FDI in India
FDI in India
SECTION-F GROUP-1
Contributors
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3
Recommendations ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------28
Conclusion -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------32
References --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------32
1.1 INTRODUCTION
FDI IN INDIA 2011
There is hardly a facet of the Indian psyche that the concept of ‘foreign’ has not permeated. This term,
connoting modernization, international brands and acquisitions by MNCs in popular imagination, has
acquired renewed significance after the reforms initiated by the Indian Government in 1991. Contrary to
the grand narrative ‘opening of flood-gates idea’ of 1991, what took place was a gradual process of
changes in policies on investment in certain sub-sections of the Indian economy.
FDI eludes definition owing to the presence of many authorities: Organization for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OCED), International Monetary Fund (IMF), International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
(UNCTAD). All these bodies attempt to illustrate the nature of FDI with certain measuring
methodologies.
Generally speaking FDI refers to capital inflows from abroad that invest in the production
capacity of the economy and are “usually preferred over other forms of external finance because they are
non-debt creating, non-volatile and their returns depend on the performance of the projects financed by
the investors. FDI also facilitates international trade and transfer of knowledge, skills and technology.”
Changes in the national political climate have precipitated a marked trend towards greater acceptability of
FDI. The envisioned role of FDI has evolved from that of a tool to solve the crisis under the license raj
system to that of a modernizing force that has been given special agencies and extensive discourse. This
evolution is illustrated by analysis of the Economic policies of the Indian government from 1991 to 2005.
The primary focus of this analysis will be towards the industrial and infrastructural sectors which form
the beginning of the gradual liberalization process that was started in 1991. A complete understanding of
these two sectors will provide interesting statistics and information regarding trends of FDI.
In most narratives on India’s liberalization, 1991 has acquired a revolutionary status as a time of change
in the planning of India’s future.
Data from various individuals and agencies can lead to different conclusions all of which can be
challenged on different grounds. The Ministry of Finance, however, forms my primary source of
information for two main reasons: it has been the agency of and party to economic reform and has
compiled data on the state of reforms for the entire duration of their history.
With the new government focus on FDI was evident in changes in 1996-97 that resulted in an increase in
understanding and resources towards investment. This included the setting up of the Foreign Investment
Promotion Council along with the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) being streamlined and
FDI IN INDIA 2011
made more transparent. The first ever guidelines were announced for consideration of foreign direct
investment proposals by the FIPB, which were not covered under the automatic route.26 The list of
industries eligible for automatic approval of up to 51 per cent foreign equity were expanded and there was
a recognition that foreign direct investment flows provided savings without adding to the country's
external debt. The case of comparison for numbers and example seem to be China and the Asian Tigers
that were enjoying the economic boom.
By now FDI trends are taken more serious and FDI flow had to be maintained for the economy to grow.
The government recognized that greater procedural simplifications were still needed in the area of FDI.
In 1998 when there was a decline in FDI the government had to take greater technical measures in terms
of liberalizing investment norms in bring in FDI were still needed in the area of FDI. In 1998 when there
was a decline in FDI the government had to take greater technical measures in terms of liberalizing
investment norms in bring in FDI.
Greenfield Investment
Primary type of FDI involving transfer of existing assets from local firms to foreign firms
Assets and operation of firms from different countries are combined to establish a new legal
entity (Cross-border merger)
Control of assets and operations is transferred to foreign company by its local affiliate company
(Cross-border acquisition)
No long term benefits to the local economy, unlike Greenfield investment, as mostly the owners
of the local firm are paid in stock from the acquiring firm
FDI IN INDIA 2011
Horizontal Foreign Direct Investment
o Backward vertical: Industry abroad provides inputs for a firm's domestic production
processes
o Forward vertical: Industry abroad sells the outputs of a firm's domestic production
processes
FDI Procedure in India Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is permitted as under the following forms of
investments:
FDI Procedure in India Foreign direct investments in India are approved through two routes:
1. Automatic approval by RBI: The Reserve Bank of India accords automatic approval within a
period of two weeks (provided certain parameters are met) to all proposals involving: foreign
equity up to 50% in 3 categories relating to mining activities foreign equity up to 51% in 48
specified industries foreign equity up to 74% in 9 categories The lists are comprehensive and
cover most industries of interest to foreign companies. Investments in high- priority industries or
FDI IN INDIA 2011
for trading companies primarily engaged in exporting are given almost automatic approval by the
RBI.
