ch12
ch12
Chapter 12
12.12 Describe the procedure you would follow to determine whether a defect in a
casting is a shrinkage cavity or a porosity caused by gases.
Evidence of which type of porosity is present (gas or shrinkage) can be gained by studying
the location and shape of the cavity. If the porosity is near the mold surface, core surface,
or chaplet surface, it is most likely to be gas porosity because the air bubbles rise to the
surface due to buoyancy, whereas large shrinkage pores are more likely in the castings bulk.
However, if the porosity occurs in an area considered to be a hot spot in the casting, it is
most likely shrinkage porosity. Furthermore, gas porosity generally has smooth surfaces and
is often, though not always, spherical in shape (inspect, for example, the holes in Swiss cheese
and observe how shiny they are). Shrinkage porosity has a more textured and jagged surface
and is generally irregular in shape.
12.13 Explain how you would go about avoiding hot tearing.
Hot tearing can be avoided by two methods: (a) change the mold design to decrease the
tensile stress that arises upon contraction during solidification, and/or (b) change the mold
composition, such that the mold and cores are collapsible under the resulting pressure on
them during shrinkage.
12.14 Describe your observation concerning the design changes shown in Fig. 12.1.
Several observations can be made regarding this figure. Figure 12.1a is further emphasized in
Fig. 12.2 on p. 326, and shows that hot spots can develop where the section thickness changes
abruptly or where corners exist. Figure 12.2b shows how deep cavities should be located on
one side of the casting to greatly simplify pattern design as well as removal of the pattern
123
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
124
from the sand mold. Due to large temperature gradients (which may form along flat surfaces
during cooling) warping may occur. The design of a mold with ribs and serrations shown in
Fig. 12.1d can reduce this effect and result in a more sound (not warped) casting. Ribs may
be used, for example, on steel flanges at the recessed portion in order to avoid warping of
both surfaces with which it is in contact.
12.15 If you need only a few castings of the same design, which three processes would
be the most expensive per piece cast?
Die casting, shell-mold casting, and centrifugal casting would be the three most expensive
processes per piece because these processes involve high equipment costs and a high degree
of automation. Both of these factors require large production runs to justify their high cost.
The high tooling cost can be mitigated somewhat by rapid tooling technologies, as discussed
in Section 20.5 on p. 594. As an interesting comparison, refer to the answer to Problem 11.17
for a discussion regarding the most cost-effective means of producing only a few cast parts.
12.16 Do you generally agree with the cost ratings in Table 12.6? If so, why?
The cost ratings given in Table 12.6 on p. 337 are based on initial investment (die and
equipment) and the labor required to run the processes. The labor cost depends on the
extent of process automation. Thus, die casting has a low labor cost (highly automated) and
investment casting has a high labor cost (little automation).
12.17 Add more examples to those shown in Fig. 12.2.
By the student. A wide variety of potential examples can be presented. The main consideration is maintaining a uniform section thickness and eliminating corners in order to avoid hot
spots. Students should be encouraged to sketch designs that involve varying cross-sections,
but also to place chills as an alternative to modifying the shape of the casting. Some examples
of these rules are shown in Fig. 12.1c and 12.1e. Some additional designs that attempt to
maintain section thickness are shown below:
Undesirable
Desirable
12.18 Explain how ribs and serrations are helpful in casting flat surfaces that otherwise
may warp. Give a specific illustration.
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
125
Due to large temperature gradients which may develop along flat surfaces during cooling,
warping may be a problem. The design of a mold with ribs and serrations can reduce this
effect and result in a more sound (unwarped) casting because these increase the stiffness of
the casting and reduce the strain associated with a residual stress. Ribs may be used, for
example, on steel flanges at the recessed portion in order to avoid warping of both surfaces
with which it is in contact. An illustration of a situation where a rib is beneficial is given in
Fig. 12.1d on p. 325.
12.19 Describe the nature of the design changes made in Fig. 12.3. What general
principles do you observe in this figure?
Several observations can be made regarding Fig. 12.3 on p. 331, and students are encouraged
to think creatively in analyzing these design features. Some of the observations that can be
made are:
In (a), the poor design would result in a very thin wall next to the counterbore (which
may lead to potential failure), whereas the good design eliminates this thin wall.
In (b), a large flat area may not be acceptable because of casting defects or warpage.
The surface can be made much more aesthetically pleasing by incorporating featuers
such as serrations and stripling.
In (c), a radius makes the part much easier to cast; the likelihood of a large pore near
the corner is reduced and the mold integrity is improved. Furthermore, a sharp inner
corner may create difficulties durign assembly with components that may eb isnerted
into the cavity.
In (d), the poor design is difficult to machine (hence costly) into a die; the good
design is much easier to produce.
In (e), The poor design requires a sharp, knife edge in the die, which could reduce die
life. The good design eliminates the need for a knife edge in the die.
