Scribd
Upload
404 views1 page

AWT Vs SWING PDF

AWT (Abstract Window Toolkit) components are heavyweight and platform-dependent, relying on native OS components. Swing components are lightweight, platform-independent, and built entirely in Java. Swing has richer functionality than AWT, including advanced features like JTables and tabbed panes, as well as support for different look and feels. While AWT requires implementing more functionality manually, Swing has many built-in components and only requires one peer (the window object) rather than individual peers for each control.

Uploaded by

Som Krishna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
404 views1 page

AWT Vs SWING PDF

AWT (Abstract Window Toolkit) components are heavyweight and platform-dependent, relying on native OS components. Swing components are lightweight, platform-independent, and built entirely in Java. Swing has richer functionality than AWT, including advanced features like JTables and tabbed panes, as well as support for different look and feels. While AWT requires implementing more functionality manually, Swing has many built-in components and only requires one peer (the window object) rather than individual peers for each control.

Uploaded by

Som Krishna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Diff between AWT and SWING

AWT

Swing

AWT components are called Heavyweight


component.

Swings are called light weight component because


swing components sits on the top of AWT components
and do the work.

AWT components are platform dependent.

Swing components are made in purely java and they


are platform independent.

AWT components require java.awt package.

Swing components require javax.swing package.

AWT is a thin layer of code on top of the OS.

Swing is much larger. Swing also has very much richer


functionality.

AWT stands for Abstract windows toolkit.

Swing is also called as JFCs (Java Foundation


classes).

These feature is not available in AWT.

Swing has many advanced features like JTabel,


Jtabbed pane which is not available in AWT. Also.
Swing components are called "lightweight" because
they do not require a native OS object to implement
their functionality. JDialog and JFrame are
heavyweight, because they do have a peer. So
components like JButton, JTextArea, etc., are
lightweight because they do not have an OS peer.

This feature is not supported in AWT.

We can have different look and feel in Swing.

Using AWT, you have to implement a lot of things


yourself.

Swing has them built in.

With AWT, you have 21 "peers" (one for each control


and one for the dialog itself). A "peer" is a widget
provided by the operating system, such as a button
object or an entry field object.

With Swing, you would have only one peer, the


operating system's window object. All of the buttons,
entry fields, etc. are drawn by the Swing package on
the drawing surface provided by the window object.
This is the reason that Swing has more code. It has to
draw the button or other control and implement its
behavior instead of relying on the host operating
system to perform those functions.

You might also like