Selective Reductions PDF
Selective Reductions PDF
Selective Reductions PDF
1987 IUPAC
Department
Abstract -
This
INTRODUCTION
The development of numerous selective reducing agents, capable of reducing a certain
functional group in the presence of various other reducible functional groups has attracted a
great deal of recent attention (ref. 1).
In general, selective reducing agents have been
prepared by modifying the steric and electronic effects of substituents on the boron atom or
withdrawing cyano group is a milder and more selective reducing agent than sodium borohydride
(ref. 2), whereas lithium trisecbutylborohydride having sterically bulky three sec-butyl
groups is a stronger and highly stereoselective reducing agent than lithium borohydride (ref.
3). As our continuous efforts toward the development of new hydride reducing agents, we have
recently developed new types of hydride reducing agents, namely 1,3,2-dithiaborinane and
thexylphenylthioborane, which are capable of transferring hydride and mercapto moities to
We have further modified the
carboxylic acids by one step procedure (ref S. 4 and 5).
reducing properties of sodium cyanoborohydride by the addition of metal salts, especially
zinc chloride (ref s. 6 and 7). Finally, we have investigated the reducing properties of the
ate complex generated from diisobutylaluminum hydride (Dibah) and n-butyllithium and found
that the reagent is a powerful and highly selective reducing agent for the reduction of
various functional groups (ref. 8).
the first example among various partial reductions using various complex hydride reducing
agents where partial reduction and subsequent protection are achieved by one step procedure.
1,3,2-Dithiaborinane(1) was readily prepared by treating borane-dimethyl sulfide with 1 e9uiv
1005 Unauthenticated
Download Date | 6/21/16 12:59 PM
SKIM
1006
HS_.\
Me2SBH3 +
H\,S\
THF
Me2S '
1
RCOOH
r.t.
CH2=CH(CH2)8COOH
rt
(1)
SnC12 or BF3Et20
2.
2 +
HO(CH2)locO
THr
(2)
CH2=CH(CH2)8CH7OH
no additive:
44%
11%
8%
BF3'Et20:
38%
13%
7%
SnC12:
78%
dithiane and phenethyl alcohol along with a small amount of several unidentified byproducts.
Encouraged by this result, we have investigated the present reaction in detail. After much
of aromatic acids, the use of 2 equiv of the reagent is recommended to obtain better
yields. Carboxylic acids containing a bromo, an ester, and a tert-amide group were cleanly
converted into the corresponding 1,3-dithianes without attacking such reducible yroups by the
As shown in Table 1, various carboxylic acids including sterically hindered
reagent(l).
acids were cleanly converted into the corresponding 1,3-dithianes (2) in high yields.
Me2SBH3 +
HS
r.t.
HSJ
THF
R S
RCOOH
H\ ,i
I
Me231"S-J
SnC12
(3)
or BF3Et2O ''.J
Furthermore,
we have found that 1,3,2-Dithiaborolane (3), prepared by the reaction of boranedimethyl sulfide with 1 equiv of 1,2-ethanedithiol in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature for
24 h, was capable of converting acids into 1,3-dithiolanes (4) in the presence of stannous
In general, the efficiency, applicability,
chloride or boron trifluoride etherate (eq. 3).
and scope of this method were similar to those of using 1,3,2-dithioborinane (1).
BBr
BHBr'SMe2
Pb(SC H )
6 5 2 FHBHSC6H5
+ Me2SBBr3
CH2C12
(4)
RCOOH
_____BHSC6H5 +
RCH(SC6H5)2
(5)
RCH2SC6H5
(6)
Me2SBBr3
\..
