GSIS vs. CA

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

65. GSIS v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 101439 June 21, 1999


Facts: A Chevrolet truck owned by National Food Authority (NFA) and insured by
GSIS with Compulsory Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance (CMVLI) while driven
by Guillermo Corbeta collided with Toyota Tamaraw used as PUV and insured by
Mabuhay Insurance and Guaranty Co. (MIGC) with CVMLI. As a result some of
the passengers of the PUV died and sustained physical injuries the Tamaraw was
totally wrecked. Of the three cases filed, two were against NFA and GSIS which
were later consolidated by the trial court. The RTC renders decision holding
MIGC, Guillermo Corbeta, NFA and GSIS to pay jointly and severally the
plaintiffs.
Issue: Whether or not GSIS solidarily liable with the negligent insured/owneroperator of the Chevrolet truck for damages awarded to private respondents?
Held: Petitioners position insofar as joint liability is concerned is not tenable. It is
now established that the injured or the heirs of a deceased victim of a vehicular
accident may sue directly the insurer of the vehicle. However The insurer could be
held liable only up to the extent of what was provided for by the contract of
insurance, in accordance with CMVLI law. At the time of the incident, the
schedule of indemnities for death and/or bodily injuries, professional fees, hospital
and other charges payable under a CMVLI coverage was provided under the
Insurance Memorandum Circular (IMC) No. 5-78 which was approved on
November 10, 1978. As therein provided, the maximum indemnity for death was
twelve thousand (P12,000.00) pesos per victim. 22 The schedules for medical
expenses were also provided by said IMC, specifically in paragraphs (C) to (G).

You might also like