing
drug to help the patient “manage” the dangerous Yellow Finger
Syndrome “risk factor” which is an extremely accurate predictor of
greater chance of having a heart attack! The patient might even
qualify for assistance from one of the many charitable fundraising
organizations that are dedicated to helping Yellow Finger
Syndrome Sufferers.
If the patient visited a surgeon, the surgeon would most likely

recommend that the patient undergo a double-quintuple finger
transplant in order to replace the five yellowed fingers on each
hand. This would certainly seem to remove the “risk” that was
associated with Yellow Finger Syndrome. There wouldn’t be any
guarantee that the Yellow Finger Syndrome would never return,
but the transplanted fingers should remain non-yellow for a period
of time. At least during that time, the patient would not suffer the
stigma of being a Yellow Finger Syndrome Sufferer and could live
their life without the fear of such embarassment.
But what if the smoker wore gloves whenever they smoked? The
evidence would not be there! Using this faulty evidence, the
physician in the “Land of Doctors” would come to the wrong
conclusion that the patient’s non-yellow fingers = non-smoker =
lower heart disease risk. But the patient is a smoker!
In either instance, the patient would not have been properly

informed as to how Yellow Finger Syndrome related to the CAUSE
of the heart disease, which obviously is smoking. Nor would the
patient have been properly instructed as to how they should adjust
their actions so as to eliminate both the yellow fingers and the risk
to their heart that is being CAUSED by the cigarette smoke. Of

course the above example is totally absurd, but this is exactly the
same type of ill-logic that drives the marketing of “cholesterol
treatments”. Yellow Finger Syndrome does not CAUSE heart
disease. Yellow fingers are a result of an activity (smoking) that
happens to CAUSE yellow fingers and also happens to increase the
risk of heart disease at the same time. Likewise, elevated
“cholesterol” levels do not, in and of themselves, CAUSE heart
disease. Elevated “cholesterol” levels are also CAUSED by the
same dietary indiscretions that lead to heart disease. Elevated
“cholesterol” levels are a warning sign, a “risk factor” for heart
disease in exactly the same way that yellow fingers are a “risk
factor” for heart disease. Taking poisonous drugs to “lower your
cholesterol” is just as stupid as it would be to take an
anti-yellowing drug to change the color of your fingers to avoid the
danger to your heart that might be associated with the dreaded
(but fictitious) Yellow Finger Syndrome!
“The main reason for the failure of modern medical science is

that it is dealing with results and not causes. It is obvious that
dealing with the final result alone will not be wholly effective
unless the basic cause is also removed.”
Edward Bach
Author of “Heal Thyself”
My God, the idiocy of the current focus upon lowering

“cholesterol” is so unbelievably misguided that it boggles the
mind! I hope that the previous analogies have successfully opened
your eyes to the obvious.
The points to remember are these...

Just because “cholesterol” is found at the scene of the arterial

blockage does not mean that it was the initial CAUSE of the
damage, and just because your “cholesterol” levels are elevated
does not mean that they are busy CAUSING “heart disease”.
CHOLESTEROL performs countless functions in the body and the
amount of CHOLESTEROL fluctuates all the time depending upon
the body’s needs. Just because you are “managing” your
“cholesterol” levels with drugs does not mean that you have
properly identified and eliminated the root CAUSE of the problem.
You most certainly have not. Your body’s effort to raise
“cholesterol” levels is most definitely not due to a dietary
deficiency of an artificial pharmaceutical drug in your daily diet.
Your surgeon’s attempt to physically rearrange the arteries of your
heart, replacing them with veins from your leg, most certainly will
not have any effect upon the chemical and physical processes that
CAUSED that artery to clog in the first place. Most bypass patients
suffer from clogged bypasses soon after the operation. This is
simply because the CAUSE remains unchanged.
I challenge anyone reading this book to send me a copy of a death

certificate that lists “hypercholesterolemia” as the CAUSE of
death. “Hyper” means high and “emia” means in the blood.
Hypercholesterolemia means high “cholesterol” in the blood.
Hypercholesterolemia is RARELY listed as a CAUSE of death
because it does not CAUSE heart disease.
If you were to have an opportunity to ask the questions that were

posed at the beginning of this chapter to a doctor who actually
knew the answers, who would not lie and who would not try to
deceive you, you might hear something like the following...
Q. Doctor, can you reference even one study where the

subjects were fed or injected with CHOLESTEROL or
LDL to the point that they developed heart disease and
had a heart attack?
A. The correct answer is that these studies have been done,

and they failed, but your doctor simply chooses to ignore
them. The true meaning of the word ignor-ance simply
means to ignore that which is obvious. Doctors
pompously claim that modern medical ethics makes it
impossible to perform experiments like those that
you mentioned because of the dangers that they might pose
to people. They claim that no one would volunteer for a
study if the purpose was to try to cause heart disease and
even if they did, it would be seen as unethical to actually
conduct such an experiment. But these studies have been
done (see the chapter “CHOLESTEROL is NOT guilty!”).
“Apparently the first experiment evaluating the daily feeding of

CHOLESTEROL or fats to humans over a long period of time
was conducted in 1933. This study reported that the addition of
2,230mg of CHOLESTEROL per day in the form of nine egg
yolks produced only a ‘slight’ increase in blood ‘cholesterol’.
Pure CHOLESTEROL feedings were repeated numerous times
and the amounts fed to subjects ranged from about 5,000mg to
the enormous quantity of 60,000mg (about 120 times the amount
contained in the normal diet.) Thus, experimenters repeated the
same mistakes and obtained the same negative findings over a
period of at least 28 years.”
Q. Wouldn’t this type of study be necessary to

“scientifically prove” that “cholesterol” or LDL
actually CAUSE heart attacks?
A. The correct answer is: Yes, you are correct, but since the
actual cause of heart disease is known to the medical and
pharmaceutical industries, and since doctors do not have
the patented rights to the cure, there is no financial
incentive for doctors to discuss experiments that they
know would prove their current advice to be wrong. It is
much easier and far more profitable for your doctor to
simply ignore the information in this book and to deny that
it even exists. Your doctor’s ignor-ance and denial of the
truth drives you to follow the “recommended” protocols,
which are far more lucrative for them and far more
dangerous for you.
Q. If “cholesterol” does not actually CAUSE heart disease,

but is only a “risk factor” then why are we so concerned
about it? Shouldn’t we be more concerned about the
CAUSES of heart disease?
A. Because it makes people in the medical and

pharmaceutical establishment quite a lot of money. Think
about it... all the “cholesterol” screenings, prescriptions,
heart surgeries, monthly checkups, etc., generate billions of
dollars of income. If we went back to the policies of the
past when doctors actually tried to help you to understand
how to maintain your own health, there wouldn’t be any
heart disease. Cancer is a strong number two, but it
doesn’t generate nearly as much business as heart disease.
Diabetes has potential to be big. Plastic surgery, excuse
me, cosmetic surgery, is coming on strong, because
Hollywood is really helping us to promote it. AIDS was
exciting for a while, but it didn’t take off the way it could
have. All that doctors have to keep them going are diseases
that affect a relatively small number of people such as
Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Muscular Dystrophy, and the
like. Heart disease is huge. It generates more than half of
the total income received by the medical industry. You are
concerned about “cholesterol” because, financially,
doctors need you to be concerned about “cholesterol”.
It is by far the biggest money maker that doctors have.
It gets you into the office every year for your “annual
physical”, and, once doctors get you onto the meds it
keeps you coming back more frequently so that they can
monitor the damage that the drugs are doing to your liver,
kidneys and other organs. If doctors didn’t have the
“cholesterol problem” to get you worried and get you to go
to a doctor in the first place, then half of all doctors would
have to look for new jobs.
Unlike the answers given above by our make-believe doctor, who

gave honest, informed, candid answers, you may be extremely
surprised by the responses that your doctor may give once you start
asking tough questions. In general...
1) They will not produce any valid scientific evidence at all.

2) They will give you some deceptive information about some
other type of meaningless study that is decidedly NOT
what you specifically asked for.
3) They will attempt to distract you and convince you that
such “proof” is unnecessary because “everyone knows that
you have to control your ‘cholesterol’”!
4) They may get very angry. Please be forewarned.
It is your responsibility to yourself to observe the actions of your

doctor and determine whether or not...

“SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN” ??
What does the above phrase really mean? I bet you think that
you know, but I am absolutely certain that you don’t.
The phrase “SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN” is definitely one
of the most misused phrases in the English language.
Actually, it is misused 100% of the time. Let me explain.
We all studied science in grammar, middle, junior high, high
school and maybe even college. A “scientific” experiment is
one where you take a set of circumstances, purposefully
change ONLY one variable, run the experiment and observe
what happens. If anything interesting or unusual happens,
then you go looking for a reason. Since all of the KNOWN
variables were “controlled” by you, the scientist, the most
likely suspect as to the CAUSE of the observed change is the
one variable that you purposefully changed. DUH!
That’s science. But wait...
Can you really do a truly “scientific” experiment on a human

being? How can you really control ALL of the variables of a
human life? How many times did you breathe today? Same
as yesterday? What did you eat? Drink? Did you make
love? Did you laugh? Did you get angry? How often did
you have a bowel movement? Okay, this could go on
forever. You get the point. Honest scientists understand
that...
IT IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE TO DO A
SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT ON THE HUMAN BODY
BECAUSE YOU CANNOT CONTROL ALL OF THE
VARIABLES!
If it is impossible to do a “scientific” experiment on even one

human being, then it is most definitely impossible to
“SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE” that anything will work for
everyone. Doctors disparagingly refer to individual’s
attempts to perform simple scientific experiments on their
own bodies as unacceptable “anecdotal evidence”, but...
“Anecdotal evidence” is actually the closest that you are

ever going to get to pure science when considering your
own personal human body. If it works for you, it must
be valid, for you (and only you)!
Since it is impossible to control ALL the variables in any

experiment with living creatures, scientists have given up on
pure science. Yes, that’s right. They have given up because
it is impossible, and they realize it. They are smart people.
That’s why they are scientists. In place of real, honest, true
science, what you actually see is all kinds of media reports
on STATISTICAL data regarding health. Our marvelous
scientists work like crazy to dig out STATISTICAL
evidence that something is PROBABLE and our media and
our doctors turn around and distort all their hard work by
wrongly stating that something has been “scientifically
proven”! Hogwash!!
Now, you and I both know that statistics can be manipulated

very easily. I purposefully chose not to say that statistics lie
because statistics do NOT lie, doctors do. Statistics are just
numbers. Numbers do not lie. But numbers can be and are
manipulated by people who have an agenda to promote or by
companies who have a drug to sell.
Absolutely nothing can be “scientifically proven” in regards

to the human body The best that anyone can ever say is that
something is probable or not probable, and maybe even
assign a numerical value to that probability. Health issues
regarding the human body may be discussed in terms of
probability, not pure scientific proof. Let me give you
clear insight into the linguistic reality of the medical/
pharmaceutical establishment: If you ever hear someone say
that something has (or has not) been “SCIENTIFICALLY
PROVEN” to improve your health, then you should
immediately realize that that person is a liar!
People who present “statistical” probabilities to the

public under the mantle of “scientific proof” are liars!
On the other hand, if you ever hear that something has been
shown to be “STATISTICALLY RELEVANT” and that there
is a ___% PROBABILITY that it may improve your health,
and that you may want to consider it as a possibility, then,
before you make a move, make sure that you actually know
what “STATISTICALLY RELEVANT” really means.
Curiously, the meaning of the phrase “STATISTICALLY
RELEVANT” depends upon the field of study. Some are
stricter than others. If you are a researcher in the science of
physics, and you hope to get the results of your work to be
viewed as statistically relevant, and maybe published in a
reputable journal, then you have to meet their entry
requirements. Reputable journals in the field of physics
generally will not publish any claim of a new observation
unless the data have a significance level of 1/10,000 or more.
This means that if the same experiment were repeated 10,000

times, the new observation would have to be observable in
9,999 of the 10,000 experiments. In other words, 99.99% of
the time.
Medical journals are a little bit more forgiving. In medicine

and related fields such as psychology, pharmacology and
even social studies, the threshold for publication is supposed
to be 95%. This means that, at a minimum, an experiment
would have to be performed at least 20 times, and it would
have to show the observed result at least 19 out of 20 times
(95%). Supposedly, if, and only if, a study meets these
requirements, it will then be CONSIDERED for
publication. It doesn’t mean it will get published, but at least
it has met the minimum requirements.
Do medical journals actually follow their own requirements?

Heck no! The pressure to publish and share information is
too great. Their typical response to this criticism is
something like: “Hey, people’s lives are at stake here. We
have to publish this information so that people know what we
know as soon as we know it. It’s not like finding a new, far
off galaxy in the sky. It is important right here and now!”
And I agree, so long as what is actually “known” is made

crystal clear. Medical journals are not meant for general
public consumption, because they are merely supposed to be
sharing the latest news about PRELIMINARY results among
fellow researchers, whether they do their experiments in a
labratory or in a clinic. Medical journals simply report upon
experiments, not “scientifically proven” facts!!!!!!
By no stretch of the imagination should you ever believe that

any of the information found in medical journals has been
“SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN”. Most of it is not even
accepted yet as being “STATISTICALLY RELEVANT”. It
may be on its way to such status, but it is not there yet, and
they clearly do not claim that it is. The problem here is the
media. Everyone needs a headline. Everyone needs a story.
You can see where this is leading. “Health” reporters scan
the new issues of the medical journals for “juicy” stories and
proceed to mangle the concepts of Science, Statistics,
Probability and Truth.
If all this has been confusing, let me simplify it. People lie.
People mangle the language in order to deceive. News
reporting is never “Fair and Balanced”. Never! Our “news”
is controlled by corporations attempting to earn a profit. Are
you really so naive as to believe that they are going to report
news that may put some of their advertising revenue at risk?
Have you not noticed how much advertising revenue is being
generated by drug companies promoting their products?
Here’s a hint: The pharmaceutical industry spends more
money on marketing their drugs than they spend on
researching and developing them!
Drug companies are continually striving to create artificial

chemicals that do not exist in nature so that they can market
them as drugs to vast numbers of people. Most problems
have a multiplicity of CAUSES, and they all need to be
addressed in order to improve your health. It is a simple truth
that no single artificial chemical can ever “cure” a complex,
multi-faceted disease, but yet we still keep hoping for that
magical “silver bullet”, that “wonder drug”, that “cure-all”
No one therapy will ever work for everyone. What do you

care if a new drug helps 99.99% of the population if it has the
side effect of killing you dead! Just because one person
benefits does not mean that everyone will, and the fact that
many people benefit does not rule out the possibility that it
might not work at all for you. That’s why doctors call what
they do a practice.
Just think about it. if you could simply swallow a pill that
would “cure” your disease, then you would be cured. You
wouldn’t have to purchase any more drugs. Drug companies
do not want to discover “cures”. There is absolutely no
profit potential in finding a “cure” for any disease. However,
there is unlimited potential for profit in creating ongoing,
life-long “treatments” for symptoms that can be sold over
and over and over to unsuspecting, desperate consumers.
In the financial world, there is always a disclaimer on every

advertisement... “Past results do not guarantee future
success.” The practice of medicine should have a similar
disclaimer, but until it does, you are simply going to have to
trust your gut. Ask questions. I suggest that you follow your
instincts before you ever blindly trust your doctor, because...

Chapter 2
CHOLESTEROL
Is NOT Guilty!
IT’S A JOKE...
If medical science has made such progress, why

do I feel so much worse than I did twenty years
ago?
• • •
Medical insurance is a lot like wearing a hospital

gown. You feel sort of covered, but not where
you really need it!
• • •
You have a cough?
Go home and eat a whole box of Ex-Lax.

Tomorrow you’ll be afraid to cough!
• • •
All my doctor ever does is refer me to specialists.

I don’t know if he is really a doctor or just a
booking agent!
The next time you get an opportunity to speak with your doctor,
take the time to ask them any or all of the following questions...
Q. Doctor, does CHOLESTEROL CAUSE heart disease?
Q. If I lower my “cholesterol” levels, will I live longer?
Q. Are there any studies that show that it is dangerous to

lower my “cholesterol” too much?
A. The short answer to all of these questions is that overall,

when all factors are considered, healthier, longer-lived
people have higher “cholesterol” levels than sickly, dead
people. Stated a different way, many studies have actually
reported that, in many respects, “cholesterol” that is
too low is actually worse than “cholesterol” that is too
high!
To start you off on the right foot on this incredible journey, let me
simply say that you can’t believe everything that you read!
In my research for this book, I came across a statement that seems
innocent enough, unless you know how to read between the lines.
“The relationship between CHOLESTEROL in the diet and

atherosclerosis was first observed in rabbits in 1908 by a Russian
pathologist named Ignatowsky.”
Peter O. Kwiterovich, Jr., M.D.
Author of “Beyond Cholesterol”
The Johns Hopkins Complete Guide for Avoiding Heart Disease
Now that I know how to read between the lines, I’m beginning to
think that maybe Dr. Jim Ignatowsky from the old television series
“Taxi” may have gone “Back To The Future” to play a little joke
on all of us! It is true that in 1911, Antishkow and Ignatowski
independently published the results of studies they completed.
That is where the truth stops. In these studies, VEGETARIAN
rabbits were fed large amounts of animal based CHOLESTEROL
for several months. Their blood “cholesterol” levels rose
dramatically and autopsies of their hearts showed that they were
clogged with fatty, fibrinous material.
THUS WAS BORN THE CHOLESTEROL THEORY!
Except...
Rabbits are not humans. I know that this is obvious, but it is still a
very important point. “Cholesterol” studies performed on
VEGETARIAN animals simply cannot be translated into
meaningful information for omniverous human beings. When it
comes to diet and CHOLESTEROL, human beings are incredibly
unique. Herbivores such as goats, cattle, horses, camels, moose,
sheep, and yes, rabbits, are unable to process dietary
CHOLESTEROL. If herbivores are fed diets that are rich in
oxidized CHOLESTEROL, it is true that they may develop fatty
streaks in their arteries, but these changes are NOT the same type
of changes that occur in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries.
“Any pathologist of independent mind and free from

preconceived ideas would conclude that human atherosclerosis
and the lesions induced by the overload of CHOLESTEROL and
fats are not one and the same disease.”
William E. Stehbens
Professor at the Department of Pathology,
The favorite victim of “scientific” studies is the Watanabe rabbit.

Watanabe rabbits are generally docile and peaceful animals. They
generally don’t bite and their long ears make it easy to take blood
samples. Unlike the killer rabbit in the movie, Monty Python and
the Holy Grail, Watanabe rabbits are vegetarians. When they are
force-fed CHOLESTEROL rich foods, the rabbits’ “cholesterol”
levels quickly rise to 10-20 times higher than that of even the
highest level ever recorded in humans. CHOLESTEROL is
deposited in the rabbits’ liver, kidneys and other internal organs.
The rabbits’ fur falls out and its eyes turn yellow. Fatty streaks of
CHOLESTEROL are deposited in the rabbits’ arteries but still,
these experimental rabbits do not have heart attacks! It is simply
impossible to induce a heart attack in a rabbit by dietary means
alone! The only way to induce a heart attack in an experimental
rabbit is by either hormone injection or mechanical damage to the
rabbits’ arteries.
It is true that the arteries of these poor rabbits develop fatty streaks,
but this is not the same as human atherosclerosis. The average
American BELIEVES that atherosclerosis, or hardening of the
arteries, is caused by the buildup of CHOLESTEROL and other
fats along the inside lining of the arteries. THIS IS FALSE!
In rabbits, the obstructing materials were found to be attached to
the innermost lining of the artery. This wrong information has been
pounded into your brain your entire life. By your parents.
By your friends. By your teachers. By the media and by the
medical/pharmaceutical industry. The only problem is that what
happens in rabbits is not the same as what happens in humans.
In humans, CHOLESTEROL and fats DO NOT simply attach
themselves to the inside of your arteries and clog them up like
hair and soap scum clog your sink and shower drain. That is not
how it works. Your parents, your friends, your teachers and the
media were all wrong. Your doctor should know better, but...

“In humans, CHOLESTEROL and other fats don’t simply come

bouncing merrily along down an artery and suddenly decide to
stick somewhere. That is what happens when vegetarian animals
are fed high fat, high CHOLESTEROL diets. When vegetarian
rabbits eat a diet that is high in saturated fats and
CHOLESTEROL, they develop a form of atherosclerosis that
may totally plug up their coronary arteries within three months.
Supporters of the ‘cholesterol’ theory have used this observation
to support the theory, ignoring the fact that the pathological
changes in the animals’ arteries in no way resemble those seen in
diseased arteries of humans. In humans, fatty obstructions are
build on location, within the walls of arteries themselves.
Arterial walls contain a layer of strong circular muscles.
Therefore, the growths have only one way to expand and that is
by protruding into the opening of an artery. In vegetarian
animals the fatty deposits build up on the inner walls of the
arteries. In humans, the fatty deposits grow within the arterial
wall itself and are covered by the inner lining membrane of the
artery. A true believer in the ‘cholesterol’ theory must be willing
to genuflex before the following statements with a religious
fervor:
1. Eating CHOLESTEROL and saturated fat raises the blood

‘cholesterol’ level.
2. Elevated blood levels of ‘cholesterol’ cause fatty deposits to
form in our arteries.
3. Eating less saturated fat and CHOLESTEROL will cause blood
levels of ‘cholesterol’ to go down.
4. Lowering blood ‘cholesterol’ levels (by any means) will reduce
the risk of dying.
There is just one simple problem with these assumptions.
THEY ARE ALL WRONG!”
Charles T. McGee, M.D.

Author of “Heart Frauds”
So what happens if you feed CHOLESTEROL to carnivores?
“Innumerable experiments involved rabbits and other animals

which could not metabolize CHOLESTEROL like humans.
Consequently, while large amounts of dietary CHOLESTEROL
raise blood ‘cholesterol’ in humans by only a few milligrams, they
raise levels in rabbits by many hundreds of milligrams. Animals
which metabolize CHOLESTEROL similar to humans, such as
rats and dogs, do not develop the atherosclerosis-like disease even
when fed very large amounts of CHOLESTEROL.”
“The feeding of CHOLESTEROL to carnivorous animals is

generally without pathological consequences.”
Principles of Biochemistry (Textbook)
In 1952, Dr. Ancel Keys, the Director of the Laboratory of

Physiological Hygiene at the University of Minnesota presented a
report to a small audience in New York at Mt. Sinai Hospital. At
the time, Dr. Keys believed that food that contained high levels of
fat was the culprit to be blamed for the epidemic of heart disease
that was killing one of every two Americans. As a part of his
“proof” he presented a graph that “seemed” to show a statistical
correlation between the total dietary intake of fats and the death
rates from heart disease in seven countries. The careful reader may
recognize Dr. Keys from the introductory quotes. His position is
now clear, but in 1952 Dr. Keys apparently found a sympathetic
listener in Fred Epstein. Convinced by Dr. Keys’ presentation, Fred
Epstein began spreading the anti-fat propaganda “with great effect”
throughout Europe and America. The graph from Dr. Keys’
presentation looked like this...
Heart Disease - Deaths per 1,000

7
• USA
6 Canada
5
Australia ••
4
• England
3 & Wales
2
Italy
1 •
0 • Japan
0 10 20 30 40 50
Percentage of Calories From Fat
As you can clearly see, the data seems to imply that the more fat
that the people in a given country eat, the more heart disease they
are likely to have. However, unknown to most people is the fact
that Ancel Keys conveniently neglected to include data from many
other countries that was available at the time. He chose to only
graph the data from seven countries that seemed to fit his theory.
If Ancel Keys had instead decided to graph the available data from
Japan (a different study), Ceylon and Mexico, he might have
presented the chart below which shows that INCREASING FAT
CONSUMPTION ACTUALLY DECREASES THE RATE OF
HEART DISEASE!
8
2 Japan
Ceylon
1 •
• Mexico
0
0 10
•
20 30 40 50

Italy, Portugal and France, he might have presented the chart
below which shows that INCREASING FAT CONSUMPTION
ACTUALLY DECREASES THE RATE OF HEART DISEASE!
8
Heart Disease - Deaths per 1,000 7
3
Italy
2 • • Portugal
1
• France
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Israel, Switzerland, West Germany and Holland, he might have
HEART DISEASE!
8
5
Israel
4 •
Switzerland
3
West Germany
••
2 • Holland
1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Finland, Ireland, England & Wales and Denmark, he might have
HEART DISEASE.
8
7
Finland •
6
5
Ireland
4 •
England •
3 & Wales
• Denmark
2
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
By choosing to present only selected data from Japan, Italy,

England & Wales, Australia, Canada and the United States, Ancel
Keys basically “cooked the books”. He chose data that fit his pet
theory and ignored data that conflicted with it. By definition, this
is very good marketing, but this is very, very, very bad science!
Prior to the 1920s, highly saturated animal fats in the form of

butter, lard and tallow were eaten without fear. In 1920, when
heart disease was practically unheard of, the consumption of
animal fat in the US was approximately 26 pounds per person,
per year. By 1989, with heart disease far and away the greatest
cause of death throughout the country, the consumption of animal
fat in the US had decreased to approximately 11 pounds per person
per year. This is hardly convincing evidence that decreasing the
intake of fat is good for your heart.
One inescapable reality is that every diet is a series of trade offs.

If you eat more of something, then you will most likely eat less of
something else. It’s obvious, but... when researchers such as
Ancel Keys look at diets and see large amounts of a given food
such as meat, butter and eggs, their minds only see the obvious.
They associate any problems as being caused by what they perceive
to be an excess. They conveniently forget that the very excess that
they are observing is crowding out some other type of food such as
fruits, vegetables, seeds and nuts. Ask yourself: Is it the too much
of something? Is it the too little of something else? Or, could it
possibly be a complex combination of many things?
“The Eastern Finns, for instance, whose lofty heart disease rates
convinced Ancel Keys and a generation of researchers of the evils
of fat, live within 500 kilometers of the Arctic Circle and rarely
see fresh produce or a green vegetable. The Scots, infamous for
eating perhaps the least wholesome diet in the developed world,
are in a similar fix. Researchers joke that the only leafy vegetable
that these populations consume regularly is tobacco. As for the
purported benefits of the widely hailed Mediterranean diet, is it
the olive oil, or the fresh vegetables? After all, the olive oil is
used either to cook vegetables or as a dressing over salads. The
quantity of vegetables consumed is almost a pound a day. Indeed,
recent data on heart disease trends in Europe suggest that a
likely explanation for the differences between countries and over
time is the availability of fresh produce year-round rather than
differences in fat intake.”
Gary Taubes
Author of “The Soft Science of Dietary Fat”
We all know that life is complicated. An individual’s health is the

sum total of a vast combination of factors that are unique to each
person. Why is it that scientists, doctors, politicians and members
of the media want everything to be overly simplistic?
Starting in the 1960s, the American Heart Association (AHA)

began urging Americans to follow a low fat diet that they referred
to as the “Prudent Diet”. The public responded poorly, I guess
because, at that point in time, the public was still wise. One of the
early studies, the Joliffe Anticoronary Study, was conducted in
New York City by its namesake, Dr. Joliffe. Half of the participants
in the study were placed on the AHA’s “Prudent Diet” and the other
half were chosen because they were big eaters of red meat and had
lots of CHOLESTEROL and saturated fat in their diets. The results
of the Joliffe study were reported in 1966 as a “great success”
because the participants who followed the “Prudent Diet” had
lowered their serum “cholesterol” by 25%! Successful, yes, in
lowering “cholesterol” readings, but almost no mention was made
of the fact that NONE of the control group, who ate all of the
so-called “wrong” foods died from heart attacks, but eight of
the participants who followed the “Prudent Diet” died of heart
attacks during the study. Dr. Joliffe himself died of a
“vascular event”, but it was reported that he had died of
diabetes.
Another trial to test the “Prudent Diet” was conducted by Dr. Irving
Page of the Cleveland Clinic. The results of this pilot test with
2,000 participants were reported in 1969 and there was no benefit
at all from the “Prudent Diet”. Dr. Page died of a heart attack.
In 1969, the Diet-Heart Review Panel of the National Heart

Institute (now the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute or
NHLBI) reported that “It is not known whether dietary
manipulation has any effect whatsoever on coronary heart disease.”
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, it was realized and considered
that an extremely large scale experiment in nutrition would be the
only way to truly settle the question of how dietary fat relates to
cardiovascular disease. Such a test would have been enormous.
Tens of thousands of individuals would have to switch to low fat
diets so that their health could be compared to an equal number of
people who agreed to eat a high fat diet. All of these people would
have to be followed for decades until enough deaths accumulated
to provide statistically significant results. In 1971, The National
Institute of Health (NIH) estimated that such an experiment would
cost $1 billion. This was more than the NIH was willing to spend
so, instead, they decided to forego a $1 billion study that might be
definitive and instead fund a half-dozen studies at one third of the
cost. Everyone “expected” that these smaller studies would be
sufficiently persuasive to “prove” that reducing the consumption of
saturated fats and CHOLESTEROL (meat, butter, eggs) would
prolong the lives of those who consumed less of these “killer
foods”! These studies ran through the 1970s and their results were
published between 1980 and 1984.
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY!
Four of these trials examined the effect of diet upon heart disease
rates in people in Honolulu, Chicago, Puerto Rico and
Framingham, Massachusetts. They all showed that there was NO
evidence that men who ate less fat lived longer or had fewer
heart attacks! A fifth trial, the Multiple Risk Factor
Intervention Trial (MRFIT), which alone cost $115 million,
suggested that eating less fat might actually shorten one’s
lifespan!
The sixth study was NOT even a dietary study. The $140 million
Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial (LRC)
was a drug trial. The LRC study began in 1973 and ended in 1984.
On average, individual subjects participated in the study for
approximately 7.4 years. The LRC study only included white
males with extremely high serum ‘cholesterol’ levels (higher than
95% of the general population). Absolutely no women and no
minorities were included. In fact, 480,000 white males were
screened in order to find 3,806 health challenged white males who
were purposefully chosen to be completely UN-representative of
the general population. At the very least, the results of the LRC
study cannot be applied to women, they cannot be applied to
minorities and they cannot be applied to 95% of all white males.
The results of the LRC study (as inconclusive as they are) can only
be “scientifically” applied to the 5% of all white males who suffer
from the same level of extremely high ‘cholesterol’ levels that
affected the men who were chosen to take part in the LRC study.
PLEASE TAKE NOTE:
The above information is more than adequate to make the

remainder of this explanation a completely unnecessary exercise.
The use of the “results” of the LRC study to direct national public
health policy, in and of itself, is absurd. I will continue with the
following details for those of you who wish to understand how all
of the current insanity originated.
In December, 1984, at a Consensus Development Conference on

Lowering Blood Cholesterol to Prevent Heart Disease held by the
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and a division
of the National Institutes of Health, an “expert” panel concluded
that high “cholesterol” is a major cause of coronary heart disease,
that lowering elevated blood “cholesterol” levels (specifically LDL
“cholesterol”) will reduce the risk of heart attacks, and that dietary
changes will reduce blood “cholesterol” levels. This abomination
of science in the name of government policy became known as
“The Lipid Theory”. Please note the use of the word “theory”!
The Consensus Conference “officially” gave the appearance of

unanimity where none existed. Their conclusions completely
ignored all of the research that came before the LRC trial. They
ignored the studies in Honolulu, Chicago, Puerto Rico and
Framingham. They ignored the MRFIT trial. The conclusions
drawn by the Consensus Committee ostensibly parroted the results
of just one study (LRC). Why? Could it be that there was bias
involved? When one considers that the planning committee for the
conference was chaired by a NHLBI administrator named Basil

Rifkind (who also led the LRC trial!) and considering the fact that
the planning committee chose Rifkind’s co-investigator Daniel
Steinberg to lead the panel, is it really any wonder that the report
that was published by the panel praised the results of the LRC trial?
First of all, what exactly is a “consensus” conference? The idea of

such a conference is that an expert panel of unbiased experts listens
to vast amounts of the information pertaining to the issue at hand
and attempts to arrive at a conclusion with which EVERYONE
agrees. If there was no controversy, there would be no need for a
consensus committee to meet in the first place. The report that was
published by the conference revealed none of the differing opinions
held by the scientists who attended the conference. Cardiologist
Michael Oliver of the Imperial College in London argued that it
was unscientific to equate the effects of a drug study with the
effects of diet, but no mention of this obvious truth appears in the
committee’s final report. Oliver later complained in the
British medical journal, The Lancet, that...
“[committee members] were selected to include only experts who

would, predictably, say that all levels of blood ‘cholesterol’ in the
United States are too high and should be lowered. And, of course,
that is exactly what was said.”
Michael Oliver, Cardiologist
The data from the LRC study clearly shows that using drugs to
lower levels of “cholesterol” in the blood have absolutely NO
significant benefit in regards to a person’s OVERALL health
and longevity BUT, because the results of this one trial were
selectively misrepresented, and because the media loves a good
sound bite, soon everyone in the country was wrongly led to fear
CHOLESTEROL.
If the so-called “scientists” had honestly interpreted and honestly

presented the results of this trial, they could have provided
substantial proof that the high levels of “cholesterol” in the blood
are absolutely NOT the CAUSE of increased MORTALITY, but
they instead chose to alter the criteria by which they judged their
own results, they chose to grossly misrepresent their data and they
chose to selectively ignore other data which was completely
contrary to their misguided conclusions. The so-called “scientists”
who directed the LRC study and also controlled the “Consensus”
Conference that praised the results of the same study touted the
following results...
Placebo Drug
Participants 1900 1906
“Cholesterol” levels - -8.5%
Heart Attacks 187 155
Deaths Due to
Cardiovascular Disease 38 30
The reports of the LRC study that reached the public focused upon
the “relative” reduction of risk or heart attack death rather than the
“absolute” reduction of risk in relation to overall mortality. This is
a very clever method of statistical manipulation that is often used
by drug companies in order to make their products seem to be more
effective than they really are. I will go into further detail on this
devious practice in the next few paragraphs. The press releases
given to the media failed to note that the participants who received
the drug therapy had a greater number of violent and accidental
deaths than the control group. These deaths, along with deaths that
resulted from an increased number of gastrointestinal diseases and
gastrointestinal cancers were described by the investigators as a
“chance occurrance” and were largely ignored by the media.
A proper statistical analysis of the information listed above should

have included at least some of the following statements...
• 1.3300% of the subjects given placebo suffered from a

heart attack per year. [(187/1900)/7.4 = 1.330%/year]
• 1.0989% of the subjects given the drug therapy suffered

from a heart attack per year. [(155/1906)/7.4 = 1.0989%/year]
• Therefore, if you are a white male with “cholesterol”

levels in the top 5% of the population, then taking a drug
that lowers your blood “cholesterol” levels by 8.5%
may lower your risk of having a heart attack by
0.2311% per year (1.330 - 1.0989 = 0.2311%/year).
• For every 1% reduction in serum “cholesterol”, drug

therapy will lower your risk of heart attack by 0.0272%
per year. (0.2311/8.5%) BIG DEAL!
Also...
• 0.2703% of the subjects given placebo died from
cardiovascular disease per year. [(38/1900)/7.4 = 0.2703%/year]
• 0.2127% of the subjects given the drug therapy died from

cardiovascular disease per year. [(30/1906)/7.4 = 0.2127%/year]
• Therefore, if you are a white male with “cholesterol”

levels in the top 5% of the population, , then taking a drug
that lowers your blood “cholesterol” levels by 8.5% may
lower your risk of dying from cardiovascular disease by
0.0576%/year (0.2703 - 0.2127 = 0.0576%/year).
• For every 1% reduction in serum “cholesterol”, drug

therapy will lower your risk of death due to coronary
heart disease by 0.0068% per year. (0.0576/8.5%)
BIG DEAL!
Dr. Basil Rifkind. the director of the LRC study could have made
a positive and lasting impression upon the world if he simply had
the balls to state the obvious: He could have said that “Using a
drug to lower ‘cholesterol’ levels does NOT provide a statistically
significant amount of protection against heart attack or death
from coronary heart disease in white males with extreme
hypercholesterolemia”. But did he say that? NO! NO! NO! NO!
NO! A thousand times NO! Dr. Basil Rifkind chose to manipulate
the data of the LRC study in order to please the “powers that be”.
Instead of providing an accurate statistical analysis such as that
presented above, Dr. Rifkind ignored basic statistical practices in
order to draw the conclusion that he wanted to find rather than
perform a “scientist’s” most basic function, which is to truthfully
and completely report the results of their “scientific” experiments.
First and foremost, the analysis and interpretation of data is

typically reported in terms of benefit per year of therapy. He
ignored the fact that the participants were involved in the study for
7.4 years. Dr. Rifkind chose to ignore this basic practice in order
to make his results appear to be more impressive than they were.
He also ignored the fact that there were 1900 people in the placebo
group and 1906 people in the drug therapy group. Instead, he only
used the raw numbers for heart attacks (38, 30) and the raw
numbers for deaths due to coronary artery disease (187, 155).
To explain how this skewed his analysis, what if only 190 people
were given placebo and 190.6 (191) people were given drug
therapy? Then the results of fewer heart attacks (187, 155) and
fewer deaths (38, 30) would have been phenomenally significant!
But what if 190,000,000 people were given placebo and
190,600,000 people were given drug therapy? Then the same
results would have been phenomenally NOT significant! Clearly,
the number of participants really, really, really matters when you
are analyzing the data from any experiment, but Dr. Rifkind
“conveniently” chose to ignore this basic statistical truth in order to
make his results appear more impressive than they really were.
The current confusion that clouds the thinking of the American

medical establishment and the American public is mainly due to
Dr. Rifkind’s creative “interpretation” of the results of the LRC
study. What did Dr. Basil Rifkind, the director of the LRC study
actually report to the media? Dr. Rifkind incorrectly stated that the
LRC study showed that drug therapy lowered the risk of heart
attack by 17%! He went on to state the following...
“For each 1% fall in ‘cholesterol’, a 2% reduction in heart attack

can be expected.”
Dr. Basil Rifkind
Director of the LRC Study
Where did he get these numbers???????????
The 17% comes from conveniently ignoring the number of people

in the study and the entire 7.4 year average length of the study.
It is true that 32 more people (187-155) suffered heart attacks in the
placebo group, so Dr. Rifkind deceitfully calculated the results as
32/187 = 17%. He compared this with the percentage drop in
“cholesterol” (-8.5%) to arrive at the very appealing sound bite that
he presented to the media.
To repeat from above, an accurate statistical analysis of his own

data would have forced Dr. Rifkind to report that...
For each 1% fall in “cholesterol”, a 0.0272% per year reduction

in heart attack can be expected, but instead, he said that...
“For each 1% fall in “cholesterol”, a 2% reduction in heart attack

can be expected”.
I would say that he overstated his results by a factor of 73.5!

(2%/.0272%)
Let me try to put this into plain language for you. The absurdity of
the statement that was made by Dr. Basil Rifkind will soon become
obvious. If it were possible to reduce your risk of having a heart
attack by 2% simply by lowering your “cholesterol” by 1%, then
what if someone started with a very high “cholesterol” level and
proceeded to lower it by 50%? According to Dr. Rifkind,
that would completely eliminate their risk of heart disease!
Suppose your starting “cholesterol” level was 500. I know that this
seems high, but much higher levels have been recorded. If you
proceeded to lower this high reading by 50% down to 250,
Dr. Rifkind’s statement would mean that you would have
completely eliminated your risk of heart disease by doing so!
(50% x 2 = 100%) Most doctors today feel that a “cholesterol”
reading over 200 (certainly one of 250) puts a person at greater risk
for a heart attack, but according to Dr. Rifkind’s statement, if you
reduced your “cholesterol” reading by 50% (from 500 to 250)
you would thereby reduce your risk of heart disease by 100%.
This is obviously absurd, but this is what he said!
This stupid statement has been repeated and repeated and repeated
and repeated for more than two decades and no one has challenged
it, even though it is absolutely absurd! While writing this book I
found a product that repeated this absurdity right on its package.
The statement is highlighted below...
Please realize that the above statement is absolutely absurd!

Anyone who repeats this statement in order to try to convince
you to reduce your “cholesterol” levels is a liar!!
Somehow, just like the tailors that convinced the Emperor that his
nonexistant new clothing was spun from gold, Dr. Basil Rifkind
managed to con(vince) the entire medical, pharmaceutical,
educational, governmental, and media establishments into
believing that lowering one’s “cholesterol” levels could somehow
magically reduce their risk of heart disease. Well, he didn’t
convince me! I do hereby state that Dr. Rifkind was wrong! Dead
wrong! Lowering one’s “cholesterol” by 1% does NOT lower
heart disease risks by 2%. I do not know if Dr. Rifkind is still alive,
but if you are, I challenge you to rescind your statement and admit
that your analysis of your own data was dramatically flawed and
that your mistake has been responsible for millions of unnecessary
deaths and trillions of wasted dollars!
“Heart Disease is caused not by an excess - overconsumption of

fats and CHOLESTEROL - but by a nutritional deficiency - lack
of vitamins B6, folic acid and B12. To prevent the disease,
the emphasis needs to be on supplying adequate nutrients in
our food, not on limiting fat and CHOLESTEROL. It’s time to
revise our thinking. The idea that eating too much fat and
CHOLESTEROL raises LDL and blood ‘cholesterol’ is
outmoded. Fats and CHOLESTEROL are not the demons in our
food supply. But, ironically, our fear of them has made us eat
more of the true villains - refined flour, sugar and other
processed foods. No wonder the United States is filled with obese,
diabetic, hypertensive people and heart disease is the number one
killer among men and women. Many people in this country are
in a state of nutritional disaster. Our consciousness has to
change. The nutritional advice Americans hear every day is off
base. The official government and health agencies are giving out
confusing, contradictory, and inadequate messages. This is a
life-and-death situation. We are in a crisis, and action needs to
be taken immediately.
Kilmer S. McCully, M.D.
Author of “The Heart Revolution”
“It was Ancel Keys who introduced the low-fat-is-good-health

dogma in the 50s with his theory that dietary fat raises
‘cholesterol’ levels and gives you heart disease. Over the next two
decades, however, the scientific evidence supporting this theory
remained stubbornly ambiguous. The case was eventually
settled, not by new science, but by politics. It began in January
1977, when a Senate committee led by George McGovern
published its ‘Dietary Goals for the United States’, advising that
Americans significantly curb their fat intake to abate an
epidemic of ‘killer diseases’ supposedly sweeping the country.
It peaked in late 1984, when the National Institute of Health
officially recommended that all Americans over the age of two eat
less fat. By that time, fat had become ‘this greasy killer’ in the
memorable words of the Center for Science in the Public Interest,
and the model American breakfast of eggs and bacon was well on
its way to becoming a bowl of Special K with low-fat milk, a glass
of orange juice and toast (hold the butter), a dubious feast of
refined carbohydrates. In the intervening years, the NIH spent
several hundred million dollars trying to demonstrate a
connection between eating fat and getting heart disease and,
despite what we might think, it failed. Five major studies revealed
no such link. A sixth, however, costing well over $100 million
alone, concluded that reducing ‘cholesterol’ by drug therapy
could prevent heart disease. The NIH administrators then made
a leap of faith. Basil Rafkind, who oversaw the relevant trials for
the NIH, described their logic this way: they had failed to
demonstrate at great expense that eating less fat had any health
benefits. But if a ‘cholesterol’ lowering drug could prevent heart
attacks, then a low fat, ‘cholesterol’ lowering diet should do the
same. ‘It’s an imperfect world,’ Rifkind told me. ‘The data that
would be definitive is ungettable, so you do your best with what is
available.’ Some of the best scientists disagreed with this low fat
logic, suggesting that good science was incompatible with such
leaps of faith, but they were effectively ignored.”
Gary Taubes
Author of “What If It’s All Been a Big Fat Lie?”
The media loved it! They had the sound bite that they proceeded
to repeat over and over and over and over until this very day. The
medical establishment climbed onto the anti-CHOLESTEROL
bandwagon en masse. In the first year after the results were
published, the LRC study was referenced by the authors of 109
other articles. In the second year, the LRC results were referenced
by the authors of 121 other articles. In the third year, the LRC
study was referenced by 202 other articles. Over the years,
Dr. Rifkind’s erroneous, devious, manipulative and deceitful phrase
has been repeated millions of times by other researchers, the media,
your doctor, and maybe even by you yourself without regard to the
simple fact that it is absolutely incorrect!
“The response to the LRC trial by the media and other medical
researchers was enormous. The media accepted the LRC
authors’ press releases without question, but many medical
researchers were highly critical of the LRC study. The media
were either unaware of the criticisms or ignored them, and the
public, therefore, once again received a completely one sided
view.”
How could this have happened?
“It may surprise some readers and contributors to learn that

statistical reviewers for the Journal seldom advocate rejection of
a submitted article solely on the basis of faulty statistical analysis
of data.”
The Journal of the American Medical Association
1986, Volume 256. 18, page 2552
Sir Francis Bacon would have called this “wishful science” that
was based on fancies, opinions and biases along with the exclusion
of contrary evidence. Bacon offered a suggestion for determining
the validity of any assumption: the test of time. Good science is
rooted in truth, so as it grows and develops, the evidence
supporting it gets increasingly more and more compelling, but
“wishful science” cannot stand the test of time.
Once the official government “decree” was handed down by the

National Institute of Health, the race was on among the
pharmaceutical companies and the food industry to provide drugs
and “cholesterol” free foods to treat this menacing high
“cholesterol” problem. Now, all the public gets is advertising and
promotional materials from companies selling their products to
lower your “cholesterol” levels, while one out of every two
Americans still DIES from heart disease! IT’S NOT WORKING!
It continuously amazes me that the vast majority of people have

come to accept the fallacy that “cholesterol” causes heart disease.
This false belief has caused everyone to ask the wrong questions.
Most of the studies that have been conducted in the last two
decades seem to have been done by people suffering from brain
lock because they only go so far as to determine whether treatment
will lower one’s “cholesterol” level. If the “cholesterol” level goes
down, then it is ASSUMED that the treatment or activity MUST
be good for your heart. The most important, next logical step is
nearly often omitted:
WHO CARES IF SOMETHING LOWERS YOUR

“CHOLESTEROL”!
DOES IT ALSO IMPROVE THE HEALTH

OF YOUR HEART AND INCREASE
YOUR OVERALL HEALTH AND LONGEVITY?
“With respect to total fatalities - that is, deaths from coronary

heart disease (CHD) and all other causes - most meta-analyses
show no significant difference and thus no improvement in
overall survival rates in the trials. This finding, that ‘cholesterol’
treatment has not lowered the number of deaths overall, has been
worrisome to many researchers and is at the core of much of the
controversy on ‘cholesterol’ policy. The trials generally have not
evaluated the efficacy of ‘cholesterol’ lowering treatment for
several important population groups, such as women, elderly men
and women, and minority men and women. Thus, they provide
little or no evidence of benefits or possible risks for these groups.”
The United States General Accounting Office
Report to Congress
Cholesterol Treatment - A Review of the Clinical Trials Evidence
The debate over the cause of heart disease will only be settled when
someone figures out how to stop people from dying! “The Lipid
Theory” is a miserable failure simply because it has not proven its
worth. Far too many people are still dying from heart disease!
Science is rarely a clean, neat and tidy venture. There have been
numerous studies through the years that have clearly contradicted
“The Lipid Theory”. This is not unusual or bad. This is science.
Every theory always has loose ends to be tidied up and conflicts
and contradictions that need to be examined. Every side of any
debate will have its supporters and its detractors. This chapter is
meant to be a counter-point to all of the government,
pharmaceutical, medical and agri-business propaganda that you
have been subjected to over the past 20+ years! There is another
perspective. This other perspective believes that “The Lipid
Theory” is absolutely dead wrong! Please read at least some of the
conflicting evidence that should cause everyone to question the
validity of “The Lipid Theory”.
“Theorists almost always become too fond of their own ideas,

often simply by living with them for so long. It is difficult to
believe that one’s cherished theory, which really works rather
nicely in some respects, may become completely false.”
Francis Crick
Nobel Prize Laureate for the discovery of the structure of DNA
The following are just a few of the many studies that “prove” that
“The Lipid Theory” is an INadeqate explanation for the CAUSE of
heart disease...
Dr. Rodney Finlayson of the Wellcome Research Laboratories in

England studied the records of all the major hospitals in London,
looking for cases where patients had died of a myocardial
infarction. He found only 6 such deaths between 1870 and 1900.1
Heart disease was practically unknown then, so it did not have an
official name, but the symptoms were obvious. Dr. Alastair
Mackinnon performed a similar study in the more rural area of
Yorkshire and obtained very similar results. So what was the diet
in England at the time that led to such a low death rate from heart
attacks? The English diet in 1880 was undoubtedly high in
CHOLESTEROL and saturated fats. It was filled with large
amounts of butter, lard, eggs and red meat. No one was the least
bit concerned about “cholesterol” back then.2
**********
From World War I up until the 1980’s, the number of deaths from
heart attacks increased substantially in most countries of the world
while the dietary intake of animal fat was unchanged or actually
decreased. For instance, from 1930 to 1960 in the United States
death from heart disease increased about tenfold while the
consumption of animal fats actually decreased.3
In England, from 1930 to 1970, the number of heart attacks

increased tenfold while the consumption of animal fat remained
relatively stable.4
**********
In Switzerland after World War II the death rate from heart

disease actually decreased despite an increase in consumption of
animal fats of about 20%.5
**********
In the 1960s, Dr. S. L. Malhotra studied the diet of two distinct

sub-cultures of people in India. The first group were people living
in the far north of India, in and around the city of Udaipur.
The people of this area were the world’s largest consumers of
butterfat in the form of a purified butter product known as ghee.
They had very few deaths from heart attacks. The second group
of people lived in the far south of India, in and around the city of
Madras. These people were strict vegetarians. Polished white rice
was a major staple of their diet. They had almost no saturated fat
in their diet. The majority of fats in their diet came from
margarine. The population of this area suffered seven times the
death rate from heart attacks as the people in the northern
region.6 In a follow up study done in 1987, Dr. Butari Raheja of
the Jaslok Hospital in Bombay, India reported that the parts of India
that had a low death rate from heart attacks among people who had
much of their fat in the form of ghee were now having sharp
increases in heart attack rates as the low-cost hydrogenated
polyunsaturated margarine had priced ghee out of the market.7
**********
In Japan, since 1970, the number of fatal heart attacks has

continued to decline in all age groups despite the continuing
increase in the consumption of animal fat.8
From 1955 to 1965 the death rate from heart disease in middle
aged Yugoslavians increased threefold while the intake of dietary
fat decreased by 25%.9
**********
Dr. J. C. Paterson from London, Canada regularly analyzed blood

samples from about 800 war veterans who were confined to a
hospital for various reasons. “Cholesterol” levels varied from
person to person, but remained relatively constant over time for
each individual. When the veterans died, a post mortem analysis
was performed which included the visual, microscopic and
chemical analysis of their coronary arteries. No connection was
found between “cholesterol” levels and the degree of
atherosclerosis found in their arteries.10
**********
In Italy, between 1961 and 1985, the consumption of saturated

fat increased by 69% while the death rates from heart disease
decreased 61%!11
**********
In 1970 Professor Fredrick Stare of Harvard reported on the Irish

Brothers Heart Study. This unusual study looked into the health of
brothers who had moved to the Boston area and left blood brothers
back home in Ireland. The diet of the brothers in Boston
conformed well to the recommended diet of the American Heart
Association. The brothers in Boston had more heart attacks than
the brothers that remained in Ireland despite the fact that the
brothers who remained in Ireland consumed over one and
one-half pounds of butter per week.12
**********
Pathologist Kurt Lande and biochemist Warren Sperry of the

Department of Forensic Medicine of New York University studied
large groups of individuals who had died violent deaths.
They found absolutely no correlation between the amount of
“cholesterol” in their blood and the degree of atherosclerosis in
the coronary arteries.13
**********
Dr. K. S. Mathur from Agra, India studied 200 people who had died
in accidents and could find no correlation between the
“cholesterol” levels and the degree of atherosclerosis. Those with
low “cholesterol” levels had just as much atherosclerosis as those
who had high levels.14 Similar studies with similar results have
also been done in Poland15 , Guatemala16 and the United States.17
**********
In 1973, Dr. Charles Bemis at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in

Boston studied 70 patients, and followed up a few years later with
angiographic examinations. In eight patients, “cholesterol” levels
had increased, but none of the eight patients suffered from
increased atherosclerosis. In 16 patients, “cholesterol” levels had
decreased but yet their level of atherosclerosis had increased.18
**********
Dr. Abraham A. Kroop at the University hospitals in Nijmegen and

Leiden, The Netherlands studied 21 patients who were treated with
a “cholesterol” lowering statin drug (Zocor) AND with a blood
filtering system similar to dialysis that physically removed most of
the LDL from their bloodstream. The patients’ “cholesterol”
levels were lowered an average of 63% (from 303 to 115)! Only
two of the patients showed reduced levels of atherosclerosis but
nine patients actually got worse! “Cholesterol” levels were
reduced by more than half and still nearly half of the
participants’ conditions got worse.19
**********
Dr. Tatu Miettinen studied 600 middle-aged, overweight and

hypertensive male business executives with high “cholesterol”
levels. The men were encouraged to stop smoking, exercise more,
lose weight and to adjust their diet. If the results from these efforts
proved to be ineffective, they were placed on “cholesterol” and
blood pressure lowering medications. The men who exercised, lost
weight, ate less animal fat and more vegetable oil, quit smoking,
and took their drugs lowered their “cholesterol” by 6.3%,
lowered their blood pressure by 5% and lowered their smoking
rate 13%... and then they had twice as many heart attacks.20
“Whether we look directly with the naked eye at the inside of the
arteries at autopsy, or we do it indirectly in living people using
x-rays, ultrasound or electron beams, no association worth
mentioning has ever been found between the amount of lipid in
the blood and the degree of atherosclerosis in the arteries. Also,
when the ‘cholesterol’ goes up or down, by itself or due to
medical intervention, the changes of ‘cholesterol’ have never
been followed by parallel changes in the atherosclerotic plaques.”
Uffe Ravnskov, M.D., Ph.D.
Author of “The Cholesterol Myths”
Dr. Uffe Ravsnkov, M.D., PhD., published a meta-analysis of

numerous studies, summarizing their results. In 26 different
“cholesterol” lowering experiments using a variety of methods and
medications, Dr. Ravsnkov found that 5.8% of all the participants
who received NO treatment died during the course of the
experiment, but a higher percentage (6.1%) of the participants
who received the various treatments died! The treatments were
worse than doing nothing.21
If high ‘cholesterol’ were the most important CAUSE of

atherosclerosis, people with high ‘cholesterol’ should be more
atherosclerotic than people with low ‘cholesterol’. But as you
know by now, this is very far from the truth.

atherosclerosis, lowering of ‘cholesterol’ should influence the
atherosclerotic process in proportion to the degree of its
lowering. But as you know by now, this does not happen.

cardiovascular disease, it should be a risk factor in all
populations, in both sexes, at all ages, in all disease categories
and for both heart disease and stroke. But as you know by now,
this is not the case.
Dr. Bernard Forette and a team of French researchers from Paris

found that women who had the lowest “cholesterol” levels were
five times more likely to die and old women with very high
“cholesterol” levels actually lived the longest.22
**********
Dr. Clarence Shub at the Mayo Clinic found that coronary

atherosclerosis had increased in all patients whose “cholesterol”
had decreased by more than 60 points.23
**********
At the University of Pittsburgh, Matthew Muldoon, assistant

professor in the Department of Medicine; Stephen Manuck,
professor in the Department of Psychology; and Karen Matthews,

professor in the Department of Psychiatry did a meta-analysis of
“cholesterol” studies and found that the number of people who
received “cholesterol” lowering treatment and subsequently died
from violence or suicide was indeed, statistically significant. They
found that the death rates from violence and suicide in the placebo
groups in these studies closely matched the national average, but
the groups undergoing the “treatments” died from violence and
suicide at a significantly higher rate. They stressed that low
“cholesterol” rates are more often observed in criminals, people
with violent or aggressive conduct disorders, homicidal
offenders, people with a history of violence or suicide related to
alcohol, and people with low self control. They also calculated
that the additional violent and suicidal deaths that occured in these
studies outnumbered any life saving benefits that may have been
claimed for the “treatments” given to those who participated in the
study. In short, they found that it was better to take a sugar pill, a
placebo.24
**********
Dr. Donna Vredevoe at the School of Nursing and the School of

Medicine at UCLA found that the mortality rate in patients with
severe heart failure was higher in patients with the lowest
“cholesterol”.25
**********
Dr. Rauchhaus, in co-operation with several German and British

Universities found that people with low “cholesterol” were more
likely to die from chronic heart failure than those people with high
“cholesterol”.26
**********
A study that was led by Dr. Tamara Horwich and performed by

Professor Gregg C. Fonorow at the UCLA Department of Medicine
and Cardiomyopathy Center in Los Angeles found that people with
“cholesterol” below 129 were twice as likely to die from severe
heart failure as those with “cholesterol” above 223.27
“Most of the data showed that higher cancer death rates were
associated with lower blood ‘cholesterol’ levels and that total
death rates were greater at the lower blood ‘cholesterol’ levels
than at the intermediate levels.”
Since over 90% of all cardiovascular disease occurs in people who

are more than 60 years old, studies of elderly people are the most
pertinent. Contrary to “common knowledge”, most studies of the
elderly report that high “cholesterol” is NOT an accurate risk
factor for coronary heart disease in the elderly. Dr. Harlan
Krumholz of the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at Yale
University reported in 1994 that elderly people with low
“cholesterol” died twice as often from a heart attack as did old
people with high “cholesterol”.28
“People with high cholesterol live the longest... It is actually

much better to have high than to have low “cholesterol” if you
want to live to be very old.”
Children with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome produce very little

CHOLESTEROL. This is because an enzyme that is necessary in
the production of CHOLESTEROL does not function properly.
Since CHOLESTEROL is so very vital for life, these children are

usually stillborn or, if they survive birth, suffer from severe
malformations of the central nervous system. They also tend to
suffer from frequent and severe infections. However, if their diet
is supplemented with pure CHOLESTEROL or extra eggs, their
bouts with infection become less serious and less frequent.29
**********
The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT), in which

information from more than 300,000 young and middle-aged men
was screened, found that men with “cholesterol” lower than 160
are four times more likely to die from AIDS than those with
“cholesterol” levels above 240.30
**********
Minnesota researchers, led by Dr. Ami Claxton, found that young,

unmarried men who had low “cholesterol” at the beginning of the
study were twice as likely to test positive for HIV as compared with
those with the highest “cholesterol”.31
“How is it possible that high ‘cholesterol’ is harmful to the artery

walls and causes fatal coronary heart disease, the commonest
cause of death, if those whose ‘cholesterol’ is the highest live
longer than those whose ‘cholesterol’ is low?”
A 15 year long study of over 100,000 people in San Francisco by

Professor Jacobs along with Dr. Carlos Iribarren found that people
with low “cholesterol” at the start of the study were admitted to the
hospital more often because of infectious diseases.32
“The average person requires at least 70 to 100 grams of

protein per day, or about 400 calories worth... Eskimos eat very
little carbohydrate, in fact, no carbohydrate during the winter,
and survive nicely to a ripe old age. Although their traditional
diet is composed of a large quantity of protein and an enormous
amount of fat, Eskimos suffer very little heart disease, diabetes,
obesity, (despite the cartoons), high blood pressure and all the
other diseases we associate with a more civilized lifestyle.
Furthermore, Eskimos don’t have metabolic systems from an
alien planet; they have the exact same biochemistry and
physiology that we do. Yes, you could eat the same diet and
tolerate it nicely.
We know this because of the famous study done in 1929 and 1930
using the explorers Vilhjalmur Stefansson and Karsten
Anderson. Those men returned from the Arctic reporting that
Eskimos were able to live on nothing but caribou meat all winter
while performing arduous work, expending great amounts of
energy without consequence. To prove that not only Eskimos had
this capability, both explorers volunteered to be studied while
hospitalized in Bellevue hospital in New York City for one year.
During this time they ate a meat diet composed of more than
2,500 calories a day, which was 75% fat. At the end of the year
both had lost about 6 pounds of weight, their ‘cholesterol’ levels
and other blood chemistry values were normal, and neither
experienced any adverse effects.”
Michael R. Eades, M.D. & Mary Dan Eades, M.D.

Authors of “Protein Power”
Professor Matthew Muldoon and his team at the University of

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania found that people with low “cholesterol”
(below 160), had significantly lower total white blood cells counts
and also that the number of various types was also lower than
those people who had higher “cholesterol”.33
“Dietary CHOLESTEROL is unequivocally not a significant and

practical factor in evaluating blood ‘cholesterol’ There are only
trivial theoretical health benefits and probably no real benefits to
be obtained from eliminating all CHOLESTEROL from one’s
diet. There is neither scientific evidence nor satisfactory theory
indicating that every individual synthesizes sufficient amounts of
CHOLESTEROL for his or her needs. There is not merely
suggestive evidence that “cholesterol” lowering is harmful to
health, there is an abundance of facts. Some 31 studies,
including Framingham, the Seven Countries study, and the large
MRFIT study, reported higher cancer or total death rates with
individuals having lower blood ‘cholesterol’ levels.”
Dr. Willy Flegel, and his associates in the Department of

Transfusion Medicine at the University of Ulm, and at the Institute
of Immunology and Genetics at the German Cancer Research
Center in Heidelberg, Germany found that the powerfully toxic
effect of chemicals produced by staphylococcus bacteria
disappeared almost completely if the bacterial toxin was mixed
with purified LDL.34
**********
In an experiment performed on mice, Dr. Hihai Netea and his team

from the Departments of Internal and Nuclear Medicine at the
University Hospital in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, found that
mice with genetically high “cholesterol” could withstand

injections of purified toxins that were more than seven times as
potent as the injections given to the mice with normal
“cholesterol” levels. In another experiment in which they actually
injected the mice with toxic bacteria, they found that mice with
genetically high “cholesterol” were twice as likely to survive the
bacterial infection.35
**********
Professor David R. Jacobs of the Division of Epidemiology at the

University of Minnesota, reviewed 19 large studies of more than
68,000 deaths and found that low “cholesterol” predicted an
increased risk of dying from gastrointestinal and respiratory
disease. 36
**********
In France, between 1961 and 1985, the consumption of

saturated fat increased by 28% while the death rates from
heart disease decreased 20%!37
There is no French Paradox. The only paradox is how dense,

stubborn and blind American medical and governmental
officials have been in the face of ample evidence that shows that
the French are not the exception to the rule! The problem is
that these officials cannot see the trees of truth behind the
forest of lies that they have been repeating for fifty years since
Ancel Keys started this massive deception!
“I’ve come to think that ‘cholesterol’ is not as important as we

used to think it was.”
Dr. Ancel Keys
New York Times, July 14, 1987
Congratulations to you if you have had the patience and fortitude to

actually read all of the preceding short abstracts of just some of the
“statistically relevant” studies that exist which conflict with the
“prevailing wisdom”. Since, in scientific terms, it only takes one
example that is contrary to a proposed theory to show that the
theory is not universal, and thus not “scientifically proven”,
exactly how much more evidence is your doctor going to need
before they will admit to the truth and stop lying to you? This small
chapter in this little book points out more than three dozen
examples that clearly contradict the supposedly “scientifically
proven” theory used to justify the treatment of “high cholesterol”
with poisonous pharmaceutical drugs. None of these examples are
“anecdotal” in nature. These well designed experiments were all
performed by highly respected scientists and published in
respected, peer reviewed journals. They all have shown that, at
the very least, there are exceptions to the “prevailing wisdom”.
“The average man and woman has come to believe that should a
medical laboratory test show that the ‘cholesterol’ in his or her
blood is numerically greater than it’s supposed to be, life’s
ultimate catastrophe is imminent. Since medical science has not,
as yet, even come close to proving that ‘cholesterol’ in the blood
is the CAUSE of heart disease, it becomes ridiculous to postulate
that altering the amount of ‘cholesterol’ in one’s blood,
especially through diet, will make any difference in the health of
one’s heart. Yet government agencies have allowed health
associations and food industries to play havoc with the anxieties
of millions and millions of people by permitting this unproved
doctrine to be promoted. There is no proof that an elevated blood
‘cholesterol’ is the CAUSE of any heart disease. When business
preys on the public’s fear of heart disease for its own profit, the
only protection the consumer can have is knowledge.”
Cathey Pinckney and Edward R. Pinckney, M.D.
Authors of “The Cholesterol Controversy”
In scientific circles, this type of data is supposed to be more than

enough to send true scientists back to their proverbial drawing
boards in order to start over on developing a new theory. It is sad
that medical doctors find it expedient to tout their claims as having
been “scientifically proven” when, in actual fact, the “prevailing
wisdom” regarding “cholesterol” has been scientifically
DIS-proven! Medical doctors simply choose to ignore the
existence of these studies. They choose to be ignor-ant of the truth.
How is it that the evidence shows that having low “cholesterol”

actually increases the chances of developing heart disease and
many other diseases in all of the studies in this chapter, yet our
“authority” figures in the government and the medical and
pharmaceutical industries continue to tell us exactly the opposite?
It should be completely obvious that the advice that we have been
receiving from the medical industry and the drug treatments that
are promoted by the drug industry ARE NOT WORKING!
When valid scientific experiments say one thing, and your doctor
says something completely opposite, isn’t that a lie? When
theories and marketing claims say one thing, but results say
another, isn’t something wrong?

Q. Doctor, does CHOLESTEROL CAUSE heart disease?
A. No!
Q. If I lower my “cholesterol” levels, will I live longer?
A. No! In fact, you will probably die sooner.

Q. Are there any studies that show that it is dangerous to

lower my “cholesterol” too much?
A. Yes, there are many. See the references following this

chapter Literally millions of doctors have told their
patients that the “scientific evidence” shows that they need
to “manage their cholesterol levels” without ever offering
one shred of evidence to back up their assertion. These lies
will continue until you (and many more people like you)
wise up and insist that doctors stop lying and start telling
the truth. Clearly, the case against CHOLESTEROL
should be dismissed. Please defend its honor and let your
doctor know that you now understand that...
CHOLESTEROL IS NOT GUILTY!
If your doctor still insists that “cholesterol” CAUSES heart disease,

or even if your doctor still insists that “cholesterol” is an accurate
“risk factor” for heart disease, or any other illness for that matter,
or if your doctor still insists that it is safe for you to take a
poisonous pharmaceutical drug in order to “manage” your
“cholesterol” levels then you know beyond any shadow of a doubt
that...
The starting point in turning back the tide of all your doctor’s lies
is to start learning all that you can about the nutritional value of real
food. The following pages contain a list of foods that are sources
of dietary CHOLESTEROL. Keep in mind that the average human
body contains 150,000mg of CHOLESTEROL. It is practically
impossible to elevate your “cholesterol” levels by consuming foods
that contain CHOLESTEROL. Numerous studies have shown this
to be true. I do hereby challenge you to try to eat enough of the
following foods to raise your “cholesterol” levels!
You might also want to note that the so-called “red meat” (beef)
does NOT contain more CHOLESTEROL than the so-called
“white meat” (chicken)!!! Just another bit of evidence showing
that...
And, just one more...
The March 28, 1991 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine
included an article about an elderly gentleman who ate twenty-five
eggs per day FOR THIRTY YEARS! Despite consuming
approximately 17 times the recommended daily amount of
CHOLESTEROL in his diet, this man enjoyed blood “cholesterol”
levels that were absolutely “normal”. His LDL was 142. His HDL
was 45. His triglycerides were 65. His total “cholesterol” was an
even 200! If 25 eggs per day for thirty years failed to cause this 85
year old man any ill effects, then what the hell are you worried
about?
Enjoy your steak!
Enjoy your eggs!
Enjoy your butter!
STOP worrying about “cholesterol”!!!
Eat more CHOLESTEROL!!!

Food Serving Size CHOLESTEROL
Goose, liver 1 liver 484 mg

Cornish game hen 1 whole 340
Veal, liver 4 ounces 340
Heavy whipping cream 1 cup 326
Veal, sweetbreads 4 ounces 284
Light whipping cream 1 cup 265
Duck, liver 1 liver 227
Egg 1 212
Egg yolk 1 212
Liverwurst 4 ounces 180
Shrimp 4 ounces 173
Eggnog 1 cup 149
Eel 4 ounces 143
Chicken, liver 1 liver 140
Chicken, leg 1 leg 138
Ricotta cheese 1 cup 124
Lobster 4 ounces 108
Sour cream 1 cup 102
Liver 4 ounces 100
Caviar 1 TBSP 94
Chicken, breast 1/2 breast 92
Goose 4 ounces 91
Sea bass 4 ounces 91
Half & half 1 cup 89
Duck 4 ounces 88
Turkey, dark meat 4 ounces 83
Beef, rib roast 4 ounces 82
Beef, T-bone 4 ounces 81
Pork chop 1 81
Mackerel 4 ounces 80
Beef, sirloin 4 ounces 79
Beef, porterhouse steak 4 ounces 79
Chicken, thigh 1 thigh 79
Beef, chuck roast 4 ounces 78
Beef, tenderloin 4 ounces 78
Cod liver oil 1 TBSP 78
Bacon 4 ounces 77
Kielbasa 4 ounces 76
Carp 4 ounces 75
Rabbit 4 ounces 74
Snails 4 ounces 73
Turkey, light meat 4 ounces 73
Lamb, chops 4 ounces 68
Lamb, leg 4 ounces 66
Catfish 4 ounces 65
Ham 4 ounces 65
Trout 4 ounces 65 mg
Bologna 4 ounces 64
Veal, cutlet 4 ounces 64
Veal, rump roast 4 ounces 64
Salmon 4 ounces 63
Beef, flank steak 4 ounces 60
Chicken, drumstick 1 drumstick 59
Canadian bacon 4 ounces 57
Shark 4 ounces 57
Pork, spare ribs 4 ounces 55
Italian sausage 1 link 52
Chicken, pate 1 TBSP 50
Cod 4 ounces 49
Chicken, gizzard 1 gizzard 48
Crab 4 ounces 47
Whipped cream 1 cup 45
Swordfish 4 ounces 44
Tuna 4 ounces 43
Snapper 4 ounces 41
Knockwurst 1 link 39
Chicken, wing 1 wing 38
Oysters 5 medium 38
Scallops 4 ounces 37
Halibut 4 ounces 36
Cottage cheese 1 cup 34
Sardines 2 34
Clams 5 large 33
Whole milk (3.25% fat) 1 cup 33
Gouda cheese 1 ounce 32
Hard salami 4 slices 32
Butter 1 TBSP 31
Cream cheese 1 ounce 31
Cheddar cheese 1 ounce 30
Romano cheese 1 ounce 29
Yogurt (plain, whole) 1 cup 29
Brie cheese 1 ounce 28
Goat milk 1 cup 28
Muenster cheese 1 ounce 27
Pastrami 1 ounce 26
Swiss cheese 1 ounce 26
Feta cheese 1 ounce 25
Monterey jack cheese 1 ounce 25
Beef, ground, regular 4 ounces 24
Mozzarella cheese 1 ounce 22
Blue cheese 1 ounce 21
Beef, ground, lean 4 ounces 21
Provolone cheese 1 ounce 20
Parmesan cheese 1 ounce 19
References
1 Medical History, 1985, Supplement 5, pages 151-168.

