Slo-2015 1
Slo-2015 1
Slo-2015 1
Rationale:(Why did you choose this outcome? Why is this an appropriate area of focus? How does your outcome align to the common core?)
I selected this outcome because the MAP assessment aligns directly to the common core and reflects the skills and concepts that each student needs
to learn, develop and reinforce. The goal of 65% reflects a priority need in the 2015-2016 School Progress Plan for Featherbed Lane Elementary
School. With the implementation of Common Core State Standards (CCSS), students need to demonstrate rigorous level of performance and growth
overtime. This will enable students to develop College and Career Readiness Skills in order to become globally competitive graduates.
Students:(Which class/subject/content are you identifying? Are all students included in this outcome? If not, why?)
The attached list of students (who entered at the beginning of the 2015-2016 school year) will be the target of this outcome.
Interval of Instruction:(Must be completed by the last duty day of February.)
September 2015- February 2016
Target(s) & Evidence:(Where do you expect this population of students to be at the end of the interval of instruction? What evidence are you going
to use to measure student learning? At least one source of evidence is required, but multiple sources may be used. If a common assessment exists, it
must be used as the primary source of evidence.)
Students will demonstrate:
The winter MAP goals will be used to determine the growth of the students selected. See the attached list of target scores for individual student
growth. Based on the attached spreadsheet, the goals have been broken down by skill and goal setting score. For evidence, I will use DIBELS
progress monitoring, BCPS culminating events for Units 1-3, and sight word testing.
Basic Growth Target
Simple Average Growth Calculation
Tiered Growth Target
Advanced Tiered Growth Target
Rationale for Target:(How was this target chosen? How did you determine that it is a rigorous target? What pre-test or baseline information, if
any, informed your decision?) This target was chosen based on the goal setting worksheets provided by NWEA and individual students Fall MAP
scores (see attached). The 65% was set as a rigorous target because in 2014-2015, only 40% made the growth target for reading. The baseline for this
target is the Fall MAP Reading assessment.
Baltimore County Public Schools
Calculator
June 2015
Administration & Scoring:(How will assessments be administered? How will assessments be scored?)
For the evidence of student learning, DIBELS progress monitoring will be administered every 15 days of instruction, high frequency words will be
assessed quarterly, and the BCPS culminating events will be given at the end of each unit and scored according to the BCPS provided rubric. The
MAP winter assessment will determine the overall growth of students. The assessment is computer adaptive and will be administered in a classroom
setting or the computer lab. The scores are automatically computed and are available via report.
Approval of Outcome:(Evaluator should rate the Student Learning Outcome in the following categories. Outcomes rated as unacceptable in a
category should be revised and submitted. *Use SLO approval rubric attached for guidance.)
DRAFT
(Once the above information has been discussed and agreed upon by the teacher and the administrator, please sign below.)
Principal/Assistant Principal:_____________________________________________Date:__________________
Teacher:_____________________________________________________________Date:__________________
Mid-Interval: (Teacher may request to meet with an administrator to discuss progress of SLO.)
Mid SLO Conference Requested: No
Yes Date:___________________________ (if yes, comment below)
Comments (Adaptations/Revisions should be noted here.)
Principal/Assistant Principal:_____________________________________________Date:__________________
Teacher:_____________________________________________________________Date:__________________
Reflection: (Teacher explains evidence of student learning. How many targets were met? To what degree were targets met? Teacher should prepare
to share evidence of learning. Additional data reports may be included or attached to reflect results.)
1. My SLO target was _____%. After examining the evidence/data it is determined that ____ out of ____ total students met this target, therefore _____% of
my students met this target.
____ points earned for this SLO
2. Did your students perform as you anticipated? If so, what fostered their success? If not, what may have contributed to the lack of growth?
3. Will you choose the same SLO next year? Please explain why? Why not?
4. What have you learned from this experience? How would you approach this process differently next year?
Scoring: (The evaluator should check the box that best indicates the teachers attainment of this student learning outcome. Individual ratings should
serve as the basis for an overall rating using the*SLO Calculator, see below.)
What percentage of the target did the teacher meet? 90%-100% 80%-89% 70%-79% 60%69% Below 60%
Baltimore County Public Schools
Calculator
June 2015
Principal/Assistant Principal:_____________________________________________Date:__________________
Teacher:_____________________________________________________________Date:__________________
SLO Calculator
SLO TARGET
100%
95%
90%
85%
80%
75%
70%
90-100
86-95
81-90
77-85
72-80
68-75
63-70
65%
60%
55%
50%
59-65
54-60
50-55
45-50
DRAFT
80-89
76-85
72-80
68-76
64-71
60-67
56-62
52-58
48-53
44-49
40-44
70-79
67-75
63-71
60-67
56-63
53-59
49-55
46-51
42-47
39-43
36-39
60-69
57-66
54-62
51-59
48-55
45-52
42-48
39-45
36-41
33-38
30-35
< 60
< 57
< 54
< 51
< 48
< 45
< 42
< 39
< 36
< 33
< 30
Points Earned/Student
Performance
25 points
90-100% of target met
20 points
80-89% of target met
15 points
70-79% of target met
10 points
60-69% of target met
5 points
Less than 60% of target met
No data provided
0
Determining the number of points earned for each SLO is based on the percentage of the SLO target that is met. The above chart
establishes the number of points earned for each SLO based on the percent of students who meet the target.
Example: (SLO Target set in increments of 10 or 5 similar to the chart above):
1. Identify the SLO Target in blue. (Principal or teacher establishes a SLO where 95% of students are to meet a target in
mathematics.)
2. Review SLO evidence. After examining evidence, it is determined that 71% of students met the mathematics target.
3. Find the box under the blue SLO Target of 95% in which 71% falls. Follow that row to the gray Points Earned column on the
right to determine how many points have been earned for this SLO.
SLO points = 15 points.
Rationale
Students
Interval of
Instruction
What is the
expectation for student
improvement? What
content will the SLO
target?
Describes a broad
goal for student
learning and
expected student
improvement
Reflects high
expectations for
student
improvement and
aims for mastery
or progress
towards mastery
of content or
critical skill
development
Is identified as a
progress or
mastery goal
Specifies how
the SLO will
address
applicable
standards (ex:
Common Core
standards,
Maryland State
Standards or
National
Standards)
Identifies the
subject/content and
number of
students covered
by the SLO
Describes the
student population
and considers any
contextual factors
that may impact
student growth
If students are
excluded, explains
which students,
why they are
excluded and if
they are covered in
another SLO
Must be
completed by
the last duty
day of February
Specifies start
and stop dates
DRAFT