Vda. de Bataclan v. Medina, 1957

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

VDA. DE BATACLAN v.

MEDINA
102 PHIL 181
MONTEMAYOR; October 22, 1957
FACTS
- Juan Bataclan rode Bus 30 of Medina Transport, driven by Saylon, shortly after midnight. The bus was running
very fast. One of the front tires burst. Bus fell into canal and turned turtle. 4 passengers couldnt get out,
including Bataclan. Gasoline began to leak from the overturned bus. 10 men came to help. 1 carried a torch and
when he approached the bus, fire started, killing the trapped passengers.
- TC opined that proximate cause of Bataclans death was not the overturning of bus but the fire. At the time fire
started, Bataclan, though injured, was still alive and damages were awarded, not for his death, but for physical
injuries suffered.
ISSUE/S
WON the proximate cause is the overturning of the bus or the fire
HELD
- The proximate cause is the overturning of the bus.
- Ordinarily, when a bus overturns and pins down passenger, merely causing him injuries. If through some event,
unexpected and extraordinary, the bus is set on fire, and passenger is burned to death, one might contend that the
proximate cause was the fire and not the overturning of the vehicle.
- But here, the proximate cause of Bataclans death is the overturning of the bus, this for the reason that when the
vehicle turned not only on its side but completely on its back, leaking of gasoline from the tank was not unnatural
or unexpected.
- The coming of the men with the torch was in response to the call for help, made only not by the passengers but
even the driver and conductor, and because it was very dark, about 2:30 am, rescuers had to carry a light with
them. Coming as they did from rural area where lanterns and flashlights were not available, they had to use a
torch. What was more natural than that said rescuers should innocently approach the overturned vehicle to extend
aid.
- The coming of the men with the torch was to be expected, and was a natural sequence of the overturning of the
bus, the trapping of some of its passengers and the call for outside help.
- The burning of bus can also in part be attributed to negligence of carrier, through its driver and conductor. They,
or at least the driver, should have known that in the position in which the overturned bus was, gasoline could and
must have leaked from the gasoline tank and soaked the area in and around the bus. Gasoline can be smelt and
detected even from a distance, and yet neither the driver nor the conductor would appear to have cautioned or
taken steps to warn rescuers not to bring the lighted torch too near the bus.

You might also like