2 Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, April, 1987, pages 174-176.
3 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1964, Volume 14, pages 169-178.
4 The Cholesterol Myths, Uffe Ravnskov, page 30.
5 Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1979, Volume 33, pages 114-120.
6 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, May 1967, pages 462-475.
7 The Lancet, November 14, 1987.
8 Circulation, 1989, Volume 79, pages 503-515.
9 Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1970, Volume 42, pages 103-114.
12 World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, 1970, Volume 12, pages 1-42.
13 Archives of Pathology, 1936, Volume 22, pages 301-312.
15 American Heart Journal, 1962, Volume 63, pages 768-774.
16 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1967, Volume 20, pages 1113- 1117.
17 American Journal of Medicine, 1982, Volume 73, pages 227-234.
20 Journal of the American Medical Association, 1985, Volume 254, pages 2097-2102.
21 British Medical Journal, 1992, Volume 305, pages 420-422.
22 The Lancet, 1989, pages 868-870.
23 Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 1981, Volume 56, pages 155-160.
24 British Medical Journal, 1990, Volume 301, pages 309-314.
25 American Journal of Cardiology, 1998, Volume 82, pages 323-328.
26 Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003, Volume 42, pages 1933-1940.
27 Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2002, Volume 8, pages 216-224.
28 Journal of the American Medical Association, 1994, Volume 272, pages 1335-1340.
29 American Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997, Volume 68, pages 305-310.
30 AIDS, 1997, Volume 11, pages 929-930.
31 Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, 1998,
Volume 17, pages 51-57.
32 International Journal of Epidemiology, 1997, Volume 26, pages 1191-1202.
33 Clinical Immunology and Immunopathy, 1997, Volume 84, pages 145-149.
34 Infection and Immunity, 1989, Volume 57, pages 2237-2245.
35 Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1996, Volume 97, pages 1366-1372.
Chapter 3
Why Does It Only Clog There?
(My favorite questions!)

IT’S A JOKE...
All of the really good hospitals certainly

specialize in TLC. Takin’ Lotsa Cash!
• • •
Poverty is actually great for your health.

Doctors seem to heal you faster if you can’t pay
their bills.
• • •
A doctor called to complain about a bounced

check that he had received from his patient.
“Your check came back,” he said.
“I know,” said the patient.
“So did my bursitis!”
• • •
PATIENT: Doctor, my irregular heartbeat is

bothering me.
DOCTOR: Don’t worry. We’ll soon put a stop

to that!
take the time to ask them the following questions. They are
definitely my favorites.
Q. Doctor, if too much “cholesterol” in the bloodstream

is able to clog the arteries to the heart, resulting in
atherosclerosis and heart disease, why doesn’t the
“cholesterol” clog the microscopically tiny capillaries in
the extremities of the body, such as the toes, the fingers,
earlobes and the tip of the nose? Why don’t I get a
finger attack, or a nose attack?
Q. Since the overall surface area of all of the little “pipes”

that make up the entire cardiovascular system is
actually about the size of a football field, why is it that
the clog always occurs at the same exact spot over and
over? Why do the large coronary arteries of the heart
clog up first?
Q. When surgeons do a coronary bypass operation, they

often take a section of a vein from the leg of the same
patient to use as a replacement for the clogged artery in
the heart. Why didn’t the vein in the patient’s leg also
clog up the same way that the artery in the heart did?
The same blood flows everywhere in a person’s body,
so why don’t people get vein-o-sclerosis?
Q. Why does the replacement vein then tend to clog up

after it has been used to replace the arteries of the
heart? The vein didn’t clog when it was located in
the leg, but the same section of vein clogs after it is
relocated in the heart! Why doctor? Can you tell
me why?
A. The short answer is that the first assumption is wrong.

Heart disease is NOT CAUSED by CHOLESTEROL
simply getting stuck to the inside walls of the artery. The
body does not work that way.
There is a dramatic difference in the type and character of the

blockages that may be observed in the coronary arteries and those
found in other parts of the body. Damage to the arteries of the
heart tends to contain additional factors which differentiates it from
blockages and plaque elsewhere in the body.
High CHOLESTEROL diets do NOT create the same

type of lesions that are found in heart attack victims.
Let’s trace a little of the history of heart research.
In 1911, two American pathologists from the Pathological

Laboratories at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvannia, Oskar
Klotz and M. F. Manning, published a summary of their studies of
the human arteries and concluded that “there is every indication
that the production of tissue in the intima [the thin layer of cells that
line the interior of the arteries] is the result of a direct irritation of
that tissue.”
In 1926 a few doctors granted that there was a new disease of the
heart caused by coronary blood clots, which in turn caused an
infarction of the myocardium (death of the heart tissue) that can
often lead to the death of the entire body. This new disease was
called coronary thrombosis. The treatment at the time was to give
the patient additional oxygen in an oxygen tent.
In 1953, the Canadian physician G. C. Willis found that

atherosclerotic plaques form in both guinea pigs and humans, but
only in vascular tissue that is deficient in Vitamin C. Willis
devised a method of photographing arterial plaques with x-rays and
observed a strange phenomenon in his heart patients. Willis saw
that atherosclerotic plaques were not uniformly distributed
throughout the vascular system. These blockages were
concentrated near the heart, in the large arteries where the blood
pressure is greatest, where the arteries are constantly stressed, bent,
squeezed and subjected to high internal pressures.
Willis reasoned that the mechanical stress caused by the

pulsation of blood from the endlessly beating heart could explain
the typical pattern of atherosclerosis located in the coronary
arteries that supply the heart.
Please note that Willis also observed that this process only
occured when Vitamin C levels were depleted. To Willis, the
body was laying down plaque precisely where it was needed in
order to stabilize the vascular system. Willis noted that it was pos-
sible to induce “fatty streaks” in the arteries of experimental ani-
mals, but these “streaks” were of a dramatically different
character than the type of lesions that were concentrated in certain
arteries of the heart.
When guinea pigs were fed diets deficient in vitamin C, ALL of the
guinea pigs developed atherosclerosis. Guinea pigs that received
the human equivalent of 5 grams of Vitamin C per day had
absolutely NO atherosclerosis.
Willis conducted experiments on his patients, giving them 500mg

of Vitamin C, three times per day. Approximately 90% of his
patients either showed regression or stabilization of the arterial

plaques. Patients who did NOT take additional vitamin C showed
NO improvement.
Willis published his experiment with guinea pigs in 1957 in the

Journal of the Canadian Medical Association. This landmark paper
was entitled “The Reversibility of Atherosclerosis”. However, the
scientific and medical communities showed little interest in Willis’
experiments. They had already settled upon what they believed to
be the guilty culprit.
Because it had been observed that “fatty streaks” could be

generated along the inner lining of the blood vessel walls by
feeding large amounts of CHOLESTEROL to laboratory animals,
most scientists had accepted this as proof of the guilt of
CHOLESTEROL in heart disease. They failed to distinguish
between the different type of lesions that were found specifically in
heart tissue. True, CHOLESTEROL was deposited in these areas,
but there was another underlying mechanism which was extremely
specific to the arteries of the heart.
“Any pathologist of independent mind and free from

preconceived ideas would conclude that human atherosclerosis
and the lesions induced by the overload of CHOLESTEROL and
fats are not one and the same disease.”
William E. Stehbens
Professor at the Department of Pathology
On the following pages, you will be introduced to details of the

sequence of events that leads to cardiovascular disease. Please do
NOT take this as Gospel. The following information is the best
working theory that many scientists have settled upon in order to
Bloodstream (A)
(Lumen)
Intima (B)
(Endothelium)
Elastin Layer (C) A BC D E
Medial Layer (D)

(Smooth muscle cells)
Adventitia (E)
Outermost layer FIGURE 1
(Collagen) Cross section of an artery
(Diastolic - between heartbeats)
(Not drawn to scale)
explain what has been observed in the human body. If you get
anything at all from these following pages, please simply realize
that CHOLESTEROL is nowhere to be found! In no way
whatsoever is CHOLESTEROL implicated as a CAUSE of heart
disease.
The graphic above (Figure 1) is a representation of an artery.

The cross section that is shown is typical of any artery, but the
sequence of events that are to follow are unique to the coronary
arteries that supply nourishment to the heart itself. The innermost
circle (A) depicts the hollow area within the coronary artery
through which blood flows after it has been pumped out of the left
ventricle of the heart, into the aorta and outward to all the areas of
the body. The innermost layer of any artery is made up of a layer
of endothelial cells and is called the intima or endothelium (B).
This layer literally comes into contact with the blood flowing
through the artery. It is intimate with the bloodstream. Slightly
further away from the bloodstream is a layer of very flexible,
elastic tissue (C). Still further away from the bloodstream is a layer
of smooth muscle cells which is also referred to as the medial or
middle layer of the arterial wall (D). The outermost layer or
adventitia (E) contains a large percentage of collagen fibers and is
significantly more rigid than the more flexible layers of the
intima, elastin, and smooth muscle cells. The outermost band of
collagen fibers (adventitia) acts as somewhat like a girdle or belt in
order to limit the expansion of the inner, more flexible layers that
make up the intima, elastin and smooth muscle fiber layers when
large amounts of blood are forced through the artery after every
heartbeat.
“The fact that arteries that are physically prevented from

widening, such as the arteries that pass through the boney
channels in the skull never become atherosclerotic suggests that
atherosclerosis is a natural bodily response to overexpansion of
the arteries. Veins never become atherosclerotic, presumbly due
to the fact that they are subjected to much lower pressures than
arteries.”
Uffe Ravnskov, M.D., PhD.
Author of “The Cholesterol Myth”
The graphic on the next page (FIGURE 2) is a representation of the

same artery as on the previous page, but at a different moment in
time. Immediately after every heartbeat, a large amount of blood
is forced into the aorta, and the first branches into which the blood
may flow are the coronary arteries of the heart. When your blood
pressure is measured and found to be “normal” at 120/80, please
don’t forget that that measurement is only “normal” in the arm.
The pressure that is exerted by the blood coursing through the
Bloodstream
(Lumen)
Intima
(Endothelium)
Inner layer is
Elastin Layer
under extreme
tension
Medial Layer
Adventitia
(Collagen) Cross Section of an Artery
(Systolic - during heartbeats)
coronary arteries is far, far greater than the pressure exerted within
the arteries of your extremities. The inner layers need to be
flexible in order to allow blood to flow into the coronary artery so
that the heart itself can be nourished. If the inner layers of the
coronary arteries become too stiff, too rigid, and too inflexible,
only a limited amount of blood will flow through the coronary
arteries to nourish the heart. The optimal condition of the artery is
one where the collagen rich outermost layer is extremely tough and
impenetrable while the innermost layers are very, very flexible and
elastic, but remain intact in order to keep the flowing blood in the
lumen where it belongs.
As depicted by the graphic on the next page (FIGURE 3), it is

possible for the innermost layer, the intima, to be damaged and
Bloodstream
(Lumen)
Intima
(Endothelium)
Inner layer is
Elastin Layer
beginning to be
damaged!
Medial Layer
Adventitia
(Systolic - during heartbeats)
begin to leak. Many, many, many things can cause this type of
damage. Free radical damage is a possible cause. Bacterial,
fungal and parasitic infection are also possibilities. Toxic
environmental compounds such as pesticides and pharmaceutical
drugs are possible sources of damage. Sugar damages the inner
membrane of arteries. Even compounds that are made by the
human body itself, such as homocysteine, are considered to be
possible agents of damage to the endothelial layer of the arteries.
But none of these factorss explain why the most severe damage
is only found in the coronary arteries of the heart. The best
explanation so far is the explanation offered by Dr. Matthias Rath.
Dr. Rath believes that it is simply the physical reality that the
coronary arteries are forced to stretch to their utmost capacity with
every heartbeat that ultimately damages them. Without adequate
Bloodstream
(Lumen)
Intima
(Endothelium)
Damage has
Elastin Layer
continued into the
elastin layer!
Medial Layer
Adventitia
(Collagen) Arterial damage exposing lysine
and proline in the elastin layer.
levels of the nutrients necessary to maintain and repair this

ongoing damage, the coronary arteries fall into disrepair
(FIGURE 4), a very specific type of atherosclerotic plaque
develops and heart attacks and myocardial infarctions (death of
heart tissue) become more and more of a possibility.
Work that led to the 1987 Nobel prize in medicine discovered

that lysine and proline residues in the damaged endothelial tissue
and especially in the elastin layer behind it become the focal
starting point of atherosclerotic plaques. A very unique type of
lipoprotein known as lipoprotein(a) is especially able to stick to
these areas of damage because it contains a protein that is
specifically designed, (by our own amazing human body) to
attach itself to lysine and proline molecules that are exposed in
these damaged areas. Upon examination of coronary atheromas,

it was found that the vast majority of CHOLESTEROL found in
the built up plaque in coronary arteries was in the form of
lipoprotein(a).
Despite the lies that your doctor has told you, there is no such
thing as “bad cholesterol”! CHOLESTEROL does not clog your
coronary arteries. Your body manufactures a specific form of
lipoprotein in an attempt to HALT and repair the damage that is a
result of nutritional deficiencies. The ability to custom make a
specific lipoprotein designed to patch cracks in the cardiovascular
system belongs only to species that do not manufacture their own
vitamin C (humans and guinea pigs). In most other animals,
ascorbic acid is manufactured by the animal in quantities that are
sufficient to maintain the integrity of the cardiovascular system.
Only humans and guinea pigs have evolved and developed the
genetic ability to manufacture lipoprotein(a) in order to patch the
damaged elastin layer of their arteries. Lipoprotein(a) provides an
alternate way to strengthen and stabilize artery walls that are
chronically deficient in Vitamin C and other nutrients.
As you will see in upcoming chapters, the proteins elastin and

collagen are both exceedingly rich in the amino acid proline. The
specific locations within the matrices of these large proteins at
which the individual proto-collagen and tropo-elastin fibers are
connected (cross-linked) are very rich in the amino acid lysine.
Once they are in place within the completed collagen and elastin
matrices, the individual proto-collagen and tropo-elastin fibers are
extremely difficult to degrade, but once damage has begun, the
weakest points are at the areas where they are crosslinked together.
To protect against damage to these vitally important collagen and

elastin rich tissues, the human liver has developed the amazing
ability to manufacture a special lipoprotein, lipoprotein(a), that has
special lysine and proline receptor sites built into its surface. When
strands of collagen and elastin become exposed beneath the intima

of the arterial walls, this marvelous lipoprotein(a) specifically
attaches itself to the lysine and proline residues on the exposed or
broken fibers. This helps to seal and protect that specific area from
further damage. The CHOLESTEROL that is a part of
lipoprotein(a) is a marvelously effective waterproofing agent. It is
very waxy and smooth and it repels the fluid medium of the
bloodstream.
Lipoprotein(a) is a very, very effective and life-saving patch.
If this microscopic arterial damage occurs anywhere in the body,

the lipoprotein(a) globule is made by the liver and is then placed
into the bloodstream so that it may circulate throughout the body.
This lipoprotein(a) will thus be ready, willing and available to
prevent further damage and thus, lipoprotein(a) ultimately
protects human beings from having their arteries degrade further
and potentially burst and hemorrhage. If the nutritional deficiency
continues and the degradation of the arterial superstructure also
continues, then the liver will continue to manufacture
lipoprotein(a) and and it will continue to be deposited along the
artery walls (see FIGURE 5 on the next page). Lipoprotein(a) is a
life saver. It is a patching material that is specifically designed to
help maintain the integrity of the elastin layer in every artery in
your body. Has your doctor ever told you any of this? No? Why
not? Because...
If your doctor is one of the few who has enough wisdom and
honesty to instruct you to have a blood test performed in order to
determine the levels of the repair molecule lipoprotein(a) that are
circulating in your bloodstream, then you should count your
blessings! But don’t be afraid if these levels are high! And
don’t take drugs in a misguided attempt to lower your levels of
Bloodstream
(Lumen)
Lp(a)
Intima
(Endothelium)
Lipoprotein(a)
Elastin Layer Lp(a) coming to the
Lp(a)
rescue to patch
the cracks!
Medial Layer
(Smooth muscle cells) Lp(a)
Adventitia
(Collagen) Damage being patched
by lipoprotein(a).
lipoprotein(a)! Please remember that lipoprotein(a) is a repair

molecule that is actively saving your life! Elevated levels of
lipoprotein(a) are merely a warning light that is flashing on your
body’s dashboard. You do not need to treat elevated levels of
lipoprotein(a). If your levels of lipoprotein(a) are elevated (greater
than zero), this should prompt you to learn everything that you
need to learn in order to maintain the health and integrity of your
arteries. You don’t need to limit your body’s response to arterial
damage, you need to eliminate the CAUSES that are damaging
your arteries in the first place so that your body no longer needs to
make specific repair molecules like lipoprotein(a) in order to save
your life on an ongoing basis.
The story of heart disease does not stop here. There is far, far more
information that your doctor has not told you about.
In 1976, Russell Ross, a professor of pathology, and John

Glomset, a professor of biochemistry and medicine at the Medical
School at the University of Washington in Seattle, suggested their
Response-to-Injury Hypothesis. They suggested that the first step
in heart disease may be an injury (physical or chemical) to the
intima. The injury results in inflammation and the raised areas (not
really plaque at this stage) are simply healing lesions. These
healing lesions are quite similar to simple, everyday scabs, except
that they happen to occur on the inside of your coronary arteries.
If you had a nosebleed and developed a large healing lesion (scab)

on the inside of your nose, it would be relatively more difficult for
air to pass through that nostril. Similarly, if you have a damaged
coronary artery with a developing healing lesion (scab), it will be
relatively more difficult for blood to flow through that artery.
In 1977, Earl P. Benditt of the University of Washington used an

electron microscope to study the coronary atheromas (growths) that
tend to specifically block coronary arteries. Atheroma is the
technical term for the hardened healing lesions or scabs.
Benditt discovered that the atheromas contain almost NO
CHOLESTEROL. Instead, they are neoplastic in form. This
means that they are a benign (healthy) new growth that is made up
mostly of new cells. In essence, the cells in the damaged arteries
rapidly reproduce, much like skin cells have to reproduce
themselves in order to heal a wound on the surface of the skin. This
new growth pushes out into the interior cavity of the artery much
like a scab lifts up off of the surface of the skin. If the growth
becomes too large, it can block off the artery.
If the swollen lesions of the intima of the coronary arteries are

continually damaged due by the physical stress of the heartbeat,
then large amounts of lipoprotein(a) will be deposited to protect the
elastin layer. If the combination of multiplying cells in a fast
growing scab (lesion) and a fatty covering made up predominately
Bloodstream
(Lumen)
Intima
(Endothelium) Lipoprotein(a)
coming to the
rescue to patch
Elastin Layer the cracks!
Lp(a) Lp(a) Lp
(a) (a)
Medial Layer Lp
Adventitia White Blood Cells

Outermost layer
(Collagen) FIGURE 6: Atheroma
Smooth muscle cells multiplying
and moving into the artery
in order to repair the damage
of lipoprotein(a) grows too large for the artery that is under stress
and being damaged, then the flow of blood through that artery may
need to be blocked in order to effect repairs to that artery. When
this happens in a coronary artery, most people call this a heart
attack.
But even this is NOT a mistake on the part of the body. The body
is unbelievably wise and it is only your doctors’ ignorance and
arrogance that leads you to assume that your body has made a
mistake. It has not. The only mistake is in your doctor’s
misinterpretation of your body’s actions. If your coronary artery is
about to burst and you are about to bleed internally, there is
actually a better chance for survival if the muscle cells that
surround your coronary artery multiply rapidly and block off the
coronary artery (FIGURE 6). From the overall view of the body, it
is better to lose the function of a portion of the cardiac muscle by

blocking the bloodflow to that area of the heart rather than lose the
entire life of the person by uncontrolled internal bleeding!
“The blockages found by the angiogram are usually not relevant

to the patient’s risk of heart attack. For instance, in the most
sophisticated study of bypass surgery, the Coronary Artery
Surgery Study (CASS), it was demonstrated that heart patients
with healthy hearts but with one, two, or all three of the major
heart vessels blocked did surprisingly well without surgery.
Regardless of the number or severity of the blockages, each
group had the same low death rate of 1% per year. That same
year, the average death rate from bypass surgery was 10.1%. In
other words, the operation being recommended supposedly to
save lives was ten times more deadly than the disease.
The bottom line is this: when patients are advised to have a

coronary angiogram, chances are eight out of ten that they do
not need it. The critical factor in whether a patient needs
coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty is how well the left
ventricular pump is working, not the degree of blockage or the
number of arteries affected. Bypass surgery is only helpful when
the ejection fraction (the amount of blood pumped by the left
ventricle) is less than forty percent of capacity. Up to ninety
percent of all bypass procedures are done when the ejection
fraction is greater than fifty percent, which is adequate for
circulatory needs. In other words, as many as ninety percent of
all bypass procedures may be unnecessary.”
Michael Murray and Joseph Pizzorno
Authors of “Encyclopedia of Natural Medicine”
I have little doubt that this upcoming paragraph will clearly be the
first time you will ever see someone state that a heart attack is
actually good for you! Think about the late actor, John Ritter. He
Bloodstream
(Lumen)
Intima
(Endothelium) Damage that
has continued
through the entire
Elastin Layer artery wall and
resulted in
hemorrhage!
Medial Layer
Adventitia
(Collagen) Hemorrhage (blood loss)
due to severely damaged artery.
died due to a burst aorta. There is little hope of being rescued in

time to repair this type of massive damage. (Was John Ritter on
any “cholesterol” lowering medication that inhibited his system
from repairing the weaknesses that developed in his aorta? I do not
know the answer to this private medical information. If anyone can
ethically share this information with me, I would appreciate it.)
Angina, decreased heart output and yes, even a heart attack is

infinitely better than a burst aorta (FIGURE 7). I would much
rather have a warning of some type and that is exactly what the
body provides in the form of a heart attack. Most first heart attacks
are not fatal. Heart attacks are a very, very serious warning from
the body that there are problems inside. This is why many people
dramatically change a multitude of things about their life, their diet
and their personality after a heart attack. It is quite an effective

wake up call. Most people have quite a “change of heart” about a
great many things in their life after they have a heart attack. It is
certainly the case that their heart was trying to send them a message
in an unmistakable way.
Inside every blood vessel lies vast quantities of strands of collagen

braided into a triple helix. The collagen that is wrapped around
your arteries provides them with strength and stability much like
the steel rebar wrapped around bridge supports prevent them from
shattering during an earthquake. When the heart beats and forces
blood to flow rapidly through the arteries of the heart, the collagen
that wraps the coronary arteries prevents these arteries from
bursting like a balloon. Like any other pumping system, the pipes
near the pump must limit their inner volume so that fluids will be
forced to flow to other sections of the body. If the coronary
arteries weakened and ballooned out of shape then all the blood
would pool around the heart. Pressure elsewhere in the system
would drop and circulation throughout the body would suffer.
Healthy collagen is absolutely vital for the overall functioning of
the cardiovascular system, but it is especially vital in the arteries
nearest the heart where the pressures are the greatest. Nothing lasts
forever. Collagen is a living tissue and needs to be repaired,
replenished and routinely replaced. If all the necessary nutrients
are present in adequate amounts, collagen will be manufactured
and laid down into the structure of the arteries as needed. This
preventative maintenance needs to be done constantly in order to
keep the artery in good working condition. When all the necessary
nutrients are not present in optimal amounts, the collagen
superstructure deteriorates and the arterial wall weakens.
Let’s pay another visit to Joe, the mechanic. If I brought my car

into Joe’s repair shop with a poorly running engine caused by lack
of oil in the crankcase, Joe would probably smack me in the head
for neglecting my vehicle. Everyone knows that you have to keep
oil in the crankcase in order for your engine to run properly. Joe
would say something like, “I’ll clean this mess up and put some oil
in your engine for you, but you are going to have to start taking
better care of your engine or it’s going to die and you are going to
have to pay a lot of money to have it replaced.”
Now, a smack in the head and a verbal warning from your

mechanic is not as bad as a heart attack, but they are essentially the
same thing. If you ignorantly neglect to put oil in the engine of
your car, it generally gives you a few warnings before it explodes.
It knocks. It pings. It groans. More than likely, it will simply grind
to a halt rather than explode in your face. All you have to do is pay
attention and you will realize that something is wrong.
Likewise, if you neglect to properly nourish your heart

(nutritionally and emotionally), it generally lets you know that
something is wrong. It hurts. It doesn’t pump enough blood.
It races. It skips a beat. When you go to your doctor’s office,
unfortunately, they are neither as knowledgeable nor as honest as
your mechanic. Do they tell you that you have to maintain high
levels of nutrients in your system in order to keep your heart
functioning properly? No. They only “treat” the symptoms.
By definition, medical doctors never address the real CAUSE!
If your mechanic behaved as deceitfully as your doctor, he

wouldn’t tell you that you needed to put oil in your crankcase.
A deceitful mechanic would pour enough oil into your crankcase to
get your car well enough to limp out of their garage and hand you
a business card of their partner-in-crime, the blown engine
replacement specialist (automotive heart surgeon). Then they
would both sit back and wait for you to call, knowing all the time
that your engine is most certainly going to break down if you never
put any nutrition (I mean oil) into your body (I mean crankcase.)
The following is an excerpt from the book
“Heart Fraud”
by
“In 1963 the first angiograms were performed. During an

angiogram a catheter is passed up the aorta to a point just above
the heart. A material is then injected (loosely referred to as a dye)
which will flow through the arteries of the heart and show up on
an X ray.
In the early days of angiograms, radiologists performed the tests

and interpreted the results. Cardiologists soon began to do the
test on their own patients. So it was that a new breed of catheter
passing cardiologist was born and launched on the road to
riches. Cash registers began to clang in cardiologists’ offices as
decimal points in fee schedules were moved several places to the
right. When the balloon angioplasty (stretching the obstruction
with a balloon) arrived on the scene, financial opportunities for
cardiologists multiplied exponentially.
The angiogram was treated with awe as if it was a miraculous

technique. For the first time doctors could see what the inside of
the main arteries of the heart looked like as blood was rushing
through them. The angiogram also created a recording on paper
that doctors could hold in their hands. Seeing the results of a test
on a piece of paper has become highly important to doctors.
It makes a test seem more scientific, meaningful, and reassuring
than it really may be.
The angiogram began to be used as a reliable indicator of the

extent of obstructions in the plumbing of the heart. Cardiologists
loved the test and began to refer to pictures of the arteries seen on
an angiogram as a road map. There is just one tiny problem with
the angiogram: it is a very inaccurate test!
The angiogram became well accepted and quickly spread

throughout the land. Physicians were shocked when the first
studies related to accuracy were published in 1974, about ten
years after the first angiograms had been done. Angiograms
that had been used to plan bypass surgery were compared
with the actual arteries of patients who died shortly after
what is commonly called life saving bypass surgery. Serious
discrepancies were found.
Accuracy was studied a second way at Massachusetts General

Hospital in 1976 (in association with the Harvard Medical
School Office of Information Technology). Four experienced
readers of angiograms were asked to participate in the study.
Some of these physicians had been interpreting the test for nine
years, and each had read a minimum of 1500 angiograms. In
addition, these doctors taught the method to other physicians
in training at one of the most respected teaching hospitals in the
country.
Only angiograms of the highest photographic quality were used

in the study. Each expert was asked to examine a specific area of
one coronary artery and report the degree of obstruction he saw
as a percentage. Readings between the four experts were then
compared.
Wide differences of opinion were found. In the worst cases one

expert read an area of an artery as being totally blocked (100%),
while another saw no obstruction at all (0%). You can’t get
further apart. In actual daily practice each film would be read by
only one physician and a treatment regime would be based on
that reading. The accuracy of angiograms is of great importance
because experts recommend that only arteries more than 50%
obstructed should be treated surgically and those less than 50%
left alone. But which ones are they?
A third study was presented at a meeting of the American Heart

Association in 1979, but never published. Thirty abnormal
angiograms were circulated between three well respected medical
centers for consensus evaluations. On the first time around there
was significant disagreement between the readers in 39% of the
films. A few months later the same films were recycled through
the same centers and read by the same experts. Individual
radiologists were found to disagree substantially with their own
previous reading 32% of the time.
In 1984 a fourth study was published that approached the

problem yet another way. Preoperative angiographic readings
were compared to doppler (ultrasound) flow velocity readings
taken directly on coronary arteries with the chest open during
bypass surgery. The doppler readings were accepted as reliable,
representing the gold standard. So many discrepancies in
interpretations were found , the authors concluded:
‘The physiologic (blood flow) effects of the majority of coronary

obstructions can not be determined accurately by conventional
angiographic approaches. The results of these studies should be
profoundly disturbing to all physicians who have relied on the
coronary arteriogram to provide accurate information regarding
the physiologic consequences of individual coronary stenosis.’
Translated into plain English, this means that the ordinary

angiogram is so inaccurate it should not be used to plan bypass
surgery or balloon procedures. The article even referred to the
practice in the past tense as if this revelation would stop
physicians from doing just that.
Three of these studies were published in medical journals.

No efforts were made to attract media attention to the
embarrassing results. If the media had picked up the story they
could have accurately reported, ‘The diagnostic test used to scare
the pants off heart disease patients and coerce them into billions
of dollars of unnecessary surgical procedures is a scam.’
These studies of accuracy of the ordinary angiogram stand

unopposed. After an extensive search of the medical literature I
could find no articles that have reported the angiogram to be an
accurate test. If such articles exist I am certain they would have
been publicized to counter the negative reports referred to above.
After these reports were published the volume of angiograms,

coronary bypass surgeries and balloon angioplasties continued to
increase dramatically. In fact, during the time these reports were
made public, bypass surgeons and balloon passing cardiologists
were double-shifting their steam roller into warp drive. Nothing
was going to stand in their way. Now, a good 20 years later,
medical schools continue to teach how to perform and read the
ordinary angiogram, never mentioning its lack of accuracy.
I have shown these articles to heart patients who have had

angiograms who have then questioned their own doctors as to
this problem of accuracy. Some doctors replied that they were
aware of the studies, but they considered the question to be moot.
At their local hospital, radiologists know how to read
angiograms accurately (which means better than Harvard).
Arrogance is alive and well in medicine.
An accurate angiogram method was developed in the 1970s, but

you and I can’t get one. Its very existence has been treated
almost like an insider’s trade secret. In 1977, B. Greg Brown
described an new angiographic technique he called quantitative
angiography. Views of coronary arteries are taken from two
angles simultaneously with two cameras to achieve a three
dimensional effect. Data are interpreted by a computer, not the
human eyeball. The method measures diameters of arteries
accurately to within 150 microns, producing a margin of error of
only 1%. This distinguishes it from the conventional or
ordinary angiogram, the term I like to use for the commonly
available, inaccurate procedure. The average doctor and the
general public have almost no access to the method. Its very
existence has almost been veiled like an industrial trade secret.
The quantitative angiogram represents a giant step forward.

It gives researchers a way to measure the effects of treatment
efforts on obstructed areas of arteries. However, I am shocked
because of what has not happened. This new technique should
have been announced publicly as a major improvement and
breakthrough. Such a revelation would have publicly exposed
the ordinary angiogram for what it is. But, if that had happened,
the multibillion dollar a year bypass and balloon industries would
have been torpedoed in their underbellies. Therefore, vested
interests have had good reasons to suppress information about
the quantitative angiogram.
Thomas B. Grayboys reported that abnormalities found in the

(ordinary) angiogram had no value in trying to predict how well
a patient would do in the future. He stated this diplomatically by
saying that obstructions in arteries are not as important as how
well the heart is adjusting to the obstructions. The function of
the heart is to pump blood. If the pump is working normally,
invasive procedures are not going to improve the pumping action.
Blood flow will not be reduced in an artery until there is at least
a 75% obstruction in the channel through which it is passing.
Up to that point the same amount of blood can pass through an
obstruction simply by speeding up. Because of the mathematics
of calculating the surface area of a circle, it becomes critical to
know if an artery is obstructed more or less than 50%. A 50%
reduction in diameter will produce a 75% reduction in the
opening of an artery. At that point blood flow will begin to be
reduced.
The only reason to do an angiogram is to decide what to do

during a surgical procedure. If, after non-invasive tests,
a decision has been made to manage a patient medically, there is
no reason to do an angiogram.
Heart disease victims should insist on having either an

echocardiogram or nuclear medicine isotope scan to determine
the ejection fraction, a measurement of how well the left
ventricle is functioning as a pump. If the left ventricle is able to
pump blood normally, then there is no evidence a coronary artery
bypass graft or balloon procedure is going to improve chances of
survival.
The coronary bypass operation stands as a monument to an

almost total lack of understanding of causes, prevention and
effective management of this disease. The only large scale
studies ever conducted to try to prove that bypass surgery extends
life showed it doesn’t. Heart patients lived just as long without
the surgery. But this is not what most people (and doctors)
believe.
In the area of the angiogram, coronary artery bypass surgery,

and the balloon angioplasty, a pattern has been established.
The procedures were developed and widely used before studies
were completed that confirmed that they were either inaccurate
or of little value. When evidence appeared showing they were of
little benefit, physicians simply chose to ignore it even though the
articles were published in medical journals. Therefore, it is not
surprising to learn that a second opinion clinic run by Harvard
cardiologists found that over 80% of bypasses and angiograms
being recommended are not necessary.
Most American doctors have probably never heard of these

studies. Negative comments about medicine are not welcomed by
doctors, and those that originate from within medicine usually
are stored quietly away in medical libraries. Doctors continue to
use the inaccurate angiogram as a guide in recommending
surgical procedures to patients. The tactics used in these sales
pitches raise questions of ethics and fraud. Not informing
patients about the inaccuracy of the ordinary angiogram deserves
to be called a fraud on the public.
Bloodstream
Intima
(Endothelium)
Elastin Layer
Unrelenting
smooth muscle
Medial Layer spasm
Adventitia
And finally, we come to an issue that 99.99999% of doctors have

never, ever properly explained to their patients.
Studies of patients who have died from heart attacks have revealed
that at least 20% do NOT have any appreciable blockages in their
coronary arteries whatsoever. These people DIED due to a heart
attack, yet they had absolutely NO blockages in their coronary
arteries. The death of the heart tissue in these cases is due to some
other, completely different reason, most likely a serious,
unrelenting spasm of the coronary artery (FIGURE 8). If you recall
from the chapter on CHOLESTEROL and the hormones that are
made from it, studies of progesterone have shown that adequate
levels of this (male and female) hormone make it nearly impossible
for scientists to cause heart spasms in laboratory animals.
Progesterone prevents spasms in all muscles, including the heart.
It is also known that inadequate levels of magnesium can lead to

chronic and acute spasms of all types of muscle tissue, including
the smooth muscle tissue found in the coronary arteries. What your
doctor will NOT tell you is that sudden heart attacks are usually
NOT due to the slow buildup of CHOLESTEROL in your coronary
arteries. Sudden heart attacks are more commonly due to a
hormonal, neurotransmitter or mineral (electrolyte) imbalance that
sends the smooth muscle tissue surrounding the coronary arteries
into an unrelenting spasm that completely blocks the flow of blood
to the heart. One out of five people who have just suffered from a
heart attack find that they have absolutely no blockage in their
coronary arteries and their doctors, who are trapped by their
previous lies regarding the so-called “bad cholesterol”, can offer
them absolutely no valid explanation.
The belief that bypass surgery is beneficial has actually been

scientifically DIS-proven. It has actually been shown that the
benefits of bypass surgery are due primarily to the placebo effect!
“Even surgery has been used as a placebo. In the 1950s,

angina pectoris, recurrent pain in the chest and left arm due to
decreased blood flow to the heart, was commonly treated with
surgery. Then some resourceful doctors decided to conduct an
experiment. Rather than perform the customary surgery, they cut
patients open and then simply sewed them back up again. The
patients who received the sham surgery reported just as much
relief as the patients who had the full surgery. The full surgery,
as it turned out, was only producing a placebo effect.”
Michael Talbot
Author of “The Holographic Universe”
To further complicate the issue, numerous patients, who are very

much alive and healthy, have been found to have coronary arteries
that are completely, 100% blocked with atherosclerotic deposits yet
these patients were asymptomatic. They had no symptoms.

They did not have a “heart attack”. They did not suffer from
fatigue. They did not have pain (angina). Somehow the heart
tissue that was downstream from the blockage managed to stay
“The data from the past quarter century shows conclusively that
bypasses do more harm than good for the majority of patients
who submit to them. How can the general public be so gullible?
How can physicians get away with it? And how can society let
these physicians get away with it? Today, this trend of blindly
accepting what conventional physicians have to say, simply
because they are the ‘authorities’ is getting out of hand. What I
find particularly unnerving is that we, as a free culture with
ample access to information and the ability to verify facts, still
allow the medical industry to continually rip us off and put us in
harm’s way. The white coats dance around spouting idiotic and
frightening proclamations. ‘You’re a walking time bomb’. ‘You
could go at any minute’. ‘You have a 100% chance of a heart
attack’. And we just eat it up, no questions asked. Where is the
incensed reaction? If we were to actually hold these doctors
accountable, we could dismantle the entire profession. In the
past 25 plus years, I’ve treated between 5,000 and 10,000 patients
who were told by their conventional doctors that they needed
bypass surgery. The overwhelming majority did just fine without
the slew of recommended procedures such as angiograms,
angioplasties, or bypasses. My charts are filled with successes of
this nature. The fact that studies consistently show that bypass
surgery does little if anything but harm patients has not hindered
its growing popularity. The average angioplasty can run between
$28,000 and $31,000, and a bypass can cost up to $61,000. And
what do you get for this huge chunk of change? An increased
risk of brain damage and a 2.4% chance of dying in the hospital.
What a deal.”
Dr. Julian Whitaker, M.D.
alive and to function perfectly well despite the blockage. Despite

what your doctor has led you to believe, the process that results in
atherosclerotic blockage of the coronary arteries and the event of a
myocardial infarction (death of heart tissue) or heart attack, are not
directly related.
So let me summarize...
Every year, approximately 500,000 coronary bypass surgeries

are performed at a cost of $60,000 per surgery which, when
multiplied together, comes to over $30 BILLION dollars.
Research shows that the surgery is ten times more likely to kill
you than not having the surgery, and approximately 90% of
the surgeries are deemed to be unnecessary if the heart is still
able to pump 50% of its maximum levels. None of the
surgeries actually address the root CAUSE of the problem, so
it keeps reoccurring! Medical doctors misinterpret and mis-
represent the information that they give to their patients. When
doctors recommend statin drugs to lower your so-called “bad
cholesterol”, when doctors recommend deviously mis-
named “blood thinners” to prevent your blood from clotting
properly and when doctors say that coronary bypass surgery is
necessary, it is clear that they are not concerned with the facts.
Medical doctors are far more concerned with their financial
well-being than they are with the well-being of you, their
unsuspecting victim. It seems that most medical doctors are
quite willing to lie about the true causes of heart disease
because they are unwilling to bypass the monetary gain that
they receive by lying!
“A heart attack or stroke should indicate a failure of medical

therapy rather than the beginning of medical intervention.”
The Framingham Heart Study

Q. Doctor, if too much “cholesterol” in the bloodstream is

able to clog the arteries to the heart, resulting in
atherosclerosis and heart disease, why doesn’t the
“cholesterol” clog the microscopically tiny capillaries in
the extremities of the body, such as the toes, the fingers,
earlobes and the tip of the nose? Why don’t I get a
finger attack, or a nose attack?
Q. Since the overall surface area of all of the little “pipes”

that make up the entire cardiovascular system is
actually about the size of a football field, why is it that
the clog always occurs at the same exact spot over and
over? Why do the large coronary arteries of the heart
clog up first?
Q. When surgeons do a coronary bypass operation, they

often take a section of a vein from the leg of the same
patient to use as a replacement for the clogged artery in
the heart. Why didn’t the vein in the patient’s leg also
clog up the same way that the artery in the heart did?
The same blood flows everywhere in a person’s body,
so why don’t people get vein-o-sclerosis?
Q. Why does the replacement vein then tend to clog up

after it has been used to replace the arteries of the
heart? The vein didn’t clog when it was located in the
leg, but the same section of vein clogs after it is
relocated in the heart! Why doctor? Can you tell me
why?
A. The short answer is that the assumption that “cholesterol”

causes heart attacks is simply false. You don’t get finger
attacks or nose attacks because they are not put under
nearly as much physical stress as the arteries of the heart.
With each heart beat, seventy times a minute, 4200 times
an hour, 100,000 times a day, the arteries of the heart are
stretched to their limit over and over and over. Because
you do not have all the nutrients necessary for the
generation of collagen protein so that the body can repair
itself, you fall apart. Most people’s arteries are falling
apart all over the place and lipoprotein(a) is being laid
down to patch the cracks until a more permanent repair can
be made, but the key factor in coronary arteries is the rapid
growth of atheromas or healing lesions. When a coronary
artery begins to show signs of weakening, all the available
forces are called to the rescue. White blood cells enter the
area. Muscle cells divide and multiply. Specially designed
lipoprotein(a) is manufactured in the liver and circulated
through the blood to be used to patch the cracks.
Your heart may also choose to slow down or to decrease

the force at which it pumps in order to relieve the pressure
on the damaged coronary artery. If the damage is severe,
a blood clot may necessarily form in the artery in an
attempt to patch the damage. If even that does not stop the
problem, then the artery may purposefully go into spasm
in order to temporarily close off this section of artery until
it can be stabilized. This is not a mistake on the part of the
body. It is a desperate act that is actually life saving. All
the time, the heart sends you warnings. Heart pain
(angina) is the message that is sent by the dying cells of the
heart that are located downstream from the damaged
coronary artery. Unfortunately, they begin to starve and
possibly die once the arterial repair work has reached
critical stages. Even after a heart attack, the body works
to protect itself. Insufficient cardiac output (so-called heart

damage) will exist until the arteries are stabilized. If the
arteries are repaired, heart function will return to normal.
This only happens in the heart because only the heart is
placed under constant physical stress.
“There are three arteries supplying the heart, but when I operate
on someone, the arteries don’t all look the same. For instance,
someone will come in with one of those arteries 99% blocked.
Yet the other two vessels are in perfect condition, and the parts
before the blockage and after the blockage are so clean they look
like they belong to a baby. But there’s one blockage. Now why is
it just in that one vessel? There is something else going on in the
heart that we have yet to understand. It is going to be something
we haven’t thought about. Perhaps the definitive answer will
come to us through a long-term research study, or perhaps we’ll
stumble upon is accidentally. It may be staring us in the face
right now and nobody is putting it together.”
O. Wayne Isom, M.D.
Chairman of Cardiothoracic Sugery
Weill Cornell Medical College
“It may come as a surprise to you, but even avter 40 years of

relentless and expensive studies, researchers have failed to
prove the validity of the ‘cholesterol’ theory. The fact is, blood
‘cholesterol’ is only weakly associated with heart disease and
between 1945 and 1995 not a single study presented evidence that
reducing ‘cholesterol’ blood levels would lower overall death rate.
Some studies even showed that ‘cholesterol’lowering drugs
increased the overall death rate.”
Author of “Heart Frauds”
The following are excerpts from the book...
Why Animals Don’t Get Heart Attacks...

But People Do!
by Matthias Rath, M.D.
“The total depletion of the body’s vitamin C reserves, as they

occurred in sailors of earlier centuries, leads to a gradual
breakdown of the body’s connective tissue, including the
blood vessel walls. Thousands of sailors died within a few
months from hemorrhagic blood loss through leaky blood
vessel walls.”
“The main cause of cardiovascular disease is the instability

and dysfunction of the blood vessel wall caused by chronic
vitamin deficiency. This leads to millions of small lesions
and cracks in the artery wall, particularly in the coronary
arteries. The coronary arteries are mechanically the most
stressed arteries because they are squeezed flat from the
pumping action of the heart more than 100,000 times per
day.”
“The average diet contains enough vitamin C to prevent

open scurvy, but not enough to guarantee stable, reinforced
artery walls. As a consequence, millions of tiny cracks and
lesions develop along the artery walls. Subsequently,

‘cholesterol’, lipoproteins and other blood risk factors enter
the damaged artery walls in order to repair these lesions.
With chronically low vitamin intake, however, this repair
process continues over decades. Over many years, this
repair overcompensates, or overshoots, and atherosclerotic
deposits develop.”
“Repair of the artery walls becomes necessary.

‘Cholesterol’ and other repair factors are produced at an
increased rate in the liver and transported in the bloodstream
to the artery walls, which they enter in order to mend and
repair the damage. Because the coronary arteries sustain the
most damage, they require the most intensive repair.”
“Vitamin deficiency leads to the production of faulty and

dysfunctional collagen molecules by the arterial muscle
cells.”
“With continued vitamin deficiency over many years, the

repair process in the artery walls overcompensates.
Atherosclerotic plaques form predominately at those
locations in the cardiovascular system needing the most
intensive repair: the coronary arteries. This is why
infarctions occur primarily at this very same location and
why the most frequent cardiovascular events are infarctions
[death] of the heart, not infarctions [death] of the nose or
ears.”
“Around the core of the plaque, a local “tumor” forms from

muscle cells typical in the artery wall. This muscle cell
tumor is another way in which the body stabilizes the vitamin

deprived artery wall. The deposit of lipoproteins [Lp(a)]
from the bloodstream and the muscle cell tumor in the artery
wall are the most important factors that determine the size of
the plaque and, thereby, the progression of coronary artery
disease.”
“Lipoproteins are the transport molecules by which

CHOLESTEROL and other fat molecules circulate in the
blood and attach to the artery wall. For many years, it has
been thought that the primary transport molecule responsible
for the deposit of fat in the artery walls was LDL
(low-density-lipoprotein or the so-called “bad cholesterol”).
Today, we know that the most dangerous fat transport
molecules are not LDL molecules, but a variant called
lipoprotein(a). The letter (a) could stand for “adhesive”, as
it characterizes an additional sticky protein that surrounds
LDL molecules. By means of this sticky protein, the
lipoprotein(a) molecules accumulate inside the artery walls.
Thus, it is not the CHOLESTEROL or LDL “cholesterol”
level that determines the risk for cardiovascular disese, it is
the amount of lipoprotein(a) molecules.”
“Clear your mind of the belief

that ‘cholesterol’ causes heart disease.”
“Stop taking ‘cholesterol’ lowering medication.”
“CHOLESTEROL LOWERING,
WITHOUT CORRECTING UNDERLYING
VITAMIN DEFICIENCY, SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED MEDICAL MALPRACTICE!”
Chapter 4
The BIG Blood Clot Lie!

IT’S A JOKE...
Did you ever wonder why only doctors and bank

robbers wear masks when they go to work?
• • •
My HMO is horrible. They even charge me a flat

fee for my breast self-examination!
• • •
I finally found a way to get my doctor to make

house calls. I bought a house on a golf course!
• • •
I have a very efficient doctor. He diagnosed my

problem as low blood pressure and he managed
to fix it just by sending me his bill!
• • •
Did you hear about the wealthy proctologist?
He always uses two fingers, that way he can

charge his patient for a second opinion!
take the time to ask them the following questions.
Q. Doctor, do blood thinners actually thin my blood?
Q. Doctor, is it possible for a blood clot to travel from my

leg to my heart or to my brain?
Q. Doctor, is aspirin safe?
A. The short answer to all three questions is NO!
Patients are often frightened by their doctors in regards to blood

clots (see FIGURE 9 on the next page). They are then told that
they will have to take poisonous drugs that are deceitfully referred
to as “blood thinners” for THE REST OF THEIR LIVES!!!
Please recognize the use of scare tactics in this blatant and
despicable marketing ploy. I would like to interject some logic and
reason into this disgusting practice. Simple fluids such as water
can “thin” the blood by diluting its contents. A diet that is high in
sugar will certainly “thicken” the blood and make it have more of
the consistancy of syrup, honey, molasses or any other sugary fluid.
Conversely, a low sugar diet will “thin” the blood. Numerous
anti-oxidants such as Vitamin C and Vitamin E will also “thin” the
blood by preventing free radical damage that can cause red blood
cells to clump together.
Numerous drugs that are known as “blood thinners” and are sold as
“preventative” measures to prevent blood clots do NOT actually
“thin” the blood. Contrary to the seemingly beneficial name that
the medical and drug industries have given to their so-called “blood
thinners”, these poisonous drugs are designed to inhibit the
natural ability of the blood to form clots. This prevents the body
Bloodstream
(Lumen)
Intima
(Endothelium) Blood clot
formation
designed to
Elastin Layer stop the
hemorrhaging!
Medial Layer
Adventitia
(Collagen) Damaged artery
with life-saving bloot clot.
from stopping the hemorrhaging of blood through damaged and

leaking arteries. So-called “blood thinners” do NOT “thin” the
blood. They destroy your body’s ability to patch serious leaks in
your cardiovascular system.
As we discussed in the previous chapter and as you can see above,

a blood clot is a life-saving occurrance. Clots occur whenever
blood is leaking out of the arteries, capillaries and veins that
comprise the entire cardiovascular system.
I have personally had literally hundreds of people tell me that their

doctors “put them on blood thinners” because they had developed
blood clots in their legs and they were worried that the clots might
break free and travel to either their heart (where they are wrongly
accused of causing heart attacks) or to their brain (where they are

wrongly accused of causing strokes). Has your doctor ever spoken
to you of such a situation? Have you ever heard a family member
or friend relate that their doctor “put them on blood thinners” for
fear that a blood clot in their leg might travel and cause a stroke or
a heart attack? In regards to this situation, I cannot say this emphat-
ically enough...
YOUR DOCTOR IS A BIG LIAR!
The obviousness of this lie will boggle your mind once you come
face to face with the truth. Any introductory anatomy class (or any
anatomy book) will clearly explain that blood NEVER travels from
the legs to the brain or to the coronary arteries of the heart
without first passing through the lungs. This is fundamental.
This is undeniable. This is Anatomy 101. Let me repeat it:
Blood NEVER travels from the legs to the brain or to the coronary
arteries of the heart without first passing through the lungs.
Said another way... All blood passes through the lungs before it
ever goes to the coronary arteries of the heart or to the brain.
At this point, are you saying to yourself, so what? The answer is

simple. Mother Nature has designed our cardiovascular system to
filter out ALL blood clots by forcing every ounce of blood in our
bodies to pass through the small capillaries of the lungs first,
before any of it travels to the coronary arteries that nourish the heart
or the brain. The lungs are designed to filter out any and all
potential clots that may have dislodged anywhere else in the body.
In order to pass through the capillaries of the lungs, all of the
blood in your body must squeeze through in single file, one blood
cell at a time. Any clots or other debris will be caught in the fine
meshwork of the capillaries of the lung long before they ever get
anywhere near the coronary arteries of the heart or to the brain!
If your doctor, or the doctor of someone that you know and love
has ever told you that you need to be on “blood thinners” because
there is a danger that a blood clot may travel from your leg (or arm
or any other body part) to your heart or to your brain, then...
This is a despicable lie. It is clearly false. It clearly ignores the

most basic facts of human anatomy. It should be a criminal offense
punishable by time in prison, but most patients simply accept is as
Holy Gospel when it comes from the mouth of their Medical Deity
(M.D.). Please. I beg of you. Find out if anyone you know is
taking so-called “blood thinners” because they have fallen victim to
this disgusting lie. PLEASE give them a copy of this book, or at
least a copy of this chapter.
THEIR LIFE IS IN DANGER!!
Simply stated, anyone who takes aspirin (which is known as a

Non-Steroidal-Anti-Inflammatory-Drug or NSAID), Coumadin or
any other poisonous drug that is designed to stop the blood clotting
process might just as well get a knife and start poking holes in their
body to make themselves start bleeding, because the effect of the
drugs is nearly as immediate. Studies have shown that bleeding in
the stomach is the affliction which results in most of the deaths
from aspirin. Nearly 70% of persons taking aspirin daily show a
blood loss of 1/2 to 1-1/2 teaspoons of blood in the stool and 10%
of regular aspirin users lose 2 teaspoons of blood in the stool
every day. Aspirin does not “thin” the blood. Aspirin blocks the
production of compounds called prostaglandins which trigger
the clotting process whenever that process is necessary.
Aspirin doubles the time necessary for blood to clot, increasing the
likelihood of hemorrhage. Aspirin causes more than 500 deaths per
year in children alone! Over 100,000 people every year are
admitted to the hospital for complications such as intestinal
bleeding caused by NSAIDs such as aspirin. Over 15,000 people
DIE per year from complications caused by prescription and over
the counter NSAIDs!
The obvious side effect of consuming anti-coagulant drugs (I refuse

to call them “blood thinners”) such as aspirin and Coumadin is that
you are far more likely to bleed to death. The Physician’s Desk
Reference clearly states that:
“The most serious risks associated with Coumadin treatment are

hemorrhage (severe bleeding resulting in the loss of a large
amount of blood) in any tissue or organ and, less frequently, the
destruction of skin tissue cells (necrosis) or gangrene. Severe
necrosis can lead to the removal of damaged tissue or amputation
of a limb. Hemorrhage and necrosis have been reported to result
in death or permanent disability.”
The Physician’s Desk Reference
According to a report in the New England Journal of Medicine:
“If deaths from the gastrointestinal toxic effects from

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID] were tabulated
separately in the National Vital Statistics reports, these effects
would constitute the 15th most common cause of death in the
United States.”
The New England Journal of Medicine 1999; (24) 188-89
“Aspirin is an acid and regular use can promote heartburn,

dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, stomach ulcers, erosion of
and bleeding from the stomach lining and gastrointestinal
hemorrhage. Two standard aspirin tablets doubles bleeding time
for four to seven days. Total cardiovascular deaths and total
all-cause deaths were the same in aspirin and control groups.
Therefore, while there were fewer heart attack deaths,
there were more stroke deaths in the aspirin group, indicating
virtually no benefits of aspirin unless, of course, one considers it
preferable to die of a stroke rather than a heart attack.”
Has your doctor ever warned you of the dangers of these drugs?
No? Do you know why? Because...
I have personally seen hundreds of people whose arms and legs

were covered with bruises that were a result of their consumption
of “blood thinners” that were prescribed by their medical doctors.
These people were literally falling apart because they were taking
a deadly (yes, DEADLY!) drug that prevented their body from
stopping even the tiniest loss of blood. The lightest, slightest bump
would cause an immense bruise due to unstoppable internal
hemorrhaging. They had all been told (by their medical doctors)
that they “had to take blood thinners” because they were at risk of
having a blood clot travel from their legs to their heart or to their
brain where it might “cause a heart attack or stroke”! These
people believed their doctors and followed their instructions to take
“blood thinners” (which are more appropriately called
anti-coagulants”) in order to treat a supposed “problem” that is
absolutely, positively physically and anatomically impossible!!
These people believed their doctors lies because they simply did
not have even the most basic understanding of human anatomy.
Blood clots cannot travel from your legs (or anywhere else in
your body) to the coronary arteries of your heart or to your
brain, because they must first travel through the tiny
capillaries of your lungs which trap them and prevent them
from going any further. PERIOD!
If your doctor has frightened you, or anyone you know, into

consuming DEADLY “blood thinners” in order to prevent a
blood clot from travelling and causing a stroke or heart attack,
then...

Chapter 5
The Biggest Lie of All

IT’S A JOKE...
After my surgery they put me in the expensive

care unit. When they put me in a regular room,
the food was so bad that I begged them to hook
up the intravenous feeding tube again!
• • •
I had general anesthesia for a surgery that I just

had. That is so weird! You start out in one room
and when you wake up hours later, you are in a
completely different room, with no memory of
how you got there. It’s just like college.
• • •
Medicare is great for the elderly. Now the old

folks can be on so many tranquilizers that they
won’t care that the country’s going bankrupt!
• • •
They say that the way to a man’s heart is through

his stomach. I don’t know about you, but I
wouldn’t want the person who said that to be my
surgeon!
The Biggest Lie of All:
“It’s genetic!”
Your father had “high cholesterol”. So did your grandfather. So

did your mother, so the fact that you also have “high cholesterol”
must mean that it’s a genetic problem right?
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!
Medical doctors love to blame all kinds of problems on genetics.

Whenever your doctor blatantly lies to you by telling you that your
health problem is due to your genetics, please do yourself this
favor. Ask yourself: Did they at least run a test to determine if you
had faulty or damaged DNA?
Personally, this is the one lie that digusts me most of all. Not just
because medical doctors are bold enough to tell it, but because
patients are naive enough to believe it! Whenever a medical
doctor attributes your symptoms to a genetic disorder without
running a test to identify the damaged or missing genetic material,
THEY ARE LYING!!! This should be amazingly obvious to all.
OF ALL THE LIES THAT DOCTORS TELL,

THIS IS THE EASIEST LIE TO EXPOSE!
There is a known genetic disorder that results in extremely high

levels of “cholesterol” in the blood. It is called Familial
Hypercholesterolemia (FH). It involves a deformity of a gene that
is located on the short arm of chromosome 19, in band 19p13.2.
There are two types: heterozygous FH, which means that only one
of your parents passed along the defective genetic material on the
zygote (sperm or egg) that they provided at your conception and
homozygous FH which means that both of your parents passed

along the defective genes in their zygotes. Homozygous FH is
usually far more serious than the heterozygous form. Familial
hypercholesterolemia is a disorder that results in completely absent
or grossly malfunctioning LDL receptors (75% inactive) that are
found on the surface of the membranes of hepatic (liver) cells.
There are a number of other, less frequent and slightly different
disorders. They include type B hypercholesterolemia which is
caused by ligand-defective apolipoprotein B-100 and
hypercholesterolemia 3 which is caused by mutation in the PCSK9
gene. In all of these truly genetic ailments, the cells of the liver are
unable to take in LDL from the bloodstream due to this genetic
error, so blood levels of LDL rise dramatically...
BEGINNING AT BIRTH!
Patients who truly have inherited FH have levels that are far, far, far
above normal. The levels of infants and children at birth often
exceed 600mg/dL! In true FH, CHOLESTEROL from the excess
LDL is not only deposited in the arteries, it is deposited all over the
body. These fatty deposits are called xanthomas and xanthelasmas.
They occur as VISIBLE fatty deposits in the skin and the cornea of
the eye, as well in hidden areas everywhere in the body.
You are either born with FH or not. “Cholesterol” levels can be

checked at birth, but the National Cholesterol Education Program
(NCEP) recommends checking children in a FH family at age two.
If a person has normal “cholesterol” levels at birth, then he or she
will never develop FM later in life! You cannot all of a sudden, in
your 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s or 60s come down with a genetic disorder
that you can then retroactively blame on your parents. Inherited
diseases cause symptoms that are measurable at birth. The fact that
doctors are able to get away with this unbelievably blatant lie is a
testament to the gullibility of their patients. This does not apply
only to CHOLESTEROL. If your doctor EVER says that your
ailment “must be genetic” you know immediately that they are

lying! Did they test your DNA? If not, then please stop this lie the
next time you hear it. Never allow a medical doctor to tell you that
“it’s genetic” if they did not first test your DNA!!!ailment “must be
genetic” you know immediately that they are lying! Did they test
your DNA?
“Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is caused by mutations in

the protein coding for the LDL receptor. Among French
Canadians in Quebec, the prevalence of heterozygous FH is
1 case per 270 persons. Christian Lebanese persons have a
prevalence of 1 case per 170 persons. In South Africa, the
prevalence in Afrikaners is 1 case per 100 persons. The
prevalence in Ashkenazi Jews is 1 case per 67 persons. Although
moderate hypercholesterolemia is a common finding in
industrialized countries, heterozygous FH occurs in
approximately one per 500 persons worldwide. The prevalence of
homozygous FH is one case per one million patients. The
consequences of defective LDL receptor and subsequent
elevations of LDL are present at birth. [In the homozygous
form], corneal arcus and planar, tendon and tuberous xanthomas
are present early in childhood and sometimes at birth. Without
heroic interventions to lower blood cholesterol levels, survival
beyond young adulthood is unlikely. The gene for the LDL
receptor, which is autosomal dominant, is on the short arm of
chromosome 19.
Definitive diagnosis can be made only

with gene or receptor analysis.”
Elena Citkowitz M.D., Ph.D.

Director of Cholesterol Management Center
Yale University School of Medicine
“How can you determine whether your high blood ‘cholesterol’

indicates that you have inherited familial hypercholesterolemia
(FH)? In normal infants, the average blood ‘cholesterol’
and LDL ‘cholesterol’ levels are quite low at birth. In FH
heterozygotes, by contrast, the LDL ‘cholesterol’ level is about
twice as high at birth in blood taken from the umbilical cord.
How common are children who are FH homozygotes?
FH homozygous children are very rare, indeed, one in a million.
In the United States, where there are 240 million people, only
about 240 children are FH homozygotes. One important clue is
the presence of CHOLESTEROL deposits under the skin.
Children who are FH homozygotes develop CHOLESTEROL
deposits under the skin by the time they are five years old, and
occasionally these deposits are present even at birth. These
deposits, called ‘xanthomas’, usually start in the patient’s
twenties or thirties. They often occur as round, hard bumps
under the skin and within tendons in areas of increased friction,
notably the tendons in the hand (particularly over the knuckles),
the tendons over the elbow, and the Achilles tendon in the heel.
A definite diagnosis of FH requires a clear demonstration that
the number of LDL receptors working in your cells is decreased.
To perform this test, cells must be grown from a small piece of
skin taken from your arm using a procedure called a biopsy.
From the piece of skin, cells, called fibroblasts, are grown in cell
culture in a research laboratory. Alternatively, cells from the
blood, called lymphocytes, may be obtained and grown in cell
culture. The cells are grown under special conditions that
stimulate the number of LDL receptors on their surface.
LDL ‘cholesterol’ is removed from the blood of a donor and made
radioactive, and the actual binding of LDL to the LDL receptors
on the cells is measured. Unfortunately, this test to determine
whether a normal number of LDL receptors is working is
expensive, time-consuming and laborious.”
Peter O. Kwiterovitch, Jr., M.D.
The Johns Hopkins Complete Guide for Avoiding Heart Disease
Chapter 6
What’s in a Name?
IT’S A JOKE...
Virus: A Latin word used by doctors which

means “Your guess is as good as mine!”
Gurney: A hospital taxi with the meter
running.
Minor surgery: Any surgery that isn’t done on
you!
• • •
Did you ever wonder why dentist and

doctor are between death and drugs in the
dictionary?
• • •
The country doctor came out to the farmer’s

house to give the farmer’s wife her yearly
physical. As he pulled up to the farmhouse,
he realized that he was getting thirsty, so he
decided to go to the well in order to get a cool
drink. As he attempted to lower the bucket down
into the water, it got stuck. He pulled on the hand
crank so hard that it broke and the entire
mechanism fell into the well.
The moral of the story is that doctors should take

care of the sick and leave the well alone!
Q. Doctor, is the CHOLESTEROL that is listed in the

Nutritional Facts panel on food packages the same as
the “cholesterol” that you listed on my blood test?
Q. If they are the same, then why don’t the food packages
list whether the “cholesterol” in the food is the so-called
“good” kind of “cholesterol” or the so-called “bad”
kind?
Q. Wouldn’t it be better for me to eat foods that contain

the so-called “good cholesterol” and only avoid the
foods that contain the so-called “bad cholesterol”?
And while I have you here...
Q. Why do I always see the words “good” and “bad”

between quotation marks in regards to “cholesterol”?
I learned in english class that this is a linguistic
technique that is used when you are lying or being
facetious, like when someone says, “Gee, ‘thanks a
lot’”!
Q. And, come to think of it, why are they both referred to

as the so-called “good” and the so-called “bad
cholesterol”?
A. The simple answer to all of the above questions is that the

meaning of the word CHOLESTEROL has secretly been
changed! If you look up CHOLESTEROL in a
biochemistry textbook, you will find one definition. If you
talk to your doctor, your surgeon, your pharmacist or if
you listen to the media or to your family and friends, you
will get a completely different definition. (If you ever get a

definition, that is.) This chapter will help to clarify your
understanding of the true definition of CHOLESTEROL
despite the fact that...
I only wish that I could be there with you in your doctor’s office
when you pose these questions. It is so very amusing to see
doctors squirm. As a patient, it is empowering to see them begin to
fall down off of their pedestals, but it also sad to see them begin the
process of telling lies in earnest.
Simply stated, one of the major premises of this book stems from
the clear-cut observation that the medical profession has
masterfully changed the meaning of the word CHOLESTEROL.
It’s not just with CHOLESTEROL. This problem pervades the
entire medical establishment. The assumed status of the entire
medical profession itself is based upon this language barrier.
Doctors often speak in a Latin-based language that I call
“DoctorTalk”. Language, any language, is vague. Words are
used to define ideas that contain a wealth of information, so all
words can ever do is approximate the idea that you are trying to get
across. One of the most recent, blatant examples of linguistic
manipulation occurred when President Clinton proclaimed with a
straight face (and a clear conscience no doubt) that he...
“did not have sexual relations with that woman!”
What is the definition of the phrase “sexual relations”? Since no

commonly used dictionary clearly defines that particular phrase,
savvy man that he is, President Clinton chose to define it for his
own personal benefit. When he made the above statement, he was
speaking in a manner that he firmly believed was consistant with
his own inner truth. Because the people that opposed him chose to
define the term “sexual relations” differently, they accused him of

lying. It’s a linguistic argument for the ages.
When any one word is given multiple, conflicting definitions, you

have to be “in the know” in order to understand the conversation.
If I talk to my friend about the “tree” that is growing next to my
driveway, we both
know what type of
tree I am talking “If you can control the meaning of
words, then you can control the people
about, but you
who must use the words.”
don’t, because you
Philip K. Dick
have never been in
my yard. When I
use the phrase “too
big” with my girlfriend, she understands that I am talking about
water, because in her native language of Tagalog, “tubig” means
water. Have you ever heard the famous comedy skit performed by
Abbott and Costello regarding the discussion about the baseball
players named “Who” (on first base), “What” (on second base) and
“I don’t know” (on third base)? At first, if you don’t understand
the double entendre (double meaning) that is involved, the skit is
not the least bit funny (and is actually quite irritating) but once you
are “in the know”, the skit is hilarious.
I have read enough medical books to finally be able to crack the

doctor’s code. I understand the dual meanings that doctors use for
the word CHOLESTEROL, and I do not think that their 100+ year
con is the least bit funny at all.
Let me explain how I stumbled upon this.
A very good friend of mine, Maclovia, called me up one day to

ask me for my opinion. Her mother, 76 year young Carmen (one
of the original dancers in West Side Story) had bumped her knee on
the coffee table. It swelled up and hurt pretty badly, so she went
to her doctor. The doctor did a few physical manipulations that are
designed to help diagnose damage to certain ligaments within the
knee, and while doing so, actually aggravated the injury. X-rays
were taken, which were negative, but soon the doctor hit Carmen
with the bad news: She had ARTHRITIS! The doctor then wrote
a prescription and sent Carmen home. When her daughter
Maclovia called me, she was simply seeking a different opinion,
from a different perspective. Much of the conversation with the
doctor had disturbed her mother’s normally positive attitude and
they were looking for more information. We proceeded to have a
discussion about, of all things, not knees, but about language.
Haven’t you ever wondered why the doctor says that your test
results are “negative” when they are actually good as far as
your health is concerned? Could it be that when they say that a
test result is “positive” that it is only from the point of view of the
potential profit that they stand to receive by treating your
condition?
When a doctor “makes a diagnosis” it doesn’t do or mean anything.

The word “diagnosis” has a very interesting definition. The root
“di” means two, “a” means the opposite (like a-typical),
and “gnosis” means to know. So when a doctor gives you a
di-a-gnosis it only means that now two people do NOT know
what is happening! I kid you not, that’s the meaning of the word
di-a-gnosis. Calling a bumped and swollen knee a bumped and
swollen knee just does not cut it in the “Land of Doctors”. Medical
insurance companies’ billing practices demand specific
di-a-gnoses, which are then converted into numerical codes,
which can then be entered into forms that can then be submitted for
PAYMENT TO THE DOCTOR! Well, unfortunately, there is no
insurance code for a bumped and swollen knee, so, in order to get
paid, the doctor had to settle on the most acceptable (to the
insurance company) di-a-gnosis: ARTHRITIS!
Did Maclovia’s mother Carmen have a history of knee trouble?

No.
Did her x-rays show bone degenerations or abnormal deposits?
No.
Did any blood test prove positive for rheumatoid arthritis?
No.
Had she had any joint pain prior to bumping her knee?
No!
And now, for the $64 million dollar question? Did she really have
“arthritis”? Yes, she did, but its not what you think. Most people
think that they know what “arthritis” is. Factors like bone
degeneration, abnormal growths, and chronic pain are what most
people associate with “arthritis”, but Carmen didn’t have those
symptoms. Yet she did have “arthritis”. How can that be?
Here is the secret to the lies that doctors tell every day. It happens
with “arthritis”. It happens with cancer. It happens with the
common cold and it happens all the time in a big, big way with
“cholesterol” and heart disease. Doctors simply define the
language that THEY use just like President Clinton defined the
language that he used when referring to his “activities” with
Ms. Monica Lewinsky. In Latin, “arth” means joint and “itis”
means inflammation, swelling,
and redness. So, in Latin,
“When there is a failure
“arthritis” actually means a red,
of human understanding,
swollen joint. Doctors love to men make up new words.”
translate your health status into
Goethe
“DoctorTalk” in order to
confuse you. Arthritis sounds
like a much more serious and impressive health problem than a
bumped and swollen knee but, more importantly, there is an
insurance code that corresponds to arthritis, so the doctor can get
paid when they make a diagnosis of arthritis. They cannot get paid
for a diagnosis of a bumped and swollen knee. They (your doctor)
also get the side benefit of being able to prescribe a dangerous

pharmaceutical drug that requires constant monitoring, which
guarantees more office visits and more billable procedures. Hmm.
So what should Carmen do? Accept the di-a-gnosis? Take the drug
and deal with all of the negative side effects? Come back for more
visits? Worry about a di-a-gnosis that is only a word? Carmen
wisely went home. She rested. She waited. Amazingly, her body
fixed itself. She banged her knee and it got better all by itself.
Imagine that! A miracle! She overcame the dreaded di-a-gnosis of
“arthritis” and she walks pain free to this day.
Hopefully, the above true story gives you some idea about where
we are headed in discussing the lies about “cholesterol”. In their
own minds, doctors do not believe that they are lying, just as
President Clinton did not believe that he was lying. Somehow, our
culture always seems to put more emphasis upon the word liar,
than we do upon the word: DECEIVER! Technically, President
Clinton never lied to the American public, but he did try to
DECEIVE us.
Your doctor is skilled in the deceptive language of “DoctorTalk”,

so the only thing that you can do to protect yourself is learn how to
ask questions that force them to answer you in common, everyday
accepted English. When you learn to ask your doctor probing
questions, then you will be presented with an opportunity to see
how they will react. They will be unable to continue the deception,
because you have learned HOW to ask the right questions.
So let’s revisit the questions at the start of this chapter, knowing,

and demanding that the definition of the word CHOLESTEROL is
the definition that was just given. No deception. No “sexual
relations”. No Latin. No lies. No so-called this or so-called that.
The following is a hypothetical question and answer period that

you might have if you asked these questions of a doctor that was
completely honest, did not lie, AND DID NOT ATTEMPT TO
DECEIVE YOU EITHER!
Q. Doctor, is the CHOLESTEROL that is listed in the

Nutritional Facts panel on food packages the same as
the “cholesterol” that you listed on my blood test?
A. No, they are different.
Q. If they are the same, then why don’t the food packages
list whether the “cholesterol” in the food is the so-called
“good” kind of “cholesterol” or the so-called “bad”
kind?
A. They are not the same. Please realize that, even though
they may sound as if they are value judgements, the
phrases “good cholesterol” and “bad cholesterol” are not
value judgements at all. Those phrases actually only refer
to how CHOLESTEROL is being transported in the blood.
“Good cholesterol” (HDL) and “bad cholesterol” (LDL)
are only found in blood. Food manufacturers do not
specify levels of HDL and LDL that their foods contain
because the government does not require them to do so.
Q. Wouldn’t it be better for me to eat foods that contain

the so-called “good cholesterol” and only avoid the
foods that contain the so-called “bad cholesterol”?
A. The phrases “good cholesterol” and “bad cholesterol” are

not really value judgements about the effect upon human
health. These phrases only refer to how CHOLESTEROL
is transported within the bloodstream. Please realize that
these phrases do not mean what you think they mean.
Q. Why do I always see the words “good” and “bad”

between quotation marks in regards to “cholesterol”?
I learned in english class that this is a linguistic
technique that is used when you are lying or being
facetious, like when someone says, “Gee, ‘thanks a
lot’”!
A. The correct answer is: You see, that is one way that
doctors cover themselves legally. By using this technique,
doctors are actually clearly telling you that they are just
pulling your leg by calling HDL “good” and by calling
LDL “bad”. Doctors know better, but they use this
deceptive language to keep you confused.
Q. And, come to think of it, why are they both referred to

as the so-called “good” and the so-called “bad
cholesterol”?
A. The correct answer is: This is just a little bit more of the
same. Using “good” and “bad” to redefine HDL and LDL
worked so well that absolutely no one ever questions the
validity of these phrases. If you repeat something often
enough, eventually people will accept that it must be true
simply because they have heard it said so many times.
Your doctor lies blatantly because they know that you are
not going to realize the importance of what they are telling
you. It’s basically due to your ignorance and your doctors’
arrogance.
Chapter 7
Something Doesn’t Add Up!