2. The FIPB Route: This involves processing of non-automatic approval cases by FIPB (Foreign
Investment Promotion Board) where the parameters of automatic approval are not met Normal
processing time is 4 to 6 weeks Liberal approach for all sectors and all types of proposals with
few rejections It is non-mandatory for foreign investors to have a local partner, even when the
foreign investor wishes to hold less than the entire equity of the company. The portion of the
equity not proposed to be held by the foreign investor can be offered to the public.
Current Indian FDI Limits Sector Specific Foreign Direct Investment in India
Hotel & Tourism: FDI in Hotel & Tourism sector in India - 100% FDI is permissible in the sector on the
automatic route. The term hotels include restaurants, beach resorts, and other tourist complexes providing
accommodation and/or catering and food facilities to tourists. Tourism related industry include travel
agencies, tour operating agencies and tourist transport operating agencies, units providing facilities for
cultural, adventure and wild life experience to tourists, surface, air and water transport facilities to
tourists, leisure, entertainment, amusement, sports, and health units for tourists and Convention/Seminar
units and organizations. For foreign technology agreements, automatic approval is granted if
i. up to 3% of the capital cost of the project is proposed to be paid for technical and
consultancy services including fees for architects, design, supervision, etc.
ii. Up to 3% of net turnover is payable for franchising and marketing/publicity support
fee, and up to 10% of gross operating profit is payable for management fee, including
incentive fee
Private Sector Banking: Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC) - 49% FDI is allowed from all
sources on the automatic route subject to guidelines issued from RBI from time to time in19 NBFC
activities - Merchant banking, underwriting, portfolio management services, investment advisory
services, financial consultancy, stock broking, asset management, venture capital, custodial services,
factoring, credit reference agencies, credit rating agencies, leasing & finance, housing finance, foreign
exchange brokering, credit card business, money changing business, micro credit and rural credit There
are separate prescribed minimum capitalization norms for fund/non-fund based NBFCs
FDI IN INDIA 2011
Insurance Sector: Up to 26% FDI is allowed on the automatic route subject to obtaining licence from
Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority (IRDA)
Telecommunication Sector: It is limited to 49% in basic, cellular, value added services and global
mobile personal communications by satellite, subject to licensing and security requirements and
adherence by the companies (by both investor & investee companies) to the license conditions, up to 74%
in ISPs with gateways, radio-paging and end-to-end bandwidth, up to 100% is allowed subject to the
condition that such companies would divest 26% of their equity in favor of Indian public in 5 years, if
these companies are listed in other parts of the world
Trading Companies: Up to 51% under automatic route provided it is primarily export activities, and the
undertaking is an export house/trading house/super trading house/star trading house. However, under the
FIPB route, 100% FDI is permitted in case of trading companies for activities like exports, bulk imports
with ex-port/ex-bonded warehouse sales, cash and carry wholesale trading etc.
Power Sector: Up to 100% FDI allowed in respect of projects relating to electricity generation,
transmission and distribution, other than atomic reactor power plants. There is no limit on the project cost
and quantum of foreign direct investment .
Drugs & Pharmaceuticals: Up to 100% under automatic route for manufacture of drugs and
pharmaceutical, provided the activity does not attract compulsory licensing or involve use of recombinant
DNA technology, and specific cell / tissue targeted formulations, otherwise prior Government approval is
required
Pollution Control and Management: Up to 100% under automatic route in both manufacture of
pollution control equipment and consultancy for integration of pollution control systems
Roads, Highways, Ports and Harbors: Up to 100% under automatic route in projects for construction
and maintenance of roads, highways, vehicular bridges, toll roads, vehicular tunnels, ports and harbors
Retail Sector: The proposal for FDI in Retail sector has loomed into a controversy with the proposal
being put on the backburner.
