This document summarizes issues around intersections of homosexuality with race and sex, as well as same-sex marriage and civil unions. It notes that (1) there is no "unitary gay experience" and different groups may have conflicting interests. It also discusses (2) how sexual orientation has come to define gender and discrimination based on sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination. (3) The gay rights movement has become more mainstream but risks distancing itself from its working class roots.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Summary of Gay Rights and Narratives (Page 730-732)
This document summarizes issues around intersections of homosexuality with race and sex, as well as same-sex marriage and civil unions. It notes that (1) there is no "unitary gay experience" and different groups may have conflicting interests. It also discusses (2) how sexual orientation has come to define gender and discrimination based on sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination. (3) The gay rights movement has become more mainstream but risks distancing itself from its working class roots.
This document summarizes issues around intersections of homosexuality with race and sex, as well as same-sex marriage and civil unions. It notes that (1) there is no "unitary gay experience" and different groups may have conflicting interests. It also discusses (2) how sexual orientation has come to define gender and discrimination based on sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination. (3) The gay rights movement has become more mainstream but risks distancing itself from its working class roots.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views1 page
Summary of Gay Rights and Narratives (Page 730-732)
This document summarizes issues around intersections of homosexuality with race and sex, as well as same-sex marriage and civil unions. It notes that (1) there is no "unitary gay experience" and different groups may have conflicting interests. It also discusses (2) how sexual orientation has come to define gender and discrimination based on sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination. (3) The gay rights movement has become more mainstream but risks distancing itself from its working class roots.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Gay Rights and Narratives (pgs.
730-732) Prepared by Joshua Lee
Intersections of Homosexuality with Race and Sex
I. Issues with “Coalition Building” a. The term homosexual is associated with a “white gay man” b. Different groups may not fit into this mold and there may be conflicting interests c. Too often times, even gay legal advocates assume that a “unitary gay experience” exists II. Sexual Orientation and Sex a. Professor Valdes argues that society has come to use sexual orientation to define gender b. Discrimination based on sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination: Society constructs how people of different sexes should behave and homosexuality is viewed as aberration from the norm c. Lesbians are in a unique class because they are homosexual, but the gay movement doesn’t totally represent them. They are also feminists, but neither group fully represents their interests. III. The Movement and Social Class a. The early gay rights movement was driven by working class individuals b. The movement has now become more mainstream and distancing itself from its roots
Same Sex-Marriage and Civil Unions
I. A Brief History (as of publication of the book) a. Hawaii started the gay marriage debate in 1993 in a state supreme court ruling that the law defining marriage as between a man and woman violated equal protection b. The Federal Defense of Marriage Act was passed in 1996 providing Federal recognition of only heterosexual marriage and that that states need no recognize homosexual marriages from other states c. 1999 Vermont’s supreme court ruled it unconstitutional for homosexual couples to be denied benefits of marriage and a result, civil unions were recognized II. Arguments for and against a. Against gay marriage: heterosexual unions benefits society in innumerable ways b. For gay marriage: marriage is a right vital to equality i. Civil unions without the label of marriage are similar to “separate but equal” treatment of blacks c. Limitations of marriage as a vehicle for equality i. Extending marriage to gays would seem to benefit primarily white and upper- class gay males