MBE Notes
MBE Notes
NOTES
UNIT I
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Management book usually deals with managing other people. That one can manage
other people is by no means adequately proven. But one can always manage oneself.
Indeed, executives who do not manage themselves for effectiveness cannot possibly expect
to manage their associates and subordinates. Management is largely by example. Executives
who do not know how to make themselves effective in their own job and work set the
wrong example.
Effectiveness is what executives are being paid for, whether they work as managers
who are responsible for the performance of others as well as their own, or as individual
professional contributors responsible for their own performance only. Without effectiveness
there is no ‘performance’. Ability to perform and survive depends increasingly on the
effectiveness of the people.
According to Peter Drucker the manager is a dynamic, life giving elements in business.
His function is to co-ordinate efforts, encourage initiatives and keenness, use each man’s
ability and develop a dynamic and devoted team which functions as a single entity. He
should be endowed with delicate and sensitive perceptions so that he understands the
changing needs of the organization and those of organizational members.
1.2 MANAGEMENT
Management also refers to the process through which the goals of the organization
are attained by channeling the efforts of employees. It can be divided into four distinct
but integrated activities, which includes planning (deciding what is to be done),
organizing (deciding how it is to be done), leading (influencing behavior) and controlling
(to make sure that plans are carried out). They are the general functions that managers
perform.
Generally the major activity of a manager includes managing and interacting with people,
coaching low performers to improve their work, organizing job tasks, settling disputes and
developing career paths for individual employees. They make decisions, allocate resources,
and direct the activities of others to attain goals. They function on a relatively continuous
basis to achieve a common goal or a set of goals.
Managers are also responsible for designing an organization’s structure. We call this
function organizing. It includes the determination of what tasks are to be done, which is to
do it, how the tasks are to be grouped, who reports to whom and where the decisions are
to be made. Thus, in essence, organizing function deals with matching organization structure
to its goals and resources and the process is called “Organizational Design”.
Every organization contains people, and it is management’s job to direct and coordinate
these people. This is the leading function. When managers motivate subordinates, direct
the activities of others, select the most effective communication channel, or resolve conflicts
among members, they are engaging in leading.
The final function that managers perform is controlling. After the goals are set; the
plans formulated; the structural arrangements delineated; and the people hired, trained,
and motivated, there is still the possibility that something may go amiss. To ensure that
things are going, as they should, management must monitor the organization’s performance.
Actual performance must be compared with the previously set goals. If there are any
significant deviations, it is management’s job to get the organization back on track. NOTES
1.3.2 Functional Dimensions: Henri Fayol
Henry Mintzberg studied the activities of five chief executive officers of major
corporations and found out that when business organizations give authority, they also convey
certain amount of status. Executives then use this status to facilitate interpersonal relationships
with supervisors, subordinates, peers and individuals outside but connected with the
organization. Thus the managers are playing different roles. A role is an organized set of
behaviors that are identified with a specific position.
Mintzberg developed a model of the related roles of managers and he called them
“Management role constellation” (see exhibit 1.1)
Interpersonal Roles
Figurehead role
The manager performs certain functions such as receiving important visitors and signing
documents.
Leader
Liaison role
The manager establishes and maintains a network of relationships with outside persons
to bring information and favors to the organization.
Informational Roles
Monitor
Disseminator role
The manager must transmit much of the information received from outsiders or insiders
to other organization members.
Spokes person
Decisional Roles
Entrepreneurial role
The manager acts as an initiator and designer of controlled change in the organization.
This role equips the manager to take corrective actions needed to resolve important
and unexpected disturbances. He must seek solutions of various unanticipated problems
like strike, natural disasters, accidents etc. Routine problems must also be dealt with
simultaneously.
Negotiator role
The manager frequently must negotiate with outsiders in matters affecting the
organization.
To come to grips with the interesting and highly important interaction of gender,
leadership and managerial effectiveness, no doubt the best place to start is with myths,
misunderstandings and misconceptions pertaining to all three. The four greatest myths are:
Task-oriented skills are more important for leadership effectiveness than are person-
oriented skills.
Male managers are more likely to possess task-oriented abilities than are female
managers; whereas female managers are more likely to possess person oriented
skills than are male managers.
In order to maximize managerial effectiveness, men should be given the jobs that
require task-oriented abilities and women should be given the jobs that require
interpersonal skills.
If women want to rise to the top levels of management, they need to be more like
men.
MYTH#1: Task-oriented skills are more important for leadership effectiveness than are
person-oriented skills.
Both task and person oriented sills are important for managerial effectiveness. Task
orientation is related to abilities such as planning, organizing, decision-making, and problem
solving. A lack of task-orientation can result in problems in areas such as showing initiative,
getting paperwork done on time, delegating, and providing appropriate guidance to
subordinates.
A leadership style that balances task and person- orientation keeps one dimension
from overpowering the other. A manager whose task-orientation is not balanced with person-
orientation can be overly aggressive, domineering, and autocratic. This type of person will
try to resolve conflicts in an overly dominating or competitive manner. These types of
Insensitivity to others, a cold, arrogant style, and being overly ambitious are the first,
second, and fourth ranked reasons, respectively, for the derailment of fast-track executives.
A manager who is person-orientation and not balanced with task-orientation can be overly
accommodating and overly concerned with the needs and feelings of others. This type of
manager will try to resolve conflicts by being overly obliging and will have difficulty conveying
negative feedback to subordinates.
The optimal leadership style is one that is high in both task and person-orientation and
in which these two dimensions are balanced with one another. This is known as an
androgynous style. Because they have both task-oriented and person-oriented abilities,
androgynous managers can function effectively in a broader range of situations.
Androgynous leaders are also very flexible. They are able to switch back and forth
between task and person oriented leadership behaviors and will perform whatever role is
not already represented in a group.
MYTH#2: Male managers are more likely to possess task-oriented abilities than are female
mangers, whereas female managers are more likely to possess person-oriented skills than
are male managers.
Due to gender-role socialization practices, in the general population, men are more
likely to possess task-oriented or masculine characteristics than are women, whereas women
are more likely to possess person-oriented or feminine characteristics than are men. How
ever, this is not true for managers.
MYTH#3: In order to maximize managerial effectiveness, men should be given the jobs
that require task-oriented abilities and women should be given the jobs that require
interpersonal skills.
This approach is obviously based on stereotypes about the types of qualities that men
and women possess, and doesn’t make full use of the actual talents that individuals of both
sexes may have. This approach is particularly detrimental to women’s career advancement,
however, because it tends to relegate them to certain types of positions and career paths
that do not typically lead to the top echelons in organizations. Most managerial jobs actually
require both task-oriented and person-oriented skills.
MYTH#4: If women want to rise to the top levels of management, they need to be more
like men. NOTES
Male and female managers in comparable positions don’t differ in their personality
traits, leadership styles, or objective indicators of performance. Female managers have
already adopted the strategy of acting like men and can be just as “tough” as male managers,
but it need to act particularly tough to prove that they have the “right stuff”. But no matter
how much a woman tries to act like a man, she is still visibly a woman and others will
expect her to behave like one.
Masculine behavior is viewed as more acceptable when coming from a man than
from a woman. And female manages who behave in a “masculine” manner are often disliked,
especially by their male subordinates. Because of this, female managers are particularly
likely to benefit from androgynous management approach adopted by the organizations
FRED LUTHANS and his associates looked at the issue of what managers do from
a somewhat different perspective. They asked the question: Do managers who move up
most quickly in an organization do the same activities and with the same emphasis as those
managers who do the best job? You would tend to think that those managers who were the
most effective in their jobs would also be the ones who were promoted fastest. But that’s
not what appears to happen.
Fred Luthans and his associates studied more than 450 managers. What they found
was that these managers all engaged in four managerial activities.
Traditional Management: Decision-making, planning, and controlling.
Communication: Exchanging routine information and processing paper work
Human resource Management: Motivating, disciplining, managing conflict,
staffing,and training.
Networking: Socializing, politicking, and interacting with outsiders.
This study adds important insights to our knowledge of what managers do. On an
average, managers spend approximately twenty to thirty percent of their time on each of
the four activities: traditional management, communication, human resource management,
and networking. However, successful managers don’t give the same emphasis to each of
these activities, as do effective managers. In fact, their emphasis is almost the opposite.
This challenges the historical assumption that promotions are based on performance, vividly
illustrating the importance that social and political skills play in getting ahead in organization.
Some other functions that managers perform are Communication, Listening, Oral
Presentation, Written Communication and many more.
A manager in an enterprise cannot himself carryout all the tasks necessary for the
accomplishment of goals. His capacity to do work and take decisions is limited. Therefore,
he assigns some part of his work to his subordinates and gives them necessary authority to
make decisions within the area of their assigned duties. This downward pushing of authority
to make decisions is known as delegating authority.
There are several advantages resulting from effective delegation:
Delegation allows the manager more time for thinking and planning.
The person closest to the activity should be better able to make decisions than a
distant superior.
Delegation tends to encourage initiative in subordinates and to make effective use
of their skills. Initiative, in turn, improves morale.
Delegation tends to reduce decision time, as it eliminates recommendations going
upwards to the superior, where the decision is made, and subsequent downward
communication.
Delegation develops the skills of subordinates by permitting them to make decisions
and apply their knowledge gained from training programs and meetings.
In order to delegate, the manager should have the following:
Receptiveness – Willingness to delegate – welcomes the ideas of subordinate
Willingness to allow them to make decisions
Willingness to let others make mistakes
Willingness to trust subordinates
Should delegate only if they have means of getting feedback
Reward effective delegation.
TSRDS includes
Building infrastructures such as construction of link roads
Developing sources of water both for irrigation and domestic use.
Helping farmers to adopt improved methods of cultivation and animal care.
Construction of school buildings and community hall
Promotion of rural industry and entrepreneurship
Promotion of adult literacy
Providing health and rural sanitation
Providing health care and other facilities to under privileged.
Many of us let the time manage us rather than managing it. Time perhaps is the most
important resource ever known to the human beings. Often we wonder how nice would it
be if we could recall the past time. Interestingly this is the only resource, which is available
in equal measure for everyone. However, we may find many persons finishing most days
behind the clock. “As per Bill May, President of American Can Company” Time is the
most valuable thing we deal with. It cannot be bought; it cannot be recaptured. It must be
utilized with the highest degree of effectiveness possible. Time is the scarcest resource,
and unless it is managed nothing else can be managed.
Time is a unique resource. Time cannot be saved; it can only be spent wisely. Time
past is gone forever.It is nothing but getting the best out of our time. It is a unique resource.
Time cannot be saved; it can only be spent wisely. Time is the most valuable resources
available to a person. Time is also irreversible.
The concept has been viewed differently through the ages. Different cultures and
different individuals in these cultures attach different meanings to time. In fact, the concept
of time is an integral part of one’s personality and culture. Immanuel Kant, the great
The objective of time management is to increase and optimize the use of your
discretionary time. Time Management actually relates to:
Getting the best out of your time
Time management is the same as managing your life
Life management
Time management
Now management
Prioritization
Managing your mind
Awareness
There are five major areas, which are imperative to improving the management of
time:
The way we spend our time is habitual in nature
Setting personal goals
Priorities
Proper communication
Procrastination
Man is indeed a creature of habit. The way we spent our time is largely habitual. Most
managers do not consciously think about how they are spending their time. Douglass quotes
that, “The way you spend your time determines how you live your life”.
Learning to control our time means changing some of our time habit. Douglass suggests,
keeping a record of how you spend your time for a week or two. At the end of each week,
summarize what you did and check the percentage of time spent on goal-oriented, prioritized
activity and how much activity was aimless, repetitive or of low priority.
Summarizing the log will give us a good idea as to whether we are controlling our own
time or our time is being controlled by outside influences or habit.
Plan the time by setting goals, goals about what we want to do, divided into long term
and short term goals. Determine the time we plan to devote to each of the goals we set.
Emphasis should be given to two or three major thing we would like to do. The goals
should be specific, subdivided into concrete objectives, as well as realistically attainable.
That is set objectives, which are smart – SMART
S – Specific
M- Measurable
A – Achievable
R – Realistic
T – Timed
1.5.2.3 Priorities
Once the goals are established, we need to set priorities. The process of setting
priorities involves planning. The priorities should be set on a daily basis. By scheduling the
time effectively we learn to avoid over-committing our self. Learning when and how to say
“no” becomes important because our over commitment dilutes our effectiveness. Inability
to concentrate on important goals is often due to devoting a little time to everything rather
than committing a great deal of time to a few things.
1.5.2.4 Communication
Once habits have been analyzed, goals identified and priorities decided, do not mean
that managers will automatically use their working hours in the most efficient way possible.
The idea of communicating these goals and objectives to the subordinates also, should be
in such a way that the goals planned will actually be carried out.
1.5.2.5 Procrastination
Procrastination is a major stumbling block for almost everyone seeking to improve his
use of time. There are three causes, which lead to procrastination:
Unpleasantness
Difficult projects
Indecision
The solution lies in how the day’s activities are scheduled. Those tasks, which we find
most unpleasant and keep putting off, should be scheduled first. That way we can quickly
get them out of the way, leaving you free to concentrate on the rest of the days work.
Other ways of dealing with unpleasant tasks are: analyzing the task to see what makes
it unpleasant; tackling unpleasant tasks in small pieces, doing the task for five or ten minutes
at a time; learning to recognize our few critical activities and focus our attention on doing
those things first.
The third cause of procrastination is indecision. Everyone wants to make the right
decision so as to avoid unsatisfactory results. The best thing to do is gathering all the
information available; make the decision, and then move on from there.
Thus the real point of managing the time effectively is to carve out as satisfying and
rich a professional and personal life as we possibly can.
1.5.4.3 The other time wasters could be with regard to planning and process
itself.
Planning:
Lack of clarity on objectives
Shifting priorities
Unrealistic time estimates
Process:
Lack of clarity about the job requirements.
Poor crisis management
Inability to concentrate
Ineffective delegation
1.5.5.1 Visitors
Unplanned and unwelcome visitors are great time wasters and cause physical
interruption. One way to put off the visitor is to stand up whilst the person is in the room.
Alternatively the visitor may be asked to take an appointment before meeting. Some of the
visitors interrupt just because you are visible to them.
Scrap all unnecessary forms, reports and returns. Ensure that the gains from every
type of paperwork exceed the work involved. Use triplicate sets of internal memos, which
have a section for reply. Word processors may be used to facilitate editing of reports,
minutes, and etc. use of abstracts of long reports dictating machines, increase in reading
speed, marking important points in the first reading, etc. also help to reduce time spent on
paper work.
1.5.5.4 Telephone
Unplanned telephone conversations are generally longer than planned ones. Therefore,
plan our calls both incoming and outgoing. An efficient and tactful secretary can protect a
manager from too frequent and untimely telephone interruptions by taking messages without
giving offence. An organization – wide habit and culture of brevity in conversations should
be developed to save time and cost. Use of local extensions and switchboard can be
helpful in reducing telephone interruptions.
1.5.5.5 Travel
Unnecessary travel should be avoided by making use of telex and telephone services.
Very often unscheduled blocks of time become available to managers, for example, while
waiting for a delayed flight. One can utilize these small time segments productively if one
carries a book or report that needs to be read in such situations.
1.5.5.6 Information
Both lack of necessary information and excessive information can hamper the work
of a manager. An effective management information system should be developed if the
information available is incomplete and/or delayed and incorrect. Efficient records
management can also be helpful. Subordinates can be instructed to submit information in a
summarized form.
We can manage ourselves with regard to time. It is the way in which we organize our
work and manage our time that we differ from each other. Time constraint can be a source NOTES
of stress. There are four Ds to be kept in mind for managing our work effectively with
regard to time. They are:
D - Dump
D - Delay
D - Delegate
D - Do
There would certainly be papers that come to us over which we are not required to
contribute. We can easily dump those. Certain matters do not require our immediate
attention, delay those. Some matters can easily be passed on to our subordinates, delegate
those and finally some matters have to necessarily be done by us alone, devote attention to
those.
