Scribd
Upload
128 views

Mtss Data Team Form

This document summarizes an MTSS analysis of student work from a PLC team. It includes sections for identifying the learning target, the common formative assessment used, a proficiency scale, student data and performance levels, SMART goals, differentiated instructional plans, post-intervention data, and evaluating whether the goal was met. The team analyzed student performance, set a goal for growth, implemented differentiated instruction plans, and assessed progress to determine next instructional steps.

Uploaded by

api-293484203
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
128 views

Mtss Data Team Form

This document summarizes an MTSS analysis of student work from a PLC team. It includes sections for identifying the learning target, the common formative assessment used, a proficiency scale, student data and performance levels, SMART goals, differentiated instructional plans, post-intervention data, and evaluating whether the goal was met. The team analyzed student performance, set a goal for growth, implemented differentiated instruction plans, and assessed progress to determine next instructional steps.

Uploaded by

api-293484203
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

MTSS Analysis of Student Work

Four Critical Questions of a PLC:


1. What do we want our students to learn? (essential, guaranteed, viable curriculum)
2. How will we know they are learning? (administer frequent, team-developed common, formative
assessments)
3. How will we respond when they dont learn? (timely, directive, systematic intervention)
4. How will we respond when they do learn? (timely enrichment/extension)

Learning Target/FOCUS Standard:


What priority standard do we want all students to learn?

Common Formative Assessment Used:


What CFA is being used to determine how well students understand the specified learning target?

Proficiency Scale:
What has your team identified as proficient within each group?

WS

Proficiency Score

Student Data:
How did the students perform based on the proficiency scale? Insert students names below.

Teacher Name

WS - Teacher
2

W - Teacher 4

M - Teacher 3

E - Teacher 1

1234Percentage of
Students

Description of Student Performance:


What can the students do well? What will they need to learn next? (Grade level teams fill out
collaboratively)

WS

E
1

Can already do
To learn next

SMART Goal:
Looking at Student Data, determine a team SMART goal based on current student performance.
(duration)

Description of Student Learning Targets and Instructional Plan:


What does each student need to work on to meet their target?

Teacher

Group

Learning Target

Teacher 2

WS

Teacher 4

Teacher 3

Teacher 1

Differentiated Instructional Plan

Student Post Intervention Data:


How did the sample of students perform after the intervention?

WS

Teacher Name

1234Percentage of
Students

Looking at Goals:
After adding the percent of students proficient in the M and E groups from the post assessment, did
we meet/exceed the goal we set before starting the intervention?
Percent Proficient Before Intervention:

Percent Proficient After Intervention:

Did we meet our goal? (circle one):

Yes

Our Goal:
No

Next Steps:
What considerations need to be made for those who havent made necessary growth? GEI plan?
Distributed practice? Small groups?

You might also like