International Debt Crisis/ Latin American Debt Crisis: - Arpana Chandra - Santosh Sarate
International Debt Crisis/ Latin American Debt Crisis: - Arpana Chandra - Santosh Sarate
International Debt Crisis/ Latin American Debt Crisis: - Arpana Chandra - Santosh Sarate
-Arpana Chandra
-Santosh Sarate
Introduction
• In the year 1970’s many Latin American countries
notably Brazil, Argentina and Mexico borrowed huge
sums of money for Industrialization.
• In the Mid 1970 Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members used
their new surpluses to purchase deposits from world
commercial banks.
• In the year 1982, brazil was the 1st country to accept its inability to pay back.
•Budget deficit
• Distributional Consequences.
What Went Wrong - Debtors
Non-productive Investments
This would seem to suggest that a large proportion of borrowed funds either went into the
unproductive sector or by-passed economies of poor countries altogether. A common factor
to the two arguments is that third world countries did not devote the funds towards
increasing their own capacity to service loans.
• Ideological Miscalculations :-
Walter Wriston, who served as head of Citibank Corporation that was still a
leading financial institution in the USA - around 1967 - was one of the proponents of the‘sovereign
risk hypothesis’. Wriston contended that a country ‘…how badly off, will “own” more than it
“owes”. He maintained that countries could not go bankrupt, nor could they disappear and that
even if they had short-term cash flow problems, the cure would be ‘sound programs and time to
• The Baker plan emphasized that the debt crisis could only be resolved through
sustained growth by the debtor countries.
• The Baker plan gives new importance to the World Bank and other Multilateral
Development Banks (MDBs), mainly the Inter-American Development Bank, both
by increasing their disbursements and, as a condition of this, by giving them a
bigger share of policy formation. The World Bank will be expected to increase from
11% to about 20% of total credits its non-project lending, in the form of structural
or sectoral adjustment loans, aimed at improving either the whole economy, or key
sectors such as foreign trade. In the past these loans have been linked with IMF
programs. But countries such as Brazil were anxious not to be tied to two sets of
conditions, and may regard the World Bank as more sympathetic to their pleas for
gradualism and flexibility than the IMF.
The Brady Plan.
“key To The crisis is Debt Reduction
• On March 10, 1989 the United States approach to managing the Third
World debt took a dramatic turn. Treasury Secretary Nicholas F. Brady
acknowledged that serious problems and impediments to a
successful resolution of the debt crisis still remains. The framework
that Brady outlined in his speech is only a first step toward designing
and implementing a more effective approach to dealing with the
problem.
• The framework that Brady outlined in his speech is only a first step
toward designing and implementing a more effective approach to
dealing with the problem. The major elements of the Brady initiative
are as follows.
The Highly Indebted Poor Country Initiative
(HIPC) “Debt Forgiveness is The Key”
After the Baker plan and its call for growth failed, and then the
Brady plan and its call for debt reduction failed, HIPC came along
and proposed the ever popular proposal for debt forgiveness. In
October 1996, there was a major shift by the IMF and the World
Bank when they produced a debt relief initiative, which
contemplated for the first time the cancellation of debts, owed to
them.
The agreement also recommended a strategy to enable countries
to exit from unsustainable debt burdens. Briton’s Chancellor
proposed that the Initiative should be financed through the sale of
IMF gold. The Initiative proposed 80% debt relief by the key creditor
countries (Japan, U.S., Germany, France and Briton). The World Bank
announced the establishment of a Trust Fund to finance the
Initiative.
PRESENT DEBT
Conclusion