The Philippine Airline Industry
The Philippine Airline Industry
The Philippine Airline Industry
Submitted by:
Eliel Daang
Harold Cruz
Melody Cua
Faye de Cadiz
Submitted to:
Introduction
In Asia, one of the first countries to embrace air transport is the Philippines.
Founded in February 26, 1941, Philippine Airlines made Asias oldest carriers and oldest
operating under its current name. The airlines first flight was made on March 15, 1941
with a single Beech Model 18 NPC-54 aircraft, which started its daily services between
Manila and Baguio, later to expand with larger aircraft such as the DC-3 and Vickers
Viscount. Today, despite the numerous challenges faced, the Philippine Airline Industry
still survives with more than 50 destinations within the Philippines and around the
world.
This paper aims to show the Market Structure and Outlook of the Airline Industry
in the Philippines. Likewise, Porters 5 Forces as well as the Threats and Opportunities
for the Airline Industry are presented. The top 2 Airlines companies which are the
Philippine Airlines and Cebu Pacific, are illustrated to provide more insights as to the
strengths, challenges and competition in the industry. Recommendations for
improvement are also being given by the end of this paper.
2|Page
Market Structure
For 22 years, Philippines Airlines, being the first air transport company was able
to dominate the countrys domestic airline industry. The monopoly created control over
the domestic flight schedules, number of routes served, flight frequencies and fare.
Moreover, it also resulted inefficiency in the quality of service, since it was not tailored
to the demand. The airline was not concern to keep its service to certain standards to
keep and attract even more customers since it knows that passengers had no
alternatives. Left with no choice, travelers have to contend themselves of what PAL has
to offer.
Today, domestic air transport industry has
evolved
into
oligopolistic
structure.
The
liberalization under Executive Order 219 signaled
the entry of new airlines in the industry. The
bigger players, as defined by the size of their fleet
and aircrafts (Philippine Airlines, Cebu Pacific, and
Air Philippines) are concentrating on the major
trunklines where traffic demand is heavier while
smaller airlines (Zest Air and South East Asian
Airlines) are flying the secondary or tertiary/rural
routes where traffic demand is lighter.
In contrast, except for the number of sectors, much of the secondary and
tertiary routes were now slowly being penetrated by two of the major players (Cebu
Pacific and Philippine Airlines) with the launching of their new small fleet. The presence
of big carriers in secondary and tertiary routes could kill small carriers flying the said
routes. Competition comes in terms of comfort that a passenger obtains by flying bigger
airline and lower fare. Because the cost spread for bigger airlines is higher, they could
charge lower airfare than smaller airlines.
Cebu Pacific is providing PAL stiff competition in major trunklines. In 2007,
Gokongwei said Cebu Pacific had a 43 percent share of the domestic market while
Philippine Airlines had 39 percent and Air Philippines, 11 percent. Last year, CebuPac
had a load factor of 83 percent compared to PALs 79 percent and Air Philippines 73
percent.
The entry of new players resulted in intensive competition in the business.
Competition opens the air industry to travelers who previously could not afford to travel
by air by giving promotional and discounted fares. Furthermore, it provides passengers
a wide range of choices on departure schedules, facilities and service quality.
3|Page
The Government does not allow foreign carrier to fly the countrys
domestic routes, thus limit the domestic market to domestic airlines.
Brand Loyalty
This refers to the fall in average unit cost as the number of passengers
traveling on a particular route increases. This is achieved if an airline adds flights
in a route or seats on existing flights. If the incumbent airline is realizing
economies of density in a route, potential entrants are deterred from entry by
the choices available to them. That is, entry can be made either on a small scale
but with a significant cost disadvantage or on a large scale that is likely to
depress airfares significantly (Warren et. al., 1998).
Incumbent airlines possess some advantages that would prevent potential
entrants from achieving economies of density. One, incumbent airlines generally
have established interlining agreements1 with other airlines that could feed
connecting traffic into the route at issue. There are significant reductions in
transfer costs available for passengers who prefer interline travel. Potential
entrants would therefore have difficulty attracting this kind of passengers without
interlining arrangements. But making interlining arrangements could also prove
difficult and could put the potential entrants at a cost disadvantage. This would
require potential entrants to either duplicate the incumbents existing
arrangement or hire existing airlines who can provide feeder services. Most
likely, those who can provide feeder services are already committed to the
4|Page
incumbent airline and hence, would only be willing to shift loyalty if offered a
higher price (Warren, et. al., 1998).
