Ched Data Elements Final
Ched Data Elements Final
The Revised
CHED Data
Element Manual
March 2005
Foreword i
Abbreviation iii
1 Introduction .................1
FOREWORD
A manual is an expression of carefully and systematically selected set of basic data and
information. It also defines the terms. If appropriate, a classification or categorization system is
attached to each piece of information so that when all the data are in, they can be listed, sorted and
packaged for statistical analyses.
This Revised Data Element Manual serves a number of purposes. It gives important
information needed in making transactions using the Management Information System (MIS) designed
for CHED purposes according to the type of data element (e.g. institutional, curricular, student, etc.)
used from the CHED Regional Offices (CHEDROs) and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).
There are seventeen (17) types of data element and for each data element, the element
number, name, nickname are defined. Furthermore, each element’s profile is also given including its
data reference points, common definitions, major uses, coverage, and description. This is done to
make the reader understand the functions of this manual.
This manual will not have been completed without the technical assistance of the Asian
Development Bank (ADB) through Prof. Honesto “Bong” G. Nuqui as Consultant and the MIS-
Technical Working Group from various HEIs.
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
This is the revision of THE CHED DATA ELEMENT MANUAL first published in 1996. It gathers in one document
the operating definitions, full names, short names, and proposed coding of data elements to be used in the
education management information systems (EMIS) of individual higher education institutions (HEIs) and of
CHED itself.
The REVISED CHED DATA ELEMENT MANUAL (RCDEM) is organized around data reference points or entities.
Each chapter answers the general question: what are the specific pieces of data which an HEI or CHED needs
or wants to know about the entity? For instance, the second chapter is all about a degree program. What are
the specific things we need to know about a degree program?
The RCDEM itself is not a repository of data. It is not a database. It is not a statistical bulletin. A Data
Element Manual is a catalogue of data elements and their data elements which a researcher can use to specify
what data should be gathered about different entities.
This Data Element Manual is not for computer programmers or rather not only for computer programmers.
Indeed, the RCDEM is most useful to the personnel of CHED and in higher education institutions and
researchers who need to gather data and extract information out of the data. This Manual is designed to
assist a university administrator, CHED official or researcher to specify precisely what he/she might need. It is
designed to assist the computer programmers and statisticians understand what the manager might need or
want.
Every specific piece of data about an entity is called a data field or data element.
• Examples of data elements on an individual faculty member: name, birthday, highest degree
attained in the discipline where he teaches, if the faculty member is in “active pursuit” of an advanced
degree, if the faculty is full-time, half-time or part-time, the no. of units teaching lecture subjects, the no.
of units teaching laboratory subjects, the no. of credit units for research, etc.
• Examples of data elements on an academic program in a specific HEI: the name of the program,
the program level, the usual number of years it takes to complete the program, the accreditation level,
if a thesis is definitely required or simply an option, the no. of new admissions each year, the total
enrollment in the first semester, the total no. of graduates from one school year, the graduation rate,
etc.
• Examples of data elements on an HEI: the full name, the popular acronym by which the HEI is known,
the address, if the HEI is funded by the national government, local government or is privately-funded,
the no. of programs offered, total enrollment in the first semester, no. of graduates, graduation rate, no.
of full-time faculty, the no. of full-time faculty with advanced degrees in the discipline they teach, etc.
In most cases, the data element is well understood but there are some data elements which need to be defined
precisely. Consider something as crucial as the “number of full-time faculty (FTF) members” in an HEI. In
a public-funded HEI, it is easy to identify the full-time faculty because of the Salary Standardization Law (SSL)
and the plantilla. In a public HEI, the full-time faculty are those who satisfy all 3 conditions below:
• The position title includes any of the words “teacher”, “instructor”, or “professor”
• The person receives the full regular salary as authorized in the SSL, and
• The person must account for the minimum or normal full-time faculty load per semester (typically
18 units per semester).
It is not as easy to define “number of full-time faculty (FTF)” in a private HEI. In a private HEI, the entitlement to
a monthly salary cannot be used to identify the full-time faculty members because most of them are paid on a
per-hour, per-unit or per-class basis. If this is the case, who among the faculty members in a private HEI will be
counted as full-time and who as part-time?
If a faculty member in a private HEI receives no monthly salary but teaches, on average, 18 units per semester,
such a faculty member should probably be counted as “full-time”. If the faculty member teaches only 6 units,
the faculty member is probably “part-time”. But what if the faculty member teaches an average of 12 or 15 units
per semester? Should such a person be considered full-time?
Since CHED wants to compile comparable data across 1,600 HEIs in the Philippines, there must be standard
and precise rules for counting. These rules are spelled out in the RCDEM.
Other popular data elements which need precise definitions: “student-to-faculty ratio”, “board exam passing
rate”, “graduation rate”, “full-time equivalent faculty”, “full-time equivalent students (FTES), etc. Each of these
terms has at least 2 or 3 plausible definitions. In the RCDEM, all definitions with formulas are explained and it is
up to CHED, the HEI or the researcher to choose which is the most appropriate for specific occasions.
• EXAMPLES OF SPECIFIC DATA. About a higher education institution, the following are specific data
elements: the official name, the date when it was officially established, the mailing address, the name
of the head, if the HEI is public or private, etc.
• NON-SPECIFIC DATA. In contrast, the following are too general and not specific enough: “institution
profile”, “institution type”, “faculty profile”, “socioeconomic profile of students”, “typology”, etc.
The “faculty profile” of an HEI is too broad and it cannot be considered as a data element. However, it could be
broken down into specific data elements such as:
• The number of full-time faculty (FTF) in the HEI
• The number of part-time faculty (PTF),
• The number of faculty members who are tenured or at least on a tenure track
• The no. of full-time faculty with advanced degrees in the discipline where they teach.
• Among the tenured faculty or those on tenure track, the % of them with advanced degrees in the
discipline where they teach.
• The number of full-time faculty “in active pursuit” of an advanced degree in the discipline where they
teach.
• Percentage of classes taught by part-time faculty (as opposed to full-time faculty).
In other words, “faculty profile” itself is not a data element: it is actually a collection of many data elements.
Similarly, “socioeconomic profile of students” is too broad and cannot be considered as a data element. However,
if we focus on some specific degree program, the socioeconomic profile of the students could be broken down
into specific data elements such as:
• No. of students from families reporting total family income of P100,000 or less per year,
• No. of students from families where the per capita income is lower than the poverty threshold,
• No. of students who graduated from public general high schools ( as opposed to public special and
private high schools).
• No. of students who paid more in their 4th year high school than they are currently paying per year in
the HEI.
• No. of students who come from families who consume less than 100 KWH of electricity per month.
• No. of students who come from families where no parent is a college degree holder.
In other words, “socioeconomic profile of students” itself is not a data element: it is actually a collection of many
data elements.
“Institution type” is vague and cannot be considered a data element. There are many ways to classify an HEI:
• whether the HEI is funded by the national government, local government, or private-funded
• whether the HEI is officially recognized by CHED as a “university”.
• whether the HEI is “deregulated” by CHED or not.
• whether the HEI has a CHED-designated Center of Excellence, Center of Development or none.
• The grading system used by the HEI.
Again, “institution type” is too broad and it must be broken into specific data elements such as those listed
above.
The data elements listed in the RCDEM are specific pieces of data.
The RCDEM is a catalog of data elements which an HEI, CHED or a researcher on Philippine higher
education might possibly need or want.
1. Depending on its need and its resources, each HEI will decide if it will collect the data element, when
and how frequently it will update it.
2. Depending on its own need and its resources, CHED will have to assign a priority to each data element.
Some data elements will deserve a “high priority” rating while some others will not deserve it. Some
data elements (obviously enrolment figures and faculty counts) have to be collected immediately and
updated yearly. Some elements will be need only for occasional requirements, e.g. application for
accreditation or proposal for funding.
2. The next intended users are the commissioners, directors and staff of CHED in its main office
and regional offices, its technical panels, and any group conducting a research or survey funded
by CHED. Many requests for data are issued under the name of “CHED” but in truth there are many
offices in CHED and there are many technical panels. Different individuals and institutions conduct
researches in behalf of CHED. Thus, it is not entirely unusual for an HEI to receive different requests
for data from various offices or individuals under the rubric of CHED. It would be good if all these
requests used the same data collection forms too but, first things first, everybody should use the same
terminology and definitions. For instance, there should be universally-accepted definition of a data
element as critical “number of full-time faculty members”, “passing rate in the board exam”, “graduation
rate from the program”, “student-to-faculty ratio”.
3. The next group of users are the partner agencies or cooperating institutions of CHED. To name
a few: FAAP, NEDA, DBM, COCOPEA, PASUC, PRC, etc. To promote common definitions and
classifications, CHED should furnish all stakeholders their own copies of the RCDEM.
Classificatory data elements are important because they will enable CHED to categorize programs, HEIs,
students, faculty members, etc. It is estimated that there are 1,600 different HEIs offering about 12,000 academic
programs in the Philippines. Classificatory data elements require very tight definitions. The classification of
entities must induce what is called a “logical or mathematical partition”: every entity must belong to one
and only one subset within the classification system. When the set of entities is divided into subsets, the
subsets must be mutually disjoint and no entity must be left out. There are many ways of partitioning a set
but the partitioning must be meaningful to the HEI and/or CHED. For every classificatory data element in the
RCDEM, the induced partitioning and the accompanying coding scheme are shown.
3. ELEMENT SHORT NAME OR NICKNAME (e.g. “PROGLADD”). The short name must be mnemonic
but use only 12 or fewer characters. It will be used as a row or column heading in tabulations and in
computer programs.
4. PURPOSE The purpose for collecting the data element must be specified for at least 2 levels:
• To begin, why would the HEI itself collect this piece of data?
• Subsequently, why would CHED want to collect this piece of data? There might even be need
for the different offices and Technical Panels of CHED to answer this question on their own.
The HEI and CHED have to state their own purpose for collecting the data element because:
• There are data elements which every HEI needs to collect and which CHED also needs to
collect. Example: About a degree program, total enrolment.
• There are data elements which the HEI will need to collect but which CHED will not need.
Example: About a student, the name of the person to call in case of emergency.
• There are data elements which CHED may require but which the HEI does not regularly collect.
Example: About a student, whether the student belongs to the Top 50% of his high school
graduating class.
• Then of course, there are data elements which neither the HEI nor CHED now collect but may
need in the future, Example: About a student, the per-capita income of the family.
5. DESCRIPTION This is the operational definition which will assist in data collection and data analysis. The
definition or description should include some examples/counterexamples. It should specify inclusions
and exclusions. The data element should be compared or contrasted with related data elements. If the
data element is computed numeric data, the formula should be spelled out. If the element is a percentage
or ratio, there will be a numerator and a denominator. Specify what the numerator includes or excludes.
Specify what the denominator includes or excludes. Whenever appropriate, the interpretations should
be given as well.
6. SUGGESTED CODING If the data element is classificatory, the different sub-categories within
the classification should be listed explicitly. The classification must induce a mathematical or logical
“partition”: each entity must fall into one and only one category. Furthermore, the sub-categories must
be meaningful to an education manager or researcher.
For instance it will not suffice to state that “program level” is the place of the program in various
educational levels. It is necessary to actually list down and code the different program levels. This is the
best way to standardize classification systems in the Philippine higher education sector. For instance,
shown below is the coding of the element PROGLEVEL which classifies each academic program into
the following “levels”:
7. CENSUS DATE OR COUNT DATE OR INCLUSIVE DATES ( e.g. For counting students and faculty
members, there must be a national census day, e.g. July 1 of each year. For counting graduates in
one year, inclusive dates have to be specified, e.g. June 1 to May 31 of the following year if we want a
school year. For cost figures, the inclusive dates might be Jan 1 to Dec 31 to capture the calendar year
or June 1 to May 31 to capture a school year.)
8. FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION (Should the data element be collected every semester? or is it enough
to collect once each year?)
Some data elements are “raw” and some are “derived”. Derived or computed data are obtained after
some calculations with the raw data. The following are examples of derived data: totals or sums, averages,
percentages, ratios, maximum value, minimum value, median value, etc. In a computer implementation, only
the raw data will be stored and everything else will just be calculated. However, both raw data and derived
data will be listed and defined in this Revised CHED DATA ELEMENT MANUAL.
The RCDEM is designed for human managers within HEIs and within CHED. Thus, it will explain how derived
data is computed or what formula is used. This is especially important for ratios and percentages. The RCDEM
will specify what is to be included in or excluded from the denominator. It will specify what is to be included in
or excluded from the denominator.
7. How many shift out of the program? How many immigrate into the program? See UMALIS1, UMALIS2,
UMALIS, IMMIGRANTS1, IMMIGRANTS2, IMMIGRANTS, UMALIS%.
8. How many were dropped from the program? See PROBATION, PINAALIS, PINAALIS%
9. What is the graduation rate from the program? Why is it wrong to take the straight average of graduation
rate over 3 years? See COHORT%, GROSSGRAD%.
10. Is the program accredited by FAAP? See PROGACCRED.
11. How long is a fulltime student expected to finish the program? See PROGYEARS.
12. What is the maximum residency period for the program? See MAXRESIDENCY
13. The program requires how many lecture units? Non-lecture units? How many subjects? PROGUNITSSS,
LECT_UNITSSS, NONLECT_UNITSSS, PROGSUBJS.
14. Is a thesis definitely required or is there another option? See THESIS
15. Does the HEI have a foreign partner in offering the program? See IMPORTED.
16. Does the HEI have a local HEI partner in offering the program? See CONSORTIUM.
17. How many freshmen does the program intend to accept? How many applicants did it accept? How
many actually enrolled? See E_QUOTA, Q_QUOTA, FRESHMEN
24. Is the Internal Operating Budget centralized or decentralized? How many “cost centers” does the
institution have? See COSTCTR1, COSTCTR2, etc.
25. How many computers are generally available to the higher education students? What is the BANDWIDTH?
How many students per computer? See COMPUTERS1, STCOMP_RATIO.
26. How many faculty members are tenured or on tenure track? See FTFAC_TENURED, FTFAC_TRACK,
etc.
27. How many full-time faculty members? How many half-time? Who are the part-time faculty? How many of
them are “currently in the service of the HEI”? See FULLTYMFAC1, FULLTYMFAC2, HALFTYMFAC1,
PARTTYMFAC1, PARTTYMFAC2.
28. What is the ratio of full-time faculty to part-time faculty? See FULLTYMFAC1%, FULLTIMEFAC2%,
etc.
29. What is the student-to-faculty ratio? How many possible definitions are there? STFR_FTFAC, STFR_
ALLFAC, STFR_WTD, STFR_FTE, etc.
30. How many of the faculty have advanced degrees regardless of discipline where they teach? But how
many have advanced degrees “in the discipline”? MS_FTAC1, MS_FTFAC2, PHD_FTFAC1, PHD_
FTAC2, MS_TENURED%, PHD_TENURED%, etc.
31. How many of the faculty members are “in active pursuit of an advanced degree”? See MS_PURSUE,
PHD_PURSUE.
32. What % of the tenured faculty have published at least once in the past 10 years? See PUBL_TENUR%,
AUTH_TENUR%
33. What % of the full-time faculty are Instructors? Assistant Professors? Full Professors? See INSTRUC%,
ASSTPROF%, ASSOCPROF%, FULLPROF%.
34. For purposes of monitoring faculty workload, the faculty will be grouped into categories A1,A2,A3, etc.
35. What is the faculty workload (in hours) during a typical week when classes are in session? See LECT_
HOURZ, NONLECT_HOURZ, ADMIN_HOURZ, TOT_HOURZ, etc.
36. What is the total faculty workload measured in credit units? See LECT_UNITXX, NONLECT_UNITXX,
ADMIN1_UNITXX, ADMIN2_UNITXX, STUDY1_UNITXX, STUDY2_UNITXX, TOT_UNITXX, etc.
37. What is the average teaching load per faculty? Average research load? See TEACH_AVG, RES_
AVG,
38. What percentage of total faculty hours is devoted to teaching, research, extension? See TEACH%,
RESEARCH%, EXTNSERV%
15. How much cash was given out in the form of stipends and/or allowances to the scholars or grantees?
See UG_STIPENDS, MS_STIPENDS, PHD_STIPENDS, etc.
16. How much of all GAA PS costs can be attributed (directly or indirectly) to the INSTRUCTION FUNCTION
of the HEI? To the RESEARCH FUNCTION? To the PUBLIC SERVICE (OR EXTENSION SERVICE)
FUNCTION? See TEACH_PS1, TEACH_MOOE1, TEACH_CO1, etc.
17. How much of all SUC-funded costs can be attributed directly or indirectly to TEACHING? To RESEARCH?
See TEACH_PS2, TEACH_MOOE2, etc.
18. What percentage of all costs can be attributed directly or indirectly to TEACHING? To RESEARCH? To
EXTENSION SERVICE? See TEACH3%, RESEARCH3%, EXTN3%
19. How much income was raised from TUITION? From BUSINESS OPERATIONS? See TUITREV,
MISCFEESREV, etc.
SOME INTERESTING DATA ELEMENTS ABOUT A FACULTY MEMBER. See CHAPTER 11.
1. Is the employee a faculty member? See EMPLTYPE.
2. Is the employee full-time? Is the faculty member part-time? See FULLPART.
3. Is the employee currently “in the service” or “ in the payroll”? See INSERVICE.
4. How do we classify the faculty member based on tenure? See TENURED.
5. What is the workload of the faculty member in terms of credit units? See NORMAL_LOAD, UNITX_
LECT1, UNITX_LECT2, UNITX_LAB1, UNITX_LAB2, etc.
6. Out of a typical 40-hour week, how many hours are devoted to teaching? Administrative duties? See
LECT_HOURZ, LAB_HOURZ, ADMIN_HOURZ, etc.
7. What fraction of the faculty member’s time is devoted to teaching? Research? Admin? See LECT_
%HOURZ, RES_%HOURZ, ADMIN_%HOURZ, etc.
8. Based on highest degree earned (regardless of discipline), how do we classify the employee? See
HIGHESTDEG1.
9. Based on highest degree earned IN THE DISCIPLINE where the faculty member is teaching, what is
the highest degree earned? See HIGHESTDEG2.
10. Is the faculty member “in active pursuit” of an advanced degree? See PURSUE.
11. How is the faculty ranked by the students? See EVALUATION.
12. How many classes did the faculty member teach? See CLASS_UG, CLASS_MS, etc.
13. How many subjects does the faculty member have to prepare for? See SUBJ_UG, SUBJ_MS, etc.
14. How big is the faculty member’s teaching load? How many student-credit units? How many FTE
students? See SCU_UG, SCU_MS, SCU_PHD, FTES_UG, FTES_MS, etc.
15. What is the average class size taught by the faculty member? See SIZE_UG, SIZE_MS, etc.
16. How many undergraduate students were taught by the faculty? graduate students? See UGTEACH_
STUDS, GRADTEACH_STUDS.
17. How many STUDENT CREDIT UNITS were taught by the faculty? See UGTEACH_SCU, GRADTEACH_
SCU.
18. How many thesis advisees finished in the past 12 months? How many advisees are still writing?
How many have taken “too long”? MS_TAPOS, PHD_TAPOS, MS_WRITING, PHD_WRITING, MS_
LAPSED, PHD_LAPSED.
19. What is the primary field of specialization? Why this question should not be left open-ended. See
UNESCO_12, ISCED_71, PSCED_19.
DISCLAIMERS
1. The RCDEM itself is not a repository of data. A Data Element Manual is NOT a database. The
RCDEM contains only the list, operational definitions and proposed coding of data elements about
different entities important in higher education. This Manual is not where a researcher will look for data.
This Manual is only the place where a researcher can specify what data needs to be gathered.
2. This RCDEM is not yet complete and perhaps will never be complete. Every year there will be need
to identify new elements, revise definitions or the coding. Certainly there are errors and ambiguities in
this revision, some minor and some possibly serious. These should be corrected and the corrections
should be known to everybody. This revision of the RCDEM provides a platform for putting the
corrections, clarifications and additions. Please see proposal below to establish a CHED Data Element
Committee.
3. The definitions given in this RCDEM are operational definitions to be used for data-gathering or statistical
purposes only. The definitions used here are not intended to be legal definitions. The definitions
and coding schemes are designed only to put logic or clarify the logic in counting and classifying data
entities important to HEIs and CHED.
To start, the committee will have to go through this current draft of the RCDEM, chapter by chapter, and review
each definition and coding of the classificatory data elements.
This committee should meet regularly, e.g. twice a year, and update the Data Element Manual.
• Definitions (especially classification systems) will have to be revised or updated.
• New data elements will have to be introduced.
• Some new data entities will have to be included.
In the meantime, CHED should post the latest DATA ELEMENT MANUAL in its website for free downloading.
This will promote the use of standard terminology, definitions and coding within the higher education sector in
the Philippines.
If CHED or some research group needs data (say about the performance of SUC graduates in board exams), it
may design a template such as the one below. The accompanying instructions could then simply say: For the
definitions of PROG_TAPOS, SUBOKAGAD, SUBOKAGAD%, AGADPASA, AGADPASA%, and TALAGA%,
please see Chapter 2 ( pp. 15-17; 56 ) and Chapter 3 ( pp.111-112 ) of the REVISED CHED DATA ELEMENT
MANUAL.. Or the researcher could simply attach the relevant excerpts from the RCDEM. The dictionary will be
given out for free in electronic form, thus making it easy to copy and paste. No need to write detailed instructions
on what a term means and what it does not mean.
If CHED or some research group needs to compile data about the no. of graduates, graduation rates, the
no. of completed theses/dissertations and the no. of pending theses/dissertations in an HEI, it could issue
out the template below. The accompanying instructions could simply state: For definitions of GRADUATES,
ENROLMENT, MAJORS, GROSSGRAD%, THESIS_TAPOS, THESIS_WRITING, THESIS_LAPSED please
see Chapter 2 pp.____ and Chapter 3 pp.____ of the CHED DATA ELEMENT MANUAL. Or the appropriate
excerpts could simply be copied or attached as instructions. No need to formulate new instructions.
1 4-YEAR UNDERGRAD
PROGRAMS
2 5-YEAR UNDERGRAD
PROGRAMS
3 MASTERS
4 PHD
REMARKS:
INCLUDE ONLY THE FACULTY MEMBERS “CURRENTLY IN THE SERVICE OF THE
HEI”. Exclude those on leave without pay but include those on official leave with pay.
GROUP Exclude those on AWOL. Include tenured faculty members who are assigned as full-time or
part-time administrators in the HEI – even if they have no current teaching loads. Exclude
those on secondment outside the HEI.
REMARKS:
Most part-time faculty belong to this subgroup. This consists of the lecturers, professors
emeriti, adjunct or affiliate faculty, visiting professors, etc. WHO HAVE CURRENT
TEACHING OR RESEARCH LOADS.
D3 TEACHING FELLOWS, ASSOCIATES AND ASSISTANTS
There are many standard “report templates” in the Manual which HEIs or researchers could simply adopt for
their own use.
A precise and logical DATA ELEMENT MANUAL (RCDEM) does not guarantee the success of EMIS in an
institution of higher learning or in CHED itself. Unfortunately, the absence of or the imprecision of a DATA
ELEMENT MANUAL will surely doom any EMIS. The DATA ELEMENT MANUAL is not a sufficient condition for
the establishment of an educational MIS in the Philippines but it is the necessary first step.
March 2005
CHAPTER 2
DATA ELEMENTS ON A DEGREE
PROGRAM
ENTITY TO BE DESCRIBED: The entity to be described is an academic or degree program in a specific
higher education institution, e.g. M.S. Psychology in XYZ University or Ph.D. Biology in ABC University.
A degree program or academic program is a program which leads to a specific academic credential such as
a bachelors degree, a masters degree, or doctorate degree. Sometimes the credential is not really a degree but
a mere certificate or diploma (as in the so-called pre-baccalaureate or post-baccalaureate programs). Other
terms are also used such as: “course”, “degree course”, or “curricular program”. The word course should
be avoided because it is subject to many interpretations.
A program is usually referred to by a name which consists of a credential or title (e.g. Bachelor of Arts, Master
of Science, Doctor of Education, etc.) followed by a discipline or area of study (e.g. Mathematics). Examples:
A.B. History, Certificate in Sports Coaching, Diploma in Music Education, Master of Science in Statistics, etc.
Sometimes the credential printed in the official sheepskin document is a generic “Bachelor of Arts” but in the
official transcript, it may be described or further specified by a major as in Bachelor of Arts (History), Bachelor
of Arts (European Languages), etc.
• The word "course" is a synonym for "academic program" in the following contexts: "Medicine is a very
demanding course", "Vet Med is a 5-year course", “BS Biology is a quota course”, etc.
• The word course is a synonym for training program (which is neither an academic program nor a subject) in
the following sentences: “The Institute of Computer Science is offering a one-week course on the Internet.”
“ The College of Law is offering a refresher course on Juridical Ethics.”
• The word course is a synonym for "subject" in the following usages: "Physics 188 is 4-unit course", "Ben
passed all his courses last semester", "Prof. Santos is teaching the Asian Literature course this semester",
etc.
Depending on the context of a discussion, a listener may be able to distinguish whether course is being used
to mean subject or to mean program. However, when precision is needed, the terms “subject” and “program”
should be used -- and “course” should be avoided. For instance, the questions “ How many courses does
the university offer?” or “What are the course offerings this year?” are questions which invite some confusion.
These questions should be reworded using either “subject” or “program”, whichever the
To conclude: when precision is needed, the word “course” should be avoided. Please use “program” or “subject”
instead.
Chemistry are separate and distinct programs. It may also be agreed that there is a difference between BS
Psychology and BA Psychology. Sometimes the line is not too clear. For example, BA Mass Communications
(Journalism) and BA Mass Communications (Broadcast Communication) may or may not be counted as one
and the same program. A lot depends on the specific requirements of the curricula in the HEI.
The following rule-of-thumb is proposed: based on credit units, if two programs share at least 75%
commonality in their requirements, then the two programs should be counted as just one program. This
test may be used to determine if programs such as BS Economics and BS Business-Economics deserve to be
counted separately. The same test may be used to decide if MA English (Literature) and MA English (Teaching
of a Foreign Language) deserve to be counted separately.
Admittedly the 75% cut-off is arbitrary but a limit has to be set at some point.
EXAMPLE 1:
A program with a “double-major”, e.g. a 4-year BS MATH-PHYSICS is counted as just one program.
EXAMPLE 2:
Consider the 3-rung program ladder below and suppose the entire ladder takes 4 years. After 1 year, the
student receives the tech/voc certificate (CTC). After another year, the student gets the pre-baccalaureate
degree (ACT). After 2 more years, the student receives the bachelors degree (BSCT).
In this DATA ELEMENT MANUAL, the main concern is how to count and/or how to record data. The prescribed
counting rules are illustrated below:
1. NO. OF PROGRAMS
In the RCDEM, this 3-rung ladder will be counted as 3 separate programs.
• The CTC program belongs to the Tech/Voc program level.
• The ACT program is classified as pre-bacc and
• the BSCS is classified as baccalaureate. (See PROGLEVL).
2. ENROLLMENT
Suppose there are 100 students in 1st year, 80 in 2nd year, 70 in 3rd year and 60 in the 4th year of the
4-year ladder.
o For the CTC program, ENROLMT = 100.
o For the ACT program, ENROLMT =80.
o For the BSCS program, ENROLMT = 130 = 70+60.
3. NO. OF GRADUATES
Suppose everybody who started each year level actually completes that year level.
o For the CTC program, the no. of graduates or PROG_TAPOS=100.
o For the ACT program, the no. of graduates or PROG_TAPOS = 80 and
o for the BSCS program, the no. of graduates or PROG_TAPOS =60.
The counting rules proposed in the RCDEM do not have any legal force whatsoever and should be given no
legal implications. The counting rules are designed simply to clarify the logic, standardize the procedure, and to
inform the data gatherers and data analysts.
If the two degrees are granted simultaneously, say both degrees after 5 years, then the double degree is
counted as just one program.
This is not to say that all data elements in the RCDEM should be collected regularly. Some of the data elements
here should be collected yearly and some every 2 or 3 years. Some data elements will be collected only for
some special study or research.
8. How many shift out of the program? How many immigrate into the program? See UMALIS1, UMALIS2,
UMALIS, IMMIGRANTS1, IMMIGRANTS2, IMMIGRANTS, UMALIS%.
9. How many were dropped from the program? See PROBATION, PROBATION%, PINAALIS,
PINAALIS%
10. What is the graduation rate from the program? See COHORT%, GROSSGRAD%.
11. Is the program accredited by FAAP? See PROGACCRED.
12. How long is a fulltime student expected to finish the program? See PROGYEARS.
13. What is the maximum residency period for the program? See MAXRESIDENCY
14. The program requires how many lecture units? Non-lecture units? How many subjects? PROGUNITSSS,
LECT_UNITSSS, NONLECT_UNITSSS, PROGSUBJS.
15. Is a thesis definitely required or is it optional? See THESIS
16. Does the HEI have a foreign partner in offering the program? See IMPORTED.
17. Does the HEI have a local HEI partner in offering the program? See CONSORTIUM.
18. How many freshmen does the program intend to accept? How many applicants did it accept? How
many actually enrolled? See E_QUOTA, Q_QUOTA, FRESHMEN
19. How selective is the program? See SELECTIVE%, MINGRADE1, QUALEXAM
20. Is there a minimum grade required for retention in the program? See GWARETAIN
21. Is it possible to define a STUDENTS-TO-FACULTY ratio for a program?
22. Based on the HEI counting rules, how many FTE students are in the program? Based on CHED counting
rules, how many FTE students are in the program? See FTEZZ_HEI, FTEXX_CHED.
23. Can the program be classified as a small program or large program? See SIZE_FRESHMEN, SIZE_
PROG_TAPOS, SIZE_ENROLMT.
24. What percentage of the freshmen come from public schools? Private schools? See HSPUBLIC1%,
HSPUBLIC2%, HSPRIVSEC?, etc.
25. What is the socioeconomic profile of the freshmen? See HSTUITFEES, INVERTED%, KURYENTE%,
RURAL%
26. How much will it cost one student from start until graduation? PROGTUIT, PROGFEES,
TOTALBAYAD.
27. How much income did the HEI forgo because of the scholars in the program? How much did it really
hurt the HEI to offer financial aid? How much cash did the HEI pay out to scholars in the program? See
TUITWAIVERS, FEESWAIVERS, STIPENDS.
28. For the SUCs, what are “student places”? See PLACES.
NOTE: Each data element below refers to an academic program in a specific higher education
institution, e.g. the M.S. Environmental Science in XYZ University. The generic reference is to “the degree
program” or just “the program”.
While it is clear that baccalaureate programs are undergraduate level and the
masters/doctoral programs are graduate level, the classification of the LLB
and MD programs is always subject to some discussion. In the coding below,
the LLB and MD program are counted among the “undergraduate programs”.
Observe how the pre-bacc and the post-bacc programs are classified.
CODING 1-digit code.
1 BASIC, i.e. PROGLEVL =09,10, 20
2 TECHNICAL/VOCATIONAL i.e. PROG =30, 40 Note that pre-bacc
programs are classified here.
3 UNDERGRADUATE, i.e. PROGLEVL = 50, 60, 70,75 (i.e. includes LLB, JD,
MD) Observe that the post-bacc programs are classified here.
4 GRADUATE, i.e. PROGLEVL= 80,90 Also known as “postgraduate” level,
this includes only the masters and PhD levels.
9 Not known or not indicated.
DESCRIPTION An element to indicate if the program is part of a ladderized program set and
if it is part of a ladder, to indicate the relative position of the program in the
ladder. For example, consider the following ladderized set with 3 steps or
rungs:
• Associate in Business Administration.
• Certificate in Banking and Finance.
• BS Business Administration (Banking and Finance)
As of April 2004, there were an estimated 12,000 programs in the Philippines. How do we classify these programs
into a few disciplines? The UNESCO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATION
(ISCED 1997) shows over 500 disciplines, about 80 “major disciplines”, and 12 “fields of study”.
The truth of the matter is that 12,000 programs can be classified into a few major disciplines or major fields of
study in many ways. The following issues arise:
• How many major fields should be used? (5 major fields only? 10 major fields? 20?)
• What are these major fields?
• How do we classify each program into one of these major fields?
The job of classifying each program into one of 500 disciplines is difficult and that issue cannot be addressed
here in the CHED Data Element Manual. The task of aggregating the 500 disciplines into just a dozen or fewer
programs is not easy either. The recent popularity of “interdisciplinary programs” and double degree programs
has complicated the classification problem.
0801 ACCOUNTING
0803 BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
0805 SALES AND MARKETING
0807 TOURISM
0809 OFFICE STUDIES
0811 BANKING, FINANCE AND RELATED FIELDS
0899 OTHER MANAGEMENT AND COMMERCE
0901 POLITICAL SCIENCE AND POLICY STUDIES
0903 STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY
0905 HUMAN WELFARE STUDIES AND SERVICES
0907 BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE
0909 LAW
0911 JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
0913 LIBRARIANSHIP, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND CURATORIAL STUDIES
0915 LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE
0917 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES
0919 ECONOMICS AND ECONOMETRICS
0921 SPORT AND RECREATION
0999 OTHER SOCIETY AND CULTURE
1001 PERFORMING ARTS
1003 VISUAL ARTS AND CRAFTS
1005 GRAPHIC AND DESIGN STUDIES
1007 COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES
1099 OTHER CREATIVE ARTS
1101 FOOD AND HOSPITALITY
1103 PERSONAL SERVICES
1201 GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAMMES
1203 SOCIAL SKILLS PROGRAMMES
1205 EMPLOYMENT SKILLS PROGRAMMES
1299 OTHER MIXED FIELD PROGRAMMES
9999 Not known or not indicated.
11 TEACHER EDUCATION
12 OPEN LEARNING/ DISTANCE EDUCATION.
99 No information on the matter.
REMARKS: The Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) does not require any
particular bachelors degree. Any BS or AB degree holder is qualified to take the LET.
However, for ease of coding, Bachelor of Elementary Education would be coded “23”
and Bachelor of Secondary Education “24”. Most BS and AB programs would be
coded as “98”.
CODING
01 ACCOUNTANCY. This degree program is necessary if the student wants to
be eligible for the CPA Board Exam.
02 AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
03 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
04 AGRICULTURE
05 ARCHITECTURE
06 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
07 CHEMISTRY
08 CIVIL ENGINEERING
09 CRIMINOLOGY
10 CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION
11 DENTISTRY/DENTAL MEDICINE
12 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
13 ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
14 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
15 FISHERIES TECHNOLOGY
16 FORESTRY
17 GEODETIC ENGINEERING
18 GEOLOGY
19 INTERIOR DESIGN
20 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
21 LAW (LLB)
22 LIBRARY SCIENCE
23 LET-ELEMENTARY
24 LET-SECONDARY
25 MARINE TRANSPORTATION (DECK OFFICER)
26 MARINE ENGINEERING (ENGINE OFFICER)
27 MASTER PLUMBING
28 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
29 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY
30 MEDICINE (DOCTOR OF MEDICINE)
31 METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
32 MIDWIFERY
33 MINING ENGINEERING
34 NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND MARINE ENGINEERING
35 NURSING
36 NUTRITION AND DIETETICS
37 OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
38 OPTOMETRY
39 PHARMACY
40 PHYSICAL THERAPY
41 RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY
42 SANITARY ENGINEERING
43 SOCIAL WORK
44 SUGAR TECHNOLOGY
45 VETERINARY MEDICINE
46 X-RAY TECHNOLOGY
98 The degree program is not required for eligibility in any licensure
examination. Example: BS Mathematics, BS Physics, AB Psychology, etc.
99 NO INFORMATION ON THE MATTER
Performance in the board exam is usually taken as a measure of quality of a program (and often of the entire
HEI). This is specially true for bellwether programs such as Accounting, Law, Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary
Medicine. To arrive at the correct “passing rate”, it is important – nay necessary -- for the HEIs, CHED and PRC
to gather the correct data and use the appropriate formulas.
The definitions and examples below show that there is no single way to compute “passing rate”. The computation
of “passing rate” is complicated by the fact that some graduates attempt right away (i.e. within 12 months of
graduation) while others delay or do not take the board exam at all. The definitions below put precision and
logic into the computations.
The four percentage indicators are: SUBOKAGAD%, AGADPASA%, TALAGA% and GROSSRATE%. If
CHED needs to tabulate these percentages, it should also tally PROG_TAPOS, SUBOKAGAD, AGADPASA,
KUMUHA, and PUMASA. If CHED needs a ratio or a percentage, it should separately record the numerator
and denominator.
This data element is not applicable if the degree program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam.
SUBOKAGAD is a very important data element but its value can be determined
only if CHED, the HEIs and the PRC cooperate in tracing who among the HEI
graduates took the board exam and when. If CHED or the HEI have no regular
mechanism for keeping track who among its graduates take the board exam,
it would be difficult to count SUBOKAGAD.
CODING Numeric. Integer with no decimal point. If the program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam, SUBOKAGAD=-1. This value will signal the
non-applicability.
ELEMENT NUMBER A017
NAME OF ELEMENT THE NUMBER OF RECENT GRADUATES WHO PASS THE BOARD EXAM
ON THEIR FIRST ATTEMPT
SHORT NAME AGADPASA
PURPOSE To answer: among those who made their first attempt at the board exam within
12 months of graduation, how many passed the board exam?
DEFINITION From among the recent graduates who made their first attempt at the board
exam within 12 months of graduation, the no. who passed the board exam.
Compare with PUMASA below.
This data element is not applicable if the degree program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam.
REMARKS:
This is a very important data element but its value can be determined only if the HEI and
the PRC cooperate in tracing who among the HEI graduates took the board exam and
when. If the HEI has no regular mechanism for keeping track who among its graduates
take the board exam, it would be difficult to count SUBOKAGAD and AGADPASA.
If this rate is high, it means the graduates feel confident or bold enough to
attempt the board exam right away. If this rate is low (say < 50%), the HEI
should investigate why its graduates do not attempt the board exam right
away.
DEFINITION Among the graduates counted in SUBOKAGAD, the % of them who passed
the board exam. By formula: SUBOKAGAD% = 100*SUBOKAGAD/ PROG_
TAPOS.
This data element is not applicable if the degree program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam.
This data element is not applicable if the degree program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam.
CODING Numeric with format xxx.x. No % sign necessary.
• If 200 graduated, 150 made their first attempt right away and 100
passed, we have AGADPASA% = 66.7% (=100/150) but TALAGA%
= 50.0% ( = 100/200).
• If 200 graduated, only 20 took the exam and 20 passed,
AGADPASA% = 100.0% ( =20/20) but TALAGA%= 10.0% ( =
20/200) only.
If TALAGA%=100%, it means that all graduates took the exam and all of
them passed in their first attempt. Nothing could be better than that! If
TALAGA%=0, it means that none among the graduates passed in their first
attempt. This could mean that
• no graduate even attempted the exam or
• some graduates took the exam right away but no one passed.
Either way, it does not speak well of the program.
This data element is not applicable if the degree program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam.
The data elements below are less indicative but easier to compute. The element BOARDPASS% is almost
everybody’s notion of board exam “passing rate”.
DEFINITION In a specified year, the total no. of graduates who took the board exam
regardless of graduation date or previous attempts.
Suppose KUMUHA =300 in 2002. Most of the 300 are probably those who
graduated in March 2001 or March 2002, depending on the scheduling
of the board exam. However, the 300 KUMUHA could include some
graduates from long ago whether it was their first attempt or not. The element
SUBOKAGAD is a more strictly defined element because SUBOKAGAD
counts only the recent graduates making their first attempts right away.
This data element is most applicable to programs such as the LLB, MD,
Accounting, etc. programs. It is not applicable if the degree program is not an
eligibility requirement for a board exam.
CODING Numeric. Integer with no decimal point. If the program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam, KUMUHA=-1. This value will signal the non-
applicability.
ELEMENT NUMBER A022
NAME OF ELEMENT THE NUMBER OF GRADUATES WHO PASSED THE BOARD EXAM
REGARDLESS OF DATE OF GRADUATION OR PREVIOUS ATTEMPTS
SHORT NAME PUMASA
PURPOSE To answer: In one year, the total no. of graduates who passed the board
exam regardless of graduation date or previous attempts.
DEFINITION In a specified year, the total no. of graduates who passed the board exam
regardless of graduation date or previous attempts. Out of the persons
counted among the KUMUHA, the no. of them who passed.
DEFINITION From among the graduates who took the board exam, the number of them
who passed -- regardless of graduation date or previous attempts.
Given the values of PUMASA and KUMUHA, it is not possible to infer the
value of SUBOKAGAD%, AGADPASA% or TALAGA% Conversely, if we
know the values of SUBOKAGAD%, AGADPAS% and TALAGA%, it is
impossible to deduce the values of PUMASA and KUMUHA.
This data element is not applicable if the degree program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam.
This is the popular notion of board exam passing rate but compare with
AGADPASA% and TALAGA%.
CODING Numeric with format xxx.x. No % sign necessary.
The algebraically correct method: To compute the correct average of BOARDPASS% over 3 years,
• Sum the 3 values of the denominator KUMUHA and/or take the average of KUMUHA.
• Sum the 3 values of the numerator PUMASA and/or take the average of PUMASA.
• Divide the sum of PUMASA by the sum of KUMUHA.
• Or divide the average of PUMASA by the average of KUMUHA.
EXAMPLE:
In the example above, the values of BOARDPASS% in each year are 36.0 %, 51.4% and 26.7%. The straight
average is (36.0 + 51.4 +26.7)/.3 = 38.0 % but this is not the correct average.
It is WRONG to take the straight average of the BOARDPASS% over the 3 years especially if the no. of
KUMUHA varies widely within the period. This same warning applies whenever a percentage is averaged over
a number of years. Remember College Algebra!
Still another possible measure of performance in the board exam is to count how many of the graduates land
in the Top 20 of each board exam.
CODING Numeric. Integer with no decimal point. If the program is not an eligibility
requirement for a board exam, TOPNOTCHERS=-1. This value will signal the
non-applicability.
IMPORTANT DATES CONNECTED TO THE DEGREE PROGRAM
DESCRIPTION Using a 2-digit code, to indicate the level of accreditation of the program and
the name of the accrediting agency.
CODING
01 NO ACCREDITATION WHATSOEVER BY ANY EXTERNAL AGENCY
21 Program granted Level 1 accreditation by ACSC-AA
22 Program granted Level 2 accreditation by ACSC-AA
23 Program granted Level 3 accreditation by ACSC-AA
31 Program granted Level 1 accreditation by PAASCU
32 Program granted Level 2 accreditation by PAASCU
33 Program granted Level 3 accreditation by PAASCU
41 Program granted Level 1 accreditation by PACU
42 Program granted Level 2 accreditation by PACU
43 Program granted Level 3 accreditation by PACU
51 Program granted Level 1 accreditation by AACUP
52 Program granted Level 2 accreditation by AACUP
53 Program granted Level 3 accreditation by AACUP
98 PROGRAM IS ACCREDITED BY AN AGENCY OTHER THAN THE 4
AGENCIES LISTED ABOVE.
99 Not known or not indicated.
This is the pacing of the academic program taken as a whole, not the pacing
of a specific subject in the curriculum. Most higher education programs are
offered at the “semestral” pace.
CODING
1 Yearly. That is, enrollment one year at a time and academic progress is
assessed at the end of each year.
2 Semestral. Enrolment is one semester at a time and academic progress is
assessed at the end of each semester.
3 Trimestral. Enrollment for one trimester at a time and academic progress is
assessed at the end of each trimester.
4 Quarterly.
5 No mandated pacing, e.g. student can proceed at his/her own pace. No
periodic assessment of progress required.
9 No information about the matter.
If the program is being offered under a trimestral calendar and the program
can be completed in 9 trimesters, then PROGYEARS = 3.
For the LLB program, PROGYEARS =4 even if most Law freshmen have had
to earn a 4-year baccalaureate degree prior to enrolment. The LLB program
itself is only a 4-year program. For the MD program, PROGYEARS=5 because
the MD program itself is only a 5-year program.
For the associate program at the bottom rung, PROGYEARS = 2. For the
certificate program in the middle rung, PROGYEARS = 2+1 = 3. Finally, for the
baccalaureate program at the top rung, PROGYEARS= 2+1+1=4.
Since more people are familiar with semesters, HEIs offering programs in
trimester or quarterly mode are requested to determine the equivalent number
of semesters. In particular, 3 trimesters are equivalent to 2 semesters.
For this example, PROGSEMS for the associate program or bottom rung is
clearly 4 semesters or “04”. A student with the associate degree needs only
one more year to earn the pre-baccalaureate certificate or middle rung. Thus,
PROGSEMS for the certificate program should be 6 semesters or “06”. In other
words, include the 4 semesters needed to complete the certificate program
which is a prerequisite. In this example, PROGSEMS for the BS degree or top
rung is 8 semesters or “08”.
CODING 01 1 semester.
02 2 semesters / 3 trimesters / 1 year
03 3 semesters or equivalent
04 4 semesters / 6 trimesters / 2 years
05 5 semesters or equivalent
06 6 semesters / 9 trimesters / 3 years
07 7 sems or equivalent
08 8 sems / 12 trims / 4 years
09 9 sems or equivalent
10 10 sems / 15 trims / 5 years
11 11 sems or equivalent
12 12 sems / 18 trims / 6 years
13 13 sems or equivalent
14 14 sems / 21 trims / 7 years
15 15 sems
16 16 sems / 24 trims / 8 years
17 17 sems
18 18 sems / 27 trims / 9 years
99 Not known or not indicated.
DEFINITION Counting from the date of first registration into the program, the no. of
years in which the student must complete all requirements of the
program. If the student is unable to finish within this number of years
(even if he has remained in good standing all along), the student will not be
allowed to graduate anyway because he has taken “too long”.
HOW MANY SUBJECTS AND HOW MANY UNITS ARE REQUIRED IN THE PROGRAM?
For this example, suppose PROGUNITS for the associate program, the
bottom rung, is 80 units. Suppose further that a student with the associate
degree needs 44 units to get the pre-baccalaureate certificate in the middle
rung. Then PROGUNITS for the certificate program should be 124 (= 80+44)
units. This convention will apply also in determining PROGUNITS for the top
rung of the ladder.
The curriculum might prescribe 18 units in 1st sem 1st year, 20 units in 2nd sem
1st year, 21 units in 1st sem 2nd year, etc. The data element NORMALOAD
should be averaged for all the semesters and rounded to the nearest integer
for convenience. Exclude: PE, NSTPP, thesis or dissertation.
If the student were a full-time student, how many units is he expected to enroll
in a typical semester?
The concept of “funded student places” is crucial in Output Funding or Normative Financing. Under this concept,
the funding which an SUC will receive does not depend outright on the no. of students which an SUC already
has or wants to have.
The no. of funded student places is the no. of students which the National Government is willing and
able to fund. For a specific degree program, if the government funding rate is P25,000 per student and the
program is alloted 100 funded student places, it means the SUC is entitled to receive a total of P 2.5M ( =
100*25,000) in government subsidy -- but none beyond this. If the SUC has only 80 students, then the SUC
will receive P2.0M ( =80*25,000). If the SUC happens to have 120 students (i.e. more than the no. of funded
places), the SUC will have to make do with the P2.5M anyway. To be able to afford the “excess students”,
the SUC will have to introduce economy measures, raise revenues from tuition and fees, increase business
income, solicit donations, reduce the no. of sudents – or do all of the above! An SUC will not be allowed to cross-
subsidize from one program to another. That is, funds intended for one degree program cannot be diverted to
another degree program.
The funded student places will be alloted to specific degree programs, e.g. 400 funded places for BS Computer
Science but only 100 funded places for BS Business Administration. The no. of funded places to be alloted
to an SUC program will be based on many factors: the labor requirements of the country for graduates of
the program, the availability of resources within the SUC, the availability of qualified students, the quality of
the academic program, the presence (or absence) of competition from other SUCs and private HEIs in the
geographic area, the availability of funds in the National Government, etc. The detailed procedure for alloting
funded places has not yet been set but the concept of “funded student places” is already in use in many
parts of the world.
The concept of funded student places does not prevent an SUC from offering new programs or admitting
students beyond the no. of funded places. The caveat is that: if an SUC admits students in excess of the funded
places, then the SUC itself will have to raise the funds for these unfunded student places. Government subsidy
will be limited strictly to the funded places or actual enrollment, whichever is lower.
• For a doctoral program, FRESHMEN means the no. of 1st year PhD
students who have not yet earned doctoral level credit units. For
example, somebody straight from a masters program. But if the
doctoral program is a “straight PhD” program then FRESHMEN
could mean somebody straight from an undergraduate program.
How many students are in the 1st year? 2nd year? 3rd year? 4th year? This is an important question for an HEI
but each HEI handles the classification of “irregular students” in its own way. Thus, while the classification into
year levels makes sense within an HEI, it may not make sense for CHED to add all “4th year students” in the
country. Due to the fact that some programs are 4-year programs and some are 5-year programs, some of the
4th year students are graduating and some are not! There is not much usefulness in knowing how many 4th year
students there are in a region or in the Philippines. In contrast, there could usefulness in counting the no. of
brand-new students – hence the data element FRESHMEN.
The data elements shown below will be used by an HEI for its own purposes. For reference, see data element
YEARLEVEL in Chapter 7 DATA ON A STUDENT.