RCOOR'
Zn12, CH2C12
7
R'=Me, Et, iC3H7, CH2C6H5
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 6/21/16 12:59 PM
1007
isolated yields of
S,S1-diphenyl acetals, %b
time, h
isolated yields of
1,3-dithianes, %a
84
81
3.5
90
87
(CH3)2CHCOOH
81
87
cyclohexanecarboxyli c
3.5
82
84
1-adamantanecarboxyl ic
80
87
Br(CH2)10C00H
82
87
HOOC(CH2)4COOMe
12
83
82
C6H5COOH
20
74
71(14)c
20
71
75(14)c
20
75
acid
C6H5CH2COOH
CH3(CH2)5COOH
p-Cl-C6H4COOFI
p-MeO-C6FI4COOH
time, h
aThe reaction was carried out with 1.7 equiv of the reagent (1) for aliphatic acids and 2.0
equiv for aromatic acids in the presence of 1.0 equiv of stannous chloride in
tetrahydrofuran at room temperature.
bThe reaction was carried out with 2.2. equiv of the reagent (5) in dichloromethane at room
temperature.
cThe numbers in parentheses indicate the isolated yields of benzyl phenyl sulfide and pchlorobenzyl phenyl sulfide, respectively.
Although it has been reported the aryl- and alkylthioboranes hydroborate alkenes and reduce
acids, aldehydes, and ketones to alcohols, their synthetic utilities have been hampered due
solvents
(ref.
12).
We have
found that
Since carboxylic esters were generally inert to the reagent (5), we considered the
group of an ester by the addition of Lewis acids.
possibility of activating the carbonyl
Among several Lewis acids tested in this study, the use of 1 equiv of zinc iodide gave the
best result for clean conversion of acids into phenyl sulfides (7) (eq. 6).
The present
method can be successfully applied to the preparation of various phenyl sulfides from various
esters such as methyl, ethyl, benzyl, and isopropyl ester.
ZINC-MODIFIED CYANOBOROHYDRIDE
Althoughthe reducing properties of sodium borohydride/metal salts have been intensively
investigated (ref. 13), there are relatively few reports in the literature on the use of
It has been reported that the combination of socium
sodium cyanoborohydride/metal salts.
cyanoborhydirde with Cu(II) and triphenylphosphine (ref. 14) and Pd(0) (ref. 15) reduces acid
chlorides to aldehydes and allylic acetates to alkenes, respectively. We have also studied
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 6/21/16 12:59 PM
SKIM
1008
2 NaBH3CN +
/Br
-F
2h
r
Zincmodified Cyanoborohydride
ZnC12
LH
(7)
ONe
S .M. (8)
10
82
10
58
25
Et20:
DNE:
95
MeOH:
Zinc-modified cyanoborohydride (8) utilized in this study was prepared by mixing sodium
cyanoborohydride and zinc chloride in a 2:1 molar ratio at room temperature in several
solvents such as ethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, and methanol (eq. 7). The reagent (8) was
relatively stable in aqueous media and its stability in aqueous media may enhance its utility
as a versatile reducing agent, while zinc borohydride decomposes rapidly with evolution of
0H +
(9)
C1CH2CH2C1
80%
QH cicc2ci
80 C, lh
0(1
(10)
89%
On the basis of this concept, we attempted deoxygenation of allylic, benzylic, and tertiary
of
reagent (8) in ether or dichloroethane.
However, reaction
alcohols with the
-methylbenzyl alcohol with the reagent (8) in dichloroethane at room temperature gave bis
(a-methylbenzyl) ether in 80% yield (eq. 9). This result is in marked contrast with recently
reported deoxygenation of benzylic alcohols with sodium cyanoborohydride/zinc iodide (ref.
We have developed a new convenient method for direct synthesis of ethers via zinc
20).
chloride mediated etherification of benzylic, allylic, and tertiary alcohols (eq. 9 and 10)
(ref. 21).
Zinc-modified cyanoborohydride (8) in ether reduced aldehydes, ketones, and acid chlorides to
The reagent in
alcohols but did not reduce acid anhydrides, acids, esters, and amides.
methanol did not readily reduce aldehyes and ketones, though the use of an excess amount of
zinc chloride resulted in almost completion of the reduction. The reduction of enamines with
the reagent (8) in methanol proceeded smoothly and the reaction was normally complete within
1 h at room temperature.
occurred much more rapidly than that of aldehydes and ketones, it was expected that reductive
amination of aldehdyes and ketones (eq. 11) and reductive methylation of amines (eq.
could be effected by simply reacting the carbonyl compounds with amines by the use of
It is of interest to note that the present procedure does
reagent (8) in methanol.
require pH control. Furthermore, the reductive deoxygenation of aldehydes and ketones
12)
the
not
via
the intermediacy of tosylhydrazones was accomplished with the reagent in methanol at ref lux
(eq. 13).