Managers tend to prefer to work on concrete tasks to more ambiguous ones. Simple
tasks are finished before complex ones are even started. Short-term tasks are emphasized
over long-term tasks. And the obvious result is that important long-term projects of a
complex nature tend to be postponed.
The various tasks and projects that managers, as well as staff administrators perform
can be classified according to the two key dimensions as given (see exhibit 1.2).
One dimension is degree of difficulty and the second is duration of effort. Degree of
difficulty is broken down into simple tasks and ambiguous and hard to deal with tasks.
Conversely, duration of effort is broken down into short-term tasks which can be completed
in less than an hour, and long term tasks which can take days, weeks or even months to
finish. Although these dimensions are shown as distinct subcategories, it might be more
appropriate to view each dimension as a continuum between the two extreme points.
Cell 2 tasks are the opposite of cell 3. These tasks are simple but unfortunately they
require a long-term effort to complete. These tasks may also have an intermediate amount
of ambiguity, which is due to the long-term effort required to complete them. Finally, cell 4
tasks are complex in nature and a long-term effort is required for completion. Obviously,
these tasks are of a highly ambiguous nature and are avoided in favor of less ambiguous
tasks.
Then there is the approach in which the manager promises to get started on some
important project when things become less hectic and return to normal. This often doesn’t
work because the reality facing most managers is a never-ending barrage of interruptions,
crisis and deadlines.
A final approach that some manager’s use is to continually tell anyone who will listen
about the great project they are about to start. Unfortunately, some of these people seem
to have a much higher need to impress others with what they are planning to do rather than
with what they actually done.
The Three Laws of Time and Effort Management provide solution to the above stated
problem.
A difficult work task invariably appears greater when we are approaching them rather
than when we are performing them. So, things we don’t want to do only take half as long,
cost half as much and often bring twice the rewards. Hence the managers should do planning
in such a way that twenty percent of their effort is spent in getting eighty percent of the
reward rather than eighty percent of their time and effort being wasted in fetching only NOTES
20% of the rewards.
The greatest sufferers from time pressure tend to be procrastinators. Whether pressure
causes procrastination, or vice versa, no idea. What one must do is, apply effort. This is a
more efficient way of dealing with time-related pressure than procrastination. Once we
start working on a task, the time we need to devote to it seems to diminish. The sooner we
start working on something, the less time we have to allow for it to be completed.
Managers can waste a lot of time and energy pursuing unprofitable, frustrating, time-
consuming courses of action. But if they are smart and talented enough to distinguish among
important and unimportant tasks, are able to measure performance in terms of reward and
are able to apply their skills and competency systematically in accomplishing the objectives
of these tasks, then in all probability, they would turn out to be successful.
After an employee has been selected for a job, has been trained to do it and has
worked on it for a period of time, his work should be monitored and measured on a
continuous basis such that not much of time is wasted in correcting the deviations after
completion of the job. This means that managers should always take proactive measures
rather than reactive measures to see that employee is fulfilling the job requirements in terms
of results.
Executives
Employees
The Executives fear that the program may expose ineffectiveness within his area of
responsibility.
To achieve the most desirable results from a group or organization, leadership, attitude,
the drive to work, and voluntary co-operation of the subordinates is required rather than
dependence upon the application of absolute authority. The first prerequisite for building a
smoothly operating team is the intelligence handling of delegation. This extends the
effectiveness of managers.
What is delegation?
The belief that ‘tomorrow’s CEO must be today’s empowered manager’ compelled
57-year old Rahul Bajaj, CEO of the two-wheeler giant Bajaj-Auto, to delegate his
responsibility to successor systematically, in early 90’s. Both the heirs apparent- his two
sons Rajiv and Sanjiv are qualified enough to exchange the baton smoothly.
What To Delegate?
There are certain working rules in making good delegations. Here some common
guidelines in the delegation of authority:
The superior must understand, and agree with, the theory of delegation. Each
subordinate should receive orders from and report to only one superior.
Responsibilities should be assigned as far down the organizational structure as
there are sufficient competence and information for effective decision-making and
performance.
Only decisions that cannot be made at a given level should be referred upward.
Accountability cannot be delegated, as no superior can escape accountability for
activities, performance and evaluation of subordinates through delegation.
A clear definition of the scope, responsibility, authority, objectives, which may
provide help, potential consequences and functional relationships, must be provided
for every position. Delegation of authority for a whole job should be made whenever
possible.
There must be a clear chain of command from the ultimate source of authority to
every position. Every subordinate must know who delegates authority and to whom
matters must be referred.
Some times it may also happen that managers do not like to delegate the work. Such
type of managers wastes time resource tremendously. The reasons why they do not delegate
are:
Lack of confidence in subordinates
Lack of self-confidence
Poor definition of duties
Aversion to risk taking
Fear of subordinates as competitors.
An inflated self-image
Finally it can be concluded that managing time is all about making your day go right.
There are days when things just do not seem to go the way you had planned it to be. It
could be because of ineffective planning, ineffective delegation or ineffective control. Here
are some of the common mistakes we do. Avoiding them will help us to increase our daily
success both on and off the job, in less time and with less stress.
Start your day without a plan of action. Time management is all about doing the
right things. If we do not schedule our day accordingly, chances of prioritizing wrong tasks
are high! Unplanned activities will take up most of your time and at the end of the day, you
will be back to where you have started! You will have worked hard but may not have done
enough of right things. Time Management is not doing the wrong things quicker. That just
gets us nowhere faster. Time Management is doing the right things.
Get out of balance in your life. Our lives are made up of Seven Vital Areas: Health,
Family, Financial, Intellectual, Social, Professional, and Spiritual. We need to balance time NOTES
effectively to ensure that we do not neglect any of these vital areas. If we don’t take time
for health, our family life and social life are hurt. If our financial area is out of balance, we
will not be able to focus adequately on our professional goals, etc.
Work with a messy desk or work area. Studies have shown that the person who
works with a messy desk spends, on average, one and a half hours per day looking for
things or being distracted by things! Clean your desk and chances are that you will begin to
work better and perhaps more effectively.
Don’t get enough sleep. Research shows most people complain on a regular basis
that they do not get enough sleep. Studies show that nearly 75% of us complain on a
regular basis, all throughout our days that we are flat-out tired. For most people, the factor
is lack of sleep, and even if they do get the quantity of sleep, but they lack the quality of
sleep. Their days are filled with so much stress, they are out of control, working harder but
maybe not smarter, that it’s difficult to get a full night’s sleep. If you plan your day, then
work your plan, you will get more done, feel a higher sense of accomplishment, and
experience less stress and enjoy a more restful night’s sleep.
Don’t take a lunch break. Most of us think that if we can skip the lunch and work
through we will be able to produce better results. Studies have shown it may work just the
opposite. Researchers opine that after doing what we do for several hours; we begin to
“dull out”. Once in a while it is perfectly fine to do so, but the issue is “how much more”
productive we can be. It’s advisable not to take the whole break if you are pressurized for
time, take a 15-minute break to get charged up again to effectively handle the afternoon’s
challenges. This is turn will lead to the avoidance of procrastination!
1.5.12 Some behavioral negativities of our own nature that prohibit us from
maintaining timings and schedules are:
People have a tendency to distrust in their own decisions, they fail to be guided by
their inner voice, often ask other’s opinions and set goals accordingly by changing their
planning frequently, they create confusion and conflicting views, which ultimately opt for
wrong choice and later on lament over it. Such nature also highlights their time
mismanagement.
Some people cannot say “NO” to others because they do not have the strength of
will to refuse, which disturbs their predetermined schedule, ultimately time
management. Dawdling, dodging let go or shilly-shallying, escapism tendencies and
inattentiveness affects time management, some people do not seem to learn the lesson
inherent in their past life experiences and repeat the same mistakes again and again. That
affects their future time management.
Every business organization is a part of industry and has to operate in a given economic
system and society. It receives inputs, transforms them and exports the outputs to the
environment. The heuristic model (see exhibit 1.3) indicates how the various managerial
characteristics and resourcefulness acting as inputs is being transformed into outputs through
a transformation process.
The person
Qualities include
Ability to sustain defeat Alert
Ambitious Assertive
Capable of good judgment Confident
Competitive Creative
Decisive Dedicated
Defensive Dynamism
Emotional stability Energetic
Extrovert Fear of failure
Group oriented Honest
Intelligent Mentally strong
Optimistic Pragmatic
Predictable Realistic
Self-controlled Tolerant
The process
Answers how managers manage successfully
Manage work instead of people
Plan and organize effectively
Set goals realistically
Decisions based on consensus but accept responsibility
Delegate frequently and effectively
Rely on others to help solve problems
Communicate precisely
Cooperate with others
Display consistent and dependable behavior
Win with grace
Express hostility tactfully
It’s a function of ability and motivation of managers and opportunity given to them in
the organizational environment to produce output. It involves personal characteristics and
resourcefulness of managers, expectations on the individual by the structural, administrative
and social environments of the organization and Feedback, incentive and rewards identified
by organizational policies and practices.
Here the manager tries to resolve conflicts between managerial and subordinate thinking.
Involvement in any activities of the organization is higher on the part of subordinates. A key
feature of this model is that acceptance of subordinates precedes action. On the contrary
there are also some weakness attached to this model. The first one would be getting
subordinates to buy ideas may be time consuming. Next the subordinates may also vitiate
action through resistance at discussion stage.
To be effective is the job of the executive. ‘To effect’ and ‘to execute’ are, after all,
near-synonyms. Whether he works in a business or in a hospital, in a government agency
or in a labour union, in a university or in the army, the executive is, first of all, expected to
get the right things done. And this is simply saying that he is expected to be effective.
Intelligence, imagination and knowledge are essential resources, but only effectiveness
converts them into results.
To optimize is to increase productivity for which the following four components should
be given atmost attention by the managers.
Mentoring
Feedback
Counseling
Discipline
1.9.1 Mentorin
1.9.2 Feedback
1.9.3 Counseling
1.9.4 Discipline
The managers should prompt an individual or a group to observe the rules, regulations
and procedures, which are deemed necessary for the attainment of an objective.
They are:
Technical skills
Human skills
Conceptual skills
Designing skills
Communication skills
Interpersonal skills
Understanding perception, self concept, and expressing emotions
Nonverbal and verbal skills
When it comes to listening skills, the following six negative listening skills should
be avoided by any manager:
The faker – the person who simply listens without understanding
The interrupter – the person who interrupts while others speak.
The intellectual or logic listener – the person listens to others, but have his own
perceptions.
The rebuttal maker- the person who put the same words against us, used by us
The advice giver- constantly giving advice.
Are you an effective manager? If you see some room for improvement, there are
practical steps that you can take to increase your effectiveness. Answering the following
questions will help you translate your knowledge of management policies and principles
into sound operating practices.
1. What are the goals and objectives of the organization? Do your team members
know what they are supposed to accomplish?
The best way for people to become committed to a company’s goals and objectives
is for them to participate in setting those goals. When this is not possible, the manager or
supervisor should make sure that each employee fully understands where the department
is headed and how it plans to get there.
2. What is your role in attaining these goals and objectives? What are your
team member’s roles?
Once department’s goals are defined then people should understand their duties and
responsibilities in relation to these goals. A common practice in many organizations is to
use job descriptions to define duties and responsibilities. But many job descriptions are
too long and overstuffed with how-to-do-it instead of why-to-do-it. These descriptions
are out date and fail to indicate the relative importance or priorities of duties and
responsibilities.
The resources allocated to a manager are often found in budgets, schedules, and
timetables – essential tools for the overall planning process. Unless a manager knows the
amount of money, materials, machinery, equipment, personnel, space and time allocated,
he or she may not be able to use them effectively.
Once a target has been set, with your part in reaching it clearly defined, and once you
know what resources you will draw upon in reaching it, find out what the rules of the game
are. Policies (ground rules) and procedures (the application and implementation of ground
rules) define the limits within which you can operate. They control your own actions and
eliminate the need for continuous surveillance by your head. As companies and organizations
get larger, they increasingly need to replace a supervisor’s “imposed control” with the
manager’s “self-imposed control”.
An effective way to help your own employees understand the ground rules governing
their jobs is to have them participate in establishing, reviewing, and modifying those rules
and relating them to the changing goals and objectives of their own departments. Increased
involvement makes for greater understanding and commitment.
5. How much authority do you have? How much do your team members have?
One way to resolve this dilemma is for the employee and the manager to define ahead
of time just how much authority the employee will have in carrying out his or her three or
four major duties and responsibilities. Many organizations use the following simple code to
indicate the level of authority an employee has been given: NOTES
A The employee can act on his or her own.
AA The employee can act on his or her own, but is required to report to the manager
about what he or she has done.
SR The employee is expected to check with his or her manager for suggestionsa n d
recommendations before acting.
Formal organization charts and diagrams give some clues to the working relationship
that exist in a company, but they show only one aspect of these relationships. For a true
picture of your position in the network of company relationships, look beyond your reporting
relationships up and down the line. Look at all the people with whom you must interact and
coordinate activities. These people make up the informal organization and the various
“publics” with whom you must deal. Clarifying these relationships in advance finding out
who is involved, what functions are involved, and the nature of the relationships – will help
improve your effectiveness as a team member and as a manager.
Jim Green, a manager, was unaware of the performance standard–later he was fired.
Ideally, this should not have happened. But many times employees are unaware of the
performance standards that are being applied to them. Even when employees think that
they know the standards, those standards may actually be different from the ones their
managers are using.
Today, many companies make certain that all employees know not only their assigned
duties and responsibilities, but also the specific standards of performance expected from
them, before they actually begin performing their jobs. In addition, many companies also
provide opportunities for employees to participate in setting the standards they will be
When new goals and objectives are established or when responsibilities change, new
standards of performance may be needed to fit changing conditions. Whatever the changes,
there should be no surprises. The manager and his employees must know “before the game
starts” exactly how their performance will be measured, so they can continue to keep their
own scores.
8. Will you receive feedback on how you are doing? Where, when, and how?
Many companies have formal performance appraisal systems that provide periodic
feedback on how an employee is doing on the job. Unfortunately, these are often once-a-
year events – such as the end of a calendar year or the anniversary of a person’s employment
– that require the completion of formal documents and involved paper processing.
People involved in any sport want to know how they are doing while they are playing
the game. They aren’t content to wait until the game is over before they get feedback on
their performance. Likewise, people in a company want feedback while they’re doing their
jobs. Only by receiving ongoing feedback can they continue to fine-tune their efforts and
improve their level of performance.
If you have been able to answer the first seven questions for you own job, you are
now in a position to be able to stop at any time and assess where you are compared to
where you had hoped to be, what aspects of your job you are performing well, and in what
areas you should continue to improve. Ongoing feedback is the key, not a formal, once-a-
year performance appraisal event.
9. Where and from whom can you or your team members receive help and support
when it is needed?
How can managers solve this particular problem with their own employees? If you
want to change this image so that your employees begin to look to you for coaching and
counseling, periodically ask them this question:” What can I do more of, do less of, or do
differently to be of help to you?” In addition, define the roles and availability of others in the
organization who could also help them. After a while, your employees will begin to realize
that your primary role is to do whatever you can to make each and every one of them
successful. NOTES
10. What rewards or recognition will you receive?
This may be the most important question: “Is it worth it?” Having performed effectively.
You may justifiably wonder, “What can I expect to receive?” Continuity of employment
and the possibility of receiving a wage increase are only two of the possible rewards and
recognition that employees seek today. They also want the ability to see the results of their
work contributing more responsibility, a greater sense of achievement, and the chance to
acquire additional knowledge and skills, and knowledge about the opportunities that are
available to them.
