Analysis of

Cavite LGUs Data

By:
Annie Q. Tacazon
Anne Minnette P. Medrano

Statement of the Problems:

1. Is the Political Affiliation of the
City/Municipal Mayors to the Provincial
Governor in Cavite has a significant
relationship to the Total Project Cost
granted to City/Municipality in 20002010?
2. Test the relationship of the Total Project
Cost granted to the City/Municipality on
the Projected Population 2009, Land
Area, and the Political Affiliation of the

Data:
City/Municipality Population 2007 (Table &
Bar Chart)
City/Municipality Population by District (table
& pie chart)
Projected Population 2009 (table)
Land Area in Hectares
Political Affiliation of Mayors to Governor
(table & pie chart)
Total Project Cost granted to City/
Municipality 2000-2010 (pie chart or bar
chart)

Contains data from C:\ex\cavite.dta

obs:
23
vars:
38
size:
2,622 (99.9% of memory free)
variable name
town
pop2000
pop2007
projpop2009
urb2009
rur2009
popden2009
landareaha
prodland
protland
buildup
hh2007
hhproj2009
avehh2009
avinc0407
incclass
taxassesrp2009
ira2007
ira2008
ira2009
rurbanks
combanks
thribank
banks
pawnshop
finance
nbinst
totprojcost
paraff
urbrul
district
costpercap
inc1
inc2
inc3
inc4
inc5
new

storage
type
str19
long
long
long
long
long
int
int
int
int
int
long
long
byte
int
byte
double
long
long
long
byte
byte
byte
byte
int
byte
int
float
byte
byte
byte
float
byte
byte
byte
byte
byte
float

display
format
%19s
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%10.0g
%13.0g
%11.0g
%11.0g
%11.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%11.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%9.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%8.0g
%9.0g

value
label

28 Apr 2011 17:40

variable label
city/municipality
Population 2000
Population 2007
Projected Population 2009
Urban Population 2009
Rural Population 2009
Population Density 2009
Land Area in Hectares
Production Land Area in Hectares
Protection Land Area in Hectares
Built Up Area in Hectares
Household Population 2007
Household Projected Population 2009
Average Household Population 2009
Average Town Income 2004 to 2007
Income Class
Tax Assessment of Real Property Dec 2009
Internal Revenue Allotment 2007
Internal Revenue Allotment 2008
Internal Revenue Allotment 2009
Rural Banks 2009
Commercial Banks 2009
Thrift Banks 2009
Total No. Banks 2009
No. of Pawnshops 2009
No. of Financial Institutions 2009
Non-Banking Institutions 2009
Total Project Cost 2000-2010
Party Affiliation 2000-2009
Level of Urbanization
Political District
incclass==1
incclass==2
incclass==3
incclass==4
incclass==5

Generated Data thru STATA:

. list town pop2000 pop2007 projpop2009

sum

town

pop2000

pop2007

pro~2009

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Alfonso
Amadeo
Bacoor
Carmona
Cavite City

39674
25737
305669
47856
99367

47973
31705
441197
68135
104581

50549
33584
488182
75105
106072

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Dasmarias
Gen Trias
Gen. Aguinaldo
Gen. M. Alvarez
Imus

379520
107691
14323
112446
195482

556330
218387
17818
136613
253158

618270
265403
18925
144146
271871

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

Indang
Kawit
Magallanes
Maragondon
Mendez

51281
62751
18090
31227
22937

60755
76405
18890
33604
26757

63669
80665
19117
34293
27920

16.
17.
18.
19.
20.

Naic
Noveleta
Rosario
Silang
Tagaytay City

72683
31959
73665
156137
45287

87058
39294
94228
199825
61623

91501
41598
100842
213892
67087

21.
22.
23.

Tanza
Ternate
Trece Martires City

110517
17179
41653

171795
20457
90177

194013
21467
111588

pop2000 pop2007 projpop2009

Variable

Obs

Mean

pop2000
pop2007
projpop2009

23
23
23

89701.35
124207.2
136511.3

Std. Dev.
92996.57
136598.3
152552.3

Min

Max

14323
17818
18925

379520
556330
618270

Generated Data thru STATA:

. tab district

. list town landareaha district

town

landar~a

district

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Alfonso
Amadeo
Bacoor
Carmona
Cavite City

6460
4790
5240
3092
1183

7
6
2
5
1

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Dasmarias
Gen Trias
Gen. Aguinaldo
Gen. M. Alvarez
Imus

8234
11768
5103
15641
9701

4
6
7
5
3

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

Indang
Kawit
Magallanes
Maragondon
Mendez

8920
1340
7860
16549
1667

7
1
7
7
7

16.
17.
18.
19.
20.

