Final Philosophy of Education
Final Philosophy of Education
Final Philosophy of Education
Attention flags and discomfort sets in halfway through the class if students are not asked
to get up and move around. This is essential for health as well as attention. Research
suggests that sitting for longer than 45 minutes at a stretch can be detrimental to a bodys
fitness.
While I am clearly a proponent of kinesthetic learning, I continue to recognize the
importance of offering students a variety of modalities through which they might connect
with the curriculum. This stems from Gardners Theory of Multiple Intelligences and
recognition, again, of students as individuals.
The largest growth in my philosophy is in the absolute necessity of recognizing
the role that culture plays on a students readiness in the classroom. As I stated previously
in my Philosophy of Adolescent Learning, It is important to consider culture when
thinking about adolescent learning. As a teacher, it is imperative to recognize where the
student is coming from this informs their social aptitude, language skills, and ability to
apply previous knowledge to new problems. When these factors are considered and
supported, effective student-centered learning is more likely to occur. I now believe this
to be a profoundly indispensable piece of student learning. As a former boarding school
teacher, developing student relationships was a priority. In public school, this is harder to
do for myriad reasons. Student teaching showed me how important those relationships
(and the understanding of childrens backgrounds often garnered through the
relationships) are to creating a safe environment where learning can occur.
Reflection on my philosophies from before student teaching shows growth in my
understanding of education. I hope to develop and revise my philosophy on education
each year as I continue to learn how to teach and lead most effectively.