Combined Cycle
Combined Cycle
Combined Cycle
October 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ii
October 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES1.0 INTRODUCTION
ES1.1 Background
Century Power Generation Limited (CPGL), a company incorporated in Nigeria
with head office at African Re Building, 4th Floor, Plot 1679, Karimu Kotun Street,
Victoria Island, Lagos State, Nigeria, in collaboration with her technical partners
hereby proposes to design, procure, install and operate a new combined cycle
gas power plant that would generate about 495MW (ISO) of electricity, at a
location in Okija, along Onitsha Owerri express way, Anambra State. The
project when completed will provide electric power to drive various industrial
establishments in Ihiala and its environs and the rest of the country through the
national grid via a 330KV substation and short transmission line.
Granting an on-grid generation license to CPGL means that the output of the
plant will be sold to the Nigerian Electricity Grid through the newly created
Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trader (NBET). It follows that NBET will execute a
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with CPGL which details the conditions for
the power sale transaction. In practice, such PPAs would need some form of
securitization to cushion the risk of a possible default in payment by the
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
iii
October 2012
purchaser. This crucial rung in the privatization ladder has been the most
challenging to climb by the policy drivers of the Nigerian Electricity Supply
Industry (NESI).
As part of its efforts to strengthen the power sector in sub-Saharan Africa, the
World Bank has decided to provide a Partial Risk Guarantee (PRG) scheme to
securitize the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). Currently 14 power projects
have been nominated to the World Bank for a PRG. An important pre-requisite
to obtaining a PRG from the World Bank is an Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment (ESIA) report and a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP).
Century Power Generation Limited (CPGL) desires to execute a PPA with NBET
for the sale of her proposed 495MW power plant output. As a responsible
corporate citizen, CPGL is aware of the need to articulate the environmental and
social impacts of the power plant project and work out ways of mitigating,
managing and monitoring these impacts. CPGL therefore commissioned a
consortium of two reputable Nigerian companies MASODAK Associates, a
Civil and Environmental Engineering and F. M. CHIDEZ Nig Ltd, a Power
Systems Engineering Consulting group to conduct an ESIA of her 495MW power
plant. The consortium engaged the required expertise in the various aspects of
the ESIA process to arrive at a report in full conformity with the World Bank
guidelines as well as the requirements of other local regulatory bodies. This
document presents the executive summary of the entire ESIA report from the
Legal and Administrative framework, Project Alternatives and Project
Description to major findings of the Environmental and Social studies, Impact
Identification, Mitigation measures, Management and Monitoring plans for
various stages of the project up to post closure. A life span of about 30 years is
envisaged for the equipment which may be replaced or the site closed.
iv
October 2012
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Nigeria is a country of over 160 million people with an average electric power
generation of 4500 MW resulting in a per capita power availability of 28 watts.
This is grossly inadequate. Indeed, a 2008 power demand survey report by
TRACTABEL, a British company, estimated the current national power demand
as 10,000MW which implies a shortfall of 5,500 MW. This considerable
unserviced demand is stifling economic growth and degrading quality of life. To
meet this demand, huge quantities of generating sets have been imported into
the country from all over the world. The cost of self-generated power is about 54
Naira/kwh compared with 22 Naira/kwh for grid supplied power. The citizens
willingness to pay for expensive off-grid generated power can be seen in great
demand for generators of all shapes and sizes as well as the willingness to pay
for the high cost of operating and maintaining these machines. Furthermore, the
low power availability from the public utility has forced corporate entities to
divert large amount of funds from their core business to securing quality power
supply. This has resulted in locally manufactured goods being uncompetitive
with imported goods, leading to considerable loss of production capacities.
CPGLs decision to develop the Okija IPP project is therefore strategic, farsighted
and borne out of a desire to improve the economic landscape of Nigeria.
Project Economics
From the attached survey plan (Fig. 1.1) the land area covered by the plant is
about 27.41 hectares. The project considers the use of Two Nos. SIEMENS SGT5
2000E Gas Turbines each coupled to SGen 5-100A-2P type Generators with a
SIEMENS steam Turbine SST5 4000 configured in a 2 x 1 combined cycle multi
shaft arrangement (SCC5 4000E with 2 x 1) linked to two Heat Recovery Steam
Generator (HRSG) systems bringing the total output to about 495MW (site
condition). This configuration is very suitable for the CPGL IPP project due to
minimal gas consumption. The combined cycle plant will be configured in line
October 2012
with SIMENS SCC5 2000E 2x1 system with an expected net output of 450MW.
The gross heat rate is 6883kJ/kWh (ISO) while the gross efficiency at rated
capacity is expected to be 52.7% (ISO) with an air cooled condenser. The
economic calculations shown on the excel worksheet in the feasibility study are
self-explanatory and show that the project is economically viable. Preliminary
contacts with the Okija communities during land negotiations left one in no
doubt that the investment climate is safe. Though the Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) report of the project is expected to recommend specific
relationships with the surrounding villages, the general mood of the people is
that of joyful expectation for this big power project.
Market Availability
Studies have shown that electric power demand in Nigeria is quite high and
growing fast too. In particular, the target catchments of Onitsha, Nnewi,
Ekwuluobia, Awka, Ogbaru and Ihiala play host to 39,615 commercial and light
industrial customers based on 2007 figures released by Enugu Distribution
Company. Recently a car assembly plant was commissioned at Nnewi which
would have added substantially to the total load demand.
Business Plan
The CPGL business calls for identifying a credible off-taker for electric power
together with a credible source of fuel (gas in this case). Then acquire enough
land for a power project. CPGL places a high premium on the success of the
project especially its sustainability for a minimum period of 30 years. Therefore,
a reputable, Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) company will be
hired to build the power plant through a transparent bidding process, on a turn
key basis. The project financiers should be part of the process so as to elicit
mutual confidence. May we state here that, in executing this project CPGL has
two equally viable but strategically different funding options CPGL has chosen
vi
October 2012
to partner with foreign investors to raise the enormous capital needed. The
economic analysis of the project presented in the projects feasibility report has
shown those 10 years of full operation is grossly adequate for cost recovery.
Finally, CPGL and the project financiers will hire a mutually agreeable but
reputable company experienced in managing and maintaining such power plants
to run the project for 10 years or till all costs are recovered.
OBJECTIVES OF THE ESIA
-
It is a further aim of this ESIA to attain a high level of compliance with the
local and international standards especially the World Banks OP 4.01
which is a requirement for CPGL to qualify for a partial risk guarantee
(PRG) in favour of an envisaged Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with
the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trader (NBET). Such compliance is the only
vii
October 2012
way the World Bank will be convinced that the 495MW proposed Power
Plant Project by CPGL is sustainable.
National
Guidelines,
Policies
and
Administrative
Directives
on
Environment.
-
ES1.4.1
National
Laws,
Standards
and
Regulatory
Requirements
on
Environment
Contemporary Nigeria has committed herself to a national policy that seeks
sustainable development through co-ordinated management of the environment
so as to ensure the comfort of the present and future generations. A legal
framework is therefore, needed as an integral part of National Environmental
Policy to provide legal backing for environmental protection and improvement
as well as create enabling procedural framework for effective implementation
and enforcement. Some of them that are relevant to Power Generation include:
viii
October 2012
ix
October 2012
National Electric Power Policy, 2000 seeks to ensure that Nigeria has an ESI
(electricity supply industry) that can meet the needs of its citizen in the 21 st
Century. Among the long term objectives of the policy is to encourage the
production of electricity so as to effectively support the socio-economic
development of the country and to ensure minimum adverse environmental
impact.
ES1.4.3 International Conventions in force in Nigeria
Nigeria is a signatory to a number of international conventions and agreements
relating to industrial development and environmental management. In certain
cases, conventions and agreements have influenced policy guidelines and
regulations which proponents must comply with during planning, construction
and operation of a project. Some of them are: convention on Biological Diversity
(1992), framework convention on climate change (1992), convention concerning
the protection of the world cultural an natural heritage sites (1972), convention
on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals (Bonn convention)
(1979), Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer (1987),
African convention on conservation of nature and natural resources (1968).
October 2012
World Bank group EHS Guidelines for Thermal Power Plants (IFCGTPP)
-
in
the
identification,
preparation,
and
implementation
of
xi
October 2012
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
xii
October 2012
The company HSE department shall be engaged as part of the daily business
activities;
All contractors working for or on behalf of the company are required to align
with CPGL policies and standards; and
xiii
October 2012
for the year 2020, requiring an investment of 3.5billion USD per annum for the
next 10years. In other words, the Government admitted its incapacity to drive
investment in the power sector all alone and invited the private sector to partner
with it.
Century Power Generation Ltd and her partners have responded to this call to
invest in the Nigerian Power sector.
power;
Utilising gas for electricity generation thus reducing gas flaring and its
associated environmental problems; and
xiv
October 2012
the seamless
implementation of the project shall be integrated into the project design as well
as all other stages (construction, operation and closure), to ensure sustainability
throughout its design life span. Therefore the project is sustainable as detailed in
chapter 2.
All land including the land settled on by communities within the study area,
belongs to the State under Nigerias Land Use Act of 1978. However, in the
Project area-Okija town of Ihiala Local Government Area of Anambra state, land
allocations are normally presided over by extended families to which the land
has been hereditarily allocated to. Land allocation is transferred within the
extended family from one generation to the next, until the allocation is
transferred via sale. Consequently, the above process describes the land tenure
system. The project land is a fallow land and is currently not used for cultural or
religious purposes.
xv
October 2012
Civil
engineering
works,
including
excavation
and
foundation
construction.
Installation of fuel gas system and the interface pipe between the IPP
pipes and the existing gas system of the Nigeria Gas Company (NGC);
xvi
October 2012
), Water vapor (
xvii
October 2012
No Project
(b)
(c)
(d)
It will assure the realisation of $480,000,000 USD expected foreign capital inflow which will impact positively on the Nigerian macro-economic indices, in
terms of balance of payment status.
It creates a commercial outlet for the natural gas from the Oguta Egbema oil
field (about 200 million square cubic feet of gas per day will be needed to run
the plantat full capacity. This is likely going to discourage gas flaring by
multinational oil companies in the Oguta-Egbema area and reduce the level
of environmental degradation. .
xviii
October 2012
It uses very efficient technology for power generation which maximizes the
Power Output with respect to fuel input and reduces carbon emissions.
A combined cycle plant improves gas to kilowatt ratio by about 40% and may
attract carbon credit.
Literature/desktop research
Field observation
xix
October 2012
by the two key air masses: the dry Tropical Continent air mass originating from
the Sahara in the north, and the moist Tropical
Ocean in the south. An Inter-Tropical Discontinuity (ITD) zone separates the two
air masses. The mean temperature of the project area is relatively high and
ranges between 29.2oC and 38.4oC while the mean minimum temperature varies
from 19.1oC and 26.6oC.
ES4.3 Bio-physical Conditions of the Environment
Bio- physical parameters derived from Air Quality, Noise Level, Water Quality,
Soil Characteristics have been sampled and analysed to establish base line
conditions. Also a structured examination of the Flora and Fauna were also
undertaken to establish the biodiversity of the area. Details of the reports are
presented in chapter four of this report.
xx
October 2012
officials of the LGA and Anambra State Ministry of Environment as well as the
villagers themselves.
xxi
October 2012
education, 45% are secondary school leavers while 20% are university graduates
from various tertiary institutions.
Most of the roads in the Okija community are tarred through efforts by the State,
LGA and Community. The Okija-Oguta-Egbema road is also tarred and provides
an alternative route to Imo state, especially to the oil rich Egbema. It is should be
noted that the gas fuel for the CPGL power plant will come from the OgutaEgbema region. Portable water is obtained from private bore holes, though a few
inhabitants patronize the streams mostly for domestic use, the survey shows that
most people obtain drinking water from water bagged in plastic bags sold in the
street. Electricity is currently being supplied by PHCN with the more wealthy
members of the community supplementing electric grid supply with electricity
from diesel generators. There is a post office in the community and access to
reliable mobile phone networks.
ES5.4 Health Profile
From the survey, the most prevalent sicknesses are malaria, cholera, diarrhoea,
dysentery, rheumatism, typhoid fever etc. in that order (Fig 5.12) Information
was also gathered from the General Hospital and other health facilities. A health
professional who was interviewed as part of this report corroborated the result of
the survey. The prevalence of Malaria is attributed to the occurrence of stagnant
water in drains, pots and bushes which make ideal breeding ground for the
anopheles mosquito. The other infectious diseases like dysentery, cholera etc. are
attributed to poor sanitation and limited source of clean water. Some people
obtain drinking water from the stream where bathing takes place. According to
the survey, cholera is prevalent in children, with some respondent having likely
answered for their children.
xxii
October 2012
In line with widely recommended impact assessment approaches, the first level
of impact assessment involves the preliminary identification and screening of
potential
environmental
impacts
from
anticipated
activity-environment
Foundation
Construction
Activities
Onsite construction
and installation
activities
Activities
Mobilization and demobilization:
Transportation of materials and
workers
Physical site clearing and levelling
Sand filling
Wastes and emissions: generation
and handling
Digging/Excavation: Reinforcement
of bases for equipment/facilities.
Piling
Wastes and emissions: generation
and handling
Mobilization and demobilization:
Transportation of materials and
workers
Installation of Power Plant facilities
Construction of Plant/Substation
Wastes and emissions: generation
and handling
xxiii
Potential Impact
Noise pollution
Accidents
Accumulation of
debris
Loss of vegetation
Air pollution
Ecological
Displacement
Displacement of
Fauna. Noise
Pollution
Air pollution
Accidents
Sudden increase in
human population
Noise pollution
Noise pollution
Accident from metal
scraps
October 2012
Commissioning,
production
operations and
maintenance
Maintenance activities
Decommissioning
Risk of vehicular
accidents
Noise pollution,
Availability of
power,
Employment.
Contamination from
spent oil.
Air quality
Loss of jobs
Noise pollution
Risk of accidents
Ecological
reclamation
xxiv
October 2012
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
Impact on Soil
The majority of the surface of the site area will be covered with
gravel or a similar material with a higher permeable surface to
reduce surface run-off particularly during heavy rains;
The wastewater treatment plant shall be effectively operated to
ensure that waste water and oil contaminated waste water are in
compliance with relevant standards after treatment to avoid soil
contamination.
CPGL shall ensure that the turbines will use a dry low NOx
combustion system which will form a key mitigation measure
during the Operation phase.
All vehicles used shall be regularly maintained and Vehicle
xxv
October 2012
Permit.
Impact on Noise Level
CPGI shall ensure that the plant design shall be such that
reverberant sound from the gas turbine is minimized internally by
using an acoustic enclosure.
Good door seals which shall meet the specifications for 82 dB at 1
m from the source shall be used and will be replaced regularly to
ensure efficiency.
Exhaust stacks will be designed to meet a noise level of 92 dB(A).
The walls, roof, windows and doors to the building shall have a
high noise reduction rating and ensure that there are no significant
gaps. Air conditioning/air flow requirements shall be designed to
take account of noise breakout.
Impact on Transportation
Impact on Soil
xxvi
October 2012
xxvii
October 2012
Administrative operations
Impact on Socio-cultural
System
Impact on Basic
Amenities Infrastructure
Impact on Transportation
System
xxviii
October 2012
Waste Management
Impact on Soil
xxix
October 2012
Impact on Visual
Intrusion and Aesthetics
xxx
October 2012
Safety
Impacts
Increased vehicular
traffic risk,
xxxi
October 2012
xxxii
October 2012
There was palpable fear about influx of workers during the construction stage
giving the inadequate level of social amenities. Stakeholders would wish CPGL
could provide portable water to reduce the spread of water borne diseases. Key
members of the community raised the issue of gaseous emissions and hazardous
effluents. Another gentleman raised the issue of increased potential for accidents at
the site area. CPGL responded by reiterating her commitment to taking appropriate
measures to minimise any adverse effects.
Employment
Stakeholders from the host community made a passionate appeal regarding the
employment of their youths for economic empowerment. They promised to
provide skilled manpower so as to forestall a situation whereby their job seekers
from their communities could only get jobs as guards and dish washers.
Provision of Electricity
Community members also asked for electricity supply from the power plant. The
proponent is not opposed to this, but the logistics is challenging as the distribution
infrastructure in the community will need to be improved and regulatory permit
obtained from NERC. However the engagement continues.
ii.
xxxiii
October 2012
iv.
ES 9.1
CPGL shall ensure that all employees working in the power plant shall adequately
train and retrain on specific operations with regards to safety procedures and
environmental protection. All construction and operation personnel shall be given
periodic training and briefing on sound environmental management practices
pertaining to their jobs. The proponent shall ensure that the staff gains good
understanding of the rationale behind the recommended mitigation measures and
monitoring programs.
CPGL shall establish a Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Department which
shall be responsible for all environmental management issues including regular
training of staff and visitors to the power plant facilities. The personnel of this
department shall be effectively trained in handling safety issues, Environmental
Management Systems (EMS), Occupational Health and Safety Management
Systems, etc.
Summary of Implementation Cost of the ESMP
No
Phase of Implementation
xxxiv
Cost in NGN
October 2012
Construction Phase
34.2million (annually)
Operation Phase
14.4million (annually)
48.6million
Cumulative impacts from the Project and neighbouring sources have been
quantified for NOx in (Table 10.1), and for CO in table 10.2. Both levels are
considered to be very low and not associated with significant impacts on air
quality. The cumulative dust impacts are also expected to be low since the vehicular
traffic does not add to the completed dust level. The road is still new and well
covered with bitumen.
The proposed project area has many important ecological and economic
functions
2.
By its nature and characteristics, the project many cause some ecological
disruptions, such as: significantly low gaseous emission which the in-built
mitigation measures would take care of, as well as some negative sociocultural impacts
xxxv
October 2012
3.
The identified negative impacts are either temporary or are of low to medium
magnitude and are far outweighed by the positive impacts which are long
term and of national significance.
4.
5.
There will not be any need to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan, since the
proposed site covering 27.41 hectares does not contain any economic trees,
farm land, proposed or completed residential structures, economic structures
temporary or permanent or shrines for any Okija deity. (refer to section 4-77:
Vegetation studies). However, enumerations of the flora and fauna currently
existing at the proposed location have been documented in section 4-77, as
part of this ESIA.
ES11.1 Conclusion
Based on the conditions summarized above, the following recommendations are
made for implementation:
1.
The ESIA should form an integral part of the proposed power plant project
implementation document and should be used by project supervisors in
checking any adverse effect that the project may have on the various
environmental components.
2.
xxxvi
October 2012
xxxvii
October 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGES
COVER PAGE................................................................................................................... I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. III
-
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2
Background ...................................................................................................................................... 2
Project Overview .............................................................................................................................. 4
THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 6
Major Considerations ........................................................................................................................................ 6
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
xxxviii
October 2012
1.10
1.11
1.12
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
xxxix
October 2012
4.4
4.5
Season 49
Aquatic and Hydro-Biological Studies ............................................................................................................. 56
TABLE 4.11: MICROBIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SURFACE WATER AT THE PROJECT SITE .................. 59
Hydrogeological and Geophysical Studies ....................................................................................................... 70
Geophysical Studies ........................................................................................................................................ 72
Vegetation Studies .......................................................................................................................................... 77
Animal Resources and Wildlife ........................................................................................................................ 78
5.4
5.5
6.2
6.3
xl
October 2012
6.4
Noise............................................................................................................................................... 31
Impact Assessment Methodology ................................................................................................................... 31
Impact Description and Significance: Construction ......................................................................................... 34
Impact Description and Significance: Summary .............................................................................................. 37
6.5
6.6
6.7
BIODIVERSITY ................................................................................................................................. 47
Impact Description and Significance: Construction ......................................................................................... 48
Impact Description and Significance: Operation ............................................................................................. 49
Impact Description and Significance: Decommissioning ................................................................................. 49
Impact Description and Significance: Summary .............................................................................................. 50
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 65
xli
October 2012
9.0
ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) ......................................................... 2
9.1
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2
Key elements................................................................................................................................................... 2
9.2
Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... 3
9.3
Proponents Commitment ................................................................................................................. 4
9.4
Planning ........................................................................................................................................... 4
9.5
Implementation ................................................................................................................................ 6
Roles of the Project Proponent ......................................................................................................................... 6
Roles of Other Institution and Agencies ............................................................................................................ 8
Air Quality and Noise Level monitoring plan ..................................................................................................... 9
Soil Quality Monitoring Plan ........................................................................................................................... 10
Ground Water Quality Monitoring Plan .......................................................................................................... 10
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Plan .......................................................................................................... 11
Wastes Management Monitoring Plan ........................................................................................................... 11
9.6
9.7
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 6
12.0
13.0
Appendices
xlii
October 2012
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1
Table 1.2
Table 1.3
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
Design Conditions....................................................................................3-9
Specification Requirements of the Gas Turbine Plants.......................3-20
Specification Requirements of the Steam plant...................................3-21
Composition of the Natural Gas for CPGL IPP Plant.........................3-23
Emission of Air from CPGL Power Plant.............................................3-33
Effluents generated by CPGL IPP..........................................................3-36
Table 4.1
Table 4.2
Table 4.3
Table 4.4
Table 4.5
Table 4.6
Table 4.7
Table 4.8
Table 4.9
Table 4.10
Table 4.11
Table 4.12
Table 4.13
Table 4.14
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
4.15
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
xliii
October 2012
Table 5.5
Table 5.6
Table 6.1
Table 6.2
Table 6.3
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
6.14
6.15
6.16
6.17
6.18
6.19
Table 6.20
Table 6.21
Table 7.1
Table 7.2
Table 7.3
Table 7.4
Table 9.1
Table 9.2
Table 9.3
Table 9.4
Table 9.5
xliv
October 2012
Table 10.1
Table 10.3
xlv
October 2012
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig
1.1
Fig
1.2
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
1.3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Fig
Fig
3.5
3.6
Fig
3.7
Fig
3.8
Fig
Fig
4.1
4.2
Fig
Fig
4.3
4.4
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
Fig
4.10
Fig
4.11
Fig
4.12
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
xlvi
October 2012
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.10
5.11
5.12
5.13
Age of respondents..............................................................................5-32
Marital Status of respondents.............................................................5-33
Sex of respondents................................................................................5-33
Religion of respondents.......................................................................5-34
Awareness of the project......................................................................5-3
Response on desirability of project.....................................................5-36
Health symptoms..................................................................................5-37
Prevalent health problems...................................................................5-38
Response on health risk........................................................................5-3
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
xlvii
October 2012
LIST OF PLATES
Plate 4.1
Plate 4.2
Plate 4.11
Plate 4.12
Plate 5.1
Plate 5.2
Plate 5.3
Plate 6.1
Plate 4.3
Plate 4.4
Plate 4.5
Plate 4.6
Plate 4.7
Plate 4.8
Plate 4.9
Plate 4.10
xlviii
October 2012
decibel
xlix
October 2012
October 2012
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
li
October 2012
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CENTURY POWER GENERATION LIMITED wishes to thank the Government of
the Federal Republic of Nigeria through its Agencies for the opportunity given her
to conduct this Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) in support of
the 495MWe Independent Power Plant Project at Okija, Anambra State. The cooperation of the stakeholders in the project area and Federal Ministry of
Environment (FMEnv) is gratefully acknowledged. We would also like to thank the
Management of MASODAK ASSOCIATES/F.M. CHIDEZ NIG. LTD consortium
and the entire Study Team for the successful execution of this ESIA study.
lii
October 2012
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Century Power Generation Limited (CPGL), a company incorporated in Nigeria
with head office at African Re Building, 4th Floor, Plot 1679, Karimu Kotun Street,
Victoria Island, Lagos State, Nigeria, in collaboration with her technical partners
hereby proposes to design, procure, install and operate a new combined cycle
gas power plant that would generate about 495MW (ISO) of electricity, at a
location in Okija, along Onitsha Owerri express way, Anambra State. The
project when completed will provide electric power to drive various industrial
establishments in Ihiala, its environs and to the rest of the country through the
national grid via a 330KV substation and short transmission line.
Granting an on-grid generation license to CPGL means that the output of the
plant will be sold to the Nigerian Electricity Grid through the newly created
Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trader (NBET). It follows that NBET will execute a
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with CPGL which details the conditions for
the power sale transaction. In practice, such PPAs would need some form of
securitization to cushion the risk of a possible default in payment by the
October 2012
purchaser. This crucial rung in the privatization ladder has been the most
challenging to climb by the policy drivers of the Nigerian Electricity Supply
Industry (NESI).
As part of its efforts to strengthen the power sector in sub-Saharan Africa, the
World Bank has decided to provide a Partial Risk Guarantee (PRG) scheme to
securitize the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). Currently 14 power projects
have been nominated to the World Bank for a PRG. An important pre-requisite
to obtaining a PRG from the World Bank is an Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment (ESIA) report.
Century Power Generation Limited (CPGL) plans to execute a PPA with NBET
for the sale of her proposed 495MW power plant output. As a responsible
corporate citizen, CPGL is aware of the need to articulate the environmental and
social impacts of the power plant project and work out ways of mitigating,
managing and monitoring these impacts. CPGL therefore commissioned a
consortium of two reputable Nigerian companies MASODAK Associates, a
Civil and Environmental Engineering and F. M. CHIDEZ Nig Ltd, a Power
Systems Engineering Consulting group to conduct an ESIA of her 495MW power
plant. The consortium engaged the required expertise in the various aspects of
the ESIA process to arrive at a report in full conformity with the World Bank
guidelines as well as the requirements of other local regulatory bodies. This
document presents the executive summary of the entire ESIA report from the
Legal and Administrative framework, Project Alternatives and Project
Description to major findings of the Environmental and Social studies, Impact
Identification, Mitigation measures, Management and Monitoring plans for
various stages of the project up to post closure. A life span of about 30 years is
envisaged for the equipment which may be replaced or the site closed.
October 2012
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Nigeria is a country of over 160 million people with an average electric power
generation of 4500 MW resulting in a per capita power availability of 28 watts.
This is grossly inadequate. Indeed, a 2008 power demand survey report by
TRACTABEL, a British company, estimated the current national power demand
as 10,000MW which implies a shortfall of 5,500 MW. This considerable
unserviced demand is stifling economic growth and degrading quality of life. To
meet this demand, huge quantities of generating sets have been imported into
the country from all over the world. The cost of self-generated power is about 54
Naira/kwh compared with 22 Naira/kwh for grid supplied power. The citizens
willingness to pay for expensive off-grid generated power can be seen in great
demand for generators of all shapes and sizes as well as the willingness to pay
for the high cost of operating and maintaining these machines. Furthermore, the
low power availability from the public utility has forced corporate entities to
divert large amount of funds from their core business to securing quality power
supply. This has resulted in locally manufactured goods being uncompetitive
with imported goods, leading to considerable loss of production capacities.
CPGLs decision to develop the Okija IPP project is therefore strategic, farsighted
and borne out of a desire to improve the economic landscape of Nigeria. Project
Economics
From the attached survey plan (Fig. 1.1) the land area covered by the plant is
about 14 hectares. The project considers the use of Two Nos. SIEMENS SGT5
2000E Gas Turbines each coupled to SGen 5-100A-2P type Generators with a
SIEMENS steam Turbine SST5 4000 configured in a 2 x 1 combined cycle multi
shaft arrangement (SCC5 4000E with 2 x 1) linked to two Heat Recovery Steam
Generator (HRSG) systems bringing the total output to about 495MW (site
condition). This configuration is very suitable for the CPGL IPP project due to
minimal gas consumption. The combined cycle plant will be configured in line
October 2012
with SIMENS SCC5 2000E 2x1 system with an expected net output of 450MW.
The gross heat rate is 6883kJ/kWh (ISO) while the gross efficiency at rated
capacity is expected to be 52.7% (ISO) with an air cooled condenser.
The
economic calculations shown on the excel worksheet in the feasibility study, are
self explanatory and show that the project is economically viable. Preliminary
contacts with the Okija communities during land negotiations was extremely
positive and indicated a safe investment climate. Though the Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) report of the project is expected to recommend specific
relationships with the surrounding villages, the general mood of the people is
that of joyful expectation for this big power project.
Market Availability
Studies have shown that the demand for electric power in Nigeria is quite high
and is rapidly growing.. In particular, the target catchments of Onitsha, Nnewi,
Ekwuluobia, Awka, Ogbaru and Ihiala play host to 39,615 commercial and light
industrial customers based on 2007 figures released by Enugu Distribution
Company (see Table 3). Recently a car assembly plant was commissioned at
Nnewi which has added substantially to the total load demand.
Business Plan
The CPGLs business plan calls for first identifying a credible market for
electric power along with together with a reliable source of natural gas fuel (),
then acquiring enough land for a power project. CPGL expects the project to be
sustainable and be viable for at least 30years.
October 2012
Fig 1.1: Survey plan of the Landed Property of Century Power Generation Ltd at Ubahu
Okija Ihiala Local Government Area, Anambra State
October 2012
(WB), AFDB, AsDB, IFC, EIB to mention a few, have gone further to articulate
their individual guidelines for the conduct of ESIAs. These ESIAs have become
critical in making a project bankable. The new realization is that project
sustainability transcends the earlier held view that the goal of business is to
maximize profit and has been expanded to include considerations for Economic,
Socio-political and Environmental impact of the project in question. It is now
understood that plans need to be developed to monitor mitigants deployed to
minimize negative impacts as well as maximize positive impacts. Using this
benchmark, a sustainable project should have no net negative impact. In its ESIA
guidelines for Power Transmission Infrastructure, (SAPP EG01/110) sees an
ESIA as an integral part of project development and not a separate process. In
other words, incorporating environmental management consideration into the
decision-making process improves project planning and enhances sustainability.
October 2012
FMEnv
appointed
reviewers
and
sometimes
professional
associations.
OBJECTIVES OF THE ESIA
Century Power Generation Limited (CPGL) as a responsible corporate citizen, is
aware of the importance of comprehensive environmental and socio-economic
dynamics to the success of any developmental project, thus CPGL is committed
to full integration of environmental and socio-economic considerations into the
life cycle of its proposed power plant project. Therefore, the major objective of
this ESIA is to
a) Assess the nature, intensity and duration of the project impacts and those of
other project related activities on the environment and socio-economic life of the
surrounding communities
b) Proffer mitigation measures where necessary to minimize the negative impacts
as well as
c) Arrange subsequent management and monitoring programs to last the life cycle
of the project.
In doing so, CPGL plans to ensure the consultation and participation of all
stakeholders especially the local communities in the entire ESIA process so as to
promote an enabling environment for project sustainability.
A major aim of this ESIA is to ensure that the project attains a high level of
compliance with local and international standards especially the World Banks
OP 4.01 which is a requirement for CPGL to qualify for a partial risk guarantee
(PRG) in favour of an envisaged Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with the
Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trader (NBET). Such compliance is the only way the
October 2012
World Bank will be convinced that the 495MW proposed Power Plant Project by
CPGL is sustainable.
To provide relevant information, at the design stage, that will assist the
project design team to optimize environmental and socio-economic
interaction with the project.
Identify the positive impacts of the project and develop strategies for
enhancing them.
October 2012
10
October 2012
In Nigeria, the Terms of Reference (ToR), which is submitted to the FMEnv at the
point of seeking permission to conduct an EIA, details the scope of the activities
involved in the process. The world Bank Operational Polices (OP) and Bank
Procedures (BP) add more emphasis on social constitution because for a project
to be sustainable, the surrounding communities must accept its presence. This
latter emphasis may have given rise to ESIA. Shown in Fig. 1.2 is an ESIA process
chart developed by the EIA Centre, University of Manchester. An EIA flow chart
by the FMEnv is drawn in Fig. 1.3. However, after studying several ESIA
guidelines notably World Bank OP/BP 4.01, EU and SAPP guidelines, the
activities which culminate to a typical ESIA may be listed as
-
Impact Identification/Assessment
11
October 2012
Screening
Consideration
of alternatives
Establishing
the baseline
Scoping
Prediction and
evaluation of
impacts
Environmental
impacts
Social impacts
Mitigation
Monitoring
Environmental
Management
System
12
October 2012
Consultations
with
relevant
stakeholders
and
determination
of
13
October 2012
A ToR which contains the scope of the EIA and an application form were
submitted to the FMEnv on the 8th of July 2011. A subsequent approval was
received on the 23rd of August 2011 placing the project on category 1 requiring
mandatory EIA and a panel review.
14
October 2012
project and some geological studies of the Anambra Basin, form part of Desktop
studies.
Primary data collection took place from September 1st to 3rd for wet season
biophysical quantities and January 11th to 13th for dry season. Pictorial reports of
the activities during the field investigations are presented in chapter four
together with the results.
Socio-economic data acquisition usually takes more visits to the project area and
adjoining settlements. Socio-economic experts were embedded into the data
gathering team during the biophysical data gathering to undertake more visits
on social consultation. Notable dates were October 20th, 2011 at the palace of the
Obi Onowu of Okija, His Royal Highness, Obi Nnamuzie, and chairman of the
Ihiala L.G.A council of Traditional Rulers and November 18th, 2011 when they
met the Chairman of Ihiala LGA and a section of the Mpidiegwu
Nwokeaghanaji, Umuabanihi and Udensi families from whom the project land
was acquired. Dr. Usman and his team eventually organized a public forum on
the 22nd of March 2012.
Community and Stakeholder Consultation
Dr. M.A. Usman, an accomplished socio-economist and his team, performed the
following tasks.
Social engagement with special groups like the youths groups, the
women associations, the elderly groups and secondary school leavers, to
evaluate their concerns.
15
October 2012
16
October 2012
17
October 2012
18
October 2012
laws
and
those
of
international
agreements,
protocols,
in
Nigeria.(www.nesrea.org/about.php)
(Date
obtained:
4/Sept/2012)
19
October 2012
Prior to 1988, some laws and codes of practice had existed in Nigeria which deals
with the environment as well as institutions to enforce them. However, post
1988, there was a surge in the number of these statutes and institutions,
apparently due to increased awareness. By 1988, initial guidelines for the
conduct of ESIA for new projects and Environmental Audit (EA) for existing
ones had emerged with subsequent reviews to date. Contemporary Nigeria has
committed herself to a national policy that seeks sustainable development
through co-ordinated management of the environment so as to ensure the
comfort of the present and future generations. The initial concepts have been
expanded to accommodate the various institutional settings and professional
groupings, as well as the complex historical, social, cultural and legal
considerations, which form part of the process of identification and
implementation of measures designed to overcome national environmental
challenges. A legal framework is therefore, needed as an integral part of National
Environmental Policy to provide legal backing for environmental protection
and improvement as well as create enabling procedural framework for effective
implementation and enforcement.
20
October 2012
These
21
October 2012
22
October 2012
pollutants from a site, process or stack vent with the objective of achieving a
desired air quality.
Chapter four contains the noise exposure limits for Nigeria. This chapter states
that industrial or workplace noise regulation is as a result of occupational
exposure of workers to noise from industrial machines or exposure of
neighbourhood population to noise from factories nearby. The fact that most
industrial estates exist alongside or close to residential areas highlights the
importance of noise limits.
23
October 2012
discharge into the environment except when such release is otherwise permitted
under the provision of FEPA Guideline.
24
October 2012
The policy and legal instruments developed to date by the Agency to halt
environmental degradation in Nigeria include:
25
October 2012
26
October 2012
and other authorizations to occupy land). The Acts also specify the procedures
the State must follow to clear the land, and define the compensatory measures
the State must implement in order to compensate the people affected. However,
individuals still retain the right to trade on land while State endorsement is
sought thereafter.
Under the Land Use Act, there are two types of land rights (US AID, 2010)
-
Statutory occupancy rights: Individuals and entities can obtain a statutory right
for occupancy of urban and non-urban land. Recipients of certificates of
occupancy are obligated to pay the state for any unexhausted improvements (ie
improvements with continuing value such as a building or irrigation system) on
the land at the time the recipient takes possession and must pay rent fixed by the
state. Rights are transferrable with the authorization of the state governor.