With this in mind, many companies are revamping their wage and salary plans to
make sure that they directly reflect the accomplishments and contributions employees are
making, rather than the energy they have expended or “time in grade”. One-time bonuses
for specific accomplishments in a given time period have become more common in many
organizations. Salary and wage systems are beginning to be more widely publicized so
employees know where they stand and what’s ahead for them. In addition, wide spread
posting of advancement and transfer opportunities has become a common practice in
many companies today.
Have you been able to answer all ten questions? If so, you are on your way to
becoming a more effective managers. Why? Because it’s one thing to know theories about
how to manage, and it’s another to know exactly what’s expected in every facet of your
job. Both are important, and both will help you to accomplish your goals more effectively.
1.13 FUNCTIONAL AND LEVEL DIFFERENCES IN MANAGERIAL JOB
BEHAVIOR
Though all managers perform the same functions of planning, organizing, directing
and controlling. There are levels among them. It is normal practice to categories managers
into three levels consisting of top level managers, middle level managers and first line managers
consisting of supervisors and foreman. The levels of managers are shown below (see
exhibit 1.4).
Usually top management is a risky and challenging job. If it is a challenging job naturally
there will be risk involved. Risk and challenge are directly proportional. The more challenging
the job is, the more risk involved.
An illustration will help us understand better the nature of the job of top-level managers.
Lets say, a top manager has been working for 5 years in the same organization and if in the
first two years the organization has gained profit because of him. He receives praise from
the management. Later, even if he commits a single mistake in the fifth year due to which the
organization incurs some loss, the same management would fire him and demotivate him.
They forget all the benefits earned by him for the company in the past. This is the generally
the mindset of most of the organization. Eg. two years back the Managing Director of
Maruthi Udyog Ltd., took a decision to decrease the price of the car, to increase the sales
but it became vice versa. Sales got down. Because of this the management fired him out of
his job. This shows how risky the top managerial job is and how risky it is to take decision.
These will form the next layer of the management hierarchy. These are subordinates to
top-level managers. Middle level managers include – Operation Manager, Plant Manager,
Division head etc. Middle level managers have overall responsibility of implementation of
the plan and controlling the activities. They are responsible for all the activities of the first
line managers.
These managers include foreman, supervisors, and section head or department manager.
The operators or workers directly report to first line manages. These are responsible for
controlling of operations plans prepared by middle level managers. They are responsible
for outputs. Much of the time of line managers is spent in direct supervision of subordinates.
Human skill is the ability to work well in co-operation with other persons. It emerges
as a spirit of trust, enthusiasm, and genuine involvement in interpersonal relationships. A
person with good human skill will have a high degree of self-awareness and a capacity to
understand or empathize with the feelings of others. Since managers get things done through
others, they must have good human skills to communicate, motivate and delegate.
All good managers, ultimately have the ability to view the organization or situation as
a whole and solve problems to the benefit of all concerned. This is a conceptual skill that
draws heavily on one’s mental capacities to identify problems and opportunities, gather
and interpret relevant information, and make good problem-solving decision that serve the
organizations’ purpose.
The job of top managers is supposed to be risky and challenging. The main reason
could be that it is they who need to continuously keep their organization and their people in
pace with the changing and dynamic business environment.
In a period of rapid structural change, the only ones who survive are the change
leaders. A change leader (Top Management) sees change as an opportunity. The following
four components should be given more attention by the managers.
1. Change Policies
To be a change leader, it requires the willingness and ability to change what is already
being done just as much as to do new and different things. Some of the change policies,
which should be followed by the top- level manager, are listed belows:
b. Organized Improvement
c. Exploiting Success
Problems cannot be ignored. Serious problems have to be taken care of. The change
leaders have to focus on opportunities. The best opportunity for successful change is to
exploit ones own successes and to build on them.
E.g. For Sony consumer electronics, no step was a big one. And not all of them were
successful. By exploiting the success, each of these additional new products carried very
little risk, so that even when it did no succeed there was not too much damage.
2. Piloting
For new improvements or for innovation first it has to be tested. The way to do this is
to find somebody within the enterprise who really wants the new.” Everything new gets into
trouble”. So it needs champion. It needs somebody who says, “I am going to make this
succeed”.
A good way to pilot a new product or service is often to find a customer who really
wants the new, and who is willing to work together on making truly successful the new
product or the new service.
Change leaders are however designed for change. Yet they still require continuity.
People need to know where they stand, with whom they work and what they expect. They
also need to know the values and the rules of the organization.
Change and continuity are thus poles rather than opposites. Balancing change and
continuity requires work on information. There is a need for continuity in respect to the
fundamentals of the enterprise.
The only policy likely to succeed is to try to make the future change of course have to
fit the certainties. Within these restraints, however the future is still malleable. It can still be
created.
I. Answer in brief
NOTES
1. Explain briefly the role of a manager?
2. What are the skills and competencies required to perform the managerial job?
3. What are the areas of managerial job that constitute the managerial job model?
4. What are the various level differences in managerial job?
5. How is manager different from a leader?
6. Who is a transformational leader?
7. Explain briefly the importance of time management.
8. Mention any two effective behaviors for managerial decision-making process.
9. When can a manager be called an optimizer?
10. Differentiate between efficiency and effectiveness.
Chapter Summary
Management is the process of designing and maintaining an environment in which
managers and individuals, working together in groups, accomplish the their aims
effectively and efficiently.
Managers carry out various functions in an organization
Managing is an essential activity at all organizational levels. However, the managerial
skills required vary with organizational levels.
The goal of manager should be to create surplus. They should aim at being
productive. Their main concern is to achieve a favorable output input ratio within
a specific time period, with due consideration for quality.
Productivity implies effectiveness (achieving objectives) and efficiency (using the
least amount of resources)
The transformation process consists of the managerial functions, which also provide
the framework for organizing knowledge in this chapter.
Time management is one of the most important skills that should be practiced by
every manager.
“I expect all the managers in my company to act completely rationally in every decision
they make”, declared Shanti Rangarajan, vice-president of marketing for the Olympic Toy
Company. “Every one of us, no matter what his or her position, is hired to be a professional
“I agree with your idea, Madam”, said Manjeeth Singh, her advertising manager, “and
I always try to be rational and logical in my decisions. But would you mind helping me and
be sure of this by explaining just what ‘acting rationally’ is?
1. Explain how the vice-president of marketing might describe what is involved in making
rational decisions.
2. If Manjeet Singh declares that there is no way, one can be completely rational, what
reply would you suggest then?
NOTES
UNIT II
Human resources are the most important assets of an organization. The success or
failure of an organization is largely dependent on the caliber of the managers and employees
working therein. Without positive and creative contribution from the managers, the
organization cannot progress and prosper. In order to achieve the goals or perform the
activities of an organization, we need to identify and recruit managers with requisite skills,
qualifications and experience. While doing so, the present as well as the future requirement
should be kept in mind.
2.2 RECRUITMENT
An unattractive job may not lead to recruiting a large qualified pool of applicants
Results in shortage of employees if the unemployment rate is low and a wide range
of opportunities exist.
If the job is hazardous, boring, anxiety-creating, low paying/lacking in promotion
then attracting pool of qualified applicants may not be easy.
Internal organization policies are nothing but promoting individual working in the
organization wherever possible. This is done in order to fill all the positions within
ranks except for the lowest level entry positions. One of the disadvantages is that,
it reduces the no of applicants.
Government influence
Employers should no longer seek individuals based on non-job related factors
such as physical appearance, sex, and religious background. Sometimes government
policies come in the way of recruiting people as per the rules of the company.
Recruiting cost
Persons who are already working in the organization constitute the ‘internal sources’.
Retrenched employees, retired employees, dependents of deceased employees may also
constitute the internal sources. Whenever any vacancy arises, someone from within the
organization is upgraded, transferred and promoted.
The advantages
The disadvantages
Job Posting
The standard procedure followed for internal source of recruitment is to post any
new job openings and to allow any current employee to apply for the position. The
position notification can be communicated on a central “position open” bulletin board
in the plants/office whenever required.
Employee referrals/recommendations
When the current employees are not interested in the position posted then they can
use these notices for other individuals for the post, both within the organization as well as
outside the organization -this is what is called employee referral.
Disadvantages
Recommending by the people may confuse friendship with the job performance
Individuals like to have their friends join them at their place of employment due to
economic reasons.
Leads to nepotism-hiring individuals who are related to persons already employed
by the organization
Minimizes an organizations desire to add diversity to the work place.
Many organizations prefer to fill vacancies through promotions or transfers from within
wherever possible. Promotion involves movement of an employee from a lower position to
a high level position accompanied by change in duties, responsibilities, status and value.
A transfer on the other hand, involves lateral movement within the same grade, from
one job to another. It may lead to changes in duties, responsibilities, working conditions
but not necessarily salary.
The external sources lie outside the organization. The search is done only when the
position is not closed internally. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of this method
are
The Advantages
The organization has the freedom to select candidates from a large pool. People
with requisite qualifications can be selected.
It paves the way for innovation
It helps in motivating internal employees to work hard and compete with external
candidates. This creates competitive atmosphere.
Talented people join senior managerial positions and help in the growth of the
organization.
The Disadvantages
External selection may also end up hiring someone who does not ‘fit’ and who
may not be able to adjust in the new set-up. NOTES
Methods of External Recruitment
Advertisements
Employment agencies
Students from colleges and universities
Professional organization
Cyberspace recruiting
Unsolicited applicants
Job fair
Advertisement
Employment agencies
1. Public/State
2. Private
3. Executive search
Most public agencies tend to attract and list individuals who have minimum training.
Therefore public agencies tend to attract and place predominantly low-skilled
employees.
The private agencies are believed to offer positions and applicants of higher caliber.
Private agencies also provide a guarantee covering six months or a year as protection
to the employer in case the applicant does not perform satisfactorily.
The private agencies collect their fee either from the employees or the employer,
or it can be split
Educational institutions at all levels offer opportunities for recruiting recent graduates.
These institutions provide employers an opportunity to witness a prospective employee’s
performance through cooperative arrangements. Educational institutions are an excellent
Executive search
The executive search /headhunter specialize in middle-level and top level executive
placement.
The distinguishing features of executive search are their fees. These agencies charge
a certain percentage of the cost (cost to company) of recruitment from the candidate
whom they refer in their client company.
A fee up to 35% of the executive’s first year salary is not unusual as a charge for
finding and recruiting individuals.
These firms do preliminary screening. It acts as a buffer for screening the candidates
and keep prospective employer anonymous
Cyber spacing
The new arena for locating resumes of qualified employees is looking on Internet.
Nearly half of all the major U.S companies use Internet facilities to recruit for
positions from the entry-level jobs to senior executive posts.
We now have web searches for both employee and employers to reduce the gap
between them in the recruiting process
Unsolicited applicants
Unsolicited applicants are those which reach the employee by letter, telephone, or
in person, constitute a source of prospective applicants.
This source does provide an excellent supply of stock pilled applicants.
Even if there are no particular openings, when the applicants contact the organization
the applications can be kept in the files for later need.
Unsolicited application made by unemployed individuals has a short life.
Applications from individuals who are already employed can be referred to many
months later and can provide recruitment to applicants who are interested in
considering other employment opportunities.
Employee leasing
Leased employees typically remain with an organization for longer periods of time.
When an organization has a need for specific employee skills, it contracts with the
leasing firm to provide a certain number of trained employees.
The acquiring organization pays a flat fee for the employees.
The leased employees are employees of the leased firm, hence the company is not
responsible for benefits
The employees are returned after the project is over; this eliminates the cost
associated with layoffs/discharge.
Even if one employee doesn’t work out, the company can get a new employee or
make arrangements to have it’s fee returned
Independent contractors
Outsourcing
Any activity in which the firm lacks internal expertise can be outsourced
When the company does not have the time to deal with the situation.
2.3 ORIENTATION
2.3.1 Definition
Every organization has its’ unique culture. Culture includes the following
Long standing
Unwritten rules and regulations
Communication among members
Shared standards of relevance about the critical aspects of work that is to be
done.
How members should relate to peers, employees, bosses and outsiders.
The senior managers become highly visible in the organization meeting and greeting
employees and listening to employees concern. At the same time they are given the
opportunity to talk about the company i.e., where it is going and how it is going to get there.
In management terminology it is called “visioning”.
The CEO’s first responsibility is to welcome new employees aboard and to talk to
them about the job choice that they have made.
The CEO is in a position to turn on these new employees by talking about what it
is like to work for the organization.
He also discusses what really matters in a company.
The presence of CEO helps in sending truthful message that cares for its employees.
He helps the new employees feel better, more comfortable and also removes the
fear they have.
2.4 SOCIALIZATION
NOTES
2.4.1 Definition
Socialization refers to the process of adaptation. This aims at helping new managers
adapt to their new organization and work responsibilities.
2.4.2 Purpose
The main purpose is to assist managers to fully understand what working is about in
an organization. It helps them to understand and accept the behaviors that organization
views as desirable.
2.4.3 Assumptions
Pre-arrival stage
This stage explicitly recognizes each individual’s set of organizational values,
attitudes and expectations.
In this stage success depends on the degree to which aspiring members have
correctly anticipated the expectations and desires of those already working in
different departments of the organization.
Encounter
Individuals confront the possible dichotomy between their expectations about jobs
and that of their colleague, their seniors and the organization in general.
When expectations do no go hand in hand with reality the new manager must
undergo socialization that will detach them from their previous assumption and
replace these with the organizations standard.
Socialization cannot solve all the expectation differences. If there were proper
selection, including the realistic job preview, it would significantly reduce this
problem.
Under this method, the manager is placed on a regular job and the necessary skill
is taught to perform the job efficiently. On the job training has the advantage of giving first
hand knowledge and experience under the actual working condition (see exhibit 2.1).
NOTES
1. Coaching
In coaching the trainee is placed under a particular supervisor who acts as an instructor
and teaches job knowledge and skills to the trainee. He tells him what he wants him to do,
how it can be done and followed up while it is being done and corrects errors.
2. Job Rotation
The transferring of executives from job to job and from department to department in
a systematic manner is called job rotation. He has to assume full responsibility and perform
all kinds of duties. The idea behind this is to give him the required diversified skills and a
broader outlook, which is important at the senior manager level.
3. Under Study
An understudy is a person who is training to assume at a future time, the full responsibility
of the position held by his superiors. This method supplies the organization a person with
as much competence as the superior to fill his post, which may fall vacant because of
promotion, retirement or transfer.
4. Multiple Management
Cases are presented on the basis of actual business situations that happen in various
organizations. These trainees are given case for discussion. Then they are asked to identify
the apparent and hidden problems for which they have to suggest solutions. This whole
exercise improves the participant’s decision-making skill by sharpening their analytical and
judging skills.
2. Conferences
The conference method is another commonly used method for executive development.
Topics such as human relations, safety education, customer relations, sales training and
many more are often discussed, debated and spoken about at the conference. A conference
may be divided into small groups for focused discussions. Participants are expected to air
their opinions and thoughts freely. It aims to develop the managers in the areas of intellectual
ability, practical judgment and social awareness.
3. Role Playing
4. In basket method
The trainees are first given background information about a simulated company, its
products, key personnel, various memorandum, requests and all data pertaining to the
firm. The trainee has to under stand all this, make notes, delegate tasks and prepare memos
within a specific amount of time.
5. Business games
Under this method, the trainees are divided into groups or different teams. Each team
has to discuss and arrive at decisions concerning such subjects as production, pricing,
research expenditure, advertising etc, assuming it to be the management of a simulated
firm. The other teams assume themselves as competitors and react to the decisions. This
immediate feedback helps to know the relative performance of each team.
6. Sensitivity training
NOTES
The main objective of sensitivity training is the awareness and sensitivity of behavioral
patterns of one self and others. The role-play by the trainee here is not a structured one as
in role-play. It is a laboratory situation where one gets a chance to know more about
himself and the impact of his behavior on others.
