Scribd
Upload
24 views9 pages

Results

The document compares the performance of three routing protocols (AODV, AOMDV, MAODV) across four node density scenarios (50 nodes, 100 nodes, 150 nodes, 200 nodes) based on several metrics: - Throughput decreases and end-to-end delay increases as node density increases for all three protocols. MAODV consistently has the highest throughput and lowest delay. - Packet delivery ratio and residual energy are highest for MAODV across all node densities, followed by AOMDV, with AODV having the lowest values. - In general, MAODV outperforms the other two protocols for all metrics as node density increases in the network.

Uploaded by

Alex Hill
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views9 pages

Results

The document compares the performance of three routing protocols (AODV, AOMDV, MAODV) across four node density scenarios (50 nodes, 100 nodes, 150 nodes, 200 nodes) based on several metrics: - Throughput decreases and end-to-end delay increases as node density increases for all three protocols. MAODV consistently has the highest throughput and lowest delay. - Packet delivery ratio and residual energy are highest for MAODV across all node densities, followed by AOMDV, with AODV having the lowest values. - In general, MAODV outperforms the other two protocols for all metrics as node density increases in the network.

Uploaded by

Alex Hill
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

50 nodes

100 nodes
150 nodes
200 nodes

AODV
AOMDV
1997.45 1487.27
1985.29 1468.41
1957.84 1449.18
1966.86 1431.74

2500
2000
1500

Throughput (kbps)

1000
500

0
50 no

MAODV
2500
2230.9
2203.21
2173.77
2000
2147.6

roughput (kbps)

1500
AODV

1000

AOMDV
MAODV

500
0
50 nodes

100 nodes

150 nodes

Node Density

200 nodes

AODV
50nodes
98.78
100nodes
91.31
150nodes
79.57
200nodes
82.76
Packet Delivery Ratio( %)

120
AOMDV
MAODV
93.68
98.81
100
80.36
92.09
72.77
82.91
80
66.97
83.31

cket Delivery Ratio( %)

60

AODV
AOMDV

40

MAODV

20
0
50nodes 100nodes 150nodes 200nodes
Node Density

81

80

AODV
80
50nodes
80.53052
100nodes 80.51058
Residual Energy(Joule) 80
150nodes 80.14394
80
200nodes 80.37994

79

79
5

81.2
81
80.8

AOMDV
MAODV
80.6
80.21986 80.45356
80.98198 80.4742
sidual Energy(Joule) 80.4
80.48255 80.45442
80.2
80.94366 80.3916

AODV
AOMDV
MAODV

80

79.8
79.6
50nodes

100nodes

150nodes

Node Density

200nodes

AODV
AOMDV
50nodes
143.958 130.774
100nodes
143.037 117.021
150nodes
166.109 117.763
200nodes
137.803 117.313

180
160
140

MAODV
145.304
130.204
130.848
130.348

120
100
End to End Delay (ms)

AODV

80

AOMDV

60

MAODV

40
20
0
50nodes

100nodes

150nodes

Node density

200nodes

200nodes

AODV
AOMDV
MAODV

You might also like