Qualitative Research 10
Qualitative Research 10
1. Objectives
The course explores the development and application of qualitative research designs and
methods in political analysis. The aim is to introduce students to the theory and techniques
of qualitative research through readings, discussion and practical exercises, in order to
reinforce their capacity to design and implement their own research projects. The course
therefore connects with the previous subject Techniques of Statistical Analysis I and aims
to support the Final Research Paper as two of the core courses of the Masters degree.
Moreover, through the more practical issues it provides a useful toolbox for doing qualitative
research on different compulsory courses.
The course begins with an introduction to qualitative research, focusing on the major terms
of the debates about research design and issues of inference and interpretation. It then
covers some issues around conceptualization and looks at a variety of approaches and
techniques for data collection and data analysis. By producing a brief piece of empirical
research, the students have to deal with the knowledge acquired and they can also develop
skills to present, explain and defend the research approach and results.
2. Prerequisites
As the course is based on the development of a qualitative research project, it requires
students to have initial knowledge of how to formulate hypotheses and articulate research
questions connected with the theoretical concerns of political science. Both seminars and
tutorial sessions will help the development of these capacities.
Interpersonal Competences
Critical and self-critical ability
Team work
Interpersonal abilities
Ability to communicate with people that are not experts in the subject
Commitment to ethics
Systemic Competences
Ability to put knowledge into practice
Research abilities
Ability to learn
Ability to adapt to new situations
Ability to generate new ideas (creativity)
Leadership
Design and management of projects
Interest on quality
Result-oriented
The empirical approach of the course will also support the development of specific
competences in the field of political analysis where the research project will be located.
More specifically, the large group will be divided into sub-groups in order to develop brief
pieces of qualitative research in two different areas: public policy evaluation and political
attitudes. This academic year, the sub-fields selected are: local development policies (LDP)
and public policies on immigration (PPI), both at local government level. This means that
several specific competences will be connected with both fields, such as public policy
analysis and policy evaluation.
4. Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Assessment
The course requirements are:
Initial memo about the students interest in the course (length: 250-500 words)
Compulsory initial group assessment (10% of final grade)
This memo is due in the second week of the course. By then the composition of the
group has to be already decided. The memo should outline students substantive
research question on Local Development Policies or Public Policies on Immigration and
explain the preliminary ideas they may have about a research design involving
qualitative methods.
or
selecting
your
documentary
sources,
the
interview
summaries, the field notes (if you have used observation methods) and/or the
list of documents you have analysed (if you have used documentary methods).
Final memo about a critical evaluation of qualitative research methods (around 2-5 pages or
1000-1500 words)
Compulsory final individual assessment (20% of final grade)
The objective of this Individual Assessment is to evaluate your methodological learning
in terms of three different sources: reading, lectures and empirical work (your group
research project). The format of the assessment will be a methodological essay
reviewing the three main aspects of a qualitative inquiry: a) research design, b) data
collection techniques, and c) data analysis techniques.
Review your notes from your reading and lectures and read through your collective
research work in order to assess what you have learned from a methodological point of
view. Are there any similarities between what the literature recommends and what you
did in your research project? Was your research design good enough to produce
relevant findings? Were the results of using the different techniques and research
methods similar to those described in the methodological literature? You must critically
describe the potential and the limits of the qualitative research you have done and state
what you would do better in future.
The final memo will be assessed on the extent to which it makes good use of the course
reading material and discussions and provides clear explanations and arguments
regarding the use of qualitative methods and techniques in the research. A bibliography
should be included.
6. Methodology
Due to its methodological character, the course is based on a balance between conceptual
and empirical approaches. The development of sessions reflects this balance and the
importance of the field research component of the course.
The beginning of the course is designed to ensure a common basis for qualitative research,
dealing with theoretical and conceptual issues. The main large group sessions (lectures)
with compulsory attendance and the more extended required readings are the
methodological basis of this initial part (two weeks). A first assessment based on an initial
memo about students interests aims to consolidate this common knowledge basis.