7. Managerial grid
It is a six-phase program lasting from three to five years. It starts with upgrading
managerial skills, continues to group improvement, improve their inter group relations,
goes into corporate planning, develops implementation method and ends with an evaluation
phase.
2.6 MOTIVATION
2.6.1 Definition
A manager gets result through other people. His effectiveness depends, to a large
extent, on the willingness of his employees to do the assigned tasks with interest and
enthusiasm. According to Scott, “Motivation is a process of stimulating people to action to
accomplish desired goals”. Motivation has three distinct features
Assumptions
All Employees are alike
All situations are alike
There is one best way to motivate all employees
Each individual has needs, or feelings of deficiency that drive their behavior
Once a need is satisfied, then it is no longer motivating
Needs are in a hierarchy that an individual moves up as they satisfy levels of
needs
Levels of Needs
Physiological/Survival needs
Food, Clothing, Shelter, Air
Security
Feel safe, absence of pain, threat, or illness
Affiliation
Friendship, company, love, belonging
First clear step up from physical needs
Esteem Needs
Managerial perspective
Self-esteem needs
Managerial perspective
NOTES
Alderfer’s growth need is closely related with Managerial Motivation.
An intrinsic desire for personal development
This include intrinsic component from Maslow’s esteem and self actualization
component
McClelland’s needs
The Theory envisages that each person has a need for all three (as well as others),
but that people differ in the degree to which various needs motivate their behavior
Needs are acquired through interaction with environment
Types of Needs
Managerial perspective
Task managers show high on achievement and power need and low on affiliation
People centered managers show high on affiliation need.
Some variable prevent job dissatisfaction and some variables produce motivation
Hygiene factors-basic needs that will prevent dissatisfaction e.g. ventilation, normal
temperature, pay, parking etc.
Motivators, when present cause high levels of motivation. Work gets more
interesting, advancement and growth becomes possible.
Managerial perspective
Challenging assignments
Recognition.
Responsibility
Career growth
Reinforcement Theory
Behaviors are functions of consequences that they produce (see exhibit 2.5)
If a behavior is followed by a pleasant experience it will be repeated
In order to change behaviors the consequences must be changed
Types of Reinforcement
Positive Reinforcement-rewards
Negative Reinforcement-punishments
Types of Rewards
Managers are highly attracted by the intrinsic rewards and internal satisfaction that
comes out of his work rather than monetary benefits
Terms
Equity Theory
Stacy Adams has proposed this theory. According to this theory individuals try to find
a balance between their inputs, viz amount of effort, time and energy expended to do the
work and the corresponding output received in return for the work done, in the form of
pay, incentives and other benefits. They compare this input-output ratio, with that of others,
Outcome/input ratio
– Inputs — what employee contributes (e.g. skill, time, effort)
– Outcomes — what employees receive (e.g. pay, incentives)
Equity evaluation
– Compare outcome/input ratio with others who are in the same line.
Knowledge about the theories of motivation though useful is not enough to motivate
employees at work situations. Managers must know specific ways, by which they could
help and motivate their subordinates. Some amongst them is
Money
Job design
Participative Management
Quality of work life
Behavioral modification
Others
Money
Money is understood to be a powerful motivator for more than one reason. In the
first place money is fundamental for completion of a task (see exhibit 2.7). The employee
takes pay as a reward for his work, and the employer views it as a price for using the
services of the employee. Second, as a medium of exchange, money is a vehicle by which
employees can buy numerous need satisfying goods and services they desire. Third, money
is one of the hygiene factors and improving maintenance factors is the first step in efforts
directed towards motivation. Fourth, money also performs the function of a scorecard by
which employees assess the value that the organization places on their services and by
which employees can compare their values to others. Fifth, reinforcement and expectancy NOTES
theories attest to the value of money as a motivator.
Job design
Job design involves conscious efforts on the part of the management to organize
tasks, duties and responsibilities into the unit of work in such a way that meets the needs of
the employees and the organization. The design of jobs has a critical impact on organization
and employee objectives. From the organization’s perspective the way tasks and
responsibilities are grouped can affect productivity and cost.
Poorly designed jobs may lead to lower productivity, employee turn over, absenteeism,
complaints, sabotage, unionization, resignations and other problems. It was Herzberg
who conceived job design as an important instrument to motivate employees.
Job enrichment
First coined by Herzberg in his famous research with motivators and maintenance
factors, job enrichment, has become a popular concept. It simply means adding a few
more motivators to job to make it more rewarding. A job is enriched when the nature of
Job rotation
This involves shifting managers from one job to another. It reduces boredom and
disinterest through diversifying the employee’s activities. Managers with a wider range of
skills give management more flexibility in scheduling work, adapting to changes, and filling
vacancies. Some of the drawback of this method is that the training costs increases, work
gets disrupted as managers take time to adjust to a new set-up, and it may demotivate
intelligent and ambitious managers who seek specific responsibilities in their chosen specialty.
Participation
The term “quality of work life” means different things to different persons. For eg, to
a worker on an assembly line, it may just mean a fair day’s pay, safe working conditions,
and a supervisor who treats him with dignity. To a new entrant, it may mean opportunities
for advancement, creative tasks, and a successful career.
Behavior Modification
Steps in MBO
2. Flexible working hours Also called as flexi time to suit the convenience of individual
employees has often been pointed out as one of the techniques of motivation. It leads to
3. Two-tier pay system: - This provides for offering significantly lower wage rates to
newly hired employees than those already employed in the same job. For example, a
junior lecturer in a university is paid less than a senior grade lecturer.
4. Flexible benefits: - These allow employees to pick and choose from among a menu of
benefits package that is individually tailored to his or her own needs and situations.
People have different needs at different times. Offer employees a choice of flexible
rewards. Do not rely too heavily on financial rewards. They mainly address lower level
needs. Managers who are highly achievement oriented will accept to take up heavier tasks.
2.7.1 Introduction
It is a method of evaluating the behavior of the manager in work spot, both qualitative
and quantitative aspect. It is the degree of accomplishment of the task that makes up an
individual job. It is different from effort. Performance is measured in degree of the result
achieved.
Comprehensive review
Progress or periodic review
Continuous monitoring
Continuous monitoring
If the system deviates from the plan one does not have to wait for the next periodic
review to correct it. The superior and the subordinate discuss the situation such that
corrective action can be taken immediately taken up in order to prevent further deviation.
The appraisal process (Exhibit 2.10) begins with the establishment of performance
standards in accordance with the organization strategic goals. These performance standards
should also be clear and objective enough to be understood and measured. Once the
standard is set it should be communicated to all through proper communication channel.
The next step in the performance appraisal process is the measurement of performance
through various performance measuring techniques. Following this the actual performance
is compared with the desired performance and the gap is filled by means of human resource
development activities. The final step in the appraisal process is the identification of corrective
actions.
Individual performance is compared with the absolute standard. The judgment about
the performance is recorded on the scale. It is an oldest and frequently used method.
The appraisers are supplied with printed forms one for each. These forms contain a
number of objectives, behavior taint and characters. These forms contain rating scales.
Points are given to each item and they are added up to find the overall performance.
Managers are ranked based on the total points they obtain and these are plotted in the
graph.
2. Ranking method
The managers are ranked from best to worst based on some characteristics. The
rater first finds the manager with highest performance and the manager with lowest
performance. Rates the former as the best and the later as poor. Thus all the employees in
a group are given ranks.
Ranking can be easy and inexpensive, but its reliability and validity may be open to
doubt. It is possible that low ranker in one group may turn to be superstar in another
group. The limitation of the ranking method is that the size of the difference between individual
being ranked is not well defined.
This method is simple. Under this method the appraiser ranks the manager based on
his performance in comparing with all the others in the group one at a time. It will be
effective if the numbers of managers are less. The total number of comparison is given
by the formula N (N-1)/2.
The limitation is that managers are simply compared with each other on the total
performance rather than specific job criteria.
It develops to prevent the rater from rating too high or too low. Under this method the
rater after assigning the points to the performance of each manager has to distribute
The checklist is a simple rating technique in which the supervisor is given a list of
statements and is asked to check if the statements represent the characteristics and
performance of each manager. There are three types of checklist
Simple checklist
It consists of large number of statements and words. The raters are asked to mar
positive or negative check. The negative checks are neglected and the positive checks are
counted. The limitation is that the raters may interpret the statement and the word differently.
Forced checklist
In this there are large number of statements in groups. Each group consists of 4
statements.2 are favorable and 2 are unfavorable, some time 5 statements are given one is
neutral. The rater has to select one from the favorable and one from unfavorable. The
weight-age for the statement is not shown to the rater. There is a mixture of the positive and
negative statements. Based upon the score they are ranked.
Weighted checklist
The weighted checklist method involves weighting different items in the checklist,
having a series of statements about an individual, to indicate that some are more important
than others. The rater is expected to look into the questions relating to the employee’s
behavior and tick those traits that closely describe the employee behavior. Often the weights
are not given to the supervisors who complete the appraisal process, but are computed
and tabulated by someone else, such as a member of the personnel unit. In this method, the
performance ratings of the employee are multiplied by the weights of weighted performance
score of the employee. Weighted performance score is compared with the overall assessment
standards in order to find out the overall performance of the employee.
The critical incidents method of employee assessment has generated a lot of interest
these days. The approach focuses on certain critical behaviors of an employee that make
all the difference between effective and non-effective performance of a job. The incidents
are recorded as and when they occur.
The bars method combines elements of the traditional rating scales and critical incident
method _ effective and ineffective behaviors are described more objectively. The method
employs individuals who are familiar with a particular job to identify its major components.
They then rank and validate specific behavior for each of the components.
The various steps involved in constructing BARS
2.Assessment center
This method of appraising was first applied in German army in 1930.this is not a
technique of performance by itself. It uses procedures that incorporate group and individual
exercises. These exercise are designed to simulate the type of work, which the candidate
will be expected to do. They participate in in-basket exercises, work groups, computer
simulations, role-playing and other similar activities. Their performance in the situational
exercises is observed and evaluated by a team of trained assessors.
3. Management By Objective
MBO requires the management to set specific, tangible and measurable goals with
each manager and then periodically discuss the latter’s progress towards these goals. This
technique emphasizes participative management viz. goals that are agreed upon both by
the managers and their superiors. It is a kind of goal setting and appraisal program involving
six steps
5. 360-Degree Feedback
Where multiple raters are involved in evaluating performance, the technique is called
360-degree appraisal. The 360-degree technique is understood as systematic collection of
performance data on an individual or group, derived from a number of stakeholders. The
stakeholders are the immediate supervisors, team members, customers, peers, and self.
1. Rating biases
The problem with subjective measure has the opportunity for biases
Halo effect
It is the tendency of the rater to depend on the rating of one trait or behavioral
consideration. It takes place when one aspect of an individual’s performance influences the
evaluation of the entire performance of the individual. In an organization, a halo error occurs
when an employee who works late constantly might be rated high on productivity and
quality of output as well as on motivation.
Some raters play a safe role by rating all in the middle point of the rating scale and they
avoid rating the people at both extremes of the scale.
The leniency bias crops when some rater have tendency to be liberal in their rating by
assigning higher rates consistently. Equally damaging is assigning low rate. It doesn’t serve
any purpose.
Personal prejudices
If the rater dislikes any employee or any group he may rate them low. Such decision
affects the career of the manager.
Recent effect
NOTES
The raters generally remember the recent action of the manager at the time of rating
them. These recent actions may either be favorable or unfavorable. Such type of subjective
performance appraisal has certain drawbacks like
The problems of performance appraisal can be minimized through the following means:
By covering an open meeting with the appraisers and discussing the performance
of the manager before an after performance review discussions.
By encouraging every one to comment on each other’s achievements and areas
requiring improvement.
The appraiser should be objective and speak the truth.
By conducting counseling meeting with the managers to apprise them of their
performance and consequences.
2.8 Feedback
Appraisers
The appraiser may be any person who has thorough knowledge about the job contents
to be appraised. The appraiser should be capable of determining what is more important
and what is relatively less important. He should prepare reports and make judgments
without bias. Typical appraisers are supervisors, peers, subordinates, employees themselves,
users of service and consultants. Performance appraisal by all these appraisers is called
“360 degree performance Appraisal”.
A 360-degree evaluation is also valuable because people don’t act the same towards
everyone. The interpersonal skills of a manager are probably more accurately reflected in
feedback from subordinates or peers than in feedback from his superiors.
Insight into the strong and weak areas of the candidate in terms of the effective
performance of roles, activities, styles, traits, qualities, competencies knowledge,
attitudes and skills, impact on others and the like.
Identification of developmental needs and preparing developmental plans more
objectively in relation to current or future roles and performance improvements
for an individual or a group of individuals.
Data generation to serve as a more objective basis for rewards and other
personnel decisions.
Alignment of individual and group goals with organizational vision, values and
goals.
Reinforcement of other change management efforts and organization
effectiveness directed interventions.
Douglas T. Hall defines career as a sequence of work related activities that provides
continuity, order and meaning in a person’s life. There is also a subjective element in the
concept of career. A career consists of the changes in values, attitudes and motivation that
occur as a person progresses in his professional life.
the progress of special groups of employees, and to ensure that capable professional,
managerial and technical talent will be available to meet the organization’s needs. Career NOTES
development from the organizations perspective is also called organizational career planning.
Changing staff requirements over the intermediate and long term should be identified
when the company sets long term goals and objectives. Working with individual employees
to help them align their needs and aspirations with those of the organization will increase
the probability that the right people will be available to meet the organization’s changing
staff requirements.
3.Ensures that minorities and women get opportunities for growth and development
Equal employee legislation and affirmative programs have demanded that minority
groups and women receive opportunities for growth and development that will prepare
them for greater responsibilities within the organization.
Attracting and retaining the people from different cultures, enhances cultural diversity.
When employees think their organizations are concerned about their long-term well
being, they respond in projecting positive images of the organization outside wherever
they go and hence people may view it in a greater perspective.
1. The process of career planning helps the individual to have the knowledge of various
career opportunities, his priorities.
2. This Knowledge helps him select the career, which is suitable to his personality,
lifestyles, preferences, family environment and which has scope for self-development
etc.
3. It improves the efficiency and performance of the individuals.
4. Increases job satisfaction and enhanced employee commitment.
5. It satisfies employees esteem needs.
A career, as mentioned before, includes many positions, stages and transitions just as
a person’s life does. It can be easily understood if we think of a career consisting of several
stages. Most of us have gone or would go through the five stages (see exhibit 2.12).
Exploratory stage
NOTES
As the term itself denotes it is a stage in which a person explores, possible career
options for oneself and it happens usually in mid-twenties when one makes transition from
education to earn i.e., work. Experiences suggest that several factors like the careers of
the parents, their interest, and their aspirations for their children, and their financial resources
shape the children’s future career options. Since this stage occurs prior to employment, it
has least relevance for the organization.
Establishment stage
This stage begins with choosing a job, or say, career, for oneself. This stage is marked
by the first experiences on the job, acceptance and evaluation by peer groups. In this
stage, one tries to make his/her mark and in the process commits mistakes, learns from
mistakes, and gradually assumes increased responsibilities. However, one does not reach
the summit or peak productivity at this stage. Putting it differently, this stage is like going up
hill making lot of efforts, spending lot of time and energy all the while.
This stage is usually a pleasant stage for those who continued to grow during the mid-
career stage. Based on one’s good performance during the earlier stage, one now enjoys
playing the part of the elder statesman and command respect from younger employees.
During this stage, the people do not have to learn but to suggest and teach others how to
go about with their jobs. But for those who have either stagnated or deteriorated during
the mid-career stage, the late career stage brings the reality for them that they are no longer
required in the organization and therefore, it is better for them to direct themselves to
retire.