The use of Computer Reservation Systems has also the potential to close
out potential players from the market of ticket sales. The CRS is a device that
can be used to save time and cost in handling the growing number of flight
reservations. With the existence of CSR, travel agencies can easily view the seat
allocation as well as the prices available of the certain airline. About 75 percent
of flights made through CRS are made from the first screen page of the CRS
(Hanlon, 1996). Thus, airlines displaying their seat availability on the first screen
of the page can be a vital source of competition.
5|Page
Fuel Costs
Next to Labor, fuel Cost is the second highest expense in the airline operations.
Prices of fuel tend to fluctuate on a monthly basis. The increase in the cost of jet fuel
will also increase the operating cost. Thus, monitoring the prices of fuel in the world
market is crucial.
Currently, major airline companies namely Philippine Airlines and Cebu Pacific are
slowly dominating the secondary and tertiary routes. Last year, the two airlines bought
6|Page
new smaller fleet to cater to the demand of the growing market in the cities with small
airports. The entry of these airlines can serve as a major threat to small players like
Zest Air and Seair who are previously capturing majority of the passengers. Moreover,
since CEB and PAL have larger aircrafts, the spread of cost is bigger. Hence, they have
more ability to charge lower airfare compared to the latter.
Aside from the domestic routes, Cebu Pacific and Philippine Airlines are
competing head to head in the international destinations. Cebu Pacific is increasing its
passenger traffic in the international scene with the launching of new routes and buying
more aircrafts.
The potential merger of Zest Air and Seair can strengthen the competition within
the industry. They plan to purchase additional aircraft to enter into the international
market and to streamline the redundant domestic destinations to cut down the costs.
7|Page
Government Intervention
The implementation of open skies policy can have an adverse effect on the
operations of local airline companies. Under the open skies policy, national
carrier would have the right to fly over a country without landing, to stop in
a country for refueling or maintenance without transferring passengers or
cargo, and to carry it from one country to another and vice-versa. There
was no limitation on airline designation,that even non-flag carriers can fly
there from multiple designations. (www.fingad.com).
Granting access
rights to foreign airlines has no clear guarantee that governments of the
participating foreign carriers would also grant the same concessions to
Philippine carriers.
Market Opportunities
Low Fare Concept
The Domestic Airline industry faces imminent
competition and price wars among the domestic
players.
Passengers are slowly accepting the
concept of the low cost carriers. To adapt to the
demand of the traveling public which is low cost and
high quality airline, the industry players are continuously reducing its
regular fares. Passengers can now enjoy all year round discounted fare by
planning and buying their tickets ahead of time. The advance booking is a
8|Page
major boost for any airline as it allows them to better forecast passenger
volume and maximize revenues on a per flight concept. More importantly,
the new low fare concept will able to capture a good fraction of the
alternative sea transportation market, therefore, further growing their base
market.
Complimentary industry like tourism will increase the demand for airline
service. A high volume of tourist arrivals means a high probability of
tourists taking the air as a mode of transportation to explore the available
tourist spots in the country. The increasing passenger traffic in cities like
Busuanga and Caticlan can be attributed to the growing number of tourists.
Airline companies locally are starting to build partnership with hotels and
resorts creating tour packages to cater to the demand of both local and
foreign tourists.
9|Page
10 | P a g e
Cebu Pacific
Company Background
Cebu Pacific (CEB), a subsidiary of the Gokongweis JG Summit Holdings, is the low fare
leader in the Philippines. Launched in 1996, it became the countrys leading domestic
carrier with the most number of flights and routes. It now flies to more than 30
domestic points and 15 Asian Cities.
CEB now operates the youngest fleet in the country with 21 Airbus and seven ATR 72500 aircrafts.
