390 U S 719 Sheppard
390 U S 719 Sheppard
390 U S 719 Sheppard
Research Information:
CRAIG MAGNUSON
4109 BUCKINGHAM PL
Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 20 L. Ed. 2d 255, 88 S. Ct. 1318, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1877 (1968)
SHEPARD'S SUMMARY
1. Barber v. Page, 239 F. Supp. 265, 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7046 (E.D. Okla.
1965)
2. Remanded by:
Barber v. Page, 355 F.2d 171, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7659 (10th Cir. Okla. 1966)
4. Cited by:
White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346, 116 L. Ed. 2d 848, 112 S. Ct. 736, 1992 U.S. LEXIS 378, 60 U.S.L.W. 4094, 92
Cal. Daily Op. Service 485, 92 D.A.R. 697, 33 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 881 (1992)
502 U.S. 346 p.365
116 L. Ed. 2d 848 p.865
112 S. Ct. 736 p.748
7. Cited by:
Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 96 L. Ed. 2d 631, 107 S. Ct. 2658, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2727, 55 U.S.L.W. 4901,
22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 1164 (1987)
482 U.S. 730 p.738
96 L. Ed. 2d 631 p.643
107 S. Ct. 2658 p.2663
1157. ARTICLE: Should American Courts Listen to What Foreign Courts Hear?: The
Confrontation and Hearsay Problems of Prior Testimony Taken Abroad in Criminal Proceedings, 29 Am. J. Crim.
L. 29 (2001)
1159. COMMENT: PREVENTIVE DETENTION AND UNITED STATES v. EDWARDS: BURDENING THE
INNOCENT., 32 Am. U.L. Rev. 191 (1982)
1160. ARTICLE: SOMETHING NOT SO FUNNY HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO CONVICTION: THE
PRETRIAL INTERROGATION OF CHILD WITNESSES, 35 Ariz. L. Rev. 927 (1993)
1161. ARTICLE: THE HEARSAY RULE, THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE, AND REVERSIBLE ERROR
IN CRIMINAL CASES, 26 Ariz. St. L.J. 967 (1994)
1162. MILITARY JUSTICE SYMPOSIUM I: "An Old Fashioned Crazy Quilt:" n1 New
Developments in the Sixth Amendment, Discovery, Mental Responsibility, and Nonjudicial Punishment, 1997
Army Law. 72 (1997)
1164. USALSA REPORT: Trial Judiciary Note: Military Rule of Evidence 803(24)(B)
and the Available Witness, 1986 Army Law. 51 (1986)
1165. USALSA REPORT: The Advocate for Military Defense Counsel: DAD Notes, 1986
Army Law. 43 (1986)
1166. USALSA REPORT: Trial Counsel Forum: Trial Counsel Assistance Program: The
Constitutional Parameters of Hearsay Evidence, 1986 Army Law. 24 (1986)
1167. ARTICLE: THE CONFRONTATION WAIVER RULE, 76 B.U.L. Rev. 835 (1996)
1168. NOTE: LET'S MAKE A DEAL: A LOOK AT UNITED STATES V. DAILEY * AND
PROSECUTOR-WITNESS COOPERATION AGREEMENTS., 67 B.U.L. Rev. 749 (1987)
1169. CASE COMMENT: INTENT AFTER ENMUND v. FLORIDA: NOT JUST ANOTHER
AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE., 65 B.U.L. Rev. 809 (1985)
1171. THE SECOND CIRCUIT REVIEW -- 1988-1989 TERM: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: "HARE
AND HOUNDS": THE FUGITIVE DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BE PURSUED:United States
v. Diacolios, *, 56 Brook. L. Rev. 439 (1990)
1173. FROM THE BENCH: CONFRONTATION AND HEARSAY: NEW WINE IN AN OLD BOTTLE, 16
Campbell L. Rev. 1 (1994)
1174. NOTES: SHE'S GOTTA HAVE IT NOW: A QUALIFIED RAPE CRISIS COUNSELOR-VICTIM
PRIVILEGE, 17 Cardozo L. Rev. 141 (1995)
1175. NOTE: UNITED STATES v. SALIM: A HARBINGER FOR FEDERAL PROSECUTIONS USING
DEPOSITIONS TAKEN ABROAD., 39 Cath. U.L. Rev. 895 (1990)
1176. ARTICLE: CONFRONTING THE RELUCTANT ACCOMPLICE, 101 Colum. L. Rev. 1797
(2001)
101 Colum. L. Rev. 1797 p.1797
1177. NOTE: RECONCILING THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE COCONSPIRATOR EXEMPTION FROM
THE HEARSAY RULE AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT., 85 Colum. L.