A055 YRLEVEL1 NO. OF STUDENTS WITH 1ST YEAR LEVEL STANDING IN THE
PROGRAM
A056 YRLEVEL2 NO. OF STUDENTS WITH 2ND YEAR STANDING
A057 YRLEVEL3 NO. OF STUDENTS WITH 3RD YEAR STANDING
A058 YRLEVEL4 NO. OF STUDENTS WITH 4TH YEAR STANDING
A059 YRLEVEL5 NO. OF STUDENTS WITH 5TH YEAR STANDING
A060 YRLEVEL6 NO. OF STUDENTS WITH 6TH YEAR STANDING
A061 YRLEVEL7 NO. OF STUDENTS WITH 7TH YEAR STANDING
A062 YRLEVEL8 NO. OF STUDENTS WITH 8TH YEAR STANDING
How many students are enrolled in the current semester? This is answered directly by the data element
ENROLMT. CHED must declare July 1 as the National Census Day for counting enrolment in the
various programs. This is a good day to freeze enrolment in the first semester because it gives a chance
for students to change matriculation. Data will be frozen on that day and recorded.
ENROLMT includes the continuing students, i.e. those who have stayed
in the program all these years. In addition, ENROLMT also includes
IMMIGRANTS1 and IMMIGRANTS2. Indeed, ENROLMT also includes those
counted in PROBATION. However, ENROLMT excludes those in UMALIS1
and UMALIS2. All these data elements are defined below.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
The defect of the first definition is double-counting those students who enrolled in both semesters. The third
definition is more precise because it avoids double-counting but it requires more work.
For example, if 1000 students enrolled in both semesters, 200 in the first semester only and 100 in the second
semester only, the third definition above yields 1,300. In contrast, the first definition would yield 2,300 while
the second definition would yield 1,150. The first definition is the most misleading of the three but there is a
toss-up between the second and third definitions. The situation gets more complicated if we include summer
enrolment.
If CHED wants to tabulate enrolment for a schoolyear, the best thing to do is just tally the first semester
enrolment on July 1.
Include: students on official deferral or LOA. Include those who are suspended
but still eligible to return after the suspension. Include those who are in good
standing but are “temporarily missing”, i.e. not currently enrolled but did not
file official leave of absence. Exclude student who is officially enrolled “for
residence only” because such a student is classified as enrolled.
Exclude those who have been dismissed, expelled, have filed request for
honorable dismisal, and those overtaken by the maximum residency rule.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
The HEI will have its own rules but the counting rule above is only for the
RCDEM. The thesis writing period indicates only how long the student will be
counted as “writing”.
CODING Numeric.
• If the program is undergrad, THESISPERIOD = 2 YEARS.
• if the program is masters level, THESISPERIOD=2 YEARS.
• if the program is doctoral level, THESISPERIOD=3 years.
Beyond this period, the student will no longer be counted as a “thesis student”.
This is not to say the student has been dropped from the program.
REMARKS:
If it is July 1, 2004, the number of students who completed their
theses between July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004 It does not matter
when they started.
REMARKS:
As of July 1, the no. of students “currently doing” their thesis or
dissertation. These are the students have started, i.e. have had their
topics approved, but have not finished. “Finished” means the thesis has
been defended successfully and submitted in the required format and
formally accepted or approved by the authorized officials. Sometimes
a bound copy is required. If this bound copy has not been submitted or
officially accepted, then the thesis or dissertation is not yet “finished”.
If it is July 1, 2004
• The no. of undergrads who secured official topic approval
on or before July 1, 2003 but have not finished as of July
1, 2004. It has been 12 months and the UG thesis is not
finished.
• The no. of masters students who had secured official topic
approval on or before July 1, 2002 but have not finished as
of July 1, 2004. The thesis was not finished within 2 years.
• The no. of PhD students who secured official topic approval
on or before July 1, 2001 but have not finished as of July 1,
2004. The dissertation was not finished within 3 years.
A lapsed thesis will be counted only once, i.e. during the year when
the “normal thesis writing period” lapsed.
The STUDENT-to-FACULTY ratio ( or STFR) for an entire higher education institution (HEI) is defined in the
next chapter. The question here is: is it possible to compute STUDENT-TO-FACULTY ratio for a specific
program? Is it meaningful to compute STFR for a specific program, e.g. BS Civil Engineering? PhD Political
Science?
Since the STFR is a ratio, it has a numerator and a denominator. To get a precise understanding, we need to
specify who will be in the numerator (“STUDENTS”) and who will be in the denominator (‘FACULTY”).
DENOMINATOR ( “FACULTY” ).
The denominator could be either headcounts or FTE faculty. The problem with headcounts is how to segregate
the faculty who are teaching exclusively in the program. This can be done in the “self-contained” programs but
not when faculty members teach students in 2 or more programs.
• It is easy to isolate the elementary school teachers if they teach exclusively at that level. Except that
some elementary faculty may also teach high school pupils and/or undergrads in the BSE program.
• It might be easy to isolate the secondary school teachers except if a number of them also teach
elementary pupils and/or BSE students at the College of Education.
• In the LLB program the Law faculty usually teach only in the College of Law and only Law faculty teach
in the College of Law.
• In the MD program the Medicine faculty teach exclusively in the College of Medicine and only Medicine
faculty teach in the College of Medicine. Except that some College of Medicine faculty may also teach
Nursing, Physical Therapy and Public Health students. Except that some College of Public Health
faculty or clinical faculty in the teaching hospital also teach MD students.
• It might be possible to isolate the teachers who teach a specific graduate program, say MS Chemistry.
Except that the professors who teach the graduate chemistry subjects probably also teach undergraduate
chemistry.
• It is difficult to isolate teachers of most other baccalaureate programs because of the GE subjects and
the service courses. In counting the teachers of BS Civil Engineering, we will have to count all the
teachers (or at least a fraction of them) in English,Math, Chem, Physics, History, etc.
In short, if a student-to-faculty ratio has to be computed for a specific program, we should use FTE students in
the numerator and FTE faculty in the denominator. Even then it might be difficult because the natural tendency
of HEI administrators is to prettify the student-to-faculty ratios in graduate programs. Among the purported
faculty in a graduate program, the HEI would probably include the non-fulltime faculty, e.g. lecturers, affiliate or
adjunct faculty, visiting professors, professors emeriti. etc. See next chapter for an extended discussion of STF
ratio for a university as a whole.
For this series of data elements include all units enrolled and with grades but exclude PE, Military Training/
NSTP, Religion, and Thesis. Units passed include the subjects where
• the student passed outright, and
• the student got an INCOMPLETE but successfully completed later, and
• the student got a CONDITION but removed successfully.
A student who dropped the subject did not pass it. A student with a pending INCOMPLETE or an unresolved
INCOMPLETE after one year has not or did not pass the subject. A student with an unremoved CONDITION
or left the CONDITION unremoved after 1 year has not or did not pass the subject
A076 PASS100 THE NO. OF PROG_MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED 100% OF ALL UNITS
ENROLLED
REMARKS:
These are the students who have passed all their subjects. No failures, no drops,
no pending or unresolved incompletes, no unremoved or unresolved conditions. It
includes some students who got INCOMPLETES but completed them successfully.
It also includes some students who got CONDITION but removed them successfully.
A077 PASS90 THE NO. OF PROG_MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED 90-99% OF ALL
UNITS ENROLLED.
EXAMPLE:
If there are 500 PROG_MAJORS and 100 of them have passed 90-99% of all the
units enrolled, then PASS90=100. This includes a major who has enrolled in 30 units
and has passed 27 of them. It includes a major who has enrolled in 90 units and has
passed 81 units. This is not to say the student failed the 9 units because it could
mean he has 9 units of pending or unresolved INCOMPLETES or CONDITION.
A078 PASS80 THE NO. OF PROG_MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED 80-89% OF ALL
UNITS ENROLLED.
A079 PASS70 THE NO. OF PROG_MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED 70-79% OF ALL
UNITS ENROLLED.
REMARKS:
These students are probably on probation or due for dismissal.
A080 PASS69 THE TOTAL NO. OF PROG_MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED LESS THAN
70% OF UNITS ENROLLED.
EXAMPLE:
These students are probably on probation or due for disimissal.
A081 %PASS100 AMONG ALL PROG_MAJORS IN GOOD STANDING, THE NO. OF PROG_
MAJORS WHO PASSED 100% OF ALL UNITS ENROLLED
EXAMPLE:
• If there are 500 PROG_MAJORS and 400 of them passed all their subjects,
then %PASS100=80%=400/500.
• If %PASS100 = 100%, it means all PROG_MAJORS have passed all their
subjects. A perfect passing record for each student and for the program as a
whole.
• If%PASS100=0, it means none of the PROG_MAJORS has a perfect passing
record. Each major has incurred at least one failure, or at least one DROP,
or still has a pending or unremoved CONDITION, or still has a pending or
unresolved INCOMPLETE.
A082 %PASS90 AMONG ALL PROG_MAJORS IN GOOD STANDING, THE NO. WHO
HAVE PASSED 90-99% OF ALL UNITS ENROLLED.
EXAMPLE:
• If there are 500 PROG_MAJORS and 50 of them passed 90-99% of their
units enrolled, then %PASS90 = 10%.
• If %PASS90=100%, it means that all PROG_MAJORS passed 90-99% of all
units they enrolled in. This is good news because everybody passed at least
90%. This is bad news because nobody passed all his units.
• If %PASSED=0%, it means that no major passed 90-99% of their subjects.
This is bad news if %PASS100=0 also because it means that nobody has
passed more than 90% of their units. This is good news if %PASS=100%
because it means everybody passed all their units.
A083 %PASS80 AMONG ALL PROG_MAJORS IN GOOD STANDING, THE NO. WHO
HAVE PASSED 80-89% OF ALL UNITS ENROLLED.
A084 %PASS70 AMONG ALL PROG_MAJORS IN GOOD STANDING, THE NO. WHO
HAVE PASSED 70-79% OF ALL UNITS ENROLLED.
REMARKS:
It is traditional to keep track of enrolment figures or headcounts. But if many students are part-time or if many
students take less than the normal load, headcounts are misleading.
Full-time equivalent will be defined in 2 ways: see FTEZZ_HEI and FTEXX_CHED. It is natural to allow each
HEI to set the normal load for each program. But if CHED wants some comparability across different programs
and different HEIs, there is also some need to set some national standards.
In computing FTES, it is necessary to aggregate the total units enrolled in the program. As usual, exclude PE,
Military Training/NSTP, Religion, thesis.
EXAMPLE
If the HEI normal load for the program is 20 units and a student is enrolled in
15, the student is counted as 0.75 FTES ( = 15/20). If the student is enrolled
in 22 units, the student is counted as 1.10 FTES ( = 22/20). If the student is
enrolled “for residence only”, FTES= 0.10 (or whatever the HEI decides). If
these 3 students are enrolled in the program, the total FTES = 0.75 + 1.10 +
0.10 = 1.95.
For this data element, the HEI is free to set its own convention for counting
the FTES equivalent of thesis or dissertation students. It is up to the HEI
whether to include units for: PE, Military Training/NSTP, Religion. In an HEI,
the authoritative computation of FTES shall be the HEI Registrar, not the Dean
or Department Chair or College Secretary.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits with 2 decimal places.
EXAMPLE:
If there are 3 students enrolled in an undergraduate program and their total enrolled
units are 20 + 15 + 18, then FTEXX_CHED = (20+15+18)/18 = 63/18 = 3.50. ( CHED
national standard normal load for undergrad programs is 18 units per semester).
EXAMPLE:
If there are 3 students enrolled in a graduate program and their total enrolled units are 8
+ 6 + 12, then FTEXX_CHED = ( 8+6+12)/12=26/12 = 2.17 ( CHED national standard
normal load for graduate programs is 12 units per semester).
Because of the wide variability of units assignment to thesis or dissertation, there will be
no FTES equivalent for students doing thesis or dissertation.
Do not include units for: PE, Military Training/NSTP, Religion. In an HEI, the authoritative
computation of FTEXX_CHED is by the HEI Registrar, not the Dean or Department
Chair or College Secretary.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits with 2 decimal places.
CHED will need to compare programs across institutions, e.g. all Accounting programs or all Computer Science
programs. In comparing the accounting programs in hundreds of HEIs, it would be helpful to sort the programs
according to size. Thus, CHED could compare only the “small” programs against each other, the “medium-
sized” programs against each other,etc
How can CHED group programs according to “size”? There are at least 3 ways:
• according to average freshman intake per year ( i.e. FRESHMEN).
• according to average total enrolment (PROG_ENROLMT)
• according to the average number of graduates (PROG_TAPOS).
ELEMENT NUMBER A097
ELEMENT NAME THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROGRAM ACCORDING TO THE
INTAKE AT ENTRY LEVEL
SHORT NAME SIZE_FRESHMEN
PURPOSE To classify the program according to the average no. of students admitted at
the entry level.
This data element is obviously for CHED purposes. An HEI does not have to
classify its own program by size.
DEFINITION The classification of the program according to the data element FRESHMEN, the
no. of freshmen admitted each year. Since enrolment varies from year to year,
this should be averaged over the most recent 3 consecutive schoolyears. Use
only first semester enrollment in each year. See definition of FRESHMEN
This data element is obviously for CHED purposes. An HEI does not have to
classify its own program by size.
DEFINITION The classification of the program according to the data element PROG_TAPOS,
the total no. of graduates in one year. Since this number varies from year to
year, it should be averaged over the most recent 3 consecutive schoolyears.
See definition of PROG_TAPOS.
9 No information available.
This data element is obviously for CHED purposes. An HEI does not have to
classify its own program by size.
DEFINITION The classification of the program according to the data element PROG_
ENROLMT. Since enrolment varies from year to year, this should be averaged
over the most recent 3 consecutive schoolyears. Use only first semester
enrollment in each year. See definition of PROG_ENROLMT
CODING 1-digit code
1 PROG_ENROLMT < 100 Over 3 consecutive years, the average enrolment
is 100 or less. This includes 1st year, 2nd year, etc.
2 100 < PROG_ENROLMT < 200
3 200 < PROG_ENROLMT < 300
4 300 < PROG_ENROLMT < 400
6 400 < PROG_ENROLMT. Over 3 consecutive years, the average enrolment
in the first semester is 400 or more.
9 No information available.
Does the program admit anybody who applies? Is there an admission test which every applicant must pass?
Is there a minimum grade average?
EXAMPLE:
Imagine a program with the above hypothetical profile over 3 consecutive years.
1. SELECTIV% = 50.0%, 45.0% and 42.9% in the 3 years. The correct average over 3 years is given by
SELECTIV% = 45.6 % ( = 820/ 1800) but this is not the straight average of the 3 percentages.
2. The no. of applicants is increasing but the selectivity percentage is going down. Although the no. of
applicants is increasing, the no. of qualifiers is not able to keep pace. This could signal that the battle
for admissions will be getting tougher and tougher for this program
3. YIELD% = 96.0%, 61.6% and 90.0% and the correct 3-year average is YIELD% = 82.3 % ( = 675/820).
In this hypothetical example, 2002-03 is unusual year because the yield was unusually “low”. A total
of 270 applicants were offered admission but only 165 ( or 61.1%) actually enrolled. Did the HEI or
the program suffer some bad publicity that year which turned away many qualifiers? Was there an
unusual occurrence (e.g. controversy, tuition fee increase, curricular change, etc.) which prevented or
How does the program determine who are “in good academic standing”? Are there minimum performance
criteria which the program imposes? Is there a minimum average grade which the student has to maintain?
If the minimum retention grade is set by the program at 2.50, a student with
an average of 2.51 would be put on probation or dismissed from the program
– but probably not dismissed from the HEI. If the bar is set very high, the
program is in effect “culling” its students but the students are not being
dismissed altogether from the HEI!
9 No information on the matter.
HOW GOOD ARE THE FRESHMEN?
The following series of elements serves as indicators of the academic caliber of the freshmen in an undergraduate
program. The best programs and the most popular programs attract the best high school graduates. Using
NSAT scores, high school grades and ranking in the HS graduating class, the data elements indicate the quality
of the freshman batch. These are all numeric data with format XXX.X No percentage sign necessary. They will
apply only if DepEd resumes giving the NSAT to all high school seniors.
These data elements are based on the rank of the freshmen in their respective high school graduating classes.
To indicate the academic caliber of the incoming freshman batch. All elements are numeric of the form XX.X.
No % sign necessary. These data elements are very useful but they can be computed only if the HEI takes the
trouble of recording the rank of each freshman in his high school class. The rank of a student in his high school
class has to be certified by the high school principal or school registrar.
What is the socioeconomic profile of the freshmen (i.e. first year students in undergraduate programs)? Although
probably not relevant to private HEIs, this profile is very relevant for SUCs – especially in the light of the national
policy to improve equity in higher education. One major rationale for the existence of SUCs is for social equity,
to provide opportunities for the poor. Does the SUC really cater to poor students?
The actual detailed procedure for socioeconomic bracketing will have to be discussed elsewhere. The series
of elements below is intended to capture the socioeconomic profile based on NET INCOME PER WEIGHTED
CAPITA. This is total family income net of income taxes divided by “weighted family size”. Please see the
Chapter 7: DATA ON AN INDIVIDUAL STUDENT for the definitions of the elements FAMSIZE1, FAMSIZE2,
GROSS_PC1, GROSS_PC2, NET_PC1 and NET_PC2.
All these elements are numeric with format XX.X No % sign necessary.
The true socioeconomic profile of students can be problematic to determine. If the student is not applying for
financial aid, he cannot be compelled to reveal information on income. A surrogate measure is to use the type
of high school. The rule of thumb is that students from private schools are less poor than students from public
schools (where the tuition is zero but academic standards are generally deemed to be lower).
In the Chapter: DATA ON A HIGH SCHOOL, the data element HSTYPE classifies high schools into the following
categories:
A120 HS_PUBLGEN Among the college freshmen, the no. who graduated from general
public high schools and the public Vocational/ Trade HS.
A121 HS_SUCS Among the college freshmen, the no. who graduated from SUC-
administered public high schools.
A122 HS_SPECIAL Among the college freshmen, the no. who graduated from special
public high schools, e.g. the DOST science HS.
A123 HSPRIVSEC Among the college freshmen, the no. who graduated from private
sectarian high schools.
A124 HSPRIVNON Among the college freshmen, the no. who graduated from private non-
sectarian high schools.
The elements below answer: what fraction of the undergraduate freshmen come from general public high
schools? All elements are numeric with format XX.X No % sign necessary.
This element is a good measure of the “affluence” of the college freshmen but it requires collecting data on
high school tuition of all freshmen or at least a random sample of them.
Electricity consumption is a very good surrogate measure of socio-economic standing. The income tax return
is of course an indicator but not generally reliable. Electric consumption, i.e. the average consumption IN
KILOWATT-HOURS PER MONTH (not pesos), is a good indicator of how poor a family could be. For a more
complete discussion of why 100 KWH might be a critical value, see Chapter 3 DATA ON AN INSTITUTION.
DEFINITION If there are 400 students in the program and 100 of them come from families
which 100 KWH or less per month, KURYENTE% = 25% = 100/400. This is
a very strong indication that 25% of the students come from poor families.
What fraction of the students come from families living in urban areas? In rural areas? To provide some
indication of the cost of living of the family. ( This is of relevance to SUCs where equity considerations are
important.) All elements are numeric with format XX.X No % sign necessary.
Without passing judgment on the academic standards of the program, graduation rate is one measure
of the “efficiency” of the academic program. A high rate means the program is “efficient” but, without any
quality assurance, it could also mean the program might be a “diploma mill”! In fact, there is no one way to
define “graduation rate”.
Consider a batch of 200 freshmen who enrol together in the 4-year BS Math program in 2000-01.
§ If 150 out of the original 200 eventually graduated at the end of 2003-04, we could say that the
graduation rate for BS Math is 75% ( = 150/200). More specifically, we should say the graduation
rate for BS Math Freshman Batch 2000-01 is 75%. ( This is sometimes referred to as cohort graduation
rate because it traces the history of the original group of freshmen).
§ But what if an additional 10 out of the original 200 were able to graduate in 2004-05 (i.e. after 5 years).
What then is the graduation rate?
§ But what if, in addition to the 150 who graduated in 2003-04, there were an additional 20 lateral transfers
who graduated with them at the end of 2003-04? In other words, there were only 200 freshmen in
2000-01 but 170 (=150+20) actually graduated in 2003-04. Does this mean the graduation rate for BS
Math is actually 85% ( = 170/200)?
The computation of graduation rate is not straightforward because of the following reasons:
§ The no. of freshmen may vary widely from year to year.
§ Some students leave before graduation and shift to another program within the same HEI while some
leave the HEI altogether. ( See definition of UMALIS1 and UMALIS2).
§ Some students shift into the program from within the HEI and others from other HEIs. ( See definition
of IMMIGRANTS1 and IMMIGRANTS2).
§ Some students are dropped or dismissed due to rules infractions or academic failures. (See definition
of PINAALIS).
§ There are students who are “resting”. Students counted in NAGPAHINGA may or may not be included
in the denominator.
§ Some students are unable to graduate ever. Some students graduate from the program but not within
the normal no. of years. Some students do not graduate from the program but graduate anyway, albeit
from another program in the same HEI or possibly from a different HEI altogether.
The graduation rate for an institution as a whole could be 100% but the graduation rate for a specific
program in the HEI could be less than 100%. See Chapter 3.
The data elements below specify how to compute the NORMALIZED GROSS GRADUATION RATE. It is called
“gross” because it uses total enrollment as a denominator instead of the enrollment in the final year level. It is
“normalized” because the perfect graduation rate is always 100% whether the program is a 4-year or 5-year
program.
In an HEI, the final arbiter of graduation date shall be the HEI Registrar.
CODING Numeric data. No coding necessary.
DESCRIPTION Out of the original batch of freshmen, the percentage of them who graduated
within the normal number of years.
OBSERVATIONS:
The numerator excludes some of the original 200 who transferred out of the
HEI before graduation.
The numerator excludes some of the original 200 who shifted to other programs
within the same HEI. For instance, the numerator excludes the original BS
Math freshmen in 1997-98 who shifted to Physics or Statistics but may have
been able to graduate from those new programs also in 2000-01.
The numerator excludes the lateral entries into the program who graduated in
2000-01, e.g. students who started in Engineering or Physics but graduated
from BS Math in 2000-01.
The numerator also excludes the BS Math graduates in 2000-01 who started
in 1996-97 or earlier. That is, it excludes BS Math graduates who took more
than 4 years to graduate.
Alternatively,
• Get the average of PROG_TAPOS over 3 years
• Get the average of PROG_ENROLMT over 3 years
• If the program is a 4-year program, multiply the average of PROG_TAPOS by 4 and then divide the
result by the average of PROG_ENROLMT
EXAMPLE:
The example below applies to a hypothetical 4-year program over 3 years. In the example, the GROSSGRAD4%
in each year are 80.0, 87.3 and 64.0 respectively and the straight average is ( 80.0 + 87.3 + 64.0) = 77.1%.
However, the correct 3-year average is computed as follows:
• The sum of PROG-TAPOS is 290. The sum of PROG_ENROLMT is 1,500. Thus, GROSSGRAD4%=
4*290/1500 = 77.3%
• The average no. of graduates is 97 ( = 290/3) while the average enrolment is 500 ( =1500/3). Thus,
GROSSGRAD4% = 4*97/500 = 77.3 %
It is WRONG to take the straight average of GROSSGRAD% over the 3 years. The straight average could be
close but it is NOT equal to the correct average. When taking the average percentage (or the average ratio)
over 3 years, remember College Algebra!
The data elements below are very useful in estimating the costs to be incurred by a student enrolled in the
program from the first year until graduation. How much tuition does a student have to pay until graduation?
In addition to TUITION, how much other fees does the student have to pay? Most surveys ask how much is
the tuition fee per unit but PROGTUIT, PROGFEES and TOTALBAYAD as defined below are definitely more
informative to students, their parents – and to CHED officials.
There is no real need to obtain tuition per year or tuition per semester or miscellaneous fees per year or per
semester. Aggregate all the costs from 1st year until graduation. To get an idea of cost per semester, just
divide by the no. of semesters. In an 8-semester program, just divide TOTALBAYAD by 8 to obtain the cost per
semester.
DESCRIPTION The total of all fees to be paid by the student other than tuition by whatever
name they are called, from beginning to graduation.
If the program takes 4 years, PROGBAYAD is the sum of tuition and all other fees
over the 4 years. In an HEI, the official source of data is the HEI Registrar.
CODING Numeric data. No coding necessary.
EXAMPLE:
Consider the hypothetical example below tracing the increases in program tuition and non-tuition fees over a
4-year period.
1. Between 2001-02 and 2000-01, tuition increased by 6.3% ( = 500/8000). During that same year, the
non-tuition fees increased by 30.0% ( = 1500/5000).
2. In the 4-year period, the average % increase in tuition is 7.8%. This is just the straight average of the
year-on-year increases.
3. In the same 4-year period, the average % increase in the other fees is 21.8%.
4. The resultant average increase in PROG_BAYAD is 13.5%
5. Most newspapers focus on the increase in tuition rates but not on the increase in the other fees.
Actually, PROG_BAYAD is the most relevant data element to a student, the parents and the
institution itself.
6. In 2000-01, the non-tuition fees comprised only 38.5% ( = 5000/13,000) of PROG_BAYAD. In 2003-
04, these non-tuition fees comprised 47.4% ( =9000/ 19,000) of PROG_BAYAD.
7. As of May 2004, CHED has no data showing how much non-tuition fees are as a percentage of PROG-
BAYAD. It may not even be that urgent to monitor PROG_TUIT and PROG-FEES separately but CHED
should certainly keep track of PROG_BAYAD.
8. By definition, PROG_TUIT means the tuition to be paid by one student from start until graduation. If the
program were a 4-year or 8-semester program, the P 8,000 below would actually imply tuition of only
P1,000 per semester. This is too cheap for a private university but probably par for the course in an
SUC – except that SUCs hardly ever increase their tuition rates. In any event, CHED should produce
this template every year since most HEIs will not do it themselves!
% YEAR- % YEAR-
ON-YEAR ON-YEAR % YEAR-ON-YEAR
PROG_TUIT INCREASE PROF_FEES INCREASE PROG_BAYAD INCREASE
2000-01 8,000 5,000 13,000
2001-02 8,500 6.3% 30.0% 15.4%
6,500 15,000
2002-03 9,500 11.8% 18.5% 14.7%
7,700 17,200
2003-04 10,000 5.3% 16.9% 10.5%
9,000 19,000
These are the students who receive some form of financial aid COURTESY OF THE HEI ITSELF, i.e.
charged to the generosity of the institution instead of an external donor. For a more complete discussion,
see Chapter 3 DATA ELEMENTS ON AN INSTITUTION.
These are the students who receive some form of financial aid FROM EXTERNAL DONORS such as
DOST, CHED , private foundations, etc. In this context “external” means “not the HEI itself”. For the more
complete discussion, see CHAPTER 3 DATA ELEMENTS ON AN INSTITUTION. A student should be counted
at most once in the categories listed below.
How much revenue was forgone by the HEI due to the students in the program receiving financial
aid? These data elements have to do with scholars or recipients of financial aid. How many of the students in
the program receive financial aid? What is the total value of this financial aid? How much income, if any, was
forgone by the HEI due to the scholars in the program? What did the program sacrifice to provide education to
its scholars?
Some programs offer more scholaships than others. Conversely, students in certain programs (e.g. Social
Work, Community Development, etc.) are usually poorer than those in other programs (e.g. Medicine, Dentistry,
Business, etc.) The data elements below will capture such differences between programs.
EXAMPLE:
Suppose miscellaneous fees total P5,000 per student and ten scholars receive
a 50% discount on miscellaneous fees. Then the HEI is bound to forgo P 25,000
( = 10*2500).
• If there is no other donor which will reimburse the HEI for this forgone
income, then FEESWAIVERS = P 25,000.
• On the other hand, if there is a scholarship sponsor who will cover the
entire miscellaneous fees of the 10 students, FEESWAIVERS=0. The
HEI suffers no revenue loss.
CODING Numeric:7 digits. No decimal points and no peso signs needed.
EXAMPLE:
It is worthwhile for the HEI to tabulate the following for each program: the no. of recipients of financial aid,
the total income forgone and the total stipends paid out. Consider the hypothetical example below for some
program, e.g. BSE (Math) or BSE (Science) in ABC University.
1. An average of 18 students in the program received waivers or discounts on tuition and/or other school
fees courtesy of the HEI itself. The average total forgone income is TOTWAIVERS = P 90,833. Thus,
the average value of the waiver on tuition and other fees is P 4,867 per grantee per year.
2. On the average, 13 students also received cash or stipends courtesy of the HEI itself (not an external
donor). Over the 3 years, the average expense of the HEI is P 90,333 per year for an average of P
8,200 stipend per grantee.
3. The amounts above are courtesy of the institution itself. They indicate the HEI’s commitment to support
the students in the program (whether due to academic performance and/or financial need). Every year,
the HEI below forgoes or spends an average of P 181,167 per year for recipients of financial aid in the
program.
4. The HEI should make a parallel tabulation for the students in the program who receive financial aid from
EXTERNAL DONORS (i.e. other than the HEI itself), e.g. DOST, CHED or private foundations.
TOTWAIVERS STIPENDS
TOTWAIVERSE
GRANTEES1 TOTWAIVERS PER GRANTEES2 STIPENDS PER
+STIPENDS
GRANTEES1 GRANTEES2
CHAPTER 3
DATA ELEMENTS ON AN INSTITUTION
DATA ENTITY TO BE DESCRIBED: The entity to be described is a specific higher education institution
(HEI), e.g. Adamson University, Central Luzon State University.
What are the pieces of data CHED needs or wants about an HEI? Certainly the full official name, the
address, the phone number, the name of the head of the institution, the number of academic programs, number
of students, number of graduates, number of faculty, the student-to-faculty ratio, the students-to-computer ratio,
etc. Each piece of data about an HEI is called a data element.
An HEI is a legal entity authorized by the government to implement degree programs and grant higher education
degrees. An HEI could be a single-campus stand-alone university such as Silliman University or Miriam College.
Or it could be a huge organization or an entire university system such as the U.P. System. Within a university
system there are so-called constituent universities (CUs) or autonomous universities (AUs), which by themselves
are also higher education institutions. Thus, UP Diliman, UPLB, UP Manila, UP Visayas, UP Mindanao and UP
Open U are all CUs of the U.P. System but each is an HEI in its own right.
Some HEIs are not formally designated as university systems but they do have extension campuses or
satellite campuses. For instance, the Ilocus Sur Polytechnic State College has a main campus and five satellite
campuses -- Cervantes, Candon, Narvacan, Santiago and Tagudin. Indeed many of the SUCs have satellite
campuses, some of them relatively big but many of them relatively small. Nominally there are only 111 SUCs
but they actually conduct classes in more than 350 sites!
Legally speaking, these campuses or sites are not independent HEIs by themselves but they do have students,
programs, graduates, faculty, scholars, etc. just like any stand-alone HEI. It is in the interest of CHED, DBM,
PASUC, and Congress and many other stakeholders to know how many students and faculty there are in each
campus or site and of course for the entire university as a whole.
For statistical purposes (but without any legal implications), each campus of an HEI may be considered
as a separate “institution”. The separate counting of enrollment, programs, faculty and expenditures by
geographic site is not intended to endow any legal personality or status on said sites or campuses. The
aggregations and disaggregations of data are purely for statistical purposes and have no legal implications
whatsoever.
In reality, almost all the data elements in this chapter apply just as well to a university system, a stand-alone
single-campus HEI, a multi-campus HEI – or even just a satellite campus of an HEI. Thus, the definitions of
data elements in this chapter will refer to a generic “institution”.
Examples of common elements: number of students, number of graduates, the no. of students who belong to
the top 10 of their graduating classes, the no. of students who are candidate for graduation with honors, etc.
In Chapter 4 DATA ON A COST CENTER, the number of students refers to the number of students in a college
or department. In Chapter 2 DATA ON A PROGRAM, the number of students refers to the number of students in
a specific degree program. In Chapter 8 DATA ON A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM, the number of students refers
to the number of scholars or grantees in a scholarship program. Technically, all these are different elements
(because they refer to different entities) but they do share a commonality or fall under the same concept. For
elements with the same concept, the definitions are spelled out in only one chapter. In the other chapters, the
elements are only named but the complete definitions are not repeated.
Chapter 4 DATA ON A COST CENTER contains the data elements which have to do with costs and income,
and other elements which are needed for cost analysis studies. These elements (e.g. cost of personal services
or the percentage of total expenses devoted to personal services) apply just as well to an entire institution or to
a degree program but the full definition and discussion is in the chapter on cost centers.
The chapter on Scholarship Programs contains data elements which have to do with scholarship benefits and
the costs incurred by scholars.
This chapter contains data elements which could be used as indicators of the quality of an institution, e.g.
the no. of programs which have accreditation at Level II and Level III, the selectivity of its admission system,
the quality of the incoming freshmen (based on high school grades, ranks in the HS graduation class, and
performance in national standard tests such as the NSAT), the qualifications of the faculty ( no. of faculty with
graduate degrees), indicator ratios such as students-to-faculty ratios, class sizes, faculty-per-program ratios,
average passing rates in PRC board exams, the no. of Centers of Excellence and Centers of Development in
the insitution, etc. Many of these elements can be used to introduce a typology of HEIs.
This is not to say that all data elements here should be collected about each of the HEIs but whenever the
need arises, the terminology, definitions, counting rules, and interpretations are all in this RCDEM.
NOTE: The data elements below refer to a generic “institution” or sometimes “HEI”. As mentioned earlier,
this could be an entire university system, a constituent university of a university system, a stand-alone single
campus HEI, a multi-campus HEI, or the satellite campus of a multi-campus HEI. The data element ECHELON
clarifies the delineation.
Do not confuse with “grandmother”. Observe that U.P. Diliman has a “mother”
but no “grandmother”. U.P. College Cebu has both a “mother” (UP Visayas)
and a “grandmother” (UP System).
CODING Same coding as SHORTNAME. In other words, key in the short name -
- not the full name INSTNAME and not ACRONYM. there is no “mother”
institution, write “NONE”: do not leave a blank entry.
Commission on Higher Education
76 Data Elements on an Institution
Examples. If the institution is the Ilocos Sur Polytechnic State College, then
CHILDREN= 6. The said state college has 6 campuses: Cervantes, Candon,
Narvacan, Santiago, Tagudin and its main campus in Sta. Maria. This means
that data reported under the name “Ilocos Sur Polytechnic State College”
can be disaggregated into 6 pieces.
Note that the UP campuses in Cebu, Tacloban and Pampanga are not
immediately below the UP System and therefore are not counted among
the 7. If the institution is UP Visayas, CHILDREN = 4 to stand for Cebu,
Tacloban, Iloilo and Miag-ao. This signals that data reported under the name
“U.P. Visayas” can be disaggregated into 4 pieces.
The classification under the element GENERIC is based only on the generic
class embedded in INSTNAME. The official recognition by CHED of the
institution as a “university” is captured by the element UNIVERSITY.
CODING 2-digit code.
01 College/ Colegio/ Kolehiyo
02 Academy/ Academia
03 Institute/ Instituto
04 Center
05 School
06 Program
07 Project
08 Others
99 Not known.
DEFINITION The total no. of “computer classrooms” in the HEI. Include only rooms which
have at least 10 computers which can seat at least 30 students, at most 3
students at each computer. Do not include a computer room which is intended
only for faculty or administrative use.
B037 BOOKS2000 TOTAL NO. OF LIBRARY BOOKS PUBLISHED AFTER JAN 1, 2000.
B038 BOOKS1990 TOTAL NO. OF LIBRARY BOOKS PUBLISHED BETWEEN JAN 1990
AND DEC 1999.
B039 BOOKS1980 TOTAL NO. OF LIBRARY BOOKS PUBLISHED BETWEEN JAN 1980
AND DEC 1989.
B040 BOOKS1970 TOTAL NO. OF LIBRARY BOOKS PUBLISHED BETWEEN JAN 1970
AND DEC 1979.
B041 BOOKS1960 TOTAL NO. OF LIBRARY BOOKS PUBLISHED BETWEEN JAN 1960
AND DEC 1969.
B042 BOOKS_OLD TOTAL NO. OF BOOKS PUBLISHED BEFORE DEC 31 1959.
B043 LIB_BOOKS ALL LIBRARY BOOKS COMBINED ( REGARDLESS OF AGE)
B044 BOOKS_RATIO NO. OF UNDERGRAD AND GRADUATE STUDENTS PER BOOK.
REMARKS:
The no. of computers available to the students, e.g. those in the student computer
labs, libraries, dormitories, etc. Include only the computers which are available at
least during office hours during schooldays. Exclude computer terminals which
might be made available only during special occasions, e.g. registration week. Do
not include computers inside administrative offices or faculty offices. Do not include
computers in elementary and secondary school. See COMPUTERS2.
B054 COMPUTERS2 THE NUMBER OF COMPUTERS AVAILABLE TO THE FACULTY AND
THE STAFF
REMARKS:
Include computers in administrative offices and faculty offices. Include computers
in a common faculty computer room but exclude computers in student computer
labs. See COMPUTERS1.
DESCRIPTION If an institution is currently a college and was once another kind of institution,
the year shown should be the year it was authorized to become a college
as set out in national legislation (SUCs) or the Batas Pambansa 232 (private
institutions).
CODING Numeric: 4 digits as in 1995.
CODING Numeric: 2 digits. If the number is not indicated, key in COLLEGES=-1. The
computer will read this as a signal that the number of colleges is not known
or has not been reported. For a satellite campus with no colleges under
it (or if the satellite campus is a college by itself but no colleges under it),
COLLEGES=0.
ELEMENT NUMBER B079
NAME OF ELEMENT THE NUMBER OF DEPARTMENTS or ‘SECOND-TIER” UNITS INSIDE
THE COLLEGES OF THE INSTITUTION
SHORT NAME DEPTS
PURPOSE To indicate the number of departments inside or subsumed under the free-
standing colleges. This is a count of the “second-tier” teaching units of the
institution. To be used as guide in disaggregating data from a college.
DEFINITION The number of departments, institutes or divisions immediately under the
free-standing colleges. These are the “second-tier” units below a college. The
Dept of Military Science (if any) or Dept of Physical Education ( if any) should
be counted as part of this element DEPTS even if it is not attached to any
specific college.
Example: If the institution has 5 colleges and each college has 4 departments,
then DEPTS=20. In a cost study, this is a signal that the data from the 5
colleges will have to be disaggregated into 20 portions.
Every faculty member should be counted exactly once in the table below. Nobody should be counted in more
than one college. A faculty member teaching at both the basic and collegiate level should be listed at
the basic level if more than half of his/her teaching hours are at the basic level. This is to facilitate the
counting of faculty members committed to basic education as opposed to higher education. The colleges listed
below are for illustration only.
TOTAL
1 ELEM SCHOOL
2 SECONDARY SCHOOL
3 COLL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
4 COLL OF EDUCATION
5 COLL OF ENGINEERING
6 COLL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
7 COLL OF HEALTH SCIENCES
TOTAL
WTD_ENROL
COLLEGES ES_ENROL TV_ENROL UG_ENROL MS_ENROL PHD_ENROL
or HS_
ENROL
1 ELEM SCHOOL
2 SECONDARY SCHOOL
3 COLL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
4 COLL OF EDUCATION
5 COLL OF ENGINEERING
6 COLL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
7 COLL OF HEALTH SCIENCES
TOTAL
TEMPLATE H-4: AVERAGE NO. OF STUDENTS PER PROGRAM IN EACH EDUCATIONAL LEVEL
If a college offers 4 masters programs and if the total masters enrollment in the 4 programs is 100, then the
average no. of students per masters program is of course 25 ( =100/4). This template will enable the reader
to spot the program levels with low enrollment (i.e. less than 10) or those with big enrollment.
This template traces a natural sequence for the undergraduate programs ( baccalaureate and post-bacc
levels combined): E_QUOTA, APPLICANTS, Q_QUOTA, ADMISSIONS, TOTAL ENROLLMENT and FINALLY
GRADUATES.
In each major discipline, how many undergrad programs are there? How many masters programs? Etc. In this
template, the students in basic education are not classified into any of the major disciplines and are therefore
tabulated in separate rows. The list of major disciplines below is the same classification used by the National
Statistics Coordination Board (NSCB).
TECH/
BASIC ED UNDERGRAD MASTERS
VOC PHD PROGS
PROGRAMS PROGS PROGS
PROGS
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SECONDARY SCHOOL
EDUCATION SCIENCE AND
1
TEACHER TRAINING
2 FINE AND APPLIED ARTS
3 HUMANITIES
4 RELIGION AND THEOLOGY
SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL
5
SCIENCES
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
6
AND RELATED
7 LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE
8 NATURAL SCIENCE
9 MATHEMATICS
10 IT-RELATED DISCIPLINES
11 MEDICAL AND ALLIED
12 TRADE, CRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL
13 ENGINEERING AND TECH
ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN
14
PLANNING
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY,
15
FISHERIES
16 HOME ECONOMICS
17 SERVICE TRADES
MASS COMMUNICATION AND
18
DOCUMENTATION
19 OTHER DISCIPLINES
20 GENERAL
21 MARITIME
UNCLASSIFIED
GRAND TOTAL
Among all the undergraduate subjects in the HEI, which has the lowest EVENTUAL PASSING RATE? The
HEI could tabulate the outright and eventual passing rates in its subjects. ( For a more complete discussion of
OUTRIGHT PASSING RATE and EVENTUAL PASSING RATE, see Chapter 5 DATA ON A SUBJECT).
The hypothetical tabulation below shows that PHYSICS 70 has the lowest EVENTUAL passing rate of 53.3% (
= 320/600). Its outright passing rate is only 50.0% ( = 300/600). However, 60 more students were able to pass
after they passed their removal exams and completed their INCOMPLETES.
As noted in Chapter 5, these percentages should be averaged for at least one schoolyear to reveal any
seasonality factor. Better yet, the HEI should average over 3 consecutive schoolyears to spot any trends. If the
passing rate is “too low” ( e.g. less than 66.7%) or if it is too high (e.g. 98% or above), it should merit a closer
look by the VPAA. At the very least, this tabulation should be done for the GE subjects.
OUTRIGHT
ANNUAL
SUBJECT ENROLLMENT
PUMASA1 PASSING PUMASA2 EVENTUAL PASSING RATE
RATE
This is the number of programs at each level, e.g. elementary level, secondary level, technical/vocational, pre-
baccalaureate, baccalaureate or undergraduate level, post-baccallaureate, masters level, doctoral level.
One issue in counting programs is when 2 programs have a significant intersection. The following rule-of-thumb
is proposed:
• if two programs share at least 75% commonality in their requirements, then the two programs should
be counted as just one program.
This test may be used inside the HEI to determine if programs such as BS Economics, BS Finance-Economics,
and BS Business-Economics deserve to be counted separately. The same test may be used to decide if MA
English (Literature) and MA English (Teaching of a Foreign Language) deserve to be counted separately. The
75% cut-off is quite arbitrary but a limit has to be set at some point.
Chapter 2 DATA ON A PROGRAM explains the counting rules for ladderized programs and double degrees.
Please see definition and coding of PROGLEVEL also in Chapter 2.
REMARKS:
Apply the 75%-common intersection test to determine if 2 related programs should be
counted separately or as just one.
B087 PHD_PROGS NUMBER OF DOCTORATE PROGRAMS
REMARKS:
Apply the 75%-common intersection test to determine if 2 related programs should be
counted separately or as just one.
B088 TOT_PROGS TOTAL NO. OF PROGRAMS IN ALL LEVELS ( = BASIC_PROGS+ TV_
PROGS + PREB_PROGS + UG_PROGS + POSTB_PROGS + MS_PROGS+
PHD_PROGS)
B089 HE_PROGS TOTAL NO. OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS ( = PREB_PROGS, +
UG_PROGS + POSTBPROGS + MS_PROGS+ PHD_PROGS)
REMARKS:
Note that the PREBACC programs are counted as part of higher education
programs. This is a very important element because it could be used to
classify HEIs into small, medium and large.
B090 GRAD_PROGS NUMBER OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS (OR “POST GRADUATE”
PROGRAMS)
= POSTB_PROGS + MS_PROGS + PHD_PROGS
REMARKS:
Note that post-bacc programs are counted as part of graduate programs.
TEMPLATE H-10: NO. OF PROGRAMS BY UNESCO MAJOR FIELD OF STUDY (ISCED 1997)
TECH VOC
UNESCO FIELDS (12) PROGS UG_PROGS MASTERS_PROGS PHD_PROGS
1 NATURAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES
2 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
6 HEALTH
7 EDUCATION
10 CREATIVE ARTS
LIBRARIANSHIP, INFORMATION
0913 MANAGEMENT AND CURATORIAL
STUDIES
0915 LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE
0917 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES
0919 ECONOMICS AND ECONOMETRICS
0921 SPORT AND RECREATION
0999 OTHER SOCIETY AND CULTURE
1001 PERFORMING ARTS
1003 VISUAL ARTS AND CRAFTS
1005 GRAPHIC AND DESIGN STUDIES
1007 COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES
1099 OTHER CREATIVE ARTS
1101 FOOD AND HOSPITALITY
1103 PERSONAL SERVICES
1201 GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAMMES
1203 SOCIAL SKILLS PROGRAMMES
1205 EMPLOYMENT SKILLS PROGRAMMES
1299 OTHER MIXED FIELD PROGRAMMES
9999 Not known or not indicated.
TOTAL
There are about 1,800 HEIs in the Philippines. Some HEIs are small and some are big – but how will CHED
classify HEIs according to size? Regarding the discipline classifications of their programs, some HEIs are
“specialized” and some are “full range”. How can CHED classify the 1,800 based on the range of their program
offerings?
How can CHED group HEIs according to “size”? One way is to focus on the size on the undergraduate
enrolment and classify HEIs according to::
• The average freshman intake per year ( UG_ADMIT).
• The average total enrolment (UG_ENROL)
• The average number of graduates (UG_GRADXX).
The HEIs can also be classified according to HE_PROGS, the number of higher education programs or the
breadth of the disciplines of the programs.
DEFINITION The classification of the HEI according to the data element UG_ADMIT, the no.
of brand-new freshmen admitted during the first semester of each year. Since
enrolment varies from year to year, this should be averaged over the most
recent 3 consecutive schoolyears.
CODING 2-digit code
1 UG_ADMIT < 500 Over 3 consecutive years, the average no. of freshman
in the first semester is 500 or less.
2 501 < UG_ADMIT < 1,000
3 1,001 < UG_ADMIT < 2,000
4 2,001 < UG_ADMIT < 3,000
5 3,001 < UG_ADMIT < 4,000
6 4,001 < UG_ADMIT < 5,000
7 5,001 < UG_ADMIT < 6,000
8 6,001 < UG_ADMIT < 7,000
9 7,001 < UG_ADMIT < 8,000
10 8,001 < UG_ADMIT < 9,000
11 9,001 < UG_ADMIT < 10,000
12 10,001 < UG_ADMIT Over 3 consecutive years, the average no. of freshman
is 10,001 or more.
99 No information available.
In comparing similar HEIs across the country, only similar-sized HEIs should
be compared with each other. For instance, it might be unfair to compare an
HEI which graduates less than 500 each year versus an HEI which graduates
more than 1,000 each year.
DEFINITION The classification of the HEI according to the data element UG_GRADXX, the
total no. of graduates in one year. Since this number varies from year to year,
it should be averaged over the most recent 3 consecutive schoolyears. See
definition of UG_GRADXX.
CODING 1-digit code CUTOFFS UNDER REVIEW
1 UG_GRADXX < 250 Over 3 consecutive years, the average no. of graduates
in one year is 250 or less
2 251 < UG_GRADXX < 500 Over 3 consecutive years, the average no. of
graduates in one year is 500 or less.
3 501 < UG_GRADXX < 1,000
4 1,001 < UG_GRADXX < 2,000
5 2,001 < UG_GRADXX < 3,000
6 3,001 < UG_GRADXX < 4,000
7 4,001 < UG_GRADXX < 5,000
8 5,001 < UG_GRADXX . That is, over 3 consecutive years, the average no. of
graduates from the UNDERGRAD programs is 5,001 or more.
9 No information available.
One measure of quality is the “accreditation level” of a program. The highest accreditation level is “Level 3” and
the lowest is no accreditation at all. Although this is not the only possible indicator of quality, the accreditation
level is important. The elements below capture accreditation by an external agency which is a member of FAAP
( Federation of Accrediting Agencies of the Philippines). Accreditations by a non-FAAP agency is tabulated
separately.
EXAMPLES:
• If the HEI has 10 undergraad programs and 6 of them are
accredited at least level 1 by FAAP, then UG_ACCRED% =
60 % =6/10.
• If UG_ACCRED% =100%, then all the programs are
accredited at least level 1 by FAAP.
• If UG_ACCRED%=0, then none of the programs is
accredited by FAAP.
This template is based on the 21 disciplines as listed by the National Statistics Coordination Board (NSCB). In
each major discipline, how many baccalaureate programs are accredited Level 1? Level 2? Level 3?
high prestige or good reputation of the institution, proximity to the residence of the applicant, low tuition and
fees, availability of the program chosen by the applicant, good chances for graduation, etc.
The applicants are sorted according to program level. Masters level and doctoral level are separated but there
is a consolidated entry which combines them together under the generic label “graduate programs”. The no.
of applicants varies from year to year. The following data elements could apply to single years. For statistical
stability, it is better to average the no. of applicants over the most recent 3 consecutive years. Thus, the data
reported for June 2002 should be the average no. of applicants in June 2000, June 2001 and June 2002 itself.
B127 ES_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS INTO KINDERGARTEN or
GRADE 1, whichever is the entry point to the elementary level.
B128 HS_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS INTO FIRST YEAR HS
B129 PREB_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS INTO 1ST YEAR OF PRE-
BACCALAUREATE PROGRAMS
B130 TV_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS INTO 1ST YEAR TECH/VOC
PROGRAMS
B131 UG_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS INTO 1ST YEAR
BACCALAUREATE OR UG PROGS
REMARKS:
Averaged over 3 years, the total no. of applicants to the undergraduate programs of
the institution. Include the no. of students seeking lateral transfer into the institution at
the undergraduate level.