Decline Stage
This is the final stage in one’s career to retire from one’s job or career. Impending
retirement scares everyone but more to those who have sparkling career earlier. This is so
because these persons have to step out of the limelight and give up a major component of
their identity. On the contrary, decline stage is less painful for modest performers or failures.
Their frustration associated with work is left behind.
A power department is one where crucial and important organizational decisions are
made. If we start out in such a department in an organization then we are more likely to
advance in the organization and ultimately throughout our career.
Do good work
Good work performance is a necessary condition for career success. A good work
performance is no guarantee of success but without it the probability of a successful career
is low.
We should assess the organizations culture so that we get an idea of what are the
organizations wants and values. Then we need to project that image in terms of style of
dress, organizational relationships that should cultivate, shouldn’t cultivate etc.
Instead of just going through the organizational chart we need to find out “who’s really
in charge, which has the goods on whom, what are the major debts and dependencies”.
Once these aspects are learnt navigation through the power structure can be done with skill
and ease.
Gain control
Knowledge and expertise are particularly more effective resources to control. They
make us more valuable to the organization and therefore more likely to gain job security
and advancement.
Stay visible
Since performance effectiveness is very subjective it’s important that your boss and
those in power in the organization are made aware of your contributions. Tactics adopted
can be being seen at social functions and being active in professional associations.
There is a choice in staying in your first job. One should have “really made a difference”
in his first job if not should choose to move on to other jobs.
Find a mentor
Evidence indicates that finding a mentor who is part of the organization’s power core
is essential to help you grow in your career.
Stay mobile
You are likely to move upward more rapidly if you indicate willingness to move to
different geographic locations and across functional lines within the organization, or change
organizations. Working in a slow, stagnant or declining organization should make mobility
more important to you.
Think laterally
‘Lateral shifts are now a viable career consideration. They give a wide range of
experiences, which enhances long-term mobility; also makes work more interesting and
satisfying. So if we are not moving ahead in the organization then we have to consider a
lateral move internally or externally.
By focusing on current skills and continuing to learn new ones we can establish our
value to the organization. It is managers who don’t add value to an organization whose
jobs are in jeopardy.
Develop network
A network can prove to be a useful tool if your job is eliminated. Even if your job
is in danger of being cut, having a network can prove beneficial in getting things done.
I. Answer in brief
Chapter Summary
The success or failure of an organization is largely dependent on the caliber of the
managers and employees working therein. Without positive and creative
contribution from the managers, the organization cannot progress and prosper.
Recruitment is the process of locating and encouraging potential applicants to apply
for existing and anticipated job opening. It is actually a linking function, joining
together those with jobs to fill and those seeking jobs.
Selection refers to the process of picking the right candidates from the pool of
qualified applicants. It is significant as it has impact on work performance and
employee cost.
Executive development is a systematic process of growth and development by
which the managers develop their abilities to manage. It is concerned with improving
the performance of the manager by giving them opportunities to grow.
Motivation is the set of processes that moves a person toward a goal. Thus,
motivated behaviors are voluntary choices controlled by the individual employee.
The supervisor (motivator) wants to influence the factors that motivate employees
to higher levels of productivity
The process of performance appraisals helps the manager and management to
know the actual performance level of manager when compared to standard level.
Performance appraisal is the basis of HRD based on which promotions demotion,
salary fixing etc. can be decided.
A successful career program in attempting to match individual’s abilities and
aspirations with the needs of the organization should develop managers with an
objective to match the long term needs of the organization and address the dramatic
changes that will take place over time in the business.
Ganesh replied, “when you drop it , you pick it up”, dinesh became angry and
abusive, Calling Ganesh a number of name in a loud voice and refusing to pick up the
trash. All employees in the department heard Dinesh’s comments.
Ganesh had been trying for two weeks to get his employees to pick up trash in
order to have cleaner workplace and prevent accidents. He talked to all employees in a
weekly departmental meeting and to each employee individually at least once. He started
that he was following the instructions of the general manager. The only objection came
from Dinesh.
Dinesh has been with the company for five years, and in the department for six
months. Ganesh had spoken to him twice about excessive alcoholism, but otherwise his
record was good. He was known to have quick temper.
This outburst by Dinesh hurt Ganesh badly. Ganesh told dinesh to come to the office
and suspended him for one day .for insubordination and abusive language to a supervisor
. Tthe decision was with in company policy and similar behaviours had been punished in
other departments.
After Dinesh left Ganesh’s office.Ganesh phoned the HR Manager reported about
the punitive measure he had taken, and said that he was sending a copy of the suspension
order for Dinesh’s file.
Questions
NOTES
NOTES
UNIT III
Every business organization is a part of industry and has to operate in a given economic
system and society. It receives inputs, transforms them and exports the outputs to the
environment. The person, process and product approach indicates how the various
managerial characteristics and resourcefulness acting as inputs is being transformed into
outputs through a transformation process (see exhibit 3.2).
‘dimensions of employee centered and production centered. The picture shows a diagram
of the Managerial Grid. NOTES
The grid identified five basic styles of leadership. The 9,1 (task management) leader
is primarily concerned with production and has little concern of people. This person believes
in getting work done at all costs. The 1,9 (country club management) leader is primarily
concerned with people. The 5,5 (middle of the road management) leader represents a
moderate concern for both. The 9,9 (team management) style demonstrates high concern
for both production and people and is therefore the ideal approach to leadership. The 1,1
(impoverished management) has minimum concern for people and production. The model
is useful to managers in as much as it helps them identify their current styles and develop
the most desirable style.
But the belief that one leadership style is inherently superior to others is clearly contrary
to the contingency idea of leadership. It seems unlikely that the 9,9 management style is
appropriate for organizations experiencing different growth rates, labor relations,
competition, and a host of other differentiating problems.
Weaknesses
The government and industries have adopted certain practices to ensure the
effectiveness of managers which involves completion of work on time, effective and efficient
output, management of knowledge and information, careful preparations of meetings and
presentations and follow-up with deviations and corrections to ensure that agreements and
commitments have been fulfilled. Specifically some of those adopted are as follows:
Developing Initiative
Drive : High motivation for work and also encourage others to work
towards a common goal.
Energy : Enthusiastic in work place.
Self-starter : Does jobs proactively and seizes the opportunities.
By adopting these practices, the industries can definitely develop an effective manager.
The skills and competencies of their managers would help them perform better in certain
core areas like:
3.5.1 Organizational development (OD) is not an easily definable single concept. Rather,
it is a term used to encompass a collection of planned-change interventions, built on
humanistic-democratic values, that seek to improve organizational effectiveness and
employee well being. Organizational intervention becomes important because the mind set
of both the managers and the employees should be able to accept changes. They should be
willing to work in a constantly changing business environment.
3.5.2 OD Values
NOTES
The OD paradigm values human and organizational growth, collaborative and
participative process, and a spirit of inquiry. The change agent may be directive in OD;
however, there is a strong emphasis on collaboration. Concepts such as power, authority,
control, conflict, and coercion are held in relatively low esteem among OD change agents.
The following briefly identifies the underlying values in most OD efforts:
Sensitivity Training
The objectives of the T-groups are to provide the subjects with increased awareness
of their own behavior and how others perceive them, greater sensitivity to the behavior of
others, and increased understanding of group processes. Specific results sought include
increased ability to empathize with other, improved listening skills, greater openness,
increased tolerance of individual differences, and improved conflict resolution skills.
If individuals lack awareness of how others perceive them, then the successful T-
group can effect more realistic self-perceptions, greater group cohesiveness, and a reduction
in dysfunctional interpersonal conflicts. Further, it will ideally result in a better integration
between the individual and the organization.
The data from this questionnaire are tabulated with data pertaining to an individual’s
specific “family” and to the entire organization and distributed to employees. These data
then become the springboard for identifying problems and clarifying issues that may be
creating difficulties for people. In some cases, the manager may be counseled by an external
change agent about the meaning of the responses to the questionnaire and may even be
given suggested guidelines for leading the organizational family in-group discussion of the
results. Particular attention is given to the importance of encouraging discussion and ensuring
that discussions focus on issues and ideas and not on attacking individuals.
Consultants in PC are there to “give the client ‘insight’ into what is going on around
him, within him, and between him and other people.” They do not solve the organization’s
problems. Rather, the consultant is a guide or each who advises on the process to help the
client solve his or her own problems.
The process consultant need not be an expert in solving the particular problem that is
identified. The consultant’s expertise lies in diagnosis and developing a helping relationship.
Team Building: Organizations are made up of people working together to achieve some
common end. Since people are frequently required to work in groups, considerable attention NOTES
has been focused in OD on team building.
Team building can be applied within groups or at the inter group level where activities
are interdependent. Team building is applicable to the case of interdependence. The objective
is to improve coordinative efforts of team members, which will result in increasing the
group’s performance.
The activities considered in team building typically include goal setting, development
of interpersonal relations among team members, role analysis to clarify each member’s
role and responsibilities, and team process analysis. Team building attempts to use high
interaction among group members to increase trust and openness. Team building activity
can be similar to that performed by the process consultant; that is to analyze key processes
that go on within the team to identify the way work is performed and how these processes
might be improved to make the team more effective.
Although there are the several approaches for improving inter-group relations, a popular
method emphasizes problem solving. In this method, each group meet independently to
develop lists of its perception of itself, the other group, and how it believes the other group
perceives it. The groups then share their lists, after which similarities and differences are
discussed. Differences are clearly articulated, and the groups look for the causes of the
disparities.
Are the groups’ goals at odds? Were perceptions distorted? On what basis were
stereotypes formulated? Have some differences been caused by misunderstandings of
intentions? How words and concepts been defined differently by each group? Answers to
questions like these clarify the exact nature of the conflict. Once the causes of the difficulty
have been identified, the groups can move to the integration phase – working to develop
solutions that will improve relations between the groups.
Subgroups with members from each of the conflicting groups can now be created for
further diagnosis and to begin to formulate possible alternative actions that will improve
relations.
Apart from those highlighted above certain additional skills should be practiced and
developed by the managers in order to efficiently perform their responsibilities in a competitive
driven business environment.
Problem solving:
The ability to identify the information needed to clarify a situation, seek that information
from appropriate sources, and use skillful questioning to draw out the information, when
others are reluctant to disclose it.
Analytical thinking: The ability to tackle a problem by using a logical, systematic, sequential
approach.
Anticipates how individuals and groups will react to situations and information and
plans accordingly. NOTES
Conceptual thinking: The ability to find effective solutions by taking a holistic, abstract,
for theoretical perspective.
Notices similarities between different and apparently unrelated situations.
Quickly identifies the central or underlying issues in a complex situation.
Creates a graphic diagram showing a systems view of a situation.
Develops analogies or metaphors to explain a situation.
Applies a theoretical framework to understand a specific situation.
Adjusts behavior, strategies according to changing environment and circumstances.
Goes beyond conventional thinking and produces imaginative or unique response
to a problem
Technical expertise: The ability to demonstrate depth of knowledge and skill in a technical
area.
Entrepreneurial orientation: The ability to look for and seize profitable business
opportunities; willingness to take calculated risks to achieve business goals.
Notices and seizes profitable business opportunities.
Stays abreast of business, industry and market information that may reveal many
business opportunities.
Results Orientation: The ability to focus on the desired result of one’s own or one’s
unit’s work’s setting challenging goals, focusing effort on the goals and meeting or exceeding
them.
Self Confidence: Faith in one’s ideas and capability to be successful; willingness to take
an independent position in the face of any opposition.
Is confident of own ability to accomplish goals.
Presents oneself crisply and impressively
Is willing to speak up to the right person or group at the right time, when he/she
disagrees with a decision or strategy.
Approaches challenging tasks with a “can-do” attitude.
Stress Management: The ability to keep functioning effectively when under pressure and
maintain self control in the face of hostility or provocation.
Flexibility: Openness to different and new ways of doing things; willingness to modify
one’s preferred way of doing things.
Effective manager focuses on what he is doing and efficiency deals with how well he
does with minimum wastage of resources. Since managers deal with input resource that is
scarce such as money, people, equipment, and time, they should be more concerned about
its efficient utility, minimizing resource cost and optimizing the output. It is easier to be
effective if one ignores efficiency.
NOTES
I. Answer in brief
Chapter Summary
The idea of effectiveness is based on the view that all managerial positions are best
seen in terms of the output associated with it. For e.g., the areas could be in terms
of sales level, production level, inventory control, best utilization of resources etc.,
the effectiveness areas emanate from the strategy of the firm to make its organizational
structure operational.
NOTES
NOTES
UNIT IV
Communication is essential to all phases of the organizational process for two reasons.
It integrates all the managerial functions.
For example, the objectives set in planning are communicated so that an appropriate
organization structure can be derived.
To link the enterprise with its external environment, where many of the claimants
are customers, upon whom virtually all business exist.
To see that the needs of customers are identified; this knowledge enables the firm
to provide products and services at a profit.
To know about the degree of competition and be aware of other potential threats
and constraining factors.
Effective managers will regularly scan the external environment. They do not have
any control over it and cannot bring any change into any of the variables in the external
environment. Therefore, they do not have any alterative but to respond to it.
4.5.3 Outputs
It is the task of managers to secure and utilize inputs efficiently. In this process, the
inputs are transformed into outputs through the managerial functions, considering the external
variables. The kinds of outputs will vary with the enterprise; they can be different from
each other in terms of their products, services, profits, satisfaction or integration of their
goals.
The organization must indeed provide utmost “ satisfactions” to its employees and
customers if it hopes to retain and elicit contributions from its members. It must contribute
to the satisfaction, not only with regard to basic material needs (for e.g., employees’ needs
to earn money for food and shelter or to have job security) but also of needs for affiliation,
acceptance, esteem and or perhaps even self actualization so that one can use his or her
potential at the work place.
Another output is goal integration. As noted above, the different claimants to the
enterprise have very divergent and, often directly opposing, objectives. It is the task of
managers to resolve conflicts and integrate these aims.
Finally, it is important to notice that in the systems model of operational management some
of the outputs become input again. Thus, the satisfaction of the employees and managers
The nature of organizational climate will be clear from its following characteristics:
or concern is to adhere to established rules and regulations, the climate will be characterized
by achievement. NOTES
Interpersonal relationships: An organization’s interpersonal relations are reflected in
the ways informal groups are formed, and operate to satisfy the social needs of members.
If informal relations supplement the formal procedures, the organization will be benefited.
But if some powerful groups develop who acquire power in the organization, they may
displace the goals of the organization. Conflicts in the organization might also be common.
Individual freedom: If the individuals are given sufficient freedom or autonomy to work
and exercise authority, there will be efficiency in operations. Self-control will lighten the
burden of the higher-level executives.
Degree of control: The control systems may be either rigid or flexible. If the control is
rigidly followed, there will be impersonal or bureaucratic atmosphere in the organization.
The scope for self-regulation will be the minimum.
Type of structure: It clarifies who is to direct whom and who is responsible to whom. It
serves as the basis of inter-personal relations between superiors and subordinates. If the
authority is centralized at the top level, the scope for participation in decision-making by
the subordinates will be low. Where authority is delegated to the subordinates, there will
be an atmosphere of participative decision-making.
Management orientation (style): The dominant style of managers and superiors may
be task – oriented. If the task-orientation is predominant, the leadership style will be
autocratic. The employees will have to increase their productivity of face punishment.
Their morals will be low in the long run.
Conflict Management: Differences among people and groups in organizations are not
uncommon. If they are managed effectively, there will be an atmosphere of cooperation in
the organization. If they are suppressed or not handled properly, people will be unhappy
and there will be an atmosphere of distrust and non-cooperation.
Risk – taking: How members respond to risks and whose help is sought in situations
involving risk are important in any organization. If individuals feel free to try out new ideas
without fear, they will not hesitate in taking risks. Such an atmosphere will be conducive to
innovative ideas.