The following weeks will be used to introduce qualitative methods and techniques and to
initiate the research design to be done by each group (through seminars addressed to LDP
and PPI groups). In order to organize the research activities, students must select one of
the two fields into which the large group will be divided to develop their qualitative research
(local development policies LDP and public policies on immigration PPI). At the same
time, the two groups will be divided into four subgroups of four to five students each. Each
group will receive a simulated order from the local government to develop a piece of
research on the topic (this is the final report to be submitted at the end of the course).
These sessions start the applied block of the course (weeks 2 to 8), which will be
complemented with required readings (readings 2.1 and 2.2) and activities outside the
classroom such as the preparation of the research portfolio (with two partial presentations).
The final part of the course (weeks 9 and 10) will be addressed through lectures and
discussions about how to analyze qualitative data and how to draft and submit the final
research report. Finally, there will be an assessment based on the presentation of research
results, an individual rsum and an evaluation of the qualitative methods and techniques
used in the research. This final stage is designed to critically discuss the potential and the
limits of the qualitative research developed.
Basic bibliography
King, Gary; Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney (1994): Designing Social Inquiry:
Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mason, Jennifer (2002): Qualitative Researching. London. Sage.
Ritchie, Jane and Lewis, Jane (eds.) (2003): Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for
Social Science Students and Researchers. London. Sage.
Complementary bibliography
Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds.) (2004): Rethinking Social Inquiry. Lanham,
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Bryman, Alan (1989): Research Methods and organization studies. London. Unwin
Hyman.
Corbetta, Piergiorgio (2003): Social Research Theory, Methods and Techniques.
Thousand Oaks. Sage.
Creswell, John W. (1998): Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among
five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S. (eds.) (2000): Handbook of Qualitative
Research. Thousand Oak, California: Sage.
Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S. (eds) (2005): The Sage Handbook of
Qualitative Research. Thousand Oak, California: Sage.
Seale, C.; Gobo, G.; Gubrium, J. F; Silverman, D. (eds.) (2004): Qualitative Research
Practice. London: Sage.
Mas, Jordi; Rami, Carles (1992): Tcniques dauditoria operativa aplicades a
lAdministraci pblica. Barcelona. Comit Director per a lestudi de lAdministraci.
Generalitat de Catalunya.
Maxwell, Joseph A. (2005): Qualitative Research Design. An Interactive Approach.
Thousand Oak, California: Sage. 2nd edition.
Miles, Matthew B. and Huberman, Michael (1984): Qualitative Data Analysis: A
Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills. Sage.
Patton, Michael (2002): Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand
Oaks. Sage.
Ragin, Charles (1989): The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and
Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley. University of California Press.
8. Programming of activities
Week
12/01/2010
19/01/2010
Classroom activity
Lecture: Introduction to
qualitative research.
Introduction to the order
Lecture: Research designs
26/01/2010
Seminars and tutorials
Lecture: Access to the field
02/02/2010
Seminars and tutorials
09/02/2010
Lecture: Observation
methods. Overview
Lecture: Participant
observation and citizen X
16/02/2010
Lecture: Documentary
Research
Seminars and tutorials
23/02/2010
02/03/2010
09/03/2010
Research results
presentations
Seminars and tutorials
16/03/2010
Research portfolio:
Research question
(LDP and PPI),
research design
and interview
questionnaires
Research portfolio:
Research question
(LDP and PPI),
research design
and interview
questionnaires
Research results
presentations
Final research
report and
presentation of
research results
Final research
report and
presentation of
research results
Week
12/01/10
19/01/10
26/01/10
Teaching
materials and
Readings 1
Time
scheduled
1 hour
Readings 1
4 hours
Research
design
Readings 1
4 hours
Initial memo
about interests
2 hours
2 hours
Initial memo
about interests
4 hours
1 hour
Teaching
materials and
Readings 1
Teaching
materials and
Readings 1
2 hours
1 hour
Research
portfolio
Readings 1
Lecture: Interviews
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.1
3 hours