For infrastructure from 2002-2003 (re formulation of FDI data) there is mention in sub sectors for FDI
and not for infrastructure as a whole. Telecom has been a major recipient of FDI and during the period of
August 1991 to June 2002, 831 proposals for FDI of Rs. 56,226 crore were approved and the actual flow
of FDI during the above period was Rs. 9528 crore. In terms of approval of FDI, the telecom sector is the
second largest after the energy sector. In 2002, the increase of FDI inflow was of the order of Rs 1077
crore during January to July 2002.
The FDI target for the Telecommunication sector is estimated at US $2.5 billion per annum, by the
Steering Group on FDI, Planning commission. By 2003-2004 literature on Infrastructure talks about
investments needed to bring infrastructure to world standards. However there is no mention of details.
Finally for 2004-2005 there is data for Telecom but in general there is no data on FDI in the infrastructure
sector as a whole.
The analysis of both the sectors and especially Infrastructure raises questions on the haphazard nature of
FDI taking place. While this trend may have been acceptable in the early 1990s, when FDI was in its
infancy the recognition and building of reforms by the successive governments raises the questions on
what part of FDI is the government attention shifted in.
According to the guidelines for FDI in the banking sector, Indian operations by foreign banks can be
executed by any one of the following three channels
Branches in India
Wholly owned subsidiaries.
Other subsidiaries.
In case of wholly owned subsidiaries (WOS), the guidelines for FDI in the banking sector specified that
the WOS must involve a capital of minimum Rs. 300 crores and should ensure proper corporate
governance.
This clearly justifies greater engagement of Foreign partners in bringing in better risk management
practices, innovation in production & distribution, technology, specialized skills and hence there is a
strong need to raise FDI cap in insurance sector from the current 26 % to 49%, said CII in its comments
on the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2008.
Insurance Penetration to rural and social sectors is marked by high risk and hence more dynamic and
efficient risk management systems are crucial while innovation is needed not just in terms of insurance
products but also in ways of distributing them. In addition, use of better technologies right from
issuance to servicing of Insurance services is also crucial for long term growth of Insurance sector in
India.
Insurance industry is witnessing the transformation of insurance agents from mere intermediaries to
financial advisors. Greater foreign investments would help in training and skills upgradation of the
agents. Well trained agents would be better equipped to convince the customers about the benefits of
FDI IN INDIA 2011
insurance besides contributing to simplifying the procedure.
Moreover, there is a shortage of expertise (skills) in the Indian insurance industry (e.g. underwriting,
actuarial, claims management, data standardization etc.) Raising the FDI cap will enable expertise
(skills) and know how transfer that are generally not available under the current regime.
While the rural and social sector obligations set by IRDA have been met by the Insurance companies,
the untapped potential of these sectors also calls for changes in regulations to facilitate movement
towards an era of electronic policy issuance and dematerialization. This will reduce the cost of
operations and would facilitate address logistical difficulties through use of electronic distribution
channels via mobile phone and broadband technologies.
While broadly, welcoming the Insurance Laws (amendment) Bill, 2008, CII said that a few
amendments need to be re examined such as the value of penalties proposed in case of failure to comply
with Section 32B, 32C and 32D may be reduced to Rs 2 lakhs as the upper limit and the higher limit on
penalty for contravention of provisions relating to investment of controlled fund or assets may be
brought down to Rs. 5 Crs instead of Rs. 25 crores.
CII has also suggested that non-executive Directors of a Corporate Agent may be permitted to be the
Director/s of Life Insurance Company. This would help regularize many cases where the promoter
companies of the Insurance companies have their own Corporate Agency like banks and finance
companies.
On the insertion of a new definition of ‘health insurance business’ in the proposed bill to include long
term health policies, Personal Accident and Travel Policies etc., CII has pointed out that the term
“Health Insurance” has not been included in the definition of General Insurance and Life Insurance.
Under this circumstance, CII has sought for a clarification in the Bill whether the Insurance companies
registered with IRDA for conducting General and Life Insurance business shall be able to do “Health
Insurance” under their existing license.
