Project Title
Project Title
Project Title
Background
The move into higher education can be challenging for all students. International students
face additional challenges including those relating to adjustment, cultural differences and
language difficulties. These issues have the potential to impact on mental health. Although
some studies suggest that International students are less likely to experience poor mental
health than their local counterparts (Said, Kypri, & Bowman, 2013), most studies indicate
that the reverse is true. International students are more likely to experience distress (Lu,
Farran, Johnston, Wootton & Titov, 2014) and anxiety (Rosthenthall, Russell & Thomson,
2008) than domestic students.
English proficiency and academic success both act as protective factors (Roshethal, Russell
& Thomson, 2008; Wong, Jourbert & Chan, 2007). Forbes-Mewett and Sawyer (2011) and
Pan, Wong, Jobert, and Chan (2007) agree that differences in culture play a big role. Students
who expect a transmissionist style of education and come from cultures where the group is
valued may find it incredibly hard to adapt to an education system where individualism is
more dominant but that paradoxically socially constructivist approaches to education are
used. This suggests that cultural competence in International students is helpful as it makes it
easier for students to understand pedagogical approaches in Australia.
Cultural competence is also an issue for domestic students. The beliefs, behaviours and
feelings of local students can impact on how welcome International students feel. Bianchi
(2013) draws a link between feeling unwelcome and loneliness among International students.
Jia-Yan, Wong, Joubert (2007), Kashmia & Loh (2006) and Lin (2012) all agree that
relationships play a vital role in promoting feelings of connectedness among International
students and their overall mental health.
Aims of the study
The aims of the study include:
Identifying possible links between social support and mental health and how these
Improving the capacity of course designers to build inclusive curriculum and employ
pedagogical approaches that bring students from diverse backgrounds together for
mutual benefit
Improving the capacity of educators to facilitate courses that are designed to build
Part 1
The first part of this research plan involves an assessment of students from an earlier teaching
period who have studied the unit and are now studying at a second year level. A comparative
design will be used to establish whether the relationship between social support, mental well
being and cultural competence.
Participants
Potential participants are 1490 students who were enrolled in a first year onboarding subject
on Communication and Scholarship in teaching period 2, 2015 and submitted at least one
assessable task. Data about age and gender will be drawn from Salesforce (the database
where student records are retained)
Materials
Each participant will be provided with a link to an electronic survey (using Google Forms).
This survey will contain a plan language statement, a demographic questionnaire, the General
(GH) Subscale of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36v2) (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992);
Modified Cultural Competency Self-assessment Questionnaire (M-CCSAQ); the Depression
and Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS 21) (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1985) and the
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet & Farley, 1988).
Demographic questionnaire: A demographic questionnaire will be used to elicit information
about gender, age, language spoken at home, status as an International or domestic student,
highest level of educational attainment prior to enrolment, marital status, socioeconomic
status (as measured by income), employment status (number of hours worked each week) and
other responsibilities (caring for children, caring for parents, community responsibilities)
General (GH) Subscale of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36v2): This survey is
designed to be used with all people. It captures information beliefs about ones health now, in
the future and in comparison with others.
Modified Cultural Competency Self-assessment Questionnaire (M-CCSAQ): This survey
covers the general concept of culture, specific cultural content, stereotyping and racism and
access. This survey has been shown to have content validity and internal consistency (Godkin
& Savageau, 2001).
Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS 21): This survey is designed to assess
depression, anxiety and stress. This survey is suitable for clinical populations and members of
the wider population.
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Support: This instrument contains three subscales
relating to different types of social support. A 7 point Likert scale is used to assess the degree
to which students feel supported by different categories of social support.
Data analysis: Bivariate correlational analysis will be conducted to identify possible
confounding demographic variables including general heath and well being. Bivariate
correlational analysis will also be used to identify whether any significant relationships exist
between the three key variables of interest: Social support, mental health and cultural
competence. Hierarchical regression will also be used to see whether social support is a
predictor of mental health. A step wise hierarchical regression will also be used to identify the
relative contribution of cultural competence and social support to mental health.
Part 2
A Participatory Action Research will be used to evaluate current practices and identify areas
for development. This will include a number of stages:
Stage 1 Working with a group of facilitators to identify:
The participants will be 4 to 6 educators with experience delivering the first year unit
(Communication and Scholarship) focussed on in part 1. These will be selected from a pool
of existing teaching staff on a volunteer basis. If possible, the educators will vary in age,
background and ethnicity. The information will be gained through semi-structured
interviews.