Research
protocol and
questionnaire
Readings 2.1
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.1
2 hours
Research
protocol and
questionnaire
Readings 2.1
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.1
2 hours
Research
protocol and
questionnaire
Readings 2.1
Assessment activities
Items for
Estimated
assessment
time
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.1
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.1
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.2
2 hours
2 hours
Interviews
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.2
2 hours
Interviews
2 hours
Research
protocol and
questionnaire
Research
protocol and
questionnaire
4 hours
4 hours
2 hours
Research portfolio
(I) and research
question
Research portfolio
(I) and research
question
6 hours
Teaching
materials and
readings 2.1
Teaching
materials and
readings 2.1
Teaching
materials and
readings 2.1
2 hours
2 hours
Interviews
6 hours
Teaching
materials and
readings 2.1
2 hours
Interviews
6 hours
2 hours
Research portfolio
(II) and interview
questionnaires
Research portfolio
(II) and Interview
questionnaires
6 hours
6 hours
6 hours
02/03/10
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.2
Teaching
materials and
Readings 2.2
Readings 2.2
2 hours
2 hours
2 hours
Observation
Teaching
materials and
readings 2.2
4 hours
Research portfolio
(III) and participant
observation design
3 hours
Observation
Teaching
materials and
readings 2.2
4 hours
Research portfolio
(III) and participant
observation design
3 hours
Documentary
research and
research report
Readings 2.2
4 hours
Research portfolio
(III) and participant
observation design
3 hours
Documentary
research and
research report
Readings 2.2
4 hours
Research portfolio
(III) and participant
observation design
3 hours
Analysis of
qualitative data
Readings 3 and 4
2 hours
Readings 3 and 4
2 hours
Readings 3 and 4
2 hours
Research portfolio
(final), Research
report and Final
memo
3 hours
Research portfolio
(final), Research
report and Final
memo
3 hours
Readings 2.2
Readings 3 and 4
1 hour
Readings 3 and 4
1 hour
Readings 3 and 4
2 hours
Analysis of
qualitative data
Readings 3 and 4
2 hours
Research
portfolio and
research report
Readings 3 and 4
3 hours
Readings 3 and 4
2 hours
Research
portfolio and
research report
Readings 3 and 4
3 hours
2 hours
Presentation of
a qualitative
research report
09/03/10
Tutorial for each group
of LDP and PPI
16/03/10
2 hours
1 hour
1 hour
10
9. Reading list
INTRODUCTION TO QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. RESEARCH DESIGN
Readings 1
1. King, Gary; Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney (1995): The Importance of Research
Design in Political Science, in American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 2 (June
1995), pp. 475- 480.
2. Tarrow, Sidney (1995): Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Political
Science, in The American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 2 (June, 1995), pp.
471-474.
3. Flick, Uwe (2006): An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage [Chapter 12:
How to design qualitative research: An overview]
4. Gerring, John (2004) "What Is a Case Study and What Is it Good for?", American
Political Science Review, Vol. 98, No. 2 (May 2004), pp. 341-354.
5. Flyvbjerg, Bent (2004) Five misunderstandings about case-study research, in Clive
Seale; Giampetro Gobo, Jaber F. Gubrium and David Silverman (eds.): Qualitative
Research Practice. London: Sage.
6. Yin, Robert K. (2003) Applications of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks
(California): Sage. [Chapter 1: The Role of Theory in Doing Case Studies]
7. Munck, Gerardo L. (2004) Tools for Qualitative Research, in Henry E. Brady and
David Collier (eds.): Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards.
Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
8. Flick, Uwe (2006): An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage [Chapter 11:
Sampling]
9. von Kardorff, Ernst (2004) Qualitative Evaluation Research, in Uwe Flick; Ernst von
Kardorff and Ines Steinke (eds.): A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
11
1.
2.
3.
1.
Robson, Colin (2002) Real World Research. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. [Chapter 12:
The Analysis of Qualitative Data, pp. 370-407].
2.
Ritchie, Jane; Spencer, Liz (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy
research, in Alan Bryman and Robert G. Burgess (eds.): Analyzing Qualitative
Data. London: Routledge.
Readings 4
1.
Morse, Janice M.; Richards, Lyn (2002) Read Me First for a Users Guide to
Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks (California): Sage. [Chapter 10: Writing it
up, pp. 183-194]
2.
12