After liberalization of Indian Economy in general and automobile industry in particular, considerable
number of Multinational Companies are operating in India either as wholly owned subsidiaries or in
FDI IN INDIA 2011
collaboration with their Indian partners. This automotive sector has taken benefit of liberalization of
Indian economy to a large extent and made available various international brands in India for Indian
consumers. Firms like Hyundai are supplying manufactures cars in the international market using its
manufacturing facility in India in a big way. These firms are using locally available efficient and cost
competitive huge pool of human resource in India.
The automobile industry in India is growing by 18 percent per year. The automobile sector in India was
opened up to foreign investments in the year 1991. 100% Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is allowed in
the automobile industry in India. The production level of the automobile sector has increased from 2
million in 1991 to 9.7 million in 2006 after the participation of global players in the sector.
INVESTMENT SCENARIO:
CUMULATIVE FDI INFLOWS IN AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY:
Cumulative FDI inflows during January 2000-2009 (up to December 2009) are Rs. 472,231.23 crores
(US$ 105.99 billion). Out of this, the amount of FDI inflows in the Automobile Industry during January
2000 to December 2009 is Rs. 20,554.56crores (US$ 4.55 billion) which 4.29% of the total FDI
inflows. During the period from January 2000 to December 2009, cumulative FDI inflows received
from IPB/SIA, acquisition of existing shares & RBI’s automatic routes only include FDI inflows
received
FDI IN INDIA 2011
automobile industry
auto ancillaries
passenger cars
others
FDI IN INDIA 2011
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
JAPAN USA ITALY MAURTITUS SWEDEN
The telecom services industry registered a growth of 20.7 percent clocking revenues of 1, 57,542 crore
in 2008-09 compared to 1,30,561crore in the previous year. During the year 2009, government had
raised the FDI limit in telecom sector from 49 percent to 74 percent, which has contributed to the robust
growth of FDI in the sector.
FDI IN INDIA 2011
The greater chunk of foreign investments has flown into states that are doing well industrially and
commercially and which have an investor-friendly business environment.
An attractive trade and investment policy and lucrative incentives for foreign collaborations have made
India one of the world’s most attractive markets for the telecom equipment suppliers and service
providers.
No industrial license required for setting up manufacturing units for telecom equipment.
100% Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is allowed through automatic route for manufacturing of
telecom equipments.
Payments for royalty, lump sum fee for transfer of technology and payments for use of
trademark/brand name on the automatic route.
Foreign equity of 74% (49 % under automatic route) permitted for telecom services - basic, cellular
mobile, paging, value added services, NLD, ILD, ISPs - and global mobile personal
communications by satellite.
In Basic, Cellular Mobile, Paging and Value Added Service, and Global Mobile Personal
Communications by Satellite, Composite FDI permitted is 74% (49% under automatic route) subject to
grant of license from Department of Telecommunications subject to security and license
conditions. (para 5.38.1 to 5.38.4 of consolidate FDI Policy circular 1/2010 of DIPP)
FDI upto 74% (49% under automatic route) is also permitted for the following: -
Subject to the conditions that such companies would divest 26% of their equity in favor of Indian
public in 5 years, if these companies were listed in other parts of the world.
FDI IN INDIA 2011
The Government has modified method of calculation of Direct and Indirect Foreign Investment in
sector with capsand have also issued guidelines on downstream investment by Indian Companies. (para
4.6 of consolidate FDI Policy circular 1/2010 of DIPP)
FDI in Indian Telecommunications Industry is one of the most crucial parts that have caused such a
hike in the telecom market so far.Inflow of FDI into India’s telecom sector during April 2000 to Feb.
2010 was about Rs 405,460 million. Also, more than 8 per cent of the approved FDI in the country is
related to the telecom sector.
100 percent FDI is permitted under automatic route to the E-Commerce activities in India. However, a
pertinent condition is that, 26 percent of their equity will be spent on welfare activities for the Indian
population in five years. Software Technology Parks (STP) have been a major initiative in India to
drive in Foreign Direct Investment in the computer software industry. These Software Technology
Parks provide highly developed infrastructure and facilities that attract foreign investors. Regulatory
measures by the Indian government have also played a positive role in this regard. Measures like
increased freedom of recruiting and laying-off employees, tax benefits and easing of export producers
have contributed to the growth of FDI in this sector.
