Scribd
Upload
116 views2 pages

Wiki Rubric

The document provides a grading rubric for wikis with four levels (1-3) of criteria for Content, Organization, Presentation, and Accuracy. For each criteria, level 1 represents minimal or poor effort, level 2 represents adequate but room for improvement, and level 3 exemplifies thorough, well-organized work. The rubric also includes a section for evaluating collaboration where students review and contribute to other wikis.

Uploaded by

Noah Cabiac
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
116 views2 pages

Wiki Rubric

The document provides a grading rubric for wikis with four levels (1-3) of criteria for Content, Organization, Presentation, and Accuracy. For each criteria, level 1 represents minimal or poor effort, level 2 represents adequate but room for improvement, and level 3 exemplifies thorough, well-organized work. The rubric also includes a section for evaluating collaboration where students review and contribute to other wikis.

Uploaded by

Noah Cabiac
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Wiki Grading Rubric

Name __________________________________ ! Wiki Page ________________________

Content

Level Description

Minimal information on the topic. May contain description with little to no


1 elaboration or examples.

Adequate amount of information on the topic with description and examples, but
2 lacks complete explanation of the topic.

Thoroughly explains topic using easily understandable descriptions and


3 supported by multiple examples.

Organization

Level Description

Little to no organization. Lacks most organizational features such as headings,


1 table of contents, and tags.

Contains most organizational features and/or the features are improperly used or
2 formatted.

3 Headings, table of contents, and tags1 are used and properly and accordingly.

Presentation

Level Description

1 Little or no multimedia content (pictures, videos, links, etc)

Multimedia content does not support the textual content. Multimedia content is
2 not used or formatted properly and/or obtrusive. Inadequate use of multimedia
content.

Multimedia content supports textual content by increasing the understanding of


3 the main topic. Content is formatted properly and placed in a manner that is
unobtrusive.
Accuracy

Level Description

Content is poorly referenced. Information is obtained from one to two


1
sources. Content contains many spelling/grammatical errors.

An adequate amount of the content is referenced. Information on the topic


2
is obtained from many sources. Few to no spelling/grammatical mistakes.
! ! !

Collaboration

Wikis are most powerful when content is created by a collective of people rather than one
individual. Review the wikis of your fellow classmates and make a content-adding edit or post
a constructive comment or question in the discussion area for that page. Write a brief
description of the edit or discussion post.

KEY:
Total Points ! ______ 13-14 points ! =! 20 points (100%)
12 points ! =! 18 points (90%)
Grade !! ______!
11 points ! =! 16 points (80%)
8-10 points! =! 14 points (70%)
<8 points ! =! Incomplete (0%)

You might also like