Scribd
Upload
19 views

Frequency Table: Penyakit Infeksi

- The document contains frequency tables analyzing data from 36 subjects on infectious diseases, family income, knowledge, and nutritional status. - Crosstab analyses were run to examine relationships between infectious diseases and nutritional status, family income and nutritional status, and knowledge and nutritional status. - The analyses found statistically significant associations between having an infectious disease and poorer nutritional status, lower family income and poorer nutritional status, and lower knowledge and poorer nutritional status.

Uploaded by

ochink
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
19 views

Frequency Table: Penyakit Infeksi

- The document contains frequency tables analyzing data from 36 subjects on infectious diseases, family income, knowledge, and nutritional status. - Crosstab analyses were run to examine relationships between infectious diseases and nutritional status, family income and nutritional status, and knowledge and nutritional status. - The analyses found statistically significant associations between having an infectious disease and poorer nutritional status, lower family income and poorer nutritional status, and lower knowledge and poorer nutritional status.

Uploaded by

ochink
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Frequency Table

penyakit infeksi
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Percent

tidak menderita

15

41.7

41.7

41.7

menderita

21

58.3

58.3

100.0

Total

36

100.0

100.0

pendapatan keluarga
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Percent

cukup

13

36.1

36.1

36.1

kurang

23

63.9

63.9

100.0

Total

36

100.0

100.0

pengetahuan
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Percent

cukup

13

36.1

36.1

36.1

kurang

23

63.9

63.9

100.0

Total

36

100.0

100.0

status gizi
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Percent

baik

19

52.8

52.8

52.8

kurang

17

47.2

47.2

100.0

Total

36

100.0

100.0

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
penyakit infeksi *
36
status gizi
pendapatan keluarga *
36
status gizi
pengetahuan * status
36
gizi

Missing

Total

Percent

Percent

Percent

100.0%

.0%

36

100.0%

100.0%

.0%

36

100.0%

100.0%

.0%

36

100.0%

penyakit infeksi * status gizi


status gizi

penyakit
infeksi

tidak
menderita

menderita

Total

baik

kurang

Total

Count

12

15

Expected Count

7.9

7.1

15.0

% within penyakit
infeksi

80.0%

20.0%

100.0%

Count

14

21

Expected Count

11.1

9.9

21.0

% within penyakit
infeksi

33.3%

66.7%

100.0%

Count

19

17

36

Expected Count

19.0

17.0

36.0

% within penyakit
infeksi

52.8%

47.2%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square

Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

7.646a

.006

Continuity Correctionb 5.888

.015

Likelihood Ratio

.005

8.050

Fisher's Exact Test


Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb

7.433

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.008

.007

.006

36

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
7.08.

b. Computed only for a 2x2


table
Symmetric Measures

Nominal by
Nominal
N of Valid
Cases

Value

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.461

.006

Cramer's V

.461

.006

36

pendapatan keluarga * status gizi


Crosstab
status gizi

pendapatan
keluarga

cukup

kurang

Total

baik

kurang

Total

Count

10

13

Expected Count

6.9

6.1

13.0

% within pendapatan
keluarga

76.9%

23.1%

100.0%

Count

14

23

Expected Count

12.1

10.9

23.0

% within pendapatan
keluarga

39.1%

60.9%

100.0%

Count

19

17

36

Expected Count

19.0

17.0

36.0

% within pendapatan
keluarga

52.8%

47.2%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

4.760a

.029

Continuity Correction 3.364

.067

Likelihood Ratio

.026

Pearson Chi-Square
b

4.961

Fisher's Exact Test


Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb

4.628

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.041

.032

.031

36

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6.14.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table

Symmetric Measures

Nominal by
Nominal

Value

Approx.
Sig.

Phi

.364

.029

Cramer's V

.364

.029

N of Valid Cases

36

pengetahuan * status gizi


status gizi

pengetahuan

cukup

kurang

Total

baik

kurang

Total

Count

10

13

Expected Count

6.9

6.1

13.0

% within
pengetahuan

76.9%

23.1%

100.0%

Count

14

23

Expected Count

12.1

10.9

23.0

% within
pengetahuan

39.1%

60.9%

100.0%

Count

19

17

36

Expected Count

19.0

17.0

36.0

% within
pengetahuan

52.8%

47.2%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square

Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

4.760a

.029

Continuity Correctionb 3.364

.067

Likelihood Ratio

.026

4.961

Fisher's Exact Test


Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Casesb

4.628

Exact Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig.
(1-sided)

.041

.032

.031

36

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6.14.
b. Computed only for a 2x2
table

Nominal by
Nominal
N of Valid
Cases

Value

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.364

.029

Cramer's V

.364

.029

36

You might also like