Naic
Noveleta
Rosario
Silang
Tagaytay City

8600
541
567
938
6615

7
1
1
5
7

21.
22.
23.

Tanza
Ternate
Trece Martires City

9630
4350
3917

6
7
6

Political
District

Freq.

Percent

Cum.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

4
1
1
1
3
4
9

17.39
4.35
4.35
4.35
13.04
17.39
39.13

17.39
21.74
26.09
30.43
43.48
60.87
100.00

Total

23

100.00

tab paraff
Party
Affiliation
2000-2009

Freq.

Percent

Cum.

0
1

13
10

56.52
43.48

56.52
100.00

Total

23

100.00

Linear Regression (1 Var)

Problem Statement:
Is the Political Affiliation of the City/Municipal Mayors to the Provincial Governor
in Cavite has a significant relationship to the Total Project Cost granted to
City/Municipality in 2000-2010?
. reg paraff
Source

totprojcost
SS

df

MS

Model
Residual

.103258303
5.54891561

1
21

.103258303
.264234077

Total

5.65217391

22

.256916996

paraff

Coef.

totprojcost
_cons

3.89e-10
.3205246

Number of obs
F( 1,
21)
Prob > F
R-squared
Adj R-squared
Root MSE

Std. Err.

P>|t|

6.23e-10
.2118854

0.63
1.51

0.539
0.145

=
23
=
0.39
= 0.5386
= 0.0183
= -0.0285
= .51404

[95% Conf. Interval]

-9.06e-10
-.1201152

1.68e-09
.7611644

Result Interpretation:
At 5% level of significance, total project cost was found to have no
significant relationship with the party affiliations of Local Chief Executives
in the Municipal level and Provincial Level. Thus, political party affiliations
of LCEs does not affect the distribution of projects from the Provincial
Government among the cities and municipalities of Cavite.

Linear Regression (3 Var)

Problem Statement:
Test the relationship of the Total Project Cost granted to the City/Municipality on the
Projected Population 2009, Land Area, and the Political Affiliation of the City/Municipal
Mayors to the Provincial Governor .
. reg

totprojcost projpop2009
Source

SS

landareaha
df

paraff

MS

Model
Residual

1.8659e+17
4.9472e+17

3
19

6.2195e+16
2.6038e+16

Total

6.8131e+17

22

3.0968e+16

totprojcost

Coef.

projpop2009
landareaha
paraff
_cons

577.7234
2006.73
1.93e+07
1.94e+08

Std. Err.
231.6154
7672.424
6.88e+07
6.77e+07

t
2.49
0.26
0.28
2.86

Number of obs
F( 3,
19)
Prob > F
R-squared
Adj R-squared
Root MSE
P>|t|
0.022
0.796
0.782
0.010

=
=
=
=
=
=

23
2.39
0.1008
0.2739
0.1592
1.6e+08

[95% Conf. Interval]

92.9468
-14051.84
-1.25e+08
5.22e+07

1062.5
18065.3
1.63e+08
3.35e+08

Result Interpretation:
At 5% level of significance, land area of cities and municipalities were found to
have insignificant relationship with the total amount of projects granted by the
provincial government. Likewise, the same is true with the political party affiliation
in relationship with the total project cost. On the other hand, the Population was
found to have significant relationship with the amount of Provincially funded
projects. Therefore, among population, land area and party affiliation of LCEs, it is
only population that affects the amount of provincially funded projects granted to a

Further Analysis:
. reg

costpercap
Source

landareaha
SS

paraff popden2009
df

MS

Model
Residual

126131052
404598128

3
19

42043684
21294638.3

Total

530729179

22

24124053.6

costpercap

Coef.

landareaha
paraff
popden2009
_cons

-.0384618
98.99242
-.4881635
6772.309

Std. Err.
.2182633
2010.843
.2092611
2243.234

t
-0.18
0.05
-2.33
3.02

Number of obs
F( 3,
19)
Prob > F
R-squared
Adj R-squared
Root MSE
P>|t|
0.862
0.961
0.031
0.007

=
=
=
=
=
=

23
1.97
0.1520
0.2377
0.1173
4614.6

[95% Conf. Interval]

-.4952922
-4109.75
-.926152
2077.165

.4183686
4307.735
-.0501751
11467.45

Result Interpretation:
To further validate the results of the earlier regression analyses, we created another
variable (costpercap) to test the significance of, land area in hectare, party
affiliation and population density at 5% level. Results shows that land area and
party affiliation remains to be not significant indicator of projects allocated to cities
and municipalities. In contrary, population density was found to be significant. This
is consistent with the results of the previous regression tests.

Further Analysis:

Thank you.