Paul & Elder-Critical Thinking

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY
The Miniature Guide

to
Critical Thinking
C oncepts
and
T ools
By Dr. Richard Paul

and
Dr. Linda Elder
The Foundation for Critical Thinking

www.criticalthinking.org
707-878-9100
[email protected]

Why A Critical Thinking Mini-Guide?
This miniature guide focuses on of the essence of critical thinking concepts and
tools distilled into pocket size. For faculty it provides a shared concept of critical
thinking. For students it is a critical thinking supplement to any textbook for any
course. Faculty can use it to design instruction, assignments, and tests in any subject.
Students can use it to improve their learning in any content area.
Its generic skills apply to all subjects. For example, critical thinkers are clear as to the
purpose at hand and the question at issue. They question information, conclusions,
and points of view. They strive to be clear, accurate, precise, and relevant. They seek
to think beneath the surface, to be logical, and fair. They apply these skills to their
reading and writing as well as to their speaking and listening. They apply them in
history, science, math, philosophy, and the arts; in
professional and personal life.
When this guide is used as a supplement to the textbook in multiple courses,
students begin to perceive the usefulness of critical thinking in every domain of
learning. And if their instructors provide examples of the application of the subject
to daily life, students begin to see that education is a tool for improving the quality
of their lives.
If you are a student using this mini-guide, get in the habit of carrying it with
you to every class. Consult it frequently in analyzing and synthesizing what you are
learning. Aim for deep internalization of the principles you find in ituntil using
them becomes second nature.
If successful, this guide will serve faculty, students, and the educational program
simultaneously.

Richard Paul
Center for Critical Thinking
Linda Elder
Foundation for Critical Thinking

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools
Contents
Why Critical Thinking? 4
The Elements of Thought 5
A Checklist for Reasoning 6
Questions Using the Elements of Thought 8
The Problem of Egocentric Thinking 9
Universal Intellectual Standards10
Template for Analyzing the Logic of Articles and Textbooks13
Criteria for Evaluating Reasoning14
Essential Intellectual Traits 15
Three Kinds of Questions 18
A Template for Problem-Solving19
Analyzing and Assessing Research 20
What Critical Thinkers Routinely Do 21
Stages of Critical Thinking Development 22
Fourth Edition 2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

Why Critical Thinking?

The Problem:
Everyone thinks; it is our nature to do so. But much of our thinking, left to
itself, is biased, distorted, partial, uninformed or down-right prejudiced. Yet
the quality of our life and that of what we produce, make, or build depends
precisely on the quality of our thought. Shoddy thinking is costly, both in
money and in quality of life. Excellence in thought, however, must be systematically cultivated.
A Definition:
Critical thinking is the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking with a view to
improving it.
The Result:
A well cultivated critical thinker:
raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely;
gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it
effectively;
comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against
relevant criteria and standards;
thinks openmindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing
and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical
consequences; and
communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex
problems.
Critical thinking is, in short, self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored,
and self-corrective thinking. It requires rigorous standards of excellence
and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and
problem solving abilities and a commitment to overcome our native egocentrism and sociocentrism.
2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

The Elements of Thought
Point of View
frame of reference,
perspective,
orientation
Purpose
goal,
objective
Question at issue
Implications and
Consequences
problem, issue
Assumptions
Information
presupposition,
taking for granted
Concepts
data, facts,
observations,
experiences
theories,
Interpretation
definitions, axioms,
and inference
laws, principles,
conclusions,
models
solutions
Used With Sensitivity to Universal Intellectual Standards

Clarity Accuracy Depth Breadth Significance
Precision
Relevance

12
Clarity
Could you elaborate further?

Could you give me an example?
Could you illustrate what you mean?
Accuracy
How could we check on that?

How could we find out if that is true?
How could we verify or test that?
Precision
Could you be more specific?

Could you give me more details?
Could you be more exact?
Relevance
How does that relate to the problem?

How does that bear on the question?
How does that help us with the issue?
Depth
What factors make this a difficult problem?

What are some of the complexities of this question?
What are some of the difficulties we need to deal with?
Breadth
Do we need to look at this from another perspective?

Do we need to consider another point of view?
Do we need to look at this in other ways?
Logic
Significance
Fairness
Does all this make sense together?

Does your first paragraph fit in with your last?
Does what you say follow from the evidence?
Is this the most important problem to consider?
Is this the central idea to focus on?
Which of these facts are most important?
Do I have any vested interest in this issue?
Am I sympathetically representing the viewpoints
ofothers?

15
Intellectual
Integrity
Intellectual
Autonomy
Intellectual
Empathy
Intellectual
Humility
Intellectual
Traits or Virtues
Confidence
in Reason
Intellectual
Perseverance
Intellectual
Courage
Fairmindedness

21
Critical thinkers routinely apply the intellectual standards to the

elements of reasoning in order to develop intellectual traits.
T h e S ta n da r d s
Clarity
Accuracy
Relevance
Logicalness
Breadth
Precision
Significance
Completeness
Fairness
Depth
Must be
applied to
T h e E l e m e n ts
As we learn
to develop
Purposes
Questions
Points of view
Information
Inferences
Concepts
Implications
Assumptions
I n t e l l e c t ua l T r a its
Intellectual Humility
Intellectual Perseverance
Intellectual Autonomy Confidence in Reason
Intellectual Integrity
Intellectual Empathy
Intellectual Courage
Fairmindedness

Paul & Elder-Critical Thinking

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Paul & Elder-Critical Thinking

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Paul & Elder-Critical Thinking

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY

The Miniature Guide

By Dr. Richard Paul

The Foundation for Critical Thinking

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools

Why Critical Thinking?

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools

The Elements of Thought

Used With Sensitivity to Universal Intellectual Standards

2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools

Could you elaborate further?

How could we check on that?

Could you be more specific?

How does that relate to the problem?

What factors make this a difficult problem?

Do we need to look at this from another perspective?

Does all this make sense together?

2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools

2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

LIMITED DOWNLOAD COPY

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools

Critical thinkers routinely apply the intellectual standards to the

2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

You might also like

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools

2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

Could you elaborate further?

How could we check on that?

Could you be more specific?

How does that relate to the problem?

What factors make this a difficult problem?

Do we need to look at this from another perspective?

Does all this make sense together?

2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools

2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking

The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools

2006 Foundation for Critical Thinking