0% found this document useful (0 votes)
89 views11 pages

Creating and Examining Algorithm-Generated Bus Routes New

This document summarizes a study that tested algorithm-generated bus routes against existing routes to evaluate efficiency. Data on existing routes was collected and input into optimization algorithms in Excel and Google Maps. Five routes were tested, finding the algorithm routes averaged 3.2 fewer minutes and 0.9 fewer miles. Statistical analysis found this 2.3 minute reduction in time was significant. The conclusion is that algorithm-generated routes provide a more efficient solution.

Uploaded by

api-254898060
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
89 views11 pages

Creating and Examining Algorithm-Generated Bus Routes New

This document summarizes a study that tested algorithm-generated bus routes against existing routes to evaluate efficiency. Data on existing routes was collected and input into optimization algorithms in Excel and Google Maps. Five routes were tested, finding the algorithm routes averaged 3.2 fewer minutes and 0.9 fewer miles. Statistical analysis found this 2.3 minute reduction in time was significant. The conclusion is that algorithm-generated routes provide a more efficient solution.

Uploaded by

api-254898060
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Creating and Examining AlgorithmGenerated Bus Routes to Improve

Efficiency
ELI HORNER

Research Question
COULD A SYSTEM OF ALGORITHMGENERATED BUS ROUTES REDUCE THE
AMOUNT OF TIME AND/OR DISTANCE THE
BUS MUST TRAVEL TO COMPLETE THE
ROUTE?

Background/Scientific Thought
One study3 showed that compared to human-

generated routes, computerized software produced a


route that was more efficient in time and distance for
a certain school.
Other studies1 discuss the use of different algorithm
and programs for vehicle routing, and their
comparative effectiveness.
This problem is considered a variation of the
travelling salesman problem.

Background (Continued)
According to the United States Bureau of Labor

Statistics, the school bus driver profession is growing


at a rate of about 6% per year.

This is at least as fast as the average job growth for all


profession in the economy
This means that the demand for school buses should continue
to increase, making the project more significant.

Design and Methodology


First, data on the routes from the 2014-2015 school

year were collected from the District 5 Director of


Transportation, David Weissman.
Testing occurred at Chapin High School and at the
Horner residence.
The two algorithms used for testing were:
1.
2.

Optimization functions using the Microsoft Excel Solver Feature


The Google Maps Directions API (with waypoints)

The data was input into both of the systems


The result routes were then obtained

Data
Five routes have been tested so far.
The average difference in minutes between the

current and algorithm generated routes was 3.2


minutes.
The average difference in miles between the current
and algorithm generated routes was 0.9 miles.

Excel Data
Sheet

Shows stops and


distances and time
between them

Time and distance


data from Google
Maps

Data used to run


algorithm in Excel

Map Showing
Algorithm
Route

Path highlighted in
blue

Stops have
numbered flags

Shows same order as


both Excel Solver
and Google Maps
API Algorithms

Analysis of Data
A one sample t-test was run on the data to determine

significance.
Ho: There is no significant difference between the current and

algorithm generated routes


Ha: There is a significant difference between the current and
algorithm generated routes
The t-value was found to be 2.997
The p-value was found to be 0.040
Because the p-value was less than 0.05, the H a can be accepted at

the 95% significance level.

Conclusions
BECAUSE OF THE AVERAGE 2.3 MINUTE
REDUCTION IN TIME COMPARED TO THE
CURRENT ROUTE, THE CURRENT
CONCLUSION IS THAT THE ALGORITHMGENERATED ROUTE OFFERS THE MOST
EFFICIENT SOLUTION FOR THE ROUTE.

Citations
Bowerman, R., Hall, B., & Calamai, P. (1995, March). A multi-objective optimization approach to urban school bus routing:
Formulation and solution method. Retrieved from
http://www.sciencedirect.com/
1

Chandrakantha, L. (n.d.). Using Excel solver in optimization problems. Retrieved November 11, 2015, from
http://archives.math.utk.edu/ICTCM/VOL23/C006/paper.pdf
2

Eldrandaly, K. A., & Abdallah, A. F. (2012). A novel GIS-based decision-making framework for the school bus routing
problem [Abstract]. Geo-Spatial Information Sciences, 15(1), 51-59.
3

Geem, Z. W., Lee, K. S., & Park, Y. (2005). Application of harmony search to vehicle routing. American
Sciences, 2(12), 1552-1557. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2005.1552.1557
4

Graham, D. (2010, September 09). Tips for enhancing efficiency. Retrieved from

Journal of Applied

http://www.schoolbusfleet.com/

Laporte, G. (2002, June 25). The vehicle routing problem: An overview of exact and approximate algorithms. Retrieved
from http://www.sciencedirect.com/
6

Park, J., & Kim, B. (2010, January). The school bus routing problem: A review. Retrieved from
http://www.researchgate.net/
7

Ropke, S. (2005). December 2007. Note Book. doi:10.1515/9781400865567-005

Schittekat, P., Sevaux, M., & Sorensen, K. (2006). A mathematical formulation for a school bus routing problem. Retrieved
from http://www.researchgate.net/
9

10

Solomon, M. (1997, April 1). Article Tools. Retrieved from

http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/opre.35.2.254

You might also like