B132 POSTB_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS INTO 1ST YEAR OF POST-
BACCALAUREATE PROGRAMS
B133 MS_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS TO MS PROGS
B134 PHD_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS TO DOCTORAL
PROGRAMS
REMARKS:
Averaged over 3 years, the total no. of applicants to the doctoral programs.
In a “straight PhD” program, applicants need not be masters degree holder.
In a “non-straight” PhD program, applicants must already be masters degree
holders.
B135 GRAD_APPLIC 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF APPLICANTS TO GRADUATE PROGRAMS
( = MSAPPLIC+PHDAPPLIC)
The institution has to calibrate its intentional overbooking so that the correct number of students will enrol. This
is akin to the overbooking done by an airline so that its airplanes will be just exactly full -- no empty seat on
the plane but no irate passenger with a confirmed booking but no actual seat on the plane! For reference, see
definition of the element E_QUOTA in Chapter 2 DATA ON A PROGRAM.
B136 ES_EQUOTA THE 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF GRADE 1 STUDENTS THE SCHOOL
IS READY TO ADMIT
B137 HS_EQUOTA THE 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF 1ST YEAR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
THE SCHOOL IS READY TO ADMIT
B138 TV_EQUOTA THE 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF 1ST YEAR STUDENTS THE SCHOOL IS
READY TO ADMIT INTO ITS TECH/VOC PROGRAMS
B139 PREB_EQUOTA THE 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF 1ST YEAR STUDENTS THE SCHOOL IS
READY TO ADMIT INTO ITS PRE-BACCALAUREATE PROGRAMS
B140 UG_EQUOTA THE 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF 1ST YEAR STUDENTS THE SCHOOL IS
READY TO ADMIT INTO BACCALAUREATE PROGRAMS
REMARKS:
How many freshmen does the HEI really wish to admit? How many freshmen is the HEI
ready to admit? In effect, the no. of “seats” in the programs. This is very important in
programs where laboratory space is in critical supply.
B141 POSTB_EQUOTA THE 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF 1ST YEAR STUDENTS THE SCHOOL IS
READY TO ADMIT INTO IS POST-BACCALAUREATE PROGRAMS
B142 MS_EQUOTA THE 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF 1ST YEAR STUDENTS THE SCHOOL IS
READY TO ADMIT INTO MASTERS PROGRAMS
B143 PHD_EQUOTA THE 3-YEAR AVERAGE NUMBER OF 1ST YEAR STUDENTS THE SCHOOL IS
READY TO ADMIT INTO DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
B144 GRAD_EQUOTA GRAD_EQUOTA=MS_EQUOTA+ PHD_EQUOTA.
If the target of the institution is to admit 1,000 students ( i.e., E_QUOTA =1,000), then it should actually offer
admissions to more than 1,000 students. Most everybody who receives an offer of admission will actually enrol
but some will not for the usual reasons, e.g. health problems, inability to come up with the finances, or decision
to enrol elsewhere. Even if the E_QUOTA is 1,000, the HEI may have to offer admissions to 1,100 applicants.
These applicants are the “qualifiers” into the HEI.
This series of elements indicate the number of qualifiers – whether they actually enrolled or not. Do
not confuse with actual admissions or freshmen. The elements below have very much to do with the element
Q_QUOTA defined with respect to a degree program. For reference, see definition of Q_QUOTA in Chapter 2
DATA ON A PROGRAM.
The no. of qualifiers varies from year to year. The data elements below could be defined for a specific schoolyear
but more statistical reliability, they should be averaged over 3 consecutive years. For instance, the data reported
for June 2002 should be the average no. of qualifiers in June 2000, June 2001 and June 2002 itself.
To continue our example: there might be 3,000 applicants but only 1,200 qualifiers. Among the 1,200 qualifiers,
only 1,100 might actually enroll. The missing 100 are sometimes referred to as “no shows”. The series of
elements below tracks those who actually enrol in the institution, the new admissions into the first year of the
degree program. Do not confuse with lateral transfers or those who shift from one college to another within
the same institution.
The no. of freshmen or first year students varies from year to year. The following data elements should be
averaged over 3 consecutive years. Thus, the data reported for June 2002 should be the average no. of
freshmen in June 2000, June 2001 and June 2002 itself.
This template is based on the 21 disciplines listed by the NSCB. In each major discipline, how many applied,
how many were admitted, how much is total enrolment (new + continuing students) and how many graduated?
In this template, the students in basic education are not classified into any of the major disciplines and are
tabulated in separate rows.
3 HUMANITIES
4 RELIGION AND THEOLOGY
5 SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND
6
RELATED
7 LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE
8 NATURAL SCIENCE
9 MATHEMATICS
10 IT-RELATED DISCIPLINES
11 MEDICAL AND ALLIED
12 TRADE, CRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL
13 ENGINEERING AND TECH
14 ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING
15 AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHERIES
16 HOME ECONOMICS
17 SERVICE TRADES
MASS COMMUNICATION AND
18
DOCUMENTATION
19 OTHER DISCIPLINES
20 GENERAL
21 MARITIME
UNCLASSIFIED
GRAND TOTAL
TEMPLATE: THE NO. OF NEW STUDENTS IN EACH PROGRAM LEVEL AND MAJOR FIELD OF STUDY
7 EDUCATION
MANAGEMENT AND
8
COMMERCE
10 CREATIVE ARTS
SELECTIVITY IN ADMISSIONS
How selective is the institution with its admissions? If 3,000 apply but only 1,200 are qualified for admission,
we say that the selectivity rate is 40% ( = 1200/3000). If 2,000 apply but only 1,500 are qualified for admission,
the selectivity rate is 75% ( =1500/2000). The selectivity rate depends a lot on the capacity of the institution
because even if there are many good applicants, the institution may not be able to offer admissions to all of
them because of limited capacity. Observe that the selectivity rate is based on the number of students who are
deemed qualified to enroll – whether they actually enrolled or not. This data element is very much related to the
data element SELECTIV% defined in connection with a degree program. See Chapter 2.
The selectivity rate varies from year to year. Thus, the data elements below should be averaged over 3
consecutive years. By formula, UGADMIT% = UGADMIT*100/ UGAPPLIC. The other elements are similarly
defined.
REMARKS:
Suppose, on the average over 3 years, 5000 students apply each year to the undergraduate
programs and 3000 are offered admissions, then UGADMIT%= 60.0% (=3000/5000).
The numerator is the no. of qualifiers, not the no. of freshmen who actually enrolled. If
anybody who applies is admitted, then UG_ADMIT% = 100%.
B168 POSTB_ADMIT% 3-YEAR AVERAGE SELECTIVITY ADMISSION RATE AT PRE-BACC FIRST
YEAR
B169 MS_ADMIT% 3-YEAR AVERAGE SELECTIVITY ADMISSION RATE AT MASTERS FIRST
YEAR
B170 PHD_ADMIT% 3-YEAR AVERAGE SELECTIVITY ADMISSION RATE AT DOCTORAL FIRST
YEAR
B171 GRAD_ADMIT% 3-YEAR AVERAGE SELECTIVITY ADMISSION RATE AT GRADUATE LEVEL
FIRST YEAR
REMARKS:
• If the average over 3 years is that 200 students apply to the masters programs
and 100 are admitted, the MS_ADMIT%=50.0 % (=100/200).
• If the average over 3 years is that 50 apply each year to the doctoral programs
and 20 are admitted, PHD_ADMIT%=40.0% =(20/50).
• Given the above, GRAD_ADMIT% = 48.0% = (100+20)/ (200+50) = 120/250.
Observe this is not the straight average of MS_ADMIT% and PHD_ADMIT%.
THE QUALITY OF INCOMING FRESHMEN
The best universities, the best colleges – and of course the most popular degree programs – usually attract the
best high school seniors. How good are the incoming freshmen of the institution?
• The best measure is some national standardized examination such as the NSAT. The mean or median
NSAT overall score of freshmen should be recorded. Special attention could also be given to the
mathematics and English proficiency scores since these have been shown to be critical indicators of
success at the tertiary level. One measure is to count the number of college freshmen who come from
the top 5%, top 10% or top 25% based on NSAT overall scores. ( NOTE: Each year there are about
750,000 high school graduates.) Sad to say, the NSAT was not administered in 2001 and it may take
a while before a similar standard test could be developed.
• Another measure of freshman quality is the mean high school general average of the freshmen.
Unfortunately this has the defect of wide variability. It would be very difficult to factor in the academic
standards of the high schools where the freshmen come from.
• Another measure of freshman quality way is the number of freshmen who belonged to the top 5%, top
10% or top 25% of their respective high school classes.
• The DOST selects its scholars by administering a national scholarship exam. Thus another measure is
to count the number of DOST scholars who enroll in the institution. ( This is most relevant to the science
and technology colleges but this is one measure of the quality of the incoming freshmen).
For reference, please see the elements NSAT, NSATMATH, NSATENGL in Chapter 2: DATA ELEMENTS ON
A PROGRAM. These data elements apply only to the tech/voc, pre-baccalaureate, and undergraduate level
programs of the institution.
These data elements are potentially useful but they can be recorded only if the HEI takes the trouble of
tallying the NSAT and the high school graduating class rank of each freshman. A number of HEIs may be
doing this but it is doubtful if most HEIs are doing this regularly. Now that the data elements have been defined,
some special study could be commissioned by CHED to tally these data elements from a sample set of HEIs,
e.g. the SUCs. In 2001 the DepEd stopped giving out NSAT but there are plans to give out a different national
examination in 2004 or 2005. The data elements below can then be redefined in favor of the new national
examination for high school graduates.
EXAMPLE:
Suppose the institution admitted 1000 freshmen and 200 of them had NSAT scores
placing them in the top 5% of NSAT for the Philippines. Then NSAT95% = 200/1000 =
20.0%. If NSAT95% is much greater than 5%, as it is in the example, it means a high-
quality batch of freshmen. If NSAT5% = 100%, it means that all the HEI freshmen were
recruited from the Top 5% of NSAT in the Philippines.
B179 NSAT90% AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL FRESHMEN, THE NUMBER OF FRESHMEN
WITH NSAT SCORES IN THE TOP DECILE FOR THE PHILIPPINES
B180 NSAT75% AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL FRESHMEN, THE NUMBER OF FRESHMEN
WITH NSAT SCORES IN THE TOP QUARTILE
B181 NSAT50% AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL FRESHMEN, THE NUMBER OF FRESHMEN
WITH NSAT SCORES IN THE TOP HALF FOR THE COUNTRY
EXAMPLE:
Suppose the institution admitted 1000 freshmen and 300 of them had NSAT scores
placing them in the top 50% for the Philippines. Then NSAT50% = 300/1000 = 30.0%.
Since this is less than 50%, it means a relatively low-quality batch of freshmen. If
NSAT50% =100%, it means all the freshmen scored better than the national median of
NSAT.
How many of the freshmen came from the top 10% of their high school graduating classes? This is not a
foolproof measure of the quality of the freshmen but it is certainly an indicator. The data elements below can be
determined only if the HEI meticulously records the numerical high school rank of its freshmen. Numerical rank
must be certified by the HS Principal or HS Registrar. Self-declared rank by the student is not reliable. The rank
must be taken over all the high school graduates, not just the homeroom section where freshman belonged.
B182 HSTOPTEN NUMBER OF FRESHMEN WHO BELONGED TO THE TOP 10% OF THEIR
HS GRADUATING CLASSES
The no. of “high-achieving” high school graduates admitted into the HEI.
B183 HSTOP10% AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL FRESHMEN, THE NUMBER OF FRESHMEN WHO
BELONGED TO THE TOP 10% OF THEIR HS GRADUATING CLASSES
EXAMPLE:
If there are 500 freshmen and 150 of them belong to the top 10% of their
respective HS graduating class ( not just the homeroom section), then
HSTOP25%= 150/500 = 30.0%. Since this is much greater than 10%, it means
a relatively good freshman batch.
If HSTOP25%=100%, it means that all the freshmen were in the upper quartile
of their respective high school graduating classes. Numerical rank in the HS
class must be certified by the HS Principal or Registrar.
If HSTOP50%=100%, it means that all the freshmen were in the top half of their
respective HS graduating classes.
B186 HSGWA AVG HIGH SCHOOL GRADE (GEN WEIGHTED AVERAGE) OF INCOMING
FRESHMEN
REMARKS:
This is a measure of quality of the freshmen. Its defect comes from the fact that high
schools have varying academic standards. An 85% average in a very selective high
school cannot be compared with an 85% average in a barangay high school.
B187 HSMATH AVG HIGH SCHOOL MATH GRADE OF INCOMING FRESHMEN
B188 HSENGL AVG HS ENGLISH GRADE OF INCOMING FRESHMEN
What is the socioeconomic profile of the FRESHMEN? Although not as relevant to private HEIs, this profile is
very relevant for SUCs and public HEIs – especially in the light of the national policy to improve socioeconomic
equity in higher education. One major rationale for the existence of SUCs is for socioeconomic equity, to provide
higher education opportunities for the poor. Does the institution really cater to “poor” FRESHMEN?
These data elements can be determined only if each freshman is willing to disclose its family income and family
size. The HEI must have some process for verifying the data even if only on a random sampling basis. See
Chapter 7 DATA ELEMENTS ON A STUDENT.
The data elements above can be computed only if the HEI records the “income per weighted capita” of its
students. In turn, this can be done only if the students provide the correct and complete data. In the U.P. System,
students who apply for financial aid under STFAP are required to provide and document socioeconomic data
about themselves and their families. The data are subject to random checks, including house visits. However,
students who do not need financial aid are not required to submit any socioeconomic data.
If a student financial aid program is targeted for the “poor”, applicants will have to be willing to provide
data and documentation. For instance, applicants will have to supply data that will enable CHED to compute
“income per weighted capita”.
The data element income per weighted capita has several versions, e.g. GROSS_PC1 (gross income per
capita), NET_PC1 (net income per capita), GROSS_PC3 (gross income per weighted capita) and NET_PC3
(net income per weighted capita). The detailed definitions of these elements are in the Chapter 7 DATA ON A
STUDENT. A discussion of the issue is also found in the Chapter 8 DATA ON A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.
TEMPLATE H-16: NO. OF POOR STUDENTS BY DISCIPLINE
17 SERVICE TRADES
18 MASS COMMUNICATION AND DOCUMENTATION
19 OTHER DISCIPLINES
20 GENERAL
21 MARITIME
UNCLASSIFIED
GRAND TOTAL
The true socioeconomic profile of students can be problematic to determine. If the student is not applying for
financial aid, he cannot be compelled to reveal information on income. A surrogate measure is to use the type of
high school. Conventional wisdom says that students from private schools and those in special public schools
(e.g. the science high schools and those in SUCs) are less poor than students from the general public schools.
Thus, the no. of students from these general public schools is a good indicator of the no. of poor students.
In the Chapter: DATA ON A HIGH SCHOOL, the data element HSTYPE classifies high schools into the following
categories:
B201 HS_PUBLGEN AMONG THE COLLEGE FRESHMEN, THE NO. WHO GRADUATED FROM
GENERAL PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS AND THE PUBLIC VOCATIONAL/
TRADE HS.
B202 HS_SUCS AMONG THE COLLEGE FRESHMEN, THE NO. WHO GRADUATED FROM
SUC-ADMINISTERED PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS.
B203 HS_SPECIAL AMONG THE COLLEGE FRESHMEN, THE NO. WHO GRADUATED FROM
SPECIAL PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS, E.G. THE DOST SCIENCE HS.
B204 HSPRIVSEC AMONG THE COLLEGE FRESHMEN, THE NO. WHO GRADUATED FROM
PRIVATE SECTARIAN HIGH SCHOOLS.
B205 HSPRIVNON AMONG THE COLLEGE FRESHMEN, THE NO. WHO GRADUATED FROM
PRIVATE NONSECTARIAN HIGH SCHOOLS.
The elements below answer: what fraction of the undergraduate freshmen come from general public high
schools? All elements are numeric with format XX.X No % sign necessary.
• If HSPUBLIC1% > 50%, the freshmen as a whole could be even poorer than
their cohorts in high school.
• If HSPUBLIC1% < 10%, it means only a few of the graduates from general
public high schools made it into the HEI.
How many of the HEI students are from public secondary schools? Private secondary schools? On the common
wisdom that students from private secondary schools are more well-off (than public general secondary schools),
the tabulation below gives a rough indication whether students are poor or non-poor.
8 NATURAL SCIENCE
9 MATHEMATICS
10 IT-RELATED DISCIPLINES
11 MEDICAL AND ALLIED
12 TRADE, CRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL
13 ENGINEERING AND TECH
14 ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING
15 AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHERIES
16 HOME ECONOMICS
17 SERVICE TRADES
MASS COMMUNICATION AND
18
DOCUMENTATION
19 OTHER DISCIPLINES
20 GENERAL
21 MARITIME
UNCLASSIFIED
GRAND TOTAL
This element is a good measure of the “affluence” of the college freshmen but it requires collecting data on
high school tuition of all freshmen or at least a random sample of them.
Electricity consumption is a very good surrogate measure of socioecomic standing. The income tax return is also
an indicator but is not generally reliable. Electric consumption, i.e. the average consumption IN KILOWATT-
HOURS PER MONTH (not pesos), is a good indicator of how poor a family could be. The tabulation below
shows that a family with the consumption profile shown in Set A below is probably poor. Incidentally, at the
average price of P6.50/ KWH, 100 KWH would of course mean P 650 per month. This is not to say that more
than 100 KWH already means “rich” but see the table below. The cutoff is expressed in terms of KWH instead
of pesos because the price of electricity varies too much over the country. Note that Set A includes a color TV
at 6 hours per day but excludes a refrigerator. See consumption of other appliances in Set B.
COST/KWH
APPLIANCES ( SET A ) =
USAGE:
USAGE: USAGE:
APPLIANCE HOURS
HOURS KWH PER
WATTAGE PER
PER DAY MONTH
WEEK
1 RADIO 40 8 56 9.6
2 COLOR TV 12” 65 6 42 11.7
3 FLAT IRON 600 1 7 18.0
4 LIGHT BULB 50 8 56 12.0
5 LIGHT BULB 50 8 56 12.0
6 FLUORESCENT 40 8 56 9.6
7 FAN ( 14 “) 60 6 42 10.8
8 FAN ( 12 “) 50 8 56 12.0
======
TOTAL PER MONTH ( SET A ) 95.7
OTHER APPLIANCES ( SET B )
9 REF ( 6 cu ft ) 100 24 168 72.0
10 REF ( 8 cu ft ) 130 0 0 0.0
11 FREEZER ( 8 cuft) 160 0 0 0.0
RICE COOKER
12
(1.8L)
650 1 7 19.5
13 COMPUTER 225 2 14 13.5
14 AIRPOT 600 0.25 1.75 4.5
15 COLOR TV 14” 80 0 0 0.0
16 B & W TV 14” 36 0 0 0.0
STEREO MINI-
17
COMPO
380 2 14 22.8
18 VHS 45 2.5 17.5 3.4
19 AIRCON ( 1 HP) 1,420 6 42 255.6
20 AIRCON ( 1.5 HP) 2,250 0 0 0.0
21 WASH MACHINE 280 3 21 25.2
INSTANT H20
22
HEATER
1,600 0.5 3.5 24.0
23 TURBO BROILER 1,000 0 0 0.0
24 RANGE 2-BURNER 2,200 3 21 198.0
25 MICROWAVE 1,000 0.5 3.5 15.0
26 STOVE ( 6” COIL) 1,500 0 0 0.0
======
TOTAL PER MONTH ( SET B ) 653.5
COMBINED TOTAL PER MONTH ( SETS A + B ) 749.2
What fraction of the students come from families living in urban areas? In rural areas? To provide some indication
of the cost of living of the family. ( This is of relevance to SUCs where equity considerations are important.) All
elements are numeric with format XX.X No % sign necessary.
The concept of “funded student places” is crucial for an Output Funding or Normative Financing System for
SUCs and other public HEIs. The number of funded student places is the number of students which the
National Government is willing to fund or subsidize. This is a new concept not yet implemented. For a more
complete elaboration please see definition in Chapter 2: DATA ELEMENTS ON A PROGRAM.
7 EDUCATION
8 MANAGEMENT AND
COMMERCE
9 SOCIETY AND CULTURE
10 CREATIVE ARTS
TOTAL
T E C H
V O C UG_PLACES MS_PLACES PHD_PLACES TOTAL
PLACES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SECONDARY SCHOOL
EDUCATION SCIENCE AND TEACHER
1
TRAINING
2 FINE AND APPLIED ARTS
3 HUMANITIES
4 RELIGION AND THEOLOGY
5 SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND
6
RELATED
7 LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE
8 NATURAL SCIENCE
9 MATHEMATICS
10 IT-RELATED DISCIPLINES
11 MEDICAL AND ALLIED
12 TRADE, CRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL
13 ENGINEERING AND TECH
14 ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN PLANNING
15 AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHERIES
16 HOME ECONOMICS
17 SERVICE TRADES
MASS COMMUNICATION AND
18
DOCUMENTATION
19 OTHER DISCIPLINES
20 GENERAL
21 MARITIME
UNCLASSIFIED
GRAND TOTAL
These are the usual enrollment data or student headcounts. In particular, this is total enrollment per program
level in the institution. Within each program level, there is no need to separate who are in 1st year, 2nd year, 3rd
year, etc. This series captures only aggregate headcounts per program level. Do not confuse with full-time
equivalent students.
These data elements should be collected every semester on a fixed national census day, say
• July 1 for the first semester and
• December 1 for the second semester.
Enrollment data should be “frozen” on these census days. The HEI itself will tally enrollment every semester
but for CHED purposes, only the first semester count will be tallied nationally. See Chapter 2 for a more
complete elaboration of ENROLMT and MAJORS in a specific program
Include only the students who are currently enrolled. Exclude those who are
temporarily not enrolled even if they are still eligible to return or resume studying.
Compare with UG_MAJORS.
B233 POSTB_ENROL NUMBER OF POST-BACC STUDENTS
B234 HE_ENROL ENROLMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS
B235 MS_ENROL NUMBER OF MASTERS LEVEL STUDENTS
REMARKS:
Include only those who are currently enrolled. Include students officially enrolled
“for residence only”. A student writing thesis will not be counted unless enrolled
officially. Do not include those who are not currently enrolled even if they are still in
good standing and eligible to return or resume.
TECH
VOC_ UG_ENROL MS_ENROL PHD_ENROL TOTAL _ENROL
CODE PSCED (21) ENROL
00 General
Education Science and
14 Teacher Training
18 Fine and Applied Arts
22 Humanities
26 Religion and Theology
Social and Behavioral
30 Sciences
Business Administration
34 and Related
38 Law and Jurisprudence
42 Natural Science
46 Mathematics
50 Medical and Allied
52 Trade, Craft and Industrial
Engineering and
54 Technology
Architectural and Town-
58 Planning
Agricultural, Forestry, and
62 Fisheries
66 Home Economics
78 Service Trades
Mass Communication and
84 Documentation
89 Other Disciplines
47 IT Related Discipline
90 Maritime
GRAND TOTAL
Note: CHED created separate codes for IT and Maritime.
TECH VOC _
UNESCO FIELDS (12) ENROL UG_ENROL MS_ENROL PHD_ENROL
1 NATURAL AND PHYSICAL
SCIENCES
2 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
7 EDUCATION
8 MANAGEMENT AND
COMMERCE
9 SOCIETY AND CULTURE
10 CREATIVE ARTS
TOTAL
The data elements below keep track of MAJORS, i.e. students “in good standing” whether currently enrolled or
not. The general formula is MAJORS = ENROLMT + NAGPAHINGA.
The no. of MAJORS is most relevant for graduate programs because many students skip enrolling in some
semesters or take very long writing their thesis or dissertation. The data element enables CHED to keep track
of all students who are in good standing. See Chapter 2 for a more complete elaboration of ENROLMT,
NAGPAHINGA, and MAJORS in a specific program
REMARKS:
In Chapter 2, MAJORS=ENROLMT + NAGPAHINGA.
B244 GRAD_MAJORS GRAD_MAJORS = MS_MAJORS + PHD_MAJORS
TECH VOC _
UNESCO 12 MAJORS UG_MAJORS MS_MAJORS PHD_MAJORS
NATURAL AND PHYSICAL
1
SCIENCES
2 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
7 EDUCATION
MANAGEMENT AND
8
COMMERCE
10 CREATIVE ARTS
TOTAL
These are the students who receive some form of financial aid COURTESY OF THE HEI ITSELF, not
some external donor such as DOST, CHED , private foundations, etc. These students are variously referred to
as grantees or “scholars” (even if financial need or filiation, not high academic achievement, are the real basis
for the financial aid). For more detailed discussion see Chapter 8 DATA ON A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM and
Chapter 10 DATA ON A SCHOLARSHIP PROVIDER.
Do not include planholders of the College Assurance Plan or similar companies because these planholders
are not recipients of financial aid. It is the parents themselves who paid for the tuition. CAP is not an external
donor in the same manner Metrobank Foundation is. Students whose tuition are paid by relatives other than
their parents are not considered scholars nor grantees.
Every student in an SUC is actually a recipient of substantial financial aid (averaging about P 15,000 per student
in 2001). However, there will be NO blanket inclusion of SUC students as scholars or recipients of financial aid.
If necessary, the no. of SUC students can be easily pulled out. Within an SUC, some students will be singled
out either as scholars or grantees, i.e. recipients of financial aid.
The no. of students who are “honorific scholars” but receive no tuition
waiver, discount or cash prize. Purely honorific. For instance, those in the
Dean’s List if they do not get a tuition benefit or cash.
B246 VARSITY ATHLETES, FOLK DANCERS, ETC. WHO RECEIVE TUITION AND/OR
OTHER BENEFITS FROM THE HEI.
The no. of students who receive full or partial waivers on tuition and other
school fees COURTESY OF THE HEI ITSELF – but receive no stipends or
cash benefits.
• For instance, free tuition for valedictorians and salutatorians but
no cash for them.
• If students in the Dean’s List or the President’s List receive some
tuition discounts or cash prizes from the HEI, include them here.
• Count only those whose tuition benefits actually mean some
forgone revenues for the HEI.
• Do not include planholders of College Assurance plan and similar
companies.
• Do not include students whose tuition is paid by an external donor
such as CHED, DOST, Metrobank Foundation, etc. If tuition is
paid by an external donor, the student is not a grantee of the HEI
itself.
• The children of barangay officials who enroll in SUCs do not pay
tuition but the SUCs are not reimbursed by the government for
these. They should be counted in this category.
• See related elements TUITWAIVERS, FEESWAIVERS in Chapter
2.
The no. of students who receive a cash benefit FROM THE HEI ITSELF
on top of tuition waivers. The tuition waiver and the cash are not loans
and they are not payment for services rendered by the student. They are
outright grants which the student does not have to repay.
Do not include students who receive cash benefits from an external donor
such as CHED, DOST, Metrobank Foundation, etc. These externally-
funded scholars are technically not scholars or grantees of the HEI. Count
only those who receive stipends from the HEI itself.
B250 STUDASSTS STUDENTS WHO WORK FOR PAY INSIDE THE HEI
The no. of student assistants or graduate assistants who work for some
compensation in the HEI to assist in libraries, clinics, residence halls,
administrative offices, etc.
See separate category for the varsity athletes, folk dancers, etc. Do not
include the Teaching Fellows or Teaching
Associates because these are counted in TFELLOWS.
B251 SHORTLOANS1 RECIPIENTS OF SHORT-TERM LOANS FROM THE HEI ITSELF
The no. of students who receive tuition deferrals and/or loans from the HEI
itself which have to be repaid within the semester or schoolyear. In other
words, loans or deferred payment plans which are not generally offered to
all students. If everybody in the HEI can pay tuition in installment, there
is no special privilege for anybody. But if only a few are eligible for tuition
deferments or loans, include them here
B252 PAYLATER1 STUDENTS WHO ARE ON A “STUDY NOW PAY LATER” PLAN
COURTESY OF THE HEI ITSELF
These are the students who receive some form of financial aid FROM EXTERNAL DONORS such as
DOST, CHED , private foundations, etc. In this context “external” means “not the HEI itself”. If the funds are
coursed through or disbursed by the HEI but they come from external sources (e.g. the Alumni Association),
the source is still classified as external. Such students are variously referred to as grantees or “scholars”
(even if financial need, not high academic achievement, may be the primary reason for the financial aid). For
more detailed discussion see Chapter 8 DATA ON A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM and Chapter 10 DATA ON A
SCHOLARSHIP PROVIDER.
College Assurance Plan and similar companies are not donors. Do not include CAP plan holders or students
whose tuition are paid by relatives whether parents or non-parents.
Every student in an SUC is actually a recipient of substantial financial aid (averaging about P 15,000 per student
in 2001). However, there will be NO blanket inclusion of SUC students as scholars or recipients of financial aid
from the National Government. SUC students can be easily counted anyway. However, some SUC students will
be singled out as recipients of financial aid from external donors.
An HEI will be aware of externally-funded scholars mainly if the funds are coursed through the HEI itself or if the
private donor has to be billed by the HEI for the scholar’s tuition. A student could be the recipient of externally-
funded financial aid but not inform the HEI about it.
The HEI may have to go out of its way to seek out such students. There are at least 2 reasons why an HEI
should do this:
1. to acknowledge the external donors in the hope of getting more such scholars
2. to monitor and assist the externally-funded scholars because they might need additional aid from the
HEI, whether financial or morale support only.
Students whose tuition and/or other school fees are paid whether in full or partially
by an external donor (whether coursed through the HEI or given directly to the
student) – but receives no cash.
For instance, if the tuition is paid by the Alumni Association or the Rotary
Club but there is no additional cash benefit. It does not matter whether the
primary basis of the grant is high academic achievement or financial need.
B254 XGRANTS2 RECIPIENTS OF OUTRIGHT CASH BENEFITS FROM EXTERNAL
DONORS
Students who receive cash benefits from an external donor but nothing
explicit or specific for tuition or other fees. It does not matter whether the
primary basis of the grant is high academic achievement or financial need.
B255 XGRANTS3 RECIPIENTS OF TUITION AND OUTRIGHT CASH BENEFITS FROM
EXTERNAL DONORS
The students whose tuition and/or other school fees are paid by an external
donor – and then receive some cash, stipends or allowances too. It does not
matter whether the primary basis of the grant is high academic achievement
or financial need.
B256 XLOANS RECIPIENTS OF SHORT-TERM LOANS FROM EXTERNAL SOURCES
Students who receive tuition deferrals and/or loans from the HEI itself
which have to be repaid TO AN EXTERNAL DONOR within the semester
or schoolyear. For instance, students who are able to borrow money from a
Credit Cooperative, the Student Council, Alumni Association, etc.
B257 XPAYLATER STUDENTS WHO ARE ON A “STUDY NOW PAY LATER” PLAN FUNDED
BY EXTERNAL SOURCES
The students who are on a study now-pay later plan funded by an external
source such as a bank, Alumni Association, credit cooperative, private
foundation, etc.
How much revenue was forgone by the HEI due to the students receiving financial aid? These data
elements have to do with scholars or recipients of financial aid COURTESY OF THE INSTITUTION ITSELF,
not external donors.
DEFINITION The total income or revenues forgone by the HEI (over one year) due
to tuition waivers and discounts – net of reimbursements from scholarship
donors.
EXAMPLE:
If the annual tuition is P15,000 per student and 10 scholars received a 20%
tuition discount, then the HEI is bound to forgo P30,000 ( =0.20*10*15000) in
tuition revenue.
§ If a scholarship donor reimburses the HEI in the amount of P20,000,
then TUITWAIVERS = 10,000 (=30000-20000) only. That is, the HEI
will forgo P10,000, not P30,000.
§ If the scholarship sponsor reimburses the full P 150,000 tuition of the
10 scholars, TUITWAIVERS = 0. The HEI suffers no revenue loss at
all.
§ If no sponsor covers the tuition discounts, TUITWAIVERS = 30,000.
The HEI suffers the full brunt of the 20% tuition discount.
CODING Numeric:7 digits. No decimal points and no peso signs needed.
EXAMPLE:
Suppose miscellaneous fees total P5,000 per student and ten scholars receive
a 50% discount on miscellaneous fees. Then the HEI is bound to forgo P
25,000 ( = 10*2500).
• If there is no other donor which will reimburse the HEI for this forgone
income, then FEESWAIVERS = P 25,000.
• On the other hand, if there is a scholarship sponsor who will cover the
entire miscellaneous fees of the 10 students, FEESWAIVERS=0. The
HEI suffers no revenue loss.
CODING Numeric:7 digits. No decimal points and no peso signs needed.
DEFINITION The total value of stipends, living allowances, book allowances, thesis grants,
etc. or cash transfers from the HEI to scholars.
• Do not confuse with tuition waivers or tuition discounts because these
do not involve cash out by the HEI.
• Do not confuse with HEI expenditures in connection with psychosocial
assistance to the scholars or the administrative costs of implementing
the scholarship.
If the HEI paid out P500,000 in stipends but was reimbursed P200,000 by a
scholarship donor, STIPENDS= 300000 only. That is, STIPENDS is the actual
cost to the HEI after deducting the amount which is covered by an external
provider of stipends.
CODING Numeric:7 digits. No decimal points and no peso signs needed.
EXAMPLE:
It is worthwhile for the HEI to tabulate the following: the no. of recipients of financial aid, the total income forgone
and the total stipends paid out. Consider the hypothetical example below for some HEI.
5. An average of 18 students received waivers or discounts on tuition and/or other school fees courtesy of
the HEI itself. The average total forgone income is TOTWAIVERS = P 90,833. Thus, the average value
of the waiver on tuition and other fees is P 4,867 per grantee per year.
6. On the average, 13 students also received cash or stipends courtesy of the HEI itself (not an external
donor). Over the 3 years, the average expense of the HEI is P 90,333 per year for an average of P
8,200 stipend per grantee.
7. The amounts above are courtesy of the institution itself. They indicate the HEI’s commitment to support
the grantees (whether due to academic performance and/or financial need). Every year, the HEI below
forgoes or spends an average of P 181,167 per year for recipients of financial aid.
8. The HEI should make a parallel tabulation for the students who receive financial aid from EXTERNAL
DONORS (i.e. other than the HEI itself), e.g. DOST, CHED or private foundations.
TEMPLATE H-27: NO. OF RECIPIENTS OF FINANCIAL AID, TOTAL INCOME FORGONE AND TOTAL
STIPENDS PAID OUT.
TOTWAIVERS
STIPENDS PER TOTWAIVERSE
GRANTEES1 TOTWAIVERS PER GRANTEES2 STIPENDS
GRANTEES2 +STIPENDS
GRANTEES1
2000-01 20 100,000 5,000 15 100,000 9,000 200,000
2001-02 10 45,000 4,500 5 47,000 9,400 92,000
2002-03 25 127,500 5,100 20 124,000 6,200 251,500
AVERAGE 18 90,833 4,867 13 90,333 8,200 181,167
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SECONDARY SCHOOL
EDUCATION SCIENCE AND TEACHER
1
TRAINING
2 FINE AND APPLIED ARTS
3 HUMANITIES
4 RELIGION AND THEOLOGY
5 SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND
6
RELATED
Does the HEI attract “merit scholars”, e.g. valedictorians and salutatorians? Does it attract scholars who are
chosen through national qualifying exams, e.g. DOST scholars, MetroBank Foundation scholars?
• Only valedictorians and salutatorians from high schools with at least 40 graduates will be considered
as merit scholars.
• Planholders of companies such as the College Assurance Plan are not merit scholars.
• Scholars who are chosen based on high school average alone (even if set relatively high at 85%)
without a competitive examination are not considered as merit scholars.
• Scholarships where the primary criterion is need (e.g. family income less than P100,000) and there is
no qualifying or competitive examination are not considered as merit scholarships.
• The children of HEI staff members who receive tuition waivers or discounts are not counted as merit
scholars.
• The children of barangay officials, war veterans, etc. may be entitled to tuition waivers in SUCs but will
not be considered as merit scholars.
B262 DOSTSCHO THE NUMBER OF DOST SCHOLARS AMONG THE INCOMING FRESHMEN
REMARKS:
This stands as a surrogate measure of the quality of a science or technology program.
If the DOST sends many of its scholars to the program, it must be a good science
program. Of course this data element is relevant only to the science and technology
programs.
B263 MERITSCHO EXCLUDING DOST SCHOLARS, THE NUMBER OF MERIT SCHOLARS
AMONG THE INCOMING FRESHMEN
REMARKS:
Use counting rules listed above. Exclude the DOST scholars because they are counted
under DOSTSCHO.
This is a count of HEI-FUNDED scholars or grantees per program in the HEI. This format is ideal for
monitoring scholarships or financial aid targeted to specific programs in the HEI.
TEMPLATE H-29: NO. OF HEI-FUNDED SCHOLARS OR GRANTEES
SHORT
PROGRAMS VARSITY ANAKFACULTY GRANTEES1 GRANTEES 2 STUDASSTS
LOANS1
1 BS EDUCATION
2 MA EDUCATION
3 PHD EDUCATION
4 BS BUSINESS ADM
5 MBA
6 BS AGRICULTURE
7 BS PHYSICS
8 MS PHYSICS
9 PHD PHYSICS
TOTAL
1 BS EDUCATION
2 MA EDUCATION
3 PHD EDUCATION
4 BS BUSINESS ADM
5 MBA
6 BS AGRICULTURE
7 BS PHYSICS
8 MS PHYSICS
9 PHD PHYSICS
TOTAL
For this series of data elements include all units enrolled and with grades but exclude PE, Military Training,
Religion, and Thesis. Units passed include the subjects where
• the student passed outright, and
• the student got an INCOMPLETE but successfully completed later, and
• the student got a CONDITION but removed successfully.
A student who dropped the subject did not pass it. A student with a pending INCOMPLETE or an unresolved
INCOMPLETE after one year has not or did not pass the subject. A student with an unremoved CONDITION
or left the CONDITION unremoved after 1 year has not or did not pass the subject
B264 PASS100 THE NO. OF MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED 100% OF ALL UNITS
ENROLLED
REMARKS:
These are the students who have passed all their subjects. No failures,
no drops, no pending or unresolved incompletes, no unremoved or
unresolved conditions. It includes some students who got INCOMPLETES
but completed them successfully. It also includes some students who got
CONDITION but removed them successfully. It excludes anybody who has
failed outright or has dropped at least one subject.
B265 PASS90 THE NO. OF MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED 90-99% OF ALL UNITS
ENROLLED.
EXAMPLE:
If there are 500 majors and 100 of them have passed 90-99% of all the
units enrolled, then PASS90=100. This includes a major who has enrolled
in 30 units and has passed 27 of them. It includes a major who has enrolled
in 90 units and has passed 81 units. This is not to say the student failed
the 9 units because it could mean he has 9 units of pending or unresolved
INCOMPLETES or CONDITION.
B266 PASS80 THE NO. OF MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED 80-89% OF ALL UNITS
ENROLLED.
B267 PASS70 THE NO. OF MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED 70-79% OF ALL UNITS
ENROLLED.
REMARKS:
These students are probably on probation.
B268 PASS69 THE TOTAL NO. OF MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED LESS THAN 70%
OF UNITS ENROLLED.
EXAMPLE:
These students are probably on probation or due for dismissal.
B269 %PASS100 AMONG ALL MAJORS IN GOOD STANDING, THE NO. OF MAJORS
WHO PASSED 100% OF ALL UNITS ENROLLED
EXAMPLE:
• If there are 5,000 majors and 4.000 of them passed all their subjects, then
%PASS100=80%=4000/5000.
• If %PASS100 = 100%, it means all majors have passed all their subjects. A
perfect passing record for each student and for the HEI as a whole.
• If%PASS100=0, it means none of the majors has a perfect passing record.
Each major has incurred at least one failure, or at least one DROP, or
still has a pending or unremoved CONDITION, or still has a pending or
unresolved INCOMPLETE.
B270 %PASS90 AMONG ALL MAJORS IN GOOD STANDING, THE NO. WHO HAVE
PASSED 90-99% OF ALL UNITS ENROLLED.
EXAMPLE:
• If there are 5,000 majors and 500 of them passed 90-99% of their
units enrolled, then %PASS90 = 10% =500/5,000.
• If %PASS90=100%, it means that all majors passed 90-99% of
all units they enrolled in. This is good news because everybody
passed at least 90%. This is bad news because nobody passed all
his units.
• If %PASSED=0%, it means that no major passed 90-99% of their
subjects. This is bad news if %PASS100=0 also because it means
that nobody has passed more than 90% of their units. This is good
news if %PASS=100% because it means everybody passed all
their units.
B271 %PASS80 AMONG ALL MAJORS IN GOOD STANDING, THE NO. WHO HAVE
PASSED 80-89% OF ALL UNITS ENROLLED.
B272 %PASS70 AMONG ALL MAJORS IN GOOD STANDING, THE NO. WHO HAVE
PASSED 70-79% OF ALL UNITS ENROLLED.
REMARKS:
These students are probably on probation or due for dismissal.
B273 %PASS69 THE TOTAL NO. OF MAJORS WHO HAVE PASSED LESS THAN 70%
OF UNITS ENROLLED.
EXAMPLE:
These students are probably on probation or due for dismissal.
The data elements below are used to segregate undergraduate enrollment in 4-year programs as opposed
to those in 5-year programs. The segregation is made necessary to separate graduation rate from the 4-year
programs and 5-year programs. See related data elements: UG_GRADXX4, UG_GRADXX5, UG_GRAD4%
and UG_GRAD5%.
The straight total of enrolment in the different levels yields TOT_ENROL, the unweighted total enrollment for
the institution as a whole. In this data element, an elementary school student and a doctoral level student have
equal “weight”. However, it also makes some sense to attach differential weights to enrollments at the different
program levels. For an HEI, the no. of students at the graduate level should have higher weight than those in
the undergraduate level --- which, in turn, should have a greater weight than the lower levels.
The weights for enrolment in lower program levels will be lass than 1.00.
The weights for enrollment in higher program levels will be higher than
1.00. The weights are designed to reflect their relative importance in a
institution of higher learning.
Unweighted
CODING PROGRAM LEVEL WEIGHT WTD_ENROL
ENROLMT
10 Pre-school ( including Kindergarten) 0.5 50 25
Elementary: primary level ( i.e.
11 0.5 400 200
Grades 1-4)
Elementary: intermediate level ( i.e.
12 0.5 200 100
Grades 5-7)
For a specific semester, how many STUDENTS were taught by the faculty? This means the sum of
enrolments in individual classes. A student enrolled in 5 classes will be counted 5 times but a student enrolled
in 7 subjects will be counted 7 times.
• Students will be classified according to educational level.
• There will be a separate count of students in lecture type classes and those in non-lecture type classes.
This is necessary because of different time demands on the faculty between lecture and lab/non-lecture
classes. Also necessary for costing purposes.
• These are straight headcounts, making no distinction between a student in a 3-unit subject and a
student in a 5-unit subject
• Do not include thesis advisees.
For a specific semester, how many CLASSES or SECTIONS were offered in the HEI?
• This is a count of classes or sections, NOT subjects. For instance, there are about 24 subjects in the
GE program but since each subject could be offered in 5 sections, that would mean only 24 subjects
but a total of 120 classes or sections
• Classes are classified according to educational level.
• Lecture-type classes will be counted separately from the lab type and other non-lecture type. Lecture
and non-lecture classes impose different time demands on the structure and they also require different
support systems.
• If a class has both lecture and lab, it will be counted as 2 subjects – one lecture and one lab. The
appropriate no. of units will be attributed to the lecture and the lab class.
• These are all straight counts, with no distinction between a 3-unit class and a 5-unit class.
• Exclude thesis advising.
• If the faculty member taught 3 sections of the same subject, the no. of classes is recorded as 3. This is
a count of sections or classes, not subjects.
• Compare with the next series of data elements.
For a specific semester, how many different SUBJECTS were offered in the HEI?
• This is a count of subjects, not sections. For instance, there are about 24 subjects in the GE
program but since each subject could be offered in 5 sections, that would mean only 24 subjects but a
total of 120 classes or sections.
Commission on Higher Education
Data Elements on an Institution 141
• An HEI could have a hundred different subjects in its catalog but not all of them are offered in a specific
semester. This is a count of the subjects that were offered in the specific semester.
• Subjects will be classified according to the educational level.
• Lecture subjects will be counted separately from non-lecture subjects. However, thesis advising will not
be counted.
B326 LABSIZE_ES AVG CLASS SIZE of ELEMENTARY LAB AND OTHER NON-
LECTURE URE CLASSES
B327 LABSIZE_HS AVG CLASS SIZE of SECONDARY LAB AND OTHER NON-
LECTURE URE CLASSES
B328 LABSIZE_TV AVG CLASS SIZE of TECH/VOC AND PRE-BACC LAB AND
OTHER NON-LECTURE URE CLASSES
B329 LABSIZE_UG AVG CLASS SIZE of UNDERGRAD AND POST-BACC LEVEL
LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE URE CLASSES
B330 LABSIZE_MS AVG CLASS SIZE of MASTERS LEVEL LAB AND OTHER
NON-LECTURE URE CLASSES
B331 LABSIZE_PHD AVG CLASS SIZE of PHD LEVEL LAB AND OTHER NON-
LECTURE URE CLASSES
B332 LABSIZE_GRAD AVG CLASS SIZE of GRADUATE LEVEL LAB AND OTHER
NON-LECTURE URE CLASSES
If the average class size in Math is 32.0, the average in English is 19.3 and the average in Physics is 13.5, then
the straight average 21.6 ( = (32.0 +19.3+13.5) is NOT necessarily the average class size of the 3 departments
combined. This is because the no. of classes and the total no. of students in each department are not equal.
In other words, the data shown in the table below is NOT SUFFICIENT to find the true average class size of the
3 departments combined.
AVERAGE
DEPARTMENTS CLASS SIZE
MATH 32.0
ENGLISH 19.3
PHSYICS 13.5
AVERAGE ?
To compute the correct average class size within an institution, it is necessary to use either of the two templates
below. The first template lists all the classes offered but the second template is more aggregated. The true
average class size is 24.0 [ = 264/11 = (160+77+27)/(5+4+2) ].
ACTUAL AVERAGE
SECTIONS OFFERED CLASS SIZE CLASS SIZE
1 MATH 100-A 45
2 MATH 100-B 35
3 MATH 100-C 45
4 MATH 123-X 20
5 MATH 123-Y 15
SUBTOTAL 160 32.0
1 ENGLISH 10-A 25
2 ENGLISH 10-B 20
3 ENGLISH 151 22
4 ENGLISH 175 10
SUBTOTAL 77 19.3
1 PHYSICS 177 15
2 PHYSICS 180 12
SUBTOTAL 27 13.5
In this template, it is not necessary to list the classes or sections individually. However, the no. of
sections and total enrollment in each department must be shown explicitly.
This example is being given because huge algebra errors will accumulate in computing the average class size
for an institution if the averages are compiled first by departments, then by college and finally for the institution
itself. To compute the average class size for an entire university, TEMPLATE H-24 should be used to list all
departments in all colleges of the university. If there are 4 colleges in the university and 5 departments per
college, TEMPLATE H-24 should show 20 rows.
8 NATURAL SCIENCE
9 MATHEMATICS
10 IT-RELATED DISCIPLINES
11 MEDICAL AND ALLIED
12 TRADE, CRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL
13 ENGINEERING AND TECH
ARCHITECTURE AND TOWN
14
PLANNING
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY,
15
FISHERIES
16 HOME ECONOMICS
17 SERVICE TRADES
MASS COMMUNICATION AND
18
DOCUMENTATION
19 OTHER DISCIPLINES
20 GENERAL
21 MARITIME
UNCLASSIFIED
TOTAL
• At the basic education level (elementary or secondary), each student is exactly one FTES. If enrolment
at the elementary level or secondary level is 500, then that is also the number of FTE students because
all students take the same load anyway.
• For the MD, DMD and DVM programs, each student is counted as 1.00 FTES. The no. of units per
semester is immaterial in these programs. Each student is automatically counted as 1.00 full-time
equivalent.
• At the tech/voc level, TESDA shall set the normal load per semester. ( See TESDA DATA ELEMENT
MANUAL).
• The normal load for an undergraduate program shall be set at 18 units per semester. This excludes
units for PE, NSTP, Religion/Theology (unless the program is in Theology itself), and undergrad
thesis.
• The normal load for a graduate program (whether masters or doctoral) shall be set at 12 units per
semester. Because of the wide variability of units assignment to the thesis or dissertation, no FTES
equivalent will be given for it. This excludes thesis or dissertation.
• A student enrolled “For residence only” will be counted as zero FTES.
• The data elements apply in a specific semester.
EXAMPLE:
If there are 3 undergraduates enrolled in 15, 21, and 20 units of lecture
subjects respectively, their combined load is equivalent to 3.11 FTEXX
(=(15+21+20)/18 =56/18). Observe that UG_ENROL = 3 but UG_LECTFTEX
= 3.11. Compute to 2 decimal places.
B351 MS_LECTFTEXX NUMBER OF MASTERS LEVEL FTE STUDENTS IN LECTURE
CLASSES ONLY
EXAMPLE:
If there are 3 masters STUDENTS IN LECTURE CLASSES ONLY enrolled in
11, 9, and 12 units of lecture respectively, their combined load is equivalent
to 1.83 FTEXX (=(11+9+12)/12 = 22/12). Observe that MS_ENROL = 3 but
MS_LECTFTEX = 1.83 only. Compute to 2 decimal places.
B352 PHD_LECTFTEXX NUMBER OF DOCTORAL LEVEL FTE STUDENTS IN LECTURE
CLASSES ONLY
EXAMPLE:
If there are 3 doctoral STUDENTS IN LECTURE CLASSES ONLY enrolled in
9, 0, and 6 units lecture respectively, their combined load is equivalent to 1.25
FTEXX (=(9 +0+6)/12 =15/12). The middle student is enrolled for residence
only. Note that PHD_ENROL =3 but PHD_LECTFTEX= 1.25 only.
