Contract Act 1872
Contract Act 1872
Contract Act 1872
(Sec. 2)
[Sec. 10]
Basic of difference
Meaning
Creation of legal
obligation
One in other
Agreement
Agreement = offer + acceptance
An agreement does not create a legal
obligation unless it satisfies the
requirements of various provisions of
law.
The term agreement is wider than
contract. An unenforceable agreement
is not a contract.
Agreement to do an If
impossible act
Contract
Contract = agreement + enforceability
A contract necessarily creates legal
obligations.
(Sec. 56)
CLASSIFICATION OF CONTRACTS
(Sec. 2&9)
Offer / Proposal
7
MEANING OF OFFER
When one person signifies to another
His willingness
To do or to abstain from doing anything,
With a view to obtaining the assent of that
To such act; or
Abstinence,
He is said to make a proposal (i.e., offer).
Express offer
Implied offer
(Sec. 9)
Specific Offer
General Offer
10
[Sec.2 (a)]
Offer must be
communicated
Boulton v Jones
J offered to purchase 50 feet of leather from Z.
Z in the meantime sold his business to B.
Therefore, instead of Z, B supplied the leather to J.
J refused to accept the leather.
It was held that the offer was not communicated to B, and so B had
no legal right to accept the offer made by J.
Therefore, no contract had concluded between J and B.
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
A pharmaceutical company advertised that it would give 100 Pounds to
anyone who contracted influenza after using their smoke balls for a
certain period.
Mrs. Carlill purchased smoke balls and used them as directed.
Shortly afterwards, she contracted influenza. She claimed the 100 Pounds.
The Court held that the advertisement issued by the pharmaceutical
company was a general offer made to the public at large.
[Mrs. Carlill, being a member of the public, had received the offer
and had acted upon it by using the smoke balls as directed.]
Therefore, a contract was formed between the pharmaceutical company
and Mrs. Carlill, and so Mrs. Carlill could claim 100 Pounds.
Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt.
Gs nephew was missing.
L, who was munim of G, went in search of the missing boy.
4
Communication
complete offer
of
LAPSE OF AN OFFER
Lapse of time
Non-fulfillment
of
condition precedent.
Counter offer
Acceptance is not
made in prescribed
mode
Death or insanity of
the offeror or offeree
Rejection by the
offeree
Subsequent illegality
etc.
Acceptance
12
INTRODUCTION TO ACCEPTANCE
(Sec. 2 (b))
Acceptance must be
communicated
Acceptance to whom?
Acceptance by whom?
Manner of acceptance.
Time
limit
acceptance
for
Acceptance must be
given before the offer
lapses or revoked
Mode of acceptance
(Sec. 7)
14
Communication of
Offer
Acceptance
Revocation
15
Revocation of
Offer
Acceptance
(Sec. 5)
Consideration
16
MEANING OF CONSIDERATION
(Sec. 2 (d))
When, at the desire of the promisor,
The promisee or any other person
Has done/abstained from doing, or does/abstains from doing, or promises to do/to abstain from
doing, something,
Such act/abstinence/promise is called a consideration for the promise.
17
Consideration must
move at the desire of
the promisor.
Consideration may
move from promisee
or any other person.
No
adequacy
consideration
required.
of
Agreements made on
account of natural
love and affection
Conditions
However, once a gift has actually been made, the donor cannot demand it
back on the ground that there was no consideration.
No consideration is necessary to create an agency.
Agency
No consideration is necessary for an agreement to receive less than what is due.
Remission
In a contract of guarantee, consideration received by the principal debtor shall
Guarantee
be sufficient consideration for the surety.
PRIVITY OF CONTRACT
Privity
consideration
(Sec. 25)
of
CAPACITY OF PARTIES
20
Agreement is void ab A minor is incompetent to enter into any contract. Therefore, any agreement
initio, i.e., without made by a minor is void ab initio, i.e., it is without any legal effect.
any legal effect.
Mohori Bibi v Dharmodas Ghose (IMP.)
A minor entered into an agreement for mortgage of his property.
He was paid a certain amount for mortgaging the property.
Afterwards, the mortgagee filed a suit against the minor for recovery of
money paid to the minor.
It was held that the money was paid to the minor under a void agreement,
and therefore the mortgage was not valid.
10
The principle laid down in Mohori Bibi v Dharamodas Ghose applies only
if the agreement creates an obligation of a minor.
Where, an agreement is for the benefit of a minor, the agreement is not
void and therefore the minor can enforce such agreement.
If the other party to the agreement fails to perform his part of obligation, the
minor can claim restitution.
Restitution
Khan Gul v Lakha Singh
Following principles were laid down in the above case:
The Court may grant relief to the other party if the other party had entered
into a contract with the minor on the basis of a misrepresentation made by
the minor.
If the minor had received some consideration under the agreement, the
Court may grant restitution to the other party.
However, the minor shall not be personally liable. In other words,
restitution shall be made only to such an extent as the estate of minor has
been benefited.
