Race and Hispanic Origin: 1997 CUS Summary Report
Race and Hispanic Origin: 1997 CUS Summary Report
Montgomery County has the largest 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
populations live in the County. Hispanics/Latinos, with an annual growth rate since 1990
of 6.1, percent is the fastest growing minority group in the County, followed by Asians at
5.3 percent growth per year. The black population increased by 4.1 percent per year
while the non-Hispanic white majority has a negative annual growth rate of -0.3 percent.
About 19 percent of all white households in Montgomery County moved into the
area between 1992 and 1997. During the same period, 31.6 percent of the total
nonwhite households moved into the County. Proportionately more nonwhite in-movers
come from outside the metropolitan area (17.0 percent) than new white households
(11.0 percent). For the first time, a higher percentage of nonwhite in-movers are arriving
from other parts of Maryland, 8.4 percent, rather than the District of Columbia, 4.5
percent.
The I-270 Corridor is the first choice for both types of in-movers. Almost one
quarter of all new residents moved into this area. The second and third relocation
choices diverge by race with nonwhites choosing Colesville (20.0 percent) and Silver
Spring/Takoma Park (14.7 percent) while whites are moving into Bethesda/Chevy Chase
(16.8 percent) and Kensington/Wheaton (16.6 percent). Nonwhite households left single-
family structures and usually moved into garden apartments (46.5 percent) while most
white households did not change housing structure types when they moved (38.5
percent moved into single-family detached). Coincidental with higher rates of multi-family
occupancy, more new nonwhite households are renters (71.0 percent) than white
households (53.5 percent). New nonwhite households are paying less for housing, but
are carrying a greater housing cost burden. Only 27.8 percent of new white owners are
paying more than 25 percent of their income on housing costs compared to half of
nonwhite owners. Of the new renter households, more nonwhite households spend over
one-quarter of their income on rent, 45.9 percent, compared to 30.3 percent of white
tenants.
The new nonwhite households are larger, 2.78 persons per household, than the
white in-movers averaging 2.38 persons. The nonwhite head of household at 38 years
old is younger than the average white householder by two years. While the majority of
both groups are married couple households (62.7 percent of white and 59.5 percent of
nonwhite), nonwhite households are more likely to be single parents (13.8 percent) than
93
1997 CUS Summary Report
white in-movers (4.7 percent). White and nonwhite singles are drawn to the County with
one-quarter of the new white households and one fifth of nonwhite in-movers.
The 1987 to1997 period shows a continuing decline in average household size
for whites in both owner and renter categories and it also reveals contrasting gains in
nonwhite average household size across the tenure groups. The overall average
household size nudged up 0.03 during the period, from 2.62 to 2.65. Among renters,
white households registered a 0.11 decrease in size (1.96) while nonwhite households
increased by 0.09 (2.71). For owners, white owners were the only ones to experience a
reduction in average household size (-0.09); nonwhites remained the same.
Since 1977, the tenure of nonwhite households remained evenly split between
owners and renters until 1997, when the balance shifted to renters, 52.6 percent. In
contrast, white households steadily gained in homeownership, from 65.0 percent in 1977
to 73.0 percent in 1987, then rising to 76.9 percent in 1997. White households are well-
positioned to participate in home purchases - with higher median incomes of $70,515,
older householders who have resided in the County twice as long (averaging 12 years
versus 6 years), and almost three quarters having previously lived in a single-family
structure. Nonwhites confront a less advantageous marketing position – lower median
household incomes ($53,391), younger heads, and a higher percentage of single parent
households.
Table 53: Structure Type and Length of Residence by Tenure and Race
Renter households are far more diverse in Montgomery County than owner
households. Almost 45 percent of renters, or 40,120 out of 89,485 rental households,
are nonwhite compared to almost four times as many white owner households than
nonwhite owners, that is, 46,440 nonwhite owners out of over 221,000 total owner
occupied households. Nonwhites in the County are disproportionately found in rental
housing.
Owner costs are stretching a higher percent of nonwhite households with 31.7
percent spending more than 25 percent of their incomes on housing compared to 18.8
percent of white owner-occupied households. Nonwhite owners are spending on
average $100 more per month on housing costs than white households, $1,326 and
$1,230 respectively. While this differential may not in itself be a hardship, paired with a
lower median income, ownership for some nonwhite households may be burdensome.
The 1996 median household income for nonwhite owners at $72,205 is 10.0 percent
below the median for white owner occupied households.
Nonwhite renters are paying less for housing than white tenants, $760 compared
to $827 per month. But again, a higher percentage of nonwhite households face a
greater housing cost burden than white renters, with 45.3 percent of nonwhite renters
paying more than 25 percent of their income on rent versus 35.5 percent of white
95
1997 CUS Summary Report
renters. The 1996 median household income for white renters is $44,106 and $36,980
for nonwhite tenants.
than the country’s median; and the * Those of Hispanic origin may be of any race.
The County’s minority adult (25 years or older) population is very well educated.
Almost 44 percent of the county’s black adults have a Bachelor’s degree or more,
compared to 13 percent for blacks nationwide; 68 percent of Asian adults have at least a
Bachelor’s degree, compared to 42 percent of Asians nationwide; and 39 percent of
local Hispanics have at least a Bachelor’s degree, compared with 10 percent in the
nation. A higher percentage of resident Asian adults have college degrees, 68 percent,
than the white population, 62 percent.
97
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, July 1999.
R ACE & HISPANIC ORIGIN
Bl ac k % of Po pula tion
0 - 9%
10 - 24 %
25 - 60 % N
No D ata