B353 GRAD_LECTFTEX GRAD_LECTFTEXX = MS_LECTFTEX + +PHD_LECTFTEX
EXAMPLE:
Given the examples above, the combined load of the 3 masters and 3 doctoral
STUDENTS IN LECTURE CLASSES ONLY is equivalent to 3.08 FTEXX (=
1.83 + 1.25). Note that GRAD_ENROL = 6 but GRAD_FTEXX=3.08 only.
1. If 1,000 students each enroll in five 3-unit undergraduate lecture classes and if 2,000 students each
enroll in four 3-unit undergrad lecture classes, then UG_LECTUNITSZZ = 1000*15 + 2000*12 = 15,000
+ 24,000= 39,000 units. No credit load multipliers are used.
2. If 500 students each enroll in one 3-unit undergrad lab classes and if 200 students each enroll in two
2-unit undergrad lab classes, then UG_LABUNITSZZ = 500*3 + 200*4 = 1500 + 800 = 2,300 units. No
credit load multipliers are applied.
3. If 500 students each enroll in two 3-unit graduate lecture classes and if 100 students each enroll in
three 3-unit graduate lecture classes, GRAD_LECTUNITSZZ = 500*6 + 100*9 = 3,000 + 900 = 3,900
units.
4. If there are a total of 5,000 students in the HEI, the data elements below will be compiled from the
study loads of these 5,000 students. If the average study load of a student is 20 units, the job would be
tracing how 100,000 “enrolled units” ( = 20*5000) are distributed between graduate and undergraduate,
between lecture and non-lecture classes. It is an important task but it requires the ability to add up the
loads of 5,000 students. Obviously this is a job which requires computerization! Imagine a humongous
matrix with 5000 rows and 4 columns.
For the institution, the following series of elements should be computed separately for each group of faculty
members. For instance, the set of all full-time faculty members.
CODING Numeric.
Because it gives equal weight to Kindergarten and PhD FTES, this is NOT
recommended for use in computing STUDENT-TO-FACULTY ratio. See WTD_
FTEXX below.
For each program level in the HEI, the dummy table below specifies the
• WEIGHT ASSIGNED BY CHED TO THAT PROGRAM LEVEL
• UNWEIGHTED ENROLMENT ( “ENROLMT”),
• WEIGHTED ENROLMENT ( “WTD_ENROL”),
• FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT STUDENTS AS COMPUTED USING CHED RULES ( “FTEXX”) AND
WEIGHTED FTES ( “WTD_FTEXX”). The FTES figures shown below are for illustration only. The
FTES cannot be computed from headcounts alone: we really need to know the total enrolled units.
In the dummy table, total UNWEIGHTED FTES turns out to be 5,015 but weighted FTES turns out to be 4,919.
Compare the effects of the weights on Kindergarten versus PhD levels.
TEMPLATE H-36: TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT STUDENT IN AN HEI (Weighted and Unweighted)
TEMPLATE: FTE STUDENTS IN EACH UNESCO MAJOR FIELD OF STUDY (ISCED 1997)
7 EDUCATION
MANAGEMENT AND
8
COMMERCE
9 SOCIETY AND CULTURE
10 CREATIVE ARTS
FOOD, HOSPITALITY AND
11
PERSONAL SERVICES
12 MIXED FIELD PROGRAMS
The final outputs from the degree programs are the graduates, i.e. those who actually complete program
and earn the degree. The number of graduates is computed for one schoolyear and includes students who
graduate in the first sem (the so-called “Octoberians”), second sem (when most students actually finish) and
the summer session. The inclusive dates are those for one schoolyear, i.e. approximately June 1 of one year
until May 31 of the next year. See Chapter 2 for an elaboration of the element PROG_TAPOS with regard a
specific program.
A student is counted as a graduate only after all program requirements have been satisfied. Thus, a doctoral
student who is “almost done” with his dissertation is not counted until the dissertation is complete and passed
– and until all other requirements have been fullfilled. The final authority on number of graduates is the
Registrar.
The number of graduates varies from year to year. Thus, the elements below should be averaged over 3
consecutive years. The no. of graduates reported for 2001-02 should be the average no. of graduates for
1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2001-02 itself.
TEMPLATE H-38: NO. OF GRADUATES IN EACH UNESCO MAJOR FIELD OF STUDY (ISCED 1997)
7 EDUCATION
MANAGEMENT AND
8
COMMERCE
10 CREATIVE ARTS
TOTAL NO. OF
GRADUATES
For use within the HEI. The total number of honor graduates in one schoolyear. The final authority on the no. of
honor graduates is the HEI registrar. If this rate is high ( say > 20% ), it could mean the students are very good
or the program has low standards. If the rate is low ( say < 2%), it could mean the students are not very good or
the program is very strict. Either way, the data element is interesting and the HEI should tally it.
EXAMPLE:
If UG_GRADXX = 500 and UG_HONORS =20, then UG_%HONORS= 4%
= 20/500. That is, 4% of the graduates finished with honors. The HEI could
use this to track the “honors rate” across the years or across the programs.
B401 POSTB_%HONORS POSTB_%HONORS= POSTB_HONORS/POSTB_GRADXX
B402 MS_%HONORS MS_%HONORS= MS_HONORS/MS_GRADXX
B403 PHD_%HONORS PHD_%HONORS= PHD_HONORS/PHD_GRADXX
The data element UG_GRADXX include those who graduated from 4-year programs and those who graduated
from the 5-year programs. In preparation for the computation of graduation rates for the HEI as a whole, there
is need to split UG_GRADXX into at least 2 parts.
DEFINITION In a specific schoolyear, the total no. of graduates from the 4-year
undergraduate programs. In the spirit of PROG_TAPOS in connection with
a program, this is the sum of graduates from the 1st sem, 2nd sem and the
summer session. See UG_ENROL4 and UG_GRAD4%.
DEFINITION In a specific schoolyear, the total no. of graduates from the 5-year undergraduate
programs. In the spirit of PROG_TAPOS for a specific program, this is the
sum of graduates from the 1st sem, 2nd sem and the summer session. See
UG_ENROL5 and UG_GRAD5%.
What is the “graduation rate” for a specific program? That issue was discussed in Chapter 2 DATA
ELEMENTS ON A PROGAM. Two definitions of graduation rates were formulated:
For the institution as a whole, what is the “graduation rate”? Similar issues arise but there is also
a twist in moving from a specific program to the whole institution. To begin, it is clear that there will be a
different graduation rate for each program level in the HEI. The graduation rate for undergrad programs would
be different from the graduation rate from the masters programs, etc. The more precise question is: For all
programs in a specific program level in the institution, what is the graduation rate?
With respect to an HEI ( as opposed to a specific program), the computation of COHORT% is complicated by
the fact that some programs are 4 years and some 5 years. The problem is also complicated due to cross-
shifting within the same HEI. The graduation rate for the HEI as a whole could be 100% but the graduation
rate for a specific program in the HEI could be less than 100%.
Imagine a hypothetical HEI with only two 4-year programs. Suppose 100 students start together in Program
A and 200 start together in Program B. Suppose further 50 students shift from B to A after 1 year. If all 300
students graduate on time after 4 years ( 150 graduates from A and 150 graduates from B), the HEI as a whole
has a perfect graduation rate of 100%. However, Program B by itself has only a 75% graduation rate – because
it started with 200 and only 150 graduated! On the other hand, it might appear that Program A has a graduation
rate of 150% -- because it started with only 100 but graduated 150. Obviously the HEI as a whole should have a
100% graduation rate but this is not the average of 150% and 75%. The lesson: Computing graduation rate for
a specific program and computing for the HEI as a whole are related problems but they are not identical.
At the higher education level, this suggests the following data elements to measure graduation rates for the HEI
as a whole.
EXAMPLE:
In a specific year, if total enrollment (ES_ENROL) from Grades 1 to 6 is 500 and total
no. of graduates (ES_GRADXX) is 80, ES_GRAD% = 80*6/500 = 96.0%.
The reasoning behind the formula: If there are 500 students from Grades 1 to 6,
it is presumed they would be distributed equally among the 6 grades, Thus, it is
presumed that that there would be about 83.3 or 500/6 students in Grade 6. If 80
students graduated from the elementary school, then it is natural to say that the gross
graduation rate was 96%= 80/83.3.
HS_GRAD% = 100*4*HS_GRADXX/HS_ENROL
EXAMPLE:
In a specific year, if total enrollment (HS_ENROL) in the secondary school is 500 and
total no. of graduates (HS_GRADXX) is 80, then HS_GRAD4% = 80*4/500 = 64.0%.
The reasoning behind the formula: If there are 500 high school students from 1st year
to 4th year, it is presumed that they are distributed equally among the 4 years. Thus, it
is presumed there would be 125 = 500/4 in the 4th or terminal year of high school.
If 80 students graduated from the high school, then it is natural to say that the gross
graduation rate was 64%= 80/125. Of course it may not be true that there would be
125 students in the 4th year. But then that is why the data element is only referred to
as the gross graduation rate!
B410 UG_GRAD4% GROSS GRADUATION RATE FROM THE 4-YEAR UNDERGRADUATE
PROGRAMS
EXAMPLE:
In a specific year, if total enrollment (UG_ENROL4) in all 4-year programs is 1,000
and total no. of graduates (UG_GRADXX4) is 150, UG_GRAD4% = 150*4/100 =
60.0%. No need to keep track of shifting or lateral transfers.
The reasoning behind the formula: If there are 1,000 students from 1st year to 4th year,
it is presumed they are distributed equally among the 4 year levels. Thus, it presumed
there would be 250 or 1000/4 at the 4th or terminal year. If 150 students graduated,
then it is natural to say that the gross graduation rate was 60%= 150/250.
B411 UG_GRAD5% GROSS GRADUATION RATE FROM THE 5-YEAR UNDERGRAD
PROGRAMS
EXAMPLE:
In a specific year, if total enrollment (UG_ENROL5) in all 5-year programs combined
is 1,000 and total no. of graduates (UG_GRADXX5) is 150, UG_GRAD4% =
150*5/100 = 75.0%.
The reasoning behind the formula: If there are 1,000 students from 1st year to 5th year,
it is presumed that the students are distributed equally among the 5 year levels. Thus,
it is presumed that there would be 200 or 1000/5 at the 5th or terminal year. If 150
students graduated, then it is natural to say that the gross graduation rate was 75%=
150/200.
EXAMPLE:
In a specific year, if total enrollment (MS_ENROL) in all masters programs combined
is 1,000 and total no. of graduates (MS_GRADXX) is 150, MS_GRAD% = 150*2/100
= 30.0%.
The reasoning behind the formula: If there are 1,000 masters students, it is presumed
they are equally distributed in the two year levels of the standard 2-year masters
program. That is, it is presumed that there would be 500 =1000/2 students in the 2nd
or terminal year of a masters program.
If 150 students graduated, then it is natural to say that the gross graduation rate was
only 30%= 150/500. Of course it might not be true that there would be exactly 500
students with 2nd year standing. But this is why the data element is only referred to
as the gross graduation rate!
B413 PHD_GRAD% GROSS GRADUATION RATE FROM THE DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
EXAMPLE:
In a specific year, if total enrollment (PHD_ENROL) in all doctoral programs combined
is 1,000 and total no. of graduates (PHD_GRADXX) is 150, PHD_GRAD% =
150*4/1000 = 60.0%.
The reasoning behind the formula: If there are 1,000 PhD students, it is presumed
they are distributed equally among the 4 year level standings in the PHD programs.
That is, it is presumed that there would be 250 =1000/4 students in the 4th or terminal
year of a PhD program.
If 150 students graduated with their PhDs, then it is natural to say that the gross
graduation rate was 60%= 150/250. Of course it is not usually true that there would
be exactly 250 students in the terminal year of a PhD program. But this is why the
data element is only referred to as the gross graduation rate!
EXAMPLE:
Consider the table below. It shows a hypothetical HEI with three 4-year programs and two 5-year programs.
1. For all the 4-year programs combined, GROSSGRAD4% = 84.0% [ = 4*(55+25+90)/ (240+120+450) =
4*170 / 810 ]. It is wrong to take the straight average 85.0% [ = ( 91.7 + 83.3 + 80.0 0/ 3 ].
2. For all the 5-year programs combined, GROSSGRAD5% = 61.1% [ = 5*(25+35)/ (200 +250) = 5*55/450
]. It is wrong to take the straight average 61.3 % [ = ( 62.5 + 60.0)/2 ].
3. The straight average for all the 5 programs is 75.5% [ = (91.7+83.3 + 80.0 + 62.5 +60)/5 ] but this is not
appropriate because the no. of graduates and enrollment vary between programs.
4. If we compute a WEIGHTED average and use the no. of graduates as weights, we obtain 75.8 % [ =
( 55*91.7 + 25*83.3 + 90*80.0 + 25*62.5 + 30*60.0)/ (55+25+90+25+30)].
5. If we compute a WEIGHTED average and use enrollment as weights, we obtain 78.4 % [ = (240*91.7
+ 120*83.3 + 450*80.0 + 200*62.5 + 450*61.1)/ (240+120 + 450 +200 + 250) ]. Both of the weighted
averages are difficult to interpret!
6. The easy way out is to compute GROSSGRAD4% and GROSSGRAD5% separately. Thus, compare the
4-year programs among themselves and compare the 5-year programs among themselves. Compare
the 4-year programs in one HEI versus the 4-year programs of another HEI.
The data elements above could be computed for just one schoolyear but a 3-year average would have more
statistical reliability. Taking the average would iron out the kinks due to the year-to-year variations.
EXAMPLE:
Consider the example below tabulating the enrollment and the no. of graduates from the masters programs of
some HEI.
TEMPLATE H-40: ENROLLMENT AND GRADUATES OF MASTER’S PROGRAMS
GRADUATES ENROLL
PROGRAM LEVEL MAJORS GROSSGRAD% THESIS1 THESIS2
MENT
1 BS EDUCATION
2 MA EDUCATION
3 PHD EDUCATION
4 BS BUSINESS ADM
5 MBA
6 BS AGRICULTURE
7 BS PHYSICS
8 MS PHYSICS
9 PHD PHYSICS
GRADUATES ENROLL
PROGRAM LEVEL MAJORS GROSSGRAD% THESIS1 THESIS2
MENT
ELEMENTARY
1 SCHOOL
SECONDARY
2 SCHOOL
3 TECH/VOC
4 PRE-BACC
4-YEAR UNDERGRAD
5 PROGRAMS
5-YEAR UNDERGRAD
6 PROGRAMS
POST-BACC
7 PRGRAMS
8 MASTERS
9 PHD
TEMPLATE: BY MAJOR FIELD AND PROGRAM LEVEL (e.g. ALL MASTERS PROGRAMS ONLY)
This template can be used within the HEI but many of the entries could be zeroes. Even so the same template
should be used anyway so that national compilation by CHED would be easy. The same template will be used
by CHED to compile the picture for all 1,800 HEIs or for all HEIs in some group, e.g. all state universities and
colleges.
GRADUATES ENROLL
UNESCO FIELDS (12) MAJORS GROSSGRAD% THESIS1 THESIS2
MENT
NATURAL AND
1 PHYSICAL SCIENCES
INFORMATION
2 TECHNOLOGY
ENGINEERING
3 AND RELATED
TECHNOLOGY
ARCHITECTURE AND
4 BUILDING
AGRICULTURE,
ENVIRONMENTAL
5 AND RELATED
STUDIES
6 HEALTH
7 EDUCATION
MANAGEMENT AND
8 COMMERCE
SOCIETY AND
9 CULTURE
10 CREATIVE ARTS
FOOD, HOSPITALITY
11 AND PERSONAL
SERVICES
MIXED FIELD
12 PROGRAMS
TOTAL NO. OF
GRADUATES
A cost center is a “line item” in the Internal Operating Budget (IOB) of the institution. It is an entity within
the institution against which costs are charged by bookkeepers and accountants. It could be a college, a
department within a college, a research center, an office, or just some centralized fund. There are four types
of cost centers:
The number of cost centers in an institution depends on the size of the HEI and on how its internal operating
budget is set up. An HEI may have 4 colleges and 10 departments.
• If each college and each department is treated as a cost center, this HEI will have at least 14 cost
centers.
• If only the colleges but not the departments have specific budgets, then the HEI will have only 4 cost
coenters.
At the extreme, if the financial structure is highly centralized so that all costs are charged to just one lump sum
(say “Office of the President”) for the entire institution, it might turn out that the institution has only one cost
center! If the IOB has very few cost centers, the institution may be said to be “centralized”. If the IOB has many
cost centers, the institution is “decentralized” at least on financial matters.
B414 COSTCTR1 NUMBER OF COST CENTERS WHICH ARE DEGREE PROGRAMS (i.e.
IF COSTS ARE DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTED TO PROGRAMS SUCH AS BS
MATH, BS PHYSICS, ETC.)
B415 COSTCTR2 NUMBER OF COST CENTERS WHICH ARE RESEARCH OR
EXTENSION PROGRAMS
B416 COSTCTR3 NUMBER OF COST CENTERS WHICH ARE DEGREE-GRANTING OR
TEACHING UNITS (e.g. COLLEGES ,SCHOOLS, AND DEPARTMENTS)
B417 COSTCTR4 NUMBER OF COST CENTERS WHICH ARE ACADEMIC SUPPORT
UNITS (e.g. LIBRARY, COMPUTER CENTER, GUIDANCE OFFICE, etc.)
B418 COSTCTR5 NUMBER OF COST CENTERS WHICH ARE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
OR UNITS (e,g, FINANCE OFFICE, PHYSICAL PLANT OFFICE).
B419 COSTCTR6 NUMBER OF COST CENTERS WHICH ARE CENTRALIZED LUMP
SUMS, NOT ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS (e.g. LUMP SUM FOR
HONORARIA, LUMP SUM FOR BOOK PURCHASES, etc).
B420 COSTCENTERS TOTAL NUMBER OF COST CENTERS IN THE IOB OF THE INSTITUTION
What pieces of data does the HEI need about each cost center? What pieces of data does CHED need about
a cost center in an SUC? Please see Chapter 4 DATA ELEMENTS ON A COST CENTER.
PERFORMANCE OF GRADUATES IN THE BOARD EXAMS
HEIs are often rated by the performance of their graduates in board exams. The passing rates in bellwether
programs such as Accounting, Law, Engineering, LET, Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine determine
the public’s perception of the quality of the program --- and often of the HEI as a whole. In fact, an HEI could
have a very good Accounting program but a mediocre Engineering program. It may not be worthwhile to derive
a single indicator of “board exam passing rate” for an entire HEI. It will be more meaningful to simply rate
individual programs in the HEI. See dummy table below.
With regard to a specific degree program, the following data elements were defined in Chapter 2 DATA ELEMENTS
ON A PROGRAM. The most popular notion of passing rate is given by the data element BOARDPASS%. In fact
there are more precise and more telling indicators.
1 PROG_TAPOS The total no. of graduates in one schoolyear, i.e. two semesters and a
summer session.
2 SUBOKAGAD Among the recent graduates, the no. of them who make their first
attempt at the board examination within 12 months of graduation.
EXAMPLE:
There could be 200 graduates but only 150 of them make an immediate
attempt at the board exam. In this example, PROG_TAPOS=200 but
SUBOKAGAD=150. The latter excludes long-time graduates and the
repeaters. Compare with PUMASA below.
3 AGADPASA Among those in SUBOKAGAD, the no. who passed the board exam.
This element is different from PUMASA below.
4 KUMUHA In a specific year, the total no. of graduates who took the board exam
-- regardless of graduation date of previous attempts.
5 PUMASA In a specific year, the total no. of graduates who passed the board
exam – regardless of graduation date or previous attempts.
6 TOP20 Among the PUMASA, the no. of them who landed in the Top 20 of the
board exam.
EXAMPLE:
If 300 took the exam and 50 passed, BOARDPASS% =16.7% = 50/300. The
300 and the 50 could include some repeaters and long-time graduates.
EXAMPLE:
If 300 took the exam, 100 passed and 10 of them landed in the Top 20,
BOARDPASS%= 33.3% = 100/300 and %TOP20 = 5/300 = 1.67%.
The recommendation is to tabulate the data elements above separately for each program in the HEI.
Thus, there would be one set of data elements for the BS Accountancy program, a separate set for the BS
Civil Engineering program, etc. The HEI would determine the pair TALAGA% and BOARDPASS% for BS
Accountancy, a different pair of TALAGA% and BOARDPASS% for BS Civil Engineering, etc.
TEMPLATE 1:
This template shows KUMUHA (or TAKERS), PUMASA ( or PASSERS), PUMASA%., TOP20 and % TOP20.
The bottom row could shows totals but it would not be appropriate to give an interpretation to PUMASA% for
all 40 board exams. To begin with, there is no HEI which sends graduates to all board exams. Even among the
HEIs who sends board exams to the same subset of board exams, the aggregate PUMASA% cannot be used
to compare two HEIs.
39 PHARMACY
40 PHYSICAL THERAPY
RADIOLOGIC
41
TECHNOLOGY
42 SANITARY ENGINEERING
43 SOCIAL WORK
44 SUGAR TECHNOLOGY
45 VETERINARY MEDICINE
X-RAY TECHNOLOGY
46
TEMPLATE 2:
This template is not yet being used --- mainly because PRC, CHED and the HEIs do not yet collect the data
elements PROG_TAPOS, SUBOKAGAD, AGADPASA. However, this template would be even more revealing,
specially TALAGA%.
MARINE
26 ENGINEERING
(ENGINE OFFICER)
27 MASTER PLUMBING
MECHANICAL
28
ENGINEERING
MEDICAL
29
TECHNOLOGY
MEDICINE (DOCTOR
30
OF MEDICINE)
METALLURGICAL
31
ENGINEERING
32 MIDWIFERY
MINING
33
ENGINEERING
NAVAL
ARCHITECTURE
34
AND MARINE
ENGINEERING
35 NURSING
NUTRITION AND
36
DIETETICS
OCCUPATIONAL
37
THERAPY
38 OPTOMETRY
39 PHARMACY
40 PHYSICAL THERAPY
RADIOLOGIC
41
TECHNOLOGY
SANITARY
42
ENGINEERING
43 SOCIAL WORK
SUGAR
44
TECHNOLOGY
VETERINARY
45
MEDICINE
X-RAY
46
TECHNOLOGY
The data elements above are defined for a specific year. Since the rates fluctuate from year to year, it is better
to average over a period of 3 consecutive years. However, note the algebral advice given earlier in averaging a
percentage data element such as MS_GRAD% over 3 years. The average to be reported in 2004 will be based
on data from 2002, 2003 and 2004 itself.
To repeat: the data elements above are very useful but they require close cooperation among CHED,
the HEIs and the PRC.
Another measure of quality: the number of “Centers of Excellence” as determined by CHED. How many
centers of excellence are there in the college or institution? It is to be noted that this designation applies to
specific colleges, departments or institutes in an HEI. The award of “center of excellence” does not single out
a specific program within the college or HEI. It goes to all the programs administered by a college, department
or institute.
How many faculty members are in the HEI? The recommended national census date is July 1 of each year,
about 2 weeks after the start of the schoolyear. By then the no. of faculty will have “stabilized”. All new hiring
will or should have been settled by then.
The faculty constitutes the most important resource in an HEI. Since there are many ways to classify the faculty,
there is need for many data elements as well. See Chapter 11 DATA ELEMENTS ON A FACULTY MEMBER.
Some important classifications are:
• Whether the faculty member is tenured or not. If not tenured, whether on tenure track or not.
• Whether the faculty member has a fixed minimum load (or “normal load”) which he must account for.
• Whether the faculty member is full-time, half-time or part-time.
• Whether the faculty member has a degree “in the discipline” where he teaches.
There are many ways to partition the set of faculty members. If there are 5 ways to classify faculty members
and if each classification system splits the set into 3 subcategories, this means we could partition the set of
faculty members into 35 = 243 distinct subsets. This is clearly “over-partitioning” since only a few subsets are
really meaningful.
The recommended partitioning is depicted below. The set of faculty members will be divided into 10 mutually
disjoint subsets based on the two data elements: FULL_PART and TENURE. These are defined in Chapter 11
DATA ON A FACULTY MEMBER.
TA/ TF GROUP D3
TA/ TF TFELLOWS
ELEMENT
GROUP DATA ELEMENT DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
A1 FULLTF_TENURED1 NO. OF TENURED FULL-TIME FACULTY IN THE HEI
REMARKS:
This comprises a big group of faculty members in most
HEIs. Non-tenured but full-time and at least on tenure
track, they handle full loads, usually 18 units per semester.
In an SUC, every full-time faculty member with his own PS
item is deemed to be on tenure track. If a tenured faculty
member is on leave without pay and a substitute is paid
from the temporarily-vacant item, the substitute is NOT on
tenure track because the item does not belong to him.
REMARKS:
This is a big group of faculty members in some HEIs. They
are classified “full-time” based on their teaching loads ( e.g.
average 15-18 units per sem) -- but they are not on tenure
track.
REMARKS:
There are only a few of these in the country but some
Medicine or Law faculty are half-time tenured faculty.
Salaries and normal teaching loads are exactly half of their
full-time colleagues. They are often classified as part-time
but “half time” is the most appropriate term.
REMARKS:
There are only a few of these but they exist in some
colleges of Medicine or Law. Half-time faculty on tenure
track.
B2 HALFTF_NONTRACK1 NO. OF TEMPORARY HALF-TIME FACULTY WHO ARE
NOT ON TENURE TRACK
REMARKS:
Half-time, non-tenured and not on tenure track either.
Currently handling half-time loads but not in line for
permanency. There are very very few of these.
C1 PARTTF_TENURED NO. OF TENURED PART-TIME FACULTY
REMARKS:
This could be an empty category. It is being listed here on
the off-chance that there could be even just one faculty in
this category. Tenured but neither full-time nor half-time.
C2 PARTTF_TRACK1 NO. OF TEMPORARY PART-TIME FACULTY ON
TENURE TRACK.
REMARKS:
These form the big bulk of the “part-time faculty”: the
LECTURERS (all ranks), ADJUNCT/ AFFILIATE FACULTY,
PROFESSORS EMERITI, VISITING PROFS, etc.
REMARKS:
Strictly speaking, the HEI may not acknowledge these as
employees – let alone members of the faculty. However, for
the purposes of the RCDEM they will be counted as part of
the faculty, albeit separately. They do add to the teaching
capacity in the HEI. This is only for statistical purposes
and has no legal force. They have a normal teaching load
usually set at 6 units per semester.
An HEI could have 200 faculty members but in a specific semester, it is possible that only 190 of them are in
the service, i.e. put another way “in the current payroll”. Some faculty members could be on leave without pay
or AWOL. The potential teaching load of the faculty in that semester will depend only on those in the payroll.
Hence the distinction.
A faculty member who is serving full-time as an HEI administrator is considered to be in the service of the HEI
– even if he has no current teaching load. His entire normal load will be fully attributed to administrative duties.
When the average teaching load or average workload per faculty is computed, the denominator should include
only those who are CURRENTLY “IN THE SERVICE OF THE HEI”. Exclude all those on leave without pay
or AWOL but include those on leave with pay.
REMARKS:
Most part-time faculty belong to this subgroup. This consists of
the lecturers, professors emeriti, adjunct or affiliate faculty, visiting
professors, etc. WHO HAVE CURRENT TEACHING OR RESEARCH
LOADS.
D3 TFELLOWS2 TEACHING FELLOWS, ASSOCIATES AND ASSISTANTS
(CURRENTLY “IN THE SERVICE OF THE HEI”)
Because some faculty members are full-time and some are not, it is necessary to define the number of full-time
equivalent faculty ( FTE faculty). There are two approaches:
1. Let the HEI itself use its own definition of FTE faculty.
2. Prescribe some national counting rules or standards so that FTE faculty across various HEIs can
be tallied nationally.
B423 ZZFTEFAC_HEI As of a specified national census day (e.g. July 1), the number of FTE
faculty as defined by the HEI itself.
The HEI will be allowed to use its own rules for determining the FTE value of
each faculty member. It is likely that two HEIs will use different rules. Thus,
this element is useful mostly or only in the HEI itself. CHED should not add
up ZZFTEFAC computed from different HEIs.
B424 XXFTEFAC_CHED As of a specified national census day (e.g. July 1), the number of FTE
faculty using national counting rules set by CHED.
• Regardless of actual teaching load, each full-time faculty currently in
the service of the HEI will be counted as 1.00 FTE faculty.
• For the part-time faculty, the proposed national counting rule is
based on a national normal faculty teaching load of 18 units per
semester, 36 units per year or 12 units per trimester.
EXAMPLES:
If the part-time faculty teaches 6 units, the FTE faculty count is 0.33 = 6/18. If
another part-time faculty teaches 15 units, the FTEF count is 0.87 =15/18. Together
the two part-time faculty members are equivalent to 1.20 FTEF = 0.33+0.87 = ( 6 +
15)/18.
The burden of computations will be on the HEI. However, to allow some random
verification, CHED might require the HEI to list each part-time faculty and specify the
no. of teaching units.
EXAMPLE:
If FULLTYMFAC=500, if PARTTYMFAC=100 and if XXFTEFAC_CHED = 560, it
means that the combined teaching load of the 100 part-time faculty members is
equivalent to the teaching load of 60 full-time faculty members. This implies that the
100 part-time faculty rendered an average of 10.8 (=60*18/100) units per person. It
also means the part-time faculty are actually more than half-time faculty!
For a more complete explanation, see CHAPTER 11 DATA ON A FACULTY MEMBER. See definition of FULL_
PART and INSERVICE. In any case, given the grouping of the faculty above,
1. The FULL-TIME FACULTY are those who belong to the SET UNION of Groups A1, A2 and A3.
2. The “HALF-TIME FACULTY” are those who belong to the SET UNION of Groups B1, B2, and B3.
3. The “PART-TIME FACULTY” are those who belong to the SET UNION of Groups C1, C2 and C3.
Observe that “part-time” excludes the full-time, the half-time and also excludes the Teaching Fellows
and Associates.
INDICATIVE RATIOS: FULL-TIME AND PART-TIME FACULTY
As a general rule, the SUCs depend more on full-time staff than the private HEIs do. This is because many
private HEI faculty are paid on a per-hour basis and are mostly part-timers. In contrast, most faculty in the SUCs
are full-time. Within an HEI (whether public or private), the Arts and Sciences colleges would depend more on
full-time faculty than the professional colleges such as Law, Business, Engineering, etc.
Two sets of ratios will be computed, the second set applying only to those currently in the service of the HEI.
EXAMPLE:
If FULLTYMFAC1=500, HALFTYMFAC1 =50and PARTTYMFAC1=100, the
total headcount of the faculty is 650. FULLTYMFAC% = 500/650 or 76.9%.
That is, 76.9% of total faculty headcount consists of full-time faculty.
B433 FULLTYMFAC2% AS A % OF ALL FACULTY CURRENTLY IN THE SERVICE OF THE
HEI, THOSE WHO ARE FULL-TIME.
EXAMPLE:
If FULLTYMFAC2= 450, HALFTYMFAC2 = 40and PARTTYMFAC2= 80, the
total headcount of the faculty currently in the service is 520. FULLTYMFAC2%
= 450/ 570 or 78.9%. That is, 78.9% of total faculty headcount consists of full-
time faculty.
EXAMPLE:
If FULLTYMFAC1=500, HALFTYMFAC1 =50and PARTTYMFAC1=100, the
total weighted headcount of the faculty is 558.3. FULLTYMFAC% = 500/
558.3 or 89.6 % That is, the full-time faculty account for 89.6% of the weighted
faculty headcount .
B435 FULLTYMFAC4% AS A % OF TOTAL WEIGHTED FACULTY CURRENTLY IN
SERVICE, THE FULL-TIME FACULTY.
EXAMPLE:
If FULLTYMFAC2= 450, HALFTYMFAC2 = 40and PARTTYMFAC2=
80, the total weighted headcount of the faculty currently in the service
is 496.7. FULLTYMFAC4% = 450/ 496.7 or 90.6%. That is, the full-
time faculty members account for 90.6% of total weighted faculty
headcount.
Formula:
FTEFAC_CHED% = FULLTYMFAC/ FTEFAC_CHED
EXAMPLE:
If FULLTYMFAC=500, PARTTYMFAC=100 and FTEFAC_CHED= 560, it would
mean that the 100 part-faculty have a load equal to that of 60 full-time faculty.
Thus, FTEFAC_CHED% = 500/560 = 89.3 %. That is, the full-time faculty
represents 89.3% of total FTE faculty as defined by the CHED.
The UNESCO publication ISCED 1997 lists twelve (12) major fields of study. How many faculty members have
their primary specialty in these disciplines? Each faculty member will be counted in at most one discipline. If a
person claims 2 or more, the faculty member should be made to choose just one. If the faculty member insists
on 2 or more, he will coded separately. The question should be asked separately for different groups of faculty.
The dummy table below tabulates specialization for four groups: the tenured full-time faculty, the full-time faculty
(whether tenured, on tenure track or not on tenure track), half-time (whether tenured, on tenure track or not on
tenure track), and the part-time faculty. These groups are not mutually disjoint but they constitute important
subgroupings in institutions of higher learning.
If there are 10 groups of faculty and there are 12 UNESCO major fields of study, there will be a total of 120
data elements. The generic definition below applies to each of these elements.
Since this is a ratio, we need to specify the numerator and the denominator.
NUMERATOR (FACULTY).
There are full-time, half-time and part-time faculty. The recommended numerator is a WEIGHTED HEADCOUNT
OF THE FACULTY.
• Each full-time faculty member is counted as 1.00.
• Each half-time is of course counted as ½ or 0.50.
• All others with current teaching loads will be counted as 1/3 or 0.33
The ratio could be misleading if the HEI enters into service contracts with housecleaning and security agencies.
These private janitors and private security guards serve the HEI and are very visible but technically, they are
not employees of the HEI. An analysis of the Faculty-to-non-teaching staff ration should consider these private
janitors and “blue guards”.
REMARKS:
The numerator is a weighted headcount of the faculty. The denominator is a
STRAIGHT HEADCOUNT of the full-time non-teaching staff.
Include only those currently in the service of the HEI. Do not count those
on leave without pay but include those on leave with pay. Exclude those on
AWOL. Among the part-time faculty, include only the part-time faculty with
current teaching loads. An emeritus professor has an appointment for life but if
he is not teaching or researching, do not include in the count.
B439 FTEFSTAFF_RATIO FTEFSTAFF_RATIO = FTEFAC / ( REPS1 + REPS 2 + ADMIN1 + ADMIN2)
REMARKS:
The numerator is FTE faculty. The denominator is a STRAIGHT HEADCOUNT
of the full-time non-teaching staff.
The two ratios should be approximately equal.
If CHED wants a ratio, it should ask always separately for the numerator and the denominator. If an
HEI declares that its faculty-to-staff ratio is 2.00, it cannot be deduced whether that means 200/100, 220/110,
260/130 or of course 2,000/1,000. Validation of a ratio is much easier if the numerator and denominator are
shown explicitly.
People always ask about the STUDENT-to-FACULTY ratio ( or STFR) in an HEI. Unfortunately, there are
many ways to compute this ratio. Since the STFR is a ratio, it has a numerator and a denominator. To get a
precise understanding, we need to specify what will be in the numerator (“STUDENTS”) and what will be in the
denominator (‘FACULTY”).
• If the numerator is going to be a headcount, it could be either unweighted or weighted. See definition
of TOT_ENROL and WTD_ENROL. TOT_ENROL is much easier to understand but WTD_ENROL
is more meaningful if we are comparing HEIs with the full range of programs from elementary to the
doctoral level.
• If the numerator is going to be FTE students, it should be FTEXX_HEI, the number of FTE students
using standard counting rules set by CHED. If the numerator is FTE students, the denominator should
be FTE faculty.
DENOMINATOR ( “FACULTY” ).
Just like the numerator, the denominator could be either headcounts or FTE faculty.
• Or we could use a weighted total headcount such as FULLTYMFAC + 0.33*PARTTIME FAC. Each
part-time faculty member is counted as one-third of a full-time.
• Or we could use FULLTYMFAC by itself and thus ignore the part-time faculty altogether.
• Or we could use the smaller set TENURED_FAC since this is the permanent core of the faculty.
However, this would ignore all the non-tenured faculty in the HEI.
If the denominator will be FTE faculty, it should be FTEF_CHED, the number of FTE faculty using standard
counting rules set by CHED. If the denominator is FTE faculty, the numerator should be FTE students.
Given all these options, we define at least 3 different versions of STUDENT-TO-FACULTY RATIO.
EXAMPLE:
If TOT_ENROL=10,000 and FULLTYMFAC =700, then SFTR_FTAC = 10000/700
= 14.3. This means 14.3 students for each full-time faculty. This ratio ignores the
part-time faculty and, as in many private HEIs, there could be many of these.
B451 STFR_ALLFAC RATIO OF STUDENTS TO ALL FACULTY ( FULL-TIME AND PART-TIME
COMBINED)
EXAMPLE:
If TOT_ENROL=10,000, FULLTYMFAC =700 and PARTTYMFAC = 100, then
SFTR_ALLFAC = 10,000/(700 +100) = 12.5. This means 12.5 students for each
faculty. This ratio is misleading because it acts as if a part-time faculty were just like
a full-time faculty member.
B452 STFR_WTD RATIO OF WEIGHTED STUDENTS TO WEIGHTED HEADCOUNT OF
THE FACULTY
EXAMPLE
If WTD_ENROL= 9000, FULLTYMFAC =700 and PARTTYMFAC = 100, then
SFTR_WTD = 9,000/ (700 + 0.33*100) = 12.3. This means 12.3 students for each
full-time faculty. This ratio is more precise because it assigns weights to enrollment
at different program levels and also differentiates between the full-time and the part-
time faculty.
Most Philippine HEIs have enrollment from the elementary level to the doctoral
level. The best way to collapse such varied enrollment into just one number is to
use a weighting system. See WTD_ENROL.
B453 STFR_FTE RATIO OF FTE STUDENTS TO FTE FACULTY
EXAMPLE
If FTEXX_HEI= 8000 and FTEFAC_CHED = 750, then SFTR_FTE = 8,000/ 750 =
10.7 This means 10.7 FTE students for each FTE faculty.
How does one visualize the difference between two student-to-faculty ratios? Imagine two sample
universities with the following profiles:
1. XYZ UNIVERSITY: If there are 10,000 students and 700 faculty, the ratio is 14.3 students per faculty.
2. ABC UNIVERSITY: If there are 4,000 students and 300 faculty, the ratio is 13.3 students per faculty.
How can a person visualize the difference between 14.3 and 13.3 students per faculty?
The trick is to visualize the students inside classrooms with 30 students in each classroom.
1. At XYZ University, the 10,000 students will fit into 333 classrooms (=10,000/30). Dividing the 700
faculty by 333, we obtain 2.1 faculty members per class of 30 students. Multiplying by 100, this means
210 faculty members to handle 3000 students.
2. At ABC University, the 4,000 will fit into 133 classrooms (=4,000/30) with 30 students each. Dividing
the 300 faculty by 133, we obtain 2.25 faculty members per class of 30 students. Multiplying by 100,
this means 225 faculty members to handle 3000 students.
Admittedly it is now much easier for a person to visualize 210 faculty members in XYZ University versus 225
faculty members in ABC University – both sets of faculty handling 3,000 students. This leads to the proposal
that CHED should compute THE NUMBER OF FACULTY MEMBERS PER 3,000 STUDENTS. It seems like
a far-fetched proposal but one must admit it is easier to visualize than the popular-but-hard-to-picture student-
to-faculty ratio!
How many faculty members have advanced degrees? What fraction of them have advanced degrees? Just like
the previous questions, this should be answered for a specific group or subgroup of the faculty. For instance
1. GROUP A1 (full-time tenured faculty only) or
2. The set union of Group A1 and Group a2 (NON-TENURED FULL-TIME FACULTY ON TENURE
TRACK).
3. Or just the set of all full-time faculty (whether tenured or not, whether on tenure track or not).
For a specific group of faculty members, how many of have advanced degrees “in the discipline”, i.e. in
the discipline where they teach?
• For a Physics faculty member, the degree must be in Physics, not Education, not Engineering, not
Environmental Science.
• For a mathematics faculty member, the degree must be in Math, not Education, not Engineering. But
the degree be in a related discipline such as Statistics or Computer Science.
• For an English faculty member, the degree must be in English or Comparative Literature – not Education,
not Art, not Philippine Studies, not Journalism, not Drama, not Mass Comm.
• For an Economics faculty member, the degree must be in Economics – not in Education, not in Business
Adm, not in Law. But it could be in a related field such as Mathematics or Statistics.
• For a Computer Science faculty member, the degree must be in Computer Science or Electronic
Engineering – not Civil Engineering, not Education, not BA. But it could be in a related field such as
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics or Statistics.
• The first arbiter of whether the degree is “in the discipline” is the VPAA of the HEI. However, there needs
to be some validation by CHED because there is a possible incentive for the VPAA to be liberal in the
interpretation and thus make the HEI look better than it probably is.
• A faculty member will be counted at most once in BS_TUGMA, MS_TUGMA or PHD_TUGMA. IT IS
POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON NOT TO BE COUNTED IN ANY OF THE THREE.
• The focus is not whether the bachelors, masters and PhD degrees of a person are all in the same
discipline. The focus is: which of the degrees (if any) is in the discipline where the person teaches.
B454 BS_TUGMA AMONG THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER WHOSE HIGHEST
DEGREE IN THE DISCIPLINE WHERE THEY TEACH IS A BACHELORS
DEGREE.
EXAMPLE:
• If a math faculty has a BS Math, an MA Education and a PhD Education, he
will be counted in BS_TUGMA but not in MS_TUGMA nor in PHD_TUGMA.
• If a math faculty has a BS Engineering, an MA Education and a PhD
Education, he will not be counted in BS_TUGMA, nor MS_TUGMA, nor PHD_
TUGMA. However, he will be counted in PHD_HOLDER (see below).
• If a math faculty has a BS Engineering, MA Education and a PhD Math, then
he will be counted in PHD_TUGMA.
• If a History professor has an AB History, MA Education and a PhD in History,
the faculty member will be counted in PHD_TUGMA, not in BS_TUGMA nor in
MS_TUGMA.
Compare with BS_HOLDER.
B455 MS_TUGMA AMONG THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER WHOSE HIGHEST
DEGREE IN THE DISCIPLINE WHERE THEY TEACH IS A MASTERS
DEGREE.
EXAMPLE:
• If a Chemistry professor is a BSE holder but has an MS Chem degree and no
PhD, then he would be counted in MS_TUGMA not in BS_TUGMA.
• If a Chemistry professor has a BS Chem, an MS Chem and a PhD Education,
he would be counted in MS_TUGMA but not in BS_TUGMA and not in PHD_
TUGMA.
• If a Chemistry professor has a BS Chem, an MS Chem and a PhD Chem,
he will be counted only in PHD_TUGMA – not in BS_TUGMA, not in
MS_TUGMA. A faculty member will be counted at most once in the three
categories.
B456 PHD_TUGMA AMONG THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER OF DOCTORAL
DEGREE HOLDERS IN THE FIELD WHERE THEY TEACH.
The doctoral degree must be “in the discipline”, cannot be an education degree.
Doctoral degree must be fully completed. If the faculty member is teaching physics, the
doctoral degree must be PhD Physics: it cannot be PhD Education or PhD Engineering.
REMARKS:
• If a Biology professor has a BS Bio, MS Bio and a PhD BIO, he will be
counted only in PHD_TUGMA – not in BS_TUGMA and not in MS_TUGMA.
Every faculty member is counted at most once.
• If a Psychology professor has a BS Psychology, an MD and a PhD in
Education, he will be counted only in BS_TUGMA. (But what if he is a
Pyschiatrist?)
• If a math professor has a BS Engineering, MA Education and PhD Education,
he will not be counted at all --- not in BS_TUGMA, not in MS_TUGMA, and
not in PHD_TUGMA. However, see PHD_HOLDER.
• If PHD_TUGMA = 0, it does not necessarily mean there are no PhD holders.
There could be some PhD holders but their doctorates are not in the
disciplines where they teach.
• ISSUE: Does this mean that all professors in the College of Education should
be holders of Education degrees? If a Professor of Education is a PhD Biology
and teaches science in Education, would his degree be considered “in the
discipline”? If a PhD Math teaches computer science, is his degree “in the
discipline”? The final arbiter whether an advanced degree is in the discipline
will be the VPAA – subject to some validation by CHED
B457 BS_TUGMA% AS A % OF THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER WITH ONLY A
BACHELORS DEGREE IN THE FIELD WHERE THEY TEACH
EXAMPLES:
• If there are 200 faculty in the group and if BS_TUGMA=120, then BS_
TUGMA% =60%=120/200.
• If BS_TUGMA% = 100%, then it means that all faculty in the group have their
bachelors in the discipline where they teach. None of them has a masters or
PhD “in the discipline”. Some of them could have masters or doctorates but
none in the discipline where they teach.
• If BS_TUGMA%=0%, then it means _______
B458 MS_TUGMA% AS A % OF ALL FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER WITH ONLY A
MASTERS DEGREE IN THE FIELD WHERE THEY TEACH
EXAMPLES:
• If there are 200 faculty in the group, and if MS_TUGMA = 80, then MS_
TUGMA% = 40% = 80/200.
• If MS_TUGMA% = 100%, it means that all faculty members are at least
masters degree holders and their masters degrees are in the discipline where
they teach.
• If MS_TUGMA% =0%, then it means __________
EXAMPLES:
• If there are 200 faculty IN THE GROUP, and if PHD_TUGMA =15, then PHD_
TUGMA% =7.5% = 15/200.
• The perfect score is PHD_TUGMA% = 100%. It means that everybody is a
PhD holder in the discipline where he teaches.
• If PHD_TUGMA%=0, it does not necessarily mean there are no PhD holders
at all. In fact they could all be PhD holders except that none of their doctorates
are in the discipline where they teach.
• If BS_TUGMA% + MS_TUGMA% +PHD_TUGMA% =100%, then it means
that each faculty member has at least one degree “in the discipline”.
• It is possible to have BS_TUGMA% + MS_TUGMA% +PHD_TUGMA% <
100%. This will happen if the highest degrees of some faculty are not in
the discipline. For instance, an English professor whose highest degree is
PhD Education or a Physics Instructor whose highest degree is BSE or BS
Engineering.
See related element PHD_HOLDER%, PHD_PURSUE, PHD_PURSUE%.
EXAMPLE:
The table below shows the “TUGMA profile” of the full-time faculty of a hypothetical HEI.
1. There are 150 full-time faculty members in Arts and Sciences.
2. Note that PHD_TUGMA = 10 faculty (7% of 150). This means there are 10 faculty members whose
highest degrees in the disciplines where they teach is the PhD.
3. MS_TUGMA = 60 of the fulltime faculty (27% of 150). This means there are 60 faculty members whose
highest degrees in the discipline where they teach is the masters degree.
4. For the remaining BS_TUGMA=60 (representing 40% of the 150), their highest degrees in the discipline
they teach is a bachelors degree.
5. The sum of the 3 percentages is only 73%: this means some full-time faculty ( 40 of them to be exact or
27% of 410) do not have any degree in the discipline where they teach! This means their degrees are
outside the disciplines where they teach, e.g. in Education.
6. In the entire HEI, 11% ( = 45/410) of the full-time faculty are PhD holders in the disciplines where they
teach. This does not mean there are only 45 PhD holders. There could be many more PhD holders
except that their doctorates are not in the disciplines where the faculty members teach.
FULL-
TIME BS_ MS_ PHD_ MS_ PHD_
FACULTY TUGMA TUGMA TUGMA BS_ %TUGMA %TUGMA SUM OF 3 %
ARTS &
SCIENCES 150 60 40 10 40% 27% 7% 73%
B460 BS_HOLDERS AMONG THE FACULTY MEMBERS IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER WHOSE
HIGHEST DEGREE IS A BACHELORS DEGREE ( REGARDLESS OF
DISCIPLINE)
EXAMPLE: If there are 200 faculty IN THE GROUP, and if the highest degree of 195
of them is a bachelors degree (regardless of discipline) , then BS_HOLDER =195. This
would mean 5 have no bachelors degree at all. For instance, if the 5 hold only tech/voc
or pre-baccalaureate certificates.
EXAMPLE: If there are 200 faculty IN THE GROUP and if 90 of them hold masters
degrees (regardless of discipline) , then MS_HOLDER = 90. Include a faculty member
teaching Sociology even if the highest degree is LLB (classified as a masters degree
in this series of elements) or MA Education. However, masters degree must be fully
completed.
EXAMPLE: If there are 200 faculty IN THE GROUP and if the highest degree of 25 of
them is a doctoral degree (regardless of discipline) , then PHD_TUGMA = 25.
Include a faculty member teaching Psychology even if the highest degree is PhD
Education (Guidance) or PhD Education Administration. PhD must be fully completed.
For this data element MD degree is considered masters level, not PhD level. Compare
with PHD_TUGMA.
B463 BS_HOLDER% AS A % OF ALL FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER WITH ONLY A
BACHELORS DEGREE (REGARDLESS OF DISCIPLINE)
EXAMPLE: If there are 200 faculty in the group, and if the highest degree of 180
of them is a bachelors degree (regardless of discipline) , then BS_HOLDER%
=90%=180/200.
B464 MS_HOLDER% AS A % OF ALL FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER WITH ONLY A
MASTERS DEGREE (REGARDLESS OF DISCIPLINE)
EXAMPLE: If there are 200 faculty IN THE GROUP and if the highest degree of 90
of them is a masters degree (regardless of discipline) , then MS_HOLDER% = 45% =
90/200.