FDI is permitted under automatic route in the computer hardware industry in India. The huge market for
computer hardware in India, coupled with the availability of skilled workforce in this sector has boosted
the inflow of FDI. High growth prospects, in terms of increased consumption in the India as well as
increasing demand for exports are expected to lead to more Foreign Direct Investments in this sector.
Between April 2000 and September 2010, the computer software and hardware sector received
cumulative foreign direct investment (FDI) of US$ 10,406.16 million, according to the Department of
Industrial Policy and Promotion.
FDI IN INDIA 2011
Investment Scenario
Cumulative FDI inflows during January in the Computer Software & Hardware Sector during January
2000 to December 2009 wasRs. 42,458.62 crores (US$ 9.57 billion) which was 9.03% of the total FDI
inflows.
S.No. Sub Sectors Amount of FDI inflows %age with total FDI
inflows in Computer
Software &
Hardware Sector
Rupees in US $ in
crore million
Rank RBI’s States Covered Amount of FDI inflows %age with FDI
Regional inflows in Computer
Software &
Office
Hardware
Rupees in US $ in
crores million
Road Ahead
The total investments of EMC Corporation, a leading global player of information infrastructure
solutions in India, will touch US$ 2 billion (over US$ 2.01 billion) by 2014.
Syntel, an IT company, plans to invest around US$ 50 million in its global development centre in
Chennai.
Russian IT security software provider, Kaspersky Lab, will be investing US$ 2 million in its India
operations at Hyderabad during the next financial year.
The unorganised players are characterised by contractors and small builders who generally have only
regional presence while organised players include private real estate developers and government
affiliated entities. India’s real estate market can be classified into three segments: Residential,
Commercial and Retail. These three segments have witnessed rapid growth in the past few years and
have a tremendous growth potential. The commercial segment is further divided into office space,
hospitality, and industrial space.
FDI IN INDIA 2011
Investment Scenario
The housing and real estate sector in India witnessed foreign direct investment (FDI) of US$ 640
millionin April-September 2010-11, according to the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion
(DIPP). Housing and real estate sector including cineplex, multiplex, integrated townships and
commercial complexes etc, attracted a cumulative foreign direct investment (FDI) worth US$ 8,996.46
million from April 2000 to September 2010.
Foreign investors have so far contributed significant capital to India’s real estate market. Aggregate
FDI inflows into the real estate sector are recorded at approximately 7.42 per cent of the total inflows.
India allows 100 per cent FDI through the automatic route in townships, housing, built-up infrastructure
and construction-development projects, subject to certain conditions.
The relaxed FDI rules implemented by India last year has invited more foreign investors and real estate
sector in India is seemingly the most lucrative ground at present. Private equity players are considering
big investments, banks are giving loans to builders, and financial institutions are floating real estate
funds. Indian property market is immensely promising and most sought after for a wide variety of
reasons.
The real estate sector is expecting a liberalised foreign direct investment (FDI) norm and easing of rules
for external commercial borrowings, in the present tight project finance situation and rising cost of
FDI IN INDIA 2011
loans, from the Union Budget 2011-12. On the other hand, another round of interest subvention and a
higher cap on interest deduction available on housing loans to individual taxpayers will offer relief on
the affordability front.
to create a healthy and competitive market environment for both Indian and foreign investors
Challenges faced
Current FDI regulations for the sector stipulate certain conditions, such as minimum area to be
developed, minimum capitalisation requirements, lock-in and so on, that have been put in place from
the perspective of preventing speculation in the sector. Such conditions, however, pose challenges for
FDI inflows into various projects, where given the nature of projects, it may not be possible to comply
with such conditions.
FDI IN INDIA 2011
The FDI regulations currently in force allow an entity to receive FDI in construction
development only if the minimum built-up area of the project is 50,000 square metres. Such a
condition can prove unrealistic for some developers, especially those in metro (tier-I ) cities
where large parcels of land are difficult to acquire and prices are exorbitant. Further, it is also
unlikely that an affordable housing project would require more than 50,000 square metres of
development.