Stage 2 Working with students (International and local) to identify:
Positive and negative experiences associated with interacting with others from other
setting
Factors that act as barriers to interaction with people from other cultures in an
educational setting
The participants will be a mix of International and local students who have studies in the unit
Communication and Scholarship. Information will be gained through one to one interviews.
Stage 3 Developing a set of draft guidelines utilising the information gleaned in stages 1
and 2
Stage 4 Communication with the lead Instructional designer to identify ways in which the
unit may be improved to better create links between students from culturally diverse
backgrounds.
It is also probable that students engaged in their learning will be more likely to respond to
surveys and participant in interviews. As such, there is a likelihood that the results will be
skewed and not indicative of the broader student cohort.
Administration of the research (including resource requirements / budget, timetable)
Resource requirements
The following resources are required:
Budget requirements
Most activities fall within the scope of normal quality assurance and continuous improvement
processes. Students and staff are routinely interviewed and the information is feedback to all
stakeholders as part of the unit review process. As such, most of the research would not
require additional expenditure.
There are exceptions, notably:
38 hours in part 1
38 hours in part 2
The hourly wage for a suitably qualified person is $45. With on-costs (superannuation and
HR costs) of 30%, the real cost per hour would be $58.50 bringing the total costs to
$4446.00.
Some translation work may be required particularly the plain language statement. It is
envisaged that this would take no more than 2 hours. Translating the plain language into the
following community languages: Mandarin, Cantonese, Vietnamese and Hindi would cost
$85 per translation at a total of $340.
Timeframe
Part
Part 1
Teaching period
Teaching period 1
2016
Part 2
Teaching period
Week
Week 1
Week 4
Week 5
Action
Seek ethics approval
Download data from Salesforce
Email participants with details about the
Week 8
Week 9
Weeks 10 to 11
Week 12
Weeks 1 to 3
Weeks 4 to 6
facilitators
Stage 2 Working with students
Weeks 7 to 9
2, 2016
Teaching period 3
Weeks 1 to 6
Debrief participants
Stage 5 - Redesign unit
2016
Weeks 7 to 9
Teaching period 1
Weeks 10 to 12
draft unit
Stage 5 (Continued) Refine draft unit
Weeks 1 to 12
Weeks 1 to 7
2017
Part 3
Teaching 2, 2018
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (20111). 4102.0 Australian Social Trends, Dec 2011. Retrieved
from
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features20Dec+2011
Bianchi, C. (2013). Satisfiers and dissatisfiers for international students of higher education: an
exploratory study in Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4),
396-409
Forbes-Mewett, H. and Sawyer, A-M. (2011) Mental Health Issues amongst International Students in
Australia: Perspectives from Professionals at the Coal-face. The Australian Sociological
Association Conference Local Lives/Global Networks, University of Newcastle New South
Wales. November 29 December 2.
Godkin M.A. & Savageau J.A. (2001). The effect of a global multiculturalism track on cultural
competence of preclinical medical students. Family Medicine, 33, 17886
Jia-Yan, P., Wong, D.F.K., Joubert, L. & Chan, C.L.(2007). Acculturative stressor and meaning of life
as predictors of negative affect in acculturation: a cross-cultural comparative study between
Chinese international students in Australia and Hong Kong. Australian & New Zealand
Journal of Psychiatry. 41, 740-750
Kashima, E. S., & Loh, E. (2006). International students acculturation: Effects of international,
conational,and local ties and need for closure. International Journal of Intercultural
Relations, 30, 471-485.
Lin, I.J. (2012). Whom to group with - A Bourdieusian narrative analysis of international students in
an Australian University. Paper presented at the Joint AARE/APERA Conference. Retrieved
from http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2012/Lin12.pdf
Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. (2nd.
Ed.) Sydney: Psychology Foundation.
Rosenthal, Russell & Thomson. (2008). The health and wellbeing of international students at an
Australian university, Higher Education. 55., 51-67
Said, D., Kyrpi, K., Bowman, J. (2013). Risk factors for mental disorder among university students
in Australia: findings from a web-based cross-sectional survey. Social Psychiatry &
Psychiatric Epidemiology. 48(6), 935-944
Ware, J.E. & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Ssurvey (SF-36): I.
Conceptual framework and Item Selection. Medical Care. 30(6). 473-483
Zimet, G.D., Dahlem, N.W., Zimet, S.G. & Farley, G.K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of
Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41.