Rev. 1294 (1985)
1184. NOTES & COMMENTS: LILLY V. VIRGINIA: THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE AND HEARSAY
- "OH WHAT A TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE ... ."*, 50 DePaul L. Rev. 1133 (2001)
50 DePaul L. Rev. 1133 p.1133
1185. ARTICLE: The Elder Witness - The Admissibility of Closed Circuit
Television Testimony After Maryland v. Craig, 7 Elder L.J. 313 (1999)
1189. NOTE: FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 801(d)(2)(E) AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE:
CLOSING THE WINDOW OF ADMISSIBILITY FOR COCONSPIRATOR HEARSAY., 53 Fordham L. Rev. 1291
(1985)
1192. ESSAY: Confrontation: The Search for Basic Principles, 86 Geo. L.J.
1011 (1998)
86 Geo. L.J. 1011 p.1033
1194. NOTE: The True Value of the Confrontation Clause: A Study of Child Sex
Abuse Trials., 82 Geo. L.J. 1605 (1994)
1195. ARTICLE: It's Time to Change the Rule Compelling Witness Appearance at
Trial: Proposed Revisions to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(e)., 79 Geo. L.J. 81 (1990)
79 Geo. L.J. 81 p.105
1199. THE SUPREME COURT, 1986 TERM: LEADING CASES. I. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW., 101
Harv. L. Rev. 119 (1987)
1200. NOTE: THE TESTIMONY OF CHILD VICTIMS IN SEX ABUSE PROSECUTIONS: TWO
LEGISLATIVE INNOVATIONS., 98 Harv. L. Rev. 806 (1985)
1203. ARTICLE: THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE AND THE SUPREME COURT: SOME GOOD NEWS
AND SOME BAD NEWS., 17 Hofstra L. Rev. 51 (1988)
1204. NOTE: THE USE OF VIDEOTAPED TESTIMONY OF VICTIMS IN CASES INVOLVING CHILD
SEXUAL ABUSE: A CONSTITUTIONAL DILEMMA., 14 Hofstra L. Rev. 261 (1985)
1206. ARTICLE: FROM FAT TONY AND MAT TY THE HORSE TO THE SAD CASE OF A.T.:
DEFENSIVE AND OFFENSIVE USE OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL CASES, 32 Hous. L. Rev. 895
(1995)
1208. MARSHALL'S BATTLES BEFORE THE BENCH, 1 Howard Scroll Soc. J. Rev. 148
(1993)
1209. NOTE: Resolving Retroactivity After Teague v. Lane, 65 Ind. L.J. 651
(1990)
1210. ARTICLE: The Best Evidence Principle, 73 Iowa L. Rev. 227 (1988)
1211. ESSAY: Libel Law and the Realities of Litigation: Setting the Record
Straight, 71 Iowa L. Rev. 226 (1985)
1212. ARTICLE: Criminal Law Symposium: Future Frends in Criminal Procedure: The
Future of Confrontation Clause Developments: What will Emerge When the Supreme Court Synthesizes the
Diverse Lines of Confrontation Decisions?, 81 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 77 (1990)
1213. ARTICLE: Fifth And Sixth Amendments -- Changing The Balance Of Miranda,
77 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 666 (1986)
1214. ARTICLE: Supreme Court Review: Fifth Amendment -- Will The Public Safety
Exception Swallow The Miranda Exclusionary Rule?: New York v. Quarles, 104 S. Ct. 2626 (1984), 75 J. Crim. L.