Foreign funds and investors have begun to show increased interest in these brownfield
projects. Unfortunately, we have not been able to capitalise on this opportunity as investors are
not clear whether FDI is be permitted in brownfield projects . The government can consider
imposing certain restrictions and allow FDI inflows into brownfield projects subject to
specified conditions.
Real estate is a complex sector and for any project to take-off , clearances are needed from
multiple government agencies. Thus, coordination between joint venture partners becomes
extremely essential for successful completion of projects. Many real estate projects have failed
to take-off due to the delay in obtaining statutory clearances and conversion of land usage.
FDI policy for investing in real estate should provide investors exit options. The current FDI
regulations provide for a three-year lock-in for each tranche of foreign investment, and early
exit needs government approval. The process can be simplified by defining specific cases
where a foreign partner can be allowed to exit a project early without necessarily seeking
approval.
The FDI policy for investment in hotels and hospitals is far less stringent than the one for
housing projects. In case of such mixed use projects, where the majority of built-up area goes
towards development of hotel or hospital, there is lack of clarity which provisions of the FDI
policy would apply to the project - those for hotels and hospital or those for housing projects.
The government's concerns about keeping a strict vigil on inflow of funds into the real estate
sector should consider certain relaxations to provide a fillip to FDI in the real estate sector.
Adequate relaxation in current FDI policy could foster significant opportunities for growth and
investment in the sector.
According to the current policy FDI can come into India in two ways. Firstly FDI up to100% is allowed
under the automatic route in all activities/sectors except a small list that require approval of the
Government. FDI in sectors/activities under automatic routedoes not require any prior approval either by
the Government or RBI. The investors are required to notify the Regional office concerned of RBI within
30 days of receipt of inward remittances and file the required documents with that office within 30 days
ofissue of shares to foreign investors.51 All proposals for foreign investment requiring Government
approval are considered by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). The FIPB also grants
composite approvals involving foreign investment/foreign technical collaboration.52 As this clarity is
useful for future investors, it has to be seen ifthese bodies were effective.
Yet until fairly recently, India failed to get the kind of enthusiastic attention from investors, as
generated by other emerging economies such as China due to reasons such as –
a highly protected, semi-socialist autarkic economy,
Structural and bureaucratic impediments and distrust of foreign business.
FDI IN INDIA 2011
Present climate in India has seen a sea change, smashing barriers and actively seeking foreign
investment, many companies still see it as a difficult market.. Foreign investors should be prepared to
estimate India’s potential with due consideration to the inherent difficulties, contradictions and
challenges in the system
Future Potential Investment opportunity of USD 500 billion expected to emerge in India in the next 5
years in major economic sectors, of which USD 250 billion is expected in the infrastructure sector alone
Indian auto industry with a turnover of USD 12 billion and the auto parts industry with a turnover of USD
3 billion offer excellent scope for FDI Investment commission has identified 93 foreign companies across
various sectors as potential investors. These include Norsk Hydro, Singapore Power, select Japanese and
Korean companies for road development projects, Deutsche Telecom, China Telecom, SK Telecom, BT,
NEC and Toshiba, Alcan, RusAl, Burlington, Petronas, Sumitomo, Hanwa, Degussa, Renault, Scania and
EADS among others In Power sector, peak demand is expected to increase by a staggering 77% to
157,107 MW by 2012. Similarly, the energy requirement is also expected to increase by 274% to 975,222
MU by 2012. The total investment required in over 100,000 MW capacity creation, along with necessary
investments in T&D segments is estimated at USD 200 billion Total estimated investment opportunity in
the retail sector is around USD 5-6 billion in the next five years. Certain segments that promise a high
growth are Food and Grocery (91 per cent), Clothing (55 per cent), Furniture and Fixtures (27 per cent),
Pharmacy (27 per cent), Durables, Footwear & Leather, Watch &Jewellery(18 per cent)
The Indian pharmaceutical market has been forecast to grow to as much as USD 25 billion by 2010 as
per Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPPI) estimates. However, Espicom's market
projections forecast more modest but stable annual market growth of around 7.2 per cent, putting the
market at USD 11.6 billion by 2009 Health tourism presents significant investment potential. At the
current pace of growth, medical tourism, currently pegged at USD 350 million, has the potential to grow
into a USD 2 billion industry by 2012 Healthcare sector provides another investment outlet and could rise
from USD 22.2 billion currently (5.2 percent of GDP) to USD 50 billion- 69 billion (6.2-8.5 percent of
GDP) by 2012 . Healthcare spending in the country will double over the next 10 years. Private healthcare
will form a large chunk of this spending, rising from USD 14.8 billion to USD 33.6 billion in 2012. This
figure could rise by an additional USD 8.4 billion if health insurance cover is available to the rich and the
middle class Total investment opportunity in the port sector is estimated at USD 20 billion upto 2012.
