100% found this document useful (1 vote)
4K views7 pages

System Theory Model Question Paper 0001

CI 9112 - SYSTEM THEORY - pgdexa-vhnts, DEC 2009 - Duration 3 Hours PART A (5 x 4 = 20 Marks) Answer all questions 1. Distinguish the terms obervability and detectability, 2. Determine the modes of the following system which can not be changed by output. Explain the principle of separation.

Uploaded by

Karthick Nivas
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
4K views7 pages

System Theory Model Question Paper 0001

CI 9112 - SYSTEM THEORY - pgdexa-vhnts, DEC 2009 - Duration 3 Hours PART A (5 x 4 = 20 Marks) Answer all questions 1. Distinguish the terms obervability and detectability, 2. Determine the modes of the following system which can not be changed by output. Explain the principle of separation.

Uploaded by

Karthick Nivas
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7
NYP Deed a Tost Pr pers U3 borg (TT TTT TI itt ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAT PG DEGREE EXAMINATIONS, DEC 2009 DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING MLE. (PS, PED, HV & CD. CI 9112 SYSTEM THEORY Duration 3 Hours Max Marks 100 5. PART A (5 x 4 = 20 Marks) Answer all questions Distinguish the terms obervability and detectability. Determine the modes of the following system which can not be changed by output 10 0 1) 1 feedback —=|0 -1 1 [e+|1}e and y=|0le oo -2} |o i Explain the principle of separation. What is meant by minimal realization? Will there be any decoupling zero in a minimal realization? Explain, + Define the Lyapunov’s instability theorem. PART B (5 x 16 = 80 Marks) Answer all questions Consider a linear time invariant system whose state equation is given by @ Gi) Gi) @ sft AL 1-3] y=lo ik Determine the transfer function of the systema © Determine the response of the system wien u(t) = exp(-t), with x0 [rurm). (6) Is there a value of xo for which y(t) becomes identically zero? Explain, @ ea Consider the system shown in figure 7(a). Determine the value of k that makes this system uncontrollable or unobservable, Obtain a state model of the system such that the states are decoupled into controllable and uncontrollable states. Also check whether the system is stabilisable. (64644) Figure 7a. (OR) 7. (b) & 8 () % €@) 9.) Consider the system whose state equation is given by z-[ o ete -10 -7/F +h Y= 2px (® Determine the state transition matrix using the Cayley- Hi: (ii) Determine the decoupling zero of the syste (ii) Determine the initial states that produce rectilinear response (Obtain a realization for the system whose transfer function’ matrix is given by ['st43042 sPesea 3464? basa ctrate | MEM Ni ia © (@) Derive the relationship between the trarisfer function model and state variable representation © (if) Show that the modes of any two systems which are related by similarity transformation, are invariant. @ (OR) ay [2 0 1] @ _~ Consider the system wa Sef ig y=B if Determine, if possible, the initial state xp when y(t) = ¥ exp(-21)#(3/2) for u() =1 fort > 0. @) (i) Determine, if possible, a control law which will drive the system from 0 [r [ fp ee (i in 2 seconds, for the system defined by lo . felis =f ik ® ~24 "a Determine the stability of the equilibrium point of the system defined by the jg #20. AY. . equation = Late _ } using Lyapunov’s method. 6) (oR) () State the Lyapunov's theorem for’ assessing the stability of non-linear systems @ Gi) Derive the Lyapunov’s equation for assessing the stability of a linear time invariant system. © (ii) Assess the BIBO stability and Asymptotic stability of the system whose state 32/2 2 ft equation is given by“ [1 oli ® y=[ te 10 (@) Consider the state model of ‘an armature controlled separately excited DC motor. (Determine a state feedback controller that would place the closed loop poles at -1 and -2, 8) (ii) Also deign a full order estimator to estimate the states from the measurement of speed alone. (8) (or) 10. (b) Consider a system whose state equation is given by a& [0 -3) fio <. e+ ala -4f" [a 4 tis required to assign the closed loop poles at -5 and -1. (Determine all possible state feedback controllers which assign the given set of closed loop poles, making use of both the inputs 1 and 2. 