COMPETENCY TEST:

Objective:
Here , my prime object is to check the data set through a distribution to see that
whether the data is fitting that distribution or not. If the distribution is fitting with
the data then there is no abnormality in the problem with which we are dealing.
But if its not getting fitted then the problem is seen and to be rectified as soon as
possible.

Data Source:
Kalyani Black Label Strong, an 'iconic' brand has a long history which begins with
its origin in West Bengal. Kalyani Black Strong today is an established brand and
has its foot prints across East and certain markets in the South.The data set has
been taken from there.

Process:
Here, several apprentices are trained to use them in several purposes like
Fermentation, Bottlery,Company Grade Ofiicer and Plant worker .Each and
everyone has been provided with a proper training course which made an impact
on their respective competency level. I have compared their competency level by
expressing it in normal distribution table.If the datas fit in normal distribution then
the training has been imparted upon the trainees, but if the reverse happens then
further training is to be required.

Now, The following are the distribution tables for each and every department in
which the training is being done:
 A.WTP(water treatment plants) & ETP(effluent
treatment plants):
1.(competency level before training)

X(class interval) f Xm Xm*f ( Xm^2)*f z Φ(z) Δ Φ(z) Estimated f

(frequency
)
9.5-13.5 1 11.5 11.5 132.25 -1.3269 0.0917591 0.0917591 1.835

13.5-17.5 8 15.5 124 1922 -0.2654 0.3935801 0.301821 6.04

17.5-21.5 7 19.5 136.5 2661.75 0.7962 0.7881446 0.3945645 7.891

21.5-25.5 3 23.5 70.5 1656.75 1.8577 0.9685572 0.1804126 3.61

25.5-29.9 1 27.5 27.5 756.25 2.9193 0.9982498 0.0296926 0.603

20 370 7129

[Here, µ=18.5 ; σ=3.768]

 Conclusion: fitted.
2.(competency level after training)

f (Xm^2)*f z Estimated f
X(classinterval) (freq.) Xm Xm*f Φ(z) Δ Φ(z)

13.5-16.5 3 15 45 675
-1.4173 0.0778038 0.0778038 1.56

-0.62992
16.5-19.5 1 18
324 0.2643473 0.1865435 3.73
18

0.15748
19.5-22.5 21 3087
7 0.5635595 0.377016 7.54
147

0.94488
22.5-25.5 5 24
2880 0.8289439 0.2653844 5.307
120

1.73228
25.5-28.5 4 27
2916 0.9581849 0.129241 2.601
108

20 438
9882

[Here, µ=21.9 ; σ=3.81]

Conclusion: not fitting.

 B.FERMENTATION:
1.(competency level before training)

X(class interval) f Xm Xm*f ( Xm^2)*f z Φ(z) Δ Φ(z) Estimated f

(freq)

1 17 17 289 -1.1064 0.133499 0.1334995 1.201

14.5-19.5 5

19.5-24.5 3 22 66 1452 -0.1574 0.436440 0.302941 2.73

5

24.5-29.5 4 27 108 2916 0.7908 0.785236 0.3487956 3.12

1

29.5-34.5 0 32 0 0 1.7393 0.959070 0.1738344 1.564

5

34.5-39.5 1 37 37 1369 2.6878 0.996427 0.0373569 0.370

4

9 228 6026

[Here, µ=25.333 ; σ= 5.272]

 Conclusion: fitted.
2.(competency level after training)

X(class interval) f Xm Xm*f ( Xm^2)*f z Φ(z) Δ Φ(z) Estimated f

(freq)
17.5 35 612.5 -1.2593 0.1038347 0.1038347 0.93451
14.5-20.5 2

20.5-26.5 23.5 23.5 552.25 -0.4771 0.3156137 0.211779 1.90611

1

26.5-32.5 29.5 29.5 870.25 0.305045 0.6217195 0.3061058 2.754

1

32.5-38.5 35.5 142 5041 1.0872 0.8621434 0.2404239 2.1638

4

38.5-44.5 40.5 40.5 1640.25 1.8693 0.9692581 0.1071147 0.964

1

270.5 8716.25
9

[Here, µ=30.16 ; σ=7.671]

Conclusion: not fitted.

 3.CO SEP GRADE:
1.(competency level before training)

X(class interval) f Xm Xm*f ( Xm^2)*f z Φ(z) Δ Φ(z) Estimated f

(freq)
17 17 289 -1.5611 0.0593799 0.0593799 0.3562
14.5-19.5 1

19.5-24.5 22 0 0 -0.6244 0.2676289 0.208249 1.2494

0

24.5-29.5 27 54 1458 0.3123 0.6217195 0.3540906 2.124

2

29.5-34.5 32 96 3072 1.249 0.8943502 0.2726307 1.64

3

167 4819
6

[Here, µ=27.833 ; σ=5.338]

 Conclusion: not fitted.
2.(competency level after training)

X(class interval) f Xm Xm*f ( Xm^2)*f z Φ(z) Δ Φ(z) Estimated f

(freq)
25.5 25.5 650.25 -1.0989 0.1356661 0.1356661 0.814
24.5-26.5 1

26.5-28.5 27.5 55 1512.5 -0.27444 0.3935801 0.257914 1.55

2

28.5-30.5 29.5 0 0 0.5497 0.7088403 0.3152602 1.892

0

30.5-32.5 31.5 94.5 2975.75 1.3739 0.9146565 0.2058162 1.231

3

175 5139.5
6

[Here, µ=29.166 ; σ=2.4267]

Conclusion: fitted.
 D.BOTTELARY:
1.(competency level before training)

X(class interval) f Xm Xm*f ( Xm^2)*f z Φ(z) Δ Φ(z) Estimated f

(freq)
6 12 72 864 -0.9812 0.1635431 0.1635431 5.3969
10.5-13.5

13.5-16.5 11 15 165 2475 -0.0698 0.4720968 0.3085537 10.1823

16.5-19.5 8 18 144 2592 -0.8414 0.7995458 0.327449 10.805

19.5-22.5 7 21 147 3087 1.7527 0.9599408 0.160395 5.301

22.5-25.5 1 24 24 576 2.6640 0.9960930 0.0361522 1.193

33 552 9594

[Here, µ=16.73; σ=3.292]

Conclusion: fitted.
 2.(competency level after training)

X(class interval) f Xm Xm*f ( Xm^2)*f z Φ(z) Δ Φ(z) Estimated f

(freq)
2 12 24 288 -1.9261 0.0268034 0.0268034 0.8845
10.5-13.5

13.5-16.5 3 15 45 675 -1.0494 0.1468591 0.1200557 3.961

16.5-19.5 7 18 126 2268 -0.1727 0.4325051 0.285646 9.426

19.5-22.5 12 21 252 5292 0.7039 0.7580363 0.3255312 10.743

22.5-25.5 9 24 216 5184 1.5807 0.9429466 0.1849103 6.103

33 663 13707

[Here, µ=20.091 ; σ= 3.422]

Conclusion: fitted.
Decision:
So, from these normal distribution fitting tables we came to know what decision to
be taken or not.

Here, WTP & ATP department and Fermentation training department’s present
training data has not been normally distributed. Bottlary department fitted it both
the cases.