The Land Use Act vests all land in the urban areas of each state under the control
and management of the governor of the state. The governor of the state holds the
land in trust for the people of the state and is solely responsible for the allocation
of land in all urban areas to individuals who reside in the state and to
organizations for residential, agricultural and commercial purposes. All other
land in the state subject to conditions under the Land Use Act is under the
control and management of the local government. The act divests traditional
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
27
October 2012
owners of land and vests such land in the state governor for the benefit and use
of all Nigerians. It provides the processes through which land may be acquired
by the federal government. On rural land where there are no formal title deeds
and any land rights are customarily held, compensation for land acquisition is
only provided for buildings, crops and other improvements to the land as well
as rent for the year the land was occupied. Payment is not paid for land itself
since customary ownership is not recognised by government. However, in line
with the customs and traditions of the Okija people, the land is allocated to
different extended families; these families use the land for rotational farming and
grazing purposes. The transfer of the extended family land from one generation
to another is hereditary, until the right to the use of the land is sold by a
particular generation.
The 27.41 hectare land proposed for the siting of the Okija power plant by
Century Power Generation Limited was acquired from different families over
time and different agreements was executed with the parties for each purchase.
The right to use 13.6 hectares was bought from the Mpidiegwu family,and the
balance from the Nwokeaghanaji, Umuabanihi and Udensi families. The land
was left to fallow when the various portions were acquired from the families,
and it currently overgrown by wild trees, wild grass and wild shrubs. The
registration of the land and obtaining the customary right-of-occupancy is ongoing, preparatory to commencing site works.
In
28
October 2012
proper and detailed execution of EIA studies of infrastructure and oil and gas
projects in consonance with EIA Act of 1992.
In compliance with its mandate, FEPA issued the EIA Procedural guidelines and
Sectoral guidelines for infrastructure in 1995. Contained in the guidelines (pg 8)
are category 1 projects (mandatory study activities) and listed under item 14
(Power generation and transmission) is the construction of power generation
station having a capacity of more than 10 mega-watts, making an EIA mandatory
for the project. The procedure also indicates the steps to be followed in the EIA
process from project conception to abandonment in order to ensure that the
project is executed with adequate consideration for the environment. Annex C
contains the Procedure for EIA report writing as required by FMEnv.
The main aim of an EIA is to ensure that potential problems are foreseen and
addressed at an early stage in the projects planning and design. To achieve this
aim, the assessments findings are communicated to all the various groups who
will make decisions about the proposed project; the project developers and their
investors, as well as regulators, planners and administrators. The EIA
management procedure is presented in Fig. 1.3.
29
October 2012
PROPONENT
FEASIBILITY STUDY OR PROJECT PROPOSAL
FMEnv EIA SECRETARIAT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
MANDATORY
PROJECTS
OTHERS
CLASSIFIED PROJECTS
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
EXCLUDED PROJECTS
SCREENING
SCOPING
NO EIA REQUIRED
PUBLIC HEARING
REVIEW PANEL
MEDIATION
REVIEW REPORT
PROPONENT
Not approved
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
(Decision making committee)
Approved
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
COMMISSIONING
AUDIT
30
October 2012
Part III: regulations prescribing the issue of a private license and governing a
license. These stipulate that:
o every application for license whether for sole source or supply or
emergency supply shall be in writing, and shall be accompanied by the fee
prescribed by regulation 40(1) of the electricity supply regulation as
amended from time to time and together with a prepared plan; and
o where the application, involves the placing of any works or electric lines
on or across, under or over, any public place, the applicant shall furnish
evidence at the time of his application with notice in writing and served to
the following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
the owner of any other electrical line interested in the proposed works, andThe
applicant shall ensure that the proposed works are not objected to or are
approved subject to certain conditions being observed. As at now, activities in
the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI) is regulated by the Nigerian
Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), created by the Electric Power Sector
Reform Act (EPSRA) 2005 and Guided by the National Electric Power Policy
(NEPP) 2000.
National Electric Power Policy, 2000 seeks to ensure that Nigeria has an
ESI (electricity supply industry) that can meet the needs of its citizen in
the 21st Century. Among the long term objectives of the policy is to
31
October 2012
The EPSRA is the document that gives legal backing to the creation of the
Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) to regulate a competitive
electricity market.
(1)
Subject to this Act, the Commission shall have the following principal
objectives;
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(2)
32
October 2012
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
Pursuant to subsection 2(b) above, the commission has enacted the following
codes and standards:
-
The Health and Safety code defines the level of observance of occupational
health and safety in the electricity supply industry while rendering normal
services in Generation, Transmission, Distribution and Metering. The main
objective is to ensure safety of personnel during construction or servicing of
electrical installations as well as safety and healthy surroundings for the public
during operation.
33
October 2012
The Grid code (version 01) contains the day-to-day operating procedures and
principles governing the development, maintenance and operation of an
effective, well-co-ordinated and economic transmission system for the electricity
sector in Nigeria.
Specifically, the code is designed to
(a) Facilitate the efficient production and supply of electricity for all Users of
the Transmission System and TCN itself, without any
act of
Essentially the Grid Code spells out the relationship between the System
Operator (SO), the Transmission Services Provider (TSP), and the Generator
regarding Dispatch (Active and Reactive Power), System Congestion, and
Spinning Reserve, Synchronization and overall security and stability.
The Distribution Code consists of:
(a) Distribution Planning and Connection Code
(b) Distribution Operation Code
(c) Construction and Maintenance Code and
(d) Data Registration Code.
The code is designed to:
-
The Distribution Code seeks to protect the Generating Plants and hence, must be
studied and understood by the Generating Companies (Generators). Specifically,
34
October 2012
in subsection 2.2.2, the code spells out the expectations on the Distribution
Companies during emergencies to include:
(a) As first priority, to act to preserve or restore the integrity of the
Distribution System or the Transmission System, including the avoidance
of breakdown, separation or collapse (partial or total).
(b) Compliance by the Distributor with the EPSRA and the Grid Code.
(c) Preserve the safety of equipment, to prevent damage to Plant and/or
Apparatus and public safety to prevent personal injury.
(d) The achievement of objectives specifically identified in the Distribution
code.
35
October 2012
imprisonment, to cut down trees within an area or to set fire to the forest except
under special circumstances. The Forestry Law CAP 51 of 1994 also prohibits any
activity that may lead to the destruction of or cause injury to any forest produces,
forest growth or forest property.
Cultural property;
Access to fishing.
36
October 2012
compulsory acquisition of land in the public interest for a public purpose, (i.e., to
abrogate leases and other authorizations to occupy land). However, the Acts also
specify the procedures the State must follow to acquire the land, and define the
palliative measures the state must implement in order to compensate the people
affected. However, individuals still retain the right to trade on land while State
endorsement is sought thereafter.
While Nigeria has ratified all eight cores International Labour Organization
(ILO) Conventions and enacted laws to enforce the provisions, there are
indications of restrictions on the trade union rights of the workers in Nigeria,
Traces of discrimination, child labour and some elements of forced labour. CPGL
will need to take these into consideration throughout the construction and
operational life of the project.
37
October 2012
38
October 2012
responsibilities and has even wielded the big stick with respect to some Telcom
cell sites in recent times.
vii.
viii.
ix.
x.
39
October 2012
The company HSE is equally engaged with production in the daily business
activities;
All contractors working for or on behalf of the company are required to align
with CPGL policies and standards; and
40
October 2012
Table 1.1 Lists some of the key relevant international conventions and protocols
to which Nigeria is a signatory. Each convention is briefly described thereafter.
Name of Convention
United Nations (UN) Convention on Biological
Diversity
Framework Convention on Climate Change
1991
41
October 2012
The convention sets aside areas of cultural and natural heritage for protection.
The latter is defined as areas with outstanding universal value from the aesthetic,
scientific and conservation points of view.
Convention on the Conservative of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (Bonn
Convention) (1979)
The Bonn Convention concerns the promotion of measures for the conservation
(including habitat conservation especially for endangered species listed in Bonn)
and management of migratory species.
Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (1987)
The purpose of this protocol is to protect the ozone layer through enhanced
international cooperation by taking precautionary measures to control equitably
total global emissions of substances that deplete it. Signatories undertake to
communicate statistics on annual production, imports and exports of the
substances as indicated in the Protocol and to promote research and
development activities and information exchange.
African Convention on Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (1968)
The contracting countries undertook to adopt measures necessary to ensure
conservation, utilization and development of soil, water flora and fauna
resources in accordance with scientific principles and with due regard to the best
interests of the people.
International Best Practice Standards and Guidelines
To help protect the security of the Projects revenues, CPGL IPP is seeking to
obtain a Partial Risk Guarantee from the World Banks International
Development Association (IDA) together with insurance cover from the World
Banks Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA). Development finance
42
October 2012
institutions such as the World Bank provide guidance on their requirements for
the ESIA process and place particular emphasis on achieving sustainable
environmental, social and health outcomes.
World Bank group EHS Guidelines for Thermal Power Plants (IFCGTPP)
Equator principles
The Equator Principles have been adopted by a wide range of banks and lenders
all over the world in order to manage the social and environmental risks
associated with potential investment.
Table 1.2 Equator Principles
The principles comprise the following:
43
October 2012
Principle 1
Principle 2
Categorization of projects
The borrower has to conduct an Environmental and
Social Impact Assessment (ESIA)
Applicable Social and Environmental Standards
Principle 3
Principle 4
Principle 5
Grievance Mechanism
Principle 6
Independent Review
Principle 7
Covenants
Principle 8
Principle 9
Equator
Principle 10
Reporting
Principles
Financial
Institutions
(EPFI)
44
October 2012
More specifically, the following policies are likely to be triggered by the project
activities:
45
October 2012
or unprecedented and which may affect an area beyond the site or facilities. An
ESIA for a Category A project is required to identify and assess potential
negative and positive environmental and social impacts, compare these with
those of feasible alternatives (including the no project alternative), and
recommend mitigation measures to reduce negative impacts and enhance
benefits. The EIA process and this EIA report have been conducted and prepared
in line with OP 4.01.
The following steps, which are integrated into the EIA process, will take account
of the PCR in the area of interest: screening, developing terms of reference (TOR),
collecting baseline data, impact assessment and formulating mitigating measures
and a management plan.
Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines for Thermal Power Plants
This World Bank Group guideline provides guidelines on emission limits,
management measures and monitoring for all fossil-fuel thermal-based power
plants with a production capacity of more than 50MW. The document outlines
guidelines
on
assessing
the
industry-specific
impacts
and
identifying
46
October 2012
waste, hazardous material handling and noise. Similarly, the guideline provides
management measures for occupational and community health and safety
(H&S).
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work as contained in the Terms of Reference (ToR) shall be strictly
adhered to. This includes but not limited to the following:
47
October 2012
DECLARATION
Century Power Generation Limited (CPGL) as the operator of the 495MWe
Independent Gas Power Plant hereby declares its intention to abide by all
relevant environmental laws during the operation of the facility. CPGL will
ensure adequate protection of the project environment in accordance with its
CASHES policy and in compliance with all the applicable International
Guidelines, National, State and Local Government Laws, regulations and/or bye
laws.
48
October 2012
49
October 2012
CHAPTER TWO
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CHAPTER TWO
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
NEED FOR THE PROJECT
The Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI), like its counterparts in
developing economies is characterized by low generating capacity, weak
Transmission capability and grossly inadequate distribution infrastructure. The
deficient available capacity results in low spinning reserve and weak security
(Okafor and Shomolu 2000). Due to low inertia arising from relatively small
capacity, frequency swings against load changes are in most cases, beyond the
mathematical first order, which is assumed in the design of most control
equipment. In consequence, frequency errors are high while system collapses
(partial/total) are frequent which adversely affect power quality and reliability.
Technical losses are high due to a number of factors including long transmission
distance while the level of system automation is far below average.
Against the above background, Deregulation has been proposed as a way of
improving the electricity supply industry in Nigeria. Therefore, in 2005, the
Electric Power Sector Reform Act (EPSRA) was passed into law by The National
Assembly (NA), which paved the way for private participation in the NESI. The
major objective of Government was to increase available generating capacity
from an embarrassing 3000MW to 10,000MW by the end of 2007, through a
combination of public and private investments in generation. On her part, the
Government of the day under the watch of Chief Olusegun Obasanjo started a
rather ambitious project named the National Integrated Power Project (NIPP)
aimed at doubling the entire power infrastructure by 2007 when the tenure of the
incumbent President would lapse. Suffice it to say that in 2012, the available
generation capacity still stands at about 4500MW, which is grossly inadequate
for a population of almost 160million people.
October 2012
From the foregoing, a simple arithmetic presents the Nigerian per capita
electricity consumption at 28.125watts. This is far below the level recommended
by the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI). Suppose we make a
further assumption that only the urban/semi - urban population, estimated at
50million have access to electricity, then the per capita consumption grows to
90watts, which has not really changed much. A 2008 report by the Presidential
Committee on Accelerated Power Infrastructure Development recommended
that the available generating capacity for Nigeria should be 25, 000MW by the
year 2015. The figure was worked out from a desire to raise per capita urban
electricity consumption to 500watts or 0.5KW which can be achieved by raising
the generating capacity to 500watts x 50million which results to 25,000MW.
Though this calculation is technically not feasible due to issues of spinning
reserve and other reliability issues, this prospect of raising the installed capacity
from the then 4000MW to 25, 000MW in the next 7years was definitely a tall
order. The reality was that for Nigeria to achieve 25,000MW available electricity
generation capacity in 2015 from 2008 translates to an average additional
capacity of 3000MW per year for the next 7years. Currently, it seems that the
NIPP power project is the only project that is making any measurable headway
in improving the countrys generating capacity. This makes it abundantly clear
that unless the private sector responds to the call for more power generation, the
500MW per capita consumption in 2015 will remain a mirage.
CPGLs 495MW project, when complete, will increase the Countrys installed
capacity by 10% which is a substantial achievement. The choice of Okija as the
project site is very strategic due to its proximity to two economic hubs in
Anambra state Onitsha and Nnewi. The site is also close to Oguta-Egbema gas
fields where natural gas is available and can be piped down to the plant. This
will drastically reduce the incident of gas flaring with its attendant
environmental challenges. Furthermore, locating the plant in the south eastern
part of the Nigeria deserves special commendation because this part of the
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
October 2012
country is devoid of any power generating infrastructure. Yet the inhabitants are
known to be very entrepreneurial, in fact it is widely acknowledged that the
industrialization of the region has been held back by lack of reliable power
supply. . When the plant is completed, it is expected that the power supply
situation around the Onitsha-Nnewi region will be drastically improved. Also
load management in the area in terms peaking capacity and spinning reserve will
be greatly improved due to the IPP. .
In 2010, the current administration of Dr Goodluck Jonathan launched the road
map for power sector reform where 40,000MW available generation was targeted
for the year 2020, requiring an investment of 3.5billion USD per annum for the
next 10years. The document went further to say, These sums cannot and will
not be funded and directed by Federal Government. Rather, central to the
development of the sector will be the need to incentivize the private sector to
partner with Government in this endeavour. In other words, the Government
has admitted its inability to drive investment in the power sector on its own and
has invited the private sector to partner with it.
CPGL CORPORATE OBJECTIVES
Century Power Generation Limited is a member of the Obijakson group with
Nestoil as the most prominent subsidiary. In response to the Federal
Governments call for improved power generation through private sector
participation, the Obijakson group registered CPGL as an investment vehicle for
power related development and acquisitions. The aim is to deploy her vast
experience in handling large projects in Oil and Gas sector to the Nigerian ESI for
the benefit of Nigerians. As at today, Century Power has obtained a generation
license from NERC and is in the process of signing on technical partners for the
power plant project.
October 2012
October 2012
Utilising gas for electricity generation thus reducing gas flaring and its
associated environmental problems; and
Environmental Sustainability
In all projects which impact on the environment, either positively or negatively
or both, environmental sustainability is assured by strictly adhering to local and
international guidelines on maintaining a clean environment as well as
maintaining an active HSE policy which integrates well planned socio-economic
responsibilities. In this case, some international guidelines like the World Banks
Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines (EHSGs) and The Equator Principles,
provide useful guides for good compliance. Century Power Generation Ltd
October 2012
Ensure
that
mitigation
measures
are
adequate
to
maintain
an
Regulate the form and scope of all residual negative impacts to ensure
they are as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP).
At the end of the useful life of any operation, restore the environment to a
condition suitable for future use.
October 2012
Many jobs will be created during construction of the proposed power plant.
Several jobs will be created to fill labor demand from plant operation.
Emissions from power plant with natural gas will be much lower than
with other fossil fuel alternatives.
Emissions of
standard.
The site for the power plant is - 28.4 hectares of completely virgin land
overgrown with vegetation with no current use.. It is obvious that no
resettlement of any kind is required.
Ulasi stream that passes through the edge of the property will remain
largely undisturbed since the entire power plant will be cooled by water
obtained from boreholes to be drilled.
The 330KV transmission line near the proposed plant, part of the national
grid, already exists and is already in the process of being upgraded by the
Nigerian Government.
It follows from the above that with appropriate stakeholder engagement, the
environmental and social sustainability of the project is assured.
October 2012
October 2012
demand. Therefore CPGL market strategy may involve direct supply to some
bulk consumers otherwise classified by the Electric Power Sector Reform Act
(EPSRA) as Eligible Customers.
Technical Sustainability
SIEMENS AG of Germany, an advisor on this project,, has been involved in
power plant operations for decades and has proven expertise in the manufacture
of gas turbines. It follows therefore; that the CPGL IPP plant will be run by
technically qualified staff who will insist on international best practices thus,
ensuring Technical Sustainability. In spite of this, the following measures have
been put in place to further enhance technical sustainability of the CPGL IPP
plant:
-
Time
Based
Maintenance
(TBM),
cutting edge protective devices will be installed to shield the plant from
damaging voltage, current and frequency fluctuations arising from faults
in and outside the plant.
10
October 2012
11
October 2012
CHAPTER THREE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CHAPTER THREE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This chapter captures some salient features of the project which interaction
results in the conversion of certain sets of inputs to corresponding sets of outputs
under specific conditions. Also outlined is the scope of work necessary for
implementing the various stages of the project, including Excavation, foundation
construction, plant erection, operation and decommissioning at the end of project
life. The main objective is to highlight the impact of these stages to the
environment.
October 2012
to Onitsha which is a major load centre in the Eastern part of Nigeria. Major
challenges are the single circuit nature of the line which may affect its load
bearing capacity and the existence of a window at Onitsha for possible bay
extension.
Anambra
State
October 2012
October 2012
families. Of particular interest is the fact that the Nzomiwu family was
represented by Mrs R. Nzomiwu, a clear testimony that the transaction is both
transparent and equitable.
October 2012
the project site is the permanent site of MADONNA University. This fast
growing citadel of learning is expected to benefit immensely from the proposed
injection substation at Ihiala. Also, just across the expressway, opposite the
project site is the headquarters office/Yard of HAMMAKOPP Consortium
Limited, a Civil and Mechanical construction company promoted by same
owners as Century Power Generation Limited.
The Study Area in particular is also characterised by very little or no human
activities that have impacted upon the vegetation structure. Footpaths used for
hunting, can be noticed running across a section of the land. The vegetation
types encountered within the Study Area were similar to those in the rest of the
State and included:
-
All flora habitats surveyed were found to comprise shrubs, grasses, sedges and a
mixture of mature trees and re-growing juvenile trees.
October 2012
OKIJA
Fig. 3.3: Part of Anambra State Showing Okija (sourced from Google
images)
Scope of the Project
The proposed project involves the use of gas turbines to generate electricity and
further use of the exhaust gases to power a steam turbine for more electricity in a
combined cycle configuration. The installation of the Power Plant would involve
the following activities:
Civil
engineering
works,
including
excavation
and
foundation
construction.
October 2012
Installation of fuel gas system and the interface pipe between the IPP
pipes and the existing gas system of the Nigeria Gas Company (NGC);
Design Philosophy
The main design objective of the proposed CPGL IPP project is to develop an
environmentally sustainable facility in substantial conformity with applicable
regulations, industry standards and codes.
The design concept of the proposed 495MW CPGL Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
Power Plant is based primarily on CPGL specifications of achieving low heat
rate, maximised output and minimum down time within the scope of relevant
standards and codes.
mechanical, civil, power generation and transmission as well as lines and subESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
October 2012
stations. Some of the codes and standards relevant to the proposed project are
drawn from International Electrotechnical Comission (IEC),
The Nigerian
Electrical Installation Standards CAP 106 (1976), The Nigerian Building Code
(2008), the Grid and Distribution Codes issued by NERC, to mention a few.
Design Conditions
The average environmental design parameters/conditions, considered for the
proposed 495MW CPGL Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant are:
Table 3.1: Design Conditions
Environmental Conditions
Altitude
Climate
Air Relative Density
Monthly Maximum Average Temperature
Monthly Minimum Average Temperature
Average Maximum Annual Temperature
Average Minimum Annual Temperature
Yearly Rainfall
Relative Humidity
Maximum Wind Velocity
Average Wind Velocity
Ice Build-up
Isokeraunic Level, Lightning Strokes
Source: CPGL feasibility study.
draining from north to south into the Ulasi stream. Access to the plant is direct
from the Onitsha Owerri express road from where a temporary road already
exists at the western end of the site terminating at the Ulasi stream. The road is
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
October 2012
currently being used by Lorries prospecting for sand at the bank of the stream.
The site is bounded in the north and south by the express road and Ulasi River
respectively and stretches from east to west.
According to the site layout shown in Figs. 3.5 and 3.6, the power plant will
consist of the following main elements:
2 indoor Combustion Turbine Generator units
1 indoor Steam Turbine Generator Unit
Fuel handling area where natural gas supply from the Nigerian Gas
Company is interfaced with supply to the plant.
Control room where the turbine generator units and associated
transformers and switchgears are controlled.
A multipurpose building housing the workshop, the offices and a staff
canteen.
The switch yard is on the north-eastern part to facilitate the connection to
the 330kV Alaoji Onitsha Line where the power output will be
evacuated. Normally, power is generated at 15kV and stepped up to
330kV by the generator transformers before transmitting to the substation.
On the southern part situates the staff quarters for operations staff on shift
duty (not shown).
The fire station lies between the switchyard and the fuel handling area.
Ulasi River/Stream bounds the southern end of the site.
Specifically, the proposed CPGL power plant will include the following main
components:
Generator House A
10
October 2012
Switchyard area
Stacks Module 1
Multipurpose Building
Administrative Building
Fire Station
Facility Plan
The facility plan for the proposed CPGL power plant considers mostly human
safety and escape, accessibility to components, free movement of materials and
personnel, minimum separation distances as well as optimum use of space.
Other considerations were provisions for expansion of each phase of the project,
compact arrangement, room for effective functionality, and measures to decrease
pollution upon the surrounding environment particularly the greenbelt of the
plant area. The total land area for the CPGL IPP project is about 16 hectares.
Proposed Plant Layout
The proposed plant layout is shown in Figs. 3.4 and 3.5 below. Both depict the
relative locations of the main elements of the power plant listed above. CPGL has
plans to expand the capacity of the plant in stages up to 1000MW in response to
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
11
October 2012
Nigerias load growth. This future intent may have informed facility planning at
the site. A brief description of each of the site facilities is presented below.
Two Nos. SIEMENS SGT5 2000E Gas Turbines each coupled to SGen 5-100A-2P
type Generators will be housed together with a SIEMENS steam Turbine SST5
4000 configured in a 2 x 1 combined cycle multi shaft arrangement (SCC5 2000E
with 2 x 1) with two Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) systems bringing
the total output to about 495MW (site condition). Each unit is housed with its
associated indoor accessories. A lower electrical annex will house the generator
unit, switchgear, control panels and cabling for the auxiliaries. Standard noise
reduced enclosures will be deployed to ensure the recommended values of 85
dBA within the plant and 45 dBA outside the plant are met.
The combined cycle plant will be configured in line with SIMENS SCC5
2000E 2x1 system with an expected net output of 450MW. The gross heat
rate is 6883kJ/kWh (ISO) while the gross efficiency at rated capacity is
expected to be 52.7% (ISO) with an air cooled condenser. It is important to
note that the gas turbine generators consist of two SIEMENS Eclass
heavy duty turbine SGT5 2000E with a net heat rate of 10370 kJ/kWh
(LHV ISO) for standard gaseous fuel and a net efficiency of 34.7%. This
configuration is very suitable for the CPGL IPP project due to minimal gas
consumption. The gas turbine pressure ratio is 11.7. Nominal voltage of
the plant will be 15.75KV at a frequency of 50 Hz. The plant will be
operated as a base load plant but could act as peaking capacity or render
any other ancillary service as the system operator pleases.
12
October 2012
The run-up and run-down rates of the Power Plant will be 22 MW per
minute.
A 7.5 MW Wartsila dual fuel gas engine generator will be installed to provide
black start services. The use of dual fuel is informed by a situation where the gas
supply fails. This generator can then run on fuel oil to supply station load. An
alternative supply from the local utility will also be provided.
One standard industrial borehole will be provided together with a medium sized
water treatment plant (7.5-10) m de-mineralized water a day, with a storage tank
for 7 days usage (approximately 700 m).
Three raw water storage tanks of approximately 300 m each spread at three
locations for fire fighting and two foam making machines, one near the power
house and the other near the fuel handling area respectively.
A moderate raw water storage tank (800 m) will be provided for different plant
wash activities. Here the drains will be separately collected, filtered, treated and
discharged according to World Bank guidelines and International best practices.
330KV air insulated switchgear, with bus section breakers and bus coupler
breakers. A set of breaker and half arrangement which is standard for
PHCN/TCN installations will be used for connecting the units to the main bus.
At this station, the gas from the gas supplier will be treated to conform to the
specifications expected by the Gas turbines. Hence, it will contain a metering
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
13
October 2012
station, Scrubbers, Filters, Gas heaters and Pressure adjustment device. Usually
an emergency shutdown system will be provided with a slam shut value station.
AUXILIARY FACILITIES
A medium sized space, of about (30x20 m) will be carved out for the trapping of
hydrogen from the atmosphere. The trapped hydrogen is then stored in cylinders
and used for cooling the generators. This alternative cooling method drastically
reduces the water requirement for running the plant.
Switchyard Area:
The 330kV switchyard will be located to the north-east of the site close to the
Alaoji - Onitsha 330kV transmission line. This restricted zone will include the
transformers, 330kV outdoor switchyard, electrical control room, utility control
room and Wartsila generator room for black starting.
Administrative/Management Area: The area includes the office building,
parking area, workshop, warehouse and domestic sewage treatment station.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
14
October 2012
This area shall be located in the southwest corner of the power plant. The power
plant main entrance shall be next to the office building and workshop. The
workshop and warehouse shall be combined. The domestic sewage treatment
station shall be located in the southwest of the power plant.
Specifications of the Generator
The project will be turnkey such that the exact type of generator will be advised
by the EPC and approved by the consultant. However, preliminary design by
SIEMENS has recommended a rating of 175MVA with a terminal voltage of 15.75
KV, rated frequency of 50 Hz and nominal speed of 3000 rpm. The rated power
factor will be between 0.8 and 0.85 (lagging) while the output efficiency varies
between 98.5 and 98.8 percent depending on the unit load. Each generator will
have automatic voltage regulator (AVR), a Power System Stabilizer (PSS) and a
Turbine Speed control Governor (TSG). Hydrogen cooling system will be used
with appropriate heat exchangers. The generators shall be protected against
earth faults, short circuit faults, excessive temperature, etc. so as to prevent
damage to the plant.
15
October 2012
Fig. 3.5: Site Layout Plan of Proposed 495MW CPGL Plant at Okija
16
October 2012
Fig 3.6
17
October 2012
Exciter
Controls
The Power Plant shall consist of three turbines (two gas turbines and one steam
turbine), each rated about 165 MW (ISO Rating) and 150MW (Site Rating). The
SCC5- 200E 2x1 Industrial Combined - Cycle Power plant is a self-contained and
flexible
18
October 2012
The choice of extension to CCPP serves the dual purpose of commercial and
environmental advantages:
The exhaust gas from an open cycle gas turbine exits at near 543oC and
relatively high pressure which tends to alter the ambient conditions of the
immediate environment especially air quality.
The use of this exhaust gas to power a steam plant (usually rated about
half of the total capacity of the gas plants) increases the megawatt output
of the station by reducing the overall heat rate, thus, improving the
revenue base of the station as well as its thermal efficiency. The effect of
high temperature gas fumes on the immediate environment is also
drastically reduced.
Fig 3.7 SGT5-PAC 2000E - Typical Arrangement of Major Components & Systems
(SIEMENS)
19
October 2012
Efficiency
Fuel Quality Specifications
Heat Rate
20
October 2012
Ignition system
21
October 2012
Steam Pressure and Temperature (Super Project specific Heat Recovery Steam Generator
Heat
(HRSG) used, t.b.d.
and Reheat)
Heat Rate
Noise Level
Manufacturer's name /
Year of Manufacture I
Warranty
22
October 2012
20m. Other facilities to be installed include dedicated filters, pressure let down
station and a slug catcher.
No gas storage tanks are planned for installation. However, if the available fuel
gas pressure cannot meet the Gas Turbine Generator requirements then the
installation of a gas compressor station and a gas storage tank within the project
area shall be considered. Thus, at the first phase of the proposed project the
design shall make provision for connection points for future supply from other
sources to the IPP.
1.1.1.2 Fuel Composition
The composition of the natural gas to be used for power generation for the
proposed IPP project is presented in Table 3.4. The fuel low heating value (LHV)
is about 35.4MJ/Sm3, where Sm3 is the volume under the condition of 101.32kPa
pressure and 150C temperature.
Table 3.4: Composition of the Natural Gas for CPGL IPP Project
Component
Nitrogen
Water
Carbon dioxide
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Iso Butane
Normal Butane
Neo pentane
Iso pentane
Normal pentane
Hexane +
Total
Percentage Mole
0
0
0.13
98.40
0.96
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.23
100.00
Specific gravity
Gross calorific value (MJ/m3)
Net calorific value (MJ/m3)
Low heating value (MJ/Sm3)
0.57
40.3
36.3
35.4
23
October 2012
Molecular weight
16.4
Hydrocarbon dew weight
-11.40C
Source: SIEMENS Conceptual Design Proposal (2011)
Fuel Gas Distribution
Fuel gas distribution will reach each GTG unit through a single header system
sized to handle the total gas flow. Provisions will be made in the design to allow
any items of equipment and associated piping to be disconnected for
servicing/maintenance, purging and flushing without shutting down the
turbines. It is also planned that for reliable operation of the gas turbines, the fuel
gas shall be supplied at constant pressure and at an acceptable quality as
required by the gas turbine OEM specification. The fuel gas will be supplied at
280C, above the gas dew point, to minimise any possible condensation of
hydrocarbon in the station fuel gas system.
Furthermore, to ensure fail-safe protection of the proposed IPP, emergency shutoff valves will be installed at each fuel gas treatment station inlet and outlet
points. Also, to measure and monitor the gas consumption of the station, a
computerized gas measurement system containing flow meters with meterproviding facilities, analyzer, etc will be provided to give information on
volume, mass and energy as required. The flow meter will be located in the
utility control room and shall be used as a component of the gas control unit of
each gas turbine.
1.1.1.3 Fuel Gas Receiving Skid
The fuel gas shall pass through a fuel gas-receiving skid consisting mainly of
emergency stop valve (solenoid operated), pressure control valves, scrubbers,
and common condensate drain tank before the fuel gas enters the Gas Turbine
Generator. The gas pressure control valve shall maintain proper pressure of the
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
24
October 2012
outgoing gas. The gas will first enter the scrubbers where all impurities (solid
particles and liquid contaminants) to a large extent (above 99%) are removed.
The condensate drain tanks will be responsible for collecting hydrocarbon drains
from various points.
1.1.1.4 Fuel Gas Flow meter
Fuel gas flow meter will be provided complete with continuous integration and
automatic compensation for temperature and pressure fluctuations, as well as
the aggregated fuel consumption totaliser. The flow meter is a metering system
and will be used to measure the volume of the fuel gas flow used by gas turbine.
Intermittent sampling of the gas for quality analysis will be carried out to ensure
conformity with the specifications contained in the Gas Purchase Agreement
(GPA), and determine the penalties if otherwise.
1.1.1.5 Nitrogen Purging System
A nitrogen purging system will be employed to form part of the gas piping
sections prior to repair and maintenance work; purging of air from the gas
piping system prior to charging up with gas; and nitrogen blanketing during
long plant outage.
Water Supply System
1.1.1.6 Groundwater Supply System
As stated in 3.2.3, a project site deep well (borehole) will be constructed to
provide clean water supply for various equipment and project activities
including human consumption. Water for the service/industrial consumption, as
well as for fire fighting will also be sourced from the bore hole. Two water
boreholes will be constructed within the project site to supply water.
The
boreholes will be located as far apart as possible from one another to prevent the
potential for erosion of the aquifer due to the force of the water pumps when in
25
October 2012
use. One bore hole at the north eastern end of the site will be dedicated to
process water and will feed a treatment plant for that purpose.
In order to remove suspended solids and floaters from the water, reduce the ion
contents; and prevent rusting and corrosion (through oxidation and deposition
of the iron and manganese ions) of the pipes and other water supply equipment,
the groundwater shall be treated to ensure all regulatory requirements are met.
The treatment shall also protect the humans that would drink from the bore-hole
water source.
Second bore hole of the south eastern end will provide water for other uses. The
two bore holes will be about 200m apart.
Two surface tanks with pressed steel sectional structure will be provided one
each for the storage of fire fighting water and raw water. In order to ensure
continuous water supply during inspection and maintenance activities, the raw
water tank will be separated into two chambers so that when one chamber is
being cleaned, the other can be routed to normal water flow ensuring that the
power plant stays operational. A medium sized storage tank will be dedicated to
process water, basically for replenishing minor losses encountered during the
process of changing from water to steam and vice-versa. Therefore, the second
bore hole is hardly in use, with the result that eroding the acquifer remains a
remote possibility.
Domestic water will be supplied from the sterilised water tank and the supply
system will convey water from the sterilised water tank to the consumers. This is
to satisfy the demand for potable water, sanitation, and road wash water, water
for green belt (flowers and grass) and car wash water in the power plant area.
The domestic water supply system shall be designed in accordance with WHO
standards.
26
October 2012
The express way has become a major link between the western/mid western
states of Lagos, Oyo, Edo e.t.c and the south eastern/southern states of Anambra,
Imo, Abia, Rivers, Bayelsa e.t.c. Therefore, during construction of the power
plant, when increased heavy duty vehicular traffic is expected, the risk of
accident will be greater and more caution will be applied.
27
October 2012
during working hours, the utility vehicles and pick-up vans will move about to
pick and drop materials as part of logistics.
However, traffic levels will peak during planned annual maintenance shutdowns
which usually last for two weeks or during any emergency shutdown that
requires repairs. Also, major maintenance every five to six years which lasts
about six weeks will attract high vehicular traffic.
no loss of life.
that manpower, equipment and funds are available to effectively contain and
clean up oil/chemical spills, and
28
October 2012
problem search;
isolation of causes;
notification of authorities;
The CPGL IPP plant will incorporate many environmental safeguards and
mitigation measures, including:
The use of natural gas as fuel (Natural gas is cleanest burning fossil fuel) all
emissions will comply with applicable environmental requirements. Ambient
air quality levels will also be in compliance with all applicable criteria;
29
October 2012
Minimal ambient air quality impacts resulting from an efficient, low polluting
combustion system and a high exhaust temperature.
Handling, storing and disposing solid and liquid wastes in accordance with
accepted practices;
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The major fuel input to the generating process is natural gas which Nigerian
average specification is given in table 3.4. This fuel will be brought to the plant
site through a pipe linked to the SDPC and Orwell-Linkso gas stations at Oguta.
The major stages in the process of generating power from Gas Power Plant can
be summarized as:
30
October 2012
3. Natural gas will be mixed with air at high pressure inside the combustion
chamber of the Gas-turbine unit and ignited. The resulting hot flue gas at
high pressure ultimately drives the turbine electrical generator to produce
electric energy.