Compare with MS_TUGMA%.
B465 PHD_HOLDER% AS A % OF ALL FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER OF DOCTORAL
DEGREE HOLDERS (REGARDLESS OF DISCIPLINE)
EXAMPLE: If there are 200 faculty IN THE GROUP and if the highest degree of 25 of
them is a doctoral degree (regardless of discipline) , then PHD_HOLDER% = 12.5%
=25/200.
Compare with PHD_TUGMA%.
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE:
The table below shows the highest degrees (regardless of discipline) of the full-time faculty of a hypothetical
HEI.
There are 150 full-time faculty members in Arts and Sciences.
There are ten PhD holders and they constitute 7% of the 150 full-time. It is not known if the PhD are in the
discipline or not.
There are 60 masters degree holders and they constitute 27% of the 150 full-time. It is not known if their
masters are “in the discipline” or not.
There are 60 faculty members who are only bachelor degree holders but they constitute 40% of the 150 full-
time. Even then it is not known if the bachelors degrees are “in the discipline” or not.
The sum of the 3 percentages is 100%: this means all the full-time faculty have at least a bachelors degree.
In the entire HEI, 28% ( = 115/410) of the full-time faculty are PhD holders (regardless of the discipline). It
cannot be deduced from the table below how many of the 115 have their doctorates in the disciplines where
they teach.
Compare with previous example.
TEMPLATE H-48: NO. OF FACULTY BY HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED AND DISCIPLINE GROUP
FULL-
TIME BS_ MS_ PHD_ BS_ MS_ PHD_
FACULTY HOLDERS HOLDERS HOLDERS %HOLDERS %HOLDERS %HOLDERS SUM OF 3
ELEM SCHOOL
SECONDARY
SCHOOL
ARTS &
SCIENCES 150 60 20 70 40% 13% 47% 100%
EDUCATION 40 0 10 30 0% 25% 75% 100%
ENGINEERING 60 50 10 0 83% 17% 0% 100%
BUSINESS 100 60 25 15 60% 25% 15% 100%
HEALTH
SCIENCES 60 55 5 0 92% 8% 0% 100%
TOTAL 410 225 70 115 55% 17% 28% 100%
Another measure is to count the number of faculty with publications (over the past 10 years) in international
refereed journals – and the percentage of such faculty. This series of data elements is designed to apply to a
specific group of faculty members. For instance,
• The set union of GROUP A1 and B1, the group of tenured faculty members (whether full-time or half-
time).
• Or the set union of GROUP A1, A2, B1,B2 – the set of tenured faculty (whether full-time or half-time) or
at least on tenure track (whether full-time or half-time).
The series of data elements below applies to the faculty members “IN THE GROUP”.
B466 PUBLISH1 AMONG THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NO. OF THEM WHO HAVE
PUBLISHED IN REFEREED JOURNALS (LOCAL OR INTERNATIONAL)
or HAVE BOOKS PUBLISHED BY A RECOGNIZED INTL PUBLISHER
(WITHIN THE PAST 10 YEARS)
EXAMPLE: If there are 200 faculty who are IN THE GROUP and 20 of them have
published in a refereed journal (whether local or international) in the past 10 years,
then PUBLISH1 = 20. Do not include publications in non-refereed journals or
proceedings. Do not include technical report. Do not include an article in a popular
magazine. Include faculty even if there is only one publication in 10 years.
B467 AUTHORS AMONG THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NO. OF THEM WHO ARE
AUTHORS OF PUBLISHED TEXTBOOKS.
B468 PUBLISH1% AS A % OF ALL FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER OF FACULTY
WHO HAVE PUBLISHED IN REFEREED JOURNALS (WHETHER LOCAL
OR INT’L) or HAVE BOOKS PUBLISHED BY A RECOGNIZED INTL
PUBLISHER (WITHIN THE PAST 10 YEARS)
EXAMPLE: If there are 200 faculty IN THE GROUP and 20 of them have published
in a refereed journal (whether local or international) in the past 10 years, then
PUBLISH1% = 10% = 20/200.
B469 AUTHORS% AS A % OF ALL FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER OF AUTHORS
OF TEXTBOOKS.
This series of data elements applies to the faculty members in a specific group. For instance, the group of all
full-time and half-time faculty members on tenure track. This is the group of faculty members who would or
should be actively pursuing advanced degrees in the hope of tenure. The group could also be expanded to
the group of all full-time faculty members, whether on tenure track or not. Those not on tenure track would (or
should) be actively pursuing advanced degrees with the hope of at least being put on tenure track. The generic
reference is to the faculty members “in the group”.
The general question is: How many of the faculty members IN THE GROUP are still actively pursuing
advanced degrees? The data elements are important in faculty development programs. The advanced
degrees must be in the discipline where they teach. If the faculty member is teaching Psychology, the advance
degree must be in Psychology, not PhD Education (Guidance), not PhD Philippine Studies, not PhD Sociology,
not LLB or MBA.
Observe the choice of numerators and denominators in the percentage data elements below.
B470 MS_PURSUE OUT OF THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THOSE WHO ARE “ACTIVELY
PURSUING” MASTERS DEGREES IN THE DISCIPLINE WHERE THEY
TEACH
EXAMPLE:
A faculty member is “in active pursuit” of a masters degree in the discipline if he
satisfies ALL the conditions below:
• The faculty member has already earned some masters credits or is
currently enrolled.
• “in good academic standing” as a masters student,
• has not been overtaken by the max residency rule
• has not declared that he has given up permanently.
Exclude those pursuing masters degrees outside the discipline where they teach,
e.g. an English faculty member going after an MA Education or an LLB.
B471 PHD_PURSUE OUT OF THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THOSE WHO ARE “ACTIVELY
PURSUING” DOCTORAL DEGREES IN THE DISCIPLINE WHERE THEY
TEACH
REMARKS
A faculty member is “in active pursuit” of a PhD in the discipline if he satisfies ALL
the conditions below:
• The faculty member has already earned some PhD credits or is
currently enrolled in the PhD program
• “in good academic standing” as a PhD student,
• has not been overtaken by the max residency rule
• has not declared that he has given up permanently..
• The faculty member has completed a masters degree or is enrolled in a
“straight PhD program”
Exclude somebody pursuing a PhD outside the discipline. Exclude a faculty member
in English going after a PhD in Music, Art or Education. Exclude a History faculty
member going after a PhD in Psychology, Philippine Studies or Education.
B472 MS_PURSUE% AS A % OF THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER OF THEM
ACTIVELY PURSUING MASTERS DEGREES IN THE DISCIPLINE
WHERE THEY TEACH
EXAMPLE:
If there are 200 faculty IN THE GROUP and if 50 of them are in “active pursuit”
of a masters degree, then MS_PURSUE%=25% =50/200. The other 75% may
already have masters degrees or are not pursuing or have stopped pursuing a
masters degree.
B473 PHD_PURSUE% AS A % OF THE FACULTY IN THE GROUP, THE NUMBER WHO
ARE STILL ACTIVELY PURSUING DOCTORATE DEGREES IN THE
DISCIPLINE WHERE THEY TEACH.
EXAMPLE:
If there are 200 faculty in the group, and if 20 of them are in “active pursuit” of
a PhD, then PHD_PURSUE%=10% =20/200. The other 90% may already have
PhDs or are not actively pursuing or have stopped pursuing a PhD.
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE:
ELEM SCHOOL
SECONDARY
SCHOOL
ARTS &
SCIENCES 150 60 30 20% 20 10 7%
ENGINEERING 60 50 30 50% 10 5 8%
This series of data elements may be applied separately to the following groups of faculty:
• Full-time tenured faculty only
• Tenured faculty (full-time or half-time)
• Full-time tenured faculty or full-time non-tenured but on tenure track
• All full-time faculty (tenured or untenured, even those not on tenure track).
However, the classification is not recommended for the group of part-time faculty members.
In any case, the generic reference is to the faculty members “in the group”.
EXAMPLE: If there are 500 faculty members in the group under discussion and 300
of them hold the rank of Instructor, INSTRUC% = 60% = 300 /500. There is no finer
distinction among Instructor I, Instructor II, etc.
If INSTRUC% is too high, say 90%, it means the core of the faculty is too “bottom
heavy” and consists mostly of junior or low-ranked faculty members. It could mean
the faculty members are relatively young or unqualified but it could also mean the HEI
does not have a faculty development program in place! Or the HEI does not have the
funds to promote the faculty.
B475 ASSTPROF% PERCENTAGE OF THE FACULTY WHO ARE ASSISTANT PROFS
B476 ASSOCPROF% PERCENTAGE OF THE FACULTY WHO ARE WHO ARE ASSOCIATE
PROFS
B477 FULLPROF% PERCENTAGE OF THE FACULTY WHO ARE FULL PROFESSORS
EXAMPLE: If there are 500 faculty members in the group and 50 of them hold the
rank of Professor (including College Professor, University Professor), FULLPROF% =
10% = 50/500.
In the first semester, how many units do the faculty devote to the following duties: actual teaching hours (normal
teaching load plus any overload), preparing lessons, actual consultation with students (not just waiting for
students to appear in the office), administrative duties, study load on official time, study load on the faculty’s
own time (i.e. study without benefit of load reduction), research, extension services, sabbatical or other official
leaves.
In tabulating total faculty work load in the HEI, there should be separate tallies for different groups.. The grouping
will make it much easier to compute AVERAGE LOAD PER FACULTY. Recall the definition of the 10 groups of
faculty members in an HEI:
REMARKS:
INCLUDE ONLY THE FACULTY MEMBERS “CURRENTLY IN THE SERVICE OF THE HEI”.
Exclude those on leave without pay but include those on official leave with pay. Exclude
GROUP
those on AWOL. Include tenured faculty members who are assigned as full-time or part-time
administrators in the HEI – even if they have no current teaching loads. Exclude those on
secondment outside the HEI.
A1 THE FULL-TIME TENURED FACULTY
REMARKS:
Most part-time faculty belong to this subgroup. This consists of the lecturers, professors
emeriti, adjunct or affiliate faculty, visiting professors, etc. WHO HAVE CURRENT TEACHING
OR RESEARCH LOADS.
D3 TEACHING FELLOWS, ASSOCIATES AND ASSISTANTS
The unit of measure below is HOURS PER WEEK when classes are in session. To be more specific,in the
first semester of each academic year. If there are 1,000 full-time faculty and if each faculty can account for a
40-hour week, the potential total is 40,000 hours. The actual potential could be less than 40,000 since some
could be on leave. Many full-time faculty serve as administrators but if so their administrative hours are counted
as part of the 40-hour week and attributed to “administrative duties”. The general question is: How many of
these hours were rendered in teaching lecture subjects? Lab subjects? official administrative duties?
In doing official research? Etc.
Human nature dictates that a faculty member will tend to inflate his hours so that the total would be at least 40
hours or possibly more. If one full-time faculty member declares a 60-hour week, it implies working 12 hours
per weekday over the 17 weeks or 85 weekdays of the semester! Observe that the data elements below do not
include the hours devoted to class preparation, formulation of exams and grading the test papers. Thus, the
total hours for one faculty member should actually be less than 40, say 30 hours.
The data elements below are useful only if the faculty members will be honest and prudent in declaring
the distribution of 40 hours in a typical week. In fact, the nominal values of the hours are not as revealing
as their relative values!
These data elements are also explained in CHAPTER 11 DATA ELEMENTS ON A FACULTY MEMBER.
REMARKS: Most faculty members in HEIs teach only in higher education but
there are many who teach, whether fully or partly, in the secondary school of
the HEI. Indeed, some Education faculty members teach in both secondary
and undergraduate level.
B480 TECHVOC_HOURZ TOTAL HOURS DEVOTED TO TEACHING UNDERGRAD
LABORATORY AND OTHER NON-LECTURE SUBJECTS.
REMARKS: Include only the actual lecture hours. Do not include hours used
in preparation for the lecture. Do not include hours for formulating exams,
checking papers or computing grades,
REMARKS: Include only the actual graduate ecture hours. Do not include
hours used in preparation for the lecture. Do not include hours for formulating
exams, checking papers or computing grades,
B484 GRADLAB_HOURZ TOTAL HOURS DEVOTED TO TEACHING GRADUATE
LABORARATORY AND OTHER NON-LECTURE SUBJECTS.
REMARKS: There are the hours devoted to teaching in graduate labs or non-
lecture subjects such as those taught in the studio, clinic, workshop, gym,
etc. Include only the actual hours in the lab, studio, workshop, etc. Do not
include hours used in preparation. Exclude thesis or dissertation advising.
EXAMPLE; If 10 faculty members are on full study leave with pay, then
that means 400 hours should be included in STUDY1_HOURZ. If 5 faculty
members are put on half-time leave so they could study, then that means
5*20=100 hours to be included in STUDY1_HOURZ.
B488 STUDY2_HOURZ TOTAL HOURS ENROLLED IN BY THE FACULTY OUTSIDE
OFFICIAL TIME OR BEYOND NORMAL FACULTY LOAD.
EXAMPLE:
If 10 faculty members teach full loads but they each enroll in 3-unit graduate
subjects, then that means 30 hours to be included as part of STUDY2_
HOURZ.
B489 RES_HOURZ TOTAL HOURS DEVOTED BY FACULTY TO OFFICIALLY-
CREDITED RESEARCH
B490 EXTN_HOURZ TOTAL HOURS DEVOTED BY THE FACULTY TO OFFICIALLY-
CREDITED EXTENSION SERVICES
Full or partial study leave with pay should be counted as part of STUDY1_
HOURZ.
Note that STUDY2_HOURZ is not part of the sum because it is beyond the
normal load. No compensation is given for it either.
REMARKS:
• For an individual faculty member, TOT_HOURZ must be
approximately 40 hours -- plus or minus 5 hours perhaps.
• If TOT_HOURZ = 60 , it would imply the faculty member is
rendering 60-hour weeks or 12-hour weekdays throughout the 17
weeks of a semester.
• If TOT_HOURZ =30, it would imply the faculty member is rendering
about 6 hours of official work per weekday over the 17 weeks of a
semester.
The best use of the HOURZ data elements is in determining the percentage distribution of REPORTED FACULTY
HOURS. Indeed, the relative values of HOURZ are more useful than their nominal values -- especially
if faculty members report more than 40 hours per week. The data elements below are lifted from Chapter
11 DATA ON A FACULTY MEMBER but in this chapter, they are supposed to apply to the institution. If there are
500 faculty members in the HEI, this is the compilation of the HOURZ reported by the 500 persons.
EXAMPLE:
If ELEM_HOURZ= 1,000 and TOT_HOURZ= 10,000, then ELEM_
%HOURZ= 10 % = 1000/ 10,000. That is, 10% of the time of faculty
members in the group is devoted to elementary level teaching.
B494 SECONDY_%HOURZ SECONDY_%HOURZ = 100*SECONDY_HOURZ/ TOT_HOURZ.
EXAMPLE:
• If STUDY1_HOURZ = 500 hours and TOT_HOURZ= 10,000, then
STUDY1_%HOURZ = 5.0%. That is, 5% of total faculty time in the
group is devoted to studying on official time. This means that 5%
of faculty salaries in the group represents an investment in faculty
development.
• If STUDY1_%HOURZ = 0, it means that the HEI is not reducing
anybody’s teaching load so that faculty members could pursue
advanced degrees. Or it could mean all the faculty members are
PhD holders already?
EXAMPLE:
If the faculty members report RES_HOURZ= 800 and TOT_HOURZ =
10,000, then RES_HOURZ=8% ( = 800/ 10,000). That is, the faculty
members directly devote 8% of the typical work week to research. In a cost
analysis study, 8% of the faculty salaries in the group should be attributed
directly to RESEARCH. See also HOURZRES% below.
B504 EXTN_%HOURZ EXTN_%HOURZ = 100* EXTN_HOURZ/ TOT_HOURZ.
EXAMPLE:
If TOT_HOURZ = 2,000 and LEAVE_HOURZ = 150, then LEAVE_%HOURS
= 7.5% =150/2000. This means 7.5% of TOT_HOURZ is devoted to official
leaves with pay.
Observe that study leaves with pay are part of STUDY1_HOURZ. Research
leaves with pay are part of RES_HOURZ.
EXAMPLE:
Consider the example below where the faculty members in a hypothetical HEI reported a total of 25,190 hours
per week as distributed to official duties. The percentage distribution to the faculty duties are also shown.
% DISTRIBUTION
FACULTY DUTIES HOURZ DATA ELEMENT
1 HOURS TEACHING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2,100 8.3% ELEM_%HOURZ
REMARKS:
1. If there are 620 faculty members in the group but only 600 of them were in the service on the census
day, the average no. of hours per faculty is 42.0 ( = 25,190/600) hours per week. This means the faculty
members in the group are working overtime! Or at least they claim rendering more than 40 hours per
week.
2. A total of 2,200 hours were reported for administrative duties and that represents 8.7% (=2,200/25,190)
of total faculty time. At 40 hours per week, the 2200 hours for research means the equivalent of 55
(=2200/40) full-time faculty members were doing nothing but administration.
3. A total of 990 hours were reported for research. This implies that 3.9% (=2200/25190) of total faculty
time is devoted to research. At 40 hours per week, the 990 hours are equivalent to 24.8 (= 990/40)
faculty members doing nothing but full-time research the entire semester. That represents a substantial
investment on research. Unfortunately, if 500 persons participated in claiming the 990 hours, that means
less than 2 hours per week per person. It is not reasonable to expect any research output in such a
case!
In a higher education institution, every activity is eventually attributed to just the 3 primary functions: TEACHING
(or INSTRUCTION), RESEARCH and EXTENSION SERVICE -- or T,R,E for short. The table above shows
that:
• Out of TOT_HOURZ = 25,190 hours, a total of 22, 260 hours were spent directly in teaching. This is the
sum 22,260 = 2,100 + 1,400 +400 + 12,750 + 1,700 +2,200 + 500.
• The remaining 2,930 hours were spent in official duties but, in a university, everything has to be
attributed eventually to only T,R,E. This can be done by pro-rating.
The appropriate data elements are defined below:
The sum of all the three should be 100% because ALL of faculty time in the HEI has been attributed to
only the 3 main functions.
EXAMPLE (continued)
REMARKS:
1. The pro-rating reveals that HOURZ_TEACH% = 94.5% ( = 21,050/ 22,260). Recall that TEACH_
%HOURZ = 83.6% (= 21,050/ 25,190) was the % of hours devoted DIRECTLY to teaching. In contrast,
94.5% is the fraction of total faculty hours which can be attributed directly and/or indirectly to the
teaching function.
2. If the total faculy salaries is P100M, this would imply that P 94.5M of it was spent directly or indirectly
for teaching.
3. Only HOURZ_RES%= 4.4 % (= 990/22.280) can be attributed directly or indirectly to research. This
suffers in comparison to teaching but if total HEI expenditures was P 100M, it still means that the HEI
devoted directly or indirectly P 4.4 M to research. That is not an insignificant sum and the HEI will do
well to find out what research output came out of that sum.
4. Extension service turns out to be a poor cousin to teaching and research because only HOURZ_
EXTN%= 1.1% ( = 240/22,280) was devoted directly or indirectly to extension service.
5. Observe that HOURZ_TEACH% + HOURZ_RES% + HOURZ_EXTN% should equal 100%.
EVENTUALLY, all of the faculty time in the HEI must be attributed to only the 3 main functions.
The standard unit of measure of faculty workload is “units”, “teaching units”, “credit units” or “load credits”. If the
normal load of the faculty is 18 units per semester, the units could be apportioned among the following duties:
1. TEACHING AT THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL
2. TEACHING AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL
3. TEACHING AT THE PRE-BACCALAUREATE AND TECH/VOC LEVELS
4. TEACHING IN UNDERGRAD AND POST-BACC LECTURE CLASSES
5. TEACHING IN UNDERGRAD AND POST-BACC LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE
CLASSES
6. TEACHING IN GRADUATE LECTURE CLASSES
7. TEACHING IN GRADUATE LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE CLASSES
8. ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES INSIDE THE HOME COLLEGE
9. ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES INSIDE THE HEI OUTSIDE THE HOME COLLEGE
10. RESEARCH
11. EXTENSION SERVICE
12. STUDY ON OFFICIAL TIME OR STUDY AS PART OF NORMAL LOAD
13. STUDY BEYOND THE NORMAL LOAD
14. OFFICIAL LEAVE (e.g. SABBATICAL, SICK LEAVE, VACATION, etc.)
15. OTHER OFFICIAL DUTIES.
If there are 500 full-time faculty members in the HEI and their normal load is 18 units per semester, the potential
total is of course 9,000 units per semester. The subsequent question is: Out of the potential total 9,000 units,
how many units were spent in teaching? In research? In administration? The 9,000 units must be
accounted for. In other words, where did all the units go? The answer is important to the HEI administrators.
In analyzing the higher education sector, CHED will also need the answer.
For instance, a faculty member teaching a 3-unit graduate subject could actually be credited with 4.5 units. In
effect, a CREDIT LOAD MULTIPLIER (CLM) of 1.50 has been applied. The teaching load without CLM is only
3.0 units but the teaching load with CLM is 4.5 units.
Teaching load without the CLM and teaching units WITH THE CLM will be tabulated separately.
For the HEI, the separate tally will enable it to compute the cost implications of the CLM.
For CHED, the distinction is important because the credit load multipliers have implications on the “effective
normal load” of the faculty. Consider for instance the usual 1.50 multiplier used for graduate classes.
Without the CLM, an 18-unit normal load means six 3-unit subjects. With the CLM, the 18-normal load
can be met with a teaching load of just four 3-unit graduate classes. The nominal normal load is still 18
units but with the CLM, the “effective normal load” is only 12 units ( = 18/1.50).
The credit load multipliers effectively reduce the normal load -- and therefore free up more time for
research or extension (although the CLM do free up some time for administration too!).
IMPORTANT
The data elements UGLECT1_UNITSXX, UGLAB1_UNITSXX, GRADLECT1_UNITSXX, GRADLAB1_
UNITSXX are pulled out from the individual faculty workload reports. If there are 200 faculty
members, these data elements are each the sum of 200 numbers.
In contrast, the data elements UGLECT_UNITSZZ, UGLAB_UNITSZZ, GRADLECT_UNITSZZ,
GRADLAB_UNITZZ are pulled out from the individual study loads of the students. If there are 5,000
students, these data elements are tallied from the study loads of 5,000 students.
REMARKS:
At the undergraduate level, 1 “unit” means 3 lecture hours per week
over the 17-week semester. Units may be counted differently at the
elementary and secondary level.
EXAMPLE:
If 100 faculty members each handle four 3-unit undergrad lecture classes
and 200 faculty members each five 3-unit undergrad lecture subjects,
UGLECT1_UNITSXX = 100*12 +200*15 = 1,200 +3,000 = 4,200 units
without CLM. No credit load multipliers were applied.
EXAMPLE:
If 20 faculty members each handle two 3-unit graduate lecture classes
and 10 faculty members each three 3-unit graduate lecture subjects,
GRADLECT1_UNITSXX = 20*6 + 10*9 = 120 +90 = 210 units without
CLM. No credit load multipliers are applied.
B514 UGLAB1_UNITSXX TOTAL UNITS (WITHOUT CLM) IN TEACHING UNDERGRAD AND
POST-BACC LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE SUBJECTS.
EXAMPLE:
For undergraduate subjects, multipliers may apply when the class size is
too big ( say more than 60) or it the subject is a General Education subject.
U.P. uses a multiplier for the GE subjects to encourage the senior faculty to
teach GE subjects. Note that multipliers are those used to allow a faculty
member to meet his normal load more easily – not necessarily to increase the
compensation!
B520 GRADLECT2_UNITSXX TOTAL UNITS (WITH CLM) IN TEACHING GRADUATE LECTURE
SUBJECTS.
EXAMPLE:
If 20 faculty members each handle two 3-unit graduate lecture classes
and 10 faculty members each three 3-unit graduate lecture subjects,
and if the usual multiplier 1.50 is used, then GRADLECT2_UNITSXX =
20*6*1.5 + 10*9*1.5 = 180 + 135 = 325 units with CLM.
B521 UGLAB2_UNITSXX TOTAL UNITS (WITH CLM) IN TEACHING UNDERGRADA LAB AND
OTHER NON-LECTURE SUBJECTS.
In an HEI, if there is a dispute on crediting teaching load, the VPAA will be the
final authority.
B522 GRADLAB2_UNITSXX TOTAL UNITS (WITH CLM) IN TEACHING GRADUATE LAB AND
OTHER NON-LECTURE SUBJECTS.
Do not include units for “committee work”, etc. if there are no official load
reductions for such work.
B526 ADMIN2_UNITSXX TOTAL UNITS RENDERED IN OFFICIAL ADMIN DUTIES INSIDE THE
HEI BUT OUTSIDE HOME COLLEGE
Do not include units for “committee work”, etc. if there are no official load
reductions for such work.
B527 STUDY1_UNITSXX TOTAL UNITS CREDITED TO THE FACULTY FOR STUDYING ON
OFFICIAL TIME
Study must lead toward an advanced degree in the discipline where faculty
member is teaching. If the faculty member is teaching Chemistry, do not
include time off in pursuit of an MBA , PhD Education (Chemistry), etc.
REMARKS: Include only official load reductions for research. If the normal load
is 18 units per semester and the faculty is given 18 credit units for research,
the faculty member will not have to teach anything. If the faculty is given 6
units for research, then the faculty can get away with only 12 units of teaching.
It is not critical whether the research is funded or not: the crucial element is
that the faculty member is being given some time off for teaching so he can do
research.
For the HEI as a whole, what is the overall effect of credit load multipliers? What is the implication for the
faculty members? What is the cost implication for the HEI?
FORMULA:
CLM1_%EFFECT = (TEACH2_UNITSXX/ TEACH1_UNITSXX) -1
EXAMPLE:
• Suppose TEACH1_UNITSXX = 4,000 ( units in all teaching
without the credit load multipliers).
• Suppose further that TEACH2_UNITSXX = 4,500 (units WITH
the credit load multipliers).
• Then CLM_%EFFECT = 4500/4000 -1 = 12.5%. This means
the cumulative effect of load multipliers on teaching units is an
additional 12.5%.
• From the point of view of the HEI this could mean additional
12.5% cost because of the credit load multipliers. If total faculty
salaries is P 100M, this could mean an additional P12.5M cost.
• From the point of view of the faculty, the 12.5% effect of the
multipliers means that the normal load has been effectively
reduced to 16.0 units ( =18/1.125). This could mean extra time
for research or extension services.
• The 12.5% value applies to a specific semester because the
mix of subjects might be different in other semesters.
The data elements immediately below are parallel to UGLECT_%HOURZ, UGLAB_%HOURZ, RES_%HOURZ,
etc. except that the HOURZ elements were computed based on total hours reported. In contrast, the data
elements immediately below are computed based on total units reported.
EXAMPLE:
If UGLECT2_UNITSXX= 5,500 and TOT2_UNITSXX = 10, 960 then
UGLECT2_%UNITSXX = 50.2% (=5500/10960). This means that 50.2% of
total faculty load reported is devoted directly to teaching undergrad lecture
subjects.
This data element does not yet reflect the indirect costs of teaching.
See TEACHING%.
B543 TEACH2_%UNITSXX AS A % OF TOT2_UNITSXX, TOTAL UNITS (WITH THE LOAD
MULTIPLIERS) DEVOTED DIRECTLY TO TEACHING AT ALL
LEVELS.
This data element does not yet reflect the indirect costs of teaching.
See TEACHING%. See also CLM_%EFFECT.
EXAMPLE:
If STUDY1_UNITSXX= 330 and TOT2_UNITSXX = 10, 960 then
STUDY1_%UNITSXX = 3.0 % (= 330/10960). This means that 3.0
% of total reported faculty load is devoted to studying on official time.
This represents an investment in faculty development. If total faculty
compensation is P100M, it means P 3.0M has been invested in faculty
development.
B547 STUDY2_%UNITSXX AS A % OF TOT2_UNITSXX, TOTAL UNITS ENROLLED IN BY THE
FACULTY OUTSIDE OFFICIAL TIME.
EXAMPLE:
Recall that STUDY2_UNITSXX is NOT part of the 10,960. These are the units
of studying done by faculty members after they teach their normal teaching
loads. This is studying beyond the full teaching loads.
EXAMPLE:
If RES_UNITSXX= 750 and TOT2_UNITSXX = 10, 960 then RES_%UNITSXX
= 6.8 % (= 750/10960). This means that 6.8% of total faculty load is devoted
directly to the RESEARCH function of the university. This does not yet reflect
the indirect costs of research. See RESEARCH%.
B549 EXTN_%UNITSXX AS A % OF TOT2_UNITSXX, TOTAL UNITS CREDITED TO THE
FACULTY FOR DOING EXTENSION WORK
EXAMPLE:
If EXTN_UNITSXX= 210 and TOT2_UNITSXX = 10, 960 then EXTN_
%UNITSXX = 1.9 % (= 210/10960). This means that 1.9% of total faculty load
is devoted directly to the EXTENSION OR PUBLIC SERVICE function of the
university. This does not include the indirect costs of extension services. See
EXTNSERV%.
B550 LEAVE_%UNITSXX AS A % OF TOT2_UNITSXX, TOTAL UNITS CREDITED TO THE
FACULTY FOR OFFICIAL LEAVES (e.g. SICK LEAVE, MATERNITY, etc.)
B551 TOT1_%UNITSXX AS A % OF TOT2_UNITSXX , THE TOTAL UNITS (WITHOUT
CREDIT LOAD MULTIPLIERS) RENDERED BY THE FACULTY IN
ALL OFFICIAL DUTIES COMBINED.
EXAMPLE:
If TOT1_UNITSXX = 10,000 UNITS ( without the miltipliers) and TOT2_
UNITSXX = 10, 960 with the multipliers, this means that the credit load
multipliers imply a then RES_%UNITSXX = 6.8 % (= 750/10960). This means
that 6.8% of total faculty load is devoted directly to the RESEARCH function of
the university.
B552 TOT2_%UNITSXX This is of course 100% because the denominators in all of the above is
TOT2_UNITSXX.
If TOT_UNITSXX = 9,000 units and the normal load is 18 units per semester, the total load is equivalent to 500
( = 9000/18) FTE faculty. How many FTE faculty were in teaching? In administration? In research?
B558 UGLAB2_XXFTEFAC TOTAL FTE FACULTY IN TEACHING UNDERGRAD LAB AND OTHER NON-
LECTURE SUBJECTS.
B559 GRADLAB2_XXFTEFAC TOTAL FTE FACULTY IN TEACHING GRADUATE LAB AND OTHER NON-
LECTURE SUBJECTS.
B560 TEACH_XXFTEFAC TOTAL FTE FACULTY DEVOTED TO TEACHING AT ALL LEVELS
COMBINED
This average load per faculty (whether teaching load or total load per faculty) is a fraction with a numerator and
a denominator.
THE NUMERATOR
The numerator will be the UNITSXX data elements. Assuming the tallies are correct, LECT1_UNITSXX must
be equal to the total units of all classes and sections offered in that semester. If 1,000 3-unit lecture classes and
200 5-unit lecture classes were taught by Group A ( FULL-TIME TENURED OR ON TENURE TRACK), then
LECT1_UNITSXX should be equal to 3*1000 +5*200 = 3,000 + 1,000 = 4,000 units.
THE DENOMINATOR
1. If the group under discussion is GROUP A: FULL-TIME TENURED FACULTY OR ON TENURE TRACK,
then the denominator will be the no. of faculty members in this group. To be more precise, it is the no.
of them who are in the HEI payroll as of July 1, the national census day for CHED. If they were not on
the payroll at that time, they cannot be part of the average. If the faculty member was on the payroll but
did not actually teach, he should be part of the denominator anyway. The numerator should of course
be TOT_UNITSXX and the other UNITSXX elements for this group only. Since all of them are full-time,
the same NORMALLOAD applies.
2. If the group under discussion is GROUP B: TENURED HALF-TIME FACULTY, then the denominator will
be all of them who were in the payroll on the national census day. The numerator will be TOT_UNITSXX
and other UNITSXX data elements for this group only. The NORMALLOAD will be only half the usual,
say 9 units.
3. If the group is GROUP C: FULL-TIME FACULTY BUT NOT ON TENURE TRACK, the denominator will
be all of them on the payroll on the national census day. The numerator will be the UNITSXX series for
this group only. The NORMALLOAD will be the usual 18 units or whatever it is for the HEI.
4. If the group is GROUP D: TEACHING FELLOWS, ASSOCIATES AND ASSISTANTS, then the
denominator will be all of them on the payroll. The numerator will be the UNITSXX series for this group
only. The NORMALLOAD will be whatever is set for them by the HEI. Typically this is 6 units per
semester.
5. For the last group, GROUP E: ALL OTHER PART-TIME FACULTY ( LECTURERS, ETC), the denominator
will be all of them who were in the service during that semester. Those who had no teaching load in that
semester should not be in the denominator. The numerator will be UNITSXX for their group only. Most
likely this will only mean LECT1_UNITSXX, LECT2_UNITSXX, LAB1_UNITSXX and LAB2_UNITSXX.
All others would be zero. There is no prescribed normal load and this is precisely why they are grouped
together.
What is the average no. of units per faculty member? Units per faculty for teaching lecture subjects. Units per
faculty for teaching lab or non-lecture subjects. Units per faculty for administrative duties, etc. In general, are
the faculty members overloaded, underloaded or just right?
Let FACNUM be the no. of faculty members in the group who are in the service of the HEIl on July 1, the
census day. Exclude those on AWOL or official leave without pay . Include those on leave with pay.
FORMULA:
UGLECT2_AVGUNITSXX = UGLECT2_UNITSXX/ FACNUM.
B574 GRADLECT2_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS (WITH CLM) PER FACULTY IN
TEACHING GRADUATE LECTURE SUBJECTS.
B575 UGLAB2_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS (WITH CLM) PER FACULTY IN
TEACHING UNDERGRAD AND POST-BACC LAB AND OTHER
NON-LECTURE SUBJECTS.
B576 GRADLAB2_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS (WITH CLM) PER FACULTY IN
TEACHING GRADUATE LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE
SUBJECTS.
B577 TEACH_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS (WITH CLM) PER FACULTY FOR
TEACHING AT ALL LEVELS COMBINED
REMARKS:
This is only the average teaching load per faculty and excludes the
non-teaching duties such as administration, study, research, etc.
This is not yet the total load per faculty.
If the normal load is 18 units, it would be ideal for TEACH_
AVGUNITSXX to hover around 15.0 so that 3 units ( or 16.7% of
18 units) can be devoted to non-teaching duties. If the average
teaching load alone is already 18 units, there will be no time for the
non-teaching duties, notably research.
B578 ADMIN1_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS PER FACULTY IN OFFICIAL ADMIN
DUTIES INSIDE THE HOME COLLEGE
B579 ADMIN2_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS PER FACULTY IN OFFICIAL ADMIN
DUTIES INSIDE THE HEI BUT OUTSIDE HOME COLLEGE
B580 STUDY1_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS PER FACULTY STUDYING ON
OFFICIAL TIME
B581 STUDY2_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS PER FACULTY DEVOTED TO
STUDYING BEYOND FULL TEACHING LOADS.
B582 RES_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS PER FACULTY FOR RESEARCH.
FORMULA:
RES_AVGUNITSXX = RES_UNITSXX/ FACNUM.
Recall that FACNUM is the total no. of faculty members IN THE GROUP
being discussed. These must be faculty members currently in the service of
the HEI.
B583 EXTN_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS PER FACULTY FOR EXTENSION
SERVICE.
B584 LEAVE_AVGUNITSXX AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS PER FACULTY IN OFFICIAL LEAVES
WITH PAY.
B585 TOT1_AVGUNITSXX WITHOUT CREDIT LOAD MULTIPLIERS (CLM), THE AVERAGE
NO. OF UNITS PER FACULTY IN ALL OFFICIAL DUTIES
COMBINED.
FORMULA:
TOT2_AVGUNITSXX = TOT2_UNITSXX/ FACNUM.
Recall that FACNUM is the total no. of faculty members IN THE GROUP
being discussed. These must be faculty members currently in the service
of the HEI. Exclude those on AWOL or official leave without pay . Include
those on leave with pay.
REMARKS:
• If TOT2_AVGUNITSXX < 18.0 units., the faculty as a whole
are underloaded.
• If TOT2_AVGUNITSXX > 18.0 units., the faculty as a whole
are overloaded.
• If TOT2_AVGUNITSXX = 17.0 units, it means that 5.55 %
(=1/18) of total faculty units cannot be accounted for. If
total faculty payroll is P 100M, this means P 5.55M cannot
be accounted for!
• If TOT2_AVGUNITSXX = 16.0 units, it means that 11.1% (
=2/18) of total faculty units cannot be accounted for. If total
faculty payroll is P100M, this means that P 11.1M cannot be
accounted for!
• If the financial survival of the HEI is in the balance, there is
need for some investigation. This should merit a close look
by the HEI officials – even if one likely explanation is that
many faculty members are not filling up or submitting their
Faculty Workload Reports.
• If TOT2_AVGUNITSXX =19.0 units, it means that faculty
members as a whole render 5.55% “overtime”. This could
mean additional costs for the HEI.
Suppose 600 faculty members in the group of all full-time faculty members add up their total unit credits (WITH
CLM) reported in their Faculty Workload Reports (FWR). Suppose further that all 600 faculty members are
currently in the service of the HEI. The task of compiling the total workloads of 600 faculty members can be
done using an electronic spreadsheet on a personal computer. Imagine a giant matrix with 600 rows and about
20 columns! The dummy table bellow shows what the total workloads of 600 full-time faculty members could
be:
AVERAGE PER
FACULTY DUTIES DATA ELEMENT UNITSXX %UNITSXX XXFTEF FACULTY
1 UNITS (WITH CLM) ELEM_UNITSXX 700 6.4% 38.9 1.17
TEACHING IN
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
2 UNITS (WITH CLM) SECONDY_UNITSXX 500 4.6% 27.8 0.83
TEACHING IN
SECONDARY SCHOOL
3 UNITS (WITH CLM) TECHVOC_UNITSXX 120 1.1% 6.7 0.20
TEACHING IN TECH/ VOC
CLASSES
SOME REMARKS:
1. The 700 units in elementary school teaching means that ELEM_FTEFAC = 38.9 FTE faculty ( = 700/18)
are devoted to teaching at the elementary level. This represents 6.4% ( = 700/ 10960) of total faculty
units. If the total HEI faculty payroll is P 100 M, this implies that P 6.4M is devoted directly to the
elementary school. This does not yet include the indirect costs.
2. The 120 units in Tech/Voc teaching means that TV_XXFTEFAC = 6.7 FTE faculty ( = 120/18) are
devoted to teaching tech/voc classes. This of course is not the actual headcount of faculty members
teaching at this level.
3. The 850 units devoted to administrative duties implies that ADMIN_XXTEFAC= 47.2 FTE faculty
( = 850/18) are in administration. This is equivalent to releasing 47.2 faculty members to full-time
administrative duties. This represents 7.8% ( = 850/10960) of total faculty time is devoted to administration.
If the total faculty payroll is P 100M, it means that P 7.8M has been spent in administration. This is in
addition to all the non-teaching staff who are also in full-time administration.
4. The 750 units in research means RES_XXFTEFAC = 41.7 FTE faculty ( = 850/18). It is as if 41.7 faculty
members were assigned to full-time research. It might be prudent for the VPAA or the President to
inquire what research output came from 41.7 FTE faculty. This represents 6.8% of total faculty time.
If the faculty payroll is P100M, this means P 6.8M has been committed to research. This is not an
insignificant amount and it does not even include any MOOE components!
5. The total 10,960 units when spread over the 600 faculty members in the group and currently in the
service of the HEI means TOT2_XXFTEFAC = 608.9 FTE faculty.
6. The 600 faculty members in the service rendered services equivalent to 608.9 FTE faculty! This
means full utilization of faculty resources.
7. TOT2_AVGUNITSXX = 18.27 per faculty member in the group. If we combine teaching load,
administrative load, study load, research load, etc. the average per faculty member in the group is
18.27 units per faculty. Since this exceeds the normal 18 units, it means the faculty as a whole are
overloaded. The 0.27 may look negligible to one faculty member but to the HEI it represents 1.5% ( =
0.27/18) “overtime” for all faculty members. If the total faculty salaries is P 100M, the 1.5% “overtime”
could mean an additional P1.5M for overload honoraria. An HEI (whether private or public-funded )
has to monitor such overloads. This important job usually belongs to the VPAA.
8. What if TOT2_AVGUNITSXX < 18.0? See remarks in the definition above.
9. The table above can be compiled within the HEI only if faculty members religiously fill up and submit
their Faculty Workload Reports. Using only an electronic spreadsheet and a generic computer, an HEI
can easily compile such a table. All it needs is political will. There is more pressure to do it in a private
HEI because every overload or underload means thousands or millions of pesos. Actually, even the
SUCs should be compiling such tables.
All the data elements on faculty workload could be used on them. However, for the part-time faculty, STUDY1_
UNITSXX, STUDY2_UNITSXX, ADMIN1_UNITSXX, ADMIN2_UNITSXX, RES_UNITSXX, EXTN_UNITSXX,
and LEAVE_UNITSXX are all probably zeroes.
WHAT IF ALL THE FACULTY UNITS HAVE TO BE ATTRIBUTED TO ONLY THE 3 PRIMARY
FUNCTIONS?
In a higher education institution, every activity is eventually attributed to just the 3 primary functions:
TEACHING (or INSTRUCTION), RESEARCH and EXTENSION SERVICE -- or T,R,E for short.
B587 TEACHING% OUT OF TOTAL UNITS OF FACULTY LOAD, THE % WHICH CAN
BE ATTRIBUTED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TO THE TEACHING
FUNCTION.
This percentage reflects both the direct costs and indirect costs of
teaching.
B588 RESEARCH% OUT OF TOTAL UNITS OF FACULTY LOAD, THE % WHICH CAN
BE ATTRIBUTED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TO THE RESEARCH
FUNCTION.
These 3 data elements are parallel to the elements HOURZ_TEACH%, HOURZ_RES%, and HOURZ_
EXTN%.
• The difference is that the HOURZ series are computed based on the reported hours per week.
• The UNITSXX% series are based on reported units.
THE 3 PRIMARY
FUNCTIONS OF A
UNITSXX DATA ELEMENT
UNIVERSITY
REMARKS:
2. In addition, some of the administration units, study units, and official leaves can also be attributed
indirectly to teaching.
If this is done, we see that TEACHING% = 89.7% ( 8320/ 9280) of total faculty time goes directly or
indirectly to the TEACHING or INSTRUCTION FUNCTION of the university.
If the total faculty payroll is P 100M, it means that P 75.9M goes directly to teaching but an additional P
13.8M ( = 89.7 – 75.9) can be attributed indirectly to INSTRUCTION or TEACHING. These sums
do not yet include MOOE costs or the cost of the non-teaching staff.
3. RES_%UNITSXX = 6.8% (=750/10,980) of total faculty units goes directly to research. However, some
of the units in administration, study 2 and official leaves can be attributed indirectly to research.
If this is done, the table reveals that RESEARCH% = 8.1% ( = 750/9280) reflects the faculty units
devoted to research whether directly or indirectly.
If the total faculty payroll is P100M, it means that P 6.8M can be attributed directly to research.
However, an additional P1.3M ( = 8.1 -6.8) can be attributed indirectly to research. These
are not insignificant amounts. It would do the VPAA well to determine what research outputs
came out of the P 8.1M investment in research. (This does not even include costs for the non-
teaching personnel or the MOOE costs).
4. Finally, the table shows that EXTNSERV% = 2.3% ( = 210/9280) of total faculty units goes directly or
indirectly to the EXTENSION or PUBLIC SERVICE function of the university.
5. Observe that TEACHING% + RESEARCH% + EXTNSERV% = 100%. Eventually all costs will have to
be attributed to just the 3 primary functions.
Suppose the group of faculty under discussion is the set of full-time and half-time faculty members. Suppose
further that there are 500 full-time faculty members and 100 half-time faculty members and suppose all 600
of them are currently in the service of the HEI. Earlier, we used faculty headcount as the divisor to obtain
AVERAGE WORKLOAD PER FACULTY.
This time consider the TOTAL POTENTIAL UNITS of the group. If the normal faculty load is 18 units for the
fulltime and 9 units for the half-time, the 600 full-time and 100 half-time faculty members together account for
a total potential of 600*18 + 100*9 = 10,800 + 900 = 11,700 units. What happened to all these units? Can the
HEI account for all these units? How much of total potential was spent for teaching only? For research?
These are all very important questions and it is the job of the VPAA to do it every semester!
EXAMPLE:
Suppose normal full-time load is 18 units per sem. If there are 600 full-time
faculty members and 100 half-time faculty members, then total potential
load is POT_UNITXX = 600*18 +100*9 = 10,800 + 900 = 11,700 units. In
other words, the HEI expects a total of 11,700 units of faculty service from
the 700 faculty members.
Count only the faculty members who are currently in the service of the HEI.
The part-time faculty members have no fixed minimum load and are not
counted as part of the potential.
CODING Numeric data, no coding necessary.
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE:
Imagine 600 full-time faculty members and 100 half-time faculty members. If the HEI normal full-time load is
18 units per sem, the 700 faculty members in the group have a total potential In contrast, the total potential is
POT_UNITXX = 11,700 units ( = 600*18 + 100*9 = 10,800 + 900). What happened to all these units?
HOW MANY THESES WERE COMPLETED IN THE HEI DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS?
What is the “thesis output” from the HEI over the past 12 months? How many thesis or dissertations where
completed? “Completed” means all the requirements have been full-filled. The final arbiter on the matter is the
VPAA of the HEI.
REMARKS:
If it is July 1, 2004, the number of MASTERS students who
completed their theses between July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004 It
does not matter when they started.
B611 PHD_DISSERT NO. OF PHD STUDENTS WHO COMPLETED THEIR
DISSERTATION IN THE PAST SCHOOLYEAR.
REMARKS:
If it is July 1, 2004, the number of PhD students who completed
their dissertation between July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004 It does
not matter when they started.
Count only those whose “thesis writing periods” have not expired. If the thesis writing period is 2 years (as for a
masters), a student could be counted once in one year and then once again in the next year. If the thesis writing
period is 3 years (as for a PhD), a student will be counted once each year for 3 years unless he finishes before
that. See UG_LAPSES, MS_LAPSED, PHD_LAPSED.
HOW MANY STUDENTS HAVE TAKEN “TOO LONG” TO FINISH THEIR THESES?
How much time is a masters thesis student allowed to finish his thesis? In the RCDEM, the “masters thesis
writing period” will be 2 years and the “PhD dissertation thesis writing period” will be 3 years. The counting
will start from the date when the topic is officially approved. Beyond this time, the thesis or dissertation writing
period is supposed to have “lapsed”. This is only for the purposes of the REVISED CHED DATA ELEMENT
MANUAL and the actual rules within the HEI may be different. A lapsed thesis will be counted at most once.
After it has been counted, it will never be counted again.
A lapsed thesis will be counted only once, i.e. during the year when
the “normal thesis writing period” lapsed.
B617 PHD_LAPSED NO. OF PHD DISSERTATION STUDENTS WHOSE
“DISSERTATION WRITING PERIODS” LAPSED IN THE PAST 12
MONTHS.
A lapsed thesis will be counted only once, i.e. during the year when
the “normal thesis writing period” lapsed.
How many PS ITEMS are in the official plantilla of the SUC? In government agencies, no employee can be
considered permanent unless there is an available item. Thus, the number of PS ITEMS is an indicator of how
many permanent employees an SUC is allowed to have. PS ITEMS are very difficult to obtain because each
PS item entails a “lifetime funding commitment” by the National Government.
Starting 2004, the SUCs have been given the flexibility to merge or modify some PS items so they could create
more faculty positions. In modifying PS items, there are two important provisos:
1. The SUC must work within the original PS total. In other words, if the SUC has 400 PS items with total
authorized salaries of P 400M, it can modify, merge or split the items but the total value cannot exceed
the original P 400M.
2. Salaries and position titles will follow the SSL.
This flexibility means the plantilla of an SUC will be in constant metamorphosis. The proposed census date for
the SUC plantilla is July 1. This should enable the SUC to reflect the modifications that it needs to prepare for a
new school year. The series below keeps track of how many PS ITEMS are in the DBM-approved plantilla.
Do not confuse with employee headcounts.
EMPLOYEE HEADCOUNTS
This series of elements capture employee headcounts ( as of July 1, the same census day for faculty
headcounts).
Count only the employees who are receiving their salaries on that date.
Exclude those who are on leave without pay or AWOL on that date.
However, include those on official leave with pay: they are considered to be in the service because they
are being paid.
Do not confuse with the count of PS ITEMS in the plantilla.
An HEI employee is one who has an employment relationship with the HEI. In this context, the blue guards
hired by the institution from a private security agency or janitors from a private janitorial services agency are not
employees of the HEI: they are employees of the service agencies.
Each HEI has the usual 3 functions: teaching (or instruction), research and extension. In the Philippines, the
most-funded function is of course teaching. However, many SUCs receive substantial resources from the GAA
intended for research, i.e. the creation of new knowledge. The following series of data elements are measures
of outputs from the research activities of an SUC or a unit of the SUC. However, they actually apply to any
HEI.
The inclusive period: June 30 of past year until July 1 of current year.
Many HEIs offer formal tech/voc programs in addition to the usual undergraduate and graduate degree programs.
These are the programs which take at least 1 semester and indeed usually at least one year. At the end of the
program, there is a formal assessment, either an exam or proficiency demonstration. These are the programs
counted as part of “TV_PROGS”. All data about the formal tech/voc programs are reported under the tech/voc
program level.