11 | P a g e
Market Outlook
Throughout the world, the air transport industry experienced radical changes
since the 1980s to meet the emergence of air traffic as a result of the ever-increasing
integration of economies. From government owned or
supported to independent, for-profit public companies,
has been the pattern of ownership. To increase the
efficiency of the industry, reforms were made through
deregulation and liberalization towards decreasing
restrictions on competition.
The overall trend of demand to the Airline Industry has been consistently
increasing. It can be seen that there would be more competition and greater pricing
freedom. This will result in lower fares and sometimes dramatic spurts in traffic growth.
The industry has been observed to be repeating in its financial performance. Four or
five years of poor earnings proceed five or six years of improvement. But profitability
even in the good years is generally low. In times of profit, the airlines will lease new
generations of airplanes and upgrade services in response to higher demand.
The entry of five new players in the industry, namely, Cebu Pacific Air, Air
Philippines, Asian Spirit, Mindanao Express and Grand International Airways resulted to
a strong and tough competition in the domestic flights. As the new airlines grow, PAL
suffered a significant decline in market shares. Air Philippines and Cebu Pacific are
currently PALs stiff competition in terms of the domestic flights.
However, even with the increased competition in the domestic air industry, this
gave travellers lower airfares. The outcome is the rapid growth in domestic travel. PAL,
however, still charges the highest fare. This picture shows that competition in the
industry enables the more efficient, low-cost airlines to operate at fares lower than precompetition days and yet continued to be profitable.
There would be only a small number of big efficient airlines in the long run to
survive, should a financial problem in the industry occurs. The Airlines with continued
12 | P a g e
losses could force them to withdraw or exit from the industry or merge with those
profitable.
Merger and acquisition is also an area for competition in the Airline Industry.
Though domestic traffic in the country is relatively minute, there is a limit to the
number of airlines that would make an efficient domestic airline industry. Considering
that only two of the airlines are currently profitable, the intense competition in the
industry could lead the airlines into merger and consolidation. Similarly, merger and
consolidation could be a fast solution to the problem of local ownership requirement
and huge capital requirement of the new entrants to be able to fly international routes.
Still, a defined policy on mergers and consolidation should be established so as not to
result in reduced service, less competition and decreased efficiency. It should always
keep in mind that these mergers and consolidation are done for the interests of the
travelling public.
13 | P a g e
Recommendations
Though is it apparent that the Airline industry is
continually growing, the Philippine Airline companies
as well as the government should always think of
ways to improve and sustain the industry.
Philippines as we all know is an archipelago and
the most efficient way to travel would be by Air,
domestically and especially internationally. They
may benchmark this with other countries with the
same archipelagic setting. Improving the Airline
industry would entail growth to other economic
areas, more importantly on Tourism.
On the domestic side, there are areas in the Philippines where travel by Air is still
not viable, though necessary. Airline companies do not venture to these locations due
to financial constraints. The government should act upon this to enable growth to that
location. They may provide incentives to encourage these companies to fly to that
location, like reduced taxes. However, if the government will provide incentives, the
policy of that should be designed not to reduce competition and efficiency. Again, the
policies should always be for the benefit of the Travellers.
Competition
between
the
Airline
companies is also a way to make improvements
to the industry in which the government has the
major role to facilitate competition. Of course, if
there is competition, these companies would not
be complacent and would constantly think of
ways to improve their service in order to continue
being profitable. Airlines could invest heavily in
the quality of service that they offer, both on the
ground and in the air. They can enhance their
Ticketless travel, new interactive entertainment
14 | P a g e
systems, and more comfortable seating. When these Airline companies are able to
make outstanding services and product enhancements, these will attract foreign
investments, trade and tourism.
Improving the airports could help tremendously in the progress of the Airline
industry. Though this will take a lot of effort, time and money, this improvement would
definitely contribute so much to the advancement of the industry. With a much efficient
airport, there would be fewer delays in flight and much less congestion on the air
traffic. This would provide more flights as well as create more jobs not only to the
Airplane staff, but also to the ground operations including
those in construction and maintenance.
15 | P a g e
ones. So the more passengers there are, demand will increase as well, creating more
transactions and business to these airline companies. But then, the Airline companies
should retain the airworthiness of the aircraft so people would not be frightened of
travelling by air. Sustaining the integrity and reliability of the aircraft, at the same time
having a reasonably low fare would certainly drive up the market for the airline
industry.