4. The exhaust gas will be discharged to the atmosphere at a temperature of
about 543C in accordance with the FMEnv and WHO standards as well
as in conformity with World Bank (WB) guidelines for sustainable
development. Main by-product of Natural Gas combustion are Carbon
Dioxide (
Oxide (
), Water vapor (
5. The hot exhaust air exits from the gas turbine at about 543 degrees
centigrade and then passes through the Heat Recovery Steam Generator.
In the HRSG, there are layers of 100 foot tall tube bundles, filled with high
purity water. The hot exhaust gas coming from the turbines passes
through these tube bundles, which act like a radiator, boiling the water
inside the tubes, and turning that water into steam. The gas then exits the
power plant through the exhaust stack at a much cooler temperature of
about 120 degrees Celsius, after having given up most of its heat to the
steam production process. About 453.6 metric tonnes (1 million pounds)
of steam power per hour is generated in this way and sent over to the
steam turbine through overhead piping.
31
October 2012
wetting the ground before excavation and ensuring diligent routine services for
all vehicular machines. The latter measure ensures complete fuel combustion and
hence low emissions.
The major source of gaseous emission during the operational stage of the project
is combustion of natural gas in the combustion chambers of the nine turbines
plus the operation of the 7.5 MW wartsila gas engine power generator. As
expected, the emission from the black start wartsila generator is very small since
the total operating time annually is limited to between 100 120 hours.
Furthermore, in order to minimize the storage of hazardous chemicals on site,
the back-up fuel for the wartsila generator will be liquefied natural gas to be
stored in cylinders in a fenced off area close to the fire station. Not more than 7
days use will be stored at a time in a manner that conforms strictly with DPR
guidelines on risk abatement around gas storage areas.
In line with standard practice, all air emissions will be released through a stack,
which design will be determined from the results of dispersion modeling
procedures. The objective of the modelling process is to ensure that the stack is of
optimal dimensions, with the efflux velocity sufficiently high for ground level
concentrations to fall within the FMEnv and WHO limits which constitute the
basis for WB guidelines. Granted that the plant is situated in an industrial area
where the 2km radius is sparsely populated, it is the intention of CPGL to
maintain the WHO emission limits at all times, on ground level concentrations.
Predictions from the air dispersion models shown in chapter six, using stacks of
about 35m high and 7 meter diameter reveal ground concentrations that fall
within local and international limits.
At full capacity, it is envisaged that two gas turbines will be used for power
generation at the CPGL site, deploying the technology of SIEMENS E class of
32
October 2012
turbines or its equivalent. There are a number of turbines in the market which
fall within this class namely GE frame 9E, SIEMENS SGT5 2000E, Hitachi
PG9171 (E), ALSTOM GT13EZ; etc. (GAS TURBINE WORLD, vol. 29 2012).
Though support on the conceptual design of the power plant has been received
from SIEMENS AG, the intention of CPGL is to conduct an open tender process
for the selection of the EPC contractor based on the above turbine technology.
The beauty of the technology of E- class gas turbines is its ability to reduce NOx
emissions through the use of dry low NOx burners while CO is reduced by an
appropriate ratio of air natural gas mixture. As long as the specified quality of
natural gas fuel is maintained, the compounds of sulphur like HS will be in
trace quantities in the atmospheric emissions.
Table 3.5 below shows a summary of the overall emissions from the two gas
turbines in open cycle operations and 100% load factor (worst case scenario, 75
is recommended in the feasibility report) as well as exhaust parameters.
20
30
Trace
545,000
33
20
30
Trace
1,090,000
October 2012
the
During operation, the major source of noise is the gas turbines which have been
specified for 85 dBA for noise level within the plant and less than 45 dBA for
levels outside the plant.
All ventilation apertures including air filters will be fitted with silencers.
Gas turbine exhausts in particular will be fitted with high performance
silencers tuned to attenuate low frequencies from the gas turbine
exhausts.
34
October 2012
CPGL will insist on a standard acoustic enclosure for the turbine housing to
avoid reverberant noise. Hushclad double skin enclosures with good door seals
will be deployed to meet the recommended noise level of 85 dBA at one metre
from the source. Other plant items will be regulated to minimize noise of an
impulsive or tonal nature, such that the rating level specified in (BS) 4142: 1997 is
met. Noise dispersion modelling for day and night operating periods is
discussed in chapter six.
It may be stated here that achieving WHO noise limits is not too hard, even in
Nigeria. Measurements taken at the Geregu I power plant, which deploys
equivalent turbine technology from SIEMENS, still satisfied those limits after five
years in operation. (BCS EIA Report 2012) The same can also be said of Ughelli
gas plant in Delta State which deploys equivalent technology from HITACHI
(Environmental Audit Report). In all, by selecting a competent EPC contractor, a
good owners Design consultant and the right specifications, the attainment of
FMEnv and WHO noise limits by CPGL will be guaranteed.
Heat Emissions
The SIEMENS Combined 6883kJ/kwh machine presents a reduced heat rate of
6883kJ/kWh. Major heat emissions emanates from the stacks at a transfer rate of
approximately 810 GJ / hour and temperature of 120C coupled with additional
heat exchanges with the atmosphere from the cooling systems.
Liquid Effluents
Used lube oil, maintenance drains and equipment wash will produce effluent
wastes
especially
oily
water
sometimes
containing
particulate
matter.
35
October 2012
Waste
Water
Source
Characteristics /
Contaminants.
Disposal Method
1.
Water
Based
Demineralization
Plant regeneration
waste.
Dissolved solids:
< 1000 ppm pH:
6-9.
2.
Chemicals
Equipment Drain
Chemical traces,
traces of
suspended
solids, pH: 6-9.
Chemical Drains
in water treatment
plant.
Various
Chemicals
3.
Oil in
Water
36
October 2012
Nigerian nationals, so that within three years it is planned that all employees will
be Nigerians. There will also be indirect local job creation for plant and office
consumables, and for equipment and lubricating oil vendors.
In line with WB guidelines, CPGL will establish two key units under, the Health,
Safety and Environment (HSE) Department namely, the Environmental
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
37
October 2012
Management Unit (EMU) and Project Monitoring Unit (PMU). These twos, each
with an average of three personnel, must be in place at the inception of
construction to manage and monitor environmental guidelines recommended by
the ESIA. Bi-monthly reports will be made to the FMEnv and the World Bank
who will be providing Partial Risk Guarantee for power sales and hence, has a
stake in the sustainability of the project. A Community Liaison Officer (CLO) will
be part of the PMU personnel to serve as an agent of continuous stakeholder
consultation throughout the life span of the project including decommissioning.
The personnel requirement will include staff for operations (technical and
administration) and maintenance of the proposed power plant.
The total
Other direct reports to the MD are the the Legal and regulatory liasion
officer and the secretary and the logistics,
Direct Reports to the CFO are the Accountant and Financial officers,
38
October 2012
Direct Reports to the CPO are the Plant control room Operations
manager, Despatch control room manager,
Direct reports to the CHRO are The manager human resources, public
relations and community relations manager and admin officer.
Direct reports to the CHSEO are the safety manager, the fire fighting
crew manager and the security manager.
39
October 2012
HSE/EMS
SU
Fig 3.8
Organizational Chat
40
October 2012
No Project
(b)
(c)
(d)
41
Plant
October 2012
ID Task Name
Duration
Start
Finish
2012
2013
2014
J A S O N D J FM AM J J A SO N D J FM AM J J A SO N D
1 LICENSE AVAILABLE
0 days
Mon 8/29/11
Mon 8/29/11
425 days
Tue 10/02/11
Mon 12/05/11
51 days
Mon 8/29/11
Wed 10/19/11
57 days
Mon 8/29/11
Tue 10/25/11
87 days
Mon 8/29/11
Thu 11/24/11
93 days
Mon 8/29/11
Fri 12/2/11
7 EPC CONTRACT
8 AWARD EPC CONTRACT
Wed 1/4/12
EPC CONTRACT
Wed 1/4/12
9 BOP ENGINEERING
10 BLG/STRUCTURES DESIGN - PLANT VILLAGE AREAS
46 days
Mon 1/9/12
Fri 2/24/12
BOP ENGINEERING
46 days
Mon 1/9/12
Fri 2/24/12
11 EPC ENGINEERING
12 EPC ENGINEERING
42 days
Wed 2/15/12
Wed 3/28/12
EPC ENGINEERING
22 days
Wed 2/15/12
Thu 8/3/12
EPC ENGINEERING
28 days
Wed 2/15/12
Wed 3/14/12
34 days
Wed 2/15/12
Tue 3/20/12
GEOTECHNICAL/SOILS TESTING
40 days
Wed 2/15/12
Mon 3/26/12
42 days
Wed 2/15/12
Mon 3/28/12
1 days
Mon 3/28/12
Mon 3/28/12
210 days
Mon 1/9/12
Mon 8/6/12
28 days
Mon 1/16/12
Mon 2/13/12
5 days
Mon 1/9/12
Sat 1/14/12
60 days
Mon 2/13/12
Fri 5/18/12
180 days
Mon 2/13/12
Mon 8/6/12
23 EPC CONSTRUCTION
24 SITE CLEARINING/PREPARATION
234 days
Mon 2/6/12
Mon 11/5/12
14 days
Mon 2/6/12
Wed 2/21/12
25 CONSTRUCTION ROADS/GRADING
ID Task Name
180 days
Wed 2/29/12
Wed 9/26/12
2 ESIA COMPLETION
Duration
Start
Finish
LICENSE AVAILABLE
ESIA COMPLETTION
EPC PROCUREMENT
NEGOCIATE/AWARD - GAS TURBINES
EPC EQUIPMENT OUTLINE
MANUFACTURE & DELIVER - GT'S
FABRICATE & DELIVER - PRE ENGR BLDGS & STRUCTURE
EPC CONSTRUCTION
SITE CLEARING/PREPARATION
CONSTRUCTION ROADS/GRADING
2012
Task
42
October 2012
2013
2014
Task Name
Duration
PILING
Start
Finish
2012
2013
2014
J A S ON D J F MAM J J A S ON D J F MAM J J A S ON S
PILING
Wed 5/10/12
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION
Wed 8/22/12
60 days
Wed 2/29/12
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION
150 days
Wed 2/29/12
PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION
210 days
Mon 3/5/12
UNIT 1
181 days
Mon 9/17/12
Tue 4/19/13
ERECTION/CONSTRUCTION UNIT 1
150 days
Mon 9/17/12
Mon 3/12/13
30 days
Mon 3/12/13
Mon 4/18/13
1 day
Mon 4/18/13
Tue 4/19/13
UNIT 2
181 days
Mon 9/17/12
Tue 4/19/13
UNIT 2
ERECTION/CONSTRUCTION UNIT 2
150 days
Mon 9/17/12
Mon 3/12/13
30 days
Mon 3/12/13
Mon 4/18/13
Mon 11/5/12
PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION
UNIT 1
ERECTION/CONSTRUCTION UNIT 1
ERECTION/CONSTRUCTION UNIT 2
1 day
Mon 4/18/13
Tue 4/19/13
UNIT 3
181 days
Mon 9/17/12
Tue 4/19/13
UNIT 3
ERECTION/CONSTRUCTION UNIT 3
150 days
Mon 9/17/12
Mon 3/12/13
30 days
Mon 3/12/13
Mon 4/18/13
1 day
Mon 4/18/13
Tue 4/19/13
Duration
Start
Finish
ERECTION/CONSTRUCTION UNIT 3
2012
Task
Project: CENTURY POWER
Progress
43
October 2012
2013
2014
Options Implication
Option a
No project would:
Entails depriving the National Economy of four hundred and eight million
dollars (480,000,000 USD) of investment capital, 70% or 336,000,000 USD
constitutes foreign capital inflow which should have greatly enhanced
Nigerian economic growth.
44
October 2012
It will assure the realisation of 336,000,000 USD expected foreign capital inflow which will impact positively on the Nigerian macro-economic indices, in
terms of balance of payment status.
There will also be a multiplier effect (indirect job creation) creating work for
citizens of Anambra state in particular and Nigeria in general in new
industries and businesses.
A sale outlet will be provided for Nigerian natural gas from the Oguta
Egbema oil field (about 200 mmscf) will be needed at full capacity. This is
likely going to discourage gas flaring by multinational oil companies in that
area with the attendant environmental degradation.
Ensure the use of efficient technology for power generation in terms of raw
materials (Natural Gas) input against higher energy output, due to reduced
gross heat rate
A combined cycle plant improves gas to kw ratio by about 40% and may
attract carbon credit.
This option will release additional 545,000 tonnes of CO2 annually as well
as 990m/s of flue gas which pollute the environment
Requires 100mmscf more gas than option b for the same quantity of
electricity which implies wastage of natural resources that could have
45
October 2012
The available coal deposit in Kogi and Enugu states estimated at 356
million tonnes can barely satisfy the envisaged demand of power
generating plant already being considered for the region. Another
company is already building a 1200 MW coal fired plant near the coal
deposits in Kogi state. From the feasibility study performed for the
Nigerian government by Messrs Behre Dolbear, 1200MW is about the
maximum plant rating the coal deposit can support for a reasonable
length of time.
The nearest coal deposit to the Okija site is 90 kilometres of road transport
away and without a rail line, it will be extremely costly to move coal
down to the site (Fig 3.11).
Attempting to move the coal down will involve high density heavy
vehicular traffic in a poorly maintained road network which will pose
serious environmental concern.
A coal plant will require a much larger land area to handle ash storage,
erect emission management equipment such as towers for gas cleaning
and sulphur dioxide removal plant usually implemented through the use
46
October 2012
From the forgoing, this option is considered unsuitable for the present
consideration.
47
October 2012
48
October 2012
consideration, the only major substation for evacuation is Onitsha through the
upgrading of Alaoji Onitsha 330kV line. The Okija site has the advantage of
proximity to this 330kV line. Other sites considered around Oguta needed
resettlement of villages and sometimes conservation sites. The Okija site is
completely unencumbered. The Ulasi stream is another advantage of the Okija
site. Though the current design is air cooled, future expansion can be water
cooled to take advantage of the stream. Furthermore, land for future expansion is
available in Okija which is not the case in alternative sites considered around
Oguta Egbema region. Finally , the Onitsha Nnewi axis is potential industrial
hub due to the nature of the inhabitants. Yet there is no generation around the
area. The Okija plant will provide the needed power for the industrial growth of
this enterprising region.
49
October 2012
CHAPTER FOUR
BIOPHYSICAL BASELINE
CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT
AREA
CHAPTER FOUR
DESCRIPTION OF THE BIOPHYSICAL BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS
This section describes the physical, chemical, biological and socio-economic characteristics of the
project area and its environs. It provides information on the features, quality and sensitivity of
the project area.
Information and data presented in this section is based on primary surveys and
environmental quality monitoring and secondary data that have been collected
from various departments and from other studies available on the subject. The
information on the baseline environmental conditions forms the basis to analyse
the probable impacts of the proposed Century power plant activities on the
environment.
STUDY APPROACH
The environmental status indicators and sensitivities of the various ecological
components were carefully assessed through detailed field work and extensive
literature search. A multi-disciplinary approach was adopted for the ecological
characterization and data acquisition. The field methodology and sampling
techniques are discussed in the sections below.
October 2012
areas were established. Scene photographs and video recording covering various
environmental features of Century Power project site were taken as necessary.
The area studied covered about 5km radius from the proposed facility and
adequately encompassed all boundaries of environmental influence, which
construction and operation activities may possibly have.
The Environmental Impact Assessment Study was carried out in accordance with
the terms of reference and scope of work specifications. The study methodology
and sampling techniques were consistent with established and standard
methodologies, and also with the Federal Environmental Protection Agency
guidelines of April 1995.
October 2012
October 2012
Relevant literature materials on the theme and area of study were also reviewed
accordingly. The information generated vis--vis the experience of the study team on
the region constituted the basis on which the climatic characteristics of the area and
their impact identification were evaluated. The data was analyzed statistically and
graphically using the Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet on a PC within a Windows 2007
environment.
Air Quality
In-situ measurement of air quality parameters such as CO, NO2, H2S, CH4 and VOC
was conducted using the modern Crowcon Gasman II Monitors while a Sibata
Digital Dust Indicator (Model P-5L2) was used to measure suspended particulate
matter (SPM) levels.
Air quality measurements were conducted at ten locations within the proposed
project site and the surrounding community of Okija, Ihiala L.G.A. The coordinates
and description of air quality and noise sampling points are given in table 4.1 while
figure 4.2 is the map of the study area showing the distribution of the air quality and
noise sampling points
Accessibility
October 2012
Table 4.1: The Coordinate and Description of Noise, Air Quality Samples and
climate
S/N
Sample
Location
CPGS 1NAQ
CPGS 2NAQ
CPGS 3NAQ
GPS
N05
Descriptive
E 006
H
76
73
556'38.78"N 650'29.50"E
65
CPGS 4NAQ
556'20.69"N 650'56.34"E
56
CPGS 5NAQ
556'34.15"N
36
CPGS 6NAQ
555'55.65"N 650'15.96"E
52
Madonna University
CPGS 7NAQ
555'28.25"N
50
Okija Town
CPGS 8NAQ
556'17.89"N 649'24.70"E
51
Okija Town
CPGS 9NAQ
555'8.29"N
651'30.09"E
54
10
CPGS
10NAQ
556'4.46"N
651'26.29"E
52
Ihembosi Town
556'11.63"N 650'41.21"E
556'1.14"N
651'2.01"E
651'9.90"E
650'4.25"E
October 2012
Figure 4.2: Map of the study area showing the air quality and noise sampling points
October 2012
Noise Level
Noise is sound that bears no information intensity and usually varies with time
(Plog, 1996). Noise is the term frequently used to describe unwanted sound,
which interferes with the perception of wanted sound and is likely to be
physiologically damaging.
October 2012
Plate 4.2: Noise and Air Quality Measurement at a Point near the Project Site A
construction site for HAMMAKOPP Engineering.
The noise level within the proposed project site for Century IPP Plant was
determined using the Portable Rion Sound Level Meter Model NA-24 on the Aweighted scale.
Soil Studies
Sampling locations of Ten soil samples from project area were collected using
soil Auger at two depths (0-15cm) and (15-30cm).
The coordinates and description of the soil sampling points are given in table 4.2
while figure 4.2 is the map of the project area showing the distribution of the
sampling points
October 2012
Plate 4.4: Soil sample Collection at a control point outside the Project Site.
10
October 2012
Table 4.1: The Coordinate and Description of Soil and Vegetation Samples
GPS
S/N
Sample
Number
556'21.68"N 650'45.11"E
CPGCS1
&
CPGCV1
CPGCS2
&
CPGCV2
556'15.43"N 650'39.33"E
556'9.09"N
650'32.56"E
CPGCS3
&
CPGCV3
CPGCS4
&
CPGCV4
556'2.98"N
650'35.46"E
556'9.59"N
650'44.49"E
CPGCS5
&
CPGCV5
556'15.68"N 650'50.85"E
CPGCS6
&
CPGCV6
556'3.02"N
CPGCS7
&
CPGCV7
555'58.12"N 650'18.64"E
CPGCS8
&
CPGCV8
10
Northings
Eastings
By 1st Pillar. At the entrance to
the site
Inside the site between the road
and Ulasi river.
650'51.52"E
South eastern side of the site
* Soil and Vegetation Samples: (Codes: CPGCS = Soil: 1 for Top Soil i.e. 015 cm and 2 for Bottom Soil
i.e. 1530 cm); CPGCV = Vegetation)
11
October 2012
Figure 4.3: Map of the study area showing the soil sampling point
12
October 2012
13
October 2012
Plate 4.5: Surface Water Sampling from Ulasi River at the back of the site.
14
October 2012
Table 4. 2: The Coordinate and Description of Surface and Ground Water Samples
GPS
S/N
Sample Location
Height above
sea level (H)
m
ULASI RIVER
27
555'34.39"N 651'5.87"E
27
Upstream.
555'42.36"N 650'53.16"E
16
Upstream.
14
65
56
Down stream
36
Downstream.
52
Northings
CPGC 1SW
CPGC 2SS
CPGC 1SW
CPGC 1SS
CPGC 2SW
Eastings
555'20.16"N 651'38.08"E
555'49.61"N 650'45.54"E
CPGC 2SS
CPGC 3SW
555'58.65"N
650'40.09"E
CPGC 3SS
CPGC 4SW
556'3.01"N
650'32.64"E
CPGC 4SS
CPGC 5SW
556'9.53"N
650'23.37"E
CPGC 5SS
556'36.77"N 649'53.80"E
CPGC 6SW
E 00650' 46.5"
50
10
N0556' 29.6"
94
15
October 2012
Figure 4.4: Map of the study area showing surface water and sediment sample collection points along Ulasi River
16
October 2012
Plant identification was carried out either in the field or herbarium using
appropriate Floras, Manual and Monographs (Hutchinson & Dalziel 1954-67;
Keay 1959).
To delineate the subsurface layers within the premises of the project site
using geo electrical method.
ii.
To determine from (i) the nature of the identified layers and evaluate the
integrity of the subsurface layers.
iii.
iv.
v.
17
October 2012
The geophysical investigation involved the vertical electrical sounding (VES) and
horizontal resistivity profiling of electrical resistivity method in view of the
relative values of resistivity of subsurface layers in most typical sedimentary
setting.
The quantitative interpretation of the VES curves assumes that the earth is made
up of horizontal layers with differing resistivities. Any significant deviation (>
100) from this planar assumption in the stratigraphy will slightly distort the VES
curve and introduce some errors into the VES interpretation. Other sources of
error are lateral in homogeneity, suppression and equivalence. VES computer
modelling is usually aided by availability of borehole lithological logs from an
environment of interest. Apart from serving as good control, the logs help in
lithological correlation.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
18
October 2012
Landuse Study
The landuse component of the Environmental Impact Assessment Study of the
Century IPP was based on the interactive applications of a series of maps,
remotely sensed data, ground survey and measurements as well and relative
auxiliary sources.
The sets of maps that were used for the landuse component included:
(i)
(ii)
The Nigerian topographical maps (Onitsha Sheets Nos 267 at the scale of
1:100,000, 267 SE at scale 1:50,000 and 267 SE1 at scale 1:25,000)
(iii)
The Vegetation and Land-use Map of Nigeria Sheet NB-31-7 that was
compiled from Side Looking Airborne RADAR Microwave Imageries and
produced by the Forestry Department at a scale of 1: 250,000 in 1978.
(iv)
The imageries were interpreted using the maps as base and also with some
other auxiliary data that were accessed during the fieldwork. They were
digitized and analyzed using the Geographical Information System (GIS) and
spreadsheet software packages. Relevant statistics and illustrations were
generated for the EIA at the completion of the second season fieldworks.
19
October 2012
The generated land use map was digitised and analysed using the Geographical
Information System (GIS) software packages of ARCINFO (ver. 4.3+). The
preliminary digital maps, generated statistics, charts and other illustrations are
presented using the interactive Atlas GIS (ver. 4.0 for Windows) and other
database management software packages.
20
October 2012
The methods of analysis used were those specified in FMEnv Guidelines and
Standards and other International Analytical Standards such as APHA for water
quality. Analysis of trace metals was carried out using Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotometer duly calibrated with authentic standards. Physiochemical
parameters were determined using the DREL 2000 HACH Spectrophotometer,
duly calibrated with standards, as well as Flame Photometer.
Statistical Analysis
Errors in field data include those resulting from the instrument and those
introduced by the observer. With proper, sustained calibration of the instrument
and the use of standardised observational procedures, equipment errors were
brought to acceptable minimum. However, other errors arise from the method of
sampling. Errors often arise from two-stage sampling or sub sampling, or even
from the fact that the samples collected are not representative samples of the
medium. There are also spatial variations of the same medium, e.g., soil and
water. Thus, it is necessary to determine the true mean and the estimated
variance among the number of samples taken, so as to establish a reasonable
level of confidence in the results obtained. A good result is obtained when the
variance is within 5% of the mean.
Data Coding and Analysis
EIA studies in most developing countries where reliable data banks are nonexistent, invariably involve acquisition of large amounts of baseline data. To
ensure preservation of the integrity of data collected, data coding forms for use
in the field were designed in such a way that field data could be directly entered
into computer data sheets.
21
October 2012
data collected were labelled and the following information provided among
others:
Description of sample,
Methods of sampling,
Where samples were sent to another laboratory for examination, a duplicate copy
of this information was sent along with the sample to the laboratory,
independent of the sample. All movements of the samples were included on the
samples record. Basic information was recorded together with results of analysis,
in a register.
22
October 2012
Physical Setting
23
October 2012
On the surface the dominant sedimentary rocks are the Imo Shale a sequence of
grey shales, occasional clay iron stones and Sandstone beds.
The Imo Shale underlies the eastern part of the state, particularly in Ayamelum,
Awka North, and Orumba North LGAs. Next in the geological sequence, is the
Ameke Formation, which includes Nanka Sands, laid down in the Eocene. Its
rock types are sandstone, calcareous shale, and shelly-limestone in thin bands.
Outcrops of the sandstone occur at various places on the higher cuesta, such as at
Abagana and Nsugbe, where they are quarried for construction purposes. Nanka
sands out crop mainly at Nanka and Oko in Orumba North LGA.
Lignite was deposited in the Oligocene to Miocene; and it alternates with gritty
clays in places. Outcrops of lignite occur in Onitsha and Nnewi. The latest of the
tour geological formations is the Benin Formation or the coastal plain sands
deposited from Miocene to pleistocene. The Benin Formation consists of yellow
and white sands. The formation underlies much of lhiala LGA. Thick deposits of
alluvium were laid down in the western parts of the state, south and north of
Onitsha in the Niger and Anambra river floodplains.
Landforms and Drainage:
Anambra State falls into two main landform regions: a highland region of
moderate elevation that covers much of the state south of the Anambra River,
and low plains to the west, north, and east of the highlands. The highland region
is a low asymmetrical ridge or cuesta in the northern portion of the Awka-Orlu
Uplands, which trend roughly southeast to northwest, in line with the geological
formations that underlie it.
It is highest in the southeast, about 410m above mean sea level, and gradually
decreases in height to only 33m in the northwest on the banks of the Anambra
River and the Niger. At Onitsha and Otuocha, the cuesta provides well drained
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
24
October 2012
low land, very close to the river, thereby enabling settlements to extend to the
banks of the river.
The cuesta has confined the wide and braided channel of the Niger to a
comparatively narrow valley bed at the southern part of Onitsha, making an
appropriate location for the construction of bridge across the river. The
highlands consist of two cuestas, a lower and a higher one, each with an east
facing escarpment. The two cuestas merge south of Nanka.
The lower cuesta, formed by the more resistant sandstone rocks of the Imo Shale,
rises to only 150m above mean sea level at Umuawulu and decreases in height
northwestward to only 100m at Achalla. Its escarpment faces the Mamu River
plain and has a local relief of between 30 and 80m west of it, is the higher cuesta,
formed by the same stones of the Ameke Formation. Its height is above 400m in
the south-east at lgboukwu and lsuofia decreasing northwestward to less than
300m; Abagana, and to only 100m at Aguleri.
These are only of moderate height, they provide elevated, well drained and
attractive settlement sites, and hence, they are closely settled even up to their
crests. Agulu, Abagana, Awkuzu, Nteje an Aguleri are some of the settlements
on the crest of the higher cuesta, and lfite-Awka, Mgbakwu Amanuke and
Achalla are some of those on the crest of the lower cuesta. The dip slope of the
cuesta extends westwards for over 30km and is heavily settled.
The plains lie west and north of the highland; The River Niger plain, south of
Onitsha, about 9km wide, and the Niger-Anambra River plain north of Onitsha,
which stretches for over 36km east of the Niger, are really low plains, well below
30m above mean sea level, and are liable to flood. They are underlain by recent
alluvium; and, east of the Anambra River, by the Imo Shale formation.
25
October 2012
The plains are almost featureless, except for sporadic broad undulations, rising
above the flood plain at forming sites for the farming and fishing settlement in
the area. Such settlements include Nzam, Nmiata, and Anam in Anambra West
LGA, and Atani, Odekpe, and Oshita in Ogbaru LGA. East of the Anambra
River, a narrow and elongated sand, stone ridge, projecting about 30m above the
level at the plain, formed settlement sites for Anaki lgbakwu, lfute, and Umueje
in Ayamelum LGA.
The Mamu River plain, east of the cuesta landscape, is a little higher than the
other two plains. It lies between 30 and 70m above sea level in the area and
underlain by the Imo Shale, rising higher southwards. East of the Mamu River
are found the more, resistant sandstone ridge, at some 50 m above the level of the
plains. The extension of this ridge southward is settled by the people of Ufuma,
Ajali lsuUlo, Ezira, and Urnunze.
The main drainage system in the state, the Anambra River rises on the Gala
Plateau near Ankpa in Kogi State and, for its over 85km course in Anambra State,
flows through the northern low plain where it, as well as its right bank
tributaries, meander heavily, developing oxbow lakes and abandoned meander
channels. Its largest left bank tributary is the Mamu River, which drains the
eastern low plain on the Imo Shale Formation.
The higher cuesta forms the watershed separating the numerous east flowing
tributaries of the Mamu River from the west flowing rivers, the Idemili, the
Nkisi, and the Oyis, which drain the dip slope of the cuesta. All, but one of the
main rivers in Anambra state empty into the River Niger, which forms the
western boundary of the state and constitutes the local base level for the rivers.
The exception is the Ulasi River, which rises near Dikenafai in Imo State, flows
northward to Ozubulu and Okija in Anambra State and then turns round in a
26
October 2012
wide loop and heads for the Atlantic Ocean. The dip slope of the higher cuesta
between Nsugbe, Onitsha, Ogbunike and Urnunya is dissected by the numerous
tributary streams of the Mamu Anambra into a rolling landscape.
Vegetation and Soils:
Although annual rainfall is high in Anambra State, ranging from 1,400mm in the
north to 2,500mm in the south, it is concentrated in one season, with about four
months of dryness, November to February. Consequently, the natural vegetation
in the greater part of Anambra State is tropical dry or deciduous forest, which, in
its original form, comprised tall trees with thick under growth and numerous
climbers.
The typical trees (silk cotton, Iroko and oil bean) are deciduous, shedding their
leaves in the dry season. Only in the southern parts of the state, where the annual
rain fall is higher and the dry season shorter, is the natural vegetation marginally
the tropical rainforest type. Because of the high population density in the state,
most of the forests have been cleared for settlement and cultivation.
What exists now is secondary re-growth, or a forest savannah mosaic, where the
oil palm is predominant, together with selectively preserved economic trees.
Relics of the original vegetation may, however, be found in some "juju" shrines or
some inaccessible areas.
Three soil types can be recognized in Anambra State. They are: (i) alluvial soils,
(ii) hydromorphic soils, and (iii) ferallitic soils. The alluvial soils are pale brown
loamy soils. They are found in the town plain south of Onitsha in Ogbaru and in
the Niger Anambra low plain north of Onitsha. They differ from the
hydromorphic soils in being relatively immature, having no well developed
horizons. They, however, sustain continuous cropping longer than the other two
types. Hydromorphic soils are developed on the Mamu plain east of the cuesta,
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
27
October 2012
extending northward into the eastern part of Anambra River flood plain, where
the underlying impervious clayey shales cause water logging of the soils during
the rainy season. The soils are fine loamy, with lower layers faintly mottled;
while the subsoil layers are strongly mottled and spotted, containing stiff grey
clay. The soils are good for yam, cassava and maize, and for rice in the more
heavily waterlogged areas. The cuestas and other elevated areas underlain by
sandstones and shales of the Ameke Formation and the Nanka Sands are regions
of ferrallictic soils. The soils are deep, red to reddish brown loamy sands, often
referred to as "red earth" or acid sands because of low fertility. They are easily
eroded into gullies.
Ecological Hazards:
The main ecological hazards in the state are accelerated gully erosion and
flooding. Extensive forest clearing, often by bush burning, and continuous
cropping with little or no replenishment of soil nutrients, resulted in the
disruption of the ecological equilibrium of the natural forest ecosystem. Such a
situation in a region of loosely consolidated friable soils is prone to erosion,
giving rise to extensive gully formation.
In the Agulu, Nanka and Oko areas, which are underlain by the Nanka Sands,
the gullies have attained spectacular and alarming proportions, turning the area
into real "bad lands." Many of the gullies are at the head streams of the rivers that
flow down the cuestas. The head streams carve their valleys deep into the deeply
weathered red earth; developing dendritic patterns of gullies.
Such gullies are also found in Nnobi, Alor and Ideani, along the course of the
Idemili River. Besides, the greater part of the state is prone to severe sheet
erosion. In the low plains of the Niger and Mamu Rivers, heavy rains often result
in excessive flooding, such that the undulations occupied by settlements are
28
October 2012
marooned for some months. The people resort to the use of canoes for movement
and transportation. Orba Ofemili and Ugbenu on the plains of the Mamu River
are sometimes, in the rainy season, cut off from others as their roads remain
flooded knee-deep for many weeks. The floods also cause serious damage to
crops.
Climate and Meteorology
1.1.1.13 Climatic Factors
The typical humid climate of the proposed site has considerable influences
resulting from apparent movement of the sun across the tropics, the relative
stability of the Inter Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), prevailing (seasonal)
wind and nearness to the coast. The relatively flat topography of the
environment also supports wide area effects of the factors.
A humid Tropical Maritime (mT) from across the Atlantic Ocean in the south
dominates the region in the longer wet season (April to October). A drier Tropical
Continental (cT) airmass blowing from the northeast direction controls the climate
and meteorology of the area during the dry season (November to March). Around
December, it culminates into a very hungry (i.e. dry) and foggy harmattan wind as
it blows right from across the continental region of the West African sub-region.
The two dominant winds are separated by an Inter-Tropical Discontinuity (ITD)
zone. This oscillates seasonally across the area depending on the apparent
movement and location of the sun.
1.1.1.14 Rainfall
Some characteristics of observed daily rainfall in the area are shown in Figures
4.1, based on data from the Nigeria Meteorological Office, Lagos. Annual rainfall
total varies widely from year to year and across the area. The distribution of the
mean annual rainfall in the area is shown in Figure 4.1 while the rainfall data for
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
29
October 2012
30
October 2012
during the Harmattan or dry season when cool dry winds blow off the desert.
600
500
Rainfall (mm)
400
2005
2006
2007
300
2008
2009
200
2010
100
0
JAN
31
October 2012
40
35
2005 TMIN
2005 TMAX
30
2006 TMIN
2006 TMAX
Temp oC
25
2007 TMIN
2007 TMAX
20
2008 TMIN
15
2008 TMAX
2009 TMIN
10
2009 TMAX
2010 TMIN
2010 TMAX
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
32
October 2012
33
October 2012
westerlies during the day in the wet season. Southerlies, south easterlies and
south westerlies prevail more in the night during the period. This implies that
directions are usually more variable in the nights than in the mornings.
The winds are mostly northerlies, north easterlies and north westerlies in the dry
season particularly in the mornings. They are more of sourtherlies, south
easterlies and/or westerlies during the evenings, indicating the fairly strong
influences of the adjoining maritime oceanic air masses, contrasting land and sea
breezes as well as appreciable degree of differential heating of the two surfaces.
Table 4.4: Wind Speed Measurements at the Project Site
S/N
Sampling Station
Mean Value
(dBA)
Wet
Dry
CPGCN1
2.6
3.2
CPGCN2
2.6
3.3
CPGCN3
2.5
4.5
CPCGN4
3.2
4.2
CPGCN5
6.4
5.2
CPGCN6
6.0
6.4
CPGCN7
4.0
7.3
CPGCN8
6.0
7.3
CPGNC1
7.0
6.5
10
CPGNC2
6.5
6.0
34
October 2012
Wind Direction
Incidences of these are often associated with thunder and lightening especially
during changing seasons. Atmospheric disturbances such as line squalls and
disturbance lines often induce the variability that results in speeds higher than 5
m/s. Such increases characterize the beginning of rainy season (March-April)
and end of heavy rains (September-October), during which storms are more
frequent. The harmattan season (December to February) can give rise to
occasional high wind regimes.