In addition to the formal tech/voc programs or instead of them, many HEIs offer “non-formal” or short-term
training programs, e.g. a 2-month training program on “Entrepreneurship”, “Computer-aided Manufacturing
Techniques”, etc. These training programs are offered as part of the EXTENSION SERVICES function of an
institution of higher learning. A non-formal training program is usually short and there is no formal assessment
(i.e. no examination, no grades) at the end of the training. What pieces of data does CHED need about the non-
formal training programs in an HEI?
Since training is within the purview of TESDA, an HEI will have to report data on both its formal tech/voc
programs and non-formal training programs to TESDA. But since every HEI is also within the purview of CHED,
the HEI should also report the same data to CHED. The data elements below apply to the non-formal training
programs of the institution. Since these are short-term programs, the inclusive dates must be specified: June
1 of the previous year to May 30 of the current year.
REMARKS:
More data elements which apply to an institution may be found in the Chapter 4 DATA ON A COST CENTER.
5/6/04 10:06 AM
CHAPTER 4
DATA ON A COST CENTER IN AN SUC
DATA ENTITY: The data entity to be described is a “cost center” in a public-funded higher education
institution such as a national-funded or a local-government funded HEI. Although many elements apply to
public and private HEIs, the focus in on the public institutions.
A cost center is a “line item” in the SUC Internal Operating Budget (IOB), an entity against which costs are
charged or attributed by the SUC. It could be a college, a department within a college, a research center, an
office, or just some centralized fund. In fact, the SUC as a whole could be viewed as one cost center.
A typical SUC budget might have the following general format. The columns follow the usual government
classification of type of expenditures: PS is for Personal Services, MOOE is for Maintenance and Other
Operating Expenditures and CO is for Capital Outlays.
10 MAIN LIBRARY
11 BUSINESS AFFAIRS OFFICE
12 LUMP SUM FOR HONORARIA
13 LUMP SUM FOR BUILDING
MAINTENANCE
14 LUMP SUM FOR UTILITIES,
JANITORIAL AND SECURITY
SERVICES
15 LUMP SUM FOR EQUIPMENT
======== ======== ======= ========
TOTAL
The sample budget shown above has 15 cost centers but the first two cost centers, College of Arts and Science
and the College of Education, have 3 sub-centers each.
Most cost centers are organizational units but some are centralized lump sum funds. Cost centers will be
classified into four types:
Many of the data elements on a cost center apply just as well to a higher education institution (HEI): the
no. of students, no. of faculty and non-teaching employees, address, e-mail, total allotments from the GAA,
expenditures against income, etc. This is not surprising since most cost centers are actually colleges or
academic departments – and in a sense mini institutions! Many of the things we want to know about an entire
university apply just as well, albeit in a smaller scale, about a college or department.
There is also commonality between a cost center (if it is a college) and a degree program: no of applicants,
no. of freshmen, no. of scholars, etc. Indeed, in a cost analysis study, it will be important to determine the total
costs which can be attributed (directly or indirectly) to a degree program. From this we would be able to derive
the cost per student in the program.
The data elements defined in this chapter supplement the data elements already defined for an institution.
However, the focus in this chapter are the data elements which have to do with costs and revenues – in other
words, pesos.
NOTE: The common reference point in the definitions is a “cost center”. This could be a college or
department inside an SUC but it could be the entire SUC itself. Since many data elements apply only to cost
centers which are teaching or degree-granting units in the HEI, the cost center is sometimes referred to as a
college. If so, a special instruction is given how to record the data element if the cost center happens to be not
a college.
In the Office of the President, it is of course the SUC President himself. For a
central fund such as the Lump Sum for Honoraria, the person in charge could
be the Vice-President for Academic Affairs. For the Lump Sum for Utilities,
Janitorial and Security services, it could be the VP for Administration. It all
depends on the administrative setup within an SUC.
CODING Text data. 100 characters. Use standard conventions for recording names of
persons.
APPROPRIATIONS
ALLOTMENTS
OBLIGATIONS
C028 OBLIGPS1 PS OBLIGATIONS FROM GAA
C029 OBLIGMOOE1 MOOE OBLIGATIONS FROM GAA
C030 OBLIGCO1 CO OBLIGATIONS FROM GAA
C031 OBLIG1 TOTAL OBLIGATIONS FROM GAA
C032 OBLIGPS2 PS OBLIGATIONS FROM SUC INCOME
C033 OBLIGMOOE2 MOOE OBLIGATIONS FROM SUC INCOME
C034 OBLIGCO2 CO OBLIGATIONS FROM SUC INCOME
C035 OBLIG2 TOTAL OBLIGATIONS FROM SUC INCOME
C036 OBLIGPS3 COMBINED PS OBLIGATIONS
C037 OBLIGMOOE3 COMBINED MOOE OBLIGATIONS
C038 OBLIGCO3 COMBINED CO OBLIGATIONS
C039 OBLIG3 GRAND TOTAL OBLIGATIONS
EXPENDITURES
This is a measure of the efficiency of a cost center and the SUC itself in utilizing allotments. GAA funds which
are left unobligated at the end of the fiscal year have to be reverted back to the National Treasury. Since most
SUCs are short of funds, it is to their interest to fully utilize the allotments it receives. There is no incentive for
savings. The situation is different for SUC-generated income. SUC income is retained within the SUC and an
SUC may choose to accumulate some income, even from one fiscal year to another, before actually spending
it.
The concept of “funded student places” is crucial for an Output Funding or Normative Financing System for
SUCs and other public HEIs. Under this concept, the funding which an SUC will receive does not depend
outright on the no. of students which an SUC already has or want to have. Under an Output Funding System,
the funding will be based on the no. of students the National Government is willing and able to fund.
This concept is very important in cost analysis. Terminology, definitions and coding can be found in Chapter 3
DATA ELEMENTS ON AN INSTITUTION.
To provide a measure of the amount of teaching in the cost center. In a specific semester, the no. of
CLASSES offered by the college or cost center, classified by level, e.g. technical/vocational, baccalaureate
or undergraduate level, masters level, doctoral level. This is the no. of classes or sections, not subjects. If there
are 20 Math 11 classes and 10 English 1 classes, the total no. of classes is 30 but the total no. of subjects is
only two.
Include all lecture, lab, field work and seminar classes. Exclude thesis writing and “independent reading” classes
because these are too difficult to account for. If the cost center is not a teaching unit, the elements below are
automatically set at zero.
If a class caters to 2 or more levels, it will be counted in the lower level. For instance, if Chemistry 288 can be
taken by both masters and doctoral students, it will be classified at the masters level.
“Laboratory” classes are all classes held outside the usual lecture classroom. Include classes held in a lab,
computer room, studio, gymnasium, theater, workshop, clinic, field, etc. Exclude thesis and independent reading
classes. Include PE classes but exclude Military Training.
In a specific semester, the AVERAGE CLASS SIZES offered by the college or cost center, classified by level,
e.g. technical/vocational, baccalaureate or undergraduate level, masters level, doctoral level.
To provide a measure of the cost efficiency of teaching in the cost center. Include all lecture, lab, field work and
seminar classes. Exclude thesis writing and “independent reading” classes. If the cost center is not a teaching
unit, the elements below are automatically set at zero.
In a specific semester: The no. of classes, classified according to size and educational level. To provide
an indication of the cost efficiency of teaching in the cost center. The elements below are defined for the
undergraduate and masters level lecture classes only. However, the given definitions and cutoffs are suggestive
of how to define the parallel series for tech/voc, masters and PhD level classes and for different types of
classes. Exclude thesis writing and “independent reading” classes. If the cost center is not a teaching unit, the
elements below are automatically set at zero.
In all HEIs, there is a group of students who receive some form of “financial aid”. The usual funding source is
an outside donor (e.g. the government itself or some philanthropic foundation) but most HEIs, on their own, also
provide financial aid to some of their students.
• Members of the school varsity teams, school cheering squad, or cultural groups.
• Children of the HEI staff or the HEI employees themselves.
• Students who have been identified to be “poor but academically qualified”. Financial aid for this group
is more often referred to as “grants-in-aid” although the term scholarships is often used anyway.
The total monetary value of the financial aid per student might be small (e.g. full tuition waiver in a low-tuition
SUC where the tuition could be as low as P 200 per semester) or substantial (e.g. full tuition waiver at a high-
tuition university such as Ateneo de Manila or de La Salle University where tuition could be at least P 30,000 per
semester/ trimester). The question is: How many students receive some form of financial aid?
The data elements below are headcounts. There are two options in deciding who will be included:
• No cutoff will be imposed. No differentiation will be made between a student who receives the equivalent
of P 200 per semester or P 10,000 per semester.
• A minimum cutoff could be imposed, say P 2,500 per semester (or P500 per month). Only students who
receive at least the minimum cutoff will be counted. This cutoff is admittedly arbitrary but it is probably
more meaningful than no cutoff at all.
• Still another approach is to categorize the recipients according to the amount of benefits, e.g. 0-
2500, 2501-5000, etc. For additional discussion on the matter, see Chapter 8: DATA ELEMENTS ON
INDIVIDUAL SCHOLAR. In particular, see GENEROSITY1, GENEROSITY2 and GENEROSITY3.
As a fraction or percentage of total enrollment, how many students receive “financial aid”? At the undergraduate
level, if total enrollment is 1,000 and 50 students receive financial aid, then UG-ISKO% = 5.0% (= 50/1000).
This series of data elements measure the peso value of “tuition waivers” or tuition discounts. When
an HEI grants a tuition waiver to any of its students, it forgoes some revenues or income from tuition and
miscellaneous fees. If the average tuition is P5,000 per semester and 100 students are given a 25% tuition
discount, the total forgone tuition equals P 125,000 ( = 0.25*5000*100). If this 25% discount is shouldered by a
donor (say a private foundation or some government scholarship fund in CHED), then the HEI itself suffers no
forgone income. If no outside source funds the 25% discount, then the HEI has, in effect, sacrificed or forgone
P 125,000 in tuition income. The amount of forgone tuition and fees is a measure of the HEI’s commitment to
provide financial aid to some of its students.
It is government policy to encourage HEIs, specially public-funded HEIs, to provide financial aid to
its poor students. For the SUCs, the government will have to provide incentives for them to recover
forgone tuition and fees for poor students. (It is assumed of course that the new socioeconomic eligibility
criterion being developed by CHED will be used to identify the “poor students”). For instance, the government
could reimburse the SUC, at least partially. In any event, this series of data elements records the peso value of
forgone tuition and fees – net of the tuition paid by or reimbursed by scholarship donors.
C126 TVFORGONE TOTAL PESOS TUITION AND MISC FEES FORGONE BY THE HEI
DUE TO TECH/VOC SCHOLARS/ GRANTEES
C127 UGFORGONE TOTAL PESOS TUITION AND MISC FEES FORGONE BY THE HEI
DUE TO BACHELORS LEVEL SCHOLARS/ GRANTEES
C128 MSFORGONE TOTAL PESOS TUITION AND MISC FEES FORGONE BY THE HEI
DUE TO MASTERS LEVEL SCHOLARS/ GRANTEES
C129 PHDFORGONE TOTAL PESOS TUITION AND MISC FEES FORGONE BY THE HEI
DUE TO DOCTORAL LEVEL SCHOLARS/ GRANTEES
C130 GRADFORGONE TOTAL PESOS TUITION AND MISC FEES FORGONE BY THE
HEI DUE TO GRADUATE LEVEL SCHOLARS/ GRANTEES ( =
MSFORGONE+ PHDFORGONE)
This series of data elements record the total value of stipends and allowances paid out by the HEI
or college ( from its own funds, not from a third party donor ) to its scholars. This is a measure of
“cash out” or cash transfers from the HEI to scholars. (Do not confuse with tuition waivers or tuition discounts
because these do not involve cash out by the HEI. Do not confuse with SUC expenditures in connection with
psychosocial assistance to the scholars or the administrative costs of implementing the scholarship). Examples
of “cash out” to scholars: stipends or allowances.
If the HEI or cost center provides a P500 monthly allowance to 20 scholars for 10 months, then the cash out is
P 100,000 for the year. If an outside donor (say the DOST or a private foundation) or the national government
(via a specific appropriation to the SUC or CHED) covers this amount, then the HEI itself suffers no expenditure.
But if no external donor covers the amount or reimburses the HEI, then the HEI or cost center itself incurs the
expenditure. The intention here is to record only the stipends and allowances paid out by the HEI from its own
funds to the scholars or grantees.
It is government policy to encourage HEIs, specially SUCs, to provide financial aid to its poor students.
Thus, the government will have to provide incentives for SUCs to recover the cost of stipends and
allowances to poor students. For instance, the government could reimburse the SUC, at least partially. This
series of data elements record the expenditures for stipends and allowances.
A typical HEI has the 3 traditional functions: teaching, research and extension. The following data elements
answer the question: Out of the PS expenditures in the college, how much of it is attributable to teaching? Out of
the MOOE expenditures in the college, how much of it is attributable to teaching? The following data elements
capture peso amounts, to be measured in thousand pesos for convenience.
If the cost center is a college, TEACHPS1 will include the expenditures (or at least a major portion of the
expenditures) for salaries and all related compensation of the faculty in the college. It will not include the
cost of honoraria for overload teaching paid to the faculty because such expenditures are charged against
the central fund Lump Sum for Honoraria – and not against the college itself. It may not include the cost of
electricity because such expenditures may be charged against a central lump sum instead of the college itself.
As mentioned before, a lot depends on the administrative structure of the SUC and the formulation of its IOB.
To aggregate the teaching costs directly or eventually attributable to a college, we will have to accumulate
TEACHPS1 from the non-degree granting cost centers in the SUC.
The elements below should be determined for each cost center in the SUC – whether the cost center is a
degree-granting unit or not:
For each cost center (whether it is a college or not): What fraction or percentage of the expenditures in the cost
center may be attributed to teaching? This records percentage, not pesos. For a typical college in an SUC,
TEACH%PS1 would probably hover in the 80-95% range since the major bulk of faculty salaries are attributable
to teaching. To determine the actual percentage, we may have to look at the distribution of faculty time in the
college to official duties such as: actual teaching, research, administrative duties, etc.
In an SUC, if the total PS expenditures from the GAA is P 50 M and P P48M of it could be attributed
to teaching, then TEACH%PS1= 96.0% ( =48/50). Incidentally, this means that the remaining P2M is
attributable to research and/or extension.
If the total PS expenditures from the SUC income is P4M and P P3.5M of it is attributable to teaching, then
TEACH%PS2=87.5% (=3.5/4). This means that the remaining P 0.5M is attributable to research and/or
extension.
Out of the total expenditures in the cost center, how much of it is attributable to the research function? These
are peso amounts in thousands.
If the cost center is a college, RESPS1 will include a portion of the faculty salaries of faculty members doing
research. For instance, if a faculty is credited with a 1/6 load reduction (or 3 units load credits out of a normal
load of 18 units per semester) for research activities, then 1/6 of his faculty salary should be counted as part
of RESPS1. Some faculty members hold dual appointments: one appointment as faculty in the college and
another appointment as researcher in a research center. If this is a 50:50 appointment (i.e. half-time in the
college and half-time in the research center), then half of the faculty salary should be included in RESPS1.
The elements below should be determined for each cost center in the SUC – whether the cost center is a
research unit or not. For instance, how much of the expenditures in the Library or in the Office of the President
should be attributed to research?
For each cost center (whether it is a research unit or not): what fraction or percentage of expenditures of the
cost center is attributable to research? In an SUC, if the total PS expenditures from the GAA is P 50 M and P
1.5M of it could be attributed to research, then RES%PS1= 3.0% (= 1.5/50). Incidentally, this means that the
remaining P48.5M is attributable to teaching and/or extension.
For each cost center (whether it is an extension services unit or not): how much of the expenditures in the cost
center are due to the extension function? For instance, how much of the expenditures in the library can be
attributed to the extension function?
For each cost center (whether it is an extension services unit or not): what percentage of expenditures in the
cost center is attributable to extension services?
In other words, the entire expenditures of a cost center must be partitioned into 3 parts -- teaching,
research, extension – and everything must be accounted for. A cost that is not attributed to teaching is
automatically attributed to either research or extension. Cost attribution to the 3 functions is a “zero-sum game”.
What is not attributed to one function is automatically attributed to the other two functions. Teaching costs
cannot or should not be pushed unduly to research or extension – and vice-versa.
As mentioned at the beginning, a cost center in an SUC is an entity against which the SUC attributes
costs. That is, bookkeepers and accountants will book expenditures against the cost centers.
Conversely, a “revenue center” in an SUC is an entity to which revenues are credited. A revenue
center may be an organizational unit such as college. Certainly, revenues from tuition and miscellaneous fees
should be credited to the colleges and the departments where the students are enrolled. Whether this actually
happens or not depends on how an SUC books its revenues. Ideally, every cost center should also be a revenue
center but it may not be so in reality.
SUC-GENERATED INCOME
On the average, about 90-95% of the expenditures of a cost center in an SUC are funded from GAA funds.
However, some SUCs fund many expenditures from SUC-generated income. This means: tuition revenues,
miscellaneous fees, interest income, revenues from business operations, etc. The trend all over the world is
reduction in government subsidy for SUCs and this means the SUCs will have to be more enterprising. This
series of data elements capture data on income credited to a cost center.
5/24/2004 4:02 PM
CHAPTER 5
DATA ELEMENTS ON A SUBJECT
DATA ENTITY TO BE DESCRIBED: The entity to be described is a subject in a specific institution, e.g.
Math 155 Introduction to Differential Equations at XYZ University. The focus is on the subject itself -- not a
specific section or class of the subject.
A subject is a collection of topics which form a coherent whole intended to be taught by a faculty
member --- and learned by a group of students with more-or-less equal preparations --- within a specific
number of hours in a semester or term, and after which there is a formal assessment and a grade is
given to the student. The breadth and depth of the topics is designed to be “just enough” to fill the mandated
number of hours, usually 51 “contact hours” spread out over 13 hours per week over the 17 weeks of a semester,
sometimes requiring more hours and sometimes fewer hours. The subjects themselves are designed to be part
of a curriculum designed so that students who pass all the subjects are deemed proficient or educated enough
to earn a degree, certificate or diploma in the HEI.
The topics to be taught in a subject are specified in a document called the syllabus. Each subject has a
defined syllabus (or is supposed to have one). Students enrolled in the subject must undergo some form of
formal evaluation, either through written and/or oral tests, and/or the submission of term papers, completion of
projects, presentation/s in class, etc. At the end of the weeks allotted for the subject, the faculty member gives
out a grade, usually numerical, intended to indicate the faculty member’s objective assessment of how well the
student has learned the topics in the subject.
For each subject, there is a defined or traditional “delivery mode” by which the topics in the subject are taught to
students. The most popular delivery mode is the usual lecture mode but sometimes the delivery mode requires
more active participation by students in set activities (often called “experiments” or “projects”) in a laboratory.
In some cases, the delivery mode includes both lecture and laboratory mode. Other delivery modes which
require more active student participation than sitting in a traditional lecture class are the seminar mode, directed
reading mode and of course distance mode. Some subjects (e.g. Geology, Archaeology, etc.) are handled in
the field work mode. In the health sciences many classes in the clinical sciences are handled in the clinics
mode. (Please see the element SUBJMODE).
The data elements on a subject are of primary interest to the HEI offering the subject. CHED itself might not be
interested in a specific subject but might be in all subjects belonging to a discipline, e.g. all science subjects..
Some subjects such as those in the General Education (GE) program are in great demand by students. For
instance, it is not unusual for an HEI to have 1,000 students who want to enrol in a subject like English 1. When
this happens, the subject has to be offered in several sections or classes. Thus, it is not unusual to have 25
sections or classes of English 1. In this example, there are 25 different classes or sections but there is only
one subject. The subject is English 1. A faculty member teaching two sections of English 1 and two sections
of Humanities 1 is actually teaching only 2 subjects but is teaching a total of 4 sections or classes. Another
difference. Subjects are listed in the official University Catalogue. In contrast, sections or classes are listed in
the Schedule of Classes.
FOCUS ON A SUBJECT
A subject is usually known by the abbreviated name of an academic discipline or department followed by a
number as in “CHEM 66” or “BA 101.1”. Each subject is further identified by an official title such as “Introduction
to Organic Chemistry” or “Fundamentals of Management Accounting” which appear in the official transcript.
The subject name is unique to the institution. Thus, HISTORY 100 in one university is not the same as HISTORY
100 in another university.
A one-day or one-week course or training program titled “Introduction to the Internet” is not considered a subject
because there is no formal evaluation. Furthermore, no academic program requires the student to pass or
attend such a training program.
Attributed to each subject is a number of units or credit units. One unit usually means a total of 16 hours of
lecture. Thus, a 3-unit subject offered in a 16-week semester requires that a student attend 3 lecture hours per
week for a total of 48 (= 3x16) hours for the semester. A 17th week is for examinations. Put another way, a 3-unit
subject requires a total of 48 “contact hours”. A 3-unit subject offered in a 12-week trimester has to meet 4 hours
per week so that at the end of the trimester, the subject will have met a total of 48 (= 12x4) contact hours.
The terms "course" and "subject" are synonyms in the following usages: "Math 101 is 3-unit course", "Ben
passed all his courses last semester", "Prof. Santos is teaching the Asian Literature course this semester", etc.
On the other hand, "course" is a synonym for "academic program" in the following contexts: "Medicine is a very
demanding course", "Vet Med is a 5-year course", “BS Biology is a quota course”, etc. Sometimes the word
course is even used as a synonym for training program – which is neither an academic program nor a subject.
For instance: “The Institute of Computer Science is offering a one-week course on the Internet.”
Depending on the context, a listener may distinguish whether course is being used to mean subject or to mean
program. However, when precision is needed, the terms “subject” and “program” should be used -- and “course”
should be avoided. For instance, the question “ How many courses does the university offer?” is a question that
invites confusion. This question should be reworded using either “subject” or “program”, whichever the inquirer
really intends to ask about..
In an HEI, the official record keeper of data elements on a subject is the University Registrar. The official master
list of subjects, their titles, their complete descriptions, etc. are published in an official catalogue. If a student,
parent, or faculty member wants the official subject description, they go to the official catalogue. If there are any
further questions, they see the University Registrar.
Every semester, new subjects are instituted and old subjects are modified or abolished. Sometimes only the
numbering system is changed, sometimes only the title, or only the description, etc. Sometimes the prerequisites
are modified, etc. Sometimes there is a complete overhaul! The University Registrar has to keep track of
such changes, e.g. which subjects have been abolished, re-numbered, re-titled, etc. The situation presents a
challenge in database management.
The no. of subjects in an institution varies from institution to institution. Small institutions may have less than 50
subjects but big universities with many programs could be offering as many as 500 different subjects. The data
elements on a subject are of primary interest to the HEI. For HEIs which have not started a computer database
on their subjects, this chapter provides a good start with terminology, definitions and coding.
offered in Philippine HEIs, what pieces of data will CHED want or need about each subject?
NOTE: Each data element below refers to a subject in a specific institution, e.g. Physics 144
Advanced Optics at XYZ University. The focus is on the subject itself, not a specific section or
class of the subject. See separate chapter on DATA ON A CLASS OR SECTION.
DESCRIPTION This is the full official description of the subject as published in the official school
catalogue. Example of a description of a math subject: “Systems of Linear
Equations. Matrices and matrix operations. Some computational algorithms.
Vector spaces and linear transformations.”
CODING This is textual data (usually a short paragraph). No coding required: just key in
the entire description. Field length: 300 characters.
DESCRIPTION The no. of units which the student will earn if he passes the subject. When we
say the subject is a 3-unit subject, it means SUBJCREDIT=3. For a lecture
subject, 3 units means 3 hours of meetings per week over a 17-week semester.
In other words, a total of 51 contact hours.
Do not confuse with TEACHCRED below.
CODING Numeric. No decimal place.
CODING No coding required. This element is a numerical value. Field length: 2 digits.
Round off to the nearest integer.
CODING Numeric data. No coding required. Round off to the nearest integer.
REMARKS:
If the subject has both a lecture portion and a lab portion, it will be counted
in the RCDEM as 2 separate subjects. For instance, a Physics 100 might
involve 40 students attending the lecture portion together but then will split into
2 separate sections of 20 each for the lab portion. Although technically only
one subject, this will be counted as 3 different classes: one lecture class (40
students) and 2 lab classes ( 20 students each). More and more HEIs now
split such subjects into 2 parts, e.g. Physics 100.1 for the lecture portion and
Physics 100.2 for the lab portion.
03 SEMINAR MODE (i.e. most of the talking or lecturing is by the students)
04 INDEPENDENT READING OR INDEPENDENT STUDY ( but not thesis or
dissertation).
05 CLINICAL INTERNSHIP OR MEDICAL RESIDENCY
06 APPRENTICESHIP OR ON THE JOB TRAINING (OJT)
07 LECTURE AND FIELD WORK.
08 FIELDWORK ONLY
80 DISTANCE MODE.
90 THESIS OR DISSERTATION WRITING.
99 No information on the matter.
Include: all those officially enrolled but exclude those who changed matriculation
before the last day of late registration. Exclude students who are merely “sitting
in” or are on “audit” status. Include students who eventually dropped.
CODING Numeric, no decimal point.
ELEMENT NUMBER D023
ELEMENT NAME AVERAGE SECOND SEMESTER ENROLLMENT IN THE SUBJECT
SHORT NAME ENROLSEM2
PURPOSE To indicate the average enrolment in the subject during the SECOND semester
– and contrast it with the first semester or the summer session. To reveal
seasonality of demand.
DEFINITION Over the past 3 consecutive years, the average enrollment in the subject during
the SECOND semester. The sum of enrollments in each section.
CODING Numeric, no decimal point.
For each subject, there is an outright passing rate and an eventual passing rate. There is also an outright
failing rate and an eventual failing rate. This is due to the grades of “Incomplete” and “condition”. After 1
year, the “incomplete” and the “condition” either
• Become failing grades.
• Become passing grades.
• Remain unresolved.
There is need to compute the following series of data elements for the following periods:
1. FIRST SEM ONLY.
2. SECOND SEM ONLY.
3. SUMMER SESSION ONLY.
4. FOR THE ENTIRE SCHOOLYEAR.
Note that if %PUMASA1 is 80% for the 1st sem, 70% for the 2nd sem and 85%
for the summer, the %PUMASA1 for the entire year is not the straight average
(80+70+85)/3.
The sample table below illustrates the “seasonality” of a hypothetical math subject. In the example below, Math
100 is more commonly taken in the 2nd semester because that is where most curricular programs place it.
In the first semester, only 2 sections are offered but in the second semester, 6 sections are offered. In other
words, Math 100 is in season during the second semester and off-season during the first semester. This is
typical of math and science subjects because of their strict sequencing.
OUTRIGHT EVENTUAL
ENROLLED PUMASA1 PASSING RATE PUMASA2 PASSING RATE
2002-03 SEM 1
2002-03 SEM 2
passing rate is 85.2 % ( = 178/210). In other words 10 ( = 178 – 168) students were able to convert their
CONDITION or INCOMPLETE into passing grades. This does not include students who re-enrolled the
subject, only those who passed the removal exams and completed their requirements.
8. In Math 100-A of the first semester, the outright passing and eventual passing rates are equal. This
could mean that no CONDITION or INCOMPLETE grades were given at the outset. Or it could mean
that although some CONDITION or INCOMPLETE grades were given, none of those students passed
eventually. Either they failed eventually or just left the CONDITION and INCOMPLETE unresolved
even after 1 year.
9. FOR THE ENTIRE SCHOOLYEAR, the OUTRIGHT passing rate is 74.4% [ = 238/320 ] but the
EVENTUAL passing rate is 80.3% ( 257/ 320). This means that over the year, 19 students ( = 257-
238) were able to convert their CONDITION or INCOMPLETE into passing grades.
10. It would be even better if the annual passing rate could be averaged over 3 consecutive years. The
illustrative table below shows that the straight average of PUMASA1% is 75.8% [ = (66.7 +83.3 +
77.3)/3 ] but the true or correct 3-year average is 75.0 % [ = 800/ 1,067 = (800+ 750 +850)/ (1,200+900+
1,100)]. Remember College Algebra!
DESCRIPTION The tuition to be paid by one student taking the subject. Do not include
the lab fee or other non-tuition fees.
• If the tuition per unit is P500 and the subject is a 3-unit subject, then
SUBJTUIT = 1,500.
• However, it may not be that straightforward for thesis or dissertation,
OJT, field work, etc.
• The official source of the data should be the HEI Registrar.
This data element is crucial if the subject is not the typical lecture class. For
instance, laboratory subject, field work, thesis or dissertation, clinical subject
or clinical internship, on-the-job training, etc.
CODING Numeric data. No coding necessary.
CODING Could be difficult since some prerequisites are textual information. Number of
prerequisites is also unpredictable.
If data is entered as text in a computer it will be difficult to classify or analyze. Unfortunately, the
following data elements are text data.
IN PREPARATION FOR NORMATIVE FINANCING (This part is for discussion purposes only.)
The general goal is to determine how much a curricular program in an SUC ought to cost. This question is not
attacked directly. Instead, we determine first how much each subject in the curriculum ought to cost. For this
purpose, each subject will be classified into one of 10 categories. The general descriptions of the 10 categories
are listed below. The cost per student per subject will be computed for each of the 10 types.
5/6/04 11:34 AM
CHAPTER 6
DATA ELEMENTS ON A SECTION
BASIC DATA REFERENCE POINT: The data elements in this chapter describe a specific class or section in
a specific semester or term, in a specific HEI, e.g. Math 11 TFQ-2 of the First Semester of 1998-99 as offered
by the Department of Mathematics in U.P. Diliman. The focus is on the specific class, the group of students and
the teacher, not the subject as a whole.
The data on a specific class or section is of primary interest to the HEI. It is unlikely that CHED itself would be
interested in a specific class. What does an HEI need to record about a class?
First of all, a section/class is a section/class of some specific subject. For instance, in the example above,
Math 11 TFQ-2 is first of all a Math 11 class. Being a Math 11 class, it shares many things with other Math 11
sections or classes. However, Math 11 TFQ-2 is also a specific section and it is unique from all the other Math
11 sections offered by the Math Dept in the specified semester. For each class, the HEI would need to keep
track of the following elements: the official subject title, the schoolyear and semester in which the class was
offered, the class size, the name of the teacher, the number of students who passed, etc.
For each class or section, there is an official grade sheet. Indeed, many of the data elements on a section
actually appear in the grade sheet. The Registrar is the official keeper of grade sheets of all sections and
classes offered by the HEI. Each grade sheet must specify at least the semester and schoolyear, the subject
title, : the official list of students, the final grades obtained, and the name of the teacher.
In a manner of speaking, the data elements which refer to a section or class are essentially the data elements
recorded in an official grade sheet. We are assuming here a strict one-to-one correspondence between grade
sheets and classes. That is, we assume that one grade sheet corresponds to exactly one section/class. Each
class corresponds to exactly one grade sheet.
NOTE: Each data element below refers to a specific section or class, e.g. Math 17 TFQ-2, First
Semester 1997-98 Department of Mathematics. The data elements do not refer to the subject as a
whole but refer directly to the specific group of students who were taught by a specific teacher.
CODING See coding scheme for SUBJCODE in the previous chapter of the Manual.
CODING Text information. Use conventions recommended by the Manual for recording
names.
DEFINITION The no. of students who received a conditional grade. In the U.P. grading
system, this means the students who received a grade of 4. These students did
not fail outright and did not pass outright either. The eventual grade depends
on what happens in the removal examination.
CODING Numeric, no decimal point.
There is an outright passing rate and an eventual passing rate. There is an outright failing rate and an
eventual failing rate. The outright rates are based on grades received at the outset. The eventual rates are
based on what later happened to the grades of “INCOMPLETE” and “CONDITION”. What happened to the
INCOMPLETE after the student completed? What happened to the CONDITION after the student took the
removal exam? What if the INC and CONDITION remain unresolved after 1 year?
5/7/2004 7:00 AM
CHAPTER 7:
DATA ON AN INDIVIDUAL STUDENT
THE ENTITY BEING DESCRIBED: The entity to be described in this chapter is a specific student, a
person. Each data element in this chapter captures information about the student.
The data on an individual student are most relevant to the HEI itself. It is the HEI (not CHED) which will collect
the data, use it, and store it for a number of years. With respect to an individual student, the purpose of
the REVISED CHED DATA ELEMENT MANUAL (RCDEM) is to provide common terminology, definitions and
coding of data elements. CHED will collect aggregate data per degree program in an institution and also per
institution as a whole. The question in this chapter is: If there are 2,000 students in an HEI, what specific pieces
of data will the HEI need or want about each of them?
Examples: the total enrolment in the program or in the HEI as a whole, the total no. of units they are enrolled
in (to be used in cost analysis), the total no. of fulltime equivalent students (FTES), the no. of students who
receive financial aid, etc. To help HEIs collect data on an individual student and to help itself collect aggregate
data on students, CHED has come up with this revision of the CHED DATA ELEMENT MANUAL first published
in 1996.
Student enrolment data is always for a specific semester. For the first semester, the recommended count date
or census day is July 1. For the second semester, the recommended count date is December 1. Enrolment
data should be “frozen” on the count date and stored in the HEI data warehouse. This is equivalent to
snapping the picture on the census day but the actual submission of the data, just like the development of the
film into a picture print, can come a few days later.
1. INCLUDE all students registered or enrolled as of the last day for late registration in the specific
semester.
2. INCLUDE all students enrolled for credit whether or not the student is working toward a specific degree.
Include a student if he is expected to do all required assignments and take all examinations, if he is
required to pay the full fees or else present some tuition waiver, and if the grade will be recorded in his
official transcript.
3. EXCLUDE “auditors” or sit-in’s who do not plan to take examinations and will not earn credits.
4. INCLUDE students whether or not they have fully paid their assessed fees on the count date.
5. INCLUDE students who are officially enrolled “for residence only” as of the count date – but exclude
those who enrol after the count date. Typically these are graduate students who have completed all
subject requirements and are in the middle ( or late stages) of writing their thesis or dissertation. If they
are officially enrolled for residence, they are classified as students. If they are not so enrolled, exclude
them.
A person who is not currently enrolled is not counted as part of enrolment. However, some persons who are not
currently enrolled may still be considered as students of the HEI. These students are temporarily not enrolled but
may still return because they are still “in good standing”. Thus, they are still part of the HEI student database:
1. A student who is not currently enrolled but has been granted official deferment or leave of absence.
2. A student who is under temporary suspension by the HEI but is still eligible to return after the period of
suspension.
3. A student who is “temporarily missing”. This means a student who is not currently enrolled but did
not submit a request for leave of absence or deferment -- but is not yet in violation of the maximum
residency rule. In other words, the student can still re-enrol. Do not confuse with a former student
who disappeared for so long that the maximum residency rule will prevent him from re-enrolling. For
instance, a student in good standing who interrupts his studies for one semester.
To capture data on such persons, see the elements GOODSTAND and SCHOLSTATUS.
Although most requests for enrolment data are requests for headcounts, there are times when more precise
measures of enrolment are needed. Headcounts are specially misleading when counting graduate students
because many graduate students are part-time. A graduate program may have some students enrolled for 12
units while most of them might be enrolled in only 3 or 6 units. The elements STUDUNITS, STUDFTEX, and
STUDFTES provide more precise measures. These are defined fully in this chapter.
If the student is a scholar or receives some financial aid, more data elements are needed about him,
e.g. the name of the scholarship program, the amount of tuition benefits, the stipends received, etc. If the
scholarship is targeted for poor students, there will be even more data required: data on family income, the
size of the family, other socioeconomic indicators, etc. These data elements are also included in this chapter
because a scholar is just a special type of student. As the recipient of financial aid, the student is variously
referred to as a: scholar, grantee, awardee, recipient, or beneficiary. The data elements in this chapter refer
to the student himself, not the scholarship program which is funding the financial aid.
IMPORTANT: A student who is the holder of a pre-paid “college plan” (such as those made popular by College
Assurance Plans, Inc. and other similar companies) should not be referred to as a scholar or grantee. Such a
student is not a recipient of financial aid because it is the student’s family who paid for the plan to begin with!
Such a student is more correctly referred to as a “plan holder”. See the element 3RDPARTY.
If the student receives some financial aid, then some of the data elements defined in this chapter are relevant
not only to the HEI but also to the provider or funding source of the financial aid.
P2,000 per year. Thus, it is perfectly appropriate to refer to any SUC student, whether rich or poor, whether with
high grades or low grades, in whatever degree program, as a “Iskolar ng Bayan”.
Having said that, the subset of SUC students who receive tuition waivers or discounts, book allowances and/or
stipends, will still be referred to as “scholars” or “grantees” to distinguish them from the general studentry of the
SUCs.
There are about 170 data elements on an individual student. It is unlikely that any HEI is already collecting all
these data elements on each of its students. Some of the data elements (e.g. address, phone numbers, grades,
etc.) are quite standard. However, some are rather unusual or quite involved to obtain (e.g. HSRANK the rank
of the student in his high school graduating class, HSTUIT the tuition which the student paid in his 4th year high
school, the number and ages of siblings to obtain the “weighted family size”, etc).
Many of the data elements here are intended for scholarship programs which are targeted for the poor and/or
financial aid programs which calibrate the level of financial benefits based on the family income. A classic example
of such a scholarship program is the U.P. Socialized Tuition and Financial Assistance Program (STFAP).
It is up to each HEI and each scholarship provider to decide if and when to collect a specific data element.
The purpose of the RCDEM is to set the standard names, definitions and coding of data elements for
all HEIs and aid providers which will need them
The dictionary is most useful to the HEIs and aid providers which have not started or are only starting to
computerize their student records systems. For such HEIs and aid providers, they are invited to use the
terminology and the coding suggested in the data elements. The goal is that, eventually, all HEIs will have the
same interpretation of a data element such as HSRANK, HSTUIT, TUITCOST, etc,
NOTE: The following data elements refer to an individual student, a person. If the student is the
recipient of financial aid, the data elements still refer to the student as a scholar or grantee – not the
scholarship program, not the funding organization.
CODING 1 Male
2 Female
9 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER F008
NAME OF ELEMENT CITIZENSHIP OF STUDENT
SHORT NAME CITIZEN OF STUDENT
PURPOSE In public HEIs, non-citizens have to pay more because they are not entitled
to Philippine government subsidy. Non-citizens also need special permits to
enroll as students in Philippine HEIs.
DEFINITION Citizenship of student.
CODING Text: 5 digits. Coded by country, using standard DFA code.
RP citizen = 00001. If citizenship is not known, CITIZEN=99999.
A “working student”, i.e. a student who is gainfully employed outside the HEI
while being enrolled at the same time, is not considered a recipient of financial
aid. A student with a “college plan” or “education plan” (such as that provided
by the College Assurance Plan) is not considered a recipient of scholarship
or financial aid because his own family paid for the plan.
DEFINITION Unique ID code as assigned by aid provider. Each financial aid program
will have its own code. Do not confuse with STUDCODE which is the code
number assigned by the HEI to the student.
If the HEI is also the provider of the financial aid, it is up to the HEI if a
separate code number is assigned to the student/scholar. As an aid provider,
CHED will be issuing scholar ID code numbers to its own grantees.
CODING Text data: 10 alphanumeric. If the student is not a recipient of financial aid,
key in NO FINANCIAL AID.
The data elements below capture high school data. These are useful for research purposes. To know the
quality of the freshman class, the HEI will have to collect this type of data. For providers of scholarship funds, a
usual basis for awarding scholarships at the freshman level is of course the performance of the student in high
school.
ELEMENT NUMBER F029
NAME OF ELEMENT IF STUDENT IS A HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE
SHORT NAME NAKATAPOS
PURPOSE To indicate if the student graduated from HS or if he passed an equivalency
test.
CODING 1-digit code.
1 Yes, high school graduate.
2 Not a high school graduate but passed an equivalency exam such as the
PEPT
3 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER F030
NAME OF ELEMENT NAME OF HIGH SCHOOL
SHORT NAME HSNAME
PURPOSE To indicate the name of the high school.
DEFINITION Short name of high school. To save space, use abbreviations as in CAMARINES
DEL SUR NATL HS or COLL HOLY SPIRIT HS-QC.
CODING Text data: 70 characters.
ELEMENT NUMBER F031
NAME OF ELEMENT TYPE OF HIGH SCHOOL
SHORT NAME HSTYPE
PURPOSE To identify the type of high school graduated from. To provide a non-
income indicator of socioeconomic level. For instance, a student enrolled
in an expensive HS without any scholarship. (Please see related elements
HSTUIT1, HSTUIT2, and HS SCHOLAR )
DEFINITION The type of high school, as classified below:
CODING 1-digit code.
1 Public General High School
2 Public Vocational/ Trade HS
3 Public Special (e.g. science high schools)
4 SUC-administered HS
5 Private non-sectarian HS
6 Private Sectarian
7 Foreign HS (i.e. HS located in a foreign country)
8 No high school, i.e. equivalency certification only.
9 Not known.
(Note: since public HS are tuition-free, this element is relevant only to students
who come from private high schools and to scholarship programs where
socioeconomic level is a factor.).
DEFINITION If the student enjoyed the benefits of a scholarship in high school.
CODING 1-digit code.
1 No scholarship benefits in high school as certified by the HS Principal or
Registrar.
2 Yes, student was recipient of some scholarship benefits in high school as
certified by the HS Principal or HS Registrar.
9 No info available on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER F053
NAME OF ELEMENT HIGH SCHOOL TUITION AND OTHER FEES “AS BILLED’ BY THE HIGH
SCHOOL IN 4TH YEAR.
SHORT NAME HSTUIT1
PURPOSE To indicate how much it cost the student to be in the high school. To indicate
how much the family can afford. The rationale: if the family was able to afford
P20,000 tuition (or whatever amount) in high school, then the family should
certainly be able to afford to pay that at the college level.
DEFINITION The high school tuition and all other fees (for all of 4th year high school) as
billed by the high school. Do not deduct amount paid by any high school
scholarship but see HSTUIT2 below.
If the school is a public HS, then HSTUIT1 = 0 of course. Cost is for one year:
include both semesters. Include all costs billed to the student by the high
school – including (if any) school bus fees, board and lodging, etc.
CODING Numeric: 6 digits as in XXXXX. No commas, no decimal places., no peso
signs, no centavos. If no tuition is billed (as in public schools), enter “0” and
do not leave blank. If no data is provided, enter “999999”.
Include units enrolled in even if the student actually dropped, failed or received
an incomplete. Include units passed of course – but exclude units for PE,
Military Training, Religion, thesis.
CODING Numeric, integer.
ELEMENT NUMBER F064
NAME OF ELEMENT THE CUMULATIVE NO. OF ACADEMIC UNITS PASSED
SHORT NAME CUMUNITS_P
PURPOSE To measure progress against the curriculum.
DEFINITION As of a specific date, the total no. of academic units PASSED by the student.
Do not include units in progress. If the student is currently enrolled in his
4th semester, CUMUNITS_E includes all units passed enrolled in the first 3
semesters. Do not include units in the 4th semester if it is still in progress.
Include only units passed. Exclude units dropped, failed, or not completed.
Exclude units where student received “condition” unless the student eventually
passed. Exclude units where student received “incomplete” unless the student
has completed and passed the units. Exclude units for PE, Military Training,
Religion, thesis.
CODING Numeric, integer.
ELEMENT NUMBER F065
NAME OF ELEMENT THE CUMULATIVE NO. OF ACADEMIC UNITS ENROLLED BUT NOT
PASSED BY THE STUDENT
SHORT NAME CUMUNITS_N
DEFINITION As of a specific date, the total no. of academic units enrolled in BUT NOT
PASSED by the student. Do not include units in progress. If the student is
currently enrolled in his 4th semester, CUMUNITS_N includes all units enrolled
in the first 3 semesters but which the student dropped or failed. Include also
units where the student got “incomplete” but the student has not completed
or passed. Include units where the student got “condition” but the student has
not removed or passed. In other words, all units enrolled in but not passed.
In a sense, CUMUNITS_N is the no. of units “wasted” by the student.
Exclude units for PE, Military Training, Religion, thesis.
CODING Numeric, integer.
• If the student is currently enrolled in 21 units and if 21 units is the normal student load in his current
program, the student is counted as one full-time equivalent student (FTES).
• If the student is currently enrolled in 15 units but the normal student load is 21 units, then the student is
counted as 0.71 FTES ( = 15/21).
• If the student is currently enrolled in 24 units but the normal student load is 21 units, then the student is
counted as 1.14 FTES ( = 24/21).
In these computations, ignore units for PE, Military Training, Religion or Thesis. Thesis units are excluded
because the assignment of units to the thesis varies widely from program to program and HEI to HEI.
DEFINITION Expressed as a number with 2 decimal places, the full-time equivalent of the
student based on the standards set by the program and HEI.
Compare with STUD_CHED below. For the extension of these data elements
in reference to a program, see Chapter 2 discussion of FTES_HEI and FTES_
CHED.
CODING Numeric with format x.xx
ELEMENT NUMBER F070
NAME OF ELEMENT IN A SPECIFIC SEMESTER, TOTAL ACADEMIC UNITS ENROLLED IN
SHORT NAME SEMUNITS
PURPOSE
DEFINITION In a current semester, the total academic units enrolled in. Exclude units for
PE, Military Training, Religion, thesis.
CODING Numeric, integer.
The following data elements provide insight into the motivation of a student. These data elements are very
useful but only if the student is willing to disclose the information and only if the HEI will tabulate the data.
As of a specific date, is the student “in good standing” as a student in the HEI? Do not confuse with his
standing as a scholar. A student might be in good standing as a student but not as a scholar.
In the case of DOST scholars, the tuition and fees (whether partially or in full) are billed to DOST. In
the case of scholars of a well-known foundation such as The Metrobank Foundation, Inc, the tuition
and fess are billed (whether partially or in full) to the foundation. In the case of holder of pre-paid
educational plans, the tuition and fees are billed (whether partially or in full) to the company (e.g.
College Assurance Plans, Inc) which sold the educational plan. In some cases, the student pays the
HEI directly but is reimbursed later (whether partially or in full) by somebody else -- in which case the
transaction does not involve the HEI itself. The element below simply asks: does the HEI have to deal
with a third party to collect tuition and miscellaneous fees of the student?
As of a specific date: is the student in good standing in the scholarship program? Do not confuse
with his standing as a student in the HEI. A student may not be in good standing in the scholarship
program but could still be in good standing as a student in the HEI.
Do not confuse with status as a student in the HEI. A person might be in good
standing as a student but not in good standing as a scholar or grantee. Of
course if the person is not in good standing as a student, he is probably not
in good standing as a scholar.
CODING 1-digit code:
1 Not currently and has never been a scholar or the recipient of financial
aid.
2 A scholar or recipient of financial aid in good standing. In other words,
the student is currently receiving financial aid, is complying with all scholarship
requirements, submitting all documentation, and is therefore receiving all
scholarship benefits.
For instance, a student with one failing grade or one incomplete grade might
be temporarily suspended from financial aid but not suspended from the HEI.
Upon completing the deficiency, the person can be restored to good standing
as a scholar.
4 Grantee on official leave or deferment from the scholarship, i.e. student
is temporarily out of the scholarship program because he/she has submitted
an official request for deferment (say due to illness, some family emergency,
or other valid reason acceptable to the provider). Scholar has no academic
deficiency and can return to good standing as a scholar upon enrollment or
re-enrollment.
5 Dropped permanently or terminated as a grantee. The student was,
at some earlier time, a scholar or grantee but as of specific date, the . the
scholarship award has been permanently withdrawn from the student by the
provider, either due to severe academic deficiencies or some serious breach
of rules. The person may still be a student in good standing but will no longer
be a scholar or grantee.
6 Grantee who withdrew voluntarily from the scholarship. .The student
was, at some earlier time, a scholar or grantee but has voluntarily withdrawn
permanently from the scholarship but was otherwise in good standing. This
category means official withdrawal from the scholarship, not withdrawal
from the degree program or the HEI. The student was “not forced out” of the
financial aid program due to poor academics or serious breach of rules.
7 Grantee who is missing without official leave, i.e. student is “missing” but
was otherwise in good standing. This means missing from the scholarship
program but possibly not missing from the HEI. A student might be in school
and doing well but simply not reporting to the scholarship provider.
9 No information provided on the matter.
CODING 1 Yes, scholar has been penalized for breach of rules of student discipline.
2 No, scholar has never been penalized for breach of rules of student
discipline.
9 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER F100
NAME OF ELEMENT IF GRANTEE REQUIRES SPECIAL MONITORING
SHORT NAME SPECIAL
PURPOSE To flag a scholar that may need “special monitoring”. To identify a student or
scholar in a special situation, e.g. medical or psychological disability, extreme
poverty, etc.
These are the tuition and other fees as billed to the student by the school for a specific semester. This the total
amount which the school is charging – not the net amount to be paid by the student or the net amount to be paid
by the scholarship provider. Typically, only a portion of tuition and other fees is actually paid by the financial
aid provider. The rest has to be paid by the student and his family. This series of elements records how much
it would actually cost the student to be enrolled in the HEI if he did not have a scholarship. Another series of
elements will capture benefits.
This series of elements estimate other costs incurred by the student – whether he is a scholar or not.
The data elements are useful for cost surveys and cost analysis studies. These data on costs will have
to be obtained from the student directly or from his parents. In general, the costs tabulated are the
costs incurred by somebody who is enrolled in school as opposed to somebody who is not enrolled.
Thus, food costs are not estimated because both students and non-students need to eat.
DEFINITION The estimated cost of textbooks and school supplies required for the subjects
enrolled in by the student in the specific semester. Include only costs not
already included as part of MISCFEES1. Exclude cost of school uniforms,
commuting costs , dormitory fees or food expenses.
CODING Numeric data: XXXXX. In Philippine pesos. No commas, no decimal places..
