Scribd
Upload
55 views

Lab Report Rubric: Name: - Title of Lab or Project

This rubric evaluates lab reports based on several criteria in different categories. An introduction is scored on addressing the question, stating a hypothesis, and having a relevant title. The methods section is scored on providing a clear description of how the experiment was conducted. The results section is scored on clearly presenting organized data, recorded trends, and appropriate labels. The conclusions section is scored on summarizing data, drawing logical conclusions, discussing applications, and rejecting or accepting the hypothesis. Additional scores are given for following directions, cleaning up, and safety protocols. The total score is out of 20 points.

Uploaded by

wawahalim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
55 views

Lab Report Rubric: Name: - Title of Lab or Project

This rubric evaluates lab reports based on several criteria in different categories. An introduction is scored on addressing the question, stating a hypothesis, and having a relevant title. The methods section is scored on providing a clear description of how the experiment was conducted. The results section is scored on clearly presenting organized data, recorded trends, and appropriate labels. The conclusions section is scored on summarizing data, drawing logical conclusions, discussing applications, and rejecting or accepting the hypothesis. Additional scores are given for following directions, cleaning up, and safety protocols. The total score is out of 20 points.

Uploaded by

wawahalim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Name:_____________________________________

TitleofLaborProject:_________________________

LabReportRubric

Introduction

Adequate(2pts)

Not
NeedsWork(1pt) attempted
(0)

Excellent(4pts)

Good(3pts)

1.Includesthequestiontobe
answeredbythelab
2.stateshypothesisthatis
basedonresearchand/or
soundreasoning
3.titleisrelevant.

Oneofthe
Introduction
"excellent"
Twoofthe"excellent"
present,no
conditionsisnot
conditionsisnotmet,
exemplary
met,twoconditions oneismet
conditionsmet
met

Thedescriptiongives Wouldbedifficultto
generalities,enough repeat,readermust
forreaderto
guessathowthe
Methods
understandhowthe datawasgathered
experimentwas
orexperiment
conducted
conducted
Resultsareunclear,
Resultsare
Resultsareclear
missinglabels,
Resultsanddataareclearly
disorganizedor
andlabeled,trends trendsarenot
recorded,organizedsoitis
poorlyrecorded,do
Dataand
arenotobviousor obvious,
easyforthereadertosee
notmakesense
Analysis
thereareminor
disorganized,thereis
trends.Allappropriatelabels
notenoughdata
errorsin
enoughdatatoshow
areincluded
wastakentojustify
organization
theexperimentwas
results
conducted
1.Summarizesdatausedto
drawconclusions
2.Conclusionsfollowdata
(notwildguessesorleapsof 3of4ofthe
2ofthe4excellent 1ofthe4excellent
Conclusions logic),
"excellent"
conditionsmet
conditionsmet
3.Discussesapplicationsor conditionsismet
realworldconnections
4.Hypothesisisrejectedor
acceptedbasedonthedata.
Someoftheexcellent
conditionsmet,
Studentdidnot
directionswerenot
Labreportsubmittedas
Mostoftheexcellent
followdirections,
explicitlyfollowed,
directed,andontime.
conditionswere
practicedunsafe
Formatand
labstationsmay
Directionswerefollowed,
metpossibleminor
procedures,goofed
LabProtocols
havebeenleft
stationswerecleaned.All
errorsinformator
aroundinthelab,
uncleanorgroupnot
safetyprotocolsfollowed.
procedures
leftamessor
practicinggood
equipmentlost
safety(suchasnot
wearinggoggles)

Total(outof20)
Description
Descriptionorstepbystep
included,some
processisincluded,couldbe
stepsarevagueor
repeatedbyanotherscientist
unclear

You might also like