CASE: Crime That Pays (And Pretty Well Too) : T.Deepthi 5133

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

CASE: crime That

Pays (and pretty well


too)
T.DEEPTHI
5133
 Software technology was facing the problem of digital piracy .Digital
piracy is the illegal distribution and copying of software for personal
and business use.
 In U.S software is automatically protected by federal copyright law
from the moment of its creation. U.S copy right act grants the
copyright owner “the exclusive rights to protect the copyrighted
work” and to distribute the copies of it.
 According to U.S federal law any one who violates the law for
copyright infringement are punished. illegal copy can land six figure
fine and jail time.
 But in china digital piracy is very high and penalty is very less.
1.What is the relationship among governments, institutions,
organizations and companies in developing legal codes to
fight software piracy?
 Industry associations BSA (Business software alliance),
Software and Information Industry (SIIA) and
international Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition (IACC) made
efforts to spur government to toughen laws.

 They work to promote legal online world by negotiating


with governments and consumers in the international
software and internet markets.
 Software makers ,governments and associations are
acting singly and jointly to help police piracy.
 WIPO pledged to protect intellectual
property worldwide by developing IPR
treaties.
 hoping collective political arrangements
and legal actions by companies,
associations, governments, and
institutions would lead to a decline in
global software piracy.
2.Should the software companies ,industry associations
,home governments take the lead in dealing with the
government of countries with high piracy rates why?
 BSA reported that ,of all the packaged software installed on PCs
worldwide in 2005 more than 35% was acquired illegally –at a cost
of $34 billion in losses to software makers and distributors which is
more than in 2003 where loss was $29 billion.
 Lowering PC software piracy can have significant economic benefits
to economies in the Asia Pacific.”
 “Now, more than ever, our global economy depends on a robust IT
sector. Policies that promote innovation today – including protection
for intellectual property such as software – will drive economic
growth and prosperity in the future,”
 BSA’s efforts to combat software theft have continued to make
some progress.
3.Can the software industry expect to control software
piracy without relying on government ?why would the
software company dislike greater government regulation?

 In spite of the need for assistance and


cooperation from all stakeholders, the
software industry object greater
government regulation
 There is a rapid innovation in IT and
government regulation may slow down
technological developments.
4.How do you think consumers in high theft countries justify software
piracy ?similarly what ideas or conditions lead to respect IPR s in low
theft countries?
 Consumers in high theft countries tend see property as being
common to all and existing for the benefit of all—often they do not
understand the basic concept of intellectual property rights.
 they want to acquire the product at the lowest possible cost and
they believe that software makers should allow informational and
technical wealth to be openly shared with customers
 They also feel that piracy is the most effective way of chasing with
western monopolists who charge exorbitant prices .
 On the other hand, consumers in lower theft countries tend to share
an individualist mindset;
 the concept of intellectual property rights is well understood and
long established within their countries and cultures.
 Political and legal system is very strong in
low theft countries

You might also like