The Maritime sector (Ports and Shipping, Inland waterways) requires an investment of USD 22 billion for
future development.
1.8 RECOMMENDATIONS
FDI IN INDIA 2011
For the positive trend of growing FDI investment in India to grow, following recommendations can be
given:
One of the biggest myths surrounding FDI today is that it is always good for the economy’s present and
future. But, in reality it is actually “quality FDI” which works positively for the economy. World
Investment Report published by UNCTAD in 2006 describes “quality FDI” as “the kind that would
significantly increase employment, enhance skills and boost the competitiveness of local enterprises.”
Whether FDI succeeds in these objectives depends on the sector, industry and the country’s global
strengths. It also depends on the industry’s dependence on external capital and the level of skill of people
required.
Not all foreign companies have the same objectives when they invest in a country. Firms may differ in
terms of degree of vertical integration, investment in local R&D, local sourcing and export
orientation.The advantages derived from FDI differ across primary, services and manufacturing sectors.
There may be differences across industries within a particular sector also. FDI in primary sector
industries like mining, agribusiness and raw materials offers lesser scope of technical progress in
developing countries. In contrast, industries in manufacturing sector and other technology-intensive
industries
attract high quality FDI. This is because, in developing countries (having a lower technology base), the
probability of domestic firms learning about new technology and new knowledge through collaboration
and reverse engineering is very high. In contrast, in labor-intensive industries (found mainly in
developing countries), technically advanced firms tend to crowd out the lesser performing and financially
weaker domestic firms.
The table above shows the sectors targeted by some countries for attracting FDI. These are the sectors in
which these countries possess global strengths. India also needs to focus majorly on a few sectors to
attract FDI e.g. manufacturing, services, communications etc.
India has secured good ranks in parameters of “Getting Credit” and “Protecting Investors”, but in other
parameters, a lot needs to be done. The government needs to emphasize on policy reforms to improve
India’s rank in different parameters to make India the investment destination of the world. Doing
Business 2010
1.9 CONCLUSION
As evidenced by analysis and data the concept and material significance of FDI has evolved from the
shadows of shallow understanding to a proud show of force. The government while serious in its efforts
to induce growth in the economy and country started with foreign investment in a haphazard manner.
While it is accepted that the government was under compulsion to liberalize cautiously, the understanding
of foreign investment was lacking. A sectoral analysis reveals that while FDI shows a gradual increase
and has become a staple for success for India, the progress is hollow (Annexure 1 and 2). The
Telecommunications and power sector are the reasons for the success of Infrastructure. This is a
throwback to 1991 when Infrastructure reforms were not attempted as the sector was performing in the
positive. FDI has become a game of numbers where the justification for growth and progress is the money
that flows in and not the specific problems plaguing the individual sub sectors.
1.10 REFERENCES
www.dipp.nic.in
Doing Business Report 2010, World Bank
FDI IN INDIA 2011
www.livemint.com, last accessed on 25tDecember, 2009
Data derived from Indiastat.com,
ris.org.in,adb.org.in and google.com
http://www.rbi.org.in
http://smetimes.tradeindia.com/smetimes/news/industry/2011/Jan/17/strong-need-to-raise-fdi-
cap-in-insurance-sector-cii624638.html
http://business.mapsofindia.com/fdi-india/guidelines/banking.html