The settlements closer to the project site and their estimated distances include
Ubahu (1km), Ubahumaonum (1km), Ugwucheleku (1.5km), Uhuobo (1km),
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
35
October 2012
Umuhu (2km), Umuogu (2.5km), Umuohi (2.5 km), Ihite (1.5km), Isieke (2km)
and Oghalegbu (2.5km). They are all accessible by roads but lack basic
infrastructure like pipe borne water, utility supplied electricity. Majority of them
are also inhabited by migrant farmers who are both indigenes and nonindigenes. About 60% of Okija Urban is made up of residential areas. The town
has basic amenities including electricity, water supply schemes, schools even at
tertiary level, hotels etc, courtesy of state and self-help efforts. Nearest settlement
to the proposed site is about 1km away while Madonna University, which is the
nearest human concentration, is 2km away. However, the built up areas consist
mainly of modern houses predominantly bungalows and storey buildings.
Due to the presence of the expanded Onitsha Owerri road, many businesses
and commercial activities have sprung up along the same route. With this type of
development, more residential buildings are expected to emerge alongside other
commercial activities.
Of the 30 villages that made up Okija, Ubahu is the community in which the
proposed project lies. Ironically, the chairman and CEO of the Nestoil group,
which promotes the project hails from this from this village. This gentleman has
touched the lives of the people in several ways. He built the most attractive
residential estate in the region, tarred a few roads, renovated school, established
companies and is currently building a hospital as well as some recreational
facilities including a golf course (see plate 4.7).
36
October 2012
Plate 4.6: Typical village home surrounded by farms and cash crops
1.1.1.22 Industrial Landuse
The existing industries in the area include:
(i)
(ii)
37
October 2012
Ozubulu while several LGA roads traverse the town. Okija appears endowed
with a good network of roads some of which are yet to be tarred.
Generally, some of the main roads are without drains and where present, the
drainages are blocked by indiscriminate refuse disposal. This situation portends
such
environmental
hazards
as
flooding,
surface
and
groundwater
contamination.
1.1.1.24 Institutional Landuse
There is a General Hospital and a Health centre both owned by government.
1.1.1.25 Recreational Landuse
The town is endowed with a total of about 20 hotels and associated social
infrastructures. A substantial portion of the amenities is owned by private
individuals. Some others are owned by the government and/or receive
appreciable assistance from respective CDAs.
1.1.1.26 Religious Landuse
This revolves around the two dominant religions in the axis. Areas, including
churches and a few sacred traditional shrines.
1.1.1.27 Educational Land use
Okija plays host to two Universities; the Madonna University and Legacy
University which is under construction there is also the government owned Okija
Grammar school and Royal Secondary School which is privately owned. Several
primary schools abound, the most prominent perhaps is St. Peters Primary
School where the chairman of Nestoil Group built a classroom block as well as
fenced the entire compound (see plate 4.3).
38
October 2012
39
October 2012
Plate 4.8: Typical Food Crop Farms within the Ubahu Community
Breadfruit, oil palm trees (Elaeis guineensis), raffia palm, coconut, plantain,
banana and a host of fruits and citrus crops are the major cash crops being
produced. Fruits range from cashew and guava to mangoes, pawpaw and
oranges. The state Ministries of Agriculture has a number of field offices around
the area.
40
October 2012
Plate 4.9 Oil palm trees typical of primary forest around the Ubahu Community.
Individual farm holdings are usually small. They are hardly up to 0.5ha for food
crops and 2.0ha for cash crops. Often, there is a lot of crop mixes. Sizes of
holdings are also controlled by proximity of the farms to settlements. For
examples farms further away from the settlements were found to be larger in size
compared to those nearer. This is because farmers are found to work harder at
the distant farms which also have farmsteads/huts.
Some ornamental trees dot some roads around the project area especially the
better planned and above-average income areas. Some economic trees are also
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
41
October 2012
planted within residential area. These include mostly bananas and plantains
which provide appreciable quantity of the food crops and monetary returns.
The main agricultural resources in the area cover all the agricultural farm types
as discussed above.
Table 4.5. Some Cultivated crops in the Ubahu Community
S/NO COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
1.
Maize /corn
Zea mays
2.
Cassava
Manihot esculenta
3.
Banana
Musa sapientum
4.
Plantain
Musa parasidiaca
6.
Water leaf
Talinum triangulare
7.
Okro
Abelmoschus esculentus
12.
Pineapple
Ananas comosus
13.
Guava
Psidium guajava
14.
Cocoyam
Colocasia esculenta
15.
Pumpkin
Cocurbita pepo
16.
Tomato
Lycopersicon esculentum
17.
Melon
Citrullus vulgaris
18.
Pepper (small)
Capsicum annuum
20.
Mango
21.
Pawpaw
Carica papaya
22.
Bitter leaf
Vernonia amygdalina
However, the project site which covers a total of 27.41 hectares is located in an
area which has been left fallow, from the shifting cultivation and land
conservation practice, currently resulting in the non-existence of economic trees
and cash crops, some of which are listed above within the project area. This has
contributed to informing our opinion that a Resettlement Action Plan does not
need to be produced by CPGL for this project.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
42
October 2012
Plate 4.10: A cross section of the proposed site together with the 330KV Alaoji
Onitsha Transmission line.
Air Quality
The results of the air quality assessment for the proposed project site are
presented in Table 4.7.
The ambient air quality of the proposed site for the Century IPP facility Okija is
very good. None of the pollutants exceeded the allowable limits of FMEnv. Table
4.6 shows SPM (141 224 g/m3) to be the predominant pollutant. Other
detectable gases include CO (1 2ppm) and H2S (1 2ppm). It must be observed
that only SPM was detected at all the Stations sampled. To a relatively small
extent CO was detected at Stations CPGS1NAQ CPGS3NAQ, while H2S was
detected at Stations CPGS1NAQ, CPGS3NAQ CPGS5NAQ. The predominant
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
43
October 2012
44
October 2012
Table 4.6: Air Quality Data for the Proposed Okija Independent Power Project Site (Dry and Wet Season, 2011)
S/N
Sampling
Station
SPM (g/m3)
CO (ppm)
NO2 (ppm)
SO2 (ppm)
NH3 (ppm)
H2S (ppm)
Dry
Wet
Dry
Wet
Dry
Wet
Dry
Wet
Dry
Wet
Dry
Wet
CPGS 1NAQ
1410.0
148.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CPGS 2NAQ
1475.0
147.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01
ND
ND
ND
CPGS 3NAQ
224.0
135.8
ND
ND
0.01
ND
ND
ND
0.02
ND
CPGS 4NAQ
196.0
144.1
ND
ND
0.02
ND
0.02
ND
ND
ND
ND
CPGS 5NAQ
140.0
134.6
ND
0.02
ND
0.03
ND
0.02
0.01
CPGS 6NAQ
132.0
138.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01
ND
ND
CPGS 7NAQ
152.0
150.9
ND
ND
0.01
ND
0.02
ND
ND
ND
CPGS 8NAQ
150.0
137.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01
ND
ND
ND
CPGS
NAQC1
142.0
148.1
ND
ND
0.01
ND
0.01
ND
ND
ND
10
CPGS
NAQC2
140.6
147.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FMEnv/DPR
Standards
250
250
10-20
ppm
10-20
ppm
0.040.06
0.040.06
0.01
0.01
NS
NS
NS
NS
WHO
150230
150230
10
ppm
10
ppm
0.08
0.08
0.040.06
ppm
0.040.06
ppm
NS
NS
NS
NS
45
October 2012
Table 4.7: Noise Level Measurements for Okija Independent Power Proposed
Project Site and Environs
S/N
Sampling Station
Mean Value
(dBA)
Dry
Wet
CPGCN1
56.65
59.95
CPGCN2
65.50
76.55
CPGCN3
66.32
62.35
CPCGN4
55.6
58.7
CPGCN5
46.7
45.45
CPGCN6
48.4
47.45
CPGCN7
46.9
47.1
CPGCN8
48.2
47.2
CPGNC1
52.1
51.2
10
CPGNC2
42.4
39.9
90
90
46
October 2012
Soil Studies
1.1.1.30 Physiographic Unit of the Study Area
Land
surface
in
Nigeria
resulted
from
alternating
denudational
and
Plate 4.11: Road leading to Ulasi River at the western boundary of the site.
Soils on this geomorphic unit, around the project area, are basically two types
and are derived from alluvium of fine littoral and lagoon sediments. On the
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
47
October 2012
surface the dominant sedimentary rocks are the Imo Shale a sequence of grey
shales, occasional clay iron stones and Sandstone beds.
In general, the Imo Shale underlies the eastern part of the state, particularly in
Ayamelum, Awka North, and Orumba North LGAs. Next in the geological
sequence, is the Ameke Formation, which includes Nanka Sands, laid down in
the Eocene. Its rock types are sandstone, calcareous shale, and shelly-limestone
in thin bands. Outcrops of the sandstone occur at various places on the higher
cuesta, such as at Abagana and Nsugbe, where they are quarried for construction
purposes. Nanka sands out crop mainly at Nanka and Oko in Orumba North
LGA.
Lignite was deposited in the Oligocene to Miocene; and it alternates with gritty
clays in places. Outcrops of lignite occur in Onitsha and Nnewi. The latest of the
tour geological formations is the Benin Formation or the coastal plain sands
deposited from Miocene to pleistocene. The Benin Formation consists of yellow
and white sands. The formation underlies much of lhiala LGA where the project
is located. Thick deposits of alluvium were laid down in the western parts of the
state, south and north of Onitsha in the Niger and Anambra river floodplains.
1.1.1.31 Soil Physico Chemistry
The Physico-Chemical parameters of top and sub soil samples from the Okija IPP
project area are presented in Table 4.8.
1.1.1.31.1 Colour and Texture
The soil in the project area was predominantly brownish to dark brown in
appearance. The texture varies from the surface, from coarse sandy clay and
loamy sands to silty clay at the sub-surface. The distribution of the soils vary
from one location to the other. There are no significant seasonal variations in soil
texture at the surface and sub-surface.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
48
October 2012
Table 4.8: Physico-Chemical Parameters for Soil Samples for the Wet & Dry season
Sample
Code
SEASON
CPGCS1 &
CPGCV1
Wet
Dry
CPGCS2 &
CPGCV2
Wet
Dry
CPGCS3 &
CPGCV3
Wet
Dry
CPGCS4 &
CPGCV4
Wet
Dry
CPGCS5 &
CPGCV4
Wet
Dry
CPGCS6 &
CPGCV6
Wet
Dry
CPGCS7 &
CPGCV7
Wet
Dry
CPGCS8 &
CPGCV8
Wet
Dry
CPGCSC1&
CPGCV1
Wet
Dry
CPGCSC2
&
CPGCSC2
Wet
Dry
Sample
Depth
Concentration (mg/kg)
PH
Ca2+
Mg2+
Cl-
NH3
PO43-
SO42-
K+
Na2+
NO3-
THC
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
6.49
6.78
7.49
7.36
6.40
6.30
7.60
6.20
84.00
210.0
14.00
180.8
85.00
202.0
19.50
15.40
50.00
66.00
65.00
55.20
70.00
80.00
54.50
55.00
15.00
14.00
34.00
36.00
50.50
40.50
35.00
35.50
1.20
1.10
2.20
2.15
1.30
1.60
2.40
2.50
20.00
20.10
30.10
30.20
24.00
24.10
22.00
23.00
18.00
20.00
39.00
40.00
19.00
20.00
40.00
40.00
22.00
23.00
70.50
80.00
13.00
24.00
80.00
80.50
25.20
22.00
23.20
22.40
24.00
25.00
24.00
24.50
1.121
0.658
0.132
0.144
0.905
1.191
0.011
0.013
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
0-15cm
15-30cm
6.98
7.72
7.11
6.90
6.00
6.80
7.70
7.60
6.82
6.46
6.20
7.00
6.10
7.90
6.46
6.29
6.50
6.30
6.00
7.80
6.20
6.10
8.11
8.10
6.30
6.00
7.50
6.00
6.35
6.10
7.57
6.50
410.0
164.5
32.50
38.50
520.0
170.0
40.50
36.00
505.0
120.0
55.10
40.00
408.0
130.5
85.80
65.00
600.0
133.3
75.60
85.40
92.00
44.00
64.00
65.00
74.00
65.00
45.00
35.10
349.0
285.0
86.00
85.50
315.0
300.0
49.60
48.50
318.0
320.0
99.00
98.00
304.0
280.0
241.0
230.0
305.0
320.0
202.0
200.0
306.0
350.0
200.0
205.5
180.0
190.0
120.0
110.0
182.0
188.0
120.0
110.5
180.0
189.0
120.0
123.0
40.00
60.00
32.00
30.00
50.00
60.50
30.00
29.00
40.00
40.00
44.00
42.00
30.90
30.80
24.00
23.10
40.00
30.90
23.00
23.10
12.50
16.00
30.00
25.00
12.00
18.00
32.00
26.00
12.05
19.00
32.05
25.00
1.30
1.40
2.11
2.13
1.30
1.50
1.10
1.00
1.11
1.60
2.20
2.10
1.10
1.20
3.50
3.40
1.15
1.20
3.60
3.50
1.20
1.30
2.20
1.50
1.10
1.15
2.50
2.80
1.15
1.10
2.50
2.80
35.40
37.60
34.00
33.00
39.50
38.00
33.00
32.00
12.30
15.50
22.00
21.00
22.50
25.40
22.80
20.00
20.50
25.30
21.80
29.00
36.00
37.00
40.00
46.00
37.00
38.00
45.00
45.00
38.00
39.05
48.00
35.00
16.00
22.00
80.00
79.00
16.00
21.00
75.00
74.00
20.00
80.00
56.00
55.00
20.00
78.00
72.00
71.00
20.00
78.00
71.00
71.00
12.00
11.00
55.00
70.00
19.00
11.00
54.00
80.00
19.00
12.00
55.00
85.00
38.00
25.00
22.00
21.00
30.00
25.00
22.00
21.50
26.00
29.00
28.00
25.00
27.00
28.00
20.00
19.00
27.00
28.00
21.00
21.05
25.00
22.00
23.00
21.50
24.00
21.00
22.00
22.05
25.00
21.00
22.00
23.00
27.00
22.00
25.40
25.00
27.50
23.00
25.50
25.00
24.00
26.00
26.40
26.30
24.00
25.00
28.00
27.00
24.00
23.00
28.00
27.05
25.00
20.00
25.00
25.10
24.00
29.10
24.50
24.60
24.00
28.00
24.80
25.00
0.046
0.026
0.056
0.055
0.112
0.032
1.002
1.000
0.004
0.011
0.010
0.051
0.421
0.400
0.321
0.222
0.011
0.211
0.233
1.091
1.022
1.012
0.712
0.622
1.011
1.022
0.050
0.041
0.022
0.122
1.101
1.001
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
49
October 2012
Season
DRY
CPGCS1
WET
DRY
CPGCS2
WET
DRY
CPGCS3
WET
DRY
CPGCS4
WET
DRY
CPGCCS5
WET
DRY
CPGCS6
WET
Total Heterotrophic
Bacteria (THB)
Pseudomonas Bacillus
Enterobacter
Pseudomonas
Serratia
Enterobacter
Alcaligene
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas
Proteus
Pseudomonas
Klebsiella
Proteus
Pseudomonas
Klebsiella
Proteus
Alcaligene
Bacillus
Ecoli, Proteus Bacillus
Pseudomonas
Exterobacter
Pseudomonas
Proteus
Micrococcus
Pseudomonas
Ecoli Proteus
Pseudomonas
Proteus Norcadia
Counts
Hydrocarbon
utilizing Bacteria
(HUB)
Counts
3.0 x 102
4.4 x 103
Hydrocarbon
Utilizing Fungi
(HUF)
Aspergillus
Penicillium
Penicillum
3.2 x 102
Trichoderma
1.6 x 102
2.0 x 103
Tricgoderma
Rhizopus
Aspergillus
2.0 x 103
2.6 x 103
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
2.6 x 103
6.5 x 102
Trichodenma
Rhizopus
Trichoderma
Rhizopus
Aspergillus
Geotricum
Aspergillus
Cladosprium
Aspergillus
1.6 x 102
3.1 x 103
Aspergillus
Cladosporium
4.0 x 102
Bacillus
3.6 x 104
2.0 x 103
Bacillus
Pseudomonas
1.8 x 102
5.0 x 102
2.0 x 103
2,8 x 102
Aspergillus
Aspergillus
2.0 x 102
1.5 x 102
Pseudomonas
Micrococcus
1.8 x 103
3.2 x 103
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
1.3 x 102
4.2 x 103
2.6 x 102
Pseudomonas
1.3 x 102
Aspergillus
Cuvularia
Aspergillus
Aspergillus
Cuvularia
Rhizopus
Aspergillus
geotrichum
Aspergillus
Cuvularia
Rhizopus
Aspergillus
1.0 x102
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
1.3 x 102
2.0 x 101
2.8 x 102
2.2 x 103
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas
3.6 x 102
5.0 x106
Pseudomonas
2.5 x 102
3.0 x 103
Pseudomonas
9.0 x 102
1.7 x 105
Pseudomonas
2.7 x 102
2.1 x 103
Pseudomonas
2.5 x 104
2.4 x 103
Pseudomonas
50
2.3 x 102
Total Heterotrophic
Fungi (THF)
Aspergillus
Penicillium
Geotricum
Penicillium
October 2012
Counts
1.5 x 103
Counts
2.0 x 102
2.0 x 102
5.0 x 102
1.7 x 102
3.4 x 102
DRY
Proteus Bacillus
1.5 x 103
Bacillus
7.2 x 102
WET
Pseudomonas
Proteus
Bacillus Eriwinia
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas
Micrococcus
Erwinia
Alcaligene
Pseudomonas
Ecoli
Ecoli
Pseudomonas
Proteus
Pseudomonas
Norcadia
2.2 x 104
Pseudomonas
2.8 x 102
3.0 x 103
Bacillus
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas
Micrococcus
2.0 x103
7.2 x 102
CPGCS7
DRY
CPGCS8
CPGCS9
WET
DRY
WET
CPGCS10
DRY
Cuvularia
Aspergillus
Rhodotorula
Rhizopus
Cuvularia
2.0 x 103
Aspergillus
3.0 x 102
5.2 x 103
Rhodotorula
Rhizopus
-
5.2 x 102
1.2 x 102
Aspergillus
Cuvularia
7.5 x 102
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
3.1 x 102
Alcaligene
Pseudomonas
6.0 x 102
Penicillium
Rhodotorula
2.3 x 102
Penicillium
Rhodotorula
2.3 x 102
3.0 x 103
Pseudomonas
2.5 x 102
Penicillium
2.5 x 102
Penicillium
1.5 x 102
3.7 x 103
Pseudomonas
3.5 x 102
Penicillium
3.0 x 102
Penicillium
1.2 x 102
4.2 x 103
3.0 x 102
High Bacterial counts could be due to closeness to a water body (Ulasi River) which receives a lot of bio-degradable
materials from the heavily flooded area.
51
October 2012
52
October 2012
the soil source of nearly all nitrogen, 5 60% of the phosphorus, about 80% of the
sulphur, and a large part of the boron and molybdenum used by plants in a
given season when the crop is not fertilized. The concentration of total organic
matter (TOM) in the surface soil samples ranged between 0.86 2.3mg/L during
the wet season and 0.67 2.86mg/L during the dry season for the sub surface
soil.
1.1.1.32.4 Nutrients
Nearly all soil nutrients are used by plants in ionic forms. Plants absorb soil
nutrients through their roots or through the stomata. The nutrient anions in the
soil are usually stored in the soil organic matter from where decomposition
makes them available for plants use. The cations however, are absorbed either
from the soil solution or through exchange of hydrogen ions with the nutrient
cations at the surfaces of clay and humus particles where they had been
adsorbed (Donahue, et al, 1990).
Nitrate ions contain nitrogen, which is often the limiting element in plant
growth.
Phosphate ions contain phosphorus, a constituent of plant cell nuclei and part of
energy storage and transfer chemicals in the plant. Soils usually have low total
and low plant-available phosphate supplies because mineral phosphate forms
are not readily soluble (Donahue, et al, 1990).
The nitrate concentration in the surface soil samples ranged from 0.30
0.90mg/L during the wet season, while the sub surface soil ranged from 0.31
0.81mg/L. Slightly lower levels of phosphate (PO43-) ions were observed in the
soil samples with an average value of 0.44 0.10mg/L for surface soil and 0.33
0.08mg/L for sub-surface soil.
53
October 2012
First, the
54
October 2012
Naturally, the bacterial populations in soil are usually higher than those of fungi,
however because of their small size in relation to large size and extensive
filament of Fungi and other groups. In a well aerated soil, both bacteria and
fungi are present, however if limited oxygen conditions prevail, bacteria
accounts for most of the microbial community biomass. Numerically, Fungi are
much less than bacteria in soil, but are the major contributor to soil biomass
because of their large size.
Majority of the soil samples analyzed especially the surface layer recorded
relatively high concentrations of total heterotrophic Bacteria and Fungi. The total
heterotrophic bacterial counts in the upper soil layer ranged between 46 x 105 and
4800 x 105 Cfu/g. while those of Fungi ranged between 32 x 105 and 1100 x 105
Cfu/g. The corresponding hydrocarbon utilizing bacterial counts were however
low, same is applicable to Coliform bacterial counts. The corresponding lower
soil layer recorded relatively low heterotrophic and hydrocarbon utilizing
microbial counts. The predominant microbial isolates from soil samples include;
Pseudomonas fluorescence, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Flavobacterium Sp; Serratia
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
55
October 2012
Majority of microbial species listed above have the ability to utilize petroleum
hydrocarbons as their sole carbon and energy source for growth and
proliferation. High heterotrophic microbial counts recorded in the soil samples is
as a result of the high organic matter and nutrient load of the soil samples
especially the upper soil layer which is sufficient enough to support rapid
microbial growth and proliferation. A lower concentration of hydrocarbon
degrading bacterial species is a clear evidence of insignificant concentrations of
Petroleum hydrocarbons in majority of the soil samples.
56
October 2012
experienced. These however move gradually into existing channels, streams and
flood plains within few hours after rains.
1.1.1.35 Water Quality (Surface/Groundwater)
The results of the physico-chemical parameters, heavy metals contents of the
surface and ground water samples in the project area in the wet and dry seasons
as well as FMEnv permissible limits are presented in Table 4.10.
1.1.1.35.1 Hydro-Physical Parameters of Water Quality
The measured hydro-physical parameters were temperature, colour, turbidity
and total suspended solid (TSS). The surface water temperature in the both
seasons varied from 24.9 to 28.50C, with an average of 26.150C all of reported
values were below the FMEnv permissible limit of 350C. The turbidity of the
surface water bodies ranged from 3 to 260 NTU with an average value of 69.75
NTU, while it varied from 3 to 13 NTU for the ground water samples (Table 10).
The corresponding mean turbidity values in the wet season for the surface water
bodies exceeded the FMEnv allowable limit of 10 NTU.
There were slight variations in the concentrations of some physical and chemical
parameters of the water bodies with respect to seasonal changes. As expected,
temperatures were generally higher in the dry season than in the rainy season.
The results data suggest that the water bodies were generally characterized by
low turbidity. The turbidity showed a decrease in value during the dry season.
There was a very highly significant positive correlation between water turbidity
and TSS (P<0.01) indicating that this parameters are affected by hydrological
factors.
57
October 2012
Table 4.10: Physico-chemical characteristics of Surface Water Samples (Wet and Dry Seasons)
CPGC
SEAs
DRY
Tem
28.5
C0n
65
TDS
33
pH
6.34
TSS
14
PO4
0.10
DO
5.0
BOD
4.0
COD
6.0
CO3
1.22
Ca
18.0
Mg
12.0
TA
50.0
TH
30.0
Cl
4.20
NO3
1.40
SO4
4.0
K
8.0
Na
3.0
THC
ND
O/G
ND
1SW
WET
25.3
49
25
7.50
17
0.33
4.5
5.0
8.0
2.28
12.0
9.0
30.0
15.0
1.22
3.10
9.0
2.0
6.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
23.6
205
102
6.00
24
2SW
WET
29.9
23
11
5.92
29
0.07
4.9
5.0
9.0
1.06
15.0
10.0
40.0
25.0
2.86
5.34
6.0
4.0
9.0
ND
ND
0.06
4.4
7.0
6.0
3.00
10.0
8.0
30.0
14.0
3.00
1.23
8.0
3.0
7.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
23.9
122
61
7.40
38.0
0.03
4.8
4.0
8.0
2.00
20.0
12.0
30.0
32.0
1.80
0.96
5.0
2.0
6.0
ND
ND
3SW
WET
28.9
49
24
6.24
40.0
0.15
5.1
6.0
8.0
3.02
12.0
8.0
20.0
20.0
2.24
2.98
7.0
5.0
3.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
28.8
75
4SW
WET
26.3
63
37
7.30
47.0
0.02
5.2
5.0
11
1.00
14.0
7.0
30.0
21.0
5.25
3.11
9.0
6.0
2.0
ND
ND
31
7.84
48.0
0.08
5.8
6.0
8.0
2.24
18.0
12.0
40.0
30.0
1.04
3.00
4.0
10
8.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
29.2
61
30
7.43
36.0
0.04
5.0
5.0
9.0
3.50
10.0
4.0
20.0
14.0
1.88
1.75
3.0
8.0
4.0
ND
ND
5SW
WET
28.5
83
41
6.47
40.0
0.16
5.3
6.8
8.0
1.03
15.0
9.0
30.0
24.0
2.90
0.55
8.0
5.0
10
ND
ND
CPGC
6SW
DRY
29.3
171
85
7.16
88.0
0.04
5.1
8.0
20
0.95
17.0
10.0
50.0
27.0
5.48
0.99
2.0
2.0
2.0
ND
ND
WET
28.6
46
22
6.69
74.0
0.09
5.7
7.0
15
0.68
20.0
9.0
50.0
29.0
4.90
0.28
1.0
4.0
3.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
26.5
36
28
6.02
57.0
0.08
5.2
6.0
10
1.02
24.0
7.0
30.0
31.0
3.33
1.00
3.0
3.0
5.0
ND
ND
7SW
WET
31.1
120
60
6.60
42.0
0.12
4.3
5.8
3.0
0.63
17.0
10.0
20.0
27.0
2.04
1.95
2.0
5.0
4.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
28.3
72
35
6.40
14.0
0.15
4.6
3.0
12
1.00
15.0
13.0
30.0
28.0
1.48
0.46
4.0
1.0
8.0
ND
ND
8SW
WET
31.9
68
34
7.01
10.0
0.06
5.0
5.5
10
1.02
20.0
8.0
60.0
28.0
3.00
0.22
6.0
4.0
5.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
28.6
164
83
6.41
86.0
0.28
4.4
6.0
13
0.30
12.0
7.0
20.0
19.0
6.03
0.84
1.0
2.0
7.0
ND
ND
9SW
WET
29.8
155
78
6.58
69.0
0.14
5.3
8.3
11
0.77
28.0
5.0
30.0
33.0
4.77
1.49
4.0
2.0
7.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
29.8
93
46
6.53
34.0
0.43
4.7
5.0
8.0
1.00
21.0
11.0
40.0
32.0
7.00
1.20
2.0
5.0
2.0
ND
ND
10SW
WET
32.2
66
23
6.72
39.0
0.66
4.3
7.0
10
1.34
20.0
9.0
40.0
29.0
5.25
0.85
3.0
2.0
3.0
ND
ND
58
October 2012
Counts
Hydrocarbon
Utilizing Bacteria
(HUB)
Counts
Total
Heterotrophic
Fungi (THF)
Counts
Hydrocarbon
Utilizing
Fungi (HUF)
Counts
Pseudomonas
Proteus
Klebsiella
Pseudomonas
Klebsiella
6.2 x103
Pseudomonas
1.S3 x102
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
2.3 x 103
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
3.4 x 102
3.0x104
Pseudomonas
2.5x102
Rhizopus
Geotrichum
5.5x102
Rhizopus
1.0x102
DRY
Salmonella
E coli Alcaligene
7.0x102
Alcaligene
1.1x102
Trichoderma
Cladosporium
7.0 x 102
Trichoderma
1.3 x 102
WET
Pseudomonas
E coli Proteus
3.5x103
Pseudomonas
2.0x102
Trichoderma
2.0x102
Trichoderma
2.0x102
DRY
Citrobacter
Pseudomonas
Proteus
2.4 x103
Citrobacter
Pseudomonas
1.5x102
Aspergillus
1.7 x 102
Aspergillus
1.7 x 102
WET
Proteus
Pseudomonas
4.0x103
Pseudomonas
3.0x102
Geotrichum
Aspergillus
4.5x103
Apergillus
2.6x102
Sample
Season
CPGCM
1SW
DRY
WET
CPGCM
2SW
CPGCM
3SW
59
October 2012
CPGCM
4SW
CPGCM
5SW
CPGCM
6SW
CPGCM
7SW
DRY
Erwinia
WET
2.0x104
Aspergillus
Geotrichum
6.0x102
Aspergillus
1.0x102
E coli
4.3x103
Aspergillus
1.8 x 102
Aspergillus
1.8 x 102
DRY
Citrobacter
Pseudomonas
Klebsiella
2.6x103
Citrobacter
Pseudomonas
7.2x102
Cuvularia
Aspergillus
3.6x103
Aspergillus
2.0x102
WET
Pseudomonas
Klebsiella
Proteus
5.0 x103
Pseudomonas
1.2 x102
Aspergillus
Penicilium
1.3 x 103
Penicillium
Aspergillus
1.3 x 102
DRY
Pseudomonas
E coli Proteus
4.8x104
Pseudomonas
2.2.x102
Aspergilus
Geotrichum
7.3x102
Apergillus
2.5x102
WET
Salmonella
Pseudomonas
E coli Proteus
7.4x104
Pseudomonas
2.8 x102
Aspergillus
1.0 x 102
Aspergillus
1.0 x 102
DRY
Proteus
Alcaligene
4.0x103
Alcaligene
3.0x102
Cuvularia
Aspergillus
1.3x103
Aspergillus
7.0x102
WET
Pseudomonas
Proteus
Salmonella
6.2x103
Pseudomonas
3.0 x102
Aspergillus
Penicilium
8.3 x 102
Penicilium
Aspergillus
8.3x 102
E coli
60
October 2012
CPGCM
8SW
CPGCM
9SW
CPGCM
10SW
DRY
2.0x103
Pseudomonas
7.0 x102
Geotrichum
5.7 x 102
WET
E coli
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas
Micrococcus
E coli
4.4x103
Pseudomonas
Micrococcus
2.6x102
Geotrichum
Aspergillus
2.0x103
Aspergilus
4.0x102
DRY
Proteus E coli
3.5 x103
Penicilium
Rhodotorula
1.6 x 103
Penicilium
Rhodotorula
1.4 x 102
WET
E coli
Pseudomonas
Proteus
2.8x103
Pseudomonas
1.8x102
Penicilium
Geotrichum
2.3x103
Penicilium
2.0x102
DRY
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas
8.5 x102
Rhodotorula
Penicilium
3.4 x 102
Penicilium
Rhodotorula
3.4 x 102
Pseudomonas
5.4x102
Penicilium
Geotrichum
2.6x103
Penicilium
6.3x102
8.5 x102
WET
Salmonella
Pseudomonas
4.5x103
61
October 2012
13.0
8.10
21.1
2.10
2.86
THC
2.00
O/G
20
Na
2.0
2.0
SO4
5.8
NO3
0.02
Cl
CO3
47
TH
TA
40
Mg
PO4
80
Ca
Tss
29.1
COD
Tds
6.97
BOD
cond
DRY
DO
Temp
CPGC
SEASON
pH
Table 4.12: Physico-chemical characteristics of Ground Water Samples (Wet and Dry Seasons)
10.0
4.0
7.5
ND
ND
1GW
WET
5.60
32.4
53
27
49
0.08
5.5
3.0
5.0
20
4.05
11.0
5.0
16.0
1.05
3.38
4.0
8.0
9.0
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
6.27
30.1
88
43
60
0.03
5.3
3.0
3.0
30
1.50
15.0
10.0
25.0
4.05
2.11
5.00
7.2
4.8
ND
ND
2GW
WET
6.18
29.5
72
36
54
0.05
5.0
2.0
4.0
20
1.00
12.0
7.0
19.0
2.34
1.00
3.0
10
7.8
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
7.10
30.8
66
32
19
0.05
5.4
2.0
2.2
10
3.18
10.0
7.10
17.1
4.00
2.08
4.00
3.0
8.0
ND
ND
3GW
WET
4.85
30.4
58
28
16
0.07
6.5
3.0
5.0
30
5.44
8.00
2.40
10.4
1.60
1.68
3.88
6.0
10
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
7.49
29.7
57
28
20
0.02
6.6
2.0
2.0
40
2.11
8.0
3.50
11.5
7.00
2.60
11.0
8.3
3.5
ND
ND
4GW
WET
6.58
28.9
50
25
18
0.04
5.5
3.0
6.0
40
4.88
11.0
7.0
18.0
2.55
4.00
7.45
5.0
5.4
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
9.00
27.8
53
26
16
0.02
5.0
4.0
7.0
20
4.80
15.0
7.0
22.0
1.80
0.74
3.0
2.4
7.0
ND
ND
5GW
WET
6.24
28.0
49
24
20
0.03
5.9
3.0
7.0
30
2.85
13.0
9.0
22.0
1.63
2.40
4.8
4.0
3.6
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
8.96
28.2
62
31
16
0.03
5.4
2.0
2.0
30
1.05
11.0
6.0
17.0
3.30
1.16
9.0
7.1
5.5
ND
ND
6GW
WET
6.31
29.5
58
29
82
0.01
5.2
6.0
9.0
40
4.00
9.00
10.0
19.0
3.12
3.11
6.7
3.8
2.9
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
7.68
30.6
445
222
29
0.02
5.3
2.0
2.0
50
3.55
18.0
12.0
30.0
4.50
1.90
3.0
9.0
2.6
ND
ND
7GW
WET
4.93
30.3
496
246
40
0.03
5.1
3.0
8.0
30
2.96
11.0
5.0
16.0
2.05
1.05
3.8
9.5
4.1
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
9.00
28.4
230
124
62
0.0I
5.3
4.0
8.0
20
1.18
8.0
5.0
13.0
1.88
0.17
4.0
5.8
5.0
ND
ND
8GW
WET
5.94
30.8
255
129
90
0.02
5.3
5.0
8.0
20
3.35
10.0
6.0
16.0
1.35
1.80
6.1
6.3
8.8
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
8.92
33.5
48
24
74
0.04
3.8
6.0
15
40
4.56
12.0
8.0
20.0
2.50
0.82
5.0
3.1
6.9
ND
ND
9GW
WET
7.10
29.8
70
35
50
0.06
4.0
3.0
7.0
20
1.86
9.0
3.0
12.0
1.00
2.65
5.4
2.0
7.5
ND
ND
CPGC
DRY
9.00
34.5
136
68
75
0.03
5.2
4.0
9.0
50
1.88
18.0
11.0
29.0
1.10
2.92
8.0
2.0
8.0
ND
ND
10GW
WET
6.04
29.1
138
68
39
0.04
6.2
2.0
7.0
30
2.99
12.0
8.0
20.0
3.00
3.08
3.9
4.8
10
ND
ND
62
October 2012
Counts
Counts
Total Heterotrophic
Fungi (THF)
Counts
3.0 x104
Hydrocarbon
Utilizing Bacteria
(HUB)
Pseudomonas
2.3x102
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
4.2x 103
4.8x106
Pseudomonas
6.5x103
Rhizopus Geotrichum
Penicilium
4.0x104
Alcaligene
Pseudomonas
4.0x103
2.5x105
Pseudomonas
DRY
Citrobacter
Pseudomonas
Proteus
7.4 x104
WET
Proteus
Pseudomonas
Enterobacter
Erwinia Bacillus
E coli
WET
DRY
Sample
Season
CPGC
1SD
DRY
WET
CPGC
2SD
DRY
WET
CPGC
3SD
CPGC
4SD
CPGC
5SD
DRY
WET
Hydrocarbon
Utilizing Fungi
(HUF)
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
Counts
2.7x103
Rhizopus
Penicilium
1.4x103
Trichoderma
Cladosporium
7.5 x 103
Trichoderma
2.8 x 103
2.7x102
Trichoderma
Saccharomyces
5.3x103
Trichoderma
4.4x103
Citrobacter
Pseudomonas
9.2x103
Aspergillus
9.0 x 102
Aspergillus
9.0 x 102
5.5x106
Pseudomonas
3.7x102
Geotrichum
Aspergillus Alternaria
3.5x103
Apergillus
1.5x102
6.1x104
Bacillus
3.7x103
Aspergillus
7.3x102
Aspergillus
7.3x102
E coli Bacilus
2.5x105
Bacilus
2.9x104
Aspergillus Cuvularia
2.0 x 103
Aspergillus
5.0 x 102
Citrobacter
Pseudomonas
Klebsiella Proteus
Pseudomonas
Klebsiella
Proteus E coli
3.6x103
Citrobacter
Pseudomonas
5.0x102
Cuvularia Aspergillus
3.9x103
Aspergillus
2.0x102
4.6 x105
Pseudomonas
8.3 x103
Aspergillus
Rhizopus
5.0 x 103
Penicillium
Rhizopus
2.2x 102
63
October 2012
4.2x 103
dissolved oxygen content (DO) had an average value of 5.0mg/l for the surface
water and 4.6mg/l for the groundwater samples in the wet season.
