Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 44 views

    Before The President, Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Gurgaon

    Uploaded by

    Nishant Ahlawat
    The respondent denies the claims made by the complainant in their written statement to the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum. They argue that the complaint has no merit and is an attempt to coerce the respondent into providing a new air conditioner. The respondent also denies receiving any legal notice from the complainant and maintains that they are committed to providing consumer services.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Before The President, Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Gurgaon

    Uploaded by

    Nishant Ahlawat
    44 views2 pages
    The respondent denies the claims made by the complainant in their written statement to the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum. They argue that the complaint has no merit and is an attempt to coerce the respondent into providing a new air conditioner. The respondent also denies receiving any legal notice from the complainant and maintains that they are committed to providing consumer services.

    Original Description:

    Written Statement of Consumer Complaint

    Original Title

    Upload

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The respondent denies the claims made by the complainant in their written statement to the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum. They argue that the complaint has no merit and is an attempt to coerce the respondent into providing a new air conditioner. The respondent also denies receiving any legal notice from the complainant and maintains that they are committed to providing consumer services.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    44 views2 pages

    Before The President, Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Gurgaon

    Uploaded by

    Nishant Ahlawat
    The respondent denies the claims made by the complainant in their written statement to the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum. They argue that the complaint has no merit and is an attempt to coerce the respondent into providing a new air conditioner. The respondent also denies receiving any legal notice from the complainant and maintains that they are committed to providing consumer services.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM,

    GURGAON
    In RE:
    SUMIT YADAV VERSUS M/S DGS ELECTRONICS
    WRITTEN STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO 2

    Sir,
    It is respectfully submitted as under:Preliminary Legal Objections
    1. That at the outset no cause of action is made out whatsoever, hence sans
    cause of action /merit, this application deserves dismissal on this ground
    itself.
    2. That it is a crystal clear case of Applicant/Petitioners attempt to get the
    process and procedures of this honble forum initiated out of complainants
    whims and preferences. His sole intent is to extort and coerce the
    respondents to get a new AC from the answering Respondent.
    On Merits
    1. Contents of Para 1 to 3 dont need any reply for want of knowledge of the
    answering Respondent in absence of any documents being supplied.
    2. Contents of Para no.4 as made out are wrong, incorrect and are denied. It is
    incorrect that the abovesaid AC is not giving satisfactory services and fro that
    the complaint was lodged by the Complainant with the Opposite Party. It is
    incorrect that AC is not cooling and giving hot air instead of cool air. The
    complainant had deliberately tried to misguide this honble forum with
    confusing words and statements. It is further stated that Complainant has
    1

    further omitted to place the important documents before this Honble Forum
    while concealing the facts from the Honble Forum.
    3. Contents of Para no.5 as made out are wrong, incorrect and are denied
    however it is clearly stated that Complainant has not supplied any documents
    to answering respondent. However it is pertinent to mention here that
    answering respondent is a company of ethics and is committed to provide
    consumer centric services, while not even a complaint reference number has
    been cited or mentioned by the complainant , it itself establishes that sole this
    complaint has been purely filed out of whims of the complainant.
    4. Contents of Para no.6 as made out are wrong, incorrect and are denied.
    Answering respondent never received any Legal notice from the complainant.
    However it is pertinent to mention here that the complainant was never denied
    valid and committed services for with his grievances if he had one.
    5. Contents of para no.7 as made out are wrong, incorrect and are denied. A t

    the outset no cause of action is made out whatsoever,


    hence sans cause of action /merit, this application
    deserves dismissal on this ground itself.
    Respondent No 2
    Gurgaon
    29 May 2015
    Through Counsel

    You might also like