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 6/21/16 12:59 PM
1009
r.t., 2h
KIII:= + NH2 +
(11)
KI::_.NH_-::
85%
r.t, 2h
O2N--NH2 +
HCHO
OCH32
(12)
90%
2h
+ 8
+ CH3S02NHNH2
n-C12H26
(13)
70%
50%, with further reaction being sluggish probably due to the formation ot lithium
triethylborohydride-triethylborane complex and 2 equiv of the reagent are required for the
However, we expected that the bulkiness of lithium tri-seccomplete reduction.
butylborohydirde (10) might prevent the formation of such complex. Indeed, it was found that
the reduction of the primary alkyl bromide with a stoichiometric amount of lithium tri-secIn general, the efficiency and applicability
butylborohydride (10) proceeded to completion.
of lithium tri-sec-butylborohydride were very similar to those of the reagent (9) (ref. 24).
iBu2A1H +
nBuLl
LIA1H(nBu)(lBu)2
(14)
9
C6H5CH2Br +
C6H5CHBrCH3
r.t.
C6H5CH3 +
C6H5CH2CH3
9:
95
10:
98
OMe 2 eq. 9
NaBH4 pH (16)
78 Cr.t., lh
78 C, lh
X=CONEt2
=Br
lh
83%
95%
80%
=CN
NEt2 1
(15)
NCI
86%
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 6/21/16 12:59 PM
(17)
SKIM
1010
Esters and lactones were completely reduced to alcohols at room temperature, whereas they
were reduced to a mixture of alcohols and aldehdyes at -78C even with an excess amount of
Partial reduction of esters and lactones to aldehydes and lactols was not
the reagent (!).
achieved. The reagent reduced acid chlorides and acid anhydrides but did not reduce
carboxylic acids, primary, and secondary amides. Tertiary amides were cleanly reduced to
aldehydes with a stoichiometric amount of the reagent at room temperature or at 00C, whereas
they were inert to the reagent at -78C, which permitted the selective reduction of other
reducible functional groups in the presence of the tertiary amide group.
Unlike facile
reduction of nitriles with Dibah, nitriles were only slowly reduced to the corresponding
Systematic investigations of the reagent (9) toward various functional groups
aldehydes.
For instance, selective reduction of
suggest the possibility of many selective reductions.
esters in the presence of a tertiary amide, a bromide, and a nitrile can be achieved with the
Furthermore, the reagent is capable of reducing selectively a tertiary
reagent (eq. 16).
amide in the presence of a nitrile (eq. 17).
Acknowledgement
wish to thank my collaborators of this work and continuing financial support from Korea
REFERENCES
1.
3. (a) H.C. Brown and S. Krishnamurthy, 3. Am. Chem. Soc., 94, 7159-7161 (1972).
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
(b) S.
Krishnamurthy, Aldrichimica Acta, 7, 55-60 (1974).
5. Kim, S.S. Kim, S.T. Lim, and S.C. Shim, Submitted.
5. Kim and S.S. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett., in press (1987).
S. Kim, Y.J. Kim, and K.H. Ahn, Tetrahedron Lett., 3369-3372 (1983).
5. Kim, C.H. Oh, J.S. Ko, K.H. Ahn, and Y.J. Kim, 3. Org. Chem., 50, 1927-1931 (1985).
(b) S. Kim and
(a) S. Kim and K.H. Ahn, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 4, 152-153 (1983).
K.H. Ahn, 3. Org. Chem., 49, 1717-1724 (1984).
9. (a) H.C. Brown, 3.5. Cha, B. Nazer, and N.M. Yoon, 3. Am Chem. Soc., 106, 8001-8002
(1984). (b) M. Muraki and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 1447-1450 (1974).
10. T.W. Greene, "Protective Grups in Organic Synthesis", John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York,
1981.
18. (a)
19.
(1983).
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
(b) J.Y. Gauthier, F. Bourdon, and R.N. Young, Tetrahedron Lett., 15-18
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 6/21/16 12:59 PM