The total dissolved solids (TDS) content of the surface water varied between 7.0
and 17.8mg/l with an average value of 12.4mg/l, while the groundwater values
ranged from 114 to 124mg/l with a mean value of 119mg/l. All the stations gave
values below the FMEnv permissible limit of 2000mg/l during the wet and dry
seasons.
Furthermore, the nutrient elements namely nitrates and phosphates were low in
the water bodies, while sulphate values were lower than the regulatory limit of
250mg/l during the wet and dry seasons.
parameters considered occurred within the known range for the coastal rivers in
the south-west based on previous similar studies (Chukwu and Nwachukwu,
2004).
64
October 2012
1.1.1.35.3 Heavy Metals in Surface and Ground Water Samples in Project Area
The mean concentrations of heavy metals in the surface and groundwater
samples in the project area for the two seasons did not differ significantly from
each other. Heavy metals concentrations in the water bodies varied from Not
Detected to 0.74ppm with Iron being the most abundant metal. Lead, Arsenic
and Mercury were not detected at all in the water samples. Other heavy metals
including Zn, Mn, and Cu were in tolerable concentrations and therefore do not
pose any hazard to the aquatic environment. Most of the metals (Pb, Ni, Co, Cr
and Zn) were slightly higher in mass concentration in freshwater site of the study
area than in the brackish lagoon water.
1.1.1.36 Microbiological Characteristics of Surface and Ground Water Samples
The microbial flora of water usually consists of the autochthonous or indigenous
species which are the true residents and the allochthonous or foreign residents.
The indigenous species are well adapted to their environment and are able to
survive under extreme conditions which may be unfavourable to their foreign
counterparts, for example E.Coli is known to die quickly in water whereas
indigenous species such as Pseudomonas and Achromobacter do not.
Most aquatic microbial flora plays very useful roles in nature while others are
regarded as nuisance. Some aquatic bacteria like the Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium
and Achromobacter degrade complex organic substances in water which may be
harmful to marine life while others like the E. Coli, Salmonella typhi and Vibrio
cholera are human pathogens. E. Coli in water is usually an indication of faecal
contamination while others such as Sphaerotilus natans, Leptothrix and
Ferrobacillus cause odour, taste and turbidity problems in water. All the issues
mentioned above make it very necessary to study and understand the
microbiological characteristics of water samples during any EIA study.
65
October 2012
The total
heterotrophic bacterial counts ranged between 160 x 105 and 220 x 105 Cfu/ml.
for surface fresh water samples while those of borehole samples ranged between
1.80 x 105 and 36 x 105 Cfu/ml. The total microbial counts of surface water as
expected were higher than those of borehole samples. Hydrocarbon utilizing
bacterial counts were relatively low in all the samples suggestive of the fact that
no recent organic pollution has occurred in the area. Coliform bacteria were
present at significant concentrations in samples from the fresh water streams.
Heterotrophic and Hydrocarbon Utilizing Fungal and Yeast Counts were
relatively low in all the water samples. The predominant microbial flora of the
surface water samples are: Corynebacterium Sp., Serratia marcescens, Bacillus
subtilis, and Alkaligenes sp., Borehole samples were dominated by Pseudomonas
aeruginosa and Bacillus cerus, the later is also the predominant microbial flora of
the bottom sediment. The following fungal species were also isolated from the
water and bottom sediment samples; Aspergillus niger, Candida sp., and
Aspergillus flavus.
All the microbial isolates indicated above have the potential to degrade complex
organic substances that may be present in the water body; however their
presence is not significant enough to suggest organic pollution. Majority of these
organisms have the ability to utilize petroleum hydrocarbons as their sole carbon
and energy source for growth and metabolism. The low heterotrophic and
hydrocarbon utilizing microbial counts recorded in the surface water and
borehole samples is as a result of very low levels of nutrients and organic matter
in the water samples which is not sufficient to support microbial growth and
proliferation. Also the very low concentrations of coliform bacteria recorded in
the surface water samples is an evidence of faecal pollution which may have
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP OKIJA
66
October 2012
occurred as a result of run off due to perennial rainfall as at the time of the
investigation.
Counts Range
Fresh Water
Swamps
Groundwater
Wet
Season
Dry
Season
Wet
Season
Dry
Season
Bacterial
160
220
1.80
36
Utilizing
1.40
2.80
0.017
0.026
% Hydrocarbon Utilizers
0.875
1.27
0.108
0.02
0.028
0.006
0.0026
0.006
0.0032
Nil
0.046
Nil
Total
Heterotrophic
Hydrocarbon
105)
Total Fungal and Yeast Counts
(Cfu/ml x 105 )
67
October 2012
68
October 2012
69
October 2012
Anambra State lies in the Anambra Basin, the first region where intensive oil
exploration was carried out in Nigeria. The Anambra basin has about 6,000 m of
sedimentary rocks. The sedimentary rocks comprise ancient Cretaceous deltas,
somewhat similar to the Niger Delta, with the Nkporo Shale, the Mamu
Formation, the Ajali sandstone and the Nsukka Formation as the main deposits.
On the surface the dominant sedimentary rocks are the Imo Shale a sequence of
grey shales, occasional clay iron stones and Sandstone beds.
General Formation
The Imo Shale underlies the eastern part of the state, particularly in Ayamelum,
Awka North, and Oruma North LGAs. Next in the geological sequence, is the
Ameke Formation, which includes Nanka Sands, laid down in the Eocene. Its
rock types are sandstone, calcareous shale, and shelly-limestone in thin bands.
Outcrops of the sandstone occur at various places on the higher cuesta, such as at
Abagana and Nsugbe, where they are quarried for construction purposes. Nanka
sands out crop mainly at Nanka and Oko in Orumba North LGA.
Recent Sediments
The recent sediments occur along the coastal belt as alluvial deposits of the major
rivers. The sediments consist of unconsolidated sands, clays and mud. The
alluvial deposits consist of coarse, clayey unsorted sands with clay lenses and
occasional pebble beds.
70
October 2012
High precipitation of 2500-4500 mm per annum has been reported by Ajao et al.,
1996, Jeje (1983), and Zumberge (1963) reported that high permeability of the
topsoil, the generally flat topography and vegetative cover, as well as lenses of
clay ensure stupendous recharge and retention of subsurface water by the
aquifers all year round.
1.1.1.39 Geomorphology
Anambra State falls into two main landform regions: a highland region of
moderate elevation that covers much of the state south of the Anambra River,
and low plains to the west, north, and east of the highlands. The highland region
is a low asymmetrical ridge or cuesta in the northern portion of the Awka-Orlu
Uplands, which trend roughly southeast to northwest, in line with the geological
formations that underlie it.
It is highest in the southeast, about 410m above mean sea level, and gradually
decreases in height to only 33m in the northwest on the banks of the Anambra
River and the Niger. At Onitsha and Otuocha, the cuesta provides well drained
low land, very close to the river, thereby enabling settlements to extend to the
banks of the river.
71
October 2012
The cuesta has confined the wide and braided channel of the Niger to a
comparatively narrow valley bed at the southern part of Onitsha, making an
appropriate location for the construction of bridge across the river. The
highlands consist of two cuestas, a lower and a higher one, each with an east
facing escarpment. The two cuestas merge south of Nanka.
The lower cuesta, formed by the more resistant sandstone rocks of the Imo Shale,
rises to only 150m above mean sea level at Umuawulu and decreases in height
northwestward to only 100m at Achalla. Its escarpment faces the Mamu River
plain and has a local relief of between 30 and 80m west of it, is the higher cuesta,
formed by the same stones of the Ameke Formation. Its height is above 400m in
the south-east at lgbolkwu and lsuofia decreasing northwestward to less than
300m; Abagana, and to only 100m at Aguleri.
Geophysical Studies
The field data for the Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) are presented in Table
4.15, while the resulting computer iterated field curves is presented in Figure
4.11.
Table 4.15: Geophysical Field Data
AB/2 (m)
MN/2 (m)
VES 1 ( m)
VES 2 ( m)
1.0
0.25
31.4
38.1
2.0
0.25
35.5
49.5
3.0
0.25
42.0
59.1
4.0
0.25
47.0
63.0
6.0
0.25
53.4
71.4
6.0
0.50
52.0
67.3
9.0
0.50
57.3
76.8
12.0
0.50
64.6
95.0
15.0
0.50
69.5
27.9
72
October 2012
15.0
1.00
72.2
90.7
20.0
1.00
85.1
99.7
25.0
1.00
74.9
82.0
32.0
1.00
90.0
119.9
40.0
1.00
90.7
171.1
40.0
2.50
51.4
72.8
50.0
2.50
98.3
71.0
65.0
2.50
45.5
116.3
80.0
2.50
31.5
69.4
100.0
2.50
51.2
41.6
100.0
5.00
37.8
49.8
120.0
5.00
160.0
5.00
200.0
5.00
200.0
7.00
152.8
73
October 2012
The VES data were initially subjected to interpretation process using the usual
manual technique of curve matching. This entails the use of two-layer model
master curve alongside auxiliary curves. However, visual evaluation of the
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
74
October 2012
Resistivity ( m)
Thickness (m)
Sediments
30.1
1.1
Topsoil
47.7
0.7
Sand (medium)
71.8
10.4
Sand (coarse)
75
October 2012
341.7
4.8
Sand (coarse)
102.5
12.1
5.1
Sandy clay
Layer No.
Resistivity ( m)
Thickness (m)
Sediments
37.1
1.4
Topsoil
121.5
6.0
Sand (medium)
95.4
40.7
Sand (coarse)
10.6
VES 2
Sandy clay
The aquifers in the type localities i.e. the underlying sands are recharged both
from the surface (vertical) as percolation from rain and from the sides
(horizontal) by the river in contact with the water bearing sands. The findings
indicate that groundwater flow is basically north-south into the river implying
the hydraulic gradient is to a reasonable extent controlled by the topography.
76
October 2012
Vegetation Studies
Vegetal Covers
This is the most dominant land cover within the region. The most dominant are
complex transitional rain forests to secondary forests zone and savannah
vegetation. The plants are at different stages of evolution with identifiable
floristic composition. These range from characteristic close stands of varied
layers and canopies to typical shrubs, herb layers, lianas, epiphytes and parasites
(Plate 4.12).
77
October 2012
The main uses to which the features are put include lumbering, hunting and fuel
wood gathering for both domestic and cottage industrial purposes. The
vegetation also serves as main source of fuel-wood for domestic uses, smoking
fish catches and boiling palm kernels.
Only the freshwater forests support farming activities. They are carried out on
subsistence for both food crops largely. In almost all the settlements, palm trees
Silk trees, Iroko, Bread fruit, Oil bean and coconut trees predominate as
economic trees along with some fruits like guava, oranges, pawpaw and
mangoes.
Animal Resources and Wildlife
Field observations, literature review and interview of local people revealed that
the project area is not rich in wild life. This was attributed to widespread of
deforestation, habitat loss, intensive human activities such as farming. From the
investigations conducted, representatives of amphibians, reptiles, birds and
mammals were found in the area. The dominant species encountered in the area
were those associated with grassland such as Grass Cutters, Squirrels, Vipers,
antelopes, porcupines and many species of rats. Birds that are known to be
cosmopolitan or increasingly tolerant of human activities were common around
the project site. These include egrets, sparrows and pied-crown.
78
October 2012
CHAPTER FIVE
SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE
CONDITION OF THE PROJECT
ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER FIVE
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ENVIRONMENT
BASELINE
CONDITION
OF
THE
PROJECT
INTRODUCTION
This chapter provides information on the social and economic baseline
conditions of the project area. The goal is to establish existing socio-economic
condition as a benchmark for assessing future changes in socio-economic
indicators with a view to ascertaining the likely impact of the project. Great
attention is paid to health profile enumeration, assessment of current living
standards as well as means of livelihood.
Baseline information has been gathered from desktop studies and results of
primary data collection which is accomplished through enumeration, resource
assessments, socio-economic surveys and community consultations carried out
in June, August 2011 and January 2012 respectively.
THE STUDY AREA:
The Proposed 495MW gas powered plant will be located at Okija, in Ihiala Local
Government Area of Anambra State in the South-Eastern region of Nigeria (Fig
5.1). Anambra State is bordered in the north by Kogi State, in the south by Enugu
State, in the west by Delta State and in the east by Imo State. The State is divided
into twenty one LGAs with Ihiala where the plant is situated, located towards
the eastern end.
As stated in chapter three, the geographic scope of the social baseline covers the
Okija traditional heritage while the immediate receptacles include the Ubahu
village and other neighbouring communities like Ugwucheleku, Umuogu,
Oghalegbu and Umuhu in Okija. Data accumulation for the baseline information
2 October 2012
starts with some commentaries about the Nigerian state obtained from desktop
studies of various reports on Nigeria.
This provides the context within which the baseline information about Anambra
State, Ihiala LGA and the immediate settlements around the project site will be
appreciated.
3 October 2012
METHODOLOGY
A Combination of techniques was deployed for the socio-economic enumeration
of the project area, including but not limited to the following:
Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) with adult males, female, the aged
and youths.
4 October 2012
Procedure Adopted
Secondary
Data
Survey
KI
Interviews
FGDs
5 October 2012
Direct
Observation
Impact
Zoning
Paired
Needs
Ranking
Identity marginalized
groups
within
the
community
Identify and assess
status
of
resources
(land, forest, water) and
level of dependence
upon these
Suggest mechanisms to
minimize
negative
effects of proposed
project
upon
local
population
6 October 2012
Ethnic conflicts between original land owners and settlers around the
project site who have become stakeholders may breed future rivalry over
distribution of CSR projects and some socio-economic mitigation
measures against such impacts as unemployment: Such conflicts may
breed responses that are economical with the truth depending on which
side of the divide the respondent belongs.
7 October 2012
8 October 2012
9 October 2012
major cause of Nigerias relatively unimpressive showing in critical socioeconomic indicators. In the 21st century world per capita energy consumption is a
major index for measuring the state of development of a country. As at today,
peak generation is about 4.2GW which translates to a per capita electricity
consumption of 25.8 watts (population of 162.5m people assumed).
Table 5.2
Socio-Economic
Indicator
National level
Year
Population Growth
2.5%
2011
2,532
2011
Literacy Rate
61%
2009
Proportion of total
population served with
piped water (%)
74%
2010
School Enrollment
Primary (Gross)
83
2010
15.1
2011
Total Population
162.5m
2011
3.6
2009
51
2010
Religion
60% Muslim
30% Christian
10% Indigenous
Belief
5
2011
0.459
2011
2011
10
Source
World Bank
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.pop.G
ROW
World Bank
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.
PCAPP>PP.CD
World Bank
http//data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.
LITR.ZS/countries
World Bank
http//data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.H2O.S
AFE.UR.ZS
World Bank
http//data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.
ENRR
World Bank
http//data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.
DEFL.KD.KD.ZG/countries
World Bank
http//data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.POP.T
OTL
World Bank
http//data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.DYN.
AIDS.ZS/countries
World Bank
http//data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.
LEOO.IN/countries
CIA World Fact-book
http//www.cia.gov/library/publication/theworld-factbook/goes/ni.html
World Health Organization
http//app.who.int/whosis/data/core/core_sele
ct_process.cfm
UNDP International Human
Development Indicator
http//hdrstats.undp.org/en/table/default.html
October 2012
Low HDI may have arisen from massive unemployment with so many youths
yielding to crime out of peer pressure and societal expectations. Social agitation
is on the increase starting from the Niger-Delta region where oil and gas are
exploited and spreading to all parts of the country wherever any developmental
project is sited. This underpins the importance of a properly conducted ESIA to
the sustainability of such projects especially power generation which takes place
in remote areas.
In recent times, the Federal Government of Nigeria appears to be focused in
three key development directions, viz: reduction/elimination of importation of
refined petroleum products, increased agricultural production and improved ESI
performance. These three development agenda, if vigorously pursued, will result
in generating millions of employment opportunities and of course a moderate
growth in socio-economic indicators.
The above key socio-economic indicators provide the context within which the
socio-economic dynamics of Anambra state in general and the Okija Community
in particular will be understood
The Host State (ANAMBRA)
In 1991 when the military regime of General Ibrahim Babangida increased the
number of states to 36, Anambra State was carved out of old Anambra State,
with Awka as the state capital. Located in south east of Nigeria, Anambra State
occupies 4,416 square kilometers. It comprises the Igbos. It shares common
boundaries with four states (Kogi, Enugu, Imo and Delta). Ethnically, Igbos is the
main ethnic group. Anambra State is popularly called the Light of the Nation.
There are twenty-one local government areas in the state. They include Ihiala,
Awka North, Awka South, Idemili North, Idemili South, Orumba North,
Orumba South, Ogbaru, Onitsha North, Onitsha South, Ayamelum, Anambra
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
11
October 2012
East, Anambra West and Aguata. Others are Anaocha, Oyi, Dunkofia, Ekwusigo,
and Nnewi North, Nnewi South, Njikoka (Fig 5.1). The CPGL 495MW power
plant is located at Ihiala LGA.
5.4.3.1 Traditional Heritage
The state has a rich cultural heritage. Archaeological discoveries at Ezira (Hartle,
1967) and at lgboUkwu (Shaw, 1970) reveal great works of art in iron, bronze,
copper, and pottery works, dated ninth century AD, and belonging to the ancient
Nri kingdom. Long before AD 800, the Nri people had developed an advanced
political organisation that culminated in divine kingship (Jeffreys, 1935 and
Onwuejeogwu, 1981). The authority of the Eze (King) of Nri, widely
acknowledged in traditional lgboland, led to the establishment of the Nri
theocratic hegemony, stretching from beyond Agbor, west of the Niger, to east of
Okigwe on the eastern side of the Niger and to Owerri. Eze Nri had control over
the Ozo and Eze titles and all rituals of abrogation or enactment of taboos,
cleansing of abomination, and so on. While it lacked militarism, the Nri was
widely acknowledged as a craft industrial centre. Ethnically, the people of the
state are lgbos, who are widely known to be very resourceful, hardworking,
sociable, friendly, accommodating, peace loving, and law abiding. They are
highly enterprising and are reputed for their business acumen. Skilled
manpower resources are readily available in every field of human endeavour.
The language of the people is lgbo, but English is widely spoken.
5.4.3.2 Economy
Majority of the people of the state are farmers. The State is blessed with suitable
ecological and climatic conditions. It is therefore possible to produce various
agricultural products including yam, cassava, soya bean, cocoyam, maize, rice,
palm produce, and others. The States rich agricultural endowment is reflected in
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
12
October 2012
its capacity to produce cash crops like palm produce, and cashew. Anambra State
is blessed with strategic minerals.
5.4.3.3 Demography
Anambra State occupies a total land area of 4,416 square kilometres and based on
the 2006 national population headcount, the state has a population of about
4,184,032 people resulting in a density of 937/sq km; one of the highest in
Nigeria. Naturally, the state harbours both her indigenes and those of other parts
of Nigeria as well as sizeable numbers of people from such other West African
countries as Benin Republic, Togo, Ghana, Niger, Mali and Sudan. Table 5.4
shows the population distribution according to LGAs which is also represented
in the bar chart of Fig. 5.2.
Table 5.3: Population Distribution of Anambra State
LGA
Males
Anambra West
Ayamelum
Awka North
Anambra East
Oyi
Dunukofia
Njikoka
Awka South
Orumba
Anaocha
Idemili North
Onitsha North
Onitsha South
Ogbaru
Idemili South
Nnewi North
Ekwusigo
Ihiala
Nnewi South
88253
81287
59128
77804
88023
50731
76158
97815
89559
147998
225288
63304
72204
117975
108990
79962
82210
156019
121862
167416
158410
112608
153331
168029
96382
148465
189049
172405
285002
430783
124942
136662
221879
207683
157569
158231
302158
233658
13
October 2012
2174641 2007391
4182032
233,658
158,231
Ekwusigo
302,158
157,569
207,683
Nweli North
136,662
Onitsha South
Idemili South
124,942
172,405
189,049
148,465
168,029
Oyi
96,382
153,331
Anambra East
150000
112,608
158,410
200000
Ayamelum
250000
167,416
300000
Anambra west
350000
Onitsha North
285,002
400000
221,879
450000
Ogbaru
430,783
100000
50000
Nweli South
Ihiala
Idemili North
Anaocha
Orumba
Awka South
Njikoka
Dunukofia
Awka North
14
October 2012
Locations (I.g.as)
Possible project
1.
2.
Agricultural
resources
Rice
Cassava
3.
Cashew
4.
Castor seed
5.
Palm Produce
6.
7.
Yam
Maize
8.
Tomatoes
Rice milling
Gari
processing,
industrial starch, cassava
flour,
cassava
chips,
ethanol
Cashew juice, cashew nut
& nut oil processing
Castor oil processing for
industrial uses
Palm oil processing,
vegetable
oil,
palm
kernel oil processing for
industrial uses
Yam flour processing
Maize gritz and flour
processing
Tomatoes juice & paste
production industry.
15
October 2012
The need for infrastructural growth is recognised by both the state and Federal
government. Courtesy of Niger Delta Power Holding Company (NDPHC) a new
132/33 KV substation is slated for construction at Ihiala to boost power supply.
This may provide partial evacuation point for the proposed Century IPP plant.
As a typical rural setting, the major source of lively hood is farming. However a
few people are engaged in civil service, artisan trades (Mason, Carpentry,
Welding e.t.c.), cottage industries (cassava and grains processing), and
employment by commercial and industrial establishments as well as commerce.
16
October 2012
social status may be more adversely affected by a project than others, and who
may be constrained in their ability to take advantage of a project developmental
benefits. Therefore, typical Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives are
designed to favour these groups as much as practicable. In the particular case of
the CPGL 495MW IPP Project, the socio-economic team discovered women,
children, disabled people, the elderly and to some extent, the peasant farmers are
the most vulnerable. This classification is more by virtue of their restrained
opportunity to participate in decision making processes within the traditional
governance structure than strict economic deprivation. As a typical African
Community, the people practice the extended family system whereby even the
mentally challenged receives some form of care by his /her immediate relatives.
Furthermore, even the peasant farmers must have adjusted to the project landtake which was executed by the promoters of Century Power Generation Ltd.
over five years ago. It follows therefore, that the above listed groups are
classified as vulnerable partly because of their poor economic base and partly
because of their restricted opportunity to benefit from such CSR initiatives as
employment skill training and scholarships. Mitigation measures against adverse
economic impacts must of necessity consider these groups. In the particular case
of women, both the traditional setting and religion dont seem to favour female
empowerment. This culture excludes women in most decision making processes
which makes them vulnerable to adverse socio-economic impacts. The study
team discovered that this trend is gradually changing for the better.
COMMUNITY STUDIES
After renaissance surveys, ground truthing and key informant interviews, the
socio-economic team scoped the community studies as follows:
-
17
October 2012
18
October 2012
It is forbidden to fish in Ulasi River. In Owere nda Obi stream, it is forbidden for
a woman in menstruation to fetch water in the stream. Women in such condition
who wish to fetch water from the stream are required to come to the stream with
palm kernel and keep it in a place in order to indicate to anyone that she is
menstruating. The person will then collect her utensil and fetch the water for her.
These beliefs may breed social tension if migrant workers flux into the village as
a result of a new project.
Apart from the shrines and deities, no archeological sites or items of interest
were identified in the community.
Traditional Heritage
The Host communities in particular have their sets of cultural heritage revolving
around serene natural amenities including traditional religion and amenities that
bring the people together very often. Prominent among the major annual
festivals are the New Yam Festival and others marking the beginning and end of
the planting season . These are itemised below.
2) Otutu Ulasi
June/July
3) Asara ngwu
4) Ilo muo
,,
August
19
October 2012
Transportation
The means of transportation is mainly by road. The project site is accessible
direct form the Onitsha Owerri express way (Plate5.2) The area also enjoys a
good network of rural roads. Okija in particular has a road network that links all
the villages. One of them is tarred and maintained by the proponent while the
others are maintained by the state and LGA. Human and material movement
using Lorries, buses, cars and motorcycles are very common.
Traffic counts were undertaken on the road for three days of the week during the
first season study of the EIA. The results indicate that motorcycles are mostly
used, followed by commercial buses, lorries (conveying building materials
especially earth dugs) while cars are the least used on the rural roads.
20
October 2012
Peak periods are usually in the early morning (between 6.30am and 7.30am) and
in evenings (between 4.00p.m and 6.00p.m). These two peak periods represent
when people go to work/farm and when they return to their homes. It is also
observed that there are more vehicular movement on traditional market days.
Plate 5.2 Project site showing direct access form the express road
Education
Among educational institutions found in the LGA are 61 public primary schools, 25
Secondary Schools, one Teachers College, two privately owned universities and
one Seminary owned by the Catholic Church. The figures exclude the privately
owned nursery, primary and secondary establishments which are now on rapid
increase. In Okija alone, there are various educational institutions ranging from
nursery, primary, secondary and tertiary institution. There are about 30 primary
schools located in all the villages. There are also about 8 private secondary
schools and 2 government schools, namely;
1) Okija community Secondary School
2) Union Secondary School
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
21
October 2012
Madonna University
2)
Atlantic University
A few observations regarding the occupational study and chart detailed below
may be in order. (i) the unemployed youths are not necessarily jobless; some
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
22
October 2012
have acquired artisan training, some are petty traders, contractors, political
jobbers while almost all follow their parents to the farm in a typical peasant
settlement. (ii) Farming is the basic occupation of an average native. However,
both farmland and personnel are depleting and it is only a matter of time for this
age long practice to disappear. (iii) Civil servants include teachers in private
schools and even Doctors/nurses in private hospitals. (iv) Hunting, sand mining,
etc. are typically secondary occupation.
OCCUPATIONAL CHART
3%
Unemployment
15%
2%
40%
5%
Farming
Artisanship
Hunting
20%
Company work
15%
Civil Service
Sand Digging
Infrastructural Development
Most of the Okija community roads are tarred through state, LGA and
community efforts. The Okija-Oguta- Egbema road is also tarred and provides an
alternative route to Imo state, especially the oil rich Egbema. It is noted that the
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
23
October 2012
fuel gas for the CPGL power plant will come from the Oguta, Egbema axis.
Portable water is obtained from private bore holes. Though a few inhabitants
patronize the streams mostly for domestic use, the survey shows that most
people drink the commercial sachet water.
Electricity is being supplied by PHCN and individuals who can afford the use of
generators to generate their own power. There is a post office in the community
and the GSM telecommunication facilities of various networks are available in
the area.
Plate 5.3. Road Side Market at Okija Junction, Near the Project Site.
Civil Service / Company Employment
An estimated 15% of the people living in the communities around the project
area are on paid employment either by the Local Government or the few
24
October 2012
25
October 2012
None of the people interviewed was against the project. Most respondents are of
the view that given the philanthropic disposition of the proponent, they are
convinces that the community will benefit immensely from the proposed project.
Some more enlightened folks pleaded with the EIA team to ensure that adequate
mitigation measures are put in place to forestall all negative impacts to the
community.
Witness land loss and the crops and other resources there-in
26
October 2012
27
October 2012
Stakeholders
The primary stakeholders are the major settlers around the project area, which
includes Ubahu village in Okija, and other communities maintaining a border
with Ubahu. The secondary impact stakeholders are the Ihiala L.G.A., which is
responsible for the welfare of the affected communities, and the environmental
NGOs all over the country.
Institutional Consultation
The primary regulatory authorities are FMEnv while the secondary authorities
are the Anambra state Ministry of Environment and Ihiala Local Government
Authority is at the tertiary level. All these bodies were informed of the EIA
studies as appropriate.
Public Involvement
The public especially those affected by the proposed project are entitled to
participate in the consultation process. The preliminary phase of consultation
was carried out during initial contacts made by CPGL supervisors and during
reconnaissance visits to the proposed project site by EIA consultants, prior to
fieldwork for the EIA baseline data gathering exercise.
28
October 2012
Fig. 5.5 shows the bar chart of the educational level of the respondents. A
majority of them attended primary school followed by secondary school and
then tertiary. The chart explains the fact that there are two tertiary institutions in
Okija. The direct consequence of that is that most graduates of tertiary
institutions are at home while others are in the cities doing white collar jobs. A
few such graduates who responded to the survey, work at the LGA office, the
few industries or teach in the secondary schools. Also as a result of various
educational policies dating back to the first republic when primary school
education was made free, most of the village respondents attended primary
school.
29
October 2012
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Age Of Respondents
The pie chart of Fig 5.5 depicts the age distribution of the respondents in
percentage. The chart is more representative of the visible population depending
on the time of day and location. Younger population are predominant around
the LGA office and construction sites while the more elderly are visible in the
evenings around the village square and Churches. However virtually all age
groups are covered.
30
October 2012
AGES OF RESPONDENTS
20-35 yrs
(30%)
Above 55 yrs
(40%)
46-55 years
(20%)
36-45 yrs
(10%)
Fig. 5.7 shows clearly that more males were approached with the questionnaire
than females. This has to do with visibility; otherwise the official demographic
figure presents more females than males. However, the females hardly move
with their male counterparts especially among the youths due to cultural
persuasions which is more relevant in the village. Same goes with Fig 5.6 which
shows the marital status of respondents. It simply shows that more matured
people were more eager to respond than the younger ones who did not have
much patience. Awareness of ESIA procedures could also have informed the
participation of mostly married persons who hope to benefit from any of the
socio-economic mitigation measures.
31
October 2012
MARITAL STATUS
85%
100%
80%
60%
40%
15%
20%
0%
SEX OF RESPONDENTS
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Religion of Respondents
On the whole, the people of the area are predominantly Christians, as shown in
Fig 5.8, though the relative numbers may vary from village to village.
32
October 2012
RELIGION OF
RESPONDENTS
15%
5%
Christian
Traditional
80%
Islamic
A substantial number of the respondents seem aware of the new power plant
especially around Ubahu and Umuohi settlements along the express way.
However, these groups of respondents are aware of ESIA procedures as it
concerns socio-economic baseline data gathering and were eager to fill the
questionnaire. Fig 5.9 shows a representative response about the level of
awareness of the project and the ESIA.
33
October 2012
AWARENESS OF THE
IPP POWER PROJECT
80%
80%
60%
40%
15%
20%
5%
0%
Yes
No
Neutral
34
October 2012
as depicted in Fig 5.10. However, the issue of employment for locals and pipe
borne water were re-echoed by most respondents.
RESPONSE ON THE
DESIRABILITY OF THE PROJECT
80%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
15%
5%
35
October 2012
HEALTH SYMPTOMS
Tiredness/Fatigue
Stuffy or runny nose
Headache
Sinus Congestion
Heartburn
Dry or Sore Throat
Dizziness
Irritation of Eyes
Coughing
Blurred Vision
Hearing Problem
I dont know
No
Yes
10
20
30
40
RESPONSE IN (%)
36
October 2012
Diarrhea
Dysentery
HEALTH PROBLEMS
Cholera
Chicken Pox
Measles
Neutral
Rheumatism
No
Yes
Asthma
Cough
Typhoid Fever
Malaria
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
RESPONSE IN (%)
Fig 5.12 Prevalent Health Problems
Perceived Health Risk of the Proposed Project
Majority of the respondents do not see any health risk posed by the 495MW
CPGL Power plant because it is isolated from where they live. The enlightened
ones would rather the ESIA process determine their level of exposure and inform
them accordingly. A respondent who retired from PHCN claimed he worked at
the Ughelli gas plant for 25 years without any health problem. He wanted to
know if it is a similar technology that is being proposed for CPGL. When the
answer was yes, he concluded there was no health risk!.
37
October 2012
RESPONSE TO HEALTH
RISK
85%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
10%
Yes
5%
No
Neutral
38
October 2012
CHAPTER SIX
CHAPTER SIX
ASSOCIATED AND POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
INTRODUCTION
This chapter focuses on the assessment of potential environmental impacts
associated with the 495MW CPGL IPP project.
The technical literature is inundated with several methods for assessing
environmental impacts. However, there is no universal methodology, which can
be applied to all project types in all environmental settings (UNEP, 1996). UNEP
(1996) also emphasizes the need to use tools from existing methodologies that
best suit the specific project situation.
In this section of the report, a succinct description of the impact assessment
methods used for this project, as well as the results emanating from the
application of the selected methods and a summary of the residual impacts is
presented.
2 October 2012
Emergency Response
Security of facilities.
Waste Disposal
Decommissioning
3 October 2012
The primary socio-economic indicators for this impact assessment are the
following:
Land use / Land take
Employment and income;
Community population and ethnicity;
Community relations; and
Services (e.g. water and electricity supply).
Objectives of the Impact Assessment
The objectives of an ESIA are among others,
(a)
(b)
(c)
To incorporate the results of the ESIA into the project design and every
stage of the decision making process
4 October 2012
5 October 2012
To further guide the identification and screening of impacts using the matrix,
established environmental impact indicators or indices are developed for each of
the environmental interaction categories. Impact indicators are the observable or
measurable parameters of each environmental component that can be directly or
indirectly linked to changes in environmental conditions. The source of probable
impacts and the summary of related activities from the various phases/stages of
project development, project operation and maintenance and decommissioning
and abandonment were identified and outlined in Table 6.1.
The various
6 October 2012
Foundation
Construction
Activities
Onsite construction
and installation
activities
Commissioning,
production
operations and
maintenance
Activities
Mobilization and demobilization:
Transportation of materials and
workers
Physical site clearing and leveling
Sand filling
Wastes and emissions: generation
and handling
Digging/Excavation: Reinforcement
of bases for equipment/facilities.
Piling
Wastes and emissions: generation
and handling
Mobilization and demobilization:
Transportation of materials and
workers
Installation of Power Plant facilities
Construction of Plant/Substation
Wastes and emissions: generation
and handling
Transportation of materials and
workers
Commissioning and start-up
Maintenance activities
Decommissioning
7 October 2012
Potential Impact
Noise pollution
Accidents
Accumulation of
debris
Loss of vegetation
Air pollution
Ecological
Displacement
Displacement of
Fauna. Noise
Pollution
Air pollution
Accidents
Sudden increase in
human population
Noise pollution
Noise pollution
Accident from metal
scraps
Risk of vehicular
accidents
Noise pollution,
Availability of
power,
Employment.
Contamination from
spent oil.
Air quality
Loss of jobs
Noise pollution
Risk of accidents
Ecological
reclamation
Biophysical
Socio-economic
Population
Social and cultural structure
Cultural/archaeological resources
Security
Infrastructure
Transportation
Macro and micro-economy
8 October 2012
Impact Indicators
Biophysical
Terrestrial
Geology
Soil
Vegetation
9 October 2012
Definitions of Impacts
An impact is a change (which can be positive or negative) that occurs as a
consequence of an activity. Table 6.4 describes the various types of impact that
may arise, and the terms used in this report.
In addition to the different types of impact, it is worth also providing brief
generic descriptions of what is impacted.