IT’S A JOKE...
Why do doctors ask you to wait two to three weeks

for an appointment and then, once they take a look
at you ask, “Why did you wait so long to come in
and see me?”
• • •
The doctor pulled a white sheet over the dead

patient’s face, turned solemnly to the family and
said, “Well, his condition is stable!”
• • •
An old man woke up in the recovery room after an

operation and said, “Thank God that’s over!”
“Don’t be so sure!” said the man in the bed next to
him. “They left a sponge inside of me and had to
operate again to take it out!”
“How terrible!” said the old man.
“That’s nothing,” said a third man.
“They had to open me up again to remove a clamp
that they left inside of me!”
“That’s dreadful!” said the old man.
Just then, the surgeon poked his head around the
corner and asked all of them,
“Have any of you seen my car keys?

I know that I had them with me earlier!”
Q. Can you please explain to me exactly what the

difference is between the so-called “good cholesterol”
(HDL) and the so-called “bad cholesterol” (LDL)?
Q. Doctor, I have a question regarding the results of my

“cholesterol” test results. You said that my “total
cholesterol” was _______, and that my LDL was
_______, and that my HDL was _______. Are those
numbers correct?
Q. Okay, so here’s my real question. When I add my

LDL and my HDL together, I only get _______, which
is less than the “total cholesterol” which you told me
was _______. Something here does not add up!
Can you please explain why?
Q. Are triglycerides the same as CHOLESTEROL?
A. The short answer to all of these questions is that HDL,

LDL, triglycerides and CHOLESTEROL are all
completely different things, and really cannot be compared
with each other in any meaningful way. HDL and LDL
NEVER add up to “total cholesterol”. Your doctor has
obviously been giving you only a part of the story. This is
the key to the entire deception that doctors have been
keeping a secret for generations.
When numbers don’t add up, you should begin to smell a rat.
In the above questions, please fill in the blanks with the specific
results of your own “cholesterol” test. I guarantee you that your
HDL and your LDL will not add up to the “total”. They never do,
but yet most patients never question the obvious. Why don’t your
test result numbers add up? Why are you contemplating life-
changing health decisions based on numbers that you do not
understand? Why doesn’t your doctor take the time to fully explain
them to you so that you do understand? Why are they reaching for
their prescription pad without even discussing the reasons and the
CAUSES behind the numbers that they are using to justify the
prescription of pharmaceutical drugs? The obvious reason is
because...
CHOLESTEROL TESTING
Doctors and the laboratories that process your “cholesterol” tests

use a very interesting formula to determine what they deceptively
refer to as “total cholesterol”. That formula is...
HDL + LDL + (triglycerides / 5) = “Total Cholesterol”
Most people would be surprised to learn that the laboratory test that
is done to “determine” LDL doesn’t even actually measure LDL at
all. The formula above is used to calculate, not measure LDL!
The number that your doctor gave you for that infamous, so-called
“bad cholesterol” (LDL) was only an estimate! That’s right....
UNLESS YOUR DOCTOR HAS PROVIDED YOU WITH

THE OPPORTUNITY TO UNDERGO A VERY SPECIAL
(AND EXPENSIVE) TYPE OF BLOOD TEST THAT
ACTUALLY MEASURES THE AMOUNT OF LDL IN YOUR
BLOOD, THEN YOU HAVE NEVER ACTUALLY HAD
YOUR LDL MEASURED! YOUR LDL HAS ONLY BEEN
ESTIMATED!
Despite what they may have told you, it is highly likely that your
doctor has NEVER actually measured your LDL levels! The
simplistic version of ths so-called “cholesterol” blood testing that
your doctor uses only CALCULATES AN ESTIMATE of your
LDL levels by manipulating the equation that was shown above
into the following...
LDL = “Total Cholesterol” - [(HDL + (triglycerides / 5)]
The Physicians’ Desk Reference clearly states that this formula is

not accurate. Numerous testing companies are springing up all
over the world now touting the benefits of their NEW testing
methods. These companies are pointing out the inadequacies of the
former types of testing (the kind that your doctor has been doing for
50+ years) and they are now recommending that patients submit
their blood samples for these new types of “cholesterol” testing.
The first type of new “cholesterol” testing is called electrophoresis.

In this technique, your blood plasma is placed in a gel and is then
subjected to an electrical charge. Specific types of lipoproteins
migrate through the gel in specific patterns that depend upon the
size and electrical charge of the specific lipoproteins in your blood.
Once the various subtypes have migrated and formed these various
patterns, they can be measured and reported with great detail.
The accuracy of this method has been validated in hundreds of
scientific publications.
An even newer type of “cholesterol” testing is called NMR

(Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectroscopy. This technique
employs a device that is similar to the machines used to perform
MRIs (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) on other sections of the body.
A magnetic field is applied to the blood plasma and it affects
different types of lipoproteins differently, which enables them to be
accurately measured. This form of testing does not rely upon the
skill of the technician performing the test.
“With the importance of LDL levels, it may come as a surprise to

many that their LDL was not directly measured, but simply
calculated. How accurate is the calculated LDL result?
A direct LDL test result rarely coincides with a calculated one.
For someone with an LDL at or close to the desirable ceiling
value, a calculated result can be dangerously misleading. How
can you tell whether your LDL level was a direct measurement or
simply calculated? A direct test of LDL costs about $150. Divide
your triglyceride level by five, add that sum to your HDL and
subtract both from your total ‘cholesterol’ level. If the arithmetic
works out neatly, chances are you are reading calculator results.
Does it matter? Very much, in my opinion.”
Julius Torelli, M.D.
PLEASE ask yourself this simple question. If the tests that have
been done for the last fifty years were inaccurate (because they
didn’t actually measure LDL), doesn’t that mean that all of the
so-called “scientific” studies and all of the “expert” advice based
on the so-called “cholesterol” “measurements” should be thrown
into the trash because all of the numbers were inaccurate?
Scientists, test manufacturers and doctors ARE now telling us

that “total cholesterol”, LDL and HDL are no longer accurate
indicators of the risk of heart disease, despite the fact that they
have been telling us for more than fifty years that these so-called
“measurements” were meaningful! But instead of re-evaluating
the mistakes of the past 50 years, the medical industry expects us
to take more expensive tests so we can start worrying about NEW
categories of blood lipids such as LDL particle number, particle
size profiles such as HDL2 (Large, buoyant), HDL3 (Small, dense)
VLDL(1+2) (Large Buoyant), VLDL(3) (Small Remnant), IDL
(Intermediate Density Lipoprotein), Remnant Lipoproteins (IDL +
small VLDL3), Total Non-HDL (LDL + VLDL).
WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO END?
I will not go into the details of all of these NEW measurements that
your doctor will soon be using in their ongoing attempts to confuse
you even further. I will only cover the basics of lipid metabolism
that most people are already completely misinformed about and
completely confused by. If I can help you to understand the basics
of the lies that have already been told, then maybe you will be able
to recognize and avoid the new lies that are being developed.
HDL
HDL stands for High-Density-LipoPROTEIN. It is highly dense

because it is 50% protein and protein is much more dense than any
of the other components in HDL. HDL is a globule that contains a
collection of a wide variety of different nutrients. Since oils
(triglycerides) and waxes (CHOLESTEROL) do not mix well with
water, it is necessary to surround them with a special wrapper
(lecithin), so that they can travel through the watery fluids of the
blood. Lecithin naturally forms globules that are very much like
soap bubbles. On average, a single globule of HDL weighs
thousands of times more than a single molecule of
CHOLESTEROL. The CHOLESTEROL that is found in HDL is
exactly the same as the CHOLESTEROL that is found in LDL.
The CHOLESTEROL is neither “good”, nor “bad”. It is simply
being transported by a different type of lipoprotein.
“ ‘Good cholesterol’ is not a type of CHOLESTEROL...

‘good cholesterol’ refers to the way the body transports
CHOLESTEROL in the blood.”
(Textbook)
Any biochemistry, medical or nutrition textbook will tell you that

CHOLESTEROL is an individual molecule with the chemical
formula C27H45OH. Those same textbooks will tell you that
compared to a single molecule of CHOLESTEROL, a globule of
HDL is unbelievably huge in size. It is true that HDL globules do
contain CHOLESTEROL, but HDL is definitely not the same as
CHOLESTEROL. HDL typically contains:
Triglycerides (8%)
Protein (50%)
Lecithin (22%)
CHOLESTEROL (20%)
High Density Lipo-Protein (HDL) Globule
.
Relative size of a single CHOLESTEROL molecule
One of the most devious things about the entire “cholesterol” scam
being perpetrated by your doctor, is obvious once you learn what
HDL actually is. HDL is 50% protein!!! How can your doctor,
and the American Heart Association tell you that it is good to
elevate your HDL levels in one breath, and in the very next breath,
they tell you to drastically limit your consumption of eggs, red
meat, liver and other protein rich animal foods? How hypocritical
can they be? How obvious do their lies need to be before
you notice? HDL is 50% protein and their diet advocates
consuming only 15% protein along with 30% fat and 55%
carbohydrates! Talk about a Catch-22. How can you expect to
make more HDL, which is 50% protein, when the diet that
they recommend is only supposed to contain 15% protein?
“CHOLESTEROL travels in the blood as a ‘passenger’ on a

family of protein particles called lipoproteins (meaning lipid
carrying proteins). This allows CHOLESTEROL to be soluble in
blood. It also permits proteins to steer the lipoprotein particle to
target the liver, plaque, or other places in the body. Proteins also
determine to what degree its passenger CHOLESTEROL and
other lipids will interact and be deposited into plaque. In other
words, it is the protein component of the particle that determines
the behavior of the lipoprotein particle. The CHOLESTEROL
component just goes along for the ride. When your ‘cholesterol’
is tested in your doctor’s office or hospital, the amount of
CHOLESTEROL present is measured, while the protein
component is ignored. This approach ignores the important fact
that the behavior of a CHOLESTEROL particle depends on its
protein partner.”
Dr. William Davis, M.D.
This unbelievably obvious deception is only the first of many

things that simply do not add up!
HDL globules are used by the cells of your body as a sort of

garbage truck. According to medical textbooks, individual cells use
HDL to discard any waste materials and excess nutrients that are in
OVERABUNDANCE WITHIN THE CELLS!
“HDL: the type of lipoprotein that transports

CHOLESTEROL back to the liver from peripheral cells,
composed primarily of protein.”
(Textbook)
Please slow down the rate at which you are reading, because you
must understand the next paragraph. The logic is simple and
straightforward, but you have been so brainwashed by medical
bullshit that you may need to read the next paragraph a few dozen
times for it to really sink in. It takes a while to clean out all of the
old ideas and let a new perspective enter. Please be patient. When
the light bulb goes off inside of your head, you will be rewarded
for your efforts.
***IMPORTANT: Please read slowly***
HDL levels in the bloodstream rise when the individual cells have
EXCESS CHOLESTEROL (or unneeded hormones) that they are
sending back to the liver for reuse or disposal. This garbage truck-
like function is the textbook purpose of HDL. Doctors tell you that
high HDL levels are good for your health. I AGREE! Enabling
your cells to throw out the garbage is a good thing. BUT, in the
very next breath, doctors and the American Heart Association tell
you to cut down on your consumption of CHOLESTEROL! But
the textbooks say that HDL levels rise when the cells have
EXCESS CHOLESTEROL to discard! How can you get your
HDL levels to rise by restricting the very thing that they are
designed to carry away from the cells? If high levels of HDL are a
sign of good health, and HDL is used by cells to discard their
excess CHOLESTEROL, then that means that high cellular
CHOLESTEROL levels are a sign of good health, so we should eat
more CHOLESTEROL in order to be more healthy! If you want
your HDL levels to rise, you have to consume additional protein so
that your cells can make HDL in the first place and your cells need
to have EXCESS CHOLESTEROL that they may choose to
discard. But doctors tell you to try to get your HDL levels to rise
by eating less protein and less CHOLESTEROL! Either all the
textbooks and medical dictionaries are wrong, or...

LDL
LDL stands for Low-Density-Lipoprotein. LDL is less dense than

HDL because it contains a smaller amount of dense protein. LDL
and HDL are made from the same basic compounds. The main
difference is simply in the relative amounts and ratios of those
compounds. LDL contains a lower percentage of protein than
HDL, and since protein is much more dense than CHOLESTEROL
or triglycerides, LDL is less dense than HDL (that’s how LDL and
HDL got their names). LDL is at least twice as large as HDL and
LDL is far bigger than a single molecule of CHOLESTEROL.
It is true that LDL globules contain CHOLESTEROL, but LDL is
definitely not the same as CHOLESTEROL. On average, LDL
typically contains...
Triglycerides (11%)
Protein (21%)
Lecithin (22%)
CHOLESTEROL (46%)
Low Density Lipo-Protein (LDL)

“The LDL circulate throughout the body, making their contents

available to all the cells - muscle, including the heart muscle; fat
stores; the mammary glands; and others. The body cells take up
triglycerides from them; they also collect phospholipids
[lecithin], and CHOLESTEROL to build new membranes, to
make hormones or other compounds, or to store for later use.”
(Textbook)
Again, as before, please slow down the rate at which you are
reading, because you must understand the next paragraph.
The logic is simple and straightforward, but you have been so
brainwashed by medical bullshit that you may need to read the next
paragraph a few dozen times for it to really sink in. It takes a while
to clean out all of the old ideas and let a new perspective enter.
Please be patient. When the light bulb goes off inside of your head,
you will be rewarded for your efforts.
***IMPORTANT: Please read slowly***
All medical and nutritional textbooks state quite clearly that LDL
is manufactured in the liver to send nutrients to the cells. The main
thing that is being sent is CHOLESTEROL. This means that the
cells need more CHOLESTEROL. As you will see in an upcoming
chapter, CHOLESTEROL is used by all the cells in the body to
make a multitude of compounds without which life could not exist.
So what do doctors and the American Heart Association tell you to
do in terms of diet? They tell you to stop eating the very substance
that your cells are desperately in need of. Your cells are so
depleted, that your very own liver has stepped up production and
is shipping out more and more in delivery trucks called LDL.
Doctors tell you that the higher your levels of LDL are, the less
healthy you are. I AGREE! But does that mean that you should
take drugs that prevent your liver from doing its job? Does that
mean that you should eat less CHOLESTEROL and force your
liver to manufacture it from scratch? High levels of LDL traveling
from your liver to your cells means that your cells need more
CHOLESTEROL!! The cells of your body are screaming because
they need to receive MORE CHOLESTEROL! For God’s sake,
and your own, EAT AN EGG! HAVE SOME BUTTER!
EAT SOME RED MEAT! Why else would your liver be
manufacturing it and sending it? Why does your doctor tell you to
eat LESS CHOLESTEROL when the very blood test that they are
reading says that your liver is busy making CHOLESTEROL
because the cells of your body desperately need MORE? You may
have already guessed the answer: Because...
“Most of the time your doctor makes a myopic attempt to decide

whether you have heart disease by looking only at your
‘cholesterol’. ‘LDL cholesterol’ doesn’t tell us whether you do or
do not have coronary plaque. If treatment of coronary disease
were as easy as treating your ‘LDL cholesterol’, lowering your
‘LDL cholesterol’ would cure heart disease. It does not.”
Dr. William Davis, M.D.
TRIGLYCERIDES
Now lets take a look at the third variable in the equation that
doctors and laboratories misuse. The word triglyceride is used to
define a category that includes many similar compounds. There are
thousands of different triglygerides. They all have the same
general structure, but the details can be different and unique in so
many ways, that it nearly defies description. A two dimensional
representation of a triglyceride molecule looks like this...
Glycerol
Fatty Acid
Fatty Acid
Fatty Acid
Triglyceride (general template)
The glycerol portion of the triglyceride molecule can have all kinds
of different chemicals attached to it on the top side that is opposite
the fatty acids. Additionally, there are dozens, if not hundreds of
different fatty acids of all shapes and sizes and they can all be
combined in so many different permutations that it would be
impossible to list all of the possibilities. Triglycerides are the
preferred storage medium for energy in the body. They are found
in abundance in adipose (fat) cells. Your body can take excess
calories from just about any food (protein, carbohydrates, fat and
alcohol) and convert it into triglycerides. It is much easier for the
body to store excess calories in the form of triglycerides than it is
to convert those excess calories into CHOLESTEROL.
The amount of triglycerides found in the bloodstream normally

rises after a meal. The more fats, carbohydrates and alcohol that
you consume, the higher your level of triglycerides becomes.
Almost twelve hours must pass before the level returns to
“normal”. But how many people fast for twelve hours? How can
that level be considered normal? The fasting level that doctors

usually measure is actually abnormal! Normal means usual. What
people usually do is eat three to six times per day. Most of the day
people are walking around digesting their latest meal, so most of
the day people are walking around with triglyceride levels that are
far above their so-called “normal” fasting levels. If high levels of
triglycerides are “bad” for you, then all of us are constantly
walking around with levels that are too high for our own good
health!
CHOLESTEROL
This is where you get to catch your doctor in the biggest, most
obvious lie ever, so please read this carefully. CHOLESTEROL is
a very unique molecule. There is only one version. It has the
chemical formula C27H45OH where C stands for Carbon,
H stands for Hydrogen and O stands for Oxygen. A two
dimensional representation of the structure of a CHOLESTEROL
molecule looks like this:
H
H H H
C21 H C22 H
H
H C20 H
C23 H H
H H
H H C18 C26
H H
H
H C12 C17 H C24 C25
H H
C11 C13 C16 H H
H H H C27
H H
H H C19
H H
H C1 C9 C14 C15 H
C2 C10 C8 H H
H
H
H
C3 C5 C7
O
H H C4 C6 H
H H
H
CHOLESTEROL (detailed)
HO
CHOLESTEROL (simplified)
TRIGLYCERIDES ARE ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY,

WITHOUT A DOUBT, NOT THE SAME AS
CHOLESTEROL!!! It should be abundantly and brutally
obvious that triglycerides and CHOLESTEROL are clearly not the
same thing! Just look at them!
Here is how your doctor has deceived you. Your doctor has not told
you that it is possible for you to eat absolutely ZERO dietary
CHOLESTEROL but still have your so-called “cholesterol” levels
rise because they deceitfully call triglycerides “cholesterol”! If you
overeat anything, your liver can convert that food into triglycerides
and then your lying doctor will tell you that your “cholesterol”
levels went up! Doctors, testing laboratories and the drug industry
all use the formula below to “calculate” your “cholesterol”.
“Total Cholesterol” = HDL + LDL + (triglycerides / 5)
Please, please, please, please realize that this equation is a lie!

I realize that many of you may have math phobia, but let’s take a
look at this equation from an algebra teacher’s point of view
anyway. We have an equation with four different variables.
HDL, LDL and triglycerides are absolutely and completely
different from each other, and they are absolutely not the same as
CHOLESTEROL, yet the amounts of all of these substances are
treated as if they are completely interchangeable.
Any good algebra teacher would fail you for setting up an equation
like this. It is meaningless and non-sensible. It has no solution
because all of the variables represent different units of
measurement. For sake of discussion, let’s say that your doctor
told you that your LDL is 120, your HDL is 60 and your
triglycerides are 100. If you plug all these numbers into the
equation that your doctor uses, you will find that your so-called
“total cholesterol” equals 200. You would probably be happy with
these results. Everything seems to add up nicely, despite the fact
that, in reality, this exercise is completely absurd. Any self
respecting algebra teacher would be completely disgusted with this
scenario, because even though the numbers add up, all the units of
measurement are different!
60 HDL + 120 LDL + 100 Triglycerides/5 = 200 CHOLESTEROL
An appropriate analogy would be to argue that 60 big baskets of

mixed fruit plus 120 truckloads of a different fruit mix plus one
fifth of a bunch of 100 bananas equals 200 raisins! You might be
able to pull off a trade like that at a farmers’ market if you stood in
such a way that the sun got into the farmer’s eyes and blinded him,
but in terms of your health, please, this is absolutely ridiculous!!
You most certainly would never get away with anything like this in
an algebra class (certainly not in my sister Joan’s algebra class),
but this is exactly what they teach future doctors in medical
schools.
I understand that medicine is an art, and doctors love to dress

up the practice of their “art” with all kinds of “scientific”
mumbo-jumbo. The bottom line with the work of a creative artist
such as a painter or a sculptor is very simple... Does the art work
leave your surroundings more beautiful? The bottom line with the
work of the practitioner of the art of medicine is also very simple...
Does their work leave you healthier?
I suggest that you get out your latest “cholesterol” test scores and
plug your results into the above equation. You will see that your
numbers will seem to “work” when you plug them into your
doctor’s equation (you may not have been given the number for
triglycerides, so it may not be possible for you to check without
first obtaining that information). Don’t strain your brain trying to
comprehend the mathematics. That is not the point. The point is...
THE USE OF THIS EQUATION IS RIDICULOUS!!
The only thing that doctors accomplish when they throw all of
these confusing numbers at you is that they confuse you.
A confused patient can be frightened. A scared and confused
patient can easily be manipulated and led into making a poorly
informed, and thus badly reasoned decision about their health.
Most scared and confused patients look for help from the
“authority” figure in a white lab coat for advice, and more often
than not, the advice that you receive is to take a pharmaceutical
chemical drug and schedule a follow-up appointment so that the
doctor can check to see if the drug is damaging your liver or some
other organs. Doesn’t this set off a red flag? Shouldn’t the
possibility of liver damage awaken you to the dangers of the
treatment being offered? Doesn’t the admission that drugs that
inhibit the production of CHOLESTEROL can also cause your
liver cells to burst and die raise your awareness just a little bit?
Do you really want to trade high numbers in a completely
meaningless equation for severe liver damage??
Although it may be counter-intuitive, a high level of LDL in the

bloodstream (proclaimed to be ‘bad’) actually indicates that you
suffer from LOW levels of CHOLESTEROL in the tissues of the
body. The elevated LDL blood levels indicate that your liver is
manufacturing and sending CHOLESTEROL to all the cells of
your body because they need MORE CHOLESTEROL!
Contrary to the advice of your doctor, the American Medical
Association and the American Heartless Association, if you have
elevated LDL levels, then you actually need to eat MORE
CHOLESTEROL, NOT LESS!
Also contrary to the prevailing ‘wisdom’, a high level of HDL in

the bloodstream means that your cells have adequate protein and
excess CHOLESTEROL that they are sending back to the liver
for disposal. Low levels of HDL, which most doctors say are a
sign of poor health, actually mean that the cells are deficient in
protein and are also deficient in CHOLESTEROL.
In order to lower LDL levels and in order to raise HDL levels,

it is necessary to consume MORE protein and MORE
CHOLESTEROL!
So why does your doctor tell you to do the opposite?
Doctors base the treatment of their patients on a blatantly fallacious

equation that is completely meaningless, because they know that
most people’s eyes gloss over once their brains are forced to
contemplate numbers, equations and algebra. Through the
deceitful manipulation of mathematics, doctors have turned the
business of “cholesterol management” into a mega-trillion dollar
industry and YOU are the livestock being led to slaughter.
As a patient, do you fail to fulfill the most basic responsibility that

you have? The responsibility to yourself? YOU have a
responsibility to yourself to demand that any test be run a second
time at a different laboratory in order to rule out the possibility

of error and simple variation due to chance. YOU have a
responsibility to be informed about your own body and your own
health. YOU have a responsibility to demand explanations. YOU
have a responsibility to get a TRUE second opinion from someone
who is able to look at the problem from a different perspective.
Another opinion from another allopathic doctor or from a different
specialist trained in the same methodology and using the same
procedures will not normally result in additional knowledge being
offered to the patient. What you get with a second opinion from a
second allopathic doctor is merely an echo of the only opinion that
they are permitted to give you without risking the loss of their
license, so make it a point to step outside of the medical industry
when you seek a true second opinion. Your health is ultimately
your responsibility. It was YOU who chose to walk into the office
of a medical doctor in the first place in order to request their
assistance. It is YOU who follows their advice without question.
It is YOU who looks at the numbers that they give you for HDL,
LDL and “total cholesterol” and never bother to check the math or
ask questions.
“The only truly accurate measurement of LDL is the direct LDL

test. The customary, indirect measure of LDL is estimated
mathematically and can result in values that are grossly in error.
Direct measurement of LDL, however, may cost more than all the
rest of your lipid profile.”
Richard K. Bernstein, M.D.
Author of “Diabetes Solution”
At this point, the manipulated, scared and confused patient (YOU)

usually forgets to stand up for their rights. You forget to get a
second opinion. You meekly do as you are instructed. Surely the
medical deity (M.D.) is all knowing and compassionately
concerned with your welfare. “What do you know” compared to
this powerful authority? The fearsome spector of having “high
cholesterol” and having to be on medication “for the rest of your

life” because “if you don’t control your ‘cholesterol’ you are
likely to have a heart attack or a stroke” is simply too much to bear.
You don’t want to die. You have a family to take care of and friends
that love you. So you stop at the pharmacy to purchase your drugs
and you completely ignore the warnings of the dangers that the
pharmaceutical company prints on the sheet that they provide along
with their drugs as you swallow your prescribed poisons!
Let me tell you something about those warnings. They are there
for an obvious reason: Every pharmaceutical drug is technically a
poison. That’s right, a poison. That’s why they have a pharmacist
guarding them. That’s why you have to get an official “permission
slip” from your doctor in the form of a prescription in order to
receive them. Ask yourself... would you give these poisons to your
child? Would you give these poisons to your pet? If you took a
few extra doses of these poisons could you get sick and possibly
die? Would you ever consider taking the whole bottle? How do
people usually attempt to commit suicide? They swallow drugs.
People don’t try to kill themselves by swallowing vitamins or
nutritional supplements! You can’t kill yourself that way! People
don’t try to commit suicide by swallowing too many peas and
carrots! They swallow drugs because swallowing drugs is the
easiest way that there is to kill yourself. How do you define a
poison? It’s something that can kill you! DRUGS ARE POISON!
Your doctor, and the pharmaceutical industry for whom they push
drugs, have masterfully crafted a series of partial truths that are
designed to confuse and misinform you, while leading you to
believe that they are actually explaining the truth and informing
you. The sum total of this mis-information propaganda leads you
right into the hands of the medical/pharmaceutical establishment.
Are you not able to see the obvious? They have convinced you to
swallow poison in the pursuit of health! It cannot be stated in any
simpler way.
The medical establishment has somehow convinced you

that it wise to swallow poison in the pursuit of health!
Who is guilty here? Who recommended that you swallow poison?

Look at the name of the person who signed your permission slip
(prescription) that allows you to obtain the poison. Your doctor.
You trust them with your life, and they recommend that you
swallow poison in the pursuit of health. So what do you do? You
buy your drugs, go home and swallow your poison like a very
compliant, brainwashed, poorly informed and easily deceived fool.
Why? Because...

Q. Can you please explain to me exactly what the

difference is between the so-called “good cholesterol”
(HDL) and the so-called “bad cholesterol” (LDL)?
A. The similarities are more important than the differences.

Neither HDL or LDL are actually the same as
CHOLESTEROL. Both LDL and HDL are delivery
vehicles for CHOLESTEROL, phospholipids such as
lecithin, protein and triglycerides. Both HDL and LDL
only exist in blood. They are merely vehicles that transport
and deliver materials between the liver to the bodily
tissues. They both carry the same basic ingredients, but
they vary somewhat in the percentages of those materials.
They are not actually “good” and “bad” in terms of what
they do. “Good cholesterol” does not make you healthy.
Healthy people have an abundance of HDL BECAUSE
they have EXCESS CHOLESTEROL. “Bad cholesterol”

most certainly does not CAUSE bad health. People with
bad health tend to have higher levels of LDL BECAUSE
their cells are unable to make enough CHOLESTEROL,
so the liver has to make it and send it to the cells of their
body in the form of LDL. Don’t confuse CAUSE with
EFFECT.
Q. Doctor, I have a question regarding the results of my

“cholesterol” test results. You said that my “total
cholesterol” was _______, and that my LDL was
_______, and that my HDL was _______. Are those
numbers correct?
A. Yes, from the point of view that that is what the lab report
says.
Q. Okay, so here’s my real question. When I add my

LDL and my HDL together, I only get _______, which
is less than the “total cholesterol” which you told me
was _______. Something here does not add up! Can
you please explain why?
A. HDL and LDL are only part of the equation. The complete
equation is...
HDL + LDL + (triglycerides / 5) = “total blood lipids”
Somewhere along the line, doctors starting using a

shorthand to refer to these very different variables. None
of them actually refer to the individual molecule known as
CHOLESTEROL. CHOLESTEROL is not bad. You must
have CHOLESTEROL to survive. This equation is just a
simple way to summarize what was observed in your
blood. When your overall health is good, these numbers
tend to reflect that reality. Changing these numbers does

not change your health. If your health improves, then
these numbers will tend to improve also. Don’t put the cart
before the horse. You have to focus on being healthy.
Once you get healthier, you will see these numbers
reflect that newer, healthier you. Focus on being
healthy. Don’t focus on trying to merely change the
numbers. Don’t confuse CAUSE with EFFECT.
Q. Are triglycerides the same as CHOLESTEROL?
A. No. They are absolutely and completely different things.

This, more than anything else, is all the evidence that
anyone should need to realize that their doctor is lying
about “cholesterol”. It is entirely possible for you to eat
absolutely zero dietary CHOLESTEROL and still have
your blood “cholesterol” levels rise. This is simply due to
the fact that your body can easily and quickly convert
excess calories from ANY source into triglycerides which,
according to your doctor’s formula, are then deceitfully
referred to as “cholesterol”. Triglycerides are definitely
not the same as CHOLESTEROL, but the medical and
pharmaceutical industries have changed the meaning of the
word “cholesterol” to include triglycerides. This has
been done in order to trick you into believing that you need
to consume poisonous pharmaceutical drugs. It has also
been devised to convince you to eat exactly the wrong
foods in order to maintain the health of your
cardiovascular system. It has been devised to convince you
that you are sick when, in fact, you are not. When your
doctor uses the equation that is typically used to
deceitfully refer to triglycerides as “cholesterol”, they you
should immediately realize that...

“The first point to make is that you do not have a

CHOLESTEROL level in your blood. CHOLESTEROL is
insoluble in blood, and therefore has to be carried around the
body inside a small sphere known as a lipoprotein. There are
many different types of lipoprotein, ranging from the monster
chlyomicron to the teeny, weeny, High Density Lipoprotein
(HDL). Lipoproteins do not just carry CHOLESTEROL. They
also carry all sorts of other fats, saturated, monounsaturated and
polyunsaturated. When you eat CHOLESTEROL and saturated
fat, they are both absorbed into the intenstinal wall, where the
saturated fats are all stuck onto a glycerol molecule, to make
triglycerides. The CHOLESTEROL remains unchanged. Then,
within the intestinal wall, both are rammed into a chylomicron
before being expelled into the portal circulation system to be
moved around the body. Most chylomicrons go directly to the
liver where they are absorbed, broken down, and reconstructed
into a smaller type of lipoprotein known as a Very Low Density
Lipoprotein (VLDL). These VLDLs then go out into the general
circulation and gradually lose triglyceride. As they do so, they get
smaller, transforming from VLDL to Intermediate Density
Lipoproteins (IDL), then Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL). The
LDL is either absorbed back into the liver, to be reused to create
more VLDLs, or they are absorbed into other tissues where the
contents are used by the cell. So, at what point does saturated fat
get turned into CHOLESTEROL? Answer: It doesn’t! You don’t
make CHOLESTEROL out of saturated fat. CHOLESTEROL,
when it is made in the liver, starts out as a substance called
Acteyl-coenzyme A. This is not a fat; it is nothing like a fat. Point
one, therefore, is that saturated fat and CHOLESTEROL
are completely unrelated chemically, and you don’t make
CHOLESTEROL from fats. So why would eating saturated fat
increase CHOLESTEROL production in the liver? It can’t
and it doesn’t. But of course, the substance we are interested
in nowadays is LDL. Which is not the same thing as
CHOLESTEROL at all. So why do we called a raised LDL level
a raised ‘cholesterol’ level? In fact, the nomenclature in this
whole area is just designed to make things almost impossible to
understand. For example, a raised VLDL level is known as hyper-
triglycerideamia. The only connection between saturated fats and
CHOLESTEROL is that, because they are insoluble in water,
they sit inside lipoproteins in order that they can be carried

around the body. The liver doesn’t make LDL - LDL is the
metabolic residue of VLDL. The liver doesn’t make LDL, it
makes VLDL, and when VLDL loses triglyceride it turns into
LDL. So, if you eat more saturated fat (or any other kind of fat),
the liver will churn our more VLDL. NOT because there is
more CHOLESTEROL around, but because there are more
triglycerides around to deal with. Therefore, presumably, after
all the VLDLs have shrunk in size, there will be more LDLs left.
Which means that a high fat consumption could lead to a higher
level of LDL, via VLDL metabolism - although we have to
abandon the whole CHOLESTEROL argument at this point, as
CHOLESTEROL has nothing whatsoever to do with this process,
it just gets carried around as an innocent bystander. After a meal
VLDL levels go up, as you would expect, but the LDL level
remains absolutely constant. Absolutely constant….(and there is
no delayed response either). So, the amount of VLDL in the blood
is totally unrelated to the level of LDL in the blood. Despite the
fact that you ‘make’ one from the other. What this proves, beyond
any doubt, is that the metabolic system tightly controls the level of
LDL in the blood. It doesn’t matter how many VLDLs are con-
verted to LDL, the system takes the excess LDL out of play -
instantly. It pulls excess LDLs into the liver where it recycles
them. So, although fat intake can increase VLDL production, it
has no effect on the level of LDL. Which means that, not only
does saturated fat have no effect on CHOLESTEROL production
in the liver, it also has no effect on LDL levels. In reality, it has
no effect at all.
Fact one: The liver does not use fats, saturated or otherwise to
make CHOLESTEROL
Fact two: The liver does not make LDL, it makes VLDL
Fact three: VLDL is converted into LDL through triglyceride loss
Fact four: VLDL levels and LDL levels are totally unrelated -
totally, which means that: Saturated fat intake has no impact on
LDL levels.
A Raised LDL Level Has No Impact On Heart Disease.”

Malcolm Kendrick
Medical Director, Adelphi Lifelong Learning
Cheshire, United Kingdom
Chapter 8
What is CHOLESTEROL, Really?

IT’S A JOKE...
DOCTOR: You’ve only got six months to live.

PATIENT: But what if I can’t pay your bill in that
time?
DOCTOR: Then I’ll give you another six months.
• • •
A man was in really bad shape. His eyes bulged

way out of their sockets and he was always
gasping for breath. His doctors didn’t give him
very long to live, so he decided to enjoy his final
days and live it up. He withdrew all of his money
from his bank account and went on a shopping
spree, stopping at a fancy men’s clothing store to
purchase a new suit of clothes for a night out on
the town. He asked the tailor for a white silk shirt
in a size 14. The tailor replied, “ Your neck looks
a bit larger than that sir. Let me bring you a size
16.”
“I know my size,” said the man. “Please bring me

a size 14 shirt.”
“Very well,” said the tailor. “I’ll bring you the

size 14 shirt, but if you wear it my guess is that
your eyes will bug out and you will always be
gasping for air!”
Q. What is CHOLESTEROL?
Q. What does CHOLESTEROL do in my body?
Q. Why does my body make CHOLESTEROL?
A. The short answer is: CHOLESTEROL is a very unique

molecule that is converted into a wide range of hormones
in the body. CHOLESTEROL is absolutely not the same
thing as HDL, LDL or triglycerides.
Far from being a dangerous substance, CHOLESTEROL is

absolutely necessary for life. CHOLESTEROL is a unique
molecule. It is a chemical. It is a monohydric alcohol. It is
organic because it is carbon based. Its chemical formula is
C27H45OH. It is a yellow, waxy, solid lipid substance that melts at
300OF.
CHOLESTEROL is a steroid! Don’t be afraid of that word. There

is absolutely nothing wrong with naturally occuring steroids.
Please make the distinction between the steroids that are made
naturally within your own body and artificial steroids that are
chemically different than those that are made by the human body.
The word steroid comes from the same root as the word sterol, as
in CHOLE-STEROL.
CHOLESTEROL is the raw material from which skin cells are able
to manufacture Vitamin D in the presence of sunlight.
CHOLESTEROL is vital for adequate natural protection from the
sun. Vitamin D is necessary for the proper absorption of calcium

and the maintenance of healthy bones.
CHOLESTEROL also serves as a building block for some of the

most important hormones in the human body such as
pregnenolone, progesterone, DHEA, the glucocorticoids
(cortisol), the mineralcorticoids (aldosterone), the androgens
(androstenedione and testosterone) and the estrogens
(estradiol, estriol and estrone).
CHOLESTEROL is a vital constituent of bile acids that are

produced by the liver and stored in the gall bladder. Bile acids are
necessary for the proper digestion and absorption of fat soluble
vitamins, essential fatty acids and other fat soluble compounds.
CHOLESTEROL is secreted by glands in our skin in order to seal

skin tissue from the outside world. Its waxy quality helps to cover
and protect our skin against dehydration, cracking, wear and tear,
sunlight, toxic compounds and bacteria. If you have ever squeezed
a waxy plug out of one of the pores in your skin (a blackhead
or a whitehead), then you have come face to face with
CHOLESTEROL.
CHOLESTEROL is located in every cell of the body, especially in

the cellular membranes and in the brain, nerves, spinal cord, liver,
kidneys and adrenal glands. It is manufactured by every cell of the
body and can be manufactured in the liver and delivered via the
bloodstream to the cells of the body on an as needed basis.
CHOLESTEROL can be manufactured whenever our total intake

of any food supplies us with calories in excess of our body’s
requirements. The breakdown of starches, sugars, fats, proteins
and even alcohol provides the raw materials which the body can
use to manufacture CHOLESTEROL from almost everything we
eat. The more excess calories that we consume of any type of food
(especially sugars and saturated fats), the greater our ability to

manufacture CHOLESTEROL.
CHOLESTEROL is even manufactured by the placenta during

pregnancy. CHOLESTEROL can act as an anti-oxidant in a pinch
when the body’s level of antioxidants such as Vitamin C & E are
running low.
“Despite popular impressions to the contrary, therefore,

CHOLESTEROL is not a villain lurking in some evil foods - it is
a compound the body makes and uses. Your liver is
manufacturing CHOLESTEROL now, as you read. At the rate
of perhaps 5 x 1016 (50,000,000,000,000,000) molecules per
second!”
(Textbook)
An average human body contains about 150,000 milligrams

(one-third of a pound) of CHOLESTEROL. Only about 7% of the
total is found in the blood (150,00mg x 7% = 10,500mg). An
“ideal” “cholesterol” reading of 200 milligrams per deciliter of
blood means that there are 200 milligrams of “cholesterol” in every
one tenth of a liter of blood. The average person has
approximately five liters of blood. For simplicity, lets say that
there is an average of 10,000 mg (5 liters x 10 deciliters/liter x
200mg/deciliter = 10,000mg) of CHOLESTEROL in the blood and
another 140,000mg elsewhere in the body, for an overall total of
150,000mg.
In most people, increased consumption of CHOLESTEROL

triggers a feedback mechanism which results in decreased
production of CHOLESTEROL within the body. Likewise,
decreased consumption triggers a feedback mechanism which

results in increased production of CHOLESTEROL within the
body. The point to gather from this information is that your body
definitely needs a regular supply of CHOLESTEROL. If you don’t
do your body the favor of eating CHOLESTEROL, already made
and ready to go, then every cell in your body has to work overtime
in order to manufacture CHOLESTEROL from scratch.
Take a look at the complexity of the CHOLESTEROL molecule.

Did you realize that every day your body manufactures more than
four thousand billion billion molecules of CHOLESTEROL?
Do you have any idea how difficult this process is? Do you have
any idea how much energy this requires? It is unreasonable to
assume that the body does this by accident. CHOLESTEROL is
manufactured by the body on purpose.
“Infants need CHOLESTEROL for proper brain development.

Large amounts of CHOLESTEROL are supplied to the infant in
human milk. Also the mammary gland secretes a special
enzyme into the human milk that ensures that almost all
of the CHOLESTEROL will be absorbed by the infant.
CHOLESTEROL may be needed to form properly the part of the
brain that allows the eyes to develop normally. Infants fed
most infant formulas get either very small amounts of
CHOLESTEROL or no CHOLESTEROL. The scientists in the
companies that manufacture infant formulas generally know that
infants need to consume adequate amounts of CHOLESTEROL,
but they have let the anti-CHOLESTEROL propaganda control
the composition of their products to the detriment of the growing
infant.”
Mary G. Enig, Ph.D.
Author of “Know Your Fats”
In addition, the more stress that we are under (physical and

mental) the more CHOLESTEROL our body makes, because
CHOLESTEROL is the building block for all of the steroid
hormones that are essential for life.
CHOLESTEROL enables every cell to compensate for and/or

create changes in the fluidity and the permeability of cellular
membranes. This function is so vital that nature has ensured that
every cell is able to manufacture its own CHOLESTEROL. Cells
add CHOLESTEROL to their membranes in order to stiffen them.
Adding CHOLESTEROL to the membrane of a cell makes that
membrane more waxy and impermeable. Conversely, cells remove
CHOLESTEROL from membranes that are too stiff in order to
soften them. Removing CHOLESTEROL from cell membranes
makes the membranes less waxy and thus more permeable to
water-borne compounds and pathogens. Cells adjust the make-up
of their membranes in response to the stresses upon which they are
placed. If pressures are too great, if pathogens surround the cell,
if toxins surround the cell, it will protect itself by adding a waxy
layer of CHOLESTEROL to its outer membrane. If pressures are
too low, or if nutrients are surrounding the cell, then it will remove
CHOLESTEROL from its membrane in order to make it more open
to the outside world.
On the last page of this chapter is a graphic representation of a cross

section of a typical cellular membrane. Please note the important
placement and the abundance of CHOLESTEROL within the mem-
brane itself.
To obtain the raw material to manufacture the various hormones

that they need, cells remove stored CHOLESTEROL from their
cellular membranes. When the cellular levels of CHOLESTEROL
are low, due to insufficient production or elevated conversion into
other compounds, the amount of CHOLESTEROL that is stored in
the cell’s membrane is reduced. This is not a healthy condition.
Lowered levels of CHOLESTEROL in the cell’s membrane leaves

vulnerable gaps in the cellular membrane that open the interior of
the cell to the dangers of the outside world. If the cell is able to
produce sufficient amounts of CHOLESTEROL to replace that
which is used, a balance is obtained. Typically, this balance is
reflected throughout the body by a blood “cholesterol” reading in
the range of 200mg/dl. Forcibly maintaining this 200mg/dl level
with drugs does not result in health! Health and balance result in a
“normal” CHOLESTEROL level. If the cell is unable to
manufacture enough CHOLESTEROL to meet its needs, it must
call upon the liver to make and send more CHOLESTEROL to it
via packages of LDL in the bloodstream. Elevated levels of LDL
actually mean that the cells of the body need MORE
CHOLESTEROL.
Do you realize that you can dramatically ease the manufacturing

burden placed upon every cell of your body, and especially your
liver, by simply eating more pre-formed, ready-made
CHOLESTEROL in the form of animal based foods? Since
CHOLESTEROL is found in every membrane of every cell of
every animal tissue, all animal foods contain at least some
CHOLESTEROL. Needless to say, that animal worked very hard
and expended a great amount of energy in order to either produce
or obtain that CHOLESTEROL in their diet. You can easily relieve
your body of that energetic burden by consuming MORE
CHOLESTEROL. The energy saved can then be used for the
completion of other bodily functions.
CHOLESTEROL is the primary lipid (fat-like) compound found in

the myelin sheath that surrounds all nerve cells. CHOLESTEROL
is the primary lipid in the brain. CHOLESTEROL accounts for
approximately 17% of the dry weight of the entire brain. Calling
someone a “fat-head” is mistakenly seen as an insult, but calling
someone a “CHOLESTEROL-head” would definitely be a
compliment! The very substance that has been vilified as evil is
vitally essential for creating synaptic connections between nerve

cells in the brain. Glial cells, which are sort of helper/assistant
cells to brain cells must be able to produce CHOLESTEROL for
brain cells. Brain cells absolutely must have a dependable source
of CHOLESTEROL in order to form synaptic connections with
other brain cells. In short, CHOLESTEROL is necessary in order
to learn, in order to create new ideas and store new memories.
“The statement ‘even if you didn’t eat any CHOLESTEROL,

your liver would manufacture enough for your body’s needs’ has
been made so frequently it is often believed. But, in fact, there is
evidence that for some people, CHOLESTEROL is an absolute
dietary essential because their own synthesis is not adequate.”
Mary G. Enig, Ph.D.
CHOLESTEROL is unusual in that our body can manufacture it,

but it is unable to break it down. There is an intricate loop that
takes CHOLESTEROL from the bloodstream into the liver for
conversion into bile acids or “soaps”. The liver converts
CHOLESTEROL into bile acids and then excretes these bile acids
into the small intestine to assist in the digestion of fats and oils.
The bile salts enable the body to absorb essential fatty acids and fat
soluble vitamins. The absorbed fats make their way into the
circulation by first flowing into the lymphatic system. However,
CHOLESTEROL, in the form of bile acids, is returned to the liver
via the portal vein. Normally, over 90% of bile acids are returned
to the liver. Very little CHOLESTEROL in the form of bile is ever
supposed to make its way to the outside world through the feces.
CHOLESTEROL is an incredibly valuable commodity and is
conserved and reused by the body.
If our food contains large amounts of soluble fiber, if the peristaltic

action of our intestines is rapid and if our bowel movements are
regular, then CHOLESTEROL may be lost in the feces. By this

manner, diets that are high in soluble fiber reduce the level of
“cholesterol” in the blood. Soluble fiber from oats, apples, beans,
peas and flax have been shown to accomplish this reduction.
Wheat bran does not. The soluble fiber traps the CHOLESTEROL
that the liver has removed from the bloodstream and dumped into
the small intestine in the form of bile.
Please do not fall victim to the marketing of high fiber products as

an aid in the so-called “healthful” reduction of CHOLESTEROL
levels. While it is true that reasonable amounts of fiber, from
natural, whole food sources are a healthful addition to any diet,
it is also true that the excessively high consumption of
concentrated, purified fiber has been found to cause numerous
digestive problems and has even been found to increase cancer
rates! The reason is simple. CHOLESTEROL is a necessary and
vital nutrient. Removing it from the body at an unnaturally high
rate is not health promoting. Too little CHOLESTEROL in the diet
is MORE dangerous than too much! While the practice of
consuming large amounts of fiber is recommended by doctors to
“lower your cholesterol”, this can actually deplete the whole-body
stores of CHOLESTEROL and require additional production by the
liver. The liver-bile-small-intestine-reabsorption loop for
CHOLESTEROL containing bile acids is designed by Mother
Nature in order to conserve a very, very, very important and
valuable resource: CHOLESTEROL!
“CHOLESTEROL is not the evil molecule it is made out to be.”

Dr. Joseph Mercola, D.O.
CHOLESTEROL is only found in animal foods. CHOLESTEROL

is not found in plant based food although plants do contain
compounds that are quite similar to CHOLESTEROL (see beta
sitosterol). One egg contains approximately 250mg of

CHOLESTEROL. Liver and butter contain approximately 1000mg
per pound, but most people do not eat liver and butter by the
pound. Fish, shellfish, poultry, beef, pork and other meats contain
relatively less.
The average North American adult consumes approximately just

500mg of CHOLESTEROL per day. About half of it is absorbed
into the bloodstream and the remainder is excreted in the feces.
Dietary intake pales in comparison to the amount of
CHOLESTEROL that resides in the body (150,000mg) as well as
the amount that can be produced by every cell in the body.
The overall consumption of CHOLESTEROL has not changed

dramatically in the last 100 years. It should be clearly understood
that the increase in heart disease in the early 1900s was
definitely not aligned with an increase in CHOLESTEROL
consumption. Heart disease rates skyrocketed in the early 1900s
while CHOLESTEROL consumption was actually decreasing.
As you have already seen, there is actually ample scientific
evidence that people should actually eat MORE CHOLESTEROL
in order to be healthier.
CHOLESTEROL is NOT bad! Our bodies require quite a lot of

CHOLESTEROL in order to perform all of the tasks that are
necessary to preserve and maintain our lives. It is only the value
judgement that doctors place upon CHOLESTEROL’s
“character” that is truly in error. CHOLESTEROL is NOT bad!
CHOLESTEROL is your very, very, very best friend!
CHOLESTEROL has, no doubt, saved your very life countless
times and will save your life many countless more times in the
future. It is only your doctor’s limited understanding, narrow
mindedness and lack of appreciation for the many benefits of
CHOLESTEROL that can truly be described as “bad”!
“‘Good’ and ‘bad’ are improper descriptions because all

CHOLESTEROL is exactly the same.”

Q. What is CHOLESTEROL?
A. CHOLESTEROL is a molecule that has the chemical

formula C27H45OH. It is technically classified as a steroid.
Q. What does CHOLESTEROL do in my body?
A. CHOLESTEROL is used by the body to do so many things,

the list is almost endless. Additionally, CHOLESTEROL
is converted by the body into a large number of different
hormones including Vitamin D, pregnenolone, DHEA,
progesterone, cortisol, aldosterone, testosterone, estradiol,
estriol, estrone and many others.
Q. Why does my body make CHOLESTEROL?
A. CHOLESTEROL is made by the body because it is

difficult to obtain enough in the diet. Most foods do not
provide enough CHOLESTEROL, so the body is forced to
make it from other substances, such as excess
carbohydrates and fats. Suffice it to say that
CHOLESTEROL is absolutely necessary for life.
Cellular membrane
CHOLESTEROL acts to interlock the phospholipids that make up

the vast majority of cellular membranes throughout the body.
Removing CHOLESTEROL from your cellular membranes causes
structural problems for the cells of your body that are analagous to
what might happen if you were to remove all of the nails from your
house. Most importantly, CHOLESTEROL is a major constituent
of the myelin sheath that wraps and protects brain and nerve cells.
.
Chapter 9
CHOLESTEROL Becomes...
IT’S A JOKE...
I went to the doctor for my checkup. I hate getting

undressed in front of him, but he is a really good
eye doctor!
• • •
The doctor enters the examination room and said,

“Okay, take off your clothes and lie down.”
I said, “Hey, the least you could do is buy me a

drink first!”
• • •
A woman was seeing a doctor about a skin ailment

for which the doctor had prescribed artificial
hormones. She was a little worried about the side
effects that she was experiencing, so she asked her
doctor, “Doctor, I’m afraid that these hormones
are not doing what they are supposed to do. I’ve
started growing hair in places that I’ve never had
before.”
The doctor replied, “Let me reassure you, a little

hair growth is a perfectly normal side effect of the
medication. Where has the hair growth occured?
The woman replied, “On my balls!”

The chart below is a simple outline of the biochemical pathways by

which the human body transforms food into numerous compounds,
many of which are necessary hormones.
All forms of food Acetyl CoEnzyme A “Statin” drugs

and numerous inhibit the enzyme
chemical processes that makes this
in the body result in conversion happen,
the production of HMG-CoEnzymeA thus blocking the
one of the most production of all
basic biochemicals, the compounds
Acetyl CoEnzyme A Mevalonate listed below.
Mevalonate Pyrophosphate
Famesyl Pyrophosphate
CoEnzyme Q10 Squalene Dolichol
CHOLESTEROL Vitamin D
Pregnenolone
Progesterone DHEA
Cortisol Aldosterone
The
Androgens
The
Estrogens
This chapter will compare and contrast the similarities and the
differences among the many chemical compounds that the human
body makes from CHOLESTEROL. I realize that much of the
information in this chapter is very technical in nature and that it
will not appeal to every reader. I included all of this information as
a resource for those of you who do enjoy learning “the details”.
Although you should definitely read every word of this entire

chapter, please make sure that you at least read the summary at the
end of this chapter (skip to page 224, if you wish).
Please realize that, in the language of chemistry, all of the

compounds discussed in this chapter are classified as STEROIDS.
Don’t be afraid of that word. These compounds will not make you
bulk up and go into fits of rage at the drop of a hat. The compounds
discussed in this chapter are all naturally occuring steroids that
every human being has circulating throughout their bodies.
In addition to the natural compounds that are discussed in

this chapter, however, there are also artificial steroids that
unscrupulous athletes use to obtain an unfair advantage in sporting
competitions, and there are artificial steroids that your
unscrupulous doctor tries to sell you in the form of birth control
pills, fertility drugs and hormone replacement therapy. These
artificial steroids are known to be carcinogens, but yet they are
marketed and sold by the billion$ of dollar$ by your doctor and
their associates. At the same time, they tell you NOT to eat whole,
natural foods that contain the most important natural steroid of all
(CHOLESTEROL) from which your body makes all the natural
steroid hormones that are necessary for life itself. They also tell
you to take cancer-causing statin drugs that prevent your body from
making its own CHOLESTEROL Why? ($$$$$) Because...

Vitamin D3
H
H C
HO
Please note the slight differences between the molecule of

Vitamin D3 above and the schematic representation of
CHOLESTEROL shown below. They are identical except for the
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Vitamin D3 is also known as cholecalciferol, which gives a better

clue as to its nature and function as a member of the sterol family
that all have CHOLESTEROL as an ancestor. Most people are
aware that the body can manufacture its own Vitamin D3 when in
the presence of direct sunlight, but most people do not know that
Vitamin D3 is actually made from CHOLESTEROL. The family

resemblance is unmistakable. CHOLESTEROL is found in the
cells of the skin for a number of reasons. Its wax-like nature makes
it a perfect compound to protect the skin from the ravages of
water, pathogens, harsh chemicals and even minor injury.
CHOLESTEROL even offers natural protection from the sun.
When one of the carbon rings of CHOLESTEROL is hit by
ultraviolet radiation from the sun, it absorbs some of the energy
and protects the body from further sun damage. In the process,
CHOLESTEROL is changed into Vitamin D3. The altered, but
still useful molecule is then removed from the skin. From there it
travels to the liver where it is altered further. Then it travels to the
kidneys for even further alteration. Finally it is ready to proceed to
the small intestine where it is put to work improving the body’s
ability to absorb dietary calcium from the inside of the digestive
tract.
Since Vitamin D3 is not found in many foods, and even then, it is

found in extremely small quantities, and since the body can
actually manufacture it, Vitamin D3 is not properly classified as a
vitamin. Vitamin D3 behaves very much like a hormone, and since
it comes from a family of compounds that all behave as hormones,
it is reasonable to think of Vitamin D3 as a hormone also. Nearly
everyone knows that Vitamin D3 is important for the proper
absorption of calcium. Needless to say, anything that effects the
production of Vitamin D3 will also have a profound effect upon
calcium absorption, bone formation, mineral storage and many
other bodily functions that rely upon a ready and available supply
of calcium.
Please understand that “cholesterol” lowering statin drugs inhibit

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which Vitamin D3 is
made. Thus, by definition, statin drugs also inhibit the production
of this vital hormone (Vitamin D3) and inhibit all of its beneficial
actions.
Maybe that is why Lipitor and other statin drugs are known to
cause numerous side effects, inclucing abdominal pain, abnormal
heartbeat, back pain, constipation, distorted facial muscles,
headache, heartburn, indigestion, joint pain, leg cramps,
SENSITIVITY TO LIGHT, skin irritations, tingling of the
extremities, and weakness! If your doctor denies these facts, then
ask them to look it up in the Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) that
they are supposed to have on their desk. If they refuse to look it up,
or if they deny the printed reality that is right in front of them, then
I suggest that you get out of their office as soon as possible and
never, ever go back, because...

H
H H
Pregnenolone C
C O
HO

pregnenolone above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Pregnenolone is made from CHOLESTEROL in the mitochondria

of every cell of your body. All of the other hormones that will be
described are then manufactured from pregnenolone.
Pregnenolone does seem to have some benefit on rheumatoid

arthritis symptoms. Researchers have found that pregnenolone
blocks receptors for the neurotransmitter GABA (gamma-amino-
butyric-acid). High GABA levels can have the effect of blocking
memory. Pregnenolone seems to block that negative effect. Thus,
pregnenolone improves memory. Pregnenolone also increases
brain cell activity. Pregnenolone may also stimulate NMDA
(N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors in the brain, which play an
important role in regulating synapses, thus influencing learning
and memory.
Please remember these important functions of pregnenolone when

you read the amazing article entitled “Transient Global Amnesia”
that was written by former NASA astronaut and flight doctor
Duane Graeline which is included in the chapter entitled “Horror
Stories”. When you read his story, please remember that
pregnenolone is the first compound that the body produces
directly from CHOLESTEROL. The list of compounds that are
then made from pregnenolone is long, and it includes DHEA,
progesterone, the glucocorticoids (cortisol), the mineralcorticoids
(aldosterone), the androgens (androstenedione and testosterone),
and the estrogens (estradiol, estriol, and estrone).
Pregnenolone is produced from CHOLESTEROL in our adrenal

glands, liver, skin, testicles, ovaries and brain. Pregnenolone was
seriously studied in the 1940’s, after the well known researcher
Hans Selye found that pregnenolone was helpful in reducing stress
and fatigue.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which pregnenolone is
of this vital hormone (pregnenolone) and inhibit all of its beneficial
actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing amnesia! If your doctor
denies this fact, then ask them to look it up in the Physician’s Desk
Reference (PDR) that they are supposed to have on their desk.
If they refuse to look it up, or if they deny the printed reality that is
right in front of them, then I suggest that you get out of their office
as soon as possible and never, ever go back, because...

DHEA
HO

DHEA (dihydroepiandrosterone) above and the schematic
representation of CHOLESTEROL shown below. They are
identical except for the shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
DHEA is made in the adrenal glands. The androgens and the

estrogens are then made from DHEA. Only 5% of the DHEA in the
body is found as free DHEA as pictured on this page.
Approximately 95% of all the DHEA in the body is bound to a
molecule of sulfur and is called DHEA-S (see next section).
It is not necessarily believed that the benefits of DHEA are

actually due to some activity of DHEA itself. It is more likely that
DHEA is merely a precursor to the hormones which will be
discussed further on in this chapter. Still, many people who
consume supplemental DHEA report that they feel as if it has taken
years off of their chronological ages in terms of how good they feel.
Higher levels of DHEA in people of all ages correlates with:
• Improved health
• Longer lifespan
• Longer period of healthier life
• Higher energy levels
• Improved immune function
• Improved ability to adapt to stress
• Improved sense of overall well-being
• Increased libido

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which DHEA is made.
Thus, by definition, statin drugs also inhibit the production of this
vital hormone (DHEA) and inhibit all of its beneficial actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing decreased sex drive,
depression, fatigue, hair loss and hearing difficulties! If your
doctor denies these facts, then ask them to look it up in the
Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) that they are supposed to have
on their desk. If they refuse to look it up, or if they deny the
printed reality that is right in front of them, then I suggest that you
get out of their office as soon as possible and never, ever go back,
because...

DHEA-S
H O S O

DHEA-S (dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate) above and the
schematic representation of CHOLESTEROL shown below.
They are identical except for the shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
DHEA-S is found in blood plasma. The sulfur bond makes

DHEA-S more soluble in water, and this distinguishes it from
regular DHEA, which is not water soluble. Approximately 95% of
all the DHEA in the body is found in this form of DHEA-S.
The benefits attributed to DHEA-S are the same as those attributed

to DHEA. Please see the previous section on DHEA for a list of
these benefits.
Since DHEA-S is the form of DHEA that circulates in the blood

stream, this is the type of DHEA that can be measured in a blood
or saliva test. The normal blood range is between 200ng/ml and
1,500ng/ml for women and between 400ng/ml and 2,500ng/ml for
men.
Please be aware that blood tests for DHEA-S DO NOT distinguish

between DHEA and DHEA-S. This is incredibly important!
DHEA-S, is NOT biologically active. Only DHEA is biologically
active. You can think of it this way... the sulfur molecule bound to
DHEA acts as a sort of chastity belt that prevents DHEA from
having any influence while it is circulating. DHEA-S circulates
throughout the bloodstream until a cell grabs it, unlocks the
chastity belt of the sulfur bond and then converts the DHEA into
the androgens (androstenedione and testosterone) and/or the
estrogens (estradiol, estriol and estrone) that are discussed later on
in this chapter. The bloodstream acts as a sort of DHEA-S
reservoir from which all the cells of the body can drink.
Saliva tests DO distinguish between biologically active DHEA

(about 5% of the sample in most cases) and biologically inactive
DHEA-S (about 95% of the sample in most cases).
If your doctor is unaware of the difference between DHEA and

DHEA-S, or if they are unaware of the difference in quality and
accuracy between the blood test and the saliva test, then you
should leave their office and find a more knowledgeable health care
professional to assist you.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which DHEA-S is made.

vital hormone (DHEA-S) and inhibit all of its beneficial actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing decreased sex drive,
depression, fatigue, hair loss and hearing difficulties! If your
because...

H
H H
Progesterone C
C O

progesterone above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Although many people have the wrong impression about

progesterone, please realize that it is NOT a “female” hormone.
Progesterone does not create or cause any “feminine” attributes.
The multitude of functions performed by progesterone are

important for both genders. Both men and women manufacture
progesterone in the myelin sheath that surrounds and protects all
nerve and brain cells.
In women, levels of progesterone are low during the first half of

the menstrual period and remain low until after ovulation.
Progesterone is produced by the ovaries in very large amounts
during the second half of the rhythmic menstrual cycle.
Progesterone levels rise dramatically after ovulation, peak about a
week later and decline before the expulsion of the lining of the
uterus that occurs during menstruation.
Progesterone is probably best known for its importance in

maintaining the viability of a growing fetus in the mother’s womb.
It literally received its name from its performance of this all
important function. Pro-gest-erone is the pro-gestation hormone.
Progesterone acts to ensure the growth and development of a newly
impregnated egg in the womb (uterus) of an expectant mother-to-
be. During pregnancy, progesterone is produced in absolutely
huge amounts by the placenta. The placenta produces up to 400mg
per day during the third trimester of pregnancy. In fact, prior to
the development of other methods of producing progesterone, the
only way to obtain progesterone was to eat the placenta (afterbirth).
In most animals and in many human cultures, this is still a
common practice following childbirth, and with good reason. The
dramatic reduction in the amount of progesterone in the woman’s
body after childbirth can cause severe post-partum depression in
new mothers.
Progesterone has an extremely long list of beneficial functions...

Procreation
• Increases libido in women at the time of ovulation.

• Stops ovulation by the other ovary once one egg has been
released.
• Makes the cervical mucus accessible by sperm.
• Maintains the the lining of the uterus (secretory
endometrium) for nurturing a possibly fertilized egg
(ovum).
• Necessary for the embryo to survive.
• Prevents immune rejection of the developing baby.
(Fetuses carry the DNA of the father, which is “foreign” to
the mother’s body.)
• Facilitates the use of body fat for energy during pregnancy.
• Allows for the full development of the fetus throughout
pregnancy.
• Allows the fetus to develop without determining
gender specific development.
Progesterone is an important building block for...
• Cortisol and all the other adrenal corticosteroids.

• Aldosterone and all the other mineralcorticoids.
• The androgens (androstenedione and testosterone) in
both males and females.
• The estrogens (estradiol, estriol and estrone) in both
females and males.
General functions of progesterone...
• Necessary for healthy growth and maintenance of the

myelin sheath that surrounds nerve cells.
• Protects against spasms of the heart muscle!
• Normalizes blood clotting functions.
• Protects against strokes.

• Restores proper tonicity to the cardiovascular system.
• Activates osteoblasts to increase new bone formation.
• Is thermogenic (raises body temperature).
• Helps metabolize fat for energy production.
• Helps prevent high blood pressure!
• Helps thyroid hormone function properly.
• Acts as a natural diuretic.
• Helps relieve muscle cramping.
• Acts as a natural anti-depressant.
• Helps relieve anxiety.
• Maintains normal cell membrane functions.
• Increases immunoglobulin E (Ig-E), which can help sinus,
respiratory and vaginal infections and allergic reactions.
• Reduces the incidence of auto-immune disorders.
• Calms down a hyper-sensitive immune system.
• Helps prevent yeast (candida) infections in large doses.
• Helps normalize blood sugar levels.
• Restores proper cell oxygen levels.
• Normalizes zinc and copper levels.
• Is anti-inflammatory.
• Protects against endometrial, breast and ovarian cancer in
women.
• Protects against fibro-cystic growths in the breast.
• Protects against prostate cancer in men.
• Complements and balances many of the functions of the
estrogens.
• Restores balanced sensitivity to cell receptors for the
estrogens.
Research done by M.R. Adams at the Bowman School of Medicine

at Wake Forest University examined rhesus monkeys because their
hearts closely approximate human hearts. Researchers injected the
monkeys with chemicals that are known to cause coronary spasm.
The hearts of the monkeys that were deficient in progesterone went

into an unrelenting spasm that could only be relieved by another,
different injection. The researchers were unable to cause any
similar spasms in the hearts of monkeys that had adequate levels of
natural progesterone. This can be interpreted in two ways:
Adequate levels of natural progesterone may prevent heart spasms
or insufficient levels of natural progesterone may lead to heart
spasms.
In a study of 1083 pre-menopausal women, it was found that those

who suffered from progesterone deficiency were five times as
likely to develop breast cancer and ten times as likely to die from
malignant growths of all types when compared to women with
normal progesterone levels.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which progesterone is
of this vital hormone (progesterone) and inhibit all of its beneficial
actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing abdominal pain, acne,
back pain, decreased sex drive, depression, fluid retention, and
unstable emotions! Ask your doctor to explain why the PDR
specifically and emphatically warns pregnant women against
taking Lipitor! If your doctor denies these facts, then ask them to
look it up in the Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) that they are
supposed to have on their desk. If they refuse to look it up, or if
they deny the printed reality that is right in front of them, then I
suggest that you get out of their office as soon as possible and

H
Cortisol
O
H C H
C O
H
O H
O
Please note the slight differences between the molecule of cortisol

above and the schematic representation of CHOLESTEROL shown
below. They are identical except for the shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Contrary to the “prevailing wisdom” in many circles due to a

wealth of highly inaccurate marketing and promotion, cortisol is
NOT really the “stress” hormone. Adrenalin (which is made from
the amino acid tyrosine and is chemically completely different

than everything that is covered in this book) is really the “stress
hormone par excellence”! Cortisol is far, far better described as the
“shortage” hormone or as the “deficiency” hormone or as the
“I sure am getting hungry” hormone. Most accurately though,
from your body’s inner perspective, cortisol should be called the
“I guess we are going to have to rip apart some portion of our
body because this human being refuses to eat what they really
need” hormone.
Cortisol levels rise during periods of not eating. Cortisol levels

typically rise at night while one is sleeping because, for about eight
hours, the sleeper is not eating! High cortisol levels actually cause
you to awaken in the morning, and low levels can leave you
feeling sluggish and sleepy. You can roughly gauge the levels of
cortisol in your own system by how hungry or not hungry you are.
If you are very hungry, then you probably have cortisol levels that
are on the rise. If you are always hungry, it probably means that
whatever you have been eating is NOT satisfying your nutritional
needs, so your body signals you to GO EAT AGAIN! This signal
will repeat ad infinitum until you finally eat a food or a food
supplement that is exactly what your body needs at that moment.
Eating carbohydrates when your body is asking for protein doesn’t
help. Eating candy when your body is asking for Vitamin C
doesn’t help. Applying a sunscreen when your body is in need of
Vitamin D is exactly the wrong thing to do! Hunger is the body’s
signal that some type of nutrient or fuel source is needed. It is very
important that you learn to listen to the messages that your body is
sending to you so that you can understand what your body is
really asking for. Hunger is not vague. Hunger is very, very
specific. After you eat a very, very small portion of whatever it
may be that your body needs, your hunger will immediately
subside. It’s not about how much you eat. It’s about eating
exactly what your body needs.
While your cortisol levels will vary, there is a pattern that is easy
to understand.
Cortisol Levels
During After Not While

Activity Eating Eating Sleeping
Cortisol’s job is to signal the entire body, and especially the liver
and musculature, that nutrients are in short supply. This may be
due to increased usage patterns. Maybe you are running a
marathon at the moment, or maybe you are burning glucose like
crazy in your brain trying to understand CHOLESTEROL and
hormones. Maybe you have serious dietary nutritional deficiencies
and cortisol is signaling the storage mechanisms in your body to
release any available nutrients. Storage and the subsequent timely
release of nutrients is one of the main functions of the liver. Next
to the sheer bulk of the skin, bones and muscles, your liver is the
biggest single organ in your body. It is a vast chemical
manufacturing and storage facility. Vitamins, minerals, hormones,
you name it, and your liver probably has some in storage. Your
muscles are obvious storage depots for protein. Bones are also an
obvious storage medium for protein! What? You didn’t realize that
your bones were made up mostly of protein? Yes, they are.
Much like a modern skyscraper depends upon its steel skeleton for
structural support, the bones of your body are held together by
strands of collagen protein. Minerals such as calcium, magnesium,
copper, zinc, sodium and potassium fill the space in between the
steel girders (collagen) in the bones, so yes, your bones do store

minerals, but bones are primarily made up of protein. This puts a
whole new perspective on osteoporosis, doesn’t it? (That may
very well be my next book, because doctors lie almost as much
about osteoporosis as they do about CHOLESTEROL!)
When your brain gets a signal that some type of nutrient is needed
by some specific area of the body, and if that nutrient is not
currently circulating in the blood in an adequate supply, the brain
signals the adrenal glands to go into action. One of the actions that
the adrenals take is to release cortisol into the bloodstream. Where
do they get this cortisol? The manufacture it from progesterone
which was made from pregnenolone which was made from,
you guessed it, CHOLESTEROL! Cortisol is classified as a
glucocorticoid because its main purpose is to maintain at least a
minimum amount of sugar in the bloodstream at all times. A steady
stream of CHOLESTEROL is needed by the adrenal glands for
them to be able to manufacture the specific steroid hormones that
they must release into the bloodstream in order to satisfy the
requests of the brain and in turn, guarantee that the nutrients
needed by the tissues of the body are available in the bloodstream.
If cortisol can be classified as a “stress” hormone, as so many are

anxious to do these days, then the stress that they must be referring
to can only be the stress of nutritional deficiency. The following is
a short list of situations that can cause cortisol levels to rise.
• Inadequate protein intake.

