Capital Budgeting Techniques Capital Budgeting Techniques
Capital Budgeting Techniques Capital Budgeting Techniques
Capital
Capital Budgeting
Budgeting
Techniques
Techniques
© Pearson Education Limited 2004
Fundamentals of Financial Management, 12/e
Created by: Gregory A. Kuhlemeyer, Ph.D.
Carroll College, Waukesha, WI
3-1
After studying Chapter 13,
you should be able to:
◆ Understand the payback period (PBP) method of project evaluation and
selection, including its: (a) calculation; (b) acceptance criterion; (c)
advantages and disadvantages; and (d) focus on liquidity rather than
profitability.
◆ Understand the three major discounted cash flow (DCF) methods of
project evaluation and selection – internal rate of return (IRR), net
present value (NPV), and profitability index (PI).
◆ Explain the calculation, acceptance criterion, and advantages (over the
PBP method) for each of the three major DCF methods.
◆ Define, construct, and interpret a graph called an “NPV profile.”
◆ Understand why ranking project proposals on the basis of IRR, NPV, and
PI methods “may” lead to conflicts in ranking.
◆ Describe the situations where ranking projects may be necessary and
justify when to use either IRR, NPV, or PI rankings.
◆ Understand how “sensitivity analysis” allows us to challenge the single-
point input estimates used in traditional capital budgeting analysis.
◆ Explain the role and process of project monitoring, including “progress
reviews” and “post-completion audits.”
3-2
Capital
Capital Budgeting
Budgeting
Techniques
Techniques
◆ Project Evaluation and Selection
◆ Potential Difficulties
◆ Capital Rationing
◆ Project Monitoring
◆ Post-Completion Audit
3-3
Project
Project Evaluation:
Evaluation:
Alternative
Alternative Methods
Methods
3-4
Proposed
Proposed Project
Project Data
Data
Julie Miller is evaluating a new project
for her firm, Basket Wonders (BW).
She has determined that the after-tax
cash flows for the project will be
$10,000; $12,000; $15,000; $10,000;
and $7,000, respectively, for each of
the Years 1 through 5. The initial
cash outlay will be $40,000.
3-5
Independent Project
◆ For this project, assume that it is
independent of any other potential
projects that Basket Wonders may
undertake.
◆ Independent -- A project whose
acceptance (or rejection) does not
prevent the acceptance of other
projects under consideration.
3-6
Payback
Payback Period
Period (PBP)
(PBP)
0 1 2 3 4 5
-40 K 10 K 12 K 15 K 10 K 7K
Cumulative
Inflows PBP =a+(b-c)/d
= 3 + (40 - 37) / 10
= 3 + (3) / 10
= 3.3 Years
3-8
Payback
Payback Solution
Solution (#2)
(#2)
0 1 2 3 4 5
-40 K 10 K 12 K 15 K 10 K 7K
-40 K -30 K -18 K -3 K 7K 14 K
3-10
PBP
PBP Strengths
Strengths
and
and Weaknesses
Weaknesses
Strengths: Weaknesses:
◆Easy to use and ◆ Does not account
understand for TVM
◆Can be used as a ◆ Does not consider
measure of liquidity cash flows beyond
◆Easier to forecast the PBP
ST than LT flows ◆ Cutoff period is
subjective
3-11
Internal
Internal Rate
Rate of
of Return
Return (IRR)
(IRR)
3-12
IRR
IRR Solution
Solution
3-14
IRR
IRR Solution
Solution (Try
(Try 15%)
15%)
$40,000 = $10,000(PVIF15% ,1) + $12,000(PVIF15% ,2) +
$15,000(PVIF15% ,3) + $10,000(PVIF15% ,4) + $
7,000(PVIF15% ,5)
$40,000 = $10,000(.870) + $12,000(.756) +
$15,000(.658) + $10,000(.572) + $ 7,000(.497)
$40,000 = $8,700 + $9,072 + $9,870 + $5,720 +
$3,479 = $36,841 [Rate is too high!!]
3-15
IRR
IRR Solution
Solution (Interpolate)
(Interpolate)
.10 $41,444
X $1,444
.05 IRR $40,000 $4,603
.15 $36,841
X $1,444
.05 = $4,603
3-16
IRR
IRR Solution
Solution (Interpolate)
(Interpolate)
.10 $41,444
X $1,444
.05 IRR $40,000 $4,603
.15 $36,841
X $1,444
.05 = $4,603
3-17
IRR
IRR Solution
Solution (Interpolate)
(Interpolate)
.10 $41,444
X $1,444
.05 IRR $40,000 $4,603
.15 $36,841
X = ($1,444)(0.05) X = .0157
$4,603
IRR = .10 + .0157 = .1157 or 11.57%
3-18
IRR
IRR Acceptance
Acceptance Criterion
Criterion
The management of Basket Wonders
has determined that the hurdle rate
is 13% for projects of this type.
Should this project be accepted?