Resources are those elements of the biophysical environment and social
systems that are essential to, or of value to, the functioning of such natural or
human systems. These include areas or elements of ecology, landscape,
agricultural value; soil; air; water; and vegetation.
Receptors are people as users of dwellings, users of places of recreation and
users of places of employment and community facilities, together with
individual species and groups of flora and fauna.
10
October 2012
11
October 2012
respect to two different pollutants) to create an impact that is greater than the
sum of their parts.
Permanent: Impacts that occur once on development of the project and cause a
permanent change in the affected receptor or resource (e.g. the loss of sensitive
aquatic fauna).
Short-term: Impacts that are predicted to last only for a limited period (e.g. land
excavation, digging or backfilling) but will cease on completion of the activity, or
as a result of mitigation measures and natural recovery.
Long-term: Impacts that will continue over an extended period, (e.g. noise from
operation of a development, impacts from operational discharges or emissions).
Local: Impacts that affect locally important environmental resources or are
restricted to a single habitat/biotype, a single (local) administrative area, a single
community.
Regional: Impacts that affect regionally important environmental resources or
are felt at a regional scale as determined by administrative boundaries, habitat
type.
Impact Significance
The adoption of consistent and robust criteria for assessing significance is an
important element of the ESIA process. For the purposes of this ESIA, the
following definition of significance has been adopted:
An impact is significant if, in isolation or in combination with other impacts, it should,
in the judgment of the ESIA team, be taken into account in the decision-making process,
including the identification of mitigation measures (by the Project) and consenting
conditions (from Regulators and Stakeholders).
Assessment of significance is important for two reasons:
12
October 2012
There are a number of factors that are important in determining the significance
of an impact. These include:
1. The magnitude of the impact (e.g. duration or extent of impact);
2. The sensitivity and value of the resource or receptor affected;
3. Compliance with relevant laws, regulations, standards or Company
policies;
4. Effects on government plans or policies;
5. Views of stakeholders; and
6. Likelihood of the impact occurring.
For this ESIA, four categories of impact significance are applied (Table 6.5). The
criteria takes into account the degree to which impacts can be quantified and
compared with accepted limits and standards or a combination of the magnitude
of change caused by the project in combination with the value/sensitivity of the
receptor/resource that is impacted.
impacts
such
as
economic
benefits,
or
opportunities
for
employment.
13
October 2012
14
October 2012
topics, taking account of the generic definitions presented above. Defining the
significance criteria for individual topics facilitates the process of making the
ESIA transparent. The criteria need to be consistent, so that a moderate impact
with respect to one environmental topic is broadly equivalent to a moderate
impact with respect to another.
Table 6.6: Overall Significance Criteria for Environmental Impacts in the EIA
Low Magnitude Moderate Magnitude High Magnitude
Impact
Impact
Impact
Low value / low sensitivity
receptor or resources,
within standards
Minor
Minor
Moderate
Minor
Moderate
Major
Moderate
Major
Major
15
October 2012
Medium
High
16
October 2012
The study area is primarily defined as an area within 2km of the proposed
development location. This study area is defined as such, as the maximum
ground level concentration will be within this zone based on the local terrain and
exhaust height. As the air quality standards are applicable anywhere offsite, this
is considered appropriate for the purposes of this assessment.
Potential impact sources will include the following:
(a)
A major impact associated with the project is the emission of NOx. The
modelling effort considered two scenarios for this pollutant:
(b)
There is a potential for the natural gas to leak out of the gas treatment
system or the pipeline leading to the proposed plant. Obviously, such a
leak would create a potential explosion and fire hazard, and precautionary
steps have been incorporated into the plants design to preclude such an
event.
Hydrocarbon monitors will be installed at various sites around the plant
to ensure the safety of the plant personnel. In addition, each flange in the
17
October 2012
natural gas pipeline will be monitored twice per day using portable
hydrocarbon monitors. Safety of plant personnel is of the highest concern
so, if detectable quantities of hydrocarbons are recorded by any of the
monitors, the plant will be shut down and the problem rectified before
operations are begun again.
(c)
Another air quality impact that may arise from operations of the project
may be the re-entrainment of exhaust gases as a result of disturbance to
the plume due to stack tip or building downwash.
Stack tip downwash can occur when low pressure region on the
downwind side of the stack results in low vertical momentum of exhaust
pollutants. This is usually aided by a wind speed higher at the stack
height by at least 1.5 times the exit velocity. Occurrences of stack tip
downwash are not anticipated as analysis of the wind speed data from the
area shows that the wind speed is seldom much higher than 8m/sec.
Building downwash occurring as a result of buildings and structures
disturbing the wind flow and generating regions of flow recirculation and
low pressure, which can draw emissions down towards the ground; is
another possible impact of the operations from the plant. This impact is
not expected to be significant due to the design of the power plant.
Specifically, as combustion turbines have a high exhaust temperature,
which stands at 120C due to the combined cycle configuration this will
result in a rapid plume rise; an integrated design determines the nature
and size of the buildings at the site. Nevertheless, the stack is higher than
any other building on site and even the surroundings.
The following discusses the associated impacts arising from potential air
pollutants.
Nitrogen Dioxide
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
18
October 2012
19
October 2012
Therefore,
The model has only considered emissions relating to the power plant gas
turbines i.e. not potential emissions relating to the Wartsila generator,
20
October 2012
Worst case condition of 100% capacity factor is assumed over the period
under consideration.
21
October 2012
22
October 2012
23
October 2012
At all but the most extreme wind speeds, dust will typically travel a
maximum of 200 m from source before falling from the air column (IFC,
2007);
At the highest wind speeds, dust is unlikely to travel more than 500 m
from source; and
Conditions
Major adverse
Moderate adverse
Minor adverse
24
October 2012
generation.
Insignificant Impact
25
October 2012
producer upwind of the plant. It is therefore safe to assume that only marginal
NO to NO2 conversion will occur at the limited time.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
26
October 2012
Averaging
Recommended NO
period
to NO2 conversion
ratio.
United States
Germany
United
Kingdom
24 hour
75%
Annual
75%
24 hour
60%
Annual
60%
Short term
50%
(1 hr)
Annual
100%
24 hour
20%
Hong Kong
Annual
20%
Ontario,
24 hour
52%
Canada
Annual
68%
Assuming that the suggested ratios are some true representatives of the actual
situation and drawing on the experiences of the experts, CPGL has adopted a
long term conversion ratio of 100 percent and 50% for the short term.
Analysis of the result of the modeling effort indicates the following:
27
October 2012
The highest predicted ground level NOx concentrations all occurred within
1.5 3.5km of the plant, generally to the east and south of the plant (which is
over largely uninhabited land areas) or to the north and east of the plant,
depending on the averaging time and the specific year of weather data used;
Maximum annual means are all to the northeast within 1 2km of the plant.
At this distance from the plant, not all NOx will have been converted to NO2;
however, in the modeling study it was assumed that half the NOx had been
converted to NO2;
From the above, it can therefore be concluded that all regulatory air quality
requirements will be attained as a result of emissions from the proposed project.
The effects of thermal emissions on ground-level temperature in the area were
predicted to be insignificant, with an annual average effect of at most +0.1 0C.
28
October 2012
Thus, impact of operations on air quality would be of minor risk, with a minor
negative consequence and low likelihood of occurrence.
Methodology for Assessment of Air Quality Impacts
Air Quality Standards
The air quality standards considered in the assessment are the Nigerian Federal
Ministry of Environment (FMEnv) interim ambient air quality standards, and
WHO guidelines.
Granted that the WHO guidelines are generally considered conservative and fall
short of incorporating economic factors; they have been deployed here because
they are recommended by the IFC and at least represent the most conservative
approach.
Table 6.10: Air Quality Standards used in the Assessment
FMEnv Standards
Pollutants
Average
Criterion
period
(gm-3)
CO
1hr
11400
CO
CO
NO2
1hr
75-113
NO2
Particulates 24hr
-
WHO Guidelines
Pollutants
Average
Criterion
period
(gm-3)
CO
8hr
40000
CO
1hr
30000
NO2
1hr
200
NO2
Annual
40
mean
PM10
24hr
50
PM10
Annual
20
mean
250
-
Significance criteria
In an attempt to determine the potential significance of the predicted impacts,
two parameters are considered:
29
October 2012
Air quality measurement values are not obtained from PEC values, the results
are not appropriate for PEC computation. However, PEC is still relevant in
assessing cumulative impacts.
The IFC General EHS guidelines state (IFC, 2008):
As a general rule, this Guideline suggests 25 percent of the applicable air quality
standards to allow additional, future sustainable development in the same airshed.
This rule applies to undegraded airsheds, where degraded is defined as an
airshed should be considered as having poor air quality if nationally legislated
air quality standards or WHO Air Quality Guidelines are exceeded
significantly.
The IFC General EHS guidelines also state:
Facilities or projects located within poor quality airsheds, and within or next to areas
established as ecologically sensitive (e.g. national parks), should ensure that any increase
in pollution levels is as small as feasible, and amounts to a fraction of the applicable
short-term and annual average air quality guidelines or standards as established in the
project-specific environmental assessment.
As a follow up from guidelines, the report has been able to set up this
assessment. Airshed on Okija is undegraded and a criteria of PC<2 percent was
used.
Table 6.11: Significance Criteria
Significance
Major Adverse
Moderate
adverse
Minor adverse
30
October 2012
Insignificance
100% of AQS
PC < 25% of AQS
Source
Significance
and
Insignificant Negative
Operation
NO2
Minor Negative
CO
Insignificant Negative
Greenhouse gases
Decommissioning
Dust
NOISE
Impact Assessment Methodology
Nigeria Interim Guidelines and Standards for Noise
The Federal Environmental Protection Agency Decree 1988 Interim Guidelines and
Standards for Industrial Effluent, Gaseous Emissions and Noise Limitation
(Government Notice 1991) provides guidelines and standards to ensure
industrial activities are compatible with a clean and safe environment in Nigeria.
Chapter 4 of the Guidelines present noise exposure limits for Nigeria. These
limits relate to occupational noise exposure and set out limits protect workers
from noise induced hearing loss. The limits for daily noise exposure for workers
should not exceed an equivalent noise level of 90 dB over an 8-hour working
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
31
October 2012
period. This standard is, however, applicable for occupational noise exposure
only, and is not suitable as criteria for assessing the significance of environmental
noise impacts to receptors outside the project footprint. It does provide a design
standard that plant and equipment associated with the project should aim to
achieve where practicable.
The Noise Level Guidelines make reference to noise originating from facilities as
well as stationary noise sources, and are commonly applied as design standards
for industrial facilities. Although the guidelines relate to noise effects thresholds
in a general sense, the IFC has indicated that these are not directly applicable to
transport or mobile noise sources. Measurements should therefore be taken at
noise receptors located outside the project property boundary.
Table 6.13 IFC Noise Level Guidelines
Type of Receptor
Residential institutional or
educational
Industrial or commercial
55
45
70
70
In some cases, the baseline noise may be sufficiently high that even noise levels
from the plant that exceed the above standards may only give rise to small
changes in ambient noise. In this case, the noise impacts will not cause a
significant change. In line with the approach of the IFC, if changes in background
noise as a result of noise emissions from the plant are no greater than 3 dB(A)
then noise impacts are not deemed significant, even if they are above the
Nigerian standards. In summary, these general IFC guidelines also note a
significance standard that noise impacts should not:
32
October 2012
These are outdoor noise levels and also state that highly intrusive noises, such as
noise from aircraft flyovers and passing trains, should not be included when establishing
background noise levels.
Table 6.14 Impact Assessment Methodology for Residential Receptors
Major
Construction and
Decommissioning
Noise
Noise
level > 15
dB above
criteria
Moderate Minor
Noise
level
between
10 to 15
dB above
criteria
Noise
level
between
5 to 10 dB
above
criteria
Negligible
Noise
Noise level
level up to up to 5 dB
10 dB
above
above
criteria
criteria
Noise
level
between 3
and 5 dB
above
criteria
and above
baseline
Note: Criteria for construction is 70dB LAeq, 1hr
Noise level
below
criteria but
above
baseline <
3dB
Not
significant
Noise level
below
criteria
Noise level
> 10 dB
below
criteria and
below
baseline
33
October 2012
There are no standardised criteria for assessing construction noise and associated
impacts, and consequently such criteria must be determined on a project specific
basis. The Project construction noise criteria should take into account the existing
noise environment, the absolute noise levels during construction activities, and
the receptor land use. The following reviews of recognised construction noise
guidelines provide guidance to develop suitable construction noise criteria. For
construction, noise criteria of 70 dB LAeq, 1hr are set to take account of the fact
that it is temporary, and to acknowledge that construction work by its very
nature is noisy and a lower, strictly enforced criteria, can limit development.
Impact Description and Significance: Construction
Impact Description
There are no specific positive impacts relating to the construction of the
proposed project.
Construction of the plant will take up to two years, and will include
approximately two months of earthworks and site clearance, the preparation of
footings for the plant, heavy earthworks and the construction and installation of
the superstructures.
Proposed construction hours are 0700 1800 Monday to Saturday. Auger
(screw) piling will take place; but no impact piling is anticipated and as such,
vibration impacts are not considered likely given the distance between the site
and the closest sensitive properties. Noise from construction activities are likely
to be perceptible at the closest noise sensitive properties during the key phases of
the work, particularly earthworks and any activities where a number of items of
plant will be operating simultaneously.
Impact Significance
In the absence of specific details on the proposed construction work programme
and method, it is not possible to quantify construction noise impacts exactly or
take account of the duration of such works to determine significance.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
34
October 2012
Although construction noise may be noticeable during civil works such as site
clearance, or the use of jackhammers, pile drivers and the like. However, due to
the overall types of activity and distance between main work sites and nearest
sensitive receptors, there is a low likelihood of the noise levels exceeding 70 dB
LAeq, 1hr and if so, this will be of short duration. The negative noise impacts are
therefore considered to be of negligible significance at the nearest receptors.
6.4.3 Impact Description and Significance: Operational
Impact Description
There are no specific positive impacts relating to the operation of the proposed
project.
Noise during operation is expected to be generated by various components of the
CPGL Plant, including the gas turbines and associated fin-fan coolers and bag
filter houses, the high-voltage and power station transformers and switchyard,
the black-start Wartsila gas generators, the turbine hall, the workshops and
ancillary facilities such as the water treatment plants and the administration
buildings.
The noise levels from each of these components and sources were modelled to be
able to understand the combined noise emissions from the operations and
therefore present a reasonable worst-case scenario. Operational noise has been
modelled based on the assumptions and the proposed design of the Century
Power IPP, according to the design specifications of the proposed plant to meet
45 dB(A) at 300m from the plant boundary. This specification was used to
determine input source noise levels in terms of sound power and was used to
calculate the predicted noise levels. Potential noise impacts from the Project at
35
October 2012
36
October 2012
Impact
Significance (pre37
October 2012
mitigation)
Construction
Operation
Negligible, Negative
Insignificant,
Negative
The Anambra basin has about 6,000m of sedimentary rocks. The sedimentary
rocks comprise ancient cretaceous deltas, somewhat similar to the Niger Delta,
with the Nkporo shale, the Mamu formation, the Ajalli sandstone and the
Nsukka formation as the main deposits
The Imo shale underlies the eastern part of the state, particularly in Ayamelum,
Awka North and Orumba North LGAs. Next in the geological sequence, is the
Ameke formation, which includes Nanka Sands, laid down in the Eocene, its
rock types are sandstone, calcareous shale, and Shelly-limestone in thin bands.
38
October 2012
the superstructures. It will also include piling. Site clearing and construction
activities will result in the removal of the vegetation and topsoil present at the
site. Site clearance activities will also be required for the burial of the pipeline.
The vegetation clearing will impact upon several aspects of the soil
characteristics including water flow, microbial activity and nutrient content. The
removal of the topsoil will result in alterations to the drainage and surface runoff regime on the site, particularly during the wet season, reduce the fertility of
the site and result in the potential for increased erosion. There may be potential
changes in siltation patterns as a result of construction activities which will
destabilize soils potentially leading to soil erosion during heavy rainfall and
sedimentation in downstream water bodies. In addition, the compaction of the
soil will also reduce the permeability and water infiltration of the soil. This may
result in increased surface water during the wet season, and hence effective site
drainage will be critical.
Impact Significance
If certain precautions are taken, such as allowing soil excavation only in the dry
season, then erosion of the silt and subsequent sedimentation will be reduced.
However, project implementation will inflict permanent changes on a reasonable
portion of the site which will make the impact high negative pre mitigation. But
the land take is direct from an isolated forest land, acquired for industrial use,
and for which alternative farmlands exist nearer the settlements. It follows that
since there are no human clusters within the kilometre, and the land is meant for
industry, the impact can be considered of moderate significant pre mitigation.
Impact Description and Significance: Operation
Impact Description
The project area occupied by buildings and roads will be paved or otherwise
covered by a surface with low permeability. Thus the area paved or thus covered
is expected to be as low as 35 percent of the total site during the CCGT plant
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
39
October 2012
construction and operation. The rest of the site area will be covered with gravel
or another form of highly permeable surface.
The area which will be covered by hard standing (or less permeable surface) may
result in increased soil surface runoff and consequently continued erosion,
leaching and nutrient loss of adjacent land during the operational phase. This is
particularly relevant due to the characteristic heavy rainfall in the Study Area,
however as much as possible the site will be covered in gravel or an equivalent
porous material. Apart from oil inside equipment tanks, there is no storage of
hydrocarbon liquid fuel on site.
Impact Significance
Granted that the negative impacts on soil will be long-term, for the lifetime of the
project but this is restricted to the site and adjacent areas. The impact magnitude
is therefore considered to be minor.
In addition, given the low sensitivity of the surrounding areas, which are already
disturbed, the resulting impacts are considered to be minor prior to mitigation.
Furthermore every effort will be made to ensure that as far as possible, the site is
covered with gravel or equivalent materials to ensure that the impacts on run-off
are kept to a minimum.
Impact Description and Significance: Decommissioning
Impact Description
It is assumed that decommissioning will involve removal of the plant and
equipment and restoration of the site. It is possible that the site will be
redeveloped for other industrial use, depending on the situation at the time of
the end of the Projects life. For this assessment it is assumed that the
decommissioning activities will include dismantling and demolition of Project
facilities as well as subsequent earthworks and site levelling. Since certain areas
of the site are likely to be covered with hard standing, this would be removed.
The resulting disturbance and associated soil compaction could result in negative
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
40
October 2012
been
modified
and
disturbed
to
large
degree
once
the
Geology)
Phase
Impact
Construction
41
Significance (premitigation)
Moderate, Negative
Minor, Negative
Minor, Negative
October 2012
WATER RESOURCES
Impacts on water resources may come in form of erosion or contamination of
water resources from construction, operation and decommissioning activities as
well as from the use of local water resources to provide usable water. The project
envisages that all the water requirements will be obtained from a borehole that
will be sunk on the Project site.
Impact Description and Significance: Construction
Impact Description
The two major activities that may result in impacts on hydrology and
hydrogeology are the:
Site clearances and preparation activities, including the removal of soils and
vegetation could result in increased surface water run-off and sedimentation of
surface water bodies. The nearest permanent surface water body from the
boundary of the project site is the Ulasi Stream which forms the southern
boundary of the project site.
Water resources may be at risk during these construction activities from
pollution from an accidental spillage of hazardous materials, lubricants, cement
and wet concrete, or from the inadequate or unsafe storage of waste and disposal
of sanitary wastewater and domestic water from the contractors during the
construction work site and facilities. The construction of the water abstraction
boreholes may have negative impacts on groundwater quality due to the new
permanent or temporary pathways created between pollutant sources and the
aquifers.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
42
October 2012
43
October 2012
44
October 2012
45
October 2012
46
October 2012
Impact
Construction
Significance (premitigation)
Minor, Negative
Insignificance,
Negative
Minor, Negative
Minor, Negative
Minor, Negative
Insignificance,
Negative
BIODIVERSITY
The general ecosystem profile across Anambra State is varied from thick rain
forest in the primary forests and secondary forests consisting mainly of farm
lands. Ihiala and indeed the project site is made of secondary rain forests which
are green in the raining season and open in the dry season with cleared trees and
the remains of burnt grasses. The common trees grow in clusters up to 6 metres
tall, interspersed with grasses which grow up to 3 metres and some much taller
trees up to 20 metres. Most of the vegetation is secondary forest owing to the
constant human use of the forest and the resulting decidues and grass
vegetation.
The project site cannot be classified as high biodiversity status; some species of
fauna and flora identified during sampling are of ecological significance
47
October 2012
48
October 2012
the
noise,
dust
and
vehicle
emissions
generated
during
49
October 2012
In the long-term, if the site is rehabilitated, the ecological health and biodiversity
could be restored over time.
Impact Significance
The impact of the Project on the biodiversity during decommissioning will be
negative, temporary and local. The magnitude of the impact is therefore
considered to be low.
The sensitivity of the receptor is expected to remain the same as for the other
Project phases i.e., moderate
The impacts during decommissioning are therefore judged to be of minor
significance prior to mitigation.
Impact Description and Significance: Summary
A summary of the impacts of the Project on biodiversity is included in Table 6.18
below.
Table 6.18 Summary of Impact Significance Pre-mitigation (Biodiversity)
Phase
Impact
Construction
50
Significance (premitigation)
Moderate, Negative
Minor-Moderate,
Negative
Minor, Negative
October 2012
51
October 2012
b) Potential of conflict between the workers and the locals due to perceived
disrespect to traditional institutions.
The extent of impacts to cultural institutions is limited primarily to the local area
affected. However, although the construction phase is relatively short term, the
duration of impacts on cultural institutions such as traditional leadership could
be permanent. Based on the experience of the neighbouring HAMMAKKOP
Construction Company, the probability of impacts occurring is likely. The
localized extent of impacts to cultural institutions during the construction phase
is offset by the potential permanence of impacts and high likelihood of
occurrence and the overall impact magnitude is considered to be moderate.
52
October 2012
Project closure may remove a source of authority and influence for local
and regional traditional leaders; and
Departure of foreign workers, who may have affected the cultural profile
of the region.
Impact Significance
The extent of potential impacts to cultural institutions will be primarily local,
although some impacts associated with traditional leadership and the presence
of foreign workforce would be felt at a regional level.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
53
October 2012
6.19
Summary
of
Impact
Significance
Pre-mitigation
(Cultural
Institutional)
Phase
Impact
Construction
Operation
Significance (premitigation)
Minor, Negative
Minor, Negative
Insignificant,
Negative
54
October 2012
55
October 2012
Impact Significance
The extent of impacts to employment and economy is expected to be regional.
While employment skills and service/supply capacity for construction phase
activities exists in Anambra State, primarily Ihiala, skill levels and numbers of
available workforce are currently insufficient within the local communities for
the Project to have a significant impact at that level. The duration of the impacts
will be primarily limited to the construction phase, and will therefore be short
term. CPGL has committed to maximize local employment and contracting, both
directly and through subcontractors. Moreover, the region has experience with
this type of project and has begun training construction workforce for
recruitment. As such, the probability of the impact occurring is likely. The overall
magnitude is therefore considered to be minor.
Due to the high unemployment rate in Anambra State and sensitivity around
local opportunities engendered by the neighbouring HAMMAKKOP Company,
the potential regional workforce and supply base is considered to be a receptor of
medium sensitivity.
Despite the large number of construction labourers required, the short term
duration of positive impacts reduces the overall significance rating to minor.
56
October 2012
from the local Other positions during this phase will require technical
supervisory and managerial skills which are less likely to be available locally,
and will therefore be sourced from outside.
In a few cases, such as during large scale maintenance operations, additional
temporary personnel may be required. These will consist of a small number of
specialized individuals who will be called in to supervise maintenance
programmes and carry out performance testing. It is not known how many of
these temporary employees will be required, or how often, during operations;
however, it is unlikely that a significant number of these positions will be
sourced from the Project area.
The Operation Phase of the Project is expected to result in the following positive
impacts:
Impact Significance
The extent of impacts to employment and economy is expected to be primarily
national and regional, although a number of unskilled positions may be sourced
from local communities, following training and capacity building initiatives for
the local workforce and contractors. Century Power Generation has also
committed to maximise local employment and contracting, both directly and
through subcontractors. The duration of impacts will extend over the life of the
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
57
October 2012
Project; with certain induced impacts (such as economic activity and capacity
building) continuing beyond Project closure and is therefore long term or
permanent. As for the probability of impacts, the probability is highly likely. The
overall impact magnitude is considered to be high.
CPGL is committed to ensuring that the requisite infrastructure is put in place to
enable the distribution of electricity (at lower voltages) to the local communities,
as well as evacuation to the national grid at a higher voltage level. This will be
worked out with the distribution company. This measure combined with
targeted social investment support to local entrepreneurs will enable the local
communities to establish small business enterprises that can take advantage of
the increased power supply. The multiplier effects on all economic sectors of this
additional power supply will be significant.
Therefore, impacts to employment and economy during the Operation Phase
after mitigation are expected to be positive and high.
Impact Description and Significance: Decommissioning
Impact Description
During the 30year operation phase, the Project is expected to require a steady
workforce of 120 employees. An additional number of employment and contract
opportunities will be required for Project servicing and support, and will be
generated through local economic development and investment. Through
targeted training and capacity building, the Project expects that the majority of
jobs during the operation phase will be offered locally, as a priority, or
regionally. This is expected to have a significant impact on local employment
levels and local economic development.
Decommissioning will necessitate demobilizing of employment positions and
subcontracts directly associated with the Project, as well as related economic
58
October 2012
activities in the region. However, the effect of constant electricity may have
created also equal number of employment opportunities locally.
Impact Significance
It may appear that the impact of decommissioning on the employment and
economic situation of the area could be of equal significance with that of
operation, but negative. This could go beyond simple reversal of positive
impacts, as Project activities will have made it impossible for people to return to
the primarily agricultural livelihoods practiced before Project development.
However, the skilled labour could relocate to other areas while the others will be
trained to acquire a skill prior to closure.
The extent of impacts will be regional, since the majority of the affected
workforce and businesses will be regionally-based. Without initiatives to
encourage development and economic diversification, the duration of impacts
would be long term, if not permanent. The probability of the impacts occurring is
considered to be likely and the overall magnitude is considered to be moderate.
The Project may have reduced the viability of agriculture as an alternative
livelihood in the area for a few people. Others may have been exposed to
mechanised farming techniques which replenishes the loss of viability. The
sensitivity rating for receptors of this impact is moderate - low.
As such, the significance of the impact of Project decommissioning on
employment and economy is considered to be negative and minor.
Impact Description and Significance: Summary
Table 6.20 provides a summary of the significant impacts likely to arise during
construction, operation and decommissioning prior to the implementation of
mitigation measures.
59
October 2012
Impact
Construction
Significance (premitigation)
Minor, Positive
Major Positive
Minor, Negative
Besides the construction of the plant itself, there will also be activities relating to
the laying of the gas pipeline. There may also be risks associated with gas leaks
from testing the gas pipeline at the end of construction, and the laying and
60
October 2012
61
October 2012
As mentioned earlier, CPGL has committed to hiring locally where possible, and
there are high expectations within local communities for employment and
contract positions. However, skilled positions will require some foreign
recruitment which implies that workers will almost certainly have the
opportunity to mix with local communities.
The operation phase will also result to increased traffic in the area, using existing
road networks.
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
62
October 2012
Negative impacts during operation are relatively few and may include:
63
October 2012
Along with the reduced scale of exposure from the construction phase, negative
health impacts during operation are considered to be minor prior to mitigation
and the positive impacts are also cautiously assumed to be minor.
64
October 2012
high sensitivity. Substantial part of this problem will be offset by the National
Health Insurance Scheme to which all staff should have been registered.
Negative impacts to health associated with Project closure are cautiously
considered to be moderate prior to mitigation.
Impact Description and Significance: Summary
Table 6.21 provides a summary of the significant impacts likely to arise during
construction, operation and decommissioning prior to the implementation of
mitigation measures.
Table 6.21 Summary of Impact Significance Pre-mitigation (Health Profiles)
Phase
Impact
Significance (premitigation)
Construction
Operation
Decommissioning
SUMMARY
From the forgoing, it is clear that there will be both positive and negative impacts
associated with the construction, operations and decommissioning of the power
ESIA of CPGL 495MW IPP Okija
65
October 2012
However, the negative impacts can be easily mitigated with best practices and
through cost effective measures. The measures to be used to mitigate these
impacts are discussed in the next chapter.
66
October 2012
CHAPTER SEVEN
IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES
CHAPTER SEVEN
IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES
INTRODUCTION
Environmental and socio-economic sustainability of any project is greatly
dependent on the ability of project proponents to ensure that appropriate
mitigation measures are put in place for unavoidable significant negative
impacts associated with the project. Such mitigation measures could either be inbuilt in the project design or put in place through appropriate measures over the
entire lifespan of the project.
The preceding chapter identified and assessed the potential and associated
impacts of the proposed Century Power plant. The assessment defined all
negative impacts as being; high, moderate, low or negligible in significance.
Impacts assessed, as negligible or low do not necessarily require additional
mitigation, while those within the moderate and high category need appropriate
mitigation. However due to the project proponents high premium on
sustainability in development low significant impacts have been considered for
further mitigation as well.
This chapter therefore presents comprehensive mitigation measures that Century
Power shall implement during construction operation and decommissioning of
the power plant. The mitigation measures are put in place to either completely
avoid or mitigate all associated and potential negative environmental and social
impacts from the project. The measures are equally intended to accentuate the
positive impacts associated with the project.
Mitigation Measures Development Approach
The traditional approach in impact mitigation is to ensure compliance with the
applicable safety codes and standards in design. However compliance with
regulations, codes and standards may not be sufficient to achieve certain desired
levels of Health Safety and Environmental (HSE) performance. More so design
codes are generic and may need specific adaptations to be suitable for different
environmental conditions
The mitigation measures prescribed for the proposed power plant is based on the
assessment of safety consideration in key facilities design and superimposition of
the project technical details on the baseline environmental conditions to predict
associated impacts.
2 October 2012
3 October 2012
Table 7.1: Anticipated Negative Impacts and Mitigation Measures during Pre-Construction Activities
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
Creation of access
road
4 October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
and solid wastes indiscriminately shall be prohibited.
As much as possible, local materials shall be used for road
construction.
Removal of deep rooted trees shall be avoided as much as
possible.
5 October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
national and international emission standards.
Contractors vehicles shall be inspected by the proponents
HSE supervisor to ensure that they are good condition
before the issuance of work permit. Only contractors with
work permit shall work on site.
Dust-prone ground shall be watered while working in dry
season.
Burning of vegetal wastes shall be prohibited on site.
6 October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
All potentially impacted residents of the area shall be
informed of any noise emitting activity to be carried out,
the expected noise levels and duration
Metal-to-metal contact on equipment should be avoided as
much as possible.
All work men shall be provided with (and enforced to use
them) appropriate personal protective devices like ear
plugs, muffs, etc.
7 October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
All forms of encroachment into other land uses shall be
avoided.
Good house-keeping shall be ensured during access road
creating.
Waste materials shall be collected in specialised containers
to be disposed appropriately via certified waste managers.
Indiscriminate discarding or discharging of wastes shall be
prohibited.
Light sources shall be properly shaded and directed onto
work area
The HSE Manager shall periodically give safety and
environmental management briefing to all personnel to
ensure that they have adequate information on proper
environmental management.
8 October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
before issuance of work permit.
All personnel at work site shall be provided with and
enforced to put on all necessary personal protective devices
like, hard hat, safety shoes, ear muffs, nose masks etc.
Periodic safety briefings shall be provided to relevant
personnel to ensure that safety is not compromised at work.
All accidents and near misses shall be reported and duly
documented for improvement in safety protocols.
Site clearing
9 October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
be given adequate briefing on this, while conspicuous
warning signage shall be placed at strategic locations
against poaching.
In the event of capture of endangered wild species, it shall
be delivered to appropriate institution for conservation.
10
October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
Storage of construction materials shall be kept away from
near water bodies to avoid wash down of contaminants into
water.
Temporary waste dumps shall be kept clear of surface water
bodies.
11
October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
site clearing shall duly inspected by the HSE Supervisor to
ensure that they are in tip-top conditions before issuance of
work permit.
All personnel at work site shall be provided with and
enforced to put on all necessary personal protective devices
like, hard hat, safety shoes, ear muffs, nose masks etc.
Periodic safety briefings shall be provided to relevant
personnel to ensure that safety is not compromised at work.
All accidents and near misses shall be reported and duly
documented for improvement in safety protocols.
Ground compaction
and grading
Impact on Soil
12
October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
conform to national and international emission standards.
Contractors vehicles and equipment shall be inspected by
the proponents HSE supervisor to ensure that they are in
good condition before the issuance of work permit. Only
contractors with work permit shall work on site.
All work men shall be provided with (and enforced to use
them) appropriate personal protective devices like nose
masks, ear plugs, muffs, etc.
13
October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
like, hard hat, safety shoes, ear muffs, nose masks etc.
Periodic safety briefings shall be provided to relevant
personnel to ensure that safety is not compromised at work.
All accidents and near misses shall be reported and duly
documented for improvement in safety protocols.
Mobilisation of
construction
equipment and
Personnel to site.
Impact on Transportation
14
October 2012
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
rules and certified to be in good physical/mental health and
are not under Alcohol or drugs.
All vehicles shall be properly maintained and serviced.
All vehicles shall be properly checked before moving to site.
Outriders shall be engaged during heavy vehicle and
equipment movement.
15
October 2012
Table 7.2: Anticipated Negative Impacts and Mitigation Measures during Construction Activities
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
Procurement of construction
materials
Movement of people and vehicle in and out of the project site shall be
limited to delineated road areas.
Poaching of wild life shall be prohibited. All work men shall be given
adequate briefing on this, while conspicuous warning signage shall be
placed at strategic locations against poaching.
In the event of capture of endangered wild species, it shall be
delivered to appropriate institution for conservation.
Impact on Transportation
System
16
October 2012
Movement of people and vehicle in and out of the project site shall be
limited to delineated road areas.
Poaching of wild life shall be prohibited. All work men shall be given
adequate briefing on this, while conspicuous warning signage shall be
placed at strategic locations against poaching.
In the event of capture of endangered wild species, it shall be
delivered to appropriate institution for conservation.
17
October 2012
Impact on Soil
Impact on Ground
Topography
18
October 2012
Impact on Transportation
System
19
October 2012
20
October 2012
Water utilisation
Impact on Groundwater
Impact on Socio-cultural
System
21
October 2012
Impact on Environmental
Justice
Waste Production
Impact on Vegetation
Impact on Soil
22
October 2012
23
October 2012
shall be prohibited.
The HSE Supervisor shall implement periodic survey of adjoining
waters bodies to ensure that unguided discharge or dumping of
wastes does not occur.
Impact on Visual Intrusion
and Aesthetics
Impact on Transportation
24
October 2012
25
October 2012
Table 7.3: Anticipated Negative Impacts and Mitigation Measures during Operation of the Power Plant
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
Impact on Soil
The majority of the surface of the site area will be covered with
gravel or a similar material with a higher permeable surface to
reduce surface run-off particularly during heavy rains;
The wastewater treatment plant shall be effectively operated to
ensure that waste water and oil contaminated waste water are in
compliance with relevant standards after treatment to avoid soil
contamination.
The turbines will use a dry low NOx combustion system which will
form a key mitigation measure during the Operation phase.
All vehicles used shall be regularly maintained and Vehicle
inspection shall be conducted prior issuance of WORTHY
Permit.
Impact on Noise Level
26
The plant design shall be such that reverberant sound from the gas
turbine is minimized internally by using an acoustic enclosure.
October 2012
Impact on Transportation
Impact on Soil
27
October 2012
28
October 2012
Impact on Socio-cultural
System
Impact on Transportation
System
29
October 2012
Impact on Soil
30
October 2012
31
October 2012
Table 7.4: Anticipated Negative Impacts and Mitigation Measures during Decommissioning of the Power plant
Activities
Anticipated Impacts
Mitigation Measures
32
October 2012
maintenance.
Alternative provisions shall be worked out for facilities that as a
matter of necessity shall be removed at decommissioning of the
power plant.
