Sarah Becker observed a 5th grade math class where she implemented centers to teach division. She differentiated the centers to accommodate varying skill levels. Most students were engaged in the hands-on activities. While classroom management was generally good, some students had to be removed from centers for misbehaving. The centers promoted higher-order thinking and used a variety of teaching strategies. Becker would keep the centers but change to using a rubric for grading student work at each center.
Sarah Becker observed a 5th grade math class where she implemented centers to teach division. She differentiated the centers to accommodate varying skill levels. Most students were engaged in the hands-on activities. While classroom management was generally good, some students had to be removed from centers for misbehaving. The centers promoted higher-order thinking and used a variety of teaching strategies. Becker would keep the centers but change to using a rubric for grading student work at each center.
Sarah Becker observed a 5th grade math class where she implemented centers to teach division. She differentiated the centers to accommodate varying skill levels. Most students were engaged in the hands-on activities. While classroom management was generally good, some students had to be removed from centers for misbehaving. The centers promoted higher-order thinking and used a variety of teaching strategies. Becker would keep the centers but change to using a rubric for grading student work at each center.
Sarah Becker observed a 5th grade math class where she implemented centers to teach division. She differentiated the centers to accommodate varying skill levels. Most students were engaged in the hands-on activities. While classroom management was generally good, some students had to be removed from centers for misbehaving. The centers promoted higher-order thinking and used a variety of teaching strategies. Becker would keep the centers but change to using a rubric for grading student work at each center.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Name ____________Sarah Becker________________________
Date of Observation_______September 30 2015__________________
Placement _____5th Grade Math DCS Mrs. Rios___________________________ In each box, reflect on the questions provided and provide detailed responses.
Planning and Preparation
Classroom Environment
Did you design instruction that supports
the students varying intellectual, social, emotional, and physical needs? How did you differentiate?
Were student actively engaged and
motivated? What indicated engagement or lack there of?
Each of the 4 centers had different levels of
difficulty, in hopes that each student would go to a center in their ZPD. The Figure Me Out center was the most difficult because students had to create their own division problems. The next most difficult center was Division Battle because it was totally as to what numbers the students would be dividing. The Division Board Game had basic division problems for struggling students. The last center was with Mrs. Rios. She retaught division with each group in hopes of pulling up the low students. Additionally, because each center was 15 mins long, students had the opportunity to move around as they needed to. Centers were done as a group with 3-5 other students so this activity was a interpersonal assignment. We had several students who had a hard time working with others that had to be pulled out to work by themselves.
Did you lesson and activities full
address/support the learning objective? Yes, one of the learning objectives for this unit was that students are able to divide using the standard method. All of the centers emphasized and reinforced this skill.
A vast majority of the students were engaged and
motivated at most of the centers. At the end of each center, I had students turn in their trash work. I looked through all of the papers. If the students did not have work written down as much as other members of their group or class, I knew that they were not on task. If this was the case, I decreased their participation grade. Additionally, I walked around to each of the centers to ensure that they were running smoothly. If the students were not engaged, I redirected them and helped them to get back on task.
Identify areas of strength and weakness
in regard to classroom management. In general, the classes were very well behaved because they were interested in the activities. However, if students chose to misbehave, they were taken out of the centers and given a pack of division worksheets to complete. I did not enjoy pulling students out of the centers because I know that most students enjoy hands on work more than worksheets but for the benefit of the whole group, it was best to take out students who were misbehaving.
Instructional Strategies
Reflection
What strategies did you use to promote
higher ordered thinking?
What aspects of your lesson would you
keep you the same? Why?
During the Figure Me Out center, students had
to create division problems to answer a quotient that they had created. This encouraged students to think out of the box. They had to solve division problems backwards.
I would keep all of the same centers that I
created. After the end of the week, almost all of the students showed improvement after taking a 5 min division assessment on Monday and Friday. I think the centers helped the students to stay interested because they were fun and had different levels of difficulty.
Did you incorporate a variety of teaching
strategies? Which ones and how? Centers is a great way to incorporate different teaching strategies. Students participated in hands-on games within their center groups . This means that they had to work together with other students to complete the tasks. They also did hands-on activities instead of the normal visual/oral teaching style that I use.
What aspects of your lesson would you
change? Why? I would have created a grading rubric for completing each center. The grading was difficult because it was subjective to what I saw in class and did not always reflect what was actually going on. I would have graded each student on effort, productivity, and ability to work with others. Each center would have a grading scale based on each of these categories.