The power of the Court to grant relief is discretionary in nature.
The Court shall not grant relief if the other party had the knowledge of the
fact that it was entering into an agreement with a minor.
No estoppel against a If the rule of estoppel is applied against a minor, it would amount to an
minor
indirect way of enforcing a void agreement.
Therefore, the rule of estoppel does not apply against a minor.
No specific
The other party cannot demand that minor should perform the obligation
performance
which he had agreed to perform under the agreement.
No ratification by a Ratification means acceptance of a transaction already done.
minor
An agreement entered into by a minor cannot be ratified by him after he has
attained majority.
Where on attaining majority, a minor agrees to pay for the goods supplied by a
third party, such agreement is void for want of consideration.
No liability of guardian The guardian of a minor shall not be liable for acts of a minor.
Contracts
by
a The contract by a guardian on behalf of a minor shall be valid if
guardian Valid
(a) The contract is for the benefit of minor; and
(b) The guardian has the authority to enter into such a contract.
Minors liability for Nature of As per Sec. 68, a minor is liable for necessities supplied to
necessities
liability
(a) him; or
(b) Any other person who is dependent on the minor.
(a) The liability is only for necessities of life. The term
Conditions
necessity means necessities of life as per the social status
and conditions of life of the minor.
(b) The minor is not already in possession of such necessities.
(c) The minor shall not be personally liable.
(a) Minor cannot be a guarantor.
Position of minor
(b) Minor may be admitted as a member where the shares are fully paid up.
11
(Sec. 12)
Company
Alien enemy
Foreign diplomats
A company is a legal person and therefore it can enter into a contract in its
own name.
However, a company is disqualified to enter into any contract which falls
outside the object clause of memorandum
- is suspended until the war is over;
Existing contract
- is discharged, if such contract is against public
policy.
- cannot be entered into until the war is
Fresh contract
over
- An existing contract can be enforced;
Permission of CG
- A fresh contract can be entered into.
Right to sue others
Available
Can be sued
- Only in the following cases:
- (a) Where he submits himself to the Court
- (b) Where approval of CG is obtained.
12
Existing contract
Fresh contract
Permission of CG
Free Consent
23
COERCION - CONDITION
(b) Intention
(Sec. 15)
Other points :
Applicability
of IPC is not relevant
(Sec. 16)
Relations
between One party is in a position to dominate the will of the other.
the parties
Use of the dominant The dominant party uses his dominant position.
position
Dominant
party The dominant party obtains an unfair advantage by way of entering into a
obtains an unfair
contact.
advantage
Undue influence was employed/not employed burden of proof.
Unconscionable
The burden of proof is on the dominant party.
transactions
The dominant party has to prove that undue influence was not employed.
Any
other The burden of proof is on the weaker party.
transaction
The weaker party has to prove that undue influence was employed.
25
ESSENTIALS OF FRAUD
By a party to the
contract
(Sec. 17)
It must be proved that fraud was committed by(a) A party to the contract; or
(b) Anyone with the connivance of a party to the contract.
13
The misrepresentation was made with a view to deceive the other party.
Silence as fraud
General rule
Exceptions
26
Mere silence, which is likely to affect the willingness of the other party,
is not a fraud.
Where the parties stand in fiduciary relationship.
When silence is equivalent to speech.
Partial disclosure of truth which deceives the other party is a fraud.
ESSENTIALS OF FRAUD
(Sec. 18)
By a party to the contract.
The party makes a representation.
The representation is false.
The misrepresentation was made innocently.
The misrepresentation was not made with a view to deceive the other party.
The other party has actually acted.
27
MISTAKE
Mistake of Indian
law
Bilateral mistake
Unilateral Mistake
(Sec. 23)
Legal effect
29
in An agreement to
or something forbidden
is law
Maintenance agreement.
Champerty agreement.
30
Meaning of maintenance
agreement
Legal
effect
of
maintenance agreement
Meaning of Champerty
agreement
(Sec. 25)
An agreement containing Whether unlawful part can be separated from unlawful partlegal and illegal parts.
If yes
Lawful part can be enforced; or
- Unlawful part cannot be enforced.
If no
- The whole agreement is void.
A reciprocal agreement The reciprocal promise to do
containing legal and illegal
Legal things can be enforced
parts
Illegal things - cannot be enforced.
An agreement containing The alternate promise to do
legal and illegal parts
Legal things can be enforced
Illegal things - cannot be enforced.
Void Agreements
32
33
(Sec. 27)
WAGERING AGREEMENTS
Meaning
Effects
of
agreements
(Sec. 30)
Contingent Contracts
36
(Sec. 31)
Meaning
of A contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something,
contingent contract
If some event, collateral to such contract, does or does not happen.
(a) It is a contract to do or not to do something.
Essentials features of
a contingent contract
(b) This contract is dependent on happening or non-happening of an
event.
(c) Such an event is a collateral event, i.e., it is collateral to the contract,
i.e., the event must not depend upon the mere will of a party.
(d) The event is uncertain.