Impact on Transportation
System
be
properly
removed
from
site
after
Discharge workers
33
October 2012
SUMMARY
The mitigation measures presented here above are deemed adequate based on
sound judgement to either completely eliminate or ameliorate the potential and
associated negative environment and social impacts from the proposed Century
Power plant development project. The measures are expected to reduce high
significance impacts to as low as possible, while moderate and low significance
impacts could be reduced to negligible significance.
The objective of the mitigation measures will be most effective if strictly followed
and necessary monitoring activities carried out as prescribed by the
environmental management plan presented in this report.
34
October 2012
CHAPTER EIGHT
STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGEMENT
AND DISCLOSURE
CHAPTER EIGHT
STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGEMENT AND DISCLOSURE
BACKGROUND
At this stage of the evolution of
requirement of the Nigerian regulatory agencies and the World Bank that ESI
management should contain a Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) which
incorporates a grievance mechanism. In consequence, F.M. Chidez Ltd., as part
of the ESIA consortium articulated a SEP for CPGL. The main objective is to
define preliminary engagement procedures with environmentally concerned
communities, subject to continual reviews, to be deployed throughout the life
cycle of the project.
A typical SEP is a living document, which gets updated and adjusted as the EIA
progresses and will continue to be amended as the project planning evolves. The
SEP provides a framework to facilitate and manage effective engagement with
the key stakeholders (IFC 2007).
8.2
2 October 2012
8.3
STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION
3 October 2012
4 October 2012
Women have been identified as vulnerable group for the project, due to their
economic vulnerability and inability to participate in decision-making processes
within the traditional context. Women in the project are not always able to attend
or speak freely at open meetings and/or may have household restrictions on
when they are able to attend such meetings. The project will hold womens
meeting at times and places convenient to the women in each community. These
meetings will be held by a female member of the project team, where possible.
Other potential vulnerable groups identified as part of the EIA include the
elderly, youth and migrant farmers. Vulnerability of these groups is also based
on reduced opportunities to participate in local decision-making, as well as their
economic vulnerability, particularly with regard to employment. As such,
engagement activities have been designed to ensure representation of these
groups among stakeholders, and to seek to understand potential project
interactions with their livelihood opportunities and agency within the
communities.
5 October 2012
8.4
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Stakeholder engagement usually begins before the ESIA process and extends
well beyond it. It takes place in stages. In the particular case of CPGL IPP, the
stakeholder engagement and disclosure process has been divided into four
stages, each having individual objectives for engagement. The main focuses of
each stage of the stakeholder engagement process are outlined in the sequel.
8.4.1 STAGE 1: SCOPING
The scoping process is the first phase of the ESIA process. The main objectives
are to define the scope of the engagement program that will continue to be
adjusted and amended throughout the life cycle of the project. The critical
activities in this stage are.
6 October 2012
Ihiala LGA
7 October 2012
Meetings and correspondence with NGOS and research institutions for the
gathering of baseline information.
This stage of stakeholder engagement was completed in March, 2012
There may be simultaneous disclosure of the draft ESIA report on the World
Bank INfoShop website which The FMEnv will be notified about.
8 October 2012
9 October 2012
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITY
STAKEHOLDERS
Government officials
Steel
TIMING
STAGE 1: SCOPING
Government Agencies Federal,
State and local Authorities
regulatory Authorities
Employment opportunities
Environment
Employment opportunities.
10
October 2011
Ihiala LGA
Government officials
CSR is general.
October 2012
October 2011
November 2011
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITY
STAKEHOLDERS
TIMING
The youths
January 2012
NGO Representatives
Foundation
June 2012
Federal Ministry of
Disclosure timetable
Environment
Display Timetable
Traditional Rulers.
STAGE 3: DISCLOSURE
Engagement with FMEnv officials,
Community Engagement,
engagement with local groups,
and traditional leaders.
Community Engagement.
Traditional Ruler
groups
Youths
11
October 2012
Panel Review
CPGL representatives
Community groups
ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITY
State Government
NGOs representatives
Federal Ministry of
Environment Officials.
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
STAKEHOLDERS
TIMING
employment.
CPGL representatives.
Environment.
officers.
12
October 2012
Every quarter
during
construction.
Operation
NESREA
Market Operators
System Operator
13
Once a year.
Once a year.
Once a year.
Traditional Rulers
October 2012
Once every 2
years or earlier if
the need arises.
14
October 2012
15
October 2012
16
October 2012
Reject
complaint
Yes
Refer as
appropriate
Define
approach
Implement
approach
Communicate
decision
Track and
document
Resolved?
Process
feedback and
learn
Not resolved?
Revise choice
or execution
of approach
SOURCE - IFC
17
October 2012
CHAPTER NINE
CHAPTER NINE
ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP)
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents a comprehensive Environmental & Social Management
Plan for the proposed CPGL Independent power plant. ESMP is a critical
component of an Environmental and social Impact Assessment of projects. It is
an important tool used to continuously monitor and check the efficacy of the
mitigation measures recommended by the ESIA. It is a project activities-specific
plan developed to ensure that project implementation is environmentally
sustainable. It ensures that all contractors, sub-contractors and consultants
understand the potential environmental risks arising from every activity of a
project as it concerns their involvement so as to take appropriate actions to
properly manage them. ESMP ideally runs through the life span of a project;
however peculiarity of specific phases of the project such as construction and
operation phases are given appropriate considerations in the plan. The plan
equally outlines the roles and responsibilities of specific institutions and
personnel in its implementation.
KEY ELEMENTS
In developing the ESMP, a number of key elements came into play. These
elements include:
i.
ii.
October 2012
iv.
of
mitigation
measures.
It
also
covers
proper
national
and
international
environmental
management
standards;
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
October 2012
PROPONENTS COMMITMENT
CPGL is committed to developing and operating the proposed power plant in an
environmentally friendly manner. This commitment drove the implementation
of this detailed ESIA to take preventive measures against potential and
associated negative impacts of the proposed project on the environment. Part of
the ESIA is Environmental Management Plan which seeks to ensure that all
recommended mitigation measures outlined in the ESIA are appropriately
implemented. The ESMP shall equally serve as a tool for monitoring,
documentation, and evaluation of the progress of the mitigation measures
implementation, with a view to improving on them. CPGL shall implement all
environmental
management
activities
in
compliance
to
national
and
PLANNING
In order to ensure effective and comprehensive sound environmental
management, a number of specific management plans shall be put in place by
CPGL to ensure that all sources of impacts on the environment (including socioeconomic and cultural attributes) are given adequate considerations. In addition
to the plans presented herein, the proponent shall develop other relevant plans
(as events demand) during the life time of the proposed project
Water Quality Management Plan: this shall outline the procedure and
activities to be carried out to ensure that the activities of the proposed
power plant do not constitute pollution to nearby water resources. It shall
cover surface and groundwater resources.
ii.
Air Quality and Noise Management Plan: this shall outline the
procedure and activities to be carried out to ensure that impacts on air
October 2012
quality and noise level from the power plant are maintained at healthy
and regulatory acceptable limits.
iii.
Soil Quality Management Plan: this shall outline the procedure and
activities to be carried out to ensure that the activities of the proposed
power plant do not constitute pollution to nearby soils. This will include
measures to prevent spillage of hazardous materials.
iv.
Waste Management Plan: this shall outline the methods and activities for
waste handling and evacuation from the power plant facilities. It shall
also cover procedure for clean-up of accidental leakages of liquid wastes
and monitoring of wastes disposed through licensed agents.
v.
vi.
vii.
October 2012
IMPLEMENTATION
The implementation of the ESMP will involve CPGL, Environmental standards
regulatory agencies, Contractors and Consultants. While the various agencies
and institutions shall synergise at different times, the specific roles of the parties
are presented in the following sections.
CPGL shall establish a Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Department which
shall be responsible for all environmental management issues including regular
training of staff and visitors to the power plant facilities. The personnel of this
department shall be effectively trained in handling safety issues, Environmental
Management Systems (EMS), Occupational Health and Safety Management
October 2012
Systems, etc. The department shall periodically organise safety meetings for all
relevant stakeholders.
responsibility of the HSE department to ensure that all contractors and workmen
comply with all rules and guidelines stipulated in the impacts mitigation
recommendations. The HSE department shall issue Work Permit to all workers
on the project. The work permit shall be issued after the worker(s) has fulfilled
all requirements aimed at preventing or mitigating impacts from their works on
the environment. The department shall monitor facilities in the power plant
during its operations and alert the maintenance department on necessary repairs
promptly. It is equally the responsibility of the department to develop all the
necessary management plans (including those in section 9.5) to ensure sound
environmental management throughout the life time of the project.
1.1.1.42 Facilities Surveillance
CPGL shall setup a Plant Operations department shall be responsible for periodic
surveillance of the power plants facilities. Surveillance is a very crucial element
of safety protocols because it is via it that early warnings of facility failures and
malfunctioning are detected. Based on international standards, surveillance of all
facilities of the power plant shall be implemented. Proper documentation of
surveillance reports shall be made to ensure references and adequate follow ups.
This is without prejudice to the periodic but scheduled inspections to be
undertaken by maintenance contractors.
1.1.1.43 Implementation of Management Plans
It shall be the duty of CPGL to ensure that all management plans put in place to
ensure sound environmental management of the power plant development and
operations are implemented. CPGL shall do this by assigning its various
departments, clear-cut responsibilities in implementing the plans, outlined in
section 9.5.
October 2012
include:
Ministry
of
Power;
Nigerian
Electricity
Regulatory
Table
9.1:
Agencies/Institutions
and
their
Roles
in
Environmental
October 2012
Regulatory Commission
October 2012
9.2 and 9.3 present the schedule for air quality and noise monitoring during the
various phases of the proposed project.
10
October 2012
11
October 2012
facilities, structures and equipment; removal of surface installations; recontouring of landscape; re-vegetation of bare grounds, etc.
For the proposed project, CPGL will adopt a combination of partial rehabilitation
and rehabilitation to an acceptable alternative condition in restoring the
environment after decommissioning of the proposed Power plant. This option is
anticipated to be more viable in view of the high possibility of putting erstwhile
power plant facilities (including buildings) to other uses.
12
October 2012
Decommissioning Activities
In the event the power plant has to be decommissioned or abandoned, some
associated activities shall be implemented to conform to international best
practice. To ensure most sustainable decommissioning of the project, the
following stages shall be followed in its implementation:
Planning
Consultation
Mobilization
Operation
Restoration
1.1.1.45 Planning
This is the first step and activity to be undertaken when need for
decommissioning
is
being
considered.
It
involves
evaluating
the
13
October 2012
1.1.1.47 Mobilization
Once the decommissioning plan is finalised and work schedule drawn up,
machineries and personnel needed for works will be mobilized to site.
Mobilization could be phased in line with the work plan.
1.1.1.48 Operation
This stage is primarily concerned with the actual decommissioning of all facilities
within the premises of the power plant. The key activities to be carried out
include:
Installation of closure markings;
The demolition of building structures such as hangers, control towers,
admin buildings, apron, car parks, etc;
Unearthing of underground cables and pipes;
Disposal of materials and wastes;
1.1.1.49 Restoration
During the decommissioning operations a number of negative impacts on the
environment and people would occur. Among others, the negative impacts that
will result from the activities include;
Contamination of ambient air quality and noise disturbances.
Soil erosion resulting from improper refilling of excavated areas
Accidents and hazards to safety.
Waste management problems.
Loss of livelihood for persons dependent on the jobs provided by the
power plant.
14
October 2012
condition. For instance, the land shall be re-contoured and bare areas revegetated.
shall
inform
relevant
stakeholders
of
the
proposed
decommissioning/abandonment;
CPGL shall remove all debris and contaminated soils.
CPGL shall restore contours and topography of natural surroundings.
CPGL shall restore natural drainage patterns;
CPGL shall break-up base materials and remove them from site
CPGL shall re- vegetate all open land areas
Access routes shall be blocked (if they would pose security threat) or if
required, handed over to local authorities by CPGL
Wastes shall be evacuated appropriately by certified waste managers
commissioned by CPGL;
All agreed staff welfare programmes (such as pension schemes) shall be
appropriately implemented by CPGL
All site recovery activities shall be properly documented and monitored
by CPGL.
MONITORING PLAN
Environmental monitoring is essentially a scientific activity aimed at detecting
negative impacts of a project on the environment early enough to take remedial
actions. Monitoring is typically carried out to check for observable deviations
15
October 2012
Sampling
Frequency
Spatial locations within Monthly
and around the project site
Noise
Noise Level (dBA)
Spatial locations within Monthly
and around the project site
Soil
Heavy metals and Spatial locations within the Bi-Monthly
THC
project site, especially
work
equipment
and
vehicular movement paths
Surface Water Physico-chemistry,
Upstream, downstream as Bi-Monthly
Quality
THC,
Colour
and well as closest portions of
Heavy
metals, water bodies to the project
hydrobiology
area
(including fisheries).
Solid Waste
Indiscriminate
Within and around the Bi-Monthly
discards, Construction project area
Spoil,
Equipment
packaging.
Sampling location
16
Duration
Short-term
Short-term
Short-term
Short-term
Short-term
October 2012
Impact/Change
Indicator
TSP, CO, NOX, SOX
Noise
Soil
Surface Water
Quality
Physico-chemistry,
THC, Colour,
Heavy metals and
hydrobiology
(including
fisheries).
Physico-chemistry,
THC, Chemical
Content and Heavy
metals
Indiscriminate
discards, sanitary
and office wastes.
Ground water
Solid Waste
Sampling location
Sampling
Frequency
Quarterly
Duration
Quarterly
Long-term
Bi-Annually
Long-term
Quarterly
Long-term
Monitoring boreholes
around the project site
Annually
Long -term
Quarterly
Long-term
Long-term
The above tables are merely indicative of the activities necessary to track
environmental dynamics of the project during the listed phases. That may suffice
for a local project devoid of international exposure.
In her Operational and Safeguard policies, the World Bank appears to be of the
view that an ESMP is as important as the structure for its diligent
implementation. In other words, a program for environmental management and
monitoring must include established institutional arrangement, responsibilities,
the target mitigation regime, detailed monitoring activities, human capacity
required, indicative cost etc. As described below.
17
October 2012
18
October 2012
mention a few. The EMU which may absorb the staff of the defunct PMU
will be responsible for the day- to day environmental activities in the
plant including inspection of the various waste treatment facilities,
managing the monitoring stations for environmental attributes and
reporting to regulatory agencies and the World Bank when required.
Special Case: From the geological description of Anambra State, the site
of CPGL Power Plant in Okija is prone to erosion. Capacity must
therefore be developed for erosion monitoring both at construction and
operational phases of the Power Plant implementation with special
attention paid to erosion control during and after decommissioning.
Therefore, CPGL has put together Table 9.4 which shows the necessary
institutional structures and indicative costs for implementing the ESMP. Beyond
that, lies Table 9.5 which gives further details of Impact Mitigation Measures, the
Monitoring Arrangement, Responsibility, and Management including the Staff
Training Requirements for each phase of the project as well as indicative cost for
implementation. The primary objective of this part is to emphasize full
commitment of CPGL to the environmental sustainability of the 495MW IPP
plant. A summary of the cost and that of the various training requirements is
presented at the end of this chapter.
19
October 2012
Table 9.4
Issue
CPGL Response
Institutional
Activities
Supervision
CPGL Project
Manager in
collaboration with
FMEnv
Monitoring
Indicators
Budget in NGN N
Construction Phase
Institutional
capacity to
address
environmental and
social issues
during
construction
Basic induction
training for all
employees on good
construction site
management
practice.
Training programs
Compliance with
ESMP
Environmental Quality
quarterly monitoring will
start with the
commencement of
construction phase.
Basic Training
Basic Induction Training
Intermittent Air quality
sampling during
construction to ensure
compliance with
standards.
General
Environmental
Management and
Monitoring including:
Dust / Air Quality
control.
Noise Control
Erosion Control/
monitoring
Surface and ground
water quality
regulation. And so
on.
Operation Phase
20
October 2012
Institutional
capacity to
address
environmental and
social issues
Quarterly to
FMEnv/CPGL
Environmental
Management
CPGL Project
Manager in
collaboration with
FMEnv/NESREA
Training programs
Compliance with
ESMP
Notes: The figures mentioned for training form part of the financial plan submitted to NERC by CPGL Energy as part of the documentation for
granting Generation license
21
October 2012
Table 9.5: Construction Phase Impact Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Measures
Issue/Impact
Air Quality
Dust emissions
caused by
construction
vehicle
movements and
transport of
loose
construction
materials.
Mitigation measures
Monitoring
Responsibility
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting
/monitoring
Before construction
and during
construction until 6
months ahead of
commissioning:
Initiate baseline air
quality survey of
main pollutants,
particularly,
, CO, TSP and
using third
party measurements
on a quarterly basis.
Implementation of
good site
Management
practice shall be
the responsibility
of all contractors
on site under
supervision of the
PMU/EMS and the
Assistant Plant
Manager in
charge of
Environment.
Quality
reporting of
summary
results (or
more if
requested)
and submitted
to the FMEnv
and any other
concerned
authority. (E.g.
WB-IDA,
NBET etc).
During Construction,
6 Months ahead of
Commissioning
Initiate baseline air
quality survey
of
,
, CO,
TSP and
using air quality
monitors and
continue during 6
months.
CPGL Project
manager in
collaboration with
FMEnv
Two analyzer
stations will be
electronically
22
October 2012
Management
and Training
Indicative Cost
Estimate (NGN)
CPGL
responsible for
management of
the air quality
monitoring
system.
Submission of
annual summary
reports to FMEnv
and any other
concerned
authority.
Mitigation
Measures,
Management time
and costs (included
in construction
costs)
Basic training of
persons
employed to
operate and
maintain the
monitoring
system.
CPGL to ensure
all contractors
and
subcontractors
working on site
are aware of
ESMP and all
employees are
given basic
Sheeting of lorries
transporting loose
construction
materials and spoil
Enforcement of
vehicle speed limits
on unmetalled road
to <30km/h
connected to the
NESREA ambient
monitoring system.
induction training
on good
construction and
site management
practice.
Measurements and
analysis of these
pollutants to be
made on a
continuous basis by
a trained staff and
assigned by CPGL.
Reports submitted
to NESREA/FMEnv
for reporting to any
concerned authority.
& reporting.
Issue/Impact
Noise
Increased noise
in the project
area as a result
of the use of
noisy machinery
and increased
vehicle
movements
Mitigation measures
Monitoring
Responsibility
Implementation of good
site practices including:
Enforcement of
vehicle speed
limits.
Strict controls of
vehicle routing
Diesel engine
construction plant
equipment to be
fitted with
silencers.
Weekly
monitoring and
supervision by
CPGL is required
to ensure the
implementation of
good site
management
practices by all
contractors during
construction.
Implementation of
good site
Management
practices shall be
the responsibility of
all contractors on
site under
supervision of the
CPGL and the
HSE Manager.
Noise Analysis
23
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting
/monitoring
CPGL will produce a
quarterly log of valid
complaints.
Quarterly reporting
of summary results
(or more if
requested) and
submitted to the
FMENv/NESREA
and any other
concerned authority.
October 2012
Management
and Training
CPGL to ensure
all contractors
and
subcontractors
working on site
are aware of
ESMP and all
employees are
given basic
induction training
on good
construction and
Indicative Cost
Estimate NGN
Management
time and costs
(included in
construction
cost).
Third party
noise
measurement
costs (about
N3.6million)
Limited noisy
construction
activities at night.
Prohibition of
heavy vehicle
movements at
night.
Use of protective
hearing
equipment for
workers.
Expert/Third party
Auditor
Periodic
inspection and
supervision by
CPGL is required
to ensure the
implementation of
good site
management
practices by all
contractors during
construction.
HSE Manager to
ensure strict
adherence to the
site clearance
plan so as to
preserve unused
areas.
Implementation of
good site
Management
practices shall be
the responsibility of
all contractors on
site under
supervision of the
CPGL and the
project Manager.
site management
practices.
Quarterly reporting
of the No. of floral
species conserved
or planted, if any
24
October 2012
CPGL to ensure
all contractors
and
subcontractors
working on site
are aware of
ESMP and all
employees are
given basic
induction training
on good
construction and
site management
practices
Management
time and cost
(included in
construction
cost)
Table 9.5 contd: Construction Phase Impact Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Measures
Issue/Impact
Soil and
Hydrology
Site
clearance,
excavation
and disposal
of material,
exposure of
potentially
contaminated
soils, spillage
or leakage of
substances
on land,
movement of
equipment
and vehicle
on site.
Mitigation measures
Monitoring
Responsibility
Daily visual
inspection is
required to
ensure the
implementation
of good site
management
practices
during
construction.
Implementation
of good site
management
practices shall
be the
responsibility
of all
contractors on
site under
supervision of
CPGL and the
project
Manager.
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting
/monitoring
Quarterly
reporting of
summary
results (or
more if
requested)
and submitted
to the CPGL
and any other
concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA, WBIDA, NBET
etc), if
required
25
October 2012
Management
and Training
CPGL to
ensure all
contractors
and
subcontractors
working on
site are aware
of ESMP and
all employees
are given
basic
induction
training on
good
construction
and site
management
practices.
Indicative
Cost
Estimate
NGN
Costs for
mitigation
measures and
management
time included
in construction
costs.
Any additional
features (e.g.
bonding,
interceptors
etc.) may incur
additional
costs of
between
N4.8millionN8million
dependent on
the measures.
Table 9.5 contd: Construction Impact Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Measures
Issue/Impact
Traffic and
transport
Disruption,
noise and
increased air
pollution due
to increased
traffic, heavy
loads and
abnormal
loads.
Mitigation measures
Monitoring
Monitoring
traffic entering
the site during
morning and
evening peaks
to ensure the
implementation
of good site
management
practices by all
contractors
during
construction.
Type and
Frequency
Responsibility
of
Reporting
/monitoring
Implementation
of good site
management
practices shall
be the
responsibility
of all
contractors on
site under
supervision of
the CPGL and
the Project
Manager in
collaboration
with FMEnv
Three times
per month
CPGL to
ensure all
contractors
Quarterly
and
reporting of subcontractors
summary
working on
results (or
site are aware
more if
of ESMP and
requested)
all employees
and
are given
submitted to basic
CPGL and
induction
any other
training on
concerned
good
authority
construction
(e.g.
and site
NESREA,
management
FMEnv,
practices.
NBET etc.)
if required.
26
Management
and Training
October 2012
Indicative
Cost
Estimate
NGN
Management
time and
costs
included in
the
Construction
cost.
Table 9.5 contd: Construction Impact Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Measures
Issue/Impact
Mitigation measures
SocioEconomic
Environment
Positive
impact
identified.
Type and
Indicative
Frequency
Management
Cost
Monitoring
Responsibility
of
and Training
Estimate
Reporting
NGN
/monitoring
Record of local
CPGL - HSE
Bi-Annual
Responsibility Responsibility
employment provided
Manager/Department Special
of CPGL.
of
by the project.
for implementation
Report on
and
CPGL
under the
SocioHSE
Quantitative/Qualitative supervision of
Economic
Department.
report on increased
Project Manager in
engagement.
economic activity to
collaboration with
the benefit of the
FMEnv.
locals.
27
October 2012
Relations will be
maximized through open
dialogue between CPGL,
local authority, public
and industry
representatives.
28
October 2012
Table 9.5 contd: Construction Impact Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Measures
Issue/Impact
Mitigation measures
Archaeology
Potential
chance finds of
archaeological
remains during
construction.
29
Monitoring
Daily
Supervision of
construction
activities
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting
/monitoring
Responsibility
Construction
contractors
CPGL, Project
Manager and
HSE Manager will
allocate
responsibility in
accordance with
the Chance Finds
Procedure.
Daily inspection
Quarterly
reporting of
summary
results (or more
if requested)
and submitted
to the CPGL
and any other
concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, NBET)
etc)
October 2012
Management
and Training
CPGL to
ensure that all
workers on site
are aware of
the importance
of
archaeological
remains and
must report
any potential
finds
immediately.
Immediate
liaising with
Competent
administrative
Authority
should a
potential find
be uncovered.
Indicative
Cost
Estimate
NGN
Mitigation
activities
consume man
hours.
Should
chance finds
occur,
protection and
excavation
could add
significantly to
the overall
cost.
Natural
Disasters
Flash flooding
Occasional
inspection of
drainage route
and potential
source of
flooding like the
banks of the
River Niger.
HSE Department
under the
supervision of
CPGL project
manager and
FMEnv.
Quarterly
reporting of
summary
results (or more
if requested)
and submitted
to the CPGL
and any other
concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, WBIDA) etc)
30
October 2012
CPGL to
ensure that all
workers on site
receive training
in emergency
preparedness
and response
procedures.
Relevant
costs are
included
within the
construction
cost.
Table 9.5 contd: Construction Impact Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Measures
Issue/Impact
Solid Waste
Management
Mitigation measures
Monitoring
Responsibility
HSE Department
would carry out
Periodic inspection
to ensure the
implementation of
good management
practices during
construction.
Implementation of
good site
management
practices shall be
the responsibility
of all contractors
on site under
supervision CPGL
- HSE Manager
and Project
Manager in
collaboration with
FMEnv.
31
October 2012
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting
/monitoring
Quarterly reports
from
management
contractors to
CPGL.
These reports
are to be
submitted to any
other concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, NBET,
WB-IDA etc)
Management
and Training
CPGLENL to
ensure all
contractors
and
subcontractors
working on
site are aware
of ESMP and
all employees
are given
basic
induction
training on
good
construction
and site
management
practices.
Indicative
Cost
Estimate
NGN
Management
time plus
costs about
(N3.2million)
Table 9.5 contd: Construction Impact Mitigation, Monitoring and Management Measures
Issue/Impact
Monitoring
Mitigation measures
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting
/monitoring
Responsibility
Occupational
Health & Safety
Management and
Training
Indicative Cost
Estimate NGN
Mitigation
measures will
require
management time
plus costs of up to
N8million for
implementation of
HSE Plans and
policies.
`
Best national/international
construction practices in
Environment Health and
Safety (EHS) will be applied
at all times and account will
be taken of local customs,
practices and attitudes.
Measures include:
Committed Implementation
of EHS policies procedures
as a condition of contractors
and sub-contractors;
Clear definition of the EHS
roles and responsibilities of
all construction companies
and staff;
Management, supervision,
monitoring and recordkeeping as set out in plants
operational manual;
Pre-construction and
operation assessment of the
EHS risks and hazards;
Completion and
implementation of Fire
Safety Plan prior to
commissioning any part of
the plant;
Provision of appropriate
Daily inspection
is required to
ensure the
implementation
of EHS
Policies, plans
and practices
during
construction.
32
Implementation of
Good Site
Management
practices and the
EHS policies shall
be the responsibility
of all contractors on
site under the
supervision of
CPGL, HSE
Manager. and
Project Manager in
collaboration with
FMEnv.
HSE Developmeny
shall continuously
monitor all staff and
construction
workers to ensure
good safety
practices
Daily inspection
Quarterly
reporting of
summary
results (or more
if requested)
and submitted
to the CPGL
and any other
concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, NBET,
WB-IDA etc)
.
October 2012
Contractors are
responsible for
ensuring that a Fire
Safety Plan, which
conforms to best
practices, is
prepared and
implemented prior
to commissioning of
any part of the plant
under supervision
of CPGL and HSE
Department.
33
October 2012
Issue/Impact
Air Quality
Emissions from
stack are not
expected to
exceed standards.
Ambient air
quality affected by
emissions from
the power plant.
Mitigation
measures
Monitoring
Mitigation measures
have already been
included in the design
of the plant and, given
CPGLENL strict
commitment to use
only natural gas not
much change is
expected.
CPGL will
demonstrate the
validity of the
conclusions drawn in
the ESIA report. If
ground level
concentrations are
found to be above
local and World Bank
standards options for
further mitigation will
be discussed.
Responsibility
The analyzer
stations will be
owned and
operated by
CPGL, HSE
Department.
CPGL
Environmental
Management &
Studies Sector.
Report
submitted to
NESREA on
request.
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting
/monitoring
Continuous
Hourly data
acquisition.
Quarterly
reporting to
CPGL
Reports are to be
available to any
of the concerning
authorities (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, NBET,
WB-IDA etc)
34
October 2012
Management
and Training
Records must be
kept and summary
data (including
any deviations
from Nigeria and
World bank
standards) will be
submitted to the
FMEnv on annual
basis (or more
frequently if
required).
Annual reporting
by CPGL to
Government, WBIDA, NBET (or
more frequently if
required)
highlighting key
features and
comparing results
with air quality
standards and
prediction in ESIA
report.
Indicative
Cost
Estimate
NGN
Automatic
stack monitors:
included in the
project cost.
Management
time for
compilation of
reports and
performance
monitoring:
included in
operation cost.
Purchase of
Continuous
Monitors as
part of initial
erection cost.
Issue/Impact
Noise
At full operation,
noise audit
measurements
are to be carried
out at noise
source and at the
fence of the
power plant as
well as at noise
receptors around
the plant.
CPGL HSE
Department.
Quarterly to
CPGL.
Monthly
reporting of
summary
results (or
more if
requested)
and submitted
to the CPGL
and any other
concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, NBET,
WB-IDA etc)
Should any
complaints be
received
regarding noise,
these will be
logged and the
HSE Manager will
investigate the
problem.
CPGL to ensure
that all employees
are given basic
induction training
on the
requirements of
the ESMP, good
site management
will ensure
implementation of
procedures.
Indicative Cost
Estimate NGN
Issue/Impact
Mitigation measures
Monitoring
35
Responsibility
October 2012
Type and
Frequency
of
Management
and Training
Indicative
Cost
Estimate
Reporting
/monitoring
Flora and
Fauna
Disturbance
to habitats as
a result of
noise, vehicle
and
personnel
movements.
Visual
Impact
Visual image
of power
plant from
surrounding
areas
No monitoring
is envisaged
Lifetime of the
plant
CPGL- HSE
Manager to
supervise.
CPGL
Environmental
Management & unit
to implement all
measures.
CPGL-HSE
Manager
CPGL
Environmental
Management Unit
to implement.
36
CPGL to ensure
that all
employees are
given basic
induction training
on the
requirement of
the ESMP, good
site management
practices and
H&S procedures.
The HSE
Manager will
ensure
implementation
of procedures.
Management
time
Considered
management of
landscaping
areas to
maximize visual
image and
habitat creation.
Approx.
N3.2millionN5.6million for
landscaping
measures
(included in
operation
cost)
CPGL to contract
a suitable firm to
manage
landscaped
areas.
Annually
NGN
October 2012
Issue/Impact
Soil and
Hydrology
Spillage of oils,
chemical or fuel
on site.
Mitigation measures
37
Monitoring
Responsibility
The HSE
manager will
continuously
monitor
application of
ESMP and good
site management
practices and take
corrective action if
required
CPGL, HSE
Manager and the
Environmental
Management Unit.
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting
/monitoring
Bi-annual
reports from
Environmental
Management
Unit to CPGL
Annual reporting
of summary
results (or more
is requested) and
submitted to the
CPGL and any
other concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, NBET,
WB-IDA etc)
October 2012
Management
and Training
CPGL through
the HSE
Manager will
implement a
spills response
plan and all
employees will
receive
corresponding
training.
Indicative
Cost Estimate
NGN
Management
time
Solid waste
Continuous
monitoring is
required to ensure
the
implementation of
good
management
practices during
operation.
Implementation of
good plant
Management
practices shall be
conducted under
the supervision of
CPGL, HSE
Manager and
implemented by
Environmental
Management Unit
3-months reports
from HSE
Department to
CPGL
Management.
Annual reporting
of summary
results (or more if
requested) and
submitted to
CPGL and any
other concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, NBET,
WB-IDA etc)
38
October 2012
Management
time and costs
(N1.6million per
annum)
(included in
operation cost)
Issue/Impact
Occupational
Health and
Safety, Risks
and Hazards.
Mitigation
measures
Best international
practice on HSE
issues shall be
employed on site.
The mitigation
measures
summarized in
construction
management Table
apply.
Monitoring
Regular on-site
training.
Activities to be
supervised by
CPGL, HSE
Manager and
implemented by the
Environmental
Management Unit.
Monthly reports
from
Environmental
management Unit
to CPGL
Management.
Annual reporting
of summary
results (or more if
requested) and
submitted to the
CPGL and any
other concerned
authority (e.g.
NESREA,
FMEnv, NBET,
WB-IDA etc).
In addition, the
following measures
will be undertaken:
Provision of training
in the use of
protection equipment
and chemical
handling.
Use of protective
equipment.
Clear marking of
work site hazards
and training in
recognition of
hazards symbols.
Installation of
vapor detection
Responsibility
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting /
monitoring
39
October 2012
Management and
Training
Indicative Cost
Estimate NGN
Management
time and costs
(N2.4million per
annum)
(included in
operation cost).
CPGL is responsible
for ensuring that the
site emergency
response plan is
complete and
implemented prior to
commissioning any
part of the power
plant.
equipment and
control systems.
Development of
site emergency
response plans.
Table 9.5 contd: Transmission System Impact Mitigation, Monitoring and Management
40
October 2012
Issue/Impact
Direct
Vegetation damage,
habitat loss, and
invasion by exotic
species along the
ROW and access
roads and around
substation sites.
Line distance is 25
kilometres.
Row already
existing. Substation
already built but
requires a bay
extension undue
Expansion of Row
during maintenance
Mitigation measures
Monitoring
Adopt appropriate
clearing techniques,
(e.g., hand clearing
versus mechanized
clearing).
Maintain native
ground cover beneath
lines.
Replant disturbed
sites after tower
erection.
Manage ROWs to
maximize wildlife
benefits.
Increased access to
sensitive lands.
41
Regular
inspection of
materials being
used, the
construction
practices and
mitigation
measures.
Short-term
monitoring to
assure that
ecological
impacts are
avoided and
proper mitigation
measures are
employed.
Monitoring of
future ROW
maintenance
activities to
assure proper
control methods.
Responsibility
Transmission
Company of
Nigeria (TCN) and
CPGL- HSE
Manager for
implementation
Type and
Frequency of
Reporting /
monitoring
Daily (during
Construction).
Maintenance
time (during
operation).
CPGL Project
Manager in
collaboration with
FMEnv for
supervision
October 2012
Management
and Training
Training will be
conducted by
TCN and CPGL
with assistance
from
environmental
consultant.
Staff workers
should have an
understanding of
the rational for
the
recommended
mitigation and
monitoring that
they may be
implementing.
Indicative
Cost
Estimate
NGN
Included in
construction
and operation
cost.
Phase of Implementation
Cost in NGN
Construction Phase
34.2million (annually)
Operation Phase
14.4million (annually)
48.6million
Conclusion
This ESMP has been prepared to guide all activities during development and
operation of the proposed Power plant to ensure that they are carried out with
minimal or no negative impacts on the environment. It is expected that strict
compliance to this plan as well as recommended improvements arising from
performance appraisal will ensure that the proposed project is implemented
sustainably.
42
October 2012
CHAPTER TEN
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
CHAPTER TEN
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
INTRODUCTION
In Practice, most developmental projects either add to what is existing or occur in
parallel with other projects. The import of this is that impacts on the
environment now become cumulative. In the particular case of CPGL 495MW
plant, there is no power plant or any factory for that matter, envisaged in the
near future. However, noise level and air quality may be deteriorated by
increased vehicular movement and heavy trucks activity in the yard of
HAMMAKKOP Company.
AIR QUALITY
The proposed CPGL IPP plant is located opposite the HAMMAKKOP
Construction Company across the Onitsha-Owerri express road. Releases from
the construction company formed part of the field measurements since it was in
operation when the field work took place.
The model had considered only the additional NOx, COx and Noise to the level
of similar pollution by the CPGL Plant. The assessment of cumulative impacts
was performed by modelling the emissions from both sources. The results of the
assessment of cumulative impacts are presented in Table 10.1 below.