In (f), when casting threaded inserts in place, it is good practice to have a length of
shank exposed before the threaded section so that the cast metal does not compormise
the threads and interfere with their function.
12.20 Note in Fig. 12.4 that the ductility of some cast alloys is very low. Do you
think this should be a significant concern in engineering applications of castings?
Explain.
The low ductility of some cast alloys shown in Fig. 12.4 on p. 333 should certainly be taken
into consideration in engineering applications of the casting. Low ductility will adversely
affect properties such as toughness (since the area under the stress-strain curve will be much
smaller) and fatigue life. This is particularly significant in applications where the casting is
subjected to impact forces.
12.21 Do you think there will be fewer defects in a casting made by gravity pouring
versus one made by pouring under pressure? Explain.
When an external pressure is applied, defects such as gas porosity, poor surface finish, and
surface porosity are reduced or eliminated. Since gravity pouring does not exert as much
pressure as pouring under pressure, gravity pouring generally will produce more defects.
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
126
12.22 Explain the difference in the importance of drafts in green-sand casting versus
permanent-mold casting.
Draft is provided in a mold to allow the removal of the pattern from the mold without
damaging the mold (see, for example, Fig. 11.5 on p. 292). If the mold material is sand and
the pattern has no draft (taper), the mold cavity can be damaged upon pattern removal due
to the low strength of the sand mold. However, a die made of high-strength steel, which is
typical for permanent-mold casting, is not likely to be damaged during the removal of the
part; thus smaller draft angles can be employed.
12.23 What type of cast iron would be suitable for heavy-machine bases, such as presses
and machine tools? Why?
Because of its relatively high strength and excellent castability (which generally means low
cost), a pearlitic gray cast iron would probably be most suitable for this application. Note
that, as no significant ductility is required for this application, the low ductility of gray irons
is of little consequence. An important further advantage is the damping capacity of these
cast irons, especially for machine tools (see Section 25.4 on p. 770).
12.24 Explain the advantages and limitations of sharp and rounded fillets, respectively,
in casting design.
Sharp corners and fillets should be avoided in casting design because of their tendency to
cause cracking and tearing of the casting during solidification. Fillet radii should be large
enough to avoid stress concentrations and yet small enough to avoid a low rate of cooling and
hot spots that can cause shrinkage cavities in the casting.
12.25 Explain why the elastic modulus, E, of gray cast iron varies so widely, as shown
in Table 12.4.
Because the shape, size, and distribution of the second phase, i.e., the graphite flakes, vary
greatly for gray cast irons, there is a large corresponding variation of properties attainable.
The elastic modulus is one property which is affected by this factor.
12.26 Why are risers not as useful in die casting as compared to sand casting?
The main reasons are the size of typical cast parts and the solidification times involved. Die
cast parts generally have smaller sections than sand cast parts; a riser used in die casting will
not provide molten metal to the casting because the thin sections solidify and block the flow
of molten metal to the remainder of the mold. The solidification rates are important as well;
to provide molten metal to the cast shape, the flow rates have to be very high because the
casting solidifies so rapidly. Thus, even if a riser is provided in a die casting, the pressure is
insufficient to get molten metal to flow where it is needed.
12.27 Describe the drawbacks to having a riser that is (a) too large and (b) too small.
The main drawbacks to having too large of a riser are:
(a) The material in the riser is eventually scrapped and recycled, representing a material
loss;
(b) the riser has to be removed, and a larger riser will cost more to machine;
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
127
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
128
Heavy parts are placed in the drag (see Fig. 11.3 on p. 290) so that the buoyancy force on the
cope is reduced. If the buoyancy force becomes high enough, the cope can separate from the
drag, resulting in excessive flash in the casting. This requires expensive removal operations
such as machining or cropping (see Fig. 14.8 on p. 378 for a similar example).
QUANTITATIVE PROBLEMS
12.32 When designing patterns for casting, patternmakers use special rulers that automatically incorporate solid shrinkage allowances into their designs. For example, a 12-in. patternmakers ruler is longer than one foot. How long should a
patternmakers ruler be for making patterns for (a) aluminum castings and (b)
high-manganese steel?
Referring to Table 12.1 on p. 326, we note that the shrinkage allowance for the two metals
are: (a) aluminum alloy = 1.3% and (b) high-manganese steel = 2.6%. From the formula
below,
Lf = Lo (1 + shrinkage)
we find that for aluminum we have
Lf = (12.000)(1.013) = 12.156 in.
and for high-manganese steel
Lf = (12.000)(1.026) = 12.312 in.
12.33 Using the data given in Table 12.2, develop approximate plots of (a) castability
versus weldability and (b) castability versus machinability for at least five of the
materials listed in the table.