8) (i) Determine if possible, the state feedback controller which assigns the given Set of closed loop poles, using only input 2. Use Ackerman’s formula, — (8) GU ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAL DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING 3 ME (PS, PED, HY, CI Eo C19112 SYSTEM THEORY - Test 1 -OCT 2009 Duration 90 Minutes Max marks 50 PART A Answer all questions $x3=15 marks Define state controllability. Determine the mode of the following system which can not be changed by any input dx/at=[1 0;-1 -2pc{051]u 3. A system is completely state controllable. Does it mean that it is also output controllable? Explain. : a0 What is meant by minimal realization? Explain. Explain the role of left and right eigenvectors in the state response of system we PART B. s 6. ‘Consider the system shown in figure 6. Determine the value of k that makes this system uncontrollable. Obtain a state model of the system such that the states are decoupled into controllable and uncontrollable states. Also check whether the system is stabilisable. (8+6+4) Figure 6 (@ Consider a linear time invariant system whose state equation is given by ft Sh y=[o ik Show that the output of this system is identically zero when the input u(t)=exp(- 1) for some initial condition, Also Explain the reason for the output to be zero. (2#5) (OR) (b) Determine the state transition matrix of the whose state equation is given by 01 0 = Lx+| [fa Sell Y= [1 0] X using the Cayley- Hamilton’s theorem Determine if possible the control law that transforms the state from [0;0] to [10,- 10) in 3 seconds. (12#5) Ebiowaes hoon: DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GUINDY 3 ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERING CI9112 SYSTEMS THEORY TEST -1 (Common to High Voitage, Power System, Power Electronics & Drives) Time : 90 Minutes Max. Marks: 50 Date: 30.09.2009 : PART — A (3 x5=15 Marks) 1 Consider the system defined by the state equation. _ [oO 1]° fo a a xt u -2 -3f "tr ap". 10 i 00 O01 (x+/00| wu 1- 1| or determine the transfer function matrix. 2. "Determine the step response of the system whose state equation is given by -4-4)] [0] [eG y=[10]x 3... Obtain a state model for the system whose transfer function is given by S455" 46542 9 +65" +357 +2541 a) PART-B 4, Derive the dynamic equations of an inyerted pendulum and obtain the linearised state equations around the upright position of the pendulum. (12 Marks) 5. @ Consider the transfer function matrix. 1 1 _| s#1 G+2)s+3) H()=] °} i (s+3) (s#1) Obtain atleast two different state models for this system. (10 Marks) (OR) @) @ (e) Se Consider the transfer function. G(s)=—= sh+5s +1 (s+D8(s+2)@(s+3)(5+4) Obtain a state model such that solution of state equations can be obtained by solving first order differential equations, Also obtain the step response of the system. (10 Marks) Obtain the discrete equivalent of the system whose state equation is given by 1 Lo IE +[%h =20°-9 1 y=[1 1]}x (OR) (13 Marks) Obtain atleast three different state models for the equivalent circuit 0.12 0.1H Non Input of a transformer shown in figure 6(b) (13 Marks) 01H 012 oN 102 ie 5Q output Fig. 6.(b) (@) Determine if possible, the pole assignment controller that assigns the closed loop poles at -1 and -5. © (ii) Derive the Ackerman’s formula for determining the state feedback matrix that assigns the closed loop poles at desired locations. (7) (iii) Determine the observer to obtain a observation error dynamics of one second, using the Ackerman’s formula, © 5.a, Prove the following statements using an example of your own (® Controllability is preserved by state feedback © (i) In a controllable and unobservable system there is always a fixed mode by: output feedback © (iii) In a system which is detectable but not observable, the error dynamics is limited by the unobservable mode (0) (OR) 5(b) (j) State the Lyapunov’s second method for assessing the stability of non-linear “systems (10) S(b}(il) Design a reduced order observer for the system defined in question no 4 ) ‘ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING ME (PS, PED, HV, CI & EDEC) CI9112 SYSTEM THEORY Duration 1 1/2 Hours ‘Assessment III(7-12-2009) Max marks 50 PART A (Answer all questions) (3 x 4 = 12 marks) 1. Consider the system whose state equation is given by a. dxdt = [10 0; 0-11; 00 -2x+[I; 1; Ou and = [10 15111;100) x Determine the order of the minimal order observer that can be designed to estimate the states of the system. 2. Consider a LTIV system with n states, p outputs and m inputs. Determine the number of poles that can be assigned arbitrarily by state and output feedback. Assume the system to be completely state controllable and observable. 3. Compare the merits and demerits of using Lyapunov’s stability criterion for assessing the stability of LTIV systems. PART B (Answer all questions) (2 x 19 = 38 marks) 4. Consider a linear time invariant system whose state equation is given by :{} eh y=[0 tk

You might also like