& Criminology 692 (1984)
1217. ARTICLE: Passing the Confrontation Clause Stop Sign: Is All Hearsay
Constitutionally Admissible?, 77 Ky. L.J. 7 (1989)
1222. FEATURE: OPEN TO ADMISSION: UNDER CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE HEARSAY RULE,
GRAND JURY TESTIMONY MAY BE ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE BY EITHER THE PROSECUTION OR
THE DEFENSE, 20 Los Angeles Lawyer 34 (1997)
1226. SURVEY: DEVELOPMENT IN MARYLAND LAW 1985-86: VI. EVIDENCE, 46 Md. L. Rev.
722 (1987)
1240. The Constitutionalization of Hearsay: The Extent to Which the Fifth and
Sixth Amendments Permit or Require the Liberalization of the Hearsay Rules., 76 Minn. L. Rev. 521 (1992)
76 Minn. L. Rev. 521 p.536
1241. ARTICLE: The Subpoena Power: Pennoyer's Last Vestige., 74 Minn. L. Rev.
37 (1989)
74 Minn. L. Rev. 37 p.116
1242. ARTICLE: The Confrontation Clause, the Hearsay Rule, and Child Sexual
Abuse Prosecutions: The State of the Relationship., 72 Minn. L. Rev. 523 (1988)
1246. NOTE: PROTECTING THE CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE VICTIM FROM COURTROOM TRAUMA
AFTER COY V. IOWA,, 67 N.C. L. Rev. 711 (1989)
1248. NOTE: PRIOR CONSISTENT STATEMENTS AND MOTIVES TO LIE., 62 N.Y.U. L. Rev.
787 (1987)
1249. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SUPREME COURT PROJECT: APPENDIX: CRIMINAL LAW
APPENDIX. $(PART 1 of 2$), 59 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1679 (1984)
1254. ARTICLE: The Molested Child Witness and the Constitution: Should the Bill
of Rights Be Transformed into the Bill of Preferences?, 53 Ohio St. L.J. 49 (1992)
1256. ARTICLE: The New Judicial Federalism and the Ohio Supreme Court: Anatomy
of a Failure. *, 45 Ohio St. L.J. 143 (1984)
1257. COMMENT: Hypnosis -- Should the Courts Snap Out of It? -- A Closer Look
at the Critical Issues., 44 Ohio St. L.J. 1053 (1983)
1261. CONTENTS: Thurgood Marshall: The Lawyer As Judge, 13 Pace L. Rev. 299
(1993)
1264. ARTICULOS: LOS DERECHOS DE LOS ACUSADOS Y LA FACTURA MAS ANCHA, 65 Rev.
Jur. U.P.R. 83 (1996)
1265. SURVEY SECTION: 2000 Survey of Rhode Island Law, 6 Roger Williams U. L.
Rev. 667 (2001)
1266. NOTE: PIERCING THE VEIL OF TEARS: THE ADMISSION OF RAPE CRISIS COUNSELOR
RECORDS IN ACQUAINTANCE RAPE TRIALS, 68 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1335 (1995)
1268. SYMPOSIUM: THE SCIENCE OF PROOF: Some Reflections on Evidence and Proof,
40 S. Tex. L. Rev. 327 (1999)
40 S. Tex. L. Rev. 327 p.327
1269. ARTICLE: Rescuing the Confrontation Clause, 54 S.C. L. Rev. 537 (2003)
54 S.C. L. Rev. 537 p.537
1271. COMPENDIUM: NEW YORK LAW OF EVIDENCE*, 9 St. John's J.L. Comm. 289
(1993)
1272. ARTICLE: WITNESS DETENTION AND INTIMIDATION: THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF
MATERIAL WITNESS LAW, 76 St. John's L. Rev. 483 (2002)
76 St. John's L. Rev. 483 p.483
1273. Developments in the Law: The unavailability rule and its effects on New
York hearsay exceptions: The confusion surrounding the New York Court of Appeals' holding in People v.