Insufficient protein consumption for any period of time
more than 4 hours will cause a rise in cortisol.
• Inadequate glycogen storage in the muscles and liver.

Any vigorous exercise (running a marathon, hiking,
rock-climbing, etc.) will cause a rise in cortisol. The
maximum for most people is two hours. At that point all
stored sugar is used up, and you hit the proverbial “wall”
and can go no further.
• Inadequate mineral balance in the blood.

Eating too much fast food or nutritionally empty food that
was conventionally or “factory” grown as opposed to
organically grown produce and free range animal products
in their natural, whole food form.
• Low blood sugar due to the rebound effect of an insulin

spike. You had a piece of candy and a sugar filled soda
an hour ago and now both your blood sugar and you are
crashing.
The benefits of adequate and timely cortisol production by the

adrenals are far too many to mention, but the list includes...
• Balanced and stable blood sugar levels.

• Balanced and stable energy levels.
• Balanced and stable levels of protein and amino acids in
the blood.
• Ability to think clearly.
• Lower levels of inflammation throughout the body.
Eating highly nutritious meals in a timely fashion is all one really

needs to do in order to keep cortisol at a healthy level but,
since most people do not do this, cortisol is most definitely a
hormone that you want your body to be able to produce easily and
on an as-needed basis. Except in extreme circumstances, inhibiting
the production of cortisol is not a good idea. Satisfying the body’s
nutritional needs on a regular basis so that there is less of a need for
the body to make and circulate cortisol in order to remove nutrients
from storage is a far more wise and far more healthy approach.
If any of the “short term” situations above occurs chronically, then
you will suffer from chronically elevated cortisol levels.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which cortisol is made.
vital hormone (cortisol) and inhibit all of its beneficial actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing allergic reaction, changes
in taste sensation, constipation, diarrhea, fatigue, gas,
indigestion, inflammation of sinus and nasal passages, itching,
purple or red spots on the skin, rash, respiratory problems,
skin irritations, urinary problems, vomiting, weight gain and
weight loss! If your doctor denies these facts, then ask them to
they deny the printed reality that is right in front of them, then I
suggest that you get out of their office as soon as possible and

H
Aldosterone
O
H C H
C O
H O C
O

aldosterone above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Aldosterone is classified as a mineralcorticoid. Its purpose is to

regulate the balance of minerals in the body, mainly sodium and
potassium, but magnesium is also affected. The amount of bad
information that surrounds sodium (and the table salt that contains
it) nearly rivals the amount of lies that have been told by doctors
about CHOLESTEROL. Doctors have made salt into a villian that
it most certainly is not. I choose not to go into the salt issue in this
book, but it is also a humongous lie. I will provide but a quick
summary. Please remember this as you read: The body depends
upon balance and that balance fluctuates from moment to moment.
Forcing the body to go in one direction all of the time is never
balanced, never healthy.
It is needless to say that it is very important to maintain a healthy

balance of all the minerals in the body. Of the many minerals that
are necessary for life, sodium, potassium, chlorine, carbon
(carbonate), magnesium, calcium, sulfur (sulfate) and phosphorus
(phosphate) make up the vast majority of what are known as
“electrolytes”. Every cell of your body absorbs certain electrolytes
and pushes other electrolytes outside of their cellular structure in
order to create an electrical charge on the inside of the cells that is
different than the electrical charge that is on the outside of the cells.
In this way, each cell becomes somewhat like a battery that is able
to produce electricity. Without the proper balance of electrolytes,
this process cannot happen.
I once sat through an interesting seminar where the speaker was

trying to impress upon the audience the need for electrolytes. On
stage, the speaker had a light that was wired to a small battery.
To complete the circuit, the speaker placed both of the wires into
a glass of plain water. Surprisingly, nothing happened. The
speaker then sprinkled a little bit of salt into the water, stirred it
around a little and then placed the wires back in the glass of water.
Now, the light shined brightly. The point of the demonstration was
that without salt and the other electrolytes, water will NOT
conduct electricity. Your cells cannot survive in water that is
devoid of electrolytes. You need salt to live.
Aldosterone is THE hormone in the human body that governs the

processes that keep the body’s electrolytes in the proper balance.
Just the right amount of this and just the right amount of that and
all is well. Too much of this and not enough of that, or vice versa,
and every process in the body grinds to a halt because the many
trillion cells of the body rely upon aldosterone to maintain an
environment that is conducive to electricity. Then your doctor
comes along, tells you to stop eating salt and prescribes a statin
drug that makes it difficult for your adrenal glands to produce
aldosterone in order to control the electrolyte balance in your blood
and you wonder why you have high blood pressure? Hmmm.
Some of the functions of aldosterone include:

• Maintaining proper electrolyte balance in the body.
• Maintaining an adequate supply of water in the body.
• Maintaining proper blood pH levels.
• Maintaining proper blood thickness or viscosity.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which aldosterone is
of this vital hormone (aldosterone) and inhibit all of its
beneficial actions. Maybe that is why Lipitor and other statin drugs
are known to cause numerous side effects, inclucing abnormal
heartbeat, constipation, diarrhea, difficulty swallowing,
dizziness, dry eyes, fatigue, fluid retention, leg cramps,
sweating, urinary problems, weight gain and weight loss!
If your doctor denies these facts, then ask them to look it up in the
because...

The Androgens
In Greek, “andros” means male. The androgens are commonly

referred to as “male” hormones because they tend to bring about
the expression of the characteristics that are typically associated
with the male gender. This is somewhat misleading, however,
because all healthy human beings, male and female, produce the
androgens from CHOLESTEROL. When this family of hormones
dominates an individual person’s system, typical “male”
characteristics such as facial and body hair, greater muscularity,
thicker skin and elevated aggressiveness are more likely to
develop. Males typically produce about ten times as much of the
androgens as do women.Most of the androgens are produced in the
testes, but they can also be made elsewhere in the body,
especially by the adrenal glands. Small amounts are actually
manufactured in the ovaries of women. At the onset of puberty,
increasing levels of the androgens can result in various noticeable
characteristics. These same characteristics can become apparent in
adults as well, if the levels of the androgens dominate the system.
It isn’t so much about how much of the hormone is present, but the
relative ratios of all the hormones involved.
Higher levels of the androgens (relative to other hormones) can

result in...
• Disproportionately short legs

• Decreased adiposity (fat)
• More prominent larynx (Adam’s apple)
• Lower pitched voice
• Excessive facial and body hair
• Larger penis or clitoris
• Increased muscularity and strength
• Thicker skin
• Increased aggressiveness
• Higher body temperature
O
Androstenedione

androstenedione above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Androstenedione is a natural substance that is found in humans,

animals and in the pollen from many plants. It is produced in the
gonads and in the adrenal glands from DHEA or from progesterone,
which are both made from pregnenolone, which is made from
CHOLESTEROL. Androstenedione has about one-seventh the
potency as testosterone, but it can be converted into testosterone
by the body by a single chemical reaction. According to a German

patent for androstenedione, 50 mg given orally raised blood
levels of testosterone 140-183% above normal and 100 mg of
androstenedione raised testosterone levels 211-337% above
normal. Blood levels of testosterone start rising about 15 minutes
after ingestion, peak around 1-1.5 hours later and return to near
normal after around 3 hours.
After the fall of the Berlin Wall, Dr. Werner Franke obtained State
Plan 14-25, the East German steroid “bible”, which detailed
the steroid programs of over 200 elite East German athletes.
It was learned that in the 1970’s, East German athletes used
androstenedione in a nasal spray formulation as a final performance
booster just before competition.
On March 11, 2004 the FDA sent warning letters to 23 companies

which asked them to cease distributing products sold as dietary
supplements that contain androstenedione and warned them that
they could face enforcement action if they did not take appropriate
actions. So, androstenedione, the building block of testosterone,
a naturally occurring substance that became famous through its use
as a dietary supplement by home-run record setting baseball player
Mark McGuire is no longer legally available in the U.S.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which androstenedione
is made. Thus, by definition, statin drugs also inhibit the
production of this vital hormone (androstenedione) and inhibit all
of its beneficial actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing accidental injury, acne,
back pain, breast enlargement, decreased sex drive, distorted
facial muscles, fatigue, hair loss, increased muscle movement,
joint pain, lack of coordination, leg cramps, muscle aching or
weakness, weakness, weight gain and weight loss! If your

because...

Testosterone H

testosterone above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
In general, testosterone promotes the synthesis of protein and is

known for its anabolic (growth) and masculinizing effects.
Testosterone was first isolated from a bull in 1935. Large amounts
are produced from CHOLESTEROL by the Leydig cells of the
testes, but testosterone is also synthesized in smaller amounts by
the theca cells of the ovaries, the zona reticulosa of the adrenal
cortex and by the placenta. In women, testosterone can be made

from estradiol through a process know as reverse aromatization in
the liver, adipose cells and other peripheral tissues. Once
testosterone is produced, it is released into the bloodstream bound
to a protein called sex hormone binding globulin. After it is
absorbed into the cell, testosterone is then transported into the
cytoplasm where it binds with a testosterone receptor. The
testosterone/receptor complex is then transported into the nucleus
of the cell where it can bind directly to nucleotide sequences of the
chromosomal DNA. The areas at which this binding occurs
are called hormone response elements and they influence
transcriptional activity of certain genes.
The effects of testosterone include:
• Genital masculinization (development of penis, scrotum,

prostate and seminal vesicles)
• Deepening of the voice
• Increased facial, bodily and pubic hair
• Increased muscle mass and strength
• Increased bone density and strength
• Increased libido and aggressiveness
• Increased mental and physical energy
Testosterone can be converted into estradiol, so excess levels of

testosterone can actually result in a “femininization” of either
gender.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which testosterone is
of this vital hormone (testosterone) and inhibit all of its beneficial
actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing accidental injury, acne,
back pain, breast enlargement, decreased sex drive, distorted
facial muscles, fatigue, hair loss, increased muscle movement,
joint pain, lack of coordination, leg cramps, muscle aching or
weakness, weakness, weight gain and weight loss! If your
because...

The Estrogens
Doctors lie about the estrogens almost as much as they lie about
CHOLESTEROL. First of all, despite what you may believe,
there is no such thing as estrogen! That’s right, THERE IS NO
SUCH THING AS ESTROGEN!! Let me repeat that one more
time for emphasis...
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ESTROGEN!!
If you can find a specific chemical formula for this fictitious

“estrogen” that doctors always seem to refer to, please let me know
what it is! The word “estrogen” refers to an entire class of
compounds, much like the word “car” refers to an entire class of
vehicles. If you told someone that you had just purchased a new
“car”, the first question that they would probably ask you is:
“What kind?” Well, the same question needs to be asked in regards
to the word “estrogen”. If your doctor ever tells you that your
“estrogen” levels are too high or too low, the first words out of
your mouth had better be: “What kind of estrogen?”
In Greek, “oestros” means “heat” or “fertility”. The estrogens are

commonly referred to as “female” hormones because they tend to
bring about the expression of the characteristics that are typically
associated with the female gender. This is somewhat misleading,
however, because all healthy human beings, male and female,
produce the estrogens from CHOLESTEROL. When this family of
hormones dominates an individual person’s system, typical
“female” characteristics are more likely to develop.
Most of the estrogens are produced in the ovaries, but they can also
be made elsewhere in the body, especially by the adrenal glands.
After menopause, and even after a complete hysterectomy, the
estrogens are still made (in smaller amounts) in fat cells, muscle
cells and skin cells. Small amounts are actually manufactured in

the testes of men. The estrogens are also made by the placenta
during fetal development.
At the onset of puberty, increasing levels of the estrogens

can result in various noticable characteristics. These same
characteristics can become apparent in adults as well if levels of the
estrogens dominate the system. It isn’t about how much of the
hormone is present, but the relative ratios of all the hormones
involved.
Higher levels of the estrogens (relative to other hormones) can

result in...
• Disproportionately long legs

• Increased adiposity (fat)
• Typical “female” pattern deposition of body fat (hips,
breasts, etc.)
• Less prominent larynx (Adam’s apple)
• Higher pitched voice
• Lack of facial and body hair
• Small clitoris or penis size
• Diminished muscularity and strength
• Thinner skin
• Increased passivity
• Lower body temperature
Low levels of the estrogens permit the underlying action of the

androgens to become more noticeable. See the section on the
androgens to learn of their effects.
Generally, the most common “estrogen” produced by the human

body is estradiol, but once in the bloodstream, estradiol is rapidly
converted to estrone.
In women, the levels of the “estrogens” are generally at their

highest just prior to ovulation. They serve to stimulate growth of
the egg follicle, and to thicken the wall of the uterus (womb).
The American biochemist Edward Adelbert Doisy discovered

estrone (1929), estriol (1930) and estradiol (1935).
The natural “estrogens” and artificially produced pharmaceutical

variations can be used as contraceptives because they inhibit the
pituitary gland in the brain from releasing follicle stimulating
hormone (FSH). Follicle Stimulating Hormone normally triggers
the ovary to release an egg from a developed follicle. The
inhibitory effect of the excess “estrogens” in birth control pills
prevents this natural process, and thus prevents pregnancy.
One of the most important, but ignored functions of “estrogen” is

that it improves the body’s ability to absorb copper. Increased
“estrogen” levels can increase serum copper levels by more than
100%!
“‘Estrogen’ also lowers LDL in the bloodstream by increasing the

number of receptor mechanisms on liver cells.”
H
Estradiol O
O
H

estradiol above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Estradiol is by far the most potent human estrogen. Estradiol is

1,000 times more potent in its effects on breast tissue than estriol.
Estradiol has been found to inhibit the entry of calcium into
coronary artery cells in a manner that is similar to the effect of

calcium channel blocking pharmaceutical medications. This
relaxes the vascular tension of systemic arteries and thus increases
the blood flow throughout the cardiovascular system, which can
relieve much of the burden that high blood pressure can place upon
the heart. This relaxation of the arteries also inhibits spasms which
can block coronary arteries and cause heart attacks whether the
coronary arteries are filled with atherosclerotic plaque buildup or
not. It is believed that this is at least one explanation for the
cardiovascular protection that pre-menopausal women seem to
benefit from in comparison to men and post-menopausal women.
Supplemental estradiol has been found to lower the levels of

lipoprotein(a) by 9.6%.
Transdermally applied (through the skin) estradiol has been found

to provide the same desirable benefits as “estrogens” that are
administered orally, while avoiding the liver damaging effects that
are often associated with hormone replacement therapy.
Estradiol also seems to act as a protective factor in the adult brain

against neuro-degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
The human body is able to manufacture estradiol from estrone and

vice-versa.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which estradiol is made.
vital hormone (estradiol) and inhibit all of its beneficial actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing breast enlargement,
decreased sex drive, unstable emotions and urinary problems!
Ask your doctor to explain why the PDR specifically and
emphatically warns pregnant women against taking Lipitor?

because...

H
Estriol O
O H
O
H

estriol above and the schematic representation of CHOLESTEROL
shown below. They are identical except for the shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Estriol is by far the safest “estrogen”. Some of the most common

symptoms of “estrogen” deficiency are persistant vaginal dryness
and thinning (atrophy) of the vaginal mucous membrane. Estriol is
the estrogen that is the most beneficial to the vagina, cervix and
vulva. It assists greatly with improving vaginal dryness and

atrophy, which can predispose a woman to vaginitis and cystitis.
Supplemental estriol has been found to significantly improve bone

mineral density by inhibiting the loss of bone. Progesterone
actually stimulates the production of new bone while estriol
inhibits further loss. A prudent treatment for osteoporosis would
examine the potential need for either or both natural hormones.
Intermittent estriol treatments have been shown to provide

significant protection against breast cancer.
Estriol acts as a weak “estrogen” when it is administered as a

single dose. It’s potency increases with prolonged use. However,
estriol actually acts as an anti-“estrogen” when it is used in tandem
with a more powerful “estrogen” such as estradiol. Estriol works
to balance the “estrogen” activity by providing minimal activity
when there is currently very little “estrogen” activity and by
inhibiting activity when there is too much.
Estriol has been found to increase, thicken and improve the

orientation of elastin fibers in the skin after only three weeks of
topical application. After treatment for six months, skin elasticity
and skin firmness markedly improved. The depth of wrinkles and
the width of pores were reduced from 61-100%. Increased levels
of type III collagen were also evident.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which estriol is made.
vital hormone (estriol) and inhibit all of its beneficial actions.

because...
O
Estrone
O
H

estrone above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
In pre-menopausal women, estrone is produced primarily by the

ovaries and the cortex of the adrenal glands. In men, children
(before puberty) and in post-menopausal women, estrone is derived
from androstenedione in the peripheral tissues. The human body is
able to manufacture estrone from estradiol and vice-versa. Estrone
is also found naturally in palm kernal oil and in the pollen of the
date palm.
In pre-menopausal women, estrone levels usually parallel those of

estradiol. The levels of both hormones tend to rise during the first
part of the menstrual cycle (follicular phase), peaking just prior to
ovulation, with a secondary peak in the second half of the
menstrual cycle (luteal phase).
Estrone is essential for the growth and normal maintenance of the

lining of the uterus (womb). During pregnancy, large amounts of
estrone are synthesized by the placenta from DHEA-S (which
comes from the adrenal glands of the mother and the fetus).
Estrone has been used to treat threatened miscarriage, amenorrhea,

breast cancer, hypogenitalism, menopause syndrome,
osteoporosis, post partum breast engorgement, vaginitis and
vaginal atrophy. It has also been used in skin creams.
Studies have shown that a very low dose of supplemental estrone

(just .625mg/day) is enough to preserve mineral bone density in the
spinal bones of post menopausal women. Progesterone actually
stimulates the production of new bone while estrone inhibits
further loss. A prudent treatment for osteoporosis would examine
the potential need for either or both natural hormones.
In post-menopausal women, the levels of estrone typically do NOT

decline as dramatically as do the levels of estradiol.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which estrone is made.
vital hormone (estrone) and inhibit all of its beneficial actions.

because...

Bile Acid
Taurine
O
H
Please note the slight differences between the molecule of a

bile acid above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
O
H
CHOLESTEROL is soluble in fat, but the amino acid taurine is

attracted to water, so this combined molecule (bile acid) has the
ability to emulsify fats and water. Again, the “prevailing wisdom”
is wrong. “Everyone knows” that oil and water don’t mix, but bile
acids enable oil and water to do exactly that.
After bile acids are manufactured in the liver, they are stored and
concentrated in the gall bladder. Whenever a fatty meal is
consumed, the gall bladder contracts and squirts some bile into the
small intestine in order to help the body (which is mostly water)
digest and absorb the essential fatty acids, sterols and fat soluble
vitamins that were in the recently consumed meal.
The latin root word “entero” refers to the intestine (interior) and
the word “hepatic” refers to the liver. The body conserves
CHOLESTEROL by setting up what is known as the
entero-hepatic circulation. The entero-hepatic circulation transports
bile acids from the gall bladder into the small intestine to assist
with digestion. The bile acids are then reabsorbed on purpose and
returned to the liver. This is not a mistake. This is done on
purpose. Far too much effort has already gone into either
obtaining or manufacturing the bile acids in the first place.
CHOLESTEROL is far too valuable to just throw away in the feces
in the form of bile.
“The bile acids... are confined to an entero-hepatic

circulation. From this circuit, little bile acid is lost, little
appears in the peripheral blood or in the feces.”
Principles of Biochemistry
(Textbook - 1959)
Here is a simple analogy. What if every time you stayed in a hotel

you convinced the bellhop to come home with you in order to carry
things around for you on a permanent basis? The hotel trained
them. The hotel gave them a nice uniform. The hotel expects the
bellhop to help you carry your bags up to your room, and then the
hotel expects the bellhop to return to the lobby to help the next
guest. When CHOLESTEROL appears in its starring role as the
bellhop in the form of bile acids, it is expected to wait in the lobby
of your gall bladder for guests (essential fatty acids, sterols and fat
soluble vitamins) to arrive in the next meal. When they do arrive,
CHOLESTEROL (starring as the bellhop named bile) is expected
to greet them politely, take their hand and prepare them for passage
through the semi-permeable membrane of the small intestine into
the lymphatic system. The (CHOLESTEROL containing) bile
acids are then returned to the liver and the gall bladder via the
portal vein just like the bellhops are expected to return to their post
in the hotel lobby. Eating extraordinarily large amounts of fiber or
taking laxatives has the effect of dragging the bellhops out of the
hotel of your body and into the toilet with your feces. This is NOT
what your body had planned. Now your body has to combine a
completely new molecule of CHOLESTEROL with an additional
molecule of the amino acid taurine in order to recreate the bile acid
that was lost in the feces due to the overconsumption of fiber.

the production of CHOLESTEROL, from which bile acids are
of these vital compounds (bile acids) and inhibit all of their
beneficial actions.
cause numerous side effects, inclucing abdominal pain, black
stools, constipation, diarrhea, difficulty swallowing, fatigue,
fever, gas, headache, indigestion, vomiting, weight gain and
weight loss! If your doctor denies these facts, then ask them to
they deny the printed reality that is right in front of them, then
I suggest that you get out of their office as soon as possible and

Beta-sitosterol
HO

Beta-sitosterol above and the schematic representation of
shaded areas.
CHOLESTEROL
HO
Beta-sitosterol is a sterol that is found in numerous plants. It is

found in olive oil and saw palmetto berries, among many others.
Although it is different than CHOLESTEROL, it is also very
very similar. It is not known if the human body can manufacture

CHOLESTEROL from beta-sitosterol, but due to the many
healing properties of the foods that contain beta-sitosterol, the
prospect of such conversion seems promising.
“Some absorption of the plant sterol, beta-sitosterol, is indicated.

Indeed, this sterol appears to compete with CHOLESTEROL for
‘absorption sites’ in the intestinal mucosa, and consequently,
when administered for prolonged periods of time, beta sitosterol
may effect a reduction in plasma CHOLESTEROL values.”
(Textbook - 1959)
Currently, (as of 2005) there are numerous nutritional supplements

available in the marketplace that contain beta-sitosterol.
Many basic foods (such as olive oil) contain beta-sitosterol. One
can certainly purchase extra virgin olive oil anywhere in the world.
I find it immensely interesting and actually quite entertaining that
the consumption of a nutrient which is found in the most basic of
foods and is as nearly identical to CHOLESTEROL as anything
else in the world, is being sold as a therapy that has been shown to
LOWER levels of “cholesterol” in the blood. Please understand the
implications of this. Eating more plant based beta-sitosterol
satisfies your body’s need for a CHOLESTEROL-like substance.
This has been known for more than 50 years! This information has
been published in medical textbooks! Your liver’s response to
added plant based sterols (and animal based sterols as well!) is to
stop manufacturing additional CHOLESTEROL because the cells
of your body have been adequately supplied via the diet. Once the
cellular need for a CHOLESTEROL-like substance has been
satisfied with beta-sitosterol, blood levels of CHOLESTEROL
drop!
The deceitful and criminal irony of this fact cannot and should not
slip past you. Nearly fifty years ago, biochemistry textbooks
pointed out the facts as they were known at that time. In textbooks
that were printed before I was born in 1960, it was known and
accepted that beta-sitosterol competed with CHOLESTEROL for
absorption into the body. It was also known that supplemental
beta-sitosterol added to the diet resulted in reduced blood
“cholesterol” test results. This is not new information.
THIS IS A FIFTY YEAR OLD FRAUD!
Doctors have known for more than fifty years that “cholesterol”
levels can be lowered by something as simple as the consumption
of foods that contain beta-sitosterol. They have kept this a secret
from the American public. Instead of telling you the truth, they
have told you that you should eat less CHOLESTEROL in order to
lower your “cholesterol” readings, yet their own textbooks point
out the clear fact that high “cholesterol” test results respond quite
well to the ADDITION of plant based sterols into the diet.
SUMMARY
Take a minute to take another look over all of the various hormones
that have been detailed in this chapter. It should be clear to anyone,
even with no knowledge of chemistry or biology that all of these
compounds are related. They all come from the same family. They
all come from CHOLESTEROL. They are all vital for life. You
need these hormones to live and if you have a deficiency in any of
them, then...
YOUR BODY WILL MANUFACTURE MORE

CHOLESTEROL IN ORDER TO MEET
THE NEEDS OF THE BODY!
I realize that this has been a tough chapter. Congratulations to you

if you have persevered and read this book to this point. I know that
there is a lot of technical information, but I included all of this
information because I feel that it is very important to realize that
there is a huge amount of knowledge about CHOLESTEROL that
your doctor has never discussed with you. There is no need for you
to memorize all of the information that was in this chapter.
The important thing to remember is that CHOLESTEROL, and the
hormones that are made from CHOLESTEROL, have immense
importance to human life.
YOU NEED CHOLESTEROL!
Maybe now you can see why your doctor finds it easier to lie to you
and prescribe a pharmaceutical drug in order to lower your
“cholesterol” rather than take the time to truly explain to you
exactly what CHOLESTEROL is and does. First of all, they don’t
know all of this information. If you have read this book straight
through to this point, I guarantee you that you already know more
about CHOLESTEROL than your doctor ever will, and your
information will have been based upon textbook facts, not
marketing hype from the pharmaceutical industry.
There is no way in the world that your doctor is ever going to

dedicate the time and effort that it takes to learn this information.
In their arrogant minds, they believe that they already know
everything that there is to know, so why should they review
something that they think that they already know? (I personally
know former pharmaceutical sales reps who quit their jobs because
they were uncomfortable with the responsibility of having to teach
the doctors to whom they were selling drugs!) Un-learning
wrongly learned information is one of the most difficult things in
the world to do. Your doctor is never going to take the time and
make the effort to try to explain all of this information to you.
The reason is simple. There is no insurance code that corresponds

to “Explaining the truth about CHOLESTEROL to a patient”. If
your doctor can’t get paid for doing something to you, then they
simply are not going to do it. They will either tell you that it does
not exist, that it does not work or that it is not “scientifically
proven”!
“‘Cholesterol’ lowering, without correcting underlying vitamin

deficiency should be considered medical malpractice!”
Knowing what you now know, please ask yourself this question:
How could any humane person recommend and prescribe any
CHOLESTEROL lowering drugs? Only an inhuman, devious,
demented, greedy, foolish and sick person could ever recommend
that you consume a pharmaceutical drug that inhibits your body’s
ability to manufacture all of the hormones described in this
chapter! The hormones described in this chapter are vital for life.
They are necessary. They must be produced. This information is
taught in medical textbooks. It can be found in any medical
dictionary. Every doctor is supposed to know all of this. So what
does your doctor do in their actual practice? Your doctor skillfully
and deviously verbally coerces you into consuming poisonous
chemicals that inhibit your body’s ability to maintain its own life by
telling you that it is “healthy” for you to lower your “cholesterol”
by using pharmaceutical drugs! This goes far beyond lies.
THIS IS FRAUD!
THIS IS ASSAULT AND BATTERY!
THIS OFTEN RESULTS IN MURDER!
Once any reasonably sane individual realizes that

CHOLESTEROL is the building block which every cell in your
body uses to manufacture numerous hormones that are absolutely
necessary for life, it becomes obvious that the mere concept of
“cholesterol” reduction is an absurd, life threatening prospect.
If your doctor recommends that you consume carcinogenic
pharmaceutical drugs in a misguided attempt to limit your body’s
ability to manufacture numerous natural hormones that enable your
body to communicate within itself then...
If your doctor says that they can manage all these hormones better
than your body can, then...
If your doctor says that it is safe to replace any one of these many
hormones with an artificial, carcinogenic, pharmaceutical version,
then...
If your doctor says that you have to use the pharmaceutical drug
that they are pushing because the natural version of many of these
hormones is not available, then...
If your doctor says that limiting your body’s production of

CHOLESTEROL by using pharmaceutical drugs is safe, then...

If your doctor says that it is bad for your liver to be sending

CHOLESTEROL to every cell in your body so that every cell in
your body can use this CHOLESTEROL to then manufacture
countless hormones on an as needed, molecule by molecule basis,
then...
If your doctor says that a simple blood “cholesterol” test can

accurately determine the moment to moment needs of the many
trillions of cells in your body, then you should tell your doctor to
go straight to hell, because...

Chapter 10
Pick Your Poison

(Actually, Don’t!)
IT’S A JOKE...
Did you hear about the latest wonder drug?

It’s so powerful that you have to be in perfect
health in order to take it!
• • •
My brother is a brilliant medical researcher.

He just invented a cure for which there is no
known illness!
• • •
DOCTOR: Did that medicine I gave your uncle

straighten him out?
PATIENT: It sure did. They buried him

yesterday!
• • •
It’s easy to tell if a man is healthy or not. See

which he takes two or more of at one time, pills
or stairs!
Q. Doctor, are the “cholesterol” lowering drugs safe?
Q. Will I live longer or be healthier if I manage my

“cholesterol” with pharmaceutical drugs?
A. The correct answer to both questions is an emphatic NO!!
You are a victim of marketing that has been disguised as “science”.

For two decades, the American public has been bombarded with an
endless stream of statements, advertisements, and public service
announcements regarding “cholesterol” and drugs that simply are
not true. The “science” clearly shows that “statin” drugs will not
improve your overall health. If you have read this book up to this
point, you now know how and why the vast majority of the
population has been deceived, but still people allow themselves to
be taken in by the drug companies’ savvy marketing pitches.
“Sixty-six percent of patients prescribed statins at the Cleveland

Clinic had less reduction in ‘bad LDL cholesterol’ than the
product’s labeling would have predicted. Nearly one in five had
no reduction in ‘bad cholesterol’.”
Katharine Greider
Author of “The Big Fix”
If you learn how to read between the lies when you listen to the
drug companies’ advertising and promotional efforts, it becomes
quite obvious that their drugs are of absolutely no benefit. But
don’t take my word for it. Please read the information on the next
page, which is taken from the Physician’s Desk Reference.
Despite what the ads say, statin drugs do not make you healthier!
“If the decision is made to use drugs, the patient

should be instructed that this does NOT
reduce the importance of adhering to diet.”
Tricor (page 523 )
“The effect of Lescol or Lescol XL induced changes in

lipoprotein levels, including reduction of serum cholesterol,
on cardiovascular mortality has NOT been determined.”
Lescol (page 2274)
“Furthermore, the independent effect of raising HDL

or lowering triglycerides on the risk of coronary and
cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has
NOT been determined.”
Lescol (page 2274)
“The effects of Mevacor on lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen

and certain other independent biochemical risk markers
for coronary disease are UNknown.”
Mevacor (page 2025)
“The effect of combined therapy with

niacin and lovastatin on cardiovascular
morbidity and mortality has NOT been determined.”
Advicor (page 1793)
“The effect of Lipitor on cardiovascular

Lipitor (page 2543)
“...fatalities have occurred.”

Zocor (page 2116)
2004 Physician’s Desk Reference

But still the marketing continues. Why?
I asked my mother why she thought that her doctor was more
likely to recommend that she take a drug rather than recommend
other, safer and more effective healing methods. Her answer was
immediate, simple and certain: “Money!”
Selling drugs is a very profitable business. It’s all about the money.
You all know that, but somehow you still fall for the advertising.
“The drug business is the most profitable in the country and has
been at or near the top of the list for decades. The big drug
companies have managed to develop drugs and to sell them at
higher profits than are enjoyed by the biggest oil companies,
entertainment companies, automakers and commercial banks.
Families USA found that in 2000 and 2001, eight of the nine
companies selling the most drugs to American seniors spent
more than twice as much on marketing and administration as
on research and development. Spending on consumer ads surged
from a scant $266 million in 1994 to $2.6 billion in 2001.
The drug industry’s main promotional tool is the old-fashioned
salesperson who spends his or her days calling on physician
customers. An American doctor is lucky if he can go to the john
without running into some kind of industry promotion.”
Katharine Greider
“Drug reps don’t get paid if doctors are prescribing the

correct medication, they get paid if doctors are prescribing their
medication.”
Bob Goodman, M.D.
Founder of “www.nofreelunch.com”
But certainly our government and its regulatory agencies are

working hard to protect us! Aren’t they? Please realize that there
are more registered lobbyists for the drug industry in Washington
D.C. than there are members of Congress. Drug companies spend
more money to influence politicians than any other industry.
Drug companies spend more money to influence Congress than
insurance companies, telephone companies, electric companies,
commercial banks, oil and gas producers, automakers and even
more than tobacco companies. From 1999-2000, in their attempts
to influence legislation, the drug industry gave $20 million in
campaign contributions and spent another $177 million to hire
lobbyists from 134 firms, including twenty-one former members of
Congress. The result is that their efforts are amply rewarded.
The average American taxpayer is now forced to contribute a
portion of their hard earned wages in the form of taxes in order to
pay for drugs whether they use them or not!
But certainly, the federal government is looking out for our best
interest and protecting us. Isn’t it? The FDA regulates the drug
companies and ensures that the drugs on the market are safe.
Doesn’t it?
“Of fifty-three FDA reviewers who responded to a Public Citizen

survey in late 1998 (172 were contacted), nineteen identified a
total of twenty-seven newly approved drugs they had worked on
that, in their opinion, should not have been approved.”
Katharine Greider
On August 8, 2001 the FDA announced that Bayer Pharmaceutical

Division would voluntarily withdraw their “cholesterol” lowering
drug Baycol (cerivastatin) from the marketplace. Baycol was
initially approved by the FDA in 1997. From the time of its

approval to the time of its withdrawal from the marketplace
(approximately four years) the FDA received documented reports
of 31 deaths in America alone due to severe rhabdo-myo-lysis
caused by the drug Baycol. It is unknown how many additional,
undocumented deaths occurred world-wide.
Baycol is a “statin” drug. Like all other statin drugs, it is designed

to interfere with the chemical processes by which the human body
produces CHOLESTEROL. In a complicated series of chemical
transformations, the human body produces a chemical that is
known as 3-Hydroxy-3MethylGlutaryl-CoenzymeA which,
after many more transformations, can be converted into
CHOLESTEROL. Statin drugs block the action of the enzyme
HMG-CoA reductase, so they are referred to as HMG-CoA
reductase INHIBITORS. In common, everyday English, they
prevent your body from making CHOLESTEROL and numerous
other natural compounds.
BUT... As we saw in previous chapters, one of the most vital

functions of CHOLESTEROL is as a constituent of cellular
membranes. CHOLESTEROL is made by every cell of the body
and it is incorporated into their cellular membranes as a way of
stiffening and strengthening those membranes. CHOLESTEROL
is a waxy, waterproof substance that cells use to protect their
interiors from the external environment. Keep this fact in mind as
you read on, because an awareness of the inhibition of this
necessary function by statin drugs will make it easier to understand
why Baycol proved to be so DEADLY.
“One of the first duties of the physician is

to educate the masses not to take medicine.”
William Osler
The root word rhabdo means raging, viscious or rabid. Myo means
muscle. Lysis means to break down. Rhabdo-myo-lysis means the
viscious, raging breakdown of muscle. Rhabdo-myo-lysis is a
condition that results in muscle cell breakdown and release of the
contents of the muscle cells into the bloodstream. This cellular
debris can cause systemic inflammation and pain, it can overload
the lymph, liver, kidney, immune and other bodily systems.
Symptoms include muscle pain, weakness, tenderness, malaise,
fever, dark urine, nausea and vomiting. The pain may be
generalized throughout the body or it may involve specific groups
of muscles. Most frequently the specifically involved muscle
groups are the calves and lower back. However, some patients
report no symptoms while the disease silently progresses. In severe
cases, the patients develop renal (kidney) failure and other organ
failures which can be fatal.
CHOLESTEROL is used by every cell in the body to stiffen its

membrane walls. Since Baycol, and all other statin type drugs
are designed to reduce the production of CHOLESTEROL,
it comes as absolutely no surprise that the affected cells would have
great difficulty maintaining their strength. One of the most
viscious side effects of statin drugs is that they destroy cells by
preventing them from maintaining healthy membranes. Basically,
all types of cells, (including muscle and liver cells) simply burst
and their internal components explode into the bloodstream.
At the time of the withdrawal of Baycol from the marketplace the

official FDA statement included the following... “There are five
other statins available in the U.S., lovastatin (Mevacor),
pravastatin (Pravachol), simvastatin (Zocor), fluvastatin (Lescol)
and atorvastatin (Lipitor). While all statins have been associated
with very rare reports of rhabdo-myo-lysis, causes of fatal
rhabdo-myo-lysis in association with the use of Baycol have been
reported significantly more frequently than for other approved
statins.”
“But besides real diseases we are subject to many that are only
imaginary, for which the physicians have invented imaginary
cures; these have their several names, and so have the drugs.”
Jonathon Swift
The FDA’s statement implies that more deaths have been reported
in relation to the use of other statin drugs, but not enough deaths
to warrant any action on their part. In fact, the 31 deaths reported
due to Baycol in four years were not enough to warrant official
FDA action. The drug company (Bayer) “voluntarily” removed the
drug from the marketplace. Since the removal of Baycol from the
marketplace, the use of statins has dramatically increased.
The question remains:
How many people have to die before the FDA will ban a
profitable, but clearly deadly drug?
“The annual market for cardiovascular prescription drugs in the

United States alone surpasses 100 billion dollars. However, these
drugs - including beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, calcium
blockers, ‘cholesterol’ lowering drugs and many others - merely
cover symptoms. They do not target the cellular root cause of the
disease. This is neither a surprise nor a coincidence. It is a
simple fact that the pharmaceutical industry is an investment
industry; its marketplace is the diseases in your body, and the
future of this industry depends on the continuation of these
diseases. Prevention, root cause cures and, above all, the
eradication of diseases threaten the giant financial interests
behind this industry.”
In 2004, the “National Cholesterol Education Program” (NCEP)

recommended that an aggressive and increased use of statin
medications be implemented to treat high “cholesterol”. Of the
nine members on the panel for the NCEP, six were affiliated with
companies that produce statin drugs. Hmm.
You may find the remainder of this chapter to be boring and

redundant, but you should find it infuriating. I have compiled and
summarized over ninety full pages from the 2004 Physician’s Desk
Reference (PDR) into this chapter for your convenience. On the
following pages are numerous quotes that are taken directly from
the PDR. This information is not buried in some unknown
scientific journal. This information is not hidden on some obscure
website. The information on the following pages is found in a well
known book that is supposed to be sitting on your doctor’s desk so
that they may REFER to it. That’s why it is called the Physician’s
Desk Reference.
If your doctor would simply refer to the PDR that is supposed to be

on their desk, they would find that the list of side effects attributed
to “cholesterol” lowering drugs are staggering! Even more
staggering is how effective the marketing techniques of the medical
and pharmaceutical industries are at hiding the dangers and
promoting the fake benefit of lowering “cholesterol” levels.
Please make note of the fact that none of these drugs ever claim that
they will help you live longer. They only claim to change the
“cholesterol” warning light that is flashing on your body’s
dashboard. If you take the time (as I have already done for you) to
look through the fine print of the inserts that come with these
poisonous drugs, you will find that they clearly indicate that...
THE DRUG COMPANIES THEMSELVES AND THE

PHYSICIAN’S DESK REFERENCE CLEARLY STATE THAT
THESE DRUGS DO NOT PREVENT HEART ATTACKS OR
HEART DISEASE!
LIPITOR (atorvastatin)
In 2001, Lipitor was the most prescribed drug in America. patients

filled 57,989,000 prescriptions at a cost of $5,223,784,000. This is
in spite of the fact that Lipitor does NOT prevent heart disease!!!
The following direct quotes come from the 2004 edition of the
Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR).
“The effect of Lipitor on cardiovascular morbidity and

mortality has not been determined.”
“The independent effect of raising HDL or lowering

triglycerides on the risk of coronary and cardiovascular
morbidity and mortality has not been determined.”
“HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors interfere with CHOLESTEROL

synthesis and theoretically might blunt adrenal and/or gonadal
steroid production.”
“The effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on male fertility

have not been studied.”
“Safety in pregnant women has not been established.”
“Since HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors decrease CHOLESTEROL

synthesis and possibly the synthesis of other biologically active
substances derived from CHOLESTEROL, they may cause fetal
harm when administered to pregnant women.”
“The effects, if any, on the pituitary-gonadal axis in

premenopausal women are unknown.”
“Before instituting therapy with atorvastatin [Lipitor], an attempt

should be made to control hypercholesterolemia with appropriate
diet, exercise and weight reduction in obese patients and to treat

other underlying medical problems.”
On the minimum dosage studied (10mg),
10.3% of the patients reported infections;

5.4% reported headaches;
4.2% reported accidental injuries;
3.9% reported rashes;
3.2% reported muscle pain;
2.8% reported abdominal pain;
2.8% reported back pain;
2.8% reported sinusitis;
2.7% reported diarrhea;
2.5% reported sore throat;
2.3% reported dyspepsia;
2.2% reported flu symptoms;
2.2% reported asthenia (weakness);
2.0% reported joint pain.
“Adverse events associated with Lipitor therapy reported since

market introduction that are not listed above, regardless of
causality assessment, include the following: anaphylaxis,
angioneurotic edema, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal
necrolysis and rhabdomyolysis.”
“Patients should be advised to report promptly unexplained muscle

pain, tenderness, or weakness, particularly if accompanied by
malaise or fever... Therapy should be discontinued if... myopathy
[muscle pain] is diagnosed or suspected.”
“It is recommended that liver function tests be performed prior to

and at 12 weeks following both the initiation of therapy and any
elevation of dose and semi annually thereafter.”
The reported adverse side effects of Lipitor include...
Abnormal dreams Epididymitis Rectal hemorrhage

Abnormal ejaculation Epistaxis Rhinitis
Abnormal Liver Eructation Palpitation
Test Results Esophagitis Pancreatitis
Acne Eye hemorrhage Paresthesia
Albuminuria Face edema Parosmia
Alopecia Facial paralysis Peripheral
Amblyopia Fever neuropathy
AMNESIA Fibrocystic breast Petechia
(see next chapter) Gastritis Phlebitis
Anemia Gastroenteritis Pneumonia
Angina pectoris Glaucoma Postural
Anorexia Glossitis hypotension
Arrhythmia Gout Pruritis
Arthritis Gum hemorrhage Refraction disorder
Asthma Hematuria Seborrhea
Biliary pain Hepatitis Skin ulcer
Breast Enlargement Hyperglycemia Somnolence
Bronchitis Hyperkinesia Stomach ulcer
Bursitis Hypertension Stomatitis
Chest pain Hypertonia Syncope
Cheilitis Hypesthesia Sweating
Cholestatic jaundice Hypoglycemia Taste loss
Colitis Impotence Taste perversion
Contact dermatitis Incoordination Tendenous
Creatine Increased appetite contracture
phosphokinase Insomnia Tenesmus
(increased) Kidney calculus Tenosynovitis
Cystitis Leg cramps Thrombocytopenia
Deafness Libido (decreased) Tinnitis
Depression Lymphadenopathy Torticollis
Dizziness Malaise Ulcerative stomatitis
Dry eyes Melena Urinary incontinence
Dry mouth Metrorrhagia Urinary
Dry skin Migraine (increased frequency)
Duodenal ulcer Mouth ulceration Urinary retention
Dysphagia Myasthenia Urinary tract infection
Dyspnea Myositis Urinary urgency
Dysuria Nausea Urticaria
Ecchymosis Neck rigidity Uterine hemorrhage
Eczema Nephritis Vaginal hemorrhage
Edema Nocturia Vasodilation
Emotional lability Peripheral edema Vomiting
Enteritis Photosensitivity Weight gain
Do you see how your doctor’s evil system works? First they get
you to focus on a “risk factor” that is not actually the CAUSE.
Then they encourage you to take a poisonous drug that they admit
does not improve your chances of living longer (mortality). Once
they get you to fall for their recommendation of taking a poisonous
drug, they have to “monitor” your condition. Isn’t this a clue that
the drug is dangerous? They have locked you into regular office
visits and regular laboratory testing (Cha-CHING $$$$). Your
doctor has locked in yet another steady customer. Did you skip
over the list of side effects on the previous pages? Do you really
want to take a poisonous drug that is KNOWN to cause any and all
of the above problems just so that you can lower the number of the
“cholesterol” warning light that is going off in your body? The
PDR clearly states that... “The effect of Lipitor on cardiovascular
morbidity and mortality has NOT been determined” and
“Furthermore, the independent effect of raising HDL or lowering
triglycerides on the risk of coronary and cardiovascular morbidity
and mortality has NOT been determined.” So what the hell is the
point of taking Lipitor? Can there be any reason other than the
obvious fact that your doctor is working as a drug pusher because
they want to make more money by giving you a whole host of
adverse side effects that require more office visits and more
testing?
There is no other reason! Lipitor does not make anyone healthier.

Lipitor may very well prevent your body from producing
CHOLESTEROL, but it does absolutely nothing whatsoever to
address the reasons why your body needed to make that
CHOLESTEROL in the first place. The list of side effects on the
previous pages is long and impressive, but I bet that you pretty
much glossed right over them. Many of the words are in Latin
based “DoctorTalk” and may not mean much to you unless you are
already suffering from the specific symptoms of that ailment.
Please read the personal stories in the next chapter to get a true idea
of the horrors that are caused by this dangerous drug!
Lipitor has not been shown to prevent heart disease or heart

attacks! So what is the point of taking it?????????
Pictures speak louder than words. The previous page presented you
with a copy of an advertisement for Lipitor that has appeared in
many national magazines. It clearly states that Lipitor does NOT
reduce the risk of heart disease or heart attacks. It also clearly
states that Lipitor does lower “cholesterol” levels. Even the most
rudimentary logic forces you to realize that if something lowers
“cholesterol” but doesn’t reduce the risk of having a heart attack or
dying from heart disease, then lowering “cholesterol” does not
reduce your risk of having a heart attack or dying from heart
disease.
But isn’t that exactly the opposite of what every doctor and every
“official” government spokesman and every member of the media
has been telling us for decades?
Please ask yourself a few questions...
Does the propaganda and all of the brainwashing still work on you
even though I have clearly highlighted the fact (admitted to by the
drug company) that taking Lipitor does NOT lower your risk of
heart diseases?
Do you still think that it is a good idea to lower your “cholesterol”?
Do you still think it is a good idea for your family and friends to be
concerned with lowering their “cholesterol”?
Would you still consider taking Lipitor or any other drug?
Do you still trust your doctor?
Are you still doubting the crystal clear fact that...

LESCOL (fluvastatin sodium)
“The effect of Lescol or Lescol XL induced changes in

lipoprotein levels, including reduction of serum “cholesterol”,
on cardiovascular mortality has NOT BEEN DETERMINED.”

“Before instituting therapy with Lescol or Lescol XL, an attempt

should be made to control hypercholesterolemia with appropriate
diet, exercise, and weight reduction in obese patients, and to treat
other underlying medical problems.”
“Fluvastatin... is eliminated primarily via the biliary route.

Therefore, the potential exists for drug accumulation in patients
with hepatic [liver] insufficiency.”
“No consistant effect on lipoprotein(a) was observed.”
“Neither Lescol nor Lescol XL have been studied in conditions

where the major abnormality is... hyperlipoproteinemia Types I,
III, IV or V.
“The empirical formula of fluvastatin sodium is

C24H25FNO4•Na.”
The “F” in the equation above stands for fluoride which is one of
the most potent toxins known to man. Sodium fluoride is used as
rat poison.
“Since HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors decrease CHOLESTEROL

synthesis and possibly the synthesis of other biologically active
substances derived from CHOLESTEROL, they may cause fetal
harm when administered to pregnant women. Fluvastatin sodium

should be administered to women of childbearing age only when
such patients are highly unlikely to conceive and have been
informed of the potential hazards.”
“Abnormalities of liver function have been associated with

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and other lipid lowering agents.
Approximately 1.1% of patients treated with Lescol capsules in
worldwide trials developed dose-related, persistent elevations of
transaminase levels to more than 3 times the upper limit of
normal.”
“It is recommended that liver function tests be performed before

the initiation of therapy and at 12 weeks following initiation of
treatment or elevation of dose. Should an increase in AST or ALT
of three times the upper limit of normal or greater persist (found in
two consecutive occasions) withdrawal of fluvastatin sodium
therapy is recommended.”
“Rhabdomyolysis with renal dysfunction secondary to

myoglobinuria has been reported with fluvastatin and with other
drugs in this class.”
“Myopathy, defined as muscle aching or muscle weakness in

conjunction with increases in creatine phosphokinase (CPK) values
to greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal, has been
reported.”
“Patients should be advised to report promptly unexplained muscle

pain, tenderness or weakness, particularly if accompanied by
malaise or fever. Fluvastatin sodium therapy should be
discontinued if markedly elevated CPK levels occur or myopathy is
diagnosed or suspected.”
“HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors interfere with CHOLESTEROL

synthesis and lower circulating ‘cholesterol’ levels and, as such,
might theoretically blunt adrenal or gonadal steroid hormone
production.”
On the minimum dosage studied (10mg),

8.9% of the patients reported headache;
5.1% reported influenza-like symptoms;
5.1% reported accidental trauma;
5.0% reported myalgia (muscle pain);
4.9% reported abdominal pain;
3.2% reported nausea;
2.7% reported insomnia;
2.7% reported fatigue;
2.6% reported flatulence;
2.3% reported allergy;
2.1% reported arthritis.
The 2004 edition of the Physician’s Desk Reference did not list the
side effects of Lescol. Instead, it said...
“The following effects have been reported with drugs in this class.
Not all of the effects listed below have necessarily been associated
with fluvastatin sodium therapy.”
The side effects that were listed for “drugs in this class” are shown
on the next page.
“Medicine is a collection of prescriptions the results of which,

taken collectively, are more fatal than useful to mankind.”
Napoleon Bonaparte
The potential side effects of Lescol:
Alopecia Erectile Paresthesia

Alteration of taste dysfunction Peripheral neuropathy
Anaphylaxis Erythema Peripheral nerve palsy
Angioedema multiforme Photosensitivity
Anorexia ESR increase Polymyalgia
Anxiety Facial paresis rheumatica
Arthralgia Fatty change Positive ANA
Arthritis in liver Progression of
Asthenia Fever cataracts
Changes to hair/nails Flushing Pruritis
Chills Fulminant hepatic Purpura
Cholestatic jaundice necrosis Psychic disturbances
Chronic active Gynecomastia Rhabdomyolysis
hepatitis Hemolytic anemia Skin discoloration
Cirrhosis Hepatitis Skin nodules
Depression Hepatoma Skin dryness
Dizziness Insomnia Stevens-Johnson
Dryness of mucous Leukopenia syndrome
membranes Loss of libido Thrombocytopenia
Dysfunction of certain Lupus Thyroid function
cranial nerves erythematosus- abnormalities
Dyspnea like syndrome Toxic epidermal
Elevated blood Malaise necrosis
bilirubin Memory loss Tremor
Elevated blood (see next chapter) Urticaria
alkaline phosphatase Muscle cramps Vertigo
Elevated blood (GTP) Myalgia Vasculitis
(glutamyl Myopathy Vomiting
transpeptidase) Opthalmoplegia
Eosinophilia Pancreatitis
Additionally, Lescol may contain the following ingredients...
Red iron oxide, black iron oxide, yellow iron oxide, sodium lauryl
sulfate, talc, benzyl alcohol, butylparaben, methylparaben,
propylparaben, povidone and polyethylene glycol 8000.
ZOCOR (simvastatin)
“Since the goal of treatment is to lower LDL...”
[author’s note] Please note that the “goal of treatment” is not to

improve the health of your heart. The “goal of treatment” is not to
improve your overall health. The “goal of treatment” with ZOCOR
is to turn off the “cholesterol” warning light while ignoring its
underlying cause and while ignoring any of the body’s needs that
may be indicated by elevated “cholesterol” levels.
“Prior to initiating therapy with simvastatin, secondary causes for

hypercholesterolemia (e.g. hypothyroidism, nephrotic syndrome,
dysproteinemias, obstructive liver disease, other drug therapy,
alcoholism) should be excluded.” [Did your doctor do this?]
“In many hypertriglyceridemic patients, LDL may be low or

normal despite elevated total ‘cholesterol’. In such cases, ZOCOR
is NOT indicated.”
“The effects of ZOCOR on lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen and certain

other independent biochemical risk markers for [coronary heart
disease] CHD are unknown.”
“The effects, if any, on the pituitary-gonadal axis in

pre-menopausal women are unknown.”

morbidity and mortality has not been determined. Total plasma
triglyceride has not consistently been shown to be an independent
risk factor for [coronary heart disease] CHD.”
The Physician’s Desk Reference
“CHOLESTEROL and other products of the CHOLESTEROL

biosynthesis pathway are essential components for fetal
development, including synthesis of steroids and cell membranes.
Because of the ability of inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase such as
ZOCOR to decrease the synthesis of CHOLESTEROL and
possibly other products of the CHOLESTEROL biosynthesis
pathway, ZOCOR is contraindicated during pregnancy and in
nursing mothers.”
“Simvastatin, like other inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase,

occasionally cause myopathy manifested as muscle pain,
tenderness and weakness with creatine kinase (CK) above ten times
the upper limit of normal. Myopathy sometimes takes the form of
rhabdomyolysis with or without acute renal failure secondary to
myoglobinuria, and rare fatalities have occurred. The risk of
myopathy is increased by high levels of HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitory action in plasma.”
“The risk of myopathy/rhabdomyolysis is increased by

concomitant use of simvastatin with the following: Cyclosporin,
erythomycin, clarithromycin, HIV protease inhibitors, or large
quantities of grapefruit juice.”
“In an ongoing clinical trial, myopathy has been reported in 6% of

patients receiving simvastatin 80mg and amiodarone.”
“There is a serious problem in the failure of the FDA to be more

cautious in approving drugs that their own physicians say are too
dangerous.”
Dr. Sidney Wolfe
Public Citizens Health Research Group
November 5, 2004
“The use of simvastatin should not exceed 20mg daily in patients

receiving concomitant medication with amiodarone or verapamil.”
“Simvastatin therapy should be discontinued immediately if

myopathy is diagnosed or suspected.”
“Persistent increases to more than three times the upper limit of

normal in serum transaminases have occurred in approximately 1%
of patients who received simvastatin in clinical studies.”
The 2004 Physicial’s Desk Reference listed exactly the

same adverse side effects for simvastatin as they listed for Lescol.
I will not repeat them here. Please refer to the list on the previous
pages. However, there were a few additional tidbits of information
that were specific to ZOCOR.
“In a 72 week carcinogenicity study, mice were administered daily

doses of simvastatin... which resulted in mean plasma drug levels
approximately 1, 4, and 8 times higher than the mean human
plasma drug level, respectively after an 80 mg oral dose. Liver
carcinomas were significantly increased in high-dose females and
mid and high dose males with a maximum incidence of 90% in
males. The incidence of adenomas of the liver was significantly
increased in mid and high dose females. Drug treatment also
significantly increased the incidence of lung adenomas in mid and
high dose males and females.”
“We don’t always understand the full magnitude

of drug risks prior to approval.”
Dr. Steven Galson
Acting Director of the FDA’s
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
November 5, 2004
MEVACOR (lovastatin)
“The effects of MEVACOR on lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen and

certain other independent biochemical risk markers for coronary
heart disease are unknown.”
“Animal studies demonstrated that lovastatin crosses the blood-

brain and placental barriers.”
“MEVACOR is indicated as an adjunct to diet for the reduction of

elevated total ‘cholesterol’ and LDL levels in patients with primary
hypercholesterolemia Type IIa and Type IIb when the response to
diet... and to other nonpharmacological measures alone has been
inadequate.”
“MEVACOR... has NOT been studied in hyperlipoproteinemia

Type I, Type III, Type IV or Type V.”
The 2004 Physicial’s Desk Reference listed exactly the same

adverse side effects for lovastatin as they listed for Lescol. I will
not repeat them here. Please refer to the list on the previous pages.
However, there was at least one additional tidbit of information
that was specific to MEVACOR...
“Drug related testicular atrophy, decreased spermatogenesis,

spermatocytic degeneration and giant cell formation was seen in
dogs starting at 20mg/kg/day. Similar findings were seen in
another drug in this class.”
“I firmly believe that if the whole materia medica could be sunk

to the bottom of the sea, it would be all the better for mankind,
and all the worse for the fishes.”
Oliver Wendell Holmes
PRAVACHOL (pravastatin)
The 2004 Physicial’s Desk Reference listed exactly the

same adverse side effects for pravastatin as they listed for Lescol.
I will not repeat them here. Please refer to the list on the previous
pages. However, there was at least one additional tidbit of
information that was specific to PRAVACHOL.
Skillfully buried in a chart from the Long-term Intervention with

Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) study was the fact that the
people who were given PRAVACHOL were 87.5% times more
likely to DIE from stroke due to brain hemorrhage than the people
who were given placebos!
CRESTOR (Rosuvastatin Calcium)
Yet another “statin” drug, CRESTOR inhibits CHOLESTEROL

production in the same basic way as the other “statin” drugs.
In clinical studies, the following adverse reactions were noted...
9.0% of the patients reported pharyngitis;

5.5% reported headache;
3.4% reported nausea;
2.8% reported myalgia;
2.7% reported asthenia (weakness);
2.6% reported back pain;
2.3% reported flu;
2.3% reported urinary tract infection;
2.2% reported rhinitis;
During the clinical studies, 3.7% of the participants dropped out

due to the severity of the adverse effects.
Under the category of laboratory abnormalities, the warning

information regarding CRESTOR states that...
“Proteinuria and microscopic hematuria were observed.”
This means that the participants lost protein and blood in their
urine.
“Other abnormal laboratory values reported were elevated

creatinine phosphokinase, transaminases, hyperglycemia, glutamyl
transpepsidase, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin and thyroid
function abnormalities.” Other adverse events reported were...
Abdominal pain Flatulence Pancreatitis

Accidental injury Gastritis Paresthesia
Anemia Gastroenteritis Pathological
Angina pectoris Hepatitis fracture
Angioedema Hypersensitivity Pelvic pain
Anxiety Hypertension Periodontal abscess
Arrythmia Hypertonia Peripheral edema
Arthralgia Increased cough Photosensitivity
Arthritis Infection Pneumonia
Asthma Insomnia Pruritis
Bronchitis Kidney failure Rash
Chest pain Leukopenia RHABDOMYOLYSIS
Constipation Myasthenia Syncope
Depression Myopathy Thrombocytopenia
Diabetes mellitus Myositis Urticaria
Dizziness Neck pain Vasodilation
Dyspnea Neuralgia Vertigo
Ecchymosis Pain Vomiting
Face edema Palpitation Vesiculobullous rash
Please take a look at the advertisement for Crestor on the next page.
Now, I ask you, why would a drug company put such wording in
their advertisement, which is designed to entice you into
purchasing their drug? The only reasonable answer is that these
statements are true. These drugs do NOT reduce your risk of heart
attack or heart disease. As we saw in the section on Zocor, the
“goal of the treatment” is to lower your “cholesterol”. The drug
companies know that lowering your “cholesterol” does NOT
improve your health. They know that lowering your “cholesterol”
does NOT prevent heart attacks and heart disease. It says so quite
clearly in their ad. But, they also know that you mistakenly believe
that lowering your “cholesterol” DOES prevent heart attacks and
heart disease, and they are quite willing to allow you to live in your
own fantasy world. They know that you are going to look at their
latest advertisement for “The Emperor’s New Pill” and, just like
in the children’s story, you are not going to see the obvious truth
that is right in front of your eyes. The Crestor advertisement
clearly states that Crestor will lower your “cholesterol” levels by
46% and it ALSO says that this will NOT prevent heart attacks or
heart disease! Don’t you see it? The proof is right in front of you!
EVEN THOUGH DRUGS DO LOWER

“CHOLESTEROL” LEVELS,
DRUGS DO NOT PREVENT HEART DISEASE.
LOWERING “CHOLESTEROL” DOES

NOT PREVENT HEART DISEASE
BECAUSE “CHOLESTEROL”
DOES NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE!
HOW MUCH MORE PROOF DO YOU NEED!
YOUR DOCTOR IS A LIAR!!

CRESTOR has NOT been shown to prevent heart disease

or heart attacks! So what is the point of taking it?
“Astra-Zeneca’s tactics in marketing its ‘cholesterol’ lowering

drug, rosuvastatin [Crestor], raises disturbing questions about
how new drugs enter clinical practice and what measures exist to
protect patients from inadequately investigated medicines.”
Dr. Richard Horton, Editor of “Lancet”
Lancet, October 25, 2003, Volume 362, page 1341
“In March 2004, Public Citizen’s Health Research group

petitioned the FDA to ban Crestor because of seven cases of
life-threatening acute muscle breakdown known as
rhabdomyolysis. In addition, nine patients suffered serious
kidney damage or kidney failure while using Crestor.
In November 2004, Dr. David Graham of the FDA told a
Congressional Committee that he considered Crestor unsafe.
If your doctor writes a prescription or offers you samples of
Crestor, decline. And if you are feeling bold, ask your doctor why
he or she is suggesting the least-known, most-powerful
statin, which has already been linked to multiple toxicities.
Who needs Crestor? Hardly anyone.”
Jay S. Cohen, M.D.
“It becomes clearer by the day that this drug [Crestor] is

uniquely toxic without offering any unique benefit, and that it
must be removed from the market.”
Dr. Sidney Wolfe
Public Citizen’s Health Research Group
“The more you see a product advertised,

the more of a ripoff it is.”
Paul Hawken
The effect of “statin” drugs

on the body’s natural production of
CoEnzyme Q10
The drug companies that manufacture the drugs that are

detailed in this chapter know that in addition to blocking the
production of CHOLESTEROL, all of these drugs also
block the body’s ability to produce a compound called
Coenzyme Q10. (Please see the chart on the first page of the
chapter entitled “CHOLESTEROL Becomes...”). Studies
have shown that “statin” drugs block the production of
Coenzyme Q10 and reduce its levels by 29%. Coenzyme Q10
is necessary for the production of energy in every cell in the
body and studies have shown that “statin” drugs reduce the
amount of energy (ATP) that is available to the heart tissue
by nearly 50%!
Since 1990, the pharmaceutical giant Merck has held a

patent (#4,933,165) for the use of Coenzyme Q10 in
conjunction with “statin” drugs. They have known for more
than a decade that administering Coenzyme Q10 along with
these drugs minimizes the damage and reduces the side
effects of statin drugs, especially problems with low energy,
fatigue and muscle soreness. Merck has also held a patent
(#4,929,437) that would have enabled Coenzyme Q10 to be
administered along with “statin” drugs in order to reduce the
incidence of liver damage but, in both cases Merck has not
exercised these patents. Instead...
THEY HAVE CHOSEN TO HIDE

THESE FACTS FROM THE PUBLIC!
(Where is Erin Brockovich when you need her?)

“Americans now spend a staggering $200 billion a year on

prescription drugs. The prices drug companies charge have little
relationship to the costs of making the drugs and could be cut
dramatically without coming anywhere close to threatening
research and development. Contrary to its public relations, the
[pharmaceutical] industry discovers few genuinely innovative
drugs, spends less than half as much on R&D as on marketing
and administration, and consistently has profit margins far above
those of most other Fortune 500 industries. The argument that it
needs to charge ever-higher prices to cover its research costs is
simply not true. In 2004, Pfizer, the largest drug company, had a
profit margin of nearly 22% of sales (which were $53 billion).
The same year, it spent 32% of sales on marketing and
administration and only 15% on R&D. Altogether, the nine U.S.
drug companies listed in the Fortune 500 had a median profit
margin of 16% of sales in 2004, compared to just over 5% for all
the industries listed. In 2002, the combined profits for the ten
drug companies in the Fortune 500 were more than the profits for
all the other 490 businesses put together. When I say this is a
profitable industry, I mean really profitable. Charles A.
Heimbold, Jr., the former chairman and CEO of Bristol-Myers
Squibb made $74,890,918 in 2001, not counting his $76,095,611
worth of unexercised stock options. The chairman of Wyeth
made $40,521,011, exclusive of his $40,629,459 in stock options.
It is difficult to conceive of how awash in money big pharma is.
Over the past two decades [the pharmaceutical industry] has
moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and
producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine
to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and
power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way,
including the U.S. Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers,
and the medical profession itself. This is an industry that is in
some ways like the Wizard of Oz - full of bluster but now being
exposed as something far different than its image. The United
States can no longer afford the pharmaceutical industry in its
present form. In 2001, drug companies gave doctors nearly
$11 billion worth of ‘free samples’ and paid over 60% of the costs
of continuing medical education, and that fraction has increased
since them. The same year, drug companies sent some 88,000
sales representatives around to hand out the free samples
plus lots of personal gifts and to talk up company products.
There is no way to exaggerate how much a part of some doctors’
daily lives drug reps have become. A typical doctor is visited by
several every week and doctors in high prescribing specialties
may be visited by a dozen in one day. In my view, we have become
an overmedicated society. Doctors have been taught only too well
by the pharmaceutical industry, and what they have been taught
is to reach for the prescription pad. Patients have also been well
taught by the pharmaceutical industry’s advertising. They have
been taught that if they don’t leave the doctor’s office with a
prescription, the doctor is not doing a good job. The result is that
too many people end up taking drugs when there may be better
ways to deal with their problems. Drug companies have the
largest lobby in Washington, and they give copiously to
political campaigns. Legislators are now so beholden to the
pharmaceutical industry that it will be exceedingly difficult to
break its lock on them. We saw a sad demonstration of that fact
with the 2003 Medicare ‘reform’ bill, which was made to order by
and for Big Pharma. Your representatives will stand up to the
industry only if you demand that they do. The fact is that this
industry is taking us for a ride, and there will be no real reform
without an aroused and determined public to make it happen.
Marcia Angell, M.D.

Author of “The Truth About the Drug Companies”
In spite of all the lies that the

medical and pharmceutical industries have told
about the drugs listed in this chapter,
there is actually a very simple way to get to the truth.
I have a personal challenge to any and all medical

doctors who have the arrogance to deny the truth.
I will personally consume ten times the recommended

amount of CHOLESTEROL in the form of hard boiled
chicken eggs every day...
If they will consume ten times the maximum dose of

LIPITOR, LESCOL, ZOCOR,
MEVACOR, PRAVACHOL or CRESTOR
every day!
Last person alive wins.

Chapter 11
Horror Stories
IT’S A JOKE...
PATIENT: Doctor, why do surgeons wear

masks during an operation?
DOCTOR: That way, when something goes

wrong, we can’t be identified.
• • •
The medical profession is the holiest profession

that there is. Once I was sick and I had to go to
an ear, nose and throat specialist. My wife goes
regularly to a gynecologist and a urologist and
she wants me to go to a proctologist for a
checkup. What is it with doctors and holes?
There’s a different doctor for every hole and if
they can’t figure out your problem, they call in a
surgeon to make a new hole!
• • •
People that have these so-called “near death”

experiences, they always seem to say the same
thing: “I remember seeing this really bright
white light.” Of course you did stupid! It was the
paramedic shining a flashlight in your eyes to see
if you were still alive!
The previous chapter contained a lot of “dry” factual and statistical

information. Please note that the pharmaceutical industry and your
doctor are masters at manipulating that information in order to
paint a very rosy picture regarding the safety and effectiveness of
“statin” drugs. However, the reality in human terms is quite
different. As you read through the real life stories in this chapter,
please note how often the people had to argue with their doctors
who stubbornly denied the clear reality that these individuals were
suffering from side effects of the drugs that their ignor-ant doctors
had prescribed.
Statistics can easily be manipulated, but they can just as easily be

misunderstood. When a pharmaceutical company honestly and
clearly states that their drug causes side effects in approximately
2% or 7% or 9% or whatever% of people, most people forget to
multiply that percentage times the number of people taking the
drug in order to determine the actual number of people who may be
suffering from those symptoms. For example, the PDR states that
10.3% of the people who took Lipitor in the clinical trials suffered
from infections. More than ten million people currently take
Lipitor. Ten percent of ten million is one million people who may
be suffering from infection due to the Lipitor that they ingest
every day. Do you think that they suspect that their “cold” or “flu”
was not really a naturally occurring problem, but that it was
actually a side effect of their prescription drug?
All of these numbers are so huge and the ramifications are so

immense, that most doctors choose to stick their heads in the sand
and simply deny the reality that all of the people in this chapter will
be describing. It is beneficial for doctors to do this, because then
they get to continually treat their “statin” consuming patients for an
endless list of ailments that are nothing more than side effects of a
“properly prescribed” medication. “Properly prescribed” my ass!
“Statin” drugs are poisons! Read the following story from one
doctor who found out the hard way that drugs are dangerous...
Transient Global Amnesia

A Side Effect of “Statin” Treatment
written by:
Duane “Doc” Graeline, M.D.