The plots are as follows:
Castability
Good
Gray Iron
Excellent
Aluminum
Ductile Iron
Magnesium
Copper
Fair
Nickel
Steel
Very Poor
Castability
Excellent
Good
Gray
Iron
Aluminum
Ductile Magnesium
Iron
Copper
Fair
Steel,
Nickel
Very Poor
Difficult
Difficult Very Poor Fair
Good Excellent
Weldability
Difficult
Difficult Very Poor Fair
Good Excellent
Machinability
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
129
12.34 List casting processes that are suitable for making hollow parts with (a) complex external features, (b) complex internal features, and (c) both external and
internal features. Explain your choices.
By the student. The answers depend on the size of the part under consideration and the
materials used. Students should be encouraged to develop solutions based on their experience
and training. Although complex features are always difficult to cast, sometimes they can be
accomodated. For example, for complex external features:
Within limits, a pattern plate can create intricate patterns in a sand mold, so sand
casting could be suitable.
Investment casting can utilize any pattern that allows metal to flow into and fill the
cavity; these can be rapid prototyped or carved by hand, and can have very intricate
external features.
Shell molding has similar capabilities as sand casting with respect to external features.
Die casting can produce complex features as long as they do not interfere with ejection
of parts from the dies.
Internal features are more difficult to produce; however, the following are possible:
In sand casting, a core with complex features can be used when necessary.
In investment casting, internal features can be produced as long as they can be reproduced on the pattern.
When both are featuers are required, sand or investment casting may be suitable.
12.35 Small amounts of slag and dross often persist after skimming and are introduced
into the molten metal flow in casting. Recognizing that slag and dross are less
dense than the molten metal, design mold features that will remove small amounts
of slag before the metal reaches the mold cavity.
There are several trap designs in use in foundries. An excellent discussion of dross trap
design is given in J. Campbell, Castings, 1991, Reed Educational Publishers, pp. 53-55. A
conventional and effective dross trap is the following design:
The design is based on the principle that a trap at the end of a runner will capture the first
material through the runner and keep it away from the gates. The design shown above is a
wedge-type trap. Metal entering the runner contacts the wedge, and the leading front of the
metal wave is chilled and attaches itself to the runner wall, and thus it is kept out of the mold
cavity. The wedge must be designed to avoid reflected waves that would recirculate the dross
or slag.
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
130
The following design is a swirl trap, which is based on the principle that the dross or slag
is less dense than the metal. The metal enters the trap off of the center, inducing a swirl in
the molten metal as the trap is filled with molten metal. Since it is much less dense than the
metal, the dross or slag remains in the center of the swirl trap. Since the metal is tapped
from the outside periphery, dross or slag is excluded from entering the casting.
Top view
Side view
Molten
metal
Swirl
chamber
Inlet
Outlet
Dross
Outlet
Inlet
12.36 For the cast metal wheel illustrated in Figure P12.36, show how (a) riser placement, (b) core placement, (c) padding, and (d) chills may be used to help feed
molten metal and eliminate porosity in the isolated hub boss.
Rim
Hub boss
(a) Riser
(c) Pads
(b) Core
(d) Chills
12.37 Assume that the introduction to this chapter is missing. Write a brief introduction to highlight the importance of the topics covered in it.
By the student. The most challenging aspect of this problem is to make the introduction
sufficiently brief.
12.38 In Fig. P12.38, the original casting design shown in (a) was modified to the
design shown in (b). The casting is round and has a vertical axis of symmetry.
As a functional part, what advantages do you think the new design has over the
old one?
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
131
(a)
1 in.
(25 mm)
1.5 in.
(38 mm)
(b)
1 in.
(25 mm)
Ribs or brackets
1 in.
(25 mm)
By the student. There are a number of advantages, including the fact that the part thickness
is more uniform, so that large shrinkage porosity is less likely, and the ribs will control
warpage due to thermal stresses as well as increase joint stiffness. This redesign illustrates
the recommendations given in Figs. 12.1 and 12.2 on pp. 325-326.
12.39 An incorrect and a correct design for casting are shown Fig. P12.39. Review the
changes made and comment on their advantages.
(a) incorrect
Outside core
Outside core
(b) correct
By the student. The main advantage of the new part is that it can be easily cast without
using an external core. The original part requires two such cores because the shape is such
that it cannot be obtained in a sand mold without using cores.
12.40 Three sets of designs for die casting are shown in Fig. P12.40. Note the changes
made to die design 1 and comment on the reasons.
2006 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently
exist. No portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
132
(1)
(a)
(2)
Parting line
(b)
(2)
(1)
Parting line
(3)
Parting line
(c)
(1)
(2)
By the student. There are many observations, usually with the intent of minimizing changes
in section thickness, eliminating inclined surfaces to simplify mold construction, and to orient
flanges so that they can be easily cast.