Sanders, 70 St. John's L. Rev. 403 (1996)
70 St. John's L. Rev. 403 p.403
1281. RECENT DEVELOPMENT: MARYLAND V. CRAIG: A CHILD WITNESS NEED NOT VIEW THE
DEFENDANT DURING TESTIMONY IN CHILD-ABUSE CASES., 65 Tul. L. Rev. 935 (1991)
1283. COMMENT: ADMISSION OF GRAND JURY TESTIMONY UNDER THE RESIDUAL HEARSAY
EXCEPTION., 59 Tul. L. Rev. 1033 (1985)
1284. ARTICLE: THE ADMISSIBILITY OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS: AVOIDING THE
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE., 59 Tul. L. Rev. 335 (1984)
1285. NOTE: EVIDENCE -- FORMER TESTIMONY EXCEPTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE POSES
UNEXPECTED HAZARDS TO PARENTS WHO TESTIFY IN JUVENILE COURT PROBABLE CAUSE
HEARINGS. HAMBLEN V. STATE, 44 ARK. APP. 54 (1993)., 18 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 181 (1995)
1286. COMMENT: The Medical Treatment Hearsay Exception in Maryland: A Low Point
in Clarity for Practitioners and Protection for Litigants, 29 U. Balt. L. Rev. 237 (2000)
29 U. Balt. L. Rev. 237 p.237
1287. ARTICLE: CHILDREN ARE LOSING MARYLAND'S "TENDER YEARS" WAR, 27 U. Balt.
L. Rev. 21 (1997)
27 U. Balt. L. Rev. 21 p.21
1289. "Nothing We Say Matters": Teague and New Rules, 61 U. Chi. L. Rev. 423
(1994)
61 U. Chi. L. Rev. 423 p.436
1290. COMMENT: Effective Assistance of Counsel: The Sixth Amendment and the
Fair Trial Guarantee, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1380 (1983)
1291. CASENOTE: PLACING A CHILD VICTIM OF SEXUAL ABUSE BEHIND A SCREEN DURING
COURTROOM TESTIMONY AS VIOLATION OF SIXTH AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE: Coy v.
Iowa, 108 S. Ct. 2798 (1988)., 57 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1537 (1989)
1293. ARTICLE: ADMISSION OF OTHER CRIMINAL ACT EVIDENCE AFTER ADOPTION OF THE
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE, 53 U. Cin. L. Rev. 113 (1984)
1295. 1981 OHIO SUPREME COURT DECISION SURVEY: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -- SIXTH
AMENDMENT, 51 U. Cin. L. Rev. 171 (1982)
1296. NOTE: LOSING THE RIGHT TO CONFRONT: DEFINING WAIVER TO BETTER ADDRESS A
DEFENDANT'S ACTIONS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON A WITNESS, 27 U. Mich. J.L. Ref. 877 (1994)
1298. COMMENT: READING THE TEXT OF THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE: "TO BE" OR NOT "TO
BE"?, 3 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 722 (2001)
1302. ARTICLE: UTAH RULES OF EVIDENCE 1983 -- PART III *, 1995 Utah L. Rev.
717 (1995)
1303. ARTICLE: Balancing the Scales of Justice: The Case for and the Effects of
Utah's Victims' Rights Amendment, 1994 Utah L. Rev. 1373 (1994)
1305. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: White v. Illinois: The Confrontation Clause and the
Supreme Court's Preference for Out-of-Court Statements., 46 Vand. L. Rev. 235 (1993)
1307. ARTICLE: THE X FILES: JOINT TRIALS, REDACTED CONFESSIONS AND THIRTY YEARS
OF SIDESTEPPING BRUTON, 42 Vill. L. Rev. 855 (1997)
1308. NOTE: SPEAK OF THE MISSING WITNESS, AND SURELY HE SHALL APPEAR: THE
MISSING WITNESS DOCTRINE AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS --
State v. Blair, 117 Wash. 2d 479, 816 P.2d 718 (1991)., 67 Wash. L. Rev. 691 (1992)
1309. WASHINGTON SURVEY: QUALIFIED COMMON LAW PRIVILEGE FOR NEWS REPORTERS IN
CRIMINAL CASES -- State v. Rinaldo, 102 Wn. 2d 749, 689 P.2d 392 (1984)., 60 Wash. L. Rev. 535 (1985)
1311. ANNUAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN LAW + JUNE 1, 1996-MAY 21, 1997: CRIMINAL LAW,
44 Wayne L. Rev. 655 (1998)
1317. United States Supreme Court's views as to retroactive effect of its own
decisions announcing new rules, 22 L. Ed. 2d 821, sec. 10