Former NASA Astronaut
USAF Flight Surgeon
Space Medicine Research Scientist
Family Doctor
Former “Statin” Drug User
Author of
“Lipitor, Thief of Memory”
“Try to imagine the complete inability to formulate new

memory. This condition is known as transient global
amnesia, now known to be associated with “statin” drug use
for lowering ‘cholesterol’. My first encounter occurred six
weeks after my annual astronaut physical at Johnson Space
Center. Despite regular exercise, weight maintenance and
proper diet, my total “serum cholesterol” had risen to 250
and the recommendation of the flight surgeons there was to
start Lipitor, 10mg daily. My wife noticed me walking
aimlessly about the yard after my return from my usual walk.
I did not know who she was and would not enter our house.
Our family doctor referred me immediately to a neurologist,
and finally, in the office of the neurologist, my senses
returned to normal. Following a negative MRI the following
day, the diagnosis of transient global amnesia was made.
I discontinued Lipitor because I suspected it was the cause.
At my next NASA physical I was assured that statin drugs

do not do this. Reluctantly, I started again with 5mg, daily,
one-half my previous dose. Six weeks later I descended
again into the black pit of amnesia, this time for an
extraordinary 12 hours. In addition to the mainly antegrade
amnesia which characterized my first attack, this time I had
a retrograde element all the way back to my high school days.
Gone was my medical school straining, USAF flight
surgeon career, my marriage and four children and even my
selection as scientist astronaut. Again the same doctors made
the same diagnosis, transient global amnesia. Again,
I stopped Lipitor on my own, knowing it was the cause, but
I was the only one convinced.
Several months later I got in contact with the statin drug

study at UCSD’s College of Medicine. There, Dr. Beatrice
Golomb reported she had several cases just like mine. A few
days later, thanks to the radio program People’s Pharmacy,
thousands of case reports of memory dysfunction started
flooding in from patients across the country, all with the
same common thread, associated with statin drug use. And
the amnesia is just the tip of the iceberg of the true incidence
of memory impairment associated with Lipitor, Mevacor and
Zocor. For every case of amnesia, thousands of cases of
extreme forgetfulness, incapacitating confusion and
profound disorientation have been and are being reported.
Neither patients nor doctors are aware of this side effect.
For years patients have been interpreting deterioriation of

memory shortly after starting statin medications as simply
coincidental presenility or the earliest harbingers of

Alzheimers, never making the association that these
symptoms might be a side effect of a medication their
physicians have prescribed. Our memory is what makes us
what we are. To be deprived of memory, however
transitory, is comparable to one’s never having existed for
that time period - to suddenly disappear from life as we know
it. Memory is the essence of what we are. And to be
deprived of memory can place one in harm’s way. Their very
lives or the lives of others may be at risk because of that
transitory period of lapse.
When a senior citizen goes on a two-day “walkabout” or,

much worse, drives his car across three states in a whirlwind
of wanderlust with absolutely no recollection when finally
apprehended, rarely is the association made between his
actions and his medications. Lack of physician and patient
awareness of possible relationships between cognitive side
effects and the use of statin drugs almost guarantees that no
instances of accident and statin drug use will be reported.
When I was in my first year of medical school, transient

global amnesia was described in my texts as a condition so
rare that few physicians ever saw even one case. I was to
practice medicine for nearly 50 years without encountering
it. Now, in this past year I have encountered a veritable
flood of reports from all walks of life and across a wide
spectrum of ages, all associated with statin drug use. The
sheer numbers may impress you even though your medical
advisors still discount them.
Case 1
A husband noted for his sharp mind and ability for almost
total recall got out of bed wondering what day of the week it
was. His surprised wife quickly ascertained he did not even
know what month it was. She reported he nearly drove her
crazy asking this same question over and over again despite
her repeated reassurance as to time and date. He knew
nothing of their stocks and other money matters and could
not understand how his wife could know all these things and
he could not. Emergency room workup was negative.
Condition cleared completely after eight hours. Neurologist
diagnosed transient global amnesia, cause unknown but
Zocor was suspected as it had been started six weeks earlier.
The patient discontinued this drug and remained well.
Case #2
A university professor who always remembered everything

lost an entire day during his first encounter with memory loss
while on Lipitor. Weeks later during his second, he was
unable to remember his social security number, telephone or
bankcard numbers and could not even remember his
birthdate. Suspecting Alzheimer’s disease, he had himself
screened by a neurologist with negative findings. Only after
his family doctor fortuitously substituted Pravachol (because
of his complaints of co-existing muscle pain) did the
amnesia episodes clear completely.
Case #3
A young loadmaster in the United States Air Force who,

by the way, is responsible for the proper loading of our
military’s huge cargo planes, was given a waiver for flight
status for the use of Lipitor for “cholesterol” control. He
soon began to experience multiple episodes of of what he
termed “short term memory loss”. He stopped taking Lipitor
immediately after learning of the possibility of such side
effects from the Internet and his symptoms slowly regressed.
He was very concerned that they persisted for several weeks
after stopping the drug.
Case #4
A man parked by the side of the road on a dark night was

interrogated by a state trooper and found to be lost, not
having the slightest recall for traveling to this unusual site far
off the beaten track and many miles away from his home.
The trooper naturally suspected alcoholism but the man
recently had started Lipitor. His attempts to offer this drug as
a possible cause for his confusion fell on deaf ears but when
several more similar episodes occurred the patient self
diagnosed cognitive side effects of Lipitor and stopped the
drug. The episodes slowly ceased. Despite his inability to
convince his doctor he remains forever certain that his
confusion and amnesia were Lipitor related.
Case #5
A former CEO of a company, known as a thoroughly

competent, high achieving, typically type A personality, had
been on Lipitor for nearly three years before being struck
down by severe myositis and memory defects. He reported a
bizarre episode of Transient Global Amnesia three months
after discontinuation of the drug. His serum enzymes at that
time, though improved, still were moderately elevated. His
muscle pain was improving. He remarked to his wife that
because their swimming pool, neglected by his recent near
incapacitation with muscle pain, was green with algae he
had to get some pool chlorine and other supplies. Imagine
his surprise when after making a purchase of several gallons
of chlorine and returning to his car, he found in the trunk a
similar supply of chlorine already purchased.
Distraught, he called his wife who determined from the sales

slip that he had made the chlorine purchase the day before at
a completely different store. He had absolutely no recall for
having done this but there was no doubt that he had done it,
for his daughter had seen him while engaged in the purchase.
She had been somewhat concerned because she had waved
from her car as they always did and he had not responded.
He did not acknowledge her presence in her very distinctive
car. Always they had greeted each other with hand waiving
in a warm friendly fashion. In her judgement there was no
possibility that he had not seen her. He simply had not been
able to recognize her or the car despite their close proximity.
She passed it off as just one of those things until her mother
called the next day and they compared notes. The husband
and father could function sufficiently to drive to a store and
make a credit card purchase, yet he was a completely
different man who seemed to have regressed in memory so
that he no longer knew his adult daughter.
Once having identified this ‘flashback’ sort of reaction the

family began a more serious review of the father’s memory
problems of the past while still on Lipitor and discovered
many more unreported, strange episodes. One time, he
abruptly realized he inexplicably was on a freeway, headed
away from home in the wrong direction from anything he
intended to do. On another occasion he called his wife on his
cell phone to ask why he was in the Home Depot parking lot.
He had planned to run some errands but none involved Home
Depot. Woodworking materials were cut repeatedly and
remained unused as he cut them out again and again. His
wife feels that since the cessation of Lipitor he seems to be
improving in that his episodes are less frequent, but of course
they are better reported in that the entire family is looking for
these events and monitoring him closely. His pattern of
amnesia episodes illustrates a very important fact about
documenting such events - there has to be an observer for
accurate reporting. The patient has no recall, especially for
the more mild events. Only if considerable time has passed
or the patient winds up in an unusual location, is he
prompted to consider that something unusual has occurred.
In the absence of an observer any patient history is apt to be
very misleading. In most of these cases it is the patient or
family members who make the diagnosis, not the prescribing
doctor, so complete has been their brainwashing.”
People are beginning to wake up from their drug induced stupors.

Patients are beginning to question their doctors. Even the news
media is aware of the dramatic shift that is beginning to occur...
“There is a quiet backlash brewing against statins... A number of

critics believe drug companies have vastly understated side effects
caused by statins - particularly muscle pains and memory
problems. As a result, when patients complain of muscle aches
and fuzzy thinking, many doctors don’t even consider that a
statin might be the culprit.”
The Wall Street Journal
January 26, 2004
It truly boggles my mind as to how patients tend to listen to their

doctor rather than listen to the signals that their own bodies are
sending to them. The side effects of pharmaceutical drugs arequite
common and are actually well documented, but yet people ask
their doctor for their opinion rather than read what the drug
companies have to say about the dangers of their own products.
As you read through these stories, please note that many of the
individuals found the strength to stop taking their medications from
the stories of other people just like them. Quite often, their doctors
put enormous pressure upon them to continue their medications or
to switch to new medications despite their patients’ pleas for help.
If you have a similar story to tell, please share it with the world.
Your story may provide the support that helps another suffering
human being to find the strength to take control of their own health.
It is vitally important that this information be made available for
other people who may be suffering from side effects of prescription
medication. If you have a story to tell, please send it to the author
of this book at...
[email protected]
I am a thirty six year old male. Only been taking Lipitor for one
month. Stopped taking it one week ago after feeling strange side
effects. Shoulder pain, tingling fingers, heart racing at night, left
arm pain. Feel clumsy when I normally have excellent hand eye
coordination. Tendons feel funny in arm when clenching stuff. Still
feeling some side effects but not as bad now. Before I kept waking
up from sleep with pain in left shoulder and tingling in left hand,
but now not so bad.
Any alternatives? I would appreciate it. Doctors do not seem to

know what they are talking about. Said that the Lipitor would not
be causing my problems. I just got told to stretch and it would go
away as I do not exercise enough. What a load of crap! Can’t they
stop going by their scientific approach to everything and look at the
big picture?
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 by Guest, #12105
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I had a heart attack in April 04 during a squash match. My business

had been on the slide for about two years and two days earlier it had
ceased trading. It was the two years of stress dealing with this
situation that was the cause of the attack. There was a 90%
blockage of the main right artery and a stent was inserted to open it
up. Straight away the doctors prescribed a cocktail of drugs
including Lipitor. After a three months I was only taking the
Lipitor. At the same time I was determined to get back to full
fitness. I am 56 years old and very fit from the squash and I also
used to race a bike at a high level 20 years ago, so I started to train
in earnest with a view to race again in 2005. It was frustrating as I
seemed to fatigue easily. I naturally put this down to the after
effects of the heart attack. Anyway I persevered with the training
and got fitter. At the same time a pain started to develop in my
upper left arm and my neck became very sore and stiff. I ended up
going to see osteopaths and physio therapists for teatment, but

nothing worked. On a spur of the moment decision I decided to
stop the Lipitor and rely on my diet to reduce my “cholesterol”.
Out training with the guys I was getting back to my old self and was
at the front on training spins and leaving them behind on the
climbs. About four weeks later I was still suffering from the neck
pains. Then I got my check up at the doctors. They told me that my
“cholesterol” was elevated from the last readings and that I should
definitely be taking the Lipitor 40mg a day. I told him about the
symptoms which he said were nothing to do with Lipitor. Like a
brainless idiot I took him at his word and started to take the 40mg
a day. That was in February this year. There was no immediate
change in my fitness levels. I raced a few events and did quite well
but nothing like the standard I had been used to. Other muscle
problems started to appear. My right foot on the pedal was now at
a funny angle. My libido was now non-existent. At night in bed I
was getting palpitations and my heart rate rhythym was very
irregular with the heart stopping for about two-three seconds about
six times a minute. My performances on the bike were getting
steadily worse. In May I raced a 25 mile time trial and barely
finished the distance totally exhausted. It was then that I
researched Lipitor on the internet. I am very very angry to think
that the medical profession can prescribe a drug with these side
effects. Of course I stopped taking Lipitor immediately. That was
41 days ago. My heart rhythym is now normal, the palpitations
stopped and libido back to normal, the soreness and stiffness in my
neck almost gone. When riding my bike the foot on the pedal is
now OK. My bike training is still suffering as my recovery is not
very good though so it is unlikely that I will race again this year.
I am taking CoQ10 120mg, L-Carnitine 500mg, Lysine 1000mg,
Vitamin C 2000mg, plus Vitamin B supplements daily. Please
please do not take Lipitor as it is poison. It will proabaly take me
anything up to six months to fully recover.
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 by Guest, #11951

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am a 47 year old man. A year and a few months ago I was put on
10mg a day of Lipitor. After about a month my feet began to hurt
and burn, then my legs felt week. Now my hands feel strange,
(week, and kind of crampy). I drop things, my hand writing is
terrible, I have a hard time typing etc. My ankles, knees, hips,
back, elbows, wrists, and knuckles ache. The pain and burn,
tingling, and numbness in my feet is constant. I have had problems
with memory loss and loss of concentration. I have days that I am
so weak it is hard to go up stairs, roll over in bed or just get out of
a chair. I feel like I am over 100 years old at times. I feel like I have
been poisoned! About 2 months ago I asked my doctor if it could
be the Lipitor and he said “No, I doubt it, quit taking it for a week
and see if you feel better" and ordered a blood test, which came
back normal. I quit for 2 weeks with no change and started taking
it again. I don’t think he understood how bad I was feeling and was
not much help! I am feeling much worse and changed my doctor.
I have had an MRI to check for MS, which came back normal and
now have an appointment with a neurologist. I have just found this
website and I am on my third day of no Lipitor. The last two
months I have been afraid that I am dying of some horrible disease!
I hope this is my problem and I start feeling better soon!!!! If
Lipitor is the cause of my problems, it has taken a year of my life
away from me!!
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 by Guest, #11908
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I’m a 44 year old male. I was on Lipitor for four years and
recently started having severe cramps in my thighs and calf
muscles, severe diarrhea, severe fatigue and bloody urine. I asked
my doctor if it was the Lipitor, and he said it wasn’t. Probably a
virus he said because the liver tests came back okay even though I
had some jaundice.
Like a fool, I continued with the prescription and the cramps got
worse in my legs and feet. I ended up stopping the Lipitor on my
own in February 2005, nearly a year later, as the symptoms had not
gone away, and I developed muscle twitches and tremors.
My doctor then sent me for more blood work that showed my
muscle enzyme levels were over 350% above my normal range,
and a subsequent EMG/NC&VT showed the muscles had been
weakend on my left side! He then had me discontinue the Lipitor
and all statins indefinitely.
As it turns out I am not the only one in my family with adverse

reactions to statin drugs. My cousin and his father, both on my
dad’s side have the same total “cholesterol” level I have at 268, and
both are statin sensitive. My grandmother (same side) and her
sister had very high “cholesterol” and both died from congestive
heart failure at 87 and 92 respectively.
I went from a fairly active person to someone who became really

old fast. I now have to push myself out of a chair like my 93 year
old uncle did.
I am no longer taking any statin drugs and will control my

“cholesterol” through diet and exercise. If I live to 92 like my great
aunt did with no problems until she became that age, I should be so
lucky.
John
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 by Guest, #11676
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Been taking statins for several years and have put up with the
muscle aches and general feeling of unwellness for some time now.
Took myself off Lipitor 20mg dose this week after having
investigated side effects. Why does it take years of people suffering
through these side effects, poisoning their body for someone to
come up with a better, less toxic drug. My mother has been on
statins much longer than I and has all of the classic symptoms: hair
loss, tinnitus, weakness, muscle pains, loss of balance, pains in her
head so sharp she says it’s like someone’s sticking a knife into her.
Unfortunately, she comes from a different generation that doesn’t
dare go against her doctor’s advice and will probably suffer these
side effects to her grave. Looking now for an alternate, with my
family history of cardiac problems, thought I was doing something
good for myself by taking Lipitor. Started taking garlic pills but
would welcome any safe alternatives.
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 by sue, #11629
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
After taking Lipitor for over 6 years and it was controlling my

“cholesterol”. I was taking 60mg Lipitor. I began to get a terrible
burning in my toes creeping up into legs, stomach, breasts, arms
and hands, face, tongue, mainly at night in the wee hours of the
morning. Insomnia. Burning urine, faeces. rash in groin area, yeast
infections. I came off of Lipitor after having these side effect for a
year and a half as the doctors refused to believe that the Lipitor was
causing my symptoms. Side effects disappeared when I came off,
not totally but gradually going. Put back onto 20mg Lipitor after
many tests showed that my “cholesterol” was very high again and
research team suggested I be on 80mg Lipitor. Specialist however,
on my insistance, weaned me back onto Lipitor by giving me
20mg, which brought my “cholesterol” back to normal, ( Note that
the same results were achieved by a much lower dose), proving that
I was being overdosed. After being on just 20mg Lipitor, the
burning returned but the specialist said that it was keeping the
“cholesterol” controlled, so he would suggest a drug that people
with Parkinson’s Disease take, to make me sleep and not feel the
burning. I took myself off of Lipitor altogether.The burning was
disappearing again. I don’t have Parkinson’s, so why should I take
a drug to mask my side effects. At present I am taking 250mg
niacin and 10mg Pravacol and the burning has returned. I feel as if
these statin drugs are going to KILL me. I have to get another
appointment with my doctor, but at this point I am scared of the
medical profession as they do not seem to know what to do and I
am at high risk. I want to mention that I had rheumatic fever as a
child and cannot take large doses of any medications. Nobody will
listen to me. My overall “cholesterol” is 7.5 JU Ontario Canada
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 by Guest, #11494
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I recently started Lipitor, and within two weeks had a major

depressive episode. I have not had any such emotional outburst for
years. My sister asked me what was different, and the only answer
was Lipitor. I will not live like this. I will gladly drop dead from
a heart attack before living in misery forever.
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 by Guest, #11489
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been taking Lipitor 40mg for over 10 years after a triple
bypass. I experienced no noticeable side effects until about 5 years
ago my feet were burning, stabbing nerve pains sharp enough to
draw a sharp breath, unable to sleep properly. My doctor did not
suspect Lipitor so I had to find the source of the problem by a
process of elimination. This deteriorated further in the past year,
with numbness and severe muscle cramps in feet and hands. I
stopped taking the Lipitor recently and the pains and discomfort
have all but disappeared.
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 by Guest, #11467
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Hair loss, which didn’t occur to me until I read the postings - my

hair is everywhere in the house but on my head! Muscle pain,
weakness, and atrophy, itchy skin and eyes, joint pain (from
muscle weakness??) is excruciating - after months on physical
therapy was pronounced a failure and referred to a pain specialist
and another surgeon. Could not raise my arms without terrible pain,
hurt to drive my car. Nausea, dark urine, alternate constipation and
diarrhea, dizziness. I don’t know whether to be excited or terrified
after finding this site and reading the postings. At first reading, the
only symptom I have NOT had while on Lipitor is the numbness
and tingling in legs and feet. I’ve been concerned I have some
terrible, undiagnosed and terminal disease. Have had surgery on
one shoulder and am awaiting surgery on the other, plus a re-do of
a scoped knee which is now unbearably painful. Also have had
multiple steroid injections at different sites, and am scheduled for
another next week - this time in my lower back. Was put on Paxil
for pain, but have weaned myself off that. Was diagnosed with
spinal stenosis and fibromyalgia. Wouldn’t take the meds for the
fibromyalgia because of the side effect mentioned in the literature
- HAIR LOSS! I was already losing my hair! Finally found a
surgeon who told me to GET OFF THE LIPITOR! Problem is, I
had also been on Bextra at least four years, I think, for long term
mild lower back pain, and knee pain, so am wondering if arthritis
could have set in and been masked by the Bextra, which I came off
of at the same surgeon’s insistence. One week later it was taken off
the market. Am now off all anti-inflammatory drugs while
awaiting my latest steroid injection, and yes, I do fear the side
effects of THAT! My pain is back to the “rocking and swaying”
stage, and I’m awake in the middle of the night researching Lipitor!
Does it ever stop??
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 by Guest, #11377
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
After I started 10 mg Lipitor, I started having graphic nightmares.

Also, muscle soreness and fatigue.
Tue, 07 Jun 2005 by Guest, #11111
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Very weak, sick at stomach and very dark urine.
Sun, 05 Jun 2005 by Guest, #11065
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been taking 10mg of Lipitor for several years now. I was on
Zocor before that and had aching muscles in my thighs and
couldn’t even walk around the park like I used to. Doctor took me
off that although I don’t think he was convinced that it was the
problem. One year ago I was in therapy for pain in my shoulder
which the doctor said was the muscle that goes into the rotator cuff.
About a month ago, my right calf started hurting when I walked and
it felt as though the muscle was tight. When I got up to answer the
phone in the middle of the night it felt like it popped or tore or
something. I iced it, elevated it, etc., and when it didn’t get much
better (I was walking stiff-legged not to contract the muscle), I
went to the doctor. They sent me for a doppler just to make sure it
wasn’t a blood clot, which it wasn’t. I am on Coumadin for
ccasional atrial fibrillation and they did find a hematoma
(bruising), probably caused by an injury while on Coumadin.
Anyway, the doctor gave me some muscle relaxers and this helped
for a couple of days. Then, last week the leg started hurting again
and I started to have the same pain in my left leg. Now I have pain
in both calves and it is painful to walk or contract the calf muscles.
I also feel a tiredness or achiness in my top, front thighs and my
arms.
After my experience with Zocor I decided to look on the web for

anything about Lipitor and muscle pains. I was shocked by all the
posts and information I found that makes me believe the problems
I have been having are from the Lipitor. I didn’t even think about
the problem with my shoulder until I read these sites and put two
and two together (especially since I didn’t do anything to injure it).
I have now missed two doses and I have an appointment at the docs
in a week. I am hoping by that time I will feel some improvement
in my legs.
My brother is on 20mg Lipitor and he experiences light

headedness, swollen lips, tongue and genitals. My other brother
takes 80mg and his wife has complained of his moodiness and I
wonder now if that has something to do with it. This drug is not for
everyone.
Mon, 30 May 2005 by Guest, #10979
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Have been taking Lipitor for six days. After the second day I began
having depression spells that caused me to cry all the time (even
when driving down the road) and have two fights with a family
member almost to the point of disowning them. The only change in
my life at this time is the Lipitor. I am a 62 year old female who is
normally not bothered by stress or depression on a daily basis.
Sat, 28 May 2005 by Guest, #10962

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Started Lipitor a week ago due to my bad LDL of 308 (oops).

Within three days my legs, feet, and face (especially on my right
side) began to swell so bad around my ankles and feet, I could
barely walk. Called the doctor. He told me to drink Gatorade -
but not to excess. Is he kidding?? This is the same guy that said
I didn’t have a thyroid problem last week either, but my endo
diagnosed me as hypothyroid. I may be playing Russian Roulette,
but I’m stopping the Lipitor (or any other “cholesterol” drug for
that matter). I smoke, eat junk food, and don’t exercise anymore,
but after even this tiny scare, I’m changing my ways. Will
probably have to take something for the thyroid for awhile, but it
can’t be as bad as this crap. I know... more Gatorade.
Sat, 14 May 2005 by Guest, #10717
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I had been taking Lipitor for about 20 months; (80mg for 12

months and 40mg for 8 months). After recieving the first month of
Lipitor I was diagnosed with narcolepsy. Within a year I had
cataplexic episodes and sleep paralysis along with acute joint pain.
Within ten days after stopping the drug almost all those side effects
are completely gone. Anyone else?
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 by Guest, #10546
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I started Lipitor last fall, Since then I’ve had repeated tendonitis in
my elbows, stiffness in shoulders and legs. The first couple months
were off and on but since January it has been continuing on a
regular basis. Some days I can hardly lift my mug to drink. I’ve
taken anti-inflammatories (both prescription and OTC) for months.

More recently I’ve been plagued with aching in all limbs and joint
areas and greater fatigue. It sounds familiar to many of these
entries. After reading these entries, I believe it’s time for me to
stop this medication and feel better.
Sat, 16 Apr 2005 by Guest, #10450
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been on Lipitor for four months now. I am 43 years old. The
last two weeks, my legs feel like they have weights on them. My
knees ache and it’s hard to walk and not feel my knees creak. I went
to my doctor and took some blood tests. The doctor is 99% sure the
Lipitor is giving me these side affects. Sometimes it could give you
side affects right away and sometimes it takes some time to
develop them. I am off it now for three days and we will see how
that works...
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 by Guest, #10445
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been on Lipitor for almost two years, started having knee
joint pain, was pooped all the time but added that up to my being
53 years old with a bad back. Then I got a very pronouned erratic
tinnitus in my right ear, but the doctors could find no reason for it.
Live with it they said, it is age. Okay. But now every time I try to
add a new pill into my body, the Lipitor fights it. I get a terrible
burning in my chest, that works down into my both arms but it is
not my heart. I get sick to my tummy and just feel terrible.
It happens with any or all pills I try to take. So now off the Lipitor
for six weeks while my doctor checks things out. But you know my
knee is better, I can take pills again and my anxiety is better. I am
not going to take Lipitor again. I knew there was something wrong.
Why won’t doctors listen? Who knows our own bodies better?
Thank you for this site, it has shown me so much.
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 by Guest, #10413
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been taking Lipitor for four years. About two years ago most
of these side effects started. Muscle cramps in legs, muscle pain
and weakness, fatigue, stiff neck, hip joint pain and knee joint pain
and stiffness. Been off for three days and will never take it again.
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 by scribnerbliss, #10388
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been on Lipitor for four years and my doctor has put me on
40mg. I have been experiencing dizziness, hearing loss and
extreme muscle pain and angina-like symptoms. This is very scary.
I am going to try to find an alternative.
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 by donna, #10234
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been on 40mg Lipitor for about two years. I am 44 years old
and about nine months ago, my right ear went deaf. No dizziness...
no vertigo... it just went. Went to an ear specialist, hearing test
showed I have lost hearing in my right ear with no bone or ear drum
damage. MRI showed no tumors or abcesses. Family doctor then
took me off of Lipitor about two weeks ago. Have detected no
change. Any suggestions for trying to get my hearing back in my
right ear??
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 by Guest, #10088

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am a young 30-something, active, organic-healthy female with

unfortunately high (genetic) “cholesterol” levels (250ish). I have
no other health issues and I have never been on any long-term
medication. One month ago I was put on my first drug: Lipitor.
I was thrilled the first week. I had no side effects. As a matter-of-
fact, I told my mother it was like taking nothing. Into week two,
suddenly, I couldn’t lift my arm to put on mascara without it
cramping up. My legs began to throb when I used my muscles or
lifted my children. It was so incredibly bad by week three,
I stopped taking the drug and a whole week has had to pass before
the symptoms disappeared. I blindly followed my doctors
recommendation and am frightened to take the next round of drugs
to “test” on my body. I think I better do more research on other
alternatives, as neither degenerated muscles, nor heart
attacks/strokes appeal to me.
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 by Guest, #9966
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Have been on Lipitor for 3 1/2 weeks. First I noticed lower back
pain. Also depression. Today dizziness, headache and seemed I
couldn’t catch my breath. I called my doctor and he said to get off
of it for a few days and see if there is an improvement. But after
reading all these comments, I will never get back on them. Glad we
have this site. Never associated my back pain or the depression
with Lipitor.
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 by kathryn1949, #9439
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
My doctor put me on 40mg Lipitor about 4.5 months ago. My

“cholesterol” at that time was about 220. The Lipitor has reduced
my “cholesterol” to about 105 but not without serious side effects
that I began noticing about one month ago. I am a diabetic, but
sugars are well controlled. The first thing I began to notice is that
my thighs felt cold all the time, sometimes even burning, but only
when I sit down. If I put heat on them, it goes away. Another thing,
I was getting these migraine headaches that affect my vision,
causing blind spots. I’ve had them before but never with the
frequency of the way they are occuring now. The last two big things
are absentmindness and extreme fatigue....whew. Well, I stopped
taking Lipitor today and I feel better already. Diminished fatigue,
for sure.
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 by freemarketer, #9425
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
In response to those who praise the virtues of Lipitor, I will tell you
that I was on 10 mg/per day regimen for the past six and a half
years. I first noticed bizarre weakening of my legs last summer but
because I am 78, I at first attributed this to old age, but because the
onset was so rapid and unexpected, I discounted what was
happening at being due to my age. Then on December 6, I was
awaked by pain in my lower left leg so severe that I was literally
crying. I could only hobble to my doctor the following day and he,
by way of response to my question about Lipitor, suggested I stop
taking it. He also gave me a prescription (thank God) for Vicadin
without which I do not believe I could have survived until today. I
am still unable to walk more than a quarter mile or remain on my
feet for more than a half hour or so. In looking back now, I began
having sleep problems about four years ago, sleep apnea being
suggested. However, my sleep doctor also said that I had RLS
(restless leg syndrome) for which he prescribed chlonazapam.
I have had recurring problems these past few years with my legs
cramping up when I would drive any distance. When I recently

informed my cardiologist of these experiences, he pretty much
brushed me off by saying that while 2-3% of Lipitor users
experience problems, on the whole it is a beneficial drug.
In other words, they know that some folks are going to experience
problems, but that’s just too bad. What happened to the medical
adage, “Above all, do no harm”?
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 by skeezix7, #9397
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Since taking Lipitor I completely lost my balance. I couldn’t walk

through the house without bumping into the walls and I couldn’t
walk down the sidewalk without shoving my husband to one side.
My skin is shriveling up and is so dry it cracks. After one week of
being off Lipitor my balance is back to normal, I suppose the other
symptoms will take longer to get back to normal. At first I was on
a strict diet that I never varied from and still my “cholesterol” did
not go down. The doctor said what I had was inherited
“cholesterol” and would have to take medication for it. So,
what do I take?
Jean
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 by Guest, #9280
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Within two months of taking 10mg of Lipitor, I developed eye

flicker. It happens with both eyes. Looking at the sky in late
evening the sky flickers about ten cycles/second. The same thing
happens when looking at a lighted porch at night. The condition
seems permanent even after not taking the drug for a year. My eye
doctor nor any other medical professional knows of this problem.
It is not in the PDR.
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 by Guest, #9267
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
OK... I’m not an expert, but I have been experiencing severe back
pain on my left side for about a month now. I also happen to be a
thirty year old male who has been taking Lipitor 10mg for the past
year. Before taking Lipitor I did some looking around and saw
some interesting information that caused me to be cautious, but I
just put two and two together last night. Is it possible that the
Lipitor is contributing to the back pain? I’ve seen a chiropractor...
no relief. I’ve seen the doctor and I am on lots of pain medications.
(Flexiril, Hydromorphone, and Ibuprofen) with no real relief.
X-ray shows nothing, MRI is being scheduled. Does anyone have
any advice? My gut says that the doctor will think I’m crazy for
drawing the conclusion that this statin could be the cause of my
pain. I’m way too young to be living like I’m in my 90’s. My
activities have been limited and no one seems to have an answer!!!
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 by bpisani, #9253
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Started Lipitor 40mg in April 2004, am 52 years of age, female.

October 2004, woke up with head pressure on left side, ear pressure
left side only, neck and shoulder pain. Also spasms on one side of
head. This got worse. Had CT scan, chest x-rays, sinus x-rays, saw
a neurologist and no one could find a problem. In December 2004
I had to go on antibotics for a mild infection and had to
discontinue the Lipitor for 10 days. I noticed during this time, my
neck and shoulder improving and had pressure less pronounced,
but still unable to sleep on left side. I am frustrated and am happy
by nature, but been getting depressed over this. Resumed the
Lipitor in January 2005 and although my signs were not
completely gone, I got bad again, and returned to another doctor.

On February 22, 2005, I am scheduled for a carotid doppler test.
I came across this board last night. And didn’t take my Lipitor,
today, I don’t have the head pressure, and I am hoping my ear
pressure with noise will leave. I can’t sleep on my left side yet due
to the head pressure and I am hoping by me discontinuing Lipitor
that I will one day be able to lay on my left side again. I sure hope
that this solves my “mysterious” ailment. Either way, I shall
NEVER take a Lipitor pill again.
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 by asimgoldkarat14, #9194
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been taking Atorvastatin for five months, prescribed by the

hospital after I was hospitalized for three days following a minor
stroke. I was prescribed 20mg which I took for about three and a
half months. I felt dizzy a bit and believed this was side affects
from my stroke. My “cholesterol” was considered quite high.
I decided to cut down the dose to 10mg as I hate taking drugs of
any kind and a friend of mine who has low thyroid like me (we are
both on thyroxine) told me that she had been told that one should
not take statins with an underactive thyroid. This is why I reduced
the dose. Having found this website I am begining to realize that
the shoulder and neck pain that has developed over the last months
and also an increase in the dryness to my eyes and a swollen finger
joint - could all possibly be due to Atorvastatin. I have now
stopped taking the drug -- my shoulders are just beginning to feel
easier now, I await relief from my swollen painful finger -- will let
you know results.
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 by Guest, #9185
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I agree with the person below. Low thyroid function causes

elevated “cholesterol”. It’s no secret and has been a proven fact for
years, yet according to the American Association of
Endocrinologists, this fact is overlooked by physicians everyday.
And here is more! The people who suffer adverse side effects from
statins like Lipitor appear to be the ones with an underlying
metabolic problem, which was the cause for the high “cholesterol”
in the first place. Thyroid disorders are one of those problems. It’s
easy to check. A simple blood test is all. And it is easy to treat. One
simple pill a day replaces the mising thyroid hormone. Your
metabolism speeds up and your body burns off the excess
“cholesterol”. The statin drug companies will hate me for sharing
this. It is estimated that there are millions of Americans with
undiagnosed hypothyroidism.
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 by bobby, #9100
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Update on Post #8579. I have been off Lipitor seven weeks and my
symptoms have greatly improved. Saw the doctor yesterday and he
said it looks like it was the Lipitor causing my problems. However,
discovered my thyroid results warranted medication for the first
time. He said thyroid could cause some of the same type symptoms
and probably any remaining symptoms would now clear. The
thyroid problem could also cause an elevated “cholesterol”. We
will re-check me after I have been on the thyroid medication for
eight weeks to see what my “cholesterol” level is at that time.
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 by bsingleb, #9067
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am 65 years old and started taking Lipitor (10mg) in November

of 2003. Within days I strained my back doing something that
should not have had this kind of impact. It took months to recover
which was unusual for me. I should note that my lower back has
given me problems in the past but this one was the worst and took
the longest to heal. I also had the knee pain that many others have
reported but that subsided within a few months. In August of 2004
I had the worst lower back muscle spasms of my life and actually
ended up in hospital for two days as I could not move without my
back going into spasms. Muscle relaxants and anti-inflamatories
solved the spasms in a few days. Since then I have not been able
to get back to full strength in spite of physical therapy and
religiously following an exercise regimen. It seems that if I do
anything to put any strain on my back, it cannot handle it.
I am/have been, very active all my life and still play tennis and golf
regularly although I now question whether my back can stand up to
golf. I assume that Lipitor is the main culprit here as my back has
not responded to the exercise program. I see many other similar
cases on this web site but would be interested if anyone has had this
same experience.
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 by gilchrist, #9031
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I started taking Lipitor at the advice of my physcician even though

I had just lowered my high “cholesterol” to normal levels by diet
alone. Go figure. He said that new studies show that people with
diabetes should take it because they have an increased chance of
having a heart attack. I have diabetes but it is controlled by diet.
So I reluctantly started taking it. I took 10mg. At first, within a
week I developed a fever I could not explain. Although my doctor
said that Lipitor doesn’t cause fevers, the warning on the package
of the prescription said to stop taking it and consult your doctor if
you develop a fever after taking. Mine was getting up to 102
degrees for about four or five days. I quit taking Lipitor and my
fevers stopped. He accused me of “non-compliance” and told me
to start taking them at bedtime instead of daytime. I thought I’d try

again. No fevers, but I developed a severe neck pain on the left side
that felt like a tight band or chord from under my chin, where the
glands are, and it progressively over a few days moved down to my
underarm. It would start every morning as soon as I awoke. It felt
like any small movement really strained my muscles on that side of
my neck. Then around the same time, I developed a pain in my
knee. I thought I was just uncomfortable from our van and not
having enough room, but I never had the pain before taking Lipitor.
I also at the time developed an excruciating and debilitating pain in
my right arm. It got so severe that I could not even lift a piece of
paper without it hurting. I’d feel a sensation of burning as well as
muscle weakness and pain whenever I moved it just slightly.
I didn’t even imagine it was all from Lipitor. My salvation was that
I had forgotten to take it for about three nights in a row and to my
surprise, I stopped experiencing the pain I was having with my
neck, my knee and my arm! Then I decided to see if I could find
out if there were any dangers to taking Lipitor before I started
taking it again, and I found this site and read all the testimonials.
I am convinced now that Lipitor was causing my fevers, my pain
and is a very dangerous drug. I WILL NOT take it ever again.
Thanks to this site, we are all warned. Thank you, thank you, thank
you all for sharing your stories. And thanks to the creators of this
site for giving so many people the answers that will literally save
lives and change us all for the better.
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 by Guest, #8919
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I’m a 78-year old man, in very good shape for my age, was given
Lovastatin three months ago. I began to have severe foot, calf and
whole-leg cramps, left wrist and back pain. I had not had these
problems before. I cut the medicine in half for a couple of weeks,
then stopped it entirely a month ago. These symptoms have
improved greatly but I still have some of them and I’m afraid there
has been permanent damage. Has anyone else had these
symptoms?
Ray Mac.
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 by Guest, #8892
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Have been taking statins for ten plus years with side effects of
dizziness, flu-like symptoms and fatigue and attributed all to aging.
Started Lipitor three plus years ago and symptoms got worse, now
including knee pain, stiffness, loss of balance, difficulty walking
and slurred speech. Have seen numerous doctors who act as though
I’m just an hysterical female. They are right. These symptoms are
enough to scare anyone. Have stopped Lipitor for two months and
knee pain and most of stiffness is gone but not other symptoms. I’m
70 years old and have been active despite side effects until last
three years. Now find it difficult to walk and have fallen too many
times. No more statins for me but feel they have done irreparable
damage.
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 by dstevens, #8723
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I’m 62. I started using Lipitor April, 2004. About a month ago it
felt like I was losing my ability to walk and climb stairs. Left leg
was worse than right. Muscle and joint pain in lower back, arms
and legs. Even my toes and fingers ached! Sounds strange, but the
skin on my thighs became loose and flabby. My fingernails became
very dry and brittle. It even was uncomfortable for me to sit for any
length of time unless my feet were up. I saw a Lipitor ad on TV
last week that warned of unusual weakness. I searched the internet
for more info, found the NIH site, and I stopped the Lipitor on
December 20. I started doing some leg exercises and feel

improvement. I’ll notify my doctor of my decision to stop at my
next checkup in early January.
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 by kathleen, #8591
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am a 63 year old female who has taken Lipitor for three years.
Since I have arthritis in my right knee, I dismissed symptoms
starting last summer in my thumb. I had pain and gripping
problems, very difficult to lift anything. By first of October my left
knee became involved. Had minor popping in my ankle and left
knee until I turned over in bed one night and felt big pop in my
knee. Knee was sore and within about two weeks stiffness started
in both knees - so stiff after sitting that I have to stand for a few
minutes before walking. The stiffness in my knees became painful
and then my left hip developed sharp pain and some discomfort in
my back. Walked very slowly and stiffly, difficult to get out of car,
put on pantyhose, step in and out of shower, or lie on left side.
Started taking more ibuprofen and Aleve, using a tens unit, and
applying heat to both knees. Had some improvement but on
December 9, noticed my left leg was quite swollen from knee
down to ankle. Called doctor who said to quit taking Lipitor to see
if that was problem. Will be three weeks this Friday since I quit
taking Lipitor and I am experiencing a lot less stiffness in my
knees, less pain in my hip, but my left leg is still somewhat swollen.
I will see my doctor January 26 and get his verdict.
Wed, 29 Dec 2004 by bsingleb, #8579
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I thought this would be interesting for everyone to read. I went to

my dentist the other day for my checkup and he commented
“I see you’re no longer taking the Lipitor”. I was quite surprised

and wondered how he knew since I did stop taking it four months
ago because it left me in crippling muscle pain in my back and legs.
He said he could tell by looking at my gums - that they look much
healthier now. I never had any gum problems my entire life even
while taking Lipitor so I was surprised at this observation. It just
goes to show you how dangerous this drug is, that if it can be seen
in the gums this drug must affect the entire body whether you have
symptoms there or not and who knows what it’s silently doing to
you. The dentist commented that everyone that takes this drug
seems to get muscle pains and many are left crippled long after they
discontinue the drug and he wonders why doctors so blindly keep
prescribing this drug and why they keep advertising it on TV like
it’s candy.
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 by Guest, #8523
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Another side effect as well as muscle pain, difficulty walking etc...

is dry skin. I had such a dry itchy skin underneath my feet that the
skin was lifting up. Two months after stopping Lipitor my skin is
back to normal. Much less pain in the legs etc. This drug should be
taken off the market!!
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I see I am not alone. I took Lipitor for two years. Leg pain was
becoming unbearable. Having always been in the best of health,
the only thing I could attribute it to was the Lipitor. Doctor agreed
to take me off of it. After a week the leg pain subsided and I began
to feel normal. At my annual physical my doctor prescribed Zetia.
For five months I couldn’t bring myself to take the drug. Finally I
decided to give it a try. What a mistake. After fifty days of taking

it, I had unexplained pain in my teeth, then tiredness, and now the
pain in my right leg is so bad I can’t walk, sit and worst of all
sleeping is all but impossible. My doctor claims that this
particular drug is no worse than taking a sugar pill and produces no
side effects. I stopped the drug more than a week ago and little has
improved. Now I wonder if I’ll every get back to normal. I have
decided to not return to my doctor. I eat as healthy as I can, I’m not
over weight and it is increasingly apparent that the entire medical
profession is prescribing these drugs (all of my friends are on one
or the other, Lipitor/Zocor) without the least bit of concern for
those of us that can’t tolerate them. So finding a different doctor is
a waste of my time! I agree with others here, take charge of your
own heath. Your doctor’s advice may be the worst advice you can
get.
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 by hotr37, #8521
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I took Lipitor for six weeks. After five days I was catapulted into
a terrible depression. I reported it to the doctor who convinced me
to continue with the Lipitor although I decreased the dosage from
20mg to 10mg. After five weeks I developed severe leg muscle
pain. Four days later I discontinued the drug. Five months later I
am still disabled. I feel like I have no muscle control in my left leg
and foot and have severe knee pain. I also feel like my knee joint is
collapsing. My doctor refuses to believe that this is due to Lipitor
and has diagnosed me with fibromyalgia. Any hope that this is
going to get better?
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 by calamityjg, #8515
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been taking Lipitor for the past ten years or so. I never
thought that taking this medication would or could create so many
side effects until I started to read this site. I always thought, during
the past several years, that my muscle pains, headaches and other
unusual illnesses were related to something I did (by lifting heavy
boxes, turning too abruptly a certain way, etc.). In the past couple
of years, back pains and bowel pains have increased to the point
that it’s getting hard to stand for long periods at a time. I find
myself using any kind of heat to try and relieve the pain. Also,
someone on this site mentioned about not being able to sleep, well
I have been having problems sleeping and my doctor prescribed a
sleeping pill....hmmmmm! I wonder. After reading a lot of these
postings, I am thinking of getting off this medication and see what
will happen after a few days.
Blown Away
Canada
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 by quenouille, #8404
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Someone I know was on Lipitor for a year taking 10mg a day. He

is 40 years old. Prior to taking Lipitor he was in excellent health
with no medical problems. After two months on Lipitor he started
experiencing severe back, neck and leg pain and pain in the head
which he described as head fog. He reported this to his doctor who
couldn’t find anything wrong with him and his doctor, not making
any association with it being caused by the Lipitor, referred him to
a specialist. The specialist couldn’t find anything wrong with him
and he started going from specialist to specialist for nine months
for a total of six different doctors. None of them could find
anything wrong with him and none of them ever made the
association with Lipitor even though they all knew he was taking it.
From my own experience on Lipitor and all the problems it caused
me, I immediately made the association and told him to stop the
Lipitor. He was very skeptical about my advice since I have no
medical training whatsoever and six experts along with his own
doctor whom he highly trusts never said a word about Lipitor being
the possible cause. Anyway he followed my advice and to his
amazement the head fog immediately cleared up and his back,
neck, and leg pain is nowhere near what it was. His doctor said it
was impossible for Lipitor to be the cause as it has a proven safety
record and he never heard of such problems being caused by
Lipitor and told him he probably never had any problems to begin
with is the reason why he got relief and that he should just learn to
relax. This just goes to show you that only you are responsible for
your own health and you better do your own research before
blindly following professional advice as you will be the one to
suffer the consequences while the doctors just look the other way
denying everything as I found out for myself the hard way.
Sun, 5 Dec 2004 by Guest, #8261
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
My brother was on Lipitor for a few years. He ended up wearing a

brace in each leg and using a walker. He could not lift the left leg.
He has been off Lipitor now for two months. He no longer wears
the braces and he is now able to lift the left leg a little. He has
changed his diet to include walnuts, almonds, tea, spinach, chick
peas, olive oil, lentils, soup etc. He just had blood tests done and
his cholesterol is now NORMAL. No one needs this statin drug.
This is a KILLER drug!!!
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 by Guest, #8168
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I also strongly recommend what the post below says about good
disability insurance. It’s too late now for me to have taken such
excellent advice. I WAS a perfectly healthy 49 year old until I was
on this poison called Lipitor for three months. Now I got all kinds
of back and neck problems and getting out of bed can be very
difficult at times. Three months of Lipitor has aged me forty years.
I now feel like I’m ninety. I can’t believe the ignorance of the
medical profession to actually prescribe this drug after there’s been
so many reported problems with it and all the other statins. I only
wish I did my research before taking this drug instead of relying on
the so called expert advice of the doctor then I would not have been
in the position I am today and would have been perfectly healthy
instead. You have been warned.
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 by Guest, #8147
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
For those who choose to take Lipitor, I strongly recommend

good disability insurance before taking this drug or any other
“cholesterol” lowering medication.
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 by bobby, #8137
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Oh man. I am so glad I found this site. I started taking Lipitor a

year ago. About ten weeks ago I woke up with a back pain so bad
I couldn’t walk. My right side hurt from the bottom of my ribs all
the way down to my leg. I first went to a chiropractic doctor. He
adjusted my back, but my side and hip still hurt, so I went to my
doctor who said it’s not the Lipitor. I had a sonogram and a CT
scan. Nothing showed. I quit the Lipitor three days ago. The
chiropractic doctor has put me on a liver and gall bladder flush.
I wonder if anyone else has the hip, side and back pain. I wonder
if I’ll ever be able to walk or stand without pain. It hurts so bad to
lay down for more than a few hours, turning in bed is a real job.
I’m 51 and a grandmother of thirteen.
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 by msiodine, #8008
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Bad bad drug. Been on Lipitor for only four days at 20mg. Now I
can hardly walk. How can they even sell this damn drug? I think
it’s a money making machine As of today I will stop this
dangerous drug and go on a diet and exercise.
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 by tiborjr, #8002
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Can’t think straight; mumble my words; difficulty solving

problems; leg and back pains; no energy - my doctor can’t work
out why. I’ve been on 20mg Lipitor daily now for three years. Not
any more. Other minor things since going onto it - wobble when I
walk, lose balance, dry eyes, not interested in sex. Did I say minor?
After Lipitor guess what their next best seller is? Viagra. Funny
that.
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 by Guest, #7964
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Started taking Lipitor two months ago now I constantly have a high
pitched sound in my head (tinnitus). My hair seems to be thinning.
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 by Guest, #7928
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Feel like I’ve been hit by a truck. Been taking Lipitor for about
three months but like others only taking every other day. Will stop
taking the med immediately and see if there is a difference.
Tue, 9 Nov 2004 by mamarecal, #7822
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Last May I began taking Lipitor at the advice of my cardiologist.

He quickly had me ramp up to 40mg. By late July I was getting leg
cramps, dizziness and nausea. In September, I found this website
and decided to stop the Lipitor. Two weeks later the cramps and the
dizziness were 80% gone. Four weeks later I’m 100% free of the
cramps and the dizziness. Some nausea remains but is minor. I told
my cardiologist what I had done. He did not argue with me but
suggested that, when I’m free of all symptoms, I start again with
10mg. I don’t think so. Diet, supplements and exercise are the
answers from here on. If you’re on Lipitor and are having
problems, it might be wise to find a different remedy for your
cholesterol problem.
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 by captainken, #7667
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I read about a study where it was found that taking Lipitor every
other day was just as effective as taking it every day. So figuring
maybe the side-effects were from the dosage just being too high,
I decided last week to give it another try and to be even more
conservative and just take it twice a week. I took 10mg on Monday
and another 10 mg on Thursday and now my upper back and neck
pain is back again! That’s it for me. NO MORE LIPITOR! This
drug is just too dangerous!!! The doctors are really out of touch
with the reality of the situation. I reported it to my doctor and he
says I’m imagining things and it’s all in my head and says Lipitor
is so safe it should be in the drinking water supply and demanded

that I just keep taking it. I think it’s time to find a new doctor. This
drug will make you feel old very quickly.
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 by Guest, #7605
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I was placed on Lipitor in September 2003. I'm 52 years old and

185 lbs. Within a couple of months I slowly developed muscle
aches all over my body but mostly in my legs. By Christmas it
came to the point of waking me up at night with terrible leg pains
and strange tingling and burning in my left toes. If something
pressed against my leg at night, the spot was really sore in the
morning. I called my doctor in January 2004 and told him my
problems. He said to stop taking the Lipitor ASAP. So I decided to
take time off from drugs. Some of the pain began to subside, but I
was still feeling lingering aches and tingling after effects all
through the spring. My doctor insisted I go on a non-statin “Zetia”.
I started taking it late June and was on 10mg a day. In about three
weeks I was having clicking in my bones as I walked. My left knee
became so stiff and sore I could hardly walk across my driveway.
I really thought I had torn something this time. But then my right
knee started showing the same symptoms. Always considered in
good health, this was another warning sign. By September 6th
I stopped the Zetia. My knee has slowly come back to use again.
But I am left with random small muscle aches, tingling, small
pinpoints of pain all over. It comes in waves but mostly late
afternoon when I get run down. I am not sure if this is still left over
effects from the Lipitor or Zetia. I stopped having my couple of
glasses of wine at dinner each night to see if that would help. It did
reduce some of the effects by about 40-50% but not completely.
The last several days I have begun running and working out.
To date this has made the most improvement so far.
Sat, 16 Oct 2004 by Guest, #7491
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I”ve been on Lipitor at 20mg for several years. Because of arterio

diseases, my doctor upped me to 40mg. Within a week I began to
have a series of near seizure-like episodes wherein my right leg
collapsed. This lasted only seconds then, within a minute, a second
such seizure. I had four such incidents then it stopped for ten days,
then the same thing again. Additionally, I have had the right hand
go rather spastic on two occasions.There was no paralysis involved.
Because I had cardioangioplasty and a stent inserted at the
beginning of August, I thought it might be an after effect. This was
discounted by my cardiologist. In early July, my left carotid artery
totally occluded. My vascular surgeon was puzzled as to why this
happened because a year ago testing showed only 25% stenosis, but
doesn’t see any relationship to what may be neuro problems.
Today I took an EEG prior to seeing my neuro doctor tomorrow.
Only because I overheard a man and his wife talking at the
hospital yesterday, did the magic words come out about his having
the exact same symptoms as I have encountered. I’d never said a
word about my experiences until I heard him. His cardiologist had
taken him off Lipitor. Additionally, he noted a reddening of my skin
low on my forehead and recently I’ve had difficulty with pustules
breakout on my head. This gentleman had the same trouble. All
interesting. I’ve been at the Internet all day.
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 by lejacle, #7166
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I think I’ve taken my last Lipitor. It did help my “cholesterol”, but

after reading this site, I’m scared and off to the natural foods store
for remedies. Have been on 10mg Lipitor for over 1 1/2 years. I’ve
experienced some of the “usual” side effects - arthritic type pain in
gas, but chalked it up to getting older (I’m 54) and not exercising
as much as I should. But it’s the bruising that's really been a
problem. If my arm touches the inside of the kitchen cabinet while
reaching for a dish, I have a bruise on my arm. A slightly harder
bump and my skin is torn and I’m bleeding. My clotting times and
liver enzymes are normal and my doctor has no clue what’s
causing this. I never associated it with the Lipitor until I saw a
neighbor with the same red bruises up and down her arms, and she
said “Oh, it’s from my statin drug.” Then I realized that I never
experienced this problem until about the time I started on Lipitor.
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 by marshalynn, #6978
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
My husband was on Lipitor for about eight months. In that time his
personality was drastically altered. A very kind, loving, wonderful
husband and father turned into a monster. He began having temper
tantrums, was moody and suspicious, suffered muscle pain, and had
short term memory loss. He was no fun to be with. My daughter
broke my heart when she tearfully pleaded “I want my father back.”
We have you all to thank for getting him back! He would not
listen to any suggestion his medication might be affecting his
personality. So I printed out 25 pages from this web site and just
left them on the kitchen counter. Once he started reading, he could
not stop. He recognized himself and immediately cut all his pills in
half, weaned himself off Lipitor and now we are trying diet and
exercise. The husband and father we cherish is back!
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 by Guest, #6908
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Thanks to my wonderful husband I have stopped taking Lipitor

cold turkey! I have been in excruciating pain for the past couple of
months. Had no idea what was wrong with me. I went to my

doctor several times complaining about sleepless nights, blamed it
on menopause. Then swelling in my feet. Well, now I am at the
point of feeling like a cripple. I can’t get out of a chair without
severe pain, can barely walk down the hallway to the bedroom,
don’t even ask me how I do on stairs. It doesn’t stop! Even when
I am off my legs and laying in bed it kills me. My muscles in both
legs feel like they are on fire all the time, but if you touch my legs
you can’t feel the heat. I can’t sleep at all when I go to bed, I’m
awake about every two hours. If I take a pill to sleep I can get about
five hours straight sleep, if I’m lucky. My husband’s boss told him
to have me stop taking the Lipitor. Well I did two days ago. Oh,
did I mention the knife stabbing pains in my kidneys? Well, so far,
after two days the kidney pains have eased up. Now I hope the leg
pain will go away. My husband’s boss said it took about three
months for his to go away ...here’s hoping! I’ve been on Lipitor
for 2-3 years now. Not anymore.
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 by eweemyewok, #6862
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Have been on Lipitor for about 1-1/2 years at the 10mg level.
I started having cramps in my calves, stabbing pain about left hip,
numbness in left toes, weak left leg muscle and was starting to get
weak in my arms. Went off Lipitor about 10 days ago and hip pain
has just about gone. Leg muscle is about 50% better but now
numbness in toes has turned into a tingling feeling. My question is
how long does it take to overcome these side effects? Going to try
more exercise and 2,000mg of vitamin C to keep “cholesterol”
level low.
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 by Guest, #6477

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
My cardiologist prescribed Lipitor four years ago. It did lower my

“cholesterol” 30 points but I noticed some of the classic Lipitor
side effects. Intermittant dizziness, headaches and memory loss that
could have been due to high blood pressure, blood pressure
medications, internal chemical imbalance, anxiety, etc. No
conclusion. After six months or so I started having muscle spasms
and then loss of strength. After about year I couldn’t raise my arms
level or sleep in a bed. Anti-inflammatories and analgesics helped
but not enough. After several months of sleeping in a high backed
chair, I was desperate. My research found the cause could have
been the statin Lipitor, so I went off of them. The symptoms were
relieved and within two weeks they were mostly gone, except for
weakened muscles which have never fully recovered. So far that’s
classified as anecdotal. After a few weeks of relief, I went back on
Lipitor as a test. The symptoms returned immediately. When I
stopped, they were relieved again. Now that’s close to proof. Doc
prescribed another statin, Pravachol. It worked and I thought we
might have the answer. Several months later I developed tight
muscles in my neck which I did not relate to the statins. It was a
totally different muscle group. After a month or two of barely
controllable headaches and neck muscle pain, I tried going off the
Pravochol. Relief! Another on/off test gave me all the proof I
needed. I wrote my two doctors and told them I was off statins -
permanently. After the government issued the new overly
aggressive guidelines of “cholesterol under 100”, they wanted me
to try low dose Crestor every other day. After a while I started
getting similar symptoms and stopped statins forever. What is most
worrisome about all of this is the way the medical community is not
recognizing the seriousness of the statin problem. When
I challenged my cardiologist to report it to the FDA, he refused.
“It’s not clinically proven.” Otherwise he’s a good doctor, although
I’ve had to lecture him on the trade off between living longer at any
cost and the quality of that life. I turned 70 two months ago and
lead an active life.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
It’s been two months since getting rid of Lipitor “overnight” and
I could NOT be happier for doing so. I was only on it for four
months and feel that quitting it cold turkey was the best thing
I could do. I am practically pain free, except for the pre-existing
arthritis stuff that was beginning to bother me before my heart
attack six months ago. All of the horrible joint pain, muscle cramps,
anxiety, cramps, and (the worst of all) “random” shooting pains
throughout my body have ALL disappeared! I see that the airwaves
are FULL of ads now for Crestor. Looks like Lipitor has had
enough undercurrent of bad press to warrant the giant “Pharmcos”
try to sell us on that one again. They do well by them... they spent
720 billion on ad campaigns and the reports show that 1 in 8
actually DO “ask the doctor about it”. In my own humble
opinion... I don’t CARE if these drugs work fast or not. With the
side effects and mayhem they’re causing ....it’s ridiculous to say the
least! There are better ways of handling “cholesterol”.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been put on five different drugs for my “cholesterol”. I react

within a week of taking these. I wake at night with my hand
cramped and lose the power of my hand temporarily, then my feet
go ice cold, then I get great sharp pains in feet, aches in neck and
back. I stopped the statins right away and the doctor insisted that
I try another. Now I have said NO MORE. This has been over a
period of three years. I am shocked at the sudden and quick
problems of the drugs. I have stiff joints and swollen fingers since
the last trial. Any “cholesterol” lowering drug affects me. I keep
telling them I can not use statins and they say this is a new drug it
will be different. Nothing is different. I asked the doctor why they
do not try the natural route first?? He said “patients do not like the
side effects!!!!”
DO NOT TAKE THESE DRUGS...... TAKE CONTROL OF

YOUR HEALTH... DIET EXERCISE AND TAKE NATURAL
PRODUCTS
WE ARE NOT EXPERIMENTIAL OBJECTS FOR THE

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES...
THEY DO NOT HAVE OUR HEALTH AT HEART. IT IS ALL

ABOUT PROFITS AND MORE AND MORE MONEY!
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 by nulagh, #6436
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
After being on Lipitor for almost a year, I could barely walk from
my car into my office. My legs were incredibly weak. It was like
all the muscles had atrophied. I was 50 at the time, but felt like
I was 80. About 1 1/2 years later, my legs are still weak, but better.
(Then I was given the antibiotic Levaquin, and my knees almost
stopped working after 4 days on that medication.) I would not
recommend Lipitor and certainly not Levaquin, alone or in
combination with each other, especially if you have experienced
muscle pain or weakness with Lipitor!
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 by Guest, #6407
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I was taking Lipitor for one year. I began to fall and I couldn’t get
up. I was hospitalized and a neurological workup indicated that

I had fibromyolysis caused by Lipitor. I stopped taking Lipitor.
I was given a walker and sent for physical therapy. After many
sessions of being treated as if I was a stroke victim I was released
because I wasn’t making any progress. I spent three to four months
in the walker and six months with a cane. I was very active prior to
this, but it took a year to be able to walk without assistance. Three
years later I am about 85% recovered. I lift weights and walk about
three miles a day. I am thrilled, since I could not even lift my legs
initially. I still have weakness in my left leg and balance problems.
I want to get the word out. I have been interviewed on local
television twice. I would like to go national.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
38 year old male. Been taking Lipitor for about two years now for
high “cholesterol”, otherwise healthy. Experiencing occasional
cramping/muscle spasms in left forearm that sometimes cause my
hand to form a fist. Slight tremor in both hands. Also experiencing
lower back ache (again left side mostly) that is most apparent when
getting out of bed in the morning. Blurry vision. Tests performed
last year by a neurologist for the arm/hand cramping came back
negative. This site is truly a valuable resource, as I am stopping
Lipitor TODAY. Will follow up in a few months (or sooner if
symptoms change).
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 by Guest, #6281
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Phew! What a relief to find this board. Started on Lipitor a couple

of months ago to reduce “cholesterol”, I asked the doc if he knew
of any side effects before I took it and he said that no one he knew
on it had complained about any and he had a lot of patients on it.

Well Doc, I must be your first because from feeling great in a
matter of weeks I have calf muscle pain, flu like symptoms and a
headache now for two weeks with pain like a migraine at times.
My toes are always cold and tingly and I feel unwell all the time
and very tired. As my mum used to say, if the medication your
taking makes you feel worse, then stop taking it because the body
is trying to tell you something. I would rather die early from high
“cholesterol” than put up with this, so I will be stopping forthwith
and maybe someone had better let the makers of this drug know
what it is doing to people. I live in Australia by the way.
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 by Guest, #6072
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I was put on 20mg of Lipitor. In no time, I found that my knees hurt

me all the time. It got bad enough that it was painful for me to try
to get up stairs. My M.D. cut my dosage in half and my knees quit
hurting. I have heard so many horror stories about Lipitor... even
death because it affected the heart muscles. I’m considering using
Vitamin C therapy in replacement of Lipitor. I’m amazed that the
drug company hasn’t been required to list some of the side effects
that I’ve heard.
Sun, 6 Jun 2004 by Guest, #5972
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been taking Lipitor for approximately six months. Initially

on a 10mg dose, then on a 20mg dose for the last three months. My
doctor has now suggested a 40mg for the next six months as my
“cholesterol” levels haven’t come down enough. However, in the
last four weeks, I have been experiencing fairly bad joint pains in
my fingers and an arthritic like deformity to the pinkie finger on my
right hand. I have seen a hand surgeon about this and he diagnosed
osteoarthritis (an unusal, but not unheard of condition for someone
my age - 42). Is it possible that this has been caused by using
Lipitor? I have never had problems like this before and I am very
alarmed at the rapidity of its onset.
Mon, 17 May 2004 by Guest, #5671
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have been on Lipitor for several years. I am almost 60 years of

age, It is easy at my age to put “changes” in your physical being
down to “old” age. Could some or all of these changes be
symptoms of Lipitor damage? Gradually I seem to be losing the
ability to walk. My legs feel as if they are encased in cement.
Getting up from bed or a chair, I stumble around until my muscles
seem to get moving. Sometimes I seem to get vibrating spasms in
my legs. My whole body has become stiff. I walk from side to side
with my arms bent like a wooden soldier. I have lost my elasticity
of movement. My wife looking at me walking has wondered what
is wrong with me. Stepping up onto a step ladder one step at a time,
I feel like my legs are too weak to handle my body weight.
I thought it was due to my increased weight. I had not considered
that it was a breakdown of muscle caused by Lipitor. I continue to
go to the gym and do not think that my eating habits have changed
but I seem to be putting on more weight. I had a bit of arthritis in
my knees before Lipitor but it did not stop me from running for
miles. Now I find if I walk on the treadmill for a mile or two that I
am stiff and sore all day. I live with joint pain, muscle ache and a
weakness in my legs that makes getting up a real struggle. I put this
down to having put on weight but maybe I am putting on weight
because of Lipitor and that is causing the problem. I now seem to
have a perpetual nasal infection which I have been putting down to
the smog. My skin is so dry, at times, it hurts but I was putting it
down to the dryness of central heating in winter. I too have floaters
in my eyes but have been told they are common at my age whether
I was on Lipitor or not. Sometimes my vision is so blurry I have
great difficulty reading. I am also taking Cozaar, Allopurinol and
Gen-Doxazosin. I am looking at this web site because I am
worried. I will now see my doctor.
Sun, 16 May 2004 by Guest, #5666
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am going on a “mentally young” 54 year old female, but I feel

like I’m over 80 and hurt so bad I thought I should be dead, just that
someone forgot to throw the dirt on my grave. I have been
physically going downhill for the past four years with a variety of
ailments. Recently my best friend turned me on to this web site and
I could not believe what I read. I’m astounded that when my
symptoms first started my doctor of over 20 years didn’t take me
off right away. I made an appointment for a second opinion.
I definitely plan on quitting, but I want to be monitored. Besides
going through hair loss, my worst two symptoms are that my back
was hurting me so bad that I was desperate enough to go to a
chiropractor. I took the X-ray to the bone doctor and he claimed I
have scoliosis, and the second claims that it is arthritis. My spine
does have a distinct S curve to it. I’ve been going to physical
therapy for stretching exercises which I will probably have to
continue for the rest of my life just to try to keep the muscles
around my spine as strong as I possible can. The other major effect
is that my feet are going through something weird. It feels as if I
have silicone injection in my foot just before the toes on both feet.
Like walking on small water balloons. Then of course my hip is
killing me. When I try to sleep, it feels like there’s a railroad spike
in it. I just pray that when I do quit, these effects will disapear. But
after reading some of the other people’s messages, I’m afraid that
after four years, I’m screwed. Trust me though. If there is ever a
class action lawsuit I would be more than happy to jump on the
bandwagon. I’m in pain no matter if I stand, sit or sleep. An after

thought occurred to me. This is embarrasing but my bladder habits
have also changed. I haven’t had a full night sleep in years. I find
myself getting up at least two to three times in the middle of the
night just to go to the bathroom. Has anyone else had that problem?
Does anyone also know if there is something else one can do to
lower “cholesterol” level beside this hell?
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I was prescibed Lipitor and took it for four days and got the usual
leg pains and disorientation that many of you talk about. From that
point on my life has descended into hell. I had a month of daily
migraines (which I had not previously suffered from). I have severe
pain in my shoulders, arms, chest and back and sometimes feel as
though my skin is on fire. I am 55 and feel 85 to 90. I can no longer
pick things up that weigh more than five pounds, cannot walk more
than a couple of blocks (it feels as though my rib cage does not
expand) and can only drive about a mile before the dizziness and
muscle spasms start. The depression and tears at what feels like a
never ending condition is sometimes more than I can bear. It is
now eleven months since I am off Lipitor and I have yet to see any
improvement. I don’t know what is worse the pain or the
complacency of the medical community and their disbelief of our
suffering. At least this site tells me that I am not nuts but I am sorry
that so many of us are suffering.
Tue, 4 May 2004 by Guest, #5508
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am a 49 year old physically fit female who began taking Lipitor

around two years ago. I began having leg pain/cramps and went off
of them for two weeks or so. I have to admit I felt much better.
I went back on them for fear of having heart problems with high
“cholesterol”. Two weeks ago I started having severe pain in my
left leg/hip area running all the way down like muscle strains. I can
literally push on the muscle and it is so sore like someone has beat
me. I can’t lay on my left side anymore when sleeping. I think I am
going to go off of it again and if the pain subsides, find other ways
to lower the “cholesterol”. I am worried that this has caused some
type of muscle degeneration. I am also experiencing numbness in
my right hand more than ever. I am scared...
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Extreme swallowing/choking problem and extreme fatigue. I’ve

been taking Lipitor since it came out and have been on 20 mg per
day all this time. One time several years ago when I had a cough
my throat completely locked up and I couldn't breathe for what
seemed forever...VERY SCARY! It was never diagnosed.
I recently had my Lipitor raised to 40mg and immediately my
swallowing ability degraded. I had every test in the world and
nothing was found. I just got off the drug a few days ago and hope
to improve. Also I have experienced EXTREME FATIGUE!
If anyone has experienced similar symptoms please send me an
email.
Tue, 27 Apr 2004 by Guest, #5411
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I started with Lipitor around 1998 or 1999. Initially it was 10mg

and now it is 40mg. For the last year or so I have had constant
lower back pain. I thought perhaps that it was a gym injury but it
never heals. Also, I sometimes have aching joints and general
tiredness, along with tingling in the extremities and occasional toe

cramps. One thing that I have not seen anyone else mention is
tinnitus. One morning, about two years ago, I woke up and was
wondering what that noise was. Unfortunately, it is in my left ear.
Anyway, since there has been no family history of heart trouble
and, other than high “cholesterol” levels, my health at age 54 is
excellent. I have decided to stop the Lipitor. Hopefully, after a few
months my body will recover and start to feel “normal” again.
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 by Guest, #5174
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have had severe pain in my right hip-joint area and difficulty

sleeping on that side for several weeks now, and it is increasing in
intensity. I have experienced the “fog” that many have discussed as
well, leg and foot cramps are all too familiar as well as the
dizziness periodically! I had noticed increased stiffness upon
arising in the morning but attributed that to possible arthritis,
hmmm, now makes me wonder. I also thought the increased hair
loss (nothing creating baldness) that I found inconvenient, I feel
like a shedding dog, was from aging! After reading so many
comments about Lipitor, I am wondering if there is a link with this
medication. I do have one symptom I would like to inquire with
others about...I had a bout with Hemoptysis (bleeding lungs) and
recently nose bleeds, for no apparent reason other than minor
activity. Also I have a feeling of being “anxious” for no reason and
it is not a normal feeling for me to experience even during duress
circumstances. Are others experiencing similar reactions that may
be related to taking Lipitor?
Wed, 31 Mar 2004 by Guest, #5012
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am a 32 year old man who has been on Lipitor for over four years.
I recently went up to 40mg and I think it was a big mistake. Like
many others, when I was on 20mg I had some slight muscle
cramps, insomnia and back pain, but it was nothing compared to
what happened when I went to 40mg. My body now feels like a
train wreck. I have a strange tingling sensation in my feet, as well
as muscle cramps in my legs. This worries me because my feet and
sometimes my hands are always cold. It feels like almost my feet
are asleep all the time. My legs have a strange cramping/pulsating
feeling. I have a chest pain and stomach cramps as well. Plus I have
that wonderful dizzy feeling that many of you have also
complained about. I have stopped taking Lipitor for a week now,
but the symptoms remain. I am worried because I just want to feel
normal again. Can anyone who stopped taking Lipitor tell me if
these types of problems have gone away, and if so, how long it
took. On a side note, the chest pain I think is caused by gas. I have
taken a gas inhibitor which has seemed to help with the tightness in
the chest. I do tend to burp a lot though. I hope that this might help
for people who have had this side effect as well. I am father and a
husband who has no personal grudge against Lipitor or my doctor.
I have never posted to a board before and am not trying to sue
anybody. I just want to feel normal again. My wife thinks I am a
little bit crazy, and doesn’t understand how funky and bad I feel
now. She thinks that just stopping will make me better. I hope she
is right. When someone goes through this, it just wears on your
mentally as well as physically. I am off to see the doctor and I hope
that he will be able to help or tell me what to expect long term.
If I find any solutions, I will be sure to share. Thank you for
listening to my story.
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 by mpalmer7, #4978
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I started on 10mg of Lipitor a week ago. I have excellent

cholesterol” levels (total = 184; HDL = 77; LDL = 91), but because
I am a diabetic (I have been for 35 years), my physician suggested
that I begin taking the drug. I feel like I am hooked up to a
Diazepam IV!!! I am totally zoned out and have very little
energy...and I don’t really care if I get any of my work done or not
(not good!) The other thing that is driving me crazy is that I am
cold all the time. As I am typing this, it is 70 in the room and I have
on a turtle neck sweater, two sweat shirts (one with a hood that is
up), a pair of lined jeans, two pairs of socks, and down slippers...
and I am STILL cold. Has anyone experienced this side effect?
I don’t think that this drug is for me...
Sat, 20 Mar 2004 by Guest, #4857
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Lipitor - poison in disguise? I have been taking 10mg of Lipitor

daily for the past three months - but not anymore. It is an insidious
drug with side effects that crept up on me and left me in an
emotionally turbulent state. Blinding headaches, nausea, vertigo,
disorientation, memory loss, extremely dry eyes, pain and stiffness
in my neck and calf muscles, abominal pain and flatulence, and a
urinary tract infection. The local general practitioner (not the one
who initially prescribed the Lipitor) described my symptoms as
“too vague to diagnose”. It was this site that proved my turning
point. It was great to relate to so many similar case histories. I am
usually fit and healthy woman in my fifties who is keen to stop
anyone else going through what I have recently experienced.
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 by Guest, #4796
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am a 45 year old male in excellent health. Exercised daily and

went on 10mg of Lipitor five months ago because diet and exercise
were not lowering my “cholesterol” sufficiently. The Lipitor

lowered my “cholesterol” by 30% but I developed a sudden 90%
blockage in the left coronary artery which came close to causing
sudden death syndrome. I had an emergency stent put in yesterday
and I’m wondering if the Lipitor caused my blockage to occur by
loosening the plaque and allowing it to pool and cause the block-
age. The docs said my other arteries had 10% or less blockage.
Seems to me that Lipitor came close to killing me. Any others
develop blockage shortly after starting Lipitor?
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 by Guest, #4651
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I had two stents put in March, 2000. Arterial blockage 90%. Took
Lipitor for two months. Felt worse than before heart attack.
Discontinued Lipitor February, 2004. Still no improvements.
Muscle pain, weakness, spasms, buzzing in right leg. Can’t hold
arms or head up in vertical postion for two minutes without
extreme pain and weakness. Sitting or standing for ten minutes is
not possible due to back pain. Have to keep moving until
exhausted and then sleep. Use good diet and all the exercise I can
tolerate. I do NOT take any pain meds except aspirin or Tylenol.
This is crazy. I walked home from the hospital after the stents and
went downhill after taking Lipitor. Any advice will be appreciated.
Thank You
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 by Guest, #4545
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am 57 year old female. Five years ago my doctor put me on

Lipitor. From that time I had a burning sensation in my right foot
below the big toe on the ball. I was also getting cramps in my calf
muscles. It took me a year and a half to realize that it could be due
to Lipitor. So I stopped and started back twice to see what

happens. Everytime I stopped the burning sensation stopped but
that spot continued to be sore. Then I stopped it for good. But,
unfortunately Lipitor has done some permanant damage to my foot
as I still live with swelling and pain. Doctor still will not accept that
it is due to Lipitor, but I know for sure that is the culprit. They need
to do more studies on these statin drugs before they make the
patients guinea pigs!!
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 by br, #4527
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am a 52 year old man. I had another heart attack January 27, 2004.
Went to the hospital. The doctor put me on Lipitor. My hair was
always dark brown. Now it’s thinning out and turning grayer.
I ache all over like I have the flu. I stay dizzy, tired, short winded.
I coughed up blood for four days after I got home from the
hospital. I don’t want to be around nobody. The least little thing
pisses me off. I’m hurting more on my lower right side. I can’t
sleep. I just stay tired. Today is 2-13-04. I have never felt this bad
before. The doctor prescribed me Lipitor 80mg with 5 refills. I feel
worse now than before I went to the hospital. The doctor needs to
check into the symptoms of the medicine. I have dull headaches
and my eyes get blurry. I am not taking Lipitor no more.
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 by parker7101, #4515
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am 28 year old female with diabetes. My doc put me on Lipitor as

a preventive for my heart, as well as I do have slightly high
“cholesterol”. Within a week of starting the medication I developed
body aches like the worst flu you could imagine. The pain then
became intense in my right arm, but the triage nurse at my doctor’s
told me it was the flu and would last a few days, but I couldn’t
handle it and went to the ER, where they said it must be a virus
(fever of 102) and sent me home. The majority of the aches went
away, but my right arm remained a throbbing pain. I then
developed a bronchial virus, and the pain let up for a few weeks,
then all over, joints and muscles. Somedays I would cry all day-
no narcotics seem to help enough to make it worth taking them.
Finally, a month after starting the Lipitor, my doctor took me off,
“in case” it was that. Well, the first 2 days were better, then all the
weakness, fatigue, and aches came back. I could barely climb a set
of stairs, I’d be out of breath and my muscles would cramp like I’d
run five miles. I could no longer sleep at night, two to three hours
max. Finally was admitted to the hospital where a zillion tests were
done and nothing found to give a diagnosis, though mitochondrial
myopathy was mentioned, as well as mitochondrial encephalitis.
I can barely handle a day of a few errands, and have been out of
work for months. Sometimes I think my brain is fried, cuz I can’t
remember the simplest things, or I forget where I am or where I’m
going. Thank God I have wonderful friends to support me, and
Jesus Christ to lead me through. I pray that it goes away soon, as
the neurologist says it may, otherwise I think I’ll have to be put
on disability. I’ve also put on about thirty pounds due to the
exhaustion I guess, so much for those Pilates!
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 by allie214, #4508
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am (was) a healthy, very active 53 year old female who began

taking Lipitor on November 24th. After a week, I began to
experience muscle spasms in my legs and contacted my doctor.
She attributed it to panic. I had my husband take me to the
emergency room because I was frightened that I had MS, ALS
or some other “S”. All tests came back negative. I started
experiencing pain in my biceps, calves and eye. I was constantly
fatigued. My husband was talking with a friend who was having

similar side effects who eventually stopped taking Lipitor.
I happened to speak with a well respected orthopedic surgeon who
suggested that I go off Lipitor. I went to a neuro who said spasms
were benign. I have all sorts of tests (MRI, MRA, CAT scan,
cardio tests and numerous blood tests) all negative (CPK slightly
high soon after I stopped medications). I am off Lipitor for over a
month and began taking CoQ-10 (by the way Canadians patients
are told to take this with Lipitor). I am still having spasms in my
calves but energy seems to be back. I am documenting everything
I have been through in case of a class action suit and I suggest you
all do the same. If my symptoms are permanent my life is greatly
impacted. I am so angry at my doctors for not knowing all the side
effects of this drug.
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 by rsweeney, #4296
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I have had a macular hole and have been told by someone else who
had the same that it was a side effect of Lipitor. Had surgery and
survived the two-week face down position, but sight has not yet
returned. It is some better, but still very poor after two months. Also
had some tingling weak feelings in my hands, neck, back of the
head, and shoulders. From the minute I stopped taking Lipitor,
these symptoms completely disappeared.
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 by gale40, #4129
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I am so glad I decided to check out side effects for Lipitor. I was on

Lipitor for the past five years at the 10mg dose. I could not tell of
any side effects. But recently, my work performance was going
down, I was always a top performer. I could not remember things
that happened they made reference to at work. I also saw mistakes,

and did not correct them and wondered why things did not work
right. Also I have experienced loss of short term memory, my face
is swelled up and I was already losing hair, but now I think the
Lipitor may be responsible for the majority of the loss. My
stomach is always churning and making noises.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I was put on Lipitor because of a one time spike in my triglycerides.

