Kim Min Jung - Book Review 1

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Min Jung Kim

HSTAFM 463 A
Book Review #1
Mottahedeh, Roy. The Mantle of the Prophet: Religion and Politics in Iran. New York:
Simon & Schuster, 1985. 416 pp. $17.95.
In The Mantle of the Prophet, Roy Mottahedeh weaves in many threads of Iranian history
through a character named Ali Hashemi, a mullah from Qom living in the 20th century. In doing
so, he paints the picture of life in Iran during the years leading up to the Islamic Revolution of
1979 and provides the contextual historical and cultural knowledge. Most of the chapters are
divided into two sections. In the first half, we get a glimpse of Ali Hashemis life. In these
sections, Mottahedeh draws upon the interviews he conducted with Iranians before the
revolution and the madreseh curriculum, which he studied for two years in preparation for this
book. In the latter half of the chapter, Mottahedeh takes a closer look at a topic brought up in the
first half in a historical context. Although Mottahedeh did not include footnotes in these sections,
he cites essays, academic books, an oral autobiography, and biographies that he used at the
back of the book.
The story begins in Qom where we see Ali Hashemi grow up from a boy learning to pray and
read in Arabic to a first class talabeh at madresehs in Qom and Najaf. From there, we follow him
to Tehran where he accepts a teaching position at a theological school and becomes an
influential ayatollah. While Ali Hashemis life unfolds throughout the chapters, Mottahedeh
inserts academic segments on a variety of topics. On education, Mottahedeh contrasts the
education system in Europe and Iran throughout the ages and grounds these ideas in the 20th
century through a figure named Isa Sadiq, a prominent education reformer (50-68). Mottahedeh
highlights the impact Sufism had on Persian literature by analyzing excerpts and including short
biographies of influential literary figures like Sohravardi, a mystic writer who wrote about wine
and lovers (156-170). Mottahedeh also emphasizes the importance of Islamic law in Iran
through figures like Ghazzali and Sheikh Mortaza Ansari, and he draws comparison between
Shiite and Sunni interpretation of the Islamic law by parsing through their distinct logic (198212). In the latter chapters, Mottahedeh traces the ever-changing relationship between the
secular and religious leaders in the 20th century Iran as they step in and out of their powerful
roles (223-247). Mottahedeh simultaneously notes that the once unified circle of religious
leaders fell apart as their conflicting political alliances inevitably became prominent.
Even with its incredible scope of outwardly disparate topics, The Mantle of the Prophet has a
tenuous theme by the time we reach the aftermath of the revolution at the end of the book:
ambiguity, or rather lack thereof. Mottahedeh argues that during the 20th century Iranians were
stripped of the ambiguity that they relied on to morph their identity with the changing times (379).
In this process, Iranians (represented by Jalal Al-e Ahmad, an acclaimed writer and social critic
that coined the terms euromania and westoxification) found themselves hopelessly confused
and self-contradictory (Mottahedeh 287). Not only that, with increasing foreign influences and
without basic commodities, Iranians felt that their country was becoming foreign to them before
their very own eyes, and they felt the need to do away with ambiguity and reclaim their religious
roots. After the revolution, this ambiguity was gone and the parliament was finally installed, but
many (including culturally Shia people, intellectuals, leftists from the 40s and 50s, etc) felt
that they had been deceived. The radical demands were nowhere to be found, and the
revolution had brought about a new set of violent rulers.
The Mantle of the Prophets greatest strength is that it is both dense and approachable.

Comment [1]: Explain the nature of the


character (fictional, semi-fictional,
pseudonymous)

Comment [2]: Yesthis is an unusual


degree of preparation!
Comment [3]: Book?
Comment [4]: Great. What, basically, is
Mottahedeh arguing?

Comment [5]: Great selection of details


and summary. A well-balanced paragraph.

Comment [6]: Of leftists? Needs to be a bit


more specific.

Mottahedeh achieves this by embedding the academic segments containing tailored


biographies and historical analysis within Ali Hashemis narrative. The academic analysis
sprinkled throughout the text make the rich culture and history of Iran more accessible to
readers without compromising their complexity. Another major strength is that Mottahedeh
effectively captures Iranian culture through his characters dialogues and detailed description of
everyday life in Iran. Proverbs like, God willing, its a goat (Mottahedeh 181) and Arabic is
learning, but Persian is sugar (Mottahedeh 249) are interspersed throughout conversations and
thoughts. Ali Hashemis interactions with respected religious leaders shed light on Iranian
etiquette. His extensive use of quotes and allusions from the Book of Kings and Poem of Hafez,
which are considered to be cornerstones of Persian literature, in dialogues allow readers to
understand common cultural references (Mottahedeh 246-247, 365). Between these
conversations, Mottahedeh also uses intimate descriptions of everyday life in Iran. We are
exposed to the variety of public displays of religious grief over Hosains martyrdom (Mottahedeh
173-179). We get glimpses of the madreseh courtyards teeming with talabehs eager to discuss
politics, especially before the evening prayer (Mottahedeh 121). We are introduced to dowrehs
that facilitate rumination and debates among diverse groups of friends (Mottahedeh 271). These
collections of dialogues and descriptions convey aspects of Iranian culture that would be difficult
to communicate in a traditional academic text and allow readers to feel as though they have
gotten to know an Iranian mullah in person.
Although Mottahedeh covers Iranian history and culture with an exceptional breadth and depth,
a glaring weakness of this book is what is left unsaid. Mottahedeh makes it clear through Ali
Hashemis interactions with common folks that despite their influence, mullahs are generally
disconnected from the rest of the society. As a result, the majority of the Iranian population
notably the women whose existence is merely hinted when the men mention miniskirts or
hijabare left completely voiceless in this narrative. Even with its flaws, The Mantle of the
Prophet is an excellent read that allows the general audience to cultivate a deep appreciation of
the intellectual history and culture of Iran, and Mottahedehs creative approach on the subject
makes this masterpiece worth reading even for an academic audience. [988 words]
Min Jung,
Overall, this is an excellent review. Youve done an especially good job of selecting material to
review out of a dense book and achieving a critical distance from the book well enough to
recognize what it omits while still recognizing its strengths.
We (the readers of the review) need to get a better sense from the beginning of the review of
what Mottahedehs central goals and point (i.e. argument or arguments) are. It takes a while for
the reader to get there. However, you do a great job of highlighting Mottahedehs unusual
methodology, which might be the most important feature of the book.
Grade: 95%

Comment [7]: Yesgreat that you notice


this methodology and its strength. (Its an
unusual book in many ways.)

Comment [8]: Good critique.

You might also like