October 2012
Cumulative impacts from the Project and neighbouring sources have been
quantified for NOx in (Table 10.1), and for CO in table 10.2. Both levels are
considered to be very low and not associated with significant impacts on air
quality. Figs. 10.1 and 10.2 depict dispersion models of NOx and CO along the
SW wind direction. The cumulative dust impacts are also expected to be low
since the vehicular traffic does not add to the completed dust level. The road is
still new and well covered with bitumen.
Table 10.1
Traffic.
Pollutant
NO
Averaging
Period
Annual mean
Source
EU/WHO
3
Criterion
g/m
40
Max. Impact
g/m
0.538
October 2012
Pollutant
CO
1 hour mean
1 hour mean
EU/WHO
Nigeria
Averaging
Period
8 hour mean
1 hour mean
1 hour mean
Source
EU/WHO
EU/WHO
Nigeria
200
75-113
66.9
66.9
Criterion
g/m
40,000
30,000
11,400
Max. Impact
g/m
0.538
66.9
66.9
October 2012
October 2012
It must also be noted that the plants are located in a relatively isolated area
where residential receptors are found about 800 meters away. At that point, the
noise level should have come down to about 40dB (A). The values listed occur
within the perimeter boundaries of the plant site.
October 2012
Description
Day-Peak
NS 1
North-East Border
55.9
48.0
NS 2
North-West Border
52.8
63.8
NS - 3
South-East Border
51.8
61.5
NS - 4
South-West Border
50.8
63.8
October 2012
When considered with construction of the road to Ulasi stream at the right edge
of the site and in the context of an erosion prone area steeping towards the
stream; the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures will likely
reduce the cumulative impacts on soils and geology. Hence, over the two phases
of the Project, these impacts are considered to be minor. In addition, the site is
within an isolated layout where the villagers no more access for farming, only for
firewood, it then, follows that the cumulative impact will exclude direct land
take issues which render the impact of minor significance.
CULTURAL INSTITUTION
The CPGL project site does not contain any site of cultural significance. There are
neither shrines nor deities. Both CPGL and HAMMAKKOP are also located in an
isolated area remote from the villages. The project can only trigger the potential
for conflict arising from disrespect of the cultural values by foreign workers
who will live with the villagers. However, when viewed from the context that
the communities have witnessed HAMMAKKOP project implementation
processes, the cumulative impact of CPGL addition on cultural institutions will
be considered negligible.
WATER RESOURCES
As explained in chapter 6, there is potential contamination due to borehole
construction, accidental spills and increased run-off, sedimentation of surface
October 2012
October 2012
HEALTH PROFILE
Though the project situates in an isolated area guided by certain established
practices, there still exists some community health and safety risks associated
with the CPGL IPP project which include possible explosions from the gas
pipeline, traffic hazards and noise and dust at different stages of project
development.
In addition, there are higher risks of STIs (including HIV/ AIDs) and potential
psychological impacts related to influx, dashed hopes and palpable tension in the
local communities. Other jealousies among the traditional hierarchy may erupt.
Alternatively, there will be potentially positive impacts from improved
sanitation due to provision of sanitary facilities, borehole construction and other
CSR projects. The HAMMAKKOP Company has initiated a number of such
projects. CPGL would probably do more in terms of provision of power and
facilities.
health profile would tend to balance out the cumulative negative impacts with
the result that the net impact is considered to be of minor significance.
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
CPGL will integrate policies and procedures on health and safety into the
operation of the power plant that will meet the requirements of FMEnv,
International and World Bank guidelines as in chapter one of this report. The
policies and procedures are also designed to comply with all manufacturers
safety data sheets for chemical storage and usage, and to provide a safe and
healthy working environment.
10
October 2012
The health and safety programs will be supported by staff training for the power
plant and the appointment of the Health, Safety and Environment Manager. The
training will include:
First-aid; and
Hearing conservation.
WASTE
For a typical gas powered combined cycle plant, wastes come in form of silt, air
and noise emissions and the potential for spillages of transformer oil. Wastes will
include spoil, excess concrete, used timber, general and household refuse,
sewage and waste water, machinery parts and building rubble (during
decommissioning) and small amounts of hazardous waste. Due to the relatively
low magnitude of the contribution to the regional wastes generated and
assuming implementation of mitigation, the cumulative impacts are considered
to be minor.
Recommended Training Required for the HSE/EMU
Training Course
General HSE Training :
Induction
Training on
appointment
Specialist
Contents
Type
of
Training
Participants
Proposed
Scheduling
Cost Estimate.
(Annual)
Classroom
and On-job
training
All
power
plant
staff,
including
EMU.
Once
before
project
implementation
and
during
operation
for
Included
in
construction &
operation
budget
approximately
General operation of
the power plant.
Specific job roles and
procedures.
Occupational health
11
October 2012
Training
Refresher
Training
Stakeholder
Engagement/
Grievance
Management.
Special Training on
Environmental
Aspects of Power Plant
Engineering
and
Management.
and safety:
General
area
safety
Specific
job
safety
General electrical
safety
Handling
of
hazardous
materials
Entry
into
confined spaces
Hearing
conservation
Repetitive stress
disorders
Code of safe
practices
Use of personal
protective
equipment and
First-aid
Contingency Plans &
Emergency
Procedures.
Stakeholder
Identification
Building Block of
Stakeholder
identification
Consultation
Techniques
Negotiation
and
Partnership
Grievance
Management
Reporting
General
Environmental
Performance.
Daily
monitoring
activities.
Stack
Emissions
Monitoring
Air
quality
Monitoring.
Effluents Monitoring
Water
quality
Monitoring
Handson
Monitoring
Equipment, operation
and trouble-shooting.
Industrial Hygiene
refresher training.
30 million naira.
Classroom
and
Field
Exercises.
HSE/EMU
Once
before
project
implementation
and
monitoring
program.
Refreshers
Courses.
Included
in
construction &
operation
budget
approximately 4
million naira.
Classroom
and On-job
training.
HSE/EMU
(3-4
staff
members).
Once
before
project
implementation
and
monitoring
program.
Refresher courses
subsequently.
Included
in
construction &
operation
budget
approximately 2
million naira.
12
October 2012
Environmental
Auditing
and
Inspection, including
periodic safety audits.
Social
Communications.
Environmental
Auditing Techniques.
Auditing Checklists.
Environmental
Auditing Reports.
Safety Audits:
Physical
inspections
Review
of
plant
records
Interviews
with staffs.
Classroom
and
Field
Exercises.
HSE/EMU
Included
in
operation
budget
approximately 2
million naira.
Communications
Skills
Mass
Communications
Classroom
and Field
Exercises.
HSE/EMU
CLO
Included
in
construction &
operation
budget
approximately
2
million
naira.
The training plan will include induction courses when staffs are first employed,
with specialist and refresher training as required by the job role. Training
Programs will be conducted annually. Depending on the type of training, experts
may be invited to the plant or staff will go to standard training
workshops/seminars.
The safety record at the power plant will be reviewed each month at a formal
meeting, led by the HSE manager, where the agenda items, comments and
attendance will be recorded and kept on file.
Internal periodic safety audits will be conducted to verify compliance with safe
working practices, which will comprise of physical inspections, review of plant
records and interviews with staff. The audits will assign responsibility for any
corrective action necessary to mitigate a potential hazard and allow the tracking
of the completion of the corrective measures.
In addition, NESREA shall order period Environmental audit by a third party to
ascertain conformity with the standards and adoption of international best
practices.
13
October 2012
Fire
Explosion
Bomb alerts
14
October 2012
The Oil Spill Contingency Plan will be prepared by CPGL as part of ESMP for
implementation by the start of construction activities.
The plan will cover the following;
Delivery
Handling
Spills; and
Clean Up.
15
October 2012
CHAPTER ELEVEN
CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER ELEVEN
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCLUSION
Century Power Generation Limited, a wholly indigenous company has proposed
to Design, Construct and Operate a 495MW combined cycle gas powered
generating plant at a location along the Onitsha-Owerri express road in Okija,
Anambra State of Nigeria. The output of this plant will be fed to the national grid
which necessitated that CPGL should aply and obtain an On-Grid Generation
License from NERC. It also requires that CPGL will negotiate and execute a
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), with the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trader
(NBET). This PPA will be securitized by a Partial Risk Guarantee (PRG) to be
provided by the World Bank. In other words, the World Bank (WB) has become a
stakeholder in the ESI in Nigeria. The natural consequence of this is that WB will
impose her usual requirements for supporting developmental projects. A major
requirement is the conduct of an ESIA. Therefore, CPGL commissioned two
reputable Nigerian companies to conduct the ESIA study of the proposed power
plant which is reported in this document.
Every effort has been made to conduct this ESIA for the proposed Century
Power Generation Limited (CPGL) 495MW Combined cycle gas turbine power
plant in strict compliance with the Nigerian (FMEnv) and World Bank guidelines
as expressed in several national regulations and WB operational policies and
guidelines, respectively.
The results of this ESIA have assisted in reaching the following conclusions:
1. The proposed project area in Okija, Anambra state, has many important
ecological and economic functions
October 2012
2.
By its nature and characteristics, the project many cause some ecological
disruptions, such as: significantly low gaseous emission which the in-built
mitigation measures would take care of, as well as some negative sociocultural impacts
3.
4.
5.
There will not be any need to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan, since the
proposed site covering 27.41 hectares, does not contain any economic trees,
farm land, proposed or completed residential structures, economic
structures temporary or permanent or shrines for any Okija deity.
11.2
RECOMMENDATIONS
The ESIA should form an integral part of the proposed power plant
project implementation document and should be used by project
supervisors in checking any adverse effect that the project may have on
the various environmental components.
2.
October 2012
3.
October 2012
REFERENCES
October 2012
REFERENCES
NUWEIBA: 750MWe Combined Cycle Power Plant Project, EIA
APHA (1985). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water
America Public Health Association, Washington D.C.
African Convention Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. (1968)
Ahmed .M.E, (2008: A Comparative Study of International EIA Guidelines and the
Sudan EIA Experience, Vol.1
CPGL Energy Nig Ltd, (2012): Feasibility Studies on 1000MW Power Plant, by
Cornerstone System Inc. of Jupiter, Florida
Canter, L. W. (1996): Environmental Impact Assessment. Second Edition, New York,
USA: McGraw Hill.
CAO (Compliance Advisor Ombudsman), 2008: A Guide to Designing and
Implementing Grievance Mechanism for Development Projects. www.caoombudman.org
CSI (Cement Sustainability Initiative), 2005: Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment (ESIA) Guidelines World Bank Council for Sustainable
Development
David Balevic et al, (2009): GE Energy Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine Operating and
Maintenance Consideration. GER-3620L (11/09)
De Pauw, N. and G. Vanhorren: Method for Biological Quality Assessment of Water
Courses in Belgium, Hydrobiologia, 100, 153-168 (1983).
DPR (1991): Environmental Guidelines and Standards of the Petroleum Industry,
Nigeria. Ministry of Petroleum Resources, Lagos: 35-76.
EGASPIN (2002): Environmental Guidelines and Standards for the Petroleum Industry
in Nigeria.
October 2012
National Interim
October 2012
October 2012
Rees .C. (2008): Grievance Mechanisms for Business and Human Rights Strength,
Weaknesses and Gaps, Harvard University
Richards, A. E, Ram, C., Dalal S. S. (2009) Carbon storage in a ferrosol under subtropical
rainforest, tree plantations, and pasture is linked to soil aggregation. Australian
Journal
of
soil
Research.
[Online]
Available
form:
http://findarticles.com/p/article/mi_hb3364/is_4_47/ai_n35608529/?tag=content;coll
[Accessed 27 October 2011]
Round table on Sustainable Bio-fuels (RSB), 2011 Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment (ESIA) Guidelines
SAPP (Southern African Power Pool), 2010: Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment Guideline for Transmission Infrastructure for the SAPP Region, EG
01/10
SCP Project ESIA Georgia, Draft for Disclosure, 2002: A Legislation and Policy
Framework.
SIEP, (1995). Environmental Quality Standards Air. HSE Manual, EP 95-0375.
Soneye, A.S.O. (2004) Institutional Dilemma of Urban Waste Management in
Developing Nations: the Lagos State Experience in Industrialization, Urbanization
and Development in Nigeria: 1950 1999, by M.A.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (1995) AP-42 Section 13.2 Fugitive dust
sources.
[Online]
Available
form:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch13/final/c13s02.pdf [Accessed 25 October 2011]
World Bank (2010) World Development Indicators (WDI) and Global Development Finance.
[Online] Available from: http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/home.do?Step=1&id=4
[Accessed 9 November 2011]
October 2012
World Bank Group (1994): Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines: Thermal Power
Plant.
World Health Organization (2007) pH in Drinking-water. Revised background document for
development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking water Quality. World Health
Organization.
World Health Organization (2010) Core Health Indicators. [Online] Available from:
http://apps.who.int/whosis/database/core/core_select_process.cfm [Accessed 9 November
2011]
World Health Organization (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. World Health
Organization, Fourth Edition
October 2012
APPENDIX 1
Name
Prof.
Frank.
Okafor
Prof. M. A. Salau
MASODAK
Geotechnics
Ph.D 30 years
Mr. Uzondu
M.Sc. 15 years
Dr. Akanmu
MASODAK
Hydrogeology
Ph.D 12 years
Ph.D 13 years
Project Consultant
Geo-referencing
MSc. 6 years
Radiation Studies
M.Sc. 4 years
Transmission
B.Sc. 10 years
Engr.
Udeani
Engr.Ovie
Adjekpeyede
Dr. A. Balogun
Studies
University
of
Consultant
Dr. P. Kuton
University
Lagos Transmission
Ph.D 2 years
Studies
of
Ph.D 10 years
Consultant
October 2012
APPENDIX 1A
The Average Wind Speed and Direction in the Region as obtained from NIMET.
WIND SPEED (mtrs./s)
STN
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Onitsha
2009
Onitsha
2010
3
3.2
4.9
5.2
4.4
4.2
3.7
3.9
4.5
3.9
4
3.4
2.8
4.2
4.2
4.2
3
3.2
4.9
5.2
3.9
4
4.9
4.4
3.4
4.5
4.7
4.6
4.6
5.5
4.1
3.5
3.2
4.8
4.5
4.2
3.9
4
4.9
4.4
4.6
4
4.5
5.3
5.6
5.3
5.2
4.2
4.7
4.1
4.6
5
3.7
3.5
4.6
5.2
4.6
4
4.5
5.3
4.4
3.8
4.4
4.9
4.7
5.4
4.4
4.3
3.3
4.2
5.5
4.2
3.8
3.5
5.1
5.1
4.4
3.8
4.4
4.9
3.7
3.5
3.7
4.4
4.2
4.4
4.9
3.7
5.5
5.3
3.7
3.6
4
3.4
4.5
3.8
3.7
3.5
3.7
4.4
3.6
3.7
3
4
4.6
4.3
4.7
4.9
5.1
4.3
3.6
3.9
3.5
4.4
4.4
4.5
3.6
3.7
3
4
3.8
3.9
3.5
3.7
4.3
4.7
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.4
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.3
4.2
4.6
3.8
3.9
3.5
3.7
3.2
4
3.4
3.5
4.4
4
4.5
3.7
5.1
5.2
3.9
3.3
3.8
4
4.3
4.4
3.2
4
3.4
3.5
3.7
4
3.5
3.3
4.4
4.4
4.2
3.8
3.9
3.6
4.6
3.5
3.3
4.2
4.1
3.7
3.7
4
3.5
3.3
3.1
3.2
3.5
3.4
4.1
4
4.1
4.1
4.1
4
3.6
3
3.1
3.8
3.3
3.6
3.1
3.2
3.5
3.4
3.2
2.8
3.5
3.4
3.8
3.8
3.9
3.6
4.3
3.8
3.4
3
3.3
2.6
2.7
3
3.2
2.8
3.5
3.4
3
3.7
3.3
3.1
5.6
3.7
3.3
3.4
3.8
3.5
3.4
3.6
3.5
3.2
3.3
2.9
3
3.7
3.3
3.1
WIND DIRECTION
STN
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2002
2003
W
W
W
W
NE
S
S
W
W
W
W
NE
NE
W
SW
W
NE
NE
S
N
W
SW
W
NE
NE
SW
S
S
SW
W
W
S
S
S
S
SW
W
W
SW
S
S
S
SW
SW
S
S
S
S
S
SW
SW
SW
S
S
S
SW
SW
S
S
S
S
S
SW
SW
S
S
S
W
S
SW
S
S
S
S
W
S
SW
SW
S
S
SW
SW
SW
S
S
S
S
SW
SW
SW
W
W
S
W
SW
SW
S
W
W
S
W
SW
SW
SW
S
SW
W
SW
SW
W
W
S
SW
W
SW
SW
SW
S
S
W
SW
SW
W
S
S
S
W
SW
SW
SW
S
SW
W
SW
SW
S
S
S
SW
W
SW
SW
W
W
W
NE
E
W
S
W
W
W
NE
E
W
W
October 2012
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
NE
SW
NE
NE
W
W
NE
SW
NE
NE
NE
W
NE
NE
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
W
SW
SW
SW
SW
S
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
S
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
S
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
W
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
SW
SW
NE
W
E
E
NE
E
W
APPENDIX 1B
The Rainfall Data for a Period of 20 Years (1990 2010).
RAINFALL (mm)
STN
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
1990
1.8
0
1991 Trace 42.3
1992
0
0
1993
0 17.2
1994 23.6
0
1995 64.1 60.2
1996
1.1 22.3
1997
1.6
0
1998
0.2 24.6
1999 27.9 12.9
2000
36
0.2
2001
0.1
0.2
2002 22.8 22.7
2003
6.8 40.1
2004 23.6
3.8
2005
0
0
2006 10.6 Tr
2007
0
5
2008
0
5
2009 112.2
0.7
0
64
13.5
9
17.2
118
79
114.2
30.4
52.2
155.2
40.1
79.2
136.1
225.3
22
101.7
34.7
75.7
50.6
266.6
186.3
99.7
94.7
175.6
112.4
103.1
305.7
170.5
98.6
91.6
236.9
220.7
161.2
415.2
42.9
200.3
71.7
331.5
121.1
131.9
216.4
266
84.6
285.4
249.3
281.3
300.1
344.3
320.9
167.5
188
258.6
200.9
257.9
90.5
326.2
301.4
279.4
233.1
268.5
286.4
311.3
234.3
215.2
382.7
236.8
216.7
291.5
186.2
313.5
267.8
251.9
425.4
384.1
209.8
331.8
355.2
197.4
248.5
449.3
290.5
475.6
325.7
326.1
429.4
171.9
214.5
362.7
279.9
201.2
225.3
330.9
212.5
223.8
132.4
98.7
311.5
216
386.5
314.9
390.4
200.4
364.1
256
347.2
352.4
188.5
91.2
255.6
367.7
272.8
242.1
383.3
339.5
112.7
94.5
312.7
513.8
213.3
312.8
341.1
280.2
311.9
348.5
295.4
317.6
247.3
360.6
347
164.9
177.2
316.4
249.5
170.8
159.4
333
322.7
306
249.4
179.3
243.1
101.9
166.3
377.7
362.5
256.3
252.7
407.1
353.9
164.9
146.3
32
28.1
37.9
91.6
406.7
127.7
376
October 2012
NOV
DEC
32 52.5
6 16.9
56.3
0
37.5 8.9
56.4
0
49 0.3
4.9
0
45.9 19.8
0.5 2.6
53
0
8.7 3.4
1.5
0
0
0
1.3
0
6
0
0
0
6.8
0
2.4
3.8
0
96.3
0
Onitsha
2010
0.2
66.8
43.2
APPENDIX 1C
The Regional Relative Humidity Data of the Study Area.
RELATIVE HUMIDITY @ 09 HOURS (%)
STN
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
77
70
52
52
66
59
80
73
53
74
73
69
66
78
66
71
56
72
52
64
83
68
81
61
70
74
71
77
54
68
80
54
63
79
77
70
66
77
69
55
71
73
69
80
77
70
76
79
78
75
69
78
73
73
79
79
81
70
79
75
75
76
79
78
81
79
79
78
78
79
84
79
78
76
78
82
80
84
81
78
80
78
81
83
81
81
81
78
81
83
80
83
81
81
80
83
84
85
85
84
82
83
80
84
84
85
84
85
84
83
86
83
85
84
84
86
84
86
85
85
85
86
85
85
85
86
91
89
88
88
88
87
87
85
86
86
87
87
89
87
90
85
89
88
85
88
88
88
89
89
88
90
89
89
88
86
86
89
91
86
88
87
90
86
88
91
87
89
88
88
86
86
87
84
86
87
86
86
85
87
86
82
84
87
85
86
84
86
87
86
83
82
82
84
83
83
83
83
85
85
83
80
80
80
84
83
86
85
85
85
82
80
72
80
75
75
73
82
78
81
80
79
63
69
78
80
81
75
78
83
82
82
66
69
70
49
74
80
74
71
70
66
78
75
77
78
78
78
77
78
70
61
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
49
39
33
31
45
34
34
51
27
40
38
41
30
54
50
48
49
56
56
63
58
57
59
58
64
69
63
68
67
66
70
71
73
69
68
71
80
74
77
75
76
78
77
78
78
78
82
74
73
71
71
69
75
70
67
68
66
65
72
70
61
55
50
62
48
48
61
42
40
43
29
30
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
October 2012
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
49
47
32
48
46
35
39
47
38
45
36
33
36
45
34
48
22
38
55
27
31
54
50
40
38
49
27
30
38
41
56
52
41
54
40
50
60
58
59
40
56
50
55
49
56
61
64
57
57
56
58
64
62
68
59
58
58
62
59
58
64
65
64
61
62
68
70
70
69
68
63
63
65
67
66
68
71
66
67
66
69
74
71
76
69
67
73
74
68
71
73
73
76
74
74
71
77
75
79
76
77
77
74
76
78
73
74
71
71
75
79
71
76
72
79
72
78
78
82
74
75
69
73
75
72
72
73
65
66
72
70
71
74
75
70
67
69
67
71
69
65
58
59
60
66
66
66
69
72
70
42
62
53
60
56
54
37
43
49
60
52
50
59
48
48
47
48
43
39
39
48
40
43
29
49
52
40
43
29
30
APPENDIX 1D
20 Years Regional Maximum and Minimum Temperature Data obtained from NIMET.
TMIN
STN
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
24.9
23.4
21.2
22
22.4
21.3
24.8
24.3
22.4
23.5
24
24.4
25.2
24
23.9
24.5
23.9
25.5
23.1
26.6
25.5
23.6
26.2
25.3
25.1
24.2
24.9
24
24.9
24.9
26.4
25
25.2
24.9
24
24.9
24.2
23.9
23.9
24.4
23.6
25.9
24.8
24.8
24.1
24.3
24.2
24.5
23.5
23.2
24
23.5
25.2
23.8
24.4
23.1
23.9
23
23.6
23.2
23
23.8
23.6
23.9
24
22.7
23
23.3
22.9
23.2
23.2
22.8
23
23.3
23.8
23.5
23.3
23
23.1
22.8
23
23.1
23
22.7
23.4
23.5
23.3
22.9
23
23.2
23
23.2
23.4
23
23.1
23.4
23.8
23.2
23.3
23.4
23.1
23.4
23.2
23.2
22.7
23.4
23.7
24
23.2
23.4
24.6
24.6
22.8
24.2
23.5
22.4
23.7
24.6
25.3
24.3
24.9
24.2
22.4
22.5
22
19.8
23.5
25.2
23.8
23.7
23.3
22.5
October 2012
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
22.9
24.3
26
25.1
24.8
25.6
25.8
26.3
25
24.9
25
24.7
24.5
23.7
24.5
23.8
23.8
23.4
23.4
23.4
23.5
23.6
23.3
23.1
23.5
23.3
23.8
23.2
22.9
23.1
23.4
23.1
23.2
23.5
24.2
23.8
24
24.7
23.1
24.2
25.1
23.5
24.6
24.5
25.4
23.8
21.8
22.5
22.0
26.1
25.5
25.5
24.4
24.2
23.6
23.3
23.9
23.7
25.1
22.9
22.4
21.3
24.8
24.3
22.4
24.5
23.9
25.5
23.1
26.6
24.9
24
24.9
24.9
26.4
23.9
23.9
24.4
23.6
25.9
23.5
23.2
24
23.5
25.2
23.2
23
23.8
23.6
23.9
23.2
22.8
23
23.3
23.8
23.1
23
22.7
23.4
23.5
23.4
23
23.1
23.4
23.8
23.2
22.7
23.4
23.7
24
23.5
22.4
23.7
24.6
25.3
19.8
23.5
25.2
23.8
23.7
TMAX
STN
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
Onitsha
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
33.6
33.5
33.5
34.2
33.2
33.8
34.4
34
35.2
33.4
33.6
34.5
35.8
35.6
35.5
35.4
34.8
36.8
35.6
35.3
35
35.4
36.4
37.1
34
35.4
36.1
34.9
35.6
36.5
37.6
34.6
35
34.4
35.3
34.2
34.3
33.9
36.9
34.4
35.9
35.3
33.8
34.5
33.3
34.6
32.6
34.2
33.8
33.4
34.3
33.6
32
35.3
33.6
33.7
33.8
32.5
33.1
31.5
32.5
31.8
32.7
32.9
32.1
32.1
32.7
32.2
33.5
32.5
32.4
32.1
31.3
30.8
30.7
30.8
31.4
30.1
31
31.3
31
31.2
30.6
32
31.3
30.9
31.1
30.4
30.5
29.7
28.5
29.5
29.3
29.2
29.3
29.8
29.3
29.5
30
29.9
29.6
29.7
29.1
29.6
28.7
29.3
28.7
28.1
29.1
28.8
30
29.1
29.5
29.7
29.8
28.7
28.2
30.2
29.9
30.4
30.1
30.2
30
30.2
30.1
31
29.7
30.8
30.4
29.4
30.1
30.1
30.9
32.1
31.5
30.9
30.4
31.5
31.4
30.8
30.7
30.5
31.6
31.8
29.9
30.5
31.7
33
33.1
32.4
32.3
32.7
32.8
32.3
33.5
33.6
34.1
32.8
34.1
32.3
33.3
33.6
35
33.9
33.9
32.3
32.8
34
33
34.3
33.9
34
33.3
34
33.7
33.9
34.5
33.5
34.1
34
33.3
35.1
34.4
34.7
32.5
31.3
29.3
29.5
30.7
31.0
33.6
33.7
33.4
33.6
33.5
33.4
35.6
34
35.4
36.9
34
35.6
34.4
35.9
35
34.4
34.5
33.6
33.7
33.3
33.6
33.1
32.5
32.4
32.1
32.5
30.8
31.3
30.9
31.2
31.3
30.5
29.9
29.6
30.3
29.9
29.6
29.8
28.7
30
29.8
29.9
29.4
30.1
30.9
29.4
32.1
29.9
30.5
31.2
29.9
33.1
32.3
33.3
33.9
32.3
33.9
33.7
33.9
32.2
33.7
34.1
October 2012
APPENDIX 2
CHANCE FIND PROCEDURES
Though the area is not expected to harbor any item of archeological importance or a set
of antiquities buried in the ancient times, CPGL has put together a response procedure
in case of a Chance Find. World Bank OP 4.11 defines Physical Cultural Resources as
movable or immovable objects, sites, structures, groups of structures, and natural
features
and
landscapes
that
have
archaeological,
paleontological,
historical,
b)
c)
Secure the site to prevent any damage or loss of removable objects. In cases of
removable antiquities or sensitive remains, a night guard shall be present until the
responsible local authorities or equivalent takes over.
d)
Notify the supervisory Engineer who in turn will notify the responsible local
authorities and the National Bureau of Antiquities immediately (within 24 hours
or less)
e)
f)
October 2012
g)
h)
Construction work could resume only after permission is giving from the
responsible local authorities and National Bureau of Antiquities concerning
safeguard of the heritage.
These procedures must form part of standard provisions in the construction contract,
where applicable. The site engineer owes it as a duty to ensure the application of the
above procedure to the treatment of any Chance Find.
October 2012
Date : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
SECTION A: SETTLEMENT AND CHARACTERISTICS
2. LGA: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....Town: . . . . . . . . . . ......Village : . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Ward: . . . . . . . . . . . Constituency: . . . . . . . . Distance from Site: . . . . . .. . . . . .....
4. Date of Initial Settlement: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Origin of Inhabitants (i.e.Ancestorial linkages): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
.
6. Reasons for Migration : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...........................................................................
7. Estimated Population of Settlement: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Major Occupation of Inhabitants:
Occupation
Fishing
Proportion
Farming
Occupation
Services (Artisans)
Proportion
Forestry
Hunting
Company Works
Civil Service
9.
S/N
Unemployed
Location/LGA
Population
2 Main Occupations
October 2012
Company
Year
Ownership
Name
Established Structure
Nature of Activities
%age if
Staff
Indigenes
Capacity
Employed
12.
Number
October 2012
14.
Banking, Insurance and other financial Institutions in the Community, names
and ownership
Year
Ownership
Current
Institution
Nature of Activities
Remark
Provided
Structure
Status
15.
Income
Services (Artisans)
Company Works
Civil Service
Unemployed
16.
Nearest Markets
Name /
Year
Marketing Duration
Location Established
Articles sold by
Inhabitants
Articles Bought
by Inhabitants
SECTION C: HEALTH
17.
S/N
Remedial
Action
18.
Remark
October 2012
19.
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
......
20.
21.
Remark
22.
Source of Energy/Electricity in the Community (Year Provided, Ownership
Structure and Current Status)
23.
( )
Generators ( ) Radio ( )
Motorcycles
TV Sets (
24.
Media
Town Criers
October 2012
%age
Radio
TV Set
Churches/Mosques
Others (Spiritual)
25.
Rampant Criminal activities around and number of cases
Criminal
1970 - 19801990 200
Perceived
Activity
80
90
2000
2005
Cause(s)
Community
Hall
Remedial
Action(s)
26.
27.
S/N
28.
Had any of the cultural heritages been disturbed in recent times by operations
(especially industry)? If yes, give details and the remedial actions taken
29.
S/N
30. What are your perceived positive impacts of the CPGL IPP project in the area?
(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... (b).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31. What are your perceived negative impacts of the CPGL IPP project in the area?
(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... (b).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
October 2012
32. Suggestions on how to abate the perceived impacts of the proposed project
activities
............................................................................
............................................................... ...........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
..........................................................................
34. Free comments on the activities and impacts of neighbours and electricity projects in
the area.
............................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
35. Community requirements from the proponent for a sustainable implementation of
the IPP project
............................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
36. Promises by the community to the proponent for a sustainable implementation of
the IPP project
............................................................................
..........................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37. Any other information on the project and similar ones in the community
October 2012
............................................................................
..........................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
October 2012
Female ( )
5.
6.
Sex: Male( )
Female( )
Age of Respondent: ------------------- Years
Marital Status: (a) Single( ) (b) Married( ) (c) Widow/ Widower( ) (d)
Divorcee( )
Educational Status: (a) No formal education( ) (b) Less than Primary ( ) (c)
Primary School ( ) (d) School Secondary( ) (e) Quranic School( )
(f)
Others ( ) (specify-------------------------------------- )
How long have you stayed in this Village? -------------------------years
If not since birth, from where did you emigrate? --------------------------------
7.
8.
9.
4.
13.
5-15 yrs
16-25 yrs
> 25 yrs
Male
Female
14.
Secondary
Tertiary
Male
Female
15.
16.
(c) Tertiary -----------------------------------If married, tick the three main occupations of spouse (a) Primary ----------(b) Secondary -------------------------------- (c) Tertiary ----------------------------
October 2012
17.
If you are engaged in any other occupation previously, what was the occupation?
-------------------------------------
18.
19.
20.
Number of Sheeps (
21.
) Goats(
Lorries ( )
Houses(
Canoes(
22
Cars(
(b) Children(
%)
Mother (
%)
Others (
%)
23.
Free comments on the observed impacts of the IPP projects in this area and how
to ameliorate them.
October 2012
APPENDIX 5
STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGEMENT PLAN (SEP)
STAKEHOLDER
ENGAGEMENT
ENGAGEMENT
ACTIVITY
STAKEHOLDERS
TIMING
STAGE 1: SCOPING
Government
Agencies Federal,
State and local
Authorities
regulatory
Authorities
Federal Ministry of
and local
Government officials
October
2011
continuous engagement
Employment opportunities
Improvement in Electricity
Supply
Federal Ministry of
Environment
Anambra State
Ministry of
Environment
October
2011
community
Composition of traditional
November
council.
2011
Employment
opportunities.
Meeting with
Ihiala LGA
Local Government
officials
Employment opportunity
for local people and
provision of electricity
STAKEHOLDER
ENGAGEMENT
ENGAGEMENT
ACTIVITY
STAKEHOLDERS
CSR is general.
SPECIAL
AREAS
DISCUSSION
TIMING
Community
Engagement,
engagement with
of Okija
The Obi of
The youths
January
the project
2012
Discussion of
community concern
Uhuowele Okija
traditional
Formal presentation of
leaders,
Discussion on CPGL
workers integration into
the community
Engagement with
NGO
Conservation Foundation
NGO Representatives
General discussion on
the
project
as
concerns
June 2012
it
NGF
activities
STAKEHOLDER
ENGAGEMENT
ENGAGEMENT
ACTIVITY
STAKEHOLDERS
SPECIAL
DISCUSSION
AREAS
TIMING
STAGE 3: DISCLOSURE
Engagement with
FMEnv officials,
Community
Engagement,
engagement with
local groups, and
traditional
leaders.
Federal Ministry
Disclosure timetable
May/ June
of Environment
Display Timetable
2012
Traditional
Printing Media
Rulers.
Advertisement.
Electronic Media
Advertisement
Panel review
Timetable.
Community
Engagement.
Panel Review
EIA Public
Presentation by
CPGL
EIA Evaluation
Report by the
experts
Community
questions and
answers
Evaluation by the
regulatory
Authorities.
Traditional
Ruler
Youths
CPGL
representatives
Regulators from
LGAs and State
Government
NGOs
representatives
Community
groups
Federal Ministry
R-2
Invitation to panel
review meeting
Discussion on issues
raised by the
community before
the panel review.
Findings of EIA
study
Mitigation of
Stakeholder and
community concerns
Adequacy of
mitigation measures
against negative
impacts
Adequacy of
Environmental
Management Plan.
Appropriateness of
Environmental
Monitoring
May/ June
2012.
18th 20th
July 2012.
August 2012
of Environment
Officials.
STAKEHOLDER
ENGAGEMENT
ENGAGEMENT
ACTIVITY
STAKEHOLDERS
SPECIAL
Grievance
Mechanism
Discussion on
Marginalised/
Vulnerable groups.
DISCUSSION
AREAS
TIMING
Traditional
Rulers and
Employment of the
locals
Influx of workers into
the community
Community relations
with other workers
Migrant workers
respect for traditional
Institution.
Observance of best
practices during
construction
Every
quarter
during
construction.
Health Impact of
Construction
Activity.
Traffic risks and
mitigation.
Every six
months
during
construction.
Employment of the
Locals
CSR Projects.
Youth
Empowerment.
Women
Empowerment.
Grievances if any
Compliance with all
the standards
2ice a year
Once a year.
Once a year.
community
leaders.
CPGL
representatives.
Construction
Ministry of Environment.
Anambra State
Ministry of
Environment
Regulators from
LGA
Meeting with
Traditional
Institutions
Community
Leaders.
Women Groups.
Youths
Federal Ministry of
Traditional
Rulers
Environment
Federal Ministry
of Environment
NESREA
Anambra State
Ministry of
Environment
Anambra State
Ministry of
Environment
Local
Government
Officials
Health and
Environmental
Officers
Market Operators
Regulators from
LGA
Monitoring
compliance with
environmental
management plan.
Compliance with
market rules and
CPGL performance.
Operation
R-3
Monitoring
Compliance with
NERC transmission
Every six
months
during
construction.
Once a year.
Once every
2 years or
earlier if the
need arises.
August 2012
codes.
System Operator
Monitoring
compliance with
protective systems
reactive power
injection
Transmission
Services Provider
Monitoring
compliance with
standards at PCC.
Special Meeting
with the disabled
and aged.
R-4
August 2012