The above dimensions often overlap with each other; they are not mutually exclusive.
The way in which these dimensions operate in an organization also indicates the underlying
philosophy of its management.
Organizational Context
NOTES
In practice it is not difficult to observe the management philosophy of an organization.
It will be evident from the goals, policies and functions of the organization and the manner
in which the goals are put into operation. For instance, the reputation of a particular company
regarding the treatment of employees would provide some indication of the managerial
philosophy regarding the utilization of human resources. This philosophy of management is
expressed by policies, rules, and regulations and, of course by the actions of managers.
The reaction of the employees and the degree to which they agree with management’s
philosophy is critical to the development of a favorable climate. If management is able to
match employees’ goals to organizational goals it is most likely to put a positive influence
on climate. The management’s attitude towards employees is indeed a major determinant
to the overall organizational climate.
Organization Structure
Leadership process
The type of leadership prevailing in the organization is vital to the organizational climate.
Every employee has to interact with his superior or boss for necessary instructions and
guidance. It is immediate superior who allows (or disallows) the subordinate to participate
in decision making, gives assignments, does performance appraisals, conducts performance
reviews, interprets policies, determines pay increments, and decides who has the potential
to be promoted. These functions are inherent in managing and every manager is concerned
with these functions.
Physical environment
The working conditions and physical space characteristics also influence the
organizational climate. An employee working in a relatively quiet, clean, and safe environment
will probably have a more favorable perception of the organizational climate than one who
works in a noisy, dirty and dangerous environment. Many people consider size and location
of the building of the company, nature of city (e.g. metropolitan) and even weather before
joining an organization. It is obvious that many factors contributing to external work
environment affect the climate of an organization and consequently affect the level of job
satisfaction.
It has been observed that office décor; office size and the physical space allotted to a
person at work etc. have an important influence to the development of a favorable attitude
towards the job.
Over a period of time, every organization develops a culture of its own. Culture is the
social or normative glue that holds an organization together. It expresses the values or
social ideals and beliefs that organization members come to share. In the words of Bro
Uttal, “Organization culture is a system of shared values (what is important) and beliefs
(how things work) that interact with a company’s people, organization structures, and NOTES
control systems to produce behavioral norms (the way we do things).”The above quotation
suggests that organizations have different culture – goals and values, managerial styles, and
norms – for carrying out activities.
Values
Every organization has a distinctive set of values, spoken and unspoken, which govern
the way people interact with one another. Although there might not always be a monolithic
and universally accepted set of standards, nevertheless most of the people working in an
organization seem to have a pretty good idea of what the culture at large considers important.
Many of these value standards stem from the words and deeds of the managers in their
day-to-day operations.
The formal value system determines the types of behaviors to be encouraged and
rewarded and those to be discouraged and punished. The values are communicated through
policies, rules and regulations of the organization. Besides, the organizational members
may develop informal values. These may apply to actions and behaviors within the work
group. The values of both formal and informal groups are very powerful is determining the
climate of an organization which may be conservative or progressive.
Norms
Behavioral norms are usually well known and well accepted in an organization; people
don’t pay them much conscious attention. Only when someone violates a strongly emplaced
norm, do the onlookers become highly aware of the norm. There are probably too many
behavioral norms in a typical organization to count, and most of them are unconsciously
understood and enforced. The norms include: ways to speak to persons in authority; styles
of dress; patterns of protocol in staff meetings; inter-actions between men and women;
established methods for disagreeing with the boss; the considerations of arriving and leaving
on time, and working extra hours without pay. If such norms are observed, the organizational
climate will be steady and conducive to cooperation and participation in the organization.
Even though organizational culture and organizational climate are sometimes used
interchangeably, some important differences between two concepts have been recognized.
According to Bowditch ad Buono, “Organizational culture is concerned with the nature of
beliefs and expectations about organizational life, while climate is an indicator of whether
those beliefs and expectations are being fulfilled.” Basically, organizational climate reflects
a person’s perception of the organization to which he belongs.
While some of the factors are easily measured by quantitative methods, others have to be
assessed subjectively simply by asking employees relevant questions as to how they feel
about certain factors relating to organizational climate. A number of questions are prepared
and the questionnaire is given to the workers to respond. Their responses are generally
measured on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 means generally a strong disagreement with the
essence of the question and 5 means a strong agreement. For example, a question such as,
“ In this organization, promotions are given entirely on the basis of merit and contribution to
the organization”, could elicit a response on the following scale:
1. Strongly disagree
2. Moderately disagree
3. Neutral (No opinion)
4. Moderately agree
5. Strongly agree
These responses can be tabulated and conclusions can be drawn about how the employees
feel about the process of promotion. NOTES
Likert, who developed a profile of organizational climate by isolating six variables,
with each variable having four dimensions and each dimension containing five degrees or
levels, has done considerable work in this area. Organizational variables developed by
Likert are: Leadership style, motivation, Communication, goal setting and control. Based
upon the inputs so received from the employees, the organization can determine the type
and state of the existing climate and the changes that can be undertaken to achieve the
desired climate.
4.7 LEADERSHIP
In the words of Louis A. Allen, “ A leader is one who guides and directs other
people. He gives the efforts of his followers a direction and purpose by influencing their
behavior”. Managers at all levels must perform this function of leadership to lead the
subordinates towards organizational goals. Leadership is the physical process influencing
followers or subordinates and providing guidance to them. It is always related to a situation,
which means a leader may be effective in one situation while ineffective in another. To be
effective, a leader should change his leadership style depending upon the requirements of
the situation.
Determination of goals: A leader performs the creative function of lying down goals and
policies for the followers. He acts as a guide in interpreting the goals and policies.
Achieving coordination: A leader integrates the goals of the individuals with the
organizational goals and creates a community of interests. He keeps himself informed about
the working of the group. He shares information with the group for the coordination of its
efforts.
Inspiration of employees: A good leader inspires the subordinates for better performance.
Motivation is necessary for getting the desired work from the subordinates. The leader
motivates the employees by providing them economic and non-economic rewards.
Building employees’ morale: Good leadership is indispensable for high employee morale.
The leader shapes the thinking and attitudes of the group. He develops good human relations
and facilities interactions among the members of the group. He maintains voluntary
cooperation and discipline among followers.
Facilitating change: Leadership is the mechanism to convince workers about the need
for change. Dynamic leadership is the corner stone of organizational change. An effective
leader is able to overcome resistance to change on the part of workers and thus facilitates
change.
In late 1940’s Ralph Stogdill reported on the basis of at least fifteen studies that
leaders possess intelligence, scholarship, dependability in exercising responsibilities, activity
and social participation and socio-economic status. Persons who are leaders are presumed
to display better judgement and engage themselves in social activities. The study of the
lives of successful leaders reveals that they possessed many of these traits. Some of the
important traits of an effective leader are discussed as below:
1. Intelligence: This trait seems to hold up well than any other. Leaders generally
have somewhat higher level of intelligence than the average of their followers.
They possess the ability to think scientifically, analyze accurately and interpret
clearly and precisely the problems before them in terms of different aspects and
perceptive.
4. Maturity: Leaders generally have broad interests and activities. They are emotionally
mature and have balanced temperaments avoiding menacing extremes so that they
may not become thoughtless victims of the circumstances. They also have high
frustration tolerance.
5. Vision and Foresight: A leader can’t maintain his influence unless he exhibits his
trait of looking forward well in advance and imagination for handling his followers.
So he should imaginatively visualize trends and devise his policies and programmes
with foresight based on logical programmes.
7. Open-mind and Adaptability: A leader is ready to absorb and adopt new ideas
and views of others as may be demanded by the situation. Flexibility is the other
name for open-mindedness, which makes the leader more identified with the group.
8. Self-confidence: a good leader has conceptual clarity about the things he is going
to do. He has confidence in himself whenever he initiates any course of action.
Self-confidence is essential to motivate the followers and boost up their morale.
10. Fairness and Objectivity: A good leader is fair and objective in dealing with
subordinates. He must be free from bias and prejudice while becoming emotionally
involved with the followers. Honesty, fairplay, justice and integrity of character are
expected of any good leader.
The behavioral approach is based on the premise that effective leadership is the result
of effective role behavior. A leader uses conceptual, human and technical skills to influence
the behavior of his subordinates. There is a dynamic interaction between the leader and the
followers, and leaders produce different styles while dealing with the employees. NOTES
Some of the important contributions in this regard include Ohio State Studies, Michigan
University Studies and Managerial grid of Blake and mouton. The behavioral scientists
don’t concentrate on the traits of leaders; rather they study the activities of leaders to
identify their behavioral patters.
The behavioral approach has failed to explain why a particular leadership behavior is
effective in one situation, but fails in another situation. Thus, situational variables are not
considered. In practice, it is the situation, which determines the effectiveness of a particular
leadership style.
Michigan Studies
The institute for Social Research at the university if Michigan conducted empirical
studies to identify styles of leader behavior that results in higher performance and situation
of a group. As a result of these studies, two distinct styles of leadership were identified:
The leadership studies initiated by the Bureau of Research at Ohio State University
attempted to identify various dimensions of leader behavior. Ultimately, these studies
narrowed the description of leader behavior to two dimensions: Initiating Structure and
Consideration (see exhibit 4.4).
NOTES
The research studies also showed that initiating structure and consideration are two
distinct dimensions and not mutually exclusive. A low score on one does not require high
score on the other. Thus, leadership behavior can be plotted on two separate axes rather
than on a single continuum. The four quadrants show various combinations of initiating
structure and consideration and a manager can adopt any one style.
This theory advocates that leadership is strongly affected by the situation from which
a leader emerges and in which he works. It is based on the assumptions that there exists an
interaction between a group and its leader and that people tend to follow the leader who is
capable of fulfilling their aspirations. Thus, leader is a means of achieving the goals of the
group and its members. He recognizes the needs of the situation and then acts accordingly.
The focus in the situational approach to leadership is on observed behavior and not
on any hypothetical inborn or acquired ability or potential for leadership. The emphasis is
on the behavior of leaders and their followers and the type of the situation. In other words,
a person becomes a leader not only because of his personal attributes, but also because of
various situational factors and the interactions between the leader and the group members.
The situational theory contends that there is no one best style of leadership universally
applicable to all situations. A leadership style may be effective under one situation and
ineffective under the other. Fiedler identified two basic styles of leadership and on the basis
of the study tried to analyze their effectiveness under different situations: (i) task-oriented
or controlling, structuring leadership under which the leader gains satisfaction from seeing
tasks performed; and (ii) relationship-oriented or considerate leadership under which the
leader tries to achieve good interpersonal relations with the subordinates.
Fiedler found that low-LPC leaders emphasize completing task successfully, even at
the expense of interpersonal relationships, gaining self-esteem through task completion NOTES
and valuing job performance. High-LPC leaders emphasize good interpersonal relationships,
are more considerate, derive major satisfaction from relationships with other, and are not
influenced by success or task accomplishment. Low LPC reflects task-oriented leadership
and high LPC reflects relationship-oriented leadership.
Situational Variables: Fred E. Fiedler analyzed three major situational variables, which
exert powerful influence on the leader’s behavior and his effectiveness. The three variables
are:
(i) Leader-member relations: these refer to the compatibility between group members
and managers. If group members respect the manager and also feel a personal
attachment, then formal authority is less important in getting work accomplished.
(ii) Task structure: The nature of jobs and how tasks are structured influence leadership.
If tasks are highly structured, with formal guidelines and well-defined expectations,
authority is also formalized and both managers and employees will be at ease with
a directive style of leadership. If tasks are unstructured, such as in creative research
labs, group members and managers expect less directive leadership with more
conciliatory behavior.
(iii) Position power: The position power of leaders is influenced by organizational
culture, the formality of management hierarchy and the style of work environment.
Therefore, the values and beliefs of employees and managers, the philosophy of
top management towards leadership and the prevailing attitude towards leadership
will partially determine what style is acceptable.
Leadership is the process of influencing others to get the job done effectively over a
sustained period of time. Leaders play a crucial role in influencing the work behaviour of
employees in the system. The term influence is a nebulous concept; however, it could be
described as the power to shape the potential behaviour of others, as desired.
There are three ways people are influenced – compliance, identification and
internalization.
Compliance occurs when people are influenced to do something against their will because
they have been coerced into doing it. People may obey because the repercussions of
failure to do so may have serious consequences, as for example, stoppage of their increments,
or a bad report that might jeopardize their future career in the organization.
Internalization occurs when followers are convinced that acting as the leader’s
directions serves their interest best.
Charismatic Leader
2. Personal risk. Willing to take on high personal risk, incur high costs, and engage
in self-sacrifice to achieve the vision.
Transformational Leaders: Leaders who inspire followers to transcend their own self-
interests and who are capable of having a profound and extraordinary effect on
followers.Transactional and transformational leadership shouldn’t be viewed as opposing
approaches to getting things done. Transformational leadership is built on top of transactional
leadership—it produces levels of follower effort and performance that go beyond what
would occur with a transactional approach alone. Moreover transformational leadership is
more than charisma. “The purely charismatic leader may want followers to adopt the
charismatic’s world view and go no further; the transformational leader will attempt to
instill in followers the ability to question not only established views but eventually those
established by the leader.”
Transactional Leader
Transformational Leader
1. Charisma: Provides vision and sense of mission, instills pride, gains respect and
trust.
2. Inspiration: Communicates high expectations, uses symbols to focus efforts,
expresses important purposes in simple ways.
3. Intellectual Stimulation: Promotes intelligence, rationality, and careful problem
solving.
4. Individualized Consideration: Gives personal attention, treats each employee
individually, coaches, and advises.
Visionary leader
Definition: - The ability to create and articulate a realistic, credible, attractive vision of
the future for an organization or organizational unit that grows out of and
improves upon the present.
Team Leader
The challenge for most managers is to learn to become an effective team leader. They
have to learn skills such as the patience to share information, to trust others, to give up
authority, and understanding when to intervene. Effective leaders have mastered the difficult
balancing act of knowing when to leave their teams alone and when to intercede.
A meaningful way to describe the team leader’s job is to focus on the following four
specific roles:
First, team leaders are liaisons with external constituencies. These include upper
management, other internal teams, customers, and suppliers. The leader represents
the team to other constituencies, secures needed resources, clarifies others’
expectations of the team, gathers information from the outside, and shares this
information with team members.
Second, team leaders are troubleshooters. When the team has problems and
asks for assistance, team leaders sit in on meetings and help try to resolve the NOTES
problems. This rarely relates to technical or operation issues because the team
members typically know more about the tasks being done than does the team
leader. Where the leader is most likely to contribute by asking penetrating questions,
helping the team talk through problems, and by getting needed resources from
external constituencies.
Third, team leaders are conflict managers. When disagreements surface, they
help process the conflict. What’s the source of the conflict? Who is involved?
What are the issues? What resolution options are available? By getting team
members to address questions such as these, the leader minimizes the disruptive
aspects of intra-team conflicts.
Finally, team members are coaches. They clarify expectations and roles, teach,
offer support, cheerlead, and do whatever else is necessary to help team members
improve their work performance.
Mentoring
Why would a leader want to be a mentor? There are personal benefits to the
leader as well as benefits for the organization. The mentor-protégé relationship gives the
mentor unfiltered access to the attitudes and feelings of lower-ranking employees. Protégés
can be an excellent source of potential problems by providing early warning signals. They
provide timely information to upper managers that short-circuit the formal channels. So the
mentor-protégé relationship is a valuable communication channel that allows mentors to
have news of problems before they become common knowledge to others in upper
management.
Self-leader: A set of processes through which individuals control their own behavior
Leadership is the ability to enthuse the followers towards a definite goal. It is the
process of stimulating members of the group towards a particular direction. Leadership is
a part of management, but not all of it. A manager is requires planning and organizing. A
strong leader can be a weak manager because he is weak in planning or some other
managerial duty.
