Applying Schedules and Profiles in HAP: QB Tip 001
Applying Schedules and Profiles in HAP: QB Tip 001
Applying Schedules and Profiles in HAP: QB Tip 001
HAP e-Help
HAPe-Help
e-Help
HAP e-Help 008 V4.3 June 15, 2006
HAP
HAPe-Help
QB 008
TIP
e-Help 008001 V4.20a V4.20a May 25, 2006
May 25, 2006
This HAP e-Help discusses the importance of properly applying schedules and profiles in HAP. We will also discuss potential
misapplications of these user inputs. First, we need to understand the differences between schedules and profiles and their effect
on design loads and energy simulation.
A “Schedule” is made up of one or more hourly “Profiles” and the associated day type “Assignments.” A fractional schedule is
used to describe how much and how often a building parameter like people, lights, and miscellaneous internal heat gains exist.
These schedules are then assigned to, and modify the internal loads defined in the space input forms.
Page 1 of 6
Fan/Thermostat Schedules
Fan/Thermostat schedules define the hours when the HVAC equipment is operating in the “occupied” or “unoccupied” period.
Hours of the day in these profiles are designated as "occupied" or "unoccupied" and not fractional as with lights and people.
During occupied hours, the occupied thermostat set points are used and the air system fan operates to ventilate and condition
the building. During unoccupied hours, the unoccupied thermostat set points are used and the fan systems cycle to condition the
building. This type of schedule is selected in the “Air System Properties” under the “Zone Components” tab and the
“Thermostats” input by clicking the “Thermostat Schedule” button.
The bar for each hour indicates operation for the full hour.
For example, if you have a bar for hour 09, that covers the
time period 9:00:00 a.m. thru 9:59:59 a.m. And a bar for
hour 18 covers the time period 6:00:00 p.m. thru 6:59:59
p.m. So, the schedule shown to the right results in an
occupied period beginning at 6:00:00 a.m. and ending at
6:59:59 p.m. If this is not understood, it is easy to
schedule operation 1 hour longer than intended. Figure 5 – Typical Fan/Thermostat Profile for Office
Page 3 of 6
Assignments
Figure 7 – Assignments
Page 4 of 6
Some HAP users question the relevance of inputting actual fractional profiles. Some may think they are simply being
conservative by leaving the profile multipliers at 100% for the entire 24-hour period. But what is the consequence of doing this in
the HAP program?
The above described condition will result in a very large pull down load. This extremely large pull down load could result in the
peak coil load occurring in the morning instead of the late afternoon, which would have been the case with a more realistic
schedule. So, the actual time and magnitude of the peak cooling coil load has been skewed by the large pull down load. This
load would not exist if the internal gains were not present during the unoccupied periods.
Because of the large pull down load, the system will struggle to reduce the zone temperature to the cooling set point in a
reasonable time during the occupied period. This can result in unsatisfied and higher than expected zone temperatures. (See
HAP e-Help 007 for additional information on Zone T-Stat Check.) This struggle occurs because the airflow being used to pull
down the load at the onset of the occupied cycle has, in fact, been sized based on stage 1 calculations. These calculations do not
account for the unrealistic pull down requirements. However, the size of the cooling coil does take into account pull down if it
exists. So, a larger cooling coil load will be sized versus a scenario where less or no pull down is required.
Page 5 of 6
So, why not use continuous internal heat gains at 100% and run the fan/thermostat schedule for 24 hours? This way, no pull
down loads exist, right?
This is not advisable. HAP may undersize the cooling coil since no pull down loads exist because the system does not have an
occupied period with a lower set point temperature. At that point, many engineers would attempt to apply a suitable safety factor
to account for the pull down load. However, the magnitude of the pull down load can be accurately calculated by HAP with
suitable attention to realistic profiles representing the internal loads.
What is the energy consumption and operating cost penalty if the internal loads are not correctly profiled?
The energy use and operating costs will be higher. In addition, the exaggerated heat gains can also offset heat losses in the
transition seasons and in winter, further skewing results. Hours of cooling operation will be larger than they should be. Hours of
heating operation will be less than they should be. In some cases, all hours of heating operation will disappear due to
overestimating the hours when heat gains occur. As a result, answers can not only be overstated, but seriously skewed (all
cooling operation, no heating operation, for example). Lastly, since alternative designs are often compared on the basis of %
savings, the % value will be unreliable because the totals are inflated. Demand charges could also be skewed.
The validity of the building model for load estimating and energy
simulation depends on representative inputs relative to internal
loads. Since a large part of the total load and operating cost in a
building involve internal loads like people and lights, Carrier Figure 9 – Building Wizard Pre-defined Occupancy
recommends utilizing realistic and representative profiles in order Schedules
to maintain accurate results.
Page 6 of 6