16 | P a g e
Manila Cebu
Airline
PAL
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
751,276
881,596
981,781
987,963
994,961
464,559
512,601
500,973
679,303
845,574
99,571
45,224
51,005
29,170
47,065
1,315,406
1,439,421
1,533,759
1,696,436
1,887,600
CEB
Others
Total
Passengers
Manila Davao
Airline
PAL
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
437,383
521,023
529,575
570,705
585,082
260,739
302,691
306,526
361,960
448,821
65,148
61,279
58,024
86,279
104,359
763,270
884,993
894,125
1,018,944
1,138,262
CEB
Others
Total
Passengers
Manila Iloilo
Airline
PAL
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
243,242
264,495
288,768
306,854
332,888
173,267
191,402
155,045
238,336
323,685
151,982
161,620
154,862
181,365
193,008
568,491
617,517
598,675
726,555
849,581
CEB
Others
Total
Passengers
17 | P a g e
Manila Cagayan
Airline
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
PAL
276,227
315,052
321,870
301,531
316,414
133,068
145,359
119,296
205,477
320,677
41,566
55,771
46,821
77,325
105,672
450,861
516,182
487,987
584,333
742,763
2005
2006
2007
CEB
Others
Total
Passengers
Manila Bacolod
Airline
PAL
2003
2004
227,704
249,169
269,584
282,417
294,066
164,738
187,390
153,716
243,860
307,164
38,340
46,348
47,628
58,142
68,893
430,782
482,907
470,928
584,419
670,123
CEB
Others
Total
Passengers
18 | P a g e
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
Singapore
Airline
PAL
2003
2004
110,606
CEB
Total
Passengers
2005
170,932
-
110,606
246,658
-
2006
2007
233,877
257,129
39,810
173,182
273,687
430,311
170,932
246,658
Hong Kong
Airline
PAL
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
411,304
514,539
594,426
584,846
690,574
130,164
123,103
134,451
259,612
377,877
541,468
637,642
728,877
844,458
1,068,451
CEB
Total
Passengers
Seoul
Airline
PAL
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
161,817
190,875
222,667
233,877
236,051
37,658
61,511
81,769
93,963
190,482
199,475
252,386
304,436
327,840
426,533
2006
2007
153,554
172,304
2,749
79,287
156,303
251,591
CEB
Total
Passengers
Bangkok
Airline
PAL
2003
2004
84,725
CEB
Total
Passengers
2005
109,049
-
84,725
152,985
-
109,049
152,985
Taipei
Airline
PAL
2003
46,440
CEB
2004
74,602
2005
81,436
2006
84,157
2007
90,529
44,971
Total Passengers
46,440
74,602
81,436
84,157
135,500
21 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
84,725
109,049
152,985
153,554
172,304
411,304
514,539
594,426
584,846
690,574
218,618
310,323
282,887
284,026
306,671
200,195
244,577
270,003
228,582
253,815
161,817
190,875
222,667
212,871
236,051
110,606
234,347
246,658
233,877
257,129
217,981
261,168
265,166
254,986
254,030
50,131
72,265
84,785
74,130
101,945
Hong Kong
Los Angeles
San
Francisco
Seoul
Singapore
Tokyo
Shanghai
24 | P a g e
References
Austria M S. The state of competition and market structure of the Philippine air
transport industry. PASCN Discussion Paper No. 2000-12. PASCN Discussion Paper
Series 2000. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Department of Transportation and Communications, Civil Aeronautics Board, 2009. Data
& Statistics of Airlines International and Domestic Pax.
Hanlon, Pat, 1996. Global Airlines, Competition in a Transnational Industry,
Butterworth-Heinemann, Great Britain.
Warren,Tony, Tamms, Vanessa and Findlay, Christopher, 1999. Beyond the Bilateral
System: Competition Policy and Trade in International Aviation Services, PECC Trade
Policy Forum, Auckland.
www.philippineairlines.com
www.cebupacificair.com
www.wikipedia.org
25 | P a g e