Earl P. Strong is of the opinion that leadership in business is not synonym of the
boss. He makes the following distinctions between the two terms (see exhibit 4.6):
A group consists of two or more people working together on a regular basis to achieve
common goals. Organizations achieve their goals by allocating tasks to group of people
who are held responsible for accomplishing them. Through the division of labor among the
various groups, and the coordination of their activities, organizations function in an efficient,
effective and orderly manner. Groups provide synergy to the organization.
Formal and informal groups exist in organizations. Formal groups are sets or collections
of employees whom the organization relies upon to work together to get the job done
smoothly and efficiently.
Formal groups are organized by the hierarchy and are subject to rules and regulations.
In other words, formal groups are officially put together for a specific purpose by the
organization and bound by its policies. Formal groups could be temporary or permanent.
Temporary groups, such as task forces working on particular projects, and committees
formed to brainstorm ideas for problem solving, are disbanded on completion of their
task.
Informal groups on the other hand, are groups that emerge at random as a result of
interactions among the members of the formal group and discovery and development of
common interests. In other words informal groups are not organized by the system, but
randomly developed on their own at the work place, because of common interests and
mutual liking among the members of the formal group. Members from different units of the
organization, or members from within the same formal group may develop friendships and
form their own informal groups. Members of the informal groups could also interact with
each other outside the work place.
In some informal groups, members may develop a high level of sentiment or affinity
and become aware of one another’s needs and potential contributions. Such a group is
called a psychological group. A psychological group evolves when the informal group
members become very close-knit; evince a sense of pride in being a member of the group
from which they derive a sense of identity; are sensitive to other’s needs, and at the same
time, are aware of their strengths and personalities; and develop strong feelings of
togetherness or oneness among themselves. A strong “we” feeling and a “we” orientation
among the group members is characteristics of psychological groups.
Virtual Groups: The virtual group is an outcome of the advances in information technology.
Here, group member work together electronically through networked computers. Team-
oriented software has facilitated information sharing, decision-making and solving complex
problems through virtual groups.
In the interacting group the workflow is usually sequential and each member is
dependent on another to do the work, as in an assembly line. In co-acting groups, member
work independently of one another, as in a job shop. Counteracting groups have the main
function of reconciling differences, resolving conflicts and disputes.
In open groups the composition of the membership changes frequently with the arrival
of new members and departure of old ones. The new entrants bring fresh perspectives and
viewpoints towards solving problems, as a result of which solutions tend to be creative.
The time horizon for activities is short and not geared towards the long term. Closed groups,
on the other hand, have stability and permanence, with status relationships among members
being well established and defined. Long term planning and long-range projects are feasible
because of knowledge of the history of the institution and past events.
Membership group is the one to which a member actually belongs, and the referent
group is the one that the member would like to be in.
wield much power and influence, as evidenced by what unions can wrest from the
management by their powers in numbers. NOTES
4.8.4 Group Effectiveness
An effective group can be defined as one, which, over extended periods of time
achieves a high level of task performance and keeps its human resources intact as well.
Task performance refers to the effective achievement of the goals set for the group, and
human resources maintenance to the high morale and satisfaction experienced by group
members, their sense of pride in belonging to the group, and their psychological commitment
to the group and its goals. Thus, group effectiveness refers to the task accomplishments of
the group while it simultaneously maintains itself as a cohesive, satisfied and well-integrated
unit.
Certain characteristics of the group, the types of tasks they perform, the work setting,
the technology used and the operating dynamics of the group within the work setting, all
have an influence on group effectiveness. We examine group effectiveness through Input-
group processes-Output model (see exhibit 4.7).
Inputs
The inputs constitute (1) certain factors in the organizational setting, as for instance,
the work environment, seating arrangements, layout of the work place, how work flows
within the system, the size of the group, and the reward systems; (2) the level of complexity
Organizational Setting
If group members are in close proximity to one another in the work setting, they
would interact more, and sentiments and affinities would develop faster. If the work flow
technology makes them very interdependent, then again, interactions will be more frequent,
there will be more communication among the members, and norms will soon develop as to
who should do what, and what kinds of activities are expected of the members, when, and
in what sequence. Usually, smaller groups are likely to be more cohesive since there is
greater scope for much closer interactions among the group members, and the individuals
are more likely to adhere to the group norms.
Nature of Task
The complexity of the task and the analyzability of the procedures involved in performing
the task are two important variables influencing group processes and group effectiveness.
The group’s task could be complex and demand high-level skills from its members to
perform the many operations in completing the job. Easy and readily available solutions for
the performance of such tasks may not exist to determine the most effective way of
accomplishing the goal. The group processes would vary based on the extent of task
complexity and analyzability and they in turn, would ultimately impact the group’s total
effectiveness.
Technology
Technology is the means by which the effort put in is turned into a final product. It
could be manual, mechanical, or electronic, all of which facilitate the transformation of
materials into outputs. It is important to use the right and efficient technology.
Group processes
Group processes refer to all aspects and dynamics that result in task performance
and member satisfaction. Some of these are the norms developed in groups, group
cohesiveness, decision-making processes used by the group and extent of task and
maintenance activities performed by the group members.
The range of skills and ability of the group members, their orientation towards work,
their needs and motivations to belong to the group and be accepted as group members,
their value systems of right and wrong, and judgment of the correct and incorrect procedures,
influence the group processes. Homogeneity among group members, in terms of status
congruence and such other factors, also have an effect on the processes. How problems
are solved, who makes decisions for the group, what kinds of norms are developed, and
the extent of group cohesiveness are all a function of the group members characteristics NOTES
and the group’s composition.
Cohesive group members subscribe to the same norms and goals as the company;
the task performance of the group will be high both in terms of quantity and quality. Such
groups will also experience high morale and satisfaction, as members continue to be
committed to the group goals.
Task and maintenance activities form an integral part of the group processes and
serves the twin purposes of successful task performance and effective group maintenance,
thus contributing to group effectiveness. Task functions refer to the activities that need to
be attended to for the effective execution of the job. These include such activities as initiating
ideas, seeking opinions, providing information, clarifying problems and summarizing the
discussions of the group. Maintenance functions refer to activities that need to be taken
care of to maintain the group’s social relationships, cohesion and satisfaction.
Task roles
In effective groups, the roles that are undertaken by group members as they work
towards their group goals. They are the roles of
Idea Initiator
Information Seeker
Information Provider
Problem Clarifier
Summarizer
Consensus tester.
Harmoniser
Gatekeeper
Supporter
Compromiser
Standards monitor
Self-Oriented Roles
The self-oriented roles refer to some group members’ concerns about their own status
and identity in the group. The self-oriented roles are:
Aggressors
Blockers
Recognition Seekers
Dominators
Avoiders
Output
Outputs constitute the successful task performance of the group as well as its human
resources maintenance. Successful task performance is a function of the task roles performed
by group members as also the norms of high quality of performance maintained by the
group. A cohesive group that subscribes to the norms of the organization is bound to
perform well.
Member satisfaction and high group morale are attained through the maintenance
functions performed by the group members. Group cohesion and the establishment of
norms to which the members conform also enhance member satisfaction. High morale and
group satisfaction are reflected in the pride felt by group members in belonging to the group
and their commitment and loyalty to the group and its goals. Goodwill and cohesiveness
among members, and adaptability to internal changes are the hallmarks of high morale and
efficient performance.
Teams
Teams represent groups of people who work together and are accountable for
achieving the goals set for them. Teamwork involves members working in a coordinated
manner, utilizing a variety of skills to accomplish the job and assuming collective responsibility
for getting it completed successfully and on time.
Teams are usually small in size, possess a mix of skills, make their own decisions
about planning, setting standards, scheduling, budgeting, training and the like, and the team NOTES
leaders and members are held accountable and responsible for the task assigned to the
group.
Teams Vs Groups
The main difference between teams and groups is one of direct accountability for
results. Teams and their members are assigned a job and held accountable for the results,
while groups through committed to the goals of the organization, are supervised by a
hierarchical superior.
Advantages
Because of their joint collaboration, they are creative, remain flexible and adapt to changes
as needed, and operate within a flat structure.
pes of Teams
Depending on the nature of the tasks performed there could be several types of
teams or work groups. Common among them are problem-solving teams, cross-functional
teams, self-managing teams and virtual teams.
Problem solving teams: These teams, comprising a few members from a single unit
(usually five to twelve), meet regularly for a few hours every week or so to find ways for
continuously improving the quality of the operations and processes. Common examples of
these are Quality circle and Total Quality Management both aimed at improving processes
and structure for the purpose of providing a better product or service.
Virtual teams: These teams convene and operate through electronically linked members.
This is a cost effective means of overcoming the constraints of time and space and solving
critical issues. That there are no face-to-face interactions among members could at times
pose a problem.
Team effectiveness
Team Building: Both intra-group and inter-group effectiveness can be increased through
teambuilding, a technique that uses a series of steps to bring the group members together,
makes them share their perceptions of each other and understand each other’s point of
view. Team building helps develop a strong and high performing group of member.
Team building efforts help members resolve their problems and work together in a
cooperative and collaborative mode. Team building helps develop greater organizational
effectiveness.
4.9 COMPETITION
Domestic economy: The more competition there is in the domestic economy the more
productive and competitive the domestic firms are likely to be abroad and higher value-
will be added to productivity and country prosperity.
Management: A competitive product and service reflects managerial ability, its long-term
orientation, ability to adapt to changes in the competitive environment, a level of
entrepreneurship and skill for integration and differentiation of business activities.
Science and technology: Competitive advantage can be built on efficient and innovative
application of existing technologies. Investment in research and innovative activities creating
new knowledge is crucial for a country in a more mature stage of economic development.
Quality of people: A skilled labor force with a positive attitude increases a country’s
productivity and competitiveness. Education, the technical ability of labor, the quality of
management and efficiency all contribute to competitiveness. All this means that to pursue
a competitive strategy many coordinated changes in human resource development are
simultaneously needed rather than a few high profile initiatives in one or two areas.
Business managers, need a perspective that allows them to look across the world
and recognize commonalities or see opportunities for economies. They’ve got to be able
to play a game of global chess with competitors who may take profits from one-market
and cross-subsidize losses in another. They’ve got to have a big, strategic world view,
and be able to see broad cross-market trends and commonalities.
The CEO were generally looked up as the grand strategic architect, sitting on top of
the company and defining the priorities and making the strategic investments. Historically,
that was the role. But now the world is so complex and so fast moving that you can’t haul
all the information to the top for someone to make all those calls. In a world that’s moving
in nanoseconds, empowerment is driving more strategic decisions down to people who are
closest to the customers, competitors, and technology changes. So the general manager’s
role really is less about managing content and more about managing or framing context,
creating an environment in which these people can negotiate the best solution for the
organization.
If we look into the evolution of the definition of management at the beginning and
middle of this century, management was defined as planning, organizing, creating, controlling,
motivating and communicating (Henri Fayol, Peter Drucker). Later on it was considered
as the ability to manage people effectively: creating people who are proud and happy to
work with you and excel at the things they do. Then there was a focus on management of
processes, which lead to the creation of effective organizations, change management,
developing and implementing effective strategies and changing organizational cultures (Tom
Peters, Robert Waterman, Rosabeth Moss Kanter).
Finally, more and more specialists agreed that the most constructive view of
management would be an integration of all of the above: good management focus their
efforts not just on the tasks that they are managing, but also on the individuals with whom
they are working and on organizations they are working with. Indeed, effective managers
should be able to understand the business environment, think strategically, be client-oriented,
organize and manage all major resources (particularly people), use available management
methods and techniques, create and build organizations and a strong culture. What is even
more important is that good management should be able to recognize the global
environmental changes, be both proactive and reactive, change organization structure,
systems and management style when necessary.
Management practice and management development are not exempt from the effects
of increasing globalization of the economy, structural changes and trade liberalization that
These trends in the domestic and international environment require that the managers
become even more entrepreneurial and continuously upgrade their capabilities to enable
them to adapt their practice and business to the very dynamic, highly competitive world.
The most competitive organizations become flatter, more project and network-oriented,
lean and knowledge-based. The organizations of the future will be intelligent networks very
different from today’s hierarchical structures and will look more like an organism. The
authority distribution would be also modified. Change in any organization happens at the
edge where the company interfaces with the customer and the competition, and the managers
at the front end have a detailed knowledge of the situation, but often little authority to
instigate change.
Indeed, one of the toughest resources to acquire and sustain is knowledge or intellectual
capital. This may be the only sustainable competitive advantage in the future and, because
companies cannot innovate, they cannot analyze and they cannot make judgment and
produce knowledge - only people can do these things - the most important resources will
always be people. This is where the role of management must be changed in the new
knowledge-based organization. The managers’ role in the intelligent network is not as an
overseer of others’ activities but to coach others; a provider of tools; a facilitator; a doer in
their own right and someone who is comfortable only to interfere by exception and use
their authority sparingly and trust people.
A new manager should also become an inventor, and if one agreed that the most
enlightened definition of innovation is “commercialization of creativity”, it would help to
understand how and why an organization is creative and how people apply creative skills in
the workplace to support commercially successful activities. If creativity is about knowledge
management and if knowledge management is the basis for a successful strategy, how can
we encourage thorough and purposeful development of people, and particularly, managers
become the key issue and objective of management development for global alliances and
network organizations.
Moving to more innovative organizations requires more flexibility and creativity from
managers. Their underlying principle should stem around their emphasis on “people and
ideas” and not on “politics and procedures”. Thus, the efficient use of available human
resources and their development is central to the effective management for better productivity
and competitiveness.
Skillful use of formal style will involve a good working knowledge, of the laws of the
land, rules and regulations and aggregates the willingness to use former power of rooms to
get what one wants. Increasingly, the use of former power has been managed where many
management’s and organizational development thinkers, developers and practitioners believe
in order to map of the need for competency mapping with that of roles that are deployed
by respective individual. The use of power is still a potent means to influence our original
events provided those in word recognize the use of former power as being legitimate.
The political style of behaviour relies principally on informal influence to get things
done and has different but something complimentary strategies. The first of these is the
formation of alliance and usually those that all originally powerful groups or individuals
accept and agreed and mutual self-interest. These alliances will usually be convert but
occasionally strong groups which will form an overt that they want to put them in an
unchangeable position. The basis of relationship within such an arrangement is usually
proud negotiations, for the promotion and support of some goal or object and of mutual
benefit of all parties. If an individual reasons to deploy negative behaviour so that it can
benefit one’s own group, it is foolhardy and is detrimental to the opposite group as a
behavioral disposition. Then the alliance might well be broken on the parties will tend to
3. Open style:
The open style of influence in behaviour, can generally be seen to be the style that
organizational development specialist advocated. Essentially it offers an idea of the – individual
being aware of him, as a person with feelings, attitudes, knowledge, skills and behavioral
responses, being prepared to share this awareness of him, and behave in ways that are
coherent. Organizations should create climates of trust and acceptance or the employees.
But by its very nature an open approach also involves being prepared to express feelings of
hostility, anger and confrontation and not just feelings of love and support. In dealing with
the reality, it is hoped that a much more insightful understanding of the problems can be
developed and that solutions to problems will be long-term, since they deal with fundamentals
as supposed to peripheral issued. In a sense, the open style of behaviour can be seen as the
opposite of a political style of behaviour, since it values reveals the use of standard issues.
In our view, organizations should tie any reward and recognition system to competency
based performance improvement as measured by the competency maps. Thus, employee
incentives will tend to reinforce the organizational objectives being measured by the
competency maps. While handing out rewards to individual employees has its own place,
certain group reward and recognition systems are needed to encourage integrated, cross-
functional teams of employees, customers and managers to undertake targeted competency
based performance improvement.