It was only 10mg for three weeks. Within a week my ankles were
stiff and my feet heavy. I had cramps/pain in the legs. Within a
couple of weeks, I had pain in all my joints and muscles,
especially my legs. It has now been a year, and I’ve have been told
that if I don’t stop the process, I may not make it. All of my
muscles have atrophied to the point that I can hardly walk. My
spine is no longer being supported by my muscles, so I have three
torn disks. No one will address that problem because the muscles
are not strong enough to undergo even the most minor procedure.
In addition, my hips have separated as though I had been in an
accident. The only accident was taking Lipitor. I am desperate to
find some help. Time is running out. I am already on CoQ10 and
fish oil. If anyone can point me in the right direction, it would
greatly be appreciated. I have been to California with no help.
Please, please, please. I will do whatever necessary to stop this
horrific illness. It is beyond my imagination how they can get away
with passing these drugs out like candy. Help!
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 by Guest, #3777
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
My Doctor put me on Lipitor 20mg for a preventive maintenance.

I took it for about a month and my muscles and joins hurt so bad
I could hardly get out of bed come morning. I also came up with a
urinary tract infection. The doctor took me off the Lipitor for two
weeks and gave me medications for the infection. Two weeks later
infection was gone most of my pain was gone except for my knee
pain. He wanted me to try the Lipitor 20mg again saying that the
infection might have been the problem. I did four days and four
Lipitor 20mg tablets and I am in real pain and I have a urinary tract
infection again. He has taken me off the Lipitor and the infection
has cleared up, But my knees are still so painful. There are times I
don’t think I will be able to stand up. Will my knees ever get back
to normal? P.S. My doctor says the infection is not due to Lipitor
but can’t explain why I get it while I am taking the Lipitor.
Sat, 25 Oct 2003 by faye, #3690
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
My husband began taking Lipitor about six months ago and and has
experienced a dramatic change in his temperament. It is even scary
to me. We have been married a long time and I can notice it. He
doesn’t. It seems to affect him like I believe what the kids call
“speed”. Our life together has suffered because of this. I have
heard of other people that these drugs have affected. Please help
me. I’m at my wits end. As I have said, he cannot see the drastic
change and insists I want him to die with high “cholesterol”. Please
do not e-mail me back as it would cause a big uproar. If you could
just find some more research on this subject, I would be eternally
grateful. I will read it on this web site. Thank you.
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 by Guest, #3521
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I’m 48 and have been taking Lipitor for about two years. I can’t
remember phone numbers to dial them. I have to write everything

down the instant I hear it or I will forget it. Old neighborhoods
I haven’t been in for awhile (six months or more) don’t look
familiar at all. I started playing guitar four years ago. I find that
after practicing a ten to twenty note riff, fifty times in an hour’s
time, I will not remember how to play it the next time I pick up a
guitar. I can’t remember words to finish sentences or names of
familiar people, places and things. I lose my train of thought and
focus constantly. Any new exercise (i.e. normal extended walking,
biking) ends up in excruciating muscle pain. I also noticed I have
been getting depressed and agitated. After I noticed that my hair
was getting really thin I went to my doctor thinking I might have a
problem with my thyroid. He did some blood work and said he
couldn’t find anything wrong so I thought I was just getting old.
Can’t hurt to quit taking the Lipitor for a month to see what
happens.
Mon, 4 Aug 2003 by Guest, #3175
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
After taking 10 mg/day dose for one year, my physician increased

the dosage to 20mg/day. Over the next year, I began to lose short
term memory. This eventually became so acute, that I could not
even remember a phone number long enough to dial it. A minor calf
muscle strain became chronic, and never diminished, as though the
region was under constant tension. This was during a three month
period of relative inactivity, with the hopes of the cramp/strain
healing. A third “side-effect”, was the gradual despondency that
was subtle enough to avoid detection, till one day I realized I had
all the symptoms of mild depression. As a white 50 year old male,
with five siblings, none of whom have had histories of the
aforementioned complaints (side-effects), I found the cure (Lipitor)
was worse than the disease!
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 by Guest, #2032
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
If you have a story which you would like to share, please contact
the author via email to info@yourdoctorisaliar. com.
“Medical science acknowledges that despite scores of studies and

years of experience with a drug, when an individual takes a new
drug for the first time, it is an experiment of its own, and the
outcome cannot be forseen. It is a notoriously known fact that
drug company studies often fail to identify many common side
effects. Side effects that occur in one of every 1,000 patients are
often not identified in drug studies. When 20 million people are
taking the drug, it means that approximately 20,000 people are
sustaining the side effects. Why are doctors so resistant to
admitting that statins might have some adverse qualities?
My belief is that some doctors over-identify with their medications
and lapse into psychological denial when patients report side
effects. The integrity of the entire system depends on doctors
listening to their patients. The average doctor listens to patients
for only twenty-three seconds before interrupting them. All drugs
have unintended effects. Even the most beneficial drug can cause
harm in some people. This is basic medical science. Sixty to
seventy-five percent of people started on statins stop taking them.
The average patient lasts only eight months on statins. Why?
Side effects. These side effects may be considered minor by
doctors, but abdominal discomfort, muscle or joint pain, or
memory impairment are not minor to you. Moreover, in rare
cases, statins have caused death from acute muscle degeneration
or liver toxicity. There have also been thousands of reports of
serious cognitive and psychiatric problems that do not always
appear when statins are discontinued. And now we are hearing
about nerve injuries, sometimes severe and permanent, with
long-term statin use. All of this will worsen as doctors push
stronger statins indiscriminately. There are no guarantees with
any drug. Just because a drug is safe for most people does not
mean that it will be safe for you. And although you may take a
drug for years, problems can still develop unexpectedly.”
Jay S. Cohen, M.D.

“Any drug, no matter how trivial its therapeutic actions, has the
potential to do harm.”
Goodman and Gilman’s
Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics
“The practical size of pre-marketing clinical trials means that we

cannot learn everything about the safety of a drug before we
approve it. Therefore, a degree of uncertainty always exists about
the risk of drugs.”
The U.S. FDA
2002 Report to the Nation
“The sad truth is that, even after all the clinical development that
occurs with every drug and even after drugs have been approved
for a time, we only have a crude idea of what they do in people.”
Dr. Janet Woodcock, Director
The FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
“What irks me, is it’s important to know all sides of the equation,
and nobody’s paying attention to the toxic side of the equation.”
Dr. Paul Phillips, M.D.
(Cardiologist)
“An unexplained disturbing event must be taken as the

equivalent of a yellow traffic light: as a signal to proceed with
caution and be prepared to stop. If the patient thinks the drug
has caused the problem, it very often has. Patients should be
routinely asked for their opinion.”
Dr. Andrew Herxheimer
The Cochrane Center (Britain)
Chapter 12
A New Theory
For The Causation
of Heart Disease
in Human Beings
IT’S A JOKE...
At an out of town medical convention which both

were attending, a male doctor introduced him-
self to a female doctor. He asked her to din-
ner and they went to a very nice restaurant.
Before, and after dinner, she made it a point to
visit the ladies room in order to wash her hands.
The dinner was wonderful, so she invited him
back to her hotel room. When they got there, she
again went to the bathroom to wash her hands.
They made love and afterwards, she washed her
hands again. The male doctor finally said,
“I wonder. Are you a surgeon?”
“Why yes,” she replied. “How did you know?”
“Well, you sure do wash your hands a lot.”
“True. Let me guess also. I bet that you are an

anesthesiologist.”
“You’re right. How did you know?”
“I didn’t feel a thing!”

I do hereby present, for all in the world to hear,

a new and highly plausible theory regarding the root CAUSE
of cardiovascular diseases that disproportionately affect those
people who live in “civilized” Western cultures.
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IS CAUSED BY:
THE (SAD) STANDARD AMERICAN DIET
WHICH CONTAINS...
TOO MUCH...
PROCESSED OIL,
and
SUGAR,
and
NOT ENOUGH ...

VITAMIN C,
CHOLESTEROL,
PROTEIN,
(especially collagen & elastin)
and
COPPER
(and other minerals).
The evidence in the scientific literature for a CAUSAL link

between heart disease and the over consumption of PROCESSED
OILS and SUGAR and the underconsumption of VITAMIN C,
CHOLESTEROL, PROTEIN (collagen & elastin) and
COPPER is already very very substantial.
I believe that it is time for some self-answering, rhetorical

questions.
Q. How much PROCESSED OIL does the average

American consume?
A. WAY TOO MUCH! The point is simple. You don’t even

realize that you are eating these toxic foods! You think that
you are “eating healthy” by avoiding the fats and oils that
Mother Nature has provided in the foods that human beings
have consumed for thousands, even millions of years. You
think that you are “eating healthy” by replacing Mother
Nature’s foods with man-made, processed, concentrated
fats such as margarine, refined vegetable oil and even fake
fats that are actually made from sugar. You may have
heard of trans fatty acids and the health problems that they
cause in all who consume them, but you have absolutely
no idea how much of these destructive compounds you
consume every day. Your refrigerator is full of these toxic
compounds. So is your pantry. And so is practically every
food that you purchase at your favorite restaurant, not to
mention your favorite fast food restaurant! On a pound for
pound basis, no civilization in the history of the earth has
ever consumed dangerous artificial chemicals in nearly the
amount that Americans consume every day in the form of
trans fatty acids from partially hydrogenated vegetable oil.
And your children consume more than you! The scope of
this health disaster is enormous. Like the iceberg that
struck the Titanic, this health catastrophe is barely
recognized by the average person, and the vast majority of
its total impact is hidden below the surface. Of this there
is absolutely no doubt in my mind: Processed oils have
poisoned three generations of Americans into their early
graves! Please read the next chapter so that you can begin
to learn more about this amazing health disaster.
These toxic compounds are in every cell of your body.
You MUST stop adding in more before it is too late!
Q. How much SUGAR does the average American

consume?
A. WAY TOO MUCH! To the tune of nearly 150 pounds per

year! Instead of eating 150 pounds of non-nutritious
SUGAR, what if people consumed 150 pounds of
nutrients that were necessary for life? The chapter after the
next one will go into very specific evidence that sugar,
and processed foods that contain mostly sugar are the
most accurate “risk factor” for heart disease, and they
are actually one of the major CAUSES of heart disease
itself!
Q. How much VITAMIN C does the average American

consume?
A. NOWHERE NEAR ENOUGH!! The average American

consumes just 50 mg per day. This “average” is barely
enough to prevent outright scurvy, but not nearly enough
to maintain collagen connective tissue throughout the
body. Please realize that the overall average includes
the consumption of Vitamin C by people like the author
who consumes vastly larger quantities than the rest of the
population which certainly skews the overall average, so
the true average is far less than one might think.
Q. How much CHOLESTEROL does the average

American consume?

consumes approximately 500 mg per day in a feeble
attempt to maintain a whole body supply of approximately
150,000 mg. Why don’t you consume more? Because your
doctor told you not to? The simple fact that the human
body produces large amounts of CHOLESTEROL and
then converts it into so many compounds that are all vital
for life should be enough, in and of itself, to put and end
to the lunacy of the fallacious health benefits that the
medical and pharmaceutical industries have claimed for
their drugs that lower “cholesterol”.
The fact that the body has the genetic programming to

perform chemical magic by manufacturing a complex
compound such as CHOLESTEROL implies that it is
doing so for a reason!
Just for a few minutes, take a different perspective.

Just because the human body is able to manufacture
CHOLESTEROL from excess fats, carbohydrates, protein
and alcohol does not mean that it should be forced to
struggle to do so. As you have seen in previous chapters,
CHOLESTEROL is absolutely necessary for human life.
Why not accept this fact and ease the burden on the body
by providing the pre-made CHOLESTEROL directly in the
diet?
Would you expect the skilled bricklayer that you hired to

pave your driveway to also manufacture the paving blocks
that they are installing while you were waiting to pull into
your garage?
Would you expect the carpenters that you hired to board up

your windows to cut down the trees and manufacture the
plywood that they are using to protect your house while the
hurricane is about to hit?
Would you expect the chef at your favorite restaurant to go

out and actually catch the fish and grow the broccoli that
you ordered while you were eating your appetizers and
waiting for dinner?
Would you expect the AAA driver to dig a well and refine
some crude oil into gasoline while your car is stuck on the
side of the road in the middle of nowhere?
So why is it so hard for doctors to realize, accept and admit

that the body needs CHOLESTEROL. It is abundantly
clear that the body makes it. It is abundantly clear that the
body needs it! Why not provide more of it in the diet in its
naturally occurring and ready made form?
Q. How much PROTEIN, especially collagen & elastin,

does the average American consume?

obtains less than 12% of their caloric intake in the form of
protein. Despite the efforts of the proponents of The
Atkins Diet, The Paleo Diet, The Zone Diet, The Protein
Power Diet, The South Beach Diet and countless others,
Americans are still addicted to sugar. Most nutritional
textbooks clearly state that carbohydrates are NOT
ESSENTIAL for human survival because the body can
manufacture most sugars on an as needed basis from other
compounds. Those same textbooks also clearly state that
the building blocks of protein, known as amino acids,
ARE ESSENTIAL FOR LIFE. Our Paleolithic ancestors
were hunter-gatherers who consumed 30+% of their
calories in the form of protein and they did not suffer from
the diseases that plague modern, civilized humans, such as
heart disease, cancer, arthritis, and diabetes. The
government tells you to make these essential proteins be
only 15% of your diet. The government also tells you to

make the NON-essential carbohydrates 55% (or more) of
your diet. Are you unable to see the obvious? How can it
make sense to consume more of something that is not
necessary for survival while you are consuming less of
something that is essential?
Q. How much COPPER does the average American

consume?
A. I challenge you to name one food that supplies large

amounts of copper in YOUR diet! For decades, scientists
have known that copper is a nutrient that is necessary for
life, and is especially vital for the health of the
cardiovascular system and yet, practically no one has any
idea of which foods they should eat in order to get
adequate levels of copper in their diet.
Just a few of the symptoms that are known to be caused by

a deficiency of copper include...
• Cardiovascular disease
• Elevated “cholesterol” levels
• Aortic aneurism (burst blood vessels)
• Cerebral aneurism (hemorrhagic stroke)
• Irregular heart rhythms
• Increased blood pressure
• Thrombosis
• Iron-deficiency anemia
(copper is needed for iron absorption and usage)
• Hemorrhoids
• Increased uric acid levels
• Reduced thyroid function
• Skeletal defects
• Impaired glucose tolerance
• Poor nerve conductivity

• Reproductive failure
• Defects in pigmentation and structure of hair
• Weakened immunity including:
Reduced cellular immune response
Reduced white blood cell activity
Reduced thymus hormone production
I will ask you again: How many foods do you eat on a regular basis
that provide YOUR body with adequate levels of copper?
How much copper have you eaten today?
Every human being is different. A nutritional deficiency will

manifest differently in different people, precisely because they are
different. A copper deficiency will manifest itself as immune
disfunction in one person, as bone loss in another person and as a
hemorrhaging cerebral artery that leads to a stroke and paralysis in
yet another person. The pathetic little minds of most medical
doctors are unable to link these seemingly different manifestations
to a single CAUSE, simply because they do not think in terms of
eliminating CAUSES. They only think in terms of treating
symptoms. Obviously the symptoms that result after a
hemorrhagic stroke are different than the symptoms of bone
degradation or immune disfunction, but the underlying CAUSE
can be one and the same thing.
Your body does not need nearly as much PROCESSED OIL and
SUGAR as you have been feeding it. I suggest that you cut back
on your consumption of these processed poisons.
Your body needs far more VITAMIN C, PROTEIN (COLLAGEN

and ELASTIN) and COPPER than your diet has been providing.
I suggest that you eat a lot more foods that contain these nutrients
and see what happens. There is no harm in eating foods that
contain these nutrients. There is great harm that can come to you
if you do not. Ignorance of basic nutritional needs strikes nearly
half of our population dead in the form of heart disease.
I would like to ask you a simple question. If doctors are so

smart, if they are right and their recommendations are correct,
then why do more than 750,000 people still die from
cardiovascular disease each and every year?
Doctors do not want you to know how to properly feed your body
to maintain your health because, if you did, they would be out of
work. If I am right, and all you have to do to limit your risk and
improve your health is to make a few dietary changes, then the
next time you see your cardiologist may very well be as you drive
past the unemployment line and see them going inside to apply for
benefits because their services are no longer needed.
Eat the food you need to maintain your cardiovascular system and
enjoy the good health and longevity that comes with the proper
knowledge and the proper action. It’s wise, it’s inexpensive and it’s
easy, but it’s up to you.
I suggest that you read the remaining chapters of this book and as
many of the books listed in the last chapter as you possibly can.
I suggest that you learn more about the dangers of drugs, processed
oils and concentrated sugars. The truth will shock you.
I suggest that you ignore your doctor’s lies because...

Chapter 13
Deep Fried Death

IT’S A JOKE...
Three doctors died in an automobile accident and

are met by St. Peter at the Pearly Gates. St. Peter
asks all three doctors to describe the good deeds
that they did while on earth.
The first doctor replied, “I worked in Africa

helping to feed and care for starving villagers.”
St. Peter replied, “We certainly have a room for

you here in heaven. You may pass through the
Pearly Gates.”
The second doctor said, “I worked for a

non-profit children’s hospital in the slums of the
inner city.”

you here in heaven. You may pass through the
Pearly Gates.”
The third doctor proclaimed proudly, “I was the

CEO of the world’s largest HMO.”

you here in heaven. You may pass through
the Pearly Gates. BUT, there will be a $50
co-payment, $5,000 deductable and you can only
stay for a week!”
To me, the following is obviously, absolutely absurd.
But yet, YOU do this every day!
Recipe for a heart attack...
Start with some kind of food that naturally has a lot of oil in it such
as peanuts, soybeans, corn, rapeseed (canola), sunflower, safflower,
cottonseed, coconut, palm, etc.
Step #1:
Get someone to mash or grind the original food for you.
Step #2:
Have them cook the original food long enough to break
down its cellular structure. This may take at least a couple
of hours and temperatures in excess of 250oF.
Step #3:
With a screw-like auger press, have them place the raw
material under incredibly high pressure in order to squeeze
out as much oil as possible from the raw material.
The pressure within the machinery itself generates
temperatures that can rise up to 185o - 200oF.
Step #4:
Make sure that they expose the raw material to air in order
to increase the rate of oxidation. Remember that
oxidation occurs approximately 100 times as rapidly at
these elevated temperatures as it occurs at room
temperature.
Step #5:
To get any remaining oil out of the raw material, have
them mix it with a gasoline-like substance (hexane or
heptane) that acts as a solvent to dissolve more oil away
from the remaining raw material at temperatures ranging
from 130o - 150oF.
Step #6:
Have them heat this oil to temperatures above 300oF in
order to evaporate most, but not necessarily all of the
solvent (heptane or hexane). Have them do this very
carefully, since these chemicals are quite explosive.
Step #7:
Remove as many of the remaining nutrients as possible.
They can use phosphoric acid to remove nearly all of the
phospholipids (lecithin), protein, polysaccharides,
calcium, magnesium, iron, copper and other nutrients.
Step #8:
Have them remove as many of the free fatty acids as
possible. Do this by mixing the oil with an extremely
corrosive alkaline material such as caustic soda (NaOH,
sodium hydroxide, which is the main active ingredient in
Drano) and then have them agitate the mixture until the
free fatty acids form “soaps” with the sodium hydroxide so
that they can be “cleaned” away.
Step #9:
Have them use acid-treated activated clays to bleach out
any remaining pigments (chlorophyll and beta-carotene).
This takes about 15 to 30 minutes at temperatures of 230oF.
Remember that this “bleaching” process creates large
amounts of toxic peroxide compounds.
Step #10:
Have them also remove any aromatic properties of the oil.
They can do this de-odorization by distilling the oil under
high pressure and temperatures of 460o - 520oF for thirty
to sixty minutes. This helps to remove aromatic
compounds that gave the original oil its natural smell and
flavor. Be sure that they also remove as much vitamin E as
possible. At these temperatures, numerous toxins are
formed when fatty acids are cross-linked to each other to
produce polymers that are similar to plastics and
vulcanized rubber.
Step #11:
Have them add methyl silicone to the processed oil so that
it is less likely to become “foamy”.
Step #12:
To ensure a long shelf-life, have them add synthetic
preservatives to the oil, such as butylated hydroxytoluene
(BHT), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), propyl gallate
(PG), tertiary butyl hydroquinone (TBHQ) and others.
At this point, if you wish, you can eat this tasteless, odorless and
nutrient depleted “food product” that is the end result of the twelve
steps detailed above. If you dare!
Are you saying to yourself...
“No way! That sounds gross! And deadly! Why would I ever want
to eat that?”
This obviously depleted, dead and toxic “product” is none other

than refined vegetable oil. Corn oil. Canola oil. Soybean oil.
Cottonseed oil. Even olive oil! Most likely, you have a bottle of
these poisons in your kitchen. Most definitely, you have products

in your home that contain these ungodly artificial substances.
I can’t even begin to count the number of people who have
PROUDLY told me that “They eat healthy!” but yet they have a
kitchen full of products that are laced with toxic, refined vegetable
oils.
Have you fallen victim to the marketing hype? Do you avoid

naturally occurring fats and oils and consume these so-called “heart
healthy” processed vegetable oils instead? Do you use processed
oils because you foolishly believe the medical “authorities” who
have proclaimed that these artificial “products” are “healthier” for
you than the oils that are found naturally in fresh, whole,
unprocessed and unroasted seeds and nuts? Do you use margarine
and shortening because “they” said that you should use these
artificial foods instead of butter?
Sucker!
Have you fooled yourself into believing that you “eat healthy”
because you shop at a “natural foods” store? Do you only purchase
oil that has been “cold-pressed”? Please realize that there is
no legal definition of the term “cold-pressed”! The term
“cold-pressed” only means that the manufacturer didn’t add any
heat during the “pressing” of the oil. Manufacturers can abuse
natural oils by performing all of the above steps of the “refining”
process and still label their product as “cold-pressed” simply
because there is no law that prevents them from doing so.
If you prefer an even more deadly, greater heart attack producing

“product”, you may continue with one more step...
Step #13:
Have someone place the oil under pressure and add in
hydrogen gas at temperatures that range from 250o - 410oF
along with some type of metal (usually nickel, but they
may also use “Raney’s Nickel” which is 50% nickel and
50% aluminum). Have them do this for six to eight hours.
Make sure that some of the nickel and aluminum remain in
the oil.
You now have the “dream product”! An unspoilable product with

a shelf life of practically forever. This nightmare product has a
plastic, spreadable consistency that helps to “improve” the texture
and “mouth feel” of literally thousands of manufactured products.
What is this “nightmare” product?
Hydrogenated or Partially Hydrogenated oil!
Judging from both food data and turn-of-the-century cookbooks,

the American diet in 1900 was a rich one—with at least 35 to 40
percent of calories coming from fats, mostly dairy fats in the form
of butter, cream, whole raw milk, and eggs. Salad dressing recipes
usually called for egg yolks or cream; only occasionally for olive
oil. Lard or tallow served for frying; rich dishes like head cheese
and scrapple contributed additional saturated fats during an era
when cancer and heart disease were rare. Today, everyone “knows”
that vegetable oils are “healthier” than animal fats, but the only
reason that everyone “knows” this is simply because the
advertising and marketing forces in America have claimed this to
be true. It isn’t true! The research shows exactly the opposite to
be true. Is this hard to believe? Please re-read the steps that are
involved in refining vegetable oils. Please use your common sense.
How can anything that has been put through the thirteen steps
listed above be good for you? The increase in the consumption of
processed vegetable oils, whether we consume “vegetable oil”,
“partially hydrogenated vegetable oil”, completely “hydrogenated

vegetable oil”, shortening or margarine, directly parallels the
increase in heart disease rates in the 1900s.
“I began my practice as a cardiologist in 1921 and I never saw a

Myocardial Infarction patient until 1928. Back in the MI free
days before 1920, the fats were butter and lard and I think that we
would all benefit from the kind of diet that we had at a time when
no one had ever heard the words corn oil.”
Dr. Dudley White
Prior to 1900, heart attacks were virtually unknown. They did

occur, but very, very rarely. The technology by which liquid
vegetable oils could be hardened to make margarine was first
discovered by a French chemist named Sabatier. Subsequently, the
British chemist Norman developed the first application of
hydrogenation to food oils and took out a patent. In 1909, Procter
& Gamble acquired the U.S. rights to the British patent that made
liquid oils solid at room temperature. The process was used on
cottonseed oil and lard, not to improve their nutritional value, but
to give them better physical properties. The result is a fat that has
a spreadable, “plastic” consistancy that is also less likely to melt in
warmer weather. Prior to the process of refrigeration (which is so
very common today), this was seen as quite a convenience. Crisco
vegetable shortening, which was, and still is, marketed as a cheap
replacement for butter, went on sale in 1911. It, and other artificial
shortenings, have been shortening the lives of millions of
Americans ever since!
After the second world war, “improvements” made it possible to

plasticize highly unsaturated oils from corn and soybeans. New
catalysts allowed processors to “selectively hydrogenate” the kinds
of fatty acids found in soy and canola oils. Called “partial
hydrogenation”, the new method spurred a tremendous rise in

soybean production, from virtually nothing in 1900 to 70 million
tons in 1970, surpassing even corn production. Today soybean oil
dominates the market and is used in almost eighty percent of all
hydrogenated oils. The particular mix of fatty acids in soybean oil
results in shortening that contains about 40% trans fatty acids.
Canola oil (Canadian Oil), which is processed from a hybrid form
of rape seed, is another commonly hydrogenated oil. After
hydrogenation, canola oil can contain as much as 50% trans fatty
acids.
“My pet name for canola oil is ‘can-ugly’ oil. Since canola oil is
a completely contrived substance, I thought it should have a
ridiculous name. The modern methods for processing canola oil
are what make it ugly. The canola oil found on supermarket
shelves has been refined, heated, and damaged beyond repair. Be
aware of the dangers of using canola oil. I have to be as vocal as
I can in encouraging people to avoid eating this damaging
product. Even some of the most sophisticated health writers still
report about this product as if it were healthful, while nothing
could be further from the truth.”
Fred Pescatore, M.D.
Author of “The Hamptons Diet”
During the 20th century, as heart disease rates were increasing,

the consumption of butter dramatically DECREASED. During the
same period, the consumption of margarine, shortening and
vegetable oil dramatically INCREASED. Please take a look at the
charts on the next few pages that clearly show this information.
358
Grams of fat / per person / per day Grams of fat / per person / per day
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1909-1913 1909-1913 35
1925-1929 1925-1929
1935-1939 1935-1939
1947-1949 1947-1949
Butter
1957-1959 1957-1959
Margarine
1967-1969 1967-1969
1975 1975
1985 1985
www.yourdoctorisaliar.com
Grams of fat / per person / per day Grams of fat / per person / per day
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1909-1913 1909-1913
Your Doctor is a Liar!
1925-1929 1925-1929
1935-1939 1935-1939
1947-1949 1947-1949
1957-1959 1957-1959
Shortening
Vegetable Oil
1967-1969 1967-1969
1975 1975
1985 1985
359
So why does the AHA tell you to eat margarine and vegetable oils
instead of butter and animal foods? Why do foods such as non-
dairy creamers and artificial egg substitutes even exist? And why
hasn’t your doctor told you that scientists have determined that
more than 60% of the deposits found in blocked coronary arteries
are actually the types of fatty acids that are found in refined
vegetable oils, not the saturated fats found in animal foods?
Why? Because...
The American public has been lied to. For decades we have been
told to avoid naturally occurring oils found in seeds, nuts, meat,
eggs and dairy products, especially butter. We have been told to eat
man-made, artificially manufactured oils and hydrogenated
margarine and shortening. Did you forget the thirteen steps that
were listed above? Here’s a quick review...
“Oil bearing materials are ground, steam cooked then mixed with
a solvent (of a petroleum base) which dissolves out the oils,
leaving a dry residue. It is quick and cheap. But...
most commonly used solvents are light petroleum fractions,
naptha, pentane, heptane, hexane and octane types. Often,
a synthetic trichlorethylene (found in gasoline) is used.
Furthermore, it is suspected that some of the chemical solvent
remains in the oil and this is objectionable for natural health.
This may help retard rancidity of the oil, but it makes it an
unhealthy, chemicalized, adulterated product that is to be
shunned by the seeker of natural health.”
Carlson Wade
Author of “Fats, Oils and Cholesterol”
Do you think that you might be able to get away with eating “just
a little”? Think again!! Approximately 25%-37% of the trans
fatty acids in the American diet are consumed in the form of
shortening and margarine. The remainder of these harmful fats are
lurking in processed “foods”. Food manufacturers add these
nightmare artificial fats and oils to everything under the sun...
Bread Nacho Chips
Cake Non-dairy Creamer
Cereals Pancakes
Chocolate Pasta Sauce
Cookies Peanut Butter
Crackers Potato Chips
Donuts Popcorn
Energy Bars Pretzels
Hot Dogs Protein Drinks
Ice Cream Roasted Nuts
Imitation Cheese Salad Dressing
Imitation Eggs Sour Cream
Instant Rice Soy Products
Ketchup Tortillas
Mayonaise Toaster Pastries
Muffins Waffles
And restaurants (fast-food and sit down) use it to deep-fry anything
and everything.
French Fries/Hash Browns Fried Chicken

Fried Apple Pie Fried Jalepenos
Fried Clams Fried Mozzarella
Fried Eggs Fried Shrimp
Fried Fish Fried Zucchini
Refined vegetable oils are currently added into enough

products that they have become the #1 artificial substance in
the entire American Diet. YOUR DIET!!
Put this book down. Go into your kitchen. Pick up a package

of manufactured “food”. Look at the list of ingredients.
The odds are extremely good that some form of processed
vegetable oil is listed as one of the main ingredients.
Do you still think that you “eat healthy”?
“When you eat foods containing hydrogenated and partially

hydrogenated fats they disrupt normal fatty acid metabolism in
your body. These are oils that have usually been synthetically
manipulated and interfere drastically with your health and
should be avoided. They use up enzymes that normally would be
utilized by the good oils, and prevent your body from creating
quality cell membranes and nerve sheaths. A recent clinical study
in Canada demonstrated that the metabolism of good oils into
substances needed by the body was completely blocked when the
people in the study were given hydrogenated or partially
hydrogenated oils. This means that the margarine you have been
eating instead of butter is probably doing you more harm than
good. Therefore, read the labels on everything that you buy.
You may be surprised to see just how many of the foods you eat
contain hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oils or fats. Any
time you see hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oils or fats,
put that food back on the shelf and do not buy it. ”
James L. Wilson, N.D., D.C., Ph.D.
Author of “Adrenal Fatigue”
Did anyone notice this insanity? In fact, Dr. Ancel Keys originally
claimed that partially hydrogenated vegetable oils with their trans
fatty acids were the culprits in heart disease. In a 1956 paper,
Keys suggested that the increasing use of hydrogenated vegetable
oils might be the underlying cause of the cardiovascular disease
epidemic. The edible oils industry was very swift in their
squelching of that information; they shifted the emphasis to

saturated fat and started the phony attack on animal fats from meat,
dairy products and tropical oils such as coconut and palm oil.
“Exclude trans fatty acids. This is a primary dictate of

‘The Hamptons Diet’. These man-made molecules, produced
during the hydrogenation of vegetable oil, are the most
dangerous fats in our diet. The largest offender in this category
is margarine. Studies show that people who consume large
amounts of trans fatty acids in their diet will more than double
their heart disease risk. You should avoid trans fatty acids at all
costs, but that’s harder than you think, considering that they’re
found in more than 42,000 foods in the United States alone.
Given the standard American diet, it’s likely that trans fat intake
hovers around 40 grams per day, with fast-food and junk-food
eaters ingesting much more. So, go immediately to your
cupboard and look at every canned, bagged or boxed food, then
throw away anything that has the words partially hydrogenated
or vegetable shortening listed in the ingredients.”
Fred Pescatore, M.D.
Author of “The Hamptons Diet”
Most of the trans fatty acids in modern hydrogenated fats are new
to the human physiology and by the early 1970’s a number of
researchers had expressed concern about their presence in the
American diet, noting that their increasing use had paralleled the
increase in both heart disease and cancer. The solution was one that
could be easily presented to the public: Eat natural, traditional fats;
avoid newfangled foods made from processed vegetable oils; use
butter, not margarine. But medical research, food manufacturing
practices and public consciousness due to media advertising and
corporate marketing went in a totally different direction. They
attacked traditional, whole foods like meat, eggs and butter, and
promoted dramatic increases in the consumption of processed
vegetable oils as well as numerous manufactured products that

were laced with hydrogenated and partially hydrogenated oils.
Your doctor (who is a liar) may attempt to confuse you by

mentioning studies that “seem” to show that blood “cholesterol”
levels can be lowered by eating more polyunsaturated oils. On the
surface this is true. At a deeper level, this is a scam.
The physiological explanation for this is that when excess
polyunsaturated oils are built into the cell membranes, they cause
these membranes to become more liquid and less solid. In a word,
they make your cell membranes more “limp”. The cells of the body
are then forced to take more CHOLESTEROL from the blood
in order to add it to their membranes to maintain the level of
“stiffness” that is necessary for normal functioning. Stated simply,
there is NO proof that lowering blood “cholesterol” levels in this
manner actually improves the health of your cardiovascular system.
A vast amount of research shows that increasing the levels of
polyunsaturated fatty acids in the diet does exactly the opposite.
“Whenever you see these words on a food label ingredient list -

‘hydrogenated’ or ‘partially hydrogenated’ vegetable oil -
especially as the first ingredient, it’s a cause for alarm.
It’s another term for trans-fatty acids. However, some labels say
‘no trans’ even though hydrogenated oil is listed as an ingredient.
How is this possible? Because government regulations let
companies list anything less than .5 grams of fat, including trans
fat, as zero. Cutting out as little as 4 grams a day of trans fats
could reduce your heart disease risk by half.”
Jack Challem, Burton Berkson, M.D., and Melissa Diane Smith
Authors of “Syndrome X”
It is important to know that historically no human beings have ever

had such a high intake of polyunsaturates in their diets as we do
today. This is really a phenomenon of the past one hundred years,
and the evidence against the excess intake of polyunsaturates is

mounting. Prior to 1900, people didn’t really have the ability to
extract oil from vegetables such as corn, or from many seeds as
they do today. They got their essential fatty acids from many of
these plants when they were included in the whole foods they were
eating. People ate the intact leaf, root, nut, grain or seed along with
all their antioxidants in the whole, unprocessed natural food.
This was the manner in which all oils, animal and vegetable, have
always been consumed. Seeds, nuts, legumes, greens and yes, even
animal products, contain the essential fatty acids that are needed for
survival. In their natural, whole food forms, they also contain
the proper amounts of vitamins, minerals, enzymes and other
co-factors that are necessary to digest, absorb and utilize the fats
that they contain. Our food manufacturing industry does not seem
to appreciate the intricate balance that nature provides.
Despite their advertising, processed oil manufacturers don’t seem
to realize that...
“It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature!”

Margarine advertisement from the 1970s
Trying to fool Mother Nature seems to be what American food

manufacturers believe their full time job should be. One of their
grandest mistakes occurs in the processing of vegetable oils that
results in the formation of trans fatty acids. Mother Nature
produces numerous unsaturated fatty acids that are found in a form
that chemists refer to as the “cis” form. This means that wherever
there is a double bond between carbon atoms in a fatty acid, the
hydrogen atoms that are attached to the molecule are together on
the same side.
H H
C C C C
Normal Fatty Acid With a Double Bond
The manufacturing steps that are used to process vegetable oils

(Steps #1 to #12 and #13 above) cause their fatty acids to “twist”
into their trans form. This means that wherever there is a double
bond between carbon atoms in a trans fatty acid, the fatty acid
becomes twisted so that the hydrogen atoms are located on
opposite sides of the double bond.
H
C C
C C
Abnormal Trans Fatty Acid With a Twisted Double Bond
Does this “twisting” of fatty acid molecules matter?
You bet it matters!
Trans fatty acids are sufficiently similar to natural fats that the
human body readily incorporates them into the membrane of every
cell in your body. YOU have quadrillions+ of these molecules
imbedded into every brain cell, nerve cell, heart cell and every
artery cell! Once they are consumed, their altered chemical
structure creates havoc with thousands of necessary chemical
reactions - everything from energy production to the conduction of
electrical impulses that control the beating of your heart!
“Most baked goods and fried fast foods still are made with
partially hydrogenated fat and are high in trans fatty acids. For
example, a person eating one doughnut for breakfast (2.2 grams)
and a large order of fries (6.8 grams) for lunch would ingest ten
grams of trans fatty acids or five percent of all calories of an
1,800 calorie diet. It is unlikely that this situation will change
without strong federal guidelines. Thus, simple labeling changes
alone will not be sufficient. The combined results of metabolic
and epidemiologic studies strongly support an adverse effect of
trans fat risk on coronary heart disease. The relation between
trans fatty acid intake and risk of coronary disease has now been
reported from three large studies (The Health Professionals
Follow-up Study, The Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Study
and the Nurses Health Study.) In a case-control study in the
Boston area, we found a strong and significant positive
association between trans fat intake and risk of acute myocardial
infarction. This association was entirely explained by trans
intake from hydrogenated vegetable oil. Thus, there appears to
be no likely alternative to the hypothesis that high trans intake
increases the risk of coronary heart disease. Furthermore, two
independent methods of estimation indicate that the adverse
effect of trans fat is stronger than that of saturated fat.
By our most conservative estimate, replacement of partially
hydrogenated fat in the U.S. diet with natural unhydrogenated
vegetable oils would prevent approximately 30,000 premature
coronary deaths each year, and epidemiologic evidence suggests
this number is closer to 100,000 premature deaths annually.
Because partially hydrogenated fats can be eliminated from the
food supply by changes in processing that do not require major
efforts in education and behavioral modification, these changes
would be an extremely efficient and rapid method for
substantially reducing rates of coronary disease.”
Alberto Ascherio, Meir J. Stampfer and Walter C. Willett
Authors of “Trans Fatty Acids and Coronary Heart Disease”
Harvard School of Public Health;
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Typical french fried potatoes contain around 40% trans fatty acids,
and many popular cookies and crackers contain from 30 to 50%
trans fatty acids. Donuts and other baked goods range between
35-40% trans fatty acids. Do you eat any of these dangerous trans
fatty acid containing foods? Do you know exactly which
foods contain trans fatty acids and how much they contain?
Does the government know about this? Are our health authorities
concerned about this issue? Shouldn’t there be some kind of law?
“Whenever you see these words on a food label ingredient list -

‘hydrogenated’ or ‘partially hydrogenated’ vegetable oil -
especially as the first ingredient, it’s a cause for alarm.”
Jean Carper
Author of “The Miracle Heart”
All the way back in 1994, the Center for Science in the Public
Interest petitioned the FDA to require that Nutrition Facts labels
disclose the amount of trans fatty acids in manufactured food
products. In 1999, the Food and Drug Administration proposed to
require trans fat labeling, but delayed finalizing a regulation, in
part, to consider a report from the National Academy of Science's
Institute of Medicine. An expert panel at the Institute of Medicine
issued a detailed review of research into trans fatty acids and
concluded...
“It is recommended that trans fatty acid consumption be as low

as possible.”
National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine
So what did our official, government health “authorities” do?

“On July 9, 2003, FDA issued a regulation requiring

manufacturers to list trans fatty acids, or trans fats, on the
Nutrition Facts panel of foods and some dietary supplements.
With this rule, consumers have more information to make
healthier food choices that could lower their consumption of
trans fat as part of a heart-healthy diet. Scientific reports have
confirmed the relationship between trans fats and an increased
risk of coronary heart disease. Food manufacturers have until
January 1, 2006, to list trans fat on the nutrition label. FDA
estimates that by three years after that date, trans fat labeling will
have prevented from 800 to 1,200 cases of coronary heart disease
and 250 to 500 deaths each year.”
www.FDA.gov
Sounds good, right? Sounds like your government cares about your
health, right? Wrong! Please read between the lines. The FDA
admits that a mere “labeling” change can save 250-500 lives per
year. Scientists at the Harvard School of Public Health say that
eliminating trans fatty acids could save 100,000 lives per year!
Could our government have been more forceful in safeguarding our
health? Merely requiring a labeling change as an official response
to such an enormous health catastrophe is absolutely pathetic.
The quotation on the following page is the recommendation that
was made by the Danish Nutrition Council. It is very similar to the
recommendation that was made by the National Institutes of
Health. In response to this information, the Dutch government
acted quickly and clearly. What did they do?
THE DUTCH OFFICIALS BANNED

THE USE OF TRANS FATTY ACIDS!!
Why doesn’t the FDA have the guts to do what Dutch officials did?
“The strongest epidemiological evidence relating levels of trans

fatty acids in the diet to the risk of heart disease comes from
three major prospective studies covering about 150,000 subjects
monitored for 6-14 years: The Health Professionals Follow-up
Study, USA 1996, the Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Cancer
Prevention Study, Finland 1997, and the Nurses’ Health Study,
USA 1997 and from the Zutphen Elderly Study, Holland 2001.
These four studies all find a positive association between the
intake of trans fatty acids and the risk of heart disease.
The studies indicate that, gram for gram, the intake of trans fatty
acids as compared with saturated fatty acids, is associated with an
approximately 10-fold higher risk increment for the development
of heart disease. Levels of trans fatty acids in industrially
hydrogenated fats may account for up to 60% of the fatty acid
content. There is a possibility that a high trans fatty acid intake
results in the incorporation of these fatty acids in heart muscle
cells and the conduction system and that this lowers the threshold
for cardiac arrythmias, which may be life-threatening in
connection with acute myocardial infarction in the heart.
It was found that levels of trans linoleic acids were associated
with a markedly increased risk of sudden cardiac death.
The mechanism behind this finding can theoretically be related
to changes in the fatty acid composition of muscle cell
membranes. This effects the function of the ion channels, which
are important for the formation and propagation of the electrical
impulses in the cells. It has also turned out that industrial
produced trans fatty acids reduce endothelial function in the
vascular wall. Endothelial dysfunctions are probably the
first stage in the development of cardiac arteriosclerosis.
The Danish Nutrition Council recommends that the use of
industrially produced trans fatty acids in foodstuffs be ceased as
soon as possible.”
Steen Stender and Jorn Dyerberg

Authors of “The Influence of Trans Fatty Acids on Health”
The Danish Nutrition Council
MARK MY WORDS!
The production, promotion and consumption of refined

vegetable oils, margarine, hydrogenated and partially
hydrogenated vegetable oils will soon be recognized as...
THE LARGEST MISTAKE IN THE HISTORY OF HEALTH!
“The process of hydrogenation is extremely damaging to oils and

poses the most dangerous health risks. Structural damage to oil
is created by hydrogenation. Trans fatty acids have recently
been proven to be one of the key health risks associated with
heart disease. Hydrogenated fats serve no function in the body.
In fact, they interfere with the metabolism of essential fatty acids,
normal growth and development, the immune system and
anti-inflammatory responses. The corporate food industry takes
advantage of the fact that food tastes better with fat and ‘hides’
large quantities of unhealthy hydrogenated fats in many
processed foods. Avoid all hydrogenated fats!”
Encyclopedia of Natural Healing
“Trans-fatty acids promote insulin resistance and a variety of

health problems in the body because they are shaped differently
than the polyunsaturated fatty acids from which they are made.
Essentially, they act like misfits. Trans-fatty acids interfere with
the enzyme delta-6-desaturase, needed by the body to
manufacture docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a principle omega-3
fat. Trans-fatty acids also inhibit the body’s production of a very
important omega-6 fat, called gamma-linolenic acid (GLA).
What’s even worse is that diets with a lot of trans-fatty acids
double the risk of heart disease.”
Jack Challem, Burton Berkson, M.D., and Melissa Diane Smith
“Some adverse effects of consuming trans fatty acids are the

following:
• Lowers the amount of cream in milk from lactating

females in all species studied, including humans, thus
lowering the overall quality available to the infant;
• Causes a dose response decrease in visual acuity in
infants who are fed human milk with increasing levels of
trans fatty acids, which extends to 14 months of age;
• Correlates to low birth weight in human infants.
• Increases blood insulin levels in humans in response to
glucose load, increasing risk for diabetes;
• Affects immune response by lowering efficiency of B cell
response and increasing proliferation of T cells;
• Decreases levels of testosterone in male animals,
increases level of abnormal sperm, and interferes with
gestation in females;
• Decreases the response of the red blood cell to insulin,
thus having a potentially undesirable effect in diabetes;
• Inhibits the function of membrane-related enzymes such
as delta-6 desaturase;
• Causes adverse alterations in the activities of the
important enzyme system that metabolizes chemical
carcinogens and drugs;
• Causes alterations in physiological properties of
biological membranes including measurements of
membrane transport and membrane fluidity;
• Causes alterations in adipose cell size, cell number, lipid
class, and fatty acid composition;
• Adversely interacts with conversion of plant omega-3
fatty acids to elongated omega-3 tissue fatty acids;
• Escalates adverse effects of essential fatty acid
deficiency;
• Precipitates childhood asthma.”
Mary G. Enig, Ph. D.
“Nearly every article about fats and oils in the diet begins with a
faulty premise. That faulty premise is that CHOLESTEROL and
the saturated fats are the culprits for the myriad of chronic
ailments that afflict modern populations. CHOLESTEROL is
perhaps the most misunderstood and wrongly maligned
biological molecule in existence. This premise was basically
invented in the late 1950s for the purpose of protecting the
margarine and shortening industry from the challenges that were
newly emerging from some of the scientific critics of
hydrogenation who saw this as the cause of the epidemic of heart
attacks. The resulting information that was generated has
virtually removed the safe and important natural fats from the
diets of many people and has replaced these desirable fats with
various partially hydrogenated fats and oils. Thus, we have
ended up with a situation where the fats that have been used for
centuries are out, and the fabricated fats that should be out are
in. The supposed benefits of ‘heart healthy’ polyunsaturated
spreads and monounsaturated oils will not stand the test of time.
The industries benefitting from this modern agenda will continue
to propagandize the public and the professionals in order to keep
their multibillion dollar markets. As a result of being misled, we
have a consuming public terrified of natural fats and oils --
a public, which, by its avoidance of these natural fats and oils,
and consumption of fabricated, man-manipulated fats and
oil replacements such as the trans fats and the unstable
polyunsaturates, is becoming increasingly obese and ill.
The claim that saturated fat leads to heart disease is simply false.
Eventually, the idea became dogma as it was repeated year after
year. Discarding deeply ingrained misinformation and replacing
it with factual information is difficult for anyone. For the
consumer who today has been the recipient of nearly three
decades of fats and oil propaganda that is both false and
misleading, the task is doubly difficult.”
Mary G. Enig, Ph.D.
“Membranes in humans are composed mostly of oils, with some

protein and carbohydrate. The oils are continually renewed and
replaced. Their composition is affected by the kinds of oils in the
diet. Thus, the very basic and crucial actions of cells to the
proper functioning of the organism depends to a great extent on
the oils we consume every day. Cells must be flexible and be able
to change readily in response to signals, such as hormones and
triggers of inflammation, or to the pressure of growth from
adjacent cells. The oils allow for the proper flexibility or fluidity
of the cell membranes and present the proper targets to
chemical messengers that coordinate critical body functions.
When partially hydrogenated vegetable oils find their way into
our diet, like other oils, they are easily incorporated into our cell
membranes. Unlike the essential oils in our diet, they stay
much longer and change the flexibility of our membranes.
The membranes become stiff and lose their ability to signal and
respond appropriately to the demands of life. This has the same
effect as fine grains of sand dropped into the workings of the most
complex Swiss watch: The watch will fail to keep perfect time,
then eventually break down completely.”
Jeffrey M. Aron, M.D.
University of California, San Francisco
The first time that you eat trans fatty acids, you don’t get sick.
Poisoning with trans fatty acids is cumulative over time and
depends upon your level of intake and your personal metabolism.
The damage is subtle, but it adds up over time, and you pay for it
in ways that you don’t realize. Fatigue, stiffness, soreness, poor
sleep, allergies, frequent colds, asthma, heart attacks!... the list is
endless. The good news is that as soon as you stop eating foods that
contain trans fatty acids and increase your intake of natural fats and
oils, your body will gradually replace the trans fatty acids in your
cellular membranes with the natural and more appropriate fatty
acids that you consume.
The Institute of Medicine at the National Academy of Sciences

reported on July 10, 2002 that Americans are eating foods that were
contaminated with dangerous levels of an ingredient for
which there is absolutely no safe level for human consumption.
In regards to trans fatty acids from partially hydrogenated oils,
the report stated that the threshold of safety rests at an
“upper intake level of zero” ! Yet, nearly 50% of all products
found in grocery stores across the country are laced with poisonous
trans fatty acids. The FDA itself has reported that trans fatty acids
are found in more than 50% of all breakfast cereals, 70% of all cake
mixes, 75% of all snacks and chips, 80% of frozen breakfast foods
and 95% of all cookies. Trans fatty acids are found in nearly all
donuts, french fries and microwave popcorn. They are even found
in such supposed “health foods” as whole wheat bread, granola,
and bran muffins. Trans fatty acids are in your Caesar salad
dressing as well as the croutons on top of the salad. They are in
your Japanese tempura as well as your chicken nuggets. They are
in your hash browns and most of the pastries that you get from your
favorite coffee shop. You are exposed to trans fatty acids hundreds
of times each day, and you have consumed these poisonous
compounds thousands upon thousands of times in your life.
Your doctor is way behind the curve regarding the dangers of trans
fatty acids. Government agencies such as the FDA and the
Department of Agriculture are more concerned with business
interests than they are with your health, so don’t expect them to
provide you with any reasonable advice or help. You are on your
own! The FDA itself has estimated that by removing all the trans
fatty acids from margarine and only 3% of baked goods, the United
States could eliminate 17,000 heart attacks and more than 5,000
deaths every year. Why stop there??? How many lives could be
improved and saved if the FDA admitted what they already know:
Trans Fatty Acids are poisonous and they need to be BANNED!

“Trans fats interfere with important, normal functions by

inhibiting enzymes which are necessary for the body’s normal
metabolism of fats, and they keep doing it for a long time.
When you eat normal fats, the body metabolizes half of them in
18 days. When you eat trans fats, the body requires 51 days to
metabolize half of them. This means that half of the trans fats
you eat today will still be inhibiting essential enzyme systems in
your body 51 days from now. Few family doctors, internists, or
cardiologists are aware of the mass of recent research evidence
indicating trans fats as increasing their patients’ risk of heart
disease, much less the other adverse effects of consuming these
poisonous substances. In fact, most doctors still recommend
margarine instead of butter for patients trying to prevent or
improve heart disease. The fact is that trans fats increase cardiac
risk factors twice as much as saturated fat in the diet! Still,
many patients blindly follow their misinformed doctors’ advice
and are unwittingly consuming foods thinking they will decrease
their risk for heart disease when these foods will actually
significantly worsen their cardiac risk factors, not to mention the
other problems they cause. Read labels as if your life depended
on it, which it does! We must stop the insanity of slowly
poisoning ourselves and our society. The ingestion of
hydrogenated and partially hydrogenated fats and oils contribute
to the common aches and pains of daily life as well as slow
degenerative processes and life ending illnesses. Many people
put up with or medicate daily nagging symptoms which they
wrongly assume are normal. There are no such thing as normal
headaches, normal backaches, normal arthritis, normal
menstrual cramps, etc. These symptoms can be changed and the
quality of life improved by simply avoiding hydrogenated and
partially hydrogenated fats and oils. Due to the prolonged life of
trans fatty acids, you must be both diligent with avoiding them
and patient for the changes to take place. Within a few weeks or
a couple of months, however, the results are usually noticeable
and often quite gratifying.
Dr. Gary Farr
Author of “The Danger of Hydrogenated or
Partially Hydrogenated Fats and Oils”
So why haven’t you heard very much about this issue?
When the United States Surgeon general’s office set out in 1988
to write the definitive report on the dangers of dietary fat, the
task seemed like it would be straightforward. They thought that all
they would have to do is gather the existing science together,
review it and publish it. The planned report was initiated with a
pre-conceived notion of what the conclusions should be.
Unfortunately, the science that was needed to back up those
already formed conclusions could not be found. Finally, in June
1999, eleven years after the project began, the Surgeon General’s
Office quietly circulated a letter explaining that the project would
be terminated. There was no public announcement. There was no
press release. Why? The reality of the “science” proved to be
unavoidable. The types of dietary fat that are most damaging to
human health are exactly the same types of fat that all of the
official health “experts” have been recommending for decades:
polyunsaturated oils and their evil step-children, trans fatty acids
that are found in partially hydrogenated oils used in margarine and
shortening! Saturated fats and CHOLESTEROL found in animal
products do NOT cause heart disease! Heart disease is caused by
the fats and oils that the medical profession has been telling us to
eat instead of the natural fats and oils that are found in red meat,
butter and eggs! The Surgeon General’s Office decided to NOT
make an honest report of their findings because to do so would
have embarassed the medical profession and would have upset
thousands of very wealthy corporate food processors. An honest
report of the scientific facts would have incriminated the entire
medical profession and all of the organizations that support it. An
honest report would have explained that they have been giving us
extremely bad advice for decades. A true and honest reporting of
the scientific facts would have revealed the truth that...

“I can’t help but think about so many in the general public who
are not scientifically trained and who have been brain-washed by
the countless illegal commercials that promise that using
margarine will protect them from heart disease. These people
don’t even read the newspaper accounts such as the report from
Harvard that margarine actually is associated with increased
heart disease and heart disease death. ”
Richard Passwater
I have just a few words for you.
The only fats and oils that you should ever consume are those
that are found in their natural state. RAW seeds and nuts that
have not been roasted or dry roasted are wonderful sources of
healthy oils. Organic butter, extra virgin coconut oil and
unrefined macadamia nut oils are the only heat stable oils
currently available in the marketplace. Don’t ever heat any
other oil. Never, never, never eat margarine, shortening,
hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oils of any kind.
Never, never, never eat any processed food that contains any of
these toxic oils and fats. Never, never, never eat any salad
dressing, veggie dip, condiment, sandwich spread, non-dairy
creamer, sauce or anything else unless you know exactly what
kind of oil was used.
It’s your heart. It’s your life. You decide.
“Trans fats are bad fats.

The less trans fats you and I eat, the healthier we will be.”
Tommy G. Thompson
Secretary of Health and Human Services
July 9, 2003
Friends
don’t let friends
eat
refined
vegetable oils!
.
Chapter 14
Evil, Evil, Evil, Evil White Food

IT’S A JOKE...
Fortunately, my doctor does not believe in

unnecessary surgery. He won’t operate unless he
absolutely needs the money.
• • •
An 88 year old paraplegic veteran who had lost

both arms in World War II and an 78 year old
woman were close friends in an old folks home.
The highlight of their week occurred every Friday
night when she would help him masturbate in her
room. This ritual had been going on for 18 months
until one Friday evening the man didn’t show up.
Alarmed, the woman stopped by his room the next
morning to see if he was all right. “Where were
you last night?” she asked.
Embarrassed, but truthful, the old man said,
“I was with another woman last night.”
“Who?”
“Gladys, in room 217.”
“Gladys? My God, she’s over a hundred years
old! What does she have that I don’t have?”
she exclaimed.
“Parkinson’s disease!”
DEADLY PROCESSED WHITE RICE
Apparently, as a society, we have collectively forgotten that the

introduction of processed rice into the diets of Eastern Asian
countries in the late 1800s clearly resulted in widespread plagues
of beriberi, a disease that is caused by a deficiency of thiamin
(vitamin B1).
The Japanese ideogram for peace is a mouth with a grain of whole

rice in it. In the Orient, for countless centuries, grains such as rice
were harvested, beaten against a hard surface to remove the
inedible outer hull and then left alone. The whole grains were eaten,
not just the starchy inner core, and they were chewed between the
teeth, not ground between stones in a flour mill. This process
worked well, until Western “civilization” decided to “improve” it.
During the flowering of the Industrial Age in the 1800s, a patent

was issued for a German invention called the Engelberg machine.
This machine went well beyond the hand threshing of rice that had
served the people of the Orient so well for centuries. Each grain of
rice could now be mechanically stripped of its intermediate and
inner shells. Little was left but the pure white carbohydrate core.
The ubiquitous, low class, brown rice that had been the staple of the
Asian peasant could now be polished up and turned into a sweet
confection that was more acceptable to the higher, elegant taste of
the European and American aristocracy. White food for white
people!
Immediately after the whole grain of any grass (wheat, rice, barley,
oats, rye, etc) is cracked, cut, smashed, ground or rolled, it begins
to lose some of its nutritional value. Exposure to the atmosphere
causes oxidation that immediately lowers the antioxidant benefits
of the food. Further processing strips the fiber, essential fatty acids
and mineral rich outer hull. Bleaching and countless other
processes add numerous toxic chemical compounds and result in a
concentrated starch based flour that in no way maintains the

balance and nutritious value of the original whole grain. Once a
whole grain is processed in any way, it will not sprout because it
is no longer alive. Its life force is gone. It is dead, and it is this
property of death that it will pass along to whomever consumes it.
To refer to white rice that has been stripped, bleached, polished,
toxified and killed by the name rice is analogous to claiming that
your bony skeleton is you.
“Traditional Oriental medicine has always insisted that the mind

and the body are not two. What we call diseases and illnesses are
merely symptoms that the entire body is out of kilter. To make a
man whole again, he has only to eat whole food.”
William Dufty
Author of “Sugar Blues”
Nevertheless, due to marvelous marketing and promotion that

preyed upon the human tendency to obey the sweet taste buds on
our tongues, white rice was a big hit. Soon it was accepted in
every “modern” society in Asia, but wherever it appeared, it
brought with it a deadly new disease: Beriberi! The name,
beriberi, comes from the Senegalese word for weakness. Beriberi
involves paralysis and numbness, starting from the legs and
leading to cardiac and respiratory disorders and eventually, to
death. In the late 1800’s, in the Dutch East Indies, soldiers, sailors,
prisoners, mine workers, plantation workers and people admitted to
hospitals for minor ailments were dying of the disease by the
thousands. People who had been in seemingly good health
sometimes died suddenly, in terrible distress, suffering from the
inability to breathe.
In 1886, a young Dutch physician, Christiaan Eijkman noticed

that chickens were also dying of a disease that seemed similar to

beriberi in humans but, all of a sudden, the chickens stopped dying
and their normal good health returned! Eijkman discovered that the
person in charge of feeding the chickens had changed their feed
from polished white rice back to their normal rations of unpolished
brown rice. The chickens began eating polished white rice on June
17 and started showing signs of the disease only one month later,
on July 10. The feeding of polished white rice stopped on
November 27 and the symptoms of the disease immediately
subsided. It was confirmed by later experiments that a diet of
polished white rice causes death in chickens in less than a month!
A study of prisoners in 101 prisons throughout the Dutch East
Indies found that the incidence of beriberi among prisoners who
were fed polished white rice was 300 times greater than among
those who received whole, unpolished brown rice. Subsequent
studies found that thiamin, vitamin B1, is found in the outer husk,
the “brown” portion of the brown rice, but not in the white, inner
kernal.
Don’t be fooled by spices and coloring agents that may be added to

polished, white rice in order to disguise its empty nutritional value.
Processed rice is deadly to human beings because all of its
necessary nutrients have been stripped away. Coloring and
flavoring cannot put these nutrients back. Knowing what we now
know, it is absolutely ignorant for anyone to ever eat processed,
polished, stripped, bleached, deadly white rice! Do you eat white
rice? Why?
DEADLY PROCESSED CORN
The intense consumption of processed corn products in the

Southern United States in the early 1900s resulted in a widespread
plague of pellagra which is now known to be caused by a
deficiency of niacin (Vitamin B3).
In 1914, pellagra had reached epidemic proportions in the

American South. The main symptom, a flaming red rash, was
unmistakable. Joe Goldberger, from New York City’s Lower East
Side, observed that many of the people suffering from pellagra
consumed large amounts of processed corn (corn meal, corn bread,
grits, etc.). Goldberger obtained federal government funding and
ran a simple nutritional experiment. Goldberger isolated eleven
adult male inmates on a Mississippi prison for six months.
The men were promised freedom at the end of the experiment,
which began in April of 1915, in return for simply eating a diet of
refined corn, refined flour, refined sugar cane syrup and refined
sugar. The convicts were fed all that they could eat of white bread,
corn pone, hominy grits, sweet potatoes, salted pork, cane syrup,
cabbage and coffee. Breakfast was biscuits, cornmeal mush,
polished rice, cane syrup, coffee and sugar. Lunch included
cornbread, collard greens, sweet potatoes, cane syrup and hominy
grits. Supper was grits, biscuits, mush, gravy, cane syrup, sugar
and coffee. The convicts originally thought that they had made a
great deal, but within a few weeks, they were all complaining of
backaches, stomachaches, and dizziness, which are all early
symptoms of pellagra. After five months, the men were weak and
haggard. Soon after that they developed the classic fire red rash
that is associated with pellagra. Goldberger had proven that
pellagra was caused by consuming a diet of processed and refined
corn, grains and sugar.
Goldberger published his findings, but did he receive a Nobel prize

for his efforts? Did he receive a medal? Heck no! The bulk of the
medical establishment hit him like a ton of bricks. They continued
to insist that pellagra must be caused by some form of infectious
agent, some kind of “germ”. Goldberger sought to convince his
skeptics, so he injected himself with blood from pellagra victims.
He swallowed intestinal discharge (?) from pellagra victims. He
scraped dry powdered skin off of the rashes of pellagra sufferers
and he ate it, but he did not get pellagra! Still, the “official”
government and medical “authorities” doubted Goldberger’s

findings. Goldberger referred to his detractors as...
“Blind, selfish, jealous, prejudiced asses!”

