Scribd
Upload
75 views3 pages

Fruitful Significator S Selection

Selection of signifactors

Uploaded by

kailash
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
75 views3 pages

Fruitful Significator S Selection

Selection of signifactors

Uploaded by

kailash
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Selection of Fruitful Significators

(Please note, extensive references have been made in drafting this article and
important sources are:
a) KP & Astrology 1990
b) Astrosecrets & Krishnamurtipaddhati Parts 1, 2 and 3
c) III Reader of Late Shri K.S.Krishnamurtiji)

More times than not, one may find that, when one wants to
judge a particular matter, for example marriage, then almost all the
nine planets come in as significators of either or all of the houses 2,
7 and 11. Such a situation is no way rare and all too common an
area where many a KP Astrologer falters in selecting the right
planets and rejecting the unfruitful ones. Most of the literature we
have surveyed in KP Astrology to find an answer to this question,
point us to one of the following two principles:
1. Supposing a person wants to know the time of marriage and also
he wants to find out the significators which will give marriage in
their conjoined period. Then, according to this principle, first note
the Sub in which each of the planets figuring as a significator is
deposited. If that Sub Lord is a STRONG significator (see
explanation below) of any or all houses of marriage (2, 7 or 11),
then you have to select the planet as a Fruitful significator, else not!
Also, the planet SHOULD NOT be a strong significator of the
bhaava/s, which negate the bhaava in question - in this case 1, 6
and 10 for marriage. This is one of the most important methods of
eliminating planets which are "merely tempters and not real
significators".
(Strong significator means - Planet/s in the star of bhaava
occupant/s, or, if there are no planets in its stars, the bhaava
occupant itself, or if the bhaava is empty (no occupant), then the
planet/s in the owners' star/s, or, if again there are no planets in the
owner's star/s the owner himself - please remember, these
conditions are mutually exclusive. That is, if and only if a bhaava
occupant has NO PLANETS in his stars, he becomes a strong
significator; likewise, IF AND ONLY IF a Bhaava is empty and there
are no Planets in the owner's stars, the bhaava owner becomes a
strong significator! However, if there are planets occupying the
occupants' or owner's star/s, then those planets and the not the
occupant or the owner of the bhaava are considered as the strong
significators of the bhaava. This is a rule reiterated by many
illustrious scholars of KP Astrology in many of their articles and
books)

2. The second principle in order to eliminate the weak planets is by


considering the ruling planets. Here again, you have to select the
ruling planets which are deposited in the SUB of such a planet which
is a strong significator of the bhaava matter concerned. Again the
planet/s which represent 2, 7 or 11 and 1, 6 or 10 (this is only for
the marriage example and for other matters, consider the
respective representative houses and their negation houses) have
to be rejected outright as they always do harm to the matter at
hand and never good.
It may become necessary to apply one or both of the above
principles depending on the number of planets you get as
significators. Please remember, ONLY Strong Significators truly
indicate the fructification of the event and are crucial in timing an
event. The "weak significators" only fortify the event and may help
to bring it to completion. But the event should and will always
materialize in the Dasha, Bhukti Antara of the Strong Significator/s.
In conclusion, let us see what weak significators are:
a) If a planet A occupies the II Bhaava and B and C are in the Star of
A, then B and C are the "Strongest Significators of Bhaava II".
b) If the condition in (a) is true, then the planet A itself which is the
occupant of the II Bhaava, is rendered only a weak significator of
the bhaava. However, that does not mean that planet A will never
contribute to the bhaava matters or the results of II Bhaava never
materialize during the period governed by planet A. But to time an
event, we should consider only planets B and C in the first place in
preference to A. Please bear in mind that planet A still gives the
result of the bhaava it occupies, but when it has planets deposited
in its star/s, it is only connected to the bhaava and not a strong
significator of the bhaava.
c) Now let us come to planets which are in conjunction with planets
B and C. Let us for example say that planet M is in conjunction with
planet B. If a true conjunction exists between planet B and M
(taking the western aspects orb into consideration as ruled by our
Guruji), then the planet M is also rendered as a Strong Significator
of the II Bhaava. It is then more powerful than planet A itself as a
significator of the II Bhaava.
d) Suppose there is no true conjunction, and planet M happens to
occupy only the same sign as planet B (as taken in classical Vedic
astrology - two planets in the same sign are said to be in
conjunction), then the planet M is a weak significator of the II
Bhaava - that is, it is only connected to the II Bhaava. In strength it
is weaker than planet A itself which is the occupant of the II Bhaava.

e) In another case, let us consider a planet Q which is aspected by


planet B. Now B is a strong significator of II Bhaava by being
deposited in the star of planet A, the occupant of the bhaava.
However, because planet Q is only aspected by planet B, planet Q is
said to be only connected to the II Bhaava, or in other words, is a
weak significator of the II Bhaava.
f) However, please note..... if the planet in conjunction or aspect of
the strong significator is actually a Node (Rahu or Ketu) then the
node becomes a Strong Significator of the bhaava concerned. That
is because the nodes are very powerful. Especially if there is a true
conjunction with a node, the node can be taken in the place of the
actual significator planet because the node is so powerful.
I hope, this clarifies the topic of selecting the most fruitful
significators in judging any event. Please note, that this is equally
applicable to both natal and horary charts and is one of the most
important (and believe me, also the most difficult and confusing)
aspects of Krishnamurtipaddhati.

You might also like