37
Contract contingent
upon
Happening of an
event
Non- happening of a
future event
Happening of an
event within a
specified time
Non-happening of an
event within a fixed
time.
Future conduct of a
living person.
Impossible events
(Sec. 31)
When does it become void?
18
Quasi Contracts
38
39
(Sec. 68)
TO CONTRACT
A person who is incompetent to contact is made liable u/s. 68.
The liability of an incompetent person arises if necessities are supplied
to
Such person (.e., incompetent person); or
Any other person who is dependent on such incompetent person.
Liability of incompetent The person who supplies necessities to the incompetent person is
person
entitled to be reimbursed from the property of such incompetent
person.
However, the incompetent person is not personally liable.
Meaning of necessities
Necessities means necessaries suitable to the conditions in life of
the person to whom such necessities are supplied.
Who is made liable u/s. 68?
Conditions of Sec. 68
40
TRANSACTION
Conditions of Sec. 69
41
(Sec. 69)
(Sec. 70)
NON-GRATUITOUS ACT
Conditions of Sec. 70
A person has lawfullyo
Done something for another person; or
o
Delivered something to another person.
Such person must have actedo
Voluntarily; and
o
Non-gratuitously
19
42
FINDER OF GOODS
A finder of goods has same rights and duties as that of a bailee.
(Sec. 71)
43
(Sec. 72)
Conditions of Sec. 72
A person has o
Paid money to another person; or
o
Delivered something to another person.
Such person must have actedo
Under a mistake; or
o
Under coercion
If the above conditions are satisfied, there will be a quasi contract
between the parties.
Consequently the party who has paid money or delivered a thing
shall be entitled to recover its value from the person who obtained
the benefit of the same.
Performance of a Contract
44
Actual performance
Tender
services
of
goods
Tender of money
20
47
PERFORMANCE
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
48
49
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
All the joint promisors are jointly and severally liable. However, the contract between the
joint promisors may provide otherwise.
A joint promisor may claim contribution from other joint promisors, if he is compelled to
perform the whole promise.
A joint promisor may claim contribution from other joint promisors, if any other joint
promisor makes a default in performance of his promise.
Where one of the joint promisors is released, other joint promisors shall continue to be
liable.
APPROPRIATION OF PAYMENTS
Application
of
payment where debt
to be discharged is
indicated
Application
of
payment where debt
to be discharged is
not indicated.
(Sec. 59 to 61)
the appropriation
Discharge of a contract
50
51
52
DISCHARGE BY PERFORMANCE
Actual performance
Attempted perform-ance
or tender
53
(Sec. 37 to 38)
Meaning of supervening
impossibility
(Sec. 56)
55
The contact becomes void. All the parties are discharged from their
respective obligations.
Restitution is allowed.
Novation
Alteration
Remission
Rescission
(Sec. 62 to 63)
Waiver
Merger
55
56
Death
Insolvency
Unauthorized material
alteration
Merger of rights.
57
Meaning of breach
Consequences of breach
58
KINDS OF BREACH
(Sec. 39)
Actual breach
Anticipatory breach
Meaning of
anticipatory breach
Modes of
anticipatory breach
60
Meaning of rescission
Effects of rescission
61
Meaning
Object of
damages
awarding
(Sec. 73)
Kinds of damages
Ordinary damages
Special damages
Exemplary or punitive
or vindictive damages
Nominal damages
Damages
for
inconvenience etc.
Liquidated
damages
and penalty
Forfeiture of security
deposit
These damages are awarded for such loss suffered by a party which is a
proximate consequence of breach.
Damages are not awarded if they have resulted because of an indirect
consequence.
Special damages are awarded to cover such loss which through does not
arise naturally, but was in the contemplation of both the parties at the
time when the contract was made.
These damages can be recovered only if the special circumstances
which would result in a special loss in case of breach of a contract are
communicated to the other party.
These damages are awarded only in the following 2 cases:
Breach of a contract The damages shall be calculated on the basis of
mental injury sustained by the aggrieved party.
to marry
Unjustified dishonor The damages shall be calculated on the basis lower
the amount of cheque, greater will be the damages.
of a cheque
Where no loss is suffered by the aggrieved party, the Court generally
awards nominal damages.
Where a party has suffered physical inconvenience, discomfort or mental
agony as result of breach, the Court may award damages for the same.
Where the parties to a contract specify a certain sum in the contract
which will become payable as a result of breach, such specified sum is
called as liquidated damages or penalty
If the specified sum represents a fair and genuine pre-estimate of the
damages likely to result due to breach, such specified sum is called as
liquidated damages.
If the specified sum is disproportionate to the damages which are likely
to result as a result of breach, such specified sum is called as penalty.
In India, damages shall be restricted to a reasonable compensation not
exceeding the specified sum.
If any loss is suffered by a party as a result of breach, the damages
awarded to him shall be limited to the loss suffered by him.
Any clause in the contract entitling the aggrieved party to forfeit the
security deposit is not valid.
25
26