Midtermreflection
Midtermreflection
Jim Farrell
UWRT-1101
3-18-16
Midterm Course Reflection
The word composing carries such a negative connotation in my mind. I am not entirely
sure why that is. I cannot recall any even in particular that brings about repressed feelings or
horrible memories that relate to the word. Composing seems so academic, and academia has
never been an environment I have been fond of. Naturally, I compose everyday. Technology
being the driving force that it is these days, I often find myself lost in a land of text messages and
emails. These forms of composing never seem to require much of a process. In fact, they seem
to be more of a reaction than anything. When someone sends a text message asking you a
questionyou respond, its that simple. I have tried to carry a lot of this thought process (or lack
there of) over and apply it to my school work. As a result, my process seems to be very similar to
one I used to compose emails while I was enlisted in the Air Force. I write things exactly how I
would say them, as if I were locked into a conversation on the topic. After my point as been
made, I devote the majority of my time making adjustments to my writing. This just ensures that
my writing is politically correct, professional, and audience appropriate.
The critical reading concept was foreign to me prior to this semester. In a lot of ways I
consider critical reflection and critical reading to be the same. I have only ever proofread my
works, which is something I find to be completely different. When I proofread I am only
concerning myself with spelling and grammar. It is more of a micro process that critical
reading. What I mean is that, when I proofread I am checking individual sentences to make sure
that they make sense. When I read my papers critically, I am making sure the entire paper
Farrell 2
makes sense. I have to analyze all of my paragraphs and make sure the paper relates to my topic
as a whole. Also, I have to make sure that the paper is written in such a way that my audience
can relate. A paper written as more of a conversational piece with slang usage and funny stories
may help my classmates to relate, but it may alienate the teacher who is grading the paper. That
may not be the wisest choice. I find myself constantly concerned with these types of things as I
read through my papers over and over again. Some may see proofreading as the same thing as
critical thinking, but I dont. I choose to delineate between the two, and I think it helps my
process tremendously.
value.
Critical Reading- When I think on this SLO, the only thing I am constantly reminded of
is the Malcom X piece that we read early on in the semester. We spent a lot of time as a
class really trying to break that passage down and really understand what was meant by
it. We had discussions on the subject and even wrote blogs. Even after so much time was
spent on it, each of us seemed t still have our own opinions on what Malcom Xs purpose
Farrell 3
word changes and grammar fixes. Draft two to draft three, I actually rewrote paragraphs
and included a lot more detail to some of my topics. Draft three to draft four, I actually
did away with a lot and chose to completely restart certain topics and include some