The document provides an overview of relational algebra, which forms the basis for relational query languages like SQL. It introduces basic relational algebra operations like selection, projection, cross-products, and set operations. It also discusses more advanced operations like joins and division. The key points are that relational algebra operations return relations and can be composed, and that they provide a formal foundation for expressing queries against relational databases.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views20 pages
Relational Algebra: Module 3, Lecture 1
The document provides an overview of relational algebra, which forms the basis for relational query languages like SQL. It introduces basic relational algebra operations like selection, projection, cross-products, and set operations. It also discusses more advanced operations like joins and division. The key points are that relational algebra operations return relations and can be composed, and that they provide a formal foundation for expressing queries against relational databases.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20
Relational Algebra
Module 3, Lecture 1
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 1
Relational Query Languages ❖ Query languages: Allow manipulation and retrieval of data from a database. ❖ Relational model supports simple, powerful QLs: – Strong formal foundation based on logic. – Allows for much optimization. ❖ Query Languages != programming languages! – QLs not expected to be “Turing complete”. – QLs not intended to be used for complex calculations. – QLs support easy, efficient access to large data sets.
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 2
Formal Relational Query Languages Two mathematical Query Languages form the basis for “real” languages (e.g. SQL), and for implementation: ❶ Relational Algebra: More operational, very useful for representing execution plans. ❷ Relational Calculus: Lets users describe what they want, rather than how to compute it. (Non-operational, declarative.) ☛ Understanding Algebra & Calculus is key to ☛ understanding SQL, query processing! Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 3 Preliminaries ❖ A query is applied to relation instances, and the result of a query is also a relation instance. – Schemas of input relations for a query are fixed (but query will run regardless of instance!) – The schema for the result of a given query is also fixed! Determined by definition of query language constructs. ❖ Positional vs. named-field notation: – Positional notation easier for formal definitions, named-field notation more readable. – Both used in SQL Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 4 R1 sid bid day Example Instances 22 101 10/10/96 58 103 11/12/96 ❖ “Sailors” and “Reserves” S1 sid sname rating age relations for our examples. ❖ We’ll use positional or 22 dustin 7 45.0 named field notation, 31 lubber 8 55.5 assume that names of fields 58 rusty 10 35.0 in query results are `inherited’ from names of S2 sid sname rating age fields in query input relations. 28 yuppy 9 35.0 31 lubber 8 55.5 44 guppy 5 35.0 58 rusty 10 35.0 Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 5 Relational Algebra ❖ Basic operations: – Selection (σ ) Selects a subset of rows from relation. – Projection (π ) Deletes unwanted columns from relation. – × Cross-product ( ) Allows us to combine two relations. – − Set-difference ( ) Tuples in reln. 1, but not in reln. 2. – Union ( U ) Tuples in reln. 1 and in reln. 2. ❖ Additional operations: – Intersection, join, division, renaming: Not essential, but (very!) useful. ❖ Since each operation returns a relation, operations can be composed! (Algebra is “closed”.) Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 6 sname rating Projection yuppy 9 lubber 8 ❖ Deletes attributes that are not in guppy 5 projection list. rusty 10 ❖ Schema of result contains exactly the fields in the projection list, π sname,rating(S2) with the same names that they had in the (only) input relation. ❖ Projection operator has to eliminate duplicates! (Why??) age – Note: real systems typically 35.0 don’t do duplicate elimination 55.5 unless the user explicitly asks for it. (Why not?) π age(S2) Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 7 sid sname rating age Selection 28 yuppy 9 35.0 58 rusty 10 35.0 ❖ Selects rows that satisfy selection condition. σ rating >8(S2) ❖ No duplicates in result! (Why?) ❖ Schema of result identical to schema of sname rating (only) input relation. yuppy 9 ❖ Result relation can be the input for another rusty 10 relational algebra operation! (Operator π sname,rating(σ rating >8(S2)) composition.) Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 8 Union, Intersection, Set-Difference sid sname rating age ❖ All of these operations take 22 dustin 7 45.0 two input relations, which 31 lubber 8 55.5 must be union-compatible: 58 rusty 10 35.0 – Same number of fields. 44 guppy 5 35.0 – `Corresponding’ fields 28 yuppy 9 35.0 have the same type. S1∪ S2 ❖ What is the schema of result? sid sname rating age sid sname rating age 31 lubber 8 55.5 22 dustin 7 45.0 58 rusty 10 35.0 S1− S2 S1∩ S2 Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 9 Cross-Product ❖ Each row of S1 is paired with each row of R1. ❖ Result schema has one field per field of S1 and R1, with field names `inherited’ if possible. – Conflict: Both S1 and R1 have a field called sid. (sid) sname rating age (sid) bid day 22 dustin 7 45.0 22 101 10/10/96 22 dustin 7 45.0 58 103 11/12/96 31 lubber 8 55.5 22 101 10/10/96 31 lubber 8 55.5 58 103 11/12/96 58 rusty 10 35.0 22 101 10/10/96 58 rusty 10 35.0 58 103 11/12/96
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 10 Joins ❖ Condition Join: R >< c S = σ c (R × S) (sid) sname rating age (sid) bid day 22 dustin 7 45.0 58 103 11/12/96 31 lubber 8 55.5 58 103 11/12/96 S1 >< R1 S1. sid < R1. sid ❖ Result schema same as that of cross-product. ❖ Fewer tuples than cross-product, might be able to compute more efficiently ❖ Sometimes called a theta-join. Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 11 Joins ❖ Equi-Join: A special case of condition join where the condition c contains only equalities. sid sname rating age bid day 22 dustin 7 45.0 101 10/10/96 58 rusty 10 35.0 103 11/12/96 S1 >< R1 sid ❖ Result schema similar to cross-product, but only one copy of fields for which equality is specified. ❖ Natural Join: Equijoin on all common fields.
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 12
Division ❖ Not supported as a primitive operator, but useful for expressing queries like: Find sailors who have reserved all boats. ❖ Let A have 2 fields, x and y; B have only field y: – A/B = { x | ∃ x, y ∈ A ∀ y ∈ B} – i.e., A/B contains all x tuples (sailors) such that for every y tuple (boat) in B, there is an xy tuple in A. – Or: If the set of y values (boats) associated with an x value (sailor) in A contains all y values in B, the x value is in A/B. ❖ In general, x and y can be any lists of fields; y is the list of fields in B, and x ∪ y is the list of fields of A. Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 13 Examples of Division A/B sno pno pno pno pno s1 p1 p2 p2 p1 s1 p2 p4 p2 B1 s1 p3 p4 B2 s1 p4 s2 p1 sno B3 s2 p2 s1 s3 p2 s2 sno s4 p2 s3 s1 sno s4 p4 s4 s4 s1
A A/B1 A/B2 A/B3
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 14 Expressing A/B Using Basic Operators ❖ Division is not essential op; just a useful shorthand. – (Also true of joins, but joins are so common that systems implement joins specially.) ❖ Idea: For A/B, compute all x values that are not `disqualified’ by some y value in B. – x value is disqualified if by attaching y value from B, we obtain an xy tuple that is not in A.
Disqualified x values: π x ((π x ( A) × B) − A)
A/B: π x ( A) − all disqualified tuples Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 15 Find names of sailors who’ve reserved boat #103
bid =103 Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 16 Find names of sailors who’ve reserved a red boat
❖ Information about boat color only available in
Boats; so need an extra join: π sname ((σ Boats) >< Re serves >< Sailors) color =' red '
❖ A more efficient solution:
π sname (π ((π σ Boats) >< Re s) >< Sailors) sid bid color =' red '
☛ A query optimizer can find this given the first solution!
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 17 Find sailors who’ve reserved a red or a green boat ❖ Can identify all red or green boats, then find sailors who’ve reserved one of these boats: ρ (Tempboats, (σ Boats)) color =' red ' ∨ color =' green ' π sname(Tempboats >< Re serves >< Sailors)
❖ Can also define Tempboats using union! (How?)
❖ What happens if ∨ is replaced by ∧ in this query? Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 18 Find sailors who’ve reserved a red and a green boat
❖ Previous approach won’t work! Must identify
sailors who’ve reserved red boats, sailors who’ve reserved green boats, then find the intersection (note that sid is a key for Sailors): ρ (Tempred, π ((σ Boats) >< Re serves)) sid color =' red ' ρ (Tempgreen, π ((σ Boats) >< Re serves)) sid color =' green' π sname((Tempred ∩ Tempgreen) >< Sailors)
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan 19
Find the names of sailors who’ve reserved all boats
❖ Uses division; schemas of the input relations
to / must be carefully chosen:
ρ (Tempsids, (π Re serves) / (π Boats))
sid, bid bid π sname (Tempsids >< Sailors)
❖ To find sailors who’ve reserved all ‘Interlake’ boats: