1

Author/s Hypothesis 3 Main Points Design & Stats 3 of My Conclusions

Capra & Liu (2006) • Mo • Interes • Experi • Sm

ral guidance ted in testing ment: all
is sought some of the key convenience
Conformity in contribution games: gender and group effects when conclusions sample (n=
playing a that • IV 8)
contribution psychologists Gender: equal
http://www.economics.emory.edu/Working_Papers/wp/capra_06_01_pap
er.pdf game. have arrived at
regarding • Onl
• IV y uni
conformity Game: public
• Dec undgergrads
rease clarity goods or
--> increase • Compl dictator
conformity exity, gender • 10
and group hours of
• IV game-
identity --> Payoff
• Incr conformity playing:
ease irrelevant practice
complexity information: effects,
--> increase • Findin results for boredom,
conformity gs were people in other fatigue
consistent with countries
those initially (Control);
• Peo reported by cohorts in out- • The
ple tend to Ash group; non- y also
conform to cohorts in in- controlled
in-group group or out- for
rather than group reciprocity
out-group motivations;
why
• DV: separate the
• [As choice of whole?
h had all payoff Conformity
male] includes
Increase feelings of r.
females --> • Contro
increase l variable:
conformity lottery choice • Wh
game for y muddy the
treatment waters with
• Ga effects the
me 3rdtreatment
complexitya group? Why
ffects • Pre-
questionnaire: not measure
conformity in-group
demographics
and multiple-

Copyright PSI Tutor:Mentor, 2010 www.psitutor.org [email protected]

 2

choice for alone?

gender bias
• Gro
up identity • Ov
and gender • Public erall, the
mediate goods game --> paper
conformity lottery game focuses on
rates --> dictator the effects
game of the
findings of
Ash
• Partici
pants able to
choose kind
and source of
feedback on
those who have
previously
played the
game (info has
normative
value)

Copyright PSI Tutor:Mentor, 2010 www.psitutor.org [email protected]