0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views16 pages

Tien Giang 413

This document summarizes a site verification report for the Tiền Giang 413 site in Vietnam. Key information includes: - Drive test was conducted on 4/16/2016 and tested the site's 3 UMTS sectors. - KPIs like RSCP, EcNo, throughput met targets for the majority of samples. Handover and voice call tests also passed. - Coverage maps show RSCP and EcNo levels across the test routes for each sector. - A few issues are listed but not described, suggesting the site is performing well overall.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views16 pages

Tien Giang 413

This document summarizes a site verification report for the Tiền Giang 413 site in Vietnam. Key information includes: - Drive test was conducted on 4/16/2016 and tested the site's 3 UMTS sectors. - KPIs like RSCP, EcNo, throughput met targets for the majority of samples. Handover and voice call tests also passed. - Coverage maps show RSCP and EcNo levels across the test routes for each sector. - A few issues are listed but not described, suggesting the site is performing well overall.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Single Site Verification Report

Site Tin Giang 413


Project NSN 2015 - MLMT

Nng 03/2016

Single Site Verification Check List

Drive Test Date

Site Name

Tin Giang 413

Longitude

10,33123
4/16/2016

Drive Tester

Mai Phi

Technology
Latitude
Cluster

UMTS

1.

106,03622
4

eneral site information


2.RF Data
2.1 UMTS

1 |Page

3.

RNC ID
Azimuth

480

LAC/RAC
Tilt

CID
Height

42

Site location and driving test routes

Figure 1: Site Location and test routes.

2 |Page

4.CQT summary
4.1 UMTS
Test case

No

Activity/ Process

Frequency and Scrambling Code correctly


defined

The LAC/RAC is correctly defined (SIB 1)

CPICH_RSCP > -95 dBm near site

RRC
Connected
Mode

Idle Mode

Cell 1

Cell 2

UARFC
N
10612,
10587
LAC: 42034
RAC:123

Psc
83

Psc
371

Cell 3
UARFCN
10612,
10587

Psc
198

Comment
UARFCN
10612,
10587

LAC: 42034
RAC: 123

LAC: 42034
RAC: 123

OK

OK

OK

200 meters

CPICH_EcIo > -10 dB near site

OK

OK

OK

200 meters

Call origination & Termination test for Voice

OK

OK

OK

The Voicecall service quality is good by the engineer


feeling

OK

OK

OK

Soft Handover
ISHO

7
8

Handover for voice service


Handover from 3G->2G

Integrity

9
10
11

Max throughput test for HSDPA (Target KPI: 3Mbps)


Average throughput test for HSDPA (Target KPI: 2Mbps)
Max throughput test for HSUPA (Target KPI: 1Mbps)
Average throughput test for HSUPA (Target KPI: 0.7
Mbps)

OK
OK
7.23
4.98
4.44

OK
OK
7.18
5.2
2.88

OK
OK
6.64
3.6
1.96

3.46

2.19

1.83

12

3 |Page

5.Serving cell coverage:


5.1 UMTS (RSCP, MS1 lap 1)
5.1.1

Sector A

Figure 2: Footprint of sector A.

4 |Page

5.1.2

Sector B

Figure 3: Footprint of sector B.

5 |Page

5.1.3

Sector C

Figure 4: Footprint of sector C.

6.DT KPI summary:


6.1 UMTS

No

KPI

Formula

Call Setup

Blocked/DroppedCa

Result

Notes

6 |Page

ll

RSCP

% sample RSCP >= - 95 dBm

68.82%

MS1 lap 1

EcNo

% sample ECNo >= -12 dB

93.58%

MS1 lap 1

Pilot pollution

Pilot pollution point/total RSCP

1.03%

MS5 lap 1

CSSR

Call setup/(Call Setup + Blocked call)*100

126

94.03%

MS1 lap 1

CDR

Dropped Call/Call Setup*100

65

4.62%

MS4 lap 1

PDP context
activation SR

Number PDP Context Accept / Number PDP


Context Request * 100

80.00%

MS2, MS3 lap 1

PS download
throughput

Mbps

2.63

MS2 lap 1

PS upload
throughput

Mbps

1.71

MS3 lap 1

7 |Page

7.DT KPI in details:

7.1 RSCP(MS5 lap1)

Figure 5: RSCP.

8 |Page

7.2 EcIo (MS5 lap 1)

Figure 6: EcNo.

9 |Page

7.3 Pilot Pollution- Poss No Of AS Member>= 4, Assumed Reporting Range = 5 (dB) (MS5 lap
1)

Figure 6: Pilot Pollution.

10 |Page

7.4 3G PS DL throughput (MS2 lap 1)

Figure 7: PS DL throughput

11 |Page

7.5 3G PS UL throughput (MS3 lap 1)

Figure 8: PS DL throughput

8.Existing issues

12 |Page

No

Description of Problems

Date

Solution

13 |Page

8.1 Description issue no.1


8.2 Description issue no.2

14 |Page

You might also like