Joe Goldberger
The process of refining grains removes the bran and the germ of the
grain and leaves only the starchy portion that is known as the
endosperm. In this process,
86% of the manganese is removed

85% of the magnesium is removed
78% of the zinc is removed
77% of the potassium is removed
76% of the iron is removed
68% of the copper is removed
60% of the calcium is removed
40% of the chromium is removed
Dr. Thomas L. Cleave performed studies of primitive cultures that

had been “civilized” and exposed to the “modern” diet of refined
grains and refined sugars. He found that, IN EVERY CASE, the
incidence of heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, gall
bladder disease and colitis dramatically increased about 20 years
after the cultures began to adopt a “modern”, processed diet. They
also developed widespread tooth decay, infertility, miscarriages,
difficult labor, birth defects, changes in the shapes of their heads,
faces and dental arches, increased susceptibility to infection and
other chronic diseases. The first serving of processed food does not
create a raging deficiency disease. It takes time. The connection is
definite, but the time lag prevents people from intellectually
making the connection. How long have you been eating these toxic
foods?
It took decades for the “official” government and medical

“authorities” to recognize this problem and do something about it.
However, instead of banning the processing of grains, they chose
to pass the feeble and inadequate Enrichment Act of 1942. This
law, while recognizing the obvious fact that processed grains are
deficient in nutrients that are necessary for human life, only
mandated the re-addition of five nutrients to the processed grains
(vitamins B1, B2, B3, folic acid and iron). So-called “enriched”
grains are far from enriched. They are grossly depleted of all
nutrients!
“Eating a lot of white-flour products that don’t provide many of

these nutrients, therefore, can lead to subtle, preclinical nutrient
deficiencies over time. The more refined grain and sugary foods
we eat, the less we eat nutritious foods that provide the nutrients
missing from refined grains and the more likely we are to
develop suboptimal intakes or outright nutrient deficiencies that
prevent our bodies from functioning at their best.”
Melissa Diane Smith
Author of “Going Against the Grain”
In centuries past, only the wealthy could afford “processed” food

and only the wealthy suffered from the degenerative diseases of
obesity, heart disease, adult-onset diabetes, arthritis and cancer.
The poorer classes were unable to afford processed “white” grains
and were subsequently spared the diseases that these foods cause.
With the onset of the Industrial Revolution, white rice, white flour
and white sugar became available to the masses, and soon after,
the masses also began to be plagued by the degenerative diseases
from which they still ignorantly suffer. Now, this dietary poison
affects absolutely everyone in our society. Processed food is
absolutely everywhere and the diseases that these food cause are
rampant in our society..
DEADLY PROCESSED WHITE CANE SUGAR
The unbelievable consumption of processed “sugar” by the

American public directly corresponds with the increase in the rate
of heart disease throughout the 20th century. From the year 1900
to the year 2000, consumption of most foods remained relatively
constant. Meat, dairy, fruit, vegetables, legumes, seeds and nuts
were all consumed at approximately equal amounts at the
beginning and the end of the 20th century. The one change that
jumps off the page is the consumption of processed “sugar”.
In 1900, the average American consumed only a few pounds of this
concentrated poison. By the year 2000, the rate of consumption
had increased to an astonishing 150 pounds per person! That is one
half of a pound of “sugar” per day. That is absolutely ridiculous!
“I do much disapprove of things preserved or very much

seasoned with sugar. I judge the invention of it and its
immoderate use to have very much contributed to the vast
increase of scurvy in this last age.”
Dr. Thomas Willis
From a health perspective, the late 1800s and the early 1900s were
a very interesting period of time. It was an era when just about
anything was available. Heroin, morphine and cocaine were
advertised on the front pages of newspapers and magazines as a
cure for everything from syphilis to bad breath and were sold over
the counter in drugstores and shops. Patent medicines based on
addictive drugs were a billion dollar mail-order business.
“Rectified” whiskey was for sale in the country store and in the
saloon. Slaughterhouses and the meats that came from them were
absolutely frightening as Upton Sinclair exposed in The Jungle.
Foods were adulterated with vast quantities of additives such as
boric acid, borax, salicylic acid, salicylates, benzoic acid,
benzoates, sulfur dioxide, sulfites, formaldehyde, copper sulfate,
saltpeter and more. Nevertheless, in the early 1900’s, heart

disease was practically non-existent!
In a textbook on heart disease, Dr. Paul Dudley White, M.D.,

(President Dwight David Eisenhower’s personal physician during
his two heart attacks) stated that when he went to medical school in
1911, he had never heard of such a thing as a heart attack. By
1943, it was already responsible for more than 50% of all deaths
in America.
“Sugar is an unnaturally concentrated chemical that has been

robbed of its Vitamin C and numerous other necessary nutrients
in the refining process. The replacement of natural fruit in its
whole natural food form with processed sweeteners forms the
basic cause of disease. What is left consists of pure, refined
carbohydrates. The body cannot utilize this refined starch and
carbohydrate unless the depleted proteins, vitamins and minerals
are present. Nature supplies these elements in each plant in
quantities sufficient to metabolize the carbohydrate in that
particular plant. There is no excess for other added
carbohydrates. Incomplete carbohydrate metabolism results in
the formation of ‘toxic metabolites’ such as pyruvic acid and
abnormal sugars containing 5 carbon atoms. Pyruvic acid
accumulates in the brain and nervous system and the abnormal
sugars in the red blood cells. These toxic metabolites interfere
with the respiration of the cells. They cannot get sufficient
oxygen to survive and function normally. In time, some of the
cells die. This interferes with the function of a part of the body
and is the beginning of degenerative disease. With over 50
percent of our diet today composed of these refined carbohydrates
[refined sugar, white flour, polished rice, pasta and most
breakfast cereals], does it require a million dollars for research
to find out why this generation is developing more and more
degenerative diseases?”
Dr. William Coda Martin
In 1924, Dr. Seale Harris, a professor of medicine at

the University of Alabama began to notice symptoms similar to
insulin shock in many people. These people were found to have
high levels of insulin in their blood. They suffered from hyper-
insulin-emia. Up until that time, patients with hyper-insulin-emia
(high levels of insulin in the blood) were known to also suffer from
coronary thrombosis and a wide variety of other ailments.
Many diabetics that use insulin to control their blood sugar
levels are eventually afflicted with hardening of the arteries
(artherosclerosis), heart attacks and strokes. The remedy that
Dr. Harris proposed for the problems that are caused by hyper-
insulin-emia was not a glamorous new miracle drug. The cure for
hyper-insulin-emia that Dr. Harris suggested was so simple that no
one - not even medical practitioners - would be able to profit from
it. He suggested that his patients completely give up refined sugar,
candy and soft drinks. It was his belief that processed sugar had
caused their symptoms (atherosclerosis, heart attacks and strokes).
The only thing that a doctor should do for patients with
hyper-insulin-emia was to teach them why they had the problem
and also teach them how to eat properly in order to avoid it.
Treatment for hyper-insulin-emia was, and still is, a do-it-yourself
operation.
“In the heating and recrystallization of the natural sugar cane,

something is altered which leaves the refined product a
dangerous foodstuff.”
Dr. Frederick Banting,
Nobel Prize winner
In 1929, Dr. Frederick Banting, Nobel Prize winner for his

discovery of insulin tried to tell everyone that insulin was not a cure
for diabetes, but was merely a temporary stopgap measure.
He knew then that the surest way to improve one’s health was to
limit the consumption of the “dangerous foodstuff” known as

“sugar”.
Nyoiti Sakurazawa pleaded with Western nutritionists to make the

distinction in the quality of the food which was categorized as
carbohydrate. He begged them to make a distinction between
whole unrefined grains (such as brown rice) as opposed to potato
starch, white bread, processed grains and white table sugar.
Unfortunately, he enjoyed very limited success.
“Standard medical therapies treat the symptoms of excess insulin

- elevated ‘cholesterol’, triglycerides, blood sugar, blood pressure
and obesity - instead of treating the excess insulin itself.
Unfortunately, the standard treatment of the symptoms may even
raise the insulin levels and worsen the underlying problem.”
Michael R. Eades, M.D. and Mary Dan Eades, M.D.
Authors of “Protein Power”
GLUCOSE, FRUCTOSE AND SUCROSE
Please understand that there are many kinds of “sugar”. If you have
read all of this book up to this point, you now know that there is
no such thing as “estrogen”. You now need to realize that there is
also no such thing as “sugar”! That’s right, there is no such thing
as “sugar”! Okay, one more time, in bold, capital letters...
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “SUGAR”!!!
“Sugar” is a word that refers to an entire category of chemical

compounds. There are many, many members of this category.
Let me name a few...
Mono-saccharides (Simple sugars)

Fructose
Fucose
Galactose
Glucose
Hexose
Mannose
Ribose
Xylose
Di-saccharides (compound sugars)

Lactose (gluctose + galactose)
Maltose (glucose + glucose)
Sucrose (glucose + fructose)
Poly-saccharides (complex sugars)

Cellulose
Chitin (chitosan)
Glycogen
Hylauronic acid
Pectin
Starch
And there are many, many, many more. In this chapter, I will
concentrate on the most basic of sugars found in the typical
American diet: glucose, fructose and the combination of these two,
sucrose. The federal government recommends that everyone
should eat 300 grams of carbohydrates per day, which works out to
be 245 POUNDS of carbohydrates per person, per year!
Many people eat more than this! The average American
consumes more than 150 pounds of simple sugars each and every
year. Please allow me to state, in very simple terms,
THIS IS THE PROBLEM!!!!!!

“Mankind never evolved to eat a diet high in starches or sugars.

Grain products and concentrated sugars were essentially absent
from human nutrition until the invention of agriculture which
was only 10,000 years ago. One of the few reasonably reliable
facts about the obesity epidemic is that it started around the early
1980s. The ongoing epidemic of obesity in America is not, as we
are constantly told, due simply to a collective lack of will power
and a failure of exercise. Rather, it occurred because the public
health authorities told us to eat precisely those foods that
would make us fat, and we did. What happens when we eat
carbohydrates, in particular sugar and starches like potatoes and
rice, or anything made from flour, like a slice of white bread?
These are known in the jargon as high glycemic index
carbohydrates, which means they are absorbed quickly into the
blood. As a result, they cause a spike of blood sugar and a surge
of insulin within minutes. The resulting rush of insulin stores the
blood sugar away and a few hours later your blood sugar is lower
than it was before you ate. Your body effectively thinks it has run
out of fuel, but the insulin is still high enough to prevent you from
burning your own fat. The result is hunger and a craving for
more carbohydrates. It’s another vicious circle, and another
situation ripe for obesity. Insulin regulates fat metabolism. We
cannot store body fat without it. Think of insulin as a switch.
When it’s on, in the few hours after eating, you burn
carbohydrates for energy and store excess calories as fat. When
it’s off, after the insulin has been depleted, you burn fat as fuel.
So when insulin levels are low, you will burn your own fat, but
not when they’re high. What’s forgotten in the current
controversy is that the low-fat dogma itself is only about 25 years
old. Until the late 1970s, the accepted wisdom was that fat and
protein protected against overeating by making you sated, and
that carbohydrates made you fat.”
Gary Taubes
Author of “What If It’s All Been a Big Fat Lie?”
Has your medical doctor ever offered to check the level of

insulin in your blood? The technology has existed for more than
50 years. I am not talking about checking blood glucose levels.
That is different. Has your doctor ever offered to check the level of
insulin in your blood? Nearly 100 years ago, Dr. Seale Harris
recognized that an elevated level of insulin in the blood was the
surest sign of impending cardiovascular disease. Why? Because
excess insulin in the blood (hyper-insulin-emia) is...
• a direct CAUSE of elevated “cholesterol” levels

• a direct CAUSE of elevated triglyceride levels!
• a direct CAUSE of elevated blood pressure!
• a direct CAUSE of increased storage of fat in fat cells
which obviously leads to obesity!
Today, there are numerous books written about the problems that
are caused by hyper-insulin-emia, but nowadays the problem is
referred to as Syndrome X. The reason that your medical doctor
does not bother to test and record the level of insulin in your blood
(which is the primary marker for Syndrome X) is that this simple
test would unravel their entire money-making scheme. If medical
doctors actually started to treat the dietary CAUSE of high
“cholesterol”, high triglycerides, high blood pressure and obesity
(all caused by too much sugar in the diet), then they wouldn’t be
able to sell you drugs that claim to do the same. They wouldn’t be
able to instruct you to come back for monthly checkups in order see
if the drugs were damaging your liver or other internal organs.
They wouldn’t be able to recommend bypass surgery, or
angioplasties, or ultrafast computed tomography scans.
Instead of simply informing you of the dramatic dangerous effects

that “sugar” has upon your cardiovascular system as I have
quickly done in this chapter, the American Medical Association,
the American Heart Association, the Federal Government’s Official
Food Pyramid and your trusted medical doctor all criminally tell
you to INCREASE your intake of carbohydrates to 55% of your

total dietary calories! This insane diet is even recommended to
diabetics!
Dr. Michael R. Eades, M.D., and Dr. Mary Dan Eades, M.D., the
authors of the book Protein Power, treat their patients differently
than your doctor treats you. When they observe elevated
“cholesterol”, elevated triglyceride levels, elevated blood glucose,
elevated blood pressure, or obesity in their patients, they
recommend that their patients take a blood test to determine
the level of insulin that they have in their blood. Typically, the
average American will have insulin levels somewhere above
25 milliUnits/milliliter. Insulin levels are often much higher than
that.
The Eades believe that a healthy insulin level is

10 mU/ml or less.
There is no drug to lower insulin levels. Just as Dr. Seale Harris

knew nearly a century ago, the CAUSE is the overconsumption of
carbohydrates in all forms, especially processed “sugars”. Since
the CAUSE is known, it is also known that no drug can be the
solution. The only ethical, logical and effective treatment is the
removal of the CAUSE. The only solution is a diet that eliminates
“sugars” and restricts carbohydrates from other sources.
Has your medical doctor ever recommended that you check the
level of glycated hemoglobin in your bloodstream? Glycated
hemoglobin is simply a measurement of red blood cells that have
been damaged by glycation which, in common English, means
that your red blood cells have too much “sugar” stuck to the
hemoglobin on their surfaces. Damaged, “sugar-coated” blood
cells are unable to function properly. They are unable to transport
oxygen from the lungs to the tissues throughout the body. Glycated
hemoglobin must be removed from the bloodstream by the spleen
and destroyed. “Sugar” causes this type of damage in even the

healthiest of human beings. Scientists are able to measure
“glycated hemoglobin” in the bloodstream in order to determine the
relative level of damage that sugar may be causing in a person’s
body, but doctors rarely recommend this test. This is because no
drugs are available to treat this problem because the solution is
simple: STOP EATING SUGAR! This dietary issue must be
addressed in order to maintain healthy red blood cells as well as
overall good health.
“Under normal conditions, receptors in the liver remove LDL

from the bloodstream and signal the liver to reduce its
manufacture of LDL when serum levels rise even slightly.
Glucose may bind to the surface of the LDL particle and also to
liver LDL receptors, so that the LDL cannot be recognized by its
receptors. In people with high blood sugars, many LDL particles
become glycosylated and are therefore not cleared by the liver.
This glycosylation is reversible if blood sugar drops. After about
24 hours, however, a rearrangement of electron bonds occurs in
glycosylated proteins so that glucose can’t release even if blood
sugar drops. This irreversible glycosylation is called glycation
and the affected protein molecules are said to be ‘glycated’. They
are also referred to as ‘AGES’ or Advanced Glycosylation End
products. These ‘AGES’ accumulate in the blood, where they can
become incorporated into the walls of arteries, forming fatty
deposits called atherotic plaques. The proteins in the walls of
arteries can also become glycosylated/glycated, rendering them
sticky. Other proteins in the blood then stick to the arterial walls,
causing further buildup of plaque.”
Just for a moment, imagine yourself as a red blood cell. Imagine

trying to flow through the watery fluids in the bloodstream.
Imagine having to bend yourself nearly in half to squeeze through
the narrow capillaries that flow through all the tissues in the body.
Now imagine yourself trying to perform that same task covered in
“sugar”. Imagine yourself trying to squeeze through a capillary
completely covered in honey, or maple syrup or molasses or high
fructose corn syrup, or mashed potatoes, or sticky sushi rice, or
chocolate chip cookie dough! Excess “sugar”, in any form, is
simply sticky.
“A fifteen-year study of 7,038 French policemen in Paris

reported that ‘The earliest marker of a higher risk of coronary
heart disease mortality is an elevation of serum insulin level.’
A study of middle-aged non-diabetic women at the University of
Pittsburgh showed an increasing risk of heart disease as serum
insulin levels increased. My personal experience with diabetic
patients is very simple. When we reduce dietary carbohydrate,
blood sugars improved dramatically. After about two months of
improved blood sugars, we repeat our studies of lipid profiles and
thrombotic risk factors. In the great majority of cases, I see
normalization or improvement. If your physician finds all of this
hard to believe, he or she might benefit from reading the
seventy articles and abstracts on the subject contained in the
proceedings of the fifteenth International Diabetes Foundation
Satellite Symposium on ‘Diabetes and Macrovascular
Complications, Diabetes 45, Supplement 3, July 1996.”
When “sugar” enters your bloodstream in quantities that are

dangerous to the health of your blood and cardiovascular system,
the body has no choice but to do something. First, large amounts
of insulin are secreted. Under the influence of insulin, the excess
“sugar” is quickly and effectively converted into triglycerides and
CHOLESTEROL. After this conversion takes place, these
substances will appear in your blood test, and the syrupy nature of
your blood will show up as elevated blood pressure. These test

results may very well be misinterpreted and/or misrepresented by
your medical doctor and an attempt may very well be made to
convince you to treat these symptoms with pharmaceutical drugs.
If the overconsumption of sugar continues, weight gain leading to

obesity is a common consequence. Your medical doctor may very
well attempt to convince you to treat your obesity with drugs or
surgery. If your body so chooses, it may decide to flush out some
of the excess “sugar” via the urine. This is one of the classic
symptoms of diabetes. Your medical doctor may attempt to get
you to treat these symptoms with medication or via injections of
insulin, rather than by addressing the simple dietary reality.
Please see through your doctor’s inappropriate recommendations.
Please see through their facade. Please ignore their lies.
“I am confident that Western medicine will one day admit what

has been known in the Orient for years: sugar is, without
question, the number one murderer in the history of humanity -
much more lethal than opium or radioactive fallout - especially
those people who eat rice as their principle food. Sugar is the
greatest evil that modern industrial civilization has visited upon
countries of Far East and Africa. Foolish people who give or sell
candy to babies will one day discover, to their horror, that they
have much to answer for.”
Nyoiti Sakurazawa
Nutritional science tells us that ALL carbohydrates are eventually

broken down by the body into their constituent parts. In short, all
carbohydrate ultimately becomes simple “sugars”. Processed
“sugar” just gets to the same end point faster than complex carbs
do. ALL carbohydrates stimulate the secretion of insulin by the
pancreas. Many people are familiar with the “glycemic index”,
but the “glycemic index” only reflects the speed at which the
“sugar” onslaught occurs. A more important measure of the

problem is a simple measurement of the overall carbohydrate load
that you are placing upon your body. Just count carbs! You don’t
necessarily have to go as low as the early stages of the Atkins diet
recommends, but you do need to be aware of your overall
carbohydrate intake. ALL carbohydrates stimulate the release of
insulin. Some just do it faster than others. It’s the total that really
counts.
Has your doctor ever recommended that you undergo an oral

“Glucose Tolerance Test”? They should! The procedure for a
typical oral glucose tolerance test is as follows...
The patient does not eat for a period of time (usually 12 hours) and
then drinks a liquid solution that contains 75 grams of pure glucose.
This is simply “sugar” water. If you look on the charts at the end
of the chapter, you will see that it is equivalent to eating a Hostess
Apple Pie and washing it down with an 8 ounce glass of Welch’s
grape juice. This used to be considered as a lot of “sugar”, but it
is actually less than most people normally consume. Blood is
drawn numerous times over a two hour (or longer) period in order
to determine how high the glucose levels in the bloodstream rise
and how quickly (or slowly) they fall back to normal. In an ideal
world, insulin levels would also be checked during this procedure.
The purpose of this test is to clearly determine how a specific

person actually responds to “sugar”. Does your body make enough
insulin to handle the onslaught of “sugar”? Is that insulin effective
in removing the “sugar” from the bloodstream in a reasonable
period of time? Is the starting level of insulin high to begin with?
Does the insulin level remain too high long after the glucose has
been reduced to a more normal level? All of these questions can be
addressed by a glucose tolerance test. These questions cannot be
addressed by the typical one-time, static blood glucose test. What
matters is not just the level of “sugar” in your blood. What really
matters is the way that your system responds when “sugar” is

introduced into the body.
“Nobody, but nobody, should ever be allowed to begin what is

called psychiatric treatment anyplace, anywhere unless and until
they have had a glucose tolerance test to discover if they can
handle sugar.”
William Dufty
Author of Sugar Blues
Do you realize why your doctor has not checked your insulin,
your glycated hemoglobin or recommended that you undergo a
glucose tolerance test? The reasons they are likely to give is that
your insurance doesn’t cover it or they don’t think that it matters.
The real reason is that they know that if you learn about these
things then you might realize that the real problem with your health
is not “cholesterol”. If you were to realize the severity of your
“sugar” problem through these tests, your doctor fears that you
would be truly motivated to change some of your negative habits.
If you were to stop eating so much “sugar”, you would begin to
have far fewer ailments, and this means far fewer office visits.
Your doctor has no pharmaceutical drugs to pick from in order to
attempt to lower your insulin levels. The only way to do this is
through proper dietary changes, but YOUR DOCTOR AND
THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, THE
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION AND THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT ARE ALL TELLING YOU TO EAT MORE
CARBOHYDRATES!!!
Clearly, the main dietary culprit to which you are succumbing, and
to which you have been victimized your entire life, is “sugar” in
all its forms and in all its disguises. And the main proponents of a
high carbohydrate diet are the very people who stand to profit when
their dietary recommendations make you more ill!
AVOID EVIL, EVIL, EVIL, EVIL WHITE FOOD!
Avoid white rice!

Avoid white flour!
Avoid white sugar!
Avoid processed corn and corn sweeteners!
Avoid all of their variations...
Brown sugar, confectioners’ sugar, dextrose, granulated sugar,

invert sugar, maltose, molasses, raw sugar, sucrose, table sugar,
turbinado sugar, white sugar and the millions of manufactured
products that contain these types of sugar.
Soda, fruit juices, ice cream, milkshakes, frozen yogurt, hard

candy, candy bars, taffy, marshmallows, soy milk, almond milk,
condensed milk, energy drinks, energy bars, sports drinks,
smoothies, coffee drinks, bottled teas.
High fructose corn syrup, corn syrup, corn starch, corn sweeteners,
modified cornstarch, grits, cornbread.
Bagels, English muffins, muffins, biscuits, cake, cookies, bread,

pasta (spaghetti, macaroni, ziti, linguini, lasagna, ravioli) crackers,
noodles, breakfast cereal, breakfast bars, pancakes, waffles, toast,
french toast, sandwich bread, hamburger buns, hot dog buns,
croissants, scones, danish, brownies, fudge, tortillas, croutons,
cinnamon buns, soba noodles, breadsticks, biscotti.
Sushi, rice cakes, rice noodles, Minute Rice, Rice-a-Roni, rice

milk.
Even meat, nuts, vegetables, seeds, beans, dried fruits and just
about every other processed and prepackaged food that you can
name now comes buried in “sugar” in some form.
“According to statistics released by the U.S. Department of

Agriculture, added sugar consumption hit an all time high in
1999 (the last year for which statistics were available), at a
whopping 158 pounds per American per year, an increase of
30% over 1983. The key word here is ‘added’. This doesn’t
account for starches and sugars naturally present in food.
This increase not coincidentally corresponds with the timing of
recommendations to eat less fat. It was 1984 when the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) began advising everyone within
shouting distance to cut fat intake. It also corresponds quite
neatly with the creation of a multi-billion dollar industry in
low fat and non fat foods, many of which are extremely high in
sugar. For more than ten years, the government had planned to
issue a report once and for all damning fat as the demon some
scientists were sure it was. The problem was researchers
couldn’t ‘reverse engineer’ the actual data to make the science fit
the assumption. It is, therefore, a myth that Americans are
overweight due to excessive fat consumption. Americans are fat
largely because of sugar, starches and other high-carbohydrate
foods. Unfortunately, the program to indict fat was left to die a
quiet death, and not so much as a press release was issued to say,
‘We were wrong’. And so many of us still don’t know the truth.
They were wrong!”
Dr. Richard K. Bernstein, M.D.

The following pages list a number of things that people incorrectly

refer to as food. It is all “sugar” and it is all basically poison! It is
okay if you want to eat 150 pounds of poison each and every year.
It is also stupid!
“Sugar” by any other name is still poison!
Brown sugar: refined white sugar crystals to which molasses syrup

has been added.
Confectioner’s sugar: Finely powdered sucrose that is 99.9% pure.
Corn sweeteners: Corn syrup and other sugars that are derived
from corn.
Corn syrup: A syrup produced by the action of enzymes on corn

starch which contains mostly glucose.
Dextrose: an old name used for glucose.
Granulated sugar: crystalline sucrose that is 99.9% pure.
High fructose corn syrup: a syrup made from corn which is

approximately 55% fructose and 45% glucose. Usually used in
processed foods and beverages.
Invert sugar: a mixture of glucose and fructose that results from the
enzymatic breakdown of sucrose. Often used as a food additive to
help prevent shrinkage.
Molasses: a thick brown syrup that is produced during the refining

of sugar. The iron found in molasses comes from the machinery
used in the refining process.
Raw sugar: the first crop of crystals harvested during sugar

processing. Truly raw sugar contains a variety of filth such as dirt,
plant matter, insects, etc. Raw sugar sold in the United States has
actually gone through over half of the steps of the refining process.
Sucrose: a mixture of 50% glucose and 50% fructose.
Turbinado sugar: sugar that is produced using the same refining

process as white sugar but without the bleaching and anti-caking
treatments. The sandy color comes from traces of molasses.
White sugar: pure sucrose produced by dissolving, concentrating

and recrystallizing raw sugar. (Table sugar)
Pseudo Food Serving Size “Sugar”
It’s Delish Dried Cranberries 5 ounces 100,000

mg
It’s Delish American Jelly Beans 5 ounces 69,000
It’s Delish Ginger Slices 3 ounces 66,000
Entemann’s Chocolate Chip Cookies 6 cookies 48,000
Haagen Dazs Orange Sorbet 1 cup 48,000
Dr. Brown’s Black Cherry Soda 355 ml 45,000
Haagen Dazs Strawberry Ice Cream 1 cup 44,000
Nabisco Fig Newtons 6 cookies 42,000
Welch’s Grape Juice 8 ounces 40,000
Armor Bologna Fun Lunch Kit 1 box 39,000
Hostess Apple Pie 1 pie 36,000
Yoplait Strawberry Yogurt 8 ounces 36,000
Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice Cocktail 8 ounces 33,000
Aunt Jemima Syrup 1/4 cup 32,000
Hansens Soy Smoothie Peach Passion 8 ounces 32,000
Hostess Twinkies 2 cakes 32,000
Starbucks Caramel Frappuccino 9.5 ounces 31,000
A & W Root Beer 8 ounces 30,000
Heartland Granola (Raisin) 1 cup 30,000
Mountain Dew 8 ounces 30,000
Quaker 100% Natural Oats & Honey 1 cup 30,000
Fanta Orange 8 ounces 29,000
Hawaiian Punch Fruit Juicy Red 8 ounces 29,000
Coca Cola Classic 8 ounces 27,000
Knudsen Pineapple Coconut Juice 8 ounces 27,000
Minute Maid Lemonade 8 ounces 27,000
Naked Juice Superfood Green Machine 8 ounces 27,000
Pepsi 8 ounces 27,000
Red Bull 8 ounces 27,000
Dr. Pepper 8 ounces 26,000
Jello Cheesecake Mix 1/6 package 26,000
Nabisco Oreo Cookies 6 cookies 26,000
Odwalla Green Superfood 8 ounces 26,000
Pepperidge Farms Mint Brussels 6 cookies 26,000
7 Up 8 ounces 26,000
Smucker’s Red Raspberry Preserves 2 Tbsp 26,000
Sprite 8 ounces 26,000
TreeTop Apple Juice 8 ounces 26,000
Welch’s Grape Jelly 2 Tbsp 26,000
Canada Dry Ginger Ale 8 ounces 24,000
Minute Maid Orange Juice 8 ounces 24,000
Soy Dream Chocolate 8 ounces 24,000
Betty Crocker Angel Food 1/12 package 23,000
DelMonte Sliced Peaches (heavy syrup) 1/2 cup 23,000
Hostess HoHo 2 cakes 23,000
Pseudo Food Serving Size “Sugar”
Nabisco Chips Ahoy Cookies 6 cookies 22,000

mg
Dole Pineapple Slices (heavy syrup) 2 slices 21,000
Ghirardelli Double Chocolate Brownie 2” brownie 21,000
Clif Bar Chocolate Almond Fudge 1 bar 20,000
Jello Pudding Chocolate 1/6 package 19,000
Kelloggs’ Pop Tarts Frosted Chocolate 1 piece 19,000
Kraft Marshmallows 4 pieces 19,000
Post Raisin Bran 1 cup 19,000
Betty Crocker Dark Chocolate Brownie 1/20 package 18,000
Manischewitz Borscht 1 cup 18,000
Nestle Hot Cocoa 1 packet 18,000
Powerbar Chocolate 1 bar 18,000
Dove Chocolate Ice Cream Topping 2 Tbsp 17,000
Popsickle 1 17,000
Kelloggs’ Apple Jacks 1 cup 16,000
Kelloggs’ Frosted Flakes 1 cup 16,000
Kraft Pudding Vanilla/Chocolate 100 grams 16,000
Post Fruity Pebbles 1 cup 16,000
Quaker Cap’n Crunch 1 cup 16,000
Quaker Instant Oatmeal 1 packet 16,000
TreeTop Applesauce 113 grams 16,000
Blue Diamond Almond Breeze 8 ounces 15,000
Kelloggs’ Fruit Loops 1 cup 15,000
Campbell’s Classic Tomato Soup 1 cup 14,000
Gatorade 8 ounces 14,000
General Mills Cocoa Puffs 1 cup 14,000
Nabisco Animal Crackers 1 box 14,000
General Mills Lucky Charms 1 cup 13,000
General Mills Trix 1 cup 13,000
Kelloggs’ Nutrigrain Cereal Bar 1 bar 13,000
Nature valley Chewy Trail Mix Bar 1 bar 13,000
Prego Pasta Sauce 1/2 cup 13,000
Van De Kamp’s Cinnamon Donut 1 donut 13,000
Balance Bar Rocky Road 1 bar 12,000
Luna Bar Nuts Over Chocolate 1 bar 12,000
Rice Dream Enriched Vanilla 8 ounces 12,000
Van Camp’s Baked Beans 1/2 cup 12,000
Snapple Iced Tea with Lemon 8 ounces 11,500
Kelloggs’ Fruit Twistables 1 piece 11,000
La Choy Sweet & Sour Sauce 2 Tbsp 11,000
Campbell’s Spaghetti O’s 1 cup 10,000
Kelloggs’ Frosted Mini Wheats 5 biscuits 10,000
Heinz Ketchup 2 Tbsp 8,000
Chef Boyardee Spaghetti & Meatballs 1 cup 8,000
Kraft Macaroni & Cheese 1 cup 7,000
Chapter 15
Vitamin C,
Scurvy
and
Heart Disease
IT’S A JOKE...
A politician died and met St. Peter in front of the

Pearly Gates. St. Peter asked him quite a lot of
questions before allowing him to proceed past the
gates. As he went through, he asked St. Peter to
do him a favor. “I’ve always wondered if the
human race will ever pass a law providing
meaningful reform of the health care system.
Could you ask God if that is ever going to
happen?”
St. Peter replied. “Certainly. I’ll get right back to

you with His answer.”
Moments later, St. Peter returned and shared

God’s answer to the politician’s question, “God
said that yes, meaningful health care legislation
will be passed, but not in His lifetime!”
• • •
PATIENT: Doctor, will my operation be

dangerous?
DOCTOR: Oh no. You can’t afford a dangerous
operation with your health insurance plan!
Glucose is a simple sugar. It is also the main sugar that circulates

in human blood. Glucose is commonly referred to as blood sugar.
Its chemical formula is C6H12O6.
H C6 H
C5 O
H H
H
C4 C1
O H H
O O
C3 C2
H H
H O
GLUCOSE
Fructose is also a simple sugar. Fructose is commonly referred to

as fruit sugar. Its chemical formula is also C6H12O6, but its shape
is different than glucose. Vitamin C has the formula C6H8O6 and
has a shape that is very similar to fructose.
H H
O O H
O
O
H C6 H H C1 H H H O
H O C C C C H
C5 C2
H O O H
H O
C C
C4 C3 H
H
O O
O H
H H
H
FRUCTOSE VITAMIN C
All animals (with the exception of primates, guinea pigsand fruit

bats) are able to chemically convert glucose into vitamin C, but
human beings are not able to do this conversion.
This leads us to three very simple questions...
QUESTION #1:
What if even a small portion of the glucose, fructose,

and/or sucrose that you consume could be converted by your
body into their chemical near twin, Vitamin C?
QUESTION #2:
Could it be possible that your constant craving for sweet foods

is actually a disguised craving for the building blocks of
Vitamin C, but since your body is no longer able to convert
“sugar” into Vitamin C, the craving never stops?
QUESTION #3:
Why are you comfortable eating, on average, 150 POUNDS

of “sugar” each and every year, but are afraid to consume
more than the government’s paltry recommendation of 60mg
of Vitamin C? Do you really think that it is healthy to eat 3000
times more “sugar” than you do Vitamin C each and every
day?
If your body was able to convert only 10% of the “sugar” that the
average American consumes into Vitamin C, this would provide
your body with 18 grams of Vitamin C per day. Interestingly
enough, this is the amount that Linus Pauling, Nobel Laureate and
champion of the benefits of Vitamin C consumed each and every
day, for the last 40 years of his life. Why do Americans think that
the consumption of 18 paltry grams of Vitamin C per day is
frightening, but the consumption of 50 grams of sugar in one

16 ounce soda is not? Why do Americans think that consuming
300-500 grams of various carbohydrates on a daily basis is safe,
but consuming 18 grams of Vitamin C isn’t? Why do your
government officials warn you about the “dangers” of consuming
too much Vitamin C, but yet they allow food manufacturers to
pump “sugar” into our food by the metric ton?
Don’t try to find a reasonable answer. There is none. The food

industry in America is insane, corrupt, misguided and deadly.
In the 1750’s, James Lind, a surgeon’s mate on H.M.S. Salisbury,

undertook one of the earliest recorded controlled experiments in
human nutrition. While at sea, Lind treated a total of twelve sailors
who were suffering from scurvy. He divided them into six groups
of two each. Each group received the same basic sea rations plus a
different additional ingredient...
1) cider
2) vinegar
3) a dilute sulfuric acid mixture
4) ordinary seawater
5) a paste of garlic, mustard seed, horseradish, balsam of Peru
and gum myrrh
6) two oranges and a lemon
One of the pair of citrus eating sailors was fit for duty in six days.
The other was soon well enough to nurse the others. James Lind’s
discovery was duly reported to the British admirality. Their
response: For forty years they continued to punish sailors who
were suffering from scurvy by flogging them. James Lind went on
to become the private physician to King George III and passed
away in 1794. The next year, when he was no longer around to say
“I told you so”, a Royal decree finally added a dose of citrus juice
to every seaman’s daily rations.
In the summer of 1933, an intrepid American dentist ventured into

the outermost reaches of the Yukon Territory in the Canadian
Rockies. Dr. Weston Price found Indian tribes whose health and
teeth were uncorrupted by contact with the culture and commerce
of the white invaders. In the winter, temperatures in the Yukon go
o
as far as 70 below zero. Obviously, lemons are not grown there.
Most of the Western sources of vitamin C are nonexistent.
The Indians were living almost entirely by hunting wild animals.
Dr. Price wondered why the Indians weren’t plagued with scurvy.
He questioned an old Indian through an interpreter:
“How do your people escape scurvy?”
“That is a white man’s disease,” was the Indian’s reply.
“Isn’t it possible for an Indian to get scurvy?” was the next

question.
“It is possible,” said the Indian. “But the Indians know how to
prevent scurvy. The white man does not.”
“Why don’t you tell the white man how to prevent it?”
“The white man knows too much to ask the Indian anything.”
“Would you tell me if I asked?”
The Indian said he was willing but would first have to consult with
the tribal chief. When he returned, he said his chief was willing to
share the secret with the visitor because he was a friend of the
Indian who had advised them not to eat the flour and sugar sold in
the white man’s store.
The Indian then described in detail the way the hunters kill a
moose, then open up the carcass at the back, just above the
kidneys. Here are found what the Indian described as two small
balls of fat: the adrenal glands. These two small balls of fat were
cut into as many pieces as there were people in the family. Each
would eat his appointed share. The walls of the moose’s second
stomach were also eaten. Primitive people who had studied the
eating habits of wild animals learned the importance of eating the
internal organs of animals and often tossed the muscle meat and
filet mignon to the dogs. Modern civilized man, eating for
pleasure and not for survival, does the reverse. Relatively large
amounts of Vitamin C are stored in the adrenal glands of most ani-
mals. The Indians in the Yukon were able to obtain ascorbic acid
(Vitamin C) from the adrenal glands of the moose and the griz-
zly bear for centuries.
“Ascorbic acid, an effective reducing agent, maintains prolyl

hydroxylase in an active form, probably by keeping its iron atom
in the reduced ferrous state. Collagen synthesized in the absence
of ascorbic acid is insufficiently hydroxylated and, hence, has a
lower melting temperature. The abnormal collagen cannot
properly form fibers and, thus, causes the skin lesions and blood
vessel fragility that are so prominent in scurvy.”
Lubert Stryer
Author of “Biochemistry”
Vitamin C contributes in many different ways to the prevention of

cardiovascular disease. It is an important antioxidant, and it serves
as a co-factor for many biochemical reactions in the body’s cells.
The most important function of Vitamin C in preventing heart
attacks and strokes is its ability to increase the production of
collagen, elastin and other reinforcement molecules in the body.
The human body manufactures protein by stringing together amino
acids into chains. In collagen, every time that a molecule of the
amino acid proline is added to the chain, an atom of oxygen must
be added to the chain after the proline. The enzyme that
accomplishes this (prolyl-hydroxylase) requires iron to be present
in sufficient quantity and in a specific form. Vitamin C is required

to maintain iron in the specific form that is needed.
Optimum intake of Vitamin C leads to the optimum production and

function of collagen molecules. A stable blood vessel wall does not
allow atherosclerotic deposits to develop. Collagen that is found in
the arterial walls acts to contain the blood that is being pumped
under pressure through the arteries in much the same manner that
a girdle or belt acts to hold in your distended abdomen after an
all-you-can-eat gourmet feast. While normal blood pressure in the
arm is 120 over 80, the pressure applied by the force of the
pumping heart onto the inside surfaces of the aorta and coronary
arteries is immense. The connective tissue (collagen) that encircles
these arteries is the only thing that keeps them from bursting.
Increased production of collagen means increased stability for our
arteries, veins and capillaries.
The overwhelming majority of plants and animals make large

amounts of ascorbic acid. Humans, high order primates, the guinea
pig and the fruit bat are unable to synthesize Vitamin C. These
species must obtain adequate levels of Vitamin C from their diet or
they will die of scurvy. The few species that fail to synthesize
ascorbic acid all suffer from heart disease, a disease that is not
found in other animals. Mammals synthesize it in an amount
averaging 5,400mg (when adjusted for body weight), which is
nearly 100 times the U.S. Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA).
In one study, more than 30% of a group of healthy, middle-class

males were found to be Vitamin C depleted. In another study,
Dr. James Enstrom at the University of California at Los Angeles
investigated the vitamin intake of more than 11,000 Americans
over a period of 10 years. He found that people who consumed at
least 300mg per day of Vitamin C through their diet or in the
form of nutritional supplements, compared to the 50 mg that is
typically consumed by the average American, could reduce their
heart disease risk up to 50% in men and up to 40% in women.

The same study showed that a higher intake of Vitamin C was
associated with an increased life expectancy of up to six years!
No claim for “cholesterol” reduction even comes close to this
reality!
“Vitamin C is essential for the building of collagen, the most

abundant protein built into our bodies and the major
component of connective tissue. This connective tissue has
structural and supportive functions which are indispensible to
heart tissues, to blood vessels, in fact, to all tissues. Collagen
cannot be built without Vitamin C. No heart or blood vessel or
other organ could possibly perform its functions without
collagen. No heart or blood vessel can be maintained in healthy
condition without Vitamin C.”
Roger J. Williams
Author of “Nutrition Against Disease”
One of the first symptoms of scurvy is bleeding gums. If you have

deficiencies that lead to chronic arterial degradation, it is
theoretically likely that you may also be prone to suffer from
bleeding gums. Dentists routinely and ridiculously give antibiotics
as a preventative because it is well known that bacteria that are
normally resident in the mouth are often found in lesions of the
coronary arteries. If dental work that causes bleeding of the gums
can give mouth bacteria access to the circulation, the most likely
place for them to get trapped would be similarly damaged coronary
arteries. Just as “cholesterol” has been wrongly accused by being
caught at the built up plaque found at the scene of the crime,
bacteria that normally reside in the mouth are also wrongly
accused. They too are a RESULT of the problem. They merely
leak into the bloodstream through weak capillaries in the mouth
and end up in the heart completely by accident. This is just

another example of doctors looking at the EFFECT and
misinterpreting it as the CAUSE.
Has your doctor ever recommended that you check your body’s
Vitamin C status by taking a blood test that measures the
amount of VITAMIN C that is actually inside of your white
blood cells?
Does this sound strange to you? It shouldn’t. As you learned in

previous chapters, blood serum levels do not adequately reflect the
levels of nutrients that are actually in the body tissues. It is always
difficult and dangerous to take a biopsy of actual tissue, so the
easiest way to analyze nutrient levels in body tissues is to measure
the white blood cells that circulate in the bloodstream. White blood
cells have the amazing ability to leave the bloodstream, cross
tissue boundaries, do their work and then re-enter the bloodstream.
Although white blood cells are not technically the same as body
tissue, they are living cells and, as such, they have the same
nutrient levels available to them for their use as do other body
tissues and thus, they VERY accurately reflect what is actually
going on in the body (much more so than blood serum levels).
Even if this is new to you, it should be very, very old news to your
doctor. This information was printed in biochemistry textbooks
before I was born in 1960. If this comes as news to your doctor,
maybe you should find a doctor who stays a little more up to date!
“The concentration of ascorbic acid in the white blood cells may

more closely reflect the concentration of ascorbic acid in tissues
than does the amount in the plasma.”
Textbook, 1959
White blood cells are constantly at the front line of problems

within your body. Wherever a problem may develop, white blood
cells leave the bloodstream and migrate to the area in question in
order to do their work. If the problem happens to be an invading
pathogen (bacteria, parasite, etc.), white blood cells (natural killer
cells) have the ability to simply gobble up the invaders in an
amoeba-like fashion, after which they then internally digest and
destroy the harmful entity. If the danger is physically larger than
the white blood cell, they use different tactics. White blood cells
have the ability to produce incredibly caustic chemical compounds
(such as hydrogen peroxide) which they use to damage, destroy or
at least inhibit large invaders. Think about what happens when you
get a splinter. Soon after it punctures your skin, the surrounding
area is red, and often painful. Soon after that a white substance
that we all know as pus starts to accumulate around the splinter.
Much of this pus is white blood cells doing everything that they can
to blast away and eat away at an invader that, compared to a white
blood cell, is the size of a skyscraper!
Put yourself in the position of one of your white blood cells. If you
were faced with an opponent that was incredibly larger than
yourself, what would you do? You can’t eat the whole splinter
yourself, so you recruit a couple million of your fellow white blood
cells to help you. Additionally, you are going to find it extremely
difficult to stay in the thick of things on the splinter battlefield
while you and all of your fellow white blood cells are busy
secreting caustic compounds such as hydrogen peroxide into the
area. You need something to protect yourself from the poisonous
hydrogen peroxide that you are secreting in an attempt to degrade
the splinter. The splinter doesn’t fight back. It’s just stuck there.
But in order to continue attacking it, you have to be able to protect
yourself from your own actions. Numerous studies have clearly
shown that the activity of white blood cells is dramatically reduced
when their internal levels of Vitamin C are reduced. The activity of
white blood cells is maximized when they are provided with
optimal levels of protective, anti-oxidant chemical compounds

such as Vitamin C.
Vitamin C can directly neutralize dangerous compounds such as

hydrogen peroxide but it can also regenerate the anti-oxidizing
potential of other protective nutrients such as vitamin E. Typically,
vitamin E is incorporated into the cellular membrane of every cell
in the body in order to protect the cellular membrane from
oxidation. With all this harsh white blood cell activity going on
around the cell, it is not practical for the cell to remove any
damaged vitamin E from its outer membrane in order to replace it
with another, fresh and active molecule of vitamin E. And there
should be no need to do so, provided that Vitamin C levels are
optimal. If the stationary, fat soluble, membrane-bound vitamin E
is oxidized as a result of white blood cell activity in the area, then
water soluble Vitamin C can be directed to the damaged area
and restore the anti-oxidant potential of the membrane-bound
vitamin E. This dramatically reduces cellular damage. This
dramatically reduces inflammation. This dramatically shortens the
time needed to heal from any problem. Optimal Vitamin C levels
are critical for all immunity.
So how do you guarantee that your white blood cells and all the rest
of your body’s tissues have optimal levels of Vitamin C?
It’s easy. I call it...
THE GAS STATION VITAMIN C ROUTINE.
Think about your car or truck or SUV or motorcycle. Specifically,

think about your vehicle’s gas tank. Exactly how much gas is in
your vehicle’s gas tank RIGHT NOW? You don’t know do you?
At least, not exactly. And you do not need to know exactly. You
know that your gas tank is not totally empty, because when you last
left your car, it was running until you shut it off, so there must still
be a little bit of gas in the tank. Think about what you would do if
the gas gauge on your dashboard was malfunctioning. Well, you
certainly wouldn’t want to run out of gas completely so every so
often, probably more often then you need to, just to be sure, you
would simply pull into a gas station and fill ‘er up.
I am old enough to remember full service gas stations. One of the

reasons that gas stations had attendants was due to the fact that the
gas pumps were not sophisticated enough to automatically shut off
once the tank was just about full. If you worked with an old style
gas pump enough, as gas station attendants did, you would get a
“feel” for when the tank was pretty close to being full. This “feel”
would enable you to stop the gas pump just before all the gas came
spraying out all over you. It was actually very important to keep
the old gas pumps out of the hands of unskilled people, because
there really was a serious risk involved with pumping gas. Once
the technology advanced to the point where the pumps were
designed to consistantly and dependably shut off automatically
without causing a spill, the days of the gas station pump attendant
were numbered.
So how does this relate to your consumption of Vitamin C?
YOU are your own Vitamin C pump attendant. You do not know
how much Vitamin C is currently in your tank. Your doctor has a
test that would give you this information, but they aren’t going to
help you use it and you wouldn’t want to pay for it anyway.
In effect, your Vitamin C dashboard warning light is completely
missing. What would you do if your gas tank warning light was
completely missing? Do the same thing with Vitamin C. Every
couple of days, as often as you think you need to, fill ‘er up! Eat
a lot of foods that contain large amounts of Vitamin C. Take a lot
(and I mean a lot!) of Vitamin C. Since, at this point, you are an
unskilled Vitamin C pump attendant, you won’t yet have a “feel”
for when enough is enough. You also won’t quite realize it when
you’ve pumped in too much Vitamin C. That’s okay, because too
much Vitamin C is nowhere near as dangerous as too much
gasoline. Eating too much Vitamin C is known as taking Vitamin
C to bowel tolerance. What this means is that when you take too
much Vitamin C, the worst thing that can happen is that you poop
in your pants. If you consume large amounts of Vitamin C, your
body will absorb as much as it possibly can. If you consume too
much, your digestive system will stop absorbing it and make you
go to the bathroom. Sometimes quite quickly, so be careful.
Be careful, but don’t be afraid.
If you were hired to be a gasoline pump attendant trainee, what

would your trainer tell you to do? Would they tell you to pump it
at full blast and take your chances? (If they didn’t like you they
would!) No. They would tell you to watch the gauge on the pump
that shows how much gas has already been pumped. They would
tell you to listen to the sound of the gas splashing into the tank.
They would tell you that it changes in tone as the tank fills up.
They would tell you to listen for the whistle of the air rushing out
of the tank faster as the last part of the neck of the tank fills up. But
most assuredly, they would tell you to go slowly at first. So will I.
At first, eat a LOT of food that contains high levels of Vitamin C.

I have provided a list at the end of this chapter. Then, one day, in
addition to the food, take one 500 mg Vitamin C supplement. Wait
a couple of days (at your discretion) and then take two 500 mg
Vitamin C supplements in addition to the food (don’t use the
chewable kind because they are too filled with sugar). Ideally, you
should divide the doses throughout the day. Don’t take them all at
once. Wait a few days and then take three, then four, then five,
then six. Keep increasing the dose from day to day. If you still
haven’t experienced diarrhea, you need to realize something. You
just took a total of 1+2+3+4+5+6= 21 supplements that contained
500 mg of Vitamin C in each dose. That is 10.5g of Vitamin C.
You do not need to have your medical doctor take a blood test to
tell you what your body has just told you quite clearly. Your body
just absorbed 10.5g of Vitamin C. Your tank was EXTREMELY
EMPTY! Your white blood cells and all the rest of your body’s
tissues were extremely deficient in Vitamin C and they are still not
completely filled up!
Continue to take more Vitamin C each day until you get a mild case
of diarrhea. Just like the old fashioned gasoline pumps, when you
try to put too much Vitamin C into your tank, your digestive
system will reject it and flush out any excess. After you have taken
enough Vitamin C to cause a mild case of diarrhea, you will know
that your tank is full and you will have a rough idea of how much
Vitamin C your body can hold. Diarrhea is a signal that your body
employs to tell you when enough is enough. Vitamin C is actually
a great solution for constipation! The amount of Vitamin C that
your body needs will vary from day to day, but just like the now
extinct gas station attendant, you will soon learn to put in just the
right amount.
It is incredibly irresponsible for your doctor or for the government

to set standards for the levels of nutrients that every person needs
to consume on a daily basis. The RDA is utterly ridiculous! First
of all, most people completely misunderstand what RDA means in
the first place. The RDA (Recommended Daily Amount) or the
RDI (Recommended Daily Intake) is the barest minimum that you
must EXCEED every day in order avoid death due to a deficiency
disease such as scurvy. Numerous studies have clearly shown that
the “average” American consumes less than the minimum of every
measurable nutrient. The minimum RDA is nowhere near the
OPTIMAL amount for vital health. Do you need to consume the
same amount of nutrients as a 350 pound football player? As a 98
pound ballerina? Do you need to eat the same amount of nutrients
the day before you are going to run in a marathon as the day that
you do run? How much Vitamin C do you need when you have the
flu? The concept of recommended daily amounts is stupid!

The amount of nutrients that are needed by individual people vary
dramatically from person to person and from day to day.
What works for you will most likely not work for your best friend
and vice-versa. The right amount of Vitamin C for YOU is the
amount that fills up YOUR tank on THIS day, but doesn’t quite
cause your tank to overflow in the form of diarrhea. Almost, but
not quite. There is no such thing as an average American.
Everyone is unique. Maybe your genetically inherited
constitutional makeup requires you to have more vitamin C than
your neighbor. Maybe it requires you to have less. Maybe the level
of emotional, mental or physical stress in your life is under control
and you can function perfectly well with lower levels than someone
else. Maybe your emotional, mental and physical stress levels are
through the roof and you need to consume far higher amounts of
Vitamin C than other people. No government mandate can ever
figure this out for you. You have to determine your needs for
yourself!
This concept of individual uniqueness and variability is the

cornerstone of health. Whenever you hear some “authority” figure
report that this food is good for you or that food is bad for you,
please realize that they do not have the foggiest idea of who you
are! They do not know you! You are not the “average” person in
their study. You do not eat the same food that the people in their
study ate. You do not work in the same job and you do not have the
same boss that they have. You come home to a unique life with a
unique spouse and a unique family every night. Every time you
hear one of these so called “scientific” studies touting the benefits
of this, that or the other drug, therapy, food, supplement, etc.,
please realize that they are talking about information that is merely
statistical in nature. Their report means very little when you
compare it to the massive readout of data that your own personal
body produces each and every second of your life. Please don’t
listen to the media. Please don’t listen to things that have been
“scientifically proven” to work a couple of percentage points better

than placebo. Please learn to listen to your body. Your body never
lies. Your doctor always does!
Since the human body does not have an empty Vitamin C warning
light on its dashboard, the best way that you can answer the
question of “How much Vitamin C do you have in your body right
now?” is to be able to say...
“I honestly don’t know, but I do know that I completely filled it up

yesterday! I consumed so much Vitamin C yesterday that
I almost pooped in my pants!”
Do you realize why your doctor has not checked the level of
Vitamin C in your white blood cells?
It is certainly not because this white blood cell test is some kind of
new technology that they have never heard of! This is fifty year old
textbook info. Did they not study when they were in school?
Could it possibly be that they do not want you to know of the
vitally important role that Vitamin C plays in immunity as well as
in cardiovascular health? Maybe your doctor hasn’t recommended
that you undergo this white blood cell test because they want to
hear your story about taking too much Vitamin C and almost
pooping in your pants!
Seriously, it is just too easy for your medical doctor to toe the line
and only do all of the “standard” stuff. Your doctor is all too happy
to check your total “cholesterol” and “calculate” your LDL,
declare that you have high levels, write a prescription, schedule a
follow up visit to check on the damage to your liver and then
shuttle you out of the office so that they can start recommending
more billable procedures for their next victim (patient)!
Medical doctors typically only recommend tests that they know

your insurance company will pay them to run. They do not base
their recommendations upon your need. They mainly base their
actions upon profitability. What truly matters is your ability to pay
them or the likelihood that your insurance company will pay them.
Believe it or not, your health needs are not your doctor’s primary
concern, nor is your health their secondary concern, nor are you
their third concern. Your doctor is more worried about their
business, their time, their malpractice insurance, and a whole host
of other concerns. If your needs were the primary consideration on
your doctor’s mind, how much time do you think they would
gladly spend with you in order to answer all of the questions that
are on your mind but you never bother to ask because you know
that they do not have the desire to give you the time that is
needed in order to answer them for you? Concern for you, the
patient, stopped being a primary concern of doctors about the same
time that doctors stopped making housecalls and started making
you wait weeks for an appointment so that you can go to their office
and wait and wait and wait and wait some more. For most of us,
that was long before we were born!
Medical doctors typically only run tests that measure things that
can be influenced by prescription drugs. That way, they don’t have
to get into actually using their brain in order to help you identify the
actual CAUSE of your problem. When your test results come back
from the lab, all the doctor has to do in order to get paid is write a
prescription. Then they get to schedule a whole series of ongoing
follow-up visits so that they can closely “monitor” the damage that
the drug (that they prescribed) is doing to your liver and other vital
organs. That way, they don’t have to get into trying to convince
you to change your diet or adjust your lifestyle or work on your
stress levels or, God forbid, help you to address any part of your
emotional, family, work or social life! All they have to do is send
you to a pharmacy with a little slip of paper. They don’t have to
bill you by the hour for an in-depth conversation. They don’t have
to try to explain to your insurance company why it took them four

hours to help you learn about “cholesterol” and “sugar” and
nutrition and diet and stress, yada, yada, yada. That way, their
office staff gets to enter a simple code number onto their insurance
compensation form, and your doctor gets your money!
As you learned in the previous chapter, there is no drug that can

safely lower insulin levels (without killing your pancreas), so your
doctor has no incentive to recommend that you take a blood test to
determine your insulin levels. Likewise, there is no drug that can
address deficient levels of Vitamin C in your white blood cells.
Put yourself in your doctor’s lab coat for a minute. If your
doctor does run this test for you, they know ahead of time that they
won’t be paid by your insurance company. They also know that
you are going to complain about the cost if they ask you to pay for
it. Regardless of the results of the test, the simple act of
recommending that you take it in the first place opens up the
Pandora’s box regarding the importance of nutrition in maintaining
human health. Whether the test results show that your white blood
cells do need more Vitamin C or not, either way, a century of
denial of the value of nutrition by the entire medical profession
begins to come crumbling down around them in their own office!
Your medical doctor cannot admit that your body might need more
nutrients. You eat a “balanced” diet, right? A balanced diet
provides all the nutrition that human beings need, right? Your
medical doctor has absolutely no intention of openly admitting that
a nutrient as simple, as safe, as inexpensive and as readily available
as Vitamin C could be so important. To admit such a fact would
immediately incriminate them for not having told you that very fact
the first time that you walked into their office. One of the questions
on their initial patient questionaire could easily be...
“How much Vitamin C do you consume on a daily basis?”

That same questionaire could easily come with a standard issue set
of minimum dietary recommendations for you to follow, subject to
change based on your individual needs. BUT they are not going
to go against the almighty American Medical Association’s
recommendations that you don’t need any more than the minimum
amounts that are recommended by the government! They didn’t
stick their neck out when you first walked into their office, so they
are most certainly not going to put themselves into the vulnerable
position of recommending a test that might shed light on the fact
that maybe you do need a lot more Vitamin C than they have led
you to believe.
Remember, you have put on your doctor’s lab coat for a few
minutes to see things from their perspective. You’ve still got
medical school loans to repay. Maybe you have a big mortgage, a
boat payment and college tuition to pay for your three children to
go to Harvard, Yale and Princeton. Maybe you are thinking about
applying for a research position at the local university. Would you
rock the boat? Would you want to pay your staff for the hours that
they are going to have to spend attempting to justify your testing
recommendations? Would you want to have your practice
examined by someone in an official capacity who has the ability to
recommend that your license be revoked? Would you want your
fellow doctors to hear that you, of all people, are recommending
vitamins to your patients? Would you want to hear your former
friends whispering “quack” under their breath in the country club
locker room?
It’s easy to see why doctors don’t do the very best that they can. It’s
easy to see why even the mere existence of fifty year old, textbook
information is routinely denied and ignored. Make no mistake.
The medical world is a business. The medical system is set up in a
manner that drives doctors to treat symptoms, not CAUSES.
Treating symptoms can go on forever. In the business of medicine,
people who only treat symptoms become some of the very best
repeat customers. Business is bad when patients like you get well.
Business drops off when you learn how to maintain your health on
your own. The medical system is not a health building business.
By definition, the medical system is a business of “managing”
disease. The more disease you have, the better their business is!
“Part of the problem is that nowhere in the world can one earn
an advanced degree denoting expertise in health promotion and
disease prevention... The objectives of true health care could best
be served by replacing the current malady-management system
with a system in which doctors are paid to keep people healthy
and fined when sickness occurs. The fine could then be used by
the patient to pay for treatment.”
Rob Faigin
Author of “Natural Hormone Enhancement”
Your doctor has no intention of recommending that you go over

their head. They have no intention of telling you that you should
take responsibility for your own health. They have no intention of
recommending that you consume nutrients that you can purchase
with or without their permission (prescription). They know that
you can go into any health food store in the country and buy a
whole bunch of VITAMIN C without their permission. They also
know that you can afford to do so very easily. Why would they tell
you to do that? What is in it for them? They know that they are
not trained and they also know that they are not qualified to speak
to you about nutrition and diet. Once you get interested in
maintaining your own health, they know that they have begun to
lose you as a steady paying customer. It is a far, far, far better
business decision for them to completely ignore the existence of
and deny the validity of tests that even come close to opening up
the proverbial can of worms known as nutrition. It is a far, far, far
better business decision for them to follow AMA guidelines. That’s
why they write you a prescription for a poisonous pharmaceutical
drug to treat the symptoms of diseases that are CAUSED by dietary

imbalances rather than educate you in regards to the nutritional
needs of your body. Doctors don’t learn about nutrition in medical
school because teaching you to stay healthy by eating properly
would ultimately cut into their profits! That’s why...
YOUR DOCTOR IS A @#&$%*?#ING LIAR!!!
Now, I’m not saying that your doctor thinks this way consciously.
I am saying that they are a product of the medical system. The
government offices that grant licenses get all of their advice from
the professional medical associations. The professional medical
associations get their advice from scientific research done at public
and private universities. Researchers at public and private
universities get their biggest research money from pharmaceutical
companies. Pharmaceutical companies get most of their money
from insurance companies who get most of their money from your
employers and now, due to prescription drug “reform”, they also
will be getting even more money from the people who pay federal
income taxes.
Your doctor lies to you because you want them to. You support
your doctor’s lies whenever you purposefully cast a political vote
for politicians because they support medical entitlement programs.
You support your doctor’s lies whenever you pay the copayment
for your share of the cost of your “visit” to a medical doctor. You
support your doctor’s lies whenever your feet don’t move you to
leave their office when you know that they are not helping you to
identify the CAUSE of your problem. You support your doctor’s
lies whenever you go to the pharmacy and buy the drugs that they
recommend for the temporary relief of your SYMPTOMS when
you know fully well that those drugs are not going to do anything
to help you in the long run, except give you a long list of side
effects. And you support your doctor’s lies with your feet and your
money and your silence when you go back for follow up visits
again and again and again and again and again and again and again
and again and again and again and again and again and again.
Don’t even try to bullshit me. I’m on to you. I have seen it far too
many times... the glassy, dazed, scared, drugged out look in the
eyes of the “patients” of medical doctors. If you go to a medical
doctor, you KNOW that you are looking for drugs. You KNOW
that you want drugs in the vain attempt that you may be able to
forget about your problems for a while. I have news for you: Your
problems are still going to be there when the drugs wear off, and
they are probably going to be even worse. You don’t want to make
serious changes in your life. You don’t want to give up your bad
habits. You want drugs! That’s why you go to the only type of
person who is licensed to prescribe them. You take those drugs,
knowing full well that there is a long list of side effects that they
most assuredly will cause. You wash those drugs down with a
spoonful of the most ubiquitous drug that there is and you even sing
a Mary Poppins song about it! (“A spoonful of sugar helps the
medicine go down!)
You do all of this, and yet you are afraid to consume a modest
amount of Vitamin C in the form of food or nutritional supplement.
Wow!
The following are excerpts from the book...
Why Animals Don’t Get Heart Attacks...

But People Do!
by Matthias Rath, M.D.
“While cardiovascular disease has become one of the largest

epidemics ever to haunt mankind, these very same heart attacks
are essentially unknown in the animal world.”
“Here is the main reason why animals don’t get heart attacks: With
few exceptions [primates, guinea pigs], animals produce vitamin C
in their bodies. The daily amounts of vitamin C produced by
animals vary between 1,000mg and 20,000mg, compared to human
body weight.”
“In humans, who are unable to produce vitamin C, dietary

vitamin deficiency of this nutrient weakens the blood vessel walls.
Cardiovascular disease is an early form of scurvy. Clinical studies
document that the optimum intake of vitamins and other essential
nutrients halts and reverses coronary heart disease naturally.”
“We human beings cannot produce a single molecule of vitamin C

ourselves. Our ancestors lost this ability generations ago when an
enzyme that was needed to convert sugar molecules (glucose) into
vitamin C became defunct. Our ancestors, for thousands of
generations, relied primarily on plant nutrition, such as cereals,
fruits and others, that provided the daily minimum of vitamins for
them. The nutritional habits and dietary intake of vitamins by
humans have changed considerably in this century. Today, most
people do not receive sufficient amounts of vitamins in their diets.
Still worse, food processing, long-term storage and overcooking
destroy most vitamins in food.”
“The primary cause of coronary heart disease and other forms of

atherosclerotic disease is a chronic deficiency of vitamins and
other essential nutrients in millions of vascular cell walls. This
leads to the instability of the vascular walls, lesions and cracks,
atherosclerotic deposits and eventually, heart attacks or strokes.
Since the primary cause of cardiovascular disease is a deficiency
of essential nutrients in the vascular wall, the daily optimum intake
of these essential nutrients is the primary measure to prevent
atherosclerosis and help repair artery wall damage. Optimum
intake of vitamin C leads to the optimum production and function
of collagen molecules. A stable blood vessel wall does not allow
atherosclerotic deposits to develop. The optimum availability of
vitamin C in their bodies is the main reason why animals don’t get
heart attacks.”
“The main cause of atherosclerotic deposits is the biological

weakness of the artery walls caused by chronic vitamin deficiency.
The atherosclerotic deposits are the consequence of this chronic
weakness; they develop as a compensatory stabilizing cast of
nature to strengthen weakened blood vessel walls.”
“The single most important difference between the metabolism of

human beings and most other living species is the dramatic
difference in the body pool of vitamin C. The body reservoir of
vitamin C in people is, on average, 10-100 times lower than the
vitamin C levels in animals.”
“Vitamin C optimizes the production of collagen and other

reinforcement molecules, thereby stabilizing the walls of the
arteries and preventing atherosclerotic deposits, heart attacks and
strokes. We human beings cannot manufacture a single molecule of
vitamin C in our bodies and, in addition, almost everyone gets too
few vitamins from the diet. The inevitable consequence of this is a
weakening of the artery walls, which triggers artery wall deposits
(atherosclerosis). Thus, chronic vitamin deficiency - not high
‘cholesterol’ - is the main cause of the cardiovascular disease
epidemic.”
“Don’t smoke: Cigarette smoke accelerates the biological

rusting of your blood vessels.”
“Stabilize the artery wall through optimum collagen

production: The collagen molecules in our bodies are proteins
composed of amino acids. Collagen molecules differ from all other
proteins in the body. We already know that vitamin C
stimulates the production of collagen in the cells of the artery wall.
An optimum supply of lysine, proline and vitamin C is a decisive
factor in the optimum regeneration of the connective tissue in the
artery walls and, therefore, the natural healing of cardiovascular
disease.”
“Decrease of the smooth muscle cell tumor in the artery wall:

With an optimum supply of essential nutrients, the smooth muscle
cells of the artery wall produce sufficient amounts of functional
collagen, thereby guaranteeing optimum stability of the wall.”
“Relax your blood vessel walls: Spasms of the blood vessel walls
are the cause of high blood pressure. Dietary supplementation of
magnesium and vitamin C relaxes the blood vessel walls and
normalizes high blood pressure.”
“Can already existing coronary deposits be reversed in a natural

way? The answer is yes. Atherosclerotic deposits develop over
many years or decades, and it takes several months to control this
aggressive disease and start the healing process. It is important to
understand that this is a natural process, and the complications
that frequently accompany angioplasty and other mechanical
procedures do not occur.”
“In individual patients, we documented the natural

reversal and complete disappearance of early coronary artery
deposits approximately within one year”
Food Serving Size Vitamin C
Peppers, red, sweet, cooked 1 226 mg

Papaya, raw 1 188
Peppers, green, hot chile, raw 1 pepper 109
Broccoli, boiled 1 cup 101
Strawberries, raw 1 cup 98
Brussels sprouts, boiled 1 cup 97
Pepper, green, sweet, raw 1 96
Grapefruit juice, fresh 1 cup 94
Cranberry juice coctail 8 oz 90
Kohlrabi, boiled 1 cup 89
Broccoli, raw 1 cup 79
Grapefruit 1 78
Peas, boiled 1 cup 77
Kiwi 1 71
Orange 1 70
Vegetable juice coctail 1 cup 67
Cantaloupe 1 cup 59
Mango 1 57
Cauliflower, boiled 1 cup 56
Pineapple 1 cup 56
Tangerine (Mandqarin orange) juice 1 cup 55
Kale, boiled 1 cup 53
Collard greens, boiled 1 cup 45
Tomato juice 1 cup 45
Bok choi (Chinese cabbage), boiled 1 cup 44
Orange juice 1 orange 43
Red cabbage, raw 1 cup 40
Turnip greens, boiled 1 cup 39
Coleslaw 1 cup 39
Chestnuts, roasted 1 cup 37
Beet greens, boiled 1 cup 36
Mustard greens, boiled 1 cup 35
Sauerkraut, canned 1 cup 35
Plantain 1 medium 33
Rutabaga, boiled 1 cup 32
Lemon (without peel) 1 31
Honeydew melon 1 cup 31
Soybeans, green, boiled 1 cup 31
Blackberries, raw 1 cup 30
Cabbage, boiled 1 cup 30
Sweet potato with skin, baked 1 29
Okra, boiled 1 cup 26
Tangerine (Mandarin Orange) 1 26
Lima beans, boiled 1 cup 22
Food Serving Size Vitamin C
Savoy cabbage, boiled 1 cup 22 mg

Lemon juice 1 lemon 22
Iceberg lettuce 1 head 21
Parsnip, boiled 1 cup 20
Carrot juice 1 cup 20
Turkey giblets, cooked 1 cup 20
Squash, baked 1 cup 19
Starfruit 1 19
Dandelion greens, boiled 1 cup 19
Chinese cabbage, boiled 1 cup 19
Onions 1 cup 19
Scallions 1 cup 19
Clam, canned 3 ounces 19
Chicken giblets, cooked 1 cup 18
Turnips, boiled 1 cup 18
Spinach, boiled 1 cup 18
Grapes 1 cup 17
Sweet corn, canned 1 cup 17
Asparagus, boiled 4 spears 15
Mung beans 1 cup 14
Blueberries 1 cup 14
Romaine lettuce 1 cup 13
Parsley 10 sprigs 13
Watermelon 1 cup 12
Green beans 1 cup 12
Yellow beans 1 cup 12
Creamed corn, canned 1 cup 12
Apricot 3 medium 11
Pumpkin, boiled 1 cup 11
Lime juice 1 lime 11
Prune juice, canned 1 cup 11
Asian pear 1 10
Banana 1 10
Celery, boiled 1 cup 9
Cucumber, peeled 1 9
Apple 1 medium 8
Rhubarb, boiled 1 cup 8
Carrot 1 medium 7
Nectarine 1 7
Pear 1 7
Peach 1 6
Cherries 10 5
Vitamin C is easily damaged during food preparation.