3-20
Actual
Actual IRR
IRR Solution
Solution Using
Using
Your
Your Financial
Financial Calculator
Calculator
3-23
Net
Net Present
Present Value
Value (NPV)
(NPV)
3-24
NPV
NPV Solution
Solution
Basket Wonders has determined that the
appropriate discount rate (k) for this
project is 13%.
NPV = $10,000 +$12,000 +$15,000 +
(1.13)1 (1.13)2 (1.13)3
$10,000 $7,000
4 + 5 - $40,000
(1.13) (1.13)
3-25
NPV
NPV Solution
Solution
NPV = $10,000(PVIF13%,1) + $12,000(PVIF13%,2) +
$15,000(PVIF13%,3) + $10,000(PVIF13%,4) +
$ 7,000(PVIF13%,5) - $40,000
NPV = $10,000(.885) + $12,000(.783) +
$15,000(.693) + $10,000(.613) +
$ 7,000(.543) - $40,000
NPV = $8,850 + $9,396 + $10,395 +
$6,130 + $3,801 - $40,000
= - $1,428
3-26
NPV
NPV Acceptance
Acceptance Criterion
Criterion
The management of Basket Wonders
has determined that the required
rate is 13% for projects of this type.
Should this project be accepted?
Thre
e of th
10 e se p
oint
s ar
e ea
sy n
5 IRR ow!
NPV@13%
0
-4
0 3 6 9 12 15
Discount Rate (%)
3-32
Creating NPV Profiles
Using the Calculator
Strengths: Weaknesses:
◆ Same as NPV ◆ Same as NPV
◆ Allows ◆ Provides only
comparison of relative profitability
different scale ◆ Potential Ranking
projects Problems
3-36
Evaluation Summary
A. Scale of Investment
B. Cash-flow Pattern
C. Project Life
3-39
A.
A. Scale
Scale Differences
Differences
Compare a small (S) and a
large (L) project.
project at various
Project I discount rates.
400
NPV@10%
200
IRR
Project D
0
-200
0 5 10 15 20 25
Discount Rate (%)
3-44
600
Net Present Value ($)
Fisher’s
Fisher’s Rate
Rate of
of Intersection
Intersection
At k>10%, D is best!
0 5 10 15 20 25
Discount Rate ($)
3-45
C.
C. Project
Project Life
Life Differences
Differences
Let us compare a long life (X) project
and a short life (Y) project.
3-47
Another Way to
Look at Things
1. Adjust cash flows to a common terminal
year if project “Y” will NOT be replaced.
Compound Project Y, Year 1 @10% for 2 years.
Year 0 1 2 3
CF -$1,000 $0 $0 $2,420
-$1,000 $2,000
-1,000 $2,000
-1,000 $2,000
-$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $2,000
Results: IRR = 100% NPV* = $2,238.17
*Higher NPV, but the same IRR. Y is Best.
Best
3-49
Capital Rationing
Capital Rationing occurs when a
constraint (or budget ceiling) is placed
on the total size of capital expenditures
during a particular period.
Example: Julie Miller must determine what
investment opportunities to undertake for
Basket Wonders (BW). She is limited to a
maximum expenditure of $32,500 only for
this capital budgeting period.
3-50
Available Projects for BW
Project ICO IRR NPV PI
A $ 500 18% $ 50 1.10
B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
C 5,000 37 5,500 2.10
D 7,500 20 5,000 1.67
E 12,500 26 500 1.04
F 15,000 28 21,000 2.40
G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43
H 25,000 15 6,000 1.24
3-51
Choosing by IRRs for BW
Project ICO IRR NPV PI
C $ 5,000 37% $ 5,500 2.10
F 15,000 28 21,000 2.40
E 12,500 26 500 1.04
B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
Projects C, F, and E have the
three largest IRRs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth
is $27,000 with a $32,500 outlay.
3-52
Choosing by NPVs for BW
Project ICO IRR NPV PI
F $15,000 28% $21,000 2.40
G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43
B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
Projects F and G have the
two largest NPVs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth
is $28,500 with a $32,500 outlay.
3-53
Choosing by PIs for BW
Project ICO IRR NPV PI
F $15,000 28% $21,000 2.40
B 5,000 25 6,500 2.30
C 5,000 37 5,500 2.10
D 7,500 20 5,000 1.67
G 17,500 19 7,500 1.43
Projects F, B, C, and D have the four largest PIs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth is
$38,000 with a $32,500 outlay.
3-54
Summary of Comparison
Method Projects Accepted Value Added
PI F, B, C, and D $38,000
NPV F and G $28,500
IRR C, F, and E $27,000
3-56
Post-Completion Audit
Post-completion Audit
A formal comparison of the actual costs and
benefits of a project with original estimates.
75 Multiple IRRs at
Net Present Value
25
-100
0 40 80 120 160 200
Discount Rate (%)
3-59
NPV Profile -- Multiple IRRs
3-60