Even in the case of a church, individuals often interpret similar interests in different
ways, and their efforts towards mutual goals do not automatically mesh with the efforts of
I. Answer in brief
1. Define organization.
2. Why is organization considered important?
3. List out the various steps involved in organizational process
4. What is organizational climate?
6. List out the various dimensions of organizational climate.
7. List out the characteristics of leadership.
8. How is transformational leader different from a transactional leader?
9. How are norms and group cohesion related to performance?
10. What are the factors that influence the competitiveness of the firm?
Chapter Summary
NOTES
NOTES
UNIT V
Why some people are successful in achieving their goals and others are not? This is
mainly due to the attitude, determination and lack of understanding in how to go about
achieving the goal. Richard dobbins and Barrie Pettman in their paper titled “Self-
Development have highlighted the nine basic skills for business success” published in the
Journal of Management Development in1997. The twelve steps that enable people to set
plan and achieve goals have been prescribed. These are:
1. Make a decision that you desire to achieve the goal.
2. Believe that you will achieve the goal
3. Write down your goal on paper
4. Be honest with yourself
5. Analyze your present position
6. Use deadlines
7. Identify the hurdles that stand in your way
8. Identify the skills you will need
9. Identify those people from whom you will need cooperation
10. Make a complete business plan
11. Visualize the perfect outcome and put in consistent effort to achieve it
12. Execute your plan with patience and persistence.
In a changing world of work and given growing preference for flexible work schedules,
involvement and empowerment measures, all managers need to acquire self-management
5.2 NEGOTIATION
1. Distributive bargaining
2. Integrative bargaining
Distributive bargaining
Definition: - Negotiation that seeks to divide up a fixed amount of resources; a win – lose
situation. Probably the most widely cited example of distributive bargaining is in labor
management negotiations over wages. Typically, the labor’s representatives come to the
bargaining table determined to get as much money as possible out of management. Since
every rupee more that labor negotiates increases management’s costs, each party bargains
aggressively and treats the other as an opponent who must be defeated.
Parties A and B represent two negotiators. Each has a target point that defines what
he or she would like to achieve. Each also has a resistance point, which marks the lowest
outcome that is acceptable - the point below which they would break off negotiations
rather than accept a less-favorable settlement. The area between these two points makes
up each one’s aspiration range. As long as there is some overlap between A and B’s
aspiration ranges, there exists a settlement range in which each one’s aspirations can be
met.
When engaged in distributive bargaining, one’s tactics focus on trying to get one’s
opponent to agree to one’s specific target point or to get as close to it as possible. Examples
of such tactics are persuading your opponent of the impossibility of getting to his or her
target point and the advisability of accepting a settlement near yours; arguing that your
target is fair, while your opponent’s isn’t; and attempting to get your opponent to feel NOTES
emotionally generous toward you and thus accept an outcome close to your target point.
Integrative Bargaining
Definition: - Negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that can create a win-win
Solution. A sales representative for a women’s sportswear manufacturer has just closed a
Rs.15, 000 order from a small clothing retailer. The sales rep calls in the order to her firm’s
credit department. She is told that the firm can’t approve credit to this customer because
of a past sloe-payment record. The next day, the sales representative and the firm’s credit
manager meet to discuss the problem. The sales representative doesn’t want to lose the
business. Neither does the credit manager, but he also doesn’t want to get stuck with an
uncollectible debt. The two openly review their options. After considerable discussion,
they agree on a solution that meets both their needs: the credit manager will approve the
sale, but the clothing store’s owner will provide a bank guarantee that will ensure payment
if the bill isn’t paid within 60 days. This sales- credit negotiation is an example of integrative
bargaining. In terms of intraorganizational behaviour, all things being equal, integrative
bargaining is preferable to distributive bargaining. Why? Because the former builds long-
term relationships and facilitates working together in the future. It bonds negotiators and
allows each to leave the bargaining table feeling that he or she has achieved a victory. The
managers also play the role of a negotiator in the organization. The managers in order to
maintain the image of the organization and earn profit from their clients constantly should
adopt integrative bargaining. Distributive bargaining, on the other hand, leaves one party a
loser. It tends to build animosities and deepen divisions when people have to work together
on an ongoing basis.
Why, then, don’t we see more integrative bargaining in organizations? The answer
lies in the conditions necessary for this type of negotiation to succeed. These include parties
who are open with information and concerned, a sensitivity by both parties towards other’s
needs, and a willingness by both parties to maintain flexibility. Since these conditions often
don’t exist in organizations, it isn’t surprising that negotiations often take on a win-at-any-
cost dynamic (see exhibit 5.2).
NOTES
A simplified model of the negotiation process is explained (see exhibit 5.3). It views
negotiation as made up of five steps:
1. Preparation and planning
2. Definition of ground rules
3. Clarification and justification
4. Bargaining and problem solving and
5. Closure and implementation.
What do you want from the negotiation? What are your goals? You also have to
prepare an assessment of what you think of the other party. What are they likely to ask
for? How entrenched are they likely to be in their position? What intangible or hidden
interests may be important to them? What might they be willing to settle on? When you can
anticipate your opponent’s position, you are better equipped to counter his or her arguments
with facts and figures that support your position.
Once you’ve gathered your information, use it to develop a strategy. For example,
expert chess players have a strategy. They know ahead of time how they will respond to
any given situation. As part of your strategy, you should determine yours and the other
side’s best alternative to a negotiated agreement. Conversely, you shouldn’t expect success
in your negotiation effort unless you’re able to make the other side an offer they find
attractive.
Once you’ve done your planning and developed a strategy, you’re ready to begin
defining the ground rules and procedures with the other party over the negotiation itself.
Who will do the negotiating? Where will it take place? What time constraints, if any, will
apply? To what issues will negotiation be limited? Will there be a specific procedure to
follow if an impasse is reached? During this phase, the parties will also exchange their initial
proposals or demands.
When initial positions have been exchanged, both you and the other party will explain,
amplify, clarify, and justify your original demands. This needn’t be confrontational. Rather,
it’s an opportunity for educating and informing each other on the issues, why they are
important, and how each arrived at their initial demands. This is the point at which you
might want to provide the other party with any documentation that helps support your
position.
The essence of the negotiation process is the actual give-and-take in trying to hash
out an agreement. It is here where concessions will undoubtedly need to be made by both
parties.
Can you predict an opponent’s negotiating tactics if you know something about his or
her personality? It’s tempting to answer Yes to this question. For instance, you might assume
that high-risk takers would be more aggressive bargainers who make fewer concessions.
Surprisingly, the evidence doesn’t support this intuition.
Do men and women negotiate differently? And does gender affect negotiation
outcomes? The answer to the first question appears to be No. The answer to the second is
a qualified Yes. A popular stereotype is that women are more cooperative in negotiations
than men. However, men have been found to negotiate better outcomes than women. This
difference might be due to men and women placing divergent values on outcomes. Women
probably due to lack of power typically hold the belief that women are “nicer” than men in
negotiations in most large organizations. In situations in which women and men have similar
power bases, there shouldn’t be any significant differences in their negotiation styles.
The French like conflict. They frequently gain recognition and develop their reputations
by thinking and acting against others. As a result, the French tend to take a long time in
negotiating agreements and they aren’t overly concerned about whether their opponents
like or dislike them.
The Chinese also draw out negotiations but that’s because they believe negotiations
never end. Just when you think you’ve pinned down every detail and reached a final
solution with a Chinese executive, that executive might smile and start the process all over
again. Like the Japanese, the Chinese negotiate to develop a relationship and a commitment
to work together rather than to tie up every loose end.
Americans are known around the world for their impatience and their desire to be
liked. Astute negotiators from other countries often turn these characteristics to their
advantage by dragging out negotiations and making friendship conditional on the final
statement.
The cultural context of the negotiation significantly influences the amount and type of
preparation for bargaining, the relative emphasis on task versus interpersonal relationships,
the tactics used, and even where the negotiation should be conducted.
The authority of the arbitrator varies according to the rules set by the negotiators. The
big plus of arbitration over mediation is that it always results in a settlement.
A consultant is a skilled and impartial third party who attempts to facilitate problem
solving through communication and analysis, aided by his or her knowledge of conflict
management. In contrast to the previous role, the consultant’s role is not to settle the issues
but, rather, to improve relations between the conflicting parties so that they can reach a
settlement themselves. Instead of putting forward specific solutions, the consultant tries to
help the parties learn to understand and work with each other. Therefore, the approach has
a longer-term focus: to build new and positive perceptions and attitudes between the
conflicting parties.
Knowledge is the power/capacity for effective action. The organized data are
information. The processed information in the actionable form is referred to as knowledge.
The knowledge becomes wisdom when it is used for a good cause of a large number of
people. The hierarchy of the knowledge is (see exhibit 5.4). Knowledge can be classified
into two; they are tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge.
NOTES
Kael Wiig- a consultant coins the term knowledge management. He coined this term
in an International Labor Organization Sponsored Conference in 1986. Knowledge
management is, “a systematic, explicit and deliberate building, renewal and application of
knowledge to maximize an enterprise knowledge related effectiveness and returns from its
knowledge assets”.
· And third, a well-designed KM system will reduce redundancy and make the
organization more efficient.
How does an organization record the knowledge and expertise of its employees
and make that information easily accessible? It needs to develop computer databases
of pertinent information that employees can readily access; it needs to create a culture that
supports and rewards sharing; and it has to develop mechanisms that allow employees
who have developed valuable expertise and insights to share them with others.
· Endemic change and the need of organizational learning. The global pace of change
requires organizations and the people within them must be continually learning.
Individual knowledge conversion takes place between tactic knowledge and explicit
knowledge. According to Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) knowledge conversion is based
on four modes:
Socialization: Knowledge is converted from tactic to tactic through sharing and exchanging
experiences and technical skills.
The individual knowledge conversion interacts with another dimension i.e., time and
produce five phases of organizational knowledge creation. These five phases include:
Creating Concepts: The cognitive process of each employee crystallizes the shared tactic
knowledge into models, concepts and words.
Building an Arche Type: The tested concepts are converted into tangible or concrets
(archetype) or prototype operating mechanism.
Collect stage: This stage includes acquiring existing knowledge, skills, experience etc. to
possess the competencies.
Select stage: This stage deals with the assessment of value of collected knowledge against
the standard requirements for success.
Store stage: This stage takes the nuggets of knowledge, classifies them and includes them
in the organizational existing knowledge.
Share stage: This stage makes the new and existing organizational knowledge accessible
for employees.
Apply stage: This stage enables employees to apply knowledge in organizational activities/
operations, decision-making, problem solving, exploiting opportunities etc.
Create stage: This stage involves development of new knowledge through observation,
feedback, brainstorming, and failures in the previous events.
All too often it is assumed that most people are noncreative and have little ability to
develop new ideas. This assumption, unfortunately, can be detrimental to the organization,
for in the appropriate environment virtually all people are capable of being creative, even
though the degree of creativity varies considerably among the individuals.
Generally speaking, creative people are inquisitive and come up with many new and
unusual ideas; they are seldom satisfied with the status quo. Although intelligent, they not
only rely on the rational process but also involve the emotional aspects of their personality
in problem solving. They appear to be exited solving a problem, even to the point of
tenacity. Creative individuals are aware of themselves and capable of independent judgment.
They object to conformity and see themselves as being different.
The creative process is seldom simple and linear. Instead, it generally consists of four
overlapping an interacting phases: (1) unconscious scanning, (2) intuition, (3) insight, and
(4) logical formulation.
The second phase, intuition, connects, the unconscious with the conscious. This
stage may involve a combination of factors that may seem contradictory at first. For example,
in the 1920s Donaldson Brown and Alfred Sloan of General Motors conceived the idea of
a decentralized division structure with centralized control – concepts which seem to NOTES
contradict each other. Yet the idea makes sense when one recognizes the underlying
principles of (1) giving responsibility of the operations to the general manager of each
division, and (2) maintaining centralized control in head quarters over certain functions. It
took the intuition of two great corporate leaders to see that these two principles could
interact in the managerial process. Intuition needs time to work. It requires that people find
new combinations and integrate diverse concepts and ideas. Thus, one must thing through
the problem. Intuitive thinking is promoted by several techniques such as brainstorming
and synectics.
Insight, the third phase of the creative process, is mostly the result of hard work. For
example many ideas are needed in the development of a usable product, a new service, or
a new process.
The last phase in the creative process is logical formulation or verification. Insight
needs to be tested through logic or experiment. This may be accomplished by continuing
to work on an idea or by inviting critiques form others. Brown and Sloan’s idea of
decentralization.
Creativity can be taught. Creative thoughts are often the fruits of extensive efforts,
and several techniques are available to nurture those kinds of thoughts, especially in the
decision-making process. Some techniques focus on group interactions; others focus on
individual actions.
Brainstorming: One of the best-known techniques for facilitating creativity has been
developed by Alex F Osborn, who has been called “the father of brainstorming”. The
purpose of this approach is to improve problem solving by finding new and unusual solutions
in the brainstorming session; a multiplication of ideas is sought. The rules are as follows:
1. No ideas are ever criticized
2. The more radical the ideas are, the better.
3. The quantity of idea production is stressed.
4. The improvement of ideas by others is encouraged.
Brainstorming, which emphasizes group thinking, was widely accepted after its
introduction. However, the enthusiasm was dampened by research, which showed that
individuals could develop better ideas working by themselves than could work in-group.
Synectics: Originally known as the Gordon technique, this system was further modified
and became known as synectics. In this approach, the members of the synectics team are
The leader of the group plays a vital role in this approach. In fact, only the leader
knows the specific nature of the problem. This person narrows and carefully leads the
discussion without revealing the actual problem itself. The main reason for this approach is
to prevent the group from reaching a premature solution to the problem. The system involves
a complex set of interactions from which a solution emerges – frequently the invention of a
new product.
What does entrepreneurship imply? It suggests dissatisfaction with how things are
and awareness of a need to do things differently. Creativity and innovation in ones work,
helps a person to be a successful entrepreneur. Innovation comes about because of some
of the following situations.
The unexpected events, failure, or success
The incongruous – what is assumed and what really is
The process or task that needs improvement
Changes in the market or industry structure
Changes in demographics.
Changes in meaning or in the way things are perceived
Innovation based on knowledge
Innovations based solely on bright ideas may be very risky and are, at times, not
successful. The most successful innovations are often the mundane ones. Innovation is not
only relevant to high-tech firms but also crucial for old-line, traditional companies, which
may not service without the infusion of innovation. Managers in such companies must create
an environment that fosters entrepreneurial spirit and actions.
I. Answer in brief
1. How does self management skills enable managers to plan and achieve goals?
2. Define the term negotiation.
3. What are the pre-conditions for negotiations?
4. What is the role of consultant in negotiation?
5. What is knowledge management?
6. How does an organization record the knowledge and expertise of its employees
and make that information easily accessible? NOTES
7. How is tacit knowledge different from explicit knowledge?
8. How is manager creativity different from innovation?
9. Who can be called a creative manager?
10. Briefly explain synectics
Chapter Summary
The self-management skill is a key factor in ensuring a stress-free, fruitful and
enjoyable working for the employees.
All the modern management practices may not deliver desired results if managers
of the organization lack self-management skills.
Negotiation is defined as a process in which two or more parties exchange goods
or services and attempt to agree on the exchange rate for them.
Negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that can create a win – win
solution is called integrative bargaining.
A mediator is a neutral third party who facilitates a negotiated solution by using
reasoning and persuasion, suggesting alternatives, and the like.
A consultant is a skilled and impartial third party who attempts to facilitate problem
solving through communication and analysis, aided by his or her knowledge of
conflict management
Knowledge management is, “a systematic, explicit and deliberate building, renewal
and application of knowledge to maximize an enterprise knowledge related
effectiveness and returns from its knowledge assets”.
NOTES NOTES
NOTES NOTES
NOTES NOTES