No peso sign.
DEFINITION The cost per month of a rooming house, dormitory, residence hall, apartment,
or bed space of a student living away from home while in school. Exclude
food or boarding costs. Exclude commuting cost. If the student is living with
his own family while in school, then LODGING1= 0.
CODING Numeric data: XXXXX. In Philippine pesos. No commas, no decimal places..
No peso sign.
These are the tuition and other fees which are actually covered or paid by the scholarship in behalf of the
grantee or actually reimbursed to the grantee. Not the amount allotted or budgeted. If the student is not a
scholar or grantee, the elements below are automatically set to zero.
This series will measure the generosity of the support for tuition and miscellaneous fees.
How generous are the scholarship benefits received by the student? This question is answered in
absolute peso amounts and also in percentage levels (at least with respect to tuition and misc fees).
These are the cumulative tuition benefits which have been received by the grantee since the date of first award
until a specific date. For student loan programs, this provides an idea of how much the student has already
borrowed so far. If the student receives no financial aid, the elements below are automatically set to zero.
DEFINITION The accumulated amount actually paid for tuition by the financial aid program
in behalf of the grantee or as reimbursed to the grantee. Summed from the
date of first award until a specific date. If the grantee has been enjoying the
scholarship for 3 years so far, then CUMTUIT is the sum over 3 years.
CODING Numeric data: XXXXX. In Philippine pesos. No commas, no decimal places..
No peso sign.
ELEMENT NUMBER F134
NAME OF ELEMENT CUMULATIVE MISCELLANEOUS FEES RECEIVED
SHORT NAME CUMFEES
PURPOSE To reflect the ACCUMULATED total miscellaneous fees paid so far by the aid
provider in behalf of the grantee, whether paid directly to the HEI or issued as
reimbursement to the grantee.
DEFINITION The cumulative total paid by the financial aid program specifically for
miscellaneous fees between the date of first award until a specific date. If the
grantee has been enjoying this benefit for 5 semesters so far, then CUMFEES
is the sum over the 5 semesters.
CODING Numeric data: XXXXX. In Philippine pesos. No commas, no decimal places..
No peso sign.
ELEMENT NUMBER F135
NAME OF ELEMENT CUMULATIVE LIVING ALLOWANCES RECEIVED SO FAR
SHORT NAME CUMLIVING
PURPOSE To reflect the ACCUMULATED total stipends or living allowances actually
received so far. To measure the level or amount invested so far by the aid
provider on the grantee.
DEFINITION The total paid by the financial aid program specifically for stipends or living
allowances (as of a specific date).. If the grantee has been enjoying the
scholarships for 3 years so far, then CUMLIVING is the sum over 3 years.
CODING Numeric data: XXXXX. In Philippine pesos. No commas, no decimal places..
No peso sign.
ELEMENT NUMBER F136
NAME OF ELEMENT CUMULATIVE BOOK ALLOWANCES RECEIVED
SHORT NAME CUMBOOKS
PURPOSE To reflect the ACCUMULATED total book allowances actually received so
far.
DEFINITION The total paid by the financial aid program specifically for book allowances so
far ( as of a specific date). If the grantee has been enjoying the scholarships
for 3 years so far, then CUMBOOKS is the sum over 3 years.
CODING Numeric data: XXXXX. In Philippine pesos. No commas, no decimal places.
No peso sign.
ELEMENT NUMBER F137
NAME OF ELEMENT CUMULATIVE LODGING ALLOWANCES RECEIVED SO FAR
SHORT NAME CUMLODGE
PURPOSE To reflect the ACCUMULATED LODGING ALLOWANCES actually received
so far.
DEFINITION The total paid by the financial aid program specifically for lodging bus fare) so
far( as of a specific date).. If the grantee has been enjoying the scholarships
for 3 years so far, then CUMTRANS is the sum over 3 years.
CODING Numeric data: XXXXX. In Philippine pesos. No commas, no decimal places..
No peso sign.
ELEMENT NUMBER F138
NAME OF ELEMENT CUMULATIVE COMMUTING BENEFITS RECEIVED SO FAR
SHORT NAME CUMCOMMUTE
PURPOSE
DEFINITION
CODING Numeric data: XXXXX. In Philippine pesos. No commas, no decimal places..
No peso sign.
This series of elements applies only (or mostly) to recipients of financial aid or applicants to such aid. In
particular the data elements defined below apply only to financial aid programs which are targeted
for the poor. (As mentioned before, if merit is the basis for the scholarship, the aid provider will be
interested primarily in grades and not on this socioeconomic data).
The following series of data elements provides indicators of the true financial capacity of the student’s family. The
income reported in the most recent Income Tax Return (ITR) is important information. However, in the Philippine
context, it is necessary to collect “non-income socioeconomic indicators”. The following indicators are specially
crucial for financial aid programs targeted for the poor or for scholarships which calibrate the financial benefits
to different socioeconomic brackets. Admittedly, many of these elements are not being collected now. They are
included in this listing anyway just in case any aid provider would need to use the information.
Exclude household helps, boarders or lodgers (if any) who live under the
same roof.
CODING Numeric: 2 digits. If no information is supplied, key in “99”.
DEFINITION As of June 1, the no. of unmarried college-age children ages 16.50 to 20.90,
whether actually enrolled or not. Include the grantee himself.
CODING Numeric: 2 digits. If no information is supplied, key in “99”.
ELEMENT NUMBER F152
NAME OF ELEMENT ADULT-EQUIVALENT FAMILY SIZE
SHORT NAME FAMSIZE3
PURPOSE To provide a more meaningful denominator to compute INCOME PER
WEIGHTED CAPITA based on the ages of the children in the family. To
differentiate between two families with the same no. of children.
DEFINITION The no. of “adult equivalent family members”. By formula: FAMSIZE3=NO.
OF LIVING PARENTS + 0.50* SIBLINGS1 + 0.60* SIBLINGS2 +
0.75*SIBLINGS3 + SIBLINGS4.
Note that the youngest siblings have only weight 0.50 while the college-age
siblings (including the scholar himself) are counted as 1.0. Example1: If there
are four children -- 1 pre-school, 1 elementary, 1 secondary, and 1 college
student, FAMSIZE3 = 2+0.50+0.60+0.75 +1.0 = 4.85
The rationale behind this formula: while the first child in a family means a
quantum jump in family expenses, each succeeding child means lower
marginal costs for the family. Put another way, having 2 children does not
cost twice as much as 1 child. Having 4 children does not cost twice as much
as much as 2 children.
Example 1:
If there are only 2 children, FAMSIZE4 = 2+1+.75 =3.75
Example 2:
If there are 3 children, FAMSIZE4 = 2 +1+.75+.60 = 4.35
Example3:
If there are 4 children, FAMSIZE4 = 2+1+.75+.60 +.50 = 4.85.
Example 4:
If there are 5 children, FAMSIZE4= 2+1+0.75+ 0.60+0.50+ 0.50 = 5.35.
Example 5:
If there are 6 children, FAMSIZE4 =2+1+.75+ .60+3*.50 = 5.85.
Include the gross income of everybody contributing to “the family kitty”, i.e.
parents, brothers, sisters, grandparents, etc. Include the contribution of
family members (e.g. brother/sister living abroad ) who are residing away
from the family residence but contributing to the family kitty. Include the
contributions (if any) of married brothers / sisters to the family kitty. Include
salaries, allowances, bonuses, commissions, business profits, etc.
CODING Numeric: 7 digits as in 100000. No commas, no decimal places., no peso
signs, no centavos. If family has no ITR but has exemption certificate, enter
“1”. If there is no data submitted on income, enter “9999999”.
ELEMENT NUMBER F156
NAME OF ELEMENT ITR-REPORTED NET FAMILY INCOME AFTER TAXES
SHORT NAME ITR_NET
PURPOSE To record net family income after income taxes . This data is required by the
provider of financial aid if the student is applying for or receiving benefits from
a scholarship targeted for the poor.
DEFINITION NET annual family income. By formula, this is ITR_GROSS less all the income
taxes paid.
CODING 1 The family owns the lot where it resides. That is, the lot is titled to the father or
mother or to dead grandparents. Include here anyway if the lot is mortgaged
or if the family is still amortizing the lot. Do not connote that some squatters
own the structure they live in but do not own the land. If so, they belong to
this category).
2 The family does not own the lot but they pay RENT for the use of the land.
3 The family does not own the lot but the FAMILY DOES NOT PAY RENT. For
instance, if the lot is owned by the grandparents or other relatives. Or if the lot
is provided rent-free by an employer.
9 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER F177
NAME OF ELEMENT FLOOR AREA OF FAMILY RESIDENCE
SHORT NAME FLRAREA1
PURPOSE To indicate the floor area of the family residence, an indicator of socioeconomic
level.
DEFINITION Classification based on FLOOR AREA of residence (in square meters), as
declared by the grantee and the parents. The area within the walls of the
house. Not the land area.
CODING 1-digit code.
1 25.0 square meters FLOOR AREA or less.
2 25.1 to 50 sq meters.
3 50.1 to 75 sq meters
4 75.1 to 100 sq meters
5 100.1 to 150 sq meters
6 10.1 to 200 sq meters
7 200.1 sq meters or bigger.
9 No information provided on the matter.
DEFINITION If there is running piped water indoors, e.g. as supplied by a municipal water
system, local water utility, or from an elevated storage tank.
CODING 1 Family residence has running piped water indoors, i.e. water from a faucet.
2 Artesian well inside the house or right next to the house.
2 No running piped water indoors, e.g. water has to be fetched from another
source and stored in drums.
9 No information provided on the matter.
Exclude a tricycle, jeepney or taxi for which a daily “boundary fee” must be
paid to somebody outside the family.
CODING 2-digit code.
1 NO MOTOR VEHICLE IN WORKING ORDER ( OR OUT OF ORDER FOR
LESS THAN 6 MONTHS) IS OWNED OR “IN BENEFICIAL USE” BY THE
FAMILY.
2 Motorcyle.
3 Tricycle.
4 Jeepney.
5 Owner-type jeep.
6 Commercial Van (e.g. Fiera, Tamaraw FX, etc.)
7 Asian Utility Vehicle (e.g. L300, Revo, etc.)
8 Car ( less than or equal to 1.60 L engine size)
9 Car ( with engine larger than 1.60L)
10 Sports Utility Vehicle (e.g. Pajero, CRV, etc.)
11 Truck, including pickup truck.
99 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER F191
NAME OF ELEMENT MOTOR BOAT USED BY THE FAMILY
SHORT NAME MOTORBOAT
PURPOSE To provide a non-income indicator of socioeconomic level. This is specially
useful for scholarship programs targeted for the poor or calibrated to different
socioeconomic levels.
DEFINITION Outright ownership or beneficial use of a motorized boat. Ownership of
a working motorized boat by parent or siblings living in the same household
(whether married or not). Ownership means titled, whether fully paid or not.
Include also even if the vehicle is not owned by the family but is provided “for
its providential use”.
CODING
1 Non-motorized boat
2 Motorized boat
9 No information provided on the matter.
If a financial aid provider want to use appliances as a non-income indicator, then the primary criterion should
not be ownership because this could be denied. The grantee or applicant should be obligated to report the
presence of the appliance if all three of the following are true:
1. the appliance is in working order or has been out of order less than 3 months,
2. it is located inside the household and positioned for use (i.e. it is not packed in its original box in
some closet), and
3. it can be used or is being used by the family.
In other words, the grantee must report the appliance if the family is “a beneficial user” of the appliance ,
regardless of whether the appliance is owned by them or not.
The use of appliances is effective only if the aid provider has a way of conducting home visits. If the aid provider
cannot or does not make random home visits, then appliance beneficial ownership would be very difficult to use
as a factor in determining eligibility or in calibrating level of benefits. The listing of appliances below is given
with this caveat.
5/7/2004 5:43 AM
CHAPTER 8
DATA ON A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
ENTITY BEING DESCRIBED: The entity to be described here is a student financial aid or scholarship
program, e.g. The Metrobank Foundation-Pi Lambda Theta Excellence in Teaching Program, The Selected
Ethnic Group Educational Assistance Plan, or the U.P. Socialized Tuition and Financial Assistance Program.
The data elements listed in this chapter refer to a specific financial aid program or “scholarship program”. The
data elements do not refer directly to the aid provider (usually an organization) nor to the specific scholar or
grantee (a person). One provider organization may offer several financial aid or scholarship programs. On
the other hand, one financial aid or scholarship program may have several grantees or awardees. The data
elements in this chapter refer to the financial aid or scholarship program itself.
The term “scholarship program” connotes high academic performance and/or tough academic competition.
However, the term is also used to refer to financial aid programs which are targeted for the poor and do not (or
may not) demand high academic performance. A student from a poor family with just-passing or so-so grades
may therefore be referred to as a “scholar” -- even if some may deem “grantee” or “beneficiary” as being
more appropriate. This distinction is not used in this chapter. Thus, the financial aid program may be referred
to as an “aid program”, a “scholarship program” or just plain “scholarship”. However, look closely at the data
elements STANDARDS and NEEDBASED. These data elements may be used to distinguish between “honest-
to-goodness” scholarships and generic student financial aid.
The definitions variously refer to the “student”, “applicant”, “scholar”, “awardee”, “grantee”, or “beneficiary”. All
these may be considered to be referring to the same person.
A student who receives financial assistance (or complete subsidy) from a relative such as a grandparent, aunt
or uncle is not considered to be a scholar or recipient of financial aid.
1 Short-term student or family loan. The financial aid is in the form of a loan which
must be repaid within a very short period, e.g. before the end of the semester or end of
the schoolyear.
2 Study Now Pay Later plan. That is, no repayment is required until the student has
graduated and has obtained a job.
3 HEI work-study plan. In return for financial aid – tuition waiver and/or hourly wages -
- the student (while enrolled) has to render some work hours for the HEI .. For instance,
“student assistantships” where students get paid for rendering part-time hours at the
library, etc.
Other classificatory data elements defined and coded in this chapter are:
With at least 20 different ways to classify financial aid programs, there could be potentially as many as 6,400
different scholarship programs in the country ( if only because there are about 1,600 HEIs to begin with and
each of them offers at least 4 types of scholarships or financial aid). The classificatory data elements listed
above will help CHED make sense of such a potential mass of data.
1 Public-funded, regardless of whether the funds come from the GAA or not, or
whether the funds are identified specifically for scholarships or not. Note that
a scholarship funded by government Trust Funds or funded by a government
agency or corporation is public.
2 Private-funded. The source of funds is not the Philippine government or any
of its agencies.
9 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER G006
NAME OF ELEMENT IF THERE IS LEGISLATION WHICH REQUIRES THE FINANCIAL AID
PROGRAM
SHORT NAME LEGALBAS1
PURPOSE To identify if the financial aid program is being offered under compulsion or
requirement by law. To distinguish financial aid programs which are offered
based on the civic-mindedness and generosity of the aid provider.
DEFINITION If the financial aid program is being offered under compulsion or requirement
by law, regardless of whether public or private. Although it is true that many
public-funded financial aid programs are compelled by specific legislations,
there are also many public-funded programs which are not offered under
such compulsion.
For instance, the UP STFAP was not compelled by law: it was a pure UP
initiative. On the other hand, some scholarships provided by private HEIs
– such as those required by the GASTPE Law for 5% of freshmen – are
compelled by law.
CODING One digit code.
1 Financial aid is being offered under compulsion or requirement of law.
2 Financial aid is not required by law, is being offered on the discretion, civic-
mindedness or generosity of the provider.
9 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER G007
NAME OF ELEMENT LEGAL BASIS FOR FINANCIAL PROGRAM
SHORT NAME LEGALBAS2
PURPOSE To identify the law which requires the offering of the financial aid program.
DEFINITION The law which requires the offering of the aid program. For example: Republic
Act 1234 or Presidential Decree 5678
CODING Text data: alphanumeric, 80 characters. Include the year of approval in
parenthesis as in R.A. 1234 ( 1995). Key in “Purely Voluntary” if the aid
program is offered on the generosity of aid provider without compulsion by
law.
ELEMENT NUMBER G008
NAME OF ELEMENT CHED ORDER WHICH SPECIFIES IMPLEMENTING DETAILS OF
FINANCIAL AID PROGRAM
SHORT NAME CHEDORDR
PURPOSE To identify the CHED order which specifies the implementing rules and
regulations.
DEFINITION CHED Order no. and date of issuance.
CODING Text data: alphanumeric, 120 characters. Include the date of issuance in
parenthesis as in CHED Order S-02 ( May 15, 1999). If there is more than
one CHED order which is relevant, list that too. Write “None” if there is no
relevant CHED order. Do not leave blank entry.
DEFINITION The classification of the financial aid programs into the types listed below.
CODING A one-digit code is recommended as follows:
1 Short-term student or family loan. The financial aid is in the form of a loan
which must be repaid within a very short period, e.g. before the end of the
semester or end of the schoolyear.
2 Study Now Pay Later plan. That is, no repayment is required until the
student has graduated and has obtained a job.
3 HEI work-study plan. In return for financial aid – tuition waiver and/or hourly
wages -- the student (while enrolled) has to render some work hours for
the HEI. For instance, “student assistantships” where students get paid for
rendering part-time hours at the library, etc.
4 Team-membership-related financial aid. For instance, financial aid to
members of the school varsity teams, cheerleading group, choir, school
band, cultural group, etc. The grantee is required to be an active participant
in such school teams or groups.
5 Grantee’s or dependent’s educational benefit. That is, the grantee enjoys
financial aid because he is an employee of the aid provider. Or the grantee
is not an employee but is the dependent ( spouse or unmarried child) of an
employee. The grant is available only for so long as the grantee or parent is
an employee in good standing. For instance: HEI staff and their children may
be entitled to tuition waivers or discounts.
6 Outright grant. That is, student does not have to repay the benefits
received, does not have to render some work hours or return service while
still studying, and has nothing to do with his employment or the employment
of his parent/s.
9 No information provided on the matter.
Example: In the UP STFAP, a grantee this year may not be a grantee next
year. Even if the student gets good grades but wins first prize in Lotto this
year, student will no longer be eligible in the next year. Thus, for UP STFAP,
TENOR=1.
2 Automatic renewal to the next schoolyear (without need to reapply) if the
awardee satisfies retention requirements.
3 Automatic renewal to the next schoolyear regardless of grades.
9 No information provided on the matter.
Note that these groups are not defined in terms of ethnicity and are not
defined by regional locations.
2 Not limited to a specific group defined by ethnicity or regional location. In
other words, open competition.
9 No information provided on the matter.
Many scholarships accept applications from all over the country. Before final
selection, these applications may be put into just one national pool (such as
is done by DOST) or the applications are kept in separate regional pools,
separate congressional district pools, or separate university pools.
With almost 200 congressional districts in the country, this means 200
separate competitions in the Philippines. An applicant in one district may
not get a scholarship if that district runs out of slots --- even if the applicant
may happen to be “more deserving” than a grantee in another district.
5 Final selection of awardees is from a pool of applicants within one
province or city only. The province or city is allotted a certain no. of
slots, say 30. The final selection of the 30 awardees is made from a pool of
applicants from the province or city only. Applicants from outside the province
or city cannot join the competition. Application and processing occur entirely
within the province or city.
6 Final selection of awardees is from a pool of applicants within one HEI
only. The HEI is allotted a certain no. of slots, say 10, or the HEI itself is the
provider of 10 scholarships. The final selection of the 10 awardees is made
from a pool of applicants from the HEI only. Applicants from outside the HEI
cannot join the competition. Application and processing occur entirely within
the HEI.
7 Final selection of awardees is from a pool of applicants within one
college only of an HEI. The college is allotted a certain no. of slots, say 5.
The final selection of the 5 awardees is made from a pool of applicants within
the college only, e.g. College of Science only. Applicants from outside the
college cannot join the competition – not even a student from the same HEI.
Application and processing occur entirely within the college.
9 No information provided on the size of short list.
Many scholarships are traditionally offered at the freshman level but may also
admit a few upperclassmen to the slots vacated by disqualified freshman
holders. If recruitment at the upper class level is done only as an exception
to the rule, UMPISA=1.
2 Financial aid or scholarship is traditionally or usually made available only at
the upper class year level, e.g. graduating students only or junior standing
only.
The rationale behind a program which is usually made available at the upper
class level is that grades in the previous years are used to screen out high-
risk applicants. Financial aid for thesis costs is of course offered only to the
upperclassmen, not the first year students.
3 Financial aid is available at any year level in the program. For instance,
financial aid offered to members of the school choir or the varsity team is not
usually offered at a specific year level.
9 No information provided on the matter.
2 More than one degree program but one specific field only. To be able
to enjoy the financial aid, the grantee has to enroll in a program belonging
to a field designated by the aid provider. For instance, DOST scholars have
to choose from Science and Technology programs only. Within the specific
field, there are many degree programs to choose from.
3 Any program at all. That is, the grantee may choose any degree program
and still be able to enjoy the financial aid. Grantee has an open choice for a
degree program.
9 No information provided on the matter.
1 No penalty.
2 Grantee will be penalized if discovered to have submitted wrong or incomplete
socioeconomic data.
9 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER G027
NAME OF ELEMENT IF THE SCHOLARSHIP ALLOWS THE GRANTEE TO RECEIVE A
SECOND SCHOLARSHIP
SHORT NAME EXCLUSIV
PURPOSE To indicate if the scholarship program allows a student to receive supplemental
benefits from a second scholarship or financial aid program. For a program
which provides only a low level of benefits, this indicates if the grantee can
look for supplemental sources of financial aid.
DEFINITION If the scholarship program allows the grantee to enjoy the benefits of a
second scholarship to supplement the benefits received from the original
program.
CODING 1-digit code
1 Scholarship program does NOT allow the grantee to receive a second
scholarship or second source of financial aid.
2 Scholarship program ALLOWS the grantee to receive a second source of
financial aid as supplement.
9 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER G028
NAME OF ELEMENT CONDITION IMPOSED IF GRANTEE WITHDRAWS BEFORE
GRADUATION
SHORT NAME CONDITION
PURPOSE To indicate what condition (if any) is imposed by the scholarship program if
the grantee withdraws voluntarily in the middle of the program.
DEFINITION The condition, if any, which the scholarship program imposes on scholars
who withdraw voluntarily “in the middle of the program” without graduating.
Not to be confused with applicants who decline the offer of scholarship at the
outset or request deferment. Not to be confused with penalty imposed on
grantees who are caught cheating or lying. Not to be confused with penalty
(if any) on grantees who are dropped permanently by the provider for poor
academic records.
CODING 1-digit code
1 No condition. That is, a grantee may withdraw without penalty even before
graduating.
2 Condition or penalty for voluntary withdrawal. For instance: if the grantee
withdraws voluntarily, grantee must refund the benefits received so far.
9 No information provided on the matter.
ELEMENT NUMBER G029
NAME OF ELEMENT CONDITION IMPOSED AFTER GRADUATION
SHORT NAME PAGTAPOS
PURPOSE To indicate what condition (if any) is imposed by the scholarship program
after graduation.
DEFINITION The condition, if any, which the scholarship program imposes on its scholars
after they graduate.
CODING 1-digit code
1 Yes, a condition is imposed, e.g. stay in the Philippines for at least 2 years.
Or, start making payments on the student loan at least one year after date
of first employment. Or the scholar is obligated to work for the provider after
graduation
2 No, there is no condition imposed. After graduation, scholar is free of any
obligation. SUC students receive financial aid from public funds but there is
no obligation on them after they graduate.
9 No information provided on the matter.
DEFINITION The minimum SCIENCE high school average ( in percentage) which the
applicant must satisfy before being considered eligible. If the applicant has
to have at least 80% in HS Science, then MIN_SCI% = 80.0
DEFINITION If the financial aid program imposes high academic standards for retention.
CODING 1-digit code.
1 “High academic standards” required for retention. Program is limited to “the
best schools”. Average grade requirements must be clearly above just-
passing.
DEFINITION The total no. of grantees “in good standing” in the program and who are
actually enrolled as of a specific census date. This includes all those who
have submitted complete documentation and have complied with all retention
rules. Exclude scholars who are “deferred” status, suspended or “on official
leave”. The recommended annual census date is September 1 of each
year -- enough time for grantees to complete their documentation and for
the aid provider to record all relevant data.
CODING Numeric: 6 digits. XXXXXX
ELEMENT NUMBER G063
NAME OF ELEMENT NO. OF GRADUATES OVER A SPECIFIED SCHOOLYEAR.
SHORT NAME NAGTAPOS
PURPOSE To record the number of grantees (in the scholarship program) who were
able to graduate in a specified schoolyear.
DEFINITION The no. of grantees in the program who were able to graduate while enjoying
the benefits of the financial aid for a specific schoolyear. This includes those
who got their degree any date in the 1st sem, 2nd sem or summer session,
i.e. between June 1 and May 31 of the next year. Even if the scholarship
did not fund all 4 year levels of education, the grantee should be counted in
NAGTAPOS if the student graduated while enjoying the scholarship. Exclude
students who, at the time of graduation, no longer enjoyed the financial
aid. ( Note that students counted in NAGTAPOS are also included among
GRANTEES in good standing).
CODING Numeric: 6 digits. XXXXXX
DEFINITION The no. of grantees in the program who are on official leave of absence
(and therefore not currently enrolled) but otherwise in good standing. This
means upperclassmen who have enjoyed the scholarship for some period
but requested official leave, e.g. for a medical break or for some acceptable
reason. Do not confuse with DEFERRED or SUSPENDED.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
ELEMENT NUMBER G067
NAME OF ELEMENT NO. OF GRANTEES DROPPED PERMANENTLY
(SCHOOLYEAR)
SHORT NAME TERMINATED
PURPOSE To record the number of grantees in the program whose financial aid was
withdrawn permanently by the aid provider.
DEFINITION The no. of grantees in the program whose financial aid was permanently
withdrawn for some negative reasons, e.g. academic failures or serious
breach of rules by the grantee. Exclude those who were dropped because
they simply did not enroll but were otherwise in good standing. Exclude
those who graduated or who withdrew voluntarily.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
ELEMENT NUMBER G068
NAME OF ELEMENT NO. OF GRANTEES WHO GAVE UP FOR FINANCIAL REASONS
(SCHOOLYEAR)
SHORT NAME GAVEUP1
PURPOSE To record the no. of grantees in the scholarship program who gave up
schooling because of lack of personal or family funds which the financial aid
could not cover.
DEFINITION The no. of grantees who had to stop schooling – and therefore lost the financial
aid – because, on its own, the family did not have enough finances.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
Exclude from the numerator a student whose financial aid was terminated
but was able to graduate anyway. This might happen if scholars are required
to maintain a weighted average which is higher than the usual HEI passing
rate. It is then possible for a scholar to be dropped from the scholarship
but not from the HEI. If the scholarship retention average is 2.75 and the
student gets 2.85, the student is dropped from the scholarship but remains
to be a student in good standing. The terminated scholar may be able to
graduate anyway but his graduation should not be credited to the scholarship
program.
CODING Numeric: 3 digits with one decimal place as in XX.X No percentage sign.
Commission on Higher Education
Data on a Scholarship Program 337
From the numerator, exclude those who “did not advance”: grantees who
were temporarily ineligible, grantees who were dropped permanently,
grantees who gave up permanently on their own, and grantees who were
AWOL. From the denominator, exclude those who requested deferment.
Compare with the next element.
CODING Numeric: 3 digits with one decimal place as in XX.X No percentage sign.
ELEMENT NUMBER G074
NAME OF ELEMENT PERCENTAGE OF SCHOLARS WHO BECOME TEMPORARILY
INELIGIBLE
SHORT NAME SUSPENDED%
PURPOSE To indicate percentage of scholars who become temporarily ineligible.
DEFINITION As a percentage of total no. of grantees at the beginning of the schoolyear,
the no. of grantees who are temporarily ineligible, e.g. due to incomplete
grades or non-submission of certain documents.
For instance, if there were 200 grantees at the start of the year and if at
the end of the year, 10 of them become temporarily ineligible ( e.g. due to
incomplete grades), then SUSPENDED% = 10/200= 5.0%.
This series of data elements details the benefits provided by the scholarship program to one grantee. These are
usually expressed as ceilings or upper bounds.
DEFINITION The maximum percentage of the tuition which the provider will be willing
to pay per grantee per semester. If the program will cover “50% of tuition
as billed per semester”, then MAX_TUIT%=50. 0%. Exclude ceiling on
miscellaneous fees.
CODING Numeric:4 digits with 1 decimal place as in 33.3 No percent sign. If the
ceiling is expressed as an absolute peso ceiling, enter “1”. If there is no
imposed ceiling, enter 100.0. If no information is provided, enter 99.9
Commission on Higher Education
Data on a Scholarship Program 339
This series of data elements provides aggregate figures paid out by the scholarship program to all its
grantees combined. This series records the aggregate amounts for all grantees combined, the actual amounts
paid out, not the amounts allotted or budgeted. These elements will indicate the total amounts paid out by the
scholarship program.
DEFINITION For a specific semester: The total monetary value of all tuition benefits
actually paid by the aid program in behalf of all its grantees combined. If the
aid program paid out P10,000 for the tuition of Scholar A, P 12,000 for the
tuition of Scholar B and P 5,000 for the tuition of Scholar C, then TUITION1=
27,000.
Do not confuse with TUITION2 (total tuition as billed) defined later in this
chapter. Exclude miscellaneous fees.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific
provision for this, enter 0.
ELEMENT NUMBER G088
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS FEES BENEFITS (ALL GRANTEES)
SHORT NAME MISCFEES1
PURPOSE To record total benefits paid out specifically for miscellaneous fees.
DEFINITION For a specific semester and all grantees combined, the total monetary
value of all the miscellaneous fees paid by the program. With or without
stipends, if the provider does not specifically cover any miscellaneous fees,
MISCFEES1=0 of course. Exclude benefits for tuition fees. Do not confuse
with MISCFEES2 ( misc fees as billed) to be defined later.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific provision
for miscellaneous fees, enter 0.
ELEMENT NUMBER G089
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL TUITION AND MISC FEES BENEFITS (ALL GRANTEES)
SHORT NAME TUITFEES1
PURPOSE For a specific semester: To indicate support for tuition and miscellaneous
fees only.
DEFINITION By formula: TUITFEES1 = TUITION1 + MISCFEES1
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific
provision for this, enter 0.
DEFINITION The total value of the “stipends” or “living allowances” actually paid by the
aid program in behalf of all its grantees. Typically there is a living allowance
per semester or per month ( where 1 semester is counted as 5 months).
Exclude any amount specifically provided to pay tuition, miscellaneous fees,
textbooks or long-distance transportation cost.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific provision
for “stipends”, enter 0.
ELEMENT NUMBER G092
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS (ALL GRANTEES)
SHORT NAME TRANSPORT1
PURPOSE To record the total value of benefits for long-distance travel such as airfare,
ship fare or bus fare (between school and family residence) actually paid by
the aid program in behalf of all its grantees during a specified semester.
DEFINITION The total value of long-distance travel fare such as for airfare, ship fare or
bus fare (e.g. between Manila and Visayas or between Zamboanga City and
Jolo) actually paid by the aid program in behalf of all its grantees. Do not
confuse with COMMUTE1. Typically, the long-distance transportation cost
being referred to here consists of one round-trip per semester. With or without
stipends, if there is NO specific benefit for transportation, TRANSPORT1 =0
of course.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific provision
for transportation benefits, enter 0.
ELEMENT NUMBER G093
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL COMMUTING BENEFITS (ALL GRANTEES)
SHORT NAME COMMUTE1
PURPOSE To record the total value of all benefits paid for “commuting costs”. Do not
confuse with TRANSPO1.
DEFINITION The total value of all benefits paid for “commuting costs”, e.g. between the
boarding house and the school. This means benefits specifically for jeepney
fare or tricycle fare incurred on a daily basis. With or without stipends, if there
is NO specific benefit for commuting costs, COMMUTE1 =0 of course.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific provision
for commuting benefits, enter 0.
ELEMENT NUMBER G094
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL LODGING BENEFITS (ALL GRANTEES)
SHORT NAME LODGING1
PURPOSE To record the total value of the lodging benefits actually paid by the aid
program in behalf of all its grantees during a specified semester.
DEFINITION The total value lodging benefits actually paid out to all grantees. With or
without stipends, if there is NO specific benefit for lodging, LODGING1 =0
of course.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific
provision for this, enter 0.
ELEMENT NUMBER G095
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL UNIFORMS BENEFITS (ALL GRANTEES)
SHORT NAME UNIFORMS1
PURPOSE To record the total value of the SCHOOL UNIFORMS BENEFITS actually
paid by the aid provider in behalf of all its grantees during a specified
semester.
DEFINITION The total value of SCHOOL UNIFORMS BENEFITS actually paid out to
all grantees. With or without stipends, if there is NO specific benefit for
uniforms, UNIFORM1 =0 of course.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific
provision for this, enter 0.
ELEMENT NUMBER G096
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL FIELD WORK BENEFITS (ALL GRANTEES)
SHORT NAME FIELDWK1
PURPOSE To record the total value of FIELD WORK actually paid by the aid provider in
behalf of all its grantees during a specified semester. Important for programs
(e.g. geology, archaeology, social work and community development, mining
engineering, etc.) which require field work.
DEFINITION The total value of FIELD WORK BENEFITS actually paid by the aid
provider in behalf of all its grantees during a specified schoolyear. With or
without stipends, if there is NO specific benefit for field work, FIELDWK1 =0
of course.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific
provision for this, enter 0.
ELEMENT NUMBER G097
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL THESIS BENEFITS (ALL GRANTEES)
SHORT NAME THESIS1
PURPOSE To record the total value of THESIS BENEFITS paid by the aid provider in
behalf of all its grantees during a specified semester.
DEFINITION The total value of THESIS BENEFITS (or for required culminating projects
such as for Architecture) actually paid by the aid provider in behalf of all
its grantees. With or without stipends, if there is specific benefit for thesis
expenditures, THESIS1 =0 of course.
CODING Numeric data: 12 digits as in XXXXXXXX with no centavos. In Philippine
pesos. No commas. No peso sign. If the scholarship has no specific provision
for thesis costs, enter 0.
The previous series of elements account for the benefits paid out by the scholarship program. This
series of elements will account for the total tuition and miscellaneous fees as billed.
This series will measure the generosity of the support for tuition and miscellaneous fees. For the
scholarship program as a whole (all grantees combined for a specific semester), if total tuition and fees as
billed is P 400,000 but total tuition and fees as billed is P 600,000, then the percentage level of support is
66.7% ( = 400,000/ 600,000). The higher the percentage, the more generous.
How “generous” is the financial aid program? Some programs are “generous”, some “very generous”,
and some rather “inadequate”. Without explicitly using such descriptive labels, the data elements below are an
attempt to classify financial aid programs into categories which may loosely be interpreted as such.
5/6/04 11:32 AM
CHAPTER 9
DATA ELEMENTS ON AN ALUMNUS
DATA ENTITY TO BE DESCRIBED: The entity to be described in this chapter is an alumnus of the HEI,
a person.
These elements are important for graduate tracer studies. They are also useful for alumni fund
campaigns.
H006 DEGREES No. of degrees earned from the HEI by the alumnus TEXT
H014 ORIGLOAN The original amount (principal) borrowed as part of SNPL. NUMERIC
H016 UTANGPA Amount of student loan (principal plus interest) still unpaid. NUMERIC
H017 JOB1DATE Date when the alumnus got his first job. NUMERIC
H021 FACULTY If Alumnus Is Or Has Served As Faculty Member In The HEI. CODED
H022 UPDIN No. of children who are HEI alumni too NUMERIC
H027 RECENT Year When Most Recent Residential Address Was Obtained NUMERIC
H048 NAGBIGAY If Alumnus Made A Contribution Or Donation Within The Past CODED
5 Years
5/6/04 11:38 AM
CHAPTER 10
DATA ON A SCHOLARSHIP PROVIDER
ENTITY BEING DESCRIBED: The entity to be described is a provider of scholarship or student financial
aid, e.g. The Metrobank Foundation, an HEI such as the Philippine Normal University or Ateneo de Davao, or
an individual philanthropist.
The data elements in this chapter refer to a specific donor or provider, usually an organization but possibly
also a private individual. The current estimate is that there are about 2,000 different scholarship providers or
donors in the Philippines. To begin with, there are already 1,300 HEIs and each of them provides scholarships
or student financial aid, e.g. to valedictorians and salutatorians. A provider may be supporting more than one
scholarship program and many grantees in each program. The data elements below do not refer directly to any
scholarship program or the scholar himself.
It is evident that private providers tend to give scholarships, i.e. merit-based financial aid, where the primary
criterion is high academic achievement or potential for such achievement. It will be the task of public providers
to fund financial aid targeted to the poor.
The data elements below refer to a provider organization, not directly to any scholarship program
funded by it or any individual scholar in particular.
03 Public HEI. That is, the provider is a public HEI, e.g. SUC or LGU-funded
HEI (e.g. Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila). No distinction is made
between the GAA funds and non-GAA funds of a public HEI.
04 DOST or any of its attached agencies.
05 Other government agency or department, e.g. Philippine National Police,
Armed Forces of the Philippines, Dept of Agriculture, etc.
06 Government corporation, e.g. Philippine National Oil Company.
07 Private HEI. That is, provider is a private higher education institution. For
instance, Ateneo de Manila U
08 Private Corporation Or Foundation, e.g. Metrobank Foundation or San
Miguel Corporation.
09 Other Non-Government Organization, e.g. Rotary Club, Makati Business
Club, United Architects of the Philippines
10 International organization, e.g. Japan International Cooperation Agency
(JICA)
11 Private individual. The donor is an individual giving from his personal
funds.
20 Others.
99 No information provided on the matter.
Whom should prospective applicants, current grantees or the general public call if they wanted to
know more information about the provider?
DEFINITION Family name. Also known as surname or last name. For a married woman,
this could be the original maiden name, the married name (i.e. last name of
husband) or a hyphenated version as in “Macapagal-Arroyo”. Should not
include the appellations “Jr.”, “Sr.” or the roman numerals “III”.
CODING Text data: 30 characters. UPPERCASE ONLY. Other rules and conventions
to be set later.
ELEMENT NUMBER I009
NAME OF ELEMENT MIDDLE NAME OF MAIN CONTACT PERSON IN PROVIDER
ORGANIZATION
SHORT NAME PERSNAM2
PURPOSE To record the middle name of main contact person.
DEFINITION Middle name. For Filipino males or unmarried females, this is usually the
maiden name of the mother. For a married Filipina woman, this is usually the
maiden name. If a person has two first names as in Maria Clara, the Clara
is not a middle name.
CODING Text data: 30 characters. UPPERCASE ONLY. Other rules and conventions
to be set later.
ELEMENT NUMBER I010
NAME OF ELEMENT FIRST NAME OF MAIN CONTACT PERSON IN PROVIDER
ORGANIZATION
SHORT NAME PERSNAM1
PURPOSE To record the first name of main contact person.
DEFINITION The first name. (Sometimes also known as “given name”). Some first names
actually involve more than one name as in MARIA CLARA or MA. CARIDAD
ESPERANA. The first name should include the appellations “JR.” or ‘SR.” or
the roman numerals if any such as “III” as in GREGORIO III
CODING Text data: 30 characters. UPPERCASE ONLY. Other rules and conventions
to be set later.
ELEMENT NUMBER I011
NAME OF ELEMENT POSITION TITLE OF MAIN CONTACT PERSON
SHORT NAME POSTITLE
PURPOSE To record the official position title of main contact person.
DEFINITION The official position title of the contact person in the provider organization,
e.g. President, Executive Director, or Scholarship Officer. Not the personal
title such as Attorney or Doctor.
CODING Text data: 20 characters.
ELEMENT NUMBER I012
NAME OF ELEMENT PERSONAL TITLE OF MAIN CONTACT PERSON
SHORT NAME PERSTITLE
PURPOSE To record the personal title by which the main contact person is addressed.
For use in correspondence.
DEFINITION Personal title of main contact person, e.g. Attorney, Doctor, Mr., Mrs., etc.
Not the position title in the provider organization.
CODING Text data: 15 characters.
ELEMENT NUMBER I013
NAME OF ELEMENT STREET ADDRESS OF PROVIDER ORGANIZATION
SHORT NAME ADDRESS1
PURPOSE To record the street address of provider organization. To indicate where
grantees may submit their applications, documents and of course where to
send their thank-yous.
DEFINITION The street address, not post office box number. Address with enough details,
suitable for messenger use.
CODING Text data: 70 characters. Alphanumeric.
ELEMENT NUMBER I014
NAME OF ELEMENT TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROVIDER ORGANIZATION
SHORT NAME PHONE1
PURPOSE To record the first telephone number of provider organization.
DEFINITION Telephone number, including area code.
CODING Text data: 20 characters. Format: (054) 890-1234 or (0917) 789-6543
ELEMENT NUMBER I015
NAME OF ELEMENT TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROVIDER ORGANIZATION
SHORT NAME PHONE2
PURPOSE To record alternate telephone number of provider organization.
DEFINITION Telephone number, including area code.
CODING Text data: 20 characters. Format: (054) 890-1234 or (0917) 789-6543
ELEMENT NUMBER I016
NAME OF ELEMENT FAX NUMBER OF PROVIDER ORGANIZATION
SHORT NAME FAXNUM1
PURPOSE To record the fax number of provider organization.
DEFINITION Fax number, including area code.
CODING Text data: 20 characters. Format: (054) 890-1234
ELEMENT NUMBER I017
NAME OF ELEMENT E-MAIL ADDRESS OF PROVIDER ORGANIZATION
SHORT NAME EMAILADD
PURPOSE To record the e-mail address of provider organization.
DEFINITION E-mail address of provider organization.
CODING Text data: 30 characters. Format: sunshinefoundation@ pacific.net.ph
DEFINITION OVER ONE SCHOOLYEAR. The no. of grantees in all programs who were
suspended ( but not permanently dropped) at any time during the schoolyear
for poor academic performance or non-compliance with other rules.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
ELEMENT NUMBER I023
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL NO. OF GRANTEES WHO WERE DROPPED PERMANENTLY
SHORT NAME TERMINATED
PURPOSE To record the number of grantees in all programs whose financial aid was
withdrawn permanently by the aid provider.
DEFINITION DURING A SPECIFIED SCHOOLYEAR. The no. of grantees in all programs
whose financial aid was permanently withdrawn for some negative reasons,
e.g. academic failures or serious breach of rules by the grantee. Do not
include those who were dropped because they simply did not enroll but were
otherwise in good standing. Do not include those who graduated or who
withdrew voluntarily.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
ELEMENT NUMBER I024
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL NO. OF GRANTEES WHO HAD TO GIVE UP THE FINANCIAL AID
FOR FINANCIAL REASONS
SHORT NAME NAUBUSAN
PURPOSE To record the no. of grantees in all programs who gave up schooling because
of lack of personal or family funds which the financial aid could not cover.
DEFINITION DURING A SPECIFIED SCHOOLYEAR The no. of grantees who had to stop
schooling – and therefore lost the financial aid – because, on its own, the
family did not have enough finances.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
ELEMENT NUMBER I025
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL NO. OF GRANTEES WHO HAD TO GIVE UP THE FINANCIAL AID
FOR MEDICAL REASONS
SHORT NAME ILLNESS
PURPOSE To record the no. of grantees in all programs who gave up schooling because
of illness or some other medical reason.
DEFINITION DURING A SPECIFIED SCHOOLYEAR The no. of grantees who had to
give up the financial aid permanently because of illness or medical reasons.
Include grantees only grantees whose illness was serious enough to make
them schooling, not just stop temporarily. Include grantees who may have
died.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
ELEMENT NUMBER I026
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL NO. OF GRANTEES WHO VOLUNTARILY GAVE UP FOR OTHER
REASONS
SHORT NAME UMAYAW
PURPOSE To record total the no. of “voluntary withdrawals” for reasons other than
illness or financial.
DEFINITION DURING A SPECIFIED SCHOOLYEAR The no. of grantees who withdrew
formally for reasons other than medical or financial. For instance, those who
shift to a degree program or HEI not supported by the scholarship, those
who emigrate, etc.
CODING Numeric: 5 digits.
ELEMENT NUMBER I027
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL NO. OF GRANTEES WHO WENT AWOL
SHORT NAME NAWALA
PURPOSE To record total the no. of grantees who disappeared or abandoned their
scholarships without official notice or permission.
This series of data elements provides aggregate figures. A provider may have 3 distinct financial aid
programs and a total of 30 grantees. Different levels of benefits are paid out for each program and indeed for
each of the grantees. This series records the aggregate amounts for all programs and grantees combined, the
actual amounts paid out, not the amounts allotted or budgeted.
This is not necessarily “tuition as billed” to the student. This element records
the amount in pesos actually paid by the scholarship program. For instance,
total tuition as billed might be P 100,000 but the provider pays only P 75,000
of it, then TUITION1= 75,000 only. If the provider paid the entire tuition,
TUITION1=100,000 of course. Do not include miscellaneous fees.
Include two semesters and summer session, if any. Do not include tuition
fees.
5/24/2004 3:06 PM
CHAPTER 11
The employee could be a faculty member or non-teaching staff but most of the data elements in this chapter
apply only to a faculty member. Provision is made on how a data element will be recorded if the staff member
is not a faculty member.
The point of reference is an employee or staff member of an HEI. This means an employee --- whether
full-time or part-time, faculty or non-faculty, temporary or permanent. Included are lecturers (even if hired on
a semester-by-semester basis), teaching fellows, associates, or assistants, student assistants and graduate
assistants.
Each of the elements describes an employee, a person. The person must have an “employee-employer
relationship” with the HEI. Many HEIs enter into contracts with private security and custodial services agencies.
Most of the blue guards and uniformed janitors in HEIs are actually employees of the agencies, not of the HEI.
Such persons are not part of the discussion in this chapter.
Of course it also happens that an HEI may have a few security and/or custodial workers in its employ. These
persons receive salaries from the HEI itself and not from an agency. They are considered employees of the HEI
and the data elements here would apply to them.
Another possible exclusion is in connection with some “projects” in an HEI. An HEI may use its own funds
or receive funding from an external agency (e.g. DOST, the Department of Agriculture, the Ford Foundation,
USAID, etc. to conduct some research or training project with a fixed duration. A person hired in connection with
such a project may be considered an employee “of the project” but not of the HEI itself.
The data on an individual employee or faculty member are most relevant to the HEI itself. The HEI is the primary
user of the data and this is especially true in the case of private HEIs. In the case of public institutions, the
employees are of interest to the SUC but they are also of interest to DBM, the Civil Service and CHED. In either
case, much of the data on an individual employee or faculty will be recorded only in the HEI itself. One cannot
see a circumstance where CHED might be interested in the name, ID number, birthday, address, etc. of an
individual employee of an HEI. After all, there could be as many as 100,000 personnel in the 1,800 HEIs.
Even so, if only for statistical and research purposes, it is in the interest of CHED for all HEIs to use the same
terminology, the same definitions and the same coding of common data elements.
CHED will be collecting only aggregate data per institution such as: the total no. of faculty, the no. of full-time
faculty with doctorate degrees, the percentage of students who enjoy financial aid, the average tuition and
miscellaneous fees paid by students, etc. An HEI cannot collect such data about its faculty unless CHED
and the HEI together have clear and common definitions of data elements on an individual faculty. For CHED
the more relevant data elements are those about an institution and those are in Chapter 3 DATA ON AN
INSTITUTION.
As mentioned many times, precise definitions and logical coding do not guarantee a good information system.
However, the absence of such precise definitions and standard coding schemes guarantee failure.
Imprecise definitions and confusing terminology will doom any computerization effort from the beginning.
Computers may be fast but they are inflexible. Thus the need for logical definitions.
The no. of data elements in this chapter seems to make data gathering more complex than it really is. The fact
is that the RCDEM is trying break down the data gathering to specific pieces of data.
HEI has 500 employees and collects 50 pieces of data every semester, this means 25,000 pieces per semester.
It will be the HEI which will decide which elements to collect, when to collect them, how frequent it will collect
the data and how the data will be stored.
As a general rule, CHED will be interested only in aggregate data about an institution such as those described
in Chapter 2. However, there will be a few occasions when some office in CHED will need data about individual
faculty members. For instance,
• the faculty members in a CHED center of excellence or center of development.
• the faculty members (esp. those teaching in graduate programs) in some discipline or cluster.
• the faculty members who are involved in proposing a new graduate program in some HEI.
• a group of faculty members submitting a research proposal.
• all faculty members with advanced degrees in the discipline where they teach.
Between the faculty members in private HEIs and those in SUCs, CHED will have a greater interest on those
in the latter. DBM too will have some interest in individual faculty members of the SUCs. For instance, the DBM
maintains a database on all SUC employees with their own PS items. There is, in fact, a government computer
database with the names of all faculty members in the SUCs – at least the ones with their own plantilla positions.
There is no such database on the faculty members or other employees of private HEIs and it is doubtful there
would ever be one.
It is the HEI which needs detailed data about each of its faculty members. In general, CHED will not need these
details but would need aggregate figures about the faculty members in an institution.
DISCLAIMER
The definitions given in this Revised CHED DATA ELEMENT MANUAL are operational definitions to be used
for data-gathering or statistical purposes only. The definitions used here are not intended to be legal definitions.
The definitions and coding schemes are designed only to put logic or clarify the logic in counting and classifying
data entities important to HEIs and CHED. They cannot and should not be used in collective bargaining
between employee unions and the HEIs or in any litigation.
DEFINITION The unique ID code number assigned to the employee by the HEI. It is
important that an employee has one code number that no two persons have
the same code.
Ideally an employee should have only one code number within the HEI -- for
use in the payroll, in the HEI library, at the HEI gym or swimming pool, at the
school clinic, etc.
CODING Text data: 10 alphanumeric.