Chapter 16
Collagen
&
Elastin
IT’S A JOKE...
Nurse: Mr. Stephens, you haven’t taken your

medication again today!
Mr. Stephens: I know. I’ve found that I prefer
the symptoms of my original disease to the side
effects of the drugs!
• • •
A doctor was doing his rounds when, to his

horror, he saw one of his patients lying in bed,
half dead. “Nurse! Did you give this man two
tablets every eight hours as I prescribed?”
“No doctor,” the dyslexic nurse replied. “I gave
him eight tablets every two hours. I’m sorry!”
The doctor moved on to the next patient who was
nearly comatose. “Nurse! Did you give this
patient one spoonful of medication every six
hours as I prescribed?”
“No doctor, I gave him six spoonfuls of medicine
every hour on the hour. My mistake!”
Finally, the doctor moved on to the third patient
who was writhing in extreme agony. “Nurse!
Did you prick this man’s boil as I instructed?”
“Oops!”
PROTEIN
The word “protein”, which was coined in the 1800s, comes from
the Greek word “proteios”, meaning “of primary importance”.
Proteins were the first substances found to be vital for the
formation of living tissue. Excluding water, about 75% of our
body mass is made up of protein. There are literally millions of
different proteins. All proteins are constructed from individual
building blocks known as amino acids. Just as an infinite number
of houses can be constructed from just a few different styles of
brick, an infinite number of proteins can be constructed from just
a few different amino acids. The human body makes use of at least
30 amino acids, twenty are used for 95% of all proteins, and 8-10
must be obtained from food because the body is unable to
manufacture them from other nutrients. I repeat... certain amino
acids must be obtained from food because the body is unable to
manufacture them from other nutrients.
The proteins that are manufactured by the body perform many

different functions which can be divided into two basic categories:
functional protein (enzymes) and structural protein (connective
tissue).
Today, the average American consumes less than 12% of their

daily caloric intake in the form of protein. Our Paleolithic
ancestors, the hunter gatherers of just 10,000 years ago, consumed
more than 30% of their daily caloric intake in the form of protein.
They were far, far more active than we are today. Archeological
records also show that they suffered very little, if at all, from the
ailments that afflict modern, “civilized” human beings, such as
heart disease, cancer, arthritis, diabetes and obesity.
A dietary deficit of protein can cause fatigue, premature aging,

erratic blood sugar levels, dull hair, weak nails and a whole host of
other symptoms. When the diet is deficient in protein, the body is
forced to break down existing tissue and to stop production of

relatively non-essential proteins in order to conserve resources.
The body’s reserves of protein are found in muscle, bone and
connective tissue, so dietary deficiencies of protein lead to a
decrease of the lean body mass that is found in muscle, bone and
connective tissue. Hair and nails are made primarily from protein,
so these body parts are often the first to show the signs of
deficiency. Dry, lackluster, brittle and falling hair or split,
cracking, ridged or otherwise deformed fingernails and toenails are
also an early warning. The point to remember is this: Absolutely
every function that is performed by every cell of your body is made
possible by enzymes and a host of cofactors (co-enzymes) that
work with those enzymes. Without enzymes, life itself would be
impossible. Since nearly all enzymes are made from protein, life
itself is absolutely not possible without protein! That’s is why
protein is called protein. The word itself means that it is the
primary necessity of life. So how much of the “primary necessity
of life” do you eat on a regular basis?
COLLAGEN
Collagen is a long, fibrous structural connective tissue that

provides form, rigidity and strength to tendons, ligaments, lungs,
arteries and nearly all other bodily tissues. Collagen serves as a
scaffolding or matrix that holds the entire body together. Collagen
is a protein that is only made in human and animal tissues.
Collagen is not found in plants. It is the connective tissue that
holds each person together. Collagen comprises about 30% of all
bodily protein. It is also found in bone, even tooth enamel and
many other tissues that provide structural support or mechanical
function in the body. Collagen is the main reinforcing protein that
surrounds the arteries. Collagen type IV forms the basal lamina of
epithelial tissue such as that found in arteries. The basal lamina is
often called the basement membrane. Collagen fibers knit the body
tissues together by forming scar tissue whenever there is damage

due to accident or surgery. Collagen is made up of amino acids that
coil into a triple helix structure, much like the braids that many
people wear in their hair. This triple helix structure is incredibly
strong. It is stronger than a strand of steel of comparable thickness.
Microscopic view of Collagen
The three strands that make up a braided collagen fiber must twist
and twist around each other. The amino acids glycine and proline
make up approximately 50% of every collagen molecule. Proline
is a unique amino acid in that it is three-dimensionally kinked or
bent, which is the perfect quality for braiding. Glycine is the
smallest amino acid. It is thus able to fit more tightly into the
braided triple-helix collagen molecule than any other amino acid
possibly could. Hydroxy-proline is created during the construction
of collagen fibers after a regular proline molecule has been
incorporated into the collagen structure. Hydroxy-proline helps to
hold the three strands together. Prolyl-4-hydroxylase is the enzyme
that is necessary to convert proline into hydroxy-proline.
“It is fascinating to me that physicians have had cadaver

dissection in medical school. Connective tissue is everywhere
when you open up and dissect a cadaver, but the information
about its importance in clinical practice is completely lost.”
Ronald B. Keys, Ph.D.
The three individual strands of the collagen triple helix are

bound to each other by covalent bonds. As any animal ages, this
cross-linking tends to increase. The process of tanning leather
increases this cross-linking even more, making the animal skin
permanently stronger and tougher.
When collagen is heated in water, the strands of the triple helix

unwind and separate. These random coils float in the water. As
these strands cool, they attempt to reattach themselves, but are
only able to do so haphazardly. The pockets that form between the
strands of protein trap the water that was used to dissolve the
collagen. The result is gelatin. The collagen protein strands in
gelatin can absorb up to 10 times their weight in water. Gelatin is
made by boiling collagen for a long time until it dissolves into the
water. At cooler temperatures, the gelatin congeals into a very
gummy substance. You will see this in roasting pans that have
cooled after cooking a whole chicken or turkey for the holidays.
Obviously, this is the main ingredient in Jell-O.
According to the Gelatin Manufactures Institute of America, the

most commonly used source materials for the collagen from which
gelatin is made are pork skin, cattle bones and cattle hide. The raw
materials are soaked in an acidic and/or an alkaline solution and
washed several times. Then the materials are boiled several times
to extract the gelatin. The gelatin is filtered, concentrated, chilled
and dried. Once it is dried, the gelatin is ground into a brittle,
transparent, colorless, tasteless and odorless powder.
Gelatin has a multitude of uses. The obvious is dessert, But

gelatin finds its way into confections such as marshmallows,
gummy candies, as a thickener for ice cream, and sour cream.
Gelatin is used to make capsules for nutritional supplements.
Gelatin was even used as a substitute for blood plasma during
World War II. Gelatin is used in preparing the silver halide
emulsions used in photographic paper and recently, gelatin has
even found use as an ingredient in paintballs!
An interesting fact about gelatin. When gelatin is hooked up to the

instrument used to measure human brainwaves (electroencephalo-
graph or EEG), the gelatin demonstrates electrical activity that is
virtually identical to the brain waves of a healthy adult human!
ELASTIN
Elastin is a structural protein that provides flexibility to various

body tissues such as the lungs, skin, bladder, stomach, vagina,
uterus and arteries. Any tissue that needs to be able to stretch and
then recoil back to its original shape most likely contains an ample
supply of elastin.
A good way to think of elastin is to visualize countless rubber

bands that are tied together at a great number of places. When the
rubber bands are pulled, they are flexible enough to stretch in
response to the pressure, but as soon as the pressure is released,
they immediately recoil to their original position. The large
number of cross linkages within the elastin matrix makes elastin a
very stable protein that greatly resists both physical, chemical and
enzymatic degradation.
Loss of elastic recoil in bodily tissues is viewed as a sign that

the tissue is not as healthy as it should be. Elastin consists of
polypeptide chains that are randomly “kinked’ and connected by
covalently bonded cross links. When placed under tension, elastin

has the ability to stretch an additional 40% in length from its
resting length before breaking. In contrast, collagen (although
stronger than elastin), will only stretch 1-2% in length, regardless
of the tension that is placed upon it. The chemical environment in
which elastin is located alters its flexibility. It has been said that
elastin behaves like the ideal rubber when bathed in DMSO
(Di-Methyl-Sulf-Oxide). Elastin has an affinity for calcium ions.
Studies have shown that during periods of inactivity, the elastin
fibers tend to calcify, harden and become more brittle.
Conceptual View of Elastin

That is “Relaxed”
Cross-Links
Conceptual View of Elastin Microscopic View of Elastin

That Has Been “Stretched”
The process by which cells manufacture elastin is quite complex.

Individual fibers known as tropo-elastin are manufactured within
various types of cells. Depending upon their anatomical location,
this includes chondroblasts, myofibroblasts, mesothelial and
smooth muscle cells such as those found in the arteries. Different
animal species manufacture different variations of tropo-elastin and
different tissues within the human body produce different forms as
well, but all of the different forms of tropo-elastin are made from
amino acids, which are the building blocks of all protein. The most
common forms of tropo-elastin in humans are made from the
following sequences of amino acids:
• Valine - Proline - Glycine - Valine - Glycine

• Alanine - Proline - Glycine - Valine - Glycine - Valine
• Valine - Proline - Glycine - Glycine
• Valine - Proline - Glycine - Phenylalanine - Glycine - Valine -
Glycine - Alanine - Glycine
After the tropo-elastin is secreted by these cells into the

extracellular space, a specific binding protein chaffeurs the
tropo-elastin into the elastin matrix, while protecting it from
degradation along the way. The building block of elastin
(tropo-elastin) is easily degraded and must be protected until it is
attached to the elastin matrix. The binding protein also acts as a
sort of scaffold in order to position the tropo-elastin properly
within the elastin matrix. The completed elastin matrix is not
digested (hydrolized) by the human digestive enzymes trypsin,
chymotrypsin or pepsin, but it is broken down by plant based
proteolytic (protein digesting) enzymes such as bromelain, ficin
and papain.
“Acute, sustained hypertension induces elastin protein

expression and subsequent increase in arterial wall thickness.”
Travis Maak
Department of Surgery, Stanford University
Elastin requires the formation of lysine-derived cross links. Once

the tropo-elastin has been secreted into the extracellular matrix it
undergoes modifications that cause it to cross-link to other
tropo-elastin fibers and form a matrix that is insoluble and nearly

indestructable. These cross links form spontaneously after the
enzyme lysyl oxidase prepares specific sections of the newly
secreted, individual tropo-elastin fibers. The areas of cross linking
typically contain stretches of the amino acid lysine separated
by either two or three molecules of the amino acid alanine.
The enzyme that prepares these areas for linkage, lysyl oxidase,
ceases to function properly when the extracellular environment is
deficient in either Vitamin C or copper.
“The degradation of elastin fibers... is accompanied by repair

processes that are insufficient and fail to prevent the progression
of disease. Our central hypothesis is that elastin can be
regenerated... thereby restoring, at least in part, the pre-existing
elastin fiber organization and its mechanical properties. Such
repair might prevent mechanical forces from causing failure.”
Phillip J. Stone
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
The ability to initiate a repair process after injury is an inherent

property of all tissues. Damaged elastin fibers, like other tissues,
undergo repair. All repair processes, however, are influenced by
the nutritional status of the person. The raw materials, the
enzymes and the vitamin and mineral co-factors must all be present
in optimal amounts. If the destructive process is mild, so that the
elastin fibers lose their integrity, but are not ruptured, then they
can be restored by repair processes. Newly manufactured
tropo-elastin fibers made by smooth muscle cells in the arteries are
incorporated into the damaged elastin. As long as repair can keep
up with degradation, disease does not result.
All of this scientific background is presented here to give you an

understanding of what really happens in damaged coronary
Bloodstream
(Lumen)
Intima
(Endothelium) Lipoprotein(a)
coming to the
rescue to patch
Elastin Layer the cracks!
Lp(a) Lp(a)
Lp
(a) (a)
Medial Layer Lp
Adventitia White Blood Cells

Outermost layer Atheroma
(Collagen) Smooth muscle cells multiplying
and moving into the artery
in order to repair the damage
arteries that can lead to heart attacks. The graphic representation of

an artery that appears on this page is the same graphic that was
presented in a previous chapter. It is presented here again for
convenience. What really happens in cardiovascular disease is that,
when the intima (inner lining) of the coronary artery is damaged
due to physical stresses caused by the beating heart, and the
underlying elastin layer begins to degrade, the smooth muscle cells
that surround the elastic layer go through a process known as
dedifferentiation and they begin to migrate into the elastin layer.
These smooth muscle cells form what is known as an atheroma.

This is merely a growth, a benign, non-cancerous, necessary
growth, just as a scab or a temporarily raised scar is a growth that
is necessary to heal an external wound on the skin. The only
difference is that this scab, this growth, is on the inside of your

coronary artery. This growth MUST occur if there is damage to the
inner lining of the artery. This growth is how the body repairs this
damage! Your short sighted medical doctor sees this growth as a
disease. They fail to recognize it as a marvelous part of the body’s
repair processes. Why does your doctor strive to prevent or do
battle with your body’s own attempts to repair itself? Why does
your medical doctor ignore the many CAUSES that necessitate this
repair process in the first place? By now, you ought to know the
answer. Because..
Whenever elastin fibers are placed under great tension, the

surrounding muscle fibers shift into repair and maintenance mode
in order to replenish, repair and restructure the elastin layer.
One of the most basic realities that your medical doctor is ignoring,
is that much research has already been done in order to determine
the nutrients that are needed in the diet in order to facilitate the
repair processes that maintain healthy levels of collagen and
elastin. Maybe that is because they don’t know very much about
nutrition.
“The medical establishment, focusing on pathology and chemical

treatment by drugs, has long equated diet with what’s put on
hospital trays. Even today, when five of America’s major health
problems - heart, liver, cancer, diabetes and cerebrovascular
diseases - have been proved to be related to diet, just 23% of
American medical schools require a course in nutrition and
many offer none.”
Betty Fussell
“The extracellular matrix protein elastin acts as a regulator of

vascular smooth muscle proliferation and migration, a finding
that could have implications for the therapy of vascular
proliferative diseases. Various vascular proliferative diseases,
including atherosclerosis and coronary restenosis, are
characterized by dedifferentiation, abnormal proliferation and
migration of vascular smooth muscle cells... the extracellular
matrix protein elastin, which is secreted by vascular smooth
[muscle] cells, inhibited cell proliferation”
S.K. Karnik
As you saw in the previous chapter, Vitamin C is vital for the

optimal performance of these repair functions. In the next chapter,
you will see that copper is also vital to the optimal performance of
these repair functions. In this chapter, you need simply to realize
that collagen and elastin are very, very, very unique proteins.
All proteins are made from various combinations of amino acids.
The combinations of amino acids that are found in collagen and
elastin are incredibly unique. Do you know what they are?
Well, if you don’t know what the amino acid content of collagen
and elastin are, (and there is no reason why you would, because
your doctor most certainly does not know either!) then it is a safe
bet that you haven’t been able to make sure that you are getting
adequate amounts in your diet. How can you eat a proper diet to
maintain your body’s collagen and elastin if you have absolutely no
idea what you should eat in order to get the necessary nutrients?
All protein is NOT created equal! To begin with, the average

American diet is woefully deficient in protein. But even people
who consume massive amounts of protein don’t have a clue as to
the details of the amino acid content of the protein that they
consume. Please realize that even if you consume vast quantities
of protein, the mixture of amino acids that you are getting from
that protein may not be aligned with the mix of amino acids that
your body actually needs. Everyone’s needs are different and
everyone needs to consume a unique diet in order to meet those
needs. Every individual person’s needs change on a day-to-day,
and even on a minute-by-minute basis. No one can tell you what
you should eat on a regular basis because there is no such thing as
a regular basis. Every day is different. The information in the
tables at the end of this chapter provides you with a database from
which you can start to make better decisions regarding the foods
that you choose to eat. A brief summary: Eat gelatin!
The most unique aspect of collagen and elastin, and their edible
cousin, gelatin,, are their unusual chemical make-up. As you will
see in the charts on the following pages, no other protein rich food
even comes close to providing as much of the specific amino acids
glycine, proline and hydroxy-proline as collagen, gelatin and
elastin do. The amino acids glycine, proline and hydroxy-proline
account for nearly 50% of the structural components of human
collagen and elastin.
The foods listed in the charts at the end of this chapter are the best
sources of glycine and proline, regardless of the percentages
shown in these charts, simply because these foods contain much
larger amounts of protein compared to the amount of protein found
in other foods. Please also note that vegetables, fruit, grains,
legumes, and certainly all processed foods contain exceedingly
small amounts of glycine and proline. Sugar contains absolutely
none!
For over 100 years, collagen and elastin have been looked down
upon as lowly, incomplete proteins because they do not contain the
amino acid tryptophan. Tryptophan is not necessary for the
production of collagen or elastin. The main ingredients found in
collagen (and gelatin, which is the edible form of collagen) and
elastin are glycine and proline. Most medical, nutritional and

scientific “authorities” downplay the importance of these amino
acids because they believe that the body can manufacture them in
adequate amounts from other nutrients.
Collagen is the scaffold that holds the entire body together, and
elastin is the flexible protein that provides flexibility and resilience,
especially in the cardiovascular system, yet vegans and certain
types of vegetarians consume absolutely zero collagen and elastin!
In fact, many vegetarians go out of their way to specifically avoid
the consumption of gelatin. I have personally witnessed
vegetarians refusing to swallow a nutritional supplement because
its ingredients were contained within a gelatin capsule. Even
hardy, carnivorous meat eaters tend to avoid the “tough cuts” of
meat, the sinew and the gristle that contain the most collagen and
elastin fibers. The “authority” figures in the health industry have
been telling everyone to avoid animal products for years.
So why is Jell-O brand gelatin one of the basic food groups

served to every hospital patient in America? Because the glycine
and proline found in gelatin are necessary for the healing of
surgical wounds! Medical and governmental “officials” have
classified glycine and proline as “non-essential” amino acids
simply because they can be manufactured by the body, but just
because they CAN be manufactured by the body does not mean that
they WILL be made in optimal amounts. Their “official”
information is true, but their overall perspective is inadequate and
misdirected. Don’t listen to what doctors say, look at what they do
and ask yourself: Why is gelatin the most well-known hospital
food?
Why should human beings force their body to manufacture

some of the most basic building blocks from scratch when
these nutrients are readily available in an extremely inexpensive
food such as gelatin? Because some “authority” figure says that it
is not necessary? Because some “authority” figure says that

glycine and proline are not essential amino acids for human beings,
even though 50% of all human beings die due to heart disease
which is essentially caused by weakened and damaged collagen
and elastin fibers? From what foods do YOU get adequate
amounts of the amino acids glycine and proline in YOUR diet?
The lack of logic is unforgivable! The term “non-essential” is a

misnomer. A better term to use would be “synthesizable.”
The amino acids glycine and proline are just as vital to human
metabolism as the so-called “essential” amino acids. In fact, one
could argue that they are so important that the body has developed
a method to manufacture them precisely BECAUSE they are so
important. Make it easy for your body to do its job. Have some
natural, additive free gelatin. It’s inexpensive and it’s easy to eat!
When the body attempts to manufacture a protein, it is directly

analagous to what you do when you attempt to complete a jugsaw
puzzle. If even one piece of the puzzle is missing, it is impossible
to complete the puzzle properly and totally. Likewise, when the
body attempts to produce a protein, it must have all of the
ingredients necessary to complete the puzzle, or the protein will
not be made properly. If anything is missing, that ingredient is
referred to as a “rate-limiting” ingredient. Any piece of the puzzle
can be missing, so any of the many building blocks that go into
making protein, if missing, can become a “rate-limiting” nutrient.
In the production of collagen and elastin, both Vitamin C and
copper (as you will soon see) can be deficient, and thus limit the
rate of production of these important proteins. But since glycine
and proline comprise at least 50% of the raw materials that end up
in collagen and elastin, doesn’t it make sense to provide all that the
body needs, and then some?
It is abundantly clear that the body needs collagen. More

than 30% of all the protein in the body is collagen. It is also
abundantly clear that millions of people are suffering from a

multitude of collagen deficiency diseases (arthritis, osteoporosis,
cardiovascular disease, etc.). Why not provide the building blocks
of this collagen in the diet of the average American in ready made
form the way that they do for hospital patients? (Well, maybe with
plain Knox brand gelatin, without all the artificial colors,
sweeteners and preservatives that are found in Jell-O.
“It is very difficult and inefficient for the body’s metabolic

machinery to store excess protein calories as fat. The surplus
almost always comes from extra fats or carbohydrates - and these
are the foods that most frequently make you fat. It is impossible
to overeat pure protein. In fact, you couldn’t gain weight just on
lean, low-fat protein if your life depended on it.”
Loren Cordain, Ph.D.
Author of “The Paleo Diet”
It is also abundantly clear that the human body needs elastin.

Elastin is the flexible, stretchy tissue that enables our lungs,
stomach, bladder, a woman’s uterus and everyone’s arteries to
stretch to accomodate the influx of the breath, food, urine, a baby
and blood, and then recoil to their original shapes.
Please be clear. I am not talking about consuming collagen or

gelatin or elastin so that the body can use the individual fibers that
are found in these substances. I am talking about consuming the
specific basic proteins that contain the raw ingredients that are
needed by the body to make collagen and elastin in the ratios that
the body needs. The digestive system will do its normal function.
The body will absorb what is needed and the cells of the body will
be better able to build the collagen and elastin that are needed
because more of the required raw materials will be readily
available.
“Some people have been told that high-protein diets damage the
kidneys. They don’t. Scientists at the Royal Veterinary and
Agricultural Institute in Copenhagen effectively put this myth to
rest. Dr. Anne Astrup and colleagues put sixty-five overweight
people on a high-protein diet for six months and found that their
kidneys easily adapted to increased protein levels. Furthermore,
kidney function remained perfect at the end of the experiment.”
Loren Cordain, Ph.D.
Author of “The Paleo Diet”
A couple of generations ago, when moms would make chicken or

turkey, they would use the whole bird. After the bird was
roasted or boiled, we would eat the legs, the wings, the breasts
and the thighs of course, but then we would also eat the skin and
gnaw on the bones until very little was left. Whatever we didn’t eat
went into the soup pot, got boiled for hours, along with some
additional ingredients in order to make soup. In short, it all got
eaten.
Now, that wise practice is considered gross. No one eats organ

meats. No one eats liver and gizzards and giblets. No one eats the
skin. No one gnaws on the bones. No one eats the sinew and
tendons. No one grabs the leg and the thigh, pulls them apart and
eats the crunchy knee joint between them. No one eats the white
chewy cartilage at the ends of all the ribs on the breast.
If you are going to watch anything on television, please watch the

animal shows to see how animals in the wild eat properly. In the
animal world, after the prey has been caught and killed, the alpha
male eats the adrenal glands, the heart, the liver and other internal
organs while these organs are still functioning. The alpha male
doesn’t even bother eating the muscle flesh of the recently killed
animal. That is left for the weaker animals in the pack or even for
the vultures and other scavengers that may happen to come by.
Humans have “civilized” their eating habits in the past few

generations to eliminate exactly the most nutritious portions of
whole foods. We scrape the peels off of fruit. We throw away the
green sections of root vegetables like beets and carrots. We quite
effectively strip the nutritious bran off of all the grains that we
consume, and we remove almost all of the collagen and elastin
from the animal tissue that we do eat. As a species, we are
behaving with great stupidity.
“Protein needs to be a centerpiece of your diet. Your focus should

be on eating small amounts of high quality protein throughout
the day, preferably at every meal and snack.”
Jack Challem, Burton Berkson, M.D., Melissa Diane Smith
The current human diet is unbelievably deficient in the building

blocks of collagen and elastin. When is the last time you ate a
really tough, piece of meat? No, you want it to be tender and
falling apart. Why do you then wonder why your body is falling
apart? Yes, your body can struggle through endless biochemical
pathways to make collagen and elastin fibers from broccoli,
tortillas, potatoes, bread and whatever else you eat, but why do you
choose to make it struggle? Is it any surprise that as a society, half
of all Americans die from a disease that is fundamentally caused by
collagen and elastin degradation, yet we refuse to consume the
basic raw materials that are needed by the body to manufacture
new, strong and much needed connective tissue?
When many people think about eating protein, they envision

professional athletes and massive body-builders pigging out at their
training tables. Please realize that your body uses protein for much
more than just muscles. Bones are mostly protein. Insulin is a
protein. Human growth hormone is a protein. Your thyroid
hormones are made from protein. Antibodies that are

manufactured by your immune system are proteins. Your hair,
skin, nails and even teeth are mostly protein. Many of the
neurotransmitters that enable you to think, breathe and move are
made from protein. The digestive enzymes that enable you to
receive nourishment from food are proteins.
“The Nurses’ Health Study is the only large prospective study

to have examined the link between dietary protein and
cardiovascular disease. Over the course of fourteen years,
we asked more than eighty thousand initially healthy women
about what they eat. The group of women who ate the most
protein, about a quarter of daily calories, were 25% less likely to
have had a heart attack or to have died of heart disease than the
women who ate the least protein, about 15% of calories.”
Walter C. Willett, M.D.
Author of “Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy”
So why does your doctor and your federal government tell you to
limit your consumption of protein to 15% of your diet? Because...
Please do not forget this simple fact...
PROTEIN IS THE PRIMARY NECESSITY OF LIFE.
EAT MORE PROTEIN!
My simple suggestion...
Add a packet of plain Knox gelatin
to your daily cup of hot green tea. It’s easy!
Amino acid breakdown of different proteins (%).
Amino Acid collagen gelatin elastin egg whey casein

(whole) (milk)
Glycine + Proline 49.4% 54.5% 37-44% 7.4% 8.8% 12.8%
Glycine 22.7 32.4 27-30 3.6 2.2 2.1
Proline 13.7 13.5 10-14 3.8 6.6 10.7
Hydroxy-Proline 13.0 8.6 11-12 - - -
Glutamic Acid 9.3 7.1 7-8 13.6 16.9 21.6
Alanine 8.3 11.4 9.5-10.5 6.6 5.2 2.9
Arginine 7.7 5.1 9-10 5.6 2.5 3.7
Aspartic Acid 5.5 4.5 5-6 9.0 10.9 6.6
Lysine 4.0 3.4 4-6 6.2 8.8 3.8
Serine 3.1 3.7 3-4 7.3 5.4 5.6
Leucine 2.8 2.5 3.5-4.2 8.5 9.5 9.0
Valine 2.3 2.2 2.5-3.2 7.0 6.0 6.6
Phenylalanine 1.9 1.3 1.5-2.7 6.0 2.3 5.1
Threonine 1.8 1.8 1.5-2 4.4 6.9 4.3
Isoleucine 1.4 1.1 1.3-2 6.0 6.0 5.1
Methionine 0.7 0.6 0.5-1.5 3.6 1.9 2.7
Histidine 0.7 0.5 0.5-1 2.2 2.0 3.0
Hydroxylysine 0.6 - - - - -
Tyrosine 0.4 0.3 0.2-0.5 2.7 2.7 5.6
Cysteine 0.1 - - 2.5 2.2 0.3
Tryptophan - - - 1.4 2.2 1.3

Amino Acid beef ham chicken turkey cod salmon
Glycine + Proline 12.6% 9.7% 11.7% 10.5% 8.6% 8.6%
Glycine 7.5 5.3 6.7 5.9 4.9 4.9
Proline 5.1 4.4 5.0 4.6 3.7 3.7
Hydroxy-Proline - - - - - -
Glutamic Acid 16.0 16.8 15.4 15.7 15.5 15.5
Alanine 6.6 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.3 6.3
Arginine 6.8 6.6 6.6 7.0 6.2 6.2
Aspartic Acid 9.2 9.8 9.3 9.4 10.5 10.5
Lysine 8.5 8.8 8.7 8.9 9.6 9.6
Serine 3.9 4.2 3.7 4.4 4.2 4.2
Leucine 8.1 8.0 7.7 7.7 8.4 8.4
Valine 4.9 4.4 5.1 5.1 5.4 5.4
Phenylalanine 3.8 4.4 4.1 3.9 4.0 4.0
Threonine 4.2 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.6 4.6
Isoleucine 4.3 4.5 5.3 5.0 4.8 4.8
Methionine 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.1
Histidine 3.2 3.6 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1
Hydroxylysine - - - - - -
Tyrosine 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.8 3.5 3.5
Cysteine 1.0 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1
Tryptophan 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1

Amino Acid tuna shrimp oyster crab soy natto peanut
Glycine + Proline 8.6% 9.3% 11.2% 9.2% 9.2% 10.0% 10.5%
Glycine 4.9 6.0 6.8 5.9 4.1 3.2 6.2
Proline 3.7 3.3 4.4 3.3 5.1 6.8 4.3
Hydroxy-Proline - - - - - - -
Glutamic Acid 15.6 17.1 14.7 16.9 19.0 18.4 21.1
Alanine 6.3 5.7 6.6 5.7 4.2 4.5 3.9
Arginine 6.2 8.7 7.8 8.6 7.5 5.1 12.0
Aspartic Acid 10.6 10.3 10.4 10.2 11.5 10.8 12.0
Lysine 9.6 8.7 8.1 8.6 6.2 6.4 3.5
Serine 4.2 3.9 4.8 3.9 5.2 6.3 5.0
Leucine 8.4 7.9 7.6 7.8 8.1 8.3 6.7
Valine 5.4 4.7 4.7 4.7 5.0 5.7 4.1
Phenylalanine 4.0 4.2 3.9 4.2 5.2 5.3 5.1
Threonine 4.6 4.0 4.7 4.1 3.8 4.5 2.6
Isoleucine 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.8 5.2 3.5
Methionine 3.1 2.8 2.4 2.8 1.3 1.1 0.9
Histidine 3.1 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.6 2.8 2.6
Hydroxylysine - - - - - - -
Tyrosine 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.8 3.1 4.3
Cysteine 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.1
Tryptophan 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.1

Amino Acid almond pumpkin sunflower walnuts

seeds seeds
Glycine + Proline 10.7% 10.0% 10.5% 9.0%
Glycine 5.3 6.4 5.8 5.2
Proline 5.4 3.6 4.7 3.8
Hydroxy-Proline - - - -
Glutamic Acid 25.5 15.3 22.3 19.5
Alanine 4.0 4.1 4.5 4.2
Arginine 10.7 14.2 9.6 14.6
Aspartic Acid 10.1 8.8 9.7 10.2
Lysine 2.9 6.5 3.8 2.7
Serine 3.9 4.1 4.3 5.4
Leucine 6.7 7.4 6.6 6.9
Valine 4.4 7.0 5.3 5.0
Phenylalanine 4.8 4.3 4.7 4.4
Threonine 3.2 3.2 3.7 3.1
Isoleucine 3.7 4.5 4.6 3.9
Methionine 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.9
Histidine 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5
Hydroxylysine - - - -
Tyrosine 3.0 3.6 2.7 3.0
Cysteine 1.5 1.1 1.8 2.4
Tryptophan 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3

Chapter 17
Copper
IT’S A JOKE...
A ninety-two year old man went to the doctor

because his left knee was bothering him.
The doctor said, “What do you expect?
You’re knee is over ninety years old.”
The old man responded, “True. But my right knee
is just as old, and it doesn’t hurt!”
• • •
I was having heart palpitations so I went to a

cardiologist. The nurse said that the first visit
would cost $350, but that would include a urine
test, a blood test, an EKG and a rectal examination.
I said, “Hell, this doctor must be good if he can

figure out what is wrong with my heart by looking
up my ass!”
• • •
Why did Dr. Kevorkian cross the road?

To help his patient cross over to the other side!
• • •
Nineteen percent of doctors say that they’d be able

to give their patients a lethal injection. But they
also went on to say that the patient would have to
be really, really behind on their payments!
Copper has been known to be an essential mineral for many

decades. It is present in all of the body’s tissues. The total amount
stored in the body is between 75-100mg, less than that contained
in one copper penny. Deficiencies are common due to soil
depletion and the resultant low levels in most commercially grown
foods. Food selection also plays a huge part in deficiency states.
Manufactured food packaging laws require neither the
measurement nor the disclosure of copper levels in food, so
consumers have absolutely no way to choose foods wisely. The
official United States Department of Agriculture list of foods that
are good sources of copper can be found at the end of this chapter.
Be cautious though, because these values are statistical in nature.
It is impossible for any consumer to accurately know how much
copper is in the food that they are actually eating. Levels of
copper in soil vary throughout the world, so it is impossible to
know if the plant food that you are eating was grown in an area of
high or low copper content and it is also impossible to know if the
animal food that you are eating was nourished with food that
contained adequate levels of copper.
Copper deficiency may result in any of the following ailments...
• Cardiovascular disease
• Elevated “cholesterol” levels
• Aortic aneurism (burst blood vessels)
• Cerebral aneurism (hemorrhagic stroke)
• Irregular heart rhythms
• Increased blood pressure
• Thrombosis
• Iron-deficiency anemia
(copper is needed for iron absorption and usage)
• Hemorrhoids
• Reduced red blood cell function
• Shortened red blood cell lifespan
• Increased uric acid levels
• Reduced thyroid function

• Skeletal defects
• Impaired glucose tolerance
• Poor nerve conductivity
• Reproductive failure
• Defects in pigmentation and structure of hair
• Weakened immunity including:
Reduced cellular immune response
Reduced white blood cell activity
Reduced thymus hormone production
Copper has been found to be beneficial in some cases of anemia,

fatigue, vitiligo, allergies and stomach ulcers.
About 30% of copper intake is thought to be absorbed. Copper is

transferred across the wall of the digestive tract by albumin and is
carried to the liver. In the liver, copper is incorporated into a
protein called ceruloplasmin. About 90% of all the copper in the
blood is bound up in this protein. The highest concentrations are in
the liver and in the brain.
Infants that are fed formula made from cow’s milk can easily
become deficient in copper. This is because cow’s milk can
contain relatively high levels of molybdenum which tends to form
insoluble chemical complexes with copper. Once the copper is
bound in this manner, it cannot be used and must be excreted.
Women can be at risk for copper deficiency after pregnancy
because children are born with large stores of copper at birth,
copper that was provided at the expense of the copper that had been
stored in the mother’s liver.
The primary function of copper is to serve as a constituent of and

as a catalyst for various enzymes throughout the body. All of the
enzymes in which copper plays a part have one unique activity in
common: They are all involved in chemical reactions that consume
oxygen or oxygen free radicals. Some of the enzymes that contain

copper are superoxide dismutase, cytochrome C oxidase, lysyl
oxidase, catalase, dopamine hydroxylase, uricase, tryptophan
dioxygenase, lecithinase, histaminase, ferroxidase II and others.
Copper is a catalyst necessary to the formation of hemoglobin.

Copper that is found in the red blood cells is bound to
erythrocuprein. The reduced red blood cell function and the
shortened life span of red blood cells that are a result of copper
deficiency can influence energy levels and cause weakness and
labored breathing due to decreased oxygen delivery to the tissues.
Copper is needed in many of the reactions related to respiration and

to the release of energy. Copper is a part of the the enzyme
cytochrome C oxidase, which is a part of the electron transport
chain, one of the processes by which the cells release energy from
food.
Copper is found in superoxide dismutase, which has anti-

inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties. This enzyme helps to
protect your cells from damage due to free radicals.
Copper is a part of the enzyme histaminase, which is involved in

the metabolism of histamine, which helps to regulate the body’s
response to allergens.
Copper is found in ferroxidase II. This enzyme participates in

converting an unusable form of iron (ferrous iron) into a form that
is more readily used by the body (ferric iron).
Copper is essential to the functioning of lecithinase and thus

influences the production of phospholipids, which are vital
components of the myelin sheath which protects nerve and brain
cells.
The use of copper bracelets by arthritic sufferers has a long

history due to the body’s ability to absorb small amounts of any
substance through the skin. Copper can also be obtained from
copper cookware and from water that has traveled through copper
pipes.
The World Health Organization states that copper is non-toxic.
Copper deficiency is often found in tandem with iron deficiency

anemia. Other symptoms include fatigue, paleness, skin sores,
edema, slowed growth, hair loss, anorexia, diarrhea and dermatitis.
Copper aids in the conversion of the amino acid tyrosine into the
pigment melanin which gives hair and skin their colors.
Copper is needed to convert thyroid hormone (triiodothyronine or

T3) into its more active form (Thyroxine or T4). Many people
suffering from hyperthyroidism have found that copper
supplementation has reduced their symptoms, often within hours!
Elevated levels of the “estrogens” tends to increase the absorption

of copper, so women with adequate levels of the “estrogens” tend
to be protected from heart attacks more than men.
Copper is THE mineral that actually holds crystals of calcium onto

the collagen matrix that makes up bone. Without copper, bone
cannot hold on to calcium. Anyone who is diagnosed with
osteoporosis must realize that all the supplemental calcium in the
world will not rebuild bone unless there is also adequate levels of
copper available to hold that calcium in place!
And most importantly, copper is necessary for the production of

collagen fibers throughout the body. This activity occurs through
the copper-requiring enzyme lysyl oxidase. Lysyl oxidase is
involved in the production and in the maintenance and repair of
collagen connective tissue throughout the body. Skin, bones,

arteries, in fact, every last nook and cranny of the body is
connected by collagen fibers. Copper is a cofactor for the enzyme
and is a determinant of its activity in connective tissue. Lysyl
oxidase changes certain lysine molecules in collagen strands by
adding oxygen in order to form hydroxy-lysine. This makes these
sites better able to be crosslinked to other activated areas of other
collagen molecules. Lysyl oxidase ceases to function properly in
copper deficiency states. Studies clearly show that the synthesis
of collagen and elastin can be controlled by controlling the
availability of copper.
Zinc and copper have a see-saw relationship in the body. They

compete with each other for absorption in the gastrointestinal tract.
Copper deficiency can occur due to the overconsumption of zinc in
the form of supplements, or through the consumption of tap water
that flows through zinc-coated, galvanized iron piping.
It is my personal belief that the introduction of indoor plumbing

(with predominantly zinc-coated galvanized iron piping) greatly
contributed to the increase in heart disease in the early 1900s and
still exerts a negative influence today. Prior to 1900, most people
did not have indoor plumbing. Early indoor plumbing utilized iron
pipes that were coated with zinc (galvanized). Since both iron and
zinc compete for absorption with copper, it is my contention that
many people in the early 1900s suffered from severe copper
deficiency due to their consumption of tap water laden with iron
and zinc residues from the plumbing that supplied water into their
homes.
While modern plumbing standards have led most people to replace

these zinc-coated iron pipes with copper or plastic pipes, many
buildings are still supplied with water that runs through galvanized
plumbing. I personally renovated a house in 2005 that had 100%
zinc-coated iron water supply pipes.
The problem of mineral imbalances, however, goes much deeper

than what kind of plumbing you have in your house. I have found
that fewer than one out of a thousand people appreciate the need for
balance in their intake of minerals, especially the metallic
minerals such as copper, iron and zinc. Many people regularly
consume nutritional supplements that contain relatively large
amounts of iron or zinc (as supplements to treat anemia or in the
form of lozenges to help prevent colds and sore throats) without
appreciating the long terms imbalancing effects that these
supplements can cause. Millions of people take enormous amounts
of calcium without considering the detrimental effect that this has
upon the levels of all the other minerals in their system. If you are
going to take any mineral supplement, unless you really know
exactly what you are doing, it is usually best to take a full-
spectrum, multi-mineral supplement that provides all of the known
minerals in a ratio that is appropriate for your needs.
To summarize, sufficient dietary copper is absolutely, definitely

and undeniably necessary for health. In fact, it is necessary for
life. How much copper do YOU consume on a daily basis?
So, has your medical doctor every spoken to you about the
importance of copper in regards to the health of your heart? Yeah,
I didn’t think so!
All of the information in this chapter is available in any nutrition

textbook. It is available in your local library. It is available on the
internet. I suggest that you ask your medical doctor to explain the
importance of copper in regards to cardiovascular health and
observe their answer closely. The lies that you will hear are just
another way for you to determine that...

CAUTION:
Approximately one out of every 30,000 individuals are born with a

genetic defect that inhibits their body’s ability to excrete copper.
This is known as Wilson’s Disease. If you have Wilson’s Disease,
then please realize that you have, in some respects, a blessing, in
that you most likely do not have to worry about the cardiovascular
weaknesses that are caused by copper deficiencies because your
body most likely has copper levels that are too high. People with
Wilson’s Disease usually must do everything possible to reduce
their copper intake and should enjoy the copper rich foods listed on
the next few pages with appropriate caution.
Food Serving Size Amount of Copper
Beef liver 3 ounces 3.80 mg

Oysters, raw 6 medium 3.74
Oyster, breaded & fried 3 ounces 3.65
Lobster, cooked 3 ounces 1.65
Shiitake mushrooms 1 cup 1.30
Semi-sweet chocolate candies 1 cup 1.18
Alaska King Crab 3 ounces 1.00
Barley, pearled, raw 1 cup 0.84
Chestnuts, roasted 1 cup 0.76
Soybeans, whole, boiled 1 cup 0.70
Baked beans, canned 1 cup 0.64
Cashews 1 ounce 0.63
Buckwheat whole groat flour 1 cup 0.62
Potatoes, baked with skin 1 0.62
Baking chocolate 1 square 0.62
Sunflower seeds 1/4 cup 0.59
Clam 3 ounces 0.59
Chickpeas (garbanzo beans) 1 cup 0.58
Turkey giblets 1 cup 0.57
Navy beans, boiled 1 cup 0.54
Dates, dry 1 cup 0.51
Duck, cooked, meat only 1/2 duck 0.51
Brazil nuts 6-8 nuts 0.50
Lentils, boiled 1 cup 0.50
Hazlenuts (filberts) 1 ounce 0.49
Vegetable juice coctail 1 cup 0.48
Prunes, stewed 1 cup 0.48
Black-eyed peas, boiled 1 cup 0.46
Wheat flour, whole grain 1 cup 0.46
Walnuts 1 ounce (14 halves) 0.45
Raisins 1 cup 0.45
Lima beans, boiled 1 cup 0.44
Pinto beans, boiled 1 cup 0.44
Kidney beans, boiled 1 cup 0.43
Couscous, dry 1 cup 0.43
Blackstrap molasses 1 Tbsp 0.41
Pumpkin seeds 1 ounce (142 seeds) 0.39
Artichoke, boiled 1 cup 0.39
Spinach, boiled 1 cup 0.39
Oat bran, raw 1 cup 0.39
Pistachios 1 ounce (47 nuts) 0.38
Chicken giblets 1 cup 0.37
Peanuts 1 ounce 0.37
Turnip greens, boiled 1 cup 0.36
Beet greens, boiled 1 cup 0.36
Food Serving Size Amount of Copper
Black beans, boiled 1 cup 0.36 mg

Split peas, boiled 1 cup 0.36
Sweet potato 1 cup 0.35
Pecans 1 ounce (20 halves) 0.34
Almonds 1 ounce (24 nuts) 0.32
Asparagus, boiled 1 cup 0.31
Miso 1 cup 0.30
Coconut meat 1 cup 0.29
Pine nuts (pignolia) 1 ounce 0.29
Red raspberries, frozen 1 cup 0.26
Pumpkin, canned 1 cup 0.26
Pineapple, canned in syrup 1 cup 0.26
Grapefruit juice concentrate 6 ounce can 0.24
Sesame butter (tahini) 1 Tbsp 0.24
Shrimp, breaded 3 ounces 0.23
Mango 1 0.23
Sauerkraut 1 cup 0.23
Pineapple juice 1 cup 0.23
Green peas, boiled 1 cup 0.22
Hamburger, double patty 1 fast food 0.22
Kolhrabi, boiled 1 cup 0.22
Parsnips, boiled 1 cup 0.22
Carrots, boiled 1 cup 0.21
Cocoa, dry unsweetened 1 Tbsp 0.21
Kale 1 cup 0.20
Blackberries, raw 1 cup 0.20
Apricots, canned in syrup 1 cup 0.20
Rice, wild, boiled 1 cup 0.20
Smoked salmon 3 ounces 0.20
Rice, long grain brown, cooked 1 cup 0.20
Squash, cooked 1 cup 0.20
Tofu 1/4 block 0.19
Peanuts 1 ounce (28 peanuts) 0.19
Oat bran muffin 1 0.19
Pear 1 0.19
Apricot nectar 1 cup 0.18
Okra, cooked 1 cup 0.18
Prune juice 1 cup 0.17
Milk chocolate with almonds 1 bar (1.45 ounce) 0.17
Swordfish 3 ounces 0.17
Cherries, red tart sour 1 cup 0.17
Mung beans, sprouted 1 cup 0.17
Pineapple, fresh 1 cup 0.17
Milk chocolate 1 bar (1.45 ounce) 0.17
Grapefruit, sections 1 cup 0.17
Chapter 18
So, What Should I Do?

IT’S A JOKE...
A man walks into an ear, nose and throat doctor’s

office with a cucumber up his nose, a carrot in
his left ear and a banana in his right ear. He says
to the doctor, “Doc, I don’t feel well. What’s
wrong with me?”
After careful examination, the doctor replies,
“You’re not eating properly!”
• • •
Eating at a seafood restaurant, a man starts

choking on a fish bone. His face grew redder
and redder as he struggled to breathe while the
other patrons only watched, not knowing what
to do. finally, a man rushed over and said
“I’m a doctor, let me at him.”
The doctor performed the Heimlich maneuver

and the bone shot out of the man’s mouth.
“Thank you, thank you” said the man. “I owe

you my life. How can I repay you?”
The doctor replied, “I’ll settle for half of what

you would have paid me five minutes ago when
you were choking!”
The information that enables a human being to be healthy is

actually quite simple to understand. This chapter contains my
personal observations about what is good for human health. It is
not only about food. Health involves the entire person. Full,
complete health involves nutrition, emotion, environment, posture,
love, friendship, community, life purpose and much much more.
I am not perfect, but I do my best to follow the guidelines
explained in this chapter. It works for me, and it works for others.
It will work for you also, but you have to try.
FIRST AND FOREMOST
Stop taking drugs. Completely. No illegal drugs. No legal drugs.

No prescription drugs. No over the counter, non-prescription
drugs. No aspirin. No drugs of any kind. PERIOD. Clean out
your medicine cabinet and throw them all away. I hate to admit it,
but Nancy Reagan was right: “Just say NO!” Drugs are poison!
Somehow, some way, the medical and pharmaceutical industries

have managed to convince you to swallow poison (drugs) in
the pursuit of health. Absolutely nothing could be more absurd.
STOP TAKING DRUGS!
“I’m a big believer in, if man makes it, don’t eat it - cakes, pies,
ice cream, fries, soda pop, that’s what’s killing people. Would
you get your dog up in the morning and give him a cup of coffee,
a cigarette and a doughnut? You’ve got to eat more natural foods
in their natural state... Your canned stuff, fried stuff, most of
your vegetables are picked green, then stored. I eat fish seven
days a week. You’ve got to have some protein, whether it’s a
steak or a lamb chop or chicken or turkey.”
Jack LaLanne
DIET
Stop eating refined vegetable oils. No canola oil. No soybean oil.

No corn oil. No cottonseed oil. Stop eating processed foods that
contain these processed oils. Read labels! Stop eating margarine.
Stop eating anything and everything that contains shortening,
hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated oils. These processed,
man-made, artificial toxic oils and fats are literally poisons!
NO MORE trans fatty acids! You do need one-third of your
calories from healthy, extra virgin, unrefined oils, but if the oil you
use does not say unrefined or extra virgin, then it is a health
disaster! Consume natural, real foods (seeds, nuts, fish, meats,
eggs) that do naturally contain oils and fats. Do use butter, extra
virgin coconut oil and unrefined macadamia nut oil for cooking
purposes, but never, ever overheat any oil.
Stop eating sugar. Completely. No candy. No table sugar. No

soda. No maple syrup. No high fructose corn syrup. No
concentrated fruit juice or fruit juice cocktail. No “energy” bars.
Don’t eat anything that contains artificial sweeteners. Saccharin is

a known carcinogen. Aspartame (Nutrasweet) has generated more
adverse reaction complaints to the FDA than any other substance in
history. When aspartame is metabolized by the body, it is broken
down into wood alcohol (methyl alcohol) and formaldehyde!
Mmmmmm. Yummy! The latest poison to be promoted as a sugar
replacement is sucralose (Splenda). Sucralose is literally a
molecule of glucose (sugar) that has three atoms of chlorine
attached to it. Avoid these artificial compounds like the plague!
Learn to appreciate flavors other than sweet. You also have
taste buds for sour, salty, bitter and spicy on your tongue.
Why don’t you put them to work?
Don’t eat anything that contains artificial colors. Many artificial

colors are made from petrochemicals or coal derivatives.
“Is our 20th century lifestyle so bad that we are literally killing
ourselves? Perhaps. There is our (SAD) Standard American
Diet . Less than 25% of us get the recommended 5 servings of
fruits and vegetables a day that protect against heart disease.
Even worse, 25% of the ‘vegetables’ we do eat in America are
french fries! Low fiber is a big problem, despite all the media
attention. The typical American eats less than 1/3 of the daily
fiber recommended for cardiovascular health! There’s our
sedentary lifestyle. Lack of exercise makes us a wide open target
for heart disease. Regular moderate exercise cuts the risk for
heart attack and stroke almost in half. New statistics from the
National Institute of Health show an astounding 58% of adult
Americans get no exercise at all! Americans are ‘stressed out’.
Chronic stress is a part of the American lifestyle. Most
Americans feel overwhelmed. Financial or work related stress is
common. A recent survey finds over 25% of baby boomers (at the
peak of their careers and earning power) still feel out of control
in their lives. Chronic stress causes coronary arteries to constrict
and blood pressure to soar. It’s is no wonder our hearts are about
to explode!”
Linda Page, N.D.
Author of “Healthy Healing”
Eat ORGANIC. Eat only ORGANIC. (Unless you like pesticides!)

Eat FREE RANGE and WILD HARVESTED meats.
Drink only purified water.
I’m sure that I have lost most of you already.
Stop eating processed wheat. Completely. No bread, no bagels,

no muffins, no toast, no buns, no croissants, no scones, no
brownies, no cookies, no cake, no crumpets, no brioche, no
crackers, no french toast, no pancakes, no pie, no noodles, no pasta
in any form, no spaghetti, no macaroni, no ziti, no lasagna, no
ravioli, no linguini, no pizza, no biscotti, no croutons, no dinner
rolls, no breakfast cereal. No breakfast bars. NO PROCESSED

WHEAT OF ANY KIND.
Stop eating white rice and stop eating white rice that has been
dressed up to look like it isn’t white rice.
Stop eating processed corn products.
I am positive that I have lost 99.99% of everyone at this point.
The way in which you cook your food matters a lot!
Stop eating anything that has been fried. No potato chips. No corn
chips. No french fries. No fried chicken. No fried green tomatoes.
No deep fried mozzarella sticks. No fried zucchini. No fried fish.
No fried onion rings. No popcorn popped in oil.
Don’t eat anything that has been subjected to cooking temperatures

that exceed the boiling point of water. No grilling. No barbeque.
No roasting. No baking. Never, never, never microwave any food.
Never, ever use aluminum cookware. Aluminum has been
implicated in numerous ailments, including cancer and
Alzheimers. Never ever use teflon cookware. Toxic chemicals used
in the production of teflon have been shown to cause cancer in
humans. Have you ever had a teflon frying pan that had degraded
to the point where much of the teflon had fallen off? Where do you
think that the teflon went? It went into your belly or your family’s
belly! Ideally, make use of glass or copper cookware.
Go to your kitchen. Empty out the fridge. Empty out the pantry.
Empty out all of the cupboards. Look at the ingredient list on each
package. Please remember that Mother Nature only makes one
food at a time. If the package lists more than one ingredient, then
throw it away. It is not food. It is a manufactured product that does
not exist in nature. It was not designed by Mother Nature to
nourish your body. It was designed by man in order to earn a

profit by appealing to your taste buds.
What does that leave you may ask?
It leaves only about 100,000 ways to prepare dozens of cuts of

meat from dozens of types of free-range animals. It leaves
thousands of types of organically grown whole vegetables, roots,
fruits, seeds, nuts, WHOLE, UNPROCESSED grains, herbs and
spices.
Eat some foods that contain the building blocks of COLLAGEN

and ELASTIN. In other words, eat some protein. Eat some plain,
unsweetened, naturally flavored gelatin. Make a gelatin dessert.
Put it in your soup. Put it in your stew. Put it in your coffee or tea.
Eat some foods that contain CHOLESTEROL.
Eat some foods that contain VITAMIN C. Eat a lot of foods that
contain Vitamin C. Take a lot of Vitamin C supplements. Do the
VITAMIN C Fill ‘er Up Routine as often as possible.
Eat some foods that contain COPPER. Take a copper supplement

every day. Never take a mineral supplement (especially one
containing iron or zinc) unless it also contains copper.
EAT BREAKFAST. Make breakfast the largest, most important

meal of the day. Teach yourself and your family to gather together
every morning at the gas station of your breakfast table in order to
fuel up for the day ahead. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER leave your
house in the morning running on empty. Would you ever head out
on a long trip in your car without first stopping to fill up your gas
tank? Don’t leave home in the morning without a good, balanced
meal in your belly.
There is an old saying that says people should...
EAT BREAKFAST LIKE A KING

EAT LUNCH LIKE A PRINCE
EAT DINNER LIKE A PAUPER
Our civilization’s social structure seems to revolve around eating

and drinking at night. This is stupid. Do you fill up your car’s gas
tank before you put it in the garage for the night? No. So why do
you fill up your body’s fuel tank before you go to sleep? Oriental
medical practice clearly dictates that the stomach system is most
active and has the most energy from 7-9 in the morning and it also
says that the stomach system is least active and least energized
from 7-9 at night. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to skip
breakfast and run on empty all day long. It makes absolutely no
sense whatsoever to eat a huge dinner just before you are planning
upon going to sleep. Learn to put fuel into your body just before
you are going to engage in some form of activity that will use that
fuel.
Only eat when the sun is up. Never eat after the sun has set.
Follow a rotation diet. This means that you should NOT eat the
same food day after day after day. Get a variety of foods. Too
much of even a good thing is no longer a good thing. If you eat a
specific food today, put it on the bottom of your list of things to eat
in the future. Look at the lists that I have provided and select from
the thousands of foods that are available in this world. Eat
something different. Then put that food on the bottom of your list
of foods to eat. Go eat something new.
It is impossible to correct a problem by continuing the habit that

created the problem in the first place. It is impossible to correct a
nutritional deficiency if you insist upon continuing to eat only the
same deficient foods that created the deficiency in the first place.
“There are no new truths, but only truths that have not been
recognized by those who have perceived them without noticing.
A truth is something that everybody can be shown to know and to
have known, as people say, all along.”
Mary McCarthy
If your body only receives the same foods over and over and over,
then eventually a nutritional imbalance will set in. It may take
months or it may take years, but it will happen. Avoiding this is
simple. Start by eating as many different, real, whole, natural,
organic and free-range foods as possible. Make sure that your body
gets the widest possible variety of nutrients and make sure that it
doesn’t get too much of any one thing.
Take a multi-vitamin supplement.

Take a multi-mineral supplement.
Take a multi-oil supplement.
Every day.
And finally, dramatically decrease the volume and increase the

nutritional quality of everything that you eat. Numerous studies in
animals and humans clearly show that longevity and quality of life
drastically improve when you restrict calories by at least one-third.
I know that by now I have lost EVERYONE.
That’s okay. I honestly do not care if you don’t follow my lead.

Just because I haven’t had to visit any kind of doctor for 25 years
doesn’t mean that you have to listen to me. Just because I don’t
catch “colds” and I don’t suffer from any kind of pain doesn’t mean
that you have to be free of these ailments. I have chosen to be
healthy for the remainder of my natural life by understanding my

body and by cooperating with Mother Nature. You should
certainly feel free to ignore my suggestions. We live in a country
that guarantees you the right to go to the doctor as often as you wish
and gives you the opportunity to take all the drugs, have all the
surgeries and suffer from all the diseases that you create by all of
your bad habits. Just remember though, that it is by your own
choice that you ignore these suggestions. It is merely a matter of
time before the imbalance and the monotony in your diet will
manifest itself as some form of disease in your body. With freedom
comes responsibility, so please, blame yourself for the diseases
that will inevitably result from your bad choices.
EMOTIONS
Explore the world of flower essences and the concept of the mind
body connection. Read books that have been written by Edward
Bach (Heal Thyself), Louise Hay (You Can Heal Yourself), Karol
Truman (Feelings Buried Alive Never Die), Ken Dychwald
(BodyMind) and others. Rent the movie What The Bleep do We
Know? Realize that your feelings and emotions are clearly
reflected in the condition of your physical body.
Pursue your life’s dream. THIS IS PRIMARY! In order to be

healthy, you must first be emotionally happy. In order to be happy,
you must see, at least, the opportunity to pursue the purpose of
your life here on earth. In order to pursue your life’s purpose and
obtain happiness from that pursuit, you must first know what it is
that you are pursuing! Take a minute to look at your own problems
from a healthier perspective. Whatever is happening in your life is
not all that bad. Give a dollar to the next struggling person that you
pass on the street just because you can. Realize that absolutely all
of your emotional and/or physical issues pale in comparison to the
struggles that others are enduring. Good or bad, this too shall pass.
ENVIRONMENT
Get an air purifier for you bedroom, your bathroom, your kitchen,
your living area, your car and your workplace. As bad as our
outdoor air is, indoor air pollution is a far, far greater danger.
Check your house for electromagnetic fields. Don’t live anywhere

near high voltage transmission lines. Limit your use of electrical
and electronic equipment. Unplug every piece of equipment when
it is not in use. Don’t sleep anywhere near an electrical device,
even if it is on the other side of one of your bedroom walls in
another room. The electromagnetic field easily passes through
walls.
Look through your bathroom, kitchen, pantry, garage, basement,

attic and all other storage areas. If you find ANYTHING, and I
mean EVERYTHING, that you would not feed to your child, then
it should be thrown away. If you find body care products that are
not safe enough for your child to eat, then you should throw them
away. Throw away your fluoride toothpaste. There is a warning
right on the tube that it is poisonous. Teeth contain a miniscule
amount of calcium fluoride. The sodium fluoride in toothpaste is
also used as rat poison. It is sheer insanity to use fluoride
toothpaste. If you find cleaning compounds that are not safe
enough for your child to eat, then you should throw them away.
If you find laundry cleaners that are not safe enough for your child
to eat, then you should throw them away. Paints. Petroleum
products. Auto products. If they are not safe enough to eat, then
they are toxic. If these products are in your home and you use them,
then you are absorbing them into your body, so you might as well
be eating them. THROW THEM ALL AWAY!
While you are going through all of your stuff, get a couple dozen
boxes and start filling them up with the things that you haven’t used
(or even seen) for years. Have a yard sale. Donate them to
charity. Throw stuff away. Clean out all the old, stale stuff that is
clogging up your life. Don’t live in a home that has wall-to-wall
artificial carpeting. Brand new carpeting gases off all kinds of
toxic, poisonous chemicals, and old carpeting is a breeding ground
for fungus, mites and countless other negative influences on your
health. Natural wood, ceramic tile or stone floors with washable
area rugs are much better options.
MENTAL
Observe your own thoughts. For that matter, start having your own
thoughts. Stop blindly accepting the thoughts that are spoon fed to
you by others in the media, government, education, medical and
religious establishment.
Throw away your television. Throw away your radio. Throw away
most of the music that you have collected over the years and only
keep the music that provides positive messages. Stop reading
commercial media such as newspapers, magazines, etc. Go to your
local library and read some of the classics.
Put down the PlayStation and your X-Box! Disconnect the TiVo!
Take the batteries out of the remotes! Call the satellite company
and tell them to take back their dish! Play catch with your kids
instead watching someone else playing sports. Go see a live
theatrical performance.
Go for a walk to clear your mind. Strike up a conversation with a

human being. Learn the names of your neighbors. Get a massage.
Relax. Take a breath. Go to a yoga class. Go to many. Rub your
dog’s belly. Play with your child. Make love with your spouse.
Smile. Go soak in a jacuzzi, or rest in a sauna or at least take a hot
bath. Go to sleep soon after the sun sets. Wake up when it rises.
LEARN
Learn how to tell a joke and tell many. Learn a new language, or
at least a few words. Learn how to play a new musical instrument.
Learn a new dance. Learn a new route to work. Go to a different
restaurant and order something different so that your tastebuds can
learn a new taste. Go to a florist and teach your nose how to smell
a new smell. Travel to somewhere on this earth that you have never
been and explore. Walk into a different church and ask someone to
help you learn about their religion.
Take the time to obtain and actually read the books on the
recommended reading list at the end of this book, especially
those marked by an asterisk. They will help you immensely in
developing a natural, real outlook towards health, an outlook that
addresses CAUSES, not symptoms.
POSTURAL
Stand up straight. Look in the mirror. From either side, your ear,
your shoulder, your hip, your knee and your ankles should all fall
along a vertical line. Is your head screwed on straight? Or does it
tip to one side? Has the stress of working on the computer, at a
desk or behind the wheel of a car caused your head to begin to fall
forward? Are you twisted or torqued in any direction? If you are
out of alignment, then you are expending an enormous amount of
energy fighting gravity every minute of every day.
Look closely at yourself. Get someone else to take a picture of you

if all of you doesn’t fit in your mirror. Work on tightening up the
muscles that are too loose and work on relaxing the muscles that
are too tight. You don’t need any equipment. All you need is
balance.
PHILOSOPHICAL
The most important thing that you can do to improve your health
is to realize that your health is your responsibility. You have
to understand and accept that it is your responsibility to know your
own body better than anyone else.
In the 1800’s, I.P. Semmelweis discovered that the cause of

child-bed fever was the failure of doctors to take the simple
precaution of thoroughly washing their hands before going from
the autopsy table to the delivery room. For fifty years, doctors
simply refused to accept the radical notion that their own dirty
hands could be the vehicle that spread disease and suffering.
Semmelweis was hounded as a charlatan and a quack and forced
into an insane asylum where he died in 1865. The point of the story
is that you should stop looking to your doctor for answers. Medical
doctors do NOT heal. Quite to the contrary and by definition,
medical doctors CAUSE diseases on purpose. Doctors slow the
process of healing by treating symptoms with poisonous drugs
which inhibit your own body’s response to the true CAUSE of your
problem. Unfortunately, doctors do not seem to remember the
teachings of the so-called father of medicine, Hippocrates, who
said: “First and foremost, do no harm.”
If you truly want to be healthy, then you should never, never,

never, never voluntarily employ the services of a medical
doctor! Period! No exceptions!
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its

opponents and making them see the light, but rather, because
its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that
is familiar with it.”
Max Planck
Medical doctors do not know anything at all about how to help you
maintain or restore good health. In this regard, absolutely all
medical doctors are liars! I know that this sounds harsh, but I stand
by my statement. Medical doctors, by definition, by tradition and
by law, are only allowed to and only know how to prescribe
poisonous drugs in a vain attempt to cause new symptoms in order
to divert your body’s attention away from the main problem.
Absolutely everything that they do only addresses the symptoms,
the effects of your situation. They never deal with CAUSES.
Absolutely nothing that they do is natural. Absolutely nothing that
they do builds and strengthens health. The practice of medicine
does not heal! NOT EVER. In fact, medical doctors murder
more than 100,000 people each and every year in America with
their properly prescribed prescription drugs! In the humble
opinion of this author, I believe that if you ever go to see a medical
doctor then you are either an ignorant fool or you have been
hypnotised by a very convincing, smooth-talking drug pusher, or
both.
“Since the days of revelation, the same four corrupting errors

have been made over and over and over again: Submission to
faulty and unworthy authority; Submission to what it was
customary to believe; Submission to the prejudices of the mob;
and worst of all: Concealment of ignorance by a false show of
unheld knowledge, for no better reason than pride.”
Roger Bacon
If you truly wish to be healthy then you need to start looking at your
life. You need to start looking for CAUSES! Take a good hard
look at all of your options. Look for possible CAUSES of your
health concern and eliminate or alter those CAUSES. Look
at every possible avenue (physical, emotional, chemical,
environmental, postural, electromagnetical, societal and more) and
do a little something in each category. It is not too late for you to

begin to learn about your body. It is not too late to stop thinking
about “risk factors” and start thinking about CAUSES. It is time
for you to stop thinking about drugs and start learning about food
and nutrition.
Find a QUALIFIED nutritionist, acupuncturist, chiropractor,

herbalist, homeopathic or naturopathic health practitioner to guide
you, to teach you and to be there for you to lean on until you get
the hang of caring for yourself.
IT IS NEVER TOO SOON TO LEARN THE TRUTH!
“Those who manipulate data do not appreciate that

understanding the nature of things cannot be permanently
distorted - the true explanations cannot be permanently ignored.
Inexorably, truth is revealed and deception is exposed... In due
time truth will come out.”
George Mann
(Former professor of medicine at Vanderbilt University)
Whatever your health problem may be, it has a CAUSE. If you

continue in all of your habits, then the results of those habits will
continue to manifest. If you change your habits, your results will
change, as will your health and your life.
What doctors call symptoms are merely the EFFECTS of the

CAUSES that you have created by all of your CHOICES.
Everything has a CAUSE.
Stop treating symptoms.

Change the CAUSES!
Create a new life for yourself.
CHOOSE DIFFERENTLY!
The poisonous drugs that are recommended by pharmaceutical

companies clearly do not address the CAUSE of heart disease!
Heart disease is not caused by a deficiency of statin drugs in
our diet!
CHOLESTEROL DOES NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE,

AND LOWERING YOUR “CHOLESTEROL” LEVELS BY
TAKING DRUGS DOES NOT ADDRESS THE CAUSE OF
HEART DISEASE!
The diets that are recommended by the American Medical

Association, by the American Heart Association, by the United
States Department of Agriculture and by your doctor are not
designed to address the CAUSES of heart disease. These diets
are improperly designed to either “manage your risk factors”
or to placate food manufacturing companies. This is both
stupid and criminal! Their diet recommendations are deadly!
It is stupid to attempt to consume a diet that is designed to
“manage your risk factors” while ignoring the CAUSE of your
problem!
It is my assertion that heart disease is primarily CAUSED by

many of the things that are unique and different about our
modern life. Please ask yourself: What do you do differently
than people did two hundred years ago before heart disease was
so widespread? Two hundred years ago, people did not eat
refined vegetable oils. They did not eat hydrogenated and
partially hydrogenated vegetable oils. Human beings did not
eat 150 pounds of processed sugar every year!
People ate food that was 100% organic! Think about it. There
were no chemical pesticides. Absolutely everything, animal and
vegetable, was grown completely organically! What a wild,
New Age concept! They ate meat. They ate butter. They did
not consume artificial flavors, artificial colors and artificial
sweeteners. They did not consume artificially created,
un-natural pharmaceutical drugs.
THE way to avoid heart attacks is simple. Avoid the poisonous,

non-nutritions chemicals that man has introduced since 1900.
Don’t ask your medical doctor for a pharmaceutical or surgical

solution because, they make their money by selling you the
very types of artificial chemicals that cause health problems!
If you have read this far, you certainly must know by now...
YOUR
DOCTOR
IS
A
LIAR!
.
Chapter 19
Recommended Reading
IT’S A JOKE...
An extremely attractive young lady went to the

doctor and told him, “Doctor, I’m afraid that I’m
becoming a nymphomaniac.”
To which the doctor replied, “Hmm. Why don’t

you lie down and tell me all about it!”
• • •
DOCTOR: I have some bad news and some

really bad news.
PATIENT: What’s the bad news?
DOCTOR: We’ve determined that you have only
got 24 hours to live.
PATIENT: Oh my! What is the really bad news?
DOCTOR: We’ve been trying to get a hold of
you all week!
• • •
Did you hear about the gynecological intern who

was up all night studying and was bushed all day!
I have personally read thousands of books. I have found the

following books to be of specific value in helping me to understand
the basics of human health. I commend the authors of these books
for the wonderful contributions that they have made, and I
strongly urge you to read these books as soon as possible.
(Especially the books followed by a “*****”).
Heal Thyself *****

by Edward Bach
ISBN 0-85207-301-1
Sugar Blues *****

by William Dufty
ISBN 0-446-34312-9
Why Animals Don’t Get Heart Attacks... But People Do! *****
by Matthias Rath
ISBN 0-9679546-8-1
The Cholesterol Myths *****

by Uffe Ravnskov
ISBN 0-9670897-0-0
Protein Power *****

by Michael R. Eades & Mary Dan Eades
ISBN 0-553-57475-2
The Cholesterol Conspiracy *****

by Russell L. Smith
ISBN 0-87527-476-5
Heart Frauds *****

by Charles T. McGee
ISBN 0-941599-56-6
Lipitor, Thief of Memory *****

by Duane Graveline
ISBN 0-7414-1881-9
The Cholesterol Controversy *****

by Edward R. Pinckney, M.D., and Cathey Pinckney
ISBN 0-8202-0155-3
Fats That Heal Fats That Kill *****

by Udo Erasmus
ISBN 0-920470-38-6
Adrenal Fatigue *****

by James L. Wilson
ISBN 0-89057-2152
Syndrome X *****
by Jack Challem, Burton Beckson & Mellissa Diane Smith
ISBN 0-471-39858-6
Going Against The Grain *****

by Melissa Diane Smith
ISBN 0-658-01722-5
You Can Heal Your Life *****

by Louise L. Hay
ISBN 0-937611-01-8
Feelings Buried Alive Never Die... *****

by Karol K. Truman
ISBN 0-911207-02-3
Bodymind *****
by Ken Dychtwald
ISBN 0-87477-375-X
Crazy Makers *****

by Carol Simontacchi
ISBN 1-58542-035-2
Ultra-Prevention *****
by Mark Hyman and Mark Liponis
ISBN 0-7432-2711-5
How to Raise a Healthy Child... In Spite of Your Doctor *****

by Robert S. Mendelsohn
ISBN 0-345-34276-3
Chinese Patent Medicines, A Beginner’s Guide *****

by Mark Taylor
ISBN 0-9662973-0-X
Homeopathic Psychology *****

by Philip M. Bailey
ISBN 1-55643-099-X
What Your Doctor May Not Tell You

About Childhood Vaccinations *****
by Stephanie Cave with Deborah Mitchell
ISBN 0-446-67707-8
What Your Doctor May Not Tell You

About Menopause *****
by John R. Lee with Virginia Hopkins
ISBN 0-446-67144-4
What if Everything You Thought You Knew

About AIDS Was Wrong? *****
by Christine Maggiore
ISBN 1-882639-17-0
The Pulse Test *****

by Arthur F. Coca
ISBN 0-312-95699-1
The Paleo Diet *****

by Loren Cordain
ISBN 0-471-26755-4
When Healing Becomes a Crime

by Kenny Ausubel
ISBN 0-89281-925-1
Fast Food Nation

by Eric Schlosser
ISBN 0-06-093845-5
Empty Harvest
by Bernard Jenson and Mark Anderson
ISBN 0-89529-416-8
The Chemistry of Man

by Bernard Jenson
ISBN 0-96083-6098
Eat Right For Your Blood Type

by Peter J. D’Adamo
ISBN 0-399-14255-X
The Bodymind Workbook

by Debbie Shapiro
ISBN 1-85230-167-8
The Great AIDS Hoax

by T. C. Fry
ISBN 1-55830-005-8
Inventing AIDS
by Cindy Patton
ISBN 0-415-90257-6
Guess Who Came to Dinner

by Ann Louise Gittleman
ISBN 0-89529-570-9
How to Live Longer and Feel Better

by Linus Pauling
ISBN 0-380-70289-4
Natural Hormonal Enhancement

by Rob Faigin
ISBN 0-9675605-0-0
Food is Your Best Medicine

by Henry G. Bieler
ISBN 0-394-71837-2
The Persecuted Drug: The Story of DMSO

by Pat McGrady, Sr.
ISBN 0-44115-1027
You Are All Sanpaku

by George Ohsawa
ISBN 0-80650-7284
The Little Herb Encyclopedia

by Jack Ritchason
ISBN 0-913923-89-3
Nutrition Against Disease

by Roger J. Williams
ISBN 0-55323-0662
“There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come.”
Victor Hugo

Your Doctor Is A Liar! CHOLESTEROL DOES NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE!

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Your Doctor Is A Liar! CHOLESTEROL DOES NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE!

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Your Doctor Is A Liar! CHOLESTEROL DOES NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE!

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the main claims made in the document?

What are the main claims made in the document?

Who is the author of the document?

Who is the author of the document?

Your Doctor

Learn the truth about “cholesterol”

BEFORE YOUR DOCTOR KILLS YOU!

(or someone you love!)

Despite what your doctor says, eating MORE

The so-called bad “cholesterol” (LDL)

The medical/pharmaceutical establishment has secretly changed

Your test results for HDL and LDL

Statin drugs such as Lipitor, Crestor, etc.,

High “cholesterol” levels reflect fundamental

Your Doctor Is A Liar!

Are you brave enough to learn the truth?

READ THIS BOOK!

If you downloaded the E-Book version from the website

May your life be long and healthy.

• Your Doctor Is A Liar!

• CHOLESTEROL does NOT cause heart disease.

• All prescription drugs and all over the counter drugs

• Drugs that lower your “cholesterol” do NOT prevent

• Find a qualified “natural” health expert. Find a good

• If you want to avoid heart disease, alter your diet to

• Avoid processed oils (soybean, canola, corn, etc.)

• As a bare minimum, take the following nutritional

• Get your natural doctor to check your insulin level

• Tell your medical doctor(s) to take their “cholesterol”

CHOLESTEROL DOES NOT CAUSE HEART DISEASE!

LOWERING YOUR “CHOLESTEROL”

YOUR DOCTOR IS A LIAR!

“The public is so brainwashed, that many people believe that the

Kilmer S. McCully, M.D.

“The idea that saturated fats cause heart disease is completely

“Clear your mind of the belief that ‘cholesterol’ causes heart

“The constant denigration of beef, animal fats, eggs, and

When our version of the Food Guide came back to us revised, we

Where we, the USDA nutritionists, called for a base of 5-9

I vehemently protested that the changes, if followed, could lead

Ultimately, the food industry dictates the government’s food

It’s evident that the government can’t be relied upon to provide

“There’s no connection whatsoever between CHOLESTEROL in

“When I was in medical school in the mid 1980’s, we were taught

Supporters are so enamored of statin drugs that some have even

The fundamental flaws in focusing on ‘cholesterol’ and statin

Really lowering your risk for heart disease

William Davis, M.D.

CHOLESTEROL is perhaps the most important substance in our

The annual toll of lives and serious side effects currently

Dr. Duane Graveline, M.D.

“It is characteristic of human nature that resentment rather than

Russell L. Smith, Ph.D.

“The great mass of people...

“The doctor is to be feared more than the disease.”

“No illness which can be treated by the diet

“Most people who suffer heart attacks have average ‘cholesterol’

“The theory that saturated fats and CHOLESTEROL clog

Earl L. Mindell, R. Ph., Ph.D.