ELEMENT NUMBER J002
NAME OF ELEMENT FIRST NAME OF EMPLOYEE
SHORT NAME EMPLNAM1
PURPOSE To record the family name of the employee.
DEFINITION Family name. Also known as surname or last name. For a married woman,
this could be the original maiden name, the married name (i.e. last name
of husband) or a hyphenated version as in “Macapagal-Arroyo”. Should not
include the appellations “Jr.”, “Sr.” or the Roman numerals “III”.
CODING Text data: 30 characters. UPPERCASE ONLY. Other rules and conventions
to be set later.
ELEMENT NUMBER J003
NAME OF ELEMENT MIDDLE NAME OF EMPLOYEE
SHORT NAME EMPLNAM2
PURPOSE To record the middle name.
DEFINITION Middle name. For Filipino males or unmarried females, this is usually the
maiden name of the mother. For a married Filipina woman, this is usually the
maiden name. If a person has two first names as in Maria Clara, the Clara is
not considered a middle name.
CODING Text data: 30 characters. UPPERCASE ONLY. Other rules and conventions
to be set later.
ELEMENT NUMBER J004
NAME OF ELEMENT FIRST NAME OF EMPLOYEE
SHORT NAME EMPLNAM3
PURPOSE To record the first name.
DEFINITION The first name. (Sometimes also known as “given name”). Some first names
actually involve more than one name as in MARIA CLARA or MARIA CARIDAD
ESPERANA. The first name should include the appellations “JR.” or ‘SR.” or
the Roman numerals if any such as “III” as in GREGORIO III
CODING Text data: 30 characters. UPPERCASE ONLY. Other rules and conventions
to be set later.
ELEMENT NUMBER J005
NAME OF ELEMENT EMPLOYEE DATE OF BIRTH
SHORT NAME BDAY
PURPOSE To keep track of age, possibly for retirement and other uses.
DEFINITION Date of birth in official Birth Certificate.
CODING MMDDYYYY. Feb 8, 1960 is recorded as 02081960.
ELEMENT NUMBER J006
NAME OF ELEMENT GENDER OF EMPLOYEE
SHORT NAME GENDER
PURPOSE
DEFINITION Gender of employee.
CODING 1 Male
2 Female
9 No information provided on the matter.
DEFINITION The sub-unit of “HOME1” (as defined above) where employee is based. In
the example cited above, HOME2=Math Dept while HOME1=College of
Science.
CLASSIFICATION AS FACULTY
Every employee in the HEI is important. Every employee contributes to the 3 missions of a higher education
institution – teaching (or instruction), research and extension services. Not surprisingly, HEIs are full of
employees with academic degrees and professional licensures. However, the HEI employees who deserve the
most statistical scrutiny are the faculty. After sorting out who deserve to considered “a faculty member”, there
remains the problem of classifying each employee into groups such as: Executive, Research/Extension staff,
Professional Staff, etc.
The specific issues of who belongs to what category will be tackled in more detail later. For the moment, the
definition of the element EMPLTYPE provides the labels for the boxes into which every employee has to be
classified. Each employee can be classified into exactly one of the groups listed in the coding.
Within an HEI, the issue of who gets classified into what group (e.g. faculty, professional or executive) could
be a matter of privilege ( e.g. entitlement to a nice office, an official vehicle and driver, Representation and
Transportation Allowance), protocol, or a matter of professional and personal pride. For CHED, the systematic
classification is a matter of accuracy and comparability of data from HEI to HEI. With almost 1,600 HEIS ( or
2,000 depending on whether campuses are counted separately) submitting statistics, it is important that HEIs
are submitting the same things. CHED must be sure that bananas are being added to bananas, not bananas
to chicos.
Deans are executives too but they do not sit in permanent positions and
do not devote all their official hours to that position. Deans usually serve in
that position as an additional duty to their primary appointment as faculty
members. Thus, deans will not be counted among the executives.
5 TECHNICAL Example: Lab Technician, Computer Personnel with a certain
minimum level of training (e.g. beyond mere data entry).
9 Not known.
CODING
1 FACULTY.
2 Research, Extension and Professional Staff (REPS)
3 ADMINISTRATIVE
9 No information provided on the matter.
Not all the full-time faculty are on tenure track. In some SUCs there are
full-time faculty members who do not have PS items and their salaries are
charged to SUC income, GAA PS lump sums or PS savings. Because of
the absence of a PS item, these full-time faculty members in an SUC are
NOT on tenure track.
CODING
1 The employee is permanent. If a faculty member, the faculty member
is said to be “tenured.”
2 The employee is not tenured but is on tenure track, in line for
permanency. That is, the employee is eligible for tenure or permanency
pending fulfillment of some requirements. Although tenure may lie in the
future for the employee, tenure is not assured.
3 The employee is not tenured and is not on tenure track either. That is,
the person is NOT in line for permanency.
• In a public SUC or public HEI, if the faculty member is non-tenured
but has his own PS item or plantilla position, he is deemed to be
on a tenure track. This is not to say tenure will be certain or even
probable.
In the SUCs, the position titles for the faculty include Roman numerals as in “ Assistant Professor IV” as
opposed to “Assistant Professor I”. If the Roman numerals are factored in, there could be as many as 30
different faculty position titles. However, it would be simpler if faculty ranks could be grouped together into just
“the generic ranks” without the encumbrance of Roman numerals. The data element FACRANK is an attempt
in this simplification.
Ignore the prefixes: Exchange, Visiting, Adjunct, Affiliate, and the suffix
Emeritus. Thus, Visiting, Adjunct or Affiliate Asst Prof will be coded along
with all other Asst Prof.
A person will be classified into one and only one of the following
categories.
• If the faculty member has no fixed minimum load but has been
teaching an average of at least 18 units in the previous four
(4) consecutive semesters, the faculty member will be classified
“full-time”.
• This counting rule is only for the purposes of the RCDEM and the
rule cannot or should not be invoked by any person to demand
some privileges or compensation from the HEI.
CODING
1 The person is a “full-time” employee of the HEI.
2 The person is a “half-time” employee of the HEI.
3 Student employee such as Student Assistant or Graduate Assistant.
4 Teaching Fellow, Associate or Assistant.
5 None of the above and therefore “part-time”. This includes: lecturers (all
ranks), adjunct or affiliate faculty, visiting professors, professors emeriti,
Physicians “on call”, lawyers or accountants “on retainer basis”, etc.
9 Not known or not indicated.
CODING
1 The employee is CURRENTLY IN THE SERVICE OF THE HEI and drawing
salary or compensation from the HEI.
If the HEI or CHED wants to analyze the responses from 200 faculty members in an HEI or the 50,000 (or
100,000) faculty members in the Philippines, the response must be limited to a pre-specified menu of
specializations. For starters, CHED could use the 12 major fields of study or the 71 disciplines listed under the
data element UNESCO_12 or ISCED_71 of Chapter 2. Or CHED could use the 21 disciplines listed under the
data element PSCED_21 also in Chapter 2. The point is that responses have to be chosen from a prescribed
menu. The response should not be open-ended.
DEFINITION As declared by the faculty, the answer to the open-ended question stated
above. The question (or the answer) is open-ended in the sense that the
faculty member is allowed to write any field he wants. This data will be
recorded in text form.
Faculty workload is usually measured of “units” or “load credits”. If the normal load of the faculty is 18 units per
semester, the units will be apportioned among the following official duties:
1. TEACHING AT THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL
2. TEACHING AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL
3. TEACHING AT THE TECH/VOC AND PRE-BACC LEVEL
4. TEACHING UNDERGRADUATE AND POST-BACC LECTURE CLASSES
5. TEACHING UNDERGRAD AND POST-BACC LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE
SUBJECTS
6. TEACHING GRADUATE LECTURE CLASSES
7. TEACHING GRADUATE LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE CLASSES
8. ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES IN THE HOME COLLEGE OF THE FACULTY MEMNER
9. ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES OUTSIDE THE HOME COLLEGE OF THE FACULTY
10. RESEARCH
11. EXTENSION SERVICE
12. STUDY ON OFFICIAL TIME
13. OFFICIAL LEAVE (e.g. SICK LEAVE, VACATION, etc.)
14. OTHER OFFICIAL DUTIES.
It will be a very rare individual who will have credit units in all the 14 categories above but the categorization
is a logical partition. It also prepares for the tabulation by the HEI of the faculty workloads of all its faculty
members.
The unit of measure is “units”. More precisely, there will be two units of measure:
1. Units without credit load multipliers (CLM)
2. Units with the credit load multipliers.
These multipliers are used only for teaching at the undergrad and graduate levels:
• For instance, a faculty member teaching a 3-unit graduate subject could actually be credited with 4.5
units. In other words, a CREDIT LOAD MULTIPLIER (CLM) has been applied. The teaching load
without CLM is only 3.0 units but the teaching load with CLM is 4.5 units.
• The typical class size is between 30 to 40 students. If a 3-unit class is extra large (e.g. 50 or more),
each student will earn only 3 units but the teacher might be credited 4.0, 4.5 or 5.0 credit units for it. The
teaching load without CLM is 3.0 units ( see SUBJCREDIT) but the load with CLM could be 4.0, 4.5 or
5.0 units. The rules on credit load multipliers are set by the HEI, not CHED.
• In a 2-unit laboratory subject, the student earns 2 units but the teacher could be credited with only 1.0
teaching unit1. In this case, the teaching load without CLM is 2 units but the teaching load with CLM is
1.0 unit. This is typical for lab classes.
• For the research load, administrative load, etc. the unit of measure is simply “units” without need to say
whether there is a credit load multiplier or not.
Because of the wide variation in assignment of units to Thesis or Dissertation advising, do NOT include units
for thesis or dissertation work. Some HEIs attribute 6 units and some HEIs attribute 12 units. Since the typical
normal load is only 18 units, these would distort the tabulations too much. Besides, it cannot be predicted
whether the student will take 1 year, 2 years, or even 4 years. Besides, thesis advising is usually compensated
separately anyway.
In the HEI, the final arbiter of how many teaching units will be credited to the faculty is the Vice-President for
Academic Affairs or equivalent. Self-declaration by the faculty is not enough. A faculty might claim 12 units for
teaching, 9 units for “unfunded research” and 3 units for “committee work” for a total load of 24 units. This would
make it appear the faculty member is even overloaded. The rule is that the units claimed by the faculty must
be officially recognized by the Vice-President for Academic Affairs (VPAA) as partial fulfillment of the
normal or minimum load of 18 units per semester.
J032 NORMAL_LOAD In units, the minimum or normal load which the faculty member must
account for each semester. Typically this is 18 units per semester, 12
units per trimester, or 36 units per schoolyear. The normal load is set
by the HEI.
REMARKS:
At the undergraduate level, 1 “unit” means 3 lecture hours per week
over the 17-week semester. Units may be counted differently at the
elementary and secondary level.
J034 UNITX_SECONDY TEACHING LOAD (IN UNITS) IN SECONDARY SCHOOL
REMARKS:
Teaching load in lecture subjects BEFORE ANY CREDIT LOAD MULTIPLIERS
ARE APPLIED. If the faculty taught two 3-unit subjects, then UNITX_
UGLECT1=6. This is just the data element SUBJCRED in Chapter 5. Do not
apply any credit load multipliers. Do not include units for thesis advising or
advising for independent study.
REMARKS:
Teaching units in lecture subjects AFTER CREDIT LOAD MULTIPLIERS ARE
APPLIED. For instance, teaching a big 3-unit undergraduate lecture subject
(say with more than 50 students) might be given a value of 4.0 units. In this
case, UNITX_UGLECT2 = 4.0 units. Of course it is still possible that UNITX_
UGLECT1=UNITX_UGLECT2.
Do not include units for thesis advising or advising for independent study.
J038 UNITX_UGLAB1 TEACHING LOAD IN UNDERGRAD AND POST-BACC LAB AND
OTHER NON-LECT SUBJECTS ( IN UNITS WITHOUT CLM)
REMARKS:
Teaching units in non-lecture subjects BEFORE ANY CREDIT LOAD
MULTIPLIERS ARE APPLIED. For instance, if the faculty teaches a 2-unit
undergrad lab subject, UNITX_UGLAB1=2. Non-lecture subjects include
those taught at the lab, gym, studio, clinic, workshop, etc. – but exclude thesis
advising, supervising independent reading, etc.
Why is there need to separate lecture and non-lecture units? For costing
purposes.
J039 UNITX_UGLAB2 TEACHING LOAD IN UNDEGRAD AND POST-BACC LAB AND
OTHER NON-LECT SUBJECTS ( IN UNITS WITH CLM )
REMARKS:
Teaching units in non-lecture subjects AFTER THE CREDIT LOAD
MULTIPLIERS ARE APPLIED. For instance, teaching a 3-unit undergrad lab
subject might mean only 1.5 teaching units to the faculty. In this case, UNITX_
UGLAB2=1.5. Teaching units for non-lecture subjects include units taught in
the lab, gym, clinic, workshop, etc. – but exclude thesis advising, supervising
independent reading, etc.
REMARKS:
Teaching load in graduate lecture subjects BEFORE ANY CREDIT LOAD
MULTIPLIERS ARE APPLIED. If the faculty member teaches one 3-unit
graduate lecture subject, then UNITX_GRADLECT1= 3. Do not include units
for thesis advising or advising for independent study.
J041 UNITX_GRADLECT2 TEACHING LOAD IN GRADUATE LECTURE SUBJECTS (IN UNITS
WITH CLM).
REMARKS:
Teaching units in graduate lecture subjects AFTER CREDIT LOAD
MULTIPLIERS ARE APPLIED. For instance, teaching a 3-unit graduate lecture
subject is usually given a value of 4.5 units. In this case, UNITX_GRADLECT2
= 4.5 units. Of course it is still possible that UNITX_GRADLECT1=UNITX_
GRADLECT2.
Do not include units for thesis advising or advising for independent study.
J042 UNITX_GRADLAB1 TEACHING LOAD IN GRADUATE LAB AND OTHER NON-LECT
SUBJECTS ( IN UNITS WITHOUT CLM)
REMARKS:
Teaching units in graduate lab and other non-lecture subjects AFTER CREDIT
LOAD MULTIPLIERS ARE APPLIED. For instance, if the faculty teaches a
3-unit graduate lab subject, then it is possible UNITX_GRADLAB2=2.0. Non-
lecture subjects include those taught at the lab, gym, studio, clinic, workshop,
etc. – but exclude thesis advising, supervising independent reading, etc.
workshop, etc. – but exclude thesis advising, supervising independent reading,
etc.
The final arbiter for UNITX_GRADLAB2 is the VPAA. Lecture units and
laboratory units are separated because of costing differentials.
J044 UNITX_TEACH1 COMBINED TEACHING LOAD (WITHOUT CLM) AT ALL PROGRAM
LEVELS.
This is the entire teaching load of the faculty member but without the
credit load multipliers. Observe that at the elementary, secondary and
tech/voc levels, there are NO credit load multipliers.
Formula:
UNITX_TEACH1 = UNITX_ELEM + UNITX_SECONDY + UNITX_TECHVOC
+ UNITX_UGLECT1+ UNITX_UGLAB1 + UNITX_GRADLECT1 + UNITX_
GRADLAB1.
This the entire teaching load with credit load multipliers applied at the
undergraduate and graduate levels only. Note that the credit load multipliers
are used only for undergraduate and graduate teaching, not in lower levels.
FORMULA:
UNITX_TEACH2 = UNITX_ELEM + UNITX_SECONDY + UNITX_TECHVOC
+ UNITX_UGLECT2+ UNITX_UGLAB2 + UNITX_GRADLECT2 + UNITX_
GRADLAB2.
REMARKS:
Include only OFFICIAL LOAD REDUCTIONS for research. If the normal load
is 18 units per semester and the faculty is given 18 credit units for research,
the faculty member will not have to teach anything. If the faculty is given 6
units for research, then the faculty can get away with only 12 units of teaching.
It is not critical whether the research is funded or not: the crucial element is
that the faculty member is being given some time off for teaching so he can do
research.
If the faculty member is allowed to teach only 12 units so that he can enroll in
6 units as a masters or PHD student, then UNITX_STUDY1=6.
Study must lead toward an advanced degree in the discipline where faculty
member is teaching. If the faculty member is teaching Chemistry, do not
include time off in pursuit of an MBA , PhD Education (Chemistry), etc.
J049 UNITX_STUDY_2 STUDY LOAD ( IN UNITS) BEYOND FULL TEACHING LOADS.
Why is there a need to tabulate STUDY2? Although this is outside official time
and not counted toward normal load, it does impose on the time of the faculty
member. This data element is useful for monitoring faculty development
programs.
J050 UNITX_ADM1 ADMIN LOAD CREDITS (ALC) INSIDE THE COLLEGE WHERE
FACULTY BELONGS TO
Do not include units for “committee work”, etc. if there are no official load
reductions for such work.
J051 UNITX_ADM2 ADMIN LOAD CREDITS OUTSIDE THE COLLEGE BUT WITHIN
THE HEI.
Do not include leaves without pay because, in effect, no service has been
rendered. If faculty is on leave without pay, all data elements above are zero
including UNITX_LEAVE=0.
J053 UNITX_TOTAL1 TOTAL FACULTY LOAD WITHOUT CREDIT LOAD MULTIPLIERS
CLM
Formula:
UNITX_TOTAL1 = UNITX_TEACH1 +UNITX_ADM1 +UNITX_ADM2 +
UNITX_STUDY1 + UNITX_RES +UNITX_EXTN + UNITX_OTHERS.
Formula:
UNITX_TOTAL2 = UNITX_TEACH2 +UNITX_ADM1 +UNITX_ADM2 +
UNITX_STUDY1 + UNITX_RES +UNITX_EXTN + UNITX_OTHERS.
This is the sum of TEACHING and NON-TEACHING loads – but this time
around, the teaching load is with credit load multipliers.
REMARKS:
If it is July 1, 2004, the number of MASTERS ADVISEES who
completed their theses between July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004 It
does not matter when they started.
J058 PHD_DISSERT NO. OF PHD ADVISEES WHO COMPLETED THEIR
DISSERTATION IN THE PAST SCHOOLYEAR.
REMARKS:
If it is July 1, 2004, the number of PhD ADVISEES who completed
their dissertation between July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004 It does
not matter when they started.
Count only those whose “thesis writing periods” have not expired. If the thesis writing period is 2 years (as for
a masters), an advisee could be counted once in one year and then once again in the next year. If the thesis
writing period is 3 years (as for a PhD), an advisee will be counted once each year for 3 years unless he finishes
before that. See UG_LAPSES, MS_LAPSED, PHD_LAPSED.
HOW MANY ADVISEES HAVE BEEN TAKING “TOO LONG” TO FINISH THEIR THESES?
How much time is a masters thesis student allowed to finish his thesis? In the RCDEM, the “masters thesis
writing period” will be 2 years and the “PhD dissertation thesis writing period” will be 3 years. The counting
will start from the date when the topic is officially approved. Beyond this time, the thesis or dissertation writing
period is supposed to have “lapsed”. This is only for the purposes of the REVISED CHED DATA ELEMENT
MANUAL and the actual rules within the HEI may be different. A lapsed thesis will be counted at most once.
After it has been counted, it will never be counted again.
A lapsed thesis will be counted only once, i.e. during the year when
the “normal thesis writing period” lapsed.
A lapsed thesis will be counted only once, i.e. during the year when
the “normal thesis writing period” lapsed.
HOW MANY SUBJECTS DID THE FACULTY MEMBER TEACH? HOW MANY SECTIONS? HOW MANY
STUDENTS?
J065 TEACH_SUBJS THE NO. OF SUBJECTS TAUGHT IN THE CURRENT
SEMESTER. Also known as “NO. OF PREPARATIONS”
J066 TEACH_CLASSES THE NO. OF CLASSES OR SECTIONS TAUGHT
J067 UGTEACH_STUDE TOTAL ENROLLMENT IN UNDERGRAD CLASSES TAUGHT
J068 GRADTEACH_STUDE TOTAL ENROLLMENT IN GRADUATE CLASSES TAUGHT
If faculty member A has 20 students in a 3-unit subject and 30 students in a 5-unit subject, the total no. of
students is 50 but the total no. of STUDENT CREDIT-UNITS (SCUs) or STUDENT CONTACT HOURS is =
20*3 + 30*5 = 60 +150 =210. For each subject, the student credit units are obtained by multiplying CLASSSIZE
by SUBJCRED ( not TEACHCRED).
If a faculty member B has 10 students in a 4-unit subject and 40 students in a 5-unit subject, the faculty member
also has 50 students but the total SCUs = 10*4 + 40*5 = 40 + 200 = 240. In this sense, B has a bigger volume
of teaching than A.
CODING Numeric.
ELEMENT NUMBER J072
NAME OF ELEMENT TOTAL GRADUATE STUDENTS TAUGHT BY THE FACULTY MEMBER.
SHORT NAME GRADTEACH_STUDE
PURPOSE To measure the volume of teaching.
DEFINITION Total GRADUATE students taught in a specific semester. Straight sum of
enrollment in maters and PhD classes, whether lab or lecture. However, do
not include thesis or dissertation advisees.
CODING Numeric.
CODING Numeric.
CODING Numeric.
MS_ADVISEES2 1
PHD_ADVISEES2 1
3. With the credit load multipliers, the total load of the faculty is TOT2_UNITX = 21.50 units and this
means he is “overloaded”. If the normal load is 18 units, this faculty member might be entitled to
overload honorarium for the 3.50 units overload ( = 21.50 -20.50).
4. A total of 120 students were taught. In terms of student credit units, the total volume of teaching is 415
SCUs or STUDENT CONTACT HOURS ( = 30*4 + 45*4 + 20*2 + 25*3 + 10*3).
5. It will be a rare faculty member who will teach in all program levels (i.e. from elementary level to
graduate level) but the FWR is a template which can be used by all faculty members in an HEI. Most
faculty members will have their teaching loads at the undergraduate and graduate level.
6. If there are 500 faculty members in the HEI, the office of the VPAA will have to compile the faculty
workload reports (FWRs) of all 500 faculty members. Imagine a spreadsheet with 500 rows and about
20 columns. This is very manageable using electronic spreadsheet in a generic PC. The key is to
convince every faculty member to submit his FWR. ( See Chapter 3 DATA ON AN INSTITUTION).
7. TOTAL STUDENT CREDIT UNITS or total student contact hours = 415.0.
Suppose the faculty member is credited with 12 units of teaching undergraduate lecture courses. What is that
as a fraction of the normal faculty load ( say 18 units per sem?)
EXAMPLE:
If UGLECT2_UNITX = 12 and NORMALOAD = 18 units, then
UGLECT2_%UNITX = 66.7% (= 12/18). That is, teaching
undergrad and post-bacc lecture subjects is already 66.7% of
the normal 18-unit load.
J079 GRADLECT2_%UNITX AS A % OF NORMAL LOAD, TOTAL UNITS (WITH CLM) IN
TEACHING GRADUATE LECTURE SUBJECTS.
J080 UGLAB2_%UNITX AS A % OF NORMAL LOAD, TOTAL UNITS (WITH CLM) IN
TEACHING UNDERGRAD AND POS-BACC LAB AND OTHER
NON-LECTURE SUBJECTS.
J081 GRADLAB2_%UNITX AS A % OF NORMAL LOAD, TOTAL UNITS (WITH CLM) IN
TEACHING GRADUATE LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE
SUBJECTS.
J082 TEACH1_%UNITX AS A % OF NORMAL LOAD, TOTAL UNITS (WITHOUT THE
LOAD MULTIPLIERS) DEVOTED DIRECTLY TO TEACHING AT
ALL LEVELS.
EXAMPLE:
If TOT1_UNITX = 20.5 units and NORMALLOAD = 18, then
TOT2_%UNITX = 113.9 % ( = 20.5/ 18). This means that the
total load of this faculty member WITHOUT the load multipliers is
113.9% of the normal load. It means that even without the load
multipliers, the faculty member is already overloaded by a factor
of +13.9 %. For the HEI this could mean payment of overload
honoraria to the faculty member.
J092 TOT2_%UNITX AS A % OF NORMAL LOAD , THE TOTAL UNITS (WITH
CREDIT LOAD MULTIPLIERS) RENDERED BY THE FACULTY
IN ALL OFFICIAL DUTIES COMBINED.
EXAMPLE:
If TOT2_UNITX = 21.5 units and NORMALLOAD = 18,
then TOT2_%UNITX = 119.4 % ( = 21.5/ 18). This means
that the total load of this faculty member WITH THE LOAD
MULTIPLIERS is 114.9% of the normal load. It means the
faculty member is overloaded by a factor of 19.4 %. For the HEI
this could mean payment of overload honoraria to the faculty
member.
The percentages below were taken over the denominator NORMALOAD = 18 units. The total teaching load
(with CLM) of this faculty member is 17.00 units. Teaching alone represents TEACH2_%UNITX = 94.4 % (=
17.0 / 18) of the normal faculty load.
UNITXX %UNITXX
0.00
T1 TEACHING UNITS: ELEM SCHOOL 0.0%
TEACHING UNITS: SECONDARY 0.00
T2
SCHOOL
0.0%
T3 TEACHING UNITS: TECH/VOC 0.00 0.0%
9.50
T4 TEACHING UNITS: UG LECTURE 52.8%
TEACHING UNITS: UG LAB OR NON- 1.00
T5
LECTURE
5.6%
4.50
T6 TEACHING UNITS: GRAD LECTURE 25.0%
TEACHING UNITS: GRAD LAB OR 2.00
T7 NON-LECTURE
11.1%
SUBTOTAL: ALL TEACHING 17.00 94.4%
1. This faculty member’s credit load for research is RES_UNITX = 3.00 and this represents RES_
%UNITX = 16.7 % ( = 3/18) of the normal faculty load.
2. The total workload (with credit load multipliers) of this faculty member is TOT2_UNITX = 21.50 units
and this represents TOT2_%UNITX = 119.4% ( = 21.5 / 18) of the normal faculty load.
3. It means this faculty member is 19.4% overloaded and probably deserves some overload honoraria
(the equivalent of “overtime pay” for the faculty). Whether the faculty member will actually receive
additional compensation depends on the HEI. Suffice it to say at this point that this faculty member
rendered more than the normal faculty workload.
Teaching load only: do not include load credits for research, administrative
duties, study, etc.
CODING 1 6 units or less PER SEMESTER.
2 6.1 to 12 units.
3 12.1 to 18 units.
4 18.1 to 21 units..
5 21.1 or 24.0 units.
6 24.1 units or more.
8 Employee is not a faculty member.
9 Not known.
Commission on Higher Education
388 Data Elements on a Faculty Member
For a specific semester, how many STUDENTS were taught by the faculty?
• Students are classified according to educational level.
• There will be a separate count of students in lecture type classes and those in non-lecture type classes.
This is necessary because of different time demands on the faculty between lecture and lab or non-
lecture classes. Also necessary for costing purposes.
• These are straight headcounts, making no distinction between a student in a 3-unit subject and a
student in a 5-unit subject If the same student is enrolled in 2 classes taught by the faculty member,
the student will be counted twice.
• Do not include thesis advisees.
Issue: counting the no. of students taught becomes a bit complicated under a “team teaching” or “relay teaching”
mode. If 2 faculty members teach a subject with 30 students in “relay mode” ( e.g. one faculty member in June
and July and then the other for August and September), should each faculty member be credited with only
15 each or do they get credited 30 each? (See next series of elements on student-credit units and full-time
equivalent students.).
For a specific semester, how many CLASSES or SECTIONS were taught by the faculty member?
• Classes are classified according to educational level, e.g. undergraduate and graduate classes are
counted separately.
• Lecture-type classes will be counted separately from the lab type and other non-lecture type. Lecture
and non-lecture classes impose different time demands on the structure and they also require different
support systems.
• These are all straight counts, with no distinction between a 3-unit class and a 5-unit class.
• Exclude thesis advising.
• If the faculty member taught 3 sections of the same subject, the no. of classes is recorded as 3. This is
a count of sections or classes, not subjects.
• Compare with the next series of data elements.
Issue to be resolved: counting the no. of classes taught becomes a bit complicated under a “team teaching”
or “relay teaching” mode. If 2 faculty members teach a subject with 30 students in “relay mode” ( e.g. one
faculty member in June and July and then the other for August and September), should each faculty member
be credited with ½ class or do they get credited 1 whole class each? What about a big laboratory class of 100
students with 5 faculty members all in the same big lab?
For a specific semester, how many different SUBJECTS were taught by the faculty? How many different
“preparations” were needed?
• This is a count of subjects, not sections.
• Subjects will be classified according to the educational level.
• Lecture subjects will be counted separately from non-lecture subjects. However, thesis advising will not
be counted.
• If the faculty taught 2 sections of Math 11 and 3 subjects of Math 14, the total no. of classes is 5 but the
no. of subjects is only 2.
• If the no. of classes is 5 and the no. of subjects is also 5, it means the faculty member had to make 5
different sets of lectures or “preparations”.
• These data elements apply to a specific semester.
J142 LABSIZE_ES AVG CLASS SIZE of ELEMENTARY LAB AND OTHER NON-
LECTURE URE CLASSES
J143 LABSIZE_HS AVG CLASS SIZE of SECONDARY LAB AND OTHER NON-
LECTURE URE CLASSES
J144 LABSIZE_TV AVG CLASS SIZE of TECH/VOC AND PRE-BACC LAB AND
OTHER NON-LECTURE URE CLASSES
J145 LABSIZE_UG AVG CLASS SIZE of UNDERGRAD AND POST-BACC LEVEL
LAB AND OTHER NON-LECTURE URE CLASSES
J146 LABSIZE_MS AVG CLASS SIZE of MASTERS LEVEL LAB AND OTHER
NON-LECTURE URE CLASSES
J147 LABSIZE_PHD AVG CLASS SIZE of PHD LEVEL LAB AND OTHER NON-
LECTURE URE CLASSES
J148 LABSIZE_GRAD AVG CLASS SIZE of GRADUATE LEVEL LAB AND OTHER
NON-LECTURE URE CLASSES
A more precise measure of teaching load is to count “student contact hours” or “student credit units” (SCUs). A
class of 30 students in a 3-unit subject is worth 90 ( = 30x3) SCUs. In contrast, 40 students in a 3-unit subject
are worth 120 (=40x3) SCUs. Similarly, 30 students in a 4-unit subject are worth 120 SCUs. Suppose a faculty
Commission on Higher Education
392 Data Elements on a Faculty Member
Note that the subjects do not have the same credit units (see SUBJCRED) in the chapter on subjects. The total
headcount is 145 students and total SCUs is 545. The average class size is 36.2 ( =145/ 4).
For each subject, the no. of SCUs = (NO. OF STUDENTS) x (SUBJECT CREDIT UNITS). No credit load
multipliers are used even if the subject is at masters or doctorate level. The appropriate weights can be applied
later. The elements below capture the unweighted STUDENT CREDIT UNITS ( or SCUs). CODING: Numeric
as in XXXXX.X ( one decimal point only).
EXAMPLE:
If there are 3 undergraduates enrolled in 15, 21, and 20 units of lecture
subjects respectively, their combined load is equivalent to 3.11 FTEXX
(=(15+21+20)/18 =56/18). Observe that UG_ENROL = 3 but UG_LECTFTEX
= 3.11. Compute to 2 decimal places.
J167 MS_LECTFTEXX NUMBER OF MASTERS LEVEL FTE STUDENTS IN LECTURE
CLASSES ONLY
EXAMPLE:
If there are 3 masters STUDENTS IN LECTURE CLASSES ONLY enrolled in
11, 9, and 12 units of lecture respectively, their combined load is equivalent
to 1.83 FTEXX (=(11+9+12)/12 = 22/12). Observe that MS_ENROL = 3 but
MS_LECTFTEX = 1.83 only. Compute to 2 decimal places.
J168 PHD_LECTFTEXX NUMBER OF DOCTORAL LEVEL FTE STUDENTS IN LECTURE
CLASSES ONLY
EXAMPLE:
If there are 3 doctoral STUDENTS IN LECTURE CLASSES ONLY enrolled in
9, 0, and 6 units lecture respectively, their combined load is equivalent to 1.25
FTEXX (=(9 +0+6)/12 =15/12). The middle student is enrolled for residence
only. Note that PHD_ENROL =3 but PHD_LECTFTEX= 1.25 only.
EXAMPLE:
Given the examples above, the combined load of the 3 masters and 3 doctoral
STUDENTS IN LECTURE CLASSES ONLY is equivalent to 3.08 FTEXX (=
1.83 + 1.25). Note that GRAD_ENROL = 6 but GRAD_FTEXX=3.08 only.
For cost analysis studies, it could be important to determine for each faculty, how many students are
from the College of Engineering, how many from Arts and Sciences, Education, etc. Indeed, it may be
necessary to count how many of the faculty member’s students are from each degree program: BS Civil
If the records are not computerized, these data elements would be very tedious to obtain --- especially
for the faculty members teaching GE subjects. If the records are manual, the data elements can still
be valued but it would take a lot of meticulous work. Clearly these are not elements which would be
collected every year but if they are needed for some special study, the definitions are given here.
The unit of measure below is REPORTED HOURS PER WEEK in a typical week during the first semester. In
such a week, how does the faculty member account for his 40 hours per week? How many hours go to the
following official duties? It is more usual for HEIs to measure faculty workload in terms of “units” but just in case
the HEI or some research group wants to tabulate HOURS, the data elements below will apply.
The work hours of the faculty member will be classified according to:
Human nature dictates that a faculty member will tend to inflate his hours so that the total would be at least
40 hours or possibly more. If one faculty member declares a 60-hour week, it implies working 12 hours per
weekday over the 17 weeks or 85 weekdays of the semester! The data elements below are useful only if the
faculty member will be honest and prudent in declaring the distribution of 40 hours in a typical week
during the first semester. However, even if the HOURZ are inflated, the data element %HOURZ are useful.
The listing above does not include the hours spent in preparing for class, formulating examinations and grading
test papers. Thus, the credible total should be in the neighborhood of 30 hours only. If a specific provision is
given to report the hours preparing for class, the answers might be inflated anyway.
REMARKS: Include only the actual lecture hours. Do not include hours used in
preparation for the lecture. Do not include hours for formulating exams, checking
papers or computing grades,
J185 LAB_HOURZ TOTAL HOURS (OUT OF A TYPICAL 40-HOUR WEEK) DEVOTED BY THE
FACULTY TO TEACHING LAB SUBJECTS ( IN ALL LEVELS COMBINED)
REMARKS: Include only the actual hours in the lab. Do not include hours used in
preparation for the lab.
J186 ADMIN_HOURZ TOTAL HOURS (OUT OF A TYPICAL 40-HOUR WEEK) DEVOTED BY THE
FACULTY TO OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES
J187 STUDY_HOURZ1 TOTAL HOURS (OUT OF A TYPICAL 40-HOUR WEEK) DEVOTED
BY THE FACULTY FOR STUDYING IN PURSUIT OF AN ADVANCED
DEGREE IN THE DISCIPLINE.
REMARKS:
• For an individual faculty member, TOT_HOURZ must be approximately 40
hours -- plus or minus 5 hours perhaps.
• If TOT_HOURZ = 60 , it would imply the faculty member is rendering
incredible 60-hour weeks or 12-hour weekdays throughout the 17 weeks of
a semester.
• If TOT_HOURZ =30, it would imply the faculty member is rendering about
6 hours of work per weekday over the 17 weeks of a semester. This is more
believable than 60 hours!
The best use of the table of HOURZ is in determining the percentage distribution of faculty time. In other words,
the relative values of HOURZ are even more useful than the nominal values -- especially if faculty members
report more than 40 hours per week.
EXAMPLE:
If LECT_HOURZ=20 and TOT_HOURZ= 35, then LECT_%HOURZ= 57.1 % =
20/ 35. That is, 57.1% of a typical work week is devoted by the faculty member
directly to teaching LECTURE CLASSES. In a cost analysis study, 57.1% of
the faculty members annual salary will be attributed directly to TEACHING
LECTURE CLASSES. ( However, see also HOURZ_TEACH% below).
J194 LAB_%HOURZ LAB_%HOURZ = 100*LAB_HOURZ/ TOT_HOURZ.
EXAMPLE:
• If the faculty member is FULL STUDY LEAVE WITH PAY, then STUDY_
%HOURZ1 = 100%. All of the faculty’s time is devoted to the study
leave.
• If the faculty member is on STUDY LEAVE WITHOUT PAY, STUDY_
%HOURS1 = 0 because there is no official service to begin with.
J197 STUDY_%HOURZ 2 STUDY_%HOURZ2 = 100* STUDY_HOURZ2/ TOT_HOURZ.
EXAMPLE:
If the faculty member reports RES_HOURZ=3 and TOT_HOURZ =30, then
RES_HOURZ=10% ( = 3/30). That is, the faculty member directly devotes 10%
of his typical work week to research. In a cost analysis study, 10% of the faculty
member’s annual salary will be attributed directly to RESEARCH. See also
HOURZ_RES% below.
EXAMPLE:
• If the faculty member is on sabbatical leave, LEAVE_%HOURZ = 100%.
All of his time is devoted to the sabbatical.
• If the faculty member is on sick leave WITH PAY for half of the semester,
then LEAVE_%HOURZ = 50%.
EXAMPLE:
Consider the illustrative example below where the faculty member reported a total of 43 hours per week. The
percentage distribution to the 8 faculty duties are shown below. It shows for instance that 20.9% of the typical
work week is devoted to official administrative duties. This is a credible value only if the “6 hours per week”
devoted to administration is truthful.
Observe that the denominator here is the reported no. of total hours, i.e. the denominator is TOT_HOURZ.
When faculty workload was measured in units, we computed % but the denominator used was the normal load
or 18 units.
TEACHING LECTURE
1 CLASSES 18 41.9% LECT_%HOURZ
2 TEACHING LAB CLASSES 6 14.0% LAB_%HOURZ
3 OFFICIAL ADMIIN DUTIES 9 20.9% ADMIN_%HOURZ
STUDY AS PART OF
4 NORMAL FACULTY LOAD 3 7.0% STUDY_%HOURZ1
STUDY BEYOND NORMAL
5 FACULTY LOAD 0 0.0% STUDY_%HOURZ2
6 RESEARCH 6 14.0% RES_%HOURZ
7 EXTN SERVICE 1 2.3% EXTN_%HOURZ
8 OFFICIAL LEAVE 0 0.0% LEAVE_%HOURZ
TOTAL HOURS IN A TYPICAL
WORK WEEK 43 100.0%
If we have to attribute faculty time to only the 3 primary functions (TEACHING, RESEARCH and EXTENSION
or T,R,E), we could do some pro-rating. Out of the 43 hours reporter above, a total of 31 hours (= 18+6+6+1)
are devoted directly to T,R,E.
Out of the 43 hours, 12 hours ( = 9+3) are devoted to administrative duties, studying and official leave with pay.
These are official faculty duties too but if everything has to be attributed only to T,R,E, there is need for some
pro-rating. The denominator will be LECT_HOURZ + LAB_HOURZ + RES_HOURZ + EXTN_HOURZ. = 31.
3 PRIMARY FUNCTIONS
ONLY DATA ELEMENT
1 TEACHING ONLY 24 77.4% HOURZ_TEACH%
2 RESEARCH 6 19.4% HOURZ_RES%
3 EXTENSION SERVICE 1 3.2% HOURZ_EXTN%
SUM OF 3 ONLY 31 72.1%
1. The table shows that 77.4 % ( =24/31) of the faculty member’s time is devoted to teaching
(directly and indirectly combined).
2. 19.4% ( = 6/31) of the faculty member’s time is devoted to research (directly and indirectly)
3. 3.2% ( =1/31) of faculty time is devoted to extension service (directly and indirectly
combined).
4. The sum of all these is 100%. This means ALL of the faculty member’s time has been attributed
to only the 3 main functions.
EXAMPLE:
In the table above, HOURZ_TEACH% = 77.4% = (18 + 6)/ (18+6+6+1) = 24/31.
This means that 77.4% of the faculty members time has been directly or indirectly
attributed to TEACHING. In a cost analysis study, 77.4% of the faculty member’s
total salary will be charged to the TEACHING FUNCTION.
J202 HOURZ_RES% HOURZ_RES% = 100* RES_HOURZ / ( LECT_HOURZ + LAB_HOURZ
+RES_HOURZ +EXTN_HOURZ).
EXAMPLE:
In the numerical example above, HOURZ_RES% = 19.4 % = 6/31. This means
that 19.4% of the faculty members time has been directly or indirectly attributed
to RESEARCH. In a cost analysis study, 19.4% of the faculty members salary
should be attributed to RESEARCH.
J203 HOURZ_EXTN% HOURZ_EXTN% = 100* EXTN_HOURZ / ( LECT_HOURZ + LAB_
HOURZ +RES_HOURZ +EXTN_HOURZ).
EXAMPLE:
In the numerical example, HOURZ_EXTN% = 3.2 % = 1/31. This means that
only 3.2% of the faculty members time has been directly or indirectly attributed
to EXTN SERVICE. In a cost analysis study only 3.2% of the faculty member’s
salary will be charged to EXTN SERVICE.
In the discipline where he teaches, what is the highest degree earned? If we disregard the possible mismatch
in discipline, what is the highest degree earned?
Compare with HIGHESTDEG2 below. In the HEI, the final arbiter of this
data element is the VPAA.
REMARKS:
The National Statistics Office (NSO) CENSUS 2000 CODE BOOK shows
the codes used in the 2000 Census. It codes not only the highest education
level reached but also the discipline as well. The coding below is only for
highest education level reached. Discipline is covered by different data
elements.
CODING 3-digit code where the first 2 digits are drawn from the coding of PROGLEVL.
( See chapter on academic programs)
00 0 No formal education at all.
10 1 Partial elementary schooling but did not complete Grade 4.
10 2 Completed Grade 4 but did not graduate from elementary school.
10 3 Completed Elementary School.
20 1 Partial completion of high school.
20 2 Secondary school graduate or equivalent.
30 1 Partial completion of Tech/Voc
30 2 Completed Tech/Voc program.
40 1 Partial completion of pre-baccalaureate certificate, diploma or
associateship.
40 2 Completed pre-bacc certificate, diploma or associateship.
50 1 Completed Year 1 of baccalaureate level or equivalent.
50 2 Completed Year 2 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 3 Completed Year 3 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 4 Completed Year 4 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 5 Completed Year 5 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 6 Completed Year 6 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 7 Completed a baccalaureate degree( including DVM, DDM, D Opt).
60 1 Partial completion of postgraduate certificate or diploma program.
60 2 Completed post-grad certificate or diploma program.
70 1 Completed Year 1 of MD or LLB ( or equivalent)
70 2 Completed Year 1 of MD or LLB ( or equivalent)
70 3 Completed Year 1 of MD or LLB ( or equivalent)
70 4 Completed Year 1 of MD or LLB ( or equivalent)
70 5 Completed MD or LLB ( or equivalent).
80 1 Partial completion of masters degree ( or equivalent).
80 2 Completed all masters requirements except masters thesis ( or
equivalent).
80 3 Completed masters degree or equivalent ( or equivalent).
90 1 Partial completion of doctorate degree ( or equivalent).
90 2 Completed all doctorate requirements except dissertation ( or equivalent).
90 3 Completed doctorate degree ( or equivalent).
98 0 NOT A FACULTY MEMBER
99 9 No record.
EXAMPLES:
If a BS Physics degree holder is a faculty member teaching Physics but
his highest degree completed is MA Education (General Science), then
HIGHESTDEG2 = 500, not 700. In the discipline of Physics, the faculty
member’s highest degree is only baccalaureate level.
CODING 3-digit code where the first 2 digits are drawn from the coding of PROGLEVL.
( See chapter on academic programs)
00 0 No formal education at all.
10 1 Partial elementary schooling but did not complete Grade 4 only.
10 2 Completed Grade 4 but did not graduate from elementary school.
10 3 Completed Elementary School.
20 1 Partial completion of high school.
20 2 Secondary school graduate or equivalent.
30 1 Partial completion of Tech/Voc
30 2 Completed Tech/Voc program.
40 1 Partial completion of pre-baccalaureate certificate, diploma or
associateship.
40 2 Completed pre-bacc certificate, diploma or associateship.
50 1 Completed Year 1 of baccalaureate level or equivalent.
50 2 Completed Year 2 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 3 Completed Year 3 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 4 Completed Year 4 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 5 Completed Year 5 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 6 Completed Year 6 of baccalaureate level or equivalent
50 7 Completed a baccalaureate degree( including DVM, DDM, D Opt).
60 1 Partial completion of postgraduate certificate or diploma program.
60 2 Completed post-grad certificate or diploma program.
70 1 Completed Year 1 of MD or LLB ( or equivalent)
70 2 Completed Year 1 of MD or LLB ( or equivalent)
70 3 Completed Year 1 of MD or LLB ( or equivalent)
70 4 Completed Year 1 of MD or LLB ( or equivalent)
70 5 Completed MD or LLB ( or equivalent).
80 1 Partial completion of masters degree ( or equivalent).
80 2 Completed all masters requirements except masters thesis ( or
equivalent).
80 3 Completed masters degree or equivalent ( or equivalent).
90 1 Partial completion of doctorate degree ( or equivalent).
90 2 Completed all doctorate requirements except dissertation ( or equivalent).
90 3 Completed doctorate degree ( or equivalent).
98 0 NOT A FACULTY MEMBER
99 9 No record.
DEFINITION The UNIVERSITY WHERE the employee earned the first baccalaureate
degree.
CODING TEXT DATA : 40 CHARACTERS. . If no second bachelors degree has been
earned, key in NONE.
ELEMENT NUMBER J218
NAME OF ELEMENT UNIVERSITY WHERE FIRST MASTERS DEGREE WAS EARNED.
SHORT NAME MS1UNIV
PURPOSE To capture the UNIVERSITY WHERE the first masters degree or equivalent
was earned.
DEFINITION The UNIVERSITY WHERE the employee earned the first masters degree or
equivalent. As recorded in the official transcript.
CODING TEXT DATA : 40 CHARACTERS. . If no masters degree has been earned,
key in NONE.
ELEMENT NUMBER J219
NAME OF ELEMENT UNIVERSITY WHERE THE SECOND MASTERS DEGREE WAS
EARNED.
SHORT NAME MS2UNIV
PURPOSE To capture the UNIVERSITY WHERE the second masters degree or
equivalent was earned.
DEFINITION The UNIVERSITY WHERE the employee earned the second masters degree
or equivalent. As recorded in the official transcript.
CODING TEXT DATA : 40 CHARACTERS. . If no second masters degree has been
earned, key in NONE.
ELEMENT NUMBER J220
NAME OF ELEMENT UNIVERSITY WHERE THE FIRST DOCTORATE DEGREE WAS
EARNED.
SHORT NAME PHD1UNIV
PURPOSE To capture the UNIVERSITY WHERE the first doctorate degree or equivalent
was earned. As recorded in the official transcript.
DEFINITION The UNIVERSITY WHERE the employee earned the first doctorate degree
or equivalent.
CODING TEXT DATA : 40 CHARACTERS. . If no doctorate degree has been earned,
key in NONE.
2 Masters degree holder with some PhD units actively pursuing doctorate
degree in the discipline where he is teaching. Person has already earned
some doctoral units, is still enrolled, but has not graduated. Person has not
exceeded max residency rule in the PhD program.
3 Masters degree holder with some PhD units in the discipline where he is
teaching but no longer actively pursuing a PhD. For instance, a faculty
member who has given up, or has been overtaken by maximum residency
rule in the doctoral program.
5 Bachelors degree holder with some masters units in the discipline where he
is teaching actively pursuing masters degree. Person has already earned
some masters units, is still enrolled but has not graduated. Person has not
exceeded max residency rule in the masters program.
6 Bachelors degree holder with some masters units in the discipline where he
is teaching but no longer in active pursuit of masters degree. For instance,
somebody who just decided to stop or somebody who has been overtaken
by the maximum residency rule in the masters program.
The degree program being pursued must be in the discipline where the
faculty member is teaching. Thus, the units earned by an English Instructor
pursuing an MBA or PhD Music will not be counted.
The elements below are defined for “single authorship” only. A parallel but different set of elements will
capture “joint authorship”. The recommended period is 5 years. If it is July 1, 2004 and the inclusive
dates are July 1 1999 to July 1 2004.
In some HEIs there is a standard instrument used to measure how students rate their teachers. In effect,
the students issue “a grade” to the professor as a teacher. One data element can be devised to capture
the average score of an individual faculty member. For statistical stability, at least 4 semesters’ worth
of evaluation scores should be averaged. Even so, such scores are relevant only within a department
because it is not fair to compare the score of a Math or Physics teacher versus that of a Music or History
teacher.
The elements shown below capture how a faculty member is ranked among his colleagues in the same
department. They are defined for the full-time faculty members. A parallel but different set of elements
could be defined for the variable-time faculty. Still another parallel series could be defined to show how
a faculty member is ranked by his peers (i.e. “peer ranking”).
.
SALARY AND OTHER COMPENSATION
J249 BASICSAL EMPLOYEE ANNUAL BASIC SALARY (Do not include NUMERIC
allowances, honoraria, etc. but include 13th month basic
salary.
J250 GROSSPAY EMPLOYEE ANNUAL TOTAL GROSS COMPENSATION NUMERIC
(i.e. basic salary plus all allowances, honoraria, overtime
payment, bonuses, 14th month, etc.)
J251 NETPAY EMPLOYEE ANNUAL NET COMPENSATION after all NUMERIC
deductions authorized by HEI: Provident Fund, car plan,
housing plan or rent, health plan, salary loan, insurance,
etc.. Also known as “take-home” pay, the cash that is left
after all authorized deductions have been made.
J252 WITHHELD EMPLOYEE TOTAL TAX WITHHELD BY THE HEI ( 1 NUMERIC
year) and to the credit of the employee with BIR.
